Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20050591 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20110121I Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Site EEP Project Number 308 USGS HUC 03040102 Third Year Monitoring Report Yadkin County North Carolina November 2010 (Updated Janu011) Table of Contents 10 Executive Summary/Project Abstract 1 1 Project Goals and Objectives 1 2 Vegetation Condition and Comparison 13 Stream Stability /Condition and Comparison 14 Wetland Conditions and Performance 15 Narrative Background 2 0 Methodology 3 0 References Project Conditions and Monitoring Data Appendices Appendix A — General Figures and Plan Views Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Consolidated Current Condition Plan View 14 -rte •�� 1 lf07 2 3 jAppendix B — General Protect Tables Table 1 Project Restoration Components Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3 Project Contacts Table Table 4 Project Attribute Table Appendix C — Vegetation Assessment Data Table 5 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table O Table 6 Vegetation Metadata Table Table 6A Vegetation Condition Assessment Table 7 Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species — Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos O — Vegetation Problem Area Photos (submitted electronically) — Vegetation Problem Area Inventory Table (submitted electronically) Appendix D — Stream Assessment Data — Table 8 Visual Morphological Stability Assessment j— Table 9 Verification of Bankfull Events J — Stream Station Photos — Cross Sections with Annual Overlays — Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays — Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays — BEHI and Sediment Export Estimates Table (omitted, not applicable) _ — Baseline Stream Data Summary Table [Exhibit Table VIII] (submitted electronically) — Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary [Exhibit Table IX] (Cross Section and Reach Parameters submitted electronically) — Stream Problem Area Photos (submitted electronically) — Stream Problem Area Inventory Table (submitted electronically) i FEJ]EcoEngineering 0 A d r mn of lbe John R McAdams Company Inc r, Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Site EEP Project Number 308 USGS HUC 03040102 Third Year Monitoring Report Yadkin County North Carolina November 2010 (Updated January 2011) —1 I Appendix E — Wetland Assessment I[ ; Table 10 Wetland Critena Attainment (omitted, not applicable) Precipitation and Water Level Plots (omitted, not applicable) 0 0 0 i {Li FJ U r, 11 AEcoEngineenng (� , A drvnsm of The John R McAdams Comp®y Ioc O Original baseline vegetation monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Monitoring Year 1 and 2008 is considered a drought year The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the baseline datum because after two years of monitoring it is assumed all planted stems within a O vegetation monitoring plot have been surveyed and accounted for Therefore, any additional species observed in proceeding monitoring years are considered volunteer species Current stem counts were calculated using vegetation plot monitoring data Interim density targets (stems /acre) are 320 at year 3 and 288 at year 4 Final stem count criteria are 260 trees U per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring As for monitored Year 3, Rocky Branch had 11 plots encompassing 0 27 acres, containing 378 planted and volunteer stems, which (� yielded a density of 1,391 trees per acre including planted and volunteer species Planted and �J volunteer vegetation survival threshold was met for each of the plots L 1 I� 0 Various exotic /invasive species were observed at the site Exotic species observed at the site include Chinese privet (Ligustrum smense), Chinese lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), and cattail (Typha lattlfolza) The extent of exotic /invasive species is depicted in the Consolidated Current Conditions Plan View Appendix D During the site investigations, encroachments into the conservation easement were observed in the form of cattle entering the easement The conservation easement encroachment area is noted on Sheet 6 of the Consolidated Current Conditions Plan View located in Appendix D [JEcoEngineenng A di ism of The john R McAdams Compmy Irc Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Site EEP Project Number 308 USGS HUC 03040102 Third Year Momtonng Report Yadkin County North Carolina November 2010 (Updated January 2011) 10 Executive Summary/Proiect Abstract 1 I Project Goals and Objectives The goals of this stream restoration project were to — To improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat in and around the stream channels by reducing sediment and waste inputs into the stream caused by bank erosion, mass - wasting, and livestock influences ri — To improve the richness and diversity of the plant species within the conservation easement — To facilitate on -going livestock operations through farm management improvements n- — To provide perpetual protection for the restored stream channels and associated riparian and upland buffers OThese goals will be met through the following objectives — By using natural channel design to restore stable dimension, pattern, and profile for j� the project stream reaches L — By establishing a native plant community to match the endemic plant species at the site — By reducing the quantities of exotic invasive species at the site through mechanical and chemical methods f� — By decommissioning a dairy waste storage pond to eliminate future risks to the Rocky Branch channel and the watershed — By installing watering facilities and a shadehouse to manage livestock previously 0 using the restoration site — By establishing a conservation easement and permanent fencing to provide long -term n protection for the site (Mulkey, 2008) J12 Vegetation Condition and Comparison O Original baseline vegetation monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Monitoring Year 1 and 2008 is considered a drought year The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the baseline datum because after two years of monitoring it is assumed all planted stems within a O vegetation monitoring plot have been surveyed and accounted for Therefore, any additional species observed in proceeding monitoring years are considered volunteer species Current stem counts were calculated using vegetation plot monitoring data Interim density targets (stems /acre) are 320 at year 3 and 288 at year 4 Final stem count criteria are 260 trees U per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring As for monitored Year 3, Rocky Branch had 11 plots encompassing 0 27 acres, containing 378 planted and volunteer stems, which (� yielded a density of 1,391 trees per acre including planted and volunteer species Planted and �J volunteer vegetation survival threshold was met for each of the plots L 1 I� 0 Various exotic /invasive species were observed at the site Exotic species observed at the site include Chinese privet (Ligustrum smense), Chinese lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), and cattail (Typha lattlfolza) The extent of exotic /invasive species is depicted in the Consolidated Current Conditions Plan View Appendix D During the site investigations, encroachments into the conservation easement were observed in the form of cattle entering the easement The conservation easement encroachment area is noted on Sheet 6 of the Consolidated Current Conditions Plan View located in Appendix D [JEcoEngineenng A di ism of The john R McAdams Compmy Irc �I 1 Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Site EEP Project Number 308 USGS HUC 03040102 Third Year Monitonng Report Yadkin County North Carolina November 2010 (Updated January 2011) �1 The conservation easement encroachment area is near the pond located at the end of the project and within an area that was not previously planted Field indicators (i e cattle hoofs 0 and cattle excrement) were observed indicating that cattle have encroached into the conservation easement It appeared that cattle entered the conservation easement for short periods of time since there was not an over abundance of field indicators No damage to planted areas within the conservation easement was noted 13 Stream Stabihty/Condition and Comparison (� The largest problem observed within the stream channel is beaver activity A beaver den and U a new beaver dam were observed this year Overall the channel morphology appeared stable However, there is a "J" hook structure (Structure Number 14, Station 12 +00, Consolidated O Current Conditions Plan View, Appendix D) which has been compromised due to the beaver activity associated with the former beaver dam number 3 Evidence of a bankfull event was observed this monitoring year O14 Wetland Conditions and Performance No wetlands are being monitored for mitigation credits at this project site 15 Narrative Background Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration O plan documents available on the EEP website All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request O2 0 Methodology All monitoring methodologies follow the most current templates and guidelines provided by EEP (EEP, 2006, EEP, 2009) Photographs were taken at high resolution using an Olympus 0 FE -115 5 0 megapixel digital camera GPS location information was collected using a Trimble Geo XT handheld mapping grade GPS unit Stream and vegetation problem areas were noted in the field on As -Built Plan Sheets 0 The methods used to generate the data`in this report are standard fluvial geomorphology techniques as described in Applied River Morphology (Rosgen, 1996) and related O publications from US Forest Service and the interagency Stream Mitigation Guidelines (USACE, 2003) Vegetation monitoring methods followed the 2008, Version 4 2 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (Lee et al, 2008) Vegetation plot photographs were collected for each vegetation plot Vegetation monitoring plots were re- marked in the field by replacing all old flagging with new orange flagging Monitoring taxonomy follows Flora of the Carolinas, O Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas (Weakley 2007) Stem height was measured with a folding one -meter rule Diameter at breast height and decimeter height were measured with calipers F1 I� 2 FE-I]EcoEngineering 0 A d vumn of The John R McAdams Company Inc CRocky Branch Stream Restoration Site EEP Project Number 308 USGS HUC 03040102 Third Year Monitoring Report Yadkin County North Carolina November 2010 (Updated January 2011) 3 0 References Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), 2006 Monitoring Report Guidelines, November 16, 2006 j j Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), 2009 Monitoring Report Guidelines, June 1, 2009 Lee, Michael T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol ( -1 for Recording Vegetation, Version 4 2 (http Ucvs bio unc edu/methods htm) Mulkey Engineer and Consultants, 2008 As -Built Mitigation Plan Rocky Branch Stream Mitigation Report Submitted to NCDENR -EEP, February 2008 Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied Morphology Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO oUS Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2003 April 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2005 Information Regarding Stream Restoration In The Outer Coastal Plain of North Carolina US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, Regulatory Division and North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, December 1, 2005 Weakley, A S , 2008 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, northern Florida, and surrounding areas University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, working Draft as of April 7, 2008 0 0 Fa-l]EcoEngineering A dimm of 7Lc John R. McAdams Company Im u f� , 1 0 V Ell 0 0 rl Li Pi P, APPENDIX A General Figures and Plan View � I •' � ! �j'� I � �•��LI � y.� 51. I i I ' �a `� • __, `� � it � PROJECT AREA r yg , - �14�+ etc 4 F'�" ..Jr�'... �"w.P... - 4, 1 • 4 - k. _ ' ��\t .. �. Sl 1t �.i�Ft �'I• .. - •�'.. Y� 'i. 1,Ji•`.. i'' 4'L1[ I f j`t 's ti elf USGS, 7.5 MINUTE, TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE; BROOKS CROSSROADS, N.C.; 1970; LAT: 36.0943785' N ON: 80.8114769' W j PROJECT NO. EEP -08020 ROCKY BRANCH AEcoEngineering A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. mLENAIW: EEP -08020 C7 a {. tell VICINn Y MAP SCALE: 1 �� _ 1,000 ENGINEERS• PLANNERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK • CHARLOTTE • WILWNGTON j L 11 't'i?lt ' YADHIN COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA i 848 Yer jo Partrq, Durham ,C 8TAJ 60Q�7J9 -5616. wrrw,ioh'vmcadema.com . License No.: C -0285 DATE: OS -13 -10 ROCKY BRANCH CONSOLIDATED CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW - YEAR THREE MONITORING VICINITY MAP NTS YADIUN COUN'T'Y, NORTH CAROLINA EEP PROJECT NUMBER: 308 DATE: AUGUST 23, 2010 NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM NC -EEP CONTACT: HARRY TSOMIDES (828) 545 -7057 POINT TABLE POINT NUMBER PROJECT START EASTING LEVATI❑ DESCRIPTION 1 1858613.93 STA. 0 +00 1464824.91 928.25 1 0 KY LAT: 36.0943785' N 1464784.29 923.60 CONTROL BRAt CHI i LON: 80.8114769' W 1465232.84 921.75 CONTROL 4 857374.24 1465869,69 943.35 CONTROL 5 857383,41 END OF YEAR THREE SURVEY CONTROL 6 P 25'INGRESS EGRESS 1466325.15 945.11 2 ✓i AND REGRESS EASEMENT 1466508.09 947.75 CONTROL %, 857188.08 TRIBUTARY 1 939.14 CONTROL w 4 1467244.76 928.06 CONTROL ll? 856996.29 1466467.36 PROJECT END CONTROL 11 1856897,33 1467392.45 STA. 40 +87 CONTROL 100 857064.87 1467441.85 917.74 CONTROL 101 858419.60 1464837.57 930.60 CONTROL 102 858025.29 1465002,38 927.84 CONTROL 103 858597.92 1464848.09 933.32 CONTROL [CONSERVATION 858530.69 1465077.59 969.73 CONTROL 105 EASEMENT 1465445.98 923.35 CONTROL 106 858309.21 1464950.27 949.60 NL SET 107 858049.05 1465099.55 941.04 NL SET 108 857672.99 1465257.40 923.10 azi 109 APPROXIMATELY 30' 1465705.60 933.45 qW 110 MAINTAINED R W 1466070.12 918.28 POINT TABLE POINT NUMBER �ORTHINC EASTING LEVATI❑ DESCRIPTION 1 1858613.93 1464824.91 928.25 CONTROL 2 1857706.98 1464784.29 923.60 CONTROL 857497.74 1465232.84 921.75 CONTROL 4 857374.24 1465869,69 943.35 CONTROL 5 857383,41 1466105.73 924.76 CONTROL 6 P 857286.17 1466325.15 945.11 CONTROL 7 857204.24 1466508.09 947.75 CONTROL 8 857188.08 1466694.46 939.14 CONTROL 93 856985.38 1467244.76 928.06 CONTROL 10 856996.29 1466467.36 970.98 CONTROL 11 1856897,33 1467392.45 917.61 CONTROL 100 857064.87 1467441.85 917.74 CONTROL 101 858419.60 1464837.57 930.60 CONTROL 102 858025.29 1465002,38 927.84 CONTROL 103 858597.92 1464848.09 933.32 CONTROL 104 858530.69 1465077.59 969.73 CONTROL 105 857360.69 1465445.98 923.35 CONTROL 106 858309.21 1464950.27 949.60 NL SET 107 858049.05 1465099.55 941.04 NL SET 108 857672.99 1465257.40 923.10 NL SET 109 857351.66 1465705.60 933.45 NL SET 110 857528.08 1466070.12 918.28 NL SET 111 857483.76 1466334.47 916.79 NL SET 9001 858530.66 1465077.56 969.66 TTPT104 9002 858583.24 1465085.65 964.54 EIP- IN- 30MAPLE 9003 858597.24 1464859.07 934.86 R/N MON 9004 858162.53 1464795.63 928.21 BENCHMARK 1 9005 858025.27 1465002.36 927.84 TTPT102 9006 857685.27 1465116.57 924.65 BENCHMARK 3 9007 857560.18 1465779.26 921.38 BENCHMARK 47 9008 857360.66 1465446.04 923.31 TTPT105 9009 857508.68 1466220.77 919.02 BENCHMARK 5 9010 857439.76 1466843.27 918.41 BENCHMARK 8 9011 857317.78 1466690.43 919.68 BENCHMARK 7 NOTE: SURVEY DATES OF THALWEG AND TOP -OF -BANK - 08/02/10 TO 08/05/10. SHEET RMEX 1-6 Dr=RATM PLAN VIEW AftoEngineering A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS - ENVIRONMENTAL IIILl ,I 1 I C it 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham NC 27713 RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK - CHARLOTTE 's *rAWa" 800- 733 -5848 ■ www.johmmcadams.com -license No.: C -0293 LEGEND EXISTING FENCE LINE THALWEG OF CREEK i CONSERVATION EASEMENT _---- T_ CE CE CE �� CE CE CE i ROCK CROSS VANE — --- CE — — CE CE CE i CE -- ---- CE -- CE -- i i ROCK A -VANE i CONSERVATION EASEMENT i LOG VANE v i j ROOT WAD NORTH CAROLINA i DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION i ROCK VANE'J CONSERVATION EASEMENT #1 13.469 ACRES I STRUCTURE NUMBER O PARCEL 701WM i SURVEY CONTROL Q i w i Cq INVASIVE /EXOTIC POPULATION i PHOTO POINT P1P O PP CROSS SECTION 1 i W i � CREST GAGE V i RIFFLE 5 i BEAVER DAM / MID - CHANNEL BAR VEG PLOT 1 � � EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT AREA i / NOTES: p \ i CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROVIDED BY EEP FROM CE \ 4 on ) PLAT PREPARED BY MULKEY ENGINEERS & CE O3 O < �� s \ CONSULTANTS TITLED "PLAT SHOWING NORTH �`CE� CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CEO _ 5§1 \ _ CRI I CONSERVATION EASEMENTS PROPERTY OF: WILLIAM M. 1xp0 CE CT / i ALLEN, ET. UX., JOE L. ALLEN, ET. UX., TEXIE B. ©' CE -L� / i J CE CE � I �- CE i -�- CE i l OWNES, ET. AL. , BOOK OF MAPS 9, PAGE 606. SURVEY DATES OF THALWEG AND TOP -OF -BANK - 08/02/10 TO 08/05/10. W t V O NO az z E t,OV V OR o x N O O U O N Co 0 O0 I 1 of II GRAPHIC SCALE w 0- o 50 0 25 50 100 0 w z Ll z L 1 inch = 50 ft. o SHEET 1 OF 6 l fiMeADAMS LESPEDEZA CUNEATA4 ENCROACHMENT '"i 25' INGRESS, EGRESS AND REGRESS EASEMENT LESPEDEZA CUNEATA ENCROACHMENT LIGUSTRUM SINENSE ENCROACHMENT CE t CE - CONSERVATION EASEMENT 1 �I 1 �I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONSERVATION EASEMENT #1 13.469 ACRES PARCEL 701 WM VEG PLOT 2 --' / VEG PLOT CROSS SECTION 3 'Q MID - CHANNEL BA Q �J of I R4 I X12 +00 HOOK COMPR © / / FORMER BEAVER DAM .r / — #3 LOCATION CRI ® / + CROSS SECTION 2 VEG PLOT 001,19 CE CE —l�cE NEW BEAVER DAM #4 ``CE CONSTRUCTED DURING MY03 CE CE PERIOD. CE CE TYPHA LATIF, ENCROACHME TYPHA LATIFOLIA ENCROACHMENT 3 lJM SEE SHEET 8 VEG PLOT 5 / tY U ".:IFOLIA ENCROACHMENT V U U U V t U GRAPHIC SCALE 60 0 30 60 120 ct 1 inch = 60 ft. SHEET 2 OF 6 •L r o W< Ar 0 0 1� No aZ z o E f 1 OO V �in O� O x N O 0 0 0 cD I O co d of II W W 00 W � 0 z F w e YeADAMS I I I- I I I\ NI I/ ,I �I �I ( I i I I I I I LESPEDEZA CUNEATA ENCROACHMENT EE CE CE - ---- -- CE CE CE CE CE CE _� CE I P CROSS SECTION 4 0 CE I 3 m CE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I ® VEG PLOT 7 CONSERVATION EASEMENT #2 m 3.641 ACRES PARCEL 702WM ,�kp0� / \ \ x00 / / LIGUSTRUM SINENSE , / m ENCROACHMENT I• / / CRI --" �VEG PLOT 6 DEPARTMEORTOFCTR CAROLINA CROSS !� CROSS SECTION 5 • CONSERVATION EASEMENT #1 CE � CE I 13.469 ACRES CE PARCEL 701 WM GE �_ CE I CE CF- / i 25' INGRESS, EGRESS /cE AND REGRESS EASEMENT / cE / GE GF- CE - CE -_CE- E /G6 CONSERVATION EASEMENT :, Qo GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 1 inch = 50 ft. SHEET 3 OF 6 Qi z C: C: LU C F' O �E W a a c� i L w V O �o 0. z z o- r) U N X O O N O 00 O i d W w 0 z F U O x O O N O Lo I Co ro O II I j W CC w ° Z a Z J fil U C o McADAMS i CEI CE _ CE CE I CE � CE I � CE CE LIGUSTRUM SINENSE C_ ENCROACHMENT CE • �� CE I CE I _ CE _ I NO I x0� DEPARTMENTTOFCTRAONSPORTATION CE ce 3 / \yx Q CONSERVATION EASEMENT #2 3.641 ACRES O • PARCEL 702WM 1100 w ® V LESPEDEZA CUNEATA \ \ 4zp AND ROSA MULTIFLORA ENCROACHMENT \ / / —� / \x00 CROSS SECTION 5 j ROSA MULTIFLORA ENCROACHMENT CE ( / LONICERA JAPONICA R CE ENCROACHMENT \ / \ CE _ CE **-� U VEG PLOT 8 BEAVER DEN `I CE I CROSS SECTION 6 I ��) CE FORMER BEAVER DAM LONICERA JAPONICA �CE Cf #1 LOCATION ENCROACHMENT L _CE [CONSERVATION EASEMENT Cf I CE CE, I �— CE CE I CE CE I cal NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONSERVATION EASEMENT #3 6.985 ACRES ° PARCEL 703WM GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 1 inch = 50 ft. r y 1 W � e W t V O 0 az W E OO V U O U O x N O O 00 ° ° i O co a of II W w o0 w ° x o SHEET 4 OF 61 ItfillicADA34 I Cr \\ CE LIGUSTRUM SINENSE END OF MY -03 THALWAG IENCROACHMENT SU VEY QE dl I 30 +90 9 �� 100 \ Loll � 1 \�1 N I � CRIO ORMER BEAVER VEG PLOT 9 DAM #2 LOCATION I I Q� I I CROSS SECTION 7 I I I\ I `CE,� QE \ CE ` LESPEDEZA cc Cf cF cF \ 5\ I I CE,� � � I o o \-VEG PLOT 11 3 o 0 3 0 i ENCROACHMENT \ \ NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I \ CONSERVATION EASEMENT #3 6.985 ACRES 136 50 l CR11 PARCEL 703WM I�p _ I w L ICf o � \ II SERVATION EASEMENT Ct\ cf� ce of I \Qr � I ct, \ Ap- \ I GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 1 inch = 50 ft. SHEET 5 OF 6 L rl F�v O i O E OV X81 O U O N O 000 `n w w W O L :J u L c. ti o I I QE cc I I � I I � I Ps I �& I 1A �� \ QE Cr I \cf �I CONSERVATION EASEMENT ,I I NORTH CAROLINA + DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION + CONSERVATION EASEMENT #3 + + 6.985 ACRES PARCEL 703WM + + + + + I � / r + + + + + I I I o \ ® EASEME AREA _ h CF \ \ + �4, PPROXIMATELY 30' MAINTAINED R/W NT ENCROACt jIG1ENT + + + + + + + + + + + + r Sb - GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 1 inch = 50 ft. SHEET 6 OF 6 rim y 0% u W<� [U zi V g 0 .9 M � x 0 E U 81 O N O 0 O 00 al of II f iw w - 0 0 0 Z 0 ®McADAMS I 1 F U r 1] r^ 0 1 Fl Li CI Fl 1 APPENDIX B General Project Tables E, F1 0 PJ J 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 ri 1 Table 1 Protect Restoration Components Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Srte/EEP Project Number 308 Project °D „ don 0 o Segment or F a U eU a Stationmg Comment Reach ID W w E w Q Rocky 3 090 R PP & 3,614 1 3 614 0+00 30 +90 94 Branch EI P4 206 066 137 Tributary 1 593 R P1 172 1 172 0 +00 1 +72 NA = Not Applicable, Portion of original Tributary 2 280 NA NA Pond NA NA NA channel contained within proposed conservation easement Mitigation Unit Summations Riparian Nonnpanan Total Wetland Stream (If) Wetland (Ac) Wetland (Ac) (Ac) Buffer (Ac) Comment r-3.923 0 0 0 0 R= Restoration EI= Enhancement EII= Enhancement II P1= Priority I P3= Priority III S= Stabilization P2= Priority II SS= Stream Bank Stabilization U 0 1 0 l� D, i 1 n 1 i 0 0 0 Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting history Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Pro ect Number 308 Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or Delivery Restoration Plan Winter 04 Mar -05 Final Design — 90% Summer 05 Winter 05 Construction May 06 Sep-06 Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area May 06 Sep 06 Permanent seed nux applied to reach/segments 1 & 2 Sep-06 Sep 06 Contamenzed and B &B plantings for reach/segments 1 & 2 Fall 06 Dec 06 Mitigation Plan / As built ear 0 Monitoring — baseline Winter 07 Feb -08 Year 1 Momtorm Sep-08 Nov -08 Year 2 Monitoring Sep-09 Nov 09 Year 3 Monitoring Aug- 10 Oct -10 Note Timeframe estimated from information provided by EEP r- �I 1 0 IJ 0 0 1 Table 3 Project Contacts Table Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project Number 308 Designer Mulkey Engineers & Consultants 6750 Tryon Road, cary, NC 27518 Primary project design POC Wendee Smith, 919 858 1833 Construction Contractor Fluvial Solutions, Inc PO Box 28749, Raleigh, NC 27611 -8749 Construction contractor POC Peter Jelenevsky, 919 -605 6134 Planting Contractor Carolina Silvics 908 Indian Trail Road, Edenton, NC 27932 Planting contractor POC Mary- Margaret McKmney 252 484 -8491 Seeding Contractor Contact Fluvial Solutions Inc PO Box 28749, Raleigh, NC 27611 8749 Planting contractor POC Peter Jelenevsky, 919 605 -6134 Seed Mix Sources Contact Fluvial Solutions Inc Peter Jelenevsky 919 605 6134 Nursery Stock Suppliers ArboGen 843 851 4129 Monitoring Performers EcoEngmeermg A Division of The John R McAdams Co 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham NC 27713 Stream Monitoring POC Jun Halley 919 287 -4262 Vegetation Momtormg POC Jun Halley 19-2874262 Wetland Monitoring POC NA NA O Note Information obtained from EEP documents and bid tabulation results Use contacts in table for additional information or to verify data 1 0 I u 0 n L C 0 0 I 0 0 1 1 1 i, I J i 1 Table 4 Project Background Table Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project Number 308 Project County Yadkin County Drainage Area 3 1 square miles Drainage impervious cover estimate ( %) For example 5% Stream Order 1 Physiographic Region Piedmont Ecoregion Northern Inner Piedmont Rosgen Classification of As built C4 Cowardm Classification R3UBH Dominant soil types Chewacla Cecil Applmg and Wilkes Reference site ID Spencer Creek USGS HUC for Project and Reference Project 03040102 Reference 03040104 NCDWQ Sub basin for Project and Reference Project 03 -07 06, Reference 03 07 09 NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference Project WS -III Reference WS-IV Any portion of any project segment 303d listed? no Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d listed segment? no Reasons for 303d listing or stressor no of project easement fenced 100% rl �l �l 0 �J 0 1 0 APPENDIX C Vegetation Assessment Data 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 C 0 1 0 1 Table 5 Vegetation Plot Nfiti ation Success Summary Table Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project ID 308 Tract Vegetation Plot ID Vegetation Survival Threshold Mete Tract Mean Rocky Branch VP1 Y 100% VP2 Y VP3 Y VP4 Y VP5 Y VP6 Y VP7 Y VP8 Y VP9 Y VP 10 Y VP l 1 Y 0 Note Threshold criteria based on planted and volunteer species 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 J 0 i Ell F N 0 0 1 0 J 1 1 0 IM 0 0 0 1 Table 6 Vegetation Metadata Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project ID 308 Report Prepared By George Buchholz Date Prepared 10/4/2010 16 25 database name EcoEngincering 2010 B mdb database location X \Projects\EEP\EEP 08020 (Rocky Branch) \Storm \CVS Vegetation Data\2010 Veizetation Data computer name BUCHHOLZGEO file size 52297728 DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT - Metadata Description of database file the report worksheets and a summary of project(s) and project data Proj, planted Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre for each year This excludes live stakes Pro l, total stems Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre for each year This includes live stakes all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems Plots List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing etc Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots Vigor b Spp Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by ecies Damage List of most frequent damage classes with numbei of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each Damage by Spp Damage values tallied by type for each species Damage by Plot Damage values tallied by type for each plot Planted Stems by Plot and Spp A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot dead and missing stems ai a excluded PROJECT SUMMARY— - — — — - Project Code 308 project Name Rocky Bi anch Description Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Project River Basin Yadkin Pee Dee length(ft) 3,992 stream to edge width (ft) 24 areas m 0 04 sq mile 24 10 aci es) Required Plots calculated 11 Sampled Plots 11 Table 6A Vegetation Condition Assessment Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Protect ID 308 Planted Acreage 13 29 Category Definitions Very limited cover of Number both woody and 1 Bare Areas herbaceous material Woody stem densities CCPV clearly below target Combined levels based on MY3 2 Low Stem 4 or 5 stem count Density Areas criteria Polygons Acreage Acrea e Areas or points (if too Areas with woody stems of a size class 3 Areas of Poor that are obviously Growth Rates or small given the Easement Acreaae 2409 CCPV Mapping Threshold De ictic 0 1 acres – umber % of of Combined Planted ilygons Acreage Acreage 0 0 00% 0 1 acres I - 1 0 1 0 1 00% 1 0 25 acres I — 1 0 1 0 1 00% 1 Number % of egetation CCPV of Combined Easement Category Definitions Mapping Threshold Depiction Polygons Acreage Acrea e Areas or points (if too small to render as 1000 SF diagonal 17 081 336% Invasive Areas polygons at map red of Concern scale Areas or points (if too 5 Easement small to render as cross Encroachment polygons at map none black 1 0 35 1 5% reas scale) Table 7 Stem Couont Total and Planted by Plot Species Rocky Branch Stream Restoration S>te/EEP Project ID 308 Page 1 I - Ongm] baud rte cgetao tip ttwng data w s trot p dod pnor to d e 2008 M mt g Yea I and 2008 mts dart a drotgbt year The 1009 M tttro g ti ear 2 s crns tiered the baultne dum botatse after two yem of mowtormg t u mstaoed an planted ttsas mthm a vqpmbm momlonng pl t beve bem surveyed and amounted for Therefore, any addtbo tal spores observed ptomedtng ntomtormg vean are Dots derrd ohaaeer speaes 2— Totalofpl tiledstars ad olunteerstars i —Total fpl nteduerrs Lily Current Plot Data (MY3 2010) Scientific Name Common Name Species Tvpe E308 01 VP10 E308 01 VP11 1 E308-01 VPl I E308-01 VP2 I E308-01 VP3 E308-01 VP4 E308-01 VPS I E308-01 VP6 E308 -01 VP7 P LS Pall T2 P LS P all T2 P LS P all T2 P LS Pall T2 JP LS P all T2 JP LS P all T2 JP LS P all T2 P LS P all T2 P LS P all T2 Acer ne undo boxelder Tree 3 1 1 47 1 1 Acer s Icatum mountain maple Shrub Tree 1 1 Alnus serrulata hazel alder Shrub Tree 4 4 2 2 Betula nigra river birch Tree 3 3 1 1 1 2 Ce halanthus occtdentalis common buttonbush Shrub Tree 3 41 1 1 1 1 3 3 6 7 2 3 Comus amomum silky dogwood Shrub fraxlnus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 3 4 6 6 3 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 Itea vtr mica Virginia sweetspire Shrub Juglans nl ra black walnut Tree 2 Linodendron tultptfera tullptree Tree 8 3 1 Platanus ocadentalts American sycamore Tree 1 381 2 3 9 11 1 1 11 11 2 2 Prunus serotlna black cherry Shrub Tree Prunus vtr Inlana chokecherry Shrub Tree 1 1 1 Quercus m ra water oak Tree 3 3 1 1 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 5 6 1 3 3 7 7 Rhus copallinum flameleaf sumac Shrub Tree 1 Saltx nigra black willow Tree 3 3 6 6 Sambucus canadensts Common Elderberry Shrub Tree I I 1 1 Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE 0 111 58 0 18 23 0 9 11 0 14 66 0 11 11 0 9 9 0 13 15 0 16 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 02 MJ 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 0 5 7 0 3 4 0 4 6 0 2 5 0 4 4 0 3 3 0 4 5 0 5 6 0 445 2347 0 728 931 0 364 445 0 567 2671 0 445 445 01 3641 364 01 5261 607 0 647 769 I - Ongm] baud rte cgetao tip ttwng data w s trot p dod pnor to d e 2008 M mt g Yea I and 2008 mts dart a drotgbt year The 1009 M tttro g ti ear 2 s crns tiered the baultne dum botatse after two yem of mowtormg t u mstaoed an planted ttsas mthm a vqpmbm momlonng pl t beve bem surveyed and amounted for Therefore, any addtbo tal spores observed ptomedtng ntomtormg vean are Dots derrd ohaaeer speaes 2— Totalofpl tiledstars ad olunteerstars i —Total fpl nteduerrs Lily o = o o = 0 0 o = = = = = = C---j Table 7 Stem Couont Total and Planted by Plot Species Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project ID 308 Page 2 I — O gunl basduto eWation trotuton data was not pro ded poor to th 2008 Momtotnt. Year t and 2008 is core deed a draught year The 1009 Motutarmg Year I rs coin derod the baseline datum beeaiue after two years f tin utonng t us assumed all planted steue wtftu egetahon momtonng pt t I a e been surveyed and omu ted for Therefim any addrhoml m obsoved m spin proaedutg motor n years are cans derod oluntcc spmm 2 -Total fplamedstartsandvol tueerstcrs 1 =T hl fplantedstatu my Current Plot Data (MY3 2010) Annual Means Scientific Name Common Name Species Type E308 01 VP8 1 E308-01 VP9 MY3 (2010) 1 M (2009)' MY3 (2008) P LS iPall TZ P LS P all Tz P LS P all Ta p LS pall Ta P LS pall T3 Acer ne undo boxelder Tree 53 Acer s icatum mountain maple Shrub Tree 1 1 2 2 2 2 nus serrulata hazel alder Shrub Tree 2 2 1 1 9 9 9 9 5 5 Betula m ra river birch Tree 1 1 6 7 8 8 8 8 Cephalanthus occldentalls common buttonbush Shrub Tree 3 3 18 21 19 19 25 25 Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub II 1 6 6 Fraxlnus penns (vamp green ash Tree 5 5 5 5 41 44 49 49 47 47 Itea wr mca Virginia sweets Ire Shrub 2 2 3 3 Ju ans ni ra black walnut Tree 2 Urnodendron tuli Ifera tullptree Tree 1 40 1 24 2 76 2 2 3 3 Platanus ocadentalls American sycamore Tree 7 55 6 33 127 37 37 37 37 Prunus serotma black cherry Shrub Tree I 1 1 Prunus vir intana chokecherry Shrub Tree 1 2 1 1 3 3 Querau ni ra water oak Tree 1 4 4 8 8 9 9 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 3 3 19 20 22 22 18 18 Rhus co allinum flameleaf sumac Shrub Tree 1 Sallx nigra black willow Tree 9 9 14 14 20 20 Sambucus canadensls Common Elderberry Shrub Tree 11 1 11 1 31 3 Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Species Counti Stems per ACRE 0 18 105 0 11 41 0 1441 378 01 1751 175 01 1891 189 1 1 11 11 11 002 0 02 027 027 0 27 0 51 7 01 121 16 0 14 14 Or 14 14 0 728 4249 01 4451 1659 01 530 1391 01 W1 644 0 695 695 I — O gunl basduto eWation trotuton data was not pro ded poor to th 2008 Momtotnt. Year t and 2008 is core deed a draught year The 1009 Motutarmg Year I rs coin derod the baseline datum beeaiue after two years f tin utonng t us assumed all planted steue wtftu egetahon momtonng pt t I a e been surveyed and omu ted for Therefim any addrhoml m obsoved m spin proaedutg motor n years are cans derod oluntcc spmm 2 -Total fplamedstartsandvol tueerstcrs 1 =T hl fplantedstatu my VEGETATION PLOT I - 5TREAMBANKS (5m X 20M). VIEW FROM 50UTHEA5T PLOT GORNER. VEGETATION PLOT 2 - RIPARIAN BUFFER (IOM x IOm). VIEW FROM 50UTHEA5T PLOT CORNER. PROJECT N0. EEP -08020 FILENAME: EEP08020 -EX1 r ROCKY BRANCH AEcoEngineering A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 9 SCALE: N TS 1,�'US�;�tt'111 MONMRING PHOTOS YADIUN COUNTY, RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC DATE: 08 -11 -10 NORTH CAROLINA (919) BOX 38115000 ZIP 27709 -4005 VEGETATION PLOT 3 — RIPARIAN BUFFER (IOM x IOm). VIEW FROM NORTHWEST PLOT CORNER. VEGETATION PLOT 4 — RIPARIAN BUFFER (IOm x IOm). VIEW FROM NORTHWEST PLOT CORNER. PROJECT NO. EEP -08020 FILe "AmE: EEP08020 —EX1 ROCKY BRANCH [JEcoEngineering A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. E SALE: MONMRING PHOTOS NTS � Ste[11 RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC DATE: R`!'' -�I 4 YADIUN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005 08 -11 -10 �: °' (919) 361 -5000 MIMI 4W "ilk VEGETATION PLOT 'i - RIPARIAN BUFFER (IOM x IOm). VIEW FROM NORTHWEST CORNER. VEGETATION PLOT 8 - RIPARIAN BUFFER (IOM x IOM). VIEW FROM NORTHWEST PLOT CORNER. PROJECT No. EEP -08020 ir 1- ROCKY BRANCH [JEcoEngineering division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc. FILE NAME: EEP08020 -EX1 " a SCALE: N TS IIA l.',i'(�VStelll MONITORING PHOTOS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC DATE: jj YADHIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005 08 -11 -10 \_ (919) 361 -5000 VEGETATION PLOT G — RIPARIAN BUFFER (IOM x IOM). VIEW FROM NORTHWEST CORNER. VEGETATION PLOT IO — RIPARIAN BUFFER (5m x 20m). VIEW FROM NORTHWEST PLOT CORNER. PROJECT No. EEP -08020 r` ROCKY BRANCH [JEcoEngineering� A division Wile John R McAdam Company, Inc. ENAbI rILENAeIe: EEP08020 -EX1 Y SCALE: NTS ll��, !�`l��t��tll PHOTOS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC d I AT�MON117OWNG YADM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005 DATE: 08 -11-10 (919) 361 -5000 �� '�� .y 'f -� ,,, �, ,�!: 777 d : ,�. �:� .(�i,, � +dam ,, � e 'S Y ? ���iQ'. 1. � � A � Nt �p� �Jp � .. ,�� Y j` i . �, YY �_ :'fir :'� � i � !� � ,'. �. ¢ l � f. . / 1 L, ri 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 n 1 APPENDIX D Stream Assessment Data C= C Table 8a Visual Morphological Stability Assessment Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Slte/EEP Protect Number 308 Rocky Branch 3,751 Linear Feet Feature Category Metric (per As built and reference baselines) (# Stable) Number Performing as Intended Total number per As built Total Number / feet in unstable state % Perform in Stable Condition Feature Perform Mean or Total A Riffles 1 Present 7 28 28 NA 100 2 Armor stable e g n o dis lacement 9 28 28 NA 100 3 Facet grade appears stable? 23 28 NA 82 4 Minimal evidence of embeddin g/fining? embedding/fining? 28 28 NA 100 5 Len ro nate� NA NA NA NA 96 25 27 NA 93 B Pools 1 Present? (e g not subject to severe aggrad or mrgrat ?) 2 Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D Mean Bkf>l 6 ?) 3 5 / 15 = 2 3 27 Max Pool / 1 5 > 16 24 of 27 NA 89 3 LenL4 a ro mate? 23 27 NA 85 89 C Thalwe 1 Upstream of meander bend (run/inflection) centenng9 37 39 NA 95 2 Downstream of meander (glidelinflection) centenng9 37 39 NA 93 94 D Meander 1 Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosron9 43 43 NA 100 2 Of those eroding # w /concomitant point bar formation 43 43 NA 100 3 Ap arent Rc within spec? 42 43 NA 98 4 Sufficient flood lam access and relief? 43 43 NA 100 100 7=w 1 General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation) NA NA NA E Bed General 100 2 Channel bed degradation — areas of increasing down cutting or head cuttings NA NA NA 100 100 F Bank 1 ActiveModing wasting or slum in bank a NA NA 5/90 98 98 G Vanes 1 Free of bank or arm scour? 35 36 30 97 2 Height appropriate? 35 36 30 97 3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate? 35 36 30 97 14 Free of ging or other structural fw1ures? 35 36 30 97 97 H Wads/ Boulders &Kffjw 1 Free of scour? 40 40 NA 100 12 Footing stable? 40 40 NA 100 100 C= = =--� = = o o = o o = = E-D o L-J o = o Table 8b Visual Morphological Stability Assessment Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Slte/EEP Project Number 308 Rocky Branch Tributary 1 172 Linear Feet Feature Category Metric (per As built and reference baselines) (# Stable) Number Performing as Intended Total number per As built Total Number / feet in unstable state % Perform in Stable Condition Feature Perform Mean or Total A Riffles 1 Present 3 3 NA 100 2 Armor stable e g n o dis lacement 9 3 3 NA 100 3 Facet grade appears stable9 3 3 NA 100 4 Minimal evidence of embeddin finin 9 3 3 NA 100 5 Len ro mate? NA NA NA NA 100 R "49 m aS' x -77. -.W`W 2 S'^ MM B Pools 1 Present? (e g not subject to severe aggrad or migrat ?) NA NA NA NA 2 Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D Mean Bkf>1 6? NA NA NA NA 3 Length appropriate? NA NA NA NA NA W Ir x'I..2YN C Thalweg 1 Upstream of meander bend (run/inflection) centering? 4 4 NA 100 2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering? 3 4 NA 100 100 D Meander 1 Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion? 5 5 NA 100 2 Of those eroding # w /concomitant point bar formation 0 0 NA 100 3 App arent Rc within spec9 5 5 NA 100 4 Sufficient flood lam access and relief? 5 5 NA 100 100 I General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation) E Bed General NA NA NA 100 2 Channel bed degradation — areas of increasing down cutting or head cutting? NA NA NA 100 100 ""A 1 Activel erodin wastta or sluging bank MMMMM7 F Bank NA NA 0/172 100 100 9 x MME Yt NA 100 G Vanes 1 Free of bank or arm scour? 3 3 2 Height appropriate? 3 3 NA 100 3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate? 3 3 NA 100 4 Free of pi ing or other structural failures? 3 3 NA 100 100 NA NA H Wads/ Boulders 1 Free of scour? NA NA 2 Footing stable? NA NA NA NA NA I v u I rl 0 0 J I --) I Ll I 0 Table 9 Verification of Bankfull Events Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Protect Number 308 Date of Data Collection Date of Occurrence Method Photo # (if available) 24 Sep 08 No occurrence Observation Not Available On Site Crest Gage located at Station Between 09/25/08 and 2 Oct 09 33 +08 Observed eleveation on gage at Not Available 10/02/09 elevation 918 99 On Site Crest Gage located at Station Between 10/02/09 and 5 Aug 10 33 +08 Observed elevation on gage at Not Available 08/05/10 elevation 914 25 r! . PHOTO POINT I. VIEW LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD DAIRY FACILITY. PHOTO POINT 2. VIEW LOOKING NORTH AGROSS NEW ROCKY BRANCH STREAM CHANNEL. ' rEOJECr No. EEP -08020 ROCKY BRANCH [JEcoEngineering A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc. "'� " "UE` EEP08020 —EXt Ci a + (' p SNS(tejmt ' „il. `l_' � tt'1 f i���' MONITORING PHOTOS YADIHN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC P.O. Box 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005 (919) 301 -5000 scALe: N TS DATE: 08 -11-10 .� j �s6:,...; N 4�. u ,� , %'o� J'a, r .0 �. ,s b s �' , �i r , .�� ._. .�,. .h .'^ �1 #;. +'� ` n�.�;n PHOTO POINT 3. VIEW LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD HOME5 LOCATED ALONG 5R 1120. PHOTO POINT 3. VIEW LOOKING EAST TOWARD HOODED AREA. PROJECT No. EEP -08020 '`'' FILENAME: � ROCKY BRANCH [aftoEngineering EEP08020 -EX1 A division Wile john R. McAdams Company, Inc. d SCAIE: MONITORING PHOTOS a NTS (`{, p l A- tJW'steIII RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005 DATE: 08— �1_.�O r..i .e (010) 361 -5000 PHOTO POINT 4. VIEW LOOKING WE5T THROU61`1 WOODED 5EGTION. PHOTO POINT 4. VIEW LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD 5R 1120. PROJECT NO EEP -08020 `'' ROCKY BRANCH AftoEngineering FtLENA"E: EEP08020 -EX1 A division ofThe John R _ McAdams Company, Inc. d SCALE: MON FdNG PHOTOS a N TS �SYSt��ll RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC � YADffiN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005 j DATE: 08_11 -10 �' (919 ) 361 -5000 166" 1 FILENAME: EEP08020 —EX1 SCALE: N TS Iy t• +fit. � S4'' � y• ; �f� ..A :a j a i 'y .. .. .. I .• i ..... ., a •:1' i .. `y —_— - y FILENAME: EEP08020 —EX1 SCALE: N TS Iy a i 'y .. .. .. I .• i ..... ., a •:1' i .. `y —_— FILENAME: EEP08020 —EX1 SCALE: N TS PHOTO POINT 5. VIEW LOOKING NORTH TOWARD NEWLY GONSTRUGTED TRIBUTARY I. PHOTO POINT 5. VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST TOWARD NEW POND. PROJECT N0. EEP- 08020 fl1.EN "►+e: ROCKY BRANCH DEcoEngineering EEP08020 -EX1 A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc. d SALE: 1(�('[��l Lr[l( MONMrMG PHOTOS a NTS Y,ll,t�� RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC iIff, 1- YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005 HATE: 08 -11 -10 . e. (919) 361 -5000 PHOTO POINT 6. VIEW LOOKING WEST TOWARD 5R 1120. PHOTO POINT 6. VIEW LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD 5R 1120 AND JOE ALLEN RE5IDENGE. J d a j PROJECT N0. EEP -08020 �' r• 1{ aSteil] i ROCKY BRANCH MONITORING PHOTOS YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA AftoEngineering A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc. RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC P.O. BOX 14005 'LIP 27709 -4005 (919) 361 -5000 FILENAME: EEP08020 -EX1 SCALE: NTS DATE: 08 -11 -10 PHOTO POINT 6. VIER LOOKING EAST TOWARD NEW POND. PROJECT NO. EEP -08020 FILENAME: EEP08020 -EX1 "`'' ROCKY BRANCH [JEcoEngineering A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc. d SCALE: N TS 1�OSV1tf'lll MONITORING PHOTOS y RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC DATE: j YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005 08 -11 -10 (919) 361 -5000 GRO55 5EGTION I - POOL. (ROCKY BRANCH, 5TA 4 + 25) VIEW LOOKING DOHNSTREAM. GRO55 5EGTION 2 - RIFFLE. (ROCKY BRANCH, 5TA G + 22) VIEW LOOKING DOWNSTREAM. PROJECT N0. EEP -08020 FILENAm' EEP08020 -EX1 SCALE: N TS DATE: 08-11-10 ROCKY BRANCH A EcoEngineering A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc. 1�1)SVStelll MONTrURIlVG PHOTOS I RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC l YADKIN COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005 11t 111 '.i 11CI ' (919) 961 -5000 GRO55 5EGTION 5 — POOL. (ROCKY BRANGH, 5TA 15 + 25) VIEW LOOKING DOWNSTREAM. GRO55 5EGTION 4 — RIFFLE. (ROCKY BRANGH, 5TA 1-7 + 4q) VIEW LOOKING DOWNSTREAM. PROJECT N0. V EEP- 08020• ROCKY BRANCH AEcoEngineering. FILENANe: EEP08020 —EX1 Aatvl.lon�T>wJo1,n d SCALE: N TS + �y[�,` MONITORING PHOTOS a 11 I IJI�'Jte��l i RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, DATE: 08_ 1 ,� _.� O ; ) , 7; YADM COUNTY, NORM CAROLINA P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 (919) 361 -5000 GRO55 SECTION 5 — POOL. (ROCKY BRANGH, 5TA 22 + 52) VIEW LOOKING DOWNSTREAM. GRO55 5EGTION 6 — RIFFLE. (ROCKY BRANGH, 5TA 26 + 22) VIEW LOOKING DOWNSTREAM. PROJECT NO. EEP -08020 v "$ "AraE: EEP08020 —EX1 rl R OCKY BRANCH aEcoEngineer A division of'Ile John R. McAdams Company. Inc. d SCALE: N TS � MONITORING PHOTOS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC a S��IIl 9ATE: )j YADIUN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA P.O. R0x 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005 08_11 -10 I11� : (919) 361 -5000 GRO55 SECTION 7 - RIFFLE. (ROCKY BRANCH, 5TA 50 + -75) VIEW LOOKING DOWN5TREAM. GROSS 5ECTION 8 - RIFFLE. (TRIBUTARY I, 5TA O + -75) VIEW LOOKING DOWNSTREAM. PROJECT No. EEP -08020 FILENAME : ROCKY BRANCH [aEcoEngineering EEP08020 -EX1 A division of The John R McAdmne Company, Inc. d SCALE: y NTS wStem MONITORING PHOTOS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005 j DATE: 10 -13 -09 P9O9�ROX Rod " ch St- --- ^-ztor<`- "'.e • S - istnu ' 031'-" 11A • "' - -" HUC " -" " "102 1 nud Y= 1vioruto11nQ Kmort • Yacuon County_ Nnrtn ramima • Nmtrmnrr AM ROCKY BRANCH EEP PROJECT # 308 CROSS - SECTION: 1 Year -0 Year -1 Year -2 Year -3 Year -4 Year -5 Year -6 Station (ft) Elev, (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station Elev. (ft) Station ft Elev. ft Station ft Elev. ft Station ft Elev. ft Station (ft) Elev. ft 0.00 928.33 0.00 928.33 -0.87 928.46 0.00 928.41 10.00 928.12 10.00 928.26 28.76 927.50 25.04 927.76 20.00 927.82 25.00 927.58 41.50 927.27 52.24 927.38 27.00 927.44 40.00 927.18 49.38 927.13 56.04 926.62 34.00 927.26 50.00 926.90 50.28 927.04 58.54 924.15 40.00 927.08 55.00 926.41 53.16 926.49 59.69 923.93 46.00 927.17 57.30 926.34 56.54 926.34 60.77 923.12 50.00 927.05 58.00 925.08 57.83 926.41 62.26 923.13 52.00 926.92 59.00 924.71 59.88 925.02 63.46 922.97 54.00 926.52 59.00 923.62 60.60 923.92 64.36 923.07 56.00 926.22 60.00 923.05 61.05 923.84 65.61 923.36 57.00 926.19 61.40 922.64 61.39 923.44 66.63 923.33 58.00 926.08 63.00 922.52 61.96 923.12 67.55 923.69 59.00 926.25 64.20 922.68 62.54 922.90 68.67 923.88 59.60 924.80 65.00 92180 63.27 923.10 69.93 924.46 59.80 923.79 66.20 923.12 64.16 923.07 70.00 924.60 60.50 923.25 67.70 923.26 65.20 923.28 71.00 925.94 61.00 923.19 69.10 923.61 66.11 923.20 71.03 925.34 62.00 922.75 71.50 924.40 66.81 923.47 74.99 926.64 63.00 922.78 72.10 924.58 67.78 923.63 83.04 926.98 64.00 922.83 72.30 925.06 68.58 923.75 109.00 927.09 65.00 923.07 74.00 925.62 69.35 923.99 140.48 92710 66.00 923.29 80.00 926.38 70.31 924.40 159.25 927.26 67.00 923.49 102.00 926.74 71.07 924.82 68.00 923.71 125.00 926.84 71.99 925.02 69.00 924.04 150.00 927.02 73.27 925.43 70.00 924.50 160.40 926.99 74.49 925.99 71.00 924.80 76.91 926.26 72.50 925.40 83.25 926.62 74.00 925.73 96.79 927.03 75.50 925.92 115.30 927.03 77.00 926.15 130.50 927.26 78.00 926.26 148.17 927.26 81.00 926.29 162.68 927.08 85.00 926.13 89.00 926.25 95.00 926.83 104.00 926.81 115.00 926.80 125.00 926.92 133.00 927.00 142.00 927.11 153.00 926.91 160.00 927.02 ®EcoEngineering A division of The John R McAdams Compmy. Inc. Rocl - ch St - ntor, -' :e - S istru 1: 03- MA, HU( 102 r nrrd Year Monitoring Report - Yadkin County_ Nnrrh r amlina - Crnrrn,hrr ')n 1 n Rocky Branch Cross Section 1 - Pool 930 929 x,928 "927 — �, 926 > 0 925 — — — Bankfull —� Year -0, 9/10/07 1 924 - Year -1, 9/23/08 —+�— Year -2, 9/30/09 923 — E) Year -3, 8/05/10 922 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 Width from River Left to Right (ft) YEAR-3,2010 SURVEY DATA PROJECT ROCKY BRANCH TASK CROSS SECTION REACH ROCKY BRANCH DATE 8/02/10 to 8/05/10 U VbN NJN U FIL)IN YLU'f - LOUK1NG DOWNSTREAM CROSS - SECTION: 1 FEATURE: Pool CREW BUCHHOLZ /PARRISH /PICKENS Summary Data All dimensions in feet. Bankfull X -sec area 51.4 sq. ft. Bankfull Width 28.8 ft. Bankfull Mean Depth 1.8 ft. Bankfull Max Depth 4.0 ft. Width/Depth Ratio >12 Entrenchment Ratio >2.2 Classification n/a Bank Height Ratio 1.0 Bankfull Elevation: 926.98 ft. CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM ®EcoEngineedng A diwWw ofThc John R McAd- Cody, tm Rock h Str stora : • Sl st>uc 034 IA- HUC M Third Year Monitoring Report • Yadkin County, North Carolina • September, 2010 ROCKY BRANCH EEP PROJECT # 308 CROSS- SECTION: 2 Year -0 Year -1 Year -2 Year -3 Year4 Year -5 Year -6 Station (ft) Elev. ft Station (ft) Elev. ft Station (ft) Elev. ft Station (ft) Elev. ft Station (ft) Elev. ft Station (ft) Elev. ft Station ft EIev. ft 0.00 923.38 0.00 923.32 0.15 923.32 0.00 923.30 10.00 923.66 10.00 923.68 31.73 923.79 19.21 923.61 16.00 923.68 35.00 923.81 42.99 923.80 36.40 923.87 20.00 923.58 49.00 923.82 49.52 923.74 51.90 923.50 25.00 923.64 50.50 923.74 53.28 923.50 53.97 923.26 32.00 923.68 54.00 923.26 56.32 923.19 56.20 922.95 38.00 923.78 57.70 922.56 57.37 922.55 58.38 922.28 43.00 923.82 58.70 922.08 58.06 922.22 58.54 922.42 48.00 923.90 59.30 921.70 58.46 922.14 58.73 921.77 51.00 923.70 60.00 921.51 58.60 921.68 59.18 921.64 53.00 923.45 61.30 921.66 59.54 921.77 59.43 921.77 55.00 923.05 62.70 921.82 60.76 921.58 59.93 921.64 57.00 922.52 63.80 922.04 61.91 921.67 60.31 921.64 58.00 922.11 64.80 922.48 62.71 921.62 60.67 921.63 59.00 921.61 66.70 922.38 64.14 921.97 61.02 921.63 60.00 921.50 69.60 922.98 64.70 921.72 61.72 921.86 60.50 921.58 74.00 923.70 65.19 921.84 62.68 921.80 61.00 921.85 94.00 923.65 65.63 922.09 63.48 921.80 62.00 921.89 115.90 923.38 66.55 922.44 63.50 922.21 63.00 921.88 167.65 922.89 63.78 921.80 64.00 921.90 69.31 922.94 64.02 921.79 65.00 922.07 75.32 923.71 64.78 922.60 66.50 922.17 90.09 923.81 66.55 923.59 67.00 922.22 103.15 923.83 68.21 923.81 67.50 922.40 115.26 923.43 82.06 923.79 69.00 922.81 100.31 923.77 70.50 923.11 116.25 923.61 72.00 923.46 74.00 923.73 76.00 923.81 80.00 923.76 88.00 923.77 95.00 923.65 105.00 923.70 116.00 923.37 FEcoEngineering A division My John R. McAdams Company. Inc. Rod _ -,h St - ston e • Si istruc : 034 RA • HUC 102 third Year Morutoring Report • Yadldn County, North Carolina • September, 2010 Rocky Branch Cross Section 2 - Riffle 926 925 w c 924 923 — — — Bankfull - - - -�— Year -0, 9/10/07 922 Year -1, 9/23/08 CJ� —M-- Year -2, 9/30/09 -�-- Year -3, 8105/10 921 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 Width from River Left to Right (ft) UMUNN bECl7OiN PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM YEAR-3,2010 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 2 PROJECT ROCKY BRANCH FEATURE: Riffle TASK CROSS SECTION REACH ROCKY BRANCH DATE 8/02/10 to 8/05/10 CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS Summary Data All dimensions in feet. Bankfull X -sec area 18.5 sq. ft. Bankfull Width 36.4 ft. Bankfull Mean Depth 0.5 ft. Bankfull Max Depth 2.0 ft. Width/Depth Ratio >12 Entrenchment Ratio >2.2 Classification C Bank Height Ratio 1.0 Bankfull Elevation: 923.82 ft. CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM ®EcoEngineedng A division ofThe John R McAdams Comp -y. Inc. KocKy Branch Stream Kestorahon Site • State Uonstruction ill: U3- U6U6l -UlA • USUS HUC U304UlU2 I sr Mc Repo an G )rth C Sept ;010 ROCKY BRANCH EEP PROJECT # 308 CROSS - SECTION: 3 Year -0 Year -1 Year -2 Year -3 Year -4 Year -5 Year -6 Station ft Elev. ft Station ft Elev. (ft) Station ft Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. ft 0.00 922.51 0.00 922.56 0.18 922.60 0.00 922.92 10.00 922.49 15.00 922.46 28.22 921.93 14.12 922.59 20.00 922.29 40.00 921.25 42.24 921.31 32.74 921.94 25.00 922.08 60.00 920.08 54.05 920.93 53.17 921.11 31.00 921.84 62.00 919.73 54.98 920.84 60.38 920.57 38.00 921.40 64.70 918.25 57.25 920.55 63.24 919.57 47.00 921.14 66.50 917.81 60.83 919.94 65.39 918.16 54.00 920.99 68.20 917.24 61.58 919.18 65.71 918.73 56.00 920.86 70.30 916.79 63.10 919.23 66.84 917.47 58.00 920.49 72.30 916.39 64.06 918.77 67.75 916.86 61.00 919.93 73.20 916.49 64.63 918.17 68.21 917.14 64.00 919.19 75.10 916.55 65.86 917.80 70.48 916.58 65.00 918.62 76.90 916.71 67.00 917.59 73.07 916.64 66.00 917.77 78.30 917.03 68.37 917.35 76.03 916.52 67.00 917.96 79.40 917.41 70.02 917.20 76.46 916.66 68.00 917.56 80.20 917.89 71.38 916.97 78.77 917.09 69.00 917.15 81.10 918.24 73.39 916.68 80.37 920.31 70.00 916.96 81.30 920.24 74.49 916.55 82.12 920.91 71.00 917.00 85.60 921.37 75.91 916.57 97.56 922.15 72.00 916.92 98.70 922.04 77.07 916.59 109.91 922.11 73.00 916.92 111.50 921.97 78.28 916.73 124.27 921.86 74.00 916.78 114.20 921.83 79.50 917.28 75.00 916.81 114.80 921.47 79.87 918.71 76.00 916.77 118.00 920.99 80.18 920.30 77.00 917.11 122.00 921.59 82.06 920.65 78.00 917.58 124.00 921.79 85.06 921.21 79.00 918.04 124.70 921.72 89.88 921.75 79.50 918.60 101.33 922.10 80.00 919.22 108.30 922.13 81.00 920.29 110.69 921.98 83.00 920.67 112.65 921.96 85.00 921.20 113.67 921.65 87.00 921.53 116.93 921.25 91.00 921.68 120.30 921.65 100.00 922.03 121.83 921.96 107.00 922.13 124.42 921.86 112.00 921.99 117.00 921.47 122.00 921.94 125.00 921.80 ®EcoEngineering A division aM. John R MoAdeme CMp.ny, Ino. Rocky Branch Stream Restoration Site • State Construction ID: 03 -06061 -0IA • USGS RUC 03040102 T it Mc Repoi in Ca Irth C Sept, 010 Rocky Branch Cross Section 3 - Pool 924 923 922 — _._ �+�- -�-"': ,r•� �� X921 -`— 920 . . 0 is 919 918 — — — Bankfull 917 —a— Year -0, 9/10/07 916 Year -1, 9/23108 --�►— Year -2, 9/30/09 915 a Year -3, 8/05/10 914 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 Width from River Left to Right (ft) CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM CROSS - SECTION: 3 ROCKY BRANCH FEATURE: Pool CROSS SECTION ROCKY BRANCH 8/02/10 to 8/05/10 BUCHHOLZIPARRISH/PICKENS 65.1 sq. ft. 26.3 ft. 2.5 ft. 4.4 ft. 10.6 >2.2 n/a 1.0 920.91 ft. CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM ®EcoEngineedng A di—ion ofThe John R IMcAdama Company, Inc irancb estor • Stan fiction 1 061-0 3S IR 1102 Third Year Monitoring Report • Yadkin County, North Carolina • September, 2010 ROCKY BRANCH EEP PROJECT # 308 CROSS - SECTION: 4 Year-0 Year -1 Year-2 Year -3 Year4 Year -5 Year -6 Station ft Elev. (ft) Station ft Elev. Station ft Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. ft Station (ft) Elev. ft Station ft Elev. Station ft Elev. ft 0.00 919.45 0.00 919.46 0.08 919.40 0.00 919.54 10.00 919.48 10.00 919.48 14.42 919.51 17.36 919.71 20.00 919.57 50.00 919.67 35.15 919.70 45.79 919.75 30.00 919.66 59.00 919.51 49.90 919.78 65.51 918.84 40.00 919.83 61.00 919.82 57.38 919.78 67.15 918.28 50.00 919.80 65.00 918.77 61.95 919.60 67.91 917.83 55.00 919.97 67.60 917.73 64.28 918.88 68.27 916.95 59.00 919.52 68.50 917.06 65.96 918.56 69.65 916.66 60.00 919.69 69.00 916.96 67.13 917.73 69.69 916.56 61.00 919.95 70.00 916.80 67.85 916.92 69.93 916.59 62.00 919.80 70.90 916.58 68.55 916.70 70.76 916.73 63.00 919.47 71.80 916.77 69.40 916.70 70.90 916.71 64.00 919.16 72.80 916.99 70.18 916.74 71.29 917.02 65.00 918.80 74.00 917.08 70.68 916.48 71.54 916.69 66.00 918.51 75.10 917.12 71.60 916.52 72.16 916.98 67.00 917.87 76.90 917.55 72.03 916.65 73.05 917.12 67.80 917.18 81.70 918.58 72.86 916.87 74.87 917.48 68.20 916.83 87.00 919.87 73.44 916.95 84.02 919.43 69.00 916.92 105.00 920.05 74.05 917.02 102.32 920.01 70.00 916.77 129.20 920.36 74.55 917.28 125.87 920.23 70.50 916.55 75.81 917.44 71.00 916.92 77.67 917.99 72.00 916.96 80.62 918.46 73.00 917.16 86.88 919.88 75.00 917.16 97.29 920.01 76.00 917.16 113.02 920.14 77.00 917.21 123.42 920.36 78.00 917.48 129.63 920.39 79.00 917.78 80.00 918.01 81.00 918.28 83.00 918.90 85.00 919.46 87.00 919.84 89.00 919.91 95.00 919.95 100.00 919.97 115.00 920.21 125.00 920.36 130.00 920.41 Fjj]EcoEngineering A division o(Thc John R. McAdams Company. Inc. 921 920 E919 e 0 is 918 M 917 916 915 - 9ranch ° -- 'testor`-- "` • Stat- -- -ction i^ "- ­06 "- -,S HC- ----- 102 - -¢d Yc_ ­_Xing 1..,,,,., ' aAcm ---,,North ____ • Sep --, 6010 Rocky Branch Cross Section 4 - Riffle — — — — — — — — — — -.&---- - - --(+= - - -- -- — — — Bankfull —•— Year -0, 9110/07 -- Year -1, 9/23/08 - *— Year - -2, 9130/09 Year -3, 8/05110 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 Width from River Left to Right (ft) CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM YEAR-3,2010 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 4 PROJECT ROCKY BRANCH FEATURE: Riffle TASK CROSS SECTION REACH ROCKY BRANCH DATE 8/02/10 to 8/05/10 CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS Summary Data All dimensions in feet. Bankfull X -sec area 32.2 sq. ft. Bankfull Width 31.3 ft, Bankfull Mean Depth 1.0 ft. Bankfull Max Depth 2.9 ft. Width/Depth Ratio >12 Entrenchment Ratio >2.2 Classification C Bank Height Ratio 1.0 Bankfull Elevation: 919.43 ft. CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM ®EcoEngineedng A division M. Mm R M.A k—Company Inc 3rench testor • Stat ction - - - -061 -0 3S HC 402 - Laird Yaw v vuworiag kepon • fadldn %_oumy, North t arour a • Septemoer, X010 ROCKY BRANCH EEP PROJECT # 308 CROSS- SECTION: 5 Year -0 Year -1 Year -2 Year -3 Year -4 Year -5 Year -6 Station l v Station Elev. Station ft Elev. ft ) Station ft Elev. (ft) Station ft Elev, fftl Station (ft) Elev. Station ft Elev, ft 0.00 918.78 0.00 918.78 0.13 918.83 0.00 918.91 5.00 918.89 5.00 918.87 24.09 918.87 31.24 918.77 10.20 918.75 9.00 918.79 45.71 918.12 46.90 918.00 15.00 918.84 14.00 918.84 49.52 917.16 56.27 915.96 20.00 918.83 19.00 918.89 52.33 916.78 56.45 915.62 25.00 918.82 25.00 918.85 54.69 916.65 56.60 914.76 30.00 918.67 30.00 918.66 56.24 916.01 57.94 914.32 35.00 918.54 40.00 918.49 56.38 915.42 58.23 914.20 40.00 918.47 44.00 918.36 57.01 914.62 58.69 914.10 44.00 918.39 45.00 918.21 58.34 914.13 59.68 914.03 45.00 918.20 47.40 917.83 59.73 913.84 61.00 913.81 46.00 918.08 49.50 917.23 61.07 913.84 61.15 913.89 47.00 917.91 53.40 916.19 62.34 913.64 61.94 913.81 48.00 917.63 54.00 916.14 63.50 913.95 62.71 913.83 49.00 917.32 55.00 916.05 64.85 914.11 63.66 913.82 49.70 917.03 56.00 915.74 64.89 915.49 64.17 914.10 50.00 916.91 56.40 915.43 65.71 916.83 65.03 914.38 51.00 916.64 57.30 914.62 67.98 917.11 65.62 914.50 52.00 916.25 60.00 913.93 71.44 918.37 65.98 916.67 52.50 916.21 61.10 913.82 99.35 920.66 67.81 916.99 53.00 916.14 61.80 913.83 104.36 920.82 72.16 918.41 54.00 916.06 62.60 913.81 95.42 920.22 55.00 916.00 64.00 914.17 105.50 920.70 56.00 915.43 64.40 914.41 56.00 915.02 65.30 916.02 57.00 914.78 65.70 916.36 58.00 914.67 67.00 916.93 59.00 914.47 69.00 917.47 60.00 913.99 71.00 918.17 60.80 913.85 73.00 918.51 61.00 913.85 75.00 918.63 62.00 913.90 78.00 919.06 63.00 913.89 83.00 919.33 63.40 914.12 90.00 919.60 64.00 914.14 97.00 920.30 64.80 914.35 100.00 920.65 65.00 914.59 102.50 920.77 65.00 915.43 104.00 920.65 65.60 916.37 105.00 920.64 66.00 916.61 67.00 916.89 68.00 917.24 69.00 917.47 69.70 917.67 70.00 917.92 71.00 918.32 72.00 918.61 73.00 918.50 75.00 918.64 80.00 919.21 85.00 919.31 90.00 919.57 95.00 919.98 100.00 920.66 105.00 920.67 [MEcoEngineering A division of 71w John R. McAdams Company, 4w. 922 921 920 E919 2 918 > 917 u W 916 915 914 913 3rancl Restor - - : - Stat ction 1061 -C 3S HI 1102 —ird Yt,- ....,,....oring -a ., - fadlrir. North —� - Sepr=m , !010 Rocky Branch Cross Section 5 - Pool --- - - - ---- -fit-=- --------- - - - - --4 — — — Bankfuli — Year -0, 9/10/07 - Year -1, 9/23/08 —>t— Year -2, 9/30109 e Year 3, 8/05110 -2 3 8 13 18 23 28 33 38 43 48 53 58 63 68 73 78 83 88 93 98 103 Width from River Left to Right (ft) I:KUJS bEC FION PLU'I" - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM YEAR-3,2010 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 5 PROJECT ROCKY BRANCH FEATURE: Pool TASK CROSS SECTION REACH ROCKY BRANCH DATE 8/02/10 to 8/05/10 CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH /PICKENS Summary Data All dimensions in feet. Bankfull X -sec area 62.0 sq. ft. Bankfull Width 33.6 ft, Bankfull Mean Depth 1.8 fL Bankfull Max Depth 4.6 ft, Width/Depth Ratio >12 Entrenchment Ratio >2.2 Classification n/a Bank Height Ratio 1.0 Bankfull Elevation: 918.41 ft. CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM ®EcoEngineedng A division of710 John R McAdams Company. Inc 9rand °'--- 2estor" • Stat ^ - -- -ction - "' ^'0611" ' " "iS HH 102 Ard Ye_ _ _____ormg l ------ ladlrm _ -__ „North ___ SepMWREMO 10 ROCKY BRANCH EEP PROJECT #308 CROSS - SECTION: 6 Year -0 Year -1 Year -2 Year -3 Year -4 Year -5 Year-6 Station Elev. ft Station ft Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station ft v. ft Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station ft Elev. (R) Station (R) Elev. (ft) 0.00 917.33 0.00 917.32 0.13 917.32 0.00 917.36 5.00 917.39 21.30 917.41 10.28 917.22 25.21 917.13 10.00 917.30 31.40 916.85 23.98 917.10 39.75 916.39 15.00 917.30 43.20 915.88 35.45 916.57 47.19 915.56 20.00 917.34 49.30 914.54 42.22 915.86 48.56 915.17 25.00 917.05 50.00 913.46 44.96 915.44 49.27 914.84 30.00 916.73 51.50 911.26 47.53 914.83 49.69 913.73 35.00 916.65 53.30 910.28 48.03 914.62 50.48 912.87 38.00 916.44 54.30 909.55 48.50 913.79 51.67 911.82 39.00 916.41 57.00 909.46 49.28 912.03 53.51 910.77 40.00 916.27 58.50 909.36 51.43 911.04 54.90 910.47 41.00 916.16 59.50 909.47 53.37 910.64 56.47 909.91 42.00 916.04 60.60 909.72 59.31 909.45 58.02 909.35 43.00 915.80 62.10 911.56 61.03 909.93 63.20 909.64 44.00 915.58 63.50 912.12 62.50 911.85 64.50 909.97 45.00 915.40 65.10 911.80 63.94 910.95 65.77 911.07 46.00 915.21 66.20 912.49 65.75 911.65 66.83 911.47 47.00 914.98 66.90 913.53 67.82 914.59 67.36 911.81 48.00 914.80 71.10 917.04 68.27 915.78 68.25 912.73 49.00 914.57 93.00 917.93 70.38 916.93 68.88 913.95 49.60 914.45 114.70 919.76 74.57 916.96 69.71 916.22 50.00 913.45 88.02 917.49 71.27 916.82 50.50 911.79 104.28 918.65 83.31 917.51 51.00 911.68 114.30 919.66 105.89 918.81 52.00 91135 114.00 919.74 53.00 910.55 54.00 910.23 55.00 910.03 56.00 909.73 57.00 909.55 58.00 909.35 59.00 90938 60.00 909.43 61.00 909.63 62.00 909.73 63.00 910.28 64.00 910.69 65.00 911.20 66.00 911.64 67.00 912.44 67.00 913.43 68.00 915.32 69.00 916.28 70.00 916.41 71.00 916.74 72.00 916.84 75.00 916.96 80.00 917.28 85.00 917.4 90.00 917.63 95.00 917.98 100.00 918.32 105.00 918.68 110.00 919.11 115.00 919.66 [AEcoEngineedng A division ofThc John R. McAdam! Company. Inc. 920 919 918 917 F916 a915 .2914 913 0912 911 910 909 908 907 Rocky Branch Cross Section 6 - Pool — — — Bankfull —�— Year -0, 9/10107 -- Year -1, 9/23/08 Year-2, 9/30/09 �— Year -3, 8105110 3ranch - testor • Stat — ction I- -061 -0, "iS Ht-- IO2 . -ird Ye.......,...arin8l.,.,...., ladkm —,,, North „_,,,.,.-- Sep.,..._...010 -2 3 8 13 18 23 28 33 38 43 48 53 58 63 68 73 78 83 88 93 98 103 108 113 Width from River Left to Right (ft) CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM YEAR-3,2010 SURVEY DATA CROSS-SECTION: 6 PROJECT ROCKY BRANCH FEATURE: Pool TASK CROSS SECTION REACH ROCKY BRANCH DATE 8/02/10 to 8/05/10 CREW BUCHHOLZJPARRISH/PICKENS Summary Data All dimensions in feet. Bankfull X -sec area 112.6 sq. ft. Bankfull Width 28.4 ft. Bankfull Mean Depth 4.0 ft. Bankfull Max Depth 6.9 ft. Width/Depth Ratio 7.2 Entrenchment Ratio >2.2 Classification n/a Bank Height Ratio 1.0 Bankfull Elevation: 916.22 ft. CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM ®EcoEngineedng A division of The John R McAdams Company. lm Bran! Resty e • Star -.Lion 5061 -I GS Ht 1102 Laird Year momtoriog report • Yadkin county, North Carotins • September, 2010 ROCKY BRANCH EEP PROJECT # 308 CROSS- SECTION: 7 Year -0 Year -1 Year -2 Year -3 Year4 Year -5 Year-6 Station ft Elev. ft Station ev. ft tai ft Elev. (ft) Station Elev. (ft) Station ft Elev. ft Station (ft) Elev. (ft Station Elev. (ft) -1.00 916.10 0.00 916.17 0.16 916.17 0.00 916.23 4.00 916.10 14.00 915.91 13.66 915.89 21.98 915.81 9.00 915.99 38.40 915.01 25.66 915.74 39.02 915.08 14.00 915.87 51.00 914.29 40.96 914.98 52.54 914.21 19.00 915.82 55.00 913.65 52.67 914.22 55.51 913.72 24.00 915.73 59.30 912.83 55.00 913.86 57.18 913.30 29.00 915.52 60.70 911.77 57.47 913.35 58.62 912.95 34.00 915.23 61.50 911.52 58.84 912.92 59.97 912.44 39.00 914.97 63.10 911.47 60.20 912.55 60.47 911.91 44.00 914.87 64.30 911.64 60.68 911.95 60.96 911.66 48.00 914.61 65.20 911.87 61.09 911.60 61.49 911.55 49.00 914.54 65.80 912.15 61.90 911.61 62.14 911.45 50.00 914.40 69.80 913.55 62.69 911.58 62.96 911.46 51.00 914.22 73.10 914.65 63.56 911.52 63.62 911.48 52.00 914.18 100.60 915.62 64.63 911.41 64.19 911.48 53.00 914.04 129.00 918.03 65.32 911.75 64.72 911.50 54.00 913.83 66.17 912.42 65.16 911.70 55.00 913.71 67.42 912.92 65.53 911.96 56.00 913.54 69.36 913.44 66.18 912.09 57.00 913.20 73.93 914.75 66.58 912.25 58.00 912.84 96.87 915.50 66.83 912.95 59.00 912.63 112.20 916.22 68.95 913.64 60.00 912.47 129.00 918.08 71.85 914.49 60.50 911.93 77.62 915.26 61.00 911.72 103.21 915.62 61.50 911.62 129.05 918.07 62.00 911.69 62.50 911.67 63.00 911.71 63.50 911.81 64.00 911.86 65.00 911.93 65.70 912.07 66.50 912.19 67.00 912.60 68.00 912.82 69.00 913.29 70.00 913.63 71.00 914.03 72.00 914.39 73.00 914.63 74.00 914.77 79.00 915.16 84.00 915.58 89.00 915.39 94.00 915.36 99.00 915.48 104.00 915.56 107.00 915.68 114.00 916.5 124.00 917.84 129.00 918.06 [JEcoEngineering A division of TU John a. McAdams Company, Inc. 920 919 918 ;R917 e 916 0 915 914 913 912 911 910 Rocky Branch Cross Section 7 - Riffle -- __- -__ - -_ -- — Bankf —b— Year -0, 9110/07 - Year -1, 9/23/08 --- 0— Year -2, 9/30109 e— Year-3, 8/05/10 - ' 3rand Rester -' : • Stat IC601L — _' _146 1 -C 3S H1-- -- - - 1102 -ird Yi ormg 1 _ ladkfJ.........,,, Nash ­..... • Se; 010 -2 3 8 13 18 23 28 33 38 43 48 53 58 63 68 73 78 83 88 93 98 103 108 113 118 123 128 Width from River Left to Right (ft) CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM YEAR-3,2010 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 7 PROJECT ROCKY BRANCH FEATURE: Riffle TASK CROSS SECTION REACH ROCKY BRANCH DATE 8/02/10 to 8/05/10 CREW BUCHHOL IPARRISH/PICKENS Summary Data All dimensions in feet. Bankfull X -sec area 31.0 Sq. ft. Bankfull Width 23.7 fL Bankfull Mean Depth 1.3 ft Bankfull Max Depth 3.0 fL Width/Depth Ratio >12 Entrenchment Ratio >2.2 Classification C Bank Height Ratio 1.0 Bankfull Elevation: 914.49 ft. CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM ®EcoEngineedng A divism ofThe John R McAd� Campavy, 10 ° - -'- 4raacl °� - 4ator - •Star iction. 061 -0. .._3S Hl.,. ----- 102 -_ird YL- .- ___..oring 1 _ (adkin ___ . North o • Sep .- ...,, -- -010 ROCKY BRANCH EEP PROJECT # 308 CROSS- SECTION: 8 Year-0 Year -1 Year -2 Year -3 Year4 Year -5 Year -6 Station ft ley. Station Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. Station ft Elev. ft 0.00 916.69 0.00 916.63 0.17 916.58 0.25 916.56 5.00 916.69 23.00 916.21 11.78 916.47 19.55 916.15 10.00 916.56 37.00 915.30 28.65 916.08 36.95 915.51 15.00 916.30 42.40 914.77 31.35 915.88 38.84 916.01 20.00 916.22 44.60 914.16 39.41 915.16 44.04 915.00 25.00 916.18 45.50 913.81 42.90 914.80 44.39 914.98 30.00 915.89 46.70 913.68 44.28 914.48 46.07 914.39 35.00 915.38 47.80 913.62 45.27 914.22 46.40 914.15 38.00 915.27 48.70 913.40 46.15 914.07 47.93 914.21 41.00 914.99 49.70 913.78 46.71 913.63 48.33 914.35 42.50 914.77 51.20 914.72 47.61 913.61 48.62 914.17 43.00 914.64 57.90 914.89 48.37 913.43 48.94 914.32 43.50 914.53 60.20 915.47 48.94 913.71 50.01 914.27 44.00 914.37 79.60 915.03 49.61 913.79 51.31 914.92 44.50 914.19 50.42 914.07 55.61 915.00 45.00 914.05 50.74 914.28 58.06 915.40 45.50 913.82 51.27 914.65 61.91 915.64 46.00 913.61 51.76 914.76 79.31 915.05 46.20 913.55 58.01 914.85 46.50 913.35 60.44 915.53 47.00 913.34 70.41 915.19 47.50 913.46 80.18 915.08 48.00 913.42 48.50 913.42 49.00 913.41 49.20 913.50 49.50 913.78 50.00 914.02 50.50 914.33 51.00 914.65 51.50 914.84 52.00 914.92 53.00 914.95 55.00 914.96 57.00 914.85 59.00 915.05 60.00 915.48 63.00 915.43 66.00 915.37 70.00 915.18 75.00 915.24 80.00 915.06 ®EcoEngineering A division ofnc John R. McAdams Company. Inc. 918 917 C 0 916 .2915 tilt[! 913 — — - - 3rand " Zestor • Stet ction : 061-0 3S Ht 102 —ird Yta. —Oring hcpon - fadkin k-oumy, North aroma • Seprrmoer, c010 Rocky Branch Cross Section 8 - Riffle — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Bankfull - -� Year -0, 9/10107 - Year -1, 9/23108 --X Year -2, 9130109 ----- Year -0, 8/05/1 0 -2 3 8 13 18 23 28 33 38 43 48 53 58 63 68 73 78 Width from River Left to Right (ft) CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM ®EcoEngineedng A division of The John R McAdams C—pmy, I— CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM YEAR-3,2010 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 8 PROJECT ROCKY BRANCH FEATURE: Riffle TASK CROSS SECTION REACH ROCKY BRANCH DATE 8/02/10 to 8/05/10 CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS Summary Data All dimensions in feet. Bankfull X -sec area 11.60 sq. ft. Bankfull Width 26.40 ft, Bankfull Mean Depth 0.40 ft, Bankfull Max Depth 1.30 ft, Width/Depth Ratio >12 Entrenchment Ratio >2.2 Classification C Bank Height Ratio 1.0 Bankfull Elevation: 915.40 ft. CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM ®EcoEngineedng A division of The John R McAdams C—pmy, I— 930 929 928 927 w 926 Z O F. 925 Q W 924 923 922 921 920 ti C Rocky Branch Longitudinal Profile 2010 (Year -3) Monitoring t YR-0 TW 9/10107 YR -1 TW 9/23/08 O YR -1 Structures YR -2 TW 9/30109 YR -2 Structures - --- YR -3 TW 8/2/10 YR -3 Structures - - -YR -3 WS 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 STATION (feet) Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Structures were used as a guide. ®EcoEngineedng A!hoiae MTTe isle R. ttla'AdYm Cbmpq, lm. 926 925 924 923 w 922 Z O F, 921 Q 920 919 918 917 1P\\\ Rocky Branch Longitudinal Profile 2010 (Year -3) Monitoring YR-0 TW 9/10/07 YR -1 TW 9/23/08 o YR -1 Structures YR -2 TW 9/30109 _ A YR -2 Structures YR -3 TW 8/2110 YR -3 Structures J - - -YR -3 WS •L -man -ftftm— IL 916 ' 1 1 1 1 1 r 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 STATION (feet) Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Structures were used as a guide. 850 900 950 1000 ®EcoEngineering AlWiwoeaf m R. WA, C^mPm'sec. 924 923 922 921 w 920 Z O 919 W w 918 917 916 915 Rocky Branch Longitudinal Profile 2010 (Year -3) Monitoring YR-0 TW 9/10/07 YR -1 TW 9/23/08 O YR -1 Structures YR -2 TW 9/30/09 YR -2 Structures YR -3 TW 8/2/10 O YR -3 Structures - - -YR -3 WS 914 1000 1050 1100 1150 Note: Due to, slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Structures were used as a guide, 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 STATION (feet) ®EcoEngineedng AA a1 l R.McAlir Cvquy,Irc. 922 921 920 919 w 918 Z: 0 Q917 W w 916 915 914 913 912 Rocky Branch Longitudinal Profile 2010 (Year -3) Monitoring YR-0 TW 9/10/07 YR -1 TW 9/23/08 o YR -1 Structures YR -2 TW 9/30/09 A YR -2 Structures - - -- YR -3 TW 8/2110 YR -3 Structures - - -YR -3 WS i i 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 STATION (feet) Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Strictures were used as a guide. ®EcoEngineedng 920 919 918 917 +d 916 Z 0 Q915 W 914 913 912 911 910 Rocky Branch Longitudinal Profile 2010 (Year -3) Monitoring YR -0 TW 9/10/07 YR -1 TW 9/23/08 o YR -1 Structures YR -2 TW 9/30/09 YR -2 Structures - YR -3 TW 8/2/10 YR -3 Structures - -YR -3 WS 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250 2300 2350 2400 2450 2500 STATION (feet) Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Structures were used as a guide. ®EcoEngineedng Adrvi" ea IMeRMe& Cmpry.ls. Rocky Branch Longitudinal Profile 2010 (Year -3) Monitoring 918 917 916 915 y w 914 Z O E. 913 Q w W 912 911 910 909 908 YR-0 TW 9/10/07 YR -1 TW 9/23/08 o YR -1 Structures YR -2 TW 9/30/09 YR -2 Structures YR -3 TW 8/2110 O YR -3 Structures - - -YR -3 WS 2500 2550 2600 2650 2700 2750 2800 2850 2900 2950 3000 3050 3100 STATION (feet) Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Structures were used as a guide. ®EcoEngineering w an�.�e ornaxr.� rt. racwm.mca�. � <. 3 -YEAR, 2010 SURVEY DATA PROJECT NAME ROCKY BRANCH Run slopes measured = TASK LONGITUDINAL PROFILE FEATURE /FACET SLOPE REACH ROCKY BRANCH LENGTH, AND SPACING AND DATE 8/2/2010 to 8/5/2010 LONGITUDINAL PROFILE DATA CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS Overall water surface slope = 0.6% 0.91% n = DESIGN MIN. MAX. RIFFLE 293.81 22.81 3.86% MIN = Riffle 1.1% 3.3% WS sta. start = 52.38 ft 737.57 Run - -- - -- WS sta. end = 3107.48 ft p -p spacing 115 161 ELEV. Start = 929.35 ft msl 12.19 0.16% ELEV. End = 912.16 ft msl Results 928.92 n= MIN. MEDIAN. AVG. MAX. Riffle slopes measured = 29 0.13% 1.21% 2.10% 18.59% Run slopes measured = 18 0.28% 6.64% 6.40% 18.78% Pools measured = 36 15 85 84 175 All data reported in units of feet unless otherwise specified. RIFFLE Feature Station Length Slope 3.27% MAX = RIFFLE 232.94 18.58 0.91% n = 29 RIFFLE 293.81 22.81 3.86% MIN = 0.13% RIFFLE 390.36 29.71 1.21% MEDIAN = 1.21% RIFFLE 443.9 7.91 0.25% AVG. = 2.10% RIFFLE 520.92 26.88 3.27% MAX = 18.59% RIFFLE 653.73 9.63 18.59% RIFFLE 737.57 29.79 0.13% RIFFLE 808.53 12.19 0.16% RIFFLE 928.92 7.65 0.52% RIFFLE 978.12 38.61 2.23% RIFFLE 1052.74 22.75 1.45% RIFFLE 1097.72 20.69 4.88% RIFFLE 1173.86 23.45 0.94% RIFFLE 1226.15 16.38 0.92% RIFFLE 1251.41 7.73 1.16% RIFFLE 1275.1 37.43 1.63% RIFFLE 1348.14 21.33 1.59% RIFFLE 1488.04 14.37 1.74% RIFFLE 1652.1 21.63 1.57% RIFFLE 1733.71 26.22 0.61% RIFFLE 1824.4 32.43 0.52% RIFFLE 1928.19 38.52 0.65% RIFFLE 2038.54 52.92 0.94% Rocky Branch, 3 -Year Monitoring Data Sheet 1 of 3 3 -YEAR, 2010 SURVEY DATA PROJECT NAME ROCKY BRANCH RIFFLE 2280.54 16.78 2.21% RIFFLE 2355.3 33 0.67% RIFFLE 2578.34 16.24 0.49% RIFFLE 2666.83 29.89 1.97% RIFFLE 2746.37 18.38 2.83% RIFFLE 3023.43 24.25 3.05% Feature Station Length Slope RUN 88.28 15.6 0.83% n= 18 .RUN 160.73 24.37 2.09% MIN = 0.28% RUN 251.52 9.33 6.11% MEDIAN = 6.64% RUN 316.62 23.74 2.91% AVG. = 6.40% RUN 663.36 23.2 9.40% MAX = 18.78% RUN 820.72 6.23 18.78% RUN 936.57 10.58 2.27% RUN 1016.73 11.54 6.24% RUN 1075.49 5.81 8.78% RUN 1118.41 7.75 7.23% RUN 1242.53 4.46 11.43% RUN 1369.47 25.42 8.06% RUN 1673.73 17.06 12.37% RUN 1856.83 4.42 1.36% RUN 1966.71 12.55 8.21% RUN 2297.32 14.96 1.80% RUN 2764.75 109.05 0.28% RUN 3047.68 11.63 7.05% Feature Station Length p -p spacing POOL 103.88 27 n = 36 POOL 185.1 37 81 MIN = 15 (p -p spacing) POOL 217.29 18 32 MEDIAN = 85 POOL 260.85 15 44 AVG. = 84 POOL 275.38 18 15 MAX = 175 POOL 340.36 34 65 POOL 477.45 36 137 POOL 571.4 41 94 POOL 641.89 20 70 POOL 686.56 28 45 POOL 789.99 29 103 POOL 826.95 35 37 POOL 912.96 26 86 POOL 947.15 29 34 POOL 1028.27 20 81 POOL 1081.3 11 53 POOL 1126.16 28 45 POOL 1217.98 19 92 POOL 1246.99 5 29 POOL 1331.95 31 85 POOL 1394.89 43 63 POOL 1542.45 45 148 POOL 1617.99 23 76 POOL 1690.79 36 73 POOL 1793.54 57 103 POOL 1877.61 20 84 POOL 2008.27 51 131 Rocky Branch, 3 -Year Monitoring Data Sheet 2 of 3 3 -YEAR, 2010 SURVEY DATA PROJECT NAME ROCKY BRANCH POOL 2118.64 37 110 POOL 2234.21 36 116 POOL 2328.99 22 95 POOL 2419.44 44 90 POOL 2517.17 58 98 POOL 2618.32 29 101 POOL 2716.24 35 98 POOL 2891.58 28 175 POOL 3059.31 32 168 Rocky Branch, 3 -Year Monitoring Data Sheet 3 of 3 Histogram 25 — -- -- — - — - ■Year 1 20 ■Year 0 O Year 2 15 OYear 3 = 10 0 5 0 ,\`O N�(b ��� ���• ���(b O• Particle Size (mm) EEP PROJECT ID: 308 CROSS - SECTION: 2 FEATURE: RIFFLE Y i Ecosystem PROJECT ROCKY BRANCH TASK PEBBLE COUNT REACH ROCKY BRANCH DATE 8/02/2010 to 8/05/2010 CREW BUCHHOLZ /PARRISH/PICKENS Material Size Range mm Count Rocky Branch silt/clay 0 0.062 82/2010 very fine sand 0.062 0.13 fine sand 0.13 0.25 Note: medium sand 0.25 0.5 coarse sand very coarse sand 0.5 1 1 2 100 °!° 90% Riffle Pebble Count, Rocky Branch - - - - -- very fine gravel 2 4 �" ; fine gravel fine gravel 4 6 6 B 800!0 „j medium gravel 8 11 m 70% medium gravel coarse gravel coarse gravel 11 16 16 22 22 32 ~ 60% U_ 50% ;i very coarse gravel 32 45 40% ver coarse ravel 45 64 a 30% small cobble 64 gp medium cobble 90 128 20% large cobble very large cobble 128 180 180 256 10% °!° small boulder 256 362 0 small boulder 362 512 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 medium boulder large boulder 512 1024 1024 2048 Particle Size (mm) Cumulative Percent ♦ Percent Item very lar a boulder 2048 4096 Size percent less than mm Percent by substrate type bedrock D16 D36 D50 D84 D96 silt/clay sand I gravel I cobble boulder bedrock Total Particle Countj 101 0.440 0.89 8.6 37 90 3 % 40% r 44% 1 14% 0% 0% Histogram 50 - -- -_ —_ -- ■Year 1 a� 40 — ■Year 0 0 Year 2 a 30 0 Year 3 20 10 lUnUlk L a 0 � 00� �� �O n�`l. O� NCO ��0 �,��. O� Particle Size (mm) EEP PROJECT ID: 308 CROSS - SECTION: 4 FEATURE: RIFFLE Ecosystem W.0r Ahl PROJECT ROCKY BRANCH TASK PEBBLE COUNT REACH ROCKY BRANCH DATE 8/02/2010 to 8/05/2010 CREW BUCHHOLZ /PARRISH /PICKENS Material Size Rana mm Count Rocky Branch silt/clay 0 0.062 813/2010 very fine sand 0.062 0.13 - -- fine sand 0.13 0.25 Note: medium sand 0.25 0.5 coarse sand very coarse sand 0.5 1 1 2 Riffle Pebble Count, Rocky Branch 100% - -, _rr - - 90% - - -. —. ...,7 very fine gravel 2 4 80 °!° fine gravel fine gravel 4 6 6 8 medium gravel 8 11 70% t ~ 60% 509° ' medium gravel coarse gravel 11 16 16 22 coarse gravel 22 32 i 1 very coarse gravel 32 45 40% very coarse gravel 45 64 small cobble 64 9p 30% medium cobble 90 128 20% large cobble 128 160 10% w ; very large cobble 180 256 small boulder 256 362 0% small boulder 362 512 0.01 01 1 10 100 1000 10000 medium boulder large boulder 512 1024 1024 2048 Particle Size (mm) _- Cumulative Percent ♦ Percent Item very lar a boulder 2048 4096 Size percent less than mm Percent by substrate type bedrock; ;Dli6 D35 D60 D84 D95 silt/clay sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock Total Particle Count: 105 A #NIA 0.1 27 39 40% 13% 47% 0% 0% 1 09/. Histogram 40 35 7 ■Year 1 ■ Year c 30 O Year 2 25 ❑Year3 M 20 E 15 -- 10 rh 5 0 Sb Particle Size (mm) EEP PROJECT ID: 308 CROSS - SECTION: 7 FEATURE: RIFFLE r� Ecosystem {'Y.Si C: KAM PROJECT ROCKY BRANCH TASK PEBBLE COUNT REACH ROCKY BRANCH DATE 8/02/2010 to 8/05/2010 CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS Material Size Range mm Count Rocky Branch silt/clay 0 0.062 0.062 0.13 8!4/2010 very fine sand fine sand 0.13 0.25 Note: medium sand 0.25 0.5 i coarse sand very coarse sand 0.5 1 1 2 Riffle Pebble Count, Rocky Branch 100% 90 °!° very fine gravel 2 4 80% fine gravel fine gravel 4 6 6 8 medium gravel 8 11 7 L 70% ~ 60% medium gravel coarse gravel 11 16 16 22 °f° coarse gravel 22 32 very coarse gravel very coarse gravel 32 45 45 64 40% 30% small cobble 64 90 d medium cobble 90 128 20% large cobble 128 180 10% °f° very large cobble 180 256 small boulder 256 362 0 small boulder 362 512 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 medium boulder large boulder 512 1024 1024 2048 Particle Size (mm) — +— Cumulative Percent ♦ Percent Item very large boulder 2048 4096 Size percent less than mm Percent b substrate type bedrock D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt /clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock Total Particle Count:1 100 #N /A 1 0.15 1 0.4 1 2 1 21 % r 40% 39% 0% 0% 1 0% EEP PROJECT ID: 308 CROSS - SECTION: 8 FEATURE: RIFFLE " E s,stem .0t,k AN! PROJECT ROCKY BRANCH TASK PEBBLE COUNT REACH ROCKY BRANCH DATE 8/02/2010 to 8/05/2010 CREW BUCHHOLZ /PARRISH/PICKENS Material Size Range mm Count Histogram Rocky Branch silt/clay 0 0.062 8140-010 very fine sand 0.062 0.13 - -- fine sand 0.13 0.25 ■Year 1 Note: 40 0.25 0.5 ■ Year 0 y 0.5 1 1 2 Riffle Pebble Count, Rocky Branch 100% T, —•—• - T...�. - - T r_,� r 90% very fine gravel 2 4 OYear 2 30 O Year 3 4 6 6 8 c� medium gravel 8 11 I 70% 20 111 co F- 60% c medium gravel coarse gravel 0 10 ii 50% . f coarse gravel 22 32 �. 0 A1111 I very coarse gravel 32 45 40% CU N M LO U-) N'qt Cfl 0 r (D N N M'IT O 00 O (D N N d' CO Cfl CD � N O �- �- N M d' CD M N Co LO CD N d' M small cobble 64 90 9 p 6 � T- N M LO O O O CD �- N d' medium cobble 90 128 Particle Size (mm) EEP PROJECT ID: 308 CROSS - SECTION: 8 FEATURE: RIFFLE " E s,stem .0t,k AN! PROJECT ROCKY BRANCH TASK PEBBLE COUNT REACH ROCKY BRANCH DATE 8/02/2010 to 8/05/2010 CREW BUCHHOLZ /PARRISH/PICKENS Material Size Range mm Count Rocky Branch silt/clay 0 0.062 8140-010 very fine sand 0.062 0.13 - -- fine sand 0.13 0.25 Note: medium sand 0.25 0.5 coarse sand very coarse sand 0.5 1 1 2 Riffle Pebble Count, Rocky Branch 100% T, —•—• - T...�. - - T r_,� r 90% very fine gravel 2 4 80% fine gravel fine gravel 4 6 6 8 medium gravel 8 11 I 70% co F- 60% medium gravel coarse gravel 11 16 16 22 ii 50% . f coarse gravel 22 32 �. very coarse gravel 32 45 40% CU very coarse aravel 45 64 small cobble 64 90 a 30% medium cobble 90 128 200/c 10% large cobble 128 180 ♦; very large cobble 180 256 small boulder 256 362 0% small boulder 362 512 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 medium boulder large large boulder 512 1024 1024 2048 Particle Size (mm) Percent ♦ Percent Item Size percent less than mm Percent by substrate type very lar a boulder 2046 4096 L bedrock -D16 I D35 I D50 I D84 D95 silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock Total Particle Count: 100 #N /A r #N /A 1 01 1 18 25 1 43% r 24% 33% 0% 0% 1 0% APPENDIX E Wetland Assessment (omitted — not applicable)