20051680 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20110224

J
r �l
i
i 1
Roquist Wetland
EEP Project # 312
Monitoring Firm
K C I
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Protect Contact Adam Speller
Email adam spoler(aikci com
KCI Protect No 12071067C_RO10
Design Firm
HSMM of North Carolina, Inc
3333 Regency Parkway, Suite 120
Cary, NC 27518
KCI Associates ojNorth Carohno
2010 MY03

I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT 3
20 METHODOLOGY 4
30 REFERENCES 4
Appendix A — Protect Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
6
Table la
Project Restoration Components
7
Table lb
Project Component Summations
7
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
8
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
9
Table 4
Project Attribute Table
10
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2
Current Condition Plan View
12
Table 5
Vegetation Condition Assessment
17
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
18
Appendix C — Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 6
Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
24
Table 7
CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
25
Table 8
CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
26
Appendix D — Hydrologic Data
Monthly Rainfall Data 28
Precipitation and Water Level Plots 29
Table 9 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Table 41
Roquist Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2010 MY03

\ J
1
\ _J
CJ
U
0
O
0
C
t�
U
�J
CJ
l
� J
C %'
C-)
10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) restored and preserved wetlands and
preserved streams at the Roquist Wetland Site in Bertie County, North Carolina The 3,926 acre site is
located within the USGS 8 -digit HUC 03010107 of the Roanoke River Basin The project restored 45 2
acres of wetland and preserved an additional 3,776 acres of wetland and 3,660 linear feet of stream
channel Project construction was completed in 2008 The project objectives are listed below _
Project Objectives
• Restoration of 45 2 acres of previously ditched and filled non - riparian wetlands
• Preservation of 3,366 acres of non -npanan wetlands
• Preservation of 390 acres of high quality non -npanan wetlands
• Preservation of 20 acres of riparian wetlands
• Preservation of 3,660 linear feet of stream channel
i
The restored wetlands were planted with fifteen different species of bare root trees and shrubs Baseline
vegetation monitoring was delayed until the end of the first growing season Ten vegetation monitoring
plots were established during the first monitoring year, following the CVS -EEP protocol Because of this,
the data reported in the Roquist Wetland Restoration Site Phase I Mitigation Report is first -year
monitoring data and not baseline data as would typically be found in the baseline report The third year of
monitoring found a site average of 113 planted stems /acre Nine plots had less than 320 planted
stems/acre, which is the third year monitoring success criterion and eight of the plots had planted stem
densities less than the five year success criterion of 260 stems /acre The site s average stem density
including volunteers is 550 stems /acre, with seven of the ten vegetation plots having densities less than
260 stems/acre There are plans to supplementally plant the site with additional trees before the 2011
growing season The first year of monitoring also reported that wild hogs significantly damaged the
planted vegetation, resulting in increased mortality
To monitor wetland hydrology, 12 gauges were established Seven of these gauges (2 3b 5 9, 11 b, 14
and 15) were installed in restored wetlands The remaining five gauges (1, 4, 6, 13, and 12) are reference
gauges that were installed in existing wetlands, and are paired with a gauge in an adjacent restoration
area Two of the restoration gauges (14 and 15) are not paired with reference gauges During the third
growing season, all of the restoration gauges met the success criteria of having saturated soil conditions
occurring within 12 inches of the ground surface for a minimum of 12 5% (29 consecutive days) of the
231 -day growing season (March 22 to November 8) during average climatic conditions, or having the
hydropenod in the restoration areas be within 20% of the corresponding reference hydropenod during
drought conditions The daily rainfall data obtained from a local weather station shows that the area had
average rainfall during the 2010 growing season
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on the ESP's website All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon request
Roquist Wetland 3 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2010 W03

2 0 METHODOLOGY
Level 2 of the CVS -EEP protocol (http //cvs bio unc edu/methods htm) was used to collect vegetation
data from the Roquist Site this year, the third year of monitoring
3 0 REFERENCES
Lee, M T, R K Peet S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2006 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4 0 (httu //cvs bio unc edu/methods htm)
Weakley A S 2006 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia Georgia, and Surrounding Areas
(http / /www herbarium unc edu/FloraArchtves /WeakleyFlora 2006 -Jan pdf)
e
Roquist Wetland 4 KCI Associates oJNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2010 MY03
�1
1

r `
� J
CJ
\ J
J
/ J
f J
C �
r�
\ J
1i \
\ J
J
� J
J
Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Roquist Wetland
EEP Project # 311
5
KCl Associates of North Carolina
1010 MY03

HERTFORD
y i p y i
HALIFAX ? _ e e t ° IJ
1 y
CHOWAN
MARTIN WASHINGTON e" A i o Ra
Y ✓' i +' 0 3
Sryi�it�teRd{ F r K
�''
2
7-0, J, k
—s�
gorchR
�a T r oil
�� F S i F,� 4 a
�Levmston Woodville
Jack Branch Rd� rya, .r ti as
'�Qt t 3 .y 4 a z `�d 4 �yo*•Q .[' p' a 5 E fk
'i+a _c %
0 —1, *v a
�,.
0
BERTIE"
{ COUNTY
a V,
4 �w k
X" V, th
a t F�e1d RU"...
9 q
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Project Property Boundary
Mayor Roads
SOME&�
— Other Roads s lmmmmb�
tem �a
d �n �Inh t Mayor Rivers 1 0 5 0 l KCI
® Cities and Towns Miles

\ J
r
1 i
1� \
\ J
J1
CJ
C
0
(0
0
0
r 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
� J
\
/\ l
f
�J
J
l
� J
Table la Project Restoration Components
Project Number and Name 312 - Ro mst Wetland
Stream 1
Riparian
Wedand Ac
Non -Riper
Ac
Upland
Ac
Buffer
Ac
BMP
rf
e h.�.�z 6 1. 5 P
Rtvenne
�
C R
Restoration
\
Enhancement
Enhancement I
O
�.
Enhancement II
Creation
�e
J
tw
C Q
V
V OD
O
O
0
O
R
20
Project Component
40
w ci
y
j
C
j Q
MIT Totals
732
Comment
Non Riparian Restored
0
0
Restored wetland hydrology and
00
R
452
1 1
452
Wetlands
planted native trees and shrubs
Riparian Preserved Wetlands
200
P
200
5 1
4
1 In conservation easement
Non Riparian Preserved
3 366 0
P
3 366 0
5 1
6732
In conservation easement
Wetlands
Non-Riparian Preserved High
Quality Wetlands
3900
P
3900
5 1
78
In conservation easement
[Jack s Branch Stream
LJL60
P 1
3,660
1
732
In conservation easement
K Kestoration V rreservation
Table Ib. Component Summations
Project Number and Name 312 -RoquistWetland
Restoration Level
Stream 1
Riparian
Wedand Ac
Non -Riper
Ac
Upland
Ac
Buffer
Ac
BMP
rf
e h.�.�z 6 1. 5 P
Rtvenne
Non-
Rtvenne
4.� 2
f
20 3 366
390 w
20 w4fft
Restoration
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Creation
�e
Preservation
3 660
HQ Preservation
0
Totals (Feet/Acres)
3,660
20
3,801
0
0
MIT Totals
732
4
7964
0
0
a ` ;;.V Non Applicable
Roqutst Wetland
EEP Project # 312
7
KC1 Associates of North Carohna
2010 MY03

Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Number and Name 312 - Ro uist Wetland
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete 2 yr 11 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete 2 yr 11 months
Number of Reporting Years 3
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion
or Dehve
Restoration Plan
N/A
Aug 05
Final Design 90%
N/A
Jul 06
Construction
N/A
Jan 08
Permanent Seeding
N/A
Jun 08
Bare Root Planting
N/A
Jan 08
Mih at►on Plan / Record Drawings Year I Veg Monitoring Data)
Oct 08
Nov 08
Year 2 Monitonng
Oct 09
Dec 09
Year 3 Monitonng
Oct 10
Dec 10
Roquist Weiland 8 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 312 2010 MY03
1

� J
\ J
CJ
CC
C
C
LC
D
LC
O
U
C
C
C
C
�J
� 1
� J
J
�J
r'
U
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Project Number and Name 312 - Ro uist Wetland
Design Firm
HSMM of North Carolina, Inc
3333 Regency Parkway Suite 120
Cary North Carolina 27518
Contact Mr Rick Prosser
Phone [phone]
Construction Contractor
Sawyer's Land Developing Inc
275 Higgmsport Road
Belhaven North Carolina 27810
Contact Mr Len Hunt
Phone [phone]
Aggregate Supplier
Hanson Rocky Mount Quarry #017
10471 NC -97
West Rocky Mount North Carolina 27801
Phone [phone]
Seeding Contractor
Holland Landscaping Inc
953 Blackrock Road
Merry Hill North Carolina 27957
Contact Mr Randy Holland
Phone [phone]
Planting Contractor /
Emerald Forest Inc
Bare -Root Plant Supplier
4651 Black Woods Road
Chesapeake Virginia 23322
Contact Mr Peter McClintock
Phone [phone]
Bare -Root Plant Supplier
Intl Paper SC Super Tree Nursery
ni94 Highway 38 S
Blenheim South Carolina 29516
Phone 843 .)28 -3203
Survey Contractor
H C Harris Jr Engineering & Surveying P A
216 Main Street
Wmterville North Carolina 28590
Contact Mr Cliff Harris Jr
Phone [phone]
Monitoring Performers
MY -01
HSMM of North Carolina Inc
3333 Regency Parkway Suite 120
Cary North Carolina 27518
Contact Mr Rick Prosser
Phone [phone]
MV -02 - MY -03
KCI Associates of NC
Landmark Center 11 Suite 220
4601 Sic Forks Rd
Raleigh NC 27609
Contact Mr Adam Spiller
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Roquist Wetland
EEP Project # 312
9
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2010 MY03

Table 4 Project Attribute Table
Pro ect Number and Name 312 — Ro cost Wetland
Project County
Berne County
Drainage Area
214 mi
Drainage Impervious Cover Estimate %
<5%
Ph sio ra hic Region
Inner Coastal Plain
Ecore ion
Mid Atlantic Flood plains and Low Terraces
Plant Communities
Nonriverme Swamp Forest and
Nonriverme Wet Hardwood Forest
Dominant Soil Types
Leaf Sandy Loam
Reference Site ID
On Site
USGS HUC for Project and Reference
03010107
Any portion of the project segment 303d listed9
No not rated
Any portion of the project segment upstream of a 303d
listed segment?
No
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
N/A
% of Project Fenced
0%
Roquist Wetland 10 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2010 MY03

L J�
J
�J
1
C\/
J
1
J
�l
Ull
�J
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Roquist Wetland J J
EEP Project # 312
KC1 Associates of North Carolina
2010 MY03

a
/
CROP ��
CROP HEIR
-1000 -500 0 1000 2000
/
GRAPHIC SCALE
o
o'
\ I
APPROX PROPER
"Z
JACKS BRAN Ha \
REMAINING ROAD
BOUNDARY
CROP FIELD
PINE PLANTATION
�
0
1
RESTORATION AREA
�
3
1
EXIST WOOD
LINE, TYP
APPROX PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
%
REMAINING
RIJAD
R
¢2
SITE ENTRANCE
I
�
PINE PLANTATION
.�
\
1
I
acn
C
F— O i
RESTORATION
AREA
vi a N
y4I,
Indian WOOds Rd
Q
ROQUIST CREEK
g H w
I''1
S E� 2
�`
z
,.
z
z 1
PINE
PLANTATION
�/
= O
O
INDIAN CREEK
W 0�
w
,2
I
I
�'
'w
RgSTORATI
AREA
/
WETLAND RESTORATION'
M`• DEC
2000
/ ROAD REMOVED
CURRENT
_ PINE PLAMATION
CONDITION
LAN VIEW
1 Of 5
L

HALIFAX
HERTFORD
�C
BERTIE HOWAN
Got n
n n
ss
MARTIN WASHINGTON Rq
0
r
8111;1116
Lewiston Woodville
a
a
�Ra
r
� 1gdian W
0
0
a
N
BERTIE p
COUNTY
�a
C+�
Fief
2
ite Rq
T-r
0.
as�l
� JacBranch Rd \
L
Ol
Q_
a
yV/
3
Q
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Project Property Boundary N
— Major Roads W E
r-�l
— Other Roads s
H1�111 — Major Rivers 1 0.5 0 1
k t" KCI
Miles
Cities and Towns

PROJECT CONDITION DETAILS PROJECT CONDITION s
VEG PLOT ACHIEVING
VEG PLOT TOTAL /PLANTED STEM DENSITY....... 8901423
DENSITY CRITERION " " " " " " " " " "'
k
VFG PI OT RFI OW
DENSITY CRITERION " " " " " " " " " "'
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET4
WETLAND GAUGE ACHIEVING ................ e
HYDROLOGIC CRITERION
WETLAND GAUGE BELOW ................. . .
HYDROLOGIC CRITERION
""WNW
GAUGE 2
O
w
n
•
EXISTING WETLAND
Y
Qj j
VEGETATI Y
ON PLOT
D
GAUGE 4 REMAINING ROAD —I r
C7 I- 4 = w o
s U <_
CJ H O'
r .0
GAUGE I
J r
.•,D REMOVED
w
m
m
cn
VEGETATION - •
m Zo
Ez°2
_Af W p Q
GAUGE 2 Q H Q
` VEGETATION PLOT 7 W
• • 1 . • • . � Z m
Q
W
> Z Q
~ Z U '
=) w Q
0--) Q
O'LJa
w a
wW
EXISTING WETLAND mw
OUNDPXY DEC 2010
- 400'
•
PROF CURRENT
CONDITION
-200 -100 0 200 400 PLAN VIEW
GRAPHIC SCALE SHEET z of s

•
-200-100 0 200 400
GRAPHIC SCALE
�I
s�
s�-
S
N
2
O
N_
I± �
GAUGE 13
GAUGE 9 -%
Y VEGETATION PLOT 4 WETLAND RESTORATION. 1�
ROAD REMOVED
EXISTING WETLAND `"
�)
LIN
Lil
�►� ..
Lij
EXISTING WETLAND t
0
o
PROJECT CONDITION
VEG PLOT ACHIEVING
DENSITY C RTTERION ." " " " " " " " ""
VEG PLOT BELOW
DENSITY CRITERION " " "" " " " " " "'
WETLAND GAUGE ACHIEVING • • • • • . • • • • ......
e
HYDROLOGIC CRITERION
WETLAND GAUGE BELOW ...................
HYDROLOGIC CRITERION
PROJECT CONDITION
DETAILS
VEG PLOT TOTAL /PLANTED
STEM DENSITY ................. 8901423
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW

Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Project Number and Name 312 - Rogmst Wetland
PlantedAcrea a 45 2 Easement Acreage 3 926
CCPV
Numberof
Combined
Vegetation CategorV
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
%of Planted Acreage
1 Bare 4reas
Very (muted cover of both woody
0 1 acres
Pattern and
0
000
00%
and herbaceous material
Color
2 Low Stem Density
Woody stem densities clearly below
Pattern and
Areas
target levels based on MY3 4 or 5
0 1 acres
Color
0
4520
1000%
stem count criteria
t�ra5��1
-1
s c � Total
r 0�
X45 20 ;,-' -
W
j kJ' is 1000%j, A,,'
3 Areas of Poor
Areas with woody stems of a size
Pattern and
Growth Rates or Vigor
class that are obviously small given
0 25 acres
Color
0
000
00%
the monitoring year
p
ueJ2'rs,Zn ` 4-lt1 ` s a1",�� �'�4 CumulativeaTotal
' ts"0 qI"
-I 4520'x°'
r� '"�. �r� 11000 % lip�k
4 Invasive Areas of
Areas or pomts (if too small to
Pattern and
C11o��ncerr�n�[.
Irender a polygons at map scale)
1000 S,tFpy
Color-
0
0 00
y /
g
yy�y00%
� �y[ �t
'1�.- uki unr'7 - 1.58's 2' i1F
5 Easement
Areas or points (it too small to
Pattern and
Encroachment Areas
render as polygons at map scale)
none
Color
0
0 00
0 0%
Roquist Weiland
EEP Pt oject # 312
J
17
KC/ Associates ojNoi th Cai ohna
2010 MY03
01 0 ,-- ��, �, U— 0 �J �-J J , � U LJ O

j
ITT Y-1

m
~
' .

Plot 5 Photo — 10/28/10 - MY 03
Plot 6 Photo — 10/28/10 - MY 03
Roquist Wetland 20 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 312 2010 - MY03

Plot 7 Photo — 10/28/10 - MY 03
Plot 8 Photo — 10/28/ 10 - MY 03
Roquist Wetland 21 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 4 312 2010 - W03

Plot 9 Photo — 10/28/10 - MY 03
Plot 10 Photo — 10/28/10 - MY 03
Roquist Wetland 22 KCl Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 312 2010 - MY03

u
CJ
0
�J
i
_J
1F \
J
�J
.J
\ J
� J
�J
Roquist Wetland
EEP Project # 312
Appendix C
Vegetation Assessment Data
23
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2010 MY03

Roquist Wetland
EEP Pr4lect # 312
Table 6 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Project Number and Name 312 - Rogwst Wetland
Vegetation Plot ID
Monitoring Year 03 Planted
Stem Density( stems /acre)
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met' (320
planted stems /acre after
MY03
1
81
No
2
364
Yes
3
0
No
4
0
No
5
0
No
6
0
No
7
283
No
8
40
No
9
162
No
10
202
No
24 KC1 Associates offorth Carolina
2010 MY03
l

C
C-)
0
J
O
O
�1
� 11
r N
�J
� 1
Cl
�l
i
C-1
i
�J
i 1
�1
L
�J
U
Table 7 CVS Vegetation Plot Nletadata
Project Number and Name 312-RoquistWetland
Report Prepared By
Adam S filer
Date Prepared
12/28/2010 1154
database name
KCI 2010 -A mdb
database location
M \200712071067 2007 EEP OPEN END \Ve database
computer name
12 CSPVOM 1
file size
150630656
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS
IN THIS DOCUNIDVT
Nktadata
Description of database file the report worksheets and a summary ofprglect(s) and
project data
Prol, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre for each year This excludes
live stakes
Prod, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre for each year This includes
live stakes all planted stems and all natural/volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems dead stem
missing etc)
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
Last of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matnxof the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot dead
and missing stems ale excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matnxof the count oftotal living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined) for each plot dead and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
312
project Name
Ro utst Wetland
Description
Wetland Restoration Site in Bertie County NC
River Basin
Roanoke
length(ft)
N/A
stream-to-edge vadth ft
N/A
areas m
35 000
Required Plots calculate
10
Sam edPlots
10
Roquist Wetland
EEP Project # 311
KCI Associates of North Carolina
1010 MY03

'Table 1 Stem Count by Plot and Species
Project 1 and Roquist Welland
Current
Plot Data I I
Scientific Name
Common Name
M.
l�ii�lIIIIII�
l�3i�lIIlIly>•
1*29 QNIM
IIIIM
�iiMl
IUM
�tii�lIIIIILT•
trii�lIIIIIY�
�ii�lIIIIII:I•
�ii�lIIIIIP�
�ii�llIli[I)•
�u \•/ttidli[I]1♦
�u \•i><i�lIl➢]7
�u \•f[iZIIlI3�
mom
kyrRUMMO-1 =151,
_ 1 1 1
---
-��
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-��
-��
-
©©
Stem counl
size (ACRES)
Species ' '
Stems per ACRE
r
mm©
W©w
www
=WW
www
www
www
MM©MMM
www
www
www
www
Mmm
www
ww®
www
www
www
wmw
MM
M
MMM
wmw
wmw
ww=
mmm
r LJ — riantea Live MaKe items
r -an — rlantea Stems I otal (witn Live Makes)
I — I otal (Planted Including Live Stakes and Volunteers)
Roqutst Wetland 26 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 4 312 2010 MY03

Appendix D
Hydrologic Data
27

18
16
14
12
°10
w
c
8
6
4
2
0
Roquist 30 -70 Percentile Graph 2009 -2010
Lewiston - Woodville, NC Monthly Rainfall
rn C�
0 o
C�
q
rn rn
o 0
rn a� rn
0 0 0
ON rn rn ON o 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
^
O °
c
a � c c O
n z Q
Z o
Date
02009 Rainfall
r---1 2010 Rainfall 30th Percentile
70th Percentile

Roquist MY03
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #1 (Reference for Gauge #2)
10
5
0
-5
c
s -10
a
0
-15
y
3
-20
0
L
v
-25
-30
-35
-40
6
5
4
y
3
v
2
1
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N
�O -- vl f� n : �O
�O .••
h
vi O �!1
M
O V� O� M
N
00 M 00 N [�
N N N
Z
7 Q
Date
t� Rainfall
t Depth
- Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface

Roquist MY03
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #2
10
E
0
-5
C
a -10
D
L
3 -15
C
3
L -20
N
-25
-30
-35
Begin Growing Season
3/22/2010
E
d Growing Season
11/8/2010
85 Days
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
� �O .• y1 � r �
-- �O .=
vi O h
N
O � O� M 00 M 00 N n
•-• -- M d'
vl kn
10 r-
n cc
Date
t;• Rainfall
Depth -
Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface
Gauge
Malfunction
Will
6
5
4
m
m
3 tV
J'
0
N
-40
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
� �O .• y1 � r �
-- �O .=
vi O h
N
O � O� M 00 M 00 N n
•-• -- M d'
vl kn
10 r-
n cc
Date
t;• Rainfall
Depth -
Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface

10
W
0
-5
s
n.
p -10
L
d
-15
0
0
V
-20
-25
-30
-35
0
0
N
Roquist MY03
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #3b
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
3/22/2010 11/8/2010 '
i
Y 3
40 Days
- — --
39 Days 19 Days
0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 o O o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
00
N M � Vl v1 �O �O n C` 00 00 O, ON
Date
Rainfall t Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
N N N N
M 00 C`
N N
O O
Gol
5
4
X
m
m
v
3 fl
s
0
2
0

Roquist MY03
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #4 (Reference for Gauge #3b)
to
5
0
-5
S
a
d
-10
3
4 -15
0
L
-20
-25
-30
-35
6
5
4
m
3
s
0
2
1
0
0 o O o O o o O
o 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0
0 0 o O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
0
N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
\ �D v'1 N [� � �O
�O -•
h O �ry
O R O� M
00
M DD N r
�• ••• N M
h Vl
�O r-
n 00 00 C,
O\+
O O
Date
t� Rainfall
--r-- Depth
- Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface

Roquist MY03
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #5
10
5
0
�. -5
r
w
a
d
O
d -10
3
e
c -15
N
-20
-25
-30
Begin Growing Season Ei d Growing Season
3/22/2010 11/8/2010
0
51 Days 30 Da s
43 Days
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
, -->11 F--->
17 Day
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N
� ^
Vl a f` � �
^ M ZZ M ^
� �O
n
V1 O h
M
O � T M
m N
00 r-
00 M 00 N r
N N N
-- •-- N en V'
vl Vl
�O r`
r- 00 00 as
C� O O
^ ^ ^ ^
Date
Rainfall
- Depth
-Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface
6
5
4
70
m_
0
m
3 O
7
-35
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N
� ^
Vl a f` � �
^ M ZZ M ^
� �O
n
V1 O h
M
O � T M
m N
00 r-
00 M 00 N r
N N N
-- •-- N en V'
vl Vl
�O r`
r- 00 00 as
C� O O
^ ^ ^ ^
Date
Rainfall
- Depth
-Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface

10
5
0
-5
C
a -10
d
D
6
3 -15
C
7
-20
V
-25
-30
-35
-40
0
0
N
Roquist MY03
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #6 (Reference for Gauge #5)
Begin Growing Season
3/22/2010
I
I1
End
Orowing Season
11/8/2010
i
0 0
106 Days
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0
N N N
42 Days
0 0
N N
N M
Vl kn
�D
r
00 00
Date
Rainfall
t Depth
Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0
N
0 0
N N
N M
Vl kn
�D
r
00 00
Date
Rainfall
t Depth
Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N
M N M 00 N N
6
5
4
m
5'
m
3
A
S
7
�.s
EA
0

111A
5
0
g -5
r
a
p -10
L
d
�r
W
b -15
t:
0
L
V -20
-25
-30
51610
-40
Roquist MY03
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #9
0 0 o O o 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
o O o 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0 0
N N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N
�O ^ h N [� .•• �D
� �O
.-• h O v1
O � O� M
00 M 00 N n
•-• •� N M
h
h �O ID [-
[- 00 00 ON
ON O O
^ ^ ^ ^
Date
l� Rainfall
Depth
- Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface
6
5
4
z
i7
7
!v
3 =
v
S
,7
2
0

10
5
0
e
a
-5
d
O
L
W -10
3
V -15
-20
-25
-30
Roquist MY03
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #13 (Reference for Gauge #9)
6
5
4
m
7
m
3 D
0
-35 t A' POOL I I L L .Y_ 1.& i 1 10
0 at
I I a ��.�1,in
E, I ■ ■ -NP t ' ■, L n 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
�
m r-
N
M DD M 00 N ['-
-• ••- N M
vl vi
�D �O r-
r- 00 00 O, O O
Date
Rainfall
—Depth
Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface

1/1/2010
1/16/2010
1/31/2010
2/15/2010
3/2/2010
3/17/2010
' 4/1/2010
4/16/2010
j 5/1/2010
5/16/2010
S
5/31/2010
C 6/15/2010
d �
6/30/2010
0
s 7/15/2010
7/30/2010
0 8/14/2010
6
8/29/2010
9/13/2010
9/28/2010
10/13/2010
10/28/2010
11/12/2010
11/27/2010
Groundwater Depth (in)
tr O Vi O c.n O tl� C cn O
O -- N W A s
(ul) 4adaa Ilqulea
R
'o
W
K
A
.a
o E
y
a 0
v4 W
i
C
or4
eo
r
Q
N S
N �
oC)
00
IL
co
CD
N
0
rr7
a
G7
�
N
o
d
_ G'
O�
y
O v
�y
O -- N W A s
(ul) 4adaa Ilqulea
R
'o
W
K
A
.a
o E
y
a 0
v4 W
i
C
or4
eo
r
Q

Roquist MY03
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #12 (Reference for Gauge 11b)
10
5
0
e -5
s
a
p -10
L
w
fl -15
e
0
L
V -20
-25
-30
-35
Begin Growing Season
3/22/2010 y
End rowing Season
11/8/2010
114 Days
42 Days
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0 0
N N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
4
0
N
cc
�
^
^ \ M M
M ^
O ON M
M ^ N ^
00
N
M 00 N r-
5 N z N
••• ^ N M R
Y)
V1 �O l�
r- 00 00
Ibi
L[i
Li
Date
Rainfall
6
F7
4
m
m
3 v
ON
-40
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0 0
N N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
0
N
cc
0 0 0 0
N N N N
^
^ \ M M
M ^
O ON M
M ^ N ^
00
N
M 00 N r-
5 N z N
••• ^ N M R
Y)
V1 �O l�
r- 00 00
O
Date
Rainfall
Depth
Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface

Roquist MY03
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #14
]0
5
0
-5
r
G -10
L
+r
3 -15
'C
C
O
O
(� -20
-25
-30
-35
-40
6
5
4
�J
J fD
S
2
1
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0 0
N N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0
N N N N N N N N N
�O -- V1 a � � �
� �
.-• vl O h
O � O� M 00 M 00 N r
z N 7 N g N z N
-• •• N M R
h
Vl �O �O [�
n 00 OO CN O� O O
Date
� Rainfall
Depth
- Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface

10
5
0
. -5
a
r
-10
O
L
3 -15
e
0
0
V -20
IMIN
-30
-35
-40
Roquist MY03
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #15
Begin Growing Season
- - - -- 3/22/2010
{ 48 Days
e
En Growing Season
I11/8/2010
40
6
5
4
m
3 p
A
0
1
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0
N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N
-- M �
�
� .\• N M �
vl h
� � r
[� 00 00 O� O� O O
Date
Rainfall
� Depth -
Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface

Tale 9 Wedand Hydrology Criteria Attainment Table
Protect Number and Name 312 - Roquist Wetland
Success Criteria Achieved/ Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
Gauge
(Percentage)
Year 1 (2008)
Year 2 (2009)
Year 3 (2010)
Gauge 1
Yes /90
Yes /95
Yes/ 108
(Reference for Gauge 2)
39%
41 %)
47%)
Yes /79
Yes /71
Yes/8:)
Gauge 2
32%
(31%) 0
37 /o 0
Yeso/76
Yes /44
Yes /40
Gauge 3b
(33%)
19%)
17%)
Gauge 4
Yes /79
Yes /65
Yes /46
(Reference for Gauge 3b)
34%
28%
20%)
Yes /79
Yes /69
Yes/:)I
Gauge 5
g
34 %)
30%)
22%
Gauge 6
Yes /85
Yes /73
Yes /101
(Reference for Gauge 5)
37%
32%
46%
Yes/78
Yes /67
Yes /o103
Gauge 9
(34%)
29%
(45%)
Gauge 13
Yes /98
Yes /93
Yes /108
(Reference for Gauge 9)
42%
40%)
47%)
Gauge I I b
Yes /92
Yes /73
Yes /114
40%
(32% )
(49%
Gauge 12
Yes /96
Yes /97
Yes/ 112
(Reference for Gauge 11b)
42%
42%
49%
Yeso/83
Yes/73
Yeso/51
Gauge 14
(36%)
(32%)
(22%)
Yes /76
Yes /66
Yes /48
Gauge 15
g
33%
29%
(21%
41