20181349 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_2020_20210303

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20181349 Version* 1
.....................................
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 03/03/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 3/3/2021
.........................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes fJ No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
I•J Stream r Wetlands r Buffer ❑ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Matthew Reid [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:* 20181349 Version:*1
Existing I[# Existing Version
Project Type: C' DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Mill Dam
County: Yadkin
Document Information
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Mill Dam Creek_97136_MY1_2020.pdf 19.77MB
Rease upload only one FtF of the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Matthew Reid
Signature:*

Annual Monitoring Report
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Yadkin River Basin- 03040101
Monitoring Year 01
DEQ Contract 6898
DMS Project Number 97136
DWR#: 18-1349
USACE Action ID: 2016-01335
Yadkin County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699
Data Collected: 2020
Date Submitted: January 2021

Monitoring and Design Firm
Prepared by:
K C I
TECHNOLOGIES
K CI
ETC
NCI ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSOCIATES OF NC TECHNOLOGIES ANT CONSTRUCTION INC.
KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27609
[phone]
Project Contact: Tim Morris
Email: tim.morris(akci.com
Mill Darn Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 MY01 Monitoring Report

KCIENGINEERS • SCIENTISTS • SURVEYORS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
ASSOCIATES OF
NORTH CAROLINA, PA 4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh,NC 27609 [phone] [phone] Fax
MEMORANDUM
Date: February 12,2021
To: Matthew Reid,DMS Project Manager
From: Tim Morris, Project Manager
KCI Associates of North Carolina,PA
Subject: Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site
MY-01 Monitoring Report Comments
Yadkin River Basin CU 03040101
NCDMS Project#97136
Contract#6898
Please find below our responses in italics to the MY-00 Baseline Monitoring Report comments from
NCDMS received on February 5, 2021, for the Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site.
• Table of contents page numbers do not match report. Please update as necessary.
KCI Response: The issue with the page numbers has been fixed.
• Project Summary: Last paragraph states that project planting and construction were completed in
March 2020.According to Table 2,the construction/grading was completed in Dec 2019 and the
repair was completed in March 2020. Please revise to state that construction was completed in
Dec 2019 and planting was completed in March 2020. The March 2020 repair is discussed later in
the same paragraph. This will make it consistent with the project activity and reporting history
timeline in Table 2.
KCI Response: This change has been made.
• Monitoring Results: Please add short discussion in second paragraph concerning erosion areas
noted on CCPV and the damaged boulder sill on UTHC4-1 in regards to heavy rainfall events in
2020.
KCI Response: This discussion has been added to the report.
• Monitoring Results: First paragraph states that vegetation monitoring results for the year are
822/970, Table 7 shows MY1 results to be 823/972. Please review and revise.
KCI Response:A rounding error in Table 7 was causing this error. In the process of reviewing
Table 7(see below) other errors were noted and corrected that changed the average on-site. The
totals for the site are 836/986.
• Monitoring Results: There were numerous gage failures on the site in 2020. Have the gages been
repaired or replaced?Please update this section with a brief summary of the failure and solution.
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

KCI Response: The failure was a result of the memory banks becoming full due to waiting too
long between downloads. The stream gauges, which are set to record every 10 minutes, can hold
approximately 5.5 months of data. The gauges were installed in January 2020 and not
downloaded again until December 2020. This oversight will not be repeated in future monitoring
years.
• Table 5: Please add a Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment for the EI reaches
(UTHC2,UTHC4-1 and UTCH4-3).
KCI Response: These tables have been added to the report.
• Please submit the random vegetation plot as polygons.
KCI Response: The point shapefiles mill_damrando_veg and mill_dam_veg plots represent the
vegetation plot locations shot during the baseline setup. These were unintentionally included in
the digital submission and have been removed. The polygon shapefile MillDam_veg plots
contains the MY01 vegetation plot locations.
• Please review the mill_dam_erosion shapefile,and ensure that the number of features in this
shapefile reflects the number of segment lengths reported in Table 5.
KCI Response: This shapefile has been reviewed and all features that are located along R or EI
reaches are included in the appropriate visual assessment tables.
• Please review Table 7. The spreadsheet that was provided shows different planted and total
values for Plot 6, 7,and 11, for example.
KCI Response: Some of the calculations in the data sheets had not been updated from the
previous year and so they did not match the numbers in Table 7. The calculations in Table 7 are
performed independent of these and so in most cases the Table 7 numbers were accurate. The
exception to this was Plot R12, which was not calculating correctly. This error has been updated.
• It appears that in some instances depressional features external to the main channel and below the
low bank elevation were not excluded from the loop used in determining the BHR(XS 15,XS 18
for example). Please be sure the areas outside of the channel are excluded for these calculations.
KCI Response:All of the XS sheets were reviewed and these errors were corrected. Table 9 was
also updated to reflect the correct numbers.
• It is great to see KCI using a loop for the calculations. For the most part,KCI's calculations were
the most accurate of the reports reviewed this year,but that accuracy relies entirely on the
exclusion of the areas mentioned above.
KCI Response: The functionality to exclude these areas is built into the spreadsheets. We will be
sure to review them more thoroughly in future monitoring years to ensure that all calculations
are accurate.
Please contact me if you have any questions or would like clarification concerning these responses.
Sincerely,
Tim Morris
Project Manager
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT SUMMARY 1
SUCCESS CRITERIA 2
MONITORING RESULTS 3
REFERENCES 4
Figure 1. Project Site Vicinity Map 5
Appendix A— Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits 7
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History 9
Table 3. Project Contacts 10
Table 4. Project Information 11
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
CCPV 13
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment 21
Table 6.Vegetation Condition Assessment. 37
Photo Reference Points 38
Vegetation Plot Photos 42
Problem Area Photos 47
Appendix C —Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species 49
Appendix D — Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary 55
Table 9. Cross-section Morphology Data Table 68
Cross-section Plots 72
Pebble Counts 104
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
Table 10.Verification of Bankfull Events 129
Stream Level Hydrographs 131
Table 11. Verification of Stream Flow 133
Table 12. Stream Flow Criteria Attainment 133
Stream Flow Hydrographs 134
Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Verification 137
Wetland Hydrographs 138
Mill Darn Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 MY01 Monitoring Report

PROJECT SUMMARY
The Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site(MDCRS)was completed in March 2020 and restored and enhanced
a total of 13,505 linear feet of stream. The MDCRS is a riparian system in the Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River
Basin (3040101 8-digit cataloging unit) in Yadkin County, North Carolina. The site's natural hydrologic
regime had been substantially modified through the relocation and straightening of the existing stream
channels, livestock impacts, and clearing of riparian buffer. This completed project will restore streams
impacted by pasture and agriculture to a stable headwater ecosystem with a functional riparian buffer and
floodplain access.
The MDCRS is protected by a 40.2 acre permanent conservation easement, held by the State of North
Carolina. The site is located approximately 0.5 miles north of East Bend, NC. Specifically, the site is 0.2
mile north on Shady Grove Church Road(SR-1538)from its intersection with Shoals Road(SR-1546).
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) published the Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee
River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) in 2009. The project's 14 digit CU (03040101110070, Grassy
Creek and Horne Creek)was identified as a Targeted Local Watershed(TLW)in the RBRP. The goals and
priorities for the MDCRS are based on the information presented in the Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities: maintaining and enhancing water quality, restoring hydrology, and improving fish
and wildlife habitat(NCEEP,2009). The project will support the following basin priorities:
- Managing stormwater runoff
- Reducing fecal coliform inputs
- Improving/restoring riparian buffers
- Reducing sediment loading
- Improving stream stability
- Reducing nutrient loading
- Excluding livestock and implementing other agricultural BMP's
- Protecting high-resource value waters, including water supply watershed designated waters
The project is also located in the Ararat River Local Watershed Plan(LWP) study area. The Ararat River
was designated a LWP Study Area due to poor water quality and aquatic habitat degradation issues,as well
as the presence of good candidate sites for stream restoration in rural catchments (NCEEP, 2009). The
stressors within the Ararat River LWP are erosion and sedimentation,missing or degraded riparian buffers,
stormwater runoff, and nutrient and fecal coliform"hot spots"(NCEEP,2013).
The goals for the project are to:
- Restore channelized and livestock-impacted streams to stable C and B type channels.
- Restore a forested riparian buffer to provide bank stability, filtration, and shading.
The project goals will be addressed through the following objectives:
- Relocate or stabilize channelized and/or incised streams to connect to a floodplain or floodprone
area.
- Install a cross-section sized to the bankfull discharge.
- Create bedform diversity with pools,riffles, and habitat structures
- Fence out livestock to reduce nutrient, bacterial, and sediment impacts from adjacent grazing and
farming practices to the project tributaries
- Plant the site with native trees and shrubs and an herbaceous seed mix.
Project construction was completed in December 2019 and project planting was completed in March 2020.
The 13,505 linear feet of streams at MDCRS were enhanced and restored by re-meandering the stream and
by tying the bankfull elevation to the historic floodplain where feasible. The entire site was planted to
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 1 MY01 Monitoring Report

establish a forested riparian buffer. The site was constructed as designed with only minor modifications
from the design plan. These modifications generally consisted of slight adjustments in the alignment and
spacing of riffles/pools due to bedrock encountered during construction. Several areas of additional bank
stabilization were also installed. On February 6,2020, shortly after construction was completed and before
woody stems had been planted,the site received over 6 inches of rain in a 24 hour period.This storm caused
significant damage to portions of the site and required repairs to be completed in March 2020.These repairs
mainly involved repair of bank erosion through the installation of live lifts, removal of aggradation from
the stream channel,and regrading areas of floodplain scour.Approximately 500 cubic yards of topsoil were
also brought in and placed on the floodplain in areas of severe floodplain scour.
The monitoring components were installed in March/April 2020. Five automatically recording pressure
transducer stream gauges that take a reading every 10 minutes were installed: one each in the upper third
of T1A,T5A,and T8A to document flow within those reaches,and two on UTHC to record the occurrence
of bankfull events. Cameras were installed in the vicinity of each of the flow gauges and set to record a
short video once a day to provide additional verification of flow. Two automatically recording pressure
transducer groundwater monitoring gauges were installed within pre-existing wetlands on the site to
monitor wetland hydrology and ensure the existing wetlands on the site are not adversely affected by the
restoration project.One of these gauges is located in the vicinity of the pre-existing wetland on the left bank
of T7 and the other is located within the pre-existing wetland on the right bank of T8. To determine the
success of the planted mitigation areas, eighteen 10 m x 10 m permanent vegetation monitoring plots were
established. An additional twelve 10 m x 10 m random temporary vegetation monitoring plots are sampled
during each monitoring year as well. The locations of the planted stems relative to the origin were recorded
within the permanent plots and the species and height of each planted stem were recorded for all plots.Any
volunteers found within the plots were grouped into size categories by species,but separate from the planted
stems. Twelve permanent photo reference points were established and are taken annually. Thirty-two
permanent cross-sections (24 riffle cross-sections and 8 pool cross-sections) were also established and a
detailed longitudinal profile of the stream was taken. Wolman pebble counts were performed at all of the
riffle cross-sections. The cross-section measurements are repeated in monitoring years 1,2, 3,5,and 7,but
the longitudinal profile will only be repeated if there are concerns about bed elevation adjustments.Reports
will be submitted to DMS each year.
SUCCESS CRITERIA
Vegetative success criteria for the stream mitigation is 260 woody stems/acre after five years, and 210
woody stems/acre after seven years. Trees in each plot must average seven feet in height at Year 5 and ten
feet in height at Year 7.Volunteer species must be present for a minimum of two growing seasons and must
be a species from the approved planting list to count toward vegetative success. A single species may not
account for more than 50%of the required number of stems within any plot.
A minimum of four bankfull events must also be recorded during the monitoring period.All project streams
must show a minimum of 30 continuous days of flow within a calendar year (assuming normal
precipitation)A"normal"year is based on NRCS climatological data for Yadkin County with the 30th and
70th percentile thresholds as the range of normal, as documented in the USACE Technical Report
"Accessing and Using Meteorological Data to Evaluate Wetland Hydrology,April 2000."
Bank height ratios(BHR) should not exceed 1.2 and the entrenchment ratios(ER) should be 2.2 or greater.
BHR and ER at any measured riffle cross-section should not change more than 10% from the previous
condition during any given monitoring interval (e.g. no more than 10%between years 1 and 2, 2 and 3, 3
and 5, or 5 and 7). Visual assessments will also be used to identify problem areas.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 2 MY01 Monitoring Report

MONITORING RESULTS
The MY01 vegetation monitoring was conducted October 26-29,2020. 29 of the 30 vegetation monitoring
plots had greater than 260 woody stems/acre. The average stem density across all the surveyed plots is 836
planted stems/acre. Including volunteers,the site averaged 986 stems/acre.
The cross-sections were surveyed for MY01 between December 17 and 22, 2020. None of the 32 cross-
sections had a bank height ratio greater than 1.2 or an entrenchment ratio less than 2.2. Some of the pools
on site have widened slightly from their baseline conditions(XS3, 8,and 25),while a few of the riffles have
lowered slightly (XS2, 9, 13, 23, 32). These changes are a result of the normal settling that occurs after
construction,and an unusually large number of high rainfall events that the site experienced in 2020.After
the large storm on February 6 and the repairs that were completed, the site experienced four separate
rainfalls of greater than 3"in 24 hours.Although these heavy rainfall events did cause some damage to the
site, the majority of the site was undamaged and overall the site is functioning as designed. As a result of
these heavy rainfall events, one area of aggradation formed at the beginning of UTHC4-3. Bank erosion is
also present along several of the outer bends on UTHC and one of the boulders from the second boulder
sill on UTHC4-1 was rolled approximately 15 feet downstream. KCI is currently evaluating the need for
any additional repair work and will perform this work in 2021 as needed. Please see Appendix B—Visual
Assessment Data for more information.
During 2020,the stream gauge on UTHC-1 recorded 10 bankful events,while the stream gauge on UTHC-
3 recorded 5 bankful events. All three of the reaches being monitored for flow demonstrated more than 30
consecutive days of flow during 2020. The gauge on T1A recorded a maximum of 68 consecutive days,
while the gauges on T5A and T8A both recorded a maximum of 152 consecutive days. These numbers
would likely have been higher, but the stream gauges stopped recording on June 15, 2020 after their
memories filled up. The gauge data was further backed up by the cameras on site. Based on the video
recordings obtained from the cameras, T 1A had a maximum of 44 consecutive days of flow, T5A had a
maximum of 70 consecutive days of flow, and T8A had a maximum of 84 consecutive days of flow. These
numbers also would likely have been higher,but the cameras were obscured by vegetation for the majority
of the summer.
Overall the site is functioning as designed with no major problem areas or threats to project success
identified during MY01. The few areas that were damaged by the heavy rains in 2020 are of limited extent
and are being evaluated to determine if future repairs are necessary.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 3 MY01 Monitoring Report

REFERENCES
NCDENR,Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2009.Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities 2009. Raleigh,NC.
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed_Planning/Yadkin_River_B
asin/2009%20Upper%20Yadkin%2ORBRP_Final%20Final%2C%2026feb%2709.pdf
NCDEQ,Division of Mitigation Services. June 2017. "As-built Baseline Monitoring Report
Format,Data and Content Requirement."
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%20Libra
ry/Guidance%20and%20Template%20Documents/6_AB_Baseline Rep Templ June
%202017.pdf
NCIRT. October 24, 2016. "Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation
Update."https://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/PN/2016/Wilmington-District-Mitigation-
Update.pdf
USACE, Sprecher, S. W.;Warne,A. G. 2000. "Accessing and Using Meteorological Data to
Evaluate Wetland Hydrology."
https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/ADA3 78910.xhtml
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 4 MY01 Monitoring Report

o vStony Ridge Rd
to. /
�
,a
w ,�-, — e e
c. Gc
a 0
Co S e�
•v aS G�
t Ri ooRdRo C)
1It Para N ^1 P� N od4r\ : tired o
Hauser Rr
co
TES
0 ,
co N.....0 T
a Yadkin Ri -r
Q.
CO
cr
a N m
F e� U
Gee co -
Al 0:c\ �9 t Dr ct
Va
-.a
0
to,
• L. ttr CI
4 CO r° o
�•ere 5 ` Miller Cieek
o-
411111111bA e<s,
Pride's Rd "Ca Main St o��a
` -- ova -67
� EAST BEND I
S.
SURRY COUNTY
1,a
YADKIN COUNTY
— Qy 1 n.
•Zsea
\c o
. `60
DAVIE COUNTY e�r0 - illy� 417' N
U
It g
o e s
ROWAN COUNTY J 2f
Figure 1. Vicinity Map, Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin County, NC
= Project Easement Streams Roads N111,1 0 0.5
T< c T m Cities and Towns Major Rivers State Highway Miles

APPENDIX A
Background Tables
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 6 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 1.Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Mitigation Credits
Riparian Non-riparian Nitrogen Phosphorous
Stream Wetland Wetland Buffer Nutrient Nutrient
Offset Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE R RE
Linear 7,166 6,340
Feet/Acres
Credits 7,166.000 3,124.666
TOTAL 10,290.666
CREDITS
Project Components
Project Existing Restoration Creditable Mitigation
Component Stationing/ Footage/ Footage or Footage or Restoration Approach Ratio Mitigation Credits Notes/Comments
-or- Location Level (PI,PII etc.)
Acreage Acreage Acreage (X:1)
Reach ID
10+00- 1,333 1 281 1,249 R P2 10+00- 1 1 249.000 Crossing Exception
UTHC1 Top
22+81 11+50,then P1 STA 20+51—20+83
UTHC1 22+81- 541 457 438 R P1,then P2 1 438.000 Crossing Exception
Bottom 27+39 24+50-27+39 STA 25+72—25+91
UTHC2 27+39- 1,494 1,493 1,493 EI N/A 1.5 995.333
42+32
P1 except P2 Utility Exception
42+32- 42+32-44+00 STA54+07—54+49
UTHC3 55+57 1,411 1,325 1,240 R and 53+50- 1 1,240.000 Crossing Exception
55+57 STA 55+14—55+57
UTHC4-1 55+57- 297 297 EI N/A 1.5 198.000
58+53
UTHC4-2 58+53- 521 521 EII N/A 2.5 208.400
63+75 1,840
UTHC4-3 63+75 481 419 EI N/A 1.5 279.333 Crossing Exception
68+55 STA 63+75-64+37
68+55- Utility Exception STA
UTHC4-4 73+97 542 497 EII N/A 2.5 199.800 68+55 69+00
T1 100+00- 764 751 734 R P2 100+00- 1 734.000 Crossing Exception
107+51 101+80,then P1 STA 104+00-104+16
T1A 150+00 746 795 795 R P2 1 795.000
157+95
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 7 MY01 Monitoring Report

Project Existing Restoration Creditable Mitigation
Component Stationing/ Restoration Approach
Footage/ Footage or Footage or Ratio Mitigation Credits Notes/Comments
-or- Location Acreage Acreage Acreage Level (PI,PII etc.) (X 1)
Reach ID
T2-1 200+00- 499 498 498 EII N/A 2.5 199.200
204+98
T2-2 204+98- 232 265 265 R P2 1 265.000
207+63
T3 300+00 378 369 369 R P1/P2 1 369.000
303+69
T4 400+00- 151 151 151 R P1 1 151.000
401+51
1000+00- Crossing Exception
T5 1012+13 1,205 1,213 1,182 EII N/A 2.5 472.800 STA 1003+59-
1003+90
T5A 1200+00 65 65 65 EII N/A 2.5 26.000
1200+65
T5B 1300+00 438 438 438 EII N/A 2.5 175.200
1304+38
T6-1 600+00 325 322 259 EII N/A 2.5 103.600 Crossing Exception
603+22 STA 602+59—603+22
T6-2 603+22- 621 658 658 R P1 1 658.000
609+80
T6A-1 650+00 60 60 60 EII N/A 2.5 24.000
650+60
T6A-2 650+60 97 101 101 R P1 1 101.000
651+61
T7-1 700+00 165 165 165 EII N/A 2.5 66.000
701+65
T7 2 701+65 335 348 348 R P1 1 348.000
705+13
T8-1 800+00 445 445 445 EII N/A 2.5 178.000
804+45
T8-2 804+45- 486 448 426 R P1 1 426.000 Crossing Exception
808+94 STA 808+20—808+42
T8A 850+00- 258 263 263 R P1 1 263.000
852+63
T9 900+00- 133 129 129 R P1,then P2
1 129.000
901+29 900+71-901+29
TOTAL 14,024 13,882 13,505 10,290.666
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 8 MY01 Monitoring Report

Component Summation
Stream Riparian Wetlands Non-Riparian
Restoration Level (linear feet) (Acres) Wetlands Buffer(square feet)
(Acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration 7,166
Enhancement
Enhancement I 2,209
Enhancement II 4,130
Creation
Preservation
Hi
gh Quality Preservation
ervationn
Table 2. Project Activity&Reporting History
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or
Deliver
Mitigation Plan Dec.7,2018
Final Design-Construction Plans Jan. 14,2019
Construction Grading Completed Dec. 12,2019
Repairs from Storm Damage Completed March 26,2020
Planting Completed March 26,2020
Baseline Monitoring/Report May 2020
Vegetation Monitoring April 24,2020
Stream Survey April 16,2020
Year 1 Monitoring11111111 December 2020
Vegetation Monitoring October 28,2020
Stream Survey December 22,2020
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 9 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 3.Project Contacts
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Design Firm KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27609
Contact:Mr.Tim Morris
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Construction Contractor Carolina Environmental Contracting,Inc.
PO Box 1905
Mount Airy,NC 27030
Contact:Mr.Wayne Taylor
Phone: [phone]
Planting Contractor Shenandoah Habitats
1983 Jefferson Highway
Waynesboro,VA 22980
Contact:Mr.David Coleman
Phone: [phone]
I Monitoring Performers
KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27609
Contact:Mr.Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 10 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 4.Project Information
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Project Name Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
County Yadkin County
Project Area 40.2 acres
Project Coordinates(lat.and long.) 36.2390°N,80.5201°W
Planted Acreage(acres of woody
stems planted) 29.2 acres
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 030401014 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03010101110070
DWQ Sub-basin 03-07-02
Project Drainage Area(acres) 400 acres
Project Drainage Area Percentage of 3%
Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classification Forest(45%),Pasture/Farmland(39%),Low-density Residential Development(15%),and
Roads(1%)
Existing Reach Summary Information
Parameters All Reaches Combined
Length of reach(linear feet) 14,024
Valley confinement Partially confined to confined
Drainage area(acres) 400 acres
Perennial,Intermittent,Ephemeral Intermittent—Perennial
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification C(Aquatic Life,Secondary Recreation)
Rosgen Stream Classification(Existing/
Proposed) F4/G4/C4/B4
Evolutionary trend(Simon) Stage III
FEMA classification Zone AE at confluence of T8 and Hall Creek,otherwise none
Existing Wetland Summary Information
Parameters WA,WB,WE,WG,WK WC WH,WI,WJ
Size of Wetland(acres) 0.23 0.10 0.10
Wetland Type Riparian Non-riverine Riparian Non-riverine Riparian Non-riverine
Mapped Soil Series Fairview Fairview Siloam
Drainage class Well drained Well drained Well drained
Soil Hydric Status Non-Hydric Non-Hydric Non-Hydric
Source of Hydrology Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater
Restoration or Enhancement Method N/A(Preservation) Areas of erosion to stabilize N/A(Preservation)
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States—Section 404 Yes NWP 27 Preliminary JD
Waters of the United States—Section 401 Yes NWP 27 Preliminary JD
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes USFWS
Historic Preservation Act No Yes NCSHPO
Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management Act No N/A N/A
(CAMA)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance No Yes N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 11 MY01 Monitoring Report

APPENDIX B
Visual Assessment Data
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 12 MY01 Monitoring Report

` n Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
-
�' 1 Existing Wetlands Camera
dli •-' — • — • — • — • - - Stream Mitigation Flow Gauge
• R (7,165 If/7,165 SMC's) • Wetland Gauge
UTHC a-a Aggradation
• I EI (2,209 If/ 1,472 SMC's)
F I Ell (4,130 If/ 1,653 SMC's) Bank Erosion
\1/4 i *'•: Vegetation MonitoringPlots
Page 6 `f Photo Points g
— - -Cross-Sections n Success Criteria Met
•
• 1 n Success Criteria Not Met
UTHC 4-3
• —I I • °• re
II I UTHI r4:2':• Page 5
I Page 7 I_ . = . • '►I1 I ,. -
• I I � % UTHC 4-1 '
* : - �8A I • _ • • _ • � • _ �
I
I * I• *. I
I Ire-z 1
T8-z I Page 4 I T6-1
I.
LP I. . _ • __ . _ I •
I T8 1 . T6 2 i
� •�. UTHC3 ' I
114.411
p- I T6A-2 /////2I 4
I T6A-1 I- •
�- _ - •s
e N.i; p�;•• .i' ,�ih � ! ® • I T4 r5A V .)''_+: ,
I
�� :., �1. i�.' • I Page 3
. t. ...,141.. i,sk- , pi
UTHC2
•
•r:' �w1 '�; * . CT2I
ter .. , • ' ram ��Page2 ' ' II t •r. k
r
I I141111111*
•' �0 Q3 T
+tip: T1 ♦' I -
' •
+4.. I • I '. Page.Q. . __ _f- .. '
' 4 I I r; . .r , _
*.. __ it-,11,—%. I _ I .
ir
1
•
-:�=1.0A,, -. I..., , � T1A I I ".
UTHC1 Top ..
4_,—v. ..-4,4c, A;disionft '-`Y i a
Current Conditions Plan View N
!•li Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
iipni 500 1,000
DMS Project #97136 0I I Ieet
�'T Yadkin County, NC
K1 Overview Page Image Source:NC OneMap Orthoimagery,2015.

-� ! Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
■ - }-.4, _ ' N" ' '{.• Existing Wetlands Camera
1 II, R5 • Stream Mitigation Flow Gauge
f '�; ,. . ': `t. R (7,165 If/7,165 SMC's) • Wetland Gauge
�
23+00. "-
r ="� '� ' El (2,209 If/ 1,472 SMC's) Aggradation
' 2_ Ell (4,130 If/ 1,653 SMC's)-Bank Erosion
106+00R4 *00 ii, Vegetation MonitoringPlots
* Photo Points g
.,,, :,1.1THC1 Bottom _ - Cross-Sections n Success Criteria Met
. " �'• n Success Criteria Not Met
4
105+00 .. ' :s t; ..
21+60
• i• r:
A 20+00• ‘ 3 ,
k,
.. 4t.k. ' 4,4%.
`` • • • 19+00
♦
,, \ ;•
'
� R2 .
to •'4 8+0011 . •
c7.
-- -oi
+00
_ ;a , '.tom ''176+,00 1 •
A ,. \ r
15+00..
R1
14+00
•'..*te s k- Virft.Arlie .
•
r •r. . 13+00- 1
WI
r ''}, ~S r
'P% \,,, .1p 12+UU
1 y
t* - '-,144.11' 1411111N .
•
• 11+00
:;. a %' '•".:_ ,-. ..
Current Conditions Plan View N
!� Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project #97136 0 100 200eet
is,K C'I Yadkin County, NC
Page 1 Image Source:NC OneMap Orthoimagery,2015.

Ti Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
. Existing Wetlands Camera
..c'.-:- " - • r.
1"Ei..' ,: - -, - A-1'-'• _ r-, _;. Stream Mitigation Flow Gauge
, . � .y .'. .. . , ( ) • Wetland Gauge
_ R 7,165 If/7,165 SMC's
_ "�s .', r� El (2,209 If/ 1,472 SMC's) Aggradation
Ell (4,130 If/ 1,653 SMC's) Bank Erosion
* Photo Points Vegetation Monitoring Plots
- - - Cross-Sections n Success Criteria Met
n Success Criteria Not Met
---\ ...ei
liff . :
104+00 •
. . . so
103+00 • 105+00
V. i 21
102:00 , t . ,
• •
. 1 +o0 20+00• \ 3
101+0o. / �.
I' 4JQ - SA w i } 1 9+0 0
fit ♦ ♦
71k, ♦
100+00• • R3: 15600 111 e ♦ •
IA • ,);' • ,,,,5 ie., ' X'It't .!.' ' \ . ;18+(
••• 44 , •
4. „ ,_
uto ,i
154+00-lk .
153+00. 2
i, r.
4 151+QO 1 ,
•I 1
-
l
149+00 '
filh• tea'. '• _
Current Conditions Plan View N
ergi
-- Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project #97136 0 100 200eet
is.K C I Yadkin County, NC
Page 2 Image Source:NC OneMap Orthoimagery,2015.

^_
^_!T2-2!T3
T4
!
T5A!T5
T5B
1303+001304+00
!UTHC2
24+00 205+00
204+00207+00206+00
37+00
36+00
35+00
34+00
33+00
32+00
31+00
30+00
29+00
28+00
27+00
26+00401+00400+00302+00301+00300+001302+00
1009+00
1008+00
1007+00
1006+00
1005+00
1004+00
1003+00
1002+00
25+00
303+00
204+00
1304+00
1009+00
1008+00
1007+00
PP4
PP5
7
8
5
6
R5
R6XS 6XS 19XS 21XS 22
XS
5 XS 18XS 20
Ü 0 200100
Feet
Current Conditions Plan ViewMill Dam Creek Restoration SiteDMS Project #97136Yadkin County, NC
Image Source: NC OneMap Orthoimagery, 2015.
Project Easement
Existing WetlandsStream Mitigation
R (7,165 lf / 7,165 SMC's)
EI (2,209 lf / 1,472 SMC's)
EII (4,130 lf / 1,653 SMC's)
^_Photo Points
Cross-Sections
Bankfull Gauge
Camera
Flow Gauge
Wetland Gauge
Aggradation
Bank Erosion
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria Met
Success Criteria Not Met
Page 3
Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
y �!, Existing Wetlands Camera
4 jeStream Mitigation Flow Gauge
• `•' • Wetland Gauge
R:; �r (7,165 If/7,165 SMC's)
El (2,209 If/ 1,472 SMC's) Aggradation
R9 Ell (4,130 If/ 1,653 SMC's) Bank Erosion
:
' r. f' * Photo Points Vegetation Monitoring Plots
o .
- - - Cross-Sections n Success Criteria Met
n Success Criteria Not Met
b00. . r- . ' , "_4 f+ _
•
• • 48+00
• I • o O
O
♦♦, co
♦ •. . Q` •
• •45+00 T6-2
• R8 •
,
44+00
603+000
•
•
Lai4/ '• • 609+00 �`.
f04+00.
43+00 �� �t
42+00 9 ♦♦• CM • ,: •tC • '
,I r$07 .,
•
` 41+015 T6A-2 650+0'
T6A-1
ao+ao -
Will
. Ati•39+0\0 .4 ' ..:.' 4-- 1'''' W,i '
... 0 -- - . - '..,, - 411,1 : ,.
mmmmmmirsimmm
Current Conditions Plan View N
mmmmmHismmmm
!4mmmmmm Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project #97136 �__ _ 0 100 200eet
1'KC I Yadkin County, NC
Page 4 Image Source:NC OneMap Orthoimagery,2015.

UTHC4-2 II Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
T9 I Existing Wetlands Camera
�� Stream Mitigation Flow Gauge
'-� • i R (7,165 If/7,165 SMC's) • Wetland Gauge
� El (2 SI ,209 If/ 1,472 SMC's) Aggradation
a......... -V& • Ell (4,130 If/ 1,653 SMC's) Bank Erosion
* Vegetation MonitoringPlots
Photo Points g
PP9 •--'As �I Success Criteria Met
• \ ,�i • - - - Cross-Sections
•t �,.XSt':' n.
n Success Criteria Not Met
, ft\ ' ,.,.
. . ..,
1
,A; i;. .
. . ,
, , 4,
... „:
. t I I ,
i r
�,. ... bou!�derY '..
UTHC4-1' - -
ti ..✓ l
)4144\"""72; .... '` \
.�� 1 54+00 ' .4. % .i '; .AN.
› r ,
1141'ai_,_ s, r52+0 .. .
13. * le
_y
'ti PP8 +O i _
4-. ,k
704++00' 'r i8. .
11'�;'.1u ,12 - •
i
• / .
3+00 , ;, R .
List/cE ,
.702+00 49+00' • ,,1 ' ,4'
i - 48+0. :�
0 Aii
iAli r
T7 ,r *0 411101 ,
' , - '44 • *if "•., 1. ••.1Pa.. ,}4 .._9.0.i. 0
Current Conditions Plan View N
!lit Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project #97136 _ 0 100 200_ r_ I eet
is.K C'I Yadkin County, NC
Page 5 Image Source.NC OneMap Orthoimagery,2015.

•
• 17 Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
Existing Wetlands Camera
,.. Stream Mitigation Flow Gauge
t " —R (7,165 If/7,165 SMC's) • Wetland Gauge
-
• El (2,209 If/ 1,472 SMC's) -= Aggradation
,
•
• 73+00 I Bank Erosion
Ell (4,130 If/ 1,653 SMC's)
-----_,,.... •
• 72+00 * Photo Points Vegetation Monitoring Plots
- - - Cross-Sections I-7 Success Criteria Met
16 ' . 71+00 - -. I-7 Success Criteria Not Met
4.
f,
k , 'A '•‘ "' '' • 'eh'4\ Iwt. '''s.
.,... A.
UT H C4-4
* : ,.;,,. . , . .. •_,
-. -‘,4... (v. .,.,. ....„......._ , .6:• 4 '41k.‘iii lir PP10 •...-.....4..,„
•.1%73
•`• `.--.',k\-• d ' .. . .
• .
ft,•
, ....,„ .
0,•%,.
, ' . A-• .,
1 . . •f ,... ,.
l• •
' r r '111164te.11
. ' ., • . . 'e.• . . • •
• w . ii. ' . . . 65+00
r41161til 1
. - ,.., ,.. _. , , . ' ..4. -,,'\..,."• ' ii ' 1'
• • .4...,...•' * -,/,' •i!
g ' . ` Yk4it\t4t41
•
UTHC4-3 •
64+00• .
! .
, •ilk ' '. ' ' Jr-''' : •63+00
., •
, .4,
--:
+00
i4. '.'.. , - -. . - if .....„
, . „,...:. . . 6
---- •,` _., - - •
- . -
f\
••• •
• ,...... -
; 44.....!'.
••. ..
• 4
, .
i . tl *ilt
,..:i. . „ .___
,„.., . } •
, , . „., . . i\,:•. .,,,.., , 1. .: • .L
\ , .
, , „. 4 •
Ilk .
"., , : " ' .".k, V ' '' -a •. . , - ,
v
• , i- .--
. .
• -,\
'', • I.. ' .4 .
' . ..• 6p, . .Mr. IA
, ....1.. Current Conditions Plan View N
Fill Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
_,..—..i
.••.i 0 100 200
... DMS Project #97136 r...., I Feet
is.
K C I Yadkin County, NC
Page 6 Image Source:NC OneMap Orthounagery,2015.

} ., • 'lb -.. -_ NT Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
k •.�, - ' "` t -•--' Existing Wetlands Camera
Net' '.;i:• $, * 'T '" Flow Gauge
t is -,.- , Stream Mitigation
y _ = L.-{`14 �•. ' tom•:• _ R (7,1651f/7,165 SMC's • Wetland Gauge
.t. ` ^ :�~ El (2,209 If/ 1,472 SMC's) Aggradation
' : 'ti Yr.
Ell (4,130 If/ 1,653 SMC's) Bank Erosion
i,'f • • • - '`;'1';- * Photo Points Vegetation Monitoring Plots
• - - �e' ' - - �I Success Criteria Met
. ,-r•am :;�`' �;� Cross-Sections
h; c' �'•' 0:9r ;r. 6 ' T1 Success Criteria Not Met t ,4t,.1, ..%....4'
t.
•''''' ' :ot, A 1 ,,,. )1:- ir--- ,,
..# , ' .. ''‘, .. 9 ( ' W., • _
..ktilto A • .. - v..,..-. 44 ...,.1 . ,.
+ ,' • TBA,N'- .
*x( 4 5
..x, , 1/4 ' 5:4, *" , ,I112 'zs. :6N • ,4p..% ,,,,,,,-...r:I. , . ,, ... . 1"*"--
}• 4
PP12 . •, • R I,' .040 1y 1 o .- ti
' '%, • 1 ► .
Illti 8Q6+ i a 9 ; � i& wo
17 ,
/ . . .. • ''L ' , _ .. • 1
-- - \. , .•_. . ; k, ..\ , I. \
T8-2 "35 ‘11111r \:, ' , .• 5-
.. ...,_ 4. , .4. ., ..... ,,, ,1,4„.1..,,t . : _ _ ,.....,
roi,, ._.,..„ .. .. .. . _ _ ...____. , , . ..,,,,. .
.,
\ ,,...; . ..‘..,,\ 10,, 4
, ilt,
, , , , ,4.,, ,, . 7 , A.c, ,,,..;!,
r .•
r
k ,1�. N \ .. , .
17 ,.. ...
4
;y F;;. x •.h•
• .1. 1
Pi\ .
. .Ni• - , .:" • , . N. ,
Current Conditions Plan View N
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project #97136 _ 0 100 200eet
is.K C I Yadkin County, NC V
Page 7 Image Source:NC OneMap Orthoimagery,2015.

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID UTHC1
Assessed Length 1,739
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments _Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 30 30 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 29 29ill 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 29 29 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 29 29 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 29 29 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 1 50 99%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 1 50 99%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 22 22 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 22 22 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 22 22 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 22 22 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 22 22 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 21 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID UTHC2
Assessed Length 1,494
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 8 8 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 8 8 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 8 8 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 8 8 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 8 8 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 1 31 99%
scour and erosion _
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat. _
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100% _
1 31 99%
3.Engineered
Structures 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 0 0
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 0 0
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 0 0
3.Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 0 0
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull
4.Habitat 0 0
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 22 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID UTHC3
Assessed Length 1,325
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 18 18 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 17 17 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 17 17 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 17 17 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 17 17 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 4 161 94%
scour and erosion _
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat. _
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100% _
4 161 94%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 8 8 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 8 8 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 8 8 100%
3.Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 8 8 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull °
4.Habitat Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow. 8 8 100/°
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 23 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID UTHC4-1
Assessed Length 297
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 3 3 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 3 3 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 3 3 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 3 3 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 3 3 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat. _
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100% _
0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 1 2 50%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 1 2 50%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 2 2 100%
3.Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 2 2 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull °
4.Habitat Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow. 2 2 100/°
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 24 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID UTHC4-3
Assessed Length 419
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 1 56 87%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 4 4 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 3 3 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 3 3 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 3 3 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 3 3 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat. _
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100% _
0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 1 1 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 1 1 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 1 1 100%
3.Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 1 1 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull °
4.Habitat Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow. 1 1 100/°
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 25 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T1
Assessed Length 751
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments _Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 16 16 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 16 16ill 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 16 16 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 16 16 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 16 16 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 8 8 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 8 8 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 8 8 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 8 8 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 4. 8 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 26 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T1A
Assessed Length 795
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments _Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 16 16 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 16 16ill 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 16 16 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 16 16 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 16 16 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 11 11 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 11 11 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 11 11 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 11 11 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 11 11 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 27 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T2-2
Assessed Length 265
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments _Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 8 8ill 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 7 7 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 7 7 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 7 7 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 7 7 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 5 5 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 5 5 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 5 5 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 5 5 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 4. 5 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 28 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T3
Assessed Length 369
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments _Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 13 13 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 12 12ill 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 12 12 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 12 12 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 12 12 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 14 14 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 14 14 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 14 14 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 14 14 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 14 14 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 29 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T4
Assessed Length 151
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments _Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 7 7ill 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 7 7 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 7 7 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 7 7 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 7 7 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 6 6 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 6 6 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 6 6 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 6 6 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 4. 6 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 30 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T6-2
Assessed Length 658
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments _Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 15 15ill 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 15 15 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 15 15 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 15 15 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 15 15 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 16 16 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 16 16 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 16 16 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 16 16 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 16 16 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 31 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T6A-2
Assessed Length 101
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments _Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 3 3 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 3 3ill 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 3 3 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 3 3 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 3 3 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 6 6 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 6 6 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 6 6 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 6 6 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 4. 6 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 32 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T7-2
Assessed Length 348
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments _Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 6 6 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 6 6ill 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 6 6 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 6 6 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 6 6 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 4 4 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 4 4 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 4 4 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 4 4 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 4. 4 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 33 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T8-2
Assessed Length 448
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments _Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 10 10 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 10 10ill 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 10 10 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 10 10 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 10 10 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 12 12 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 12 12 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 12 12 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 12 12 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 12 12 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 34 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T8A
Assessed Length 262
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments _Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 7 7ill 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 7 7 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 7 7 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 7 7 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 7 7 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 7 7 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 7 7 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 7 7 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 7 7 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 4. 7 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 35 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T9
Assessed Length 129
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments _Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 4 4 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 3 3ill 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 3 3 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 3 3 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 3 3 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 4 4 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 4 4 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 4 4 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 4 4 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 4. 4 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 36 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Planted Acreage 29.5
Mapping Number of Combined %of Planted
Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold CCPV Depiction Polygons Acreage Acreage
1. Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous 0.1 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
material.
2. Low Stem Density Areas Woody stem densities clearly below target levels 0.1 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
based on MY3,4,or 5 stem count criteria.
3.Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor Areas with woody stems of a size class that are 0.25 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
obviously small given the monitoring year.
11111 Cumulative Total 0.00
Easement Acreage 20.6
Mapping Number of Combined %of Easement
Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold CCPV Depiction Polygons Acreage Acreage
4.Invasive Areas of Concern Areas or points(if too small to render as polygons 1000 SF Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
at ma. scale .
5.Easement Encroachment Areas Areas or points(if too small to render as polygons none Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
at map scale).
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 37 MY01 Monitoring Report

Photo Reference Photos
°'freti'3
�7 :v * t
fi
�'� -;^ s
i'
PP1 —MY00—4/17/20 PP1 —MY01 — 12/17/20
I
a ''y ij,q,' ,;' r '� ,fir
w
PP2—MY00 4/17/20 PP2—MY01 — 12/17/20
1 ,
r
fi ' }
°
-._
: . � r°4w ! ry% „,.if- am .aF 1,: Y t $ t . ^r d fi i-/ ,.. r
n d' ,' fi F .A, yI 15 a �„uAart .A.-;-:„.-. ',5,- ; +r a t '0 ` rfi _ S ; 4 :t ,
PP3—MY00—4/17/20 PP3 —MY01 — 12/17/20
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 38 MY01 Monitoring Report

j ,
Ant Y - +
.-,- - Ate:i #
� ��1 ,:f. ge--"fr , , ), 4, i'- ,
PP4—MY00—4/17/20 PP4—MY01 — 12/17/20
e t d s ry s , i ,: = „ 1
4
., . ....
.,,
.....
..,, ...._ ,,..i. .......,,..,„ .
. ..,.-.r.„ -_—__, ....,.
.....„.,,I....„.._,.......... .,....
.„.„.. ,m_.,;,,,,. ., ,..,,e..... . ,
_. . .._..
.. ,?.,......,.r. . .,...4„,,i.
.._ . ..„ _
.. „.
..--: --; ,,,,, .
. .. .. . _ ..
. ,::„. ..„..h,
.. .,::-.,-.::._ ..._,,_,---.. ,-„ .-„_. „..„.7 1,1'-'.('=-;;;:`:'=, :
/ 5.. a's
;40616
414
PP5 —MY00—4/17/20 PP5—MY01 — 12/17/20
N5voloiii*. -"7-44% .-010,,.' :.: 71
i %,1).:„=„e„.51,11,14. 48::,;,.,7; , . ,,,I...,..
. _, ,,14., . .3''",- .1 ,t,if r',}A''14'"".1 ': :,',. ' ',''.i.
i t ; 1 a 4:'
.1-,
' ti'fi # v w °' 'r '`I
,''''' �
�x l
., ,,,r,..:. . ,,. ,,, ....,,,
1 °tea, Akit'• a•x y
.: �l ' i .k 'n�. Ra - „1 _ "�' k ` rig � �> ,rva o f '',.:C. \s Y ��,fl.R., .t'" x 5 "
,' ,-' ''''.''''' 1...''', ,10.-,, c .4,--,_ .4,,,,r, t.„14......,,„....„:
t, . .....„.v.c.„,„.„..
.,......* ..„ , . ‘,„,,,.... „......„,,,,tt.t.,„ ,. ,i. ,.,t,., .,-,,, fr4,,),..7,wit..,:_„4*,.•
-, -----..,, - + t„.,,,,,,t„,.-14.,,_,,,-,...- '„,-7,!....,.4'.V'
i � , ,,.. , --,-....,-, _ _
- . . y ^
tr
`` ,, f ` '43t a` , ;;', u � �'i am ' , u
r.
'i PP6—MY00—4/16/20 PP6—MY01 — 12/18/20
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 39 MY01 Monitoring Report

a •
:
, .I 1
„,,„.7_,„ 7„.;., , , . . 1, , .
{ __,,__
._., . , .
L3N iM
V �
--p?-4- 4•17;' ` -- . - •""---------.'+',".---,:- ' .:-_,.,:1/',,..tri; ,,i . 1
PP7-MY00-4/16/20 PP7-MY01 - 12/18/20
^,4
a '.
fir'" 4 "'CQ4 a .d �e•,,a,sY -d 5 3 #'"; •..
} ,,er�gg ^i }
m6 +C
,W � t - v " _ _ 1 Lay s 4 _
'' r"- Hwy _ o -`i� a hi - it i- *.
s `
x I
� I. c,
PP8 MY00 4/16/20 PP8-MY01 - 12/18/20
i !. s a
•
•
r
i
PP9-MY00-4/17/20 PP9-MY01 - 12/18/20
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 40 MY01 Monitoring Report

Ft
,, ..,. ,..,„ . . . .
..:......_. ...... , ... . .. .. -..,.}...3.,. . -_,
PP10—MY00—4/17/20 PP10 MY01 12/18/20
•
3 - ` s�Y z kys
^ v
„ - � " I": _. ��g. a ✓ a ;:,y � - of ai`
qd kh�,
, t 9 V.
t �
PP 11 MY00—4/16/20 PP 11 MY01 12/18/20
.:::, 4t. .. . f Y f ./..f,!. *i. ..,. - - 11
.,,.,.,.,,,3„...„,„..,,,,....,...,..:.,_,.,
�.� \' n`yq\ 5,4�4 ,,,,Sf!4 h, S At;,.Y7 f` .. t. �,q
4
.`,,-'.-....:,: _. y Wyk' ;�C£{ F r �
a -
C -3pyiP 7N ".
Gyp
•
5�",� v J '^ s "p41
PP 12 MY00 4/16/20 PP 12 MY01 12/18/20
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 41 MY01 Monitoring Report

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
: tee,
, -. _,. . "
. 114paiff$Z?:;e4:, :AAP' 1'
E.
Vegetation Plot 1 —MY01 — 10/28/20 Vegetation Plot 2—MY01 — 10/28/20
__....‘!.40,;4,,,,,,.„,...:10m
S
2aty: , , 1,1
1
' a _
Vegetation Plot 3—MY01 — 10/28/20 Vegetation Plot 4—MY01 — 10/27/20
9 .--„„ : , ,,,„,,, „._. ,-,..,,,,,,..,.. .., .,, ,..
, ,
. , ,..,,,
1. N
Isk,,,,,.....„—,, -- -
,,
�• ,- 3y ram
t y ..„..,,,,,,,,:„.,
s-et i �, --s,,§ram °" �
. - .,.. .r
.,,,,...,„,=.
.,„,..,.., . ,,,,....,,,,..,..,
c
Vegetation Plot 5—MY01— 10/27/20 Vegetation Plot 6—MY01 - 10/27/20
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 42 MY01 Monitoring Report

•
�' k- ) t yd _:
ep*r ww yy � 'w^ b'ra
4:
•• ..: y) ,'S '� ^mom .
1 3 - , .es;fir .C�6 X ..9e"'y £ '�-
�' s s y r 1. 55 rar ' . 7 '.y '' -,'--": ?a %4 ‘";„ 'gar ie
• x ' s 3g " t si (4 ? K
^ tie *�" +1014- `iM h iT '' r C.,.',: °Y I ks.w- - M
L.A. mk, 4+ M1 .P i p - Y Alf r F
y � _��V�& $ �: �r o rs f , ' '.
'i "•1., s -,,,,,A.,,,,,, a ,,t i , w } . ""` �ii d i- .- ' - ! sea, •'"fir ,�+'"
'r'. k\i i'" .v }# z<vr ' " fir � - k
Vegetation Plot 7—MY01 — 10/27/20 Vegetation Plot 8—MY01 — 10/27/20
E
II r a
® Iy 't ' it 1r, ',5 ,i•,ly h 4 5-4 :'4 $
`� 1 A'S A :.'Cv, -�.,_ a_yam_ �.: f Jf
t y r )' dw , k `,
s b
Vegetation Plot 9—MY01 — 10/26/20 Vegetation Plot 10—MY01 — 10/26/20
i ce'z r :_. e :.E
„ ..,_,.1.1;
Er.
. .,, , .
. . ,
,., .
. .
.. ..
,..
. ,
•
. _
•
,. ..
•
_ ,.,
. _ ,
. .
, . •..
. . .
Vegetation Plot 11 —MY01 — 10/26/20 Vegetation Plot 12—MY01 — 10/26/20
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 43 MY01 Monitoring Report

s
1� mil' _ a
4, _ x�.t1
Vegetation Plot 13—MY00— 10/26/20 Vegetation Plot 14—MY01 — 10/27/20
•
•
1
Vegetation Plot 15 MY01 10/26/20 Vegetation Plot 16 MY01 10/26/20
3v .
' \ i
Vegetation Plot 17—MY01 —10/27/20 Vegetation Plot 18 MY01 — 10/27/20
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 44 MY01 Monitoring Report

'‘IIIMPligjir'r711! ! _ _.,. ' ,..,
\. n
•
! •
`
Vegetation Plot R1 —MY01 — 10/28/20 Vegetation Plot R2—MY01 — 10/28/20
it,*
A 1 ?•
4t
s r r ' y i ' '
c 4
F r •
w x " ray O 1
v
v �'U4, ,q a n &�
P 4 h
fir y } 5 { .__ - mod-
gi.
asp y
Vegetation Plot R3 —MY01 — 10/27/20 Vegetation Plot R4—MY01 — 10/27/20
-.0111
,10.4...-f...„,1, , _
a �t yy
Y k
r sY ;� 'g> p-0 PS t L '�""C ,r 3 ,r s a#k ' `. r' y;
...,.. ‘.- --,.--tiii4-`,4--...'IN., .;:-,?...;..,',wyvio.k.424.4 -11).,1..' '--.7.-,-,', ,.. .
Vegetation Plot R5—MY01 — 10/27/20 Vegetation Plot R6—MY01 — 10/27/20
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 45 MY01 Monitoring Report

•
•
•
•
•
•
Vegetation Plot R7—MY01 — 10/26/20 Vegetation Plot R8—MY01 — 10/26/20
1 0
4
-a. y� r• ' t . �' PR
� 4� M hF _
•
M .- ,i t
V:'it-7'. . ' 'S,,;---7'4' ''.?..,,,W-.• '
•
;,_
( 'fR' P4.�;�J # i Yak p.�+Pfx " ° !al # +i_ 9
xyr. r � 9 ' a E r u A. r
C w ,
Vegetation Plot R9—MY01 — 10/26/20 Vegetation Plot R10—MY01 — 10/26/20
ti �� i ram, �eJ � g
! #4 .
t Qv k � �� F mfi f [ mot ,':
f' a _ r am ++
y
•
h3
s
Plot R11
Vegetation
—MY01 — 10/27/20 Vegetation Plot R12—MY01 — 10/27/20
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 46 MY01 Monitoring Report

Problem Area Photos _
j � + c `� _ ' it
M
u +tiyQ „ac '1c4 -�e- S .,F 'r. r,'",Sn.4 -.�ni jV f �_4'5. �"'a � S t: , Ni a 't } ffi �b( " rV
• vilifr.tw,„__
9_,p aye''�.f- s 1t. "'° .4 �4 :� _ �
7,1'47 i''-`-'16" . ._oN..1, ,,,„, ...%.,7,:,.:., ., .1..4.t":•iVvrilk -`'• ,-,-P, ,.
Outer bend erosion, Sta 39+50, 12/18/20 Outer bend erosion, Sta 46+25, 12/18/20
. . 4"V ' f grit
/ee
,,?- '::f } 4 ',',���F,�n ?.'i' .q' ` : k .
e o
•
i 1 A z
Oute � ,
r bend erosion, Sta 50+75, 12/18/20 Outer bend erosion, Sta 54+25, 12/18/20
.
� � k r �
pal. g1. . ,1 '4 Y b y Sfi �'. t _�`(i 1 -
Q.
fie ..o, '`-
1 i �
s- - . 11 � �
- t f
iii
lime
� .°�} �. -yam s
Damaged boulder sill, Sta 55+60, 12/18/20 Outer bend erosion, Sta 61+00, 12/18/20
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 47 MY01 Monitoring Report

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Plot Data
Mill Darn Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 48 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 7. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Current Plot Data(MY01 2020)
Plot 01 Plot 02 Plot 03 Plot 04 Plot 05 Plot 06 Plot 07
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Holly(Ilex opaca)
American Hornbeam(Carpinus caroliniana)
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 2 2 5 5 2 2 6 6 2 2 1 1 1 1
Black Walnut(Juglans nigra) 2
Black Willow(Salix nigra)
Boxelder(Acer negundo) 1
Eastern Red Cedar(Juniperus virginiana)
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis)
Northern Red Oak(Quercus rubra)
Oak(Quercus sp.)
Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana)
Pin Oak(Quercus palustris) 11 11
Red Maple(Acer rubrum)
River Birch(Betula nigra) 6 6 5 5 2 2 5 5 4 4 1 1 5 5
Southern Red Oak(Quercus falcata)
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 1 1 4 5 4 4 4 4 2 2
White Oak(Quercus alba) 1 1
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 8 8 11 11 8 8 5 5 11 11 1 1 3 3
Unknown
Stem count 17 17 22 23 17 20 21 21 21 21 3 3 24 24
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Species count 4 4 4 5 5 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 7 7
Stems per ACRE 688 688 890 931 688 809 850 850 850 850 121 121 971 971
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 49 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 7. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Current Plot Data(MY01 2020)
Plot 08 Plot 09 Plot 10 Plot 11 Plot 12 Plot 13 Plot 14
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Holly(Ilex opaca)
American Hornbeam(Carpinus caroliniana)
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 2 26 6 6 6 2 2 2 5 5 5
Black Walnut(Juglans nigra) 1
Black Willow(Salix nigra) 2 2 3 3
Boxelder(Acer negundo) 1
Eastern Red Cedar(Juniperus virginiana)
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis) 1 1
Northern Red Oak(Quercus rubra) 1
Oak(Quercus sp.)
Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana)
Pin Oak(Quercus palustris) 2 2 1 1 5 5
Red Maple(Acer rubrum) 1
River Birch(Betula nigra) 1 2 5 5 8 8 1
Southern Red Oak(Quercus falcata) 5
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii)
Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 10 11 2 2 1 1 5 5 8 13 4 5 6 6
White Oak(Quercus alba) 2 2 5 7 2 2
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 8 8 7 7 4 4 5 5 8 11 8 8 20 20
Unknown
Stem count 21 51 18 24 19 19 15 16 21 38 22 30 31 31
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Species count 4 8 5 6 4 4 5 6 3 5 5 8 3 ' 3
Stems per ACRE 850 2,064 728 971 769 769 607 647 850 1,538 890 1,214 1,255 1,255
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 50 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 7. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Current Plot Data(MY01 2020)
Plot 15 Plot 16 Plot 17 Plot 18 Plot Rl Plot R2 Plot R3
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total _Planted Total
American Holly(Ilex opaca)
American Hornbeam(Carpinus caroliniana)
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 9 9 2 2 11 22 6 6 4 4 4 4
Black Walnut(Juglans nigra) 1 2
Black Willow(Salix nigra)
Boxelder(Acer negundo) 6 1
Eastern Red Cedar(Juniperus virginiana)
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis)
Northern Red Oak(Quercus rubra)
Oak(Quercus sp.)
Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana)
Pin Oak(Quercus palustris)
Red Maple(Acer rubrum) 1
River Birch(Betula nigra) 8 8 9 9 4 4 3 3 2 2
Southern Red Oak(Quercus falcata)
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii) 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 4
Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 3 3 1 1 1 1 5 7 1 1 2 2 2 2
White Oak(Quercus alba)
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 10 10 10 10 8 8 14 14 6 6 4 4 8 8
Unknown
Stem count 32 33 21 21 11 11 30 51 17 19 14 14 20 20
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.025 0.025 _ 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 _ 0.025
Species count 5 6 4 4 3 3 3 5 4 6 5 5 5 5
Stems per ACRE 1,295 1,335 850 850 445 445 1,214 2,064 688 769 567 567 809 809
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 51 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 7. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Current Plot Data(MY01 2020)
Plot R4 Plot R5 Plot R6 Plot R7 Plot R8 Plot R9 Plot R10
Species Planted Total Planted Total _Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total _Planted Total
American Holly(Ilex opaca)
American Hornbeam(Carpinus caroliniana) 1
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 13 13 1 1 4 4 42 42 1 1 6 6
Black Walnut(Juglans nigra)
Black Willow(Salix nigra) 9 9
Boxelder(Acer negundo)
Eastern Red Cedar(Juniperus virginiana)
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis)
Northern Red Oak(Quercus rubra)
Oak(Quercus sp.)
Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana)
Pin Oak(Quercus palustris) 1 1
Red Maple(Acer rubrum) 5 1
River Birch(Betula nigra) 3 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 1 1
Southern Red Oak(Quercus falcata)
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii) 1 1 1 1 1 1
Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 6 6 10 10 4 4 1 1 1 1 4 4
White Oak(Quercus alba)
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 6 6 2 2 7 7 6 6 5 5 7 7 6 6
Unknown
Stem count 25 25 17 22 18 18 53 53 7 7 18 18 20 22
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Species count 3 3 5 6 5 5 5 5 3 3 4 4 4 6
Stems per ACRE 1,012 1,012 688 890 728 728 2,145 2,145 283 283 728 728 809 890
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 52 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 7. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
_ Current Plot Data(MY01 2020) Annual Means
Plot R11 Plot R12 MY01(2020) MY00(2020)
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Holly(Ilex opaca) 1 1
American Hornbeam(Carpinus caroliniana) 1 2
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 4 4 18 18 159 207 88 88
Black Walnut(Juglans nigra) 6 4
Black Willow(Salix nigra) 14 14 5 5
Boxelder(Acer negundo) 7 4 20
Eastern Red Cedar(Juniperus virginiana) 1 1
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis) 2
Northern Red Oak(Quercus rubra) 1 1
Oak(Quercus sp.) 206 206
Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana) 7 7 1 1
Pin Oak(Quercus palustris) 20 20
Red Maple(Acer rubrum) 8
River Birch(Betula nigra) 2. 2 83 85 107 107
Southern Red Oak(Quercus falcata) 5
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii) 15 15 20 20
Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 1 1 6 6 99 109 172 172
White Oak(Quercus alba) 10 12
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 4 4 10 10 220 223 30 30
Unknown 89 89
Stem count 11 21 41 45 620 731 718 723
size(ares) 1 1 30 30
size(ACRES) 0.025 0.025 0.741 0.741
Species count 4 8 4 5 8 17 9 11
Stems per ACRE 445 850 1,659 1,821 836 986 969 975
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KC1 Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 53 MY01 Monitoring Report

APPENDIX D
Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Mill Darn Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 54 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 8a. UTHC-1 Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 5.8-10.6 9.0-10.0 6.5-9 6.0 7.6 8.9 3
Floodprone Width(ft) 9.0-27.3 13-21 50 59.1 64.6 68.3 3
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.4-0.8 1.1-1.2 0.5-0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 3
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.4-1.2 1.3-1.5 0.8-1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 3
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 2.8-4.5 10.4-10.7 3.4-6.1 4.5 5.1 5.5 3
Width/Depth Ratio 7.6-28.2 8-10 12.4-13.4 8.2 11.6 14.4 3
Entrenchment Ratio 1.2-2.6 1.3-2.3 5.6-7.7 6.6 8.7 11.0 3
Bank Height Ratio 1.0-10.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 45 26-61 26-61
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 13-42 18-27 18-27
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * 1.3-4.4 2.0-4.1 2.0-4.1
Meander Wavelength(ft) * 93-136 54-125 54-125
Meander Width Ratio * 4.5-5.0 4.0-7.5 4.0-7.5
Riffle Length(ft) * U 4.2 27.2 40.9 30
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.024-0.033 0.013-0.028 0.018-0.046 0.011 0.024 0.059 30
Pool Length(ft) * 9.8 61.1 161.9 28
Pool Spacing(ft) * 30-59 48-70 31.3 59.3 118.6 27
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 2/18/51/28/0/0 1/19/51/26/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 1.3/18/37/97/130 Gravel Gravel 1.3/9.7/31/91/147
Channel length(ft) 1,874 1,739 1,739
Drainage Area(acres) 114 Variable 114 114
Rosgen Classification F4 B4c C4 C4
Sinuosity 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.021 0.013 0.025 0.026
*:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 55 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 8b. UTHC3 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data(SF) Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 8.5-14.1 9.0-10.0 12 10.9 1 11.3 11.7 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 17.1 13-21 68 69.4 72.6 75.8 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.8-1.6 1.1-1.2 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 2
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.1-2.0 1.3-1.5 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.7 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 8.5-12.5 10.4-10.7 11.4 10.6 12.0 13.3 2
Width/Depth Ratio 17 8-10 12.7 10.2 10.7 11.1 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 1.3-2.3 5.7 5.9 6.5 7.0 2
Bank Height Ratio 3.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 45 39-57 39-57
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 13-42 24-36 24-36
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * 1.3-4.4 24-36 24-36
Meander Wavelength(ft) * 93-136 111-173 111-173
Meander Width Ratio * 4.5-5.0 3.3-4.8 3.3-4.8
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) * 18.2 46.0 85.8 18
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.015 0.013-0.028 0.0007-0.032 0.003 0.015 0.040 18
Pool Length(ft) * ;11 15.9 26.6 49.1 17
Pool Spacing(ft) * 30-59 52-101 48.8 75.5 113.5 16
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 3/15/57/19/0/6 0/13/48/37/1/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 2.7/15/26/40/92 Gravel Gravel 2.5/23/48/125/165
Channel length(ft) 1,411 = 1,325 1,325
Drainage Area(acres) 297 Variable 297 297
Rosgen Classification F4 B4c C4 C4
Sinuosity 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.014 0.013 0.015 0.015
:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 56 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 8c. T1 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data(SF) Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.1-7.5 6.5 6.5
Floodprone Width(ft) 6.0-32.8 35 48.4
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.5-0.7 0.5 0.6
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.8-1.0 0.8 1.2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 2.7-3.8 3.4 3.9
Width/Depth Ratio 6.2-14.9 12-18 12.4 10.9
Entrenchment Ratio 1.5-4.4 2.2+ 5.4 7.5
Bank Height Ratio 1.0-4.5 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 23-41 23-41
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 15 22 15 22
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * 2.2-3.4 2.2-3.4
Meander Wavelength(ft) * 60-83 60-83
Meander Width Ratio * 3.5-6.3 3.5-6.3
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) * MEI7.8 22.0 42.2 16
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.019-0.028 0.015-0.60 0.002 0.022 0.035 16
Pool Length(ft) * 3.5 12.6 20.1 16
Pool Spacing(ft) * 25-63 24.4 41.3 58.4 15
Substrate and Transport Parameters
-
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 31/21/44/4/1/0 2/15/66/17/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.13/0.37/3/38/66 Gravel Gravel 1.9/8.8/22/67/94
Channel length(ft) 764 = 751 751
Drainage Area(acres) 43 Variable 43 43
Rosgen Classification B4,C4,G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.026 N/A 0.026 0.025
:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 57 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 8d. T1A Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data(SF) Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 7.1 5.5 5.4 5.6 5.8 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 7.7 35 44.5 49.4 54.4 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 2
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 2.8 2.5 1.8 2.1 2.3 2
-
Width/Depth Ratio 18.2 12-18 12.1 14.1 15.0 15.9 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 2.2+ 6.4 7.7 8.9 10.1 2
Bank Height Ratio 19.6 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 20-28 20-28
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 15-22 15-22
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * 2.3-3.4 2.3-3.4
Meander Wavelength(ft) * 72-84 72-84
Meander Width Ratio * 3.6-5.1 3.6-5.1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 1.4 20.7 51.8 16
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.025 0.020-0.062 0.000 0.025 0.046 16
Pool Length(ft) 4.9 14.7 27.2 16
Pool Spacing(ft) * 32-58 32.8 44.7 65.8 15
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 31/51/12/6/0/01111
5/19/62/14/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.062/0.072/0.13/2.9/71 Gravel Gravel 0.7/5.8/20/59/99
Channel length(ft) 746 795 795
Drainage Area(acres) 29 Variable 29 29
Rosgen Classification F4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.022 N/A 0.030 0.030
*:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 58 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 8e. T2-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
t
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 3.1 4.5 4.7
Floodprone Width(ft) 4 22 24.1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.5 0.4 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.8 0.6 0.9
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 1.5 1.7 2.3
Width/Depth Ratio 6.3 12-18 12.0 9.9
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 2.2+ 4.9 5.1
Bank Height Ratio 3.3 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length(ft) ' 1.6 13.2 40.9 8
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.04 0.024-0.063 0.023 0.049 0.099 8
Pool Length(ft) Mini 3.6 14.8 31.4 7
Pool Spacing(ft) * 21-34 24.1 37.8 55.6 6
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 11/14/63/13/0/0 111111 14/30/27/30/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.26/13/21/58/84 Gravel Gravel 0.1/0.7/6/87/130
Channel length(ft) 232 265 265
Drainage Area(acres) 16 Variable 16 16
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.038 N/A 0.042 0.040
:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 59 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 8f. T3 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
1=11-
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 3.5 4.5 4.7
Floodprone Width(ft) 4.2 18 19.2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 0.4 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.4 0.6 0.7
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 1.1 1.7 1.9
Width/Depth Ratio 11.3 12-18 12.0 11.6
Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 2.2+ 4.0 4.1
Bank Height Ratio 3.3 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length(ft) 2.2 13.3 25.7 13
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.058 0.051 -0.074 0.032 0.058 0.125 13
Pool Length(ft) 3.4 9.5 20.7 12
Pool Spacing(ft) * 20-30 22.8 28.2 46.7 11
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 28/5/38/27/4 mll 6/11/71/13/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.062/3.1/25/130/240 Gravel Gravel 1.7/7.8/28/61/84
Channel length(ft) 378 IMF ilMir _ 369 369
Drainage Area(acres) 7 Variable 7 7
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.059 N/A 0.059 0.057
*:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 60 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 8g. T4 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 2.5 4.5 4.0
Floodprone Width(ft) 4.7 16 18.7
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 0.6 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.4 0.6 0.8
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 0.7 1.7 1.9
Width/Depth Ratio 9.4 12-18 12.0 8.3
Entrenchment Ratio 1.9 2.2+ 3.6 4.7
Bank Height Ratio 6.9 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length(ft) W 7.9 13.4 22.2 7
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.1 0.102-0.103 0.039 0.11 0.23 7
Pool Length(ft) Mama
i 3.2 5.4 11.0 7
Pool Spacing(ft) * 24-27 9.5 19.5 26.5 6
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 12/65/13/8/2/0 111lP 0/15/77/8/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.11/0.16/0.21/4.3/120 Gravel Gravel 2.2/9.6/15/48/76
Channel length(ft) 151 151 151
Drainage Area(acres) 3 Variable 3 3
Rosgen Classification B4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.0 1.1-1.3 1.0 1.0
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.089 N/A 0.113 0.109
*:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 61 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 8h. T6-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.4 5.5 5.6
Floodprone Width(ft) 5.4 24 27.4
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.6 0.5 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.7 0.7 1.0
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 2.6 2.5 2.6
Width/Depth Ratio 7.5 12-18 12.1 11.9
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 2.2+ 4.4 4.9
Bank Height Ratio 4.4 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length(ft) Wm. ■ 15.4 25.1 37.9 15
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.02 0.020-0.063 0.007 0.033 0.070 15
Pool Length(ft) MEL M. 5.9 14.1 22.7 15
Pool Spacing(ft) * 32-47 28.8 42.9 50.9 14
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 7/33/60/0/0/0 1/16/53/30/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.19/1.6/4.1/13/27 Gravel Gravel 1.7/16/38/93/140
Channel length(ft) 621 658 658
Drainage Area(acres) 29 Variable 29 29
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.0 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.041 N/A 0.034 0.037
*:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 62 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 8i. T6A-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) ** 4.5 4.4
Floodprone Width(ft) ** 24 25.3
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) ** 0.4 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) ** 0.6 0.6
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(IV) ** 1.7 1.7
Width/Depth Ratio ** 12-18 12.0 11.0
Entrenchment Ratio ** 2.2+ 5.3 5.8
Bank Height Ratio ** 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) ** N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) ** N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) ** N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) ** N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio ** N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length(ft) ** 9.3 14.8 24.0 3
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) ** 0.087-0.099 0.056 0.091 0.118 3
Pool Length(ft) ** 14.2 16.7 19.5 3
Pool Spacing(ft) ** 22-23 29.4 30.0 30.6 2
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% ** 0/14/70/16/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) ** Gravel Gravel 2.6/25/36/64/85
Channel length(ft) 97 101 101
Drainage Area(acres) 9 Variable 9 9
Rosgen Classification ** B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity ** 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) ** N/A 0.091 I 0.095
**Existing conditions are ponded
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 63 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 8j. T7-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 3.2 6.5 10.1
Floodprone Width(ft) 4.6 28 47.4
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.8 0.5 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.1 0.8 1.0
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 2.4 3.4 4.3
Width/Depth Ratio 4.1 12-18 12.4 23.9
Entrenchment Ratio 1.4 2.2+ 4.3 4.7
Bank Height Ratio 1.7 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 20-24 20-24
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 15-22 15-22
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * 2.3-3.4 2.3-3.4
Meander Wavelength(ft) * 85-88 85-88
Meander Width Ratio * 3.1-3.7 3.1-3.7
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length(ft) 4.5 32.4 68.1 6
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.032 0.017-0.043 0.015 0.025 0.029 6
Pool Length(ft) 4.9 12.5 19.7 6
Pool Spacing(ft) * 36-57 45.7 54.6 86.6 5
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 3/18/62/16/1/0 7 0/20/62/17/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 1.2/7.9/22/66/89 Gravel Gravel 0.8/8.5/17/67/110
Channel length(ft) 335 348 348
Drainage Area(acres) 41 Variable 41 41
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity _ 1.1 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.033 N/A 0.024 0.022
:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 64 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 8k. T8-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
i
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 3.6 5.5 5.5 5.6 5.7 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 4.1 25 34.8 39.1 43.4 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 2
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 2.4 2.5 3.2 3.3 3.4 2
Width/Depth Ratio 5.5 12-18 12.1 9.1 9.6 10.1 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 2.2+ 4.4 6.3 7.0 7.6 2
Bank Height Ratio 2.5 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) * . N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 9.3 23.3 31.9 10
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.041 0.043-0.050 0.033 0.048 0.063 10
Pool Length(ft) 7.9 13.4 16.6 10
Pool Spacing(ft) * 32-45 34.1 42.2 53.6 9
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 18/27/40/14/0/0 I 4/17/52/27/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.13/2.2/8.5/81/140 Gravel Gravel 0.7/14/37/95/135
Channel length(ft) 486 ' 448 448
Drainage Area(acres) 21 Variable 21 21
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
-
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.044 N/A 0.045 0.048
:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 65 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 81. T8A Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 3.1 4.5 4.7 5.7 6.6 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 4.1 20 21.6 44.7 67.9 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 2
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.9 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 1.0 1.7 2.6 2.7 2.9 2
Width/Depth Ratio 5.5 12-18 12.0 8.6 11.9 15.2 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 2.2+ 4.4 4.6 7.4 10.3 2
Bank Height Ratio 2.7 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) IMli 12.3 22.7 42.7 7
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.044 0.019-0.062 0.027 0.053 0.10 7
Pool Length(ft) 6.3 12.4 22.4 6
Pool Spacing(ft) * 28-38 27.7 40.3 66.1 5
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 100/0/0/0/0/0 4/17/54/25/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.062/0.062/0.062/0.062/0.062 Gravel Gravel 1.8/23/32/84/135
Channel length(ft) 258 262 262
Drainage Area(acres) 7 Variable 7 7
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.052 N/A 0.044 0.047
.:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 66 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 8m. T9 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
■
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 2.9 5.5 4.1
Floodprone Width(ft) 5.5 22 29.6
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.7 0.5 0.7
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.9 0.7 0.9
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 2.0 2.5 2.8
Width/Depth Ratio 4.3 12-18 12.1 6.0
Entrenchment Ratio 1.9 2.2+ 4.0 7.2
Bank Height Ratio 1.7 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length(ft) 10.5 22.8 31.7 4
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.031 0.037 0.033 0.039 0.056 4
Pool Length(ft) 3.9 6.2 7.7 3
Pool Spacing(ft) * 34-36 37.02 39.1 41.1 2
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 26/66/8/0/0/0 3/7/59/31/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.062/0.13/0.15/0.23/3.7 Gravel Gravel 12/32/42/90/150
Channel length(ft) 133 129 129
Drainage Area(acres) 29 Variable 29 29
Rosgen Classification B4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.0 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.039 N/A 0.042 0.038
.:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 67 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 9. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Cross-Section 1 (Riffle) Cross-Section 2(Riffle) Cross-Section 3(Pool)
Dimension and Substrate Station 13+50,UTHC-1 Station 19+25,UTHC-1 Station 19+50,UTHC-1
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 r MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 948.8 948.8 I I 931.0 930.9 ' 930.3 930.1
Bankfull Width(ft) 6.0 6.6 8.0 7.0 8.4 7.8
Floodprone Width(ft) 66.3 66.6 68.3 70.7 • --- ---
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.7
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 4.5 4.5 5.3 5.3 7.4 7.4
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 4.5 4.4 5.3 6.1 7.4 9.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 8.2 9.6 12.1 9.2 --- ---
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 11.0 10.1 8.6 10.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 I 1.0 0.9
d50(mm) 48 48 24 40
Cross-Section 4(Pool) Cross-Section 5(Riffle) Cross-Section 6(Riffle)
Station 23+17,UTHC-1 Station 23+32,UTHC-1 Station 30+20,UTHC-2
1 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07_
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 923.0 922.9 922.8 922.9 908.7 908.7
Bankfull Width(ft) 13.1 12.1 8.9 8.6 22.6 22.8
Floodprone Width(ft) --- --- 59.1 57.6 43.0 43.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.2 1.3 0.6 0.6 I 2.5 2.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 2.2 2.4 1 1.0 0.9 3.7 3.6
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 15.4 15.4 5.5 5.5 55.5 55.5
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 15.4 16.8 5.5 4.9 55.5 55.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio --- --- 14.4 13.2 9.2 9.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio --- --- 6.6 6.7 1.9 1.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio --- 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.0
d50(mm) --- --- 21 38 19 31
Cross-Section 7 (Riffle) Cross-Section 8(Pool) Cross-Section 9 (Riffle)
Station 38+52,UTHC-2 Station 46+20,UTHC-3 Station 46+48,UTHC-3
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 1. 11 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 883.7 883.7 T T 871.2 871.2 T T 871.0 870.9 T 1
Bankfull Width(ft) 12.9 11.8 10.4 10.4 10.9 11.2
Floodprone Width(ft) 37.6 38.4 --- --- 75.8 76.1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.3 1.4 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 2.0 2.2 3.8 3.8 1.4 1.6
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 16.7 16.7 20.8 20.8 , 10.6 10.6
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 16.7 16.6 20.8 20.8 10.6 11.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 9.9 8.3 --- --- 11.1 11.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 2.9 3.3 7.0 6.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
d50(mm) 19 55 . 50 64
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 68 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 9. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Cross-Section 10 (Riffle) Cross-Section 11(Riffle) Cross-Section 12(Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate Station 53+10,UTHC-3 Station 57+40,UTHC-4 Station 65+80,UTHC-6
MY00 MYOI MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 861.6 861.7 853.8 853.9 845.4 845.4
Bankfull Width(ft) 11.7 14.0 11.9 12.1 17.6 19.0
Floodprone Width(ft) 69.4 69.5 43.2 43.8 30.7 17.7
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.1 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.6
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.7 1.7 2.2 2.3 2.8 2.6
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 13.3 13.3 17.3 17.3 30.2 29.7
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 13.3 12.1 17.3 16.0 30.2 29.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.2 14.7 8.2 8.5 10.3 12.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 5.9 5.0 3.6 3.6 1.7 0.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 3.2 1.0
d50(mm) 45 51 1 19 72 1111 MIK 20 65 11111
Cross-Section 13(Riffle) Cross-Section 14(Riffle) Cross-Section 15(Riffle)
Station 67+20,UTHC-6 Station 155+00,T1A Station 156+20,T1A
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 847.4 847.2 943.6 943.6ir
illi 938.9 939.1
Bankfull Width(ft) 24.9 27.3 5.4 4.8 5.8 5.5
Floodprone Width(ft) 67.7 68.1 54.4 54.3 44.5 1 46.4
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.6 1.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 2.6 3.2 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 38.7 38.7 1.8 1.8 2.3 2.3
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 38.7 42.1 1.8 1.9 2.3 1.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 16.0 19.3 15.9 12.5 14.1 12.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 2.7 2.5 10.1 11.4 7.7 8.4
■
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.8
d50(mm) 21 37 24 29 16 19
Cross-Section 16 (Riffle) Cross-Section 17(Pool) Cross-Section 18 (Riffle)
Station 104+80,T1 Station 105+10,T1 Station 206+60,T2
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 929.2 929.2 928.4 928.4 923.4 923.4
Bankfull Width(ft) 6.5 8.6 8.7 7.8 4.7 5.8 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 48.4 49.6 --- --- 24.1 24.6
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.6 0.4 1.0 1.1 0.5 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.2 1.3 2.3 2.1 0.9 0.9
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 3.9 3.9 8.3 8.3 2.3 2.3
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 3.9 3.7 8.3 8.4 2.3 1.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.9 19.3 --- --- 9.9 14.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 7.5 5.7 --- --- 5.1 4.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.9 --- --- 1.0 0.8
d50(mm) 22 27 --- --- 6.4 69
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 69 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 9. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Cross-Section 19 (Pool) Cross-Section 20(Riffle) Cross-Section 21(Pool)
Dimension and Substrate Station 206+80,T2 Station 302+80,T3 Station 303+30 T3
' MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 7
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 922.6 922.6 917.7 917.8 916.6 916.6
Bankfull Width(ft) 6.7 6.6 4.7 4.8 7.8 7.2
Floodprone Width(ft) --- --- 19.2 19.0 --- ---
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.4 1.0 1.1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.7 1.9 0.7 0.7 1.9 1.8
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 5.6 5.6 1.9 1.9 7.7 7.7
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 5.6 5.2 1.9 1.3 7.7 8.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio --- --- 11.6 12.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio -- -- 4.1 3.9 --
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio --- --- 1.0 1.0
d50(mm) --- --- I , 28 26 f I --- --- L
Cross-Section 22(Riffle) Cross-Section 23(Riffle) Cross-Section 24(Riffle)
Station 400+90,T4 Station 651+25,T6A Station 608+15,T6
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 _MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MYO5 MY07 _
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 906.2 906.2 894.3 894.3 _ _ 877.9 878.4 _
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.0 4.4 4.4 3.5 5.6 3.8
Floodprone Width(ft) 18.7 19.2 25.3 29.8 27.4 43.8
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.9 MI 1.0 1.0
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.7 2.6 2.6
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.8 2.6 0.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 8.3 10.0 11.0 7.1 11.9 5.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 4.7 4.4 5.8 8.5 4.9 11.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.5 I 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.6
d50(mm) 15 12 36 35 38 15
Cross-Section 25 (Pool) Cross-Section 26 (Pool) Cross-Section 27 (Riffle)
Station 608+40,T6 Station 703+40,T7 Station 703+70,T7
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 I MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 877.6 877.7 1 868.2 868.0 867.5 867.6
Bankfull Width(ft) 8.4 5.1 7.2 6.0 10.1 7.3
Floodprone Width(ft) --- --- --- 47.4 47.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.6 1.0 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.6
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.1 1.6 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.0
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 5.1 5.1 4.6 4.6 4.3 4.3
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 5.1 4.4 4.6 5.8 4.3 3.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio --- --- --- --- 23.9 12.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio --- --- --- 4.7 6.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio --- --- --- 1.0 0.9
d50(mm) --- --- 17 22
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 70 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 9. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Cross-Section 28(Riffle) Cross-Section 29(Riffle) Cross-Section 30(Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate Station 900+80,T9 Station 806+10,T8 Station 807+45,T8
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 r MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05•MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 853.0 853.3 11. 111111111r849.8 849.9 842.8 842.8 T T
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.1 4.7 5.5 5.5 5.7 5.8
Floodprone Width(ft) 29.6 31.9 34.8 43.8 43.4 42.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.9 1.2 1.0 1.2 I.0 1.0
Cross-Sectional Area(112)based on AB BKF area 2.8 2.8 3.4 3.4 3.2 3.2
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 2.8 1.5 3.4 2.9 3.2 3.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 6.0 7.9 9.1 9.0 10.1 10.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 7.2 6.7 6.3 7.9 7.6 7.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0
d50(mm) 42 6.7 36 68 37 16
Cross-Section 31(Riffle) Cross-Section 32(Riffle)
Station 850+60,T8A Station 851+75,T8A
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 850.8 850.9 845.8 845.6
Bankfull Width(fl) 4.7 5.2 4.8 4.1
Floodprone Width(ft) 21.6 21.8 49.3 49.4
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth(fl) 1.1 1.1 0.9 1.0
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 2.6 2.6 2.1 2.I
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 8.6 10.7 11.4 8.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 4.6 4.2 10.2 12.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2
d50(mm) 54 5 10 54
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 71 MY01 Monitoring Report

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River .i': :: ,}. r•
Site: Mill Dam Creek "*-
XS ID XS1
Drainage Area(sq mi): il 0.18
Date: 12/17/2020
Field Crew: TS,KB
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 949.92 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 948.82
0.0 949.20 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 4.5
6.0 948.52 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 4.4
11.9 948.33 Bankfull Width: 6.6
18.2 948.67 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 950.00
24.1 948.74 Flood Prone Width: 66.6
28.9 948.74 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.2
34.2 948.83 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7
36.1 948.88 W/D Ratio: 9.6
37.7 948.91 Entrenchment Ratio: 10.1 •
38.7 948.62 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0
40.0 947.87 Thalweg Elevation: 947.64
40.1 947.87
40.4 947.80 Mill Dam Creek,XS1,Riffle,UTHC
41.0 947.65 955
41.7 947.64
42.0 947.68 954
43.0 948.13
44.6 948.84 953
46.1 948.86 952
50.2 948.93
54.7 949.02 951
59.6 949.00 '
63.4 949.14 o0 950
•
66.9 950.08 0 949
71.5 952.06 t
73.4 952.34 W 948
76.5 952.69
76.6 953.70 947
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station(feet)
•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area -MY00 MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
:
XS ID XS2 ), � h •e. • e k•,
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.18 L. ':
Date: 12/17/2020 �`�� -
s ,
Field Crew: TS,KB "''. - -
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 935.88 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 930.86
0.0 935.27 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.3
3.0 935.20 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 6.1 5.2 934.98 Bankfull Width: 7.0dmow_
7.1 934.19 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 932.30 tir ., . :- s'
10.7 933.08 Flood Prone Width: 70.7 -.k;,;.• - ,, :-/
14.0 931.81 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.4 -'Yr.= £,.� fir°,=; ,y,.r, �,r
15.3 931.54 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 R g [. F; 4•.
17.5 931.35 W/D Ratio: 9.2 ..-'
20.9 931.23 Entrenchment Ratio: 10.1 _ / iiiy
. t'
25.4 931.14 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9
29.6 931.38 Thalweg Elevation: 929.43 r 1,
33.7 931.36
37.9 930.92 Mill Dam Creek,XS2,Riffle,UTHC
41.8 930.78
43.4 930.77 937
44.2930.27 936
45.1 930.27
46.0 929.79 935
46.4 929.60 /
47.1 929.68 934 _
47.7 929.43
48.3 929.81 ' 933
48.6 930.05 0
49.1 930.27 ti 932 _
49.8 930.44
51.2 930.90 W 931 - ------ \ f�
52.5 930.89 930
54.4 930.87
57.8 930.48 929
61.3 930.39 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
64.7 930.38
68.3 930.37 Station(feet)
72.4 930.31 ----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01
77.8 930.35
80.8 930.83

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS3
Drainage Area(sq mi): il 0.18 :
Date: 12/17/2020 - •-- ' -
Field Crew: TS,KB #► .
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA y- • .'„1:;�-"•
0.0 934.94 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 930.10 - fi' - :79
0.2 934.27 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 7.4 1 V. d' •fi{-•L ' , -, .,i ' r
1.5 934.01 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 9.5 i , u1 ��. - '
s _,:
3.2 932.92 Bankfull Width: 7.8 i �,r. S,t;. ' .k _
6.1 931.79 Flood Prone Area Elevation: _ --- w
8.0 931.30 Flood Prone Width: --- .. i
,•1:`
10.9 930.99 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.7 ' a
14.7 930.67 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 -.p 14 'y' '-':
18.0 930.22 W/D Ratio: --- -
20.9 930.42 Entrenchment Ratio: ---
22.8 930.39 Bank Height Ratio: ---
24.5 930.28 Thalweg Elevation: 928.37
25.0 930.06
25.7 929.79 Mill Dam Creek,XS3,Pool,UTHC
26.0 929.35
26.6 928.82 937 _
27.6 928.72 936
28.8 928.37 935
30.1 928.62
30.9 929.60 934
31.9 929.92 933
33.1 930.19
34.4 930.19 t 932
37.2 930.17 0 931
40.1 930.15
42.7 930.13 t 930 ' \ •
47.2 930.11 W 929 _
50.4 930.14
56.2 930.32 928
61.5 930.18 927
65.7 930.16 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
68.5 930.20
71.5 931.00 Station(feet)
74.0 932.28 ----Bankfull -MYoo -MY01
76.7 933.79
78.8 934.27

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River - - ' t'
Site: Mill Dam Creek T
XS ID XS4 t I W
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.18 •
Date: 12/17/2020 114'
Field Crew: 1=1 TS,KB dl 4 !
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ?l '. M !O
_ .?'S�+'r�'"° `..• . . - .. fir' y, .
0.0 927.07 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 922.95
4.1 926.09 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 15.4
4.8 925.99 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 16.8
7.3 924.84 Bankfull Width: 12.1
10.4 923.43 Flood Prone Area Elevation: --- . . .
14.3 923.18 Flood Prone Width: _ ---
19.0 923.03 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.4 -., 4 :7*.Z.:
r
21.6 922.99 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.3 ' • �� Y; y y'
23.1 923.02 W/D Ratio: l _` '-
23.5 922.86 Entrenchment Ratio: --- � �• + ' ti ,.
23.9 922.47 Bank Height Ratio: --- �• 1.,:': r^ ' ,
24.6 922.21 Thalweg Elevation: 920.59
25.7 920.65
26.7 920.81
28.1 920.59 Mill Dam Creek,XS4,Pool,UTHC
29.4 920.81 929 -_
30.7 921.49 928 _
31.8 922.17
32.8 922.43 927
34.1 922.64 -
35.8 923.06 926
37.5 923.12 w 925
40.7 923.17
43.2 923.10 z 924 \ X
cs
48.0 923.24 , 923
52.4 923.15 •
58.1 923.31 4-4 922 _ .3WMPERIPft.A...\c, :777or
61.0 923.33
62.8 923.44 921
65.5 924.44 920
68.2 925.95 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
70.5 927.02
71.8 927.25 Station(feet)
74.9 927.46 ----Bankfiill -MYoo -MVO!
75.0 928.08

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River - n, 7. 77i'lr:- 47
Site: Mill Dam Creek .- 1 f
XS ID XS5
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.18 fi$ F' '0 I F
Date: 12/22/2020
Field Crew: TS,KB
-71"t ~ ,
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ' -
0.0 926.30 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 922.93 • 'ef`a. .`.•' '• 6!
0.1 925.59 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.5 . 54
2.0 925.50 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 4.9 ° 'h• .6...• Y'
3.2 925.40 Bankfull Width: 8.6 1 ' -
5.5 924.39 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 923.83 ri �N*1' fir" `` '' i
7.0 923.49 Flood Prone Width: 57.6 i. a,. ([��1t yy 1
8.3 922.98 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 `` '-tr.•t t-_;` r
10.8 922.74 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 y..
14.7 922.73 W/D Ratio: 13.2 +.'
19.3 922.78 Entrenchment Ratio: 6.7
24.0 922.79 Bank Height Ratio: 0.8
• 4,1,.
26.9 922.84 Thalweg Elevation: 922.03 r -'
29.1 923.01
29.9 922.91 Mill Dam Creek,XS5,Riffle,UTHC
30.5 922.66 930
31.3 922.43
32.4 922.09 929
33.0 922.04
33.5 922.03 928
35.2 922.12 927
36.1 922.08
37.1 922.36 926
3 . 922. \
38.4 922.7878 I
925 _
39.7 922.77 924 _
41.7 922.91
44.3 922.82 W 923 - --
46.8 922.80
49.9 922.83 922
53.4 923.00 921 - I ,
57.4 923.05 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
60.9 923.20
63.6 923.64 Station(feet)
66.5 924.76 ----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 MY01
70.0 926.49
71.8 927.16

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek 4.y
XS ID XS6
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.22 +�_.: J
• ,
Date: 12/17/2020 j C r.-1;'f
Field Crew: TS,KB '" I j a - ,Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ."� : '' , Y
0.0 911.06 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 908.69 _+-.' r..- i
0.2 910.77 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 55.5 yi<-_.'-..:"=' " =, -{ :.
3.9 910.16 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 55.9 _.-- - -.:-.'i----;g:
6.0 909.78 Bankfull Width: 22.8 , -
8.8 909.49 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 912.30 +.;y ;g•':
10.9 907.44 Flood Prone Width: 43.0 ► •' :
12.0 906.71 Max Depth at Bankfull: 3.6 o v- . ; �i y r _.
14.1 906.24 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 2.4 -,.` - •. '_ 1.?N�_,,
15.8 906.04 W/D Ratio: 9.3 e'
air•
16.7 905.93 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.9 •_ 7 .; z. i• '
16.8 905.84 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 .. j.k -
16.7 905.34 Thalweg Elevation: 905.09 :- 1
17.5 905.31
18.7 905.35 Mill Dam Creek,XS6,Riffle,UTHC
19.9 905.09 914
21.1 905.33
22.3 905.98 913
23.4 905.78 912
24.0 905.69
25.8 905.64 911 --
27.3 905.71 910
29.0 906.64
31.0 907.71 t 909
32.2 908.67 0 908
33.2 908.84 '�
..."=...................c\ ..„
35.2 908.84 907
37.5 909.07 W 906
39.4 909.40
41.8 910.71 905
43.0 911.42
43.0 911.91 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Station(feet)
--Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 MY01

Cross-Section Plots
..- Y,Y • 1 i.r. l
River Basin: Yadkin River -
Site: Mill Dam Creek p ' 'I.. 1"= •Y' � F _
XS ID XS7
1• . �y
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.22 • •'�i'', � '• .p .--rv,• r r:
Date: 12/22/2020 7 •fl-.• - . -.
Field Crew: TS,KB k'-^`--i .. ,. r .' '$.rk�;
1 :.., -,T.- .1" - t ;,y.46 . .q7.•#- � - air
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA R•• -i:' '��7,.. .; _� ;`
0.0 889.03 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 883.73 ti ° r --£.w...`4. - - - -
0.0 888.47 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 16.7 ;�lF:z- ems; ti. -
5.9 888.46 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 16.6 • s -}'r - ..1.'
7.9 888.40 Bankfull Width: 11.8 • *;r' r^'
10.0 888.04 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 885.98 w:
12.3 886.39 Flood Prone Width: 38.4
13.4 885.54 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.2
r`''' S
14.8 884.97 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.4 -q `-..
16.6 884.92 W/D Ratio: 8.3
17.9 884.79 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.3 3 -
18.5 884.40 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0
19.2 883.86 Thalweg Elevation: 881.48 "
19.4 882.24
19.8 882.03 Mill Dam Creek,XS7,Riffle,UTHC
20.8 881.81 894
21.9 881.63 893
22.2 881.48
22.9 881.80 892
23.9 881.78 891
24.7 882.01 890
26.0 882.25 889
26.9 882.57 888 -
27.7 882.64 ' 887
30.0 883.13 0 886 - -
31.1 883.77 885
32.6 883.87 Z 884
35.6 883.90 W 883
39.3 884.11 882
1--
43.3 884.60 881
49.2 885.12 880
50.6 885.47 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
52.4 886.87
54.7 887.67 Station(feet)
58.4 888.11 ----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01
61.5 888.31
67.4 889.83

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River , a - "•,.'• qq
Site: Mill Dam Creek s ! l
XS ID XS8 1,•
Drainage Area(sq mi): 1.07 . r 1 ., •
Date: 12/22/2020
Field Crew: IIMI TS,KB -•._.i .si;�y -4Ii• •-i-_� i4.
'tics-: +yr. ; Y..` . • -
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA - 1 Itt -
0.0 872.99 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 871.16 - - '
0.5 872.18 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 20.8
4.5 872.16 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 20.8 •
7.4 872.16 Bankfull Width: 10.4 ,
10.1 871.65 Flood Prone Area Elevation: --- _
12.8 871.19 Flood Prone Width: _ -- •
-
18.5 871.33 Max Depth at Bankfull: 3.8
21.8 871.41 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 2.0
23.3 871.43 W/D Ratio: ---
25.9 871.31 Entrenchment Ratio: ---
27.0 871.35 Bank Height Ratio: ---
27.5 870.95 Thalweg Elevation: 867.37
27.8 869.94
28.2 869.05 Mill Dam Creek,XS8,Pool,UTHC
28.9 867.88
29.8 867.18 874 -
31.7 867.42 873
33.2 867.24 {
34.0 867.69 872 9�
35.5 868.38 •
36.9 869.04 871 7 - `
38.3 870.20
38.6 870.66 t 870
39.3 871.15 s
40.6 871.13 ° 869
42.3 871.73 0 868
45.6 871.76 W
53.1 871.56 867
60.0 871.36
63.1 871.58 866
66.8 871.50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
73.7 871.44
81.3 871.61 Station(feet)
84.6 871.61 ----Bankfull -MY00 -MY01
84.7 872.29

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek ,
XS ID XS9
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.46 '
Date: 12/22/2020
Field Crew: illiall TS,KB • .
, 1_ .i
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA •
•r'r,"rtF. ,� ,'+4.• t Su �, `
0.0 871.23 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 870.93 -
0.1 870.87 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 10.6
5.0 870.89 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 11.4 -1-111111
8.1 870.97 Bankfull Width: 11.2 ---
13.9 870.81 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 872.49 • "
17.9 870.80 Flood Prone Width: 76.1
4-• Ni
22.3 871.02 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.6 • •\14,
24.6 871.05 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 `t.
25.1 870.97 W/D Ratio: 11.7 1 ;r n
27.5 870.71 Entrenchment Ratio: 6.8 `'!,,aj`'-," ,
27.6 870.36 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0
29.2 870.13 Thalweg Elevation: 869.37
28.9 869.62
29.2 869.44 Mill Dam Creek,XS9,Riffle,UTHC
30.2 869.41 873
30.9 869.40
32.0 869.37
32.6 869.40
33.5 869.42 872
33.3 869.73
34.0 869.93
35.6 869.97
36.5 870.69 t 871 ____ __ ___
36.9 871.33 0
39.2 871.31
43.3 871.19 °� 870
48.4 871.16 W
56.8 871.17
64.2 871.23
71.3 871.32 869
76.9 871.25 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
76.1 871.72
Station(feet)
----Bankfiill ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River • .. . ."./,.$ • r•.�.I. "1
Site: Mill Dam Creek JP-e, H
XS ID XS10
vik- il,ii .' '
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.46 •.. �`
Date: 12/22/2020 I.-;,.' a !i 1:i +
Field Crew: TS,KB ! Y• } , 1R t�' 4.
rid
''..r j
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA : [r ',; art'.n e, : •,
0.0 861.90 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 861.67 33� F _
0.1 861.34 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 13.3 I . ',;.1 i'f t•'¢; w
3.7 861.30 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 12.1 • -
5.5 861.28 Bankfull Width: 14.0 I I _ ...''
6.5 860.89 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 863.38 .. - , _
7.2 860.88 Flood Prone Width: _ 69.5 �'.
7.5 860.47 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.7 i ..
7.9 860.54 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.0
4 •
8.6 860.91 W/D Ratio: 14.7 .54
10.0 860.97 Entrenchment Ratio: 5.0
10.8 861.33 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0
13.0 861.33 Thalweg Elevation: 859.97
15.7 861.50
25.1 861.49 Mill Dam Creek,XS10,Riffle,UTHC
28.3 861.64
28.9 861.53 864
30.1 861.07 -
31.0 860.65 863
31.8 860.19 -
32.7 860.10
33.5 860.09 862 - ��\`
34.2 859.98
35.4 859.97 J
86 860
42.3 861.59 -
47.0 861.59
53.7 861.83 859
61.3 861.93 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
68.8 862.11
69.5 861.87 Station(feet)
--Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River "
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS11 .3
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.46 P;r, _ • 't.-,. ,.
Date: 12/22/2020
•
Field Crew: TS,KB x
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 859.57 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 853.91 'r
0.1 859.29 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 17.3
1.1 859.13 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 16.0
6.6 858.14 Bankfull Width: 12.1
11.4 856.82 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 856.25
13.4 856.46 Flood Prone Width: 43.8 '
14.7 855.85 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.3 t •
17.0 855.71 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.4 - . . - - • .
19.5 855.31 W/DRatio: 8.5 i• • p I. 1,4^
23.0 855.11 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.6 1 /
26.8 854.93 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 = d
30.4 855.19 Thalweg Elevation: 851.57 i. ,•=j,--Cx,`6 i r' w
•
32.3 855.11
33.3 854.73 Mill Dam Creek,XS11,Riffle,UTHC
34.7 854.32 861 _
36.3 854.06
38.3 853.92 860 -
39.2 853.85 859 _
40.1 853.47 858 _ 1
41.1 853.05
42.1 852.74 857
42.3 852.17 856
42.7 851.91
43.5 851.84 s 855
44.5 851.74 'zt 854
45.0 851.61 853 =
45.9 851.62 W
46.5 851.62 852
47.3 851.57 851 =
47.6 851.81 850 -
47.7 852.43 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
48.9 852.65
49.9 852.85 Station(feet)
50.8 853.75 ----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01
51.4 853.93
53.2 854.25

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River - 1 „'
•
Site: Mill Dam Creek �II s' ' -
XS ID XS12 ., e
c.�
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.61 ' ' M: 1
Date: 12/22/2020 1 r "11
Field Crew: TS,KB l SP.
i(rt,t' ...
•
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ;
0.0 847.79 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 845.38 �' ' 'A�er'r '1 - -
0.1 847.18 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 29.7 �: - •+ '' •
- .a
2.3 847.18 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 29.7 ...16., t.
6.3 847.44 Bankfull Width: 19.0
12.5 847.69 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 848.02 _ '
15.4 847.68 Flood Prone Width: 17.7 - '-
18.0 847.67 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.6 -+
18.9 848.16 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.6
20.1 847.97 W/D Ratio: 12.2 'x- -
21.8 847.97 Entrenchment Ratio: 0.9
24.5 848.34 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0
28.0 848.32 Thalweg Elevation: 842.74
30.0 846.52
30.8 846.38 Mill Dam Creek,XS12,Riffle,UTHC
31.2 844.84 849
32.6 844.17
33.8 843.92 848 -J
34.6 iiI
36.2 847
37.5
38.6 846 _
39.4 40.8 41.7 s42.9 °cs43.6 44.0 -
44.2 842.80 842
45.2 842.95
46.0 843.42 841
46.4 843.49 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
46.7 844.69
47.3 845.07 Station(feet)
48.1 845.24 ----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01
50.3 845.40
51.8 845.45

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek . ' 1 r
XS ID XS13 �;;
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.04 • 7 1_• J
Date: 12/22/2020 ,1
Field Crew: IMMII TS,KB .- _••
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 849.59 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 847.23
0.2 848.82 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 38.7 ""�
3.1 848.66 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 42.1 i `
7.5 848.67 Bankfull Width: 27.3 l • y
15.9 848.33 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 850.40
16.3 848.44 Flood Prone Width: 68.1 .l'• ' ' �-' ii;. >
17.3 848.00 Max Depth at Bankfull: 3.2 '�• •v-0.� �' ,
20.1 847.47 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.4 :. . _ t ti.`.
22.7 847.38 W/D Ratio: 19.3 -,::.
J -
24.3 847.18 Entrenchment Ratio: 2.5 }., ' „ ` .it ►L
lb
24.4 846.94 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9 * '•
24.8 845.90 Thalweg Elevation: 844.06
25.5 844.86
26.3 844.50 Mill Dam Creek,XS13,Riffle,UTHC
27.5 844.38 853
28.4 844.06
29.2 844.15 852
30.2 844.74
30.8 844.99 851
31.5 845.22 850
32.1 845.32
33.4 845.38 849 E
84552 t84581 s 848 084590 a 847 - -- --
38.9 846.18
41.0 846.19 W 846
43.7 846.68
44.8 846.69 845
45.8 846.37 844
47.7 846.36 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
49.3 846.53
50.0 846.95 Station(feet)
51.3 847.22 ----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01
53.3 847.42
55.4 847.40

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek .1
XS ID XS14
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.04
Date: 12/17/2020
Field Crew: TS,KB
Y
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA „ iil
0.0 948.98 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 943.58 ° "',t•,; .*
3.3 948.38 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 1.8 40 N• .�- 1L s " -,1 .w ; ,
5.4 947.65 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 1.9 ._r..
10.9 945.22 Bankfull Width: 4.8 1 -
13.4 943.97 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 944.35 •
18.4 943.81 Flood Prone Width: 54.3
•
23.0 943.71 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.8
-
25.4 943.75 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4
28.0 943.63 W/D Ratio: 12.5
28.7 943.61 Entrenchment Ratio: 11.4
29.9 943.39 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0
30.6 943.05 Thalweg Elevation: 942.81
30.9 942.99
31.4 942.81 Mill Dam Creek,XS14,Riffle,TIA
32.2 943.07
32.8 943.19 950 -
33.6 943.55 949
34.7 943.59
38.3 943.68 948 _
42.9 943.65
48.1 943.70 947 _
53.6 943.57 w
58.1 943.41 ' 946
61.4 943.14 6 \
62.8 943.28 945
64.9 943.38 0 944
._-"'f-j
66.3 943.95 W
69.3 945.78 943
72.3 945.57
77.3 945.64 942
77.5 946.31 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station(feet)
----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS15
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.07 - - :
Date: 12/17/2020 _
Field Crew: TS,KB 444'
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 943.49 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 939.06 - • k,y T; ^`
0.1 942.77 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.3 S'`�' ! '`
3.2 942.75 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 1.7 T S
7.6 942.42 Bankfull Width: 5.5 r-
9.9 941.30 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 939.76 t. r
12.7 940.24 Flood Prone Width: 46.4 ,, ;
15.1 939.26 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 t., .- .
17.6 938.94 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 Ii
22.9 939.14 W/D Ratio: 12.9 1 .i` f
27.9 939.22 Entrenchment Ratio: 8.4 - . ``}' .,ems �
30.9 939.04 Bank Height Ratio: 0.8 • ) r l; �ti
1_J-.
31.9 939.03 Thalweg Elevation: 938.35
32.6 938.89
33.6 938.62 Mill Dam Creek,XS15,Riffle,T1
33.9 938.61
34.2 938.61 944 _
34.4 938.38 -
34.9 938.37 943
35.3 938.36
35.8 938.35 942
36.1 938.53
36.9 938.74 941
o,
37.4 938.95 t \
38.3 938.92 0 940 _
39.9 938.89
41.3 938.85 Ed 939 --43.4 938.80 W
45.4 938.75 938 -
48.2 938.67 -
50.2 938.61 937
53.2 938.55 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
54.3 938.56
56.8 938.88 Station(feet)
57.4 938.77 ----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 MY01
64.9 941.34
67.2 941.67

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS16 x _ •
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.07 .t - . -Y 1°, IIIIIIIIIIIF. .-
Date: 12/17/2020
Field Crew: TS,KB �/
.ulr',;Ex,.r-.ALa tmay•.-.-
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
( 4r- 1 �
0.0 933.84 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 929.19 .4 �''' ::
0.3 933.09 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 3.9 r r „ i '•f -{Cyr
2.9 932.50 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 3.7
4.8 931.93 Bankfull Width: 8.6 ' '.95�
:,4,
7.2 931.39 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 930.49 • -
., �-:. '
9.1 930.76 Flood Prone Width: 49.6 � � . 1• ti;�;� . Y-; ;� :_f r,� .... ,. -
11.4 930.01 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.3 =� J�.:r ` o;
14.0 929.83 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 .
16.7 929.79 W/D Ratio: 19.3
19.6 929.76 Entrenchment Ratio: 5.7 ',
22.5 929.74 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9
24.5 929.71 Thalweg Elevation: 927.88
26.6 929.45
28.7 929.43 Mill Dam Creek,XS16,Riffle,T1
31.1 929.21
33.1 929.16 935
34.0 929.17 934
34.9 II
3
35.8 0 933 _
36.4 0
36.8 0 932 _
37.1 5
37.4 058 ---.'='"'"" .„___,.., ._,..\r-.. .-_,,...„
jei,"7 .-"
771663 927 -
49.0 928.88 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
52.4 929.01
55.6 929.12 Station(feet)
57.3 929.48 ----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01
59.1 930.32
62.4 931.65

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek ly ,.A. 1XSID XS1Mill -.' � iDrainage Area(sq mi): 0.07goirimp
- - 4-
Date: 12/22/2020
Field Crew: TS,KB -
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 931.34 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 928.35
0.1 930.74 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 8.3
3.1 930.57 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 8.4 `' ' .JFt f,-'- .
3.8 930.55 Bankfull Width: 7.8 _
5.0 929.98 Flood Prone Area Elevation: --- .
7.7 928.74 Flood Prone Width: --- .
9.3 928.52 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.1 -" _.-:;'. .
12.0 928.30 Mean Depth at Bankfull: _ 1.1
13.4 928.30 W/D Ratio: --- -
14.9 928.29 Entrenchment Ratio: ---
15.5 927.84 Bank Height Ratio: --- - "
16.0 926.66 Thalweg Elevation: 926.21
16.8 926.21
18.1 926.72 Mill Dam Creek,XS17,Pool,T1
19.4 926.87 934
19.9 927.44
20.9 927.97 933
22.2 928.30 J
23.3 928.42 932
25.0 928.42 931
27.5 928.49
31.4 928.48 ti 930
d
35.6 928.51 t
39.6 928.65 929
42.5 929.09
" 928
44.5 929.66
46.9 930.94 W 927
48.5 931.85
50.7 932.01 926
52.1 932.03 925
52.2 932.70 0 10 20 30 40 50
Station(feet)
----Bankfuu -MY00 -MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River "r Y7
Site: Mill Dam Creek ( . -
XS ID XS18
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.02 I
C. - • �- - +• .f •• +
Date: 12/22/2020 Blf', y{? �.
Field Crew: TS,KB r�;r:nr,• 9!}+
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA '�' k`r.*%• it.,*,' -. 011B r
0.0 927.11 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 923.43 r i ,^-•r, L a _ + •;. ?`' " eR�
0.0 926.58 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.3 i h ' ,r. f1-" • :4
2.8 926.42 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 1.9 ✓ - e 1 E,wt �- l �f 1+
5.8 926.45 Bankfull Width: 5.8 '. + -ilk' -,: . r ,
6.9 926.44 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 924.36 -y -- Z .•ato- • ' .'` r
7.9 926.02 Flood Prone Width: 24.6 '- ', .- +- _ ,,.
9.6 924.81 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 *.,. -- s- ; ae
12.0 923.67 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 -!+ . • " * r 4
13.2 923.50 W/D Ratio: 14.7 • _ _ •. _. .. ;.•
.• _� r`"
15.3 923.47 Entrenchment Ratio: 4.3 •r?
18.3 923.46 Bank Height Ratio: 0.8 .. r ` f f: ,•4S.... ` r --•
18.6 923.38 Thalweg Elevation: 922.50 40 T.try _
19.2 923.18
19.8 922.82 Mill Dam Creek,XS18,Riffle,T2
20.6 922.81 928
20.7 922.52 -
21.3 922.51 -
21.4 922.50 927
21.8 922.92
22.1 923.23 926
23.0 923.21
24.2 923.43
25.0 923.44 925 -
27.1 923.42 - _
0
30.4 923.62 a 924
32.4 923.85
34.0 923.85 W
36.3 924.87 923
37.9 925.44
38.9 925.97 922 ,
40.4 925.97 0 10 20 30 40 50
44.0 926.00
47.6 925.74 Station(feet)
50.5 925.75 ----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01
50.6 926.35

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek :A...,... FAlit
XS ID XS19 L
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.02 •as
Date: 12/17/2020 -
Field Crew: TS,KB
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA -:Yr-
.
•-..,•
0.0 925.74 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 922.63
0.3 924.67 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.6 •
3.1 924.43 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 5.2 �'i•' 1�.�,,,�-6.3 924.07 Bankfull Width: 6.6 _. ,.L '` ,.; ` ... ;_- ,, r,
7.7 923.96 Flood Prone Area Elevation: --- 'X'%',` = ''"-' ,fe,.
9.7 923.00 Flood Prone Width: % 1 irs 1 1a ,, •
11.6 922.48 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.9 y� " '7''"r ° _ ..•xa
15.2 922.53 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 ,tF-y 4•
h +
19.0 922.70 W/D Ratio: --- �i _-z' _ 1..- ;� rrt ,• s j .._'� •
20.5 922.63 Entrenchment Ratio: --- . -,^
21.7 922.27 Bank Height Ratio: --- '^ w 1W. `V _ `�
22.3 922.10 Thalweg Elevation: 920.75
23.4 921.35
24.0 920.75 Mill Dam Creek,XS19,Pool,T2
24.7 920.85 927
25.8 921.59
25.9 922.12
27.3 922.69 926 -
28.5 922.67
30.1 922.66 925
31.5 922.65
32.4 923.05 924
33.6 923.87 I
J
34.592336.1 924.00 --38.8 923.98 92243.1 923.96
46.5 923.94 921 '' ''. --N\pi 1( :.' ....- 'i .C'
48.3 924.12 48.6 924.50 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Station(feet)
--Bankfull MY00 MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS20 • �- _
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.01
Date: 12/22/2020 '
Field Crew: i TS,KB F' H. x. f=+1 :-
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA V �S i r• 7 - r,r
- ed, r • t
0.0 921.14 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 917.82 �'_� •I '•` •".' •
0.0 920.23 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
1.9 ' �'" 7 /t -:. °`: � �/ L
4.3 920.16 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 1.3 + 'H' r+k' }� A `''is rt4t, i
9.8 919.85 Bankfull Width: 4.8 r.-- t y� l .r+� 3 F
13.1 919.63 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 918.54 _ ..,r j -y �: r /.
16.7 919.41 Flood Prone Width: 19.0 r r r --"'� ,t - +`.
17.5 919.41 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 { '' "1't t }
19.4 918.63 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 r '
20.7 918.18 W/D Ratio: 12.3 '44 ter' f,
23.0 918.20 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.9 f.'! l-. y
25.2 918.00 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0le '.
26.3 917.98 Thalweg Elevation: 917.11 ` j;',
27.1 917.71
27.9 917.41 Mill Dam Creek,XS20,Riffle,T3
28.2 917.20
28.8 917.21 922 _-
29.0 917.14 -
29.4 917.13 921
29.7 917.11
30.3 917.56 920
30.6 917.57
31.7 917.86
32.8 917.89 ' ::: i:
39.3 918.95 - ------- -
41.2 919.60 W
43.1 919.61 917
45.8 920.40
46.9 920.23 916 ,
47.1 920.89 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Station(feet)
--Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River " = , •. .- "-
Site: Mill Dam Creek r • :� -S
XS ID XS21 /
Drainage Area(sq mi): il 0.01 _
Date: 12/22/2020 f:
Field Crew: TS,KB
K
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA •
'i•
0.0 921.26 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 916.59 _ ,.. +
0.0 920.17 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 7.7 F - 3
2.1 920.18 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 8.1 - ' .
3.0 919.94 Bankfull Width: 7.2 -
4.5 919.62 Flood Prone Area Elevation: ___ • .F
�j �
7.1 919.32 Flood Prone Width: --- J - [ '
15.5 918.54 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.8 "_
17.2 918.15 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.1 =_ `•�'
P j•
18.6 917.97 W/D Ratio: ---
21.3 916.90 Entrenchment Ratio: .
. -. _-
23.1 916.54 Bank Height Ratio: --- \ --- _ -
24.3 916.55 Thalweg Elevation: 914.74 -
24.9 916.43
25.4 916.42 Mill Dam Creek,XS21,Pool,T3
26.2 915.79
26.5 915.35 922
27.0 915.06 921
27.5 914.74
28.6 914.76 920
29.0 914.76
29.8 915.1717 919 -_
30.5 915.38
30.7 916.16 ' 918
31.6 916.46 s
.--Y32.5 916.71 ° 917
4
34.0 916.74 916
35.5 916.76 W
---- ----a,....\.,jr,
36.7 917.17 915
38.6 918.06
39.9 918.67 914
40.9 918.63 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
44.1 918.91
47.0 919.05 Station(feet)
47.0 919.80 ----Bankfull -MYoo -MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River , ,i �,T
Site: Mill Dam Creek I,1 _
I
XS ID XS22 i1
I.
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.01 '13-
Date: 12/17/2020 _ 1. jr i.0•
Field Crew: TS,KB - • - ..
r
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA .. .. -
0.0 912.44 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 906.19
0.1 911.58 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 1.9 - 'i _••-'
3.0 911.30 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 1.9 - '+- - _#:
4.7 910.39 Bankfull Width: 4.4 - :'s
8.1 908.70 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 907.12 •r ;
'11.6 906.66 Flood Prone Width: 19.2 --F:.. r`_-- _ ` -'.? - i'.1L ' i
13.0 906.43 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 i. ^•'
14.8 906.23 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 �� _ '' ;:•� 0.1 j! .-_ *°='y-�• V.
16.9 906.34 W/DRatio: 10.0 .': •• � s �e.
17.9 906.06 Entrenchment Ratio: 4.4 i..
18.9 906.10 Bank Height Ratio: 0.5 };y` : L
19.4 905.79 Thalweg Elevation: 905.25 i r•„ ✓~ .. -s. n ...
19.7 905.42
20.1 905.25 Mill Dam Creek,XS22,Riffle,T4
20.4 905.26
20.8 905.29 914 -
20.8 905.74 913
21.8 905.91 912
23.3 906.06
26.1 906.19 911
27.9 906.12 910
29.7 906.92
32.1 908.70 ' 909 _
35.7 910.14 0 908
38.2 910.49 '�
43.6 911.39 _t 907 ' •
47.2 913.67 W 906
47.1 913.67
905 -
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Station(feet)
--Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River f 1
/.
Site: Mill Dam Creek ` '
XS ID XS23 ! ✓.. ,' � �
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.01 r .y r
Date: 12/22/2020 40 + 1'
Field Crew: TS,KB
1. .
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA -if L•,: 2.'.1. '- '"--,-•
0.0 895.87 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 894.31 Y� '�r., r r ,r� Gti�Qy.��.
Jr
3.3 895.06 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 1.7 .fir '' - �; - •i:; •_ •�r��_
7.1 894.96 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 1.8 r !+•1 ti:• i
� 4
8.6 894.78 Bankfull Width: 3.5 ' t z_ .
13.0 894.58 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 895.23 ; j1 °±z +- , �,••; A1
16.8 894.66 Flood Prone Width: 29.8 .,, :,;i` •'Fri t r. r ,
s�. Y �rr.:;
18.0 894.64 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 '- •''.1.. rr? " .,.1 .t:+''-• =:= r'`
18.4 894.49 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 r l;'` s y.
19.3 894.28 W/D Ratio: 7.1 -.r•�''�� R a.
19.9 893.64 Entrenchment Ratio: 8.544 l,
� �, : ,
20.0 893.51 Bank Height Ratio: 1.1 a ' '' F --1'
20.5 893.48 Thalweg Elevation: 893.40 r `'S f4,:z �
20.8 893.40
21.4 893.44 Mill Dam Creek,XS23,Riffle,T6A
21.6 894.05
21.8 894.16 897 -
22.4 894.21 -
23.0 894.44
23.8 894.40 896 -
26.9 894.10
29.9 893.91
32.5 893.73 -
32.5 894.05 t 895
s
0
W 894
893 , I-
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Station(feet)
--Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River Site: Mill Dam Creek _.{ �,y •
XS ID XS24 - '} r ut
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.07 'V".......
Date: 12/22/2020 ,,fi } +, taii9 71,.t:a•!f '
Y
C • .,
Field Crew: TS,KB _
,
y..
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 879.77 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 878.36 . := s
4.1 879.10 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.6 - -- .-. > f' ,
10.7 879.07 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 0.8 . " ti
"1;s
12.7 878.18 Bankfull Width: 3.8
13.5 877.91 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 879.33
14.8 877.85 Flood Prone Width: 43.8 f '{..18.0 877.87 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 � -
� ,
•20.2 877.94 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 J.
22.6 877.96 W/D Ratio: 5.5 ,- , •
23.2 877.80 Entrenchment Ratio: 11.6 ./, . -
23.5 877.55 Bank Height Ratio: 0.6 A
23.8 877.54 Thalweg Elevation: 877.39
24.4 877.39
24.8 877.54 Mill Dam Creek,XS24,Riffle,T6
25.4 877.66 881
25.5 877.66 -
26.4 878.04
27.3 878.02 880
28.1 878.15
29.5 878.16
32.6 878.33 879
38.0 878.69
o,
42.7 879.10 t
46.1 879.15 0 878
47.3 879.71
50.9 879.91
50.9 880.41 W 877 -
876 -
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station(feet)
--Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River '
Site: Mill Dam Creek
xs ID XS25 T'1z*V il•1a'0ir
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.07 .
Date: 12/17/2020 '
•
Field Crew: TS,KB .•- . r • . . _
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA }. -
0.0 879.14 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 877.72
0.0 878.64 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.1 • • _:'. - y_r
. •Y.
3.2 878.65 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 4.4 y=r Kra_.•- �. y. �;
_�> 1) t
5.4 878.21 Bankfull Width: 5.1 '��..- __� '-e= ';` . • '. =• '
8.3 878.02 Flood Prone Area Elevation: e t.'-"- 7, ' +''
r, i ,!- {.;:,f a - .! 'ram'-',
10.7 877.59 Flood Prone Width: --- '; ...,-.}-'' ''' i -. -
13.8 877.57 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.6
�, a . -
17.0 877.62 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 ..i 4 .,
19.7 877.59 W/D Ratio: ; prY k ter`,. r .•';i c
20.7 877.56 Entrenchment Ratio: ---
21.0 877.37 Bank Height Ratio: --- ,,.� : e ^fir ms ~ ' '1 .- n '
21.7 876.62 Thalweg Elevation: 876.08 �! -''; . s' r.
22.3 876.28
23.0 876.08 23.8 876.22 Mill Dam Creek,XS25,Pool,T6
881
24.5 876.55 -
24.7 877.21
25.9 877.64 880
27.4 877.68
31.8 877.77
34.8 878.0505 879
37.9 878.48
42.7 878.65 t
46.7 878.93 0 878
51.1 878.96
54.9 879.21
55.1 879.94 W 877
876
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station(feet)
--Bankfull MY00 MVO

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS26
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.07 . •
Date: 12/22/2020
Field Crew: IIIIIIIII TS,KB
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
•
0.0 868.86 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 868.03 a
-0.1 868.53 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 4.6
6.1 868.44 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 5.84'
12.7 868.34 Bankfull Width: 6.0 ''�' •" 'A fir - . ' •• -"I'14.1 868.84 Flood Prone Area Elevation: ti-?` ?,' -
16.2 868.54 Flood Prone Width: --- jir `,7` 4
21.3 868.51 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.4 .tyf v. r_ : - `" `ae9• ! '..
25.3 868.25 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 y Yi _` a !
27.4 868.11 W/D Ratio: --- 4
28.3 867.68 Entrenchment Ratio: --- N.. _-- '
29.2 867.19 Bank Height Ratio: --- --- r` - :�
29.4 866.93 Thalweg Elevation: 866.68 '
30.0 866.73
30.4 866.68 Mill Dam Creek,XS26,Pool,T7
30.8 866.84
31.1 866.84 870 -
31.6 866.69 -
32.0 866.93
32.4 867.68 869 -
33.4 868.00
34.3 868.21
35.8 868.23
37.4 868.07 868 -----
39.9 867.90 -
0
42.5 867.94
45.8 867.76 0 867
48.4 867.74 W
48.7 867.84
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Station(feet)
--Bankfull MY00 MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River '"'`- i •
•
Site: Mill Dam Creek -l�•V i rl . y�• ,.
i
1 l •1 '
XSID XS27 ll fir'
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.07 • ! ' 7 . -
7. _
•
ram., =w . tx,'-d!•
Date: 12/22/2020 r`..N.
�1;r!RL'.x; �
Field Crew: TS,KB ;lq
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA - - •
0.0 867.95 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 867.64 S _
0.0 867.41 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 4.3 •
6.3 867.64 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 3.5 ~� --- w_
11.7 867.56 Bankfull Width: 7.3 . •
17.9 867.58 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 868.68 Y
23.9 867.68 Flood Prone Width: 47.0 y?• =' "=. k
27.5 867.69 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 �; y
28.9 867.70 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 i s r••' '"
30.0 867.21 W/D Ratio: 12.4
30.8 866.87 Entrenchment Ratio: 6.5 '' n.: •
31.4 866.60 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9 -
32.0 866.66 Thalweg Elevation: 866.60 V r!
32.6 866.66
33.3 866.64 Mill Dam Creek,XS27,Riffle,T7
33.8 866.77
34.3 867.30 869 -
34.7 867.37 -
35.5 867.51
36.3 867.56
37.2 867.58 868 -
41.5 867.46
46.2 867.44 _ �
47.0 867.68 t
47.0 868.38 s
0
a 867
W
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Station(feet)
--Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS28 d
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.04 1 .
Date: J 12/22/2020
Field Crew: TS,KB
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 857.58 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 853.34
3.5 857.16 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.8 ilg '
7.3 856.92 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 1.5 .
8.9 856.85 Bankfull Width: 4.7 •
11.8 855.22 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 854.51
15.2 853.85 Flood Prone Width: 31.9
16.9 853.47 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.2
20.1 853.24 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6
23.9 853.17 W/D Ratio: 7.9
29.3 853.19 Entrenchment Ratio: 6.7
30.8 853.41 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0
31.6 853.07 Thalweg Elevation: 852.16
32.1 852.95
32.5 852.56 Mill Dam Creek,XS28,Riffle,T9
33.1 852.21
33.5 852.16 859
33.9 852.34 858
34.2 852.53
35.0 852.96 857 _-------------'
35.8 853.36
36.7 853.36 856 _ 1-
38.1 853.34 I
39.3 853.33 t 855
40.5 853.86 s .
41.0 853.92 ° 854
42.5 853.45 853
43.8 853.52 W -
44.7 854.02 852 -
47.1 855.45
48.1 855.58 851
50.8 855.60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
54.7 855.55
59.0 855.49 Station(feet)
59.1 856.19 ----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek ` Fr
XS ID XS29 I' F ��i i r * r } � �
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.03 �+ ! r
Date: 12/17/2020 ,•F -
..s.10
Field Crew: TS,KB MI5 .id,- d
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 851.02 Bankfull Elevation ft -Based on AB-Bankfull Area 849.93L. fV•+ , fir:
0.0 850.18 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 3.4 i i{.;'-�' :• 'Y'- 4` • A K' F
0.6 850.13 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 2.9 �� �.f .-4 ter_ ;
- .
1.0 849.38 Bankfull Width: 5.5 1�,- . ;s y-,. t -� . �n '`. � '
• • x
5.0 849.41 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 851.13 - ■
7.9 849.61 Flood Prone Width: 43.8 •_ ` ,
11.1 849.61 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.2 % - ..i\•' '` -
13.6 849.79 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 `PJ' K
14.5 849.80 W/D Ratio: 9.0 -'u - -sr r
15.4 849.53 Entrenchment Ratio: 7.9
16.4 849.17 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9
16.8 848.88 Thalweg Elevation: 848.72
17.4 848.72
17.8 848.86 Mill Dam Creek,XS29,Riffle,T8
18.1 849.19
19.0 849.41 854 --
20.2 850.02 -
21.1 850.21 853 -
22.7 850.25 -
26.8 850.36 852
30.7 850.53
35.5 850.72
40.4 850.81 ' 851 -7
44.7 851.22 s
51.6 851.96 0a 850
51.6 852.77
W
849 -
848 y�
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station(feet)
--Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek FTRIF r '' f
XS ID XS30
1 .
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.03
Date: 12/17/2020 ,
Field Crew: NM TS,KB
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA r -yf i' ��•�'i 4
C..�. h..:.
0.0 845.92 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 842.81 . ' ,r
0.0 844.63 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 3.2 .i 3. •, r5 ti, • ?:_,'s
3.0 844.56 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 3.4
6.6 844.45 Bankfull Width: 5.8 �•` y �' p d -'
10.4 843.34 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 843.78 ,.,
12.9 843.23 Flood Prone Width: 42.0 '.:
18.1 842.86 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 {' rWi• - a"----''''
20.4 842.70 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6
22.1 842.79 W/D Ratio: 10.5 l . k a `„
23.3 842.53 Entrenchment Ratio: 7.2 i y ti!' '�.�y';1 r :- _
23.7 842.01 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 ':'!j+ -k, •.-_,
24.2 841.94 Thalweg Elevation: 841.84
24.9 841.85
25.2 841.84 Mill Dam Creek,XS30,Riffle,T8
25.7 841.94 847
26.0 842.00 -
26.9 842.41 -
27.9 842.79 846
28.7 842.78 -
29.9 842.78 845
30.9 842.90
33.5 842.90
36.5 842.87 t 844
42.4 842.76 scji
0
47.9 842.90 a 843
49.4 842.98 -
50.6 843.65 W
51.4 843.97 842 -
52.4 844.10
53.6 844.08
53.8 844.49 0 10 20 30 40 50
Station(feet)
--Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek -
.4
XS ID XS31 Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.01 } t .�.i_,,1
�.
Date: 12/17/2020 1-1 -Q1
Field Crew: TS,KB -
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA =r•.. '- 1 it 'ry ''.-
0.0 853.80 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 850.86 ,'•r..:- -'?`'rii:4 ,...yy % '�I,{ 15�0.3 853.16 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.6
-~ .-�'
3.7 852.93 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 2.3 . -
6.7 852.93 Bankfull Width: 5.2 . 4•- .►
8.2 852.75 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 851.97 _ y .• -
9.2 852.35 Flood Prone Width: 21.8 _
y
11.7 851.11 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.1 t 1 '.
y
13.7 850.94 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 - -_ -.' c
16.0 850.85 W/D Ratio: 10.7 '
17.8 850.88 Entrenchment Ratio: 4.2 y _ _
18.6 850.88 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 •
-
19.0 850.89 Thalweg Elevation: 849.76
19.6 850.68
20.4 850.40 Mill Dam Creek,XS31,Riffle,T8A
20.9 849.95 855
21.4 849.76 -
21.6 849.95 -
21.9 850.17 854
22.7 850.30
23.2 850.45 853 - �-23.6 850.65 u
24.3 850.87
25.9 850.78 t 852 - ------ -
28.7 850.93 s
0
30.1 851.56 a 851 - _--
32.6 852.17
33.9 852.51 W
35.6 852.55 850
38.3 852.44
38.4 853.36
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Station(feet)
--Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 MY01

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek -.
XS ID XS32 l; I r T
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.01
Date: 12/17/2020
Field Crew: TS,KB .' y,� ✓<.4- l
M1•
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA r `, ti r
0.0 846.94 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 845.58 7? ..."L.,..-or.
iC. , 44"
0.0 846.38 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.1 • = _i;
5.8 846.33 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 2.8 __ '• '-- ;y:_� f 4 9.5 846.30 Bankfull Width: 4.1 ^_: 4,_.!,`
12.7 845.70 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 846.59 r
-;-. -
15.3 845.90 Flood Prone Width: 49.4 _ t • '�0 .
16.9 846.06 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 -a`'` " -- ,• `- ��-,��r�. JCr
18.4 845.79 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 s ; `+ ;i1: .. ..
19.7 845.64 W/D Ratio: 8.2
k: i:
21.1 845.70 Entrenchment Ratio: 12.0
21.9 845.79 Bank Height Ratio: 1.2
23.1 845.24 Thalweg Elevation: 844.56
23.5 844.80
23.9 844.64 Mill Dam Creek,XS32,Riffle,T8A
24.1 844.56 848
24.4 844.58 -
24.7 844.82 -
24.9 845.03
25.9 845.36 847
26.9 845.78 -
27.8 845.73
30.1 845.73
34.2 845.60 846
36.8 845.67 0
39.8 845.91 -
42.1 845.93 0 845
45.8 846.12 W
49.4 846.16
49.4 847.01
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station(feet)
--Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 MY01

Cross-Section 1 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 4 XS 1 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 3
Fine .125-.25 A 2
Medium .25- .50 N 3 —
Coarse .50- 1 D 4 100% • / ■■ • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 3 ;,
Very Fine 2-4 5 i 80% •
Fine 4-5.7 G N 1 1 I As Buil
t
Fine 5.7 8 R 2 60% , --MYo,
Medium 8- 11.3 A 1 °
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 1 N
Coarse 16-22.6 E 3 C 40% •
Coarse 4 22.6-32 L 4 w
e
Very Coarse 32-45 S 11 20% .
Very Coarse 45-64 22
Small 64-90 C 17 _ 0%
Small 90- 128 0 7 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Large 128- 180 B 8 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution ffijiM
Small 362-512 L "1111D16 1.0 mean 9.4 silt/clay 4%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 32 dispersion 24.9 sand 15%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R mil D50 48 skewness -0.51 gravel 49%
Bedrock >2048 , BDRK D65 61 cobble 24%
Total 100 mil D84 88 boulder 0%
Note: D95 150 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 2 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle
ll SizeDam Distribution
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C xS 2 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25- .50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 4 10o% e - ■■ ■ • ■
Very Coarse 1 -2 S Ti
Very Fine 2-4 3 R 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 3 E
Fine d 5.7-8 R 2 a 60%
As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 6 A tMYOI
Medium 11.3- 16 V 4 Ed
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 13 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 11 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 6 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 18
Small 64-90 C 15 0% ■
Small 90- 128 0 9 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 6 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 9.9 mean 29.5 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 22 dispersion 3.1 sand 4%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 40 skewness -0.14 gravel 66%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 58 cobble 30%
Total 100 D84 88 boulder 0%
Note: D95 140 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 5 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 5 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 2
Medium .25- .50 N 7
Coarse .50- 1 D 3 100% ■■ • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 2
Very Fine 2-4 6 .i 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2 E
Fine 5.7-8 R 2 60% As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 2 a t MY01
a
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 7 N
Coarse 16-22.6 E 8 5 40%
w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 6 e
Very Coarse 32-45 S 10 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 17
Small 64-90 C 18 0% , ■ , —
Small 90- 128 0 8 0.01 0.1 1 to 100 100o 10o00
Large 128- 180 B 4 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 2.7 mean 14.9 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 18 dispersion 8.1 sand 13%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 38 skewness -0.33 gravel 58%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 56 cobble 29%
Total 104 D84 82 boulder 0%
Note: D95 120 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 6 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 6 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 1
Medium .25- .50 N 1
Coarse .50- 1 D 6 100%
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 2
Very Fine 2-4 5 .: 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2 E
Fine 5.7-8 R 3 60% As B°'"
Medium 8- 11.3 A a t °1
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 6 N
Coarse 16-22.6 E 9 5 40%
w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 17 e
Very Coarse 32-45 S 13 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 12
Small 64-90 C 10 0% ■
Small 90- 128 0 1 0.01 0.1 1 to 100 100o 10o00
Large 128- 180 B 5 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 2
Small 256-362 B 3 Size(mm) Size Distribution Mill
Small 362-512 L 2 D16 5.1 mean 20.7 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D 1 D35 22 dispersion 4.4 sand 10%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 31 skewness -0.16 gravel 66%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 46 cobble 18%
Total 101 D84 84 boulder 6%
Note: D95 290 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 7 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C Xs 7 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25- .50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 2 100% xVery Coarse 1 -2 S 4
Very Fine 2-4 5 a 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1 E
Fine 5.7-8 R �' 60/o o - As Built
aMedium 8- 11.3 A 6 ,atMY01
Ed
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 2
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 9 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 5 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 6 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 13
Small 64-90 C 15 0% • r■
Small 90- 128 0 9 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 9 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 7
Small 256-362 B 1 Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L 1 D16 9.5 mean 36.5 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 30 dispersion 4.2 sand 6%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 55 skewness -0.17 gravel 47%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 5 D65 78 cobble 33%
Total 100 D84 140 boulder 2%
Note: D95 220 bedrock 5%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 9 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter i Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 5 xS 9 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A lin
Medium .25- .50 N 2
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100% ■■ • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S Ti
Very Fine 2-4 1 R 80%
/
Fine 4-5.7 G 1 i
Fine 5.7-8 R
60% As Built
C
Medium 8- 11.3 A 1 ,A T MY01
Ed
Medium 11.3- 16 V 1
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 7 a
Coarse 22.6-32 L 4 0
IAIIIIIIIIII
Very Coarse 32-45 S 12 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 16
Small 64-90 C 20 0% • . •
Small 90- 128 0 16 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 13 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 2
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 19 mean 47.7 silt/clay 5%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 46 dispersion 2.6 sand 3%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 64 skewness -0.14 gravel 42%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 83 cobble 48%
Total 102 D84 120 boulder 0%
Note: D95 170 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 10 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C xs 10 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25- .50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 2 100% • • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 5 Ti (
Very Fine 2-4 8 a 80% I
Fine 4-5.7 G 1 E /
Fine 6 5.7-8 R 1 (..)
60%° As Built
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 4 ,A f MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 7 Ed
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 3 a
Coarse 22.6-32 L 6 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 6 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 20
Small 64-90 C 12 0% • • •
Small 90- 128 0 16 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 8 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B 1 Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 6 mean 25.7 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 28 dispersion 5.3 sand 7%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 51 skewness -0.26 gravel 56%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 68 cobble 36%
Total 100 D84 110 boulder 1%
Note: D95 150 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 11 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C xs 11 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25- .50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 100% ,,, - • • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 2 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 1 R 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G i
Fine . 5.7-8 R 1 (..) 60% - As Built
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 2 --MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 2 E.
1~
Coarse 16-22.6 E 2 a 40%
w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 6 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 10 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 16
Small 64-90 C 22 0% , ■ . • • —
Small 90- 128 0 17 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Large 128- 180 B 13 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 3
Small 256-362 B 2 Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 32 mean 66.9 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 54 dispersion 2.1 sand 2%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 72 skewness -0.04 gravel 40%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 91 cobble 56%
Total 99 D84 140 boulder 2%
Note: D95 180 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 12 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C xS 12 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A Om
Medium .25- .50 N 1
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100% • • • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 7 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 4 R 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G a
I
Fine 5.7-8 R 60%
- As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 5 .1 tMY01
Ed
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 2
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 4 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 3 0
Very Coarse _ 32-45 S 8 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 7
Small 64-90 C 15 0% - • .■
Small 90- 128 0 12 0.01 0.1 1 10 too moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 5 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 6
Small 256-362 B 3 Size(mm) Size Distribution ffilM
Small 362-512 L 2 D16 8.3 mean 35.3 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 36 dispersion 5.1 sand 9%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 65 skewness -0.24 gravel 33%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 15 D65 86 cobble 38%
Total 100 D84 150 boulder 5%
Note: D95 280 bedrock 15%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 13 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C xS 13 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25- .50 N 2
Coarse .50- 1 D 3 100% • • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 6 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 9 R 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1 E
Fine 5.7-8 R 4
60% As Bulk
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 2 t MYO1
Ed
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 5
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 8 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 5 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 9 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 12
Small 64-90 C 15 0% • r■
Small 90- 128 0 9 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 5 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 2
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Tile
Small 362-512 L 1 D16 2.9 mean 16.6 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 18 dispersion 7.7 sand 11%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 37 skewness -0.28 gravel 54%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 4 D65 60 cobble 30%
Total 102 D84 95 boulder 1%
Note: D95 160 bedrock 4%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 14 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 4 xS 14 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 4
Fine .125-.25 A 6
Medium __ .25- .50 N 2
Coarse .50- 1 D 2 100% • •
J
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 2
Very Fine 2-4 6 R 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1 E
/7
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
60% - As Built
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 7 f MY0I
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 7 H
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 7 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 10 0
•
Very Coarse 32-45 S 16 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 13
Small 64-90 C 9 0°°
Small 90- 128 0 6 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 3 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B 1 Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 2.6 mean 13.6 silt/clay 4%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 15 dispersion 6.8 sand 10%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 29 skewness -0.27 gravel 67%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 42 cobble 18%
Total 101 D84 71 boulder 1%
Note: D95 120 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 15 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count PartiMiclell SizeDam DistributionCreek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 4 xs 15 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 16
Fine .125-.25 A 3
Medium .25- .50 N 2
Coarse .50- 1 D 100% ■■■ • • •
U
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 1 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 3 R 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2 E
Fine 5.7-8 R 3
60% As Built
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 6 ,A tMY°1
Medium 11.3- 16 V 6 Ed
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 8 a
Coarse 22.6-32 L 7 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 11 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 10
Small 64-90 C 9 0%
Small 90- 128 0 5 0.01 0.1 1 10 too moo loom
Large 128- 180 B 4 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.1 mean 2.6 silt/clay 4%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 8.4 dispersion 96.8 sand 22%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 19 skewness -0.51 gravel 56%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 36 cobble 18%
Total 100 D84 69 boulder 0%
D95 120 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 16 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count PartiMiclell SizeDam DistributionCreek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 1 xS 16 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 1
Fine .125-.25 A 6
Medium .25- .50 N I■
Coarse .50- 1 D 3 100% ■■ • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 8 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 8 R 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 4 E
Fine 5.7-8 R 4 (..) 60% As Built
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 1 ,A f MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 3 Ed
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 4 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 13 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 8 20% i
Very Coarse 45-64 18
Small 64-90 C 15 0%
Small 90- 128 0 2 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo loom
Large 128- 180 B 2 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 1.6 mean 10.4 silt/clay 1%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 8.9 dispersion 9.7 sand 18%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 27 skewness -0.32 gravel 62%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 46 cobble 19%
Total 101 D84 68 boulder 0%
Note: D95 88 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 18 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter AL Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 8 xS 18 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A lin
Medium .25- .50 N 2
Coarse .50- 1 D 5 100% ■ ■ ■ ■
Very Coarse 1 -2 S Ti
Very Fine 2-4 4 R 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 3 E
Fine 5.7-8 R 4
60% As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A ,A • tMY01
Ed
Medium 11.3- 16 V 4
a 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 1 a
Coarse 22.6-32 L o
Coarse Coarse 32-45 S 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 12
Small 64-90 C 29 0%
Small 90- 128 0 15 0.01 0.1 1 10 too moo moo
Large 128- 180 B 12 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 2.3 mean 16.6 silt/clay 8%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 50 dispersion 15.9 sand 7%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 69 skewness -0.47 gravel 28%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 82 cobble 57%
Total 99 D84 120 boulder 0%
Note: D95 160 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 20 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter il. Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 6 xS 20 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 9
Fine .125-.25 A 3
Medium .25- .50 N 2
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100% . - ■■■ • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 4 Iri /
Very Fine 2-4 6 al 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1 E
Fine 5.7-8 R 3 (..)
60%o / - As Built
C
Medium 8- 11.3 A 3 ; / f MYol
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 3 Ed -
40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 5 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 10 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 9 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 18
Small 64-90 C 13 0% - ,
Small 90- 128 0 3 0.01 0.1 1 10 too moo loom
Large 128- 180 B 2 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.16 mean 3.3 silt/clay 6%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 8.3 dispersion 82.5 sand 19%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 26 skewness -0.56 gravel 57%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 46 cobble 18%
Total 101 D84 67 boulder 0%
Note: D95 90 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 22 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter il. Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 4 xS 22 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 6
Fine .125-.25 A 6
Medium .25- .50 N 2
Coarse .50- 1 D 5 100% ■H • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 5 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 7 R 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 3 E
Fine 5.7-8 R 1 (..) 60% - As Built
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 10 ,a t MY01
Ed
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 5
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 7 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 6 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 7 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 4
Small 64-90 C 9 0% 1 -
Small 90- 128 0 12 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 woo moo
Large 128- 180 B 1 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.25 mean 4.5 silt/clay 4%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 4 dispersion 27.3 sand 24%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 12 skewness -0.27 gravel 50%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 28 cobble 22%
Total 100 D84 80 boulder 0%
Note: D95 110 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 23 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C xS 23 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 1
Medium __ .25- .50 N 3
Coarse .50- 1 D 5 100% ■■ • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 5 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 7 R 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1 E
Fine 5.7-8 R 4
60% As Bulk
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 3 a f MYol
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 5 Ed
0
40%
illi
Coarse 16-22.6 E 8 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 6 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 9 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 14 -
Small 64-90 C 14 0% ■ . —
Small 90- 128 0 9 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo loom
Large 128- 180 B 4 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 2
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 2.4 mean 14.5 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 17 dispersion 8.5 sand 14%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 35 skewness -0.31 gravel 57%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 55 cobble 29%
Total 100 D84 88 boulder 0%
Note: D95 140 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 24 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 1 xS 24 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 1
Medium .25- .50 N 11111
Coarse .50- 1 D 5 100% ■■ • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 2 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 R 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 3 E
Fine 5.7-8 R 7
60% As Bulk
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 12 ,a tMY01
Ed
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 24
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 9 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 10 0
Very Coarse _ 32-45 S 10 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 9
Small 64-90 C 4 0%
Small 90- 128 0 2 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo moo
Large 128- 180 B , _ Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B _ Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 7 mean 17.5 silt/clay 1%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 12 dispersion 2.5 sand 8%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 15 skewness 0.08 gravel 85%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 22 cobble 6%
Total 99 D84 44 boulder 0%
Note: D95 70 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 27 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle
ll SizeDam Distribution
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 1 XS 27 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25- .50 N 1
Coarse .50- 1 D 5 100% ■■ • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 7 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 10 R 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2 E
Fine 5.7-8 R 2 (..)
60%o As Built
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 5 A t MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 7 Ed
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 10 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 6 0
Very Coarse _ 32-45 S 7 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 9
Small 64-90 C 12 0% ,■ ■
Small 90- 128 0 13 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 1 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 2
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 2.3 mean 14.4 silt/clay 1%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 12 dispersion 6.8 sand 13%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 22 skewness -0.15 gravel 58%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 49 cobble 28%
Total 100 D84 90 boulder 0%
Note: D95 120 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 28 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C x5 28 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25- .50 N 8
Coarse .50- 1 D 15 100% ■■ • • •
/
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 5 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 15 R 80%
a
Fine 4-5.7 G 6 E
Fine 5.7-8 R 5
60% As Bulk
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 8 A t MY01
Ed
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 12
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 7 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 8 0
Very Coarse _ 32-45 S 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 •
Small 64-90 C 1 0% — ■
Small 90- 128 0 2 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 8 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 2
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.73 mean 4.4 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 2.9 dispersion 6.6 sand 27%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 6.7 skewness -0.14 gravel 60%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 13 cobble 13%
Total 102 D84 27 boulder 0%
Note: D95 160 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 29 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count PartiMillcle SizeDam DistributionCreek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 4 xs 29 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S
Fine .125-.25 A lin
Medium .25- .50 N 1
Coarse .50- 1 D 3 100% ■■ ■ ■ ■
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 1 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 2 al 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G IN 1 E
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
60% As Built
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 1 A t MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 3 Ed
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 2 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 4 0
Very Coarse _ 32-45 S 4 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 19
•
Small 64-90 C 29 0%
Small 90- 128 0 19 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 5 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 2
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 16 mean 42.0 silt/clay 4%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 53 dispersion 2.9 sand 5%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 68 skewness -0.23 gravel 36%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 81 cobble 55%
Total 100 D84 110 boulder 0%
Note: D95 150 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 30 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter a Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 7 XS 30 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 3
Fine .125-.25 A 7
Medium .25- .50 N 2
Coarse .50- 1 D 6 100% ■■ • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 3 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 5 a 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1 ga
Fine 5.7-8 R �- 60% - As Buiit
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 6 ,a t MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 10 Ed
0
40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 2 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 4 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 9 20% `f
Very Coarse 45-64 8 .....-
Small 64-90 C 13 0% -
Small 90- 128 0 12 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo loom
Large 128- 180 B 2 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.23 mean 4.4 silt/clay 7%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 8.4 dispersion 37.4 sand 21%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 16 skewness -0.35 gravel 45%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 45 cobble 27%
Total 100 D84 85 boulder 0%
Note: D95 120 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 31 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 20 xS 31 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 11
Fine .125-.25 A 4
Medium .25- .50 N 2
Coarse .50- 1 D 2 100% ■■ • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 4 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 4 R 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 10 E
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
60% As Bulk
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 1 ,a tMY°1
Ed
Medium 11.3- 16 V 2
0 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 3 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 2 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 5 20%
•
Very Coarse 45-64 10 . f'
Small 64-90 C 9 0%
Small 90- 128 0 4 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo moo
Large 128- 180 B 9 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 2
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.062 mean 2.3 silt/clay 19%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 0.46 dispersion 48.7 sand 22%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R skewness -0.19 gravel 36%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK cobble 23%
Total 1_______________________________
boulder 0%
Note: bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/del 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 32 Riffle-MY01
Particle Millimeter Count PartiMillcle SizeDam DistributionCreek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 8 xS 32 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 5
Fine .125-.25 A 4
Medium .25- .50 N 7
Coarse .50- 1 D 100% ■■ ■ ■ ■
Very Coarse__ 1 -2 S 1 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 R 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G i
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
60% As Built
CI
Medium 8- 11.3 A 2 ,A t MY01
Ed
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 2
a 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 6 a
Coarse 22.6-32 L 4 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 5 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 12
Small 64-90 C 21 0% — •
Small 90- 128 0 17 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo loom
Large 128- 180 B 8 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.23 mean 5.0 silt/clay 8%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 22 dispersion 118.4 sand 17%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 54 skewness -0.63 gravel 31%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 75 cobble 45%
Total 103 D84 110 boulder 0%
Note: D95 140 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

APPENDIX E
Hydrologic Data
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 128 MY01 Monitoring Report

Table 10. Verification of Bankfull Events
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Date of Occurrence Method Reach
January 24,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
February 6,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
February 11,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
February 13,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
March 24,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
April 13,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
April 25,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
April 29,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
May 21,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
May 27,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
December 16,2020 Photos taken on-site UTHC1,UTHC3,
Ti,T2,T6,T8
Tr'1
1 . . - 1 j _ -f:
•
'1 f 4 �✓k c>x'�'- �� u k
k�.M1 �'M{;'�ln".�u�i 1 �i d� �S'v1P' a��At��;'. . � �- . ,,. ;h;�o��. ,1 rn' -�' Y ..
Photo 1.Wrack lines above Bankfull,UTHC1 12/18/2020 Photo 2.Wrack lines above Bankfull,UTHC3 12/18/2020
Q
Photo 3.Wrack lines above Bankfull,Tl 12/18/2020 Photo 4.Wrack lines above Bankfull,T2 12/18/2020
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 129 MY01 Monitoring Report

A.:_,,,,....,..„.,„.?,..--',,,„.,.-,-.,.,,,- ',...,.$ ,,- --.--
. f `` ff..p 5 `Y FV°`.Auw,¢'s a B �..k F""y- ty
-- ' -L.',- ---2,t''•... -...,'4,.cr,ir.' ',4-flt-
;. i ' to �__ ~! r
r d .ar' d 02 x. P"� l' . r;ice. ,
Photo 5.Wrack lines above bankfull,T6 12/18/2020 Photo 6.Wrack lines above bankfull,T8—12/18/2020
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 130 MY01 Monitoring Report

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
UTHC-1 Stream Flow Gauge
924 - - 7.0
Gauge installed
January 16
6.0
923 Gauge malfunction
41, 5.0
w
O
© - 4.0
E.
a) 922 T.
I .
3.0 '-'
ci
ct
i.
cA 2.0
921
1.0
I III I ILII. Li .. .I i I i i
, t 10 0.0
N © — N A — N U ,O — N C — N N — N N 00 N A 1 N w s.O — N C — N N — N N 00 N
O '.0 00 1 VU .p. 1 W N r-, e 00 �l 1 Vi A r-- O �O �l 01 W N — 00 J to A r-- O �O �l O\
o a o . 0 0 w w w 7 ',9 'cs ,< w w y N V ao 0 c c . . g g 0 0 0 C R R
N N C N .y .y �t N , iY `G `C N O N N N b0 tlq tlq N N N C C C N n n
O O O O O N N O N N N O N N O N N O O O O O O O N N N O N N O N N O N N N O N N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O
Date
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Bankful Elevation Sensor Elevation

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
UTHC-3 Stream Flow Gauge
875 - 7.0
874 Gauge installed
January 16
6.0
873 -
872 5.0
Gauge malfunction
c 871 - I
4.0
E.
870 - 4�lr�w
ciJ
- 3.0 ..
c4 869 -
E
868 - - 2.0
867 -
1.0
866 -
I LI _ II .I L I k 1„. -I . II .. .I I .L I_865 1 0.0
N c N A N N D\ N N N N Oo N A N W N D\ N N N N Oo N
• O `) oo c.n ? W N Oo W
O c.n o CO CO C Nn anO1
k CnIV, OO ZZZ dcCct° ,a N N UQ UQ N .a .a IV i i
O• i iN O O
0 0 0 O O O O O OO O OOONNN O OOOO NO 0 OO 0 0
t Date
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Bankfull Elevation Sensor Depth

Table 11. Verification of Stream Flow
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Gauge Camera
Maximum Maximum
Reach Dates Achieving Consecutive Dates Achieving Consecutive
Days Days
T1A February 27—April 5 68 February 27—April 10 44
T5A January 16—June 15 152 February 27—April 8; 70
October 10—December 18
February 29—May 22;
T8A January 16—June 15 152 July 31—September 3; 84
October 25—December 18
Table 12. Stream Flow Criteria Attainment
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Greater than 30 Days of Flow/Max Consecutive Days
Reach MY-Ol MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05 MY-06 MY-07
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
T1A Yes/68
(Gauge)____
T1A Yes/44
(Camera)
TSA Yes/152
(Gauge)
T5A Yes/70
(Camera)
T8A Yes/152
(Gauge) _
T8A Yes/84
(Camera)
Mill Darn Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 133 MY01 Monitoring Report

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T1A Stream Flow Gauge
942 - in
February Camera installed
February 27 Camera obscured
Gauge install d
I. / \ — -- - 6.0
January 16
5.0
w941 Gauge malfunction
©
ct
44 ��. II I/it � �\\I
� 4.0 �
w 68 Days V
P
an
3c. .0
ifl
s..
ct
940 i �
-.
cA
- 2.0
- 1.0
I
ill
I L II .. 'ilk ill ... I . I_ 1939 � I1E0.0
` O O 00N ,LC'
O\ .N . W NN Wr- ' 0 NJ O VC; .N N — N QN 00 7; 01N . W 1:3NN Wr- `O 0 NJ a, V; .N N �-` O 00 7l 01N
" tirnV 9 A N Oti �y �r1pmm w 4 4 e `' a Y v) v' O O O 2 y cC
c c 74 `w `mN y y N NoNCc a a N .,1 . N cO O O (, (,N N
O OOOO N N N N ;N N O N N ONNOOOOO O O O qN N N O N N O N N N N N N ON ` `
O O O O O OOO O 0 0 0
0
Date
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Flow Elevation Stream Flow(Camera) Sensor Depth

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T5A Stream Flow Gauge
922 r 7.0
Camera installed
February 27 Camera obscured
6.0
Gauge instal d
January 16
Gauge malfunction 5.0
152 Da s 4.0
921
6 :r
3.0 ..
- 2.0
1.0
1 IL •I L i k I III •� .1 l i .LI 1_
920 4 f 1 0.0
N N — N N Cr N A N w ,O N Q, N N N N 00 N
I 'O oo c.n . W N — Oo J c.n . — O �O - O� W N Oo - c.n . � O �O - a1
gl p 4 4 4 ,-o Y Y w 4 4 S c E. c Y Y Y cU'c �n O O o Z Z Z d C7 U
°; 7 'a 'a m m n n n N ao a s . o 0 0 2 2
N i i N N , �i N t t `G `G N O N N N VQ UQ UQ N N i i N C C C N n n
O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O N N O O O O O O O N N N O O O O O O O N N N 0 O O
O O O O O O O O
Date
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Sensor Depth Flow Elevation Stream Flow(Camera)

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T8A Stream Flow Gauge
853 7.0
Camera installed Camera obscured
February 27 \ \
i _ 6.0
—11111,
852 Gauge instal d
January 16
- 5.0
Gauge malfunction
- 4.0
851 -
6.7 1 2D - 3.0 ..
- 2.0
850 -
1.0
849 �� . I 1 0.0
.1 , 411 I
i N !lb 1. G G , O III .Id. U' 1J O OoIIi. l
O _ W _ .N iNO N, N _ .N _ iNO d _J
c Cnnt 4 4 4 w 4 4 a Z Z Z cC° N N N UQ N i i N
O O O N OO OOO N N O ON O N N N O N N N 0 OO O O O O O O
CcnONUc1
O O O
Date
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Sensor Depth Flow Elevation Stream Flow(Camera)

Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Verification
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season(Percentage)
Gauge# Location MY-Ol MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05 MY-06 MY-07
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Gauge 1 T7 4
5
(19.7%)
Gauge 2 T8 Gauge
malfunction
Mill Darn Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 137 MY01 Monitoring Report

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Wetland Gauge 1,T7
1 - 6.5
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
March 26 November 9 6.0
0
5.5
Gauge inst lied
April 24 I �L • �v 5.0
4.5 I I_
c I L )1 ii
4.0
1
,ct, 45 Days 1 ' i 3.5
wiiii \:t
II r 1 ii :
3.
"'
ct
, S.
1III1,1% 2.5
o ti �N
C7 2.0
64
o
-2
1.5
71
I
1 I 1 I I I J 11 i I
1.0
0.5
ill
1
I
III i
3 0.0
N N A N ' AO N N N N N 00 N A N "" �O N 9A N N N N 00 N
L. O .O 00 Vi A W N .-� 00 �l Vi A .-• O ,,O - Q� w N .- 00 �l V� A — O �O �l Q�
; ; ; 3- g w 4 4 4 'a a > w 4 4 % ` `" a Y Y ' V V O O O o Z Z Z 2 C7 C7
0 n c c ' w w w '� '� w m N •' 'T. oo c a K K . 0 0 0 () rn rn
N N N 'i 'i i° N •(s is `C `C N O N N N Cfq b: b0 N N N C C C N n n
O O O O O N N O N N N O N N O N N O O O O O O O N N N O N N O N N O N N N O N N
O O O O O O O p p O O O O O O O O O O O O
Date
Rainfall Sensor-Depth Ground Surface Groundwater Depth 12"Below Ground Surface