20051877 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20120109

ME-
. ' =�
•;i. ;:�- ...ti• }r." .i L- :,;n�S_': '_ ''� \• tiles,.�. '.\r : .� �.i �t,:£�, tin; ;� �:.�, _ J- •
.•�,. rt, .. pit 'i.. ^.':Y�'�7,:�
��� = }- -i=�':r t. "_,r�=' • ''^'_ - 2. ;�•' :'� i�. - . -'t.. '"y 't''�� "fir';; '; �."
..i' ^„•;o;n Ys! �. +'rfti.;:.4,.;ti Syi t`•::;i: :; �' •" ahi. �,.: ,5.i' .�. '.y -"=�• - ,+:y," .e,
j� j• EiL'nvyr4 :�' '•.}...�; f3n,:;s\��_ .: �� a�.�`a�• ,. • -� , ._.y .� y,
•ail -•- 7#:T;�Y.L�..Av atiY —_,. `l •' • "r _ .�s. %�. .�'�i. _
:1 INK
Ji
XI
:,�.r•�T��a t cy,1.: -. `. ti.`. .yi_ Marv, - ' ,� .• v.
d
- lY_\•f,•`.� -•�Tc4 T'•1r 5,r+x' "r•:i:iw� .�Y"�'Y?" •�s � •(+ ,1• i,
_�: �_•,3'aY -•� 'k` (.,''.b� �y_: � �.t::i• •,1:. f.� !i 53.��.c 'r .' �i r ,
mm
�:: .i.,: ryi •i;_a;i� 1F`,1 p i, r ''.`f�U '. ?C�,� \•'. y. .

r- Ll
13
l�
�I
L
Monitoring Firm
,.E QUIN
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTATI ®N & DESIGN
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
828 - 253 -6856
Protect Contact Win Taylor
Email win@equinoxenvironmental com

li
J
Ili
i
WC
20
30
Dye Branch II Stream Restoration
2011 Monitoring Report (MY 1)
Table of Contents
Executive Summary / Project Abstract
Methodology
References
c
Page 1
Page 3
Page 4

L_I
0
0
1
0
0
LI
0
J
�I
�j
Appendix A Pr,
Figure 1
Table 1 a
Table lb
Table 2
Table 3
Appendices
)ject Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Vicinity Map and Directions
Project Components
Component Summations
Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Contacts
Table 4 Project Attributes
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photo Station Photos
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Cross - Sections with Annual Overlays and Photos
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table 10a Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table IOb Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic
Containment Parameter Distributions)
Table 1 la Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters — Cross - Sections)
Table 11 b Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E Hydrologic Data
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 3 Dye BranchWater Level Logger Chart
Figure 4 Precipitation for Mooresville, North Carolina

r1
U
U
U
ri
0
1
1
�i
10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The goals and objectives stated in the Dye Branch Stream Restoration Plan (NCEEP 2005) are as
follows
Provide a stable system of stream channels that neither aggrade nor degrade while
maintaining dimension, pattern, and profile with the capacity to transport the watershed's
water and sediment load,
Improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat by reducing sediment and waste
inputs into the stream caused by bank erosion, mass - wasting, and stormwater runoff
through stabilization of the stream channel and implementation of a stormwater wetland,
and
• Improve the overall viability of the riparian vegetative communities through
establishment of native species and elimination of invasive exotic species
Between the baseline monitoring and monitoring year 1 (MY]) vegetation plot data collection
efforts, two monitoring plots were impacted during the stream repair efforts in the summer of
2011 In VP7 a significant number of planted stems were damaged and VP8 was completely
destroyed Additionally, based on the MY vegetation plot data from plots 1 through 7 the
project is not on track to meet the established criterion for planted stem density, which is a
minimum survival of 320 planted stems per acre at the end of the year three monitoring period
Average stem density for planted stems in MY is approximately 272 stems per acre Of the 76
planted stems recorded within VP1 — VP7 in MYO, 38% were reported as dead or missing in
MY 1 Of the seven remaining plots, four plots ( -57 %) will not meet the year three interim
success criteria numbers per acre These include VP 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7, which had 202, 243, 202,
162, and 283 stems per acre, respectively However, when planted and natural stems are
combined, the average stem density is 619 stems per acre, which is above the minimum
established criterion Problems with vegetation consist of approximately 29 currently isolated
patches of high threat invasive plant species that span the project extent
Stream longitudinal profiles within the Cemetery Branch reach have remained stable among
monitoring years The primary stream issues observed during MY along Dye Branch include
structure degradation, bank erosion, and bed aggradation The water level logger recorded three
bankfull events during MY 1
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment
and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in
the tables and figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan
documents available on EEP's website All raw data supporting tables and figures in the
appendices is available from EEP upon request
Ll Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
rl
I
L
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

1
I
2 0 Methodology J
,
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in MY1 were intended to replicate those
employed during the previous monitoring year and are based on standard guidance and
procedures documents (Rosgen 1996 and USACE 2003) Vegetation monitoring data were U
collected following the standard CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Level II (Lee et
al 2008)
D
0
l
1
it
i
1
1
1
1
Dye Branch II Final 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc O
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
1

r -�
1
1
ii
�1
�f
�r t
U
Fi
Ll
U
LJ
i�
1
�J
3 0 References
Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4 2
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program) October 2005 Dye Branch Stream
Restoration Plan Town of Mooresville Iredell County, North Carolina Raleigh,
NC
Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied River Morphology Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa
Springs, CO
USACE (U S Army Corps of Engineers) 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines USACOE,
USEPA, NCWRC, NCDENR -DWQ Wilmington District
Dye Branch 11 Final
- Project No 92255
Monitoring Year I of 5
3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

l �
�I
' Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
J
�3
0
F1
I�
n

The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of
j j �ie•^'��r` ` '. r'1;':: the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) and is
- - - I - - - encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by -
9;
r _ land under private ownership. Accessing the site may require traversing
areas near or along the easement boundary and therefor access by the
general public is not permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state
(( and federal agencies or their designees/contractors involved in the
•• __- - 4.- -- - - -- -' �'.-.> development, oversight and stewardship of the restoration site is
permitted within the terms and timeframes of their defined roles. Any
a F l`` ,.,; intended site visitation or activity by any person outside of these
_ previously sanctioned roles and activities requires prior coordination with
EEP.
'r 115 h+ {
v i 150
r
1 L
li k - /ylv�i; ran,
r
Dye Branch II 15 f
Stream Restoration Site '?
it r
t, ►� ` �jr `;,,. , fyA j 115 ` t I � :,r �.
--J ! £ ',r " � � r -• + _. ,Ij- it ,. + '1
tip. ^ ��e 1,, , ; � ^�•- �i 9 � ',� i + r4
r r
u. R• i �l I t
ceaeN AreanaN, � uaVre
c-WY Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
r
CNwxY heoyN
Dye &ash II IIaNYy
�Y 6Yae0a Stream RearonVnn Sib
c "Y Dye Branch II EQUINOX P
4. ,NVI RONNENTAI. S S�V
` T - ar"em&t
`� y Stream Restoration Site °•� ••• °�•
PROGRAM
•Cwnry 7< , Cabrru
�Nnr Project No. 92255 N
Directions: From Raleigh, proceed west on 1-40 towards 0 0.5 1 2
Statesville. Take Exit 152 A (1 -77S) towards Charlotte. Miles
Proceed on I -77S to Exit 36 (NC -150) towards Mooresville. lredell County, North Carolina
From NC -150 turn slight right onto McLelland Avenue/NC -152
for approximately 1.2 miles. The site is located on the west 7.5 Minute Series Mooresville
side of McUlland Avenue/NC -152. August 2011 Quadrangle

C
L
I
Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Intorrnatton unavailable
Non A IMabie
Table
is Project Components
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration
Level
Stream
(H)
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
D
Branch II /Pro ct No 92255
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
Project
July 2010
Rtvenne
Non Rivenne
Footage
Temr)orary S &E mix applied
N/A
Summer 2010
Restoration
3 685
Existing
Restoration
N/A
Feb 2011
Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monrtorin - Baseline
Buffer
Enhancement
Year 1 Monitonng
Component or
00
Year 2 Monrtorin
Approach
or
Stationing
Enhancement I
BMP Elements
Comment
Reach ID
Feet/Acres
Level
Acreage
Enhancement 11
Acres
Creation
Now
SHEM
00
Cemetery Branch
9681£
R
P3
10141f
0 +00 10+14
00
Stormwater wetlands
Dye Branch
HQ Preservation
0
00
00
Upstream
1 772 If
R
P2
1 500 if
0+00 15+40
Stormwater wetlands
Dye Branch
F3,685
0
0
0
0
3
Downstream
1 1 2321f
R
P2
1 171 If
16+00 27 +71
Intorrnatton unavailable
Non A IMabie
Non A
Table 2 Project Activity &Reporting History
wDyeilpranchlH, / PLro ect No 9.2255
Table lb Component Summations
D, a Branch II /Pro ect No 9.2.255
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration
Level
Stream
(H)
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Non -
Riparian
Ac
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
N/A
July 2010
Rtvenne
Non Rivenne
101111111111, 41
Temr)orary S &E mix applied
N/A
Summer 2010
Restoration
3 685
00
00
N/A
Feb 2011
Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monrtorin - Baseline
March 2011
Enhancement
Year 1 Monitonng
00
00
Year 2 Monrtorin
doom
Enhancement I
xi "10
Year 4 Monrtorin
Year 5 Monrtorin
Enhancement 11
0
Creation
Now
00
00
Preservation
0
00
00
HQ Preservation
0
00
00
00
00
Totals
F3,685
0
0
0
0
3
Non A
Table 2 Project Activity &Reporting History
wDyeilpranchlH, / PLro ect No 9.2255
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
-
Oct 2005
Final Dest - Construction Plans
-
Aril 2006
Final Dest - Repair Plans
N/A
July 2010
Construction Repairs
N/A
Dec 2010
Temr)orary S &E mix applied
N/A
Summer 2010
Permanent seed mix apphed
N/A
Summer 2010
Plant=
N/A
Feb 2011
Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monrtorin - Baseline
March 2011
Aujz 2011
Year 1 Monitonng
Nov 2011
Jan 2012
Year 2 Monrtorin
Year 3 Monrtorin
Year 4 Monrtorin
Year 5 Monrtorin
Intormation unavailable
N/A Item does not apply
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
A 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

Appendix A
!11
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables 0
Table 3
Project Contacts
e Branch
II /Pro ect No 912255
Designer
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
6750 Tryon Road
Cary NC 27518
Primary Project Design POC
Emmett Perdue [phone]
Construction Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P O Box 28749
Raleigh NC 27611
Construction Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky [phone]
Planting Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P O Box 28749
Raleigh NC 27611
Planting Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky [phone]
Seeding Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P O Box 28749
Raleigh NC 27611
Seeding Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky [phone]
Seed M ix Sources
Hanes Geo Components
Winston Salem NC 27101
Nursery Stock Suppliers
North Carolina Forest Service
Goldsboro NC 27530
Monitoring Performers (YO) - 2010
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design Inc
37 Haywood Street Suite 100
Asheville North Carolina 28801
Stream M omtonng POC
Wm Taylor [phone]
Vegetation Momtonng POC
Win Taylor [phone]
Monitoring Performers (Y1) - 2011
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design Inc
37 Haywood Street Suite 100
Asheville North Carolina 28801
Stream M onrtonng POC
Wm Taylor [phone]
Vegetation Monrtonng POC
Win Taylor [phone]
Monitoring Performers (Y2) - 2012
Stream M onrtonng POC
Vegetation MonitonngPOC
Monitoring Performers (Y3) - 2013
Stream MomtonngPOC
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Monitoring Performers (Y4) - 2014
Stream M omtonng POC
Vegetation MomtonngPOC
Monitoring Performers (Y5) - 2015
Stream M omtonng POC
Vegetation M omtonng POC
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year I of 5
A 3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012
l-J,
1
0
0
0
0
U
1
0
1
0

i 1
LI
�l
LI
F-1
L1
i
0
Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 4
D e Branch
Protect Attributes
II / P,ro ct No 92255
Project County
Iredell
Ph sio ra hic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Southern Outer Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin Pee Dee
USGS HUC
03040105010010
NCDWQ Sub Basin
03 07 11
Within Extent ofEEP Watershed Plan
Upper Roc
River Local Watershed Plan
W RC Class
Warm
% of Project Easement Fenced or Demarcated
1000/0
BeaverActivity Observed During Design Phase
No
Restoration Component Attributes
Dye Branch
Cemetery Branch
Drainage Area (sq mi
0 6
0 06
Stream Order
Fast / Second
First
Restored Length feet
2 671
1 014
Perennial or Internment
Perennial
Perennial
Watershed Type
Urban
Watershed LULC Distribution
Urban
Other
85%
15%
Watershed Impervious Cover
NCDW Q AU /IndexNumber
13 172
NCDWQ Classification
C
303d Listed
Yes
Upstream of 303d Listed Segment
Yes
Reasons for 303d Listing orStressor
Poor Bioclassification
Total Acreage of Easement
12 0
Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement
12 0
Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration
89
Ros en Class ification of Pre Existing
E4 /G4c
EA
Ros gen Classification of As Built
C
C
Valley Type
Valley Sloe
0 0097 / 0 0125
00217
Valley Side Slope Range
Valley Toe Slope Range
Cowardm Classification
N/A
N/A
Trout Waters Designation
No
No
Species of Concern Endangered Etc
None
Dominant Sod Series and Characteristics
Series
Depth
Clay%
K
T
Chewacla / Cecil / Colfax
Information unavailable
N/A Item does not apply
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year i of 5
A 4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

ii
r-
�_ I
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
�j
r

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch II Final B 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
1 Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
V
Number
Footage Adjusted /
2 Degradation EVdence of downcutting
0
Number
Total
Number of
Amount of
/ Stable
with
txth for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stale
Number m
Unstable
Unstable
Per
Stabilizing
Stabilizing Stabilizing
Category
Sub - Category
Performing
As built
Segments
Footage
as intended
Woody
Woody Woody
Condition
2 Len h appropriate ( >30 / of centerlme distance between tail of
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation Vegetation
1 Bed
15
l Aegadation Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
0
0
100/
1 Thalweg centering at up stream of meander bend (Run)
Dye Branch II Final B 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
1 Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
V
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Degradation EVdence of downcutting
0
0
100/
2 Riffle Condition
I Texture/Substrate Riffle maintains coarser substrate
14
14
100/
I Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth Z 1 6)
14
15
93/
3 Meander Pool
Condition
2 Len h appropriate ( >30 / of centerlme distance between tail of
upstream nfte and head of downstream nffle)
15
15
100/
1 Thalweg centering at up stream of meander bend (Run)
15
15
100/
4 Thalweg Position
2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
14
14
100 /
2 Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
1 Scoured /Eroding
and/or scour and erosion
0
0
100/
N/A
N/A N/A
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear
0
0
100/
N/A
N/A N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100/
N/A
N/A N/A
Totals
0
0
]00/
N/A
N/A N/A
3 Engineered
1 Overall tntegnty
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
32
32
100/
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
28
28
100 /
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or anru
28
28
100/
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures event of influence does NOT
4
4
NO/
exceed 15 /
Pool fomung structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth Mean
4 Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio ? 1 6 Rootwad0ogs providing some cover at
13
13
100 /
base flow
N/A Item does not apply
Dye Branch II Final B 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
N/A item aces not appiy
Dye Branch lI Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year I of 5
B 3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012
Table 5 Visual ' ohoh logy Stabitlty
Assessme5
ISor'
-Dye
Branch Usessed
I,e th 1 00
feet
Number Footage Adjusted /
Number
Total
Number of Amount of / Stable with with for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable
Number in
Unstable Unstable Performing Stabiltzing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Category
Sub-Category
Perfornung
As built
Segments Footage as Intended Woody Woody Woody
as Intended
Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1 Bed
1 AMadatlon Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
4
183 88/
1 Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
2 Degradation Evidence of downcuttmg
0
0 100/
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Faffle Condition
I Te#ure/Substrate Riffle maintains coarser substrate
15
17
88/
I Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth 2 1 6)
16
20
80/
3 Meander Pool
Condition
2 Length appropriate (>30/ of centerlme distance between tail of
16
20
80/
upstream riffle and head of downstream nffle)
l Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
14
17
82/
4 Thalweg Position
2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
14
l6
88/
2 Bank '1
Scoured /Erochng
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
6
212 93/
0 0 93/
and/or scour and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2 Undercut
hkely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear
0
0 100/
N/A N/A N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slump mg, calving, or collapse
0
0 100/
N/A N/A N/A
Totals
6
212 93/
N/A N/A N/A
3 Engineered
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
27
30
90/
Structures
+
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
7
7
100/
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
6
7
86/
87/
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
20
23
exceed 15 /
Pool funning strictures maintaining Max Pool Depth Mean
4 Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio ? 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing sonic cover at
5
5
100 /
base flow
N/A item aces not appiy
Dye Branch lI Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year I of 5
B 3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
� ; � � � ss Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assess rnent:; ,r i r °
n
Branch II / Project No 92255 - DyerB'ranch - Downstream r
_Y
w
d Assessed Le ngth 1,171 feet—,
Number
Footage
Adjusted /
Nu
Total
Number of
Amount of
/ Stable
with
with
for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Sub - Category
Performing
As built
Segments
Footage
as intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Apgradation Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
f "^ B a " 14,
i r
1 Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
g
2
85
93/
(Riffle and Run Units)
e zt� ry
w
2 Devadation Evidence of downcuttuiy
0
0
100/
V
2 lb le Condition
1 Texture/Substrate Riffle maintains coarser substrate
1 I
I1
� 4� �"`i tr �.
100/
V
t
3 Meander Pool
1 Depth Sufficient (M ax Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth z 1 6)
10
10
100/
Condition
2 Length appropriate (>30/ of centerline distance between tad of
upstream time and head of downstream nffle)
10
10
���
i
X ��
e ° V
100/
1 Thalwegcemermg at upstream of meander bend (Run)
9
10
90/
i'` �
a r
4 Thalweg Position
*'k �,:
'pb+t�,�l`l�
90/
2 Thalwegcentering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
9
10
s
i ,
.,�`.
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resultmg simply from poor growth
_ `sq r
}' 7 @°
3
146
94/
0
0
94/
and/or scour and erosion
4 r 1 "fix
Banks undercut /overhangingto the extent that mass wasting appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear
.�? -�'� ? V g
0
0
100/
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
`
t
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
%
0
0
100/
N/A
N/A
N/A
se
zlyil w - Total
3
146
94/
N/A
N/A
N/A
Strueturesred
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
22
22f�zy
r C
100/
>• v ° "' �p
`rL
r P
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
8
8
t
100/
g
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
5
8
63/
.a
t , -
Y�
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3 Bank Protection
exceed l5 /
12
14
tr > '
86/
d
iF
Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth Mean
4 Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio? 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
5
5
�e i'
100/
base -flow
'- iieiil a fi Ui appy
Dye Branch II Final B 4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
n Assessment11
No 92255
IDMveghanoni,6576
);leafed Acre e 9 0
Number of
Combined
% of
Vegetation Category Defimtions
CCPV Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Planted
Acre e
I Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
N/A
0
0
0/0
2 Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on M Y3
N/A
0
0
0/0
4 or 5 stem count criteria
Totalr
0
0
0/
3 Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small N/A
0
0
0/0
given the monitoring year
Cnmulati—wIT_otale
0
0
0/
Easement Acrea a 12 01
% of
Vegetation Category
Defimtions
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combined
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4 Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
Cross Hatch
29
244
20/o
(Red Dense/Yellow Present)
5 Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at at map scale)
1
003
02/o
Orange Dots White Background
N/A item noes not appiy
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
B 5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station I
Looking Downstream
B -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Looking Upstream
Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Looking Downstream
Dye Branch II Final B -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year I of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking Downstream
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 4
Looking Upstream
B -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 5
Looking Upstream
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6
Looking Upstream
Dye Branch II Final B -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 7
Looking Downstream
Dye Branch - Permanent Photo Station 8
Looking Upstream
Dye Branch II Final B -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year I of 5
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 9
Looking Upstream
B -11 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Dye Branch II /Pro' ct No. 92255
Vegetation Plot
ID
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1
No
29%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
No
5
No
6
No
7
No
C -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Monitoring Year 1 — September 22, 2011
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Monitoring Year 1 — September 22, 2011
C -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot-3
Monitoring Year 1 — September 22, 2011
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
Monitoring Year 1 — September 22, 2011
C -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
Monitoring Year 1 — September 22, 2011
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
Monitoring Year 1 — September 22, 2011
C -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
Monitoring Year 1 — September 22, 2011
C -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Dye Branch II / Project No 92255
Report Prepared By
W ilham Carson
Date Prepared
9/29/2011 15 40
Database Name
Equinox 2011 B DyeBranch mdb
Database Location
\ \FILESERVER \shared \ES \NRI &M \EEP Monitorng \Dye Branch \DB -MYI 2011 \Data \Veg
Computer Name
D16TNK71
File Size
151068928
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file the report worksheets and a summary ofproject(s) and project
data
Protect Planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre for each year This excludes live
stakes
Protect Total Stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre for each year This includes live stakes
all planted sterns and all naturaUvolunteer sterns
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems dead stems missing etc )
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Species
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems
impacted by each
Damage by Species
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Steins by Plot and Species
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot dead and
missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and Species
A mat nxofthe count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers
combined) for each plot dead and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT S UMMARY
Project Code
92255
Project Name
Dye Branch
Description
River Basin
Yadkin Pee Dee
Length(ft)
Stream•to-Fdge Width (ft)
Area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
7
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
C 6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 9 planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Dye Branch 11 Project No 92255
��000���0000
©o���00000
©oom
®
®m
oo
©mmmoom
©omo
©000
®vv
®mm�mmm
000000000
o
©©
©000
©v
©vvo
©vo
©0000m
®mmmm
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
C 7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

I�
LI
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
J
( l

Appendix D
840
839
838
837
a�
w
C
0 836
v
W
835
834
833
832
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch
Cross - Section 1 - Pool
Station 1 + 04.27
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 -t MY16/13/2011 - - -- Bkf
Dye Branch lI Final D -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section I — Pool
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 13, 2011
Dye Branch 1I Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 1 — Pool
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 —June 13, 2011
D -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

nppcndis I)
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 1 — Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 13, 2011
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 1 — Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 1— June 13, 2011
Dye Branch II Final D -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
830
829
828
d 827
w
C
O
CC
826
W
825
824
823
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch
Cross - Section 2 - Riffle
Station 1 + 04.27
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 —E-- MY 16/13/2011 – – – - Bkf
Dye Branch 11 Final D -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design. Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 —June 13, 2011
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 13, 2011
D -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 13, 2011
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 13, 2011
Dye Branch II Final D -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
824
823
a�
822
w
C
O
ee
a�
W 821
820
819
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch
Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
Station 8 + 77.10
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 t MY16/13/2011 - -- Bkf
Dye Branch 11 Final D -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2011
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appcndi\ I)
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 —June 13, 2011
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 13, 2011
D -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 13, 2011
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 13, 2011
Dye Branch II Final D -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
829
828
827
826
d
w 825
c
0
> 824
as
W
823
822
821
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross - Section 4 - Riffle
Station 1 + 15.75
820 1I I I I I I I i i F I I 4
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70
Station (feet)
As- built5 /10/2011 tMY16 /13/2011 - - --Bkf
Dye Branch 11 Final D -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year I of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 13, 2011
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 —June 13, 2011
D -I 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 13, 2011
Dye Branch I1 Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 13, 2011
D -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
822
821
820
819
as
w 818
c
0
> 817
d
W
816
815
814
813
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross - Section 5 - Pool
Station 7 + 74.58
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40
Station (feet)
As-built 5/11/2011 — WMY16/14/2011 - -- Bkf
0+45 0+50
Dye Branch 11 Final D -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 —June 14, 2011
D -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 1 —June 14, 2011
D -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
821
820
819
818
817
a�
816
c
0
815
a�
W
814
813
812
811
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross - Section 6 - Riffle
Station 10 + 75.57
810 1 I I I I I I I I E 1 I I I I I
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80 0 +85
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 t MY 16/14/2011 - -- Bkf
Dye Branch 11 Final D -16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
D -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
D -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
819
818
817
816
815
w
w
e
0 814
ca
as
W 813
812
811
810
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross - Section 7 - Riffle
Station 13+ 85.87
809 1 i i I I F I I I I I 1 I I
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 – w— MY0 6/14/2011 – – – - Bkf
Dye Branch 11 Final D -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix 1)
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
D -20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year I of 5
Dye Branch Upstream — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
D -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
815
814
813
812
a�
811
w
C
810
W 809
808
807
806
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Downstream
Cross - Section 8 - Riffle
Station 17 + 27.43
805 1�
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80 0 +85
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 t MY1 6/14/2011 - -- Bkf
Dye Branch 11 Final D -22 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 —June 14, 2011
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
Dye Branch II Final D -23 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year I of 5

Appenclix 1)
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 1 —June 14, 2011
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 8 Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
D -24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
812
811
810
809
808
a�
��. 807
C
O
806
6J
W
805
804
803
802
801
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Downstream
Cross - Section 9 - Pool
Station 19 + 80.80
Dye Branch It Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year I of 5
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 t MY1 6/14/2011 - -- Bkf
D -25 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Downstream— Cross - Section 9 — Pool
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
Dye Branch Downstream— Cross - Section 9 — Pool
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 —June 14, 2011
Dye Branch II Final D -26 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Downstream— Cross - Section 9 — Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 1 —June 14, 2011
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year I of 5
Dye Branch Downstream— Cross - Section 9 — Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
D -27 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
810
809
808
807
806
805
a�
804
C
O
803
Q
W 802
801
800
799
798
797
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Downstream
Cross - Section 10 - Riffle
Station 24 + 85.22
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year I of 5
0 +05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 --a— MY1 6/14/2011 – – – - Bkf
D -28 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 1 —June 14, 2011
D -29 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
Dye Branch R Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of S
Dye Branch Downstream — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 1 — June 14, 2011
D -30 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2012

Appendix D
840
839
838
837
836
835
834
833
832
831
830
a�
829
828
e�
827
a
W 826
825
824
823
822
821
820
819
818
817
816
815
Stream Survey Data
Cemetary Branch
Longitudinal Profile
0 +00 to 9 +89.93
O ! 1 .,? Q S 6 > 8 9 -1p
�o �o �o �o X&o �o �o �o �o �o 'bo
Station (feet)
TW- MY012/6/2010 TW MY16 /13/2011 WS BKF o Structure
Dye Branch 11 Final D -31 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
826
825
824
823
822
821
820
819
818
a�
w
c 817
y
CO
816
w
815
814
813
812
811
810
809
808
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Upstream
Longitudinal Profile
0 +30.36 to 15 +03.3
I
•
1
1
Average $ankfull Slop
--------- -__
___
At
--------------------
-- -- -- - - -- --
--
•
•
-- - - - - --
•
•
•
1
1
r------------
1
O)9
0
Station (feet)
TW- MY012/6/2010 TW- MY16/14/2011 WS • BKF o Structure
'619
Dye Branch II Final D -32 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
810
809
808
807
806
805
w 804
a
0
y
803
W
802
801
800
799
798
797
xS0
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Downstream
Longitudinal Profile
16 +52.72 to 25 +34.71
�O
!8
so
l9�0 200
2!
�O
12
�O
Station (feet)
TW- MY012 /6 /2010 TW -MY16 /15/2011 WS BKF o Structure
1�
xS0
ly
'PO
1S
O
Dye Branch II Final D -33 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

f)
I[]
0
i
�i
l'
r
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II / Project No 92255
Cemetery Branch - Cross - Section 1- Pool
Pebble Count Summary
D50
M onng Year 1
Descnption
Matenal
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdUclay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
025
0
0%
0%
medium sand
050
4
4%
4%
coarse sand
100
4
4%
8%
very coarse sand
200
26
26%
34%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
8
8%
42%
fine gravel
57
9
9%
51%
fine gravel
80
9
9%
60%
medium gravel
113
10
100/0
70%
medium gravel
160
15
15%
85%
coarse gravel
223
7
7%
92%
coarse gravel
32
5
5%
97%
very coarse gravel
45
3
3%
1000/0
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
1000/0
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
1000/0
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
S Data
D50
57
D84
16
D95
28
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
D 34 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2012

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
p o �
r }
e �
c d
� t
Cemetery Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 1 Pool
100/
at ti
1
90/
v t a
80/
O
a
� L
t
F
7
1
70/
L
u
G
60 / G
C
u
50/
06.
40/ a
m
E
301
U
20 /
10/
O
N
e7 Y O O O
0/
O
O
O O
Particle Size (mm)
N Q
9
m
— MYl 6/13/2011
Cemetery Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 1 Pool
41
45/
40 /
35/
301
0
>
25/
a
20/ c
d
V
L
a
1S/
10/
5/
0/
N Y1 V)
O •�
V1 .w N 7
O
b 00
`O N N V) Q O 00 O �O
R b O, N 00 to
N N Q 00 10
'O
O
Y
O
en h O O
O
a
f>a
Particle Size (mm)
m MYl 6/13/2011
p o �
r }
e �
c d
� t
Dye Branch II Final D 35 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
I l Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
I
at ti
1
v t a
� L
7
1
Dye Branch II Final D 35 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
I l Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
I

f�
t
I
IJ
r
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II / Protect No 92255
Cemetery Branch - Cross - Section 2 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
M itonng Year 1
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdUclay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
025
0
0%
0%
medium sand
050
1
1%
1%
coarse sand
100
10
100/0
11%
very coarse sand
200
27
27%
38%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
3
3%
41%
fine gravel
5 7
3
3%
44%
fine gravel
80
5
5%
49%
mednun gravel
113
6
6%
55%
medium gravel
160
13
13%
68%
coarse gravel
22 3
5
5%
73%
coarse gravel
32
3
3%
76%
very coarse gravel
45
2
2%
78%
very coarse gravel
64
6
6%
84%
Cobble
small cobble
90
8
8%
92%
medium cobble
128
7
7%
99%
large cobble
180
1
1%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0° /U
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
1000/.
TOTALS I
1 100
100%
100%
S Data
D50
84
D84
64
D95
100
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
D 36 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2012

I
t�
r
a
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II Final D 37 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Cemetery Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 2 Riffle
t
100/
�
90/
80/
a
m
�
r
70/ F
a
G
60/ [%
O
V
u
v.
40/
t
m
301
}
U
1
20/
q
10/
�
0/
`O N O
� �• N en Q `O T 00 N V �
Q O�
Particle Size (mm)
m
—•— MY1 6/13/2011
Cemetery Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 2 Riffle
45/
40/
L
a
35/
c
30/
�
'O
25/ a
c
q
O
` e
20/
�
u
v.
_
15/
I
to/
4
L T
{
r
E
i
5/
t
A
s
t
q b
0/
V
Oa
Particle Size (mm)
m MY1 6/13/2011
Dye Branch II Final D 37 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II / Project No 92255
Cemetery Branch - Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Mo ormg Year 1
Descnption
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Sdt/Clay
sift/clay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
3
3%
3%
fine sand
025
0
0%
3%
medium sand
050
1
1%
4%
coarse sand
1 00
2
2%
6%
very coarse sand
200
37
37%
43%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
3
3%
46%
fine gravel
57
4
4%
50%
fine gravel
80
8
8%
58%
medium gravel
113
1
1%
59%
medium gravel
160
7
7%
66%
coarse juavel
223
4
4%
70%
coarse gravel
32
3
3%
73%
very coarse gravel
45
7
7%
80%
very coarse gravel
64
14
14%
94%
Cobble
small cobble
90
4
4%
98%
medium cobble
128
2
2%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100° /a
TOTALS1
100
100%
1000/0
S Data
D50
6
D84
50
D95
70
Dye Branch 11 Final D 38 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

i
1
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch I[ Final D 39 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Cemetery Branch
a
v
� r 5
;
!
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
r �
1
r
Cross Section 3 Riffle
c � 3
r
_
r
t
too/
-
r
90/
t
80/
a
c
m
.0
70/ F
L
T
`t
e
60 / G%
V
c
1
50/
i
>
40/
L
ra
E
A f
301
i
e
U
20/
10/
0/
O O
N
Q 9
d
m
Particle Size (mm)
— MYl 6/13/2011
Cemetery Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 3 Riffle
45/
40/
35/
301 m
0
t
25/
9
C
.t
20/ o
V
L
d
0+
15/
10/
5/
0/
N M M h .ti
N O b 00 `O N N V1 O 00 O �O N N
10 M LO
N
00
V
�D Y
C, u
d
W
Particle Size (mm)
® MYl 6/13/2011
Dye Branch I[ Final D 39 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
1
a
v
� r 5
;
!
4
r �
1
r
vA r l
c � 3
r
_
r
Dye Branch I[ Final D 39 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
1
�
-
t
-
r
t
c
L
T
`t
V
{
1
ry
A f
i
Dye Branch I[ Final D 39 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II / Project No 92255
Dye Branch - Upstream - Cross - Section 4 - R><81e
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Mo oring Year 1
Descnption
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Sdt/Clay
stldc lay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
025
0
0%
0%
medium sand
050
22
22%
22%
coarse sand
100
24
24%
46%
very coarse sand
200
13
13%
59%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
3
3%
62%
fine gravel
57
6
6%
68%
fine gravel
80
7
7%
75%
medium gravel
113
1
1%
76%
medium gravel
160
9
9%
85%
coarse gravel
223
0
0%
85%
coarse gravel
32
0
0%
85%
very coarse gravel
45
2
2%
87%
very coarse gravel
64
7
7%
94%
Cobble
small cobble
90
5
5%
990/0
medium cobble
128
1
1%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
1000/0
TOTALS1
100
100%
1 1000/0
Summ ary Data
D50
1 2
D84
15
D95
69
Dye Branch 11 Final D 40 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II Final D 41 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream
n
k
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 4 Riffle
Y
T
i t
r
y
100/
r � r
90/
80/
a
i
F
70/
e
r
60/
e
u
u
d
i
>
40/
m
r
30/ E
--
c
U
20/
10/
O
N MI
h O
O O
0/
O
Particle Size (mm)
.NOi
d
m
—r MYl 6/13/2011
Dye Branch Upstream
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 4 Riffle
45/
Y M1
t �
�
40/
7+v
35/
30 /
_
9
25 /
G
e
20 /
u u
d
15/ a
10/
5/
0/
to to Vi
10 C,
V1 O
N M
0O
0
N
to
N
Particle Size (mm)
e MY13/201
Dye Branch II Final D 41 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
n
k
+
Y
T
i t
r
y
Dye Branch II Final D 41 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II / Project No 92255
Dye Branch - Upstream - Cross - Section 5 - Pool
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Mo oring Year l
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Sdt/Clay
siWctay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
025
0
0%
0%
medium sand
050
4
4%
4%
coarse sand
100
12
12%
16%
very coarse sand
200
24
24%
40%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
4
4%
44%
fine gravel
57
6
6%
50%
fine gravel
80
18
18%
68%
medium gravel
113
18
18%
86%
medium gravel
160
11
11%
97%
coarse gravel
223
0
0%
97%
coarse gravel
32
2
2%
990/0
very coarse gravel
45
0
0%
990/0
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
990/0
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
990/0
medium cobble
128
1
1%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very lar e boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
1000/0
TOTALS
1
100
100%
1000/0
S Data
D50
6
D84
11
D95
15
Dye Branch If Final D 42 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 5 Pool
too/
90/
80/
a
a
r 1
N
�O O
O
1 O O `t
4 n t .r k + " - VN r O
� c � Y � �" a' � ., , s � ' T ;
L "
b i } �N
� � r
d � e .p - ^, S c r ±3,t 'i 1
v t 1 � " M a
" � t ' � t r � S F s ,s i de � 1 � f 3 a ;
r J d
W � � r N � �� a >` � !
4 r � d ''.� 4 d � '� � � . �ro 4 t �
�R
y � r r
6 �' � `1 a �7 r t , a n A x 4� tr � �w .
f 4 i Y l = �
x C� J
s l i � � i � � i . 5 k
I � d ° ) k1 6 � k o- 1°i t �C�'�,'
`} ' � i* M N M i ! � ." # 7l7
r y" rw
jt � � vk B + � ” 7 •� �
� '? 1l � r g � .
Y � m 6
, .�� .$ s . ti �
t 4 �.i%"a� " 5 3° � � I . ' M�'{-0
- w � 3
�� < , ^
� � . ; 'i.h � r p L �x . t,`.+ h �
' ,��a� l . Y� •N ti {1 I � � W N .V �.
� �� q� f
K .. , `b .{t � � t a e 3N # � . j i y! lS � �
# r c f '� � � ' O .� 0 + � i
�• bf �P e j^� MJ }„°l� i �f i d's Hi *�b � . ^ � ]� ^♦9 _ „i�y ui �N h ra � f �4 a 'ce+t
+i ,h
; �a ' �) . ,
�+D ^ a�, aa ' w5 , �t.� eT - t � Z X �i' � i J y .°
�µ.
cj k� f F a�^
a4? � S - 1
E
X
'� '' eiry ° •C "ih.' ' «
4 �
' X
O t 1r .M i
N .O f
N O a
"N O `
D � +
� h O O 3
r
+ `
� g r� � " -'� � F'� � i e- C C t
Q 'ti � �a ' n �i' .` �� „t r t � � d{ 1 t � S $ K i Y �
G ` ( 2 � ¢ � -'$t « - ' '. � t t "� ,''�'# � t i� .3 � . rn . 9 . � t � ` c
�
�
°
� '.'A �a ,a A � ' A " -4 ' r � Y et n J � 3k nr � k
a
�
-��
,
Y
a
i
a .3 A �
Q ��
8
� ' {,� .� 11t
^
f
D i Y r. �. a4�
,
b M #{` r r '.� r 4
N K
�
t U O �G�4 J
k
✓ �S t�� � iYC ¢�Y J
Y
Dye Branch II Final D 43 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
r 1
O t 1r .M i
N .O f
N O a
"N O `
D � +
� h O O 3
r
+ `
� g r� � " -'� � F'� � i e- C C t
Q 'ti � �a ' n �i' .` �� „t r t � � d{ 1 t � S $ K i Y �
G ` ( 2 � ¢ � -'$t « - ' '. � t t "� ,''�'# � t i� .3 � . rn . 9 . � t � ` c
�
�
°
� '.'A �a ,a A � ' A " -4 ' r � Y et n J � 3k nr � k
a
�
-��
,
Y
a
i
a .3 A �
Q ��
8
� ' {,� .� 11t
^
f
D i Y r. �. a4�
,
b M #{` r r '.� r 4
N K
�
t U O �G�4 J
k
✓ �S t�� � iYC ¢�Y J
Y
Dye Branch II Final D 43 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Dye Branch II Final D 43 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

i
Appendix D
i
it
I�
I
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II / Project No 92255
Dye Branch - Upstream - Cross - Section 6 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
M omg Year 1
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Sdt/Clay
sdUclay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
3
3%
3%
fine sand
025
2
2%
5%
medium sand
050
8
8%
13%
coarse sand
100
0
0%
13%
very coarse sand
200
41
41%
54%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
9
90/0
63%
fine gravel
57
16
16%
79%
fine gravel
80
9
9%
88%
medium gravel
113
4
4%
92%
medium gravel
160
3
3%
95%
coarse gravel
223
0
0%
95%
coarse gravel
32
1
1%
96%
very coarse gravel
45
0
0%
96%
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
96%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
96%
medium cobble
128
2
2%
98%
large cobble
180
1
1%
990/0
very large cobble
256
1
1%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summ ary Data
D50
19
D84
7
D95
22
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year I of 5
D 44 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

r �
I
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
}
Dye Branch Upstream
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
rf
Cross Section 6 Riffle
100/
rr
r
L
r
r PQ
4
4
+t
90/
r
r
r
80/
a
1
a
a
Z
F
A
r
70/
C
60 / t
r
O
w
�
a+
501 i
d
r
a
>
r
40/
r
m
E
301
e
U
20/
]0/
0/
O O
Particle Size (mm)
N
O
4
'm
—� MYl 6/14/2011
Dye Branch Upstream
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 6 Riffle
45/
40/
35/
301
0
9
25/
.C.
e
20/
151 4�
]0/
5/
up
0/
N Vl Vl tn
.y N �O 00 V O 00 O 10
N N
R 00
`O
Y
V1
O O
O
O
V
m
Particle Size (mm)
®MYl 6/14/2011
}
z �
rf
rr
r
L
r
r PQ
4
4
+t
r
r
r
1
a
A
r
r
w
�
r
r
}
z �
rf
rr
r
L
r
r PQ
4
4
+t
r
Dye Branch [[ Final D 45 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

i
Appendix D
i
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II / Project No 92255
Dye Branch - Upstream - Cross - Section 7 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
M onng Year 1
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdt/c lay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
025
5
5%
5%
medium sand
050
7
7%
12%
coarse sand
l 00
11
11%
23%
very coarse sand
200
24
24%
47%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
7
7%
54%
fine gravel
5 7
12
12%
66%
fine gravel
8 0
6
6%
72%
medium gravel
113
9
9%
81%
medium gravel
160
13
13%
94%
coarse gravel
22 3
4
4%
98%
coarse gravel
32
2
2%
1000/0
very coarse gravel
45
0
0%
1000/0
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
1000/0
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
1000/0
TOTALS1
100
1000/0
1 100%
S Data
D50
27
D84
12
D95
17
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
D 46 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2012

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II Final D 47 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream
4
t
(
1
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
�
+
Y
Cross Section 7 Riffle
100/
_
o
F
c
90/
m
t
s
F
70/
a_
as
e
O
50/ ►
i
>
-
k
40/
t
a
E
301
s
0
U
c
+
20 /
t
a
10/
r
0/
Particle Size (mm)
m
—r MY1 6/14/201 l
Dye Branch Upstream
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 7 Riffle
45/
40/
35/
30/
0
t
25/ >
20/ d
d
o,
15/
to/
5/
0/
N Ln to V+ .y N 10 00
`O N N VI Q O 00 O
N 00
10
V1
N
N N_
�D
t7 to
N T
O O O
V
O
V
m
Particle Size (mm)
- MYl 6/14/201 l
Dye Branch II Final D 47 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
4
t
(
1
j
1 i
�
+
Y
_
o
F
c
c
t
-
k
s
c
+
t
a
c
r
Dye Branch II Final D 47 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
t
1
j
1 i
�
Y
_
o
F
c
Dye Branch II Final D 47 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
�J
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II / Project No 92255
Dye Branch - Downstream - Cross - Section 8 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
M oring Year 1
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdUclay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
8
8%
8%
fine sand
025
8
8%
16%
medium sand
050
11
11%
27%
coarse sand
100
10
100/0
37%
very coarse sand
200
38
38%
75%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
6
- 6%
81%
fine gravel
57
9
90/0
90%
fine gravel
80
4
4%
94%
medium gravel
113
4
4%
98%
medium gravel
160
0
0%
98%
coarse gravel
223
0
0%
98%
coarse gravel
32
1
1%
990/0
very coarse gravel
45
0
0%
990/0
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
990/0
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
990/0
medium cobble
128
1
1%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
1000/0
TOTALS1
100 1
100% 1
1000/0
S Data
D50
13
D84
46
D95
87
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Momtonng Year 1 of 5
i
D 48 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2012

I I'd
L-
i
i
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
a
Dye Branch Downstream
s
L�, y
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
b
1
d
J
t
Cross Section 8 Riffle
" d
v
R t
b
� t
7
Z y f
I
�
r
k �
4
100/
r w r
T t r
t
�
90/
80/
O
W
Z
F
70/
e
60 /
e
50/
u
a
>
40/
L
as
3
30/
U
20/
lo/
0/
Particle Size (mm)
m
—+— MY 1 3/2/2011
Dye Branch Downstream
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 8 Riffle
45/
40/
35/
301
7
'O
25/
G
c
20/ d
u
u
15/ 0.
10/
5/
0/
N IA V1
1A ...i N R �O 00 `O N N 1f1 ? O 0p O
�O N N
Q QD b
Y
u
CC
Particle Size (mm)
O MY1 6/14/2011
a
s
L�, y
b
1
d
J
t
" d
v
R t
b
� t
7
Z y f
I
�
r
k �
4
r w r
T t r
t
�
a
� r
i
L�, y
v 1
c
7
Z y f
I
Dye Branch II Final D 49 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

i
Appendix D
1
.I
1
i
I'
U
0
1 I
J
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II / Protect No 92255
Dye Branch - Downstream - Cross - Section 9 - Pool
Pebble Count Summary
D50
M oring Year 1
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdUclay
0 062
2
2%
2%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
7
7%
90/0
fine sand
025
2
2%
11%
medium sand
050
30
300/.
41%
coarse sand
100
17
17%
58%
very coarse sand
200
24
24%
82%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
1
1%
83%
fine gravel
5 7
8
8%
91%
fine gravel
80
5
5%
96%
medium gravel
113
3
3%
99%
medium gravel
160
0
0%
99%
coarse gravel
22 3
0
0%
99%
coarse gravel
32
0
0%
99%
very coarse gravel
45
0
0%
990/0
very coarse gravel
64
1
1%
1000/0
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
mednun boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS1
100
100% 1
100%
Summ Data
D50
072
D84
42
D95
76
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
D 50 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

,I
i�
C
�I
i
i
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
� b +
� R
Dye Branch Downstream
.r
fst�44
�
i /•y �' � l
^
JIZv4T 3
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 9 Pool
s
t
�
�
s
I
t
y
100/
E
rs
a
i
90/
80/ a
W
Z
F
70/
i
a
u
a
L
r
60 / t
`e
50/
a
r
[
40/ >
as
r
301
U
20/
1o/
0/
O O
Particle Size (mm)
'� Q
•�
d
m
— MYI 6/14/2011
Dye Branch Downstream
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 9 Pool
45/
40 /
35/
301
0
25/
.C.
e
20/
m
15/ a
10/
5/
0/
d
Oi
Particle Size (mm)
E MY1 6/14/2011
� b +
� R
yil
.r
fst�44
�
i /•y �' � l
^
JIZv4T 3
s
t
�
�
s
I
t
y
�
E
rs
a
i
Dye Branch II Final D 51 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
s
s
�
�
s
i
a
L
r
r
[
r
Dye Branch II Final D 51 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Protect No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

1'
r_
Appendix D
t,
r
I�
r
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II / Project No 92255
Dye Branch - Downstream - Cross - Section 10 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Mo onng Year 1
Description
Material
Sin (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Sdt/Clay
sdUclay
0 062
6
6%
6%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
21
21%
27%
fine sand
025
3
3%
30%
medium sand
050
16
16%
46%
coarse sand
100
3
3%
49%
very coarse sand
200
27
27%
76%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
3
3%
79%
fine gravel
57
7
7%
86%
fine gravel
80
6
6%
92%
medium gravel
113
3
3%
95%
medium gravel
160
1
1%
96%
coarse gravel
223
3
3%
990/0
coarse gravel
32
0
0%
990/0
very coarse gravel
45
1
1%
1000/0
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medtum boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/.
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0 1
0%
1000/0
TOTALS1
100 1
100%
100%
Summ ary Data
D50
1
D84
5 3
D95
11
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
D 52 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
}
Dye Branch Downstream
i
7
1
t
}
'
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
� z
t ✓1 J
�
Cross Section 10 Riffle
5
+• k - E� c
j ,.t
ti
100/
r
a
90/
80/ o
h
t
Al i
F
70/
60/ [%
G
t
d
i
r �
50/
a
40/ i
Jr
W
4
7
�
301 5
0
U
4
20 /
�
�
1 y
1
1o/
0/
�O ^ N
O .• .• N e7 Q `O O. 00
h V �
N
Q
O�
Particle Size (mm)
m
—r MYl 6/14/2011
Dye Branch Downstream
Pebble Count Percent individual
Cross Section 10 Riffle
45/
40/
351
301
0
�o
25/ 2:
�o
C
c
20/ d
u
o.
15/
10/
5/
0/
N to to
�O N N
-n .+ N Q I'D 00 `O N N -n R O 00 O
`O N N
N
00
?
a Y
d\ u
O O
O O
N
-It �
d
m
Particle Size (mm)
E MY1 6/14/201 l
}
ra
i
7
1
t
}
'
4 {
}L
� z
t ✓1 J
�
r �
t
5
+• k - E� c
j ,.t
ti
Dye Branch II Final D 53 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
ProJectNo 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
'
r
ti
r
a
t
h
t
t
r �
4
7
�
4
�
�
1 y
1
Dye Branch II Final D 53 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
ProJectNo 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
aTsb1e110aYBasehne Stieam Data Summaiy , ap
�D a Branch H / Pro ct No 92255 - Cemete Branch 977 feet)- L
-to
Parameter
Regional Curie
Pre Ensting Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension"'g &)Sub-strat6�, Fiftte,;� ��,s
ILI
t UOJeEq
Mn
Mean
Med
Max
SD,
Na
plMn
Meani
Mcd
JiMax
SD¢
N
Nn
Mean
t1Na:
I Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
yr N ,
Bankfull Width (ft)
70
70
70
70
N/A
1
89
11 1
113
141
1 8
7
100
55
72
72
89
N/A
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
r
M e
gN y
142
142
142
142
N/A
1
190
540
160
1000
381
5
280
>30
>30
>30
20
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
10
10
1 0
1 0
N/A
1
07
09
08
16
6-3
7
07
05
07
07
08
N/A
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1 5
1 5
1 5
1 5
N/A
1
1 0
1 5
1 3
24
0 5
7
08
1 1
1 6
10
1 2
1 2
1 4
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
1 68
68
68
68
N/A
1
68
96
84
184
39
7
70
30
50
50
70
N/A
2
Width/Depth Ratio
j'°
7 2
7 2
7 2
7 2
N/A
I
1 69
112
1171
1501
NA
1 3
14 3
1031
1081
108
1 1 2
N/A
2
Entrenchment Ratio
i '-1
1 20
1 20
1 20
1 20
1 N/A
I I
1 38
1 68
1 77
1 89
1 NA
1 3
1
1 28
1
1>34
1>44
1>44
1>541
N/A
2
Bank Height Ratiol
I
I
1 1 5
1 15
1 15
1 15
1 N /Aq,
I
I 1 0
1 1 1
1 1 0
1 1 2
1 NA
1 3
1 10
1 10
1 1 0
1 10
1 10
1 10
1 10
N/A
4y�, ,p•
} r "c,.A. e6itz` t*
*-f
qd2
Riffle Length (ft)
68
234
195
539
114841
14
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
4
0 012
0 034
0 006
0 027
0 026
0 052
0 016
6
0 048
0 004
0 023
0 022
0 049
0 Al
14
Pool Length (ft)
47
82
35
193
196
328
115
6
138
207
276
58
162
169
391
717
24
Pool Max Depth (ft)
26
12120882
18
26
29
32
05
7
20
18
30
29
37
048
18
Pool Spacing(ft)
228
860
180
52 7
402
140 8
41 7
7
18 4
27 6
32 2
4 5
38 7
36 4
] 11 0
24 40
24
Pattern t 4- 1 r-A k
—, -0
4 r P M
A-, t F t"4
b
Y u
ChannLBeItWidth (ft)
g
5 3
10 8
22 6
26 0
49 1
40 0
119 0
29 8
9�
23 0
32 2
41 4
11 3
30 6
37 0
46 7
12 3w
16
Radius (ft)
3 9
19 6
37 0
5 0
23 8
22 0
48 0
14 6
9
18 4
27 6
36 8
8 3
13 7
12 0
29 9
5 7
16
Rc Ban/ft)
6.
0 6
2 8
5 3
0 6
2 1
1 8
4 3
1 3
9
1 8
2 8
3 7
2 4
2 4
2 4
2 4
N/A
1
Meand (ft)
13 6
42 0
71 0
26 0
72 9
69 0
155 0
47 6
9
46 0
55 2
64 4
38 8
77 4
79 1
167 0
36 1
11
Meaatty
MENEM
a
0 8
1 5
3 2
2 5
47
3 6
101
2 7
7
2 3
3 2
4 1
49
66
66
82
N/A
2
Trans rtParameteis
a
M"
wMinin
rT
MMN!!MMMw
,7M F
�{
MENLO "
7`
y
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb /ft'
6z
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
1
1
45 180
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m'1
I
Adldillonel Reach Parameters k
r r " I
sr
_
- r �' Y °" ` x� �`
b�""
`a "44. ffi ' t 6
e
Rosgen Classification
4+'
E4
E4 / C4 / C5
C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
66 7 8
4 1
70
5 5 67
7 e 'K 4',
ug y S $ Cv° e eez ii
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
443 528
350
128 1
384 466
_eY
Valley Length (ft)
a*r 11 * i
rid
a9'a``�
Channel ThalwegLength (ft)
F
977
Smuosity
v $ N
1 14
1 15
222
1 14
1 08
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
r
00190
00057
00130
00190
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
gk -
00191
Bankfull Floodplam Area (acres)
° 4
it ¢
s"
*kK '_ vh "-U"
/ of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
; r 7 wet a+
Biological or Other,
4 T
�u
b
mrormauon unavauame
N/A Item does not a I
Non Applicable rr,
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
D 54 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table l0a Basehne Stream Data Summary
e Branch II /Pro ct No 92255 - e BranclhU tream 1 465 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
I
I
Pre Eiiishng Condition
I
Reference Reach Data
Ur to Os tin Creek
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension &iSubetiayMRIHIe
�[J[,
E jj
L__]
Mean
Med
Maz
SD
�N�
EMi-D
Mean
Med
IMO
(SDj
"N�
Mn]
can
IM-7
LM�
Mea_n
Med
}_M-,
SD
"N�
Banl.f ill Width (ft)
112
160
185
206
20 1
25 7
284
269
327
N/A
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
89 5
672
702
728
709
769
888
544
649
586
818
N/A
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
16
1 6
16
1 7
15
1 1
13
1 3
14
N/A
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
28
1 5
1 9
24
1 5
1 8
22
22
28
25
36
N/A
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
181
202
197
229
NA
3
274
303
334
110
295
363
325
469
N/A
3
Width/Depth RatiolMIMIM
62
70
70
79
NA
3
93
114
1271
130
203
226
228
246
N/A
3
Entrenchment Ratio
= >3 2
>4 4
1 >5 0
>5 0
NA
3
3 5
3 8
44
35
3 8
44
20
23
23
25
N/A
3
Bank Height Ratio
10
+"10
1 1 2
1
1 14
1
1
1 1 0
1 1 0
1 0
1 1 0
1 10
1 1 0
1 1 0
N/A
3
Aroflle
Riffle Length (ft)
61
176
302
66
191
327 201
516
47 1
97
295
8
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0 002
0 014
0 042
0 006
0 028
0 066
0 007
0 030
0 070 0 002
0 006
0 005
0 016
0 005
8
Pool Length (ft)
®
183
35 1
629
199
38 1
68 1 876
246
224
664
13
20
Pool Max Depth (ft)
22
29
33
21
27
31 21
344
361
448
067
20
Pool Spacmg (ft)
503
789
1058
545
855
1147 24 1
668
653
125
286
19
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft) 6 6
243
569
360
670
115001
390
726
1626
285
450
484 54 1
8 34
17
Radius of Curvature (ft) 14 5
524
1488
190
490
1150
20 6
53 1
124 6
1.376
3l 3
312 396
47
14
Re Bankfull Width (ft/ft) ®� 13
47
133
10
27
62
1 0
2 7
62
2
2 3
23 23
1
Meander Wavelength (ft) 401
797
1727
330
940
1550
358
102
168 0
100 5
1300
1382 153
L18
12
Meander Width Ratio 0 6
2 2
5 1
1 9
3 6
8 1
1 9
3 6
8 1
1 7
1 9
l 9 2 1
3
Traneport�Parsmeten
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft
Max Part Size(mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
30 100
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m2
AddlttonMIReA&jh srameters
Rosgen Classification
E4
C4
C5
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
62 69
42
35
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
1122 1248
128
110
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2086
1 034
2 405
2 455
Smuosity
104
120
120
121
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
00090
00088
00080
00080
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
00083
Bankfull Floodp lain Area (acres)
/ of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
intonnation mavauanie
N/A Item doesnot apply
on A h e
Dye Branch II Final D 55 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10a.kBasetme Stream Data Summary '9 ' ` —5%
vm^+ H�E,t J f f � }w. 4 wt"i
"�5�.. ,r s f a Branch III / Pro "ct No 92255 = ch- Downstream 870efeet �'� r l t,4., .Vii. r,,, 4 r .a r 9 '
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre Eusting Conahon
7U1r
ference Reach Data
to Ostin Creek
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimensl`on &- Substrate iW-L
9IL
UL-1
Wq
Min's
Me&l
Med
tMax
SD
"+N
%nt
NUan
Med'
Max
SD,
i N
Min
r& an
Max
11Ln
Mean
Med
ima=
SDj
N„r
Bank-full Width (ft)
148
148
148
148
NA
1
160
185
206
20 1
184
186
186
188
N/A
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
3
f l
ink
220
220
220
220
NA
1
672
702
72 8
709
769
888
487
61 8
61 8
748
N/A
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
I ')
12
12
1 2
NA
1
16
1 6
1 7
15
19
20
20
20
N/A
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
?
s
24
24
24
24
NA
1
1 5
1 9
24
1 5
18
22
29
30
30
3 1
N/A
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Aiea (ft')
174
174
174
24
NA
1
274
303
334
310
340
361
36 1
381
N/A
3
Width/Depth Ratio
125
125
12 5
24
NA
1
93
114
12 7
13 0
93
96
96
99
N/A
3
Entrenchment Ratio
s E
1 5
1 5
1 5
24
NA
1
3 5
38
44
3 5
3 8
44
2 7
34
3 T
—45
N/A
3
Bank Height Ratio
.
I-
49
49
4 9
24
NA
1
10
12
14
1 0
1 0
1 0
10
1 0
10
10
N/A
3
Pro81e,z", -, -
t
+i"'
q
w In
.1' _ v
I tr a�
3" �. - r}mti.
-r �a
"t `. a Q
s� br
r
Riffle Length (ft)
s
6 1
176
302
66
191
327
15 7
503
55 7
793
202
7
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
,
0 003
0 021
0 121
0 006
0 028
0 066
0 007
0 030
0 070
0 001
0 006
0 006
0 014
0 004
7
Pool Length (ft)
29
248
120
183
35 1
629
199
38 1
68 1
101
199
159
396
891
14
Pool Max Depth (ft)
31
22
29
33
21
27
31
33
391
377
505
059
12
Pool Spacing (ft)
f
79 0
162 0
261 0
503
789
105 8
545
85 5
1147
153
575
388
130
41 5
14
Pattern^ a3'= $4 - I 3#" -
s j
-'f
t-%, w
~ ', R
% 7 �
--1
— I' _'� -" 6 g� =� , p'! ^ s
Channel Belt Width (ft)
156
306
677
3601670
1500
390
72 6
162 6
28 3
492
575
654
15 4
9
Radius of Curvature (ft)
a
110
42 1
819
190
490
1150
206
53 1
124 6
32 7
407
422
50 1
56
7
Rc Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
07
29
56
10
27
62
10
2 7
6 2
1 7
1 7
1 7
1 7
N/A
1
Meander Wavelength (ft)
"
i
620
1030
157
330
940
1550
358
102
168 0
138 9
1622
1573
2105
27 2
6
Meander Width Ratio
1 1
2 1
46
19
36
8 1
19
3 6
8 1
2 4
28
28
3 1
051
2
Tuns -ort Parameters ° 15 { 5
v
°
a . t �-
r *, t
r �r
i
��
e,
I
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb /ftz
a e' { '4
Max Part Size (nun) Mobilized at Bankfullj
30 100
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m2
I e
"�
'Af i 14'. r*
aC
sd' w
Additional Reach Parameters-, j- q
4
'rS
P
Rosgen Classification
-
', -
G4c
C4
C5
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
6 1 72
42
3 5
a t ,
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
1054 1260
128
110
_ " +�
Valley Length (ft)
c °� "t"e ft
a r i t^�"
°��
T
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
x
870
Sinuosity
-A
-ry
1 14
146
109
1 10
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
-
00110
00090
00095
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
"° "
00106
Bankfull Floodplam Area (acres)
.1�' - +
r „ y e 4e
k
/ of Reach with Eroding Banks
' ' 'iv
Channel Stabihtv or Habitat Metric
Pg
y -1
Biological or Other
„t
-r w
Information unavauawe
N/A Item doesnot a I
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
D 56 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Well Ob Baieline StresmData'S®imary
( Substrate, Bed, Bank and Hydrologic Contslament Parameter Distributions)
Branch II /Pro jec t1No 92255 Cemete Brturch 977 feet
Parameter
Pre Existing Con6hon
Reference Reach Data
Design
Moaitonng Baseline
R / /Ru/ /P/ /G/ /S/
—
— —
--
�
�
—
--
—
--
—
�®
jam
- --
—
—
— - --
--
—43/
35/
4/
42/
13/
1
=1
SC/ /Sa / /G / /C / /B / /Be°/
l�
������
�[�
�
�
dl6/D35/d50/d84/d95/d /dl( m)
09
12
20
80
101
889
021
05
35
139
266
450
l�i���j
Etrench 99/ 1s
15 15 199 2 49 50 99 10
Entrenchment Class 15 15 199 2 49 50 99 10
M
MEMEMM®MEM®ENNEN
®
®
�
Inctston Class
<12 12 149 15 199 20
IS
Inasion
12/12 149/15 199 >20
ENE
ME
EMINEE®E®ENEEMENE
MME
MEMENEEMM
MEMEMM�'iN
E
N/A It m do s aot a u h
on AppWbiel
N /Au It m do snot I
on e
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
D 57 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012
Table IOb Baseline Stream S®imary
(Substrate Bed, Bank, and Hydrologh: Containme� Parameter Distribirtlons)
e Branch II /Pro M1No 92255 Branch -U tream 465 feet
Parameter
Pre Emsting ConBtion
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
R //R / /P / /G / /S°/
®�
®—
—
— —��
�®
- --
—
—
— - --
--
—43/
28/
15/
34/
20/
3/
=1
SCI /Sa / /G / /C / /B / /Be°/
l�
dl6 /D35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /dP /d'(mm) 015
04
33
103
137
457
l�i���j
Etrench 99/ 1s
15 15 199 2 49 50 99 10
M
MEMEMM®MEM®ENNEN
®
®
�
Inctston Class
<12 12 149 15 199 20
ENE
EMINEE®E®ENEEMENE
MEMENEEMM
N /Au It m do snot I
on e
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
D 57 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012
T-F.J.'KIWORIM hue Stream, Summary
(Substrate Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Disiributlom) Dye R Branch(II !Pro et No 92235 a Braneb Downstreamt 870 feet
Parameter
Pre Existing Conclition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Waitonng Baseline
R / /Ru / /P / /G / /$°/
®—
—
— —��
- --
—
—
— —
—43/
6/
34/113/1
3/
=1
SC/ /Sa / /G / /C / /B / /Be°/
dl6/D35/d50/d84/d95/d /d' (mm) 015
028
056
107
130
457
l�i���j
Entrenr0 9 9 Class
15/15 199/2 49/50 99 >30
M
®
®
�
Incision Class
12/12 149/15 199 20
MEN
MEME
MEMENEEMM
N /Au It m do snot I
on e
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
D 57 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
p ble lla. Basehne Morphology & Hyflraullc Monitoring Summary
Dye Branch II / ,fact No 92255 - C *emetery Branch (971 Feet)
Parameter
Cross Section 1
Pool
Cross Section 2
Riffle
Cross Section 3
Rlflle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
8363
8363
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
18263
8263
8243
8243
8217
8217
8174
8174
Bankfull Width (ft)
97
102
815 5
89
106
8125
5 5
60
257
238
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
1 >50
170
1
>30
>30
1
1
>30
>30
241
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1 9
1 5
528
08
06
47 1
05
05
782
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3 1
27
14
12
1 1
10
10
14
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
189
15 2
70
63
30
28
20
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
5 0
68
112
181
103
127
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5 1
>4 9
>3 4
>2 8
>5 4
>5 0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 0
10
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10
10
10
10
Cross Sectional Area between End pins (ft)
189
152
246
70
63
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
30
28
d50 (mm)
N/A
TT
25
N/A
84
20
N/A
60
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A Item does not apply
N/A Item does not apply
Dye Branch 11 Final D 58 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Table lla. Baseline Mo phology & Hydranhc - o tom- ma Summary
Dye Branch II / P ject No 92255 -Dye Branch- Upstream,(1,47�1 Feet)
Parameter
Cross Section 4
Riffle
Cross Section 5
Pool
Cross Section 6
Riffle
Cross Section 7
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
8243
8243
1
8174
8174
815 5
815 5
8125
8125
Bankfull Width (ft)
257
238
171
170
327
287
269
241
Floodprone Width (ft)
586
528
50
47 1
81 8
782
544
526
Bankf ill Mean Depth (ft)
13
1 1
17
14
14
13
1 1
10
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
25
20
34
28
36
32
22
20
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
325
27 1
288
237
469
375
295
242
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
203
209,
102
122
228
220
246
240
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
23
2 2
29
28
25
27
20
22
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
l 0
10
1 0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ftZ)
325
27 1
288
237
469
375
295
242
d50 (mm)
N/A
1 2
N/A
6 0
1 1
1
1 N/A
19
N/A
2 7
N/A Item does not apply
Dye Branch 11 Final D 58 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 11 Basehne Morphology & Hydranhc MQomtoring Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No 92255 -Dye Branch - Downstream (869 Feet)
Parameter
Cross Section 8
Rt81e
Cross Section 9
Pool
Cross Section 10
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
8093
8093
806 1
8061
801 1
801 l
Bankfull Width (ft)
188
188
263
263
184
18 5
Floodprone Width (ft)
748
1 73 5
1
1
>70
>70
487
476
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
20
1 9
1 8
17
1 9
16
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3 1
30
35
35
29
24
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
38 1
35 9
484
436
340
295
Bankf ill Width/Depth Ratio
93
99
143
159
99
117
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
40
39
>2 7
>2 7
27
26
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
10
10
10
10
1 0
10
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft')
38 1
35 9
484
436
34 0
295
4
d50 (mm)
N/A
1 3
N/A
072
N/A
1 0
F-1
N/A Item does not apply
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
D 59 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012
O• �� O OO O O O O� OO OO OO rO� O OO O O� OO OO O O J

L - - _ — ( —D C-_ _
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
R: RRn / R. R. I P P "I 4 U do S 9 p
X YI CI / M S d G G, I / C C bbl B Bo I& / Ik && :
P m , hxd In dp Ip W .
Dye Branch 11 Final D 60 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
... .:...
®®®
m®®
00000000000000f�00000�000000000
�
m
®
®m
®
®000000000000000000�0
©0000000001
.:.
mmmmm00000000000000000000000000�0000
_:
m
®
®mmm00000
©oo
©000000000000000000000
_.,.-
mmomm
©0000000000000000000
©0000000000
I:
®
mm®
mommm
®mommmmmommmmmommmmmommmmmo
`.
000000mmmmm0mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
. : :: :::
o000000t�0000mmmmmommmmmommmmmommmmmo
R: RRn / R. R. I P P "I 4 U do S 9 p
X YI CI / M S d G G, I / C C bbl B Bo I& / Ik && :
P m , hxd In dp Ip W .
Dye Branch 11 Final D 60 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
RLf /R Z/P PY'I /G Gl do 5 9 P
C 91 CI /$4 Wd /G Gr 1/C C bbl /B Bad& /Bc B.& k
P _ , bsd fB dpo IP" -
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No 92255
Momtonng Year 1 of 5
D 61 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012
1
®®®
�m�OD�OD000D
©DD
©OD�O�OODO
©�m�E�
©DD
:'
mmmm�00000000
©0000
©0000
©o
©0000
©00000
®®
�®
�
®0000000
©o
©oo
©000000
©000000000©
'
Ommm®©
��O
<�1�0000
©
©
©�0�
®E�Om000�DODOO�I�
RLf /R Z/P PY'I /G Gl do 5 9 P
C 91 CI /$4 Wd /G Gr 1/C C bbl /B Bad& /Bc B.& k
P _ , bsd fB dpo IP" -
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No 92255
Momtonng Year 1 of 5
D 61 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
January 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
IL^RLC /Bu W /P PY11 /G U&/% 9p
SC �I 0 M % d/G C I/C C bH /B B. We /Bc B.& 1
P a g b—d (B d p I p MI
Dye Branch II Final D 62 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
r 1
1
1 L'
FT
•I
. � �
m
®
®
®�am
®mm�©
11111 ■lllll■_lllll■11111■_lllll■
11111■
11111■
11111 ♦_________l__lllll■1111■11111♦
••
��������®
111`•
--••'-
111111111■
11111111
11111■
11111111
11111111
11111111
11111111
111111111
11111■
11111♦
111111■
11111■
11111■
11111♦
11111■
11111■
11111♦
11111♦
11111■
11111 ■1111111111111■11111♦11111■
•'
•
®m
®�
®11(1♦1�1�00��1�1
"'1�
©�00
�'
�001J
1�1�''
�0
����0'
��
• ::, I
mmmm®
oo
©o00000000000000000�000000000
- -
m�®®®
oo
r�0000000000000000000r�oo
©oo�oo
-., .
mmmmm
©00000000
©0000000000�0000000000
•�
mmm®®
om
®
®�mommmmmommmmm
©mmmmmommmm�o
000�oom
®
®m
®ommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�m
00000001�0000mmmmmr�mmmmm
©�����o�����o
IL^RLC /Bu W /P PY11 /G U&/% 9p
SC �I 0 M % d/G C I/C C bH /B B. We /Bc B.& 1
P a g b—d (B d p I p MI
Dye Branch II Final D 62 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

if
'I
Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

I�
J
d
10
J
J
J
I1 1
L. J
I
J
1

Appendix E
I
e
�I
l-
1
Ali
I
Ta° b1e ls2 Vet, capon of B n cffl
Df a Branc
Events
2255
Date ofOccurrence
Method
Feet Above Average
Bankfidl Elevation
7/8/2011
Water level logger
107
9/21/2011
Water level logger
114
9/24/2011
j Water level logger j
0 52
I + Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year I of 5
+
�I
Hydrologic Data
E 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2012

Appendix E
5
45
4
35
3
25
2
15
1
05
0
Hydrologic Data
Figure 3 Dye Branch Water Level Logger Chart
r 2 2
� ?oro bolo olr orr orr
9�2) /roll S�2) /2orr
6 /j6i ,/26i 8 /jS� 9/�9 to /2Yi r,�2Si
roll roll 2011 Corr tor' loll
Dye Branch II Final E 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
H
E
Hi •, Y �
Y i
4
[ i 53 t 1 t `"' r� 4-z �a"Y '~ 'L`�M1� " y., A ii
t
,a1'F 2 a x �a�w ar
+.,P}�' l r 4
�h•�
,n.
µ
`4
ryT 1Y
�� .yam y '� ♦ } y S �v ?,.'2 � kU
..S � # i '� r §¢v d
�r .� +8i � R
4
�
�
- ,y. � s- .., 4F Y 3 10- 'x z' °" -, � 'Y�y- ..., .. a•. -
AverageBanldul12 8 Feet
,- .. „ ,�, � n ; ✓
�d<a .. ,y, w "� i
�tw � � > �
V
XH,
� "'s
J r`✓ r r { �Y.,
s� 4 x �y °� ?� a *. �
'�` '% � � r ./,,..7}
.�w
`` � t t..c�r "'k,�����
ell
{ �' r' x�^ Y' f .� �"' ��+-
4yf� d!- _'
,.
,•-i
k�y�
.'�
'Y y�I. �lrA
a i
21,
�' • �a4 '�"; �' ii 't
P
4y r . .. -y
x{
°.-'
'r
P'�.�
�-•• �d
'� T
ht y, y,++ .n� r,� ^p
@ y�
3;
y f mkt Y4 iw 'p� .�.
h
#
4 <jr T y 3fn
1" T�
*g
�4 .�,
'k ._ &- � ! i
7
<
5,�
A. 1 tN cil. m F )
�^ t
mss`
i Cj
e P ,a
a 1+ F
of .Fw
� w �
W-&,-7z
rti, Fi k"`
u.. 1 d U Y
`� " t
y J� 1 ..
8-
r 2 2
� ?oro bolo olr orr orr
9�2) /roll S�2) /2orr
6 /j6i ,/26i 8 /jS� 9/�9 to /2Yi r,�2Si
roll roll 2011 Corr tor' loll
Dye Branch II Final E 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix E
4
35
3
25
2
1�1
ICI
15
1
05
Hydrologic Data
Figure 3 Precipitation for Mooresville, North Carolina
k
7
v L
d
r
t
R
i
^
5 `-
i
c
^
x
r
r �
z�
-�p 8-11 -9D
! ! ��j0 910
!! !!
NC CRONOS (North Carolina Climate Retrieval and Observations Network of the Southeast Database) State Climate Office of North Carolina Version 2 7 2
Mooresville 1 9 SSE (NC IR 1) http //www nc climate ncsu edu/cronos/ Accessed November 2011
Dye Branch II Final E 3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 92255 January 2012
Monitoring Year 1 of 5