20051877 Ver 1_Baseline Monitoring Report_20111021

fit-,
-i 7o.,!
... ..........
Or
rl
io�

U
C
C Monitoring Firm
c�
c
EQUIN-
ENVIRONMENTAL
1 CONSULTATION & DESIGN
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
828- 253 -6856
C Project Contact Win Taylor
Email wingequinoxenvironmental com
T,
L.�
C'
C�

O
O
C
O
C
�i
O
O
n
C�
C
C
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Table of Contents
10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
2 0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
3
21 Location and Setting
3
22 Protect Goals and Objectives
5
23 Protect Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
5
24 Protect History, Contacts, and Attribute Data
8
3 0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
11
31 Morphometric Parameters and Channel Stability
11
311 Dimension
11
3 1 2 Pattern and Profile
12
313 Substrate
12
32 Hydrology
12
33 Vegetation
12
4 0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLAN
13
5 0 PROJECT MONITORING AND AS -BUILT CONDITIONS
13
51 Feature Monitoring Details
13
511 Stream
13
512 Hydrology
13
513 Vegetation
13
5 1 4 Permanent Photo Locations
14
52 As -Built Conditions
14
5 2 1 Streams
14
522 Vegetation
14
523 Permanent Photo Stations
15
60 REFERENCES
24
Appendix A Monitoring Plan View
Appendix B As -Built Plan View
Appendix C Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Appendix D Longitudinal Profile Plots
Appendix E Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix F Permanent Photo Station Photos

C
C\
C �
C
C
C
0
C�
C
i
C
C
O
O
C \
L
/1
i \
C`
C\
Fi ures
Figure 1 Vicinity Map 4
Figure 2 Protect Components and Assets Map 7
Tables
Table la
Protect Components
6
Table lb
Component Summation
6
Table 2
Protect Activity and Reporting History
8
Table 3
Protect Contacts
9
Table 4
Project Attributes
10
Table 5
Baseline Stream Data Summary
16
Table 6
Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
19
Table 7
Vegetation Plot Attribute Data
21
Table 8
CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
22
Table 9
Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
23
11

10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The project resides within the city limits of Mooresville, North Carolina and involved the
restoration of 3,685 linear feet of stream The goals of the project included water quality and
aquatic habitat improvement and enhancement of the riparian vegetative communities Project
objectives to accomplish the goals involved the restoration of stream channel pattern, profile, and
dimension Riparian area function was restored by revegetating with native trees, shrubs, and
herbaceous plant species Additionally, invasive exotic plant species were controlled within the
project site
The project also included the installation of a novel stormwater BMP in the form of a stormwater
wetland system composed of three serial cells designed to trap sediments and other pollutants
from the first flush of the 1 -inch storm Storm flow is diverted at the Church Street culvert on
Cemetery Branch, the projects main tributary, and treated in series through the 3 wetland cells
southwest of the confluence of Cemetery and Dye Branch before discharging further downstream
on the Dye Branch mainstem The system was designed by researchers of the Stormwater
Engineering Research Group of the North Carolina State University Biological and Agricultural
Engineering Department, headed by Dr Bill Hunt and through an agreement with the North
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is maintained by the Town of Mooresville
This aspect of the Dye Branch Project was funded via a 319 grant and is not a direct source of
mitigation credit, but is a valuable component to the overall restoration effort in terms of
managing stressors from this highly urbanized watershed
The project was originally constructed in 2008 however, storm events in this highly flashy
drainage in conjunction with some inadequate construction practices impacted approximately
half the project (mostly along the Dye Branch reaches) These events occurred at the end of
construction and before any replanting could provide stability to the stream banks Over half of
the project underwent mayor repair The repairs included bank stabilization/re- grading and
structure repair /replacement as well as replanting in December 2010 and February 2011 The
As -built survey was performed in 2011 and therefore incorporated all repair related adjustments
There were some minor revisions to the construction documents as the designer attempted to
repair in situ (within constructed stream channel) to reduce additional impacts to stabilized areas
of the project
For monitoring purposes the project site was delineated into three primary stream reaches that
include Cemetery Branch, Dye Branch Upstream of Cabarrus Avenue, and Dye Branch
Downstream of Cabarrus Avenue
The primary focus of the revegetation element of the project was to restore natural plant
communities within the project site Planting plans for three distinct planting zones were
implemented to restore native species composition associated with the stream and upland habitat
types on the project site Additionally, invasive species control was implemented during
(� construction to minimize the impacts of kudzu Pueraria montana and Chinese privet Ligustrum
sinense on the restored plant communities
C
C
O
Dye Branch II Final 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Annual monitoring will begin In 2011 and will Include stream and vegetation monitoring
components as established within this document Annual monitoring will occur for five years or
until project success criteria have been achieved
Dye Branch II Final 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

r�
i
2 0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
21 Location and Setting
The conservation easement at the Dye Branch restoration site is primarily in the ownership of the
Town of Mooresville with multiple other small ownerships associated with the neighboring
properties (Figure 1) It is situated within the Upper Rocky River watershed (14 -digit HUC -
03040105010010) of the Yadkin River basin cataloging unit (8 -digit HUC — 03 040105) The
site is located within the city limits of Mooresville in Iredell County, North Carolina and the
watershed land use is extremely urban ( >85 %) with very high levels of impervious cover Prior
to project implementation, there was limited native riparian vegetation and excessive stormwater
runoff had caused severe streambank erosion and poor water quality
t Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Baseline Monttonng Year 0
i
l
C1
3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
October 2011

The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of
ti the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) and is
1 i �! 1• y�, encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by
land under private ownership. Accessing the site may require traversing
• }< >. -�C. - Z '"v .r �t L. areas near or along the easement boundary and therefor access by the
•,1 - ' - general public is not permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state
and federal agencies or their designees/contractors involved in the
1'�` '.` .� ' "1�{•�, t v r ,7,r development, oversight and stewardship of the restoration site is
.kJ - tir _ v t ' I S` r'h . •�,;, = permitted within the terms and timeframes of their defined roles. Any
•.w4� r 1 - r „ y 1 _ ` intended site visitation or activity by any person outside of these
previously sanctioned roles and activities requires prior coordination with
EEP
w x c
1 1
• r t a" L' ' . rd � vW'! . r
,1 _i '• . 150= t ,� �� ., -�.;# `I
„t is r Dye Branch II i f15
�A. 1 } ;. ?) Stream Restoration Site ?; '
5
e
-
4C 1 I
Hs ; 1
j
j 1 (. f •
Y° vM1tu
�. 1� Figure 1 - Vicinity Map DMi r
& M. ore &encn n cam
"I'll Stream Restoratbn site
C.
°" P-
, i Dye Branch n EQUINOX &'Kostem ENVInnN \I ENT IL cer . _ Stream Restoration Site °• w ° °° • ° °'- ement
PROGRAM
Clneleed �
ca""" �p �""' Project No. 92255 N
Directions: From Raleigh, proceed west on 1-40 towards 0 0.5 1 2
Statesville. Take Exit 152 A (1 -77S) towards Charlotte. Miles
Proceed on 1 -77S to Exit 36 (NC -150) towards Mooresville. Iredell County, North Carolina
From NC -150 turn slight right onto McLelland AvenueNC -152
for approximately 1.2 miles. The site is located on the west 7.5 Minute Series Mooresville
side of McLelland AvenueNC -152. August 2011 Quadrangle

22 Project Goals and Objectives
The goals and objectives stated in the Dye Branch Restoration Plan (NCEEP 2005) are as
follows
• Provide a stable system of stream channels that neither aggrade nor degrade while
maintaining dimension, pattern, and profile with the capacity to transport the watershed's
water and sediment load,
• Improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat by reducing sediment and waste
inputs into the stream caused by bank erosion, mass - wasting, and stormwater runoff
through stabilization of the stream channel and implementation of a stormwater wetland,
and
• Improve the overall viability of the riparian vegetative communities through
establishment of native species and elimination of invasive exotic species
23 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
Prior to project implementation, flashy flood conditions associated with a highly impervious
watershed and degraded riparian habitats resulted in unstable stream banks along the project
reach
Work on Cemetery Branch involved restoring a total of 1,014 linear feet of C stream type
utilizing a Priority Level 3 approach (Rosgen 1997) The Priority Level 3 approach involved the
reconstruction and installation of additional bankfull benches within the existing channel
confines The design for the Dye Branch reaches included a Priority Level 2 restoration of 2,671
linear feet of meandering C stream channel and associated floodplain The Priority Level 2
approach involved the construction of a new channel and floodplain bench at the bankfull
elevation The restored channels of Cemetery Branch and Dye Branch were stabilized with in-
stream structures, including cross vanes, j- hooks, and single arm rock vanes These structures
were designed to reduce bank erosion and provide grade control The targeted re- vegetated
communities included stream bank, riparian, and upland planting zones
The prod ect components and summations are reported in Tables 1 a and 1 b and illustrated in
Figure 2 below
Dye Branch II Final 5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0 °

Table la. Project Components m
Dye Branch H / Prmoiject No 92255
Project
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Non-
Riparian
Ac
Upland
(Ac)
Footage
BMP
Rivenne
Non Rivenne
Existing
Restoration
Restoration
3 685
Buffer
00
Component or
Feet/Acres
Level
Approach
or
Stationing
Acres
BMP Elements
Comment
Reach ID
Enhancement I
0
Acreage
Cemetery Branch
9681f
R
P3
1 0141f
0+00 10 +14
Stormwater wetlands
Dye Branch
l 772 If
R
P2
I SOO If
0+00 15+00
Stortnwater wetlands
Preservation
00
00
HQ Preservation
0
Dye Branch
1 1 232 If
R
P2
1 171 If
16+00 27 +71
l
00
Downstream
Totals 3,685
0
0
0
0
Information unavadable
Non App"k, �
Table lb Component Summahons
Dye Branch II / Pro lect No 92255
Restoration
Level
Stream
(H)
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Non-
Riparian
Ac
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
Rivenne
Non Rivenne
Restoration
3 685
00
00
Enhancement
-
00
00
Enhancement I
0
Enhancement II
0
Creation
00
00
Preservation
0
00
00
HQ Preservation
0
00
00
00
00
Totals 3,685
0
0
0
0
3
I Non Apphcable I
Dye Branch II Final 6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
1

24 Project History, Contacts, and Attribute Data
The NCEEP contracted Mulkey Inc (Mulkey) to provide design and construction management
services The Restoration Plan was completed by Mulkey in October 2005 ( NCEEP 2005) Due
to extensive post - construction damage, the majority of the project site required repairs Repairs
were completed in December 2010 and baseline monitoring efforts were initiated Two
additional structure repairs occurred at the lower end of the project site during the summer of
2011 The baseline longitudinal profile and cross - section data were extracted from the
contractors' as -built survey data set
The project activity and reporting history are detailed in Table 2 below Project personnel and
contact information for the design and monitoring components is presented in Table 3 Table 4
presents background project attribute information for the site
Table 2 ProlectsActivtty & Reporting History
e e Branch II / Project No 92255 b `'
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
-
Oct 2005
Final Des - Construction Plans
Aril 2006
Final Desi - Repair Plans
N/A
July 2010
Construction Repairs
N/A
Dec 2010
Temporary S &E mix annhed
N/A
Summer 2010
Permanent seed mix avolied
N/A
Summer 2010
Planting
N/A
Feb 2011
Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline
March 2011
Aue 2011
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitorin
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitonn
Year 5 Monitoring
Information unavailable
N/A Item does not apply
Dye Branch II Final 8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

x Table 3 Protect Contacts
Dye Branch U / Project No 92255
Designer
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
6750 Tryon Road
Cary NC 27518
Primary Project Design POC
Emmett Perdue [phone]
Construction Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P O Box 28749
Raleigh NC 27611
Construction Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky [phone]
Planting Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P O Box 28749
Raleigh NC 27611
Planting Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky [phone]
Seeding Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P O Box 28749
Raleigh NC 27611
Seeding Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Hanes Geo Components
Winston Salem NC 27101
Nursery Stock Suppliers
North Carolina Forest Service
Goldsboro NC 27530
Monitoring Performers (YO) - 2010
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design Inc
37 Haywood Street Suite 100
Asheville North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Win Taylor [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Win Taylor [phone]
Monitoring Performers (Yl) - 2011
Stream Monitoring POC
VeWtat ion Monitoring POC
Monitoring Performers (Y2) - 2012
Stream M onrtonng POC
Vegetation MonitonngPOC
Monitoring Performers (Y3) - 2013
Stream M ondonng POC
Vegetation MonttonngPOC
Monitoring Performers (Y4) - 2014
Stream Momtonng POC
Vegetation MonrtoringPOC
Monitoring Performers (Y5) - 2015
Stream M onitonng POC
Vegetation MonrtonngPOC
Dye Branch II Final 9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monrtonng Year 0

- Dye,131inch
Table 4 Project Attributes
II / Project No 92255
;�
Project County
Iredell
Ph sio ra hic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Southern Outer Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin Pee Dee
USGS I-UC
03040105010010
NCDWQ Sub Basin
03 07 11
Within Extent of EEP Watershed Plan
Upper Rocky
River Local Watershed Plan
WRC Class
Warn
% of Project Easement Fenced or Demarcated
1000/0
Beaver Activity Observed During Design Phase
No
Restoration Com onent Attributes
Dye Branch
Cemetery Branch
Drainage Area (sq mi
06
006
Stream Order
First / Second
Fist
Restored Length feet
2 671
1 014
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Perennial
Watershed Type
Urban
Watershed LULC Distribution
Urban
Other
85%
15%
Watershed Impervious Cover
NCDW AU /IndexNumber
13 172
NCDWQ Classification
C
303d Listed
Yes
Upstream of 303d Listed Segment
Yes
Reasons for 303dListin orStressor
Poor Bioclassification
Total Acreage of Easement
120
Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement
12 0
Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration
89
Ros en Classification of Pre Fksting
E4/ G4c
E4
Ros en Classification of As Built
C
C
Valley Type
Valley Sloe
0 0097/ 0 0125
00217
Valley Side Slope Range
Valley Toe Slope Range
Cowardin Classification
N/A
N/A
Trout Waters Designation
No
No
Species of Concern Endangered Etc
None
Dominant Soil Series and Characteristics
Series
Depth
Clay%
K
T
Chewacla / Cecil / Colfax
Information unavailable
N/A Item does not apply
Dye Branch II Final 10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

3 0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
31 Morphometrilc Parameters and Channel Stability
Considering the typical 5 -year timeframe for mitigation monitoring, the determination of success
for stream projects is often based primarily on the degree of morphological stability The
complete absence of any change over these timeframes will certainly be interpreted as stability,
but is not a pre - requisite To the contrary, it is typical for streams to demonstrate variation over a
5 -year monitoring period in the form of sustainable rates of change or stable patterns of variation
(dynamic stability) Considering the young state of woody buffers and the fact that design
parameters are estimates and therefore never a perfect match for the watershed regimes, restored
streams typically adjust or shift to some extent after their exposure to varying flows in the years
that immediately follow construction However, these changes should be moderate and exhibit
little discernable trends Annual variation is to be expected, but over tune and with buffer
development should generally demonstrate a reduction to amplitude and demonstrate dynamic
maintenance around some central tendency that represents acceptable distributions for design
parameters and/or stable stream types Key among these are parameters that indicate lateral and
vertical stability and intended levels of floodplain connection If some trends or patterns become
evident, they should be modest or indicate nugration toward another stable form Lastly, all of
this must be evaluated in the context of hydrologic events to which the system is exposed over
the monitoring period
311 Dimension
Dimensional stability will be based on comparisons of overlays of annual cross - section plots and
their calculated parameters to the as -built conditions, design distributions, and distributions for
stable stream types Parameters such as cross - sectional area and the channel's width to depth
ratio should demonstrate modest overall change and patterns of variation that are in keeping with
above description of dynamic stability The stream dimension should not demonstrate trends of
enlargement either through downcutting or widening, however, modest year -to -year variation or
oscillation in channel elevation or width demonstrating maintenance around baseline or design
distributions is acceptable Changes from depositional processes resulting in the development of
constructive features on the banks and floodplam, such as an inner berm, channel narrowing,
natural levees, and general floodplam deposition will be acceptable forms of change and
indicative of stability
The entire project will also be visually cataloged for areas of bank instability and represented as
proportions of overall bank footage The overall proportion, seventy, spatial distribution, and
temporal trends in this parameter will be assessed to serve as an additional indicator of
dimensional stability In general, stability proportions (stable bank/total bank) below 85% would
be of concern Considering temporal trends, a higher percentage in a given year may also be of
concern if it represents a data point in a trend of decreasing stability Instability dominated by
surface scour versus mass wasting would be an example of differing seventy and the latter would
be more concerning than the former Erosion in meanders versus riffle reaches would generate
differing levels of concern because erosion in the former is more likely given greater bank shear
stress, whereas instability concentrated in riffle /run reaches might be more indicative of an
overall design flaw
Dye Branch II Final 11 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

3 12 Pattern and Profile
Reach profiles should not exhibit any consistent trends in thalweg degradation over any
significant continuous portion of its length Some aggradation will be acceptable and will not be
actionable unless it is apparently causal for widening/bank erosion Over the monitoring period,
the profile should also demonstrate the maintenance or development of bedform (facets) more in
keeping with reference level diversity and distributions for the stream type in question It should
also provide a meaningful contrast in terms of bedform diversity against the pre - existing
condition Bedform distributions, riffle /pool lengths and slopes will vary, but should do so with
maintenance around design/as -built size distributions This requires that the majority of pools
are maintained at greater depths with lower water surface slopes and riffles are shallower with
greater water surface slopes
313 Substrate
Pebble count data should Indicate the progression towards or the maintenance of the known size
distributions from the design phase The absence of any significant trends In bed aggradation or
deposition should represent stable conditions in terms of sediment input and transport
functionality
While stream projects are designed to transport bedload in equilibrium and carry overall
sediment loads at bankfull, fines can be transported even at low discharges and upstream
instability beyond design projections can also lead to deposition as storm events recede in areas
of energy dissipation such as restoration reaches This can have the effect of obscuring bedform
and fining of riffles especially in the first few years after the implementation of a stream project
In many cases subsequent narrowing and reduction of width/depth ratios as a project
develops /stabilizes can then increase transport efficiency and return bedform to intended
distributions, but some fining can persist due to upstream disturbance
3 2 Hydrology
A minimum of two bankfull events must occur within separate years during the five -year
monitoring period
33 Vegetation
The success of the riparian and wetland vegetation plantings will be determined by planted stem
densities within established monitoring plots Survival of planted woody species must meet a
minimum survival success criterion of 320 planted stems per acre through year three and 260
stems per acre after year five
Dye Branch II Final 12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

4 0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLAN
During annual monitoring efforts any potential constraints to project success criteria will be
documented and reported Maintenance recommendations will be based on the seventy of the
problem and in consultation with NCEEP In the event that maintenance activities are deemed
necessary, corrective measures will be documented within the annual reports
5 0 PROJECT MONITORING AND AS -BUILT CONDITIONS
51 Feature Monitoring Details
Features established for baseline data collection and future annual monitoring purposes included
stream cross - sectional and longitudinal profiles, substrate assessment sites, stream hydrological
monitoring stations, vegetation monitoring plots, and photographic monitoring stations
(Appendix A — Monitoring Plan View)
511 Stream
Ten permanent cross - sections were established throughout the project site Cross - sections
transecting two riffles and one pool were established on the Cemetery Branch and Dye Branch
Downstream reaches Cross - sections for the Dye Branch Upstream reach consist of three riffles
and one pool Cross - section locations were marked on both banks with rebar and PVC conduit
with fluorescent pink flagging tape Cross - section data will be collected annually to document
changes in dimensions such as area, width to depth ratios, and entrenchment ratios
Longitudinal profile monitoring reaches were established for 3,312 linear feet of restored
channel Cemetery Branch included 977 linear feet and Dye Branch included two reaches (Dye
Branch Upstream and Dye Branch Downstream) for a total of 2,335 linear feet The beginning
and ending locations of the longitudinal profile reaches were marked on both banks with rebar
and PVC conduit with blue flagging tape Annual measurements will be compared with as -built
conditions to document trends in the stream profile occurring throughout the monitoring period
A total station will be used to collect annual cross - sectional and longitudinal profile data Visual
monitoring will be conducted for all additional stream segments
Bed material composition will be documented through annual pebble counts at each cross -
section location
512 Hydrology
One crest gauge was installed within the project site at the downstream end of Dye Branch
Additionally, an automatic pressure transducer was installed at the Cross - Section 10 location to
record water level readings at 15 minute intervals Crest gauge readings and pressure transducer
data will be collected during each site visit to document flow events at the project site
513 Vegetation
Eight riparian and upland vegetation monitoring plots were established based on the CVS -EEP
protocol and include five standard 10 x 10 meter plots and three non - standard 5 x 20 meter plots
Dye Branch II Final 13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Approximately 0 025 -acre in size, vegetation plots were established and data was collected to
document baseline vegetation conditions Annual monitoring will determine the success of
planted vegetation and the overall trajectory of woody plant restoration and regeneration at the
project site Plots were placed within the applicable planting zones to capture the heterogeneity
of the designed vegetative communities Vegetation monitoring plot corners were marked with
t -posts and PVC conduit marked with fluorescent orange flagging tape Additionally, the
vegetation plot origin was labeled with the plot number Planted stems were also marked with
fluorescent orange flagging tape Data for the baseline report were collected according to the
CVS -EEP Level I protocol and entered into the CVS -EEP Data Entry Tool (Version 2 2 7)
Subsequent annual monitoring data collections will follow Level II (Lee et al 2008)
5 14 Permanent Photo Locations
Permanent photo stations were established at each cross - section to digitally document annual
conditions of the left and right banks Each vegetation monitoring plot includes a photo station
taken diagonally from the origin towards the opposite plot corner Additionally, nine permanent
photo stations were established throughout the project area to provide representative digital
documentation of stream features and vegetation conditions Permanent photo stations were
marked with labeled wooden stakes and red flagging tape
5 15 Visual Assessment
Visual stream assessments will occur during annual monitoring to summarize performance
percentages of morphological and structural feature categories Visual vegetation assessments
will occur to catalog the extent and type of vegetation issue areas as compared to the total
planted acreage within the project site
52 As -Built Conditions
The project's as -built conditions are included in Appendix B — As -built Plan View
5 2 1 Streams
Baseline stream monitoring data were collected in December 2010 Data are summarized in
Tables 5 and 6, while cross - section and longitudinal profile graphics are located in Appendices C
and D In general, the restored stream pattern was similar to the proposed design The design
Rosgen classification for Cemetery Branch was a C4 while the Dye Branch reaches were
designed to meet the C5 channel classification criteria Based on the as -built conditions, the
Cemetery Branch reach classifies as a low sinuosity C type channel The Dye Branch Upstream
reach as -built data is indicative of a C stream type while the Dye Branch Downstream reach
classifies as a C but having a very low width to depth ratio and low sinuosity for this stream type
5 2 2 Vegetation
Baseline vegetation monitoring data were collected in March 2011 Vegetation plot attribute
data are included in Tables 7 and 8, whereas individual plot photos are included in Appendix E
Individual plant species by plot and plot means are reported in Table 9 Stem counts for each of
the eight vegetation monitoring plots were recorded by species
Results from the baseline documentation indicate a planted stem density ranging from 364 to 688
stems per acre The average stem density for the entire restoration site is 430 stems per acre, of
Dye Branch II Final 14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

these, 34% were noted to have either good or excellent vigor values In addition, invasive exotic
plants such as Kudzu Pueraria montana, johnsongrass Sorghum halepense, Japanese
honeysuckle Lonicerajaponica, English ivy Hedera helix, Chinese privet Ligustrum sinense, and
Chinese lespedeza Lespedeza cuneata were recorded at the project site
5 2 3 Permanent Photo Stations
Photos were collected during December 2010 at the nine permanent photo stations established
throughout the project area to provide representative digital documentation of baseline stream
and vegetation conditions (Appendix F — Permanent Photo Station Photos) Pre - construction
photos are included in Appendix F where available
Dye Branch II Final 15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

I f tmt m IN
N/A It mdo t pply __
N Apphcabl— __ I
Dye Branch II Final 16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitonng Year 0
Table S BaeeBne Stream Data Summary
Branch 111 Pro ct No 92255 Cemete Breach 977 feet
o /
Perimeter
loud Cure
Pre 6)asu
Conditim
Reference
Reach Data
Desi o
As Built / Basel ne
Dim i &S bstnt VJM
IL
UL
E.I.
MI
M
M dl
Ma
I SD
I ~N
MI
M d
M
SD
N
MI
M
M
MI
M
M d
Ma
SD
N
Bsnkfull W dth(ft)
70
70
70
70
N/A
1 1
89
111
113
141
18
7
1 1001
55
72
72
89
N/A
2
Flocdp Wdth(ft)
142
142
142
142
N/A
1
190
540
360
1000
381
5
1 280
1
269
285
1 285
300
N/A
2
Benkfug M can Dcpth(ft)
10
10
10
10
N/A
1
07
09
08
16
03
7
07
1
05
07
07
08
N/A
2
B kfullM Depth(ft)
t
15
15
15
15
N/A
1
10
15
13
24
05
7
08
11
16
10
12
12
14
N/A
2
Bankr.UC Sca a1A w(ft)
68
68
68
68
N/A
1
68
96
64
184
39
7
70
30
S0
50
70
N/A
2
W dth(DepthR1
72
72
72
72
N/A
1
69
112
117
150
NA
3
1431
103
108
108
112
N/A
2
h nen h—t Rm
1 11
20
20
20
20
N/A
1
38
68
77
89
NA
3
28
30
42
42
54
N/A
2
Bank Hnght R t
1 5
15
1 5
15
N/A
1:p0
I I
1 0
1 2
NA
3
1 0
10
10
10
10
1 0
1 0
N/A
2
d50 (rtm0
2 0
I
3 S
3 5
6
2 0
Prome
RfB Length (ft)
68
234
195
539
1484
14
Rtft) SI p (ft /ft)
0 012
100341
0 088
1000610027
0 026
0 052
0 016
6
0 004
0 023
0 022
0 049
001
14
P ILwgth 111)
t
47
82
119
35
193
196
326
IIS
6
58
162
169
391
717
24
P IM DMth(ft)
26
18
26
29
32
OS
7
A207
18
30
29
37
048
I8
P Ispw g(ft)
228
860
2282
180
527
402
1408
417
7
45
387
364
1110
2440
24
P IVIm (ft)
Pattern
Cha I it Wdth(ft)
53
108
226
260
491
400
1190
298
9
230
322
414
113
306
370
467
123
16
R d fC ry t .(ft)
39
196
370
50
238
220
480
146
9
184
276
368
83
137
120
299
57
16
R BankPoB Wdth(ft)
06
28
53
06
2l
IS
43
13
9
IB
28
37
24
24
24
24
N/A
1
Mw daW I.glh(ft)
J
136
420
710
260
729
690
1550
476
9
460
552
644
3881
774
1 791
11670
361
11
Mw der Wdth Rat
O9
IS
32
1
25
47
36
101
27
7
1 23 1
32
41
49 1
66 1
66 1
82
N/A
2
S bamt Bed d T ppn P nm t o
R //R / /P / /G / /S/
t..
35//4//42//13//7 /
SC / /Se / /G / /C / /B / /Be°/
t r
I
a
d16 /D35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /d /d`°(nin)
09/12/20/80/101 /889/
021/05/35/139/266 /450/
) V—
h L
R ch Sh err St m (Compet cy) Ib/ft
Mar Pert S. I—) M b I d t Bankfull
45 180
Ste P wa (Tn p rt C p ty) W/m
'�
t
Addlti 1 Re h P mm t o
Dmt WA.(-)
006
025 028
Impm C aBt mm (/)
m
R gen Class fmt
FA
E4/C4/C5
C4
C
BenkfullVI ty(fps)
66 78
41 70
55 67
t
B kfuUD ch 9¢(f)
443 528
350 1281
384 466
a
WNy L-gh (ft)
Ch ITh I—gL gth(ft)
977
S. ty
1 14
1 15 222
1 14
1 08
Water Surf tx SI p (ft /ft)
00190
00057 00130
00190
Btmkfull Sl pe(ft/ft)
00191
B kfidlFI dplam A—(acres)
Pmp rt O aWd (/)
Ent w hmcnt Chas (ER R.W)
b
'
I cis Chas (BHR Re F)
BA
513 Fv-
Chmt ISt b1ty H btw Mein
B I gtwl Other
I f tmt m IN
N/A It mdo t pply __
N Apphcabl— __ I
Dye Branch II Final 16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitonng Year 0

y t rx a c Table 5 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Dve Branch II / Project No 92253 RLe BrawblU hea& tl,465 feet t r p'a
aram
Peter
Regional Curve
Pre- bbshmg C (Rdon
Reference Reach Data
1 Ur to Oa tlm Creek
Design
As Bwlt/ Baseline
Dm sio &S balm ihM
IL
UL
Eq
In
INU
Med
I Ma
I SD
I N
NU
Menal
Med
I M
SD
N
M1hn
M
M
Nit
Mea
Med
Ma
SD
N
Bmtkfull W dth (ft)
1
1 112
160
185
206
20 1
25 7
284
269
32 7
N/A
3
FI odp o e W dth (ft)
y;
a @
89 5
672
702
728
709
769
888
544
649
586
818
N/A
3
Bankfull Mw Depth (ft)
16
1 6
17
15
It
13
13
1 4
N/A
3
B kfull M. Depth (ft)
a
_L6
28
15
19
24
15
18
22
22
28
23
36
N/A
3
B kPo0 C Sea al A ea (ft)
181
202
197
22 9
NA
3
274
303
334
31 0
295
363
32 5
469
N/A
3
W dth/Depth Rm
r
62
70
70
79
NA
3
9 3
114
127
130
203
226
22 8
246
N/A
3
E hen taunt Rat
h
l
1
32
44
50
50
NA
3
35
38
44
35
38
44
20
23
23
25
N/A
3
Bank Hoght R t
1
1 0
10
12
14
1
1
1 1 0
1 to
to
to
10
1 0
l 0
N/A
3
d50 Irma)
s
P.Me
R M L gth (R)
t~'
yt
,e
6 1
176
302
66
191
32 7
20 1
516
47 1
97
295
8
Rtftl SI p (ft /ft)
0 002
0 014
0 042
0 006
0 028
0 066
00,07
0 03010
07010
002
0 00610
00510
01610
005
8
P Ilxngth (R)
a
183
351
629
199
381
681
876
246
224
664
13
20
P 1M Depth (ft)
^a
22
29
33
21
27
31
2l
344
I 16L
1 448
I 067
20
P I spncmg (ft)
trA
i-,
503
789
1058
545
855
111471
24 1
66 8
65 3
125
28 6
19
Pool Vol m it I
•,.Y
P tt m
Cha I It W dth (R)
569
360
670
1500
390
726
1626
285
450
484
541
834
17
Rad f C r t m (R)
y,
f
14 5
52 4
148 8
19 0
49 0
115 0
20 6
53 I
124 6
23 6
31 3
31 2
7_ 6
4 75
14
R Banitfull W dth (ft)
'"
13 1
47
1
13 31
1
1 0
1 2 7 1
1 62
10
1 2 7
6 2
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
N/A
I
M. der W length (ft)
40 I
797
117271
33 0
94 0
35 8
102
168 0
100 5
130 0
138 2
153 3
18 2
12
M ea der W dth Rat
06
22
5 1
l 9
36
115501
8 1
1 9
36
8 1
1 7
1
021 1
3
S betnt Bed d Tm sport P n t o
R,//R / /P / /G / /S/
x ,d '>
28//15//34//20/ /3/
SC/ /Sa / /G / /C / /B / /Be°/
Tst
d16/D35/d50/d84/d95/d /dam tmn
# rs,
015/04/33/103/137 /457/
R h Sh m St es Co ten lb/ft
Mss Pmt Su (mm) M bdu d t Bmkfu8
R
30 100
Stre —P Wa Ia p rt C pw t ) Wm
Addit o al Re h P t— ten
Drat FA.(-)-
"'a
06
09
1
fq, a
Impm CoerEtmat (/)
R gm Cla s Rwt
>;
E4
C4
C5
C
BmtkfullV I ty (fp )
62 69
42
35
B kfullD h W(f)
1122 1248
128
110
Valley Lmgih (ft)
8' a a.
r3 tiK x g
Ch I Th by g L-Dh (ft)
`�
1 465
S ty
t,.
121
146
109
l 15
W ter S f ce SI p (ft /ft)
., r
00080
00090
00095
B ®kfull SI p (eft)
00091
B kfuI1F1 dplm Am (acs)
°'
N 4r ..4 .F'... 1 L ,
Prop rt O erWd (/)
4 +
S 4 r
4 + A
Ent en hmcnt Clas (ER Range)
. V, I
4 .4' W,
I Cla (BHR Rarge)
,t —
3 v
13EHI
e,
57 5 En—
Chaan 1 St bthty H b t t Meth
B IoDca10 Other
b x a * I
�-J 14.
I I m m I bI
N/A It mdo t pply
N ApplmWW ,t
Dye Branch II Final 17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Table 5 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Dye BraDch 11 / Project No 92255" Die Branch- Dowmitrearn 970 feet
Pararrct
Regional Curse
Pre Wstlug Condom
Reference , tl�h Data
Design
At BuBt / Baseline
Dim 1 &S hstrat Rtm
iL
UL
Eq
MI
ea
Med
Ma
SD
N
M
M
M d
Ma
I SD
N
Min
Mea
I M
Nh
Mean
Med
Ma
SD
N
Bankfull W dth(ft)
148
148
148
148
NA
1
160
185
206
201
184
186
186
188
N/A
3
Flo dp W dth (ft)
220
220
220
220
NA
1
672
702.
72 8
7091
769
1888
487
61 8
61 8
748
N/A
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
12
1 2
1 2
1 2
NA
1
1 7
15
1
19
20
20
20
N/A
3
B kftdl Max Dcpth(ft)
1
24
24
24
24
NA
1
_L6
15
_L6
19
24
15
18
22
29
30
30
31
N/A
3
B kfullC Sea a1A ea (ft l
174
174
174
24
NA
1
274
303
334
310
340
361
361
381
N/A
3
W dth/Depth Rat
i y
125
125
125
24
NA
1
93
114
127
0
93
96
96
99
N/A
3
E nm hmcnt Rat
15
15
15
24
NA
1
35
38
44
35
44
27
34
34
40
N/A
3
Bank Height R t
5
4 9
4 9
4 9
2 4
NA
I
1 0
l 2
1 4
1 0
�13
1 0
1 0
l 0
l 0
d50
1
1 0561
24
1
1 1
Pram
Rill Lengh(ft)
61
176
302
66
191
327
157
503
557
793
202
7
Rtm SI p ( ft/ft)
000310021
0 121
0 006
0 028
0 066
0 007
0 030
0 070
0 001
0 006
0 006
0 014
0 004
7
P ILengb(ft)
1 29
1248
120
183
351
629
199
381
681
101
199
159
396
891
14
P olM DMth(ft)
31
22
29
33
21
27
31
33
391
377
1505
059
12
P Ispac g(ft)
1 790
1162 0
2610
503
789
1 110581
545
1 855
1114 7
153
575
388
130
415
14
P IVI— (ft)
Ptrra
Cha I It Wdth(11)
1 156
1 306
1
1677
1
1
1360
1 6701
115001
390
1 726
1162 6128
3
492
1 57516541
1541
9
Rad fC,t re (ft)
110
421
819
190
490
1150
206
531
1246
327
407
422
501
56
7
R Bankfull Wdth(ft)
1 07 1
29
1 56
1 1
10
1 27
1 1
62
1
1 10
1 27
62
1 17
17
1 l7
1 17
N/A
I I
MeandcrW length(ft)
1 620110301
1 157
1 1
13301
9401
115501
35 81
102
1680113891
1622
15731210
5
272
6
M eandcr W dth Rat
I I 1
21 1
1 46
1 1
1 19 1
36
1 1
8 1
1 1
1 19 1
36 1
8 l
1 2 4 1
2 8
1 2 8 1
3 1 1
0511
2
S bstrate Bed • d Tra sport Parameters
R //R / /P / /G / /S/
43//6//34//13//3 /
SC/ /Sa / /G / /C / /B / /Be/
dl6 /D35 /d50 /d84 /d9$ /d /d (nun)
015/028/056/107 /130/457/
L fit.
R h Sh ar St es (C mpetency) INft
M ax Part S. (tmn) M bdtz d a< Bankfull
30 100
St— P—(T. p n C p ty)W /m
Addid I Re h P ram t rs
DtmnaW A ea (mt)
06
09
t"
Impery u Co aEstmud (/)
R sgen Class ficat o
G4
C4
C5
C
Bankfull V I ty (fp)
6 1 7 2
42
35
B nkfull Dtsdm W ( f)
1054 1260
128
110
Valley Lengh (ft)
Ch nn I Thal cg Length (ft)
870
S ty
114
146
109
110
W to Surf ce sl p (ft/ft 1
00110
00090
0 0095
Bankfull SI p (ft/ft)
00106
B kfull FI dphu Am (aaa)
P p rt O erWd (/)
➢ t
"t *'
E tmt h—t Clan (ER Rm,W)
I s o Clas (BHR Range)
ti
BEHI
567 Erttettte
Chan ISt bIry Hbt tMan 1
L r
t f
B I giwl Other
s
) u wt
I f , t � I bi
V/A It mdo t 71Y
Dye Branch II Final 18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitonng Year 0

Table 6 Basehne Morphology & Hydrauhc Momtormg Summary
Dye Branch H / Project No 92255 - Cemetery Branch (977 Feet)
Parameter
Cross Section 1
Pool
Cross Section 2
Riffle
Cross Section 3
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
NM
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
97
1 89
55
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
269
>30
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
19
08
05
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3 l
14
10
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
189
70
30
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
50
112
103
Bankf ill Entrenchment Ratio
>51
30
>5 4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
10
10
10
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft2)
189
70
30
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A Item does not apply
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
October 2011
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

O 000000000000000 0000�00000000'�
Table 61 Baseline Morphology & Hytlrauhc Momtormg Summary
�
Dye Branch II / Protect No 92255 - Dye Branch - Upstream (1,465 Feet)
Parameter
Cross Section 4
Riffle
Cross Section 5
Pool
Cross Section 6
Riffle
Cross Section 7
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY1
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
257
184
Floodprone Width (ft)
327
269
Floodprone Width (ft)
586
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
r34
81 8
544
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1 3
35
14
1 1
38 l
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
25
340
36
93
22
143
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
325
288
40
469
>2 7
295
27
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
203
10
102
10
228
10
246
Cross Sectional Area between End Pms (ft2)
38 1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
23
484
>2 9
340
25
d50 (mm)
N/A
20
N/A
Bankft ll Bank Height Ratio
10
N/A
1 0
10
10
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft)
325
28 8
46 9
295
d 5 0 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A Item does not apply
Table 6 Baseline Morphology[& Hydrauhc Momtonng Summary
Dye Branch H / Protect No 92255 ­Dye Branch - Downstream (870 Feet)
Parameter
Cross Section 8
Riffle
Cross Section 9
Pool
Cross Section 10
Riffle
Dimension
Base
N Yl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
188
263
184
Floodprone Width (ft)
748
>70
487
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
20
1 8
19
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3 1
35
29
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
38 l
484
340
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
93
143
99
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
40
>2 7
27
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
10
10
10
Cross Sectional Area between End Pms (ft2)
38 1
484
340
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A Item does not apply
Dye Branch II Draft 20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Table 7 Vegetation Plot Attribute Data
Dye Branch II /Pro ct No 92255
Plot ID
Community Type
Reach ID
eVeone Level
VP 1
Upland
3
Cemetery Branch
I
VP 2
Riparian
2
Cemetery Branch
I
VP 3
Upland
3
Dye Branch Upstream
I
VP 4
Upland
3
Dye Branch Upstream
I
VP 5
Upland
3
Dye Branch Upstream
I
VP 6
Riparian
2
Dye Branch Downstream
I
VP 7
Upland
3
Dye Branch Downstream
I
VP 8
Upland
3
Dye Branch Downstream
I
Dye Branch II Draft 21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Momtonng Year 0

Table 8 CVS Vegetahon Plot Metadata
Dye Branch II / Project No 92255
Report Prepared By
Kevin Mitchell
Date Prepared
3/16/2011 15 57
Database Name
Equinox 2011 A DyeBranch mdb
Database Location
Z \ES \NRI &M \EEP Monitonng \Dye Branch \DB -MY0 -2010 \Data \Veg
Computer Name
Dl6TNK71
File Size
149872896
DESCRIPTION OF WORKS REM IN THIS DOCUA4INT
Metadata
Description ofdatabase file the report worksheets and a summary ofproject(s) and project
data
Protect Planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED sterns per acre for each year This excludes live
stakes
Protect Total Stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre for each year This includes live stakes
all planted stems and all natural/volunteer stems
Plots
List ofplots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems dead stems missing etc )
Vigor
Frequency distribution ofvrgorclasses for stems for all plots
Vigor by Species
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damag e
Last ofmost frequent damage classes with numberofoccurrences and percent oftotal stems
impacted by each
Damage by Species
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Species
A matrixofthe count of PLANTED living stems ofeach species for each plot dead and
missing stems are excluded
PROJECT' SUMMARY
Project Code
92255
Project Name
Dye Branch
Description
Riper Basin
Yadkin Pee Dee
Length(ft)
Stream- to-Edge Width (ft)
Area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
8
Dye Branch II Draft 22 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 October 2011
Baseline Momtonng Year 0

ToW 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Meaw)
Dye Branch H / Project No 92255
®�
®000
©©
©00000
©000000000���m��
S (ACRES)
o00�m��m�00000
©��m�m�000���
000000000
000000
©©
©000000
©©
©000000
®
®®
mmmmmmmmm�mmmmmmm��mmm���
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
23 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
October 2011
cVl�000000000000UGC_�C �--)()00000OOOOOOOCOOOCCO0000

C
�J
�J
CJ
C.
C
J
O
r -�
l
1\ �
\/1
O
\J
C�
C�
CJ
6 0 REFERENCES
Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4 2
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program) October 2005 Dye Branch Stream
Restoration Plan Town of Mooresville Iredell County, North Carolina Raleigh,
NC
Rosgen, D L 1997 A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers In
Wang, S S Y, E J Langendoen, and F D Shields, Jr (Eds ) Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision pp 12 -22
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No 92255
Baseline Momtonng Year 0
24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
October 2011

C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C`
C
c
C
C
J
C
C
\0
C �
l 1
C
l�_
\ )
C�
1
C
i
C
\--I
Appendix A
Monitoring Plan View

C''
C,
C
C�
CC
C�
C.,
Appendix B
C�
As -Built Plan View
F
C;
L-
C
C,
C`

TC)\ \ /y
�o
l
G
9c^ E IR C 3L qVE
M VI E
P h� JQ'G Ef
0� G�
gti S
m
0�9L ; CABB
�G Z
SITE I ° VICINITY MAP
m NOT TO SCALE
I ELISABETH G TURNER, CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS
WERE DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL
SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THAT THE
RATIO OF PRECISION AS CALCULATED IS 1 loom +
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL W44ATURE REGISTRATION
NUMBER AND SEAL THIS 12th DAY OF MAY
2011
62161!5� G �
41SASETH G TURNER P L S #!L4140 �i CAR
41' 688,4c,'
7�
SEAL
fZI� LIMB
1 ELISABETH G TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY
CERTIFY THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING WAS
OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION IS AN ACCURATE AND
COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN
THE FIELD AND THAT THE PHYSr:AL DIMENSIONS OR
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS43UILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT
WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON WITNESS MY ORIGINAL
SIGNATURE REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SEAL THIS 1i _
DAY OF MAY 2011
ELIPAErM O MFINER, P L 8 #L4W CARS
*Mlc+
SEAL
r �y ?
8 8UR
",-,m 0 t
AS —BUILT SURVEY OF
DYE BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION
ARTICLE 28 CONSTRUCTION
SCO# 04- 06242 -03A
IREDELL COUNTY
9w,wrx
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM
1962 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27089 -1652
[phone]
EEP PROJ MGR DEBORAH A. DANIEL
EEP REVIEW COORDINATOR ED NAJNOS
FLUVIAL SOLUTIONS INC
RALEIGH NC
[phone]
nF?IGNER
MULKEY ENGINEERS 8 CONSULTANTS INC
CARY NC
[phone]
G
EN���S
1 ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
2 THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD 88
3 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID
COORDINATES NADS3 DATUM
4 THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION SALES OR
CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G S 47.90
MAPPING REQUIREMENTS
6 ALL CROSS - SECTIONS ARE FROM LEFT BANK TO RIGHT BANK
(FACING DOWNSTREAM)
6 CONTROL DATA SHOWN TARN FROM EXISTING
CONDITIONS SURVEY PROVIDED BY DESIGNER 6
VERIFIED DURING CONSTRUCTION 8 A8 -BUILT SURVEYS
7 IRON REBAR WITH GIP SET IN CONCRETE AT EACH END OF
CROSS - SECTIONS AND ON BOTH SIDES OF STREAM AT LONG
PRO BEGIN 8 END STATKWS T41OSTS WRH PVC PIPE SET
NEXT TO WEAR. (END LP3 SUBJECT TO CHANGE FOR MONITORING)
8 VEGETATION PLOTS SET WITH T -POSTS 8 PVC PIPE SET AT
EACH CORNER (SUBJECT TO CHANGE FOR MONITORING)
SHEET INDEX
SHEET 5A TITLE VICINITY MAP SHEET IC=Y GENERAL NOTES
SHEET 5B DYE BRANCH PLAN VIEW PROFILE STA 0+00 TO 16+00
AND CROSS SECTIONS 4-7
SHEET 5C DYE BRANCH PLAN VIEW PROFILE STA 16+00 TO 27 +71
AND CROSS SECTIONS 8-10
SHEET 5D CEMETARY BRANCH PLAN VIEW AND CROSS
SECTIONS 1-3
�
J
CL
m�
? �p
AID,EI
LLI I
S
O_c
N
gN
0 F-
co
W
uj
> co
I.I� z
QG
W
U
~
? cl) P
(nZ0
Q CI
N
W
m J
U
W
DATE ,2/164010
SURVEYED BY MIEW
DRAWN BY OST/WT
REVIEWED BY DBTIEGT
ACT TLS -10-011
FILE
wmaeam�s�wiarcw
SCALE AS SHOWN
err
5A

083
NAV88
0 +73 15
ROCK VANE
c,l- 60 Oq E—
PP3\
BY OTHERS
LOG SILL
LP LEGEND
821 74
ROCK VANE
BEGIN LP2
821 72
-DB -0+30 36
e�
3+4293
f�
0+3640
cRq
ROCK CROSS VANE
-
82293
-825
1
+16 7
ROCK VANE
cf
821 82
- - - -- /BOTTOM OF BANK
N 670
ezg ,W.. «
E 1 461
R
ELEV
8t6OF
mt o m
HUB L
825 825
No-
820m 820
8151 m o m m 815
8251 nl
820
etsl
I
I m
I I
BY OTHERS
LOG SILL
LP LEGEND
821 74
ROCK VANE
LOG L1
LOG SIL L
821 72
XV —CROSS VANE
cc—
3+4293
ce
ROCK VANE
RV —ROCK VANE (SIN
ARM)
-
810
-825
RS —ROCK SILL
LS —LOG SILL i
820 19
cf
RR —RIP
- - - -- /BOTTOM OF BANK
\ROCK
D LP2 �`"
ezg ,W.. «
BDRCK— EDROCK
R
w
8t6OF
mt o m
BLDR— BOULDER I
VANE —LOG D ROCK COMBO
- DB -14 +9 17
!
ROCK
10+1244 813 11
LP— LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
9 +63 26 /
805
1
S -BUILT LIMITS`k'
�I
ROCK VANE
5
ROCK VANEcc
814 20
_
8
3
EASEMENT
2+4589
BY OTHERS
LOG SILL
2+0036
821 74
ROCK VANE
LOG L1
LOG SIL L
821 72
82 83
cc—
3+4293
ce
ROCK VANE
\
82026
-
3 +74
-825
ROCK VANE
\ I
820 19
LX 1
DYE BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION
ARTICLE 28 CONSTRUCTION
LXISIwG
McLEL� NfF'�FHEN7
RIP —RHP AVE
DITCH EX 18 RCP
5 +16 15
\ cc_ 81875CROSS VANE
�
\ - 81
4+7 /
4+72 OS
LOG SILL
/ l AS -BUILT LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE 6+3347
f SEE TARP BRA 81698
NCH ROCK VANE
� MULKEY CONTROL POINT 2
0 E 16461616235
REBARBW %CAP
I I
�mm mn I
$m n r :�
­RAP I
0�` �s
12+1983
ROCK CROSS VANE
BE
-DB -1 E
TLS 21
Ex solo cMP \
mmmm
I
m
8
N 669 433 65
13+6366
cc—
+ � �
E 1 461 303 53
ELEV 820 55
NAIL ROCK
ROCK VANE ea
13+3045 81 38
\
Ex o cMl
81 1 70
0
10 54
� PP6 Q.
�L
--
VANE
81 1 6
cf
8 -
­RAP I
0�` �s
12+1983
ROCK CROSS VANE
�
ROCK VANE cE�`E
Ex solo cMP \
mmmm
I
m
8
e
i�/
cc—
+ � �
TW— THALWEG
TB —TOP OF BANK
BB— BOTTOM OF BANK
\�
8
i
81 1 70
/
� PP6 Q.
�L
--
VANE
81 1 6
cf
8 -
- - - -- /BOTTOM OF BANK
\ROCK
D LP2 �`"
ezg ,W.. «
VANE
R
w
8t6OF
mt o m
��- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
- DB -14 +9 17
!
ROCK
10+1244 813 11
/cf
CE
9 +63 26 /
SCE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
S -BUILT LIMITS`k'
-
ROCK VANE
5
ROCK VANEcc
814 20
_
14 +03 06
OF DISTURBANCE
TILE
8134 c
CL DITCH
s
e
8 0 03VANE
\
8+7729
8t2 I
PP 0 i
cE
— ROCK9VANE
50 0 50 100
14 +71 91
ROCK VANE
e�
81574
I
a 81115
t 120
°o
ROCK VANE
8152
1
_ _
I fm
12+5305
80981
8 +48 43
ROCK
BOULDER
61 }
+
i
J
ROCK VANE
811 58
ROOTWAD
STRUCTURE BURIED
815A06
BFDROCK
RIP —R P
CD
L DITCH
J
W W
"
0
�
ROCK CROSS VANE
VP3 - VEGETATION PLOT
—c1
'I�mmmPOOL °
22
oo m $
IN DRAINAGE DITCH
X -2 - CROSS- SECTION
—cc
­RAP I
0�` �s
J
�
ROCK VANE cE�`E
LEGEND
mmmm
I
m
8
e
i�/
cc—
— THALWEG
TW— THALWEG
TB —TOP OF BANK
BB— BOTTOM OF BANK
\�
8
i
VP4
/
—TB-- —TOP OF BANK
--
cF
10 +9012 -
ANE
- - - -- /BOTTOM OF BANK
ezg ,W.. «
m
80270
8t6OF
mt o m
��- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
!
n
9 +63 26 /
SCE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
'
-
1824
°
9+2505
ROCK VANEcc
814 20
UL 7
BLA ;
RIP RAP
BEDROCK
TILE
\�'—
CL DITCH
ROCK VANE
81417
cE/
/
TURNER SURVEYING PLLC
SURVEYED OCTOBER do DECEMBER 2010
© BOULDER
ezx
8t2 I
7 +88 83
ROCK VANE
cE
m
50 0 50 100
PP3 O PHOTO POINT
SANITARY
WER PIPE
r
81574
/
\ CONSERVATION
t 120
°o
e o8 1
_ 1I
n o n
1
Y 24 RCP
I fm
EASEMENT
BENCH MARK /CONTROL PT
+
cE
41
ROCK CROSS VANE /
N
BY OTHERS
)
SCALE 1 = 100 `2(21x17)
ROOTWAD
81626
CROSS - SECTION SCALE
CD
1 CONTOUR INTERVAL
J
W W
"
o
HORIZONTAL 1 = 10 (22x34)
VP3 - VEGETATION PLOT
a
'I�mmmPOOL °
22
oo m $
I
X -2 - CROSS- SECTION
DYE BRANCH AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE STA 0 +00 TO 16 +00
I 1 I I
' I
I I I i I I
_ IN
mmmm m m m m
m
m m m m I m
1
I
1
1
I
:2 sl
�I
ml m� ml m m
8 8 -
m
L2;*A; I �l
i 1
mm'2;D m m m m mm m m m l
m
I ( I
I �
1
� � 8
CROSS SECTIONS 4-7
I
PROFILE SCALE
HORIZONTAL 1 = 50 (22x34) VERTICAL 1" = 51 (22x34)
1 =1100 (11x17) i I 1"= 10' (11x1 I)
I I I I
I I
1
e
8
a
I
Im
I
mml m oa m n 1 Fm P a�
mmm § S m § $
I
gfi
I °
ml m
Ij
4 4
NOTES
1 SEE SHEET 5A FOR
GENERAL NOTES
2 FOUR (4) PAGE
DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID
WITHOUT SHEET 5A
(TITLE)
825
I
820
815
� e10
805
s
�g
t
CROSS SECTION LEGEND
J
>r °
RIFFLE
mmmm
I
m
8
m
n
e
8
a
I
Im
I
mml m oa m n 1 Fm P a�
mmm § S m § $
I
gfi
I °
ml m
Ij
4 4
NOTES
1 SEE SHEET 5A FOR
GENERAL NOTES
2 FOUR (4) PAGE
DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID
WITHOUT SHEET 5A
(TITLE)
825
I
820
815
� e10
805
s
�g
t
CROSS SECTION LEGEND
J
RIFFLE
). RIFFLE
TW— THALWEG
TB —TOP OF BANK
BB— BOTTOM OF BANK
92
.a
mi
gS am!
1826
W
>
1 $
I
TBL —TOP LEFT CHANNEL BANK
ezg ,W.. «
m
8t6OF
mt o m
=
!
n
TBR —TOP OF RIGHT CHANNEL BANK
BBL BOTTOM OF
824m
I
'
I
1824
°
8t m
m
A
p0.
— LEFT CHANNEL BANK
BBR— BOTTOM OF RIGHT CHANNEL
8
I
i I
ezx
8t2 I
I I
O
m
O
BANK
LY —EDGE OF WATER
e22
2
_ I ry
I
R + $ $
t 120
°o
e o8 1
_ 1I
n o n
O
,
$
I fm
O
cq
'q
+
N
a
o
a s
CROSS - SECTION SCALE
CD
cl)
J
W W
"
o
HORIZONTAL 1 = 10 (22x34)
e2
a
'I�mmmPOOL °
22
oo m $
1
le,e
1 = 20 (11x17)
W
1
n�8X
818
81 41.
j
814
VERTICAL 1 = 10 (22x34)
00
Q
Qmw
51
816
2'F,
1
I
s
812
1 =20 (11x17)
814
n
18 4
e
i
m I
e1n
W
e
8
a
I
Im
I
mml m oa m n 1 Fm P a�
mmm § S m § $
I
gfi
I °
ml m
Ij
4 4
NOTES
1 SEE SHEET 5A FOR
GENERAL NOTES
2 FOUR (4) PAGE
DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID
WITHOUT SHEET 5A
(TITLE)
825
I
820
815
� e10
805
s
�g
t
J
W
>
�
I
cn
ULU
WNN
A
p0.
O
O
O
0Q
O
cq
'q
+
N
LL
O�
CD
cl)
J
W W
"
o
o
u
a
LU
Z5
W
fA
Z
Z
Q Z
00
Q
Qmw
N
a
Z
W
o�
~
g
00
W
DATE.
171204010
SURVEYED Br DSTIE(iT
DRAWN BY DSTIEOT
REVIEWED BY DSTIEOT
PROJECT TLS.10-011
FILE
1M iUr,Oln/Fiir Ie1dM,lOM
�
UOtlMLl 00 ,u
SCALE AS SHOM
5B

DYE BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION
ARTICLE 28 CONSTRUCTION
0
27+
ROCK CROSS
7
25+9330/
ROCK VANE
79842
AS -BUILT
OF DISTUR
TBM 6
N 668 358 65
E 1 461 276 00
ELEV 893 32
HUB W /TACK
27+1486
ROCK VANE
79763
27 +71 32 END
STREAM CONSTRUCTION
TURNER IAItJD SURVEYING PLLC
SURVEYED OCTOBER & DECEMBER 2010
50 0 50 100
SCALE 1 =50 (22x34
1 =100 (11x1 )
1 CONTOUR INTERVAL
LEGEND
— THALWEG
_ —TB— —TOP OF BANK
- BOTTOM OF BANK
�—�- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
_cE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
RIP RAP
BEDROCK
a BOULDER
PP3 O PHOTO POINT
e BENCH MARK /CONTROL PT
ROOTWAD
VP3 - VEGETATION PLOT
X -2 - CROSS- SECTION
°s DYE BRANCH AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE STA 16 +00 TO 27 +71
810 '$ PROFILE SCALE, I 810
;i
�o x 9- s $ m n a HORIZONTAL 1' = 50 (22x34) ( VERTICAL 11 =5'(
,m5 ° I" i� I $ I �$ $ �{ m 1 = 100l(11x17) 1' = 10 (11x17)
$ �s 1$
^n LP LEGEND I $ I $Sm ° _' $ S i b�
800 g� XV -CROSS VANE ° ^° +
z- RV -ROCK VANE (SINGLE ARM) 2S �$ ° Q $ Q5� I ✓£ & ^ ^
RS -ROCK SILL { I I I �$
LS -LOG SILL O " $
RR -RIP RAP u
BDRC% BULDER EDROCK I r K
do
795 BDR- B { ^ n
VANE -LOG ROCK COMBO .795
I alr n °w
LP- LONGITUDINAL PROFILE I ^
1 1 "I $I 790
I 1 1 1 � I ^1 ^1 I
s s * x #
CROSS SECTIONS 8 -10
J
X -0 RIFFLE -
g
CREST GUA E
CROSS SECTION LEGEND
814
R
{
s
a ® au
24+4689
TM+ —TM^LG
812 °�
I
I
a 8,2
LOG VANE
TB -TOP OF BANK
BB- BOTTOM OF BANK
TBL -TOP OF LEFT CHANNEL BANK
et0 ^^
808-°
I I $
1 $
c !
$ {
I
C m
799 77
ROCK
1 = 20 (11x17)
DDBn\
806
-
+
I I
j
I
756
° sob
=
I
$
A
° ° "
P o +
$ n 9 n
o + $ $
VERTICAL 1" = 10 (22X34)
EW -EDGE OF WATER
�
23799
, f
1" = 20'(1 1XI 7)
ROCK VANE
LOG L
LOG SILL o
04
O
N
6t
56
CE
°
pH S
LxISTINC
812
I
21+1281
I }
22+0745
CE
I 806
EDGE OF
ROCK CROSS VANE
>
ROCK SILL
PP
'm/1
Z co
Q N
0-
=
J
m U
802 16
° 1806
801 10 cf
Q Q
> a ^ n
.21802
19 +61 47
$
21+6385
&
i i
/PAVFMLNi
LOG SILL
80430
19+8857
ROCK VANE
ROCK VANE
801 15
cc
pp
i
J78
R
Y o 0 0 o 0
0 o o o a o Y
° o
19 +61 54
80377
ROCKS VANE
o
cE
N
ROCK CROSS
91
0 �
80V4A
C
DROCK
Cr
CE
184-0883
k i
CE
CONSERVATION ROCK VANE c
80610
+
B
EASEMENT t P
rn
5
BY OTHERS
- --
_ — _
cE /CE
ROCK CROSS VANE
so
/
22 +49 21
80079
BEGIN LP3 Ot -
_
E
ROCK VANE
800 55
N 668
E
- DB -16 +52 72 f
e'
cc
ELEV
sz
O
o
cE
LIMIT c�
I VANE
I x so cMP
OF DISTUR
ROCK
80299
/ i
0
/
cE
TLS 25
N 668 746 36
1 461 257 32
1�
ELEV
810 75
EX eo cl7P cE
PP7 /
17+6584
ROCK CROSS VANE
NAIL
/
PP6 nF GE
80700
D LP2 \ 16 +52 R
-DB -14 +917 / 8079000SS VANE
0
27+
ROCK CROSS
7
25+9330/
ROCK VANE
79842
AS -BUILT
OF DISTUR
TBM 6
N 668 358 65
E 1 461 276 00
ELEV 893 32
HUB W /TACK
27+1486
ROCK VANE
79763
27 +71 32 END
STREAM CONSTRUCTION
TURNER IAItJD SURVEYING PLLC
SURVEYED OCTOBER & DECEMBER 2010
50 0 50 100
SCALE 1 =50 (22x34
1 =100 (11x1 )
1 CONTOUR INTERVAL
LEGEND
— THALWEG
_ —TB— —TOP OF BANK
- BOTTOM OF BANK
�—�- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
_cE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
RIP RAP
BEDROCK
a BOULDER
PP3 O PHOTO POINT
e BENCH MARK /CONTROL PT
ROOTWAD
VP3 - VEGETATION PLOT
X -2 - CROSS- SECTION
°s DYE BRANCH AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE STA 16 +00 TO 27 +71
810 '$ PROFILE SCALE, I 810
;i
�o x 9- s $ m n a HORIZONTAL 1' = 50 (22x34) ( VERTICAL 11 =5'(
,m5 ° I" i� I $ I �$ $ �{ m 1 = 100l(11x17) 1' = 10 (11x17)
$ �s 1$
^n LP LEGEND I $ I $Sm ° _' $ S i b�
800 g� XV -CROSS VANE ° ^° +
z- RV -ROCK VANE (SINGLE ARM) 2S �$ ° Q $ Q5� I ✓£ & ^ ^
RS -ROCK SILL { I I I �$
LS -LOG SILL O " $
RR -RIP RAP u
BDRC% BULDER EDROCK I r K
do
795 BDR- B { ^ n
VANE -LOG ROCK COMBO .795
I alr n °w
LP- LONGITUDINAL PROFILE I ^
1 1 "I $I 790
I 1 1 1 � I ^1 ^1 I
s s * x #
CROSS SECTIONS 8 -10
J
X -0 RIFFLE -
g
J
CROSS SECTION LEGEND
814
R
{
s
a ® au
CROSS - SECTION SCALE
TM+ —TM^LG
812 °�
I
I
a 8,2
HORIZONTAL 1 = 10 (22x34)
TB -TOP OF BANK
BB- BOTTOM OF BANK
TBL -TOP OF LEFT CHANNEL BANK
et0 ^^
808-°
I I $
1 $
c !
$ {
I
C m
^" 810
°° eoe
1 = 20 (11x17)
TBR -TOP OF RIGHT CHANNEL BANK
806
-
+
I I
j
I
1
° sob
=
BBL - BOTTOM OF LEFT CHANNEL BANK
BBR- BOTTOM OF RIGHT CHANNEL BANK
$
A
° ° "
P o +
$ n 9 n
o + $ $
VERTICAL 1" = 10 (22X34)
EW -EDGE OF WATER
�
-
o o
o
1" = 20'(1 1XI 7)
o
04
O
N
6t
X 10 RIFFLE
I
8
pH S
et X-0 POOL
T 1
812
I
J
I }
♦
I 806
u)u��
J w
U) P —
>
V o
vi
Z
'm/1
Z co
Q N
0-
=
J
m U
806-„
° 1806
Boil
Q Q
> a ^ n
.21802
w
0
$
„$
i I $ 1804
DATE 11!20/1010
i i
mk
REVIEWED BY DSTIEO7
PROJECT TLS -10-011
D802I
m
i
J78
R
Y o 0 0 o 0
0 o o o a o Y
° o
ITT
1 SEE SHEET 5A FOR
GENERAL NOTES
2 FOUR (4) PAGE
DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID
WITHOUT SHEET 5A
(TITLE)
J
J
bt
Lu
N
I
W
g
lip
Lu
=
LL
A
4
�
�
I
N
04
O
N
( C
Q
fgND
u- 0
pH S
} W
w
J
cn
= Q� 0-
a
u)u��
J w
U) P —
>
V o
vi
Z
'm/1
Z co
Q N
0-
=
J
m U
Z
Lu
Q
Q Q
m
w
0
DATE 11!20/1010
SURVEYED BY DSTIEOT
DRAWN BY DSTIEOT
REVIEWED BY DSTIEO7
PROJECT TLS -10-011
FILE
wRnacsoa.tmxa,vL
s_ AS SHOWN
>� 5C

CONSERVATION DYE BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION �±
B
YSOTHERS ARTICLE 28 CONSTRUCTION
GRAVE DRIVF
r —CE CE CE CE
CE CE CE
E1
I FC - -CE -- /
~ BEGINOLPI SEE INSET A E�- ��GRnv L�DRIVE
(n PP1 �-
CEMETARY BRANCH
.I I l
U / o P2
o CE- °° ` I x lI ° O
=m °x X
U o0
VP1
SEE INSET B
MULKEY CONTROL POINT 2__
IN 670 169 48
CE CE CE CE CE E 1 461 162 35
CE CE
cE cE cE� REBAR W31CAP
CROSS SECTIONS 1 -3
CROSS SECTION LEGEND
J t
C ROSS - SECTION SCALE
TW- THALWEG
m��
HORIZONTAL 1 = 5 (22x34)
TB -TOP OF BANK
BB- BOTTOM OF BANK
Z
W
1"= 10 (11x17)
TBL -TOP OF LEFT CHANNEL BANK
TBR -TOP OF RIGHT CHANNEL BANK
O I
VERTICAL V= 5'(22x34)
BBL_ BOTTOM OF LEFT CHANNEL BANK
IIIIR-130TTOM HT CHANNEL BANK
1 - 10 (11x17)
OF WATER
X 2 RIFFLE
828$ I
o�
I
81
e30
eze
827 o
261 n�'+
m m
1
Qq
I
I o
1 827
826
825 °
o
825
824 I I j1 g
�' m m I
1 824
8230 I
o 0 0 0
o n
+ 0 0
0
n823
0
V
0
w
-CB -9+781
END LP1
e40 X 1 POOL
839 {
838
837n g
836 m c m
835 J
B34 I o X to
8328 0 n o
824 X 3 RIFFLE B24
823 In 823
822 $ w J m.V 822
821m4 m $ I n821
820 f m l ml w m of 820
819 o n iZ X819
0 0 0 0
INSET SCALE
5 0 5 10
SCALE 1 =5 (2x34�
1 =10 11x1 )
1 CONTOUR INTERVAL
e4o
839
I&18
837
836
835
834
833
„832
0
INSET B
VP2
Tq_TB
.k5/
6+1499
ROCK CROSS 82646
gl
eti
6�
AS -BUILT LIMITS
\ OF DISTURBANCE
- ' on
Z
Q
SHEETS 5B -5C SURVEYED OCITOBERdc ]DECEMBER 2010
50 0 50 100
SCALE 1 =50 (2x34) )
1 =100 11x17
1 CONTOUR INTERVAL
LEGEND
-- — — THALWEG
_ -Tfi- -TOP OF BANK
- - - -- 'BOTTOM OF BANK
�—�- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
_CE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
`A5D RIP RAP
BEDROCK
© BOULDER
PP3 O PHOTO POINT
8 BENCH MARK /CONTROL P
ROOTWAD
VP3 - VEGETATION PLOT
X -2 - CROSS- SECTION
NOTES
1 SEE SHEET 5A FOR
GENERAL NOTES
2 FOUR (4) PAGE
DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID
WITHOUT SHEET 5A
(TITLE)
J t
m��
Z
W
O I
UJI
zs
X
Qq
a
Za
OM
~
?�
L u
v
co
>
LL 0
z
g
0:)
}w
a
��a,
2
w 2,
Z
P:
U)
m
J c
m = Z
W
aZGo
(V
L1J
LLI
m U
U
}�
p a
DATE 14/2fVV1010
SURVEYED BY DST/EGT
DRAWN BY DBT/EGT
REVIEWED BY DBT/EOT
PRAT TLS -10-011
FILE
m � t11GW lwff a 1
wlmismrlwicrlwt.
0010761 M
SCALE AS SHOWN
5D

U
r'
L
Appendix C
Cross- Section Plots and Photos

Appendix C
840
839
838
837
a�
w
0 836
a�
W
835
834
833
832 +—
0+00
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section Plots and Photos
Cemetery Branch
Cross - Section 1 - Pool
Station 1 + 04 27
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35
Station (feet)
--�— MY012/6/2010 – – – Bkf
C 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
October 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 1 — Pool
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 1 — Pool
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 1— Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 1 — Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
830
829
828
w
827
C
O
e�
826
W
825
824
823
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Cemetery Branch
Cross - Section 2 - Riffle
Station 6 + 40.40
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35
Station (feet)
MY012/6/2010 - -- Bkf
Dye Branch II Draft C -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
824
823
a>
822
4W.
c
0
e�
as
W 821
820
819
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Cemetery Branch
Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
Station 8 + 77.10
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25
Station (feet)
t MYO 12/6/2010 — — — Bkf
Dye Branch II Draft C -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
Cross- Section Plots and Photos
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
829
828
827
826
a�
w 825
a
0
> 824
a�
W
823
822
821
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross - Section 4 - Riffle
Station 1 + 15.75
8201 I I + I I I I I I I
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70
Station (feet)
—f— MY0 12/6/2010 – – – - Bkf
Dye Branch I1 Draft C -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Appendix C
Cross- Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch Upstream— Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -1 I Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
822
821
820
819
a>
818
c
0
> 817
a�
W
816
815
814
813
0+00
Cross- Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross - Section 5 - Pool
Station 7 + 74.58
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0+45 0+50
Station (feet)
t MY0 12/6/2010 — — — - Bkf
Dye Branch II Draft C -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
821
820
819
818
817
816
c
0
815
a�
W
814
813
812
811
810
0+00 0 +05
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross - Section 6 - Riffle
Station 10 + 75.57
0 +10 0+15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80 0 +85
Station (feet)
— �MYO12/6/2010 - - --Bkf
Dye Branch 11 Draft C -16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section #6 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
819
818
817
816
815
w
w
G
0 814
R
v
W 813
812
811
810
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross - Section 7 - Riffle
Station 13 + 85.87
8091 I I I I I I I I I I
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70
Station (feet)
t MY0 12/6/2010 — — — Bkf
Dye Branch II Draft C -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Appendix C
Cross- Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
815
814
813
812
a�
811
w
C
810
ea
as
W 809
808
807
806
805
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45
Station (feet)
--E-- MY0 12/6/2010 — — — - Bkf
Cross- Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch - Downstream
Cross - Section 8 - Riffle
Station 17 + 27.43
0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80 0 +85
Dye Branch II Draft C -22
Project No. 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Appendix C
Cross- Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -23 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch Downstream— Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
812
811
810
809
808
d
807
a
0
806
d
W
805
804
803
802
801
0+00
Cross- Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch - Downstream
Cross - Section 9 - Pool
Station 19 + 80.80
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65
Station (feet)
MYO 12/6/2010 - -- Bkf
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
C -25 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch Downstream— Cross - Section 9 — Pool
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 9 — Pool
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -26 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 9 — Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 9 — Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -27 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
810
809
808
807
806
805
a�
e
804
0
803
a�
W 802
801
800
799
798
797
0+00
Cross- Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch - Downstream
Cross - Section 10 - Riffle
Station 24 + 85.22
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60
Station (feet)
tMY012 /6/2010 - -- Bkf
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
C -28 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch H Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -29 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
Dye Branch 11 Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — December 9, 2010
C -30 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix D
Longitudinal Profile Plots

840
839
838
837
836
835
834
833
832
831
830
829
e
828
s 827
a
826
825
824
823
822
821
820
819
818
817
816
815
Cemetary Branch
Longitudinal Profile
Sta. 0+00 to 9 +89.93
Station (feet)
—TW -MY012 /&2010 c Structure • BKF
Dye Branch II Draft D -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

826
825 -
824
823
822
821
820
819
ffi 818
e 817
w
816
815
814
913
812
811 -
810
809
5118
Dye Branch - Upstream
Longitudinal Profile
Sta. 0 +30.36 to 15+03.3
XS6 -R
I
?
l
.l f J B .D Ia
�o �o l 'bo we �o 'Vo �O bo 't'o 'bo bo bo 1'o bo
Station (feet)
- -TW- MY012/6/2010 c Structure • BKF
Dye Branch II Draft D -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

810
809
808
807
806
805
804
803
y 802
801
800
799
798
797
796
I'
�o
Dye Branch - Downstream
Longitudinal Profile
Sta.16+52.72 to 27 +81.55
Station (feet)
--- TW -MV012 /6/2010 O Structure B1 F
Dye Branch II Draft D -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Appendix E
Vegetation Plot Photos

Appendix E
Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Baseline — March 11, 2011
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Baseline — March 11, 2011
E -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix
Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Baseline — March 11, 2011
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
Baseline — March 11, 2011
.1
CIS
7—
1 -2011
Dye Branch II Draft E -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 October 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Appendix E
Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
Baseline — March 11, 2011
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
Baseline — March 11, 2011
E -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix E
Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
Baseline — March 11, 2011
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8
Baseline —March 11, 2011
E-4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix F
Permanent Photo Station Photos

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Cemetery Branch
Pre - construction conditions in proximity to Photo Station 1
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1
Looking Downstream
F -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Cemetery Branch
Pre - construction conditions in proximity to Photo Station 2
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Looking Upstream
F -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Looking Downstream
F -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Dye Branch
Pre - construction conditions in proximity to Photo Station 3
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking Downstream
F4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc,
October 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Dye Branch
Pre - construction conditions in proximity to Photo Station 4
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 4
Looking Upstream
F -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Cemetery Branch
Pre - construction conditions in proximity to Photo Station 5
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 5
Looking Upstream
F -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Cemetery Branch
Pre - construction conditions in proximity to Photo Station 6
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6
Looking Upstream
F -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 7
Looking Downstream
F -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc,
October 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Cemetery Branch
Pre - construction conditions in proximity to Photo Station 8
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 8
Looking Upstream
F -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Dye Branch II Draft
Project No. 92255
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 9
Looking Upstream
F -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
October 2011