20051680 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20120127

:..l: °.i +'.',7w., .F7 �' •'�::: ,f ��ii�itti%�.'.t f'"��> < =�i ' �i^ ��. •:t:
"•s� _ ?i,�', S��f�l,.^:�('P' i���xr4
`
)br�+,v l';�{ 'y�•
Sry(i,TY;:f :.".,.' , !.. }i: ;1'fir'..:"::y`.;,.•..n.•
e✓ '{ 3( �'� ii'':I;M��. 4 }4 Yy ,�1`,+' 2.'���u1. +it:;:A��j�:J,'L�`I �� ^`. . `i! ;. n,.A.j,_': ;c �. „
,l.,�r;:`' %; f('��r �y ..Nt , 't�' r,.�' .r4 r' ,S r.;;:.... . , '.�3t;•ti r': �:: •� - � •
}�'�� r t j'��''f'�r w �� YTt^7 �.t' .��y ' Y ��r' ^5:'t.� .. "'�•.,. ;
R [� 3j� f'�ske 1,?tll,,�,C^� �•�. ;1 %(�;_y,..yam �.5`�' "" • ",.r...,•r .. ' � ,
'�. tt. f�r� !•_ if� r G ��`:ar fil,i;... '_ ..,, +j � f
r<4t114�if:n,•1".r. �.��+5'�.LY,�'�i, L, :. ,t !'.i /,r��et;�:!i�;j� C��'•t�'7;!�:. j \�, :. �:.i.�s:: ":;t.� __�_-

Monitoring Firm
NNOMMAhmm
K C I
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Protect Contact Adam Spiller
Email adam sviller(Mci com
KCI Project No 12071067C11011
Design Firm
HSMM of North Carolina, Inc
3333 Regency Parkway, Suite 120
Cary, NC 27518
Roquist Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011 MY04

TABLE OF CONTENTS
10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT 1
20 METHODOLOGY 2
30 REFERENCES 2
Appendix A — Project Maps and Background Tables
Figure I
Vicinity Map
4
Figure 2
Site Asset Map
5
Table la
Project Restoration Components
6
Table I
Project Component Summations
6
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
7
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
8
Table 4
Project Attribute Table
9
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3
Current Condition Plan View
11
Table 5
Vegetation Condition Assessment
16
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
17
Appendix C — Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 6
Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
23
Table 7
CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
24
Table 8
CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
25
Appendix D — Hydrologic Data
Monthly Rainfall Data 28
Precipitation and Water Level Plots 29
Table 9 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Table 41
k
Roquist Wetland KCI Associates ojNorth Carohna
EEP Project # 312 201 l MY04

10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) restored and preserved wetlands and
preserved streams at the Roquist Wetland Site in Bertie County, North Carolina The 3,920 -acre site is
located within the USGS 8 -digit HUC 03010107 of the Roanoke River Basin The project restored 36 5
acres of wetland and preserved an additional 3,781 acres of wetland and 4 000 linear feet of stream
channel Project construction was completed in 2008 The project objectives are listed below
Project Objectives
• Restoration of 36 5 acres of previously ditched and filled non - npanan wetlands
• Preservation of 3,000 acres of non - npanan wetlands
• Preservation of 759 acres of high quality non- npanan wetlands
• Preservation of 22 4 acres of riparian wetlands
• Preservation of 4,000 linear feet of stream channel
The restored wetlands were planted with fifteen different species of bare root trees and shrubs Baseline
vegetation monitoring was delayed until the end of the first growing season Ten vegetation monitoring
plots were established during the first monitoring year, following the CVS -EEP protocol Because of this,
the data reported in the Roquist Wetland Restoration Site Phase I Mitigation Report is first -year
monitoring data and not baseline data as would typically be found in the baseline report The first year of
monitoring also reported that wild hogs significantly damaged the planted vegetation, resulting in
increased mortality The fourth year of monitoring found a site average of 109 planted stems /acre Eight
of the plots had planted stem densities less than the five year success criterion of 260 stems/acre The site s
average stem density including volunteers is 712 stems /acre, with four of the ten vegetation plots having total
stem densities less than 260 stems /acre Four plots have no planted stems in them and two of those plots have
no volunteer stems either
To monitor wetland hydrology 12 gauges were established Seven of these gauges (2, 3b, 5, 9, l lb, 14,
and 15) were installed in restored wetlands The remaining five gauges (1, 4, 6, 13, and 12) are reference
gauges that were installed in existing wetlands, and are paired with a gauge in an adjacent restoration
area Two of the restoration gauges (14 and 15) are not paired with reference gauges During the fourth
growing season, all of the restoration gauges met the success criteria of having saturated soil conditions
occurring within 12 inches of the ground surface for a minimum of 12 5% (29 consecutive days) of the
231 -day growing season (March 22 to November 8) during average climatic conditions, or having the
hydropenod in the restoration areas be within 20% of the corresponding reference hydropenod during
drought conditions The daily rainfall data obtained from a local weather station shows that the area had
average rainfall during the 2011 growing season
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on the ESP's website All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon request
Roquist Wetland ] KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011 MY04

2 0 METHODOLOGY
Level 2 of the CVS -EEP protocol (http //cvs bio unc edu/methods htm) was used to collect vegetation
data from the Roquist Site this year
3 0 REFERENCES
Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts and T R Wentworth 2006 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4 0 (http //cvs bio unc edu/methods htm)
Weakley A S 2006 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia Georgia, and Surrounding Areas
(http / /www herbarium unc edu/FloraArchives /WeakleyFlora 2006 -Jan pdf)
Roqutst Welland 2 KC/Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011 MY04

Appendix A
Project Maps and Background Tables
Rognrst Wetland 3 KCI Associates of North Carohna
EEP Project # 312 2011 MY04

Burch Rd
Lewiston Woodville
d,�p
BERTIE
COUNTY
CHOWAN
HINGTO
1�" W
e
ss
Ry
�Lil- Rd
.rT
�d
shie R
� Jacanch Rd \
L
n
N
0
A
G
a
�a
6�9 Fly \d Ra 2
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Project Property Boundary
Major Roads W
— Other Roads 5
l 5 0
'.i10.
mIllt'iit —Major Rivers I
Cities and Towns Miles K C
HERTFORD
HALIFAX
BERTIE
MARTIN
I 1
Burch Rd
Lewiston Woodville
d,�p
BERTIE
COUNTY
CHOWAN
HINGTO
1�" W
e
ss
Ry
�Lil- Rd
.rT
�d
shie R
� Jacanch Rd \
L
n
N
0
A
G
a
�a
6�9 Fly \d Ra 2
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Project Property Boundary
Major Roads W
— Other Roads 5
l 5 0
'.i10.
mIllt'iit —Major Rivers I
Cities and Towns Miles K C

Table la Project Restoration Components
Project Number and Name 312 - Ro uist Wetland
365
o
y;
a0i 000
'4 l
ij.
y
Va_�
O
O
ca
cs
ea
Project Component
w w
09 ,
e `
<
224
Comment
Non Riparian Restored
Restored wetland hydrology and
00
R
365
1 1
365
Wetlands
planted native trees and shrubs
Riparian Preserved Wetlands
224
P
224
5 1
45
In conservation easement
Non Riparian Preserved
3 000 0
P
3 000 0
5 1
600
In conservation easement
Wetlands
Non Riparian Preserved High
7590
P
7590
5 1
151 8
In conservation easement
Quality Wetlands
Jack s Branch Stream
4,000 1
P
4,000
5 1
800
In conservation easement
ITable lh Component Summations
Proiect Number and Name 312 -1
storation Level [Stream
oic
storation
hancement bx
hancementI
hancement II
K Kestoration P Preservation
Est Wetland
Riparian Non -Rrpar Upland Buffer
Wetland Ac (Ac) Ac (Ac) BMP
Renne
ry
Non-
Rrvenne
365
P� `t e 1 r e-
�m�
r
'4 l
ij.
Va_�
,,,Y �
22 4
3000
�r
1
a Chi
`+ - �
224
r' o a� F
Creationy�
Preservation
t—LQO—O
HQ Preservation
I Totals (Feet/Acres)I 4,000 I 224 I 3 796 I 0 I 0 I I
NIU Totals 800 45 7883 0 0
Roqmst Wetland 6 KC/Associates of North Carohna
EEP Project # 312 2011 MY04

Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Number and Name 312 - Ro cost Wetland
—Project
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete 3 yr l i months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete 3 yr 11 months
Number of Reporting Years 4
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
N/A
Au 05
Final Design 90%
N/A
Jul 06
Construction
N/A
Jan 08
Permanent Seeding
N/A
Jun 08
Bare Root Planting
N/A
Jan 08
Plan / Record Drawings ear 1 Veg Monitoring Data
Oct 08
Nov 08
—Mitigation
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct 09
Dec 09
Year 3 Monitoring
Oct 10
Dec 10
Year 4 Monitoring
Oct 11
Dec 11
Roquist Wetland ] KC1 Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011 MY04

Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Project Number and Name 312 - Ro cost Wetland
Design Firm
HSMM of North Carolina, Inc
3333 Regency Parkway Suite 120
Cary North Carolina 27518
Contact Mr Rick Prosser
Phone [phone]
Construction Contractor
Sawyers Land Developing Inc
275 Higgmsport Road
Belhaven North Carolina 27810
Contact Mr Len Hunt
Phone [phone]
Aggregate Supplier
Hanson Rocky Mount Quarry #017
10471 NC 97
West Rocky Mount North Carolina 27801
Phone [phone]
Seeding Contractor
Holland Landscaping Inc
953 Blackrock Road
Merry Hill North Carolina 27957
Contact Mr Randy Holland
Phone [phone]
Planting Contractor /
Emerald Forest Inc
Bare -Root Plant Supplier
4651 Black Woods Road
Chesapeake Virginia 23322
Contact Mr Peter McClintock
Phone [phone]
Bare -Root Plant Supplier
Int I Paper SC Super Tree Nursery
3594 Highway 38 S
Blenheim South Carolina 29516
Phone 843 X28 3203
Survey Contractor
H C Harris Jr Engineering & Surveying P A
216 Main Street
Wmterville North Carolina 28590
Contact Mr Cliff Hams Jr
Phone [phone]
Monitoring Performers
MY -01
HSMM of North Carolina, Inc
3333 Regency Parkway Suite 120
Cary, North Carolina 27518
Contact Mr Rick Prosser
Phone [phone]
MY -02 - MY-04
KCI Associates of NC
Landmark Center II Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh NC 27609
Contact Mr Adam Spiller
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Roquist Wetland 8 KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011 MY04

Table 4 Project Attribute Table
Project Number and Name 312 — Ro uist Wetland
Project County
Bertie County
Drainage Area
214 mi
Drainage Impervious Cover Estimate %
<5%
Ph s►o ra hic Region
Inner Coastal Plain
Ecore ion
Mid Atlantic Flood lams and Low Terraces
Plant Communities
Nonnverme Swamp Forest and
Nonnverme Wet Hardwood Forest
Dominant Soil Types
Leaf Sandy Loam
Reference Site ID
On Site
USGS HUC for Project and Reference
03010107
Any portion of the project segment 303d listed?
No not rated
Any portion of the project segment upstream of a 303d
listed segment?
No
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
N/A
% of Pro ect Fenced
i 0%
Roquist Wetland 9 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011 MY04

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Rogmst Wetland ] 0 KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project 9 312 2011 MY04

-1000 -500 0 1000 2000
aEn GRAPHIC SCALE
APPROX. PROPERTY
JACKS R HO • I NG ROAD BOUNDARY, TYP.
\ � M Wi1�110N
\ \ RESTORATION AREA /
\ EXIST. WOOD
\\ UNE, TYP.
APPROX. PROPERTY \ �+
BOUNDARY -
REMAINING
�,--= ROAD Jr'"
SNEtj A j g
SITE ENTRANCE
s f
M MIWUIaN 1 �
L o >
\ RESTORATION AREA 1 rn a
maian Woods Rd ROQUIST CREEK gFw
�m
SHEET ' �+ z Z'
S z
me nunnoH xs , N 0 w
t r C1 v K
w
INDIAN CREEK * I x w
w
A I m w
RESTORAT AREA
I I WETLAND RESTORATION o
* ROAD REMOVED
awe
_ CURRENT
rw.renoN CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
xeer a s

Main
GAUGE 6 y�
o
EMSTING WETLAND
Zo
GAUGE 5 S
VEGETATION PLOT 5
a$
a GAUGE 4 REMAINING ROAD
�
1 d'
f- Q
GAUGE 1 WETLAND RESTORATION,
$ ROAD REMOVED
a f GAUGE 36 100.00 95.00 , g
$ i'f VEGETATION PLOT — ` 00.00 95.00
80.00 75.00 "?
GAUGE 2
8 500 ➢ VEGETATION PLOT 7 VEGETATION PLOT 10
VEGETATION PLOTS
EXISTING WETLAND
PO /CONSERVATION E'S -N NT
PROPERTY BOUNDARY

EXISTING WETLAND
WETLAND RESTORATION,
ROAD REMOVED
4 j 6010
SS
VEGETATION PLOT 8 . 00
ryy
r
EXISTING WETLAND
P
Z.,,T •_ 30�OA
S
ryo
EXISTING WETLAND
WETLAND RESTORATION,
ROAD REMOVED
2y.cA
15.00
8
ryo
4
O
2
O
w
W
W
2
O
�a
W
Z
O
W
a

-zoo -loo 0 zoo 400
GRAPHIC SCALE
I
2
=
�y
EXISTING WETLAND
,,
-
REMAINING -..
ol
. .
115-00 GAUGE 13
W7F
•3INi
VEGETATION WETLAND ....
•O•. REMOVED
=g
EXISTING
WETLAND
}
M
N a�
•,
a � ,�
ti
FFT
EXISTING WETLAND
o
2
O wa
�
� w
ww
m
PROJECT CONDITION
vc<+xmecwewa _ .
oewrca�renioH
CURRENT
WGKOr KLw r�raracvwr�emvsziinnaearnaawaar
Or�em carEruO„ PROJECT CONDITION
„E,w,oewcE c „iewO B DETAILS
P�AN�EOVNJ
HYDROLOW CRHEIIIOH
e IHD
ant u e,e�ow ..........................
HronaLOMIC 9YW427
cwrenioY .....
wn

EXISTING WLTLAND
scv
EXISTING WETLAND
.LSrO�
Boa' 03'
A�•u
WETLAND RESTORATION,
GAUGE 1117 ROAD REMOVED
VEGETATION PLOT 2
GAUGE 12
.e
7, So.
2ap0
%1r03
EXISTING WETLAND
REMAINING ROAD lacc
u sao0
40.00 05•o0
Y
S
GAUGE 15
VEGETATION PLOT 1
W
. D2
�e
Q
4�
n
O
Z
D
O
z
�Z
a
0
i
0
P
K
75.00

Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Project Number and Name: 312 - Roquist Wetland
PlantedAcrea a 36.5 EasementAcrea a 3,920
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Cate o
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
CCPV Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
%of Planted Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody
0.1 acres
Pattern and Color
0
0.00
o
0.0%
and herbaceous material.
Woody stem densities clearly below
Not Depicted,
2. Low Stem Density
target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5
0.1 acres
Covers a Large Part
0
25.40
69.6%
Areas
stem count criteria.
of Restoration Area
Total
0
25.40
69.6%
Areas with woody stems of a size
3. Areas of Poor
class that are obviously small given
0.25 acres
Pattern and Color
0
0.00
0.0%
Growth Rates or Vigor
the monitoring year.
Cumulative Total
0
25.40
69.6%
4. Invasive Areas of Areas or points (if too small to
1000 SF Pattern and Color
0
0.00
a
0.0%
Concern render as polygons at map scale).
5. Easement
Areas or points (if too small to
none
Pattern and Color
0
0.00
0.0%
Encroachment Areas
render as polygons at map scale).
Roquist Wetland 16 KC /Associates of orth Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011 - Mi'04

Plot I Photo — 10/20/11 - MY 04
Plot 2 Photo — 10/20/11 - MY 04
Roguist Wetland 17 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 0 312 2011 -W04

Plot 3 Photo — 10/20/11 - MY 04
Plot 4 Photo — 10/20/11 - MY 04
Roquist Wetland 18 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011 - MY04

Plot 5 Photo — 10/20/11 - MY 04
Plot 6 Photo — 10/20/11 - MY 04
Roquist Wetland 19 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011 - MY04

r �� :.a. • F���
� t.
ty,
,�� �
� - ;r�l
�� , � �
'``� ,,_
T�'
r� ..
. ,-
* � ,
`� ..
��,
F .
,k. •.
• � ' � � t
I I >>� _ � -�
l
f. �.
3 �
1 ��
�,-
:_�.

Plot 9 Photo - 10/20/11 - MY 04
Plot 10 Photo - 10/20/11 - MY 04
Roquist Wetland 21 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011 - MY04

Appendix C
Vegetation Assessment Data
Roquist Wetland 22 KCI Associates offorth Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011 MY04

Table 6 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Project Number and Name 312 - Rogmst Wetland
Vegetation Plot ID
Monitoring Year 04 Planted
Stem Density (stems /acre)
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met9 (260
planted stems /acre after
MY05
1
81
No
2
364
Yes
3
0
No
4
0
No
5
0
No
6
0
No
7
283
Yes
8
40
No
9
121
No
10
202
No
Roquist Wetland 23 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011 MY04

Table 7 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Pro ect Number and Name 312 - Ro uist Wetland
Report Prepared By
April Helms
Date Prepared
12/5/2011 9 13
database name
KCI 2011 A mdb
database location
M\2007\12071067 2007 EEP OPEN END \Ve database
computer name
112 CV76KFI
file size
159768832
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS
IN THIS DOCUMENT --- - - - - --
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and
project data
Prol, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre for each year This
excludes live stakes
Prod, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre for each year This includes
live stakes all planted stems and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems dead stems,
missm etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor b Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and
Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot dead
and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined ) for each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY ------------------------------
Pro ect Code
312
ro ect Name
Ro uist Wetland
Description
Wetland Restoration Site in Bertie Coun NC
River Basin
Roanoke
length(ft)
N/A
stream-to-edge width 11
N/A
areas m
35,000
Required Plots (calculated)
10
Sam led Plots
10
Roquist Wetland 24 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011 MY04

Table 8 CNN Planted Stem Count by Plot and S aes
Project Number and Name 312 — Roquist NNetland
Scientific Name
Common Name
������������0��
■��
■�����A��9��m
���mo
©m��m��m��■��■000��m���aoo
���m��m��m��m��■��■�����maooaoo
•
���maoo��m��m��■��■000aoo���aoo
7axodmindisti, hunt
���m��m��m��m��■��■�����m000��m
Utnityantericana
���m��m��m��m��■��■000��m��o��m
©a000moo
©oo
©oonoonooma000
©ma
©m
•
�
,r
r,
��
,r
,r
rr
,r
species count
ao
©a
©000aoo
©oonoonoo
©oo
©o
©ao
©ol
Stems per ACRE
mm�m�m
too
®oo
®oonoonmt��mm�
®
®
®���
P LS —Planted Ln a Stake Stems Pall —Planted Stems Total (with Ln a Stakes) T —Total (Planted Including Ln a Stakes and Volunteers)
Roq tll I / 25 AC/ l J4 hC 1
EEPP 1 031 Oil M104

Table 8 CVS Planted Stem Count by Plot and Specie
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
MY4 2011
MY3 2010
MY2 2009
MYl 2008
Pnol.S
P all
T
Pno1S
Pall
T
IPmiL.SIP
all
T
I Pno1S
Pall
T
Ac r rubs um
red rnaple
Tree
46
17
54
19
Iktcch a is
bacehans
Shrub Tree
4
Clcihra alni oha
coastal si&retpepperbush
Shrub
1
I
1
1
I
Uir spjios wi imana
common persurinion
Tree
36
43
fraxinui pLnnsyli anica
green ash
Tree
3
3
10
3
3
12
3
3
15
3
3
Ilea vii inica
Virgirua sweets ire
Shrub
1
1
Leucoihoc axillaeis
coastal doghobblc
Shrub
1
1
Lt uidambar stvra i ua
swretgurn
Tree
12
2
1 1
12
Nvss ibt oiu
swarrip tupelo
Tree
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
NvvAa s lvatica
black
Tree
7
7
12
7
7
7
9
9
9
12
12
Juet uis s
oak
Shrub Tree
76
76
aeicu lawifdia
laurel oak
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
a rcvs inichawrit
swam chestnut oak
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
uercus to oda
cherrybark oak
Tree
I
I
1
1
I
1
hi rnis ih llor
willowoak
Tree
2
2
4
2
2
6
2
2
1 2
3
3
uet cus i ubra
northern red oak
Tree
115
)uerctis shumaidu
Shumards oak
Shrub Tree
I
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
59
3
1 3
Hhus co ulluiuin
flan ieleaf sumac
Shrub Tree
13
5
4alix ni is
black willow
Tree
I
1
laxodium dish lawn
bald cypress
Tree
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
Ulmer anterimna
American elm
Tree
4
4
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
4
4
1 aecriitum corvnthosum
hi bush blueberry
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
5
3
3
Stem count
27
27
176
_8
28
136
33
33
225
0
39
234
size arcs
10
10
10
10
size ACRES
025
0 2�
025
025
Species count
II
Il
14
10
]0
1 13
1 12
1 1_
18
0
1 12
1 18
Stems per ACRE
1 109
1 109
17121
113
1 113
15501
134
1 134
19111
0
1 1--,8
19471
R y r II r 1 26 ACi I r J 4 rl C vt
tFrl I 31 Oil MI01

Appendix D
Hydrologic Data
Roquist Wetland 27 KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011— MY04

16
ME
12
10
c
w 8
C_
6
4
2
0
Roquist 30 -70 Percentile Graph 2010 -2011
Edenton, NC Monthly Rainfall
Date
02010 Rainfall 02011 Rainfall 0 30th Percentile —F 70th Percentile

Roquist MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #1 (Reference for Gauge #2)
10
5
0
-5
C
s -10
a
d
D
-15
m
3
V
-20
0
L
-25
-30
59Sj
Begin Growing Season
End Growing Season
13/22/2011
11/8/2011 1
Lj
1
I �
1
I
I
1
1
I
1
IP
I
I
1
87 Days i
1
0
I
1
1
I
1?
112
1
1
1
I
1
I
1
1
�
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
o
Cs
N
^
1
I
M
N
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
all
I
6
5
4
0
3
2
-40
Lj
L
0
1?
112
^
o
Cs
N
^
N
M
N
N1�
N
Date
� Rainfall t Depth - Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface

10
5
[17
5'.
C
Z
a -10
C�
3 -15
C
3
i -20
V
-25
-30
-35
-40
Roquist MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #2
' Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
3/22/2011 11/8/2011
'[ It 1L 111 40" W - tl'4 IN I it ls► I + II 141 1 11 1 It I 1 14 •114.► 1 *11 I I
6
5
4
m
o'
m
3
2
1
0
'� a a >, >, > e c on oo a a > >
r. c Q Q cn v� O O Z Z 4 ck
M N N N N
Date
Rainfall —Depth — Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface

I -Jan-11
16- Jan -11
31 -Jan -11
15- Feb -11
2 -Mar -I I
17 -Mar -I I
I1- Apr -11
70
m
w 16- Apt -11
1- May -11
16- May -11
s
31- May -11
15- Jun -11
a fD
n'
30- Jun -II
w_
d
15 -Jul -11
30 -Jul -I I
41
c 14 -Aug -1 1
a
C
29- Aug -11
13- Sep -11
28- Sep -II
13- Oct - l l
28 -Oct -1 1
12- Nov -II
27- Nov -II
Groundwater Depth (in)
W W N N i
t!i O cr O c.n O cn O to O
(u!) IleJuleld
W
O
c
0
a.
-t O
C
O '
R �
O
D O
QQ �
A'+
C
oa
w
i •
y
- - - -
- - - -
-- - - -
- - - - -
--
-
-
- --- - - - - - -
- - --
W�
N �
N .7
O C)
5'
oa
ro
i
ra
0
F
.� oa
o�
—o
(u!) IleJuleld
W
O
c
0
a.
-t O
C
O '
R �
O
D O
QQ �
A'+
C
oa
w

Roquist MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #4 (Reference for Gauge #3b)
10
G`.
0
5 -5
s
a
-10
L
rA
3
V
4 -15
0
L
-20
-25
-30
1 Begin Growing Season End Growing Season 1
3/22/2011 11/8/2011
1 I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
' 71 Days
I
1
I
'
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
I
1
I
1
I
I
lid
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
6
m
4
m
m
3
2
-35 0
w i Q Q a o o 0
`o i „ c Q Q O O z z
-: S
M N N
Date
Rainfall Depth - Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface

10
5
0
c
-5
r
d
D
-10
w
3
c
c -15
L
V
-20
IMIN
-30
-35
Roquist MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #5
6
5
4
o'
m
3
2
0
td C C '� % �:• >. T T C G OD bD 0. 0. v > >
Q Q c d Q z z
-. M ^A N rt
M
Date
Rainfall —* —Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface

Roquist MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #6 (Reference for Gauge #5)
10
5
0
c
c -10
ev
D
L
3 -15
C
7
V -20
-25
-30
-35
Begin Growing Season
End Growing Season I
13/22/2011
11/8/2011
1
,
I
,
.� _EMI'►. ' .I
1 . �/� _
-IWW
I
I
1
,
I
1
,
I
I
,
74 Days
I
I
,
,
I
1
I
I
I
,
,
1
1
,
I
,
1
,
I
1
-
1
,
I
I
,
,
I
i
1
,
1
1
,
,
1
I
,
I
1
IL
,
,
6
5
4
m
o'
3
5
`a
-40 AL 0
a a > > c e
7B o0 0o a a � > >
o 0
ND w c Q Q h O O z z
M N N N N
Date
Rainfall Depth - Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface

10
5
0
g -5
s
a
p -10
-15
C
O
V -20
-25
-30
59SI
Roquist MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #9
6
5
9
E,
0
m
3 =
O
-40 I• L ly d M l 1 1 r 1.ro 0 1 0 , 1 1.L r.! _ r is ■ 1., 11.1 1 u q I mo- ;'_A l a ap I I I I I 1 0
a a > i
Q d c� ti ti ^ ° ° O O o 0
i o ¢ ¢ z z
M N N N
Date
� Rainfal I t Depth - Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface

Roquist MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #11b
10
5
0
° -5
Z
a
-10
d
3
0
-15
N
-20
-25
-30
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
3/22/2011 11/8/2011
i i
1 r_
VON
0. 0.
co
OA OA d R U U > >
o o 0
cn O O
i
M
4 N N .N-. N
t
Date
Rainfall
t Depth
Jurisdictional Depth
87 Days
� t
6
k,
4
r
0
m
3 :.
0
2
-35 a I I L
JL 0
0. 0.
co
OA OA d R U U > >
o o 0
cn O O
M
4 N N .N-. N
Date
Rainfall
t Depth
Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface

LF
5
0
c -5
r
a
p -10
w
b -15
C
7
O
L
U -20
-25
-30
-35
Roquist MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #12 (Reference for Gauge 11b)
6
5
4
91
0
m
3
0
2
-40 ce r r■u �i r r 1, u IL I a .1-1 L a! a I u ■� I m_ r� * . a
z z
M N N
Date
111111111111111111ainfall t Depth - Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface

Roquist MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #13 (Reference for Gauge #9)
10
5
0
C
na
-5
w
O
e -10
3
C
V -15
IKII
-25
-30
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season I
13/22/2011 11/8/2011 i
1
1
1 ,
1 ,
1 ,
� t t
I ,
I
I ,
I ,
I ,
1
1
,
1 86 Days
I
1
1
I
I
,
,
I
,
1
1
,
I
1
,
,
I
,
1
I
I
,
,
I
,
I
1
,
1
I
,
,
I
,
1
1
I
Id
I
,
,
6
5
4
o'
>v
3
7
-35 0
16 d �a Q o Q m O O z z t
M 0
4 O, 2 � M_, A r
M N fV N N
Date
l� Rainfall --- Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface

I
w
w'
v
a
`c
a
v
0
o.
C
d
1- Jan -11
16 -Jan -11
31 -Jan -11
15- Feb -11
2- Mar -11
17 -Mar -11
1 -Apr -1 1
16- Apr -11
1 -May- I I
16- May -11
31 -May -I1
d
sv
15- Jun -II
30 -Jun -II
15 -Jul -I I
30 -Jul -I 1
14- Aug -I1
29- Aug -II
13- Sep -11
28- Sep -11
13 -Oct- I I
28 -Oct- I I
12- Nov -II
27- Nov -il
Groundwater Depth (in)
O In O tJi O In O vi O to O
O ^ N W A t/, ON
(ul) 11e3u1e21
n
0
C
C.
C
,
O a
0 0
QQ �
C
QQ
A
- - --
-
- --
- - - -
- - -
- -
I
i
i
----
i
i
I
i
I
F - -� - --
I�
I
I
- - - -i
N Q�
N �
c
C6
�I'o
5 I
R
I
- - - -
-- - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- -
I
- j - - - - - - --- - - -
- - - -
- - -
O ^ N W A t/, ON
(ul) 11e3u1e21
n
0
C
C.
C
,
O a
0 0
QQ �
C
QQ
A

Roquist MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #15
10
5
0
.. -5
C
r
-10
D
-15
C
7
O
V -20
-25
-30
5911
Begin Growing Season
End Growing Season
1 3/22/2011
11/8/2011
1
1
� 1► II
i
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
73 Days
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
1
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
1
I
1
1
i
I
6
5
4
>v
o'
m
3
o'
U
-40 d 0
> >
-i, li Q Q Q ¢ cn v� O O z z
M
N ell N N
Date
fmim Rainfall —� Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface

Table 9. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Table
Project Number and Name: 312 - Roquist Wetland
Success Criteria Achieved / Max Consecutive Days During Growing
Gauge
Season (Percentage)
Year 1 (2008)
Year 2 (2009)
Year 3 (2010)
Year 4 (2011)
Gauge 1
Yes /90
Yes /95
Yes/108
Yes /87
(Reference for Gauge 2)
(39% )
((41%)
Yes /79
Yes/71
Yes /85
Yes/74
Gauge 2
°
(32%)
o
(31%)
o
(37 /o)
a
(32 /o)
Yes /76
Yes/44
Yes /40
Yes/73
Gauge 3b
g
(33 %)
(19 %)
(17 %)
(32 %)
Gauge 4
Yes /79
Yes /65
Yes /46
Yes /71
(Reference for Gauge 3b)
(34% )
(28% )
(20% )
(31
Yes/79
Yes /69
Yes /51
Yes /74
Gauge 5
(34 %)
30 %)
22 %)
32 %)
Gauge 6
Yes/85
Yes/73
Yes/101
Yes /74
(Reference for Gauge 5)
37%
32%
46 %)
32%
Yes /78
Yes/67
Yes/ 103
Yes /74
Gauge 9
(34 %)
(29 %)
45 %)
(32 %)
Gauge 13
Yes /98
Yes/93
Yes/108
Yes /87
(Reference for Gauge 9)
(42 %)
40 %)
47 %)
44 %)
Gauge I1b
Yes/92
Yes/73
Yes /114
Yes /87
(40 %)
32 0%)
49 %)
44 %)
Gauge 12
Yes /96
Yes /97
Yes/112
Yes/ 100
(Reference for Gauge 11 b)
420%
42 %)
49%
100 %)
Yes /83
Yes /73
Yes /51
Yes /94
Gauge 14
36 /° 0
32%
22 %)
41%
Yes /76
Yes/66
Yes /48
Yes/73
Gauge 15
g
33%
29%
21%
32%
Roquist Wetland 41 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2011— W04