20052078 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20120117

■ "
Naked Creek Stream Restoration
Wilkes COLIIItV,) North Carolina
201 1 Year 4 Monitoring Report - F Mal
E2 E P Project , NUmber: 261
USGS HUC 03040101010100
Project NLlIIIhCJ-: P-08000
Prepared for:
NCDFNR Licowstem FEnhancement
2728 Capital 131VCI.. SLIItC 11-1 103
- Ralciuh., NC 27604
'W ew • 4
EcoEngineering
i -he John R. N-1c.;Vlams C01111w:1
A division o"I ..-IV. 111C.
I RIAN(d.1' PARK
P. 0. Box 14005 Research Triangle Park. NC 27709
919 2 9
I -
2 -361-2260,
6- 2 FAX 9 '1
c o e n a r. c o m
.e-
0,

`� ,
r�

Naked Creek Stream Restoration EEP Project Number 261 USGS HUC 0304010 1010 100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report Wilkes County North Carolina November 2011 (Updated January 2012)
Table of Contents
10 Executive Summary/Project Abstract 1
I 1 Project Goals and Objectives 1
1 2 Vegetation Condition and Comparison 1
13 Stream Stability /Condition and Comparison 2
14 Wetland Conditions and Performance 3
1 5 Narrative Background 3
2 0 Methodology 3
3 0 References 4
Protect Conditions and Monitoring Data Appendices
Appendix A — General Figures and Plan Views
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Consolidated Current Condition Plan View
Appendix B — General Project Tables
Table 1 Project Restoration Components
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attribute Table
Appendix C — Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 6 Vegetation Metadata Table
Table 6A Vegetation Condition Assessment
Table 7 Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
— Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
— Vegetation Problem Area Photos (submitted electronically)
— Vegetation Problem Area Inventory Table (submitted electronically)
Appendix D — Stream Assessment Data
— Table 8 Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
— Table 9 Verification of Bankfull Events
— Stream Station Photos
— Cross Sections with Annual Overlays
— Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
— Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
— BEHI and Sediment Export Estimates Table (omitted, not applicable)
— Baseline Stream Data Summary Table [Exhibit Table VIII] (submitted electronically)
— Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary [Exhibit Table IX] (Cross Section and
Reach Parameters submitted electronically)
— Stream Problem Area Photos (submitted electronically) ORMCEIVED
— Stream Problem Area Inventory Table (submitted electronically)
JAN 17 2012
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
[AEcoEngneenng
A di i n n of the A hn R ai Adam Compan Ins

Naked Creek Stream Restoration EEP Project Number 261 USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Momtonng Report Wilkes County North Carolina November 2011 (Updated January 2012)
Appendix E — Wetland Assessment
Table 10 Wetland Criteria Attainment (omitted, not applicable)
— Precipitation and Water Level Plots (omitted, not applicable)
11 [JEcoEngneering
A dig uu n of The k hn R M Admn Compan in

Naked Creek Stream Restoration EEP Project Number 261 USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report Wilkes County North Carolina November 2011 (Updated January 2012)
10 Executive Summarv/Proiect Abstract
I 1 Project Goals and Objectives
The goal of the restoration project is to improve the water quality and biological habitat of
the site's streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers through the following
- Restore (pattern, dimension, and profile) unstable streams using natural channel design
techniques
-Re- establish riparian buffers (Kimley -Horn, 2007)
12 Vegetation Condition and Comparison
Original baseline vegetation monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Monitoring
Year 1 and 2008 is considered a drought year The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the
baseline datum because after two years of monitoring it is assumed all planted stems within a
vegetation monitoring plot have been surveyed and accounted for Therefore, any additional
species observed in proceeding monitoring years are considered volunteer species The 2011
Monitoring Year 4 data was provided by Carolina Vegetation Survey and was not
manipulated for presentation within Table 7 - Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendlix C
Current stem counts were calculated using vegetation plot monitoring data Interim density
targets (stems /acre) are 320 at year 3 and 288 at year 4 Final stem count criteria are 260
trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring As for Monitoring Year 4, Naked
Creek had 5 vegetation plots encompassing 0 12 acres, containing a total of 42 planted stems
excluding live stakes When examining total stems within all 5 vegetation plots, there were
53 planted stems including volunteer stems In total, the 5 vegetation plots yielded a density
of 340 planted trees per acre excluding live stakes When examining the density total of all
trees within all 5 vegetation plots, there was a density of 429 planted trees including
volunteer trees These density totals exceed the requirements by 10% for both planted trees
per acre excluding live stakes and planted trees including volunteer trees With regard to
each individual vegetation plot, Vegetation Plots 1, 4, and 5 failed to meet the requirements
by less than 10% while Vegetation Plots 2 and 3 exceed the requirements by 10% when
examining planted stems excluding live stakes Vegetation Plots 1 failed to meet the
requirements by less than 10% while Vegetation Plots 2, 3, 4, and 5 exceed the requirements
by 10% when examining planted stems including volunteer stems
Exotic/invasive species were observed at the site Exotic species observed at the site include
Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and cattail (Typha lat foha) In previous monitoring years
silktree (Ahbizia juhbrissm) was listed as an exotic/invasive species However, it was
determined that this species was incorrectly identified and is actually partridge pea
(Chamaecrista fasciculata), and therefore, eliminated as an exotic/invasive species There
are seven areas in which exotic/invasive species were observed totaling approximately 0 04
acres in size and are approximately 103% of the easement acreage The extent of
1
[4EcoEngineering
A d v o f The John R McAdams Company Inc

Naked Creek Stream Restoration EEP Project Number 261 USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report Wilkes County North Carolina November 2011 (Updated January 2012)
exotic /invasive species is depicted in the Consolidated Current Condition Plan View
Appendix A
Bare areas which exhibit limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material were
observed at the site There were two areas which were considered bare areas which total
approximately 0 23 acres in size and are approximately 9 05% of the planted area at the site
The extent of the bare areas is depicted in the Consolidated Current Condition Plan View
Appendix A
The restoration project includes within the conservation easement areas designated as
"Allowable Use Area" Allowable Use Areas are 10 foot wide areas in which mowing
activities have occurred and are permissible In general, the Allowable Use Areas are located
within the upstream section of the restoration project between Station 0+05 and Station
16 +30 These Allowable Use Areas are noted within Table 6A — Vegetation Condition
Assessment Appendix C as Easement Encroach Areas There were two areas considered to
be Allowable Use Areas which total approximately 0 34 acres in size and are approximately
8 71% of the easement acreage The extent of the Allowable Use Areas is depicted in the
Consolidated Current Condition Plan View Appendix A
Based on guidance provided to EcoEngmeenng from EEP (Julie Calull, EEP Project
Manager) on January 25, 2011, the conservation easement for the restoration project is not
shown on the Consolidated Current Condition Plan View Appendix A EcoEngmeenng
conducted field work for Monitoring Year 4 between the dates of April 4 and April 6, 2011
At the time of the field work, EcoEngmeenng visually identified stakes and diamond shaped
yellow and black EEP markers primarily located within the downstream section of the
restoration project between Stations 16 +80 and 27 +00 The approximate location of the
stakes and EEP markers are depicted in the Consolidated Current Condition Plan View
Appendix A EcoEngmeenng did survey locate one EEP Conservation Monument located at
Station 26 +70 and is depicted on the Consolidated Current Condition Plan View Appendix
A Many of the EEP markers and stakes were noted to be within 10 feet of the restored
stream's top of bank Areas have been mowed immediately adjacent to the east of the stakes
and EEP markers As a result, approximately 60% of Vegetation Plot 5 has been mowed
However, EcoEngmeenng recreated Vegetation Plot 5 and surveyed the vegetation within the
plot It should be noted that a section of fence has been removed between Stations 16 +80
and 19 +60 Furthermore, EcoEngmeenng was not able to visually identify any additional
stakes and EEP markers located on the western side of the restoration project other than those
depicted on the Consolidated Current Condition Plan View Appendix A
Based on the survey conducted for the Naked Creek Stream Restoration project, the
restoration project is 2,652 linear feet and will provide a total of 2,652 stream mitigation
units
13 Stream Stability /Condition and Comparison
Overall, the stream system appears stable and is not migrating toward lateral or vertical
instability Based on the prior year comparison using longitudinal profile data, it appears that
minor systemic aggradation has occurred throughout the reach, although this condition does
2 AftoEngineenng
A division of The John R M Adams Company Inc

Naked Creek Stream Restoration EEP Protect Number 261 USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report Wilkes County North Carolina November 2011 (Updated January 2012)
not appear to pose an imminent threat to the overall stability of the system To document
bankfull events a crest gage is located approximately 450 feet upstream of cross section 4
and is depicted in the Consolidated Current Condition Plan View Appendix A Evidence of
a bankfull event was observed this monitoring year
14 Wetland Conditions and Performance
No wetlands are being monitored for mitigation credits at this project site
15 Narrative Background
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment
and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found
in the tables and figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration
plan documents available on the EEP website All raw data supporting the tables and figures
in the appendices is available from EEP upon request
2 0 Methodology
All monitoring methodologies follow the most current templates and guidelines provided by
EEP (EEP, 2006, EEP, 2009) Photographs were taken at high resolution using an Olympus
FE -115 5 0 megapixel digital camera GPS location information was collected using a
Trimble Geo XT handheld mapping grade GPS unit Stream and vegetation problem areas
were noted in the field on As -Built Plan Sheets
The methods used to generate the data in this report are standard fluvial geomorphology
techniques as described in Applied River Morphology (Rosgen, 1996) and related
publications from US Forest Service and the interagency Stream Mitigation Guidelines
(USACE, 2003)
Vegetation monitoring methods followed the 2008, Version 4 2 CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation (Lee et al , 2008) Vegetation plot photographs were collected for
each vegetation plot Vegetation monitoring plots were re- marked in the field by replacing all
old flagging with new orange flagging Monitoring taxonomy follows Flora of the Carolinas
Virginia Georgia and Surrounding Areas (Weakley 2007) Stem height was measured with
a folding one -meter rule Diameter at breast height and decimeter height were measured with
calipers
3 ElEcoEngineering
A division of TAc A Wi R h Adams Compeny In

Naked Creek Stream Restoration EEP Project Number 261 USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report Wilkes County North Carolina November 2011 (Updated January 2012)
3 0 References
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), 2006 Monitoring Report Guidelines, November
16, 2006
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), 2009 Monitoring Report Guidelines, June 1, 2009
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc, 2007 Naked Creek Stream Final Mitigation Report
Submitted to NCDENR -EEP, August 2007
Lee, Michael T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation, Version 4 2 (http Hcvs bio unc edu/methods htm)
Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied Morphology Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2003 April 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2005 Information Regarding Stream Restoration In
The Outer Coastal Plain of North Carolina US Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District, Regulatory Division and North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, December 1, 2005
Weakley, A S , 2008 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, northern Florida, and
surrounding areas University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina
Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, working Draft as of
April 7, 2008
4 [4EcoEngineenng
A division of The John R M Adams Compuny Im.

APPENDIX A
General Fijzures and Plan View

I- f - e."-. 1, --9 , , J
- Cem' �-
AN
! Cem
OIL
E L
K t' s, ` •
USGS, 7.5 MINUTE, TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE;
PURLEAR, N.C.; 1966; LAT: 36.1394315' N
LON: 81.3634822' W
E.ATE: EEP-08000 AEcoEngineerin gEEP -08000 AKED CREEK .A dn. of n. 34. 1l M•Ad® C•mpmy, Ine.
tv , -��III �CIlVITY MAP ING911 - FIA IVM - SUxrn�e' SAL
" = 1,000
t T &W
i W!, n' lI'f WILKES COUNTY, N ORTH CAROLINA MF73SE/19.a•,yj, e�.11.ne, P. s —ewo
04 -29 -11

NAKED CREEK
CONSOLIDATED CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW - YEAR FOUR MONITORING
CONTROL TABLE
POINT
NUMBER
NORTHING
EASTING
ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION
1
1770034.41
2815810.00
1323.68
CP 1
2
1769414.45
2615888.09
1334.03
CP 2
5
1768883.08
2518058.80
1293.99
CP 5
8
1768567.01
2616D40.08
1295.82
OF 8
7
1768230.13
2618220.26
1286.57
CP 7
8
1767905.05
2615419.19
1278.62
CP 8
21
1769876.73
2615841.40
1314.65
XSEC
22
1769875.01
2615907.57
1310.10
XSEC
23
1769811.05
615854.15
1312.41
XSEC
24
1769833.93
2615921.91
1309.27
XSEC
25
1769517.07
2615935.30
1309.93
XSEC
26
1769528.18
2516000.38
1304.25
XSEC
27
1788845.89
2618001.39
1299.91
XSEC
28
1788841.05
2616071.64
1294.02
XSEC
29
1768061.50
2618058.52
1285.78
XSEC
30
1768135.40
2615090.71
1282.76
XSEC
31
1768008.00
2816130.42
1281.06
XSEC
32
1768024.62
2616192.14
1280.54
XSEC
200
1767923.77
2616295.32
1277.98
NS TRY
201
1768021.09
2616272.32
1277.98
NMAG
202
1767750.03
2616140.01
1317.13
NS TRY
203
1768248.83
2616709.45
1326.95
NS TRAY
204
1768880.70
2818461.82
1313.51
NS SPUR
206
1768656.44
2616054.29
1297.16
NS SPUR /10 /05RC
207
1767885.75
2616033.96
1320.86
NS TRAY
10
1767586.20
2816220.21
1307.38
NS AV
211
1767350.07
2816460.29
1293.22
NS TRAY
300
1767935.38
2616171.69
1279.68
1/2' EIR AT BASE
301
1787797.67
2616275.95
1284.75
112' EIR BASE
302
1767606.18
2616267.50
1284.82
27' MARKED BEECH
303
1767724.80
2616119.08
1317.87
3/4' EIP
304
1757910.76
2615956.19
1326.65
PP
305
1768030.62
2618849.25
1318.89
1/2' EIP
308
1768872.92
2616491.75
1313.53
1/2' EIP
307
1788555.88
2516073.60
1287.44
1/2' EIR
178 94.01
2615411.25
1 2.06
3/4' EIP RAB
309
1766399.81
2815612.93
1340.59
3/4' EIP
310
1768247.44
2815709.89
1335.95
PP
311
1768094.04
2615832.43
1327.39
AXLE
312
1768824.48
2516090.77
1289.05
1/2' EIR
313
1787394.13
2616438.23
1299.30
3/4' EIP
314
1767353.37
2616475.02
1297.61
1.5' EIP
315
1767947.46
2616180.14
1278.67
1/2' EIR
316
178813237
2616037.55
1280.22
1/2' EIR
317
1758209.14
2615980.69
128238
1/2' EIR
318
176857 &84
2615504.14
1
AXLE
319
1758471.54
2615925.36
1307.83
NS SPUR
320
1768545.42
2616163.77
1289.41
NS TRY
321
176774&D3
2616432.00
1273.34
NS TRAY
�Luu)
WILKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
EEP PROJECT NUMBER: 261
DATE: APRIL 29, 2011
NORTH CAROLINA
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
NC -EEP CONTACT: JULIE CAHILL (828)230 -5172
VEGETATION PLOT MONITORING CONTROL POINTS
POINT NUMBER
POINT TAG
NORTHING
EASTING
1
VC1
878937.6305
1303595.7584
2
VC2
678969.6963
1303599.5650
3
VC3
878967.2706
1303629.8125
4
VC4
878935.1638
1303628.2089
5
VC5
676716.8337
1303595.7106
6
VC6
878781.7716
1303595.5887
7
VC7
878781.7462
1303611.9076
8
VC5
878715.3560
1303616.0404
9
VC9
878238.8832
1303704.1393
10
VC10
878304.3131
1303701.2231
11
VC11
878305.6913
1303712.2540
12
VC12
878240.6355
1303720.0466
13
VC1.3
677913.0134
1303764.5696
14
VC14
877978.1274
1303757.1446
15
VC15
877977.1997
1303772.6940
16
VC16
877912.3357
1303778.7245
17
VC17
8768528189
1303975.3137
18
VC18
876908.5974
1303941.6505
19
VC19
876917.5255
1303955.2972
20
VC20
876581.4609
1303990.4754
(KHA)
❑1
DROJECT START
STA. 10 +00
-AT: 36.1394315' N
-ON: 81.3634822' W
CROSSINGS
VICINITY MAP
NTS
NOTE: SURVEY DATES OF THALWEG AND TOP -OF -BANK - 4/04/11 TO 4/06/11.
T END
STA. 2 6 +52 4 [JEcoEngineering
STA. 2
A division o£T6e Iohn IL McAdams Company, Inc.
SHEET INDEX } m
1 -5 CONSOLIDATED CURRENT CONDITIONS �te'm ENGINEERS • PLANNERS ■ SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL
PLAN VIEW FA 4II�L'lllolt R 2905 Veridien Parl,way,ADurhamHARLOTTE NC Z7713
�Raee�w 600. 733 -564B s www.jobn mcaB .com a License No.: C -0293

O
P \ \
_ - -_� w
1 L.Li
VP #1
�r
r \ _
Y o '
r
\ , o
r \
r
ALLOWABLE USE ARE
FENCE
I
q
KHA - KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (DESIGN BASED ON CAV MAPPING)
CAV - CAVANAUGH ASSOCIATES, P.A. (BASE /PRE - CONSTRUCTION MAPPING)
BAK - BAKER ENGINEERING NY, INC. (AS -BUILT MAPPING)
CUR - CURRENT SURVEYING AND MAPPING, P.A. (STATE PROPERTY EASEMENT SURVEYOR)
ECO - ECO ENGINEERING (YEAR FOUR MONITORING)
NOTES:
1) SURVEY DATES OF THALWEG AND TOP -OF -BANK - 4/04/11 TO 4/06/11.
2) BASED ON GUIDANCE PROVIDED TO ECOENIGEERING FROM EEP (JULIE CAHILL, EEP PROJECT
MANAGER) ON JANUARY 25, 2011 THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT IS NOT SHOWN. CONSERVATION
EASEMENT ACREAGE IS ASSUMED TO BE 3.9 ACRES AND IS BASED ON INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM
EEP ON JANUARY 24, 2011 AND IS BASED ON DB 1019 PAGE 361, PLAT 10 PAGE 486 WILKES
COUNTY, AND DB 1019 PAGE 417, PLAT 10 PAGE 486 WILKES COUNTY, DATED NOVEMBER 20, 2007.
3) ALLOWABLE USE AREAS ARE AREAS IN WHICH MOWING ACTIVITIES HAVE OCCURRED AND ARE
PERMISSIBLE.
4) MOWED AREAS ARE AREAS IN WHICH MOWING HAS OCCURRED ADJACENT TO THE CONSERVATION
EASEMENT.
5) CONSERVATION EASEMENT MONUMENT SURVEY LOCATED BY ECOENGINEERING AND INSTALLED
BETWEEN MY -03 AND MY -04 BY OTHERS.
\ 6) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT STAKES VISUALLY IDENTIFIED BY
ECOENGINEERING DIAMOND SHAPED YELLOW AND BLACK EEP MARKERS AND INSTALLED BETWEEN
MY -03 AND MY -4 BY OTHERS.
\
mom
d�
\ d�
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
SHEET I OF 5
6
�z
on �
w mE
Lu
"I
FENCE (BAK)
BOO
PHOTO POINT (ECO)
Gsr
z
J
—= a—
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
VP#
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT (KHA)
n
� O
z
E
EDGE OF PAVEMENT (CAV)
ROCK CROSS VANE (BAK)
W
3
T
TELEPHONE LINE (CAV)
4
ROCK A -VANE (BAK)
O
O
U
ou
OVERHEAD POWER LINE (CAV)
W
RIP RAP (BAK)
YEAR FOUR STREAM CENTERLINE (ECO)'
ROOTWAD (BAK)
AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK (BAK)
LOG VANE (BAK)
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT (KHA)
g�
xnx
MONITORING CROSS SECTIONS (ECO)
ALLOWABLE USE AREAS
STREAM CROSSING /FORD (BAK)
INVASIVE / EXOTIC VEGETATION
SURVEYOR'S BENCHMARKS (CAV, BAK)
PHOTO POINT LOCATION AND DIRECTION
®
MONITORING BENCHMARKS (KHA)
MOWED AREA
CREST GAGE
Q
CONSERVATION EASEMENT MONUMENT
%YYI
BARE AREAS
�--
CONSERVATION EASEMENT STAKESB
KHA - KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (DESIGN BASED ON CAV MAPPING)
CAV - CAVANAUGH ASSOCIATES, P.A. (BASE /PRE - CONSTRUCTION MAPPING)
BAK - BAKER ENGINEERING NY, INC. (AS -BUILT MAPPING)
CUR - CURRENT SURVEYING AND MAPPING, P.A. (STATE PROPERTY EASEMENT SURVEYOR)
ECO - ECO ENGINEERING (YEAR FOUR MONITORING)
NOTES:
1) SURVEY DATES OF THALWEG AND TOP -OF -BANK - 4/04/11 TO 4/06/11.
2) BASED ON GUIDANCE PROVIDED TO ECOENIGEERING FROM EEP (JULIE CAHILL, EEP PROJECT
MANAGER) ON JANUARY 25, 2011 THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT IS NOT SHOWN. CONSERVATION
EASEMENT ACREAGE IS ASSUMED TO BE 3.9 ACRES AND IS BASED ON INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM
EEP ON JANUARY 24, 2011 AND IS BASED ON DB 1019 PAGE 361, PLAT 10 PAGE 486 WILKES
COUNTY, AND DB 1019 PAGE 417, PLAT 10 PAGE 486 WILKES COUNTY, DATED NOVEMBER 20, 2007.
3) ALLOWABLE USE AREAS ARE AREAS IN WHICH MOWING ACTIVITIES HAVE OCCURRED AND ARE
PERMISSIBLE.
4) MOWED AREAS ARE AREAS IN WHICH MOWING HAS OCCURRED ADJACENT TO THE CONSERVATION
EASEMENT.
5) CONSERVATION EASEMENT MONUMENT SURVEY LOCATED BY ECOENGINEERING AND INSTALLED
BETWEEN MY -03 AND MY -04 BY OTHERS.
\ 6) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT STAKES VISUALLY IDENTIFIED BY
ECOENGINEERING DIAMOND SHAPED YELLOW AND BLACK EEP MARKERS AND INSTALLED BETWEEN
MY -03 AND MY -4 BY OTHERS.
\
mom
d�
\ d�
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
SHEET I OF 5
6
�z
on �
w mE
Lu
"I
0 0
0
W w d I
0 0 rn
al I II �
w w O
z
w
z
o � <
o
McADAMS
OO
Gsr
z
J
3�
U
n
� O
z
W
Pz�
O
U U
W
3
O
O
U
0 0
0
W w d I
0 0 rn
al I II �
w w O
z
w
z
o � <
o
McADAMS

LIGUSTRUM SINENSE ENCROACHMENT
BARE AREA
BOX CULVERT
ROAD CROSSING
62T
FENCE BARE AREA
7-7—
1,-! -7
-Y
fs
-4 Ic -- / - -- --
_-
-vP
-f- W-C
Wj
J
?;
PIPING AT STRUCTURE
ALLOWABLE USE AREA
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
SHEET 2 OF 5
W
OE
0
gn Z
O z -
0
Z
z
0 0
o00 00 b
co Ln rn
0
CL 1 11 cl,
w (L
w w 2
w
z
Fiam,CADAMSI

o�
u U "x a
�
x� o �
C�
o
o �
Uh y
w
O
o
, II
\\ I 1
11I�1.1��
At
' I
1 II II 11 m
i , 1''1111!i11! 11 m
zlk } 1
}�1 ''
D h ? 110111 }}
D I } 1
I
m ' •i ' �1 IrC
D
m m
r
\
�Ilil r D
z
1\ 1 1 I m
\ \ •i\ z
m
�• \ \,,!I 1 i m
II II Ft I I i °
1 I Il�lil
IT I ! _
I;�III !,ICI I 1 m
r I I z
C-)
I�
D <.
m \.
-
�T r
�Iljl
r
I�I T
I
14'i'i
PROJECT ND. EEP -08000
®
NAKED CREEK
� Y
FILERANE: EEP -08000
AEcoEngineering
a
d SCALE: -
CONSOLIDATED CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW - YEAR FOUR MONITORING
,
AdivinioeoP7LeloheR IcAd�Compmy ,Ins.
a 1" — 50
l F
1�,I�(ll
ENGVW=• PUNNERS • SURVEYORS' kq- NYM' AL
rsi� onTE:
WILKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
USIMICHTRIINGLE PARK - CHARLOTTE
04 -29 -11
M NoWin Puke". oe.r.m Rc rma
.... "
NO.73MW..v..Jehmm%d mLo=.lJ*mw No.: CAM �

IGUSTRUM SINENSE \
ENCROACHMENT
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT STAKES VISUALLY IDENTIFIED BY
ECOENGINEERING BY DIAMOND SHAPED YELLOW
AND BLACK EEP MARKERS AND INSTALLED
BETWEEN MY -03 AND MY -04 PERIOD BY
OTHERS
0
1r
1�
TYPHA LATIFOLIA
ENCROACHMENT
N— APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT STAKES VISUALLY IDENTIFIED BY
ECOENGINEERING BY DIAMOND SHAPED YELLOW
AND BLACK EEP MARKERS AND INSTALLED
BETWEEN MY -03 AND MY -04 PERIOD BY
OTHERS
1
�1
27
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
SHEET 4 OF 5
CA
.L
o �E
w
W
U
Q
w
z
0
0
0
W
0
I
a
w
w
zz
c
0
0 0 I
W L
0 0) N
a II
LLI 2
w o
a
U <
o
McADAMS

302
PIPING AT STRUCTURE
PIPING AT STRUCTURE
�rlrrrl\\1 INE- 2MUNUTAI\r1►111111 \VINims-9 0m
CONSERVATION EASEMENT MONUMENT
SURVEY LOCATED BY ECOENGINEERING AND
INSTALLED BETWEEN MY -03 AND MY -04
BY OTHERS
XS
FENCE-
PIPING AT STRUCTURE
PPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CONSERVATIO IGUSTRUM SINENSE
EASEMENT STAKES VISUALLY IDENTIFIED BY ENCROACHMENT
ECOENGINEERING BY DIAMOND SHAPED YELLOW
AND BLACK EEP MARKERS AND INSTALLED
BETWEEN MY -03 AND MY -04 PERIOD BY
OTHERS
-
PIPING AT STRUCTUR— W
__. Lij
r
MOWED AREA—.
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CONSERVATION -- '
EASEMENT STAKES VISUALLY IDENTIFIED BY
ECOENGINEERING BY DIAMOND SHAPED YELLOW
AND BLACK EEP MARKERS AND INSTALLED
BETWEEN MY -03 AND MY -04 PERIOD BY
OTHERS
IW
r Q
r
r
e
1
a
GRAPHIC 40 0 . :.
SHEET 5 OF 5
z�
W'
O el
W
C
W
U
Q
W
z
,z
.o
3¢
im-
�O
i0
.W
14cA

APPENDIX B
General Project Tables

Table 1 Protect Restoration Components
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect Number 261
Project
Segment or
y
d
a a��
w 0
".a
Reach ID
W
CL
�'
ca
<
w u
a
Stationing
Comment
UtNkd
12 652 If
R
P2
2 652 lfl
1 1
2 652
1 10 +00 26 +52
Mitigation Unit Summations
Riparian
Nonripanan
Stream
Wetland
1
Wetland
Total Wetland
Buffer
Comment
2 652
01
01
01
0
R= Restoration EII= Enhancement II P1= Priority I P3= Priority III
EI= Enhancement S= Stabilization P2= Priority II SS= Stream Bank Stabilization

Table 2 Protect Activity and Reporting
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect Number 261
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
Summer 05
Nov 05
Final Design — 90%
Spring 06
Summer 06
Construction
Fall 06
Winter 06
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
Winter 06
Winter 06
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments 1 & 2
Wmter 06
Winter 06
Containerized and B &B plantings for reach/segments 1 & 2
Winter 06
Winter 06
Mitigation Plan / As built Year 0 Monitoring — baseline
S rin 07
Aug 07
Year 1 Monitoring
Sep 08
Nov 08
Year 2 Monitoring
Sep 09
Nov 09
Year 3 Monitoring
Jul 10
Oct 10
Year 4 Monitoring
Apr 11
Nov 11
Note Timeframe estimated from information provided by EEP

Table 3 Protect Contacts Table
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect Number 261
Designer
Knnley -Horn and Associates Inc
P O Box 33068 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636
Primary project design POC
POC name and phone [phone]
Construction Contractor
Fluvial Solutions, Inc
PO Box 28749, Raleigh NC 27611 -8749
Construction contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky 919 605 6134
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics
908 Indian Trail Road, Edenton NC 27932
Planting contractor POC
Mary Margaret McKinney 252 482 8491
Seeding Contractor
Contact Fluvial Solutions, Inc
PO Box 28749 Raleigh, NC 27611 -8749
Planting contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky 919 - 605 -6134
Seed Mix Sources
Contact Fluvial Solutions, Inc
Peter Jelenevsky 919 605 6134
Nursery Stock Suppliers
ArborGen
843 -851 4129
Monitoring Performers
EcoEngineering - A Division of The John R McAdams Co
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham NC 27713
Stream Monitoring POC Jun Halley
9192874262
Vegetation Monitoring POC Jim Halley
919 -287 4262
Wetland Monitoring POC NA
NA
Note Information obtained from EEP documents and bid tabulation results Use contacts in table for additional
information or to verify data

Table 4 Protect Attribute Table
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Pro ect/EEP Project Number 261
Project County
Wilkes County
Drainage Area UTto Naked Creek
0 53 square miles
Drainage impervious cover estimate ( %)
Estimated at 0 2%
Stream Order
1 st for UT to Naked Creek
Physiographic Region
Blue Ridge
Ecoregion
Appalachian Highlands
Rosgen Classification of As -built
C
Cowardm Classification
R3UBH
Dominant soil types
Chewacla loam, Pacolet sandy loam
Reference site ID
UT Purlear, Upper Big Wamor
USGS HUC for Project
03040101010100
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project
12- 31 -3 -(0 5)
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference
C
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed9
No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d
listed segment
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
NA
% of project easement fenced
80%

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Assessment Data

Table 5 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Pro ect/EEP Project Number 261
Planted Excluding Live Stakes Summary
Tract
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Mete
Tract Mean
Naked Creek
VP1
N
40%
VP2
Y
VP3
Y
VP4
N
VP5
N
Total Planted and Volunteer Stem Summary
Tract
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Mete
Tract Mean
Naked Creek
VP1
N
80%
VP2
Y
VP3
Y
VP4
Y
VP5
Y

Table 6 Vegetation Metadata
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect Number 261
Report Prepared By
George Buchholz
Date Prepared
5/12/2011 10 07
database name
EcoEngmeermg 2011 A mdb
database location
X \Projects\EEP\EEP 08000 (Naked Creek) \Storm \CVS Vegetation Data\2011 Vegetaion
Data
computer name
BUCHHOLES
file size
49315840
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN
THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file the report worksheets and a summary of project(s) and project
data
Pro j, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre for each year This excludes live
stakes
Pro j, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre for each year This includes live
stakes all planted stems and all natural/volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data live stems dead stems missing etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor b Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems
impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by e for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by e for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot dead and
missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
261
project Name
Naked Creek
Description
10 6 miles west of Wilkesboro and 18 4 miles east of Boone in Wilkesboro NC One Reach
tNkd approximately 2 800 linear feet
River Basin
Yadkin Pee Dee
length(ft)
2 652
stream to-edge width ft
25
area (sq m
0 01 sq miles 2 92 acres
,Required Plots calculated
5
Sam led Plots
5

Table 6A Vegetation Condition Assessment
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect Number 261
riameo Acreage Z as
% of
% of
Mapping
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Areas or points (if too small to render as
Very limited cover of both woody and
diagonal
7
004
103%
Concern
1 Bare Areas
herbaceous material
0 1 acres
dash pink
2
023
905%
Woody stem densities clearly e ow target
5 Easement
2 Low Stem Density
levels based on MY3 4 or 5 stem count
0 1 acres
2
I
0
0
00%
Areas
criteria
blue
3 Areas of Poor Growth
reas with woody stems of a size class that
0 25 acres
0
0
00%
Rates or Vigor
are obviously small given the monitoring year
Easement Acreage 3 9"
Notes
' Easement Acreage is based on information received from EEP on January 24 2011 and is based on DB 1019 Page 361 Plat 10
Page 486 Wilkes County and DB 1019 Page 417 Plat 10 Page 486 Wilkes County Dated November 20 2007
— Easement Encroachment Areas are Allowable Use Areas and are areas in which mowing activities have occurred
r
% of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Easement
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4 Invasive Areas of
Areas or points (if too small to render as
1000 SF
diagonal
7
004
103%
Concern
polygons at map scale)
red
5 Easement
lAreas or points (if too small to render as
zig zag
I
2
I
034
I
8 71 %
I J
Encroachment Areas"*
1polygons at map scale)
none
blue
Notes
' Easement Acreage is based on information received from EEP on January 24 2011 and is based on DB 1019 Page 361 Plat 10
Page 486 Wilkes County and DB 1019 Page 417 Plat 10 Page 486 Wilkes County Dated November 20 2007
— Easement Encroachment Areas are Allowable Use Areas and are areas in which mowing activities have occurred
r

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Project/EEP Project Number: 261
Page 1
1 \UICJ:
a) Data presented in table was provided to EcoEngineering from the Carolina Vegetation Survey. Data was not manipulated by EcoEngineering. Formatting of table was performed by EcoEngineermg.
b) Original baselhne vegetation monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Monitoring Year I and 2008 is considered a drought year. The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the baseline datum because after two years of monitoring it is assumed all planted stems within
a vegetation monitoring plot have been surveyed and accounted for. Therefore, any additional species observed in proceeding monitoring years are considered volunteer species.
c) PnoLS = Planted Excluding Live Stakes, P -all = All Planted Stems, T = Total Planted and Volunteer Stems
Current Plot Data (MY4 2011)
Scienlific Name
Common Name
-Species T e
E261-
01 -VPI
E261-
01 -VP2
E261- 01 -VP3
E261- 01 -VP4
E261-
01 -VP5
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Inus serrullata
hazel alder
Shrub Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
13etula ni a1
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
e halanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub Tree
2
2
2
raxinus nns Ivanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
7
7
7
6
6
6
2
5
5
ssa s Ivatica
black um
Tree
1
1
1
Persea borbania
redbay
Shrub Tree
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Shrub Tree
2
2
4
uercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
uercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
3
1
1
1
51
5
91
2
2
2
uercus rubra
[Robinia
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
gseudoacacia
black locust
Tree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
7
7
7
11
11
13
10
101
12
7
7
13
71
71
8
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
5
5 5
3
3 3
4
4 4
2
2 3
2
2 2
283.28
283.28
445.15
445.15
404.69
404.69
283.28
283.28
283.28
283.28
1 \UICJ:
a) Data presented in table was provided to EcoEngineering from the Carolina Vegetation Survey. Data was not manipulated by EcoEngineering. Formatting of table was performed by EcoEngineermg.
b) Original baselhne vegetation monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Monitoring Year I and 2008 is considered a drought year. The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the baseline datum because after two years of monitoring it is assumed all planted stems within
a vegetation monitoring plot have been surveyed and accounted for. Therefore, any additional species observed in proceeding monitoring years are considered volunteer species.
c) PnoLS = Planted Excluding Live Stakes, P -all = All Planted Stems, T = Total Planted and Volunteer Stems

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Project/EEP Project Number: 261
Page 2
Notes:
a) Data presented in table was provided to EcoEngmeenng from the Carolina Vegetation Survey. Data was not manipulated by EcoEngineering. Formatting of table was performed by EcoEngineenng.
b) Ong-mal baseline vegetation monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Monitoring Year 1 and 2008 is considered a drought year. The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the baseline datum because after two years of monitoring
it is assumed al
c) PnoLS — Planted Excluding Live Stakes; P -all = All Planted Stems; T = Total Planted and Volunteer Stems
Annual
Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
MY4
(2011)
MY3
(2010)
MY2
(2009)
MY1
(2008)
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
lnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
etula ni a
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
e halanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub Tree
2
2
2
1
Fraxinus peinnsylvanica
green ash
Tree
20
20
23
22
22
261
22
22
22
15
15
15
ssa s Ivatica
black um
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
31
3
3
rsea borbonia
redbay
Shrub Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
Prunus sermina
black cherly
Shrub Tree
2
2
4
2
2
5
2
2
2
3
3
3
uercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
I
1
I
1
1
1
2
2
2
uercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
9
9
l5
9
9
12
11
11
11
9
9
9
uercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Robinia pseudoacacia
black locust
Tree
I
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
42
42
53
47
47
59
51
51
51
39
39
39
5
5
5
5
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
81
81 8
91
91 111
91
8
8 8
339.941
339.94
380.4
380.4 M
412 781
412.78
315,651
315.65
Notes:
a) Data presented in table was provided to EcoEngmeenng from the Carolina Vegetation Survey. Data was not manipulated by EcoEngineering. Formatting of table was performed by EcoEngineenng.
b) Ong-mal baseline vegetation monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Monitoring Year 1 and 2008 is considered a drought year. The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the baseline datum because after two years of monitoring
it is assumed al
c) PnoLS — Planted Excluding Live Stakes; P -all = All Planted Stems; T = Total Planted and Volunteer Stems

PHOTO VP1: LOOKING NORTH AT VEGETATION PLOT VP1.
PHOTO VP2: LOOKING NORTH AT VEGETATION PLOT VP2.
PROJECT NO. EEP -08000
Ft1dAME:
NASD ����
ng EEP -08000
SCALE: N TS
CU)
F tem
MONMRING PHOTOS
A Air94im of The John R Mc
WI�s' NOKM CAROLM
RESEARCH TRI GLE PARE, MC
P.O. HOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
DATE: 04 -OS -11
r
(9!9) 3171 -5000

PHOTO VP 3: LOOKING NORTHEAST OF VEGETATION PLOT VP3.
PHOTO VP 4: LOOKING NORTHWEST AT VEGETATION PLOT VP4.
PROJECT No. EEP -08000
�-
NAKLD CREEK RESMRAMOIN
AEcoEngineering
1�NAME:
A
EEP -06000
1
MONITORING PHOTOS
A d"ism of The John I! MsAdsme Carapef, mss.
SCALE: NTS
systeul
11 Y ` 11f ti
�r NORM CAROLM
M" TIMMAE PAM, 11C
P.O. BM 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
DATE:
04 -06 -11
(919) 3e1 -5000

PHOTO VP 5: LOOKING SOUTHEAST AT VEGETATION PLOT VPS.
PROJECT NO. EEP -08000
FILENAd1E:
y
�
CR ' '�M �
[iEcoEngineering
EEP -08000
iD
The John A AisA� Cempsa7, Inc.
n
c SCALE:
NTS
MONUORING PHOTOS
A e8visian of
9
DATE:
I�SYStr[ll
IlllL �kil;
WHIM, ar[�
HIM, NOKM ��
RESEARCH nUMGLE PARE, AC
P.O. HOE 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
04 -08 -11
(919) 361 -5000

APPENDIX D
Stream Assessment Data

Table 8 Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect Number 261
Unnamed Tributa to Naked Creek 2,655 Linear Feet
Feature Category
Metnc (per As built and reference baselmes)
(# Stable) Number
Performing as Intended
Total number per
As built
Total Number / feet in
unstable state
% Perform in Stable
Condition
Feature Perform
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1 Present 7
28
28
NA
100
2 Armor stable e g n o dis lacement 9
28
28
NA
100
3 Facet grade appears stables slo a <— design range)
22
28
NA
79
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
28
28
NA
100
5 Length appro nate?
NA
NA
NA
NA
95
maw
B Pools
1 Present? (e g not subject to severe aggrad or migrat ?)
17
17
NA
100
2 Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D Mean Bkf>l 69)
Design = 2 4 / 0 8 = 3
17
Max Pool / 0 8 >
16 10 of 17
NA
59
3 Length appropriate? (pool to pool s cn
15
17
NA
88
82
C Thalweg
1 Upstream of meander bend (run/inflection) centering?
25
28
NA
89
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering?
26
28
NA
93
91
X �YNl4![a61f 1WgLdlgFF9CJA�
}TP"" bIDy OriF3- s�'4sII.SYll�MTY
CCl➢iRIIRX /VI�L�"8"'�
CJtlIC.X"gBX@iHMtG [ bkPAS
iti9�'�PR�BY2�'6r
�Ti ^MAIII
D Meander
I Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion9
27
27
NA
100
2 Of those eroding # w /concomitant point bar formation
27
27
NA
100
3 App anent Rc within spec?
21
27
NA
78
4 Sufficient flood lam access and relief?
27
27
NA
100
95
E Bed General
1 General channel bed aegradation areas (bar formation)
NA
NA
3/700
72
2 Channel bed degradation — areas of increasing down
cutting or head cutting?
NA
NA
NA
100
86
,N'BPF-v.wL ,.V .,�.,F
,��•,,.�e����d.a,
F Bank
1 Activelycroding wasting or slum m bank
NA
NA
NA
100
100
M@P'TS.#MC+}.^p-C. iMRLiIDLA
vtlw eOl
S
�IAAW- .®- 40i.A0®1RY99
G Vanes
1 Free of bank or arm scour?
34
34
NA
100
2 Height appropriate?
34
34
NA
100
3 An le and geometry appear appropnate9
34
34
NA
100
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
29
34
NA
85
96
K�RTAI�.8Q.Y49Af� lt9�gCLP
/3$4'�i6W' '�'9�C^n.SY06pP.l'tu6 �['.ICX!'�
"�"""' "'�alllffiJld:'lvl�6L1
rlPR!:G9d..4'm�"M[AFaSIOiR"
H Wads/ Boulders
1 Free of scour?
36
36
NA
100
2 Footing stable?
36
36
NA
100
100
i{�SSI�ErisR�%99
4IIOT +�'°�^�`°= �•••a••••-'.�,#ts.�G. �iY�it
M"�d@R�YlifRS SP�L�@'f`�llks
4R�169�6ffir/P'�A
idb�J916fp�'.Ti'MP�.114�i0VR
B

Table 9 Verification of Bankfull Events
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Pro ect/EEP Project Number 261
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo # (if available
On Site Crest Gage located at Station
Between 09/16/09 and
07/15/10
10+97 Observed elevation on gage at
Not Available
07/15/10
elevation 1297 81
On Site Crest Gage located at Station
Between 07/15/10 and
04/06/11
10 +97 Observed elevation on gage at
Not Available
04/06/11
elevation 1297 93
Note A crest gage was installed dunng the 2009 Monitoring Year 2 field investigations so that bankfull events can be documented
during subsequent monitonng years The crest gage is located at Station 10 +97 and is depicted in the Consolidated Current
Condition Plan View located in Appendix A

PHOTO 1: LOOKING UPSTREAM AT THE CULVERT AT TOP OF PROJECT.
PHOTO 2: LOOKING DOWNSTREAM AT CHANNEL AND WET AREA NEAR RIGHT BANK.
P6orECT ro. EEP -08000
"LE;vA1sE:
�~
NAMD C-�N MRA'noN
AEcoEngineering
EEP -08000
tV SCALE:
)F }
MONl'i�ORMG PHOMS
A divitim of The Iotm R. McAdm Co�7, Inc.
N TS
1 ,mw) tcl i I
RMSEARCB THL414GLIC PARE, MC
WUJM, NORTH CAR011NA
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
DATE:
04 -08 -11
"
(918) 3e1-5000

PHOTO 3: LOOKING DOWNSTREAM AT CHANNEL.
PHOTO 4: LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM UPPER CROSSING AT CHANNEL.
rw PROJECT NO. EEP -08000
r. ~
NASD CREEK
AEcoEngineering
FILENAME: EEP 708000
n
9 SCALE:
MONUORING PHOTOS
A division of The lobe R. McAdam Company, Inc.
N TS
1' �i1Sy telll
v"'IP -11
, NORTHCAROUNA
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARR, PC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
cn DATE:
04 -08 -11
(919) 961 -5000

PROJECT no. EEP -08000
� FILENAm:
NA MD CREEK RlMON
AEcoEngineering
EEP -08000
n�
SCALE: NTS
C()S�Y(SIe1j�I]
MONrWRINO PHOTOS
A division of The John R. McAdam Compwy, Inc.
CA DATE:
I L. l
� 1�7r NORTH CAROL A
"22MOCH TMANGLE PARE, IVC
P.O. BOX 14006 ZIP 27709 -4005
04 -08 -11
. C 1 !� t
(P1a) 391 -51)00

PHOTO 7: LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM HILLSIDE ON RIGHT BANK.
PHOTO 8: LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM HILLSIDE ON RIGHT BANK.
�
o. EEP -08000
x �cx x o noN
®EcoEngineering
EEP -08000
A division of TM John R McAdam+ Co�7, Ins.
ry
EPRORECT
M ©NrPC)RiNG PHOTOS
N TS
'+Stelil
R &9EAHCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
NQ � C OT�A
ZI -4
H043 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
4005
04 -08 -11
iLlll1P.O.
l llll
(919) 801 -5000

PHOTO 9: LOOKING UPSTREAM AT CHANNEL FROM LOWER CROSSING.
PHOTO 10: LOOKING DOWNSTREAM AT CHANNEL FROM LOWER CROSSING.
PROJECT N0.
EEP -08000
Flt.�yAl[E:
NAKED CREEK RESPORAIION
AftoEngineenng
EEP -08000
SC..4LE:
CM
MONNORING PHOMS
A �rision of The John R McAd®e Compeay, lac.
NTS
t
l R l 7 Y? tt,� I
a
/� A n
WHIMS, NORTH " LMA
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
DATE:
04 -08 -11
(919) 3e1 -5000

PHOTO 11: LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM RIGHT BANK.
PHOTO 12: LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM HILLSIDE.
PROJECT EEP -08000
NAKED CREEK RFSMRAn0N
AEcoEngineering
EEP -08000
rZ
VO4-08-11
Fi��jI
MoNrt�oRtivG pxo'ros
A division of The John R. McAdam Compmy, Inc.
NTS
WHIMS, NO= CAMI�
P.O. B X 4005 6ZI PARK, —4 NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
i `` '
[phone]

PHOTO 13: LOOKING FROM LEFT BANK TOWARD RIGHT BANK AT WET AREA DRAINING INTO
RIGHT SIDE OF CHANNEL.
PHOTO 14: LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM RIGHT BANK AT CHANNEL AND RIPARIAN AREA.
no. EEP -08000
r it
C`
NAiD cRxR�S�oRAON
AftoEngineerin�g
: EEP -08000
N Ts
EDATE
Fmstel
MONUORiNG PHOTjOS
A vision of The John R. MCAdwe Comper
(
l
}1}�' _ �l'
v�[ii��
sr NORl�i
fIt8tmCH TRIAIi6It PARE. NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
04 -08 -11
(919) 3C1 -5000

PHOTO 15: LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM RIGHT BANK AT RIP —RAP TOE PROTECTION.
OJECT NO.
EEP -08000
�y.
NAKED CR' EK RFSM A710N
[iEcoEngineering
EEP -08000
A division The Jahn R. McAdam Compmy, Inc.
ALE: NTS
CMDATE:
yy ��II }} 11
MONII�ORING PHOTOS
of
1 1 l(��l�
WHIMS, NOR CAROUNA
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
P.O. B0X 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
04 -08 -11
(919) 361 -5000

Naked Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project Number: 261 - USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report - Wilkes County, North Carolina - June, 2011
NAKED CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 261
CROSS
SECTION
1
Year -0
Year -1
Year -2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
-2.50
1310.07
0.00
1309.99
-3.00
1310.02
-3.00
1309.84
-3
1309.8
-2.27
1309.80
3.84
1309.31
-2.79
1309.79
2.65
1309.45
0.76
1309.83
1.27
1309.87
5.55
1308.91
0.96
1309.82
9.53
1308.18
6.34
1308.73
14.11
1307.42
7.47
1308.57
6.40
1308.75
14.04
1307.56
14.95
1307.38
19.44
1306.68
9.77
1308.17
16.22
1307.24
18.47
1307.04
16.8
1307.3
21.63
1306.18
12.46
1307.64
20.34
1306.50
23.03
1306.16
21.76
1307
2126
1305.94
14.84
1307.58
21.87
1306.44
25.95
1306.76
24.68
1307.06
24.87
1305.55
17.94
1307.07
22.28
1306.22
27.52
1306.35
26.89
1306.92
26.61
1305.03
19.02
1306.73
22.70
1306.01
27.85
1306.19
2757
1306.53
29.75
1304.70
20.68
1306.47
23.89
1305.68
29.81
1306.02
28.21
1306.5
31.66
1304.67
22.07
1305.93
25.50
1305.93
31.09
1305.89
28.96
1306.43
33.44
1305.20
24.14
1305.68
26.69
1305.34
32.32
1305.88
29.72
1306.39
34.89
1305.96
26.01
1305.55
28.26
1304.83
33.76
1305.75
30.41
1306.35
3715
1307.04
27.68
1305.11
29.75
1305.08
34.29
1306.27
31.24
1306.12
41.68
1307.67
30.11
1304.68
31.57
1304.97
36.71
1307.17
32.09
1306.12
56.53
1312.96
31.83
1304.77
32.55
1304.43
42.20
1308.02
33.02
1306.2
63,35
1314.26
33.64
1305.59
33.47
1305.17
49.56
1311.16
33.78
1305.91
34.98
1306.43
34.61
1305.82
63.11
1314.30
34.69
1306.73
37.17
1307.25
34.61
1306.21
36.6
1307.11
40.61
1307.57
35.35
1306.35
39.58
1307.54
44.29
1308.81
36.20
1307.05
43.06
1308.27
46.35
1309.66
40.72
1307.45
51.45
1311.74
49.73
1311.14
46.54
1309.30
63.14
1314.34
51.91
1311.94
52.87
1311.90
56.58
1313.19
63.76
1314.26
60.05
1313.83
63.99
1314.64
63.29
1314.30
i _7 .
WcoEngineering
A do ivion of The John N. IkAdama Company, 1-

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • June, 2011
Naked Creek Cross Section 1 - Pool
1316
1315 Bankfull
1314 — Year -0, 8/22/07
1313 Year -1, 9/16/08
—*-- Year -2, 9/16/09
—1312 Year -3, 7/16/10
e1311 CIE— Year -4, 04/06/11
.21310
> 1309
w 1308
1307
1306
1305
1304
1303
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
YEAR -4, 2011 SURVEY DATA
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 4/04/2011 to 4/06/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
Bankfull Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Width /Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Classification
Bankfull Elevation:
�'>tY 11Y�tt 111
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM .
CROSS - SECTION: 1
FEATURE: Pool
38.1 sq. ft.
33.8 ft.
1.1 ft.
2.4 ft.
30.0 ft.
n/a ft.
n/a
1308.27 ft.
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
®EcoEngineering
A d­ ,n of'rhe John R. MCAdmu Comp ny, Inc.

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040 101010 100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • June, 2011
NAKED CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 261
CROSS
SECTION
2
Year
-0
Year -1
Year
-2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
-2.00
1309.25
0.00
1309.10
-2.80
1309.01
2.00
1308.94
2.53
1309.1
-1.48
1308.98
2.10
1309.14
1.72
1308.88
2.28
1309.09
5.39
1308.68
4.32
1308.96
4.94
1308.72
1.94
1309.02
4.39
1308.93
12.62
1307.11
1181
1306.89
8.49
1307.82
11.12
1307.28
12.48
1307.18
17.46
1306.81
17.81
1306.65
10.81
1307.41
17.38
1 306.80
17.67
1306.82
19.84
1306.42
2179
1305.52
13.10
1307.01
20.04
1306.12
21.02
1306.06
21.22
1306.26
23.48
1305.41
16.30
1306.86
22.47
1305.73
22.82
1305.74
22.1
1306.03
24.93
1305.51
20.85
1305.88
22.89
1305.63
23.33
1305.65
22.96
1305.84
26.27
1305.42
22.15
1305.67
23.72
1305.46
23.85
1305.04
23.47
1305.52
27.00
1305.53
23.96
1305.57
24.70
1305.53
24.46
1304.77
24.01
1305.26
28.69
1305.63
25.38
1305.51
25.65
1305.46
25.53
1304.80
24.56
1305.18
32.26
1306.67
26.58
1305.47
26.17
1305.52
26.20
1305.23
25.2
1305.2
37.62
1306.86
28.38
1305.74
26.75
1305.53
27.05
1305.61
25.82
1305.27
49.96
1307.73
29.29
1305.97
27.38
1305.59
27.68
1305.66
26.48
1305.34
64.39
1311.04
33.26
1306.79
27.98
1305.68
30.74
1306.37
27.26
1305.64
69.12
1312.05
35.66
1306.85
28.13
1305.75
38.44
1306.99
27.92
1305.71
69.32
1312.36
39.93
1307.12
28.74
1305.91
52.41
1308.27
28.56
1305.89
43.70
1307.30
29.98
1305.98
69.52
1312.17
28.98
1306.34
49.37
1307.75
33.65
1306.79
69.64
1312.38
30.82
1306.29
54.34
1308.84
44.29
1307.29
40.09
1306.99
58.12
1309.64
51.58
1308.06
51.2
1307.97
62.63
1310.72
62.15
1310.51
59.71
1309.94
66.47
1311.70
69.48
1312.12
69.37
1312.15
r
I�;ct ►„ �►�.111
®EcoEngineering

1313
1312
'1311
'1310
V309
1308
Uj 1307
1306
1305
1304
1303
Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • June, 2011
Naked Creek Cross Section 2 - Riffle
—Bankfull
---�- Year -0, 8122/07
Year -1, 9/16/08
—Year -2, 9/18/09
—E— Year -3, 7/16/10
- --@-- Year-4, 04/06/11
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
YEAR-4,2011 SURVEY DATA
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 4/04/2011 to 4/06/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ /PARRISH
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
Bankfull Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfudl Max Depth
Width /Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Classification
Bankfull Elevation:
r�
l��a ►,v�trnl
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
CROSS - SECTION: 2
FEATURE: Riffle
13.1 sq. ft.
20.2 ft.
0.6 ft.
1.6 ft.
31.3 ft.
4.9 ft.
C
1306.81 ft.
.r
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
®EcoEngineering
A di, m nr'IM Juhn R. McAdams C —pony, Inc.

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • June, 2011
NAKED CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 261
CROSS SECTION
3
Year
-0
Year -1
Year -2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
Station 11 Elev. ft
-3.20
1304.09
0.00
1304.18
-4.03
1304.01
4.00
1304.19
-3.87
1304.07
-3.00
1303.86
1.53
1304.20
3.27
1303.98
-3.87
1304.06
2.85
1304.05
1.35
1303.96
3.77
1304.04
11.12
1302.14
-3.87
1304.06
11.14
1302.17
11.93
1301.96
6.55
1303.54
18.40
1301.87
10.41
1302.39
14
1301.89
18.06
1301.71
11.86
1302.24
19.57
1301.75
14.15
1301.84
17.19
1302.15
20.40
1301.49
14.12
1301.91
20.37
1301.59
19.83
1301.74
19.51
1301.96
22.63
1300.78
19.40
1301.86
20.70
1301.46
22.50
1301.31
20.77
1301.47
23.67
1300.61
21.34
1301.53
21.59
1301.37
23.08
1301.00
21.69
1301.35
26.92
1300.63
22.85
1301.18
22.70
1301.36
23.49
1300.93
22.74
1301.33
28.78
1300.76
23.95
1301.18
23.46
1300.95
24.64
1300.85
23.73
1301.14
30.30
1300.96
25.32
1301.10
24.34
1301.05
25.54
1300.77
24.4
1300.95
31.29
1301.07
26.24
1300.99
25.60
1300.96
26.02
1300.80
25.12
1300.79
32.81
1301.58
28.29
1301.23
26.77
1300.98
26.31
1300.77
25.76
1300.88
34.80
1301.86
30.05
1301.34
28.46
1301.35
27.07
1300.87
26.6
1300.88
38.00
1302.16
32.25
1301.55
29.33
1301.45
27.37
1301.12
273
1300.9
45.53
1304.65
33.95
1301.89
30.93
1301.51
27.77
1301.45
27.73
1301.1
62.71
1309.43
35.38
1302.04
32.82
1301.98
28.57
1301.58
28.26
1301.68
63.02
1309.72
37.72
1302.24
38.00
1302.49
31.63
1301.64
29.48
1301.51
39.19
1302.76
44.96
1304.76
37.59
1302.36
31.4
1301.65
42.97
1304.00
62.29
1309.69
48.88
1305.85
33.07
1302.11
45.07
1304.70
62.14
1309.69
37.58
1302.42
50.00
1306.11
62.31
1309.91
46.94
1305.28
53.33
1306.93
57.21
1308.13
59.33
1308.78
62.15
1309.67
62.61
1309.67
c�
'Cosy.rrll l
®EcoEngineering
A di, W,n of The Jmhn It. McAdams Company. Inc.

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • June, 2011
Naked Creek Cross Section 3 - Riffle
'1311
'1310 —Bankfull
'1309 - Year -0, 8/22/07
Year -1, 9/16/08
'1308 --14 Year -2, 09/18/09
'1307 E) -Year -3, 7116/10
1306 —* — Year-4, 04/06111
.o '1305
> '1304
uj '1303
1302
'1301
'1300
'1299
'1298
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
YEAR-4,2011 SURVEY DATA
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 4/04/2011 to 4/06/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
Bankfull Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Width /Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Classification
Bankfull Elevation:
f',lY 11�1tt't 11
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
CROSS - SECTION: 3
FEATURE: Riffle
8.1 sq. ft.
14.6 ft.
0.6 ft.
1.2 ft.
26.4 ft.
2.1 ft.
C
1302.11 ft.
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
®EcoEngineering
A do uion of I he John N. hlcAdnnU Company, Inc.

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • June, 2011
NAKED CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 261
CROSS SECTION
4
Year
-0
Year -1
Year
-2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. (ft)
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. (ft)
Station ft Elev. (ft)
-3.45
1294.08
0.00
1293.89
4.80
1293.87
-3.00
1293.94
-2.93
1293.76
-2.86
1293.64
3.40
1294.15
1.22
1294.06
-2.82
1293.79
2.7
1294.01
4.04
1293.97
4.36
1294.11
2.91
1294.21
5.58
1294.04
5.49
1294.08
11.02
1292.54
6.74
1293.76
9.52
1292.69
9.11
1293.37
9.66
1293.19
14.67
1292.38
8.77
1293.28
14.07
1292.49
11.57
1292.64
14.82
1292.5
17.74
1292.08
10.25
1292.73
16.77
1292.17
17.13
1292.25
19.87
1292
19.86
1291.46
11.87
1292.54
19.32
1291.78
19.60
1292.02
20.54
1291.78
20.04
1291.29
15.36
1292.41
20.24
1291.47
20.55
1291.62
21.73
1291.59
26.31
1291.33
17.81
1292.14
21.01
1291.48
20.65
1291.63
22
1290.64
27.76
1291.43
19.39
1291.73
21.97
1291.56
21.32
1291.42
22.36
1290.39
29.18
1291.66
20.24
1291.40
22.72
1291.53
22.36
1291.43
23.01
1290.37
32.45
1292.24
20.69
1291.48
24.08
1291.48
23.28
1291.46
23.62
1290.37
36.48
1292.38
21.74
1291.57
25.07
1291.62
24.02
1291.47
24.27
1290.41
42.05
1293.42
23.44
1291.46
26.42
1291.55
24.97
1291.48
24.78
1290.41
57.67
1298.07
25.73
1291.54
27.94
1291.55
25.88
1291.51
25.22
1290.7
66.66
1299.97
27.62
1291.63
29.03
1291.81
27.47
1291.48
25.5
1291.45
66.97
1300.23
29.10
1291.86
29.51
1291.87
28.15
1291.66
26.67
1291.57
30.18
1292.07
30.31
1292.02
29.13
1291.82
27.67
1291.67
31.82
1292.34
31.54
1292.28
29.64
1291.83
28.79
1291.76
34.52
1292.42
39.72
1293.09
41.14
1293.23
29.65
1291.93
37.08
1292.69
48.44
1295.18
54.60
1296.93
31.89
1292.38
39.29
1293.14
59.63
1298.45
67.14
1299.92
40.72
1293.16
41.90
1293.60
67.20
1299.97
67.32
1299.92
47.96
1294.98
44.43
1294.23
57.7
1297.98
48.88
1295.48
66.99
1300.01
51.23
1296.11
55.20
1297.48
58.52
1298.34
61.31
1298.85
64.99
1299.68
r
®EcoEngineering
A dii- i..inn f I he John N. MIAdnmv Company. Im.

1302
— — Bankfull
1301
—,�— Year -0, 8/22/07
1300
Year -1, 9/16/2008
1299
'�— Year -2, 09/18/09
® Year -3, 7/16/10
1298
* Year -4, 04/06/11
1297
0
m 1296
obi 1295
1294
1293
1292
1291
1290
-6
-1 4 9
YEAR-4,2011 SURVEY DATA
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 4/04/2011 to 4/06/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ /PARRISH
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
Bankfull Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Classification
Bankfull Elevation:
r
I��tny�tcnl
Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS FIUC 03040 1010 10 100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • June, 2011
Naked Creek Cross Section 4 - Riffle
14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
CROSS - SECTION: 4
FEATURE: Riffle
12.4 sq. ft.
15.9 ft.
0.8 ft.
2.0 ft.
20.3 ft.
6.3 ft.
B
1292.38 ft.
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
®EcoEngineering
A dig f I he R hn k. McAdam Company. Inc.

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • June, 2011
NAKED CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 261
CROSS SECTION
5
Year
-O
Year -1
Year
-2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station tuft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev, ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
-2.50
1282.92
0.00
1282.46
0.04
1282.46
0.00
1282.74
0.15
1282.4
-1.88
1282.41
5.00
1282.37
12.00
1282.19
0.10
1282.41
8.94
1282.21
7.47
1282.32
14.00
1281.99
20.35
1281.82
10.77
1282.15
16.11
1281.92
17.80
1281.78
20.00
1281.80
24.12
1281.38
17.42
1281.92
21.72
1281.62
27.26
1280.63
24.00
1281.39
25.20
1281.26
26.92
1280.96
23.98
1281.45
29.53
1280.17
27.00
1280.95
26.56
1281.13
32.08
1280.38
27.55
1280.85
32.35
1279.52
30.00
1280.50
28.23
1280.85
35.75
1280.45
31.53
1280.54
40.12
1279.30
31.40
1280.33
29.85
1280.72
36.22
1280.30
34.22
1280.6
43.31
1279.43
33.00
1279.82
31.33
1280.43
37.08
1280.11
36.66
1280.46
43.41
1280.20
34.00
1279.69
32.44
1280.33
37.12
1279.91
36.93
1280.28
43.82
1281.02
35.00
1279.93
33.14
1280.33
37.64
1279.69
37.22
1280.02
45.56
1281.95
36.00
1280.01
34.10
1280.41
38.79
1279.49
37.84
1279.96
58.52
1283.68
37.00
1279.96
35.03
1280.43
39.90
1279.30
38.43
1279.86
60.09
1285.21
38.00
1279.76
35.63
1280.37
41.00
1279.07
39.09
1279.63
61.33
1285.56
39.00
1279.48
36.46
1280.27
42.68
1278.86
39.88
1279.57
61.22
1285.86
40.00
1279.14
37.23
1280.12
43.68
1279.14
40.72
1279.4
40.80
1278.91
38.58
1279.81
44.73
1279.38
41.46
1279.32
41.00
1278.91
39.53
1279.53
45.55
1280.69
42.2
1279.34
42.60
1279.07
40.71
1279.08
45.58
1279.90
42.95
1278.95
43.50
1279.27
41.63
1278.89
45.62
1279.63
43.74
1279.11
44.00
1279.36
42.12
1278.81
46.51
1281.29
44.38
1279.2
45.70
1279.81
43.66
1278.73
49.85
1282.26
44.94
1279.59
46.00
1280.46
44.33
1279.23
58.74
1283.12
45.62
1279.9
46.30
1280.90
45.00
1279.44
63.56
1285.36
46.13
1280.85
46.80
1281.42
45.46
1280.24
63.74
1285.74
46.58
1281.24
47.50
1281.65
46.07
1280.80
48.6
1282.01
49.00
1282.08
47.47
1281.54
51
1282.23
54.20
1282.53
48.17
1281.79
55.94
1282.7
56.30
1282.78
48.93
1282.05
60.08
1283.4
59.50
1283.18
50.03
1282.24
63.59
1285.28
61.50
1283.86
53.67
1282.57
62.60
1285
58.07
1282.93
63.90
1285.39
61.15
1283.61
64.06
1285.55
I��:tn��tenl
®EcoEngineering
A diriwinn M-i h< John R. WAd.- (',puny. 1-

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • June, 2011
Naked Creek Cross Section 5 - Pool
1288
1287 — Bankfull
—a — Year -0, 8/22/07
1286 6 Year -1, 9/16/2008
---*— Year -2, 09/18/09
1285 9 Year -3, 7/16/10
1284 —0— Year -4, 04/06/11
0 1283
1282
ua 12.81
1280
1279
1278
1277
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
VEAR4, 2011 SURVEY DATA
PRO.IIECT NAKED CREEK
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 4/04/2011 to 4/06/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
Bankfull Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Width /]Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Classification
Bankfull Elevation:
- - - - - -- --- - - - - --
r�
. I�' rr item
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
CROSS - SECTION: 5
FEATURE: Pool
22.1 sq. ft.
21.4 ft.
1.0 ft.
2.3 ft.
20.7 ft.
n/a
n/a
1281.44 ft.
®EcoEngineering
A doh, nfTn. John R. h4Adnnw Company. Inc.

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • June, 2011
NAKED CREEK
EEP PROJECT 0 261
CROSS SECTION
6
Year
-0
Year -1
Year
-2
Year -3
Year4
Year -5
Year -6
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
Station 11 Elev. ft
0.00
1280.44
0.00
1280.34
0.00
1280.34
0.14
1280.27
0
1280.39
1.02
1280.14
5.00
1280.30
5.00
1280.30
12.89
1280.24
7.15
1280.41
5.49
1280.12
10.00
1280.20
10.00
1280.20
19.52
1279.55
12.9
1280.47
14.07
1280.04
14.00
1280.16
14.00
1280.16
24.03
1279.67
18.14
1279.72
24.46
1279.47
17.00
1279.65
17.00
1279.65
25.22
1279.37
23.69
1279.82
26.73
1278.85
21.00
1279.60
21.00
1279.60
26.60
1279.06
26.88
1278.95
27.19
1278.51
23.00
1279.61
23.00
1279.61
27.77
1278.70
28.47
1278.95
29.33
1278.15
23.60
1279.63
23.60
1279.63
28.93
1278.55
29.21
1278.7
30.64
1277.95
25.00
1279.44
25.00
1279.44
29.52
1278.26
29.3
1278.58
31.47
1277.87
27.00
1278.94
27.00
1278.94
30.24
1277.90
29.5
1278.07
32.13
1277.92
29.00
1278.42
29.00
1278.42
30.45
1277.51
29.8
1277.73
33.79
1278.17
29.10
1278.33
29.10
1278.33
31.13
1277.37
30.4
1277.69
36.00
1278.61
29.70
1278.10
29.70
1278.10
31.84
1277.48
31.26
1277.62
39.47
1279.54
30.40
1277.84
30.40
1277.84
32.42
1277.66
31.7
1277.73
51.65
1280.73
31.40
1277.83
31.40
1277.83
32.90
1277.79
32.25
1277.77
59.31
1280.85
32.30
1277.80
32.30
1277.80
33.19
1278.13
32.78
1277.97
59.38
1280.96
33.20
1278.30
33.20
1278.30
33.42
1278.31
33.19
1278.31
34.05
1278.33
34.05
1278.33
34.16
1278.51
33.63
1278.53
34.70
1278.58
34.70
1278.58
36.33
1278.88
34.28
1278.85
36.00
1278.77
36.00
1278.77
40.25
1279.80
35.21
1279.19
39.00
1279.57
39.00
1279.57
50.72
1280.64
36.57
1279.2
41.30
1279.90
41.30
1279.90
59.13
1280.99
39.87
1279.94
45.00
1280.27
45.00
1280.27
48.99
1280.76
50.00
1280.58
50.00
1280.58
58.96
1281.17
55.00
1280.84
55.00
1280.84
59.00
1280.93
59.40
1281.02
c�
i �Uasystelll
®EcoEngineering
A d,-inn nf he John N. NIcAd.n Cmmpnny. Im.

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • June, 2011
Naked Creek Cross Section 6 - Pool
1282
1281
R 1480
Q
V 1 < ?79
M 1278 _ —Bankfull
—s— Year - 018/22/07
- Year -1, 9/16/08
—*_ Year -2, 09/18/09
1277 —) Year -3, 7/16/10
-- Year -4, 04/06/11
1276
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
YEAR -4, 2011 SURVEY DATA
PRO.IECT NAKED CREEK
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 4/04/2011 to 4/06/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
Bankfull Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Width /Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Classification
Bankfull Elevation:
r�
I,�t►,ytitrrn
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
CROSS - SECTION: 6
FEATURE: Pool
15.5 sq. ft.
21.2 ft.
0.7 ft.
2.2 ft.
29.0 ft.
n/a ft.
n/a
1279.82 ft.
®EcoEngineering
A dirivinn of I he Jnhn R. McAdams Company. Im.

1311
1310
1309
1308
y
Z 1307
O
d
W 1306
r1
W
1305
1304
1303
1302 +
0
Naked Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2011 (Year -4) Monitoring
YR -0 TW 8/22/07
YR -1 TW 9/16/08
o YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/16/09
p YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 7/16/10
a YR -3 Structures
YR -4 TW 4/14/11
SIC YR-4 Structures
— —YR-4 WS
100 200 300 400 500
STATION (feet)
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
®EcoEngineering
A Ji�i.i.m of TM h�nn R. L4AJmro ['umryn�, Irc.

1305
1304
1303
1302
Q
8 1301
Z
0
l:. 1300
W
1299
1298
1297
1296
1295
500
600
–r-.
Naked Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2011 (Year -4) Monitoring
700
800
STATION (feet)
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
YR -0 TW 8/22/07
YR -1 TW 9/16/08
O YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/16/09
YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 7/16/10
O YR -3 Structures
YR-4 TW 4/14/11
* YR-4 Structures
— —YR-4 WS
900 1000
[AEcoEngineering
n���i >nm of Th�InM1nR MkA�Lunn ('umryny.IM.

1298
1297
1296
1295
w 1294
Z
O
F 1293
e
w
1292
1291
1290
1289
0 _� /,
Naked Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2011 (Year -4) Monitoring
_ 1%%
1
1288
1000 1100 1200 1300
STATION (feet)
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
YR -0 TW 8/22/07
YR -1 TW 9/16/08
O YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/16/09
YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 7/16/10
o YR -3 Structures
YR-4 TW 4/14/11
* YR-4 Structures
—YR-4 WS
1400 1500
®EcoEngineering
A d,1 w. oCT --R McAdvna ('�np�n \'.IRS.

1292
1291
1290
1289
�Ir
,a 1288
Z
0
F. 1287
e
w
1286
1285
1284
1283
1282
Naked Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2011 (Year -4) Monitoring
1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
STATION (feet)
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
®EcoEngineering
A di�iam ol'1Te Jnlln R. McAdam. Cwnryny IM.

1285
1284
1283
1282
1281
1280
V
1279
F
> 1278
W
a
1277
1276
1275
1274
1273
1272
nom\
% — -..
Naked Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2011 (Year -4) Monitoring
2000 2100 2200 2300 2400
STATION (feet)
Notre: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
YR -0 TW 8/22/07
YR -1 TW 9/16/08
O YR -1 Structures
�-- YR -2 TW 9/16/09
YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 7/16/10
o YR -3 Structures
YR -4 TW 4/14/11
SIC YR-4 Structures
-YR-4 WS
t
1
2500 2600 2700
[jEcoEngineering
A d�. isiam ofTla hMn R. M.�AJnry t'uml.any, Iw.

4 YEAR, 2011 SURVEY DATA PROJECT NAME NAKED CREEK
TASK LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
FEATURE/FACET SLOPE REACH NAKED CREEK
LENGTH, AND SPACING AND DATE 4/4/2011 to 4/6/2011
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE DATA CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH
Overall water surface slope = 14% DESIGN MIN MAX
Riffle 00195 0 025
WS sta. start = 36 76 ft Run
WS sta. end= 2712 17 ft p p spacing _ 80 144
ELEV Start= 1309 82 ft msl
ELEV End = 1272 83 ft msl
Results
n =
MIN
MEDIAN
AVG
MAX
Riffle slopes measured = 43
02%
26%
31%
92%
Run slopes measured = 31
02%
36%
94%
1164%
Pools measured = 44
15
64
61
119
All data reported in units of feet unless otherwise specified
Feature Station Length Slope
RIFFLE 6321 644 248% n = 43
RIFFLE 9701 1764 266% MIN = 023%
RIFFLE 14671 2714 258% MEDIAN = 258%
RIFFLE 26104 3244 284% AVG = 307%
RIFFLE 33544 3686 171% MAX = 917%
RIFFLE 44374 783 575%
RIFFLE 50926 472 360%
RIFFLE
52575
424
708%
RIFFLE
54838
1147
375%
RIFFLE
5773
1658
458%
RIFFLE
62843
8 18
770%
RIFFLE
73341
189
153%
RIFFLE
80192
2208
068%
RIFFLE
86406
447
917%
RIFFLE
94931
1338
336%
RIFFLE
101427
589
492%
RIFFLE
10696
679
633%
RIFFLE
109826
1583
032%
RIFFLE
1158 12
2023
252%
RIFFLE
118668
2294
157%
RIFFLE
12501
539
186%
RIFFLE
131962
603
514%
RIFFLE
13368
2179
101%
RIFFLE
142504
3688
106%
RIFFLE
1484
999
190%
RIFFLE
153645
3034
155%
RIFFLE
159641
4279
264%
RIFFLE
173085
898
134%
RIFFLE
176422
501
419%
RIFFLE
179333
3604
219%
Naked Creek 4 Year Monitoring Data Sheet 1 of 3

4 YEAR, 2011 SURVEY DATA PROJECT NAME NAKED CREEK
RIFFLE
1881 87
1428
091%
RIFFLE
190484
783
281%
RIFFLE
199789
6131
054%
RIFFLE
213228
21 19
109%
RIFFLE
218213
1243
539%
RIFFLE
222822
1721
023%
RIFFLE
2322 1
461
738%
RIFFLE
239137
2489
072%
RIFFLE
2483 11
5 16
291%
RIFFLE
252374
1122
045%
RIFFLE
2561 12
191
555%
RIFFLE
2595 14
475
168%
RIFFLE
265508
847
425%
Feature
Station
Length
Slope
RUN
174
31
086%
n =
31
RUN
293
14
058%
MIN =
02%
RUN
372
14
871%
MEDIAN =
36%
RUN
452
9
565%
AVG =
94%
RUN
530
5
1732%
MAX =
1164%
RUN
560
12
614%
RUN
637
1
11636%
RUN
752
24
214%
RUN
824
26
065%
RUN
869
4
1415%
RUN
963
14
160%
RUN
1020
7
1408%
RUN
1076
11
037%
RUN
1178
4
224%
RUN
1210
7
029%
RUN
1255
35
104%
RUN
I326
6
356%
\
RUN
1359
14
107%
RUN
1462
10
1308%
RUN
1494
12
180%
RUN
1567
4
023%
RUN
1769
8
942%
RUN
1829
26
110%
RUN
1896
4
1183%
RUN
1913
11
4 19%
RUN
2195
5
1358%
RUN
2327
11
1183%
RUN
2416
6
1240%
RUN
2488
5
1234%
RUN
2580
2
066%
RUN
2600
39
095%
Naked Creek 4 Year Momtonng Data Sheet 2 of 3

4 YEAR, 2011 SURVEY DATA PROJECT NAME NAKED CREEK
Feature Station Length p -p spacing n = 44
POOL 44 7 MIN = 15 (p p spacing)
POOL 123 11 46 AVG = 61
POOL 211 10 88 MAX = 119
POOL
317
11
106
POOL
405
48
88
POOL
433
16
29
POOL
489
51
55
POOL
519
10
31
POOL
535
11
16
POOL
572
16
36
POOL
639
57
68
POOL
701
13
62
POOL
791
18
89
POOL
854
10
64
POOL
873
69
18
POOL
941
9
69
POOL
1027
14
86
POOL
1059
25
32
POOL
1122
27
62
POOL
1233
24
111
POOL
1301
11
67
POOL
1387
19
86
POOL
1472
15
85
POOL
1515
19
44
POOL
1580
24
64
POOL
1679
15
99
POOL
1750
18
71
POOL
1868
20
119
POOL
1942
39
74
POOL
1980
31
37
POOL
2072
21
93
POOL
2089
68
17
POOL
2162
20
73
POOL
2200
29
38
POOL
2258
60
58
POOL
2338
17
79
POOL
2365
18
27
POOL
2437
23
72
POOL
2478
10
42
POOL
2494
20
15
POOL
2538
21
45
POOL
2582
15
44
POOL
2647
10
65
Naked Creek 4 Year Monitoring Data Sheet 3 of 3

100 Histogram
®Year 1
m 80 ®Year 2
IM OYear 3
1p
60 E3 Year 4
40
20
O
9ti ooh N.. a �
oo
Particle Size (mm)
EEP PROJECT ID 261
CROSS SECTION 2 FEATURE RIFFLE
M
{ +OS Stem
L1111an cement
FPO KAM
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK PEBBLE COUNT
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 4/4/2011 to 4/6/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH
Matenal
Size Ran q@ mm
Count
Naked Creek
silt/clay
0 0 062
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
0 062 013
0 13 025
Note
Riffle Pebble Count Naked Creek
100% ------ ------T
90%
025 05
05 1
r
1 2
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
coarse gravel
coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
very coarse gravoll
2 4
4 6
r
60%
6 8
r
t 70%
pr
8 11
11 16
60%
16 22
LZ 50%
22 32
40%
2
32 45
45 64
64 90
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobble
small boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
large boulder
-very large boulderl
30%
20%
90 128
128 180
10%
180 256
256 362
Oho
001 01 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm) Cumulative Percent ♦ Percent Item
362 512
512 1024
1024 2048
2048 4096
Size percent less than mm
Percent b substrate type
Yqraval
bedrocki
D16 I
D35
I D50
I D84
D96
silt/clay
sand
I
cobble
boulder
bedrock
Total Particle Count
100
wA
*N /A
0 1
0
14
45%
44°!0
11 %
8%
0%
0%

80
70
m 60
50
p� 40
30
e Zo
10
O
Histogram
oo9ti ooh a w ,�b qti �` 4 �1
Particle Size (mm)
®Year 1
®Year 2
OYear 3
El Year 4
EEP PROJECT ID 261
CROSS SECTION 3 FEATURE RIFFLE
1•-
Ell ammon
S ge-ni IL
D k JL LI AM
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK PEBBLE COUNT
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 4/4/2011 to 4/6/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ /PARRISH
Material
Size Range mm
Count
Naked Creek
sift/clay
0 0 062
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sandl
0 062 013
Note
Riffle Pebble Count Naked Creek
100%
90%
013 025
025 05
1 06 1
1 2
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
coarse gravel
coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
very coarse Qvavel
2 d
4 6
6 8
,
80%
cc 70%
111.
k
0
8 11
11 16
t
~ 60%
16 22
a)
50 °!0
22 32
u-
40y0
32 45
45 64
64 90
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very lar a cobble
° 30%
20%
90 128
1 128 160
10%
1 180 256
256 362
small boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
large boulder
very large boulder
0% i �-
001 01 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm) I, Cumulatnre Percent ♦ Percent Item
362 512
512 1024
1024 2048
2048 4096
Size percent less than mm
Percent by substrate type
bedrock,j
I
D35
I D50
I D84
D95 11
silt/clay
sand
I gravel
I cobble
I boulder
I bedrock
Total Particle Count
1 100
MWA 1
0 10
1 02
1 9
18 11
23%
r 57%
r 20%
1 0%
1 0%
1 0%

Histogram
80
70 ©Year 1
JMYear 2
to C60 OYear 3
50 �Year4
40
c 30
20
10
0
o9�, oh a � ti coo *
o �
o
Particle Size (mm)
EEP PROJECT ID 261
CROSS SECTION 4 FEATURE RIFFLE
1.—
{ tem
�,Ai naicment
d IK 741t Nrl
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK PEBBLE COUNT
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 4/4/2011 to 4/6/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ /PARRISH
Material
Size Range mm
Count
Naked Creek
silyclay
0 006
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
0 062 013
013 025
Note
025 05
Riffle Pebble Count Naked Creek
100%
l
90%
05 1
1 2
i
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
coarse gravel
coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
very coarse qravel
2 d
4 6
6 8
60%
s 70%
*�
8 11
11 16
~ 60%
16 22
22 32
'T- 50%
m 40%
32 45
45 64
a 30q°
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very lar a cobble
64 90
20%
90 128
10%
128 180
180 256
256 362
small boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
large boulder
very lar a boulder
0%
001 01 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm) --.— Cumulative Percent ♦ Percent Item
362 512
512 1024
1024 2048
2048 4096
Size percent less than mm
Percent by substrate type
bedrock
D16
D35
I D50
I D84
I D95
silt/clay
sand I gravel
I cobble
I boulder
bedrock
Total Particle Count
100
#tr\VA
007
1 01
1 1
1 18
31%
r 53% r 16%
1 0%
1 0%
1 0%

APPENDIX E
Wetland Assessment
(omitted, not applicable)