20201225 Ver 1_Draft MBI and BPDP_20210304

ID#* 20201225 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 03/04/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 3/4/2021
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes a No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands G Buffer q Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Raymond Holz
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20201225
Existing ID�
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Elm Grove
County: Edgecombe
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version: * 1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Bank Instrument
File Upload: 2020-1225 Draft Elm Grove MBI and
32.47MB
BPDP 03.04.2021.pdf
Rease upload only one R]Fof the corrplete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Raymond Holz
Signature:*

AGREEMENT TO ESTABLISH THE RESTORATION SYSTEMS’ ELM GROVE
MITIGATION BANKING INSTRUMENT IN THE TAR-PAMLICO RIVER BASIN FOR
NUTRIENT OFFSET CREDITS PURSUANT TO THE TAR-PAMLICO NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. PREAMBLE .......................................................................................................................................1
II. LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA ......................................................................1
III. AUTHORITIES ..................................................................................................................................2
IV. ESTABLISHMENT OF BANK PARCEL .........................................................................................2
V. BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE ..............................................................................3
VI. POST CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION FOR THE BANK PARCEL ................................5
VII. CALCULATION OF CREDITS FOR THE BANK PARCEL ..........................................................7
VIII. CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE ......................................................................................................8
IX. PROCEDURE FOR DEBITING AND CREDITING .......................................................................9
X. BANK PARCEL CLOSURE ............................................................................................................11
XI. GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR THE BANK PARCEL .................................................................11

ATTACHMENTS & REFERENCES

A – Division of Water Resources Authority Document
B – NCDWR - Methodology & Calculations for Nutrient Reductions on the Bank Parcel
C – Ledger Templates
D – Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package

1

I. PREAMBLE

This Restoration Systems Elm Grove Mitigation Banking Instrument (“Instrument”) regarding
the establishment, use, operation, and maintenance of the Elm Grove Nutrient Offset Bank
Parcel (“Bank Parcel”), further identified in Section II, is to provide Tar-Pamlico Nutrient
Strategy nutrient load reduction credits (“Nutrient Offset Credits”), is made and entered into
by and among Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) as the Bank Sponsor (“Sponsor”), and the North
Carolina Department of Environmental Quality – Division of Water Resources (“DWR”). This
Instrument is in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703 and 15A NCAC 02B .0295, see
references.

The purpose of the Bank Parcel is:

A. To restore and preserve riparian vegetation adjacent to streams and agricultural ditches
with the intent to improve water quality within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin.

B. To convert agricultural land uses within riparian areas adjacent to streams and agricultural
ditches into a dense, hardwood vegetated state with the intent to significantly reduce
nutrient loadings associated with agricultural practices into streams and ditches.

C. To provide mitigation and sell any resulting Nutrient Offset Credits to third parties in the
Tar-Pamlico River Basin, for development (both existing and proposed), or to offset
NPDES permitted wastewater nutrient sources requiring such mitigation or offset, and or
permit obligations requiring such mitigation.

II. LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA

A. The Geographic Service Area (“GSA”) is the designated area wherein a Bank can
reasonably be expected to sell Nutrient Offset Credits for impacts requiring such mitigation
or offset.

B. The GSA for this instrument is limited to the Tar-Pamlico River Basin in the State of North
Carolina, United States Geological Survey (“USGS”) 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code
(“HUC”) 03020103.

C. Sale or transfer of Nutrient Offset Credits shall be limited to the 8-digit HUC 03020103 in
the Tar-Pamlico River Basin, in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703, unless otherwise
authorized by the DWR in accordance with Session Law 2019-86.

D. Table 1 provides site-specific details of the Bank Parcel proposed under this Instrument.

Table 1.0 – Site-specific Details
Bank
Parcel
Name
County
8-Digit USGS
Hydrologic
Unit Code
DWR
ID #
Project
Location
Named
Receiving
Stream
Primary Land
Use/s
Elm
Grove Edgecombe 03020103 2020-
1225 Tarboro Tar River Agricultural Crops

III. AUTHORITIES

A. The Bank will be used to provide Nutrient Offset Credit in accordance with the
requirements in the DWR Authority document referenced herein as “Attachment A” and
attached to this Instrument.

B. Projects eligible for utilization of the credits are those requiring authorization under the
requirements of Attachment A and any new approved North Carolina General Statutes
(NCGS) and rules for the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Management Strategy.

C. The selling of credits generated from the Bank Parcel approved under this Instrument, shall
be consistent with approved North Carolina (“State”) statutes and rules for the Tar-Pamlico
Nutrient Management Strategy.

D. Mitigation activities proposed under this Instrument and corresponding Bank Parcel
Development Package (BPDP) to generate Nutrient Offset Credits shall be consistent with
North Carolina (“State”) statutes and rules for the Tar-Pamlico Management Strategy that
are in place at the time a complete BPDP is submitted to DWR.

IV. ESTABLISHMENT OF BANK PARCEL

A. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and 15A NCAC 02B .0703, DWR has provided
a “Site Viability Letter” for the Bank Parcel proposed under this Instrument. The site
viability letter is not an approval of the site to generate Nutrient Offset Credits but is a
preliminary review of the Bank Parcel that details and confirms existing land-use
conditions, defines the riparian sites (Enhancement, Preservation, or Restoration), and
identifies features (streams, ditches, ponds, etc.) that meet general criteria to be suitable to
generate Nutrient Offset Credits. Table 2.0 below outlines when the Site Viability Letters
were issued by NCDWR:

Table 2.0 – Site Viability Letter Details
Bank Parcel NC DWR Site Visit Viability Letter
Received
Viability Letter
Expiration Date
Elm Grove October 28, 2020 December 14, 2020 December 14, 2022

B. A valid Site Viability Letter is required prior to submittal of the BPDP. Site Viability
Letters will either expire on the dates listed above or upon the submittal of an individual
As-Built Report to the DWR, whichever comes first. If a Site Viability Letter expires prior
to submittal of a complete BPDP as described in Section V to DWR, then the Sponsor must
submit a formal request to DWR for a new Site Viability Letter for that Bank Parcel.

C. The Bank Parcel proposed for inclusion under this Instrument shall require a BPDP be
submitted to, and approved by, the DWR prior to use of the Bank Parcel for mitigation
purposes or sale or transfer of any associated credits. The contents of the BPDP are
provided in Section V.

D. The BPDP submitted under this instrument will be placed on public notice and made
available for public commenting for 15 calendar days.

E. In general, the Bank Sponsor expects all Nutrient Offset Credits to be generated through
either riparian restoration or riparian preservation.

F. Nutrient Offset Credit may be achieved on the Bank Parcel through restoration of the
riparian areas where agriculture is the predominant land use. Nutrient Offset Credits are
only attainable if the width of the restored riparian areas are at least fifty (50) feet as
measured perpendicular from tops of stream and ditch banks. The width of the restoration
area begins at the most landward limit of the top of bank or the rooted herbaceous
vegetation and extends landward a minimum of 50 feet and a maximum of 200 feet on all
sides of the surface waters.

G. The Bank Parcel is expected to provide Nutrient Offset Credits in accordance with 15A
NCAC 02B .0703and is expected to provide Nutrient Offset Credit as follows:

1. Converting agricultural land uses within riparian areas to non-agricultural land
uses.
2. Planting hardwood trees or trees and shrubs on a Restoration Site as defined in 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (b) adjacent to streams and primary ditches where agriculture
has been determined to be the predominant land-use.

E. The Bank Parcel submitted for review under this Instrument is anticipated to begin
construction of proposed riparian activities after approval of this Instrument and
corresponding BPDP.

V. BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE

A. The BPDP submitted under this Instrument shall be submitted to DWR for review and must
be approved by DWR prior to any construction on the Bank Parcel. The BPDP will
describe specifics related to any phasing of the Bank Parcel. The BPDP must describe any
changes that have occurred to the site between the date of the Site Viability Letter and the
date the BPDP is submitted to DWR. The BPDP shall include detailed information
consistent with the sections below concerning; 1) site location (8-digit HUC is required);
2) existing conditions with current photos; 3) proposed nutrient offset activities including
a detailed vegetation plan; 4) monitoring and maintenance plans; 5) financial assurances;
6) associated buffer/nutrient credit calculations, which shall include credit generation,
service area, and accounting as appropriate for each regulatory authority; 7) stream
determination letter from DWR; 8) Site Viability Letter from DWR, 9) service area figure
for each mitigation type; and 10) all pertinent information regarding permitting, bank
stabilization, culvert removal, and installation of utilities indirectly or directly affecting the
Bank Parcel.

B. The Sponsor will obtain all applicable federal, state, and local documentation, permits, or
authorizations needed to construct and maintain the Bank Parcel. This Instrument does not
qualify as, or substitute for, such documentation, permit, or authorization.

C. Any restoration activities or proposed construction within the riparian buffers and other
riparian areas on the Bank Parcel to produce Nutrient Offset Credit must be approved by
DWR in writing prior to implementation. The failure of the Sponsor to comply with this
requirement may result in a revised or reduced credit release schedule for the Bank Parcel.

D. Requests for deviation from the approved BPDP must be submitted to DWR in writing.
Written approval from the DWR must be received prior to implementing any deviation
from the approved BPDP.

Property Disposition & Long-Term Management for the Bank Parcel

E. Prior to the release of any credits, the Sponsor shall record permanent conservation
easements at the Edgecombe County Register of Deed’s office that is sufficient to ensure
protection, operation and maintenance of restored riparian buffers and other riparian areas
in perpetuity.

F. The form of the conservation easement shall be consistent with the standards employed by
the State of North Carolina in the protection of restored riparian buffers and riparian areas
and shall be approved by the DWR prior to the release of any credits.

G. The Sponsor shall not grant additional easements, right of ways, or any other property
interest in or to the project areas, without prior approval from the DWR.

H. The Sponsor agrees to transfer or assign the conservation easement and its interests in
perpetuity to a qualified holder under NC General Statute (“GS”) 121-34 et seq. and 170(h)
of the Internal Revenue Code prior to the submittal of the Year 4 Monitoring Report. The
holder shall be a land trust or stewardship program that will hold and enforce the
conservation easement and the interests in perpetuity. The Sponsor shall choose a land trust
or stewardship program that is accredited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission
and/or has been approved by DWR prior to the end of the fourth year monitoring period.
A land trust must be certified under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

I. In the event the Sponsor is also the owner of the underlying fee interest in the property, the
conveyance of the conservation easement to a land trust or stewardship fund must be
arranged at the outset of the approved BPDP.

Financial Assurances for the Bank Parcel

J. Following approval of the BPDP, the Sponsor shall provide a Performance/Maintenance
Bond from a surety company that is rated no less than an “A-” as rated by A.M. Best, to
construct the Bank Parcel, in its entirety, including all phases according to the approved
BPDP. If necessary, RS may elect to acquire a separate bond for each phase of the Bank
Parcel as described in the BPDP. It is the Sponsor’s responsibility to confirm that the
surety company is rated no less than an “A-” with each annual bond renewal.

K. The amount of the Performance Bond/s shall be 100% of the estimated cost for
implementation of the riparian mitigation activities and construction of the Bank Parcel as

described in the approved BPDP. No bond shall be less than $150,000.00 to cover
construction costs.

L. Alternatively, in lieu of posting Performance Bonds, the Sponsor may elect to construct
the Bank Parcel, in its entirety, including all phases prior to the first credit release.

M. Once DWR has released all credits for completion of all the items listed below for each
phase of the Bank Parcel, then the Bank Sponsor will be released from its performance
obligations under the performance bond/s required in Item J and K of this section:

1. Instrument and BPDP Approved by DWR, Conservation Easement Recorded,
Financial Assurance Posted;
2. Site Earthwork, Planting and Installation of Monitoring Devices Completed;
3. As-Built Report as described in Section VI has been received by DWR; and
4. DWR has submitted a written approval of the As-Built Report

N. To comply with this section, DWR must be the Obligee on all performance bonds.

VI. POST CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION FOR THE BANK PARCEL

As-Built Report

A. The Sponsor agrees to perform all necessary work, in accordance with the provisions of
this Instrument and corresponding BPDP, to establish, maintain, and monitor Riparian
Buffers or other riparian areas until Item B (1) and (2) of Section X have been satisfied.

B. When all riparian restoration activities and construction have been completed for the Bank
Parcel, in its entirety, the Sponsor will submit an as-built plan and report for the Bank
Parcel within 30 calendar days after completing the establishment of the riparian buffer
and nutrient offset areas. If necessary, RS may elect to submit a separate As-Built Report
for each phase of the Bank Parcel as described in the BPDP. The As-built Report will be
submitted to DWR and describe any deviation from the approved BPDP and will document
the following:

1. Riparian restoration and planting details, invasive species control, confirmation of
fence installation if applicable, cattle exclusions if applicable, monitoring device
locations, vegetation plot locations, and photo point locations, as appropriate.

2. Boundary Survey of the conservation easement area, signed and sealed by a
licensed surveyor, including an inventory of the final nutrient offset areas in both
square feet and acres.

3. As-built map of the mitigated areas showing where riparian restoration and
preservation were performed and any deviations to the Bank Parcel from what was
approved in the BPDP.

4. Aerial map of the restoration and preservation areas approved in the BPDP.

Financial Assurance for the Bank Parcel

C. After completion of the riparian mitigation activities and construction on the Bank Parcel,
in its entirety, including all phases, a separate Performance/Maintenance Bond/s will be
secured for 100% of the estimated cost to implement the monitoring and maintenance plan
as described in the approved BPDP and As-Built Report for the site. If necessary, RS may
elect to acquire a separate bond for each phase of the Bank Parcel as described in the BPDP.
The Bond/s must be from a surety company that is rated no less than an “A-” as rated by
A.M. Best, and it is the Sponsor’s responsibility to confirm that the surety company is rated
no less than an “A-” with annual bond renewal.

D. Each Performance/Maintenance Bond shall be secured each year for a minimum of five
years, and until DWR has released all Nutrient Offset Credits to the Bank Sponsor. Upon
DWR approval, the bond/s may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to
complete the monitoring. No bond shall be less than $100,000 to cover monitoring and
maintenance costs.

E. Once DWR has released 100% of all credits for completion of all Bank Parcel milestones
described in Table 3 of Section VIII and in the corresponding BPDP, the Bank Sponsor
will be released from its performance obligations under the performance bond/s required
in “C-D” of this Section.

F. To comply with this section, DWR must be the Obligee on all performance bonds.

Monitoring and Maintenance Reports

G. The Sponsor shall monitor the Bank Parcel, in its entirety, including all phases as described
in the BPDP until such time as DWR determines that the performance standards described
below have been met. The monitoring period shall be a minimum of five consecutive years
for each phase of the Bank Parcel.

H. Performance Standards for Vegetation: Native hardwood trees or native hardwood tree
and shrub species should be planted at a density sufficient to provide 260 stems per acre
after five years. A minimum of four (4) native hardwood trees or four (4) native hardwood
tree and shrub species must be planted. No one species shall be greater than 50% of the
planted stems. A list of species for planting will be detailed in the BPDP for approval.
Native hardwood tree volunteer species may be included to meet performance standards as
determined by the DWR.

I. A “stem” means a woody seedling, sapling, shrub or tree, no less than 10 centimeters in
height.

J. If the performance standards of the vegetation are not met, supplemental plantings may be
required. Supplemental plantings will be utilized until the required densities have been
achieved and maintained for five years. Bank Parcel maintenance, such as ensuring diffuse
flow, managing invasive species, and pest control will be included in the BPDP.

K. Monitoring Reports for Nutrient Offset Credit:
Reporting criteria of the vegetation shall be based on the Carolina Vegetation Survey
(CVS) – EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level 2 Plot Sampling only version 4.0
or any updated versions of this protocol in place at the date of acceptance of the BPDP.
The Sponsor shall submit an annual monitoring report no later than December 31 of each
year for a minimum of five consecutive years after the first full growing season. This report
will describe the conditions of the Bank Parcel, including an evaluation of the performance
standards of the vegetation contained within the approved BPDP. Reports shall contain
the following:

1. A U.S. Geological Survey map showing location of the Bank Parcel;

2. A detailed narrative with supporting photos summarizing the condition of the Bank
Parcel along with any maintenance or remediation performed that year; and

3. A map, survey, or other figure showing locations of sampling plots, permanent
photo points, location of transects, etc.; and

4. Monitoring data, including specific vegetative counts showing that the trees or tree
and shrub species planted are meeting performance standards and updated
photographs; and

5. A copy of the most recent Bank credit/debit ledgers; and

6. Corresponding verification letters from designated local governments upon request;
and

7. Corresponding Mitigation Transfer Certificates upon request.

8. Proof of performance bond renewal to cover the next monitoring year (if
applicable)

Contingency Plans/Remedial Actions

L. In the event the Bank Parcel fails to achieve the performance criteria described in this
Instrument and the approved BPDP, the Bank Sponsor shall develop necessary contingency
plans in coordination with the DWR and implement appropriate remedial actions for the
Bank Parcel and the Bank. Depending on the degree of remedial actions required, the DWR
may modify the monitoring period.

VII. CALCULATION OF CREDITS FOR THE BANK PARCEL

Nutrient Offset Credits

A. The acreage of Nutrient Offset Credits on the Bank Parcel submitted under this Instrument
is determined by applying the applicable ratio as provided in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (m)
for a Restoration Site. All riparian areas proposed for Nutrient Offset Credits must be a

minimum of fifty (50) feet from the top of the bank along streams and ditches adjacent to
land noted in the Site Viability Letter as agriculture.

B. Nutrient Offset Credits cannot be achieved through the preservation activities performed
on the Bank Parcel.

C. Nutrient Abatement of Restored Riparian Area/Buffers on Agricultural lands: The Sponsor
and DWR agree to the following:

The pounds of nitrogen offset per acre of restored riparian areas/buffers shall be
2,273.02 pounds per acre,

The pounds of phosphorus offset per acre of restored riparian areas/buffers shall be
146.40 pounds per acre,

D. The Sponsor and DWR agree that the methodology and calculations for determining
nitrogen and total phosphorus reduction, associated with restoration of riparian areas on
this Bank Parcel shall be fixed as part of the approval of this Instrument, with the fixed
amount not changing during the Bank Parcel Development or credit release schedule for
the Bank Parcel. The approved method and calculations for determining nutrient
reductions associated with the riparian restoration on this Bank Parcel is provided in further
detail in Attachment B.
VIII. CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE
A. Upon submittal of all appropriate documentation by the Sponsor, and subsequent approval
by DWR, it is agreed that Nutrient Offset Credits associated with the Bank Parcel, in its
entirety and including all phases, will become available for sale or transfer to a third party
in accordance with the Credit Release Schedule in Table 3.0.

B. If necessary, RS may elect to have a separate Credit Release Schedule for each phase of
the Bank Parcel. All phases will be subject to the same schedule as provided in Table 3.0
below:

Table 3.0 - Credit Release Schedule for Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits
Task Project Milestone
% Credit
Available for
Sale
1
Instrument and BPDP Approved by DWR, Conservation Easement
Recorded*, Financial Assurance Posted, and all utilities installed and in
compliance with state issued permits/authorizations where applicable
20
2 Site Earthwork, Planting and Installation of Monitoring Devices Completed
and all applicable permits obtained 20
3 Monitoring Financial Assurance Posted and Approval of As-Built Report 10
4 Monitoring Report #1: Approved by the DWR** & financial assurances
renewed 10
5 Monitoring Report #2: Approved by the DWR** & financial assurances
renewed 10
6 Monitoring Report #3: Approved by the DWR** & financial assurances
renewed 10
7 Item B (1) of Section X in this Instrument has been completed and
approved by DWR. 5
No remaining credits will be released until the conservation easement has
been assigned to an approved land trust or stewardship
8 Monitoring Report #4: Approved by the DWR** & financial assurances
renewed 5
9 Monitoring Report #5: Approved by the DWR** and final site visit by
DWR has been conducted 10
Total 100%
* For specification, please see Section V in this Instrument
** DWR Approval provided upon a determination that the site is meeting success criteria contained within the
approved BPDP

C. DWR may modify the credit release schedule based on the information submitted or the
order in which required information is received. DWR will notify the Sponsor of any
modification to the credit release schedule.

IX. PROCEDURE FOR DEBITING AND CREDITING

Credit Ledgers

A. The Bank Sponsor shall maintain a credit ledger for each mitigation type for each phase of
the Bank Parcel under this Instrument: Credit ledgers shall provide the accounting for
Nutrient Offset Credits in pounds and acres.

B. Each credit ledger shall be submitted on a separate 8 ½-in X 11-in spreadsheet with legible
font style and font size. All ledgers shall be submitted using the templates provided in
Attachments D of this Instrument or any updated versions to these templates as provided
by DWR.

Credit Processing

C. Nutrient Offset Credits generated on this Bank Parcel will be used to offset nitrogen and
phosphorus nutrient loads within the 8-digit HUC 03020103 of the Tar-Pamlico River
Basin in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.

D. The Bank Sponsor shall obtain written verification of nutrient offset need from a designated
local government within the 8-digit HUC 03020103 of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin, or
from DWR through an approved NPDES permit for wastewater nutrient sources, prior to
debiting Nutrient Offset Credits from the Bank Parcel.

E. All credit and debit transactions for the Bank Parcel under this Instrument shall be
accurately depicted in the credit ledgers. The Sponsor shall provide DWR up-to-date credit
ledgers for the Bank Parcel by the tenth (10th) of each month. At a minimum and upon
request, DWR shall receive a hard copy of updated credit ledgers along with the
corresponding Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificates (“Certificate”) and all corresponding
letters from the designated local governments or DWR where applicable, once a year.
Notification of all credit sales shall be provided to DWR until all credits that have been
released have been sold.

Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificates

F. All credit sales will include a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate (“Certificate”) that is
required to be provided to the buyer of Riparian Buffer and/or Nutrient Offset credits, that
will include, at a minimum, the following information:

1. Bank Details: (1) Bank Sponsor Name, (2) bank parcel as it appears in this
Instrument, (3) DWR project number for the BPDP as it appears in Table 1.0

2. Credit Details: (1) date of receipt, (2) identify if full or partial payment, (3-when
applicable) amount of nitrogen Nutrient Offset Credits purchased in pounds and
confirmation from the designated local government or DWR of the amount
required, and (4-when applicable) amount of phosphorus Nutrient Offset Credits
purchased in pounds and confirmation from the designated local government or
DWR of the amount required.

3. Permitted Project Details: (1) project name as it appears on DWR or local
government permits and/or certifications, (2) 8-digit HUC, (3) river basin, (4)
nutrient strategy applicable to the project, (5 – when applicable) designated local
government or DWR requiring Nutrient Offset Credits.

G. If the DWR determines that the Bank is operating at a deficit (e.g. the Sponsor is utilizing,
selling, leasing or transferring credits that are not available), or the Bank is out of
compliance with statutes, rules or this Agreement, the sale/transfer will immediately cease,
and the DWR, in consultation with the Sponsor, will determine what remedial actions are
necessary.

X. BANK PARCEL CLOSURE

A. Bank Parcel Closure shall be identified as the event when the Sponsor is relieved of all of
its responsibilities to the Bank Parcel and there are no Nutrient Offset Credits left to sell.

B. Bank Parcel Closure shall commence only after all of the following events have occurred:

1. Transfer or assign the conservation easement and all of its interests, in perpetuity,
to a land trust or stewardship program as described in Section V of this Instrument.

2. All five years of monitoring completed and all monitoring reports submitted and
approved by DWR.

3. All credits have been released and debited and updated ledgers showing zero credit
balances have been submitted and approved by DWR.

XI. GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR THE BANK PARCEL

A. Upon the presentation of proper credentials, and during normal business hours, the Sponsor
and the landowner shall grant permission to the Director of DWR, and/or an authorized
representative of the Director of DWR, to enter the property containing the Bank Parcel.

B. Amendments: This Banking Instrument may be amended or modified only with written
approval of all signatory parties.

C. Any transfer of the Sponsor’s rights or obligations outlined in this Instrument or any other
agreement referenced in this Instrument to a third party must be approved by DWR prior
to the transfer.

D. Force Majeure: After 100% of all of the credits have been released according to the credit
release schedule in Section VIII and confirmation has been received by the DWR that the
Conservation Easement has been successfully assigned in compliance with Item H of
Section V, the Sponsor will not be responsible for Bank failure that is attributed to natural
catastrophes including but not limited to flood, drought, disease, regional pest infestation,
etc. that are beyond the control of the Sponsor.

E. However, if an event occurs before 100% of all of the credits have been released according to
the credit release schedule in Section VIII, the Sponsor shall take remedial action to restore
the property to its condition prior to the event, in a manner sufficient to provide adequate
offset and mitigation to cover credits that were sold prior to the occurrence of the event.
Such remedial action shall be taken by the Sponsor only to the extent necessary and
appropriate, as determined by DWR and the Sponsor.

DWR must concur in writing that a force majeure event has occurred for this provision to apply.

F. Oversight: Actions taken by DWR may include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. Site visits,

2. Mitigation determinations/mitigation viability assessments

3. Issuance of Site Viability Letters,

4. BPDP review and approval of items listed in Section V of this Instrument,

5. As-Built Report review and approval of items listed in Section VI of this
Instrument,

6. Monitoring Report review and approval of items listed in Section VI of this
Instrument,

7. Credit Ledger review and approval of items listed in Section IX of this Instrument,

8. Certificate review of items listed in Section IX of this Instrument and cross analysis
to credit ledgers and,

9. Information requests, file reviews and audits

Reports, ledgers, files and other information shall be made available to DWR upon request, unless
otherwise specified in this or any other document.

G. Validity of the Banking Instrument: This Instrument will become valid on the date of the
last party’s signature.

H. Specific Language of Banking Instrument Shall Be Controlling: To the extent that specific
language in this document changes, modifies, or deletes terms and conditions contained in
those documents that are incorporated into the Instrument by reference, and that are not
legally binding, the specific language within the Instrument shall be controlling.

I. Any disputes over decisions regarding this Instrument, shall be referred to the Director of
DWR for a decision. The Director’s decision is subject to review as provided in Articles
3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.

J. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and is entered into knowingly,
intelligently, and voluntarily.

K. Notices: All notices and other communications which may be or are required to be given
or made by any party to the other shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been
properly given and received on the date delivered in person, received via electronic mail,
or deposited in the United States mail, registered or certified, return receipt requested, to
the addresses set out below, or at such other addresses as specified by written notice
delivered in accordance herewith.

If to Bank Sponsor: Restoration Systems
Attn: Barrett Jenkins
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27605

If to DWR: NC Division of Water Resources – 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Attn: Nutrient Offset Banking Coordinator
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

L. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of North
Carolina.

RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC

By: (Print)

(Signature)
Title:

Date:

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY-DIVISION OF
WATER RESOURCES

By: (Print)

(Signature)
Title:

Date:

ATTACHMENT

A – Division of Water Resources Authority Document

1. Nutrient Offset Payment Rule:
http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%20ncac%2002b%20.0703.pdf

2. Riparian Buffer Mitigation Rule:
http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%20ncac%2002b%20.0295.pdf

2. NC Session Law 2019-86 "Nutrient Offset Credits":
https://ncleg.gov/EnactedLegislation/SessionLaws/HTML/2019-2020/SL2019-86.html

3. Buffer Interpretation/Clarification #2008-019 for diffuse flow:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Surface%20Water%20Protection/401/Buffer%20Clarification
%20Memos/Diffuse-Flow-for-Buffer-Mitigation-Sites-Buffer-Clarification-Memo-20080819.pdf

ATTACHMENT

B –NCDWR - Methodology & Calculations for Nutrient Reductions on the Bank Parcel
NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer EstablishmentNitrogen Water Quality Benefits for Riparian Buffer Restoration1). Benefit of Land Use Change2). Benefit of Nutrient Removal from Nonpoint Source Runoff3). Benefit of Nutrient Removal from Periodic Overbank FloodNitrogen General Assumptions:1. Life expectancy of Riparian Buffer is assumed to be 30 years. (Life expectancy for stormwater detention pond is 20 - 30 yrs)2. Restored Riparian Buffer is assumed to be natural.Effectiveness of Riparian BufferAnnual Effectiveness (kg/ha/yr)Annual Effectiveness (lb/ac/yr)Effectiveness in 30 yrs (lb/ac)Benefit (1) 11.08 9.89 296.6Benefit (2) 70.09 62.54 1876.1Benefit (3) 3.75 3.35 100.4Total 84.92 75.77 2273.0Nitrogen Benefit Descriptions and Assumptions:1) Benefit is due to change land use. Assume existing land use export coefficient is a composite export coefficient with a value of 12.98 kg/ha (agriculture and urban). Wetland export coefficient is 1.9 kg/ha.Th l t i t t t i d d b 11 08 k /h ll b l d h i The annual nutrient output is decreased by 11.08 kg/ha annually by land use changing.2) Benefit is due to nitrogen removal from nonpoint source runoff. Nutrient contribution/buffer treatment area ratio is approximately 10.8 (based on studies examined by Gannon 1997). In flow loading is calculated by nutrient contribution area x composite export coefficient. In flow loading is 10.8 ha x 12.98 kg/ha = 140 kg/ha/yr. Nutrient removal due to this benefit is calculated by in flow loading x removal efficiency *Gannon, Richard. 1997. Effectiveness of Wetland Riparian Areas for Treatment of Agricultural Pollution Sources: A Literature Review. (Draft) The nitrogen removal efficiency is 50% based on various literature. * Kadlec, Robert H. and Robert L. Knight. 1996. Treatment Wetland * Moshiri, Gerald A.1993. Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement. Lewis Publi. * Mitsch, William J. 1994. Global Wetlands: Old world and New. Elsevier3) Benefit is due to nitrogen removal from overbank flooding Nitrogen concentration is assumed to be 2.5 mg/L. Assume overboard is 1 ft. Flood frequency is assumed to be once every year. Nutrient removal due to this benefit is estimated by in flow concentration x area (1 ha) x overboard height x removal efficiency.Formula for Calculating Nitrogen Offset Reductions on Riparian Buffer Restoration Sites:Size (Acres) * 75.77(lbs/Acre/Year) * 30 Years = Total Pounds of Nitorgen Removed from Riparian Buffer Project1
Phosphorus Water Quality Benefits for Riparian Buffer Restoration1). Benefit of Land Use Change2). Benefit of Nutrient Removal from Nonpoint Source RunoffPhosphorus General Assumptions:1. Life expectancy of Riparian Buffer is assumed to be 30 years. Effectiveness of Riparian BufferAnnual Effectiveness (lb/ac/yr)Effectiveness in 30 yrs (lb/ac)Benefit (1) 1.73 51.90Benefit (2) 3.15 94.50Total 4.88 146.40Phosphorus Benefit Descriptions and Assumptions:1) Benefit is due to change land use1, 2 Export coefficient for agricultural land is 2.15 (lb/ac/yr). Export coefficient for riparian buffer is 0.42 (lb/ac/yr). The annual total phosphorus (TP) output is decreased by 1.73 lb/ac annually by land use changing.2) Benefit is due to TP removal from nonpoint source runoff 3, 4 Mass load for TP reductions for buffer is estimated to be 3.15 lb/ac/yr.Page 2Assumptions: Riparian buffer restorations only occur on agricultural lands. Width of restored riparian buffer is 50 feet, and with mixture of grass and forest.References:1 NC Division of Water Quality memo 'Export Coefficients Revisited' (1996)2 Comparison of Selected TP Loading Coefficients (Jim Blose, 2001)4 A Review of the Scientific Literature on Riparian Buffer Width, Extent and Vegetation. (Seth Wenger, 1999) Formula for Calculating Phosphorus Offset Reductions on Riparian Buffer Restoration Sites:Size (Acres) * 4.88(lbs/Acre/Year) * 30 Years = Total Pounds of Total Phosphorus Removed from Riparian Buffer Project3 Cost-Effectiveness Study of Selected Agricultural Best Management Practices in the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico River Basins (Todd Kennedy, 2001) Page 2

ATTACHMENT

C – Ledger Templates

Pounds of
Nitrogen Acres Pounds of
Nitrogen Acres Pounds of
Nitrogen Acres
00/00/0000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Credits Released to Date:
Restoration Systems, LLC - Elm Grove Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI)
Elm Grove Bank Parcel / Tar-Pamlico 03020103 Nitrogen Offset Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated: 00/00/0000
DWR # 2020-1125
Date Paid Purchaser or UMBI Task Completed Project w/HUC #
Credits Released/Available to
Bank
Credits Debited/Sold from
Bank Nutrient Credit Balance
Local Gov't
Pounds of
Phosphorus Acres Pounds of
Phosphorus Acres Pounds of
Phosphorus Acres
00/00/0000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Restoration Systems, LLC - Elm Grove Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI)
Elm Grove Bank Parcel / Tar-Pamlico 03020103 Phosphorus Offset Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated: 00/00/0000
DWR # 2020-1125
Total Credits Released to Date:
Nutrient Credit Balance
Local Gov'tDate Paid Purchaser or UMBI Task Completed Project w/HUC #
Credits Released/Available to
Bank Credits Debited/Sold from Bank

ATTACHMENT

D – Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package

BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE

ELM GROVE NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION BANK PARCEL

TAR-PAMLICO RIVER BASIN

DWR ID#: 2020-1225

Bank Parcel Sponsor
Restoration Systems, LLC
POC: Raymond Holz ([e-mail])
Ph: 919-755-9490
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1225)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. i
BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE

ELM GROVE NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION BANK PARCEL

March 4, 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Bank Sponsor ........................................................................................................................ 1
Project Location & Fee-Simple Ownership ........................................................................... 1
Directions to Parcel from Raleigh: ........................................................................................ 2
Parcel Overview .................................................................................................................... 2
Historic Land Use .................................................................................................................. 2
Project Area – Current Conditions ................................................................................................... 2
Physiography ........................................................................................................................ 2
Soils ....................................................................................................................................... 3
Existing Vegetative Communities ......................................................................................... 3
Parcel Design and Implementation Constraints ................................................................... 3
2.4.1 Existing Utility Line ................................................................................................... 3
2.4.2 Threatened and Endangered Species ...................................................................... 4
2.4.3 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................... 4
Restoration Plan ............................................................................................................................... 4
Project Schedule ................................................................................................................... 5
Permitting ............................................................................................................................. 6
Planting Plan ......................................................................................................................... 6
Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries .......................................................................... 7
As-Built Report ..................................................................................................................... 7
Monitoring and Maintenance Plan .................................................................................................. 7
Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria ............................................................................... 7
Parcel Maintenance .............................................................................................................. 8
Long Term Management Plan .............................................................................................. 8
Financial Assurance .......................................................................................................................... 8
Mitigation Potential ......................................................................................................................... 8
Credit Release .................................................................................................................................. 9
References ....................................................................................................................................... 9

Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1225)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. ii
TABLES
Table 1 – Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership
Table 2 – Project Features
Table 3 – Parcel Soils
Table 4 – USFWS FSC Species List
Table 5 – Restoration Plan Activities
Table 6 – Phase 1 Project Schedule
Table 7 – Proposed Hardwood Tree Bare Root Planting Plan by Species
Table 8 – Proposed Shrub Bare Root Planting Plan by Species
Table 9 – Nutrient Offset Credit Table
Table 10 – Credit Release Table

FIGURES, EXISTING CONDITION PHOTOS, DWR MITIGATION CREDIT TABLE
Figure 1 – Vicinity Map
Figure 2 – Service Area Map
Figure 3 – Site Map
Figure 4 – USGS Map
Figure 5 – NRCS Map
Figure 6 – Nutrient Offset Credit Map
Figure 7 – Monitoring Map
Historic Arial Imagery – EDR
Parcel Photos – Existing Conditions
DWR Mitigation Credit Table

APPENDICES
DWR Correspondence
NRCS Web Soil Survey Report
Environmental Records
USFWS – Species Report
SHPO Letter
FEMA Map

Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1225)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 1
Bank Parcel Development Package
Elm Grove Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
Edgecombe County, NC – Tar-Pamlico River Basin
Introduction
The Elm Grove Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel (“Parcel” or “Site”) is proposed under the terms and conditions
of the Elm Grove Nutrient Offset Mitigation Banking Instrument, made and entered into on ,
by Restoration Systems, LLC (RS), Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR). The Parcel shall be planned and
designed according to the MBI, 15A NCAC 02B .0731, 15A NCAC 02B .0703, and the Consolidated Buffer
Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295.

Located in Edgecombe County North Carolina, the project encompasses 44.43 acres of land utilized for
row crop production. The project will restore the riparian areas along three (3) unnamed tributaries and
five (5) surface water conveyances (ditches) with hydrologic connection to the Tar River. The primary
purpose of the Parcel is to provide nutrient offset credits for stormwater and wastewater requirements
within the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Cataloging Unit 03020103. The Parcel is located on two
continuous tracts of land held by the same owner, situated two miles east of the Tar River.

DWR representatives conducted an onsite determination for parcel applicability and suitability on October
28, 2020. A Stream Determination letter for the Parcel was provided on October 29, 2020 and a Site
Viability for Buffer & Nutrient Offset letter was provided by the Division on December 14, 2020
(Appendices).

Bank Sponsor
The Site is proposed by Restoration Systems, LLC (RS). Contact information for RS is provided below;
Restoration Systems, LLC
Attention: Raymond Holz
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
[e-mail]
919.755.9490

Project Location & Fee-Simple Ownership
The Parcel is located approximately 3.5 miles northeast of Tarboro in Edgecombe County, NC (Figure 1).
Farfields, LLC is the current fee-simple owner both tracts associated with the Bank Parcel, which have
been historically and are currently used as agricultural fields. The Parcel is within the Tar-Pamlico River
Basin 14-digit USGS Cataloging Unit 03020103010010 of the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain (North Carolina
Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Sub-basin Number 03-03-03) (Figure 1). Fee simple ownership and
details are provided in Table 1.

Table 1: Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership
Owner Name D.B/Pg. NC PIN# Acreage
Farfields, LLC 1697/0489 4749-68-0128-00 68.7
Farfields, LLC 1697/0489 4749-79-2203-00 190.91

Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1225)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 2
Directions to Parcel from Raleigh:
- Get on I-440 E from Capital Blvd
- Take US-64 E to Tarboro
- Take US-258 N 5 miles – Parcel is located on your right
Site Coordinates: 35.936319°, -77.496317°

Parcel Overview
The Bank Parcel totals 44.43 acres over two tracks of land, totaling 259.61 acres. Primary land use is
agricultural and silviculture. The Parcel includes five (5) surface water conveyances (ditches) with direct
hydrologic connection to three (3) unnamed tributaries which drain to the Tar River one mile southwest.
(Figure 1).

Parcel surface water conveyances and unnamed tributaries are periodically cleared of vegetation and
maintained as cleared ditches with some brush accumulation along feature slopes. An existing utility line
runs adjacent to the western property boundary along highway 258 and at the northern end of Feature
D2. These utility lines are excluded from the Parcel’s footprint.

DWR representatives conducted an onsite determination for parcel applicability and suitability on October
28, 2020. A Site Viability for Buffer & Nutrient Offset was provided by the Division on December 14, 2020
(Appendices). A summary of parcel features viability is provided in Table 2 and Figure 3.

Table 2. Project Features
DWR Feature ID In Field Classification Subject to Buffer Rules Nutrient Offset Viability
A1 Ditch >3ft depth No Yes
A2 Stream Yes Yes
B1 Ditch >3ft depth No Yes
B2 Stream Yes Yes
C Ditch >3ft depth No Yes
D1 Ditch >3ft depth No No
D2 Stream Yes Yes
E Not Present NA NA
F Ditch >3ft depth No Yes
Pond F In-line pond No No
G Ditch >3ft depth No Yes

Historic Land Use
A review of historic aerials suggests the current utilization of the land for row crop production has
persisted since 1960.

Project Area – Current Conditions
Physiography
The Parcel encapsulates a heavily modified headwater stream system within the Southeastern Plains.
Specifically, Ecoregion IV – 65p Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces that comprise a riverine
ecoregion that provides important wildlife corridors and habitat. Composed of alluvium and terrace
deposits of sand, clay, and gravel, the region includes large sluggish rivers and backwaters with ponds,
swamps, and oxbow lakes. It includes oak-dominated bottomland hardwood forests (Quercus michauxii,
Q. nigra, Q. phellos, Acer rubrum, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Carya aquatica, C. ovata, C. cordiformis), and
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1225)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 3
some river swamp forests of bald cypress or pond cypress (Taxodium distichum, T. ascendens) and water
tupelo and swamp tupelo (Nyssa aquatica, N. biflora). Similar to 63n, the flood-prone region includes
brownwater floodplains and blackwater floodplains. The brownwater floodplains originate in or cross the
Piedmont (45) and the sediments contain more weatherable and mixed minerals than the blackwater
floodplains that have their watersheds entirely within the coastal plain. The low terraces are mostly
forested, although some cropland or pasture occurs in some areas that are better drained. (Griffith et al.
2002).

The watershed is dominated by agricultural land, lowland forests, fringe forests, and impervious surfaces
associated single family homes and roads – Figure 3 Appendix A. Surrounding area land use is primarily
row-crop agriculture and silviculture, with some low-density residential housing, and cattle pasture.

Soils
A detailed soil report for the Parcel was produced using the Natural Resource Conservation Service’s
(NRCS) Web Soil Survey. Based on the custom Edgecombe County report, the Parcel contains four soil
series outlined in Table 3. The complete survey is attached to this report.

Table 3: Parcel Soils
Map Unit
Symbol Map Unit Name Percent of
Bank Parcel
Hydric
Soil Rating
AaA Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes 32% No
Ro Roanoke loam 36% Yes
StB State loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes 2% No
TaB Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes 30% No

Existing Vegetative Communities
Agricultural fields account for nearly 100 percent of the Parcel’s current land use. Primary crops are
cotton, corn, and soybeans. Forests immediately adjacent to the Parcel are heavily manipulated and
comprised of managed pines or primary successional species, i.e. red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), and tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). The Parcel contains minimal amounts
of invasive species and include Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and Cattails (Typha sp.). Undisturbed
adjacent reference forests could not be identified.

Parcel Design and Implementation Constraints
The presence of conditions or characteristics that have the potential to hinder restoration activities on
the Parcel were evaluated. The evaluation focused primarily on the presence of hazardous materials,
utility and restrictive easements, rare/threatened/endangered species or critical habitats, and the
potential for hydrologic trespass. Existing information regarding Parcel constraints was acquired and
reviewed including an Environmental Records Report developed by Environmental Data Resources Inc.
which located no evidence of environmental risk associated with the Parcel (Attachments). In addition,
any Parcel condition that could have the potential to restrict the restoration and implementation were
documented during the field investigation. As a result of our review and field surveys, no known Parcel
constraints exist that may hinder proposed restoration activities. Potential constraints reviewed include
the following:

An existing utility line runs adjacent to the western property boundary along highway 258 and at the
northern end of Feature D2. These utility lines are excluded from the Parcel’s footprint.
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1225)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 4

Species with the classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or officially Proposed (P) for such listing
are protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C 1531 et seq.). Five
species are federally listed within the Parcel boundaries for Edgecombe County by the United States Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (USFWS 2008) and are listed below.

Table 4: USFWS FSC Species List
Common Name Scientific Name
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Tar River Spinymussel Elliptio steinstansana
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata

Based on communications with the USFWS, there are no critical habitats within the project area. The
biological conclusion of the proposed mitigation activities is, no effect. Implementation of the Parcel will
result in positive benefits for these species listed above and through improved habitat and water quality
(Attachments).

The term “cultural resources” refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, structures, or artifact
deposits over 50 years old. “Significant” cultural resources are those that are eligible or potentially eligible
for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Evaluations of site significance are made with
reference to the eligibility criteria of the National Register (36 CFR 60).

Field visits were conducted in December 2020 to ascertain the presence of structures or features that may
be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. An online search using the North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Office’s (SHPO) Web GIS Service (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) and the National
Register of Historic Places GIS Search identified the Knight-Jenkins house, located on the Parcel’s subject
fee-simple tract, but outside of the Parcel boundary, and five features within a 1.0 mile radius of the Bank
Parcel: (https://www.nps.gov/maps/full.html?mapId=7ad17cc9-b808-4ff8-a2f9-a99909164466).

Due to the nature of the project work and absence of historic structures within the footprint of the parcel,
we have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures. A
scoping letter to SHPO is provided in the Report’s attached appendices.

Restoration Plan
The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas within the Bank Parcel will focus on
improving water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat permanently. The
Project goals will be achieved through the creation of a forested riparian buffer adjacent to stream
channels and agricultural ditches. Goals will be accomplished by the following.

1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production, including a)
ceasing the broadcast application of fertilizer, pesticides, and other agricultural materials into and
adjacent to Parcel surface water conveyances (ditches) and streams b) providing a restored buffer
to filter runoff from adjacent lands.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by reducing bank
erosion, vegetation maintenance, and agricultural land disturbances.
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1225)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 5
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance of floodwaters crossing
Parcel floodplains.
4. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively developed for agricultural
production.
6. Restoring and re-establishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity.
7. Protecting the Parcel’s riparian buffer functions and values in perpetuity.

Goals will be accomplished by implementing restoration activities detailed in Table 5. Parcel design will
ensure no adverse impacts to wetlands or existing riparian buffers occur.

Table 5: Restoration Plan Activities
Restoration
Plan Activity Action
Riparian
Restoration
1.) Prior to planting, bank parcel will be disked in linear bands parallel to the direction of
surface water flows. The established microtopography on leveled surfaces will promote
diffuse flow and surface water storage throughout the floodplain.

2.) Herbaceous vegetation treatment well be performed as needed before planting and
may include selected herbicide treatments and/or limited mechanical clearing to
remove undesirable vegetation. Where needed, invasive species will be selectively
removed and/or spot treated by a licensed pesticide applicator.
3.) Establishment of a native herbaceous community via site-specific seed mix including
both native grasses and forbs, with a variety of annual and perennial plants known to
benefit wildlife and pollinators. The grass seed component will focus on low growing
species which favor the establishment of the target forest community. Forbs will
include a diverse mixture of native and naturalized forbs and wildflowers.
4.) Establishment of a native hardwood forest via planting of bare-root saplings along all
Parcel Features from the top of bank to the Parcel’s easement boundary.

Project Schedule
Restoration is planned to begin in the winter of 2021 with planting occurring in January/February of 2022.
Table 6 details the complete project timeline and includes restoration plan activities and project
milestones.

Table 6: Phase 1 Project Schedule
Activity / Milestone Date
Approval of MBI, BPDP and recording of conservation easement Q4 2021
Soil preparation Q1 2022
Planting Q1 2022
As-Built Q2 2022
Year 1 monitoring Q4 2022
Year 2 monitoring Q4 2023
Year 3 monitoring Q4 2024
Year 4 monitoring Q4 2025
Year 5 monitoring Q4 2026
Closeout Q1 2027
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1225)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 6
Permitting
Activities outlined above do not require a permit or written notification to any regulatory agencies, i.e.,
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), DWR, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), North
Carolina Department of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources (NC DEMLR) and/or Edgecombe County.
Reasoning for each is summarized below:

USACE – Under no applicable USACE regulation do the restoration activities require a USACE permit.

DWR – Under no applicable DWR regulation do restoration activities require a DWR permit or
consultation. A parcel visit with DWR Staff was conducted on October 28, 2020.

FEMA – The Parcel is located within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) zone AE and Zone X
(Appendices). No grading activities are proposed in the floodplain; therefore, a floodplain
development permit is not required. No hydraulic modeling is proposed for this project.

NC DEMLR: Sediment and Erosion Control – Restoration activities do not require a sediment and
erosion control permit.

Edgecombe County – No applicable County ordinance, code, or regulation apply to restoration
activities.

Planting Plan
All species are proposed based on their ability for sediment stabilization, rapid growth rate, the ability to
withstand hydraulic forces associated with flood events, and suitability to site conditions. Trees will be
mixed thoroughly before planting to provide a diverse and random planting across the site. Planting will
occur at a density sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in the Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295
of 260 trees per acre at the end of five years. No one tree species will be greater than 50% of the
established stems. The Sponsor additionally proposes the planting of several different species of native
shrubs. Shrub species will count towards success criteria per the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (November 1, 2015). It is anticipated that planting of shrub species will occur at an
average density of 50 stems per acre. Tree species and shrubs proposed for planting are detailed in tables
7 and 8 respectively.

Table 7: Proposed Hardwood Tree Bare Root Planting Plan by Species*
Common Name Scientific Name % of Total Planted Trees
River birch Betula nigra 10%
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 10%
Tulip poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 10%
Red mulberry Morus rubra 10%
Black Gum Nyssa sylvatica 10%
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 10%
Pecan Carya illinoinensis 10%
Swamp chestnut oak Quercus michauxii 10%
Water oak Quercus nigra 10%
American elm Ulmus americana 10%
*Note: Species availability may result in the substitution of regionally appropriate native species.

Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1225)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 7
Table 8: Proposed Shrub Bare Root Planting Plan by Species*
Common Name Scientific Name % of Total Planted Shrubs
Chinkapin Castanea pumila 20%
Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 20%
Crabapple Malus angustifolia 20%
Chickasaw plum Prunus angustifolia 20%
Elderberry Sambucus canadensis 20%
*Note: Species availability may result in the substitution of regionally appropriate native species.

Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries
Prior to the release of any credits, RS will record a permanent conservation easement approved by DWR
at the Edgecombe County Register of Deeds sufficient to ensure protection, operation and maintenance
of restored riparian buffers and other riparian areas in perpetuity.

The form of the conservation easement shall be consistent with the standards employed by the State of
North Carolina in the protection of restored riparian buffers and riparian areas and shall be approved by
the DWR prior to the release of any credits.

Parcel easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel
and adjacent land use. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, bollard, post, tree-blazing, or other
means as allowed by Parcel conditions and/or the conservation easement and will be installed before the
submittal of the As-Built Report. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired
and/or replaced on an as needed basis. The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of
monitoring activities and reported to DWR.

As-Built Report
An As-Built Report, as defined in the MBI, will be submitted to DWR documenting the completion of the
Site’s Restoration Plan.

Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation at each Phase will monitor plant survival and species
diversity. Quantitative sampling will include thirty-five (35) permanent 10 x 10-meter vegetation plots as
outlined in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and will occur
no earlier than the first calendar day of Fall each year (Figure 7). A reference photo will be taken from the
origin point of each plot. All planted stems in the plots will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.
Data collected will include species, height, planting type (planted stem and/or volunteer), and vigor.
Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled.
Restoration Systems shall submit to DWR annual monitoring reports no later than December 31st of each
year. Each report will document the success of the vegetation and any maintenance, supplemental
planting, or encroachment within the easement areas. Success criteria will be based on the survival of
planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre after five years of monitoring. The first annual
monitoring activities will commence at the end of the first growing season, at least five months after
planting has been completed.

Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1225)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 8
Parcel Maintenance
A remedial action plan will be developed and implemented with the approval of DWR in the event the
Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve success criteria as outlined above. Other
vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. In the event
that exotic invasive plant species require treatment, such species will be controlled by mechanical
(physical removal with the use of a chainsaw) and/or herbicide application in accordance with North
Carolina Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.

If mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must receive
approval by the DWR prior to any mowing activities within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the Tar-Pamlico buffers.
Failure to receive approval to mow within the Tar-Pamlico buffer as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0611 by
the DWR, could result in Tar-Pamlico buffer violations and violations of the conservation easement.

Long Term Management Plan
The conservation easement will preserve all areas and prohibit all use of the property inconsistent with
its use as mitigation, including any activity that would materially alter the biological integrity of the Parcel.
RS will transfer or assign the conservation easement and its interests in perpetuity to a qualified holder
under NC General Statute (“GS”) 121-34 et seq. and 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code prior to the
submittal of the Year 4 Monitoring Report. The holder shall be a land trust or stewardship program that
is accredited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission and/or has been approved by DWR. A land trust
must be certified under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Financial Assurance
As stated in the Elm Grove Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Banking Instrument, dated
to-be signed ;

RS will secure all financial assurances according to the MBI. No bond shall be less than $150,000 to
cover costs of construction and no less than $100,000 to cover monitoring expenses.

Monitoring bonds shall be renewed with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual
monitoring report. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports
are submitted without proof of bond renewals.

Mitigation Potential
Of the approximately 44.43 acres protected under the conservation easement, 42.149 acres or 1,836,020
square feet are anticipated to provide nutrient offset credit (Figure 6) equivalent to 95,805.977 lbs. of
nitrogen offset credit and 6,170.646 lbs. of phosphorous offset credit. The mitigation credit calculation
was derived based on Restoration Systems’ conceptual design for maximum ecological uplift. The
mitigation type and proposed amount of nutrient offset credit is summarized in Table 9. A complete DWR
Mitigation Credit Table is attached to this report.

Table 9 – Summary of Mitigation Credits
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Nutrient
Offset:
Nitrogen: 1,836,020 95,805.977
Phosphorus: 6,170.646

Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1225)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 9
Credit Release
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by DWR, the
mitigation credits associated with the Elm Grove Mitigation Site will be released as described in Table 10
below.

Table 10 – Elm Grove Credit Release Schedule for Nutrient Offset Credits
Task Project Milestone
% Credit
Available for
Sale
1
Instrument and BPDP Approved by DWR, Conservation Easement Recorded,
Financial Assurance Posted, and all utilities installed and in compliance with state
issued permits/authorizations where applicable
20
2 Site Earthwork, Planting and Installation of Monitoring Devices Completed and all
applicable permits obtained 20
3 Monitoring Financial Assurance Posted and Approval of As-Built Report 10
4 Monitoring Report #1: Approved by the DWR* & financial assurances renewed 10
5 Monitoring Report #2: Approved by the DWR* & financial assurances renewed 10
6 Monitoring Report #3: Approved by the DWR* & financial assurances renewed 10
7 MBI Item B (1) of Section X has been completed and approved by DWR. 5
No remaining credits will be released until the conservation easement has been assigned to
an approved land trust or stewardship
8 Monitoring Report #4: Approved by the DWR* & financial assurances renewed 5
9 Monitoring Report #5: Approved by the DWR* and final site visit by DWR has been
conducted 10
Total 100%
*DWR Approval provided upon a determination that the site is meeting success criteria contained within the
approved BPDP

References

Schafale, M. P. and Weakley, 2012. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.

USDA, Soil Conservation Service, 1974. Soil Survey of Edgecombe County, NC.

Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1225) Figures
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103
FIGURES, EXISTING CONDITION PHOTOS, DWR MITIGATION CREDIT TABLE

Figure 1 – Vicinity Map
Figure 2 – Service Area Map
Figure 3 – Site Map
Figure 4 – USGS Map
Figure 5 – NRCS Map
Figure 6 – Nutrient Offset Credit Map
Figure 7 – Monitoring Map
Historic Arial Imagery – EDR
Parcel Photos – Existing Conditions
DWR Mitigation Credit Table
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
1³0 21Miles
Edgecombe County, NC
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO,USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, KadasterNL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, ©
RJH
MARCH 2021
1:50,000
21-001
VICINITY MAP
ELM GROVENUTRIENT OFFSETMITIGATION BANKPARCEL
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
Legend
Elm Grove - Proposed Easement Boundary: 44.43 Ac.
Elm Grove - Bank Parcel Features
Elm Grove - Subject Fee-Simple Parcels
Tar-Pam 03 - Named Streams
Tar-Pamlico USGS 14-Digit HUCs
Tar-Pamlico USGS 8-Digit HUC Boundary, 03020103
Elm Grove Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
USGS 8-Digit HUC: 03020103USGS 14-Digit HUC: 03020103010010NC DWR Sub-Basin: 03-03-03
35.936380°, -77.495125°
Tar-Pamlico River
^_
Bank Parcel Location35.936380°, -77.495125°
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
2³0 105Miles
Edgecombe County, NC
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO,USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, KadasterNL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, ©
RJH
MARCH 2021
1:275,000
21-001
SERVICE AREAMAPTAR-PAM 03
ELM GROVENUTRIENT OFFSETMITIGATION BANKPARCEL
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
Legend
Tar-Pamlico USGS 8-Digit HUC Boundary, 03020103, Service Area for Nutrient Offset Credits
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
3³
Edgecombe County, NC
RJH
MARCH 2021
1:5,000
21-001
SITE MAP
2017 NC One MapImagery
ELM GROVENUTRIENT OFFSETMITIGATION BANKPARCEL
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
0 400 800 1,200 1,600200
Feet
XW
XW
XW
Feature B2 Start at
confluence with Feature C
Feature D2 Start
Feature A2 StartNC H
ighway
258
50'
50'
50'
50'
50'
50'
50'
50'
50'50'
50'
50'
50'
40'
40'
40'
30'
40'
40'
40'Fea
t
u
r
e

D
2
F
e
a
t
u
r
e

G
Fe
a
t
u
r
e

F
Feature
D
1
Feature B1
Feature B2Feature CF
e
a
t
u
r
e

A
1
F
e
a
t
u
r
e

A
2
Legend
Tar-Pamlico USGS 8-Digit HUC Boundary, 03020103
Elm Grove - Subject Fee-Simple Parcels
Elm Grove - Proposed Easement Boundary: 44.43 Ac.
XW NC DWR Stream Determinations
Elm Grove Features
Ditch
Stream
Site Feature not apart of Bank Parcel
2-Foot Contours (QL2 LiDAR)
Minor: 2-Foot Contours
Major: 10-Foot Contours
XW
XW
XWFeature B2 Subject at
Confluence with Feature C
35.93513°, -77.49448°
Feature D2: Subject
Feature A2 SubjectNC H
ighway
258
Feature D1: Not Subject
Feature D2 Start
At DWR Flag
35.93720°, -77.49239°
Feature B2 Subject
Pond 1: Not Subject
Feature A2 Start
At DWR Flag
35.93341°, -77.49446°
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
4³
Edgecombe County, NC
RJH
MARCH 2021
1:8,000
21-001
USGS MAP
2019Speed & Tarboro, NC
ELM GROVENUTRIENT OFFSETMITIGATION BANKPARCEL
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
Legend
Tar-Pamlico USGS 8-Digit HUC Boundary, 03020103
Elm Grove - Subject Fee-Simple Parcels
Elm Grove - Proposed Easement Boundary: 44.43 Ac.
XW NC DWR Stream Determinations
Elm Grove Features
Stream 0 400 800 1,200 1,600200
Feet
XW
XW
XW
Feature B2 Subject at
Confluence with Feature C
35.93513°, -77.49448°
Feature D2: Subject
Feature A2 SubjectNC H
ighway
258
Feature D1: Not Subject
Feature D2 Start
At DWR Flag
35.93720°, -77.49239°
Feature B2: Subject
Feature A2 Start
At DWR Flag
35.93341°, -77.49446°
Feature F: Not Subject
Feature E: Not present/Not Subject
Feature C: Subject
Feature B1: Subject
Feature A1: Subject
Feature G: Not Subject
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
5³
Edgecombe County, NC
RJH
MARCH 2021
1:8,000
21-001
NRCS SOILSURVEY MAP
1979Map No. 15
ELM GROVENUTRIENT OFFSETMITIGATION BANKPARCEL
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
Legend
Tar-Pamlico USGS 8-Digit HUC Boundary, 03020103
Elm Grove - Subject Fee-Simple Parcels
Elm Grove - Proposed Easement Boundary: 44.43 Ac.
XW NC DWR Stream Determinations 0 640 1,280 1,920 2,560320
Feet
XW
XW
XW
NC H
ighway
258
Feature C
Feature B2
Feature A1
Feature A2
Feature G
Feature D1Feature D2
Feature B1
No Credit Area - Easement does
not extend to Feature B2 and A2 TOBs
before DOT/Powerline ROW.
Insert 1
Insert 2
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
6³
Edgecombe County, NC
RJH
MARCH 2021
1:3,000
21-001
NUTRIENT OFFSET CREDITMAP
ELM GROVENUTRIENT OFFSETMITIGATION BANKPARCEL
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
Legend
Elm Grove - Subject Fee-Simple Parcels
Elm Grove - Proposed Easement Boundary: 44.43 Ac.
30-Foot-Powerline
XW NC DWR Stream Determinations
Elm Grove - Parcel Features, Top of Bank
TOB - 20 Feet
TOB - 30 Feet
TOB - 50 Feet
TOB - 100 Feet
TOB - 200 Feet
Elm Grove - Nutrient Offset Credit: 42.149 Ac.
Less than 20
20-29 Feet (75% Credit)
TOB - 100 Feet
101 - 200 Feet 0 250 500 750 1,000125
Feet
Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC)
TOB to 20-29' qualifies for 75% Nutrient Offset Credit
TOB-200 ft. = Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimumof 30 ft. from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft. from the TOB,and qualifies for 100% Nutrient Offset Credit.NC H
ighway
258

(60
-Foo
t
ROW
)30'
Powe
r
l
ine
ROWNC H
ighway
258

(60
-Foo
t
ROW
)30'
Powe
r
l
ine
ROW
Insert 1
Insert 2
NC H
ighway
258
Feature C
Feature B2
Feature A1
Feature A2
Feature G
Feature D2Feature D1
Feature B1
No Credit Area - Easement does
not extend to Feature B2 and A2 TOBs
before DOT/Powerline ROW.
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
7³
Edgecombe County, NC
RJH
MARCH 2021
1:3,000
21-001
MONITORINGMAP
ELM GROVENUTRIENT OFFSETMITIGATION BANKPARCEL
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
Legend
Elm Grove - Subject Fee-Simple Parcels
Elm Grove - Proposed Easement Boundary: 44.43 Ac.
Elm Grove - Parcel Features, Top of Bank
TOB - 20 Feet
TOB - 30 Feet
TOB - 50 Feet
TOB - 100 Feet
TOB - 200 Feet
Elm Grove- Vegetation Monitoring Plots (35 Total - 2%
of Credit Area)
Elm Grove - Nutrient Offset Credit: 42.149 Ac.
Less than 20
20-29 Feet (75% Credit)
TOB - 100 Feet
101 - 200 Feet 0 250 500 750 1,000125
Feet
Photo 1 –Feature D2
Photo 2 –Feature D2 to D1
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 Photo Log
Photo 3 –Features A & B
Photo 4 –Overview
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 Photo Log
The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
Elm Grove
4432 US-258
Tarboro, NC 27886
Inquiry Number:
January 26, 2021
6342644.5
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
2016 1"=625'Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP
2012 1"=625'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP
2009 1"=625'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP
2006 1"=625'Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP
1998 1"=625'Acquisition Date: January 01, 1998 USGS/DOQQ
1993 1"=625'Acquisition Date: January 01, 1993 USGS/DOQQ
1977 1"=625'Flight Date: March 01, 1977 USGS
1974 1"=625'Flight Date: April 01, 1974 USGS
1964 1"=625'Flight Date: April 01, 1964 USGS
1961 1"=625'Flight Date: August 17, 1961 USGS
1956 1"=625'Flight Date: December 26, 1956 USGS
1950 1"=625'Flight Date: November 21, 1950 USGS
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 01/26/21
Elm Grove
Site Name:Client Name:
Restoration Systems, LLC
4432 US-258 1101 Haynes Street
Tarboro, NC 27886 Raleigh, NC 27604
EDR Inquiry #6342644.5 Contact:JD Hamby
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
Search Results:
Year Scale Details Source
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2021 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are
the property of their respective owners.
6342644 5-page 2
6342644.5
2016
= 625'
6342644.5
2012
= 625'
6342644.5
2009
= 625'
6342644.5
2006
= 625'
6342644.5
1998
= 625'
6342644.5
1993
= 625'
6342644.5
1977
= 625'
6342644.5
1974
= 625'
6342644.5
1964
= 625'
6342644.5
1961
= 625'
6342644.5
1956
= 625'
6342644.5
1950
= 625'
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1225) Appendices
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103
APPENDICES

DWR Correspondence
NRCS Web Soil Survey Report
Environmental Records
USFWS – Species Report
SHPO Letter
FEMA Map

October 29, 2020

DWR Project # 2020-1125
Edgecombe County
Restoration Systems, LLC.
Barrett Jenkins
(sent via email at: [e-mail])

Subject: On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B
.0734)
Project Name: Elm Grove
Address / Location: 4432 US 258, Tarboro, NC 27886
Determination Date: October 28, 2020 Staff: Rick Trone

Dear Mr. Jenkins,

On October 28, 2020, Rick Trone of the Division of Water Resources conducted an on-site review of
features located on the subject property at the request of Restoration Systems, LLC to determine
the applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0734).

The enclosed map(s) depict the feature(s) evaluated. This information is also summarized in the
table below. Streams that are considered “Subject” have been located on the most recently
published NRCS Soil Survey of Edgecombe County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS
Topographic (at 1:24,000 scale) map(s), have been located on the ground at the site, and possess
characteristics that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered
“Not Subject” have been determined to not be at least intermittent or not present on the property
or not depicted on the required maps.

This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any
activity within buffers or within waters of the state. There may be other streams or features
located on the property that do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of the features
on the site may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and
subject to the Clean Water Act.

The following table addresses the features rated during the DWR site visit:





  
DWR # 2020-1125, Elm Grove
Edgecombe County
Page 2 of 4

Feature
ID E/I/P/Other
Subject
to Buffer
Rules
Start @ Stop @
Depicted
on
Soil Survey
Depicted on
USGS Topo
A1 Other No Top of feature A2 X
A2 I Yes
DWR flag @
approximately 35.93341
-77.49446
Culvert at Hwy 258 X
B1 Other No Top of feature Confluence w/feature
C X
B2 I Yes
Confluence w/feature C @
approximately 35.93513
-77.49448
Culvert at Hwy 258 X
C Other No Not subject throughout project area X
D1 Other No Top of feature
DWR flag @
approximately
35.93720 -77.49239
X X
D2 I Yes
DWR flag @
approximately 35.93720
-77.49239
Outside project area X X
E Other No Feature not present X
F Other No Not subject throughout project area X
G Other No Top of feature Feature D X
Pond 1 Other No Throughout project area X

This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by
the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this
letter to the Director in writing.

If sending via U.S. Postal Service:
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Supervisor
512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27604

This determination is final and binding as detailed above unless an appeal is requested within sixty
(60) calendar days.

This letter only addresses the features on the subject property and within the proposed project
easement and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. If you
have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact Rick Trone at (919)
707-3631 or [e-mail]. This determination is subject to review as provided in Articles
3 & 4 of G.S. 150B.






  
DWR # 2020-1125, Elm Grove
Edgecombe County
Page 3 of 4

Sincerely,

Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch

Enclosures: USGS Topographical Map, NRCS Soil Survey, Site Map
cc: 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch files






  
DWR # 2020-1125, Elm Grove Edgecombe County Page 4 of 4 Site Map Map provided by Restoration Systems, LLC 




  
Elm Grove
Edgecombe County, NC-DWR Project # 20-1225

:: LocaƟons are approximate
and are provided for refer-
ence only ::
NRCS Soil Survey Sheet 15
Edgecombe Co NC 1979
Legend:
-project boundary
A1: Not subject
B2: Subject at
confluence w/C
A2: Subject @
DWR flag
D2: Subject @
DWR flag
B1: Not subject
C: Not subject
D2
D1: Not subject
G: Not subject
F: Not subject
E: Not present/Not subject





  
Elm Grove
Edgecombe County, NC-DWR Project # 20-1225

:: LocaƟons are approximate
and are provided for refer-
ence only ::
USGS Topographical Map
Speed Quadrangle 2019
Legend:
-Project boundary
Pond 1: not subject
D2: Subject @
DWR flag
D1: Not subject





  

December 14, 2020

Barrett Jenkins DWR# 2020-1225
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
(via electronic mail: [e-mail])

Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset – Elm Grove Site
Near 4432 US 258, Tarboro, NC
Lat., Long. 35.935659, -77.495615
Tar-Pamlico 03020103

Dear Mr. Jenkins,

On September 15, 2020, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a
request from you on behalf of Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) for a site visit near the above-
referenced site in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020103.
The site visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed Easement Boundary, which is more accurately shown in the attached maps labeled “Elm
Grove Farm Site Overview” (Figure 1) prepared by RS and edited by DWR. On October 28, 2020,
Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with RS were also present.

Ms. Merritt’s evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200’ from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.

Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
6Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
A1
(Begins at
point shown
on map)
Ditch
>3’ depth
No Non-forested agricul tural
fields

No Yes

Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

A2
(begins at
DWR stream
call flag)
Stream Yes Non-forested agricul tural
fields and partially within a
DOT R.O.W

Yes
See note
Yes
See note
Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Note: No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W

B1 Ditch
>3’ depth
No Non-forested agricul tural
fields

No Yes Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

DocuSign Envelope ID: EC232A55-7B5F-4C59-9E82-854F6200B48C
Elm Grove Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
December 14, 2020

Page 2 of 3

1Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated October 29, 2020 using the 1:24,000 scale
quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this ru le.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4 Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a conservation easement established that includes the tops of
channel banks when being measured perpendicular and la ndward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian area.
6The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffe r
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).

Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1. Maps representing the proposal for the site are
attached to this letter and are initialed by Ms. Merritt on December 14, 2020. Substantial changes to
the proposed easement boundary could affect the Site’s potential to generate buffer and nutrient
offset credits.
Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
6Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
B2
(begins at
DWR stream
call flag)
Stream Yes Non-forested agricul tural
fields

Yes Yes Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

C Ditch
>3’ depth
No Non-forested agricul tural
fields

No Yes Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

D1

Ditch
>3’ depth
No Non-forested agricul tural
fields
No

No

Not hydrologically connected to a stream
D2
(begins at
DWR stream
call flag)
Stream Yes Non-forested agricul tural
fields with downstream
partially within a DOT
R.O.W

Yes
See note
Yes
See note
Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Note: No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W

E Not Present No N/A N/A N/A N/A

F Ditch
>3’ depth
No Non-forested agricul tural
fields

No Yes Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Easement must include all of Pond F to its
confluence with D2 to be creditable.

Pond F In-line pond No Non-forested agricultural
fields adjacent to a high
forested berm along tops of
banks on all sides.

No No No
G Ditch
>3’ depth
No Non-forested agricul tural
fields

No Yes Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

DocuSign Envelope ID: EC232A55-7B5F-4C59-9E82-854F6200B48C

Elm Grove Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
December 14, 2020

Page 3 of 3

This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.

All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.

This viability assessment will expire on December 14, 2022 or upon approval of a mitigation
plan by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.

Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,

Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: “Elm Grove Farm Site Overview” (Figure 1)

cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)

DocuSign Envelope ID: EC232A55-7B5F-4C59-9E82-854F6200B48C
DocuSign Envelope ID: EC232A55-7B5F-4C59-9E82-854F6200B48C
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Edgecombe
County, North
Carolina
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
February 15, 2021
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
Soil Map..................................................................................................................8
Soil Map................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11
Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Edgecombe County, North Carolina...............................................................13
AaA—Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes...............................13
CeB—Conetoe loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes.....................................14
Ro—Roanoke loam.....................................................................................15
StB—State loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes............................................17
TaB—Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes........................................18
Wh—Wehadkee silt loam............................................................................19
References............................................................................................................21
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
Custom Soil Resource Report
6
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Custom Soil Resource Report
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
39791003979300397950039797003979900398010039803003979100397930039795003979700397990039801003980300274300 274500 274700 274900 275100 275300 275500 275700 275900 276100
274100 274300 274500 274700 274900 275100 275300 275500 275700 275900 276100
35° 56' 32'' N 77° 30' 15'' W35° 56' 32'' N77° 28' 51'' W35° 55' 47'' N
77° 30' 15'' W35° 55' 47'' N
77° 28' 51'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
0 450 900 1800 2700
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Meters
Map Scale: 1:9,600 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:20,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 17, Jun 2, 2020
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 23, 2015—Feb
25, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
10
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
AaA Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3
percent slopes
116.1 33.8%
CeB Conetoe loamy sand, 0 to 4
percent slopes
22.5 6.6%
Ro Roanoke loam 78.3 22.8%
StB State loamy sand, 0 to 4
percent slopes
18.5 5.4%
TaB Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6
percent slopes
60.8 17.7%
Wh Wehadkee silt loam 47.3 13.8%
Totals for Area of Interest 343.4 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
Custom Soil Resource Report
11
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
12
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
AaA—Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 132pf
Elevation: 80 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Altavista and similar soils:91 percent
Minor components:9 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Altavista
Setting
Landform:Stream terraces
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Old loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 8 to 15 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 15 to 42 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 42 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding:Rare
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water capacity:High (about 9.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Roanoke, undrained
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Depressions on stream terraces, backswamps on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Flat
Down-slope shape:Concave
Custom Soil Resource Report
13
Across-slope shape:Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Tomotley, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Depressions on stream terraces, flats on stream terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Wehadkee, undrained
Percent of map unit:1 percent
Landform:Depressions on flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit:1 percent
Landform:Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional):Toeslope
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
CeB—Conetoe loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 132rl
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Conetoe and similar soils:90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Conetoe
Setting
Landform:Ridges on stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional):Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional):Crest
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Sandy and loamy alluvium and/or fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
Custom Soil Resource Report
14
E - 8 to 25 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 25 to 41 inches: sandy loam
BC - 41 to 48 inches: loamy sand
C - 48 to 90 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 5 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water capacity:Moderate (about 6.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Ro—Roanoke loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 132x5
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Roanoke, undrained, and similar soils:85 percent
Roanoke, drained, and similar soils:15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Roanoke, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Depressions on stream terraces, backswamps on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Flat
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Old clayey alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
BAg - 7 to 10 inches: loam
Btg - 10 to 43 inches: clay
BCg - 43 to 52 inches: clay
Custom Soil Resource Report
15
Cg - 52 to 80 inches: gravelly sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:OccasionalNone
Frequency of ponding:Rare
Available water capacity:Moderate (about 8.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Roanoke, Drained
Setting
Landform:Depressions on stream terraces, backswamps on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Flat
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Old clayey alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
BAg - 7 to 10 inches: loam
Btg - 10 to 43 inches: clay
BCg - 43 to 52 inches: clay
Cg - 52 to 80 inches: gravelly sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:OccasionalNone
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water capacity:Moderate (about 8.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
16
StB—State loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 132x6
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
State and similar soils:75 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of State
Setting
Landform:Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Old loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: loamy sand
E - 6 to 10 inches: loamy fine sand
Bt1 - 10 to 38 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt2 - 38 to 42 inches: fine sandy loam
C - 42 to 90 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding:Rare
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water capacity:Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
17
TaB—Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 132x7
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Tarboro and similar soils:80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Tarboro
Setting
Landform:Ridges on stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional):Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional):Crest
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 9 inches: loamy sand
C1 - 9 to 48 inches: sand
C2 - 48 to 99 inches: gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:Rare
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water capacity:Very low (about 2.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
18
Wh—Wehadkee silt loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 132xh
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Wehadkee, undrained, and similar soils:80 percent
Wehadkee, drained, and similar soils:10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wehadkee, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Depressions on flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
Bg - 7 to 58 inches: loam
Cg - 58 to 84 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water capacity:High (about 10.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Wehadkee, Drained
Setting
Landform:Depressions on flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Custom Soil Resource Report
19
Parent material:Loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
Bg - 7 to 58 inches: loam
Cg - 58 to 84 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water capacity:High (about 10.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
20
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
21
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
Custom Soil Resource Report
22
FORM-LBD-CCA
®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Elm Grove
4432 US-258
Tarboro, NC 27886
Inquiry Number: 6342644.2s
January 26, 2021
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 10
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5
Physical Setting Source Map A-12
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-14
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC6342644.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6342644.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
4432 US-258
TARBORO, NC 27886
COORDINATES
35.9372100 - 35˚ 56’ 13.95’’Latitude (North):
77.4921700 - 77˚ 29’ 31.81’’Longitude (West):
Zone 18Universal Tranverse Mercator:
275181.2UTM X (Meters):
3979654.5UTM Y (Meters):
47 ft. above sea levelElevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
5944982 SPEED, NCTarget Property Map:
2013Version Date:
5945661 TARBORO, NCWest Map:
2013Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
20140618, 20141006, 20140706Portions of Photo from:
USDASource:
6342644.2s Page 2
1 MURPHY BROWN SPILL NC HWY258/122 LAST Higher 2048, 0.388, South
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
4432 US-258
TARBORO, NC 27843
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6342644.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6342644.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
LCID Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6342644.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
IMD Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6342644.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS ASBESTOS
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP Animal Operation Permits Listing
SEPT HAULERS Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System
CCB Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
PCSRP Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6342644.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST: A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
A review of the LAST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/30/2020 has revealed that there is 1 LAST
site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
MURPHY BROWN SPILL NC HWY258/122 S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.388 mi.) 1 8
Close Out: 05/22/2013
Incident Number: 92352
Current Status: C
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6342644.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
4 0
4040404040
4 0 4040
40
4 0
404
0404040404040
4 0
40
4040404040404 00 4
0
404 04040
404040404 0 4 040404040
4040
4
0
40
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
40
4040440404
0
40404040404 0
40
4040
40404040
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL LIENS
Federal Delisted NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL
Federal CERCLIS list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF
Federal RCRA generators list
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-VSQG
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROLS
Federal ERNS list
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ERNS
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NC HSDS
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500OLI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LCID
TC6342644.2s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500LAST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST TRUST
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP
State and tribal Brownfields sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL
Local Land Records
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2
Records of Emergency Release Reports
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IMD
TC6342644.2s Page 5
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 90
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 80
Other Ascertainable Records
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RMP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FINDS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ECHO
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001AIRS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ASBESTOS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Financial Assurance
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPDES
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001AOP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SEPT HAULERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MINES MRDS
TC6342644.2s Page 6
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CCB
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PCSRP
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA HWS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LF
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LUST
1 0 0 1 0 0 0- Totals --
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC6342644.2s Page 7
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
9194182148Telephone:
Katie ElmerContact Person:
Murphy BrownCompany:
RALRegion:
HMMRegional Officer Project Mgr:
Not reportedTestlat:
35.92596 -77.49136Lat/Long Decimal:
Not reportedLat/Long:
FalseValid:
NError Code:
0Error Flag:
FalseRPOP:
FalseRPOW:
0Reel Num:
0CD Num:
FalseRPL:
3PETOPT:
Not reportedRBCA GW:
CCurrent Status:
0Release Detection:
Not reportedLUR Filed:
NoFlag1:
NoFlag:
UnknownMTBE1:
NoMTBE:
Not reportedLand Use:
Not reportedSite Risk Reason:
Not reportedPhase Of LSA Req:
Not reportedSite Priority:
Not reportedNORR Issue Date:
Not reportedNOV Issue Date:
Not reportedCorrective Action Plan Type:
LRisk Class Based On Review:
LRisk Classification:
CCommercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
0# Of Supply Wells:
RTank Regulated Status:
Not reportedLevel Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
05/22/2013Close Out:
Not reportedClosure Request:
10/20/2011Cleanup:
10/10/2011Date Occur:
10/11/2011Date Reported:
PProduct Type:
12Source Type:
GWContamination Type:
92352Incident Number:
RA-92374UST Number:
Not reportedFacility ID:
PRINCEVILLE, NC 27886City,State,Zip:
NC HWY258/122Address:
MURPHY BROWN SPILLName:
LAST:
2048 ft.
0.388 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
48 ft.

1/4-1/2 PRINCEVILLE, NC 27886
South NC HWY258/122 N/A
1 LASTMURPHY BROWN SPILL S113813415
TC6342644.2s Page 8
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Signed:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
Not reportedIncident Phase:
Not reportedLast Modified:
DSource Type:
Not reportedSource:
Not reportedCause:
9Release Code:
Not reportedPirf/Min Soil:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Not reported7#5 Min Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
Not reportedSamples Taken By:
Not reportedWells Affected Number:
NWells Affected Y/N:
Not reportedPriority Update:
Not reportedSite Priority:
8Location:
Not reportedType:
8Operation Type:
4Ownership:
Not reportedOwner/Operator:
Rupture of saddle tank on truck, spilling 50-60 gallons.Description Of Incident:
10/11/2011Date Reported:
10/10/2011Date Occurred:
92352Facility Id:
PIRF:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
action levels.
confirmation samples taken on 12/06/2011, with results below state
10/10, 10/11, 10/20/2011.Excavation conducted 10/20/2011, soil
of Water Quality. Spill also occurred to soil. Intial sampling,
say-probably should have been reported to Surface Water of the Div.
of an accident.Pads and booms placed - consultant- doesen’t
50 to 60 gallons of diesel fuel released from saddle tank, as resultComments:
Not reportedRP County:
Waverly, VARP City,St,Zip:
434 West Main StRP Address:
MURPHY BROWN SPILL (Continued) S113813415
TC6342644.2s Page 9
ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 0 records.NO SITES FOUNDTC6342644.2s Page 10
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-1
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2019
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC6342644.2s Page GR-2
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6342644.2s Page GR-3
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 08/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6342644.2s Page GR-4
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 09/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 09/10/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 09/11/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6342644.2s Page GR-5
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site (TDDSS) Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site’s responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 09/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LCID: Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notification facilities (under 2 acres in
size) in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 04/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6342644.2s Page GR-6
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 04/15/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6342644.2s Page GR-7
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 07/21/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/04/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020
Number of Days to Update: 57
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 08/12/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6342644.2s Page GR-8
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 09/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6342644.2s Page GR-9
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 09/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 09/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TC6342644.2s Page GR-10
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 09/16/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 137
Source: EPA, Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
TC6342644.2s Page GR-11
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 03/18/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 03/18/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Local Land Records
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 09/20/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
TC6342644.2s Page GR-12
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/21/2021
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 09/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 69
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TC6342644.2s Page GR-13
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 09/21/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/06/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6342644.2s Page GR-14
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/21/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
TC6342644.2s Page GR-15
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/06/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2019
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6342644.2s Page GR-16
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 08/05/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 59
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2020
Number of Days to Update: 42
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-17
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Telephone: Varies
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/20/2020
Number of Days to Update: 151
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
TC6342644.2s Page GR-18
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 08/08/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/06/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/20/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-19
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 11/24/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-20
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/16/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/10/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 11/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/26/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2018
Number of Days to Update: 71
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 10/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 11/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/13/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-21
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 08/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 09/10/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/04/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020
Number of Days to Update: 57
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-22
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/04/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site (SLAS) and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility (SDTF) sites in North Carolina. The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 120
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TC6342644.2s Page GR-23
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) in North
Carolina, in point data form. The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version: 02/27/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCSRP: Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum-contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 07/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-24
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014
Number of Days to Update: 196
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013
Number of Days to Update: 172
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6342644.2s Page GR-25
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 08/10/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2020
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 72
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019
Number of Days to Update: 53
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2019
Number of Days to Update: 69
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6342644.2s Page GR-26
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
TC6342644.2s Page GR-27
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-28
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TC6342644.2s Page A-1
geologic strata.
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
2013Version Date:
5945661 TARBORO, NCWest Map:
2013Version Date:
5944982 SPEED, NCTarget Property Map:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
47 ft. above sea levelElevation:
3979654.5UTM Y (Meters):
275181.2UTM X (Meters):
Zone 18Universal Tranverse Mercator:
77.49217 - 77˚ 29’ 31.81’’Longitude (West):
35.93721 - 35˚ 56’ 13.96’’Latitude (North):
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
TARBORO, NC 27886
4432 US-258
ELM GROVE
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM®
TC6342644.2s Page A-2
should be field verified.
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 47 ft.
North South
West East5149494852504948514751514950515050524639393935363135504647505151515151505050General WNWGeneral Topographic Gradient:
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6342644.2s Page A-3
Not Reported
GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION
GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapSPEED
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720475900K
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720485000K
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720484000K
Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720474900K
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
and bodies of water).
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6342644.2s Page A-4
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Stratified SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra:
TertiarySystem:
MioceneSeries:
TmCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
2
353
4
1
3
2
4
1
1
0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles
TC6342644.2s Page A-6
Min: 3.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 0.42
Max: 141
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysandy loam68 inches53 inches 4
Min: 3.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 0.42
Max: 141
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayclay53 inches14 inches 3
Min: 3.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 0.42
Max: 141
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayloam14 inches 7 inches 2
Min: 3.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 0.42
Max: 141
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayloam 7 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 15 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: All hydric
Poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class:
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group:
loamSoil Surface Texture:
RoanokeSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 1
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6342644.2s Page A-7
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 14
Max: 42
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysandy loam59 inches42 inches 4
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 14
Max: 42
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysandy clay loam42 inches14 inches 3
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 14
Max: 42
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayfine sandy loam14 inches 7 inches 2
Min: 3.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 14
Max: 42
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayfine sandy loam 7 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 46 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Moderately well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group:
fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture:
AltavistaSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 2
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6342644.2s Page A-8
3.6
Max: 6 Min:
Min: 42
Max: 141
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularloamy sand48 inches40 inches 4
3.6
Max: 6 Min:
Min: 42
Max: 141
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularsandy loam40 inches25 inches 3
3.6
Max: 6 Min:
Min: 42
Max: 141
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularloamy sand25 inches 7 inches 2
3.6
Max: 6 Min:
Min: 42
Max: 141
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularloamy sand 7 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
excessively drained sands and gravels.
Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group:
loamy sandSoil Surface Texture:
ConetoeSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 3
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6342644.2s Page A-9
Min: 4.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 141
Max: 141
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
sand.
Poorly graded
Clean Sands,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularloamy sand 9 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class:
excessively drained sands and gravels.
Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group:
loamy sandSoil Surface Texture:
TarboroSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 4
3.6
Max: 6 Min:
Min: 42
Max: 141
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularsand89 inches48 inches 5
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6342644.2s Page A-10

> 153 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group:
loamy sandSoil Surface Texture:
StateSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 5
Min: 4.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 141
Max: 141
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
sand.
Poorly graded
Clean Sands,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granulargravelly sand98 inches48 inches 3
Min: 4.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 141
Max: 141
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
sand.
Poorly graded
Clean Sands,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularsand48 inches 9 inches 2
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6342644.2s Page A-11
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
1.000State Database
Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS
1.000Federal USGS
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
Min: 3.6
Max: 6.5
Min: 14
Max: 141
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularloamy sand90 inches44 inches 3
Min: 3.6
Max: 6.5
Min: 14
Max: 141
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularsandy clay loam44 inches 9 inches 2
Min: 3.6
Max: 6.5
Min: 14
Max: 141
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularloamy sand 9 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6342644.2s Page A-12
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
No Wells Found
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
No PWS System Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
No Wells Found
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.40404040404040
4 0 4040
40
4 04040404040404040
4 0
40
4040404040404 00 40
404
0
4040
40404040404 0
4 040404040
4040
4
0
40NC
TC6342644.2s Page A-14
NC10003201Edr id:3201Site id:
CSig:SECONDARYQuality type:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAINSitename:51.57Acres:
NC10003201NC_SNHA
NC10003200Edr id:3200Site id:
CSig:PRIMARYQuality type:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAINSitename:276Acres:
NC10003200NC_SNHA
NC10003199Edr id:3199Site id:
CSig:SECONDARYQuality type:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAINSitename:53.3Acres:
NC10003199NC_SNHA
NC10003198Edr id:3198Site id:
CSig:PRIMARYQuality type:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAINSitename:374.46Acres:
NC10003198NC_SNHA
NC10003195Edr id:3195Site id:
CSig:PRIMARYQuality type:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAINSitename:175.37Acres:
NC10003195NC_SNHA
NC10001668Edr id:1668Site id:
CSig:Not ReportedQuality type:
FISHING CREEK FLOODPLAIN FORESTSitename:964.87Acres:
NC10001668NC_SNHA
NC50017021Edr id:
101714Gisid:EEostat:
MPrecision1:AElclass:
NC50017021NC_NHEO
Map ID
Direction
Distance EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6342644.2s Page A-15
NC10003438Edr id:3438Site id:
CSig:PRIMARYQuality type:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAINSitename:199.09Acres:
NC10003438NC_SNHA
NC10003420Edr id:3420Site id:
ASig:Not ReportedQuality type:
FISHING CREEK AQUATIC HABITATSitename:815.33Acres:
NC10003420NC_SNHA
NC10003336Edr id:3336Site id:
BSig:Not ReportedQuality type:
LOWER TAR RIVER AQUATIC HABITATSitename:2082.38Acres:
NC10003336NC_SNHA
NC10003204Edr id:3204Site id:
CSig:SECONDARYQuality type:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAINSitename:278.28Acres:
NC10003204NC_SNHA
NC10003203Edr id:3203Site id:
CSig:PRIMARYQuality type:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAINSitename:106.66Acres:
NC10003203NC_SNHA
NC10003202Edr id:3202Site id:
CSig:SECONDARYQuality type:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAINSitename:18.36Acres:
NC10003202NC_SNHA
Map ID
Direction
Distance EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6342644.2s Page A-16
Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedBasement
Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor
0%0%100%0.200 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor
% >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea
Number of sites tested: 4
Federal Area Radon Information for EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Federal EPA Radon Zone for EDGECOMBE County: 3
AREA RADON INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
®
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOW Information SystemR
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC6342644.2s Page PSGR-1
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site’s significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC6342644.2s Page PSGR-2
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6342644.2s Page PSGR-3
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
February 15, 2021
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0675
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456
Project Name: Elm Grove

Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456   2

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].
02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456   3

▪
Attachment(s):
Official Species List
02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456   1

Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]
02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456   2

Project Summary
Consultation Code:04EN2000-2021-SLI-0675
Event Code:04EN2000-2021-E-01456
Project Name:Elm Grove
Project Type:LAND - RESTORATION / ENHANCEMENT
Project Description:Nutrient Offset Project
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.937039300000066,-77.49089723503215,14z
Counties:Edgecombe County, North Carolina
02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456   3

1.
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Proposed
Threatened
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Proposed
Endangered
1
02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456   4

Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Proposed
Threatened
Tar River Spinymussel Elliptio steinstansana
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1392
Endangered
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Threatened
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

January 25, 2021

Renee Gledhill-Earley,
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
109 East Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Sent electronically to [e-mail]

Re: Elm Grove Mitigation Project, Edgecombe County, NC

Dear Renee,

The purpose of this letter is to request written concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO) for the Elm Grove Mitigation Project in Edgecombe County, a Nutrient Off-set Mitigation Bank
servicing the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. Please review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge
with respect to SHPO from a potential stream restoration project depicted on the attached mapping.

Project Name: Elm Grove Mitigation Project
Project Location: 4432 US-258 Tarboro, NC 27886
Project Contact: JD Hamby, Restoration Systems LLC, 1101 Haynes St. Suite 211,
Raleigh, NC 27604

Project Description: The project has been identified for the purpose of providing in-kind mitigation for
unavoidable nutrient loading impacts. Permits from the NC DWR will be obtained to restore riparian buffer
areas that drain into waters of the US. Soil and erosion control permits will also be obtained. The project
encompasses 53 acres of agricultural fields, currently used for row crops. All 53 acres of riparian buffer area
will be replanted in native hardwoods.

The term “cultural resources” refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, structures, or artifact
deposits over 50 years old. “Significant” cultural resources are those that are eligible or potentially
eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Evaluations of site significance are made
with reference to the eligibility criteria of the National Register (36 CFR 60) and in consultation with the
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).

Field visits were conducted in the fall of 2020 to conduct evaluations for presence of structures or
features that may be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. One structure was identified
within the parcel boundaries, but not withing the proposed conservation easement boundaries, that
may be eligible for the National Register, ED0774 | Knight-Jenkins House. This frame farmhouse will not
be impacted nor disturbed during the course of our project, and a buffer around the structure will be

implemented in the field during the planting process. In addition to field reviews for historically relevant
structures, a records search was conducted at the SHPO office to determine if documented occurrences
of historic structures or artifacts occur within, or adjacent to the Site. The SHPO records identify the
Knight-Jenkins features within the parcel boundaries and five features within a 1.0-mile radius of the
Site.
• ED0464 | Batts House and Outbuildings (NR: 2006),
• ED0775 | Petway-Moore House (Gone)
• DOE : ED0442 : Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Bridge
• SD : ED0771 : Purvis Tenant House (Gone)
• SD : ED0795 : Riverside Hotel (Gone)
Typical SHPO coordination will occur prior to construction activities to determine if any significant
cultural resources are present; however, no constraints are expected at this time. We thank you in
advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact me with any questions
that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.

Yours truly,

RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC

JD Hamby
Project Manager
[e-mail]
919-755-9490

Attachments – USGS Map, Existing Conditions
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user
community, Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
Legend
Elm Grove Site Easement Area
Farfield Farm Parcels
ED 07 74 -
Kn ight-Jenkins House
1 in = 362 ft qRESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC1101 HAYNES ST, SUITE 211RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE : [phone]FAX : [phone]
This map and all data contained within are supplied as is with no warranty. Restoration Systems, LLC expressly disclaims responsibility for damages or liability from any claims that may arise out of t he use or misuse of this map. It is the sole responsibility of the user to determine if the data on this map is compatible with the user’s needs. This map was not created as survey data, nor should it be used as such. It is the user’s responsibility to obt ain proper survey data, prepared by a licensed surveyor, where required by law.
SCALE:
DATE: 06-2020
Coordinate System:NAD_1983_SP_NC_FIPS_3200_Ft.
Aerial Imagery: (c) ESRI
0 180 360 540 72090
Feet
SITE: PUNGO
Elm Grove Farm Nutrient Offset SiteViability Area MapEdgecombe County, NC
53 acres under Conservation Esement
~2 acres we would pay for butnot under Conservation Easement
National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250
Feet
Ü
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD AREAS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A, V, A99
With BFE or DepthZone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
Regulatory Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mileZone X
Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood HazardZone X
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
Levee. See Notes.Zone X
Area with Flood Risk due to LeveeZone D
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X
Area of Undetermined Flood HazardZone D
Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
17.5 Water Surface Elevation
Coastal Transect
Coastal Transect Baseline
Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Effective LOMRs
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
Digital Data Available
No Digital Data Available
Unmapped
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 2/15/2021 at 11:06 AM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective information may change or
become superseded by new data over time.
This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for
unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.
Legend
OTHER AREAS OF
FLOOD HAZARD
OTHER AREAS
GENERAL
STRUCTURES
OTHER
FEATURES
MAP PANELS
8
B 20.2
The pin displayed on the map is an approximate
point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
1:6,000
77°30'5"W 35°56'28"N
77°29'28"W 35°55'59"N
Basemap: USGS National Map: Orthoimagery: Data refreshed October, 2020