20120696 Ver 1_401 Application_20120712

Ir i
201 20696
Trimurti Temple Devasthanam
Charlotte, Mecklenhurg County, North Carolina
Request for Nationwide Permit verification
Prepared For
Mr N S Jannathan r
Trimurti Temple Devasthanam
12634 Preservation Point Drive
Charlotte, NC 28216 -6732
Prepared By
Leonard S Rmdner PLLC
Environmental Planning Consultant
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews NC 28105
[phone]
July 11 2012
JUL 1 7 1012
QENR WATER QUALITY
Wetlands & Stcwnwatee Branch

_�
S � _ � �
��� � � 5

tMecklenburg County, NC Polans
Page 1 of 1
Mecklenburg County, North Carohna
POLARIS
Parcel Ownership and GIS Summary
Date and Time 711012012 8 43 58 PM
Parcel ID # 03710103 GIS ID # 03710103 FEMA Flood Information
Owner Name TRIMURTI TEMPLE FEMA Panel # 3710454700J
DEVASTHANAM FEMA Flood Zone OUT
Mailing Address 12634 PRESERVATION FEMA Panel Date 03/02/2009
POINTE DR Community Flood Information
CHARLOTTE NC 28216 Community Flood Zone OUT
Property Characteristics Regulated Watershed Information
Legal Desc L6 M53 497 Watershed Name LONG
Land Area 13 9156AC Watershed Class
Fire District 08 LONG CREEK Budding Photography
Special District IFIRE SERVICE A PHOTO #1
Location 6425 BEATTIES FORD RD
Account Type INC CORP
Municipality 0 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
UNINCORPORATED
Property Use IVACANT
Deed Reference(s) and Sales Price
26652 842 (8/4/2011) $0 00
26336 774 (3/4/2011) $119 000 00
22754 905 (8/31/2007) $0 00
01833 297 (3/10/1956) $0 00
Situs Addresses Tied to This Parcel
6425 BEATTIES FORD RD
Site Location Information
Zoning Boundaries Contact Appropriate Planning
Department or See Map
ETJ Area CHARLOTTE
Charlotte Historic Districts NO
Within Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area NO
Census Tract # 61 02
Parcel Falls Inside a Water Quality Buffer? YES
Post Construction District
L Jurisdiction Charlotte II
IDistrict Western Catawba
Information contained within this photo may be used as a visual aid
and to generally locate identify and inventory parcels in Mecklenburg
County North Carolina There are inherent errors and limitations
associated with this type of electronic medium Mecklenburg County
cannot warrant or guarantee the information contained herein including
but not limited to its accuracy or completeness
Powered by
G
M
l ehe information provided by this program is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded
eeds plats tax maps surveys and other public records and data Users of this map data are hereby notified that the aforementioned public
rimary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no
al responsibility for the information contained herein
http / /polans m Icklenburgcountync gov/ website/ redesign /ParcelDetailsPhotoReport asp 7/10/2012

t 'Mecklenburg County NC Polaris
Special District FIRE SERVICE A
Account Type NC CORP
Municipality 0 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
UNINCORPORATED
Ns se VACANT
d Reference(s) and Sales Price
26652 842 (8/4/2011) $0 00
Addresses Tied to This Parcel
BEATTIES FORD RD
Mecklenburg County, North Carohna
POLARIS
Parcel Ownership and GIS Summary
Date and Time 711012012 8 46 33 PM
Parcel ID
# 03710143 GIS ID # 03710143
FEMA Flood Information
Owner Name
TRIMURTI TEMPLE
DEVASTHANAM
FEMA Panel #
3710454700J
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT
Mailing Addrelss
12634 PRESERVATION
POINTE DR
CHARLOTTE NC 28216
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
Community Flood Information
Community
Flood Zone
UT
Property
Characteristics
Re ulated Watershed Information
Legal Desc
L7 M53 497
Watershed Name
ILON G
Land Area
1 7749AC
Watershed Class
Fire District
08 LONG CREEK
Powered by
Special District FIRE SERVICE A
Account Type NC CORP
Municipality 0 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
UNINCORPORATED
Ns se VACANT
d Reference(s) and Sales Price
26652 842 (8/4/2011) $0 00
Addresses Tied to This Parcel
BEATTIES FORD RD
Site Location Information
Zoning Boundaries
Contact Appropriate Planning
Department or See Map
ETJ Area CHARLOTTE
Charlotte Historic Districts NO
Within Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area NO
Census Tract# 61 02
Parcel Falls Inside a Water Quality Buffer? NO
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction
Charlotte
District
Western Catawba
` ��GKLENB!/RG
�o
Page 1 of 1
he information provided by this program is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded
eeds plats tax maps surveys and other public records and data Users of this map data are hereby notified that the aforementioned public
primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no
legal responsibility for the information contained herein
I
http / /polans mecklenburgcountync gov/ website /redesign/ParcelDetailsReport asp
7/10/2012

O��¢ W ATF9vG
9
r
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A Apphcant Information
1
Processing
1a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 39 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu
fee program
❑ Yes ® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes ® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Tnmurti Temple Devasthanam
2b
County
Mecklenburg
2c
Nearest municipality /town
Charlotte
2d
Subdivision name
Trimurti Temple Devasthanam
2e
NCDOT only T I P or state
project no
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Tnmurti Temple Devasthanam
3b
Deed Book and Page No
26336 774 26652 842 22754 905 01833 297
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
p�
3d
Street address
12634 Preservation Pointe Drive
3e
City state zip
Charlotte NC 28216 JL11 1 7 2012
3f
Telephone no
DEN
3g
Fax no
"N ands a Wei &anch
3h
Email address
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other specify Owners Representative
4b
Name
Mr N S Jagganathan
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Trimurti Temple Devasthanam
4d
Street address
12634 Preservation Point Dr
4e
City state zip
Charlotte NC 28216 -6732
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Leonard S Rmdner
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Leonard S Rmdner PLLC
5c
Street address
3714 Spokeshave Lane
5d
City state zip
Matthews NC 28105
5e
Telephone no
704 904 2277
5f
Fax no
5g
Email address
Irindner @carolma rr com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

B Project Information and Pnor Project History
1 Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
03710103 03710143
lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 3223 Longitude 808679
(DD DDDDDD) ( DD DDDDDD)
1c Property size
+/ 15 68 acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to
UT of McIntyre Creek 03050101
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
Water Classification C
2c River basin
Catawba
3 Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The site consist mature woodland area abandoned agricultural and landscaped yards The site is adjacent to residential
subdivisions multi family developments and Hornets Nest Park
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
Approximately 0 80 acres of pond wetlands and streams
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
approximately 133 linear feet
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
General project development includes a temple supplemental buildings parking and stormwater management
3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used
Impacts are required for and access road and to modify and existing excavated pond Heavy construction machinery will
be used
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes [:1 No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past
Comments
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type
❑ Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company Leonard S Rindner PLLC
Name (if known) Leonard S Rindner /Pat Kealy
Other
4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
Wetlands and streams were field verified by Steve Kichefski of the USACE on 9/13/11 The delineation has been
submitted for certification and awaiting written approval
5 Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

6 Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes explain
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams tributaries ❑ Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps 404 10
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P)
(if known)
DWQ — non -404 other)
or Temporary
(T)
W1 ®P ❑ T
fill
scrub /shrub
❑ Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
002
W2 ❑ POT
® Yes
® Corps
❑ No
® DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g Total wetland impacts
002
2h Comments
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact length
number
(PER) or
(Corps 404 10
stream
(linear feet)
Permanent (P)
intermittent
DWQ — non 404
width
or Temporary
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
(T)
S1 ® P ❑ T
fill /grading for
road crossing
UT of McIntyre
Creek
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
® DWQ
2 +/
20 LF
unimportant/USACE
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
® Corps
❑ INT
® DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tnbutary impacts
20 If
31 Comments The stream and wetland determinations were confirmed by the USACE on 9/13/11
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of
impact
waterbody
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
number —
(if applicable)
Permanent
(P) or
Temporary
T
01 ®P ❑
N/A
fill for road crossing
pond
20
T
02 ® P ❑
N/A
fill
pond
06
T
03 ❑ P ❑
T
04 El P ❑
T
4f Total open water impacts
026
4g Comments the existing pond was excavated with steep side slopes The excavation may have been a borrow site and /or
used for agricultural purposes Fill is needed to avoid impacts to streams and wetlands and to smooth the side slopes for
safety purposes and aestehtic purposes The remaining pond area is 33 acres
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland (acres)
Pond ID
Proposed use or
number
purpose of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit
required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area
(acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below if yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse El Tar Pamlico El Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
(P) or
impact
required?
Temporary
T
B1 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
62 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 [3 TT
❑Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
la Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The proposed plan minimizes impacts to streams and wetlands The primary impacts are to an excavated farm and /or borrow
pit The existing pond was excavated with steep side slopes Fill is needed to smooth the side slopes for safety and aesthetic
purposes Stormwater is treated prior to the pond in a sand filter in accordance with the PCCO The remaining pond area is
33 acres Impacts to wetlands are limited to only 002 acres Impacts to streams arelimited to 20 linear feet
1b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Project is subject to strict enforcement of erosion control plans
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation
El yes ®No
for impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the
State?
2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this
❑ Payment to in lieu fee program
y p g
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

3c Comments NA
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is
attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
N/A acres
4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that
requires buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
15
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2
Stormwater Management Plan
ranges from 18% to 78% for
developed areas preliminary
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
calculations provided by the
planner /engineer are attached
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative
description of the plan
The stormwater plan will be also designed in accordance with the Charlotte Mecklenburg PCCO NPDES Phase 2
Requirements The final stormwater plans and /or approvals will be submitted to NCDENR for approval prior to any
impacts to streams and wetlands
® Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local governments jurisdiction is this project?
Charlotte /Mecklenburg
® Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements
FE]Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
F
Supplementary Information
1
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)'?
1c
If you answered "yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter )
Comments
2
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after the fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result 1n
❑ Yes ®No
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality
3b
If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description
The project utilizes existing road network and infrastructure
4
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility
Will connect with existing municipal sewer system
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act_
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Site was evaluated during the wetland delineation process for the presence of Schweinitz s Sunflower The existing
vegetation along road sides is maintained lawn Ecotonal edges along roads and clearings were inspected to determine
if Schweinitz s sunflower was present Project site is not in a watershed that has been identified as habitat for the Carolina
heelsplitter Based on a field evaluation Schweinitz s sunflower or it s habitat was determined not to be present
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitats
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http / /www nmfs noaa gov/ habitat /habitatprotection /efh /GIS_raven htm
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
According to the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of
registered properties or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein this site is not registered property or
property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register There ar no known existing historic structures on the site
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements '
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Ow a eer provided information
Leonard S Rmdner PLLC
�"'r
7 16 12
Applicant/Agents Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agents Signature
(Age gnature is valid only d an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

LEONARD S RINDNER, PLLC _
Emironmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshmc Lane
Professional Wetland Scientist M -ittlims NC 2810
Land Planning Tele [phone]
September 13 3011
Mr N S Jagannathan
Trimurti Temple, Dexasthan -im
12634 Preservation Point Dr
Charlotte NC 38216 6733
nsJagan(naol com
704 287 6305
Re Wetlands /Stream Consultation — Trimurti Temple Site, Charlotte, NC
Dear Mi Jagannathan
In order to mtet facL with the, United States Army Corps of F ngimev s and the North
Carolina Department of Natural RL%OUICLS I will need your authorization Please sign the
following statement
This letter authorizes Leonard S Rundner, PLLC as our firm s agent in »tatters related
to Waters of the U S and Waters of North Carohna for the referc nced project site This
includes interfacing with the United States Arm} Conps of Engineers and the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources
Sign owe Da&
Plca% contact mL if you have any question% or ruluuL additional LXplanatron (hank
) ou
ri-onard S Rindner PWS
1 nv►rcmimcntal 1'lannrn- Consultant
Profeseton U'Ltland SciL111151

TRIMURTI TEMPLE DEVASTHANAM SITE
I %*
SITE
H ORATE 1 S `
N.=-ST PARK
r�
z
VICINITY MAP - NTS
FIGURE NO I LEONARD S RINDNER PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews NC 28105
(704) 904 —2277
LEN RINDNER PWS @gmail com
TRIMURTI TEMPLE DEVASTHANAM SHEET 1
SITE DRBAWN PJK REVIEWED LSR
CHARLOTTE NC
DATE I PAGE
VICINITY MAP
APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION 09/21/11

TRIMURTI TEMPLE DEVASTHANAM SITE
7()}�Lf�� \ \ 1
il0 � f
��r•J � �rti� /�
�
1 p" s- .. I ' � ��U
I = �4( 1 i f },
" �1
fill
X09 f,•#� T{.
� /(ter
k 1 ,a
�� � `� ��; -� ° « �•--� f ,!� ''�i - ��...� `�h�� �� 1 � - � Met ql na
a rgropM t
(4
It
�`
x Ir �Q Y 'fib
A? TriIV � -Ve
1
POW ��t lV ��8rock nug�i`
�v 4f 4111111 A port a 4%
>tf t �� Cry r/ ( ` t� 'ti`s I i -Ch >: Vjrh `
P J N1\
fi\ I u� i ��� \�� . -/'a fit✓ �J tj r �vF\
is r. t \ r / t GM • tK ST �s
1�� � g311 IMTE kf 7`tJ� rfi -
i�Y LOCATION
1 'Are f� LATITUDE LONGITUDE
SCALE b�
1600 800 NJv { r \ 1� 35 32233 N 80 86795 W
0 1600(F et) rM r �� 4 r t y� MUC 03050T01
M j g Upper Catawba
FIGURE NO LEONARD S RINDNER PLLC TRIMURTI TEMPLE SHEET 1
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group DRAWN REVIEWED
r%r-t w n'- w BY PJK By LSR
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews NC 28105 DATE PAGE
(704) 904 -2277 USGS DERITA (NQ QUADRANGLE
LEN RINDNER PWS @gmall corn 1993 09127111

y U &
z o
\\ O
' EAT(IE� „F„���rlp �oAO d N Q N H a m
o a=
\8 s LL Z ( w 1°�ma�N aQw �o
0 O oz Q U H
J - Om
Jr W r W w U v °mo z off} i
G
>�
�y, Ilf 'll W w Pa � w� v v W 5: 3--
W �mfw1?Q ¢w�
I fA Z F-IC °o�X =o. I
£8 �NNN mN0 �N v® Z< , `O o P < a C S p
3JN3N3d3H dVH a¢ m
Q °
I df I
I I III s
O
i z
w
�a IN
I ej:
' e �w
f Vii°
J I I NQ 1110111111111// /// raz
F:Y cow
Ln
to
0 14
WE
wo
p G
�NOo A
�
aySo� °'a Leo
D r
i rA oe "w ti ti
~ 0t;� >2a �or
UUUUU
a�aQQa Q°
2omr'O co
U0 OCD n
Q 0 0 0 O (nQ Q JtC
QOf O/ EL4�
v H rL rL Q o 0 °tea
rLaa 12,
Y, U- 03 cy
~!l1�Nm N w
t7�ccvninn LL
1 -77 a' °o vJ n ao N Cl) 2
aR W w R Ie`U°Aa CJ
Z 03
y� Qa0 U O W dze
z H �
r u�
a U or
In O JJ Q px,,1 A w
Uz ap .n W W S Q d v��°
j �� � 33 w w a vC VnE
& aa3a 3
a' Q zzza3 a U ��h° c^ei
co W �00¢W p�z z
f" Z QUUZp aZ
z zo
o 2 3 W »boo Wwo {jF ��c tj

D go No
ES F
PuBLOR /W, MB 53 5a 7
f
8��� ?I 2.t 7
uNE of
CE —
acv_ / —/ ��-vex
513�4p1'E /OBE
I30 i
26.E 160 16 ` i
yi3� 70
,7() I 1g�Y I W
�� W p/ 0 Z
En�� � N�j< `�'�� �fN ��• I W
� W � 4
g.z nn owml- 0440
00 a I —
.dao94n i 1��_ N 33B 'V)
257�om
gio".Io — 13
zz ,t K
a I
I
1 I
I co
co
r. Tja°oio I on I ao
�I� 7WO 940 �� Nr
LO
00 \o
I l28 u u n I N O
al x ° I N N Z
m FL
u
„ S �/Cey /
icy xx� wl s
U� n t2vr >�K% ^n u
I
I °ym
0
I NI
I W I
�I UUUU U
/ c WO Q a� Q 0 co
UO0(DQ O
O O O IO a
£8 ClVN CIIN0 aN �
d0Nd&dddH dVM
77
in
F
z
H
J H
rL
U7 L
�NOiN@u�Di
CO 0 CO
ZI z �
M r
r- C4
KR W
00 T
ax 1
y4 LL Q
Qm
M
M
w W 0
x „y
U r
III►►YrrrQQ,QJ11444]]];;I Z
n 3
o z Q gQ
p�o3z a(9v3F
� a d ��Nao w?
� � o f- (L
o Z W �m <LO� as m °
O O �1 OWW Ya O�N
CV Q W lnU ,00 � � _
F z I-a K�wm J QZ
W J U W a2S — o
W QI.I mWWZ� �W�
Ir
V) Z F ,� W W x CL
F „/ d m z
LLJ W!� o OC °
fy U o u
N
Z I V--
tjcjw
r k G o
Ov�� PL 8p Od'�
� O� ro •{tea]' 4e��o�
ryON d LPGt✓ 2:-4Z
"N /1111111111\\\\\ Q 0
in
3O Gyp
N °o6
4 � K V Q
in K QrZ
0 �4� --� G
w1$c :O°u�`�. °o
�u tiq
o��AG
a�G
a.NC 2
010 2.4
a ” uz
jLl a �
V
2 °c o
�(.a �Q � E
F5
N
Z I V--
tjcjw
r k G o
Ov�� PL 8p Od'�
� O� ro •{tea]' 4e��o�
ryON d LPGt✓ 2:-4Z
"N /1111111111\\\\\ Q 0
in
3O Gyp
N °o6
4 � K V Q
in K QrZ
0 �4� --� G
w1$c :O°u�`�. °o
�u tiq
o��AG
a�G
a.NC 2
010 2.4
a ” uz
jLl a �
V
2 °c o
�(.a �Q � E
F5
F5

I � �
S
W I
a
°I I�
O
I IW
to
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
\ \ I
\ y
£8 (IVN O/ND JN
..9M `�
drY L� dH d V`V
7N
J
In
CY
r` I w
m
z I
wIN
a<I n 1
9 nl
CI 1
I
I
1�
I
I �8�
�I 2n�
�o I voa
�nm
Z 21
g N $I
I
I
I
0
0
7
I
l I
I
N
00"
mo
I a I
U�
a o
om
N I
In l`
O O O�t: I
N q °
(0o
C14
W W�
Z
ma
:3
4
�NeN
I �o
n
d .,3F
a
co
a o,°xa0
aalnain
s
_ P-.
I � �
S
W I
a
°I I�
O
I IW
to
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
\ \ I
\ y
£8 (IVN O/ND JN
..9M `�
drY L� dH d V`V
7N
J
In
CY
r` I w
m
z I
wIN
a<I n 1
9 nl
CI 1
I
I
1�
I
I �8�
�I 2n�
�o I voa
�nm
Z 21
g N $I
I
I
I
0
0
7
<�Y
I N
N
om
8
1
PH�I:C��ee
y
A�cyx
0102 l
� n
O z
I n
gg
�2�CGC
I �o
n
d .,3F
a
co
a o,°xa0
aalnain
I
I
I
1
_ P-.
\
I
I
I
I
I
aQ
UO
yg�yg��pG�44 y�y
FSCC�e
lAla
¢org0
<aal<
Ow
2'�
r
U
0
O 0 r o m
0 0 0
n
O
tf11e e
a+ w�y1ww
Ld
e
0
h In
f
aY
-K it: W
U 4
y � n
C O a
C 2O
z �o Ef)
C
a° w
c
w �Q Q
Q
w
Q
I-- ri
LL 0 rL ca
a)
N
(N
00
v
m
O
Q
w
w
3 w
a
oQ
2Uo
S�aa
III
�i m
u
N° Goa_
J
rye °S"
004 IIIIIIIII \ \ \ \ \\ a \j
s5 MR 1j
zla �2�o�P
CC O p
X42 OOhU��
aa �
��n��ticK = Ja�Cq� j
y�� ooh
��Up4 �V2 WZ �SSiO oZf
ofL �q �i 4F;�K
K
Z
H U
N
om
,o
53
PH�I:C��ee
y
A�cyx
0102 l
� n
O z
Q
gg
�2�CGC
F
CIO3wZ
d
n
d .,3F
a
�
a o,°xa0
aalnain
W?
Fd
_ P-.
O
ZWa
aQ
UO
yg�yg��pG�44 y�y
FSCC�e
C�
O /1 OOZ YQ
W W
2'�
WUU.Z
Za��w
NAD=
aZ
W
a+ w�y1ww
Ld
0 o
=
o W InoaWa
Q>
Q ►-I = w a
a u1 S
o
voa
m i
o
o
U
o
Q
u
N° Goa_
J
rye °S"
004 IIIIIIIII \ \ \ \ \\ a \j
s5 MR 1j
zla �2�o�P
CC O p
X42 OOhU��
aa �
��n��ticK = Ja�Cq� j
y�� ooh
��Up4 �V2 WZ �SSiO oZf
ofL �q �i 4F;�K
Q-
K
J S C
om
r
PH�I:C��ee
y
A�cyx
0102 l
�2�CGC
U�yy
no cU
o
yg�yg��pG�44 y�y
FSCC�e
y3a
d q j
Q-

e
m
zz N
z „
n
n
O a
m
n
ac 0 OW3 a� 3 F
a Q W? Z
ofUNa�
aQN ri o
0 z W �oa�
O on aW .< 02 �
r1
W W ollf C°�Z
I— Z a -wW a0
PMW,W Z
w a N
W LJ mWli Zre �w rn
LLJ
Cf) Z H d -J0�x =ftw
ao
Ja I- -<L,,x aai5
P! U O
wia.
„H/ a m
W o M cr
3
U o -
n(nmdd(DN O �Olaodd(OOMNnaO�nOWO
Mn n�d)mN Onm �0101NNt000(D in
N
N N N- N 0 M d N N M NNN N N O�(O M N
(n w
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
Z
o
OMnnd1 (OMnn07 ((�tpMnd�Onn(n�
00•- NdMMNdNtf)Mdc4 -t2NaO
t7M LO
N i
00 N u) � V) � in (01n IN d(0N W (7 O (0)) Go LO nn
MOON'- dMNO ;dONNNNOdOoOdN(P)
5
W
d* q�4 0 t((7 d0)a001n V)� 0)(0 a 00) ood(O 0G0
NONNNaOO O�OnmI d*0 Nz n ON
;a 0z0
ZZZZZZV)V)Z Z(n(nN V)VIZ Z Z V) ZZVI ZV)
NMd1[I(Onaomo NMd lmm�aorn O�-NMd
M nnnnnnMMddd dddddddln (�t(�tn
J J J
J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
4
\ \ \1111111111//// / 2
A
N Oar G {mo{o
cook eww
� zo
N
Ir
y Ik_ rcA7aOS
a m,
y N�
°o # r �oqh
`�{o bd
LP 61
w
Zrnoao�o, rn( nM�apno „��nrnNao(n�u�o,(ondo�rn(n�n
aM-n Nd)O)aDMn(O-ON(01(7-On Md)(O (OM070n 007 V)aD
1-0)0)(0 M01OMdN NO) Ou7 (OON�MOcON(O (ndnMN
NNNNN—NM���M�ON—MM-�-NN —N �wNM—N�
A,z NFZZ
yl@ cOCpr°
D
�yti C yQ5
wwwww w3w3wwwwwww w� 3w3ww33ww
C�N(nMlO�O�nOO V)(n0007N0)tOMO� --n OMO)nd MMNN
Z�( ��I( IOMN�NI�N •tMdNdlt)OMd.- dMddOONNd
E(
0�4EgS "q q
n�MONOMnMO )c0(OMCOnOn(ONO(D�nonnppppoMao
�M�dOONInNNMO-dNIANON�NN MNONMd�V)(n�
slag
m0cON0�(O CO�WIh ap a0�0(O�NO)(OOd- ONO) -dM-N
NO�NQ, 7�NNnr'naDMNO�(pM0'- d�a00�V)O��
ZZZZV)V)ZZZZZZV)VI (nZZN ZZVIZZZZZZZZZ
[x6,eG
tOna00f0•'NM dO(O naD O)O
Z�NMdU)cOna0010�NMdIn
J J J J J J J J "-j N N "-j
PuG G,�
0'R 2 Nq 3
4z
IQ
e
04�>
°
z�J
S
m G
p
L�kzC
ra
Ge��a
A�+C 2
1 -77 a
C
�ZdC�C
r 1"(C
{J
,cam t h
J J
J J
J J
J J
J J
J
J
J
J J
J J
J

LL f
Z
7�g a
W e9
F� U) SJ��
HIMON
If \
\ \ _j \' EL.
�♦ \\
i�l \~ I `♦♦
0,
CL
Q
z
U
-` \ -.
eel
e \ \ ♦ \ \\
r /
�/ -.1i
0
Cl
N
1
\y -
0
INA r r r
���1
r/ ► I
I
rr \
S l \
1
r
I/
I
I
r
1
~ / ol
r
ui
F-
U)
z
:5�-
a
Q
Z
�
to
r'
Z
>
„Z
p
W
0
�W
00W 0
0
�
w U
O
z
mV0
W
F-
v z
(A
W
oa)
NU
CM Of
t � II }
I­ co in
Cm
W
U>i V
0ofca0
z
0
a
t
Z
W
0 0
UL 0
U �
0 Q D
ti
w
U (0 i
Z
t' Z W
fA N CO
Q a
0 X ir
H W d
L
to
L
C6 t
u�i L m
C /t0
9E a
0
CD
N
V
Z
O Y
Z C
� N
u q
m
N N
v -
� N
C1
V ^�
o
m
O
N
m
C
� n

.i
/
/ t
� I \
\ \J It
C)
0
/1 N
\
�1-
o
W W
1 '
1
z
Q
z
Q
Q
N
e
Q Q
z
IL
W
UJ
❑ j—
0
J
�
Q
�
Q
LLI
w
W
m o
F-
0>
I*
to
CD
U
c�
CM C14
�rll}
C
N r m
Co CD
4W
Q W V
oQ!m❑
v
O
N
m
N
V
Z
m
m
o t c L�
wc2 E�
c ME 0
� C Y
_ $
N N
N
M
u ^^
cg
�A
m�
�l N
Q a

0
CD
0
On
0
\
L J 47
� X11
1�
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
I 1
1 \
\S1 \
\
U
2
Q
z
Q
U)
(n
�
iill
O
_
w
owe
o�
Q
I \\
l
\
\
w -'-J-
V
v
I >
Q
0
CD
0
On
0
\
L J 47
� X11
1�
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
I 1
1 \
\S1 \
\
U
2
Q
z
Q
U)
(n
�
0 .Z
_
w
owe
o�
Q
w -'-J-
V
Q
_3
n"
2 H
Q
LLI
M L)
Zw
g�N
z
w
ZZ
fa:,
G
N N
ccN�m
cc
LLI
WCDw
a IL V
v
3
v
00
L
a v
m
t M
li !r
Ca
�
6.
I
0
N
N
u
Z
m
t c
t
u"
b
u
t
a
C4
N
M
V
C7
m
m
IL$
Q a

oc
/
2
z
Q
�
J
�.
~
<
(C
„Z
a
W
�O
0 ~
�
J
LL 0
w�U
Ayl-
IL
O
W
.�
ol�
EL
o
Q
N
2
z
Q
�
1
~
<
O
„Z
a
W
�O
0 ~
�
J
LL 0
w�U
ui U
W
O
~
N Z
0
c�c
Z
g�
W
U
N N
co 04
co Li
0Ix cn0
v
y co
L Z
7 m
Y L G
0
v c o E
c to o
ro_
N N
C
N
m
u fn
v
a+ —
�o
N
N N
CL
O O

oc
O
rb
rb
r
U3
oc
5
0 10
Ir
F�
�o
W
Jw as D
aw fO~ En
O® Loa
L-- �L-��
r~
�r
m
O
W
J
J
aw�
U� koc7C
F- ��zZ
W Wrzz
5 �WaWa LLJ
to w00 Nr
O 0 cn
(A CD
z of
w N%
J
z
0 o
1- u
yw
a
0
w
W
a
91
}
Z
d
Z
O
z
w
OJ ~
W LU
W N
w , z
1—` < 0
0 0- d
O ml °
� F-
NfAz m m
Z
N
W
m
1 11 1 1
J J J 4A o! 4 00
1 4 N
�I
W U
o�
d O
a
X
W
40
0
�tq
w
W Lq
w
z
0
w^
rrU)
vJ
0
U
w
J
H
O
Q
N
W
W
CL
Da
J
H
LIJ
Z
z
z
TQ
u
LO
O
Z
z
Z J
W
U
C3
2
i C
d m
w W U
U
w
J
E-
z
O
to
c
A
U
F
Z
egg
C 10
O
MOO
tr
p
1
=
o
ry N
C�C
G
N V
}
o
N
n m
W
v
G
O�0
0
in
Ir
C4
w
w
uN
z
w
S r4
in
w
Qd"
oc
IL
W
Ir
Oa
N
W
W
CL
Da
J
H
LIJ
Z
z
z
TQ
u
LO
O
Z
i

PRELIMINARY STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT PLAN
TRIMURTI TEMPLE DEVASTHANAM
Charlotte North Carolina
Prepared for
Trimurti Temple Devasthanam
12634 Preservation Pointe Dr
Charlotte NC 28216
Prepared by
DPR Associates, Inc
420 Hawthorne Lane
Charlotte NC 28204
P 704 332 1204
F 704 332 1210
www dprassociates net
DPR Project No 11011
June 7 2012

TRIMURTI TEMPLE DEVASTHANAM
BMP /DETENTION POND & SAND FILTER DESIGN SUMMARY
DPR Project No 11011
The enclosed package Is to show the results of the BMP /detention pond & Sand Filter
design for the proposed Trimurti Temple Devasthanam development The development
is located in Charlotte Mecklenburg County North Carolina off of Beatties Ford Rd
The subject site is approximately 15 69 acres and the existing condition consists of
woods and grass lands The site will be developed as a religious facility
BMP /Detention pond & Sand Filter was designed per latest Charlotte /Mecklenburg
County Stormwater BMP manual Topographic maps and field observations were used
to delineate the watershed basins and hydraulic path feeding into the study conveyance
system With this information hydraulic length time of concentration (TOC) and basin
slope were determined for the pre developed condition TOC of 34 min was used for all
post developed condition The composite curve number (CN) was calculated based on
the hydrologic sod types and groups from the U S Department of Agriculture SCS
Mecklenburg County for the pre developed and post developed conditions The total
impervious of the development was calculated The water quality volume of the 1St —Inch
of rainfall was quantified using the Schueler simple method 1 yr 24 hr storm channel
protection volume was also quantified Hydraflow Hydrograph models were developed
to determine the peak flows and peak times for the 10 year 25 year and 50 year storm
events using SCS Unit Hydrograph with 6 hour storm distribution and the Mecklenburg
rainfall intensity in inches per hour
Three (3) BMP facilities are proposed for the site BMP #1 Sand Filter #1 drainage
area is approximately 3 7 ac BMP #2 Sand Filter #2 drainage area is approximately
2 7 ac BMP #3 drainage area is approximately 34 4 Ac which includes the drainage
area for BMP #1 BMP #3 is a detention pond with a permanent water body and intends
to provide volume control only not water quality treatment The BMP facilities together
are designed to treat the 1s' Inch of runoff volume provide the 1 yr 24 hr storm channel
protection and control the peak discharge rates for 10 yr and 25 yr 6 hr storm events
so that the total discharge in the post development condition would be equal or less than
that of pre - development condition
BMP #1 — Sand Filter provides first 1 inch 6 hr water quality treatment All larger storm
events are bypassed and controlled in BMP #3 Detention pond BMP #2 — Sand Filter
provides 1 inch 6 hr water quality treatment as well as 1 yr 24 hr storm channel
protection volume Larger storm events (10 25 & 50 yr) are routed through the sand
filter and controlled to a certain extent but volume control mostly is being compensated
for in BMP #3 BMP #3 — Detention pond provides 1 yr 24 hour storm channel
protection for the site only Including the BMP #1 drainage area BMP #3 also provides
overall detention (10 yr & 25 yr) for the overall site development Note that volume
control provided In BMP #3 was over designed to compensate for the BMP #2
Refer to tables below for summarized data Detailed maps calculations results and
details are shown In this package and In the civil engineering plans
Y 12011 Projects1110111CADIWetland permittinglprehm stormwater12 Summary doc

Table 1 DRAINAGE AREAS
Basin No
Pre Developed
( +/ Ac)
Post Developed
1(+/ Ac
BMP #1
37
37
BMP #2
27
27
BMP #3 *"
344
344
Total
44 79 < 54 72 OK
371
'"* Note BMP #1 Sand Filter Drainage Area is part of BMP #3 Detention Pond
Table 2 PRE DEVELOPED PEAK DISCHARGES
TABLE 3 POST DEVELOPED PEAK DISCHARGES
Basin No
10 Year (cfs) 25 Year (cfs)
BMP #1
BMP #2
BMP #3 **
21 2
14
4221
2526
1698
5878
** Note BMP #1 Sand Filter Drainage Area is part of BMP #3 Detention Pond
TABLE 4 POST DEVELOPED DETENTION ROUTING DISCHARGES
Basin No
E 10 Year (cfs) 25 Year (cfs)
BMP #1
1947
2394
BMP #2
255
595
BMP #3 **
282
4275
Total
29 68 <3815 OK
44 79 < 54 72 OK
** Note BMP #1 Sand Filter Drainage Area is part of BMP #3 Detention Pond
Y12011 Projects1110111CADIWetland permittinglprehm stormwater12 Summary doc

STORM
WATER
-- Services
BMP Inset Table
Sand Filter #1
Project Name
Trimurti Temple Devasthanam
Se uence ID
BMP #1
,Drainage Area acres
37
Land Use/Development Type
Religious Institution
Percent Built Upon Area
78% Used
Sediment Chamber Length ft
Tkpprox 45 LF 3130 sf @ 749
Sediment Chamber Height ft
3
Sediment Chamber Width ft
Approx 70 LF
Sand Filter Type
Surface
Media Depth ft
25
Flow Diverter Present (Y/N)
N
Regulated By
PCCO - Charlotte Stormwater
Treatment Effectiveness
85% TSS 70% TP
NC State Plane X eastin
1443000 605
NC State Plane Y (northing)
577453 7298

CAafodo-Ataekk iftrg
STORM
. WATER
BMP Inset Table
Sand Filter #2
Project Name
Trimurti Temple Devasthanam
Se uence lD
BMP #2
Drama a Area acres
27
Land Use/Development Type
Religious Institution
Percent Built-Upon Area
76% Used
Sediment Chamber Length ft
Approx 44 2800 sf 760
Sediment Chamber Height ft
4
Sediment Chamber Width ft
A rox 72
Sand Filter Type
Surface
Media De th ft
25
Flow Diverter Present (Y/N)
N
Regulated By
PCCO - Charlotte Stormwater
reatment Effectiveness
85% TSS 70% TP
NC State Plane X eastin
1442356 729
NC State Plane Y (northmW
577697 3939

CharMtftAletklenDurg
STORM
- _ WATER
swvwes
BMP Inset Table
Extended D ry Detention
[uencelD
me
Trimurti Temple Devasthanam
BMP #3
eas ft
14 500 sf @ 743
Draina a Area acres
34 4 Included BMP # 1
Land Use/Development Type
Religious Institution
Percent Built Upon Area
18 6% Used
Maximum Depth ft
11 2
Forebay Present (Y/N)
N
Flow Diverters Present (Y/N)
N
Regulated By
R
PCCO Charlotte Stormwater
Treatment Effectiveness
30% TSS 30% TP
NC State Plane X eastin
1442841 55
NC State Plane Y (northing)
577438 8695

OW � fit`
1 FL �I
XiWQ-F- Rn FLOW ' i r '^
It
1
t ,
,O <
r -_
rL
it
t
1
1
I , PKL4LVLL0VLJ f , e s lest
a+ 371 AC ElOngn n School
, �1Ir
1 G / �; ►,; 1! 1 1 I, I f I lhrr, ! 1 "!
\; jam`, i• - --\ r
I TTTFTT
�j I AI
`
`
_ �` �- 1 j
11/
it
t
f
n
PRE - DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA 0wg No
/ TIME OF CONC
CHARLOTTE NORTH CAROLINA A A A P_
FOR M
TRIMURTI TEMPLE DEVASTHANAM
Scale 1 = 300
c

D #t
30.8 AC
27AC
TO B #, (SA
R #,)
R
2 9 AC
09AC
XI 1
I I 1f J' r I
- � r
I l PC`e
POST - DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA
/ TIME OF CONC
CHARLOTTE NORTH CAROLINA
FUR
TRIMURTI TEMPLE DEVASTHANAM
Scale 1 =300
,
I r L L
1 r
r
1
. M
Dwg No
MAP -2
5
N a
a
P
CL
a
N_
}

JDA
r \ N, Q' Opt 1 IIII DA — I \
I J111 I zs � Ac s
1 � � \
- rill 1
111,, I
G,
its /� � , -� �� ��� 1/� ((i r'/ , � ► � i I t \\ \\ \� ,,� ��-
� /iii % =
\ \/ ✓I / /�/ / /�� q '�
FUTlk2E BUILDING � ``1 Jr��/
RO 'IFTO BE DRAINED \4-
/, -)47
ONSITE WATERSHED DELINEATION
CHARLOTTE NORTH CAROLINA Dwg No
FOR
TRIMURTI TEMPLE DEVASTHANAM MAP -3
Scale 1 = 200

NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Onains v 4 1
NC DR Q Sti eam Identification Foi in Veit sion 4 1
Date September 10 2011
P
Pro ect/Site Trimurti Temple D@vaSthanam
1 Season RPW
Latitude 35 32233 N
Evaluator LSR PJK
County Mecklenburg County
Longitude 80 86795 W
Total Points
Stream least 22
Stream Dete circle one)
Other Denta (NC) Quad
is at intermittent
Ephemeral termitten erennial
e g Ouad Name HUC 03050101
d z 19 or rennial if _ 30
(23
3
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13 5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
(23
3
3 In channel structure ex nftle pool step pool
ripple-pool sequence
0
1O
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
C9
2
3
5 Activelrelict floodpiain
0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
0 5
1
15
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
15
11 Second or greater order channel
NoU0J
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology (Subtotal = 55 ?
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
15
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
U5
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1
15
17 Soil based evidence of high water tables
No = 0
Yes
3
C Biology (Subtotal = 3
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
0
3
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
2
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
21 Aquatic Mollusks
C0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
15
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
15
25 Algae
0
05
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes +/ 2 3 wide chan +/ 5 6 wide
@ top of bank No H2O Sand gravel
few cobble
Sketch

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Prawt/Sito Tr n U r F T` — V � r [lc a -14n CiyiCounty C, �- I (> ), —I Somp1 ng Date 2 ! !!� li (
Applicanta?wner State Sampl rig Point G r3 /rte
Investlgator(s) 1 —r 9, rJw% i P-4 l (!4a(/ Section Township Range
t
Landform (tNlislope terrace eta) _ V a i ( < _ Local relief (concave convex, none) Ca- i-a Slope
Subreg on (LRR or MLRA) }til -9, A Lot 3 S 3 - 4 Lone 540 s as-) fi ;z W Datum /UA., b3
Soil Map Unit Name y1A _ d , l S a c+l i a n h NVVI classification
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ►,r No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation N Snit t . or Hydrology ► significantly disturbod? Are 'Normal Circumstances present? Yes )K No
Are Vegetabon t4 Sod N , or Hydrology r naturally probiematic7 of needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc
Hydrophyhc Vegetation Present? Yes 'tit No Is the Sampled Area
Hyddc Soil Present9 Yes y No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes a No
(ire.a t.,, 01� �vrs� t4x i+n 1 -cif r,! C / -
HYDROLOGY
Primary wicirtors (mlaimum cl one Is ffmmd.
clack all that amm
_ Surface Sod Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (Ai)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_„_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ Nigh Water Table (A2)
r FWrogen Sulfide Odor (C7)
! Dramage Patterns (B10)
_,_, Saturabon (A31
Ondized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_ Moss Trim Lines (016)
_ Water Marks (BI)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ _ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Recent iron Reduction In riled Soils (CB)
/ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
r Thin Merck Surface (C7)
Saturation V sibie an Aerial Imagery (C9)
e Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Other (Expia n in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di)
_ iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Positron (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (07)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (8 13)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Obsemdons
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No
�� Depth ( inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
} Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes_ No
�_ Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes / No
gaLee
previous nspections) it ova
Array Corps of Engineers Eastern (fountains and P edrnont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use sclentift names of plants
Sampling Potnt 3. W
Tree Stratum (Plot Sao )
% Cover ? Sfatus
Number of Dominant Species
1
[-,-,K
YD
% _FACW
Thal AreOSL FACW or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant ...�
2 A c.c . r b t, r- '50 Y
3
U 1 ,,,,u $ —e f-t e ,-,c
am
rAe- r/
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
Percent at Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A/8)
6
?
Prevalence index worksheet
Total % Cover of. Mulboiv by
8
OBL species x 1 ,
= Total Cover
S�luag/Shrob
Stratum (Plot sae )
FACW species x2-
I
U 1, .. e n - -
( S
�_- /
FAC Species x3=
FACU species x4-
UPL species x 5 a
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index - BIA
2 1 4, _- V , c w F l0 FAC
_ _
3 (f. t,. C n I + =_- `J Al PAW
4
5
6
7
Hydrophylic Vegetation Indicators
1 Rapid Test for Hydrophybc Vegetation
8
_
2 Dominance Test Is 2,50%
9
3 Prevalence Index Is 53 0
10
_
j_
a Total Cover
4 supporting
�maeM
size )
data o em a separate sheet
(Plot
1
Ir r ax S er �S r )dam ca
2U
V
— Problematic Hydrophybc Vegetation (Explain)
2 --row L o rj-± 30), ► ^ La r, < /0 Y F A
3 _�
t ti, t n c �, 4, n u n n u-0-,Cei +k
N PAC
Ind catora of hydne soil and watland hydrology must
be pmsent unless disturbed or problematic.
4
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
5
6
Tree - Woody plants excluding woes 3 in Q 6 an) or
more In diamoter at breast height (DBH) regardless of
7
height
8
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants exclud ng vines less
than 3 in DS and greater than 3 28 It (1 m) Jail
9
10
11
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants regardless
of size and woody plants less than 3 28 R tall
12
a Total Cover woody vino All woody vitae`, greater than 3 28 It in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size ) height
1
2
3
4
5
6
Hydrophylic
Vegetation
Present? Yes Y No
= Total Cover
re pronto numoers here or on a separate sheet)
r
f Cst iK r
US Array Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point bP1 %J+fJ
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator o► confine the absence of Indteators.)
Depth Matrix
Color (moist) % Color imolstt _� Tree Texture Remarks
H y YR 3l
15 If F- LtLa ,b 5 5 /fin C C 47L. �j �rj 61.. 16 h
Hydric Soil Indicators
_
HMOs*[ (Al)
_ Hisgc Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Hrstic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ StraNed Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck 010) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Worst (S1) (LRR H
MLRA 147 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type
Depth inches)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (39) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matnx (F2)
rC Depleted Matrix (F9)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F8)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (178)
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 138)
_ Umbnc Surface (F 13) (MLRA 136 122)
_ Piedmont F)oodptarn Solis (F79) (MLRA 148)
3n PL-Pore Lining M =Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Bolls'
_ 2 cm Muds (A10) (MLRA 147)
r Coast Prairie Redox (At 6)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F79)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ Red Parent Matenal (72)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explaln kn Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytxc vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Amry Carps of Engineers Eastern lountarns and P edmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Pro(ed/Sde Tr, t 'Tc . a ( -- O c.v. Cq /County C a r 10 ' Iy Sampling Date q110,111
Applicant/Owner State N C- Sampling Point D P r�
Investigator(s) L,... R , rd r r i Pa � _ 41<_ V, e c (_I Section Township Range
Landform (htitsiope terrace etc) k I ( 1 o Local relief (concave convex none) �f c r c. om Slope
Suttregkm (LRR or MLRA) Yin t_ (a, Let `'3 S . 3 tt `i N Long co . �� 5 i v+/ Datum ►,tF D P r
Soil Map Unit Name IY\ 4Z.. U t,1 tc k 1 c rF_ , , ^,, r . , A r 1,5e NWI classification
s
Are climatic I hydrologic oondibons on the site typical for this time of year? Yes .,__ No (if no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation r/ . Soil t or hydrology 14 significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation i,1 Sal 11 _ or hydrology +, i naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map shinning sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X is hire Sampled Area
Hydne SOU Presents Yea No — cam- within a Wolland? Yes No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No --I(—
Remarks 1
Afe^ iS ice CA4,A - -fg4tw 0( I Aura- *#,AI vasq..�
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indkators
§grgtdary IndicallIm (minimum of two reaulredl
Primary bdicators imirWmum of one Is reoumr d.
check all that ancfv)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_„ Trite Aquatic Plants (814)
— Sparsety Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Tattle (A2)
_ hydrogen Sulfide Odor IC 1)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidcred Rtnixospheres on Ltvmg Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Water Marks (B1)
^ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry Season Water Table (0)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Recent, Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muds Surface (C7)
^ Saturation Visible on Aerial imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01)
_ Iron Depot (85)
_ Goomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (03)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
— Aquatic Fauna (813)
FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Flold Observations
Surface Water PreseM9 Yes _ No
y Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
> Depth (inches)
5aturabon present? Yes No
Y Depth (tridtes)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No )e-_
mdudes capitary
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) d available
Remarks
%-I e L ,�
1 "t : tX,1 /
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains ana Predmoot - tntsrei version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum (Plot Sao )
1 I- -V n,,4 QeA-e (Q.n
° Cover cedes') Status
�r(> AGLk
2
3
L r rl et 1,N L 1 2 acre
1.. r r t L. , i-
''
( S
_ PAC
i� f &
4
5
-t1\
i �A. .HAiM L.w Gi� \�r L - IUp
1
l Cy
-_
h1
6
x5
Column Totals 2OO
(A) 7aS (B)
7
a
Sto>trt=rub
1
Stratum (Plot size
A I rv% n f
)
Total Conner
2
( 3z,r,u4
3
,ri ,Cw J+ y rain mr^
S
:\ FAra-
4
v
5
8
7
B
g
10
Herb Stratum (Plot sae )
1 E wY Writ a..,t� ca,n�
_f
- Total Cover
° Fka
2
_11_ fAC
3
Pr\anu5 ?�re� nA
_ ra
a u
4
T
5
6
7
8
9
10
91
12
f4 � = TOIHI Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1
2
3
4
5
g-- -- - --
or on a
= Total Cover
Sampling Point
Dominance Teat worksheot
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Spetaeg Across All Strata (B�
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW or FAC n (A/B)
Total A Cover of
Multiply &y.
OBL sped"
x 1
FACW spews
x 2
FAC species _��
x 3 a S
FACU spews 105
x 4 y,� b
UPI-species
x5
Column Totals 2OO
(A) 7aS (B)
Prevalence Index = B!A = -3 5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 Dorrdnanco Testis 50%
_ 3 Prevalence Index to 53 0
—4 Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
data to Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Ptobtematic Hydrophybc Vegetaton (Explain)
Indicators of hydnc sell and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Woody plants exclud rig +cries 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH) regardless of
height
SaplinglShrub- Woody plants excluding vines less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 It (1 m) tali
Herb - All herbaoaous (non woody) plants regardless
of sue and woody plants less than 3 28 tt tall
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 fl n
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point Crpr3 4 P1
ProfNe Descrfption (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Martin Redox Features
firms) Color (mast) , % Color (moist) �T Type' Lac Texture Remarks
0 `► `/N H/3 rOt
Hydrlc Sop Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Solis
_ Hrstosoi (Ai)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 an Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ HrsUe Eplpedon (A2)
— Poiyvalue Below Surface (S6) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Heft (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
Hydrogen Sufte (A4)
_ Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Fioodpiain Soils (F 19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted MaMx (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ 2 an Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
— Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) (LRR N
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) JLRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbdc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
'indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodpiam Sags (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present
Stopped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic
Type
Dept, (kxfts)
Hydrie Sall Present? Yes No _/
2ncl ca ?ors eC kJ r 'ea ) $ warC- 1104 eels. Uej
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - tntenm Version

I
39' 19 27"
1.r ,m rrf
Soil Map — Mecklenburg County North Carolina
�a
S
8
b1y' Aer 1 430d Fftftd on ar j2 11 Met
t N emrs
x 211 Tx TIM !e
Feet
o rrA 401) 500
USDA pillwqp Re mn"
comer aw ararww
Aen o I Survey
N30ona9 Coope at a So I, rvey
FIGURE NO LEONARD S RINDNER PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews NC 28105
\ (704) 904 — 2277
LEN RINDNER PWS @gmail corn
TRIMURTI TEMPLE DEVASTHANAM
Charlotte NC
SHEET 1
DRAWN PJK
NRCS SOIL MAP
DATE
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
09127111
9�sr,o 11
Pag 7 f 3
LSR
PAGE

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION i BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
B DISTRICT OFFICE FiLE NAME AND NUMBER
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue Room 208
Asheville North Carolina 28801 5006
Applicant
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION Trimurti Temple Devasthanam Site
State NC County /pansh/borough Mecklenburg City Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 35 32233 N Long 80 86795 W
Universal Transverse Mercator 17
Name of nearest waterbody McIntyre Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows Catawba River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03050101 Upper Catawba
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request
12 Check if other sites (e g offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form "
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
Office (Desk) Determination Date
® Field Determination Date(s) 09/13/2011
SECTION iI SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are no navigable waters of the US within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) junsdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
AO-
review area [Required]
(] Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
El Waters are presently used or have been used in the past or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are waters of the US within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required]
Waters of the U S
a Indicate presence of waters of U S in review area (check all that apply) i
❑ TNWs including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters' (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters including isolated wetlands
b Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non wetland waters — 140 ( +/ ) linear feet 4 5 width (ft) and /or acres
Wetlands ( +/ ) — 0 50 acres
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section Iii below
' For purposes of this form an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TN W and that typically flows year round or has continuous flow at least seasonally
(e g typically 3 months)

I l ' 4
Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on L98Dieneiton M ul
Elevation of established OHWM (if known)
2 Non regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) '
0 Potentially jurisdictional waters and /or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional
Explain
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section 111 F

4 0 4
SECTION 111 CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section IiI A 1 and Section iII D 1 only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sections iII A I and 2
and Section 111 D 1 otherwise, see Section III B below
1 TNW
identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting determination
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands if any and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapenos have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are relatively permanent
waters (RPWs) i e tributaries that typically flow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e g typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW but has year round
(perennial) flow skip to Section IIi D 2 if the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
skip to Section III D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
if the waterbody° is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW if the tributary has adjacent wetlands the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines for
analytical purposes the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary or its adjacent wetlands or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands complete Section III B 1 for
the tributary Section Iii B 2 for any onsite wetlands and Section iII B3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section iII C below
1 Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size 3285 (Entire drainage) square miles
Drainage area +/ 40 -acres
Average annual rainfall — 44 inches
Average annual snowfall inches
(u) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
® Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are 10 15 river miles from TNW
Project waters are 1 (or'less) river miles from RPW
Project waters are 9 10 aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Project waters are 1 (or i ) aerial (straight) miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW5 Seasonal RPW which originates onsite flows into McIntyre Creek which flows into Long
Creek which empties directly into the Catawba River (TNW)
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and in the and
West
5 Flow route can be described by identifying e g tnbutary a which flows through the review area to flow into tributary b which then flows into TNW

., 4
For each wetland specify the following
Directly abuts9 (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts9 (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological chemical and physical functions being performed
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical physical and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations a significant nexus exists if the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include but are not limited to the volume duration and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplam is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include for example
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW9
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species such as feeding nesting spawning or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW9
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have other relationships to the physical chemical or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary itself then go to Section IIi D
2 Significant nexus findings for non RPW and its adjacent wetlands where the non RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands then go to Section III D
3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands then go to
Section IiI D
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
TNWs linear feet width (ft) Or acres
Cl Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow seasonally' (e g typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IIi B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally Seasonal RPW was observed to have geomorphology biology and hydrologic flow characteristics consistent with
seasonal streams The channel had clear bed and banks substrate sorting and soil based evidence of a high water table See JD
package and North Carolina Stream identification form for Seasonal RPW

y a 0,
Provide estimates for junsdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
Tributary waters —140 ( +/ ) linear feet4 5width (ft)
Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
3 Non RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
El Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is junsdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for junsdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
[] Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
El Other non wetland waters acres
identify type(s) of waters
4 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are junsdictional as adjacent wetlands
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tnbutanes typically flow year round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section 111 B and rationale in Section IIi D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW Wetland A B/C empty directly into and are not separated from the Seasonal RPW or the impoundment
of the Seasonal RPW
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area — 169 acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
i❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
6 Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for junsdictional wetlands in the review area acres
7 Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule the impoundment of a junsdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
® Demonstrate that impoundment was created from waters of the U S or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 6) or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
E ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA STATE] WATERS INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS THE USE
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 10
Q which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
® from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
® interstate isolated waters Explain
sSee Footnote # 3
To complete the analysts refer to the key in Section III D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps /EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

n r A
[I Other factors Explain
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination
Provide estimates for Junsdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
Q Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
® Wetlands acres
F NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
Q Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in SWANCC the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
Migratory Bird Rule (MBR)
® Waters do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such a finding is required for Jurisdiction Explain
® Other (explain if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non Jurisdictional waters in the review area where the sole potential basis of Jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i a presence of migratory birds presence of endangered species use of water for imgated agriculture) using best professional
Judgment (check all that apply)
Q Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
Lakes /ponds acres
x Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non Jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such
a finding is required for Jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
Q Lakes /ponds acres
d Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
�] Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply checked items shall be included in case file and where checked
and requested appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters study
❑ U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
® U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name 124K Derita (NC) quad
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation
[� National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
(] State /Local wetland inventory map(s)
' FEMA/FIRM maps
3 100 year Floodplam Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs ® Aerial (Name & Date)
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
Applicable /supporting case law
d Applicable /supporting scientific literature
[� Other information (please specify)
B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD