20120693 Ver 1_401 Application_20120712

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC
524 S NEW HOPE ROAD
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 27610
919 212 1760 FAX [phone]
www environmentalservlcesmc corn
July 12 2012
Mr Ian McMillan
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Coordinator
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699 1650
Re 401 WQC Submittal for Perimeter Park Phase 3
Wake County NC
Mr McMillan
20120693
ESI is pleased to submit this applicalton to you on behalf of the applicant Duke Realty After your
review please feel free to contact me if you wish to discuss the proposed project or if you have any
questions
Thank you for your assistance and I look forward to working with you on the permit process
Warm regards
Environmental Services Inc
Y#d4---
Jeff Harbour PWS
Senior Manager
Enclosure
Jut 1 6 1012
DENR WS ATER W �E1
Wetlands & Branch
FLORIDA GEORGIA NORTH CAROLINA SOUTH CAROLINA MARYLAND OHIO

o�ot W At�19
h r
O Y
2 ®12 ®693
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 13 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A Apphcant Information
1
Processing
1 a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
lb Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 39 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
If
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu
fee program
❑ Yes
❑ No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Perimeter Park Phase III
2b
County
Wake
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Morrisville
2d
Subdivision name
Perimeter Park
D R R(�9;,B
�11�
2e NCDOT only T I P or state
project no
3
Owner Information
6 ZQ�2
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Duke Realty Limited Partnership ju-
3b
Deed Book and Page No
Deed Book 12411 Page 2656 DENR WAt E wafiea Branch
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
David Parker
3d
Street address
3005 Carrington Mill Blvd Suite 100
3e
City state zip
Morrisville NC 27560
3f
Telephone no
919 -461 8000
3g
Fax no
919- 461 -8080
3h
Email address
david parker @dukerealty com
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑ Other specify
4b
Name
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
4d
Street address
4e
City state zip
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Jeff Harbour
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Environmental Services Inc
5c
Street address
524 South New Hope Road
5d
City state zip
Raleigh NC 27610
5e
Telephone no
919 212 1760
5f
Fax no
919 212 1707
5g
Email address
(harbour @esmc cc
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

B Project Information and Prior Project History
1 Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
Wake County PIN 0756 -09 1850
1 b Site coordinates (►n decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 8651 Longitude 788291
(DD DDDDDD) ( DD DDDDDD)
1 c Property size
75 5 acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to
Stirrup Iron Creek
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
Class C NSW
2c River basin
Neuse
3 Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The project area is currently undeveloped with several at grade dirt roads and upland cleared areas The wooded areas
are vegetated with a mixture of hardwoods and pines Successional communities are prevalent in those upland disturbed
areas Land use in the vicinity is primarily commercial office park and light industry
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
Approximately 1 0 acre
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
Approximately 2 500 linear feet of perennial and intermittent channel
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose is to extend Carrington Mill Blvd through the Permiter Park Phase III property and connect to Slater Road
This extension will allow this final phase of Perimeter Park to be open to future commercial development consistent with
the remainder of the office park The project also includes construction of the Mill Spring Greenway inside Perimeter Park
proper The greenway will cross two stream channels but will not incur any impacts other than buffers
3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used
Carrington Mill Boulevard will be extended through Perimeter park Phase III to Slater Road The road extension will
cross at UT of Stirrup Iron Creek This stream crossing cannot be completely avoided but impacts have been minimized
Mill Spring Greenway is also proposed inside of Perimeter Park This 10 foot wide greenway path will cross two small
streams with concrete spans and no impacts below the ordinary high water line will occur Typical construction
equipment will be used during this construction project such as grades excavators back hoes dump trucks pavers etc
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the pasty
® Yes ❑ No ❑Unknown
Comments A new delineation was completed by ESI in
September 2011
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type
❑ preliminary ® Final
of determination was made
4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company Environmental Services
Name (if known) Jeff Harbour & Robert Turnbull
Inc
Other
4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
AID 201200833 for Corps JD
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5 Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions
Nationwide permits (199821022 199821204 199821205) were previously issued by the Army Corps of Engineers to Mr
Robert Yelverton of Weeks /Lichtm for a 160 acre property Asa result of these permits the existing culverted crossing on
Carrington Mill Blvd Oust past Tekalec) was constructed These permits were to a different property owner and for a
completely different property configuation at that time Since then Duke Realty has acquired the property currently
depicted in this application and is planning to construct Phase III of Perimeter Park ESI submitted this documentation to
Mr Jamie Shem of the Corps after the delineation was completed and he indicated that this current request should be
viewed as a single and complete project due to the history of this particular site
6 Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b If yes explain
see above
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of Jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps 404 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404 other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
road fill
headwater forest
® Yes
El No
® Corps
® DWQ
0 004
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g Total wetland impacts
0 004
2h Comments
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of Jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number
(PER) or
(Corps 404 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
culvert
UT to Stirrup Iron
® PER
® Corps
20
107
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
107
31 Comments
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P)
or Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f Total open water impacts
0
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed the complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below if any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
® Neuse ❑ Tar Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet )
(square feet)
or Temporary T
impact
required?
131 ®P ❑ T
road
crossing
UT to Stirrup Iron Creek
❑ Yes
® No
8515
5279
B2 ® P ❑ T
greenway
UT to Stirrup Iron Creek
® Yes s
2001
1325
B3 ® P ❑ T
greenway
UT to Stirrup Iron Creek
® Yes s
2115
1147
6h Total buffer impacts
12631
7751
61 Comments
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
la Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The applicant has reviewed several designs for the extension of Carrington Mill Blvd and this alignment best meets their
purpose and need Additionally the applicant requested and received approval from the Town of Morrisville to construct the
crossing in a narrower manner eliminating a normally required landscaping median This allowance by the town thus reduced
the amount of proposed stream impact to just 107 feet Without this minimization effort the crossing would have been closer
to 140 feet of impact
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
All required federal state and local regulations will be followed with redards to NPDES Erosion and Sediment Control plans
and stormwater management plans Silt fences will be used to prevent sediment from entering undisturbed buffers streams
and wetlands
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b if yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund)
6h Comments The road crossing is less than 150 linear feet and less that 1/3 acre of buffer is disturbed
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why
Comments Level spreaders are proposed at all storm outlets
® Yes ❑ No
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
24%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative description of the plan
Wet retention basins are being provided to provide stormwater quality and quantity control for the proposed roadway
improvments
® Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government s jurisdiction is this project?
Morrisville
® Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a
Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
® Session Law 2006 246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5 DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

F
Supplementary Information
1
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
Y
❑ es
No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b
If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c
If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments
2
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after the fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c
If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
if you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description
4
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility
generated
municial sewer services will be provided
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
0 Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
0 Yes ® No
impacts?
Sc If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
ESI has evaluated the property for the presence of threatened or endangered species including a query of NCNHP
records No occurrences were identified onsite The site also does not contain any areas of Critical Habitat
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCDOT list of waterbodies that are considered EFH
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur In or near an area that the state federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO Clearance letter attached
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b if yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements Compensatory flood plain volume is being provided to offset any fill
being placed in the flood plain By keeping the flood volume the same this is a no rise crossing
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map
Dpoi A po-lcsK
y —
-7 ri 1 a
Applicant/Agent s Printed Name
Applicant/Agent s Signature
Date
(Agents signature is valid only d an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

North Carohna Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M Bartos Administrator
Beverly halves Perdue Governor
Linda A Carlisle Secretary
Jeffrey J Crow Deputy Secretary
May 30 2012
Tem Russ
Environmental Services Inc
524 South New Hope Road
Raleigh NC 27610
Re Perimeter Park — Phase 3 Tract 7 Durham and Wake Counties ER 12 0712
Dear Ms Russ
Thank you for your letter of April 27 2012 concerning the above project
Off ce of Archives and Mstory
Dtvis on of Fhstoncal Resources
DaN td Brook, Director
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project Therefore we have no comment on the project as proposed
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration If you have questions concerning the above comment
please contact Renee Gledhill Earley environmental review coordinator at 919 807 6579 In all future
communication concerning this project please cite the above referenced tracking number
Sincerely
6WRamona M Bartos U
Loc boa 109 East Jon s Street Raleigh NC 27601 Madwg Address 4617 Mad S rvic Cente Raleigh NC 27699 4617 Telephone /Fax [phone] 6599

m
W2 !nix
72
fL
44
K
A0
FYI
"AW
9 OWN
Nf all's 16 k
't4
00
rl :t
10
Rl'
edgw
zo
dl
Aid
I No
Wilt
a 14 ANI'lo'n
XWO
=lWam
I

_ GrC
Cr-C 12 N
CK
1 1 '
�L. 1� v'�5� • '>
Crt
Q l „ If
f MfC
<u CrE rB2 \�\
it
MfC Y r s-MYD
Cre t"b MyC2 L" ++ C
MfO t Crc t 1
r C[B2 Car
V
s =,✓ , 6Ci� fC' CrE
SF CrC `'< MYC2
E WSC 'Cr
_ j.. Mf ''� • C MYB2 Cr62
r
CE PkC t
CfB2 M D
y A
C2 � w
WSW , . � wryc
GiC2 r M C� �4
M 'r
B `1 Cr
MyD %
Gr Gu WS92 Ws '� MYC2 AfA%
WvD3 CrB2 MY82 CrC
sC2 yC2 c � , WSM
c� NN
MYB2 ....
►� ?. ,� `�� r mall Grote
MyC2 U Cm Ct8 i� n rtt► MCP
Cat.
MY82 -
CrB2 MY82 i4 Durham Soil Mapping Units
:} ! o'•.: MyB2 Ch Chewacla and silt loam
MfC
"nyodan -Urban land complex, 0 -10% slopes
WsE White Store sandy loam, 10 -25% slopes
QProject Boundary MY0 Wake Soil Mapping Units
Cm Chewacla Soils
Q NRCS Soil Boundary CrB Creedmoor sandy loam, 2 -6% slopes
0 500 1000 ' ' CrB2 Creedmoor sandy loam, 2 -6% slopes, eroded
CrC2 Creedmoor sandy loam, 6 -10% slopes, eroded
Feet S o.. °.. CrE Creedmoor sandy loam, 10 -20% slopes
Source: NRCS Soil boundary provided by Wake MyC2 Mayodon silt loam, thin, 6 -10% slopes M D Ma 0
County, 1970 and Durham County, 1970, Project - Y y don silt loam, thin, 10 -15% slopes, eroded
Boundary provided by Wake County GIs, 2012. WSB2 White Store Sandy loam, 2 -6% slopes, eroded
Disclaimer. Information represented on (his map was derived WSC White Store sandy loam, 6 -10% slopes
from secondary data sources and is to be used for general -.--2 White Store sandy p loam, 6-10% slopes, eroded
planning purposes only. No warranties or representations of
accuracy are expressed or implied. Wy Worsham sandy loam
c
FP
ENVIRONMENTAL Project: ER11126.00
SERVICES, INC. NRCS Soils Date: July 2012
524 New Hope Road Perimeter Park - Phase III
Raleigh, gh, N NC 27610
(919)212 -1760 Drwn /Chkd: KT /JH
e M,,
(919) 212 -1707 FAX Wake County, North Carolina
wwwenvironmentelservices. com - Figure: 2
P: \GeoGra \Projects\2011 \126 \GIS\soils.mxd Date: 7/12/2012 1:24:56 PM

9
U,
a.
W o
> z EL
U 0
OUP
u
C� cr
ti
CL
AVO
A
•
TWWs i
I
�. -.aW
., a "
4 IM
1.
6
if
�► t `A �.. 1. � t •y . y
At
a %SO
t —
vo
4-4
-SiL 4p.
ev
s
J.
All
ow -
— o!-%& -

9
Z
LM
LL C D
LLI
U
U ^ p V S 7 �? to u to
QQ D
N
° 1 n Off a e 01300 ■
i C I + V I n O
cP O
n W 1I g O a W I g g O O
V-1, a \ Z till 4N
cy O A� o 1 O LLJ
g x>
W z o W
Z �/
v 7
LLJ
9
W I W s t
CL
ee
LO
C4 m
to N Nog
to
F^
/
Rtt'r
—5ghl
U) t
Z —SIR 0 i� 1 \y shah &tn >nsn >n
♦ —�
- - -- - -- mac- { A
IS
—414,1 Wa S411 10 50 m fP'. yam+ --4- t00 »N10 -K00\ -P\ NW -4'VO -W \500 RA M Wel\o

L
f
40-
-,,-t3m4 U.5l590y"i� 220E
uS
5
14
Mf
E4
L
l
Z �
AA <4 ?- 31,pg.,z
MINIMUM
13 z
-40.2129 I.w IN
Y
CA
U 3
8g
0
C7
I 1
_ L
I I
/307
I
T
I \����� ►.J I I i � i �I I
I
/ I I oe*m 37A31
L I-
SB 'S003 I
1 �
I I
� - - - - -I - - -- I
� • ��,y. I I I I I I
✓ I I
I I
18r ST
k` 720 I
r r r - r- - - T f 1 �
i I I I 1 V I
322
\� I — I
L L_ L
I I
\ I I I I I
I
I I I
k I I I I I
315 I I I I I
I I I I 1 I I I
5� I h OI �Q QQ I
[ A I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I I I
— LE LIOL m MM WVS UP SAW UW4- -p 900\6-P\3100 900 W= 4
n
8
m
i
�S
m
z
f-
c�
Iz
IL
�I
I
I
I
I
m
r
m
J
I
I�
w(ad

N
d'
N
0
N
0
5
n
U
E
It
0
0
10
rn
0
N
U
STREAM CROSSING #1 STATION # 6 +16.5
T ,
� Jr
Ij--- -- 0
o
`vim -
--
Z
' ENDWALL� PER f-
DETAILS $HEET C8
a
,y = = -
V 44
LREEK
TOP- -OF_ BANK ;
REE -
�- BOT. =309.1 -- �;
912,6 ` �^j ih `f t /
0 .` \\ T OP
- 3- SIDED ; OF g� -' -- -
' - 4'X10' BOX
CULVERT
_ ..
p
- I ° s,
STREAM CROSSING #1 INFORMATION
NEUSE RIVER ZONE 1 BUFFER DISTURBED!
2,001 SF
NEUSE RIVER ZONE 2 BUFFER DISTURBED
1.325 SF
AREA OF CREEK DISTURBED
NONE SPAN HIGH WATER MARK
TOTAL NEUSE RIVER BUFFER DISTURBED
3,326 SF
LINEAR FEET OF STREAM DISTURBED
NONE
STREAM CROSSING #2 STATION # 12 +92.25 -
315 ? .
ell
\
\ j
PROPOSb
CULVER
N
CRitEK
BOT = 308:8 �\ ,'\ \ � \`c9 ��ix ° /
\3 -SIDED \\ ^a _ `
��
ryij ��0\ 3'X'1,2' BOX - .
TOWN OF tviORRISViLJ_E CULVERT
ti
GIZEENWAY`EASEMEN,T 'I,o ^' �. `\ \ `, `\ .i�, ; ,
d '
NCDOT -838. J
ce
IF
�`.
, v °j
- _
,
tidy C�
CREEK
- 0;
vBOT. =3
o �
TOA
.�
PROPOSED S �,
PA6�K BENCH
WAKT- COUNTY 100T'YR /O�' j
FLOOD EASEMENT/LINE �` /�
ELEVATIOW'318.0'
Q4-
\ V \
, 1 \
STREAM CROSSING #2 INFORMATION
NEUSE RIVER ZONE 1 BUFFER DISTURBED
2.115 SF
NEUSE RIVER ZONE 2 BUFFER DISTURBED
1,147 SF
AREA OF CREEK DISTURBED
NONE SPAN HIGH WATER MARK
TOTAL NEUSE RIVER BUFFER DISTURBED
3,262 SF
LINEAR FEET OF STREAM DISTURBED
NONE
TOTAL NEUSE RIVER BUFFER DISTURBANCE:
NEUSE RIVER ZONE 1 BUFFER DISTURBED
4,116 SF
NEUSE RIVER ZONE 2 BUFFER DISTURBED
2,472 SF
AREA OF CREEK DISTURBED
NONE
TOTAL NEUSE RIVER BUFFER DISTURBED
6,588 SF
LINEAR FEET OF STREAM DISTURBED
NONE
NOTES:
1. SURVEY INFORMATION COLLECTED AND PREPARED BY
ADVANCED CIVIL DESIGN
2. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN
AND IS NOT LOCATED IN A WATERSHED.
3. THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE 100 -YR FLOOD PLAIN AS
INDICATED ON FIRM MAPS #3720074600J AND
#3720075600J DATED MAY 2, 2006, 100 YR FLOODPLAIN
ELEVATION IS 318.00
4. THERE SHALL BE NO CUT OR FILL PERFORMED IN THE
WAKE COUNTY 100 -YR FLOOD EASEMENT WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF WAKE COUNTY FACILITIES DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION.
5. ALL FILL INSIDE THE BUFFER IS AT MAX A 3:1 SLOPE AND
VEGATATION TO BE RESTORED TO PRECONSTRUCTION
CONDITIONS.
6. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ARE AT MOST A 3:1 SLOPE
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
Path Grade = 315.5
/-3 —sided
culvert
___. j Ex.
Go — ____ ____ _
Top Footing = 309.3
Footing
STREAM CROSS - SECTION #1 STATION # 6 +16.5
SCALE: H: 1 " =5'
V: 1 "= 5'
Path Grade = 315.5
n,
3 —sided
culvert
jEx.
Gound ®�
>p Footing = 309.3
Footing
STREAM CROSS - SECTION #2 STATION # 12 +92.25
SCALE. H: 1"=5'
V: 1"=5'
Signature:
20
Town of Morrisville
APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Town of Morrisville, Town Engineer
Signature:
Town of Cary Utilities, Water and Sewer
Engineering:
Planning:
Other (specify):
Date:
Engineering Inspection Services must be contacted (919) 463 -6907 at a minimum 24
hours prior to the commencement of any construction activities.
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 40
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 20 ft.
JUL 1 6 201
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
2 0 1 2 0 6 9 S
DRAWINGS ISSUED FOR:
❑ PRELIMINARY
❑ MUNICIPAL REVIEW
❑ BID SET
❑ STRUCTURE FABRICATION
■ CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
I IT RIA-
REALTY CORPORATION
3005 Carrington Mill Blvd
Suite 100
Morrisville, NC 27560
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

N",
\
\
\
,
cV
1
I
r
,
I /
f \ \
O
\11
2 �\
2
NOTE: ALL SLOPES STEEPED THAN 3:1 SHALL BE STABLIZED
WITH GEO -GRID FABRIC AND HYDROSEEDED.
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT = 107'
WETLAND IMPACT = 0.004 ACRES
Vf4
EX. WETLAND
II i TO REMAIN) o
-
�! -303'
,
'1 � ; ,\ ,� ,p � • �, , . �; ; y,, ,,302 - �, ,�, . ,.
LOW POINT ELEV = 319.70
-- LOW POINT TA = -17+55- -- -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - --
PVI STA 7 17 +00 I
PVI ELEV 1= 317.50 I I I
A.D. = 16.0000 I
1 K= 55.0000
- - - - - 3,30.6,0' VC I I
- - - - -I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
330 I __ 1 1 1 I 1 330
- - - - -
I to o I
3 I co
I I ao M I
E l I I I I I ! I v W I I I
1 325 I ! > > 1 325 1
NI------------- 1- - - -- I----- - - - - -- j--------------- -t -- -- - - f - - - -- - - -- - j -- - --- - - - - -I - i`i --------- I- - - - - -- --f -- - - - - -- j
i t I I I I I i I I I
N i Prole Grade I
1 I
N \ I I
o i - -- --------- 320 i- -- �- - -- - ----- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - 1 320
------ - - - - -1 - - -- -------I------------}------------
I \I I I I
I I I I I I
I I
3 I I1 315 1
----------- I I ------------ 1 \\ I I I
315 - - -- - - -- - - - - - - -- -f ---- - - - --I 1
0.
i I I I I I I I I
Existing Grade
v
310 \ i ( 21' -6"x 11' -6" Oblong Opening
------ - - - - - - - - -- -- - -- I ------------- I - - - - -- -310 --
305 - ----------- - - - - -- -!- - - -- -- - -- -- - I 305
----- - - - - -- ----- - - - -
-- I
r
z
o f I I I I I I I I I
(,a I
300 _ I
°, L- - - - - -- L - -- --- I- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- ----- - - - - -- -- - -� L -- ------ !- - - - - -- - - - - - -- 300__J
-
0) l !
o f I I I I I I I I I
I Scale: I
! 1 '= 30' H I I
I I
1"= 5' V I I
L - -� --
a` - - - - - --
16 17 18 19
U
30
FINISI
LINE
FINIS
LINE
b Ok
/ — o
JMITS OR CULVERT
FOOTING'QUANTITIES
1 PE i
Fs oo�t
PLAN
WEST HEADWALL N.T.S.
(� CULVERT
CL r DIA. WEEPHOLE
(TYP•)
v1 elV - V.Y.
ELEVATION
WEST HEADWALL N.T.S.
II
H
6.
o
/ — o
NITS 011 CULVERT
FOOTING 'QUANTITIES
t box, wall
I" PEJF (TYP.)
rye
,z' /
V�CL 4" DIA. WEEPHOLE
PLAN
EAST HEADWALL N.T.S.
CL CULVERT
ELEVATION
EAST HEADWALL N.T.S.
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 30 ft.
�q
Y
r ,
k?
NEUSE RIVER ZONE 1 BUFFER DISTURBED
E
Y
r ,
k?
NEUSE RIVER ZONE 1 BUFFER DISTURBED
8,515 SF
NEUSE RIVER ZONE 2 BUFFER DISTURBED
5,279 SF
5 TI
2,830 SF
13,794 SF
LINEAR FEET OF STREAM DISTURBED
107
EXTEN.
EXTENSION
E.F.
EACH FACE
F.F.
FAR FACE
MAX.
MAXIMUM
MIN.
MINIMUM
N.F.
NEAR FACE
SITE
PREFORMED EXPANSION
JOINT FILLER
QTY.
QUANTITY
REINF.
S*
SER.
SERIES
SHT.
SHEET
SPA.
r
T &B
TOP AND BOTTOM
OU ppP�+
ti
a
�'¢yy99�a air �a g v
B7h c r "''Po' IV,Itm�,
N
N
M
N
0 CL
Of
5
l-
N
Lu
p
V
U
TOTAL NEUSE RIVER
BUFFER DISTURBANCE
NEUSE RIVER ZONE 1 BUFFER DISTURBED
8,515 SF
NEUSE RIVER ZONE 2 BUFFER DISTURBED
5,279 SF
AREA OF CREEK DISTURBED
2,830 SF
TOTAL NEUSE RIVER BUFFER DISTURBED
13,794 SF
LINEAR FEET OF STREAM DISTURBED
107
TOWN PROJECT NUMBER: 11- 80000012
1
LEGEND
C.J.
CONSTRUCTION JOINT
CLR.
CLEAR
CONC.
CONCRETE
DIA.
DIAMETER
DIM.
DIMENSION
EXTEN.
EXTENSION
E.F.
EACH FACE
F.F.
FAR FACE
MAX.
MAXIMUM
MIN.
MINIMUM
N.F.
NEAR FACE
PEJF
PREFORMED EXPANSION
JOINT FILLER
QTY.
QUANTITY
REINF.
REINFORCING
SER.
SERIES
SHT.
SHEET
SPA.
SPACING
T &B
TOP AND BOTTOM
TYP.
TYPICAL
TOWN PROJECT NUMBER: 11- 80000012
1
.'SAW"
I
REALTY CORPORATION
3005 Carrington Mill Blvd
Suite 100
Morrisville, NC 27560
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
? O r-I Q• N
A 16
'
�M
c•
U T �
ui s
CL
0
z
«5
U
V
rti
rW
�VJ W
Q
U
�
sio '•
:Q
_ SEAL -
: 031180
a
�
a
N
N
M
N
0 CL
Of
0
l-
N
Lu
p
V
U
Z
p
m
p
ii
p
LO
n
LO co
All All
V)
to
o
O
mom,
3
�
v
(!
O
U
N
O
CID
N
W
z
J
Q
J
_J
a.
N
I_ I_
O
w
Z
�
O
o
_ �
Z
Q
W
Q N
z
�?
X
J
W
m
Y
�'
°o
Z
9
a.
_!
w Z
(/
Q
0
W U
O
V
W r°7
0
Z
0
4
>
0
J
0
m
Z
0
U
J
w
Q
aC
U
W
Y
p
Drawing Number:
23/ 31
Duke Realty Job Number:
PPK- 000 -01
ACD Job Number:
11- 0061 -04NC