20051094 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20110224

Monitoring Firm
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Project Contact Adam Speller
Email adam spiller(a,kci com
KCI Project No 12071067C_CC10
Design Firm
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
UT to Crooked Creek KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 434 2010 MY04

TABLE OF CONTENTS
10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT 1
20 METHODOLOGY 2
30 REFERENCES 2
Appendix A — Protect Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1 Site Vicinity Map 4
Figure 2 Site Map 5
Table la Protect Restoration Components 6
Table lb Project Component Summations 6
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History 7
Table 3 Project Contacts Table 8
Table 4 Project Attribute Table 9
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3 Current Condition Plan View 11
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment 13
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment 14
Stream Station Photos 15
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos 18
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment 23
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata 23
Table 9 CVS Stem Count Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species 24
Appendix D — Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section Plots 26
Longitudinal Profile Plots 34
Pebble Count Plots 36
Table 10 Baseline -Stream Data Summary Table 44
Table l la Monitonng - Cross - Section Morphology Data Table 45
Table 11 b Monitoring - Stream Reach Morphology Data Table 47
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events 49
UT to Crooked Creek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 434 2010 MY04

10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Unnamed Tributary to Crooked Creek (UTCC) in Franklin County, NC was identified as a
restoration design project in 2004 The 0 52 -mi2 project watershed is located within the USGS 8 -digit
HUC 03020101 and the NCDWQ Sub -basin 03 -03 -01 of the Tar- Pamlico Basin The project restored and
preserved streams, restored riparian buffer and created and preserved wetlands The project goals and
objectives are listed below
• Restore the degraded channel to a stable functioning channel by using Natural Channel Design
principles
• Enhance the ability of aquatic fauna and flora to survive and flourish by replacing the existing
degraded stream habitat with a stable stream channel and riparian buffer that is more conducive to
propagation
• Restore a healthy, vegetated riparian community to the currently denuded, fallow floodplain and
adjacent hill slopes
• Enhance existing wetlands by planting supplementary vegetation
• Preserve in perpetuity through a conservation easement, lands surrounding the UTCC that will
soon be impacted by residential development
The previously unvegetated portion of the conservation easement including the buffer restoration and
wetland creation areas, was planted with an appropriate mix of bare root and live stake species Three
vegetative plots were established during the baseline monitoring to determine the vegetative success of
the site Four additional plots were established in the fourth year of monitoring so that the site met the
recommended number of plots based on the EEP -CVS monitoring protocol The fourth -year monitoring
of these plots revealed an average density of 382 total planted stems /acre and minimal coverage by
invasive vegetation Due to the age of this site this site has been grandfathered in and is allowed to count
buffer restoration credit up to 200 feet away from the stream, which means that all of the plots must meet
a success criterion of 320 stems /acre Vegetation Plots 1 and 2 are not meeting this criterion However
these two plots have extensive volunteer populations and densities over 680 total stems /acre when
including volunteers Across the site there is good vegetative coverage There are plentiful volunteers,
with some dense stands of young loblolly pine (Pines taeda) Many parts of the stream have vegetation
growing in the channel, including some pools with cattails (Typha latlfoka) The vegetation growing in
the channel obscures the thalweg location in places, but overall is not adversely affecting the project
Some areas with low planted stem densities have been noted in this report These areas are most
frequently found on the excavated floodplain, where the soil quality is generally low These findings
indicate that the vegetation component of the site is on track to meeting the project's success criteria
In 2009, the EEP completed a Buffer Audit Verification of the site, during which several field visits were
made to delineate wetland soils, estimate the extent of buffer planting and locate stream preservation
reaches This audit has been updated throughout the 2010 monitoring This monitoring report includes the
findings of this verification, and Table 1 has been changed to reflect the updated mitigation units The
wetland creation and preservation areas do not have additional monitoring requirements
The stream monitoring at the site involves surveying eight permanent cross - sections and a longitudinal
profile along the entire length of UTCC The stream assessment completed during the fourth year of
monitoring found the stream to be functioning and holding grade The site does not have any bank erosion
problems or widespread bed incision or aggradation Throughout the monitoring history of this project
there have been a series of beaver dams constructed on the project channel The beavers have been
removed and the dams have been breached Most of these dams collected fine sediment behind them,
which caused small areas of bed aggradation These breached beaver dams still create areas of backwater
in the channel, which have been mapped on the Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) Another beaver
dam is located below the restored channel, and it is causing backwater conditions in the downstream
UT to Crooked Creek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 434 1 2010 MY04

portion of the lower reach In 2011 EEP will conduct maintenance planting and remove active and relic
beaver dams at the site
Summary information and data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents available on the EEPs
website All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available upon request
20 METHODOLOGY
The Level 2 CVS -EEP protocol (http / /cvs bio unc edu/methods htm) was used to collect vegetation
data from UT to Crooked Creek this year the fourth year of monitoring
The profile was stationed by thalweg length and then adjusted to match grade control structures
between monitoring years
30 REFERENCES
Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2006 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4 0 (http / /cvs bio unc edu/methods htm)
Weakley, A S 2006 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas
(http / /www herbarium unc edu/F1oraArchives/WeakleyFlora 2006 -Jan ndfl
UT to Crooked Creek KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 434 2 2010 MY04

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
UT to Crooked Creek KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 434 3 2010 MY04

DIRECTIONS TO UT CROOKED SITE:
From Raleigh, take US 64 East. Take the exit for
NC 98 and travel west. After driving through the
Town of Bunn make a right onto Pearces Road.
Then take the first driveway on the left to get to
the project site.
D
a
NC 39
a
0
Q
0
Pearces Rd. —
Project Location
Gus McGhee Rd.
NC 98
a i
Town
/ O Bun
a
W
E
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map
Y UT Crooked Creek, Franklin County, EEP Project # 434
r' N
�syystellj 0.5 0.25 0 0.5
1'�1 lint(i.Mmt"li- TFnMiles KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC.

0
C
C
0
O
O
C
CJ
O
O
0
O
0
O
O
O
0
0
C3
G
�f
_i
U
O
C
C
0
0
0
O
O
0
V
0
J
�J
\ J
9
Table la Project Restoration Components
Project Number and Name 434 - UT to Crooked Creek
0 48
Preservation
2010
o
HQ Preservation
d
a..- .q�J1-
r3
CX
O
p
0
0
1 484
y
o.
MW
eo
_o
GL
Project Component
w riw
>
a j
; `
Stationing
pip
Comment
Restored pattern profile and
Upper Reach
R
PI /2
1 083 If
10+00 21 +34
1 1
1 083
1 920 If
dimension
Restored pattern profile and
Lower Reach
R
PI /2
1 134 If
21 +34 - 32 +67
1 1
1 134
dimension
Preservation Reach
672 If
P
-
672 If
-
5 1
134
In conservation easement
UT1
271 If
P
271 If
-
5 1
54
In conservation easement
UT2 1
4:)8 If
P
458 If
5 1
92
In conservation easement
Restored pattern profile and
UT2 2
U
R
P2
104 If
1 1
104
dimension
UT3 l
4341f
P
434 It
5 1
87
In conservation easement
Restored pattern profile and
UT3 -2
U
R
P2
43 If
-
1 1
43
dimension
UT4 l
175 If
P
175 if
-
5 1
35
In conservation easement
Restored pattern profile and
UT4 2
U
R
P2
55 If
1 l
55
dimension
Buffer
4 84 ac
R
4 84 ac
1 1
484
Planted
Graded to new floodplam
Riparian Wetland
0 48 ac
C
0 48 ac
-
3 1
0 16
elevation and planted
Riparian Wetland
13 72 ac I
P
13 72 ac
5 1
274
In conservation easement
U Unknown K Kestoration P Preservation C Creation P1 Priority 1 PZ Priority 2
' A 50 easement exception is not included in these figures
Table I Project Component Summations
Project Number and Name 434 - ]UT to Crooked Creek
Riparian Non -Ripar Upland Buffer
Restoration Level Stream Wetland Ac Ac (Ac) Ac BMP
rs �+ �r s u
a T� „C' Non K eu+�. d� ")�'.��t� `' 11W,
,
Rlvenne Rrverme ,.S '� a a�;�xrf f�v 4 „�' '` �`Aq
�a
storation 2 419
hancement '' s r
hancementI
hancementll
Creation
4 84
0 48
Preservation
2010
1372
HQ Preservation
a..- .q�J1-
r3
0
0
4 84
0
0
1 484
Creation
14-1- _- ,
0 48
Preservation
2010
1372
HQ Preservation
' ' �V—_ 142 1 0
Totals (Feet/Acres) 4 429 142
MUTotals 2 821 29
-; Non - Applicable
UT to Crooked Creek
EEP Project # 434
6
KC1 Associates gfNorth Carolina
2010 MY04

Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Number and Name 434 - UT to Crooked Creek
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete 4 years 5 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete 4 years
Number of Reporting Years 4
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
�` = r,,
Apr 05
Final Desi n 90%
x ',
Jun 0!�
Construction
Jul 06
Planting�
� ^k
Winter 06/07
Mitigation Plan
':t
Feb 07
Year 1 Monitoring
Dec 07
Dec 07
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct 08
Jan 09
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov 09
Dec 09
Year 4 Monitoring
Sep 10
Dec 10
Year Monitoring
UT to Crooked Creek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 434 7 2010 MY04

Table 3 Protect Contacts Table
Project Number and Name 434 - UT to Crooked Creek
Design Firm
Ko & Associates, P C
5121 Kingdom Way Suite, 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Contact R Kevin Williams, PE
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Construction Contractor
Land Mechanics Designs
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Springs, NC 27592
Contact Mr Lloyd Glover
Phone [phone]
Vegetation Design Firm
HARP
(2004 Vegetation and Stream
9305 -D Monroe Rd
Maintenance Plan)
Charlotte, NC 28270
Contact Mr Alan Peoples
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Goldsboro Forestry Service
762 Claridge Nursery Rd
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Phone [phone]
MY -01 Stream
Ko & Associates, P C
5121 Kingdom Way Suite 100
Raleigh NC 27607
Contact R Kevin Williams, PE
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Vegetation
Environmental Services, Inc
524 S New Hope Road
Raleigh North Carolina 27610
Todd Milam
Phone [phone]
MY -02 - MY -05
KCI Associates of NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh NC 27609
Contact Mr Adam Spiller
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
UT to Crooked Creek KC1 Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 434 8 2010 MY04

Table 4 Project Attribute Table
Project Number and Name 434 - UT to Crooked Creek
Project County
Franklin County
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Northern Outer Piedmont
Project River Basin
Tar Pamlico
USGS HUC for Project 8 digit)
03020101
NCDWQ Sub basin for Project
03 03 -01
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan9
U
WRC Class Warm Cool Cold
Warm
% of project easement demarcated
U
Beaver activity observed during design hase9i
Yes
Restoration Component Attnbute Table
Drainage Area
0 52 sq mi
Stream Order
Second
Restored length feet
2 219
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Watershed Type Rural Urban Developing etc
Rural
Watershed LULC Distribution
Urban
Ag Row Crop
Ag Livestock
Forested
' Water /Wetlands
Watershed impervious cover
NCDW AU /Index Number
-
NCDWQ Classification
C NSW
303d listed?
No
Upstream of a 303d listed segment9
No
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
N/A
Total acreage of easement
37 6 Acres
Total vegetated acreage within the easement
37 6 Acres
Total planted acreage as part of the restoration
7 5 Acres
Ros en Classification of pre existing
F:5
Ros en Classification of As built
C5
Valley Type
U
Valley Sloe
U
Valley side slope ranee g 2 3%
U
Valley toe slope ranee g 2 3%
U
Trout waters designation
No
Species of concern endangered etc ? (Y/N )
No
Dominant soil series and characteristics
Series
Chewacla and Wehadkee
Depth Cla /o
-
K
T
-
N/A is for items that do not apply
is for items that are unavailable
U is for items that are unknown
1
UT to Crooked Creek KC/ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 434 9 2010 MY04

J
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
UT to Crooked Creek KC1 Associates offorth Carolina
EEP Project # 434 10 2010 MY04
J

f`
LEGEND
EASEMENT BOUNDARY. ............................................................................. \.
AS -BUILT STATIONED
CENTERLINE AND TOP OF BANK ................................ ............................... =
PHOTOPOINT ..................................................................... ............................... Q
CROSS - SECTION ............................................................... ............................... —
BEAVERDAM ...................................................................... ...............................
ROCKCROSS VANE ........................................................ ...............................
LOGVANE .......................................................................... ............................... `
ROOTWAD.......................................................................... ...............................
ROOTBALL.......................................................................... ...............................
RIP- RAP ............................................. ...............................
.... ...............................
f ♦� `� per \ \e .jr ► i�l� r
10 � ` i •� � Y.. yr
4t r
BEAVER DAM HAS BEEN BREACHEDM y`'`t • , , •
1 - �. d• 4 BACKWATER IS CAUSED FROM SEDIMENT.
`jy,� �t • - THAT HAS BUILT UP BEHIND BEAVER D
fp
�v,I "A y b `��'►" BACKWATER AREA t�
FTPPER REACH
• H• � � yam' �� ..,
• i,,,
SECTION 2
PHOTO
STATION
' r'�.Y_ ��_ �. fit: 1.• s+�.- "�II"�•
PROJECT CONDITION
STREAM BED DEGRADATION .................................................... ..............................'
BANK EROSION _ ................. ...............................
UNDERCUTBANK ........................................................................ ...............................
MASSWASTING OF BANK ........................................................ ...............................
BACKWATER AREA
CR08S
FROMBEAVER DAM ................................................................. ...............................
" SECTI0*f 1
>>
VEG PLOT ABOVE 288 TOTAL
LEGEND
EASEMENT BOUNDARY. ............................................................................. \.
AS -BUILT STATIONED
CENTERLINE AND TOP OF BANK ................................ ............................... =
PHOTOPOINT ..................................................................... ............................... Q
CROSS - SECTION ............................................................... ............................... —
BEAVERDAM ...................................................................... ...............................
ROCKCROSS VANE ........................................................ ...............................
LOGVANE .......................................................................... ............................... `
ROOTWAD.......................................................................... ...............................
ROOTBALL.......................................................................... ...............................
RIP- RAP ............................................. ...............................
.... ...............................
f ♦� `� per \ \e .jr ► i�l� r
10 � ` i •� � Y.. yr
4t r
BEAVER DAM HAS BEEN BREACHEDM y`'`t • , , •
1 - �. d• 4 BACKWATER IS CAUSED FROM SEDIMENT.
`jy,� �t • - THAT HAS BUILT UP BEHIND BEAVER D
fp
�v,I "A y b `��'►" BACKWATER AREA t�
FTPPER REACH
• H• � � yam' �� ..,
• i,,,
SECTION 2
PHOTO
STATION
' r'�.Y_ ��_ �. fit: 1.• s+�.- "�II"�•
PROJECT CONDITION
STREAM BED DEGRADATION .................................................... ..............................'
BANK EROSION _ ................. ...............................
UNDERCUTBANK ........................................................................ ...............................
MASSWASTING OF BANK ........................................................ ...............................
BACKWATER AREA
FROMBEAVER DAM ................................................................. ...............................
VEG PLOT ABOVE 288 TOTAL
PLANTEDSTEMS / ACRE .............................................................. ...............................
■
VEG PLOT BELOW 288 TOTAL
PLANTED STEMS / ACRE .............................................................. ...............................
LOW PLANTED
P—TI
STEM DENSITY . ............................ ............................... °- ° °°
VEG PLOT TOTAL /
PLANTED STEM DENSITY .......................................................... ............................... 8901423
r
3
C'
tr
e,
-40 0 40 80
GRAPHIC SCALE
N
z
0
T
W
a
1
v
c
a
n
H
~Z W O<
V� Ko
Z 0U
6 x
'o
W �
W
Z
Z
W
Q
z� co
J O N
LU Z'
R = v p:
H
0 0 m
Y vi
z
Z °
o O w
U
F- a o
0 w
LL
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
SHEET 7 OF 2

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Project Number and Name 434 - UT to Crooked Creek
Pro ect linear footage** 2,219
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Adjusted % for
Major Channel
Channel
Performing as
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Stabilizing Woody
Category
Sub-Category
Metric
Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Vertical Stability
1 Aeeradation Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly
,� '
-
1 Bed
(Riffle and Run units)
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
�
0
0
100%
[
x�--
e
v � '�
^ � 2- �j '� �
e
F ��A � = � L f � -i ` i �.
2 Degradation Evidence ofdowncutting
- "i�r.+. m
r� � - _ w
0
0
100%
1 n i
Y�< G•
2 Riffle Condition*
1 Texture /Substrate Riffle maintains coarser substrate
18
30
} -
60%
3 Meander Pool
Condition
1 Death Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth > 1 6)
—
40
32
125 %�
2 Length appropriate ( >301/o of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstreamnflle)
40
32
i1 f
g �
125%
4
�),
-�
{ u
r F d x
4 1
4 Thalvm Position+
g
1 Thalwe centering at upstream of meander bend Run
g g P (Run)
N/A
N /A�
N/A
2 Thahveg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
N/A
N/A
� ,wy °Ky
N /A�
yy,, -r; 1� u.. * ♦
A`'�i[4CrdfC_.✓'
3"f
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
2 Bank
1 Scoured/Froding
and /or scour and erosion
s �-
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
�.,
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bankslumping calving orcollapse
raw ^
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3 Engineered
Structures
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
26
26
'Ag
100%
,ri-
d
control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
�k1
2 lT� ails COntrOl
Grade
Sill
26
26
, h'{•gYy r� dS;
1 O00%
3'
-�,'
aye r ' - - �� $rte' t ,
2a Piping
Structures laLkmg any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
26
26
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
3 Bank Protection
exceed 15% (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance
26
26�;,wb'�
100%
document)
Pool forung structures maintaining Max Pool Depth Mean��
4 Habitat
Bankfull Depth ratio > 16 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
26
26
,x,� ter^
100%
base -flow
Ste_,
-3mce au or the nrnes are sand rimes ano mostly covered with vegetation this metric identities all of the stable ntfles that were identified during the longitudinal profile survey The total number of as-built riffles has been estimated from
the as -built profile and planview sheets
+The exact position of the thaiweg in relation to the pattern is not a factor in channl stability for this stream All of the banks are well vegetated and stable Most of the riffles having rooted vegetation growmg in them, which obscures the exact
positon of the thalweg
* *This evaluation only includes the length of the mamstemand not the portions of restoration on the small tributaries
UT to Crooked Ci eek
EEP Protect # 434 13 KCI Associates ojNo2010 Carohna

0000O00000 000000 00t�j
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Project Number and Name 434 UI' to Crooked Creek
Planted Acreage - 7 5
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
% of Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
De ction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Very Itnuted cover of both woody and herbaceous
Pattern
1 Bare Areas
material
0 1 acres
and Color
0
0 00
0 0%
2 Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels
0 1 acres
Pattern
9
036
48%
based on Mi Y3 4 or 5 stem count criteria
and Color
ILC °r i �+� ''
� b t &aTotal
ti )I" �` r
w '� 9 f•
aY a t�
<- 0 36�, fi a
$' O
at' , e 4 8 /0 ,a W.
3 Areas of Poor Growth
Areas with woody stems of size class that are
Pattern
Rates or Vigor
obviously small given the monitoring year
0 25 acres
and Color
0
0 00
0 0%
X4,9, 1 J'- ° t 419-I Cumulah�+e,Total
� 'A�t9��m
"���0 36+� u� �
� "�� ��4 8% w� r
Easement Acreage - 37 6
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
% of Easement
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons-
Acreage
Acreage
4 Invasive Areas of
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at
Pattern
Concern
map scale)
1000 SF
and Color
0
000
00%
5 Easement Encroachment
Areas or points (►f too small to render as polygons at
Pattern
Areas
ma scale)
none
and Color
0
000
00%
UT to Ci ooked G eek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 434 14 2010 MY04

Stream Station Photos
PS -1 Looking Downstream — 12/3/07 - MY 01
PS2 Looking Upstream— 12/3/07 - MY 01
PS -3 Looking Downstream — 12/3/07 - MY 01
PS -1 Looking Downstream — 12/13/10 - MY 04
PS -2 Looking Upstream— 12/13/10 - MY 04
PS -3 Looking Downstream — 12/13/10 - MY 04
UT to Crooked Creek KCl Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 434 15 2010 - MY04

PS -7 Looking Downstream — 12/3/07 - MY 01
PS -8 Looking Downstream — 12/3/07 - MY 01
PS -7 Looking Downstream — 12/13/10 - MY 04
PS -8 Looking Downstream — 12/13/10 - MY 04
UT to Crooked Creek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 434 17 2010 - MY04

1
0
} .d
r f
-r
1
0

•
UT to Crooked Creek
EEP Project # 434
Plot 7 Photo — 10 /1 /10 - MY 04
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2010 - MY04

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
UT to Crooked Creek KC/ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 434 22 2010 MY04

Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Project Number and Name 434 - UT to Crooked Creek
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold
MW (320 Planted Stems/Acre)
1
No
2
No
3
Yes
4
Yes
file size
Yes
6
Yes
7
Yes
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Project Number and Name 434 - UT to Crooked Creek
Report Prepared By
Adam S filler
Date Prepared
12/20/2010 10 18
database name
KCI 2010 A mdb
database location
M \2007\12071067 2007 EEP OPEN END Ve database
computer name
12 CSPVOMI
file size
150462720
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT — — —
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets and a summary of project(s) and
project data
Prof, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre for each year This excludes live
stakes
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre for each year This includes live
stakes all planted stems and all natural volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems dead stems missing
etc
Igor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total
stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by e for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by e for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot dead and
missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined ) for each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY — — -- — —
Project Code
434
project Name
UT to Crooked Creek /Speas Property G
Description
stream mitigation site
River Basin
Tar Pamlico
len h ft
2267
stream to edge width ft
50
areas m
1053439
.Required Plots calculated
7
Sampled Plots
7
UT to Crooked Creek
EEP Project # 434
23
KCI Associates of North Carolina
1010 MY04

Table 9 CVS Stem Count Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Project Number and Name 434 - UT to Crooked Creek
Current Plot Data (MY4 2010)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
434- AH-0004
434 AH -0DOS
434 AH -0006
434 AH-0007
E434
-GT -0001
E434-
GT-0002
E434 -GT -0003
MY4 (2010)
MY3
(2009)
MY2 (2008)
MYl
(2007)
MYO
(2007)
P LS
Pail
T
P LS
P all
T
P LS
P all
T
P LS
P all
T
P LS
P all
T
P LS
P-all
T
P LS
P all
T
P LS
P all
T
P LS
Pall
T
P LS
P all
T
P LS
P all
T
P LS
Pall
T
nus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub Tree
4
4
1
1
1
1
6
6
2
2
2
2
3
3
Bacchans
bacchans
Shrub Tree
� a2#;(
t 1,1,r
+�54
4 -9 w
'111
34�
" *20r
192
etula n► ra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
2
1
1
5
5
1
1
1
1
3
3
Cephalanthus
occidentalts
common
buttonbush
Shrub Tree
1
1
3
5
5
3
6
6
3
3
3
5
5
5
1
1
Comus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
4
4
1
4
4
1
5
5
1
7
7
4
12
12
Frax►nus
enns Ivan►ca
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
L►qu►dambar
s rac►flua
sweetgum
Tree
3
}
.
r�
L►nodendron
tul► ►fera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
N ssa s lvahca
black um
Tree
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
4
4
Pmus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
X181°
Quercus
oak
Shrub Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus m►chaux►►
swamp
chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
4
4
6
6
2
2
2
2
16
16
3
3
3
3
4
4
Quercus n► ra
water oak
Tree
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
13
13
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
2
2
Quercus hellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
2
2
6
6
11
11
6
6
6
6
6
6
hus copallinum
sumaceaf
Shrub Tree
�3 �
13
Sahx n► ra
black willow
Tree
2
Unknown
unknown
44
44
Stem count
size (arcs )
size (ACRES
Species coun
Stems per ACR
0
8
13
0
15
26
0
10
15
0
9
23
0
6
17
0
7
42
4
11
31
4
66
167
4
25
25
6
28
51
4
39
39
0
44
44
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
3
3
3
3
0 02
002
002
002
002
002
002
017
007
007
007
007
0
4
6
0
5
6
0
2
3
0
4
7
0
4
5
0
2
4
2
4
5
2
11
14
2
9
9
2
9
12
1
12
12
0
1
1
0
324
526
0
607
1052
0
405
607
0
364
931
0
243
688
0
283
1700
162
445
1255
23 1
382
965
54
337
337
80 9
378
688
54
526
526
0
594
594
UT to Crooked Creek KCI Associates of North Car ohna
EEP Project # 434 24 2010 MY04

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT to Crooked Creek 25 KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 434 2010 MY04
J

Cross - Section Plots
River Basin:
Elevation M
Tar - Pamlico
Watershed:
UT to Crooked Creek, MY04
s
XS ID
XS - I, Pool
Drainage Area (s mi):
0.52
Date:
12/14/2010
Field Crew:
A. French, B. Robert
.r..
�rxl• ` �..:
•�.,
6
Tar - Pamlico River Basin, UT to Crooked Creek, MV04, XS - 1, Pool
240
238 --
-
_
--
aa
236
- -�
C
----------------------------------
- - - - --
--- - - - - --
- -- - - - - --
o
- -
W
234 - - -
- - -- Bankfull
MY -00, 8/06*
MY -0I, 12/07
232
- MY -02, 10/2/08
MY -03, 8/25/09
230
-� - MY -04, 12/14/10
0 10 20
30 40 50
60 70
80 90 100
Station (feet)
Station E
Elevation M
s
Station E
Elevation M
SUMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 23.0
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 18.6
Bankfull Width: 18.6
Flood Prune Area Elevation: -
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.0
W / D Ratio: -
Entrenchment Ratio: -
Bank Height Ratio: -
*MY-00 cross - section plots shifted as needed due to likely stationing issue during baseline monitoring.
*MY-00 cross - section plots shifted as needed due to likely stationing issue during baseline monitoring.

River Basin:
Tar - Pamlico
Watershed:
UT to Crooked Creek, MY04
XS ID
XS - 2, Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi :
0.52
Date:
12/14/2010
Field Crew:
A. French, B. Roberts
Station
Elevation
0.0
234.68
2.9
234.74
6.6
234.42
12.0
234.25
17.0
234.41
19.2
234.22
22.8
233.73
25.2
233.48
26.7
233.07
28.1
232.80
29.2
232.72
30.0
232.74
31.6
233.42
34.1
234.03
35.9
234.44
43.2
234.32
51.2
234.42
56.8
234.51
60.8
234.84
237
236
d
235
0
234
W
233
232
SUMMARN' DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
234.3
Bankfull Cross- Sectional Area:
12.1
Bankfull Width:
14.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
235.9
Flood Prone Width:
>60
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
W / D Ratio:
16.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.3
Bank Height Ratio:
LO
Tar - Pamlico River Basin, UT to Crooked Creek, MV04, XS - 2, Riffle
r---------------------------- - - ---- - --- --
. - -- Bankfull
-- -Flood Prone Area
MY -00, 8/06'
MY -01, 12/07
MY -02, I0/2/08
MY -03, 8/25/09
MY-04,12/14/10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
'MY -00 cross - section plots shifted as needed due to likely stationing issue during baseline monitoring.

River Basin:
Tar - Pamlico
Watershed:
UT to Crooked Creek, MY04
XS ID
XS - 3, Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi :
0.52
Date:
12/14/2010
Field Crew:
A. French, B. Roberts
Station
Elevation
0.0
233.84
1.6
233.53
6.8
233.31
11.4
233.06
17.1
233.07
22.8
232.94
27.0
233.08
33.3
232.96
39.9
23186
42.3
232.84
43.5
232.86
45.4
232.59
46.4
232.12
48.0
231.71
48.6
231.34
49.3
231.22
50.3
231.16
51.5
231.14
52.9
231.27
53.4
231.72
55.1
231.90
56.5
232.46
57.5
232.60
61.9
232.39
66.5
232.42
71.9
232.58
76.5
232.79
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
232.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area:
11.2
Bankfull Width:
12.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
234.2
Flood Prone Width:
>75
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
W / D Ratio:
14.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
235
234
E
fi
233
�a
a
W
232
231
Tar - Pamlico River Basin, UT to Crooked Creek, MY04, XS - 3, Riffle
----Bankfull
--- - - -_ -_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Flood Prone Area
-- MY -00, 8/06
- - MY -01, 12/07
MY -02, 10/2/08
MY -03, 8/25/09
MY-04,12/14/10
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
50 60 70 80

River Basin:
Elevation
0.0 2
Tar - Pamlico
2.7 2
231.90
6.0 2
Watershed:
10.1 2
231.84
UT to Crooked Creek, MY04
s
i
XS ID
XS -4 Pool
Drainage .Areas mi :
0.52
. Aa
Date:
12/14/2010
Field Crew:
A. French, B. Robert
1.
�3
Tar - Pamlico River Basin, UT to Crooked Creek, MY04, XS - 4, Pool
234
232 -
- - --
---------------- - -- - --
- -- ------- - - - - -- -----__---------------
5
c
230
- - -- Bankfull
W
MY-00, 8/06•
228
MY -01, 12/07
MY -02, 10/2/08
MY -03, 8/25/09
226
- -� MY -04, 12/14/10
0 10
20 30
40
50
Station (feet)
Station E
Elevation
0.0 2
231.88
2.7 2
231.90
6.0 2
231.83
10.1 2
231.84
13.7 2
s
Station E
Elevation
0.0 2
231.88
2.7 2
231.90
6.0 2
231.83
10.1 2
231.84
13.7 2
231.94
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 231.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 30.8
Bankfull Width: 10.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation: -
Flood Prone idth: -
Max Depth at Bankfull: 4.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 2.9
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio: -
Bank }lei ht Ratio: -
•MY -00 cross- section plots shined as needed due to likely stationing issue during baseline monitoring.
•MY -00 cross- section plots shined as needed due to likely stationing issue during baseline monitoring.

River Basin:
Tar - Pamlico
Watershed:
UT to Crooked Creek, MY04
XS ID
XS - 5, Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi :
0.52
Date:
12/15/2010
Field Crew:
A. French, B. Roberts
Station
Elevation
0.0
227.96
3.2
227.86
11.0
227.68
17.5
227.66
25.0
227.52
30.9
227.44
33.9
227.21
35.8
226.91
38.9
226.68
40.2
226.50
41.4
226.34
41.9
225.84
42.3
224.84
44.0
224.51
44.4
224.18
45.6
223.93
46.3
224.22
47.1
224.80
47.9
225.49
48.8
225.96
49.7
226.45
50.1
227.67
51.9
228.55
53.2
228.36
55.8
228.09
58.1
227.76
61.3
227.98
66.0
228.31
69.0
228.4
70.4
228.5
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
227.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
23.7
Bankfull Width:
17.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
230
228
d
g 226
C
W
224
222 +
0
Tar - Pamlico River Basin, UT to Crooked Creek, MV04, XS - 5, Pool
10 20 30 40 SO
Station (feet)
"MY -00 cross - section plots shifted as needed due to likely stationing issue during baseline monitoring.
-- -- Bankfull - -
- MY -00, 8/06'
MY -01, 12/07
MY -02, 10/6/08
MY -03, 8/25/09
MY-04,12/14/10
60 70

River Basin:
Elevation
0.0
Tar - Pamlico
4.5
�?
Watershed:
0.52
Date:
UT to Crooked Creek, MY04
Field Crew:
A. French, L. Lord
XS ID
224.7
26.0
XS - 6, Pool
27.1
224.6
Drainage Area s rail:
224.3
29.1
224.0
30.7
223.8
31.8
223.5
33.1
223.5
33.9
222.7
35.1
222.4
36.4
222.3
38.0
221.9
38.7
221.7
39.6
221.6
40.1
221.6
40.4
221.7
41.2
222.4
41.8
223.5
42.8
224.0
43.8
r
44.5
224.7
47.2
224.9
51.0
224.8
54.3
224.8
57.5
225.1
62.7
�.
67.4
225.5
"0
Tar - Pamlico River Basin, UT to Crooked Creek, MY04, XS - 6, Pool
229
227
- -
m
0
225
- -
- - -- �_
IU
W
Bankfull
MY -00, 8/06*
223 -
MY -0 1, 12/07
MY -02, 10/6/08
MY -03, 8/26/09
221
-� MY -04, 12/14/10
0 10
20 30 40 50
60 70
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
225.1
4.5
224.9
0.52
Date:
1 2/17/2010
Field Crew:
A. French, L. Lord
Station
Elevation
0.0
225.1
4.5
224.9
8.9
224.8
13.7
224.7
18.8
224.7
23.3
224.7
26.0
224.7
27.1
224.6
28.4
224.3
29.1
224.0
30.7
223.8
31.8
223.5
33.1
223.5
33.9
222.7
35.1
222.4
36.4
222.3
38.0
221.9
38.7
221.7
39.6
221.6
40.1
221.6
40.4
221.7
41.2
222.4
41.8
223.5
42.8
224.0
43.8
224.5
44.5
224.7
47.2
224.9
51.0
224.8
54.3
224.8
57.5
225.1
62.7
225.3
67.4
225.5
SUMM:IRY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
224.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
21.7
Bankfull Width:
15.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-
*MY-00 cross- section plots shifted as needed due to likely stationing issue during baseline monitoring.

River Basin:
Elevation
0.0
Tar - Pamlico
2.9
223.40
(s mi):
0.52
Date:
12/17/2010
Field Crew:
A. French, L. Lord
Watershed:
222.86
24.5
UT to Crooked Creek, MY04
25.8
t'
XS ID
221.88
31.3
XS - 7, Riffle
31.9
220.99
Drainage Area
221.01
33.0
221.42
33.7
221.2
34.1
221.43
35.3
221.61
37.1
221.83
39.9
222.63
41.4
222.86
46.4
222.68
52.8
222.77
59.6
223.05
64.2
223.20
67.8
223.19
,
.j
7
Tar - Pamlico River Basin, UT to Crooked Creek, MY04, XS - 7, Riffle
226
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
224
- --
222
- - -- Bankfull
- -- -Flood Prone Area
m
W
- MY -00, 8/06•
220 -
MY -0l, 12/07
MY -02, 10/6/08
MY -03, 8/26/09
218
MY -04, 12/14/10
0 10
20 30 40 50
60 70
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
223.57
2.9
223.40
(s mi):
0.52
Date:
12/17/2010
Field Crew:
A. French, L. Lord
Station
Elevation
0.0
223.57
2.9
223.40
7.1
223.20
12.7
223.12
19.8
222.98
22.9
222.86
24.5
222.82
25.8
222.68
29.3
221.88
31.3
221.73
31.9
220.99
32.3
221.01
33.0
221.42
33.7
221.2
34.1
221.43
35.3
221.61
37.1
221.83
39.9
222.63
41.4
222.86
46.4
222.68
52.8
222.77
59.6
223.05
64.2
223.20
67.8
223.19
SU�IMARI' DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
222.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
16.8
Bankfull Width:
20.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
224.8
Flood Prone Width:
>70
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
25.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
"`MY -0O cross- section plots shifted as needed due to likely stationing issue during baseline monitoring.

River Basin:
Elevation
Tar - Pamlico
Watershed:
0.52
Date:
UT to Crooked Creek, MY04
r ' s
A. French, L. Lord
\S ID
XS - 8, Riffle
�..,
Drainage
_{ �•
Tar - Pamlico
River Basin, UT to Crooked Creek, MV04, XS - 8, Riffle
224
222 - -- -_ -
22
------------ -- - ----
-- --------- - - - - --
o
- - -- Bankfull
o
- - -- Flood Prone Area
v
tU
220
- MY -00, 8/06'
MY -0I, 12/07
MY -02, 10/6/08
MY -03, 8/26/09
MY -04, 12/14/10
218
0 10
20 30 40 50
60
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
Area s mi):
0.52
Date:
1 2/17/2010
Field Crew:
A. French, L. Lord
Station
Elevation
L
SiMMARI' DATA
Banldull Elevation: 221.7
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 15.9
Bankfull Width: 13.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 223.8
Flood Prone Width: >65
Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.2
W / D Ratio: 11.5
Entrenchment Ratio: 4.8
Bank Ilei ht Ratio: I.0
'MY -00 cross - section plots shifted as needed due to likely stationing issue during baseline monitoring.
'MY -00 cross - section plots shifted as needed due to likely stationing issue during baseline monitoring.

W
z
0
Q
Lzl
r�
Gs7
240
235
230
225
220
1000
Longitudinal Profile
UT to Crooked Creek (Upper Reach), Franklin County
EEP Project Number 434 - MY04
1100 1200 1300 1400
1500 1600 1700 1800
STATION (ft)
1900 2000 2100
MY -00, 8/06 MY -01, 12/07 MY-02,10/6/08 MY -03, 8/26/09 — MY-04,12/15/10 • Bankfull — — — Water Surface 0 In- stream Structures ♦ Beaver Dams Bankfull ----- Water Surface
-
—
-'' • -- ■ ■ Ssmjp= - 0.0072x + 244.31
1 �
Sws= -0.00742 + 243.52
•
G --
i
C
VV
1100 1200 1300 1400
1500 1600 1700 1800
STATION (ft)
1900 2000 2100
MY -00, 8/06 MY -01, 12/07 MY-02,10/6/08 MY -03, 8/26/09 — MY-04,12/15/10 • Bankfull — — — Water Surface 0 In- stream Structures ♦ Beaver Dams Bankfull ----- Water Surface

235
230
Z
O
F
Q 225
W
.a
W
220
Longitudinal Profile
UT to Crooked Creek (Lower Reach), Franklin County
EEP Project Number 434 - MY04
215 4—
2100
2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400
STATION (ft)
MY -00, 8/06 - MY -01, 12/07 MY -02, 10/6/08 MY -03, 8/26/09 • MY -04, 12/15/10 ■ Bankfull — — — Water Surface O In- stream Structures O Beaver Dams Bankfull - - - -- Water Surface
Note: MY -01 profile data ends at Station 29 +50. A survey error affected the elevations from Station 29 +50 to the end of the profile.

Pebble Count Plots
Cross - Section 1 Pool - MY04
Particle Size Distribution
UT to Crooked Creek
XS 1 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
SildCla
< 0.062
S/C
54
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062- .125
.125 - .25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
10
15
16
6
100%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
;
c'
80%
60°x°
t;
■ MY02
t MY03
o
40%
20 % - —
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 too
Particle Size - Millimeters
— —
1000 10000
—+— MY04
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.13
0.32
0.56
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 3.1
skewness 0.42
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
53%
47%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
101
Note:

Cross
- Section 2 Riffle
- MY04
Particle Size Distribution
UT to Crooked Creek
XS 2 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
12
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125 - .25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 1 -2
S
A
N
D
S
13
27
20
18
E
100%
80%
- —
5
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
1 45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
1
1
IE
60%
40%
—t - W02
t MY03
4
c
U.
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
— -
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
+�
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.078
0.16
0.24
0.4
0.82
5.9
Size Distribution
mean 0.3
dispersion 3.2
skewness 0.02
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
12%
82%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRI:
Total
101
Note:

Cross - Section 3 Riffle
- MY04
Particle Size Distribution
UT to XS Crooked
Riffle reek
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
13
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
26
28
36
100%
m
K
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3 - 16
16 - 22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
A
80%
60%
°
i40%
— JMWYO
c
U.
e
20%
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
1395
Size (mm)
0.068
0.12
0.17
0.25
0.36
0.45
Size Distribution
mean 0.2
dispersion 2.3
skewness -0.04
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
13%
87%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
103
Note:

Cross
- Section 4 Pool
- MY04
Particle Size Distribution
UT to XS 4 Pool reek
Crooked
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
14
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125 - .25
.25-.50
.50- 1
- - 2
S
A
N
D
S
18
31
34
2
100%
xatr
1
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4 - 5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
1 45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
E
�?
80%
60%
40%
.
�"
E:,�M
c
e U.
/
j
20%
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Medium
Lr g- Very Lr =
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
1395
Size (mm)
0.068
0.14
0.19
0.27
0.4
0.5
Size Distribution
mean 0.2
dispersion 2.4
skewness -0.07
Type
_
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det
artificial
14%
84%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
102
Note:

Cross
- Section 5 Pool
- MY04
Particle Size Distribution
UT to Crooked Creek
XS 5 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
21
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 1 - 2
S
A
N
D
1 S
11
28
42
100%
80%
f�
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
E
�?
60%
w
IE
40%
MY02
MY03
c
U.
Z
—•— MY04
20%
0%
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.14
0.2
0.28
0.38
0.46
Size Distribution
mean 0.2
dispersion 2.6
skewness -0.13
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det
artificial
21%
79%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
102
Note:

Cross - Section 6 Pool - MV04
Particle Size Distribution
UT to XS 6 Pool reek
Crooked
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
22
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125 - .25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 1 -2
S
A
N
D
S
24
30
29
1
100%
/
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
1 45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
80%
60%
`�
I`
40%
■
■ MY02
• MY03
_c
U.
°
-- MYOa
20%
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
0%
0.01
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
0.1
(mm)
0.062
0.096
0.15
0.21
0.34
0.45
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 2.3
skewness -0.02
1000 10000
Type
silt/clay 21%
sand 79%
gravel 0%
cobble 0%
boulder 0%
bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood /det 0%
artificial 0%
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lr =
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Bedrock
>2048
BD
Total
106
Note:

• oiiiif
Cross
- Section 7 Riffle
- MY04
Particle Size Distribution
Crooked C
UT to XS 7 Riffle reek
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
44
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse 1
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
1 S
21
16
15
3
100%
a-Fr-
I 1
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4 - 5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
1
E
80%
%
60%
c
F
40%
�- MY02
MY03
c
U.
—� MY04
20% �
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
_
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.062
0.077
0.13
0.3
0.5
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 2.6
skewness 0.30
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
44%
55%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
101
Note:

Cross
- Section 8 Riffle
- MY04
Particle Size Distribution
UT to XS 8 Riffle reek
Crooked
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
28
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125 - .25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 1 -2
S
A
N
D
S
4
10
10
°k
12
100
7
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4 - 5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
5
E
C
80%
2
5
60%
w
IE 40 °k
—t— MY02
MY03
5
4
2
c
MY04
6
3
20%
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.17
0.48
1.3
10
28
Size Distribution
mean 0.8
dispersion 14.3
skewness 0.14
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det
artificial
27%
42%
31%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
103
Note:
a a a 0 a@ a a

nJC�0000O1) C,00O C, C,OOC�) mOCCCC'COC rC ', ,�� �C�C�J000O00OO
Table 10 Baseline -Stream Data Summary Table
Protect Number and Name 434 - Ur to Crooked Creek
Segment Reach Ur to Crooked Creek (2,219 ft) °
Parameter
USCrS Gage Data
Regional Curve
Interval
Pre Existing
Condition
Project Reference
Stream
Design
As built
Dimension
Min
Max
Mean
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Mean
Min
Max
Mean
Min
Max
Mean
Mm
Max
Mean
Bankfull Width (ft)
L�
164
,�
114
150
Flood prone Width (ft)
COe &
��
s „
< �
� *
� !„ a°
�w"� '�
z +
248
675
69
683
59
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area��
X.91
A
�
t 1,
U c '
tl
13 3
8 8
a,�
17 3
a���
h
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1%4!1
;
`"
w ,
< V � `
,
x
12
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
a e
L,�
!"f
_VOd rA
19
kM,i,A
i0llkw IVI
18
15
Width/Depth Ratios
202"oY
154
o
13 0
, t
Bank Height Ratio
�it<<�
�.�
�'��
�'�`
�A,�r °#?i
a'
' a'
;��11�"a
Entrenchment Ratio
15
46
46
46
53
v& 4
Wetted Pei ureter ft)
�
180
125
hS � ,S
173
p
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
074
r
�
w
a
Pattern
Channel Behwidth ft)
79
,
h b'�
377
315
63
945
25
63
45
Radius of Curvature (ft)
; , r
4
7
55
66
158
112
30
45
38
25
40
32
Meander Wavelength ft
Q
41,
�
'
6
29
17 5
19 7
42
31
45
135
90
101
150
125
Meander Width Ratio
�,`"�
'��a",";r
i, w�w�h-
06
18
38
56
3
9
6
67
10
8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
°:�
° g
dp `��
,�„
,
_ ,
6
20
13
5
13
9
20
40
25
21
61
48
Riffle Slo pe (ft /ft)
A,�; 04V
r_� j
0 043
W, ),A
VL6
0 031
0 004
1111`
Pool Length (ft)
XW i
"t "t
a sks °
6
8
7
14
20
17
15
60
20
7
81
29
PoolSpacing (ft)
s` _„" h
u° ,
_ . r
+�
i
�
6
31
18 5
4 9
47 3
26 1
36
82 5
593
236
1295
493
Substrate
d50 (mm)
JtO�! -'
�4
�& jvAJM
74
VW"_-
Rid
0 2
V
r I
""' $i.,A
0 2
, 7T
02
d84 mm
`
.
i a i r
, Y
w � � Y
0 2
°
0 2
02
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
��� w _rp,�
_±,fx��a�?��4 �r
1900
86
1 866
1 866
Channel Length (ft)
1920
106
2 277
2 267
S in u o s ity
;, Wn,* 4t-
_ INVI; `�»�3111
101
123
122
121
Water Surface slope (ft /ft)
w4a
00071
00164
00039
N/A
BF Slope ft/ft
�, $ �"
„w : tc"
00071
00164
00039
0 004
Ros en Classification
F5
C5
C5
C5
UT to Ci ooked Creek
EEP Project # 434 44 KC /Associates ojNoith Cm olu�a
1010 MY04

Table IIn Monitoring - Cross- SectionMorphology� Data Table
Project Number and Name 434 - UT to Crooked Creek
Segment/Reach UT to Crooked Creek (2 219 ft )
Parameter
Cross Section I
Cross Section 2
Cross Section 3
Pool
Riffle
Riffle
Dimension
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Elevation (datum) used
'r a s
2350
2350
2350
k "�n
p
U
2343
2343
2343
`+
i s
��,.
2327
2327
2327
Bankfull Width (ft)
177
164
164
186
�
� ; ��
150
15 3
147
14 1
" , rya
126
127
1 1 2
126
Floodprone Width (ft)
9D
i�i
° ���
e�`(�
�!�
,+
61
>60
>60
>60
77
>70
>70
>70
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft )
175
144
15 2
186
r
' ei
96
9 1
92
12 1
f a�
122
10 1
100
112
Banktull Mean Depth (ft)
10
09
09
1 0
v414
'�Y
06
06
06
09
'_V d ti
1 0
08
09
09
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
2
22
23
25
e{
s
1 4
1 4
1 3
1 6
J. 4
1 5
1 3
1 3
1 5
we
a
Width/Depth Ratio
�¢
r q�
-�
r 5
23 5
256
23 6
164
'
m }4 {
130
161
127
142
1 &A
Entrenchment Ratio
5 4
4
zj t
(f M
mw
40
>4 0
>4 0
>4 0
6 1
>5 0
>6 0
>6 0
Bank Height Ratio
i+
i y
1 0
10
10
1 0
Wiz'
^
10
10
10
1 0
Cross Sectional Area behtieen end pins (ft)
"��
k;
« ib s
16 2
',
s
er44
m�
t ; ";
30 0
w nti
��
t
r
18 2
d50 (mm)
02
09
08
01
��
02
08
03
024�w
02
06
11
02
Parameter
Cross - Section 4
Cross Section 5
Cross Section 6
Pool
Pool
Pool
Dimension
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Elevation (datum) used
try. J
2315
231
231 5
`
p
2273
2273
2273
0''
2244
2244
2244
=y
, 'i
Bankfull Width (ft)
96
99
108
105
" � , '
16 5
16 7
16 3
17 2
n i
�� =M�
159
150
1 5 2
15 4°g
- s
Floodprone Width (ft)
48
'
v
d w �i
r
Ja
sx
4
''
� 1
71
4.
e' x
a
7t--k + �
ai `
, N �
68
�
e
�
�`
°a a� �
r- �r
r r,
a
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
266
268
253
308
j' `
25 6
25 7c
21 1
237
e. i
�1a4
223
200
205
21 7
'ti'
taj
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
28
27
23
29
''`�
1 6
1 5
1 3
14
��,
°?
1 4
1 3
1 4
1 4
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
3 5
3 6
3 5
41
j
3 6
3 5
29
34
x�e a
t a� �}
2 8
25
27
27
Width/Depth Ratio
a
Entrenchment Ratio
5 0
"wSi
K '"
k L
43
S
a
i i i
°
i r 4
"y. 1 i
s
f
4 3
Bank Height Ratio
r�sd
�t
�7"+'���
r�
�;�' <��
"*an`3dw;`���i
«A�
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft )t'
k
a s '
37 4
u� r�
�'7 i
* t
�� M
45 8
-
; ' t
r
r
� ""�,J
43 5
d50 (nun)
02
I l
09
02
�tyvi�
02
04
05
02�s
*rF
02
04
05
02
'x�a
r;
UT to Ci coked Creek
EEP Protect # 434
45
KCI Associates of Noi th Cat ohna
10/0 MY04
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000c

00000 0000000000000000000000000000000000 (l)UOUCY
Table 1]a Monitoring - Cross - Section Morphology Data Table
Project Number and Name 434 - UT to Crooked Creek
Segment / Reach UT to Crooked Creek (2 219 ft )
Parameter
Cross Section 7
Cross Section 8
Rittle
Rittle
Dimension
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Elevation (datum) used
a
2229
2229
2229
' -,
� ,PZ
Lr� 1%
221 7
221 7
221 6
=�A
m � 1
Bankfull Width (ft)
191
170
195
208
,,"Kit
41, gt
1 15 0
13 3
121
13 5
Floodprone Width (ft)
68
>60
>60
>60
°��„
x.�a
200
>60
>60
>60
< &
„' e�
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
167
175
15 2
168
i
15 7
140
146
159
Banktull Mean Depth (ft)
09
1 10
08
08
Yg
1 I
1 1
1 1 2
1 2
Bankfull Maxanum Depth (ft)
16
26
19
25
` t'}
1 2
20
2 1
22
Width/Depth Ratio
219
166
224
25 7
143
126
10 1
l 1 4*t;*
Entrenchment Ratio
36
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0�'hx
40
>4 0
>4 0
>4 0
10r4
t�
Bank Height Ratio
10
1 0
10
10
tie"
10
1 0
10
10
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft)
3
;
gym" g
254
$"
f
207
d50 (mm)
02
02
05
0 1
02
0 1
1 32
05
UT to Ci ooked Creek 46 KCI Associates of North Cat ohna
EEP Project # 434 2010 MY04

Table l lb Monitoring- Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Project Number and Name 434 - UT to Crooked Creek
Segment Reach UT to Crooked Creek (2 219 ft )
Parameter
MY 01 (2007)
MY 02 (2008)
MY 03 (2009)
MY 04 (2010)
MY 0:� (2011)
Dimension
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Mcan
Mcd
Maa
SD
n
Min
Mcan
Med
Max
SD
n
Mut
Mcan
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
126
190
150
127
170
143
112
144
134
195
37
4
126
156
134
229
49
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
60
200
75
60
70
60
600
62
600
700
50
4
600
675
675
750
65
4
�ar
- r RA,,
W '
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
100
170
160
91
175
121
92
123
123
152
3 1
4
1 1 2
137
134
168
25
4
+A4
, "
°&
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
06
1 1
09
06
1 1
09
06
09
09
12
03
4
08
09
1 09
1 1
01
4
E a w
m
;.K -Av "
_It4
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
14
20
1 5
1 3
26
1 7
1 3
1 7
16
21
04
4
1 5
1 8
1 8
20
02
4+
Width/Depth Ratio
130
235
143
126
256
164
101
172
176
236
68
4
110
169
153
258
64
4
Entrenchment Ratio
40
130
60
30
43
40
60
1 3
4
34
47
47
60
1 1
4
Bank Height Ratio
1 0
1 0
10
1 0
10
10
1 0
1 0
1 0
10
00
4
10
10
10
10
00
4'���jr
§�
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
� "
Y
^�i
4 r,�
Radius of Curvature ft
( )fi9'n
� a
"dEl
e
S'4
J �`
i k't�dt
a��
P R+ nAai
toa#t • "
ev_
'`,,,<."r"Y 4
+v'Y&.•*
d`
TfA
a a9i�1,*
F�
fi:k
`
�ki
��
6"'N4�
of �d
L
�+
Meander Wavelength (ft)
$ a
$
��
to l
��
"_'pf
-"-t
'4 4 44
ylx'
in
Meander Width Ratio'
a..
z'
-g'
t �
ce r
a 1, � 14
-
�
v
�
-�
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
11
66
30
10
44
22
4
14?"
52
3
15
13
47
123
18
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0 000
0 025
0 006
0 003
0 037
0 009
0 001
0 010
0 051
m"r
z
0 009
0 015
0 012
0 049
0 013
18
Pool Length (ft)
5
48
27
3
29
10
3
9
t g
40
, 'a't
3
15
I5
44
7 9
40
'}
��
� �
,
r k,,�
��
Pool Spacing(ft)
10
86
48
12
160
44
12
34
y
138
r'�;;�
°t
17
59
48
182
374
39
Additional Reach Parameters
Vallev Length (ft)
1 866
1 866
1 866
1 866`
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2 376•'
2 287
2 287
2 287
Smuostt)
121
123
123
123
j 4' wi L V W1` 4 4 '�� A'
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0 00384 0 00484
00073
00067
00074
�fP- r 'ggzR � a�
Bankfull Slope (ft /tt)
0 00384 0 00484
00073
00068
00072
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be /o
°{
'� ' p r r
25% / 70% / 5%
d16 /d35 /d50 /d84/d95
0062/0096/017/044 /2
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
h
0%
"
T
Rosgen Classification
C5
C5
C5
CS,"
-- i najweg longer aue to tape sKew
UT to Crooked Creek
47 KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project 9 434 2010 MY04

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
UT to Crooked Creek 48 KC/ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 434 2010 MY04

r
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Project Number and Name 434 - UT to Crooked Creek
Date of Data
Date of
Method
Photo Number
Collection
Occurrence
11/11/2009
06/18/09
Evaluation of rainfall data
N/A
11/25/2009
11/13/09
Evaluation of rainfall data
N/A
Site visit to evaluate indicators
10 /15/2010
9/30/2010
N/A
after rainfall event
UT to Crooked Creek 49 KCl Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 434 2010 MY04