20051919 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20110201

os - /0
IaICY41q
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
GOOSE CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION
DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project Number 147)
Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
Submitted to: �C
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources F ��
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina -"-"*Al 4t-
I.-
d ZQ O
r
14;n 1, �emelnt
l
January 2011
gNcF�9yys
j°R�

FINAL
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
GOOSE CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION
DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project Number 147)
Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (20 10)
x
r
A.
r
Z r "
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
Prepared by:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
20 Enterprise Street, Suite 7
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Design Firm:
Biohabitats
8218 Creedmoor Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27613
En lat 'ement
Axiom Enwrormental. Inc. rrocRwM
January 2011

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY /PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Goose Creek Stream Restoration Site (Site) is located in the City of Durham, North Carolina in a
highly developed watershed (Figure 1, Appendix A). Goose Creek is part of the Neuse River Basin
(Upper Neuse, Subbasin 03- 04 -01) and is located in USGS Cataloging Unit 03020201. This project is
located in EEP's Ellerbe Creek Local Watershed Plan area, which is targeted for mitigation to protect
watershed functions, increase aquatic life, decrease destructive flooding, provide recreational
opportunities, and protect the Falls Lake drinking water supply. The preproject stream was highly
modified and artificially confined by concrete on the channel and banks upstream and by rock walls
downstream. The goals of the project were to eradicate artificial hardening structures, restore a more
natural channel geometry and riparian buffer. Project restoration efforts provided 1465 linear feet of
stream restoration, 1.38 acres of riparian buffer restoration, and 0.06 acre of riparian buffer enhancement.
This report (compiled based on EEP's Revised Table of Contents for 2009 Monitoring Report
Submissions Version 1.2.1 dated 6/1/09) summarizes data for year 2 (20 10) monitoring.
The goals of the Goose Creek stream restoration project were:
• To improve aquatic habitat by removing the fabriform channel liner on the Eastway Elementary
School reach and the stone retaining walls on the Longmeadow Park reach and reintroducing a
more defined and natural riffle /pool channel geometry sequence.
• To improve water quality by reducing nutrient loading from adjacent developed properties
through restoration of a riparian buffer.
• To improve terrestrial habitat by restoring a riparian buffer.
• To decrease sediment and nutrient content of stormwater flow originating in the Barnes Street
Redevelopment project site, which flows through the Site and into Goose Creek, through the
means of a re- configured stormwater channel which slows stormwater flow, allowing sediment to
settle and nutrients to be absorbed by planted vegetation.
Goals were accomplished by constructing a natural, stable profile and dimension for the stream channel
and reestablishing a continuous riparian buffer along the stream banks. Project implementation has
greatly increased the prominence of riffles and pools in the reach and improved aquatic habitat.
Success criteria dictate that an average density of 320 stems per acre must be surviving after five
monitoring years in accordance with North Carolina Division of Water Quality Administrative Code 15A
NCAC 02B.0242 (Meuse River Basin, Mitigation Program for Protection and Maintenance of Existing
Riparian Buffers) (NCDWQ 2007). Based on the number of stems counted, average densities were
measured at 415 planted stems per acre surviving in year 2 (2010). The dominant species identified at the
Site were planted stems of green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera),
sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and willow oak (Quercus phellos). Two of the individual plots met
success criteria when counting planted stems alone. Plots 1 and 2 were one and two stems shy when
counting planted stems alone; however, when including appropriate naturally recruited species stems such
as elm (Ulmus sp.), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), river birch (Betula nigra), and eastern redbud
(Cercis Canadensis) these plots were also well -above success criteria.
Success criteria for stream restoration reaches dictate that little to no change from the as -built channel
occurs over the monitoring period. Year 2 (20 10) monitoring measurements indicate that there have been
minimal changes in cross - sections and profile downstream of Liberty Street as compared to as -built data.
Profile upstream of Liberty Street was designed to adjust itself to changes in watershed flows. A total of
six bankfull events are documented to have occurred at the Site with three events in year 1 (2009) and
three events occurring so far during the year 2 (20 10) monitoring period. Noted problem areas within the
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2011
Durham County, North Carolina page i

Site include an area of bank erosion on the right bank just downstream of Cross - section 7 and at Cross -
section 5 (Figure 2, Appendix A). In addition, vandalism of containerized plants and livestakes within the
vicinity of Vegetation Plot 2 occurred shortly after planting in late spring/early summer of 2009. This
Site is located in a public park and it is suspected that neighborhood kids pulled the plants out of the
ground resulting in reduced numbers of planted stems. Naturally recruited stems of appropriate hardwood
species are establishing within these areas; it is recommended to watch these areas closely.
In summary, the Site achieved success criteria for vegetation and stream attributes in the Second
Monitoring Year (2010). Summary information and data related to the occurrence of items such as
beaver or encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in tables and figures within this report's appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents
available on EEPs website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available
from EEP upon request.
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2011
Durham County, North Carolina page ii

Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT .................................... ...............................
2.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................ ...............................
2.1 Vegetation Assessment .............................................................................. ...............................
2.2 Stream Assessment .................................................................................... ...............................
3.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................. ...............................
List of Figures
Figure 1. Site Location ................................................................................ ............................... Appendix A
Figures 2a -2b. Monitoring Plan View ......................................................... ............................... Appendix A
List of Tables
Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives ............. ............................... .......................Appendix B
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History .................. ............................... .......................Appendix B
Table 3. Project Contacts Table ............................................ ............................... .......................Appendix B
Table 4. Project Attribute Table ............................................ ............................... .......................Appendix B
Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table ............................ .......................Appendix C
Table 6. Vegetation Metadata Table ..................................... ............................... .......................Appendix C
Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species ......... ............................... .......................Appendix C
Table 8. Verification of Bankfull Events .................................................... ............................... Appendix D
Tables 9a -9b. Qualitative Visual Stability Assessments ............................. ............................... Appendix D
Appendices
APPENDIX A. FIGURES AND PLAN VIEWS
Figure 1. Site Location
Figures 2a -2b. Monitoring Plan View
APPENDIX B. GENERAL PROJECT TABLES
Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
APPENDIX C. VEGETATION ASSESSMENT DATA
Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
CVS Summary Data Tables
Table 6. Vegetation Metadata Table
Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
APPENDIX D. STREAM ASSESSMENT DATA
Table 8. Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 9a. North Reach Goose Creek Qualitative Stability Assessment
Table 9b. South Reach Goose Creek Qualitative Stability Assessment
Cross - section Plots and Tables
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Pebble Count Plots
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc- Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2011
Durham County, North Carolina Table of Contents

2.0 METHODOLOGY
3.1 Vegetation Assessment
Following Site construction, four plots (10- meters square) were established and monumented with metal
rebar at all plot corners. Plots were surveyed in June -July 2010 for the year 2 (2010) monitoring season.
Sampling was conducted as outlined in the CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.0
(Lee et al. 2006) ( http :Hcvs.bio.unc.edu /methods.htm); results are included in Appendix C. The
taxonomic standard for vegetation used for this document was Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia,
and Surrounding Areas ( Weakley 2007). The locations of vegetation monitoring plots are depicted on
Figure 2 in Appendix A.
2.2 Stream Assessment
Eight permanent cross - sections were established after construction was completed. Measurements of
each cross - section include points at all breaks in slope including top of bank, bankfull, and thalweg.
Riffle cross - sections are classified using the Applied Fluvial Morphology ( Rosgen 1996) stream
classification system. Longitudinal profile measurements of the entire Site restoration reaches include
thalweg and water surface; with each measurement taken at the head of facets (i.e. riffle, run, pool, and
glide) in addition to the maximum pool depth. Visual assessment of in- stream structures was conducted
to determine if failure has occurred. Failure of a structure may be indicated by collapse of the structure,
undermining of the structure, abandonment of the channel around the structure, and/or stream flow
beneath the structure.
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, Michael T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.0. (online). Available: http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu /methods.htm
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2007. Redbook, Surface Waters and Wetlands
Standards. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water
Quality. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology (Publisher). Pagosa Springs,
Colorado.
Weakley, Alan S. 2007. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas (online).
Available: http: / /www. herbarium. unc .edu /WeakleysFiora.pdf [February 1, 2008]. University of
North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Weather Underground. 2010. Station at Raleigh - Durham Airport, North Carolina. (online). Available:
http: / /www.wunderground .com/history/airport/KRDU /2010 /2 /15 /CustomHistory.html [February
15, 2010]. Weather Underground.
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (20 10)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2011
Durham County, North Carolina page 1

APPENDIX A
FIGURES AND PLAN VIEWS
Figure 1. Site Location
Figures 2a -2b. Monitoring Plan View
Goose Creek (final)
EEP Project Number 147
Durham County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
January 2011
Appendices

r
w
+ 4y�f' .ial�r
�^ Axiom Environmental
20 Enterprise Street
Suite 7
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 215 -1693
A
0
�Ns
some
-.
0 700 1,400 2,800 4,200 5,600
� Feet
Scale 000
D—. by.
Goose Creek
SITE LOCATION MAP
CAF
Restoration Site
Date
A
lk"WI �.
NOV 2009
I I
�r
15
08 -001
♦��Sr, �
�j�f�� �r
+�
!
in
y r �:,•
v �
�
,
A
0
�Ns
some
-.
0 700 1,400 2,800 4,200 5,600
� Feet
Scale 000
D—. by.
FIGURE
SITE LOCATION MAP
CAF
GOOSE CREEK SITE
Date
A
EEP PROJECT NUMBER 147
NOV 2009
I I
Durham County, North Carolina
Project
08 -001

2005 Durham County Orthophotograph Liberty St. N
Problem Area 2:
Bank Erosion
on Right Bank
r�-
Fxr��tem
�tI �c 1a1 nick
Matchlin Figure 2 ..oc.wr
Xsect 5
Plot 3
Xsect g
Comment• Lon Rude Latitude plot 4
Problem Area 1:
Bank Erosion
on Right Bank
Legend
Conservation Easement
Restored Stream Channel
Cross - sections
%:sect
Structures
,r Vegetation Plot Origin
Vegetation Plots It
0 40 80 160 240 320
Fee
Xsect 8
Scale 1:1200
vp = vegetation plot, xs = cross-section
D-. by.
FIGURE
Axiom Environmental MONITORING PLAN VIEW CLF
20 Enterprise Street
suite? GOOSE CREEK SITE Daie
Raleigh, NC 27607 EEP PROJECT NUMBER 147 FEB 2010
(919) 215 -1693 Durham County, North Carolina P�oie�r_
2B
E^ i°v^°^ "''nc• 10 -009
v 1 - 78.88428807010 35.99419284740
v 1 - 78.88431099220 35.99411022280
Vol - 78.88441700420 35.99413188950
1 origin - 78.88440030210 35.99422471960
v - 78,88398521060 35.99416646130
v - 78.88395978500 35.99407776030
v - 78.88406798710 35.99405434090
2 on in - 78.88408533090 35.99414585150
v - 78.88370854310 35.99179182840
v - 78.88385999570 35.99179449810
v - 78.88364574290 35.99197147050
3 origin - 78.88369943100 35.99197805180
v - 78.88374436330 35.99120963450
v - 78.88369684360 35.99120309110
v - 78.88367122940 35.99138281330
origin
- 78.88373074370
35.99138760720
xs1
- 78.86431515510
35.99422927800
xs1
- 78.88412084630
35.99426334970
xs2
- 78.88405842400
35.99364372310
xs2
- 78.88386791880
35.99376040220
xs3
- 78.88358099260
35.99321673000
xs3
- 78.88384776390
35.99324014180
xs4
- 78.88363044960
35.99302764270
xs4
- 78.88384681400
35.99311337920
xs5
- 78.88364554900
35.99188687370
zs5
- 78.88387897610
35.99197005400
xs6
- 78.86390661370
35.99142297110
zs6
- 78.88369007520
35.99136346110
xs7
- 78.88368665170
35.99067103710
xs7
- 76.88390759170
35.99066068430
xs8
- 78.88390127690
35.99039694400
xs8
- 78.88371291820
35.99040630750

APPENDIX B
GENERAL PROJECT TABLES
Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
Goose Creek (fmal) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2011
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
*Buffer restoration and enhancement is to be used to mitigate for buffer impacts per the Neuse River Buffer Rules
* *Restored length of Longmeadow reach does not include 55 feet of stream between the end of the project and the Holloway Street
culvert that was not restored.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
Activity or Report
Pre-
Actual Completion or Deliver
Restoration Plan
July 2005
Planted
Buffer
Buffer
Restoratio
Reach
Project
Stationing
Restoration
Approach
Easement
Restoration
Enhancement
n Length
Planting
--
February 2009
Level
March 2009
March 2009
Year 1 (2009) Monitoring
October 2009
November 2009
Year 2 2010 Monitoring
Length ft
January 2011
Acreage
(acres)*
(acres)*
(ft)**
Eastway
514
3 +48 -8 +61
Restoration
P2
0.86
--
-
514
Upstream
Eastway
347
0 +00 -3 +47
Restoration
P2
1.4
0.58
0.06
347
Downstream
Longmeadow
Park Section
659
0 +55 -6 +59
Restoration
P2
1.69
0.8
--
604
TOTALS
1 1500
3.95
1.38
0.06
1465
Component Summations
Restoration
Stream (linear feet)
Restoration Buffer (acres)*
Level
Restoration
1465
1.38
Enhancement
--
0.06
1465 linear feet
1.44 acres
TOTALS
1465 SMUs
1.41 BMUs
*Buffer restoration and enhancement is to be used to mitigate for buffer impacts per the Neuse River Buffer Rules
* *Restored length of Longmeadow reach does not include 55 feet of stream between the end of the project and the Holloway Street
culvert that was not restored.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
Activity or Report
Data Collection Completion
Actual Completion or Deliver
Restoration Plan
July 2005
October 2005
Final Design-Construction Plans
November 2006
Aril 2008
Construction
--
September 2008
Permanent Seeding Completed
--
September 2008
As- Builts
October 2008
December 2008
Planting
--
February 2009
Mitigation Plan
March 2009
March 2009
Year 1 (2009) Monitoring
October 2009
November 2009
Year 2 2010 Monitoring
August 2010
January 2011
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (20 10)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2011
Durham County. North Carolina Appendices

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
Designer
8918 Creedmoor Road, Suite 200
Biohabitats, Inc
Raleigh, NC 27613
Kevin Nunnery 919 -518 -0311
Construction Contractor
6106 Corporate Park Dr.
Shamrock Environmental, Inc
Browns Summit, NC 27214
Dan Albert 336 - 375 -1989
Survey Contractor
668 Marsh Country Lane
Level Cross Surveying, PLLC
Randleman, NC 23717
Sheri Willard 336 -495 -1713
Planting Contractor
1932 Holt Rd
Southern Garden, Inc
Cary, NC 27519
Todd Laakso 919- 362 -1050
Seed Mix Suppliers
1218 Management Way, Garner, NC 27529
Green - Resource
Rodney Montgomery 919- 779 -4727
Planting Stock Suppliers
880 Buteo Ridge Road
Container Stock -Cure Nursery
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Bill Cure 919 -542 -6186
Balled in Burlap
3705 New Bern Ave
Taylor's Nursery
Raleigh, NC 27610
Richard Taylor 919 231 -6161
Year 1 -2 (2009 -10) Monitoring
20 Enterprise Street, Suite 7
Performer
Raleigh, NC 27607
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Grant Lewis (919) 215 -1693
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2011
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
Project County
Durham
Ph sio ra hic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Triassic Basin
Project River Basin
Neuse
USGS HUC for Project 14 digit)
3020201050010
NCDW Sub -basin for Project
03 -04 -01
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
Ellerbe Creek Local Watershed Plan
WRC Hab Class Warm, Cool, Cold
Warm
% of project easement demarcated
100%
Beaver activity observed?
No
Eastway upstream
Eastway downstream
Longmeadow
Drainage area
350
396
481
Stream order
2
2
2
Restored length feet
514
347
604
Perennial or Intermittent
perennial
perennial
perennial
Watershed type Rural, Urban, etc.
urban
Urban
urban
Watershed LULC Distribution
Urban -Low Intensity Developed
44
43
Urban-High Intensity Developed
22
22
Residential Urban
18
19
Forest, Herbaceous, Open Water
16
16
Watershed impervious cover %
—55
—54
NCDW AU /Index number
27 -5 -1
27 -5 -1
27 -5 -1
NCDWQ classification
WS -IV, NSW
WS -IV, NSW
WS -IV, NSW
303d listed?
no
no
no
Upstream of a 303d listed segment?
yes
yes
yes
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
urban stormwater
urban stormwater
urban stormwater
Total acreage of easement
0.9
1.4
1.7
Ros en classification of pre-existing
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ros en classification of As -built
Bc5
Bc5
Bc5
Valle type/slope
N/A
N/A
N/A
Valley side slope ranee. . 2 -3.%
10 -15%
10 -15%
10 -15%
Valley toe slope ranee.. 2 -3.%
3 -5%
3 -5%
3 -5%
Dominant soil series /characteristics
Series
Whitestore -Urban
Whitestore -Urban
Whitestore -Urban
Depth
60"
60"
60"
Cla %
1 5 -70
5 -70
5 -70
Used N/A for items that may not apply. Use "- ` for items that are unavailable and "U" for items that are unknown
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2011
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

APPENDIX C
VEGETATION ASSESSMENT DATA
Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
CVS Summary Data Tables
Table 6. Vegetation Metadata Table
Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2011
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1
Yes
100%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
Goose Creek Restoration Site
Year 2 (2010) Annual Monitoring
Vegetation Plot Photos (taken June 2010)
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2011
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 6. Vegetation Metadata Table
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Proiect Number 1471
Report Prepared By
Corri Faquin
Date Prepared
9/29/2010 8:41
database name
Axiom -EEP- 2010 -A.mdb
database location
C: \Business \Projects \2010 \CVS Database
computer name
PHILLIP
file size
40685568
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems,
and all natural /volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are
excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------
Project Code
147
project Name
Goose Creek
Description
River Basin
Neuse
length(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
4
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2011
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Proiect Number 147)
Current Data (MY2 2010)
Annual Totals
N
w
d
CL
N
EN
E
Z
O
0
E
E
0
U
�••1
O
CL
N
O
a
M
O
Q.
�
O
a
o
y C
W Y
u
rn
Y
a
N
Q
a
c
a
c
a
c
a
c
O
E
w
N
m
N
m
c
a
E
d
V
O
N
�'
N
a
c
a
E
V
O
F
N
«'
N
m
c
A
a
Acer negundo
boxelder
1
1
2
1
Acerrubrum
red maple
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Acersoccharinum
sugar maple
2
2
Amelonchier orborea
common serviceberry
2
2
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
Baccharis Halimnifolia
eastern baccharis
6
1
7
Betula nigra
river birch
1
1
1
2
1
4
2
5
2
11
11
Callicarpo americana
american beautyberry
2
2
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
Catalpa bignonioides
southern catalpa
5
2
1
8
Cephalanthus occidentolis
common buttonbush
1
1
10
10
Cercis conadensis
eastern redbud
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
2
2
3
3
Cornus
dogwood
1
1
1
1
1
1
Froxinus pennsylvanicc
green ash
9
4
1
4
3
5
5
22
9
10
7
Ilex decidua
possumhaw
1
1
1
1
2
2
4
2
7
7
luniperus virginiona
eastern red cedar
1
1
Liquidombarstyrocifluo
sweetgum
4
4
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
5
2
1
1
5
5
11
8
10
10
10
10
Morus
mulberry
90
3
93
Morus rubra
red mulberry
2
2
20
Oxydendrum arboreum
sourwood
4
2
4
Platonus occidentolis
American sycamore
10
1
1
4
3
15
4
8
5
6
6
Prunus serotina
black cherry
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
3
3
Ulmus
jElm
1
1
unknown
junknown
1
1
Viburnum dentatum
southern arrowwood
1
1
1
1
1
1
Plot area (acres)
a
N
0
v
N
0
v
N
0
a
N
0
Species Count
8
5
12
5
12
7
9
7
21
13
17
is
13
14
Stem Count
22
1 7
37
6
1
106
10
24
18
189
41
79
45
61
1 65
Stems per acre
891
1 283 1
1498
243
4291
405
972
729
1913
415
800
455
617
1 658

APPENDIX D
STREAM ASSESSMENT DATA
Table 8. Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 9a. North Reach Goose Creek Qualitative Stability Assessment
Table 9b. South Reach Goose Creek Qualitative Stability Assessment
Cross - section Plots and Tables
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Pebble Count Plots
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2011
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 8. Verification of Bankfull Events
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
Date of Data
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo (if
Collection
available
Visual observation of overbank as the result of Tropical
November 11, 2009
November 11, 2009
1 -2
Storm Ida
Visual observation of overbank in addition to a total of 0.82
September 29, 2010
June 11, 2009
inches* of rain occurring after numerous rain events, within
the 2 weeks prior, that totaled 2.75 inches *.
Visual observations of wrack lines within the floodplain with
September 29, 2010
September 23, 2009
a total of 1.7 inches* of rain occurring within a 2 -day period
from September 22 -23, 2009.
Visual observations of overbank event including wrack lines
and sediment deposition resulting from a 1.37 inch* rainfall
February 10, 2010
February 5, 2010
event on February 5, 2009 that occurred after numerous
3 -4
rainfall events, within the 3 weeks prior, that totaled 3.94
inches *.
September 29, 2010
May 23, 2010
A total of 4.57 inches* of rain occurring between May 16-
--
23, 2010.
September 291 2010
September 27, 2010
A total of 2.9 inches* of rain fall between September 26 -27,
--
2010 with more rain expected to follow.
* Reported at the Raleigh- Durham Airport (Weather Underground 2010)
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2011
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Goose Creek (final)
EEP Project Number 147
Durham County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
January 2011
Appendices

Table 9a. Eastway Reach Goose Creek Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment (861 linear feet)
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Proiect Number 147)
Feature
Category
Metric (per As -built and reference baselines)
(# Stable)
Number
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
per As -built
Total Number
/ feet in
unstable state
% Perform.
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perform.
Mean or
Total
A. Riffles
1. Present?
7
7
N/A
100
100
2. Armor stable (e.g. no displacement)?
7
7
N/A
100
3. Facet grade appears stable?
7
7
N/A
100
4. Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
7
7
N/A
100
5. Length appropriate?
7
7
N/A
100
B. Pools
1. Present? (e.g. no severe a radation)
6
6
N/A
100
100
2. Sufficient) deep (Dmax ool:Mean Bkf> 2.2 ?)
6
6
N/A
100
3. Length appropriate?
6
6
N/A
100
C. Thalweg
1. Upstream of meander bend centering?
NA
NA
N/A
N/A
2. Downstream of meander centering?
NA
NA
N/A
D. Meanders
1. Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
NA
NA
N/A
N/A
2. Of those eroding, # w/ concomitant point bar formation?
NA
NA
N/A
3. Apparent Rc within spec?
NA
NA
N/A
4. Sufficient flood lain access and relief?
NA
NA
N/A
E. Bed General
l .General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation)
N/A
N/A
0
100
100
2. Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down
cutting or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
0
100
F. Bank
1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
0
100
100
G. Vanes
1. Free of back or arm scour?
5
5
N/A
100
100
2. Height appropriate?
5
5
N/A
100
3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
5
5
N/A
100
4. Free of piping or other structural failures?
5
5
N/A
100
H. Wads /
1. Free of scour?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Boulders
2. Footing stable?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Goose Creek (final)
EEP Project Number 147
Durham County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
January 2011
Appendices

Table 9b. Long Meadow Reach Goose Creek Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment (659 linear feet)
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
Feature
Category
Metric (per As -built and reference baselines)
(# Stable)
Number
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
per As -built
Total Number
/ feet in
unstable state
% Perform.
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perform.
Mean or
Total
A. Riffles
1. Present?
9
9
N/A
100
100
2. Armor stable (e.g. no displacement)?
9
9
N/A
100
3. Facet grade appears stable?
9
9
N/A
100
4. Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
9
9
N/A
100
5. Length appropriate?
9
9
N/A
100
B. Pools
1. Present? (e.g. no severe a radation)
7
7
N/A
100
100
2. Sufficient) deep (Dmax ool:Mean Bkf> 2.2 ?)
7
7
N/A
100
3. Length appropriate?
7
7
N/A
100
C. Thalweg
1. Upstream of meander bend centering?
NA
NA
N/A
N/A
2. Downstream of meander centering?
NA
NA
N/A
D. Meanders
1. Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
NA
NA
N/A
N/A
2. Of those eroding, # w/ concomitant point bar formation?
NA
NA
N/A
3. Apparent Rc within spec?
NA
NA
N/A
4. Sufficient flood lain access and relief?
NA
NA
N/A
E. Bed General
I.General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation)
N/A
N/A
0
100
100
2. Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down
cuttin or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
0
100
F. Bank
1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
20
98
98
G. Vanes
1. Free of back or arm scour?
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Height appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
4. Free of piping or other structural failures?
N/A
N/A
N/A
H. Wads /
1. Free of scour?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Boulders
2. Footing stable?
N/A
N/A
N/A
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2010)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2011
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Goose Creek
YS ID
XS - I
Feature
Rife
Date:
8/11/2010
Field Crew:
Dean, Perkinson
Station
Elevation
0.0
333.03
7.2
333.02
11.8
331.89
14.7
330.45
17.4
328.93
19.6
328.07
22.9
327.21
24.6
326.80
26.5
326.73
27.5
326.83
29.4
326.62
32.2
326.64
34.7
326.64
37.3
326.78
38.1
326.98
40.7
326.83
42.7
327.5
46.8
329.3
51.5
331.8
59.0
332.8
326
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
50 60 70
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
331.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional .Area:
120.7
Bankfull Width:
36.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
335.6
Flood Prone Width:
170.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
3.3
W/ D Ratio:
11.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.6
Bank Hci ht Ratio:
1.0
Stream T P
Neuse River Basin, Goose Creek, XS - 1
337
336
335
--------------------- ----- ---------------- -- - - --
-- - -- - -- - --
334
v
5
333
e
0
332
------ - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - -- - -- -
cu
331
330
329
328
327
- - -- Bankfull
__ - -Flood Prone Area
As-Built 2008
MY -01 11 /2/09
MY- 028/11/10
326
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
50 60 70

River Basin:
Elevation
Neuse
332.3
5.1
331.8
Watershed:
330.4
Goose Creek
329.0
15.0
XS ID
328.0
XS -2
327.6
a
327.7
Feature
327.7
Riffle
327.6
24.4
327.8
Date:
328.0
8/11/2010
327.9
35.0
328.2
Field Crew:
328.1
Dean, Perk inson
329.0
42.5
330.2
61.2
332.9
71.5
333.4
Stream Type UC
Neuse River Basin, Goose
Creek, XS - 2
337
336
335
334
_
333
c
9 332 _ ----------
------ -- -- --- ----------
__
---- -- - ---_________-----
331
- - -- Bankfull
w
330
- -- -Flood Prone Area
- +- As -Built 2008
329
t MY -01 11 /2/09
328
t MY- 028/11/10
327
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70 80
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
332.3
5.1
331.8
10.4
330.4
14.0
329.0
15.0
Station
Elevation
0.0
332.3
5.1
331.8
10.4
330.4
14.0
329.0
15.0
328.2
16.3
328.0
18.7
327.6
20.2
327.7
21.8
327.7
23.2
327.6
24.4
327.8
28.0
328.0
31.2
327.9
35.0
328.2
36.9
328.1
38.5
329.0
42.5
330.2
61.2
332.9
71.5
333.4
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
331.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
120.8
Bankfull Width:
48.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
336.0
Flood Prone V1'idth:
300.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.2
1►'Ieaa Depth at Bankfull
2.5
VV 1 D Ratio:
19.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.2
BankHe' ht Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation
Neuse
332.34
Watershed:
Feature
Goose Creek
Date:
V
XS ID
Dean, Perkinson
14.1 3
328.10
7
327.46
18.7 3
327.17
Stream Tye
-
Neuse River Basin, Goose Creek, XS - 3
336
334
332
c
0_ 330
- -_ - Bankfull
- -- -Flood Prone Area
d
w
� As -Built Zoos
326
�- MY -01 11/2/09
+ MY -02 8/11 /10
326
324
0 10
20 30 40
50 60 70
Station (feet)
Station E
Elevation
-8.8 3
332.34
XS -3
Feature
Pool
Date:
8/11/2010
Field Crew:
Dean, Perkinson
Station E
Elevation
-8.8 3
332.34
1.0 3
332.11
6.9 3
331.73
10.6 3
330.38
12.5 3
329.53
14.1 3
328.10
15.6 3
327.46
18.7 3
327.17
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 33 17
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 155 7
Bankfull Width: - t) 3
Flood Prone Area Elevation: -
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull: 6.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 3.9
/ D Ratio: -
Entrenchment Ratio: -
Bank ei�ht Ratio: I I)

River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Goose Creek
XS ID
XS -4
Featuer
Rile
Date:
8/11/2010
Field Crew:
Dean, Perkinson
Station
Elevation
0.0
332.2
6.7
330.9
9.7
330.4
14.6
329.5
15.9
328.8
20.1
328.9
24.1
329.2
26.1
329.1
28.1
329.4
30.0
329.6
31.7
329.9
33.7
329.6
36.2
330.1
38.4
330.5
40.3
331.4
42.3
332.2
52.0
332.8
56.3
333.5
66.6
333.8
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfall Elevation:
332.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area:
91.6
Bankfull Width:
43.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
335.6
Flood Prone Width:
240.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.1
W / D Ratio:
20.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type C
Neuse River Basin, Goose Creek, XS - 4
336
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
334
332 c
''E
N
lL
----------------- -- ----------------- --- - - - - -- --- --- --
- - - - Bankfull
- -- -Flood Prone Area
• As -BOR 2008
330
- -�- MY -01 11/2/09
MY- 028/11/10
328
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Bankfull Elevation:
Neuse
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
1 15.4
Watershed:
65.9
Goose Creek
-
Flood Prone Width:
\S ID
Dean, Perkinson
XS -5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
I S
Feature
-
Pool
-
Bank Height Ratio:
Date:
8/11/2010
Field Crew:
Station
Elevation
-
0.0
334.4
5.2
333.6
i
12.0
332.0
14.9
332.1
15.1
330.6
16.9
330.5
17.9
329.7
19.3
329.0
21.3
329.3
24.2
328.8
25.3
328.9
26.6
329.5
Stream Type
29.1
329.8
31.1
330.0
32.7
330.6
Neuse River Basin, Goose Creek, XS - 5
33.9
332.4
37.1
331.7
42.3
331.9
46.8
332.2
334
52.3
332.6
- - -- -----------------------------------------------
------- - - -- -- - --
56.9
332.8
64.8
332.8
76.8
333.9
332
0
0
T'a
- - - - Bankfull
- - - - Flood Prone Area
330
+- As -Built 2008
�- MY -01 11/2/09
MY- 028/11/10
328
0 10
20 30 40 50
60 70 80
Station (feet)
SUMMARY D:�TA
Bankfull Elevation:
333.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
1 15.4
Bankfull Width:
65.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
Dean, Perkinson
SUMMARY D:�TA
Bankfull Elevation:
333.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
1 15.4
Bankfull Width:
65.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4 ri
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
I S
V1' / D Ratio:
-
F,ntrenchmentRatio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Goose Creek
XS ID
XS -6
Feature
Riffle
Date:
8/11/2010
Field Crew.
Dean, Perkinson
Station
Elevation
0.0
336.1
9.8
334.4
17.3
333.3
21.9
332.1
23.4
331.9
25.4
332.1
25.5
331.0
27.7
330.7
28.8
330.6
29.9
330.0
33.2
330.6
34.2
331.6
35.7
332.2
38.5
332.5
43.4
333.1
46.6
333.3
54.9
333.7
58.9
334.0
63.0
334.2
67.9
334.1
330
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
334.2
Bankfull Cross- Sectioual Area:
725
Bankfull Width:
55.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
338.4
Flood Prone Width-
162.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.3
W / D Ratio:
42.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.9
Bank He' ht Ratio:
1.0
Stream Tye I C
Neuse River Basin, Goose Creek, XS - 6
338
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
336
c
0
334
- - - - - -- -------------------------------------------------
d
w
- - -- Bankfull
- -- -Flood Prone Area
332
r As -Built 2008
t MY -01 11 /2/09
MY-028/11/10
330
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Elevation
Neuse
336.1
Watershed:
Feature 'Pool
Gose Creek
Date:
8/11/2010
XS ID
Dean, Perkinson
24.8
332.5
30.7
331.8
31.2
330.7
33.7
330.3
35.9
330.1
38.2
330.1
41.3
331.1
42.5
332.5
46.7
333.9
54.0
335.0
56.7
336.1
64.7
338.3
Station (feet)
r
Stream T
ISON
EA
Station
Elevation
1.4
336.1
XS -7
Feature 'Pool
334.8
Date:
8/11/2010
Field Crew:
Dean, Perkinson
Station
Elevation
1.4
336.1
8.0
335.3
11.1
334.8
16.6
334.1
18.5
333.7
24.8
332.5
30.7
331.8
31.2
330.7
33.7
330.3
35.9
330.1
38.2
330.1
41.3
331.1
42.5
332.5
46.7
333.9
54.0
335.0
56.7
336.1
64.7
338.3
Station (feet)
S1��1�1:�R1' DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
335.2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
104.6
Bankfull Width:
45.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
c
0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
5.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.3
�V / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-
Neuse River Basin, Gose Creek, XS - 7
338
336
c
0
� 334
Bankfull
w
W
Flood Prone Area
Ii,
As -Built 2008
332
MY -Ot 11/2/09
MY- 028/11/10
330
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Elevation
Neuse
340.2
44.9
Watershed:
41.4
s Goose Ceek
38.2
I
\S ID
Dean, Perkinson
` XS-8
332.5
27.4
Feature
26.0
Riffle
24.7
332.0
Date:
331.9
' 81
332.3
20.5
332.6
19.5
333.2
16.5
333.14
11.3
333.58
7.8
333.97
0.4
336.24
�.3
336.80
Stream Type
E/C
Neuse River Basin, Goose Ceek, XS - 8
342
----------------------------------
----- -------
------------- - -____
340
338
,_. 336 �________
_- -- ________ -
- - _
o
-- -- Bankiull
- - -- Flood Prone Area
w 334
T As -Built 2008
--.o---MY-01 11/2/09
332
MY-02 8/11 /10
330
0 10
20 30
40 50 60
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
52.0
340.2
44.9
337.6
41.4
336.0
38.2
11/2010
Field Crew:
Dean, Perkinson
Station
Elevation
52.0
340.2
44.9
337.6
41.4
336.0
38.2
335.1
35.0
333.2
31.6
332.5
27.4
332.7
26.0
332.0
24.7
332.0
23.1
331.9
21.6
332.3
20.5
332.6
19.5
333.2
16.5
333.14
11.3
333.58
7.8
333.97
0.4
336.24
�.3
336.80
SUMMARY DATA
Baakfull Elevation:
337.1
Baokfull Cross - Sectional Area:
87.7
Bankfull Width:
38.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
340.9
Flood Prone Width:
170.0
Max Depth at Bankfulh
3.8
Mean Depth at Bank-full:
2.3
W / D Ratio:
16.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

903.1
905.2
906.4
907'1
9094
911.2
9134
914 7
916.2
917 6
9196
921.2
922.7
Q4
926.7
927.8
9292
930.3
931.5
432.7
933.8
935.1
936.1
937.5
9388
940.3
9414
334
333
332
331
330
329
e
0
328
327
326
325
0
0101291 to 10+011
1Vetile
811109
Dun.Pakut-
200@
Ord Kin tkm
32 &6
32X 7
128.29
328.9
328.8
328.8
328 9
32X X
32 &9
328.7
328.7
328.3
3283
328.2
328.2
3282
328.5
328 6
328.6
3286
32 &6
328.6
32& 6
32 &7
1286
328.9
12aa
3298
91
196
3R 4
46.1
526
59.1
61.7
65.3
71.2
&3.0
87.9
96.0
102.8
1121
120.0
29.1
1363
1 Mi6
1771
181 8
186 9
1916
0 5 .
211 7
2214
2291
237 5
x009
Yur 1 MnnilorinR is.-y
Bed EkvaHon Wr4r Elev
332.3
311.1
.3.323
332.1 3323
331.8
332.2 3322
131 7 3313
332.0 3323
3.3 332.1
3322 3324
331 9 112 4
331.0 3123
330.7 332.3
331.2 332.3 1 3311.1 332.)
3.1 332.3
331.4 3123
331.1 3323
330.9 332.3
3.30.9 332.3
332.2 3323
332.1 332.1
331.7 3319
311.3 331.9
331 6 .4319
331.1 331.9
331.4 .1"0
331.1 331.9
IM 331 A 331 9
993.7
962.5
958.4
920.3
665.1
852.5
812.6
837 0
827 R
808.5
7996
791.1
771.0
751 6
7461
732.1
7276
71 R.5
711.7
703.7
695.8
687.5
67fi 9
671 4
665.3
656.7
M54
2010
2011
2010
Veac 2 Mnniterle[`sZ'y
1�xi 3 Moni6ein1; Sni'.rx
W.- S Slnpe
.A" educe
Brd Ekvalbn Wa1er Ele�xOxn
ti1u1 Wd Fle. u0on N'x1rc F.1-own
326.4 329.3
Rim, '-WR
35
326.6 329.3
328.6 329.3
02290
00075
329.0 329.3
P-I 1-g1h
.129.1 329 3
33
329.5
8x4 M.
OOWB
3294 3295
329.2 329.,,
328.3
3291
327.7 129.5
326.9 329.5
326.7 329.4
329.1 329 .5
129.8 3294
28.9 329.5
328.4 329.5
328.5 329.5
329 0 329 5
329 1 3291
329.7 3291
328.7 329.5
327.5 329.5
328,9 329.5
3290 3291
328.7 329 5
329.0 329 5
3289 3291
1 86 3291
Goose Creek Year (2010) Profile- Reach 00+00 to 10+00
100 200 300 400 S00 600 700 800 900 1000
Distance (feet)
- Arbu01(2009) Bed + Year 1 (2009) Bed �Vear2 (2010)Bed -Year 2 (2010) Water Surface
2009
2010
2011
21112
W.- S Slnpe
.A" educe
000 37
107
03
Rim, '-WR
35
36
ASR Rim. Sbpe
02290
00075
P-I 1-g1h
40
33
8x4 M.
OOWB
00107
3289 3291
1 86 3291
Goose Creek Year (2010) Profile- Reach 00+00 to 10+00
100 200 300 400 S00 600 700 800 900 1000
Distance (feet)
- Arbu01(2009) Bed + Year 1 (2009) Bed �Vear2 (2010)Bed -Year 2 (2010) Water Surface

th
10-Mt, 16.00
1lnlile
R 1 1'10
�c4n. 14H:mwn
2010
2011
2012
A,, Water S'""' Sbpe
0.0017
00037
a
2008
Rink I,eHth
'a"
36
101"
A,R Ri"k SI.,
0.2290
A+hoat S1 ve.,
Yeer 1 WWI., i \S.-
Ynr
2 8looitorin8
�_,
S ow.
Bed Elerefbn Water Eln'etbn
Stetlon
and ElrraHOn
Wrtrr Ekeelioe
Soo lm
Bed Ekr'etion
Water Eln
798 4
326 6
994.5
326.7
3294
15U 5
325 8
3266
101812
1267
10166
329.2
3294
1562.1
3762
3266
1MI.1
3268
10754
328.3
3286
15.368
327.0
327.1
10029
3267
10822
327.6
3286
15012
327.1
3273
0104.9
3268
1088.8
3284
328.5
1484.5
3258
3273
1(816.7
326.9
1103 B
3260
328.5
1471.8
3252
327.3
118182
326.9
1116_3
3259
328.5
1455.3
1225.1
3273
1009.8
3270
II34.0
328.3
3211
1439.1
327.1
327.3
1011.6
3271
1166.1
327.7
3282
1419.5
3275
3276
1013.9
3272
II79.9
325.8
3282
1385.7
327.1
3276
10153
327.7
1203.7
3266
328.2
1377.3
3258
327.6
1016.7
327.7
12174
327.8
328.2
1366.6
325.6
327.6
1018.1
328.1
12310
3253
3282
1348.8
3'25.7
327.6
1019.1
3284
12394
326.4
3282
1327.0
326.8
3276
10204
328.4
!�: t.
328.0
328.2
12960
328.1
3282
1021.)
3286
3273
327.5
1267.0
327.9
328.3
1022.3
3286
I 1
325.5
327.5
1256.5
326.4
3293
102'1
32x.7
13.8
325.9
327.6
1240.1
326.1
328.3
10243
3288
1382.4
377.4
327.6
1224.2
327.7
3283
1025.6
328.8
14356
326.7
327.3
1214.6
3262
328 3
1026.7
328.9
1448.5
320.9
3272
1210.1
3259
328.3
1027 9
,328.9
106x.4
325.4
327.3
1185.8
325.7
328.3
1028.7
328.7
14%1
327.1
327.2
11736
327.9
328.3
1030.0
328.8
15117
326.8
326.9
11.'39.8
3282
129.6
1031.0
328.8
15740
326.0
326.5
1132.5
326.1
328.5
10321
328.8
1575.2
326.5
1119.7
1252
328.5
1033.4
3288
11080
3256
3285
2011
\'en I MooitotieR \Swvr3
2009
2010
2011
2012
A,, Water S'""' Sbpe
0.0017
00037
a
Rink I,eHth
35
36
`-� 326
A,R Ri"k SI.,
0.2290
0.0075
i 325
Pwd U.0h
40
33
Pool SI.W
00008
00007
Goose Creek Year 2 (2010) Profile - Reach 10+00 t0 16 +00
330
... _.......... _..._. _.__ __.__ ....___. _._._. __...._.. _. ...__. __..... ._. _._ _. _. _.. _. _.. _..
329
328
AA
a
t
AN
327
`-� 326
e
e
'w
I
i 325
324
323
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600
Distance (feet)
- As- buil(2009)Bed -War 1(2009) Bed -War 2(2010) Bed --Year 2(2010)Wrter S.-aiee

Percent Riffle: Percent Run:
Percent Pool Percent Glide:
Material
Size an e (mm)
Total #
32
-
-
-
Note: Goose Creek Upstream
Pebble Count, -
silt/clay
0 0.062
27.2
very fine san
fine sand
medium sanc
coarse sanc
very coarse san (
0.062 0.13
0.0
0.13 0.25
0.0
0.25 0.5
0.0
0.5 1
1.9
1 2
1.0
100%
90%
very fine graVE
fine grave
fine grave
medium grave
medium grave
coarse grave
coarse grave
very coarse grav
very coarse rav
2 4
7.7
4 6
1.0
I
6 8
5.8
80%
70%
8 11
9.4
11 16
14.5
I
60%
50%
L
- - - - --
45 64
0.9
40%
E 30%
small cobbl
medium cobbl
large cobbl
very large cobbl
64 90
1.0
90 128
1.9
c
a)
128 180
0.0
20%
a 10%
--
180 256
0.0
small boulde
small boulde
medium boulde
large boulde
very large bould
256 362
0.0
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm) tCumulativePercent • Percent Rem -Riffle -Pool -Run -Glide
362 512
1.9
512 1024
0.0
1024 2048
0.0
2048 4096
0.0
bedroc
0.0
Size percent less than (mm) Percent by substrate type
True
Weighted Count
Total Particle Count
100
D16
D35
D50
D84
D95 silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble boulder
bedrock
109
#N /A
3.13
9.7
30
59 27%
3%
65%
3% 2%
0%
16
22
6.5
22
32
10.7
32
45
8.8

Perce7RAle Perc
Ll
M
(mm)
Total #
Note:
sil0.062
23.3
very fine san
fine sanc
medium sanc
coarse sanc
very coarse san
0.062 0.13
0.0
-
Goose Creelk Downstream
0.13 0.25
0.0
0.25 0.5
0.0
Pebble Count, -
0.5 1
19.6
1 2
0.0
100%
90%
-
f
very fine graVE
fine grave
fine grave
medium grave
medium grave
coarse grave
coarse grave
very coarse graVE
very coarse graVE
2 4
3.9
4 6
3.9
I
I
I
I I
I
I 1 Ilk
I
6 8
9.8
/°
80%
°
70 /o
j
i
I
I
8 11
2.1
11 16
9.4
16 22
3.1
6096
50%
I
22 32
7.3
32 45
4.2
45 64
6.3
40%
S °
LL 30%
j)
if
I
small cobblE
medium cobblE
large cobbl
very large cobbli
64 90
4.0
90 128
0.0
if
if
i
128 180
0.0
�
a 10%
- !
i 1
f- -
1
{►
i
�1
t
I'
! i
-
180 256
0.0
small boulde
small boulde boulde
medium boulde
large bouldell
very large bouldeK
256 362
1.0
362 512
1.0
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm) tCumulative Percent , Percent Rem -Riffle -Pool ---Run -Glide
512 1024
1.0
1024 2048
0.0
2048 4096
0.0
bedroc
0.0
Size percent less than (mm)
I Percent by substrate type
True
Weighted Count:
Total Particle Count
100
D16
D35
D50 I
D84 1
D95
1 silt/day I
sand
gravel
I cobble
I boulder bedrock
99
#N /A
0.76
5.6
1 36 1
77
23%
20%
1 50%
1 4%
1 3% 1 0%