20050597 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20101215

/jj 05q�
L/
Cox Mitigation Project
Johnston County, North Carolina
Prepared for
Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC 27606
Prepared by
WK Dickson and Co, Inc
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 782 -0495
And
Ecosystem & Land Trust Monitoring
PO Box 1492
3674 Pine Swamp Road
Sparta, NC 28675
December 2010

Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
Table of Contents
10 SUMMARY
20 INTRODUCTION
2
2 1 Project Description
2
22 Project Purpose
2
23 Project History & Schedule
2
30 HYDROLOGY
5
31 Hydrologic Success Criteria
5
32 Description of Hydrology Monitoring Efforts
5
3 3 Results of Hydrology Monitoring
8
3 3 1 Site Data
8
3 3 2 Reference Data
11
3 3 3 Climate Data
11
34 Hydrologic Conclusions
12
40 VEGETATION 12
41 Vegetation Success Criteria 12
42 Description of Species and Vegetation Monitoring 13
43 Results of Vegetation Monitoring 13
44 Vegetation Observations & Conclusions 15
5 0 STREAM MONITORING
15
5 1 Stream Success Criteria
15
52 Stream Morphology Monitoring Plan
15
5 2 1 Cross Sections
16
5 2 2 Longitudinal Profile
16
5 2 3 Hydrology
16
5 2 4 Photo Reference Stations
16
5 3 Stream Morphology Monitoring Results
16
5 3 1 Cross Sections
16
5 3 2 Longitudinal Profile
17
5 3 3 Hydrology
17
54 Stream Conclusions
20
6 0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
21
i December 2010

Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
List of Figures
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
3
Figure 2
USGS Map
4
Figure 3
Monitoring Summary Map
6
Figure 4
Groundwater Hydrographs
9
Figure 5
2010 Rainfall
12
Figure 6
Stream Problem Areas
18
List of Tables
Table 1
Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives
2
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
2
Table 3
Project Contacts
2
Table 4
Hydrologic Monitoring Results
8
Table 5
Comparison of Normal Rainfall to Observed Rainfall
11
Table 6
Planted Tree Species
13
Table 7
2010 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Species Composition
14
Table 8
Volunteers within the Wetland Restoration Area
14
Table 9
Stream Observation Areas
17
Table 10
Crest Gauge Data
17
Table 11
Summary of Morphologic Monitoring Parameters
20
Table 12
Summary of Vegetative Monitoring Data 2006 -2010
21
Table 13
Summary of Hydrology Monitoring Data 2006 -2010
22
Table 14
Summary of Crest Gauge Data 2006 -2010
22
Table 15
Summary of Morphologic Monitoring Parameters 2006 -2010
22
APPENDICES
Appendix A As -Built Survey
Appendix B 2010 Profile and Cross Section Data
Appendix C 2010 Gauge Data
Appendix D 2010 Site Photos
11 December 2010

O
C
O
C
Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
10 SUMMARY
This Annual Report details the momtonng activities during the 2010 growing season on the Cox
Mitigation Site Construction of the site was completed in December 2005 The 2010 data
represent the results from the fifth year of hydrologic, vegetation, and stream morphology
monitoring
Restoration of the Cox Site involved stream restoration, stream enhancement, riverme wetland
restoration, and non riverme wetland restoration Construction included a stable, meandering
channel across prior converted hydric agricultural fields The channel was designed and
constructed with natural channel design techniques Wetland restoration activities included
raising the water table by filling drainage ditches, and creation of microtopography across the
Site After construction, it was determined there was 7,292 linear feet of stream restoration, 350
linear feet of stream enhancement, 26 8 acres of riverine wetland restoration, and 16 9 acres of
non - riverme wetland restoration Appendix A contains the As -Built survey
This Annual Report presents data from the 12 hydrology monitoring gauges, 22 vegetation
monitoring plots, one crest gauge, one on -site rain gauge, and 16 cross sections, as required by
the approved Restoration Plan
In 2010, ten of the 12 hydrology monitoring gauges recorded hydroperiods of at least seven
percent of the growing season The two gauges that did not meet the success criterion recorded
hydroperiods of two and five percent of the growing season Based on the monitoring results of
Years 1 through 5, the restored wetland has achieved the success criterion specified in the
Restoration Plan for the Site
Weather station data from the Smithfield Weather Station were used in conjunction with one
manual rain gauge and one automatic rain gauge located on the Site to document precipitation
amounts The on -site gauges are used to validate observations made at the Smithfield station
This Annual Report documents vegetation survivability based on 22 vegetation - monitoring plots
randomly located to represent the different zones within the Site The vegetation monitoring for
2010 documented a range of surviving tree stem densities of 440 stems per acre to 800 stems per
acre, with an average tree density of 591 stems per acre The Site had earlier met the initial
vegetation success criterion of 320 surviving stems per acre after the third growing season, and
now has met the final success criterion of 260 stems per acre after the fifth growing season
During 2010, the restored stream channel remained stable, and continued to provide the intended
habitat and hydrologic functions Two bankfull events were recorded during the year All
monitored cross sections showed minor adjustment in stream dimension The Site has achieved
the stream success criteria specified in the Restoration Plan for the Site
December 2010

Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
2 0 INTRODUCTION
21 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Cox wetland and stream restoration Site is located near the community of Bentonville in
Johnston County, North Carolina (Figure 1 and Figure 2) The Site has a history of agricultural
use consisting primarily of row crop agriculture Ditches on the Site were used to increase
subsurface drainage when the land was under agricultural production Construction of the Site,
including planting of trees, was completed in December 2005 Groundwater, surface water, and
manual rain gauges were functional beginning January 2006 The 2010 monitoring season
represents the fifth year of monitoring for the Site
22 PROJECT PURPOSE
Monitoring of the Cox Site is required to demonstrate successful restoration based on comparison
to reference site conditions, and based on the other criteria found in the Restoration Plan
Hydrology, vegetation, and stream monitoring are conducted on an annual basis Success criteria
must be met for five consecutive years This Annual Report details the results of the monitoring
efforts for 2010 (Year 5) at the Cox Mitigation Site
Table 1 Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives
Reach Name
As -Built Length (feet)
Mitigation Units
Restoration Approach
Stream
919 608 -9688
January 2006
Post - restoration Monitoring Begins
UT to Mill Creek
7,292
7,292
Restoration
UT to Mill Creek
350
140
Enhancement
Total
7,642
7,432
Report
Wetland
As -Built Area (acres)
Report
Rrverme
268
268
Restoration
Non- Riverme
169
169
Restoration
23 PROJECT HISTORY & SCHEDULE
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
" Month ", " ,
Activity
9
January 2005
Construction Completed
919 608 -9688
January 2006
Post - restoration Monitoring Begins
November 2006
1 st Annual Monitoring
Report
November 2007
2nd Annual Monitoring
Report
November 2008
3rd Annual Monitoring
Report
November 2009
4th Annual Monitoring
Report
September 2010
5th Annual Monitoring
Report
Table 3 Project Contacts
Contact
Firm Information
Project Manager
EBX -Neuse 1, LLC
Norton Webster
919 608 -9688
Designer
Buck Engineering PC
Kevin Tweedy, PE
919 463 -5488
Monitoring Contractor
WK Dickson and Co, Inc
Daniel Ingram
919 782 -0495
December 2010

o N
GT3 ko\Nn d 9de d
o �
00
O-
n
e
�c
�a
as
Or,` Sd Gc
Orch rd Rd °
e �
f�a
Ilia Rd
Rhom &arm Ln
iu
C
T
O
d sro
lan
Str 1143 OH ON
- -- - -- Cox Project Site
Reference Site
P Rd
Westbrook ow o ds G�e e a
S
c
cc
cn ScootR
o Q r
m WV,
w S a S Mill
0 ono Rd t`
Harper
House
Qom _ Joh Chur �Rd
vm 11
Lo
a� m !
s eattlef ,lr�u �fa� a tee °ad a
N o S �e /d m
°o
Rd N D
3 Nf WAYNE
o
a tate Road 120
,
T ON 2
po N cn load
e US West ighway
0
Figure 1.
Cox Stream Mitigation Site
Project Location Map 0 Referlence �,�►
equals Johnston County, NC Streams
1 inch Roads
-- Westbrook

� --!
JIFF
—1
i -- - `N
Cox Project Site l
Reference Site
1 � � (i •ti � I I
cc!.
W
WestiA p i�Gwgrounds Rd esfb,
�0 x/ '
Ch ,R{rATION
cout
It
t
PC d N U
Figure 2.
Cox Stream Mitigation Site LEGEND
USGS Topographic Map ® Reference Sites
Johnston County, NC Streams
Roads
1 inch equals 2,000 feet
---� Cox Site

Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
30 HYDROLOGY
3 1 HYDROLOGIC SUCCESS CRITERIA
As stated in the approved Restoration Plan, to meet the hydrologic success cnteria, the
momtonng data must show that for each normal year of rainfall within the monitoring penod the
Site has been inundated or saturated within 12 inches of the soil surface for a minimum of seven
percent of the growing season (17 days) The day counts are based on the growing season for
Johnston County, which is 232 days long (17 March — 5 November) As specified in the approved
Restoration Plan, data are collected from nine automated and three manual groundwater gauges
The Restoration Plan further specifies that in order for the hydrologic data to be considered
successful it must be demonstrated that precipitation is either within or below nonnal limits
32 DESCRIPTION OF HYDROLOGY MONITORING EFFORTS
Three manual groundwater gauges, nine automated Infinities groundwater gauges, one manual
rain gauge, one automatic rain gauge, and one manual stream crest gauge were in place
throughout the 2010 growing season (Figures 3a and 3b) The monitoring protocol for the Site
specifies that automated momtonng stations will be downloaded and checked for malfunctions on
a monthly basis Dunng monthly Site visits, manual groundwater gauges are read, the crest gauge
is read and rainfall totals are collected from the on site rain gauges
Automated Gauges
Automatic groundwater gauges record water table elevations twice daily at 08 00 and 20 00
Infinities gauges employ pressure sensors that record water elevation above the bottom of the
sensor (with atmospheric pressure compensation) Immediately adjacent to each automatic gauge
is a manual calibration gauge The calibration water table depth is recorded at monthly
downloads To determine wetland hydroperiods, the automatically recorded data are compared to
the calibration data to determine a standard correction factor between the calibration gauge and
the automatic gauge for each location The standard correction factor is applied to correct daily
readings The corrected daily readings are then used to determine wetland hydropenods
Manual Gauges
Water table depths are recorded monthly in manual groundwater gauges To calculate wetland
hydropenods, interpolations are made between monthly readings by correlating twice daily
automatic gauge readings Each manual gauge is correlated to an automatic gauge based on
proximity, landscape position, and the relationship of their groundwater depth readings (i e if
their readings are separated by a consistent value) Once the appropriate automatic gauge has
been selected, a correction factor is calculated for each monthly gauge reading This correction
factor typically vanes by several inches on a monthly basis A daily rate of change between
monthly correction factors is calculated to determine the daily correction factor The daily
correction factor is then applied to the automatic gauge readings to calculate an estimated daily
water table depth for the manual gauge These daily readings are used to determine wetland
hydroperiods
Data Interpretation
Wetland hydroperiods are calculated from twice daily water table depth elevations A
hydropenod is calculated if the water table is equal to or less than -12 inches below ground
surface for at least 24 hours If a gauge falls below -12 inches for two consecutive readings (24
hours), then the hydroperiod ends at the last reading within -12 inches If a gauge falls below -12
inches for only one reading then maintains a reading above -12 inches for a minimum of 24
December 2010
i

Jr
'N
-
MANUAL J AUTOMATIC
.Mv r•` / -' - -!i'./ �y `. .,' *J: ' - WELL 749 O WELL #10 y,
VBXTATION PLAT 5 XSEcs
VEOETATICH PLar
`, i ���,b , �•��, _ - •1 ' ` — ` y 1 , J `.. .+rte j ` VEOETATKM PLAT
By
so
i
�.
XSEC 3 AUTOMATIC
} / ►1 / O MATI mi=l WELL #12
I.
WETLAND HYDROPERIOD
O >7%
5-7%
<5%
•
• AUTOMATIC AUT C WaETATicN PLAT \
WELL #it O' � � WELL #4� � a� f1U `XSEC?
XSEC6
+• ` \ ATTON OT -
/
- vvau a -
AUTONAnc -- 1
r Q - AUTS --., 1 - - _.� VEIL
OLU
VwdL a s
VEGETATION PLOT "�/ _ •
�•— / TLiTw fGQT _ VETETATIgI PLOT #A.. -
w—
t
VEGETATM
N1
XSECS
Cox
Monitoring Summary

VEGUAIM FUR
/13
%SEC9
i
! " WETLAND HYDROPERIOD
{. Q
>7%
' 5 -7
/l
I
r
fol
T
COX
t irl Monitoring Summary
• Figure 3b
tae s 0

L�
C�
C�
C�
Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
hours, the hydropenod is calculated continuously This methodology accounts for minor technical
malfunctions experienced by the automatic gauges
33 RESULTS OF HYDROLOGY MONITORING
3 3 1 Site Data
The following hydropenod statistics were calculated for each monitoring station during the
growing season 1) most consecutive days that the water table was within twelve inches of the
soil surface, 2) cumulative number of days that the water table was within twelve inches of the
soil surface, and 3) number of times that the water table rose to within twelve inches of the soil
surface The results of these calculations are presented in Table 4 Figures 4a, 4b, and 4c
provide charts of the water depth for each of the monitoring gauges on the site Precipitation is
shown in Figure 5 Raw hydrograph data collected from the monitoring gauges are provided in
Appendix C
Year Five monitoring demonstrates that the Site is functioning as designed, with varying degrees
of wetness and saturation across the Site All gauges at the Cox site, except AW6 and AW 12,
exceeded the seven percent hydrologic success criteria Gauges AW6 and AW 12 had
hydroperiods of five and two percent of the growing season, respectively These hydropenods are
consistent with reference data from Years 1 through 4 Overall, the mitigation Site recorded
hydroperiods similar to the range of hydropenods recorded at the reference wetland site
Table 4 Hydrologic Monitoring Results
2010 Max Hydroperiod (Growing Season 17 -Mar through 05-No-vi-232 days) r
Well Data for 17 -Mar through 29 -Apr (44 days) _
w Success Criterion 7 % =16 Consecutive Da s "
Gauge
r
Consecutive
Cumulative , y�
�b�
Occurrences
=
J
Days
Percent of,
d
RGrowmg
,Season
Da y s
~. ,
n Percent of
Growing Season
a r 14 -,1', t
Cox AW 1
51
22
94
40
4
Cox MW2
34
15
57
25
2
Cox AW3
20
9
23
10
3
Cox AW4
21
9
24
10
3
Cox AW5
32
14
50
22
5
Cox AW6
11
5
30
13
5
Cox AW7
47
20
77
33
4
Cox MW8
42
18
62
27
2
Cox MW9
32
14
50
22
4
Cox AW 10
31
13
47
20
3
Cox AW 11
28
12
43
18
6
Cox AW 12
1 5
2
10
4
4
'Reference Gauges
WBK RAW 1
43
18
60
26
3
WBK RMW2
33
14
50
22
7
WBK RAW3
41
18
55
24
3
WBK RMW4
31
13
44
19
5
WBK RAW5
31
13
43
18
5
Note AW3 malfunctioned from 23 June to 2 Sept
December 2010

Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year S)
Figure 4. Groundwater Hydrographs
Figure 4a. 2010 Cox Groundwater Gauges
10
0
7-10
d
t
U
C
C -20
.q O
m
W -30
M
v
C -ao
E
-50
-60
70
J
10
0
ap -10
L
O
C
C -20
O
.7
W -30
v
C -40
Q
-50
-60
-70
F M A M J J A
Months
Smithfield Daily Rainfall —Cox AW1 ■ Cox MW2
S O N D
—Cox AW3 —Cox AW4
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
� I
6.0 t
v
C
C
5.0 O
a
4.0
LO
a
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
10.00
9.00
8.00
7.00
N
6.00 L
U
C
C
5.00 O
'a
4.00 .d,
a`
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
11111111111111ISmithfleld Daily Rainfall —Cox AW5 Cox AW6 Cox AW7 ■ Cox MW8
9 December 2010

10
0
T -10
•
L
V
C
C -20
O
W -30
C -a0
Q
-50
-60
Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year S)
Figure 4c. 2010 Cox Groundwater Gauges
- 70, r.. A. M4. J1!'. A.. �1. I... N4. �M..,4....eh..h..JILILI�.IIb.M, AJ6 -ft
J F M A M J J -JSA S O N D
Months
Smithfield Daily Rainfall ■ Cox MW9 Cox AW10 —Coot AW11 —Cox AW12
10
0
T-10
m
C
CO -20
a
W
m
W -30
C •o
Q
:7
-50
-60
-70
J
Figure 4d. 2010 Cox Groundwater Gauges
F M A M J J A s O N
Months
t Smithfield Daily Rainfall RefAW1 ■ Ref MW2 — RefAW3 ■ Ref MW4
10
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0 L
V
C
5.0 O
r
a
4.0 LD
a
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
y
6.0 .c
v
c
c
so O
a
a
4.0
a
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
D
– Ref AW 5
December 2010

Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
3 3 2 Reference Data
The hydropenod statistics that were calculated for the on -site monrtonng stations were also
calculated for each reference monrtonng station during the growing season The results of these
calculations are presented in Figure 4d and Table 4 The reference gauges exhibit a range of
hydropenods similar to the mitigation site data, ranging from 13 to 19 percent of the growing
season The reference gauges are located in a riverme wetland upstream of the adjacent
Westbrook mitigation site
The approved Restoration Plan for the site provides that if the rainfall data for any given year
dunng the monitoring period is not normal, the reference wetland data can be used to determine if
there is a positive correlation between the performance of the restoration Site and the natural
hydrology of the reference site
Table 5 Comparison of Normal Rainfall to Observed Rainfall
Month
Average �
Normal
Limits�
Smithfield'
Precipitation
° - 4
On-Site
Manual Rain
,N_
n Gau e
On -Site
j
Automatic d
ate,
Rain Gauge
=�
X30 Percents
70 Percent
January
4 17
290
492
246
- -
367
February
366
251
478
346
- --
230
March
423
328
501
356
290
- -
Apnl
300
179
3 89
064
255
-
May
376
254
462
760
425
529
June
374
1 99
447
208
250
1 53
July
504
340
5 89
234
280
264
August
456
300
572
463
3 71
--
September
435
2 11
528
- --
--
- --
October
3 14
1 80
393
- --
- --
--
November
3 14
1 93
3 81
- -
- --
- -
December
3 15
2 10
3 80
- --
- --
- --
Average
- --
2935
5612
- --
--
--
Total
4594
--
- --
2677
1871
1543
3 3 3 Climate Data
The manual rain gauge at the Cox mitigation Site recorded rainfall conditions below the annual
average in March and July, and normal conditions in April, May, June, and August (Table 5 and
Figure 5) The on -site automatic rain gauge recorded below- average rainfall in February, June,
and July, and normal or above normal rainfall in February and May No data was available from
this gauge in March, April, or August The Smithfield rain gauge recorded below - normal rainfall
in January, April, and July, and normal rainfall in February, March, June, and August Only May
had above normal rainfall Total on -site rainfall is slightly below normal limits for the year
Rainfall totals from the Smithfield gauge are below average, but within normal limits for the year
11 December 2010

Figure 5. 2010 Rainfall
10.00
900
800 -
7.00
N
t 6.00
V
C
L
O 5.00
'a
U 4.00
0)
a
3.00
2.00
1.00
Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
2010 Precipitation for Cox Site
0.00
J F M A M J J A S O
Months
N D
�On sfte Manual Rain Gauge � —On -site Auto Rain Gauge —6 Smithfield Monthly Rainfall .... •. • 30th/70th Percentile
3.4 HYDROLOGIC CONCLUSIONS
Data collected from all the groundwater monitoring gauges on the Cox Mitigation Site indicate
that ten of the 12 hydrology monitoring stations recorded hydroperiods of at least seven percent
of the growing season. The remaining gauges recorded hydroperiods of two and five percent of
the growing season.
On -site rainfall data is slightly below normal limits January through August 2010. The Smithfield
gauge recorded rainfall totals that are below average but within normal limits for the same time
period. Based on the results from the mitigation Site monitoring gauges during Years 1 through 5,
the site has achieved the success criteria specified in the Restoration Plan.
4.0 VEGETATION
4.1 VEGETATION SUCCESS CRITERIA
The interim measure of vegetative success for the Cox Wetland RestorationPlan is the survival of
at least 320 three -year old planted trees per acre at the end of Year 3 of the monitoring period.
The final vegetative success criteria is the survival of 260 five -year old planted trees per acre at
the end of Year 5 of the monitoring period.
12 December 2010

Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
Up to 20 percent of the Site species composition may be comprised of invasive species (i e
loblolly pine, red maple, sweet gum, etc ) Remedial action may be required should these present
a problem and exceed 20 percent composition
42 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES AND VEGETATION MONITORING
The following monitoring protocol was designed to monitor vegetation survival 22 plots were
established on the Cox Mitigation Site to monitor approximately 1 2 percent of the site (Figures
3a and 3b) Fifteen of the plots are established next to the stream bed to monitor the vegetation in
the stream restoration buffer and riverme wetland zone The other seven plots are randomly
located to represent the non - riverine wetland zone on the Site
Plots have metal fence posts at each of the four corners to clearly and permanently establish the
area to be sampled Ropes are hung connecting all four corners to help determinie if trees close to
the plot boundary are inside or outside of the plot Trees on the boundary, and trees dust outside of
the boundary that appear to have greater than 50 percent of their canopy inside the boundary are
counted inside the plot A piece of ten - foot -tall white PVC pipe is placed over the metal post on
one corner to facilitate visual location of the plot throughout the five -year monitoring period
All of the planted stems inside the plot are flagged with orange flagging, and marked with a three -
foot -tall piece of half -inch PVC to identify them as the planted stems (vs any colonizers), and to
help locate them in the future Each stem is tagged with a permanent, numbered, aluminum tag
Table 6 identifies the planted tree species
Table 6 Planted Tree Species
ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
FAC Status
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
FACW-
2
Q uercus phellos
Coastal Willow Oak
FACW-
3
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
FACW-
4
Celtis laevi ata
Sugarberry
FACW
5
uercus 1 rata
Overcup Oak
OBL
6
N ssa s lvatica
Black um
FAC
7
Betula ni ra
River Birch
FACW
8
1 N ssa bi ora
Swamp Tu leo
OBL
9
Taxodium dtstichuin
Bald Cypress
OBL
10
Fraxinus enns lvanica
Green Ash
FACW
43 RESULTS OF VEGETATION MONITORING
The vegetation monitoring documented a surviving tree stem density range of 440 to 800 stems
per acre with an overall average density of 591 stems per acre The Site had earlier met the initial
vegetation survival criteria of 320 stems per acre surviving after the third growing season, and has
now met the final vegetation survival criteria of 260 stems per acre surviving after the fifth
growing season
Table 7 presents stem counts for each of the monitoring plots Each planted tree species is
identified across the top row, and each plot is identified down the left column The numbers on
the top row correlate to the ID column of Table 6 Trees are flagged in the field on an as- needed
basis before the flags degrade Flags are utilized because they will not interfere with the growth
13 December 2010

Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
of the tree Volunteers are also flagged and recorded during this process Annual variation in stem
count data can be attributed to mortality and regeneration from root stock of stems previously
assessed to be dead
Table 7 2010 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Species Composition
Plot
1
2
3
4
5
6
7,
8
9
10
Total
Stems per
Acre
1
2
2
2
0
1
0
5
0
1
0
13
520
2
0
0
3
0
5
0
7
0
0
2
17
680
3
2
5
7
0
1
0
0
0
5
0
20
800
4
2
1
3
0
1
0
3
0
2
0
12
480
5
3
0
0
1
1
0
4
3
0
0
12
480
6
1
1
10
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
16
640
7
1
0
1
0
0
0
8
0
3
0
13
520
8
0
0
1
0
0
0
10
0
0
2
13
520
9
7
0
7
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
16
640
10
5
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
12
480
11
2
2
0
0
2
3
3
0
1
3
16
640
12
0
0
0
0
0
2
6
0
1
7
16
640
13
1 9
1
1 1
0
1 0
0
3
1 0
2
1 1
17
1 680
14
0
0
0
0
1
1
14
0
0
2
18
720
15
2
0
1
0
5
5
3
1
0
0
17
680
16
1
0
0
2
3
0
5
0
0
0
11
440
17
6
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
560
18
1
0
3
0
3
3
4
0
2
1
17
680
19
2
0
6
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
11
440
20
3
0
1
5
0
0
2
0
0
0
11
440
21
3
0
3
5
0
0
6
3
0
0
20
800
22
2
0
4
2
0
0
4
1
0
0
13
520
Average Stems per Acre 591
Range of Stems per Acre 440 -800
Volunteer species will also be monitored throughout the five -year monitoring period Below is a
table of the most commonly found woody volunteer species
Table 8 Volunteers within the Wetland Restoration Area
ID
Scientific Name " ,
Common Name F
FAC Status
A
Laquadambar styracaflua
Sweetgum
FAC+
B
Acer rubrum
Red Maple
FAC
C
Panus taeda
Loblolly Pine
FAC
Woody volunteer species were observed in high quantities in vegetation Plots 10 and 11
Sweetgum (Laquadambar styraciva) is the most common volunteer, though red maple (Acer
14 December 2010

Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
rubrum) and loblolly pine (Pmus taeda) were also observed These areas are overpopulated with
mvasives due to the presence of seed trees in close proximity, as this is the narrowest part of the
Site
44 VEGETATION OBSERVATIONS & CONCLUSIONS
After construction of the mitigation Site, a permanent ground cover seed mixture of Virginia wild
rye (Elymus virginicus), switch grass (Panicum virgatum), and fox sedge (Carex vulpinoidea)
was broadcast on the site at a rate of 10 pounds per acre These species are present on the site
Hydrophytic herbaceous vegetation, including rush (Juncus effusus), spike -rush (Eleocharis
obtusa), boxseed (Ludwigia sp ), sedge (Carex spp ), smartweed (Polygonum spp ), and
woolgrass (Scirpus cypermus) were observed across the site, particularly in areas of periodic
inundation The presence of these herbaceous wetland plants helps to confirm the presence of
wetland hydrology on the Site
A number of weedy species occur on the Site, though none seem to pose any problems for the
woody or herbaceous hydrophytic vegetation Common weedy vegetation includes ragweed
(Ambrosia artemisufolia), wild dill (Foeniculum vulgare), goldenrod (Solidago spp ), dogfennel
(Eupatorium capillhfolium) horseweed (Conyza spp ), and broomsedge (Andropogon spp )
The Site was planted in costal plain small stream swamp and wet hardwood forest species in
January 2006 Twenty-two vegetation - monitoring plots were established throughout the planting
areas The data reflects that the site had earlier met the interim minimum success criteria of 320
trees per acre at the end of year three, and has now met the final success criteria of 260 trees per
acre at the end of year five
5 0 STREAM MONITORING
51 STREAM SUCCESS CRITERIA
As stated in the approved Restoration Plan, the stream restoration success criteria for the Site
includes the following
• Bankfull Events Two bankfull flow events must be documented within the five year
monitoring period
• Cross - sections There should be little change in as -built cross sections Cross sections
shall be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross
sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for "E" or "C" type
channels
• Longitudinal Profiles The longitudinal profiles should show that the bedform features
are remaining stable, e g they are not aggradmg or degrading Bedforms observed
should be consistent with those observed in "E" and "C" type channels
• Photo Reference Stations Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel
aggradation or degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and
effectiveness of erosion control measures
52 STREAM MORPHOLOGY MONITORING PLAN
To document the stated success criteria, the monitoring program described in the following
sections was instituted following construction completion on the Cox Site
15 December 2010

Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year S)
5 2 1 Cross Sections
Two permanent cross sections were installed per 1 000 linear feet of stream restoration work,
with one of the locations being a riffle cross section, and one location being a pool cross section
A total of 16 permanent cross sections were established across the mitigation site (Figures 3a and
3b) Each cross section was marked on both banks with permanent pins to establish the exact
transect used Permanent cross section pins were surveyed and located relative to a common
benchmark to facilitate easy comparison of year -to -year data The annual cross section surveys
include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, inner berm, edge
of water, and thalweg Riffle cross sections are classified using the Rosgen stream classification
system Permanent cross sections for 2010 (Year 5) were surveyed in July 2010
5 2 2 Longitudinal Profile
A longitudinal profile of approximately 3,000 feet was surveyed along the restoration reach in
Years 1, 3, and 5 Measurements include thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of low bank
Each of these measurements is taken at the head of each feature (e g riffle, run, pool, glide) and
at the maximum pool depth A common benchmark will be used each year to facilitate
comparison of year -to -year data
5 2 3 Hydrology
A crest gauge was installed on the site to document bankfull events (Figure 3) The gauge is
checked monthly, and records the highest out -of -bank flow event that occurred during the past
month (Table 10)
5 2 4 Photo Reference Stations
Photographs are used to visually document restoration success Reference stations are marked
with wooden stakes, and Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) coordinates have been determined for
each location Reference photos are taken at each permanent cross section from both stream
banks, as well as facing upstream and downstream in the channel The survey tape is centered in
the photographs of the bank and the water line is located in the lower edge of the frame with as
much of the bank as possible included in each photo In- stream structures (e g , rock vanes, cross
vanes, and constructed nffles) are also photographed Photo reference stations will be
photographed at least once per year for at least five years following construction
53 STREAM MORPHOLOGY MONITORING RESULTS
Photographs were taken throughout the monitoring season to document the evolution of the
restored stream channel (Appendix D) Herbaceous vegetation is moderately dense along the
restored stream Pools have maintained a variety of depths and habitat qualities, depending on
the location and type of scour features (logs, root wads, transplants, etc )
In- stream structures installed within the restored stream included constructed riffles, log vanes,
log weirs, and root wads Visual observations of structures throughout the 2010 growing season
indicated that most of the structures are stable and functioning properly Vegetation has stabilized
several areas of bank erosion and end cutting that were observed in previous monitoring years
Minor erosion is still occurring at a few structures, and several mid- channel bars were noted
Table 9 details the stream areas of concern
5 3 1 Cross Sections
Year 5 cross section monitoring data for stream stability were collected during July 2010, and
compared to baseline data collected in 2006 (Appendix B) All monitored cross sections fell
16 December 2010

Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
within the quantitative parameters defined for "E" or "C" type channels The cross section data
are summarized in Table 11
5 3 2 Longitudinal Profile
A longitudinal profile survey was conducted in Year 5 Based on a comparison to the previous
profiles and cross sections, there has been little adjustment to the stream profile or dimension
since construction Stream observation areas are listed in Table 9, and their locations are shown
in Figure 6 None of these areas threaten the overall stability of the stream system
Table 9 Stream Observation Areas
ea �
STA
Desc owRecommendation
---
February
000
March
Numober
Root wads
24 +25
Minor erosion on right bank behind root wads,
SOA 1
June
000
ve etation is stabilizing banks, no repair needed
000
Channel
43 +00
Mid- channel bar formation, no repair needed
SOA 2
Channel
44 +35
Mid channel bar formation, no repair needed
SOA 3
Channel
45 +50
Vegetation in channel, no repair needed
SOA 4
Log weir not functioning properly, causing
Log weir
46 +85
minor erosion of banks, stream is stable and no
SOA 5
repair is needed
Channel
74 +90 to
Mid- channel bar formation, no repair needed
SOA 6
75 +00
5 3 3 Hydrology
Two bankfull events were recorded between February and August of the 2010 monitoring season
Out of bank events of 0 10 and 0 15 feet above bankfull stage were recorded during the April and
May site visits, respectively The crest gauge data from 2010 are summarized in Table 10
Table 10 Crest Gauge Data
Month Recorded
Crest Gauge
January
---
February
000
March
000
April
0 10
May
0 15
June
000
July
000
August
000
September
- --
October
- --
November
- --
December
- --
17 December 2010

•� mow. � i � � ` ,� _ f
' • � � �, I �'` f w.. _ � '`ter !` � , o \ � �/ .' - ~ I�`�' -`_`'_ I
— I I `- -, I�\ _- �� I' it //, �_ ✓~ � _:� ^� ��7 �� /.
..
-- -_ r�r / ��,,. _,i '�~ mar' _ r^ 1 •.�. , � ~ �� r i � j. I �- _ _ _ _ `: - ..
Xf
' - w/:
;g
es
llol
101* 'Iel
lb
_ %rte / '`; `..; _\ - ^ _ -.. - —�' -��•� `�` �} ,� C
--ter
PAPP-
n
3
Cox
Stream Observation Areas

Sri -
ti
r
A.
v
�A Ad
J
/ Na
/I
Z — —
-�' COX
Stream Observation Areas
Figure 6b
100 50 0 � z

Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
Table 11 Summary of Morphologic Monitoring Parameters
s� Parameter
Ye r 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
t%
` ,,
B
Built
�, � '
Bankfull Xsec Area, Abkf (sq ft
174
130
109
136
125
123
Avg Bankfull Width, Wbkf ft
175
15 1
15 3
167
13 9
140
Bankfull W/D
185
188
228
214
164
170
Bankfull Mean Depth, Dbkf (ft)
10
08
07
08
09
09
Bankfull Max Depth Dmax ft
1 9
15
13
14
1 7
1 7
54 STREAM CONCLUSIONS
Overall the Cox Stream Mitigation Site is performing as designed Cross section and profile data
indicate that little change has occurred since the stream channel was built Two bankfull events
occurred at the site in 2010 A log weir and a root wad have experienced minor erosion, and
minor bank erosion has occurred Several small mid- channel bars have formed, and vegetation
was observed in the channel Several areas of erosion observed in 2008 and 2009 have been
stabilized by vegetation The Site has achieved the success criteria specified in the Restoration
Plan for the site
C
C1
U
0
C
n
L�
20 December 2010
u
n

Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
6 0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The stream, hydrologic, and vegetation monitoring data for all five monitoring years at the Site
are summarized in Tables 12 -15 Based on this data and the other data and comments provided
above in Sections 3, 4, and 5, the Site has achieved the stream, hydrologic, and vegetative success
cnteria specified in the Restoration Plan
Table 12 Summary of Vegetative Monitoring Data 2006 -2010
Plot
Planted Stems Per Acre
Base
2006
2007'
2008
2009 ,
2010
1
720
600
600
520
520
520
2
760
640
640
680
680
680
3
800
760
800
800
800
800
4
680
680
680
680
520
480
5
680
680
640
640
600
480
6
640
640
640
640
640
640
7
720
720
720
720
560
520
8
680
640
640
600
520
520
9
720
680
680
640
640
640
10
720
720
520
480
480
480
11
720
720
720
720
640
640
12
720
760
760
760
720
640
13
680
680
680
680
680
680
14
720
720
720
720
720
720
15
680
680
680
680
680
680
16
640
520
560
560
440
440
17
640
640
600
560
560
560
18
680
680
680
680
680
680
19
640
640
520
440
440
440
20
680
600
520
520
440
440
21
800
800
800
800
800
800
22
680
640
560
560
520
520
Average
700
675
653
640
604
591
21 December 2010

Cox Mitigation Site
FINAL Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year S)
Table 13 Summary of Hydrology Monitoring Data 2006 -2010
Gauge
Max Consecutive Hydroperiod ( %)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
AW1
43
20
30
38
22
MW2
29
18
27
31
15
AW3
0
17
7
10
9
AW4
2
2
7
11
9
AW5
9
5
17
17
13
AW6
29
4
8
12
5
AW7
58
28
32
45
20
MW8
13
8
25
19
18
MW9
7
8
26
16
14
AW10
6
4
22
17
13
AWll
N/A
4
27
18
12
AW12
N/A
0
4
3
2
Ref AW1
8
3
2
3
19
Ref MW2
8
8
8
15
14
Ref AW3
29
19
22
17
18
Ref MW4
9
19
16
16
13
Ref AW5
0
1
0
0
13
Table 14 Summary of Crest Gauge Data 2006 -2010
'
Table 15 Summary of Morphologic Monitoring Parameters 2006 -2010
Parameter' ° �
200K.
2007
-2008
2009
2010
Number of Bankfull
2
1
2
3
2
Events
Bankfull Xsec Area, Abkf (sq ft)
174
13
109
Maximum Height
03
03
1 5
08
0 15
Above Bankfull (feet)
167
139
14
Bankfull W/D
1 185
Table 15 Summary of Morphologic Monitoring Parameters 2006 -2010
Parameter' ° �
�Dt11
Ye 'l
Year 2,
�Yearr3
2, Vearj4
:Year 5
Bankfull Xsec Area, Abkf (sq ft)
174
13
109
136
125
123
Avg Bankfull Width, Wbkf (ft)
175
151
15 3
167
139
14
Bankfull W/D
1 185
1 188
228
214
164
17
Bankfull Mean Depth Dbkf (ft)
1
08
1 07
08
09
09
Bankfull Max Depth, Dmax (ft)
19
1 5
1 1 3
14
1 7
1 7
22 December 2010

APPENDIX A
As -Built Survey

h
O
U
N
O
ti
IKA-
VICINITY MAP
INDEX OF
SHEETS
TITLE SHEET
1
1,A
STREAM CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
5944 FEET
GENERAL NOTES STANDARD
AS —BUILT STREAM =
SPECIFICATIONS AND
VEGETATION SELECTION
1 B
CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
2 TO 2 B
TYPICAL POOL AND
RIFFLE CROSS SECTIONS
STRUCTURE DETAILS
4 TO 13
AS -BUILT PLAN VIEWS
14 & 15
GRADING PLAN AND
MONITORING OVERVIEW
16&17
WETLAND OVERVIEW
EBX NIEUSE ° 19LLC
CON SITE
JOHNSTON COUNTY
LOCATION WEST OF GOLDSBORO
OFF SR 1198 WESTBROOK LOWGROUNDS ROAD
TYPE OF WORK AS BUILT PLANS
"A" AOMWR 009 0 q I Zia I ;an
C 02148 1 1 1,20
1
NO DATE CHECKED BY I APPROVED SY
�� 1 OMI>QI�M JOHN HUT'MN I KEVIN TRWT
GRAPHIC SCALES
PROJECT SUMMARY
EXISTING STREAM LENGTH =
5944 FEET
50 Q 50 Ip
AS —BUILT STREAM =
7357 FEET
RESTORATION LENGTH
PLANS
AS —BUILT STREAM =
285 FEET
ENHANCEMENT LENGTH
50 Q 50 100
EMSTING WETLAND ACREAGE =
0 8 ACRES
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
AS —BUILT WETLAND ACREAGE
5 0 5 1
4
RIVERINE WETLAND =
26 8 ACRES
AS —BUILT WETLAND ACREAGE
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
NON— IUVERINE WETLAND =
169 ACRES
PREPARED FOR THE OFFICE OF
EBX NEUSE - 1, LLC
2530 MERIDIAN PARKWAY SUITE 200
DURHAM NORTH CAROLINA 27713
EBX CONTACT
THOMAS L RINKER
PROJECT MANAGER
PREPARED , IN THE OFFICE OF
BUCK � ,
c ra naew
f
KEVIN TWEEDY
i pjmv cr AY�
DECEMBER '05
COAUMM"M 1W=
I JOHN HUTTON
JlQPMT mmfd
PROJECT EXGINEER
THIS DOCUMENT
ORIGNALLY ISSUED AND
SEALED 6Y
NEWT L. TWEEDY
aaTSST
APRL 4 2DOS
THIS MEDIA &TALL Nor BE CONSIDERED
A CEIMFED DOCUMENT

STREAM CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
SUPERCEDES SHEET 1B
00 ROCKJ -HOOK
00
¢tom ROCK VANE
OUTLET PROTECTION
d d ROCK CROSS VANE
LOG VANE
® LOG WEIR
DOUBLE DROP ROCK CROSS VANE
c
SINGLE WING DEFLECTOR
0 o
BOULDER CLUSTER
qal
DOUBLE WING DEFLECTOR
RANDOMLY S TO S FEET APART FROM THE TOP OF THE
TEMPORARY SILT CHECK
STREAMBANK OUT TO THE EDGE OF RNERINE WETLAND
ROOT WAD
°— o
LOG J HOOK
LOG VANE
® LOG WEIR
— ®— SAFETY FENCE
—TF— TAPE FENCE
—FP— 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
—- CONSERVATION EASEMENT
- - - - - EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
- - - - - EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
FOOT BRIDGE
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
I-u-T PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
® TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
X TREE REMOVAL
25` TREE PROTECTION
I
"NOTE ALL ITEMS ABOVE MAY NOT BE USED ON THIS PROJECT I
GENERAL NOTES
1 THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL INSTREAM STRUCTURES USING
A TRACK HOE WITH A HYDRAULIC THUMB OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO MOVE
BOULDERS 2FT X 2FT X 3FT (APPROXIMATELY 0 7 TONS)
2 THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE AT MINIMUM TWO
OPERATORS AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW STREAM
CHANNEL IN GENERAL, ONE OPERATOR WILL CUT THE NEW CHANNEL WITH
A TRACK HOE WHILE THE OTHER OPERATOR FOLLOWS AND INSTALLS INSTREAM
STRUCTURES BANK STABILIZATION PRACTICES AND TRANSPLANTS
DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW STREAM CHANNEL THE CONTRACTOR
WILL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE TWO TRACK HOES AND ONE LOADER ON-SITE
3 CONSTRUCTION IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN JUNE 2005
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
THIS DOCUMENT
ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND
SEALED BY
KEVIN L. TWEEDY
027=
AUGl.W 25, 2006
THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
BUCK aa
OI 6RIN0 L 7,2-91, "1e- Med1a0
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL
DECEMBER 1993
660 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP
6 08 CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
6 82 SILT FENCE
6 70 TEMPORARY (FORD) STREAM CROSSING
VEGETATION SELECTION
STREAMBANK AND RNERINE WETLAND VEGETATION SELECTION LIST NON:UVERINE WETLAND VEGETATION SELECTION LIST
BARE ROOTVEGETATION BARE ROOT VEGETATION
NOTE BARE ROOT VEGETATION SHALL BE INSTALLED
LOG CROSS VANE
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
0 o
BOULDER CLUSTER
qal
ROCK STEP POOL
— ®— SAFETY FENCE
—TF— TAPE FENCE
—FP— 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
—- CONSERVATION EASEMENT
- - - - - EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
- - - - - EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
FOOT BRIDGE
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
I-u-T PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
® TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
X TREE REMOVAL
25` TREE PROTECTION
I
"NOTE ALL ITEMS ABOVE MAY NOT BE USED ON THIS PROJECT I
GENERAL NOTES
1 THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL INSTREAM STRUCTURES USING
A TRACK HOE WITH A HYDRAULIC THUMB OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO MOVE
BOULDERS 2FT X 2FT X 3FT (APPROXIMATELY 0 7 TONS)
2 THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE AT MINIMUM TWO
OPERATORS AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW STREAM
CHANNEL IN GENERAL, ONE OPERATOR WILL CUT THE NEW CHANNEL WITH
A TRACK HOE WHILE THE OTHER OPERATOR FOLLOWS AND INSTALLS INSTREAM
STRUCTURES BANK STABILIZATION PRACTICES AND TRANSPLANTS
DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW STREAM CHANNEL THE CONTRACTOR
WILL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE TWO TRACK HOES AND ONE LOADER ON-SITE
3 CONSTRUCTION IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN JUNE 2005
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
THIS DOCUMENT
ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND
SEALED BY
KEVIN L. TWEEDY
027=
AUGl.W 25, 2006
THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
BUCK aa
OI 6RIN0 L 7,2-91, "1e- Med1a0
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL
DECEMBER 1993
660 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP
6 08 CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
6 82 SILT FENCE
6 70 TEMPORARY (FORD) STREAM CROSSING
VEGETATION SELECTION
STREAMBANK AND RNERINE WETLAND VEGETATION SELECTION LIST NON:UVERINE WETLAND VEGETATION SELECTION LIST
BARE ROOTVEGETATION BARE ROOT VEGETATION
NOTE BARE ROOT VEGETATION SHALL BE INSTALLED
NOTE BARE ROOT VEGETATION SHALL BE INSTALLED
RANDOMLY 5 TO S FEET APART FROM THE TOP OF THE
RANDOMLY S TO S FEET APART FROM THE TOP OF THE
STREAMBANK OUT TO THE EDGE OF RNERINE WETLAND
STREAMBANK OUT TO THE EDGE OF RIVERINE WETLAND
REVEGETATION LIMITS
REVEGETATION LIMITS
COMMON NAME SCW -4'rV CNAME
PNM7009 d Tote/
Totel Number
COMMON NAME SCJENThc7C NAME
Arsnkp"dTodd
Toted Number
BYakpon Nyw ryMtLr
10
2900
Swamp Tupelo Aysa"yM6te vwb6bra
15
Iwo
Omen ash Fiasyup"nrl ,
10
2900
Sycamore pAdlow ooddealrN
5
SDO
Swamp Cheebwt Oak Owmw mkharuY
/6
4350
Swamp Chestnut Oak Qusrou" rrrkhowd
10
1200
OvMaup Oak Qusrara "0
10
2900
Ovemup Oak Quarmu /ynte
10
1200
Willow Oak Quraa pJra6a"
6
1450
WDow, Oak Quarow plr0oe
5
500
Syoamas P**nu" ooddevila9L
20
5500
Suparbanp Ca61*rrjla0
2400
RNar Bkch Be** extra
20
6500
RlvW Bkoh Sabii I*v
20
2400
Bd ewes Tian D*6ykae
10
2900
Oren Ash FiNdkspwaxyA"vyoe
6
500
TOTAL
100
2p000
Bell Cypss Tamdied*6lkm
10
1200
TOTAL
100
12OW
LIVE STAKING
NOTE LIVE STAKES SHALL BE INSTALLED RANDOMLY 2 TO 3 FEET APART ALONG
PERMANENT SEED AID( FOR ALL PLANTING ZONES
THE STREAMBANKS FROM THE TOE OF THE SANK TO THE TOP OF BARK
COMMON NAME SCB:.NnM NAME
Pol—d of Tow
TaW Number
NOT'
ELDERBERRY SAMBUCUS CAMWENSIS
42
2WD
WETLAND SEED MD( SHALL BE SEEDED AT A RATE
BUTTONBUSH CEPIiHANTHM OCCIDENdLIS
60
3000
OF 15 LBS PER ACRE THOUGHOUT PLANTING ZONES
BLACK WILLOW SALDfAUGM
5
500
TOTAL
100
5000
COMMON NAME SCIEN77FIC NAME
Prowifto dTow
Ras (be par aan)
TEMPORARY SEED MD(
Redtop Agrosdo ab
10
15
VkpkNa WlMrys Eymus r6yhbla
15
2 26
NOTE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED USING TEMPORARY SEED MD(
Swttah Gress Pknkum Apabkn
15
225
Eaatam Gamma Ors" flpdam decobdes
5
0 7 6
COMMON NAME RATE
DATES
PenMWaola Omarliwad P "ono n parwYMnkun
5
0 76
ANNUAL RYE (COOL SEASON) 130 LBSIACRE
SEPTEMBER TO MARCH
LWs Ski* Stem Sahteeohyrkm aogoa*=
6
07 6
MILLET (WARM SEASON) 45 LBSIACRE
APRIL TO AUGUST
Soft Rush Juncw asters
5
0 76
B"ppsrs Tkk Bklrw 6vndo"a (aradeteaa)
10
15
Lanes- Laaysd Tick S""d Casopa* *noaa*6
10
1:
Ta Dow Tongue Pankvm o*nd"a5nwn
kp
10
1
Bb Oka Stem Andap*- pm-0
5
075
Indian G" Sorpaetrum mdv»
m
5
075
c
.D,
a
c
P

m
(n
CL
X
co
W
N
C
a
STATE
OF NORTH CAROLINA
t
•S U E = SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEER
DIVISION
OF HIGHWAYS
CONVENTIONAL
SYMBOLS
ROADS £7 RELATED ITEMS
BUILDINGS & OTHER
CULTURE
Edge of Pavement
— — — -
MINOR
Recorded Water Line
• •
Buildings
Curb
_ _ _ _
Head & End Wall
Designated Water Line (S U E •)
— .--- r
Foundations
yJ
Prop Slope Stakes Cut
- - - _ _ _
Pipe Culvert
_ _ _
Sanitary Sewer
_ -_
Area Outline
-�
ti
Prop Slope Stakes Fill
- - - F _ _ _
Footbridge
9
Recorded Sanitary Sewer Force Main
�- - - - - -< rY
- mss -.ss—
Gate
Prop Woven Wire Fence
$E)
Drainage Boxes
ci,
Designated Sanitary Sewer Force Main(S U E')_,u—
Gas Pump Vent or L4G Tank Cap
o
Prop Chain Link Fence
---EE
Payed Ditch Gutter
— — —
- Recorded Gas Line
—�
Church
dS
Prop Barbed Wire Fence
Designated Gas Line (S U E
School
Prop Wheelchair Ramp
Curb Cut for Future Wheelchair Ramp
®
UTILITIES
Storm Sewer
�—
Park
` _ J
Exist Guardrail
iii _
Exist Pole
Recorded Power Line
—P P
Cemetery
t
Prop Guardrail
East Power Pole
•
+
Designated Power Line (S U E •)
- + � -
Dam
Equality Symbol
Prop Power Pole
b
Recorded Telephone Cable
—T —r—
Sign
g
Pavement Removal
East Telephone Pole
♦
Designated Telephone Cable (S U E •)
_ _T_ _t_ _
Well
o
®
Prop Telephone Pole
o
Recorded lJG Telephone Conduit
Small Mine
yr
RIGHT OF WAY
East Joint Use Pole
+
Designated lLG Telephone Conduit (SUE •)
—n —n—
_ _n_ _n_ _
Swimming Pool
Baseline Control Point
Prop Joint Use Pole
Unknown Utility (SUE)
— rm -�iun—
Fasting Right of Way Marker
0
Telephone Pedestal
M
TbPOGRAPHY
East Right of Way Line w'Marker
— -
UAG Telephone Cable Hand Hold
®
Recorded Television Cable
— r. —r.—
IOOSe Surface
_ _ - _ _ - -
Cable TV Pedestal
©
Designated Television Cable (S U E I
_ _,._ _-_
-TV--
Hard Surface
Prop Right of Way Line with Proposed
Uo-G 7V Cable Hand Hold
®
Recorded Fiber Optics Cable
�
—ro—ro—
Change in Road Surface
R/1N Marker Iron Pin & Ca
( p)
Ar-
UoG Power Cable Hand Hold
®
Designated Fiber Optics Cable (S U E •)
Prop Right of Way Line with Proposed
Hydrant
Water Meter
-- i0 - -ro --
Curb
(Concrete or Granite) RJW Marker
—�
Satellite Dish
b
UG Test Hole (S U E •)
Right of W Symbol
g Way
R/W
Exist Control of Access Line
.�.
��� ~
Water Valve
®
Abandoned According to lLG Record
.f,,,,
Guard Post
OcR
Sewer Clean Out
+
,
Paved Walk
Prop Control of Access Line
Power Manhole
�
End of Information
c a,
_ _ - - - - -
East Easement line
Telephone Booth
®
BOUNDARIES f� PROPERTIES
Bridge
Box Culvert Tunnel
Prop Temp Construction Easement Line
c
Cellular Telephone Tower
p
"�'
or
- - - - - - -
� - �
Prop Temp Drainage Easement Line
ra
Water Manhole
State Line
County line
- - - - --
Ferry
- - - - - - -
Prop Perm Drainage Easement Line
roc
Light Pole
H -Frame Pole
��
Township Line
_ _ _
Culvert
,
Power Line Tower
City Line
__ —_—
Footbridge
HYDROLOGY
Pole with Base
Reservation Line
— — —
Troil, Footpath
Stream or Body of Water
- -
Gas Volvo
O
Properly Line
Light House
River Basin Buffer
_ RBB _
Gas Meter
Property Line Symbol
FE
Flow Arrow
-
Telephone Manhole
East Iron Pin
}
VEGETATION
Disappearing Stream
-
Power Transformer
0
Property Comer
+
Single Tree
9
p
Spring
0 - -/
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
®
Property Monument
Ja
Single Shrub
o
Swamp Marsh
Shoreline
Storm Sewer Manhole
®
Property Number
Parcel Number
t23
Hedge
- - - - - - -
Tank, Water, Gas, Oil
0
6
Woods Line
Falls Rapids
_ _ f_ _
Water Tank With Legs
Fence Line
1
- x —x —x-
Prop Lateral, Tail, Head Ditches
T
mT
Traffic Signal Junction Box
Existing Wetland Boundaries
.. a �sg.
— _,R_8_ -
Orchard
flflt`3Qfld
r
Fiber Optic Splice Box
®
p
High Quality Wetland Boundary
—RB ,Re!
Vineyard
STRUCTURES
Television or Radio Tower
®
Medium Quality Wetland Boundaries
—,p OLB --
RAILROADS
MAJOR
Utility Power Line Connects to Traffic
Low Quality Wetland Boundaries
—Lo WLB—
Standard Gauge
Bridge, Tunnel, or Box Culvert
coHC
Signal Lines Cut Into the Pavement
n rs
Proposed Wetland Boundaries
"�
RR Signal Milepost
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall
Existing Endangered Animal Boundaries
— _ E„B — -
Switch
mum z
and End Wall
,Care .■(
Existing Endangered Plant Boundaries
— _ EPe — -

a
c
10,
a
tV6
TYPICAL STRUCTURE PLACEMENT
ROOT WADS WITHOUT TRANSPLANTS
NTS
EXTEND BEYOND UMITB OF ROOT
ROOT WADS
o'J v «
FIBER
1D
1.6
1
FLOOD MAT
MA7'ITI/G
121
WMOTHTODEPTHRA710(VWH /D)
LOG VANES AND COIR FIBER MATTWO
PLAIN
BANIFLL AREA (AM
0.0
WILL BE INSTALLED IN THE LOCATION
BOTTOM vAm(WN
O O
AND SEQUENCE AS SHOWN
TOP of
BANG AND WELL BELOW THE STREAI®LED ONE THIRD OF THE
2 ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES OR CHANGES
BANK
TO STRUCTURE LOCATIONS MAY BE MADE
'�7 BANKFULL STAGE
BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER DURING
�sTRUCnoN.
BELOW STREAM Be
OPTIONAL.
COVER LOG
VD OF RQDT MASB HEIGHT 18
J
BELOW STREAM BED
ROOT WADS
(NUMBERAND
NOTES'
MAT SAWS VMTH COIR FIBER MATTING
SIM TO BE
ANCHOR COVER LOO
MEE SPECS)
FOOTER LOO > 17 DIAMETER INSTALLED BELOW STREAMBED
UNDER FOOTER LOW
DETERMINED
(OPTIONAL PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEEFQ
(OPTIONAL PER DIRECTION OF EWINEIn
OR WMTH A BOULDER.
10.16 FEET LONG
RIFFLE IN THE FIELD)
B FEET LONG TRUNK
>1P DIAMETER
CROSS SECTION VIEW
>17 DIAMETER
DEFLECTING THE WATER AMY FROM THE BANK A TRANSPLANT
OR BOULDER SHOULD BE PLACED ON THE DOVMNSTREAM SIDE OF
TOP OF BANK
ROOT VWD
TRANSPLANTS OR
ROOT WADS WITH TRANSPLANTS
BOULDERS
NM
FOOTER LOG FOR
TRENCHING METHOD
ONLY
a1
BUM MAX B EI
PLAN VIEW
�v
FLOOD —� EXTEND BEYOND LIMITS O= ROOT V ADS
PLNN
0
TOP I
BANK
TRENCHING METHOD
IF THE ROOT WAD CANNOT BE DRIVEN INTO THE BANK OR THE
1 ALL EZrOOR®rnNG TOAD ALLED ON
2 IF ROOT WADS DO NOT COVER ENTM SLOPE ON OUTSIDE
OF MEANDER SENDS OM FIBER MATING IS NEEDED
LOO VANE
THIS DOCUMENT
ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND
SEALED Br
= T%EEDY
AUGUST 76, MW
THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
B CK
G — Ot ,��° I
iMSMiD
THE ROOT WAD IF A BACK EDDY E FORMED BY THE ROOT WAD
THE BOULDER $ AL BE APPROXIMATELY 4 X SX 7
TYPICAL RIFFLE, POOL, AND BANKFULL BENCH CROSS SECTIONS
�� � I TOPOFTId6RACE
oar �' �1/AREB� NMQ �j�IZ1H►
� � oRleoc
F�
vw
RIFFLE
rAeM
DRNQ
1 MAW CONSTRUCTION CORNERS OF DESIGN CHANNEL V1ALL BE ROUNDED
AND A TALWEG WILL BE SHAPED PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
2 POOLS SHOWN ABOVE ARE LEFT POOLS ONLY
i
COX
SHOULD BE 7�HB�ftEQ(A 8 TILT A�TRE METHOD
o'J v «
NMI
1D
1.6
MAKMUM DEPTH IOU"
BE EXCAVATED FOR THE LOG PORTION OF THE ROOT VAD IN
121
WMOTHTODEPTHRA710(VWH /D)
1S6
760
BANIFLL AREA (AM
0.0
THIS CASE,A FOOTER LOG SHOULD BE INSTALLED UDEiNEATH
THE ROOT WAD IN A TRENCH EXCAVATED PARALLEL TO THE
BOTTOM vAm(WN
O O
BANG AND WELL BELOW THE STREAI®LED ONE THIRD OF THE
IA OF ROOT MASS HEWIT 18
ROOT VWD SHOULD REMAIN BELOW NORMAL BASE FLOW CONDITIONS
MAT BANKS WIN COW FIBER MATnw
(SEE SPECS)
BELOW STREAM Be
�
J
ROOT WADS
(NUMBERAND
NOTES'
SIM TO BE
FOOTER LOG > 17 DIMETER INSTALLED BELOW STREAMBED
DRIVE POUT MERHM
DETERMINED
(OPTIONAL PER DIRECTION OF EWINEIn
SHARPEN THE END OF THE LAO WITH A CHAINSAW BEFORE 'DRIVING"
IT INTO THE BANK ORIENT ROOT NAGS UPSTREAM SO THAT THE
CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE IN THE FIELD)
B FEET LONG TRUNK
STREAM FLOW MEETS THE ROOT WAD AT A o6DEGREE ANGLE
>17 DIAMETER
DEFLECTING THE WATER AMY FROM THE BANK A TRANSPLANT
OR BOULDER SHOULD BE PLACED ON THE DOVMNSTREAM SIDE OF
TOP OF BANK
THE ROOT WAD IF A BACK EDDY E FORMED BY THE ROOT WAD
THE BOULDER $ AL BE APPROXIMATELY 4 X SX 7
TYPICAL RIFFLE, POOL, AND BANKFULL BENCH CROSS SECTIONS
�� � I TOPOFTId6RACE
oar �' �1/AREB� NMQ �j�IZ1H►
� � oRleoc
F�
vw
RIFFLE
rAeM
DRNQ
1 MAW CONSTRUCTION CORNERS OF DESIGN CHANNEL V1ALL BE ROUNDED
AND A TALWEG WILL BE SHAPED PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
2 POOLS SHOWN ABOVE ARE LEFT POOLS ONLY
i
COX
NRDIM OF BANEFUL M"
RIFFLE
117
POOL
160
1D
1.6
MAKMUM DEPTH IOU"
14.0
121
WMOTHTODEPTHRA710(VWH /D)
1S6
760
BANIFLL AREA (AM
0.0
64
BOTTOM vAm(WN
RIFFLE WITH BANIFULL BENCH
TOP OF
VON
I. L
POOL WITH BANKFULL BENCH
MAT BANKS WITH CM FIBER MATTING
(SEE SPECS)

~ A
A
1rTo BANIX
et �
I
W
f
o-
M
cVt
L
A
PLAN VIEW
ELEVATION PONE (LEAD OF RIFFLE)
TOE OF BANK
� 2 FOOT M KOF CLASS A STONE, 2 FOOT MIXOF CLASS A STONE.
/ I CLASS B STONE, AND 467 STONE CLASS B SIONIE AND 057 UTOM
VARIES
J.
6 NCH MOE OF CLASS A STONE AND
CRABS B STONE TOPPED VTH 2 NOES
OF 467 STONE
ELEVATION POINT
(TAIL OF fffRE)
H=
1 N NES I AND LOOS MUST BE AT LEAST 10 O DETER A 15 FEET LONG,
2. DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR THE UPSTREAM FOOTER LOGO AND
STOOL PLE CUT WTEML
3. PLACE FOOTER LOGS FRSTAND THEN HEADER ROPI LOG BET
HEADER LOO APPROGOMATELY 3 NOE$ABOVE TFE W3tT
ELEVATION
4 CUT NOTCH LATHE HEADER LOO APPROXIMATELY 60 Pf3tCEff
OF THE CHANNEL BOTTOM MOTH AND EXTENDING DOM TO THE
INVERT ELEVATION
L PLACE FOOTER ROCK FIRST ATTAL OF RIFFLE AND THEN HEADER ROCK
L FOR BOTH INVERTS INSTALL FILTER FABRIC FOR DRAINAGE BEGKNG
AT THE MIDDLE OF THE HEADER AND EITED DOWNV*J DTO THE DEPTH
OF THE FOOTED AND TON UPSTREAM TO A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET
7 FILL NTHE UPSTREAM BIDE OF THE STRUCTURE NRH 2 FOOT UK OF
MASS A STONE, CLAW B STONE AND IB7 SrONE TO THE ELEVATION
OF THE TOP OF THE HEADER LOG.
L UNDERCUT RIFFLE BETMEHM INVERTS BY S NOES, BACIPIL BETMM
LOOS W HH A S MICH MR OF CLASB A AID B STONE TOP W TH 2 NOES OF
467 STONE
BOULDERS
Iw
HEAD OF
RIFFLE
`7YPE2 fff
FILTER FABRIC
PROFILE A-A
6 NCH MIL OF CLASS A STONE AND
CLASS B STONE TOPPED WTH 2 /NCHES
OF 4W STON^ TAIL OF FORE
TYPE 2
FILTER FABRIC
EROSION
CONTROL
WTnmG D•4 1A DIIa
ELEVATION POINT _ = 7 -� NOTCH LOO TO INVERT ELEVATION
HEAD OF Iiff.E _ - 60 PERCENT OF BOTTOM WIDTH
SECTION B B
ROCK CROSS VANE
1 BOULDERS MUST BEAT LEAST ZK ZxY
2. INSTALL FILTER FABRIC FOR DRAINAGE BEGINNING AT THE MIDDLE OF THE HEADER ROCKS AND
EXTEND DOWNWARD TO THE DELETE OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER ROCK AND THEN UPSTREAM
TO A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET
3 DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS AND PLACE FILL ON
UPSTREAM SIDE OF VANE ARM BETWEEN THE ARM AND SIREAMBED
4 START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER ROCKS FURSTNO THEN WADER ROCK
6 CONTINUE WITH STRUCTURE, FOLLOWING ANGLE AD SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS
6 AN EXTRA BOULDER CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HA&TAT 01PROVEME NT
7 USE CLASS B STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF BOULDERS THEN CLASS A STONE
N FRONT OF CLASS B STONE AND 067 STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTRE M SIDE OF CLASS A STONE
6 AFTER ALL STONE HAS BEEN PLACED FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE
STRUCTURE WITH ON4 TE A.LUMUM TO THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCK
B START SLOPE AT BANKFULL STAGE
B
SAN FLIU. STAGE HEADER ROCK
B B
MATER FLOW
FILTER FABRIC FOR
STREAM BED — (SEE )
ELEVATION FOOTER ROCK
CHANNEL BED
PROFILE VIEW B B
CHANNEL BED
CLASS A STONE
NO 67 STONE
r
MIN -I F MIN
I IF I \— CLASS 8 STONE
S MINIMUM
SECTION A A
I
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
I
TRAM W ANTED VEGETATION, ROOTMASS AID 8011. MATEOAL
1
t
TOP OF LTAEAM®ANK c
1 '
TRANSPLANTED ROOT TW66, ND SOIL WTERNL
TOE OF LAW +
� ` I
BOTTOM OF CHANNEL
iS .a. _4SI�1
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION AID ROOTMAM
® /I
IN
CH XNELVNDTH
6 X CFHAIDIEL VYD\
LOO VLOR
B
LOG WEIR
TI-IS DOCUMENT
ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND
SEALED BY
KEVIN L TWEEDY
027337
AUGUST 23 2006
THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
Bu K � i"°
i N FQ M6- *8S6N0
1100GL
T EXCAVATE A HOLE N THE BANCTO BE STABIL®TWLTWIL
ACCOMMODATE THE SM OF TRANSPLANT TO BE PLACED
ELGIN EXCAVATION AT THE TOE OF THE BANE
2. EXCAVATE TRANSPLANT USIA A FRONT ED LAADEL
EXCAVATE THE ERNE ROOT MASS AND AS MUCH ADDITIONAL
SOL MATERIAL AS POSSIBLE. E E71NE ROOT MASS CAN NOT HE
EXCAVATE N ONE BUCKET LOAD THE TRANSPLANT IS TOO LARGE
AND ANOTHER NLOlU D E SELECTED
IL PLACE TRANSPLANT N THE BARN TO BE STABILIZED 90 THAT
VEGETATION IS ORIENTATED VERTICALLY
4 FILL N ANY HOLES AROUND THE TRANSPLANT AND COMPACT
5. ANY LAOS SOIL LEFT N W THE STREAM SHOULD E REMOVED
L PLACE MULTIPLE TRANSPLANTS CLOSE TOGETHER SUCH T HAT
THEY TOUCHI.
TOP OF SAW
TOP OF STREANBANK
FLOW
STREAMMBED
�kd1RPTA'
HEADER LOO / BAOIffLL (ON-SITE 'N)
FILTER FABRIC FOR DRAINAGE
FOOTER LOO I (SEE SPECS)
4 4' MINIMUM ---►I
(SECTION A
1 LOOS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 12 INCHES N DIAAETEN, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT
HARDWOOD AND RECENTLY HARVESTED
2 LOOS >241NCWS N DIAMETER WAY DE USED ALONE WITHOUTAI ADDITIONAL LOG
FILTER FABRIC SHOULD STILL BE USED TO BEAL AROUND LOO
HEADER LOO 3. PLACE FOOTER LOOS FIRST AND THEN HEADER
(T� LOO SET HEADER LOO
APPROXWIATLEY 3 INCHES ABOVE THE AVERT ELEVATION
FOOTER LOO 4 CUT A NOTCH N THE HEADER LOO A'PRIDOMATLEY 60 PERCENT OF THE CHANNEL
I BOTTOM WIDTH AND EXTENDING DORM TO THE INVERT ELEVATION
6 USE FILTER FABRIC FOR DRAINAGE TO SEAL GAPS BETWEEN LOGS
L PLACE TRANSPLANTS FROM TOE OF STFWJM NK TO TOP OF STREAMBANK

C
�o
OG
a
BAs
e
PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS
:LQI�
I MARE AND TREES TO THE VWTH OF THE
SIPPER A8 e110WC 01171E PLANS
2 ALLOW FOR 6.10 FEET NiOL YEE N PINKING% DEPENDING ON SUE
OF STREAMS ANK a LOOSEN COMPACTED
I PLANT N
MADE MEANIL MATTOCK DIBBLE RANi1N0 BAR OR
a WIN NOLES DEEP AND WIDE ENOUGH TO ALLOW THE ROOTS
am, YUTgA81fpDDYW WTHDATJAOOTND.
0. BY M611i OF NET Aa STRAW
TO RNff
T HEFLN PUVKS N MOIST 6OLL OR BIINDUST F NOT PROIPRY
RANKS UPON ARRNAL TD PROJECT SITE
CROSS SECTION VIEW OF BARE ROOT PLANTING
77
HIM
1 WHEN PREPARING THE HOLE FOR A POTTED RANT OR
suwN T DOG THE HOLE a 1H POT AND LARGER
THAN THE DIAMETER of THE POTAND 7HE FAME DEPTH
AS THE PDT
2 REMOVE THE RANT FROM THE POT LLUYTHEPLANTON
S.T SPACING
rib BmE F TO REMOVE THE POT
a IS N A
LOP OF 81RFAIBANK
BOAPLANT
BpSU�L AROUND THE ROOT MAZE
CUTS N1 A OFFS OR SPA TD
TOP OF BTRFiR1®111K
HE ALSO
CUT RMS'C NET C T ROOTS. ACRD AL60 YAIE A
CUT 8077011 OF THE BALL
pD88CHE
ra
R
4 RACE THE RANT N THE HOLE
N THE H LE
a FILL WLLF � BA0VIO�LELLN�TfIC SOIL (BANE 80L
0. VPTER TIE SM70 REMOVE AN POCKETS AND F81
THE REST OF THE HOLE NTH H THE REiU6MN) SOIL
CROSS SECTION VIEW OF CONTAINER PLANTING
LIVE STMNG SPECIFICATION
i AAKES SHOULD BE CUT AID
INSTALLED ON THE SANE DAY
2 DO NOT INSTALL STAKES THAT
HAVE BEEN OUT
a STAKES MUST BE INSTALLED WITH
KIDS POINTING UPVPJD&
♦ STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED
PEIPEIMGRAR TO BANK.
L STAKES SHOULD BE Na TO DOOM
N DIAMETER AND 2 TO 3 Fr LONG,
S. STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED LEAVING
M OF STAKE ABOVE GROUND
LIVE CUTTING �q
z a LENGTH
I HNF STAKE DEM
PLAN VIEW
TOP OF
STREAMBATK
CATTLE C CONSTRUCTED
WTM 21 am SLOPES 1a
S.T SPACING
_
TOP OF BTRFiR1®111K
Ll
r
TOE OF SLOPE—
•
•
•
FARM PATH
1a
8 INCHES OF
b
VARO
LOG VANE
LOG BUtlED
N STREM®NK
AT LEST S
d�
„ A-/
203 BK FL WIDTH
oR
oao
F\ \
FBUPoED
BELOW STREAK
LOG
PLAN VIEW
TRANSPLANTS
FILTER FABI6C FOR DRAINAGE
TOP OF SIIEAMBANK
-
FLOW —► - - — ,
STREAMBED - -
T-`-
THIS DOCUMENT
ORKiNALLY ISSUED AND
SEALED BY
KEVIN 7•. TWEEDY
027337
AUGUSTA 2006
THIS MEDIA WALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
A CHtTF® O()r.IAIENT
BUCK �°
O ii RING L FQ 011M"nNi0
HIM MAX DI DAL 1 UM SHOCAD BE AT -EAST T2' U9*M N MIIETM MEATNELY MAOW
HARDWOOD AID RECENTLY HARVESTED
2 SOL SHOULD BE COMPACTED VAIL AROIRID BUN® PORTIONS OF LOG
a TRANSPLANTS AM RACED ALONG THE TOP OF THE SANK OVER
PROFILE VIEW THE BINa®LOOVANETO DURSO
HIGH FLOIVa
PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
—SPACING,
CATTLE C CONSTRUCTED
WTM 21 am SLOPES 1a
S.T SPACING
_
TOP OF BTRFiR1®111K
Ll
r
PLANT STAKES FROM TOP OF BANK
TO TOE OF SANK N A DAMMD SHAPED
STAGGERED PATTERN

O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O_
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O_
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
KXX PROJECT WHENCE NO SHEET NO
THIS DOCUMENT
Of�KIINALLY ISSUED AND
/ . O / — / , / / SEALED BY
/ / / / / ' / / ' KEVIN L TWEEDY
1
/ % O \ / / " / I ✓ r\ / ' / / / / / / / / (/ ' l I ' / TM MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
\ A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
QI
P..,.,. mo. 100
--RE AR & CAP BUCK 27811
2214423 21 N� 1- ma,asa,ao
� / / / / / / \
-- 581084 -5 - E -
�.� 120 91 ELEVJ
1 1 D, W5 /
° / i REBAR & CAP \ \
2214754 00 N
\` / / 581425 53 E \
1 ( 1 I /r _ 10618 ELEV �� \
BEGIN GON'STRUCTION - ` — �� \� /�$ PHOTO POINT
0+00 00 12�� �� - \ #3
\1 N \ // / i /� ���` l 1 J ��%' \\ ✓� , ` HbTO POINT
PHOTO POINT—
#2
Ci
�x
�P
CHANNEL BLOCK
-
/
Cox SITE
°p/ �� \\ AS- BUILT
30 0 30 60

„Hem
SEALED
BY
ISSUED AND
APRIL 200E
NAD 83 \ \ A BRED SHALL DOCUMENT
`-
BucK �� am
Pt. IH
_j \ NiiRINO Z FQ 919404W
REBAR $ CAP
2214923 88 N
�\O 581689 62 E
�\ 104 60 ELEV
MATCHLINE SHEET 4 STA 16 +00 00 P¢I/OTO POINT
/ z Z
10 �p 2
P4TO POINT \ �� G�
IPA
18+00 , c'v
Aso s19 2iX�
PHOTO POINT —
o \ #5 ,
so
\ \ \ F Y
o� FILL EX/STMC cruAavEc
1
Cox Sim
J ) \ \ \ \ AS BUILT
30 0 30 60
r t SCALE (FT)

i
cc
a
K= nR
THIS
ORK
BEN
KEVI
I am
f APR
I THIS
ACE
rl
I
i BlJ
I
i
I
o
0
i
M fy�
Z
W
K y
PHOTO POINT
#7
'� 32
� a�>oti if \
� M
0 i REBAR CAP
221498100 0 N
LKM 104 \ 9
100 74 ELEV
N !' — goo /o(
0
1
1
ARMOR PPE CROSSING
WITH #67 STONE
ARMOR UPSTREAM
AND GOWIiBTREAM
EL=105 V-\ ' FACE OF FILL SLOPE
10600 WITH CLASS B RIP RAP
I I I I I
I I I I I
103 00 - -� T - -T -- — - -T -- —000
000 I 0 00 8000
CL EL -9006
SECTION A-A
n.2
SECTION
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL

a
a
C
C
J
I
u �
a �
� I
°o
\ I
o%,a
00
�x
--
co
co
�0
o0
VU---
/
i
i
l
_ J
1\
I \
1 %
� 1\
J COA \
- - -- y�I \
0 � \
I I \ \\
I �
1 I
1
I
0 / %
7CDO
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
CHANNEL BLOCK
I
o%,a
00
�x
--
co
co
�0
o0
VU---
/
i
i
l
_ J
1\
I \
1 %
� 1\
J COA \
- - -- y�I \
0 � \
I I \ \\
I �
1 I
1
I
0 / %
7CDO
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
CHANNEL BLOCK

c
c
c
a
Cl!
r
1 r��
i
xoo
C5
r
i
/
/ M
001 `
i
o
i
i
I �
I '
\ \ REBAR '$ iCAP /
3215363 65 N 1
\ 563074 61 E
/ 98 63 ELEV
I /
I'
i
®V /
4,4 s
y 6,
A �s
� r
r
/
l
r
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
I
I '
\ \ REBAR '$ iCAP /
3215363 65 N 1
\ 563074 61 E
/ 98 63 ELEV
I /
I'
i
®V /
4,4 s
y 6,
A �s
� r
r
/
l
r
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL

4f,q,
PHOTO
Tc POINT
49,008
00
-PHOTO POINT /
#12
` 1
nwoi err wo
CL
,wr ~
CL /
SECTION A-A /
a
M
-7=
If
PHOTO POINT \ -> _
#13 \/
PHOTO
/ #14
I I i
to
15 I
2�v
s
�Q.
O
o0
00
h
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL

REBAR & CAP /
2215325 -43 N 32 t
93 99 3 ELEV\
1 D Ch
I z
O
REBAR CAP
2215548 0 N '
584050 E �� R
9322 LEV +�
PHOTO POINT
I #15 / ' \
Nz
y
CIO
�95� FILL ErfSr/NC CHANNEL
\ " --- \ \ --� \ \ CHANNEL arocx
1 1' 90 V A A \
�1
COX SITE
AS— BUILT
30 0 30

'a
2
ooti�
OO�j.
�O
i
0
n
a
ID,
a
M
cave
Qi
REBAR & CAP
2215622 36 N
584609 39 E
9154 ELEV
PHOTO POINT
#16
s�U
9 X03
67i66
r \ �
I \ �
J
1
Il
13®'
� P
Q �
1 / i
A /
/ �/
1
I I `
/ I �
\
1
� r 1
r-- — _ _
- OHOTO POINT -
�17 - -
t
r
I
I�
REBAR & CAP
21 .5740 N
I 1 1 585002 581 E
I
90 57 ELEV
I
1\ I
I ,
i
I I \
i i 1
I l Vp
it I
.9
C,0
ti
oI
CO
r
PHOTO POINT
#18 /
r �
r#
4

a
P
i
_--- 90 - --�/
`
06\
U
Q
I �
� 1
lc�
,o �
Off/ o
/ °'
n
REBAR & CAP /
,gQ f 2216388 37 N
X90 /r 89 30 ELEV
i
�I I
O6
n
;r
z
pm
�N
�m
CA
FILL EX/STMO CK4WU

Harz NIOJECr No slur No
� FleouEa e+cMM
THIS DOCUMENT
� Y ISSUED AND
KEVIN L. TlAEEIYY
A
THIS MEDIA DOCUMENT
CONSIDERED
BUCK ,
ns
END CONSTRUCTION
STA 86+42 56
ID cyi i 9
CID
co
:A �� \ 82 ( \ / \ 6, / / /�j� / 2218851 22 NAP
585598 33 E
8853 ELEV �.
PHOTO POINT
/ II
�P2H�OT0 POINT
.1 ✓ • I
FALL EX/STUG CNMNEL
COX SITE
AS -BEUT
I 30 30 60
SCALE (Fn
/

W
a
0
N
P
0
T
o�
c
0
y t 1
/,/ y % \ p \ V ` _ - — \ — v _ I- - - — ` ids --v ' % l \ I ' • v \— /,/ / / I ROJECT ENWN9EEIL
V,
^ �,'�� '� \\ �� `„/ ��� ` -. `� `•• —e..� ^—' ` r �/ J , C i 1 C / / 1 / ✓� //% r THS DOCUMENT
- �®er Issu®Aw
IMVIN L. TI EEVY
APRIL sooe
& THIS MEDIA Sill NOT BE CONSIDERED
A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
KI
BUCK Ph— 019401
C �\ Cf`�`� I ✓ \ \ f 1 / ` 1 iiRINO /s 0154056tO
Ilan
VEGETATION PLAT
'e / v vEGEr ` 4 wN PLAr 1 /
C l_
i � \
n �._,.J `•\ �� J ' ti. �~ �. ' �j, r� VEGETATION PLOT
VEOETATIOW PLAT
� Y
VEGETATION
r
r V f i
/ Pwry
/ J ��✓ / '•-_ �.� �y7 �/ v w I VEGETATION PLOT
A 4:50
Ile
e✓ •-e �� � � /,� / \ t /� � fir- y � � � / � " AT10N PLOT / / � � � \ � YJ � �
r \ /
� �'�° —J` J
A), J - _ ♦ r MAHnuL -
✓/J J — — / r VAEU a
-7 WELL 01
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
VEGETATION PLOT , / +. /! �_ , o� \ $� ►... �0.. '�� C - , i r
�D1* �$ VE�OETAiION PLOT �` \ � � � / �/ /�'�r -•��� � V � � �' � ���� � � / � � � � � �
�
_ J
> 1
� \ ! , �- :i•!i� � �/r " -. \�♦� '� � � � � -- , rr�y✓� // , _ • � ♦ �, � — 1\ } / JI /� y I CHANNEL dCOCd
' %' / \ \ `��— \ • ===_ ��_ _ _ /— •r� // �/ = `, ` `\ • ' \ \ 1 1 } x \ _ I GRADING PLAN /
— % fi//� ✓// (� l r — -� �\ `�— — � / ) \ ` MOAUMRLNG OVERVIE
I/� 100 J 50 0 �� -00 20

I Oa
THIS DOCUMENT
OPofiD1A .SUEDAND
SEALED 9Y
/ / ♦ (� / / ` 7 V `���� \ APRIL4 2006
\ \ / \ I \ `•�`� C ✓ l— _ , / / / / f f 1 `� � THS MEDIA SWILL NOT BE CONSIDERED
A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
F6 WPM►MYO
OWNED ADJACENT PAWERTY cuARENra
\�\ ON7TE0 BY EBX MEUSE I [LC t
\c- PLOT Vb
\ oN
6 ATIOl1 PLOP i w _ �o ti `
AAlI�f)�p �.;r-j \ 1� 11
#13
11
OETATIO
VEOETAYIgt{_PLOf
#1#EDErAnoN PL$T \ \ J ns°ErA'IO xor 'oo,�
\ ✓/ MANUAL / VEGETATION PLOT , \ \ \ \ / I ✓I /\ 1 \ / I� \-• �� I/
NULL So / �C ♦',�/ ` ` t �\ f _ \ l
PLOT
vdu 07
Al
I In
_ � t
t � � l� � � , � / � ' � '� ~ ` � '' ' =` -__ % ' l� � � �• ` ; i vE�g -Erb„^ l ,, � \� - � � \ � , � -- � <
FHL EXfS7A1C CHANNEL
c / �
CHANNEL BLa7f
GRADING PLAN /
MOM RING OVERVIEF
\ .�; 100 50 0 100 270

BUCK PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
004H r
\% .� iv l/J ' C PROJECT ENGINEER
W C ^� ✓ \ J - 1 l /\ 1. '� "`.vi - a S I / \ ` ( i / (^ / �l �x �/ /' .' j 7 '' THIS DOCUMENT
ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND
-+_ ^ -""-tom �. J, SEALED BY:
KEVIN L TWEEDY
\ `� �_ `� �� p— �`� ._ ✓ '� � —~- 1 �� !� / / / // / _ 1
APRIL
'`� �-- ��.`w - \ � \ � � J- f � • � � I ✓ � 1 \ � I C (.. � � � �/ / \ � \ ` % 1 AawL a, zaae
el THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
il �� v !•
✓ � ' \ \�� ��\a�'��
J -T \ �6NORN66RINO * eoaP � c 7511
BUCK 4ft
cam}- �i►`
Ir
f -� _�/ _w�•.i / n ~�-SV\
so
/
-A
1
ell
i
41 - �-- \ All,
1
� J/ I — /-J RIPER /NE WETLAND
Ilk M -RIVER /N£ WETLAND
MINIMUM 50 STREAM
RESTORATION BUFFER
co
m `-� ` r -'�� �/ / /��""`\ \�`� \�"� _�- —� ,f �i // \'\ % , _i / �`► ^ �� l �� MINIMUM 5O` STREAM
ENHANCEMENT B
i i I l
/� �/ / p �`l \ \� `�\ \ ✓ �- //\ ` BUFFER
MLrFj
�� \ \ + / �•_ ��\ SEE VEGETATION SECECTNMY TABLES
J SHEET I -A TD DETERMINE SPECIES
�J �/ L�� ONE DIFFERENT
/� -ice �I i , r/ , 11 ��✓l /! ��(� ��� , -\ \�►�.�,�\�;�,i��\ \ i • 1 I \ r
10O 50 0 ,00 zao
''° '� ri!l�111I!^ -✓ f, i. ��, \�11\�11) \lj�` \ \ `-r_
rN
Its
SCALE (F)

vum
I MOJECT ENGINE
J THIS DOCUMENT
ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND
SEALED BY:
,_ •^ .� 1 . i� . < "J \/. �� \' {� = 1\ \ .._-\ -- KEMN L. TWEEDY
�L 4, 2006
THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
/`" / � / � \ \ \`\\ - / / � \ v � '' _� � j /// / / � .�,•- 1 � � ` i ` A CERi1FIED DOCUMENT
`N���\,\
7D�6SWDzo ;r 200 BUCK D
o
7-- /
l
PL.INTlN6 zawES y I `- J� VA
RIVER/NE wETUwO �a� /'�
I V-
.0 SEE VE DETATOV SELECTION TABLES
m NON- RIVER /Nf wETlANO SHEET I -A TD DETERMINE SPECIES r/ -_
w COMPOSITION OF DIFFERENT \ I \� \ / -1F7 \ 1
a PLANTING ZONES \ \`/ "'i-/
m MINIMUM 50, STR£AY
RESTORATION BUFFER
rn
n MENTRAY NIYESYENHC BUFFER W H"D OVERVLEI
100 50 0 loo zoo
Z'
ir SCALE (Fo

APPENDIX B
2010 Profile and Cross Section Data
O
O
O
O
O

101
ON ..
97
r- 95
0
a�
M
91
87 '-
3850
Cox
Station 38 +52 - 68 +92
— Year 1 (Offset -1 ft) Year 5 ♦ LTB • RTB )K Water Srf Linear (Water Srf)
•
• •
: ♦ 4 • • •
• :
* * • • • ♦ •
X •
X * ♦ : 2
X •
x ♦ ♦
F\ -/-. x
• ♦
•
X X
^M A A * I X
4350 4850 5350
Channel Distance (ft)
5850
•
♦
•
♦
•
•
•
•
•
•
:
♦
•
♦
•
•
X
X
-
-
*
6350
.: 1

Looking at left bank.
106.5
106
105.5
r 105
c
°- 104.5
m
m
w 104
103.5
103
102.5
Cox, Cross Section 1, Riffle
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Wift (ft)
- —fpa — bkf— As- buift — Year 1 — Year 2 — Year 3 Year Years

107
106.5
106
105.5
105
104.5
104
103.5
103
w 102.5
102
101.5
101
100.5
100
99.5
Cox. Cross Section 2. Pool
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
-fpa -bkf - As -BuiN -Year 1 -Year 2 -Year 3 -Year 4 -Year 5

103
102.5
102
101.5
101
0 100.5
100
d
M 99.5
99
98.5
98
97.5
Cox, Cross Section 3, Pool
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
Lfpa -bkf -As -Built -Year 1 -Year 2 -Year 3 Year 4 -Year 5

102
101.5
101
100.5
c
°— 100
W 99.5
99
98.5
98
Cox, Cross Section 4, Riffle
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
—fpa —bkf —As -Built —Year 1 —Year 2 —Year 3 —Year 4 —Year 5

101
100.5
100
99.5
x
c 99
0
TO 98.5
d
w 98
97.5
97
96.5
Cox, Cross Section 5, Riffle
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
Lfpa —bkf —As -Built —Year 1 —Year 2 —Year 3 —Year 4 —Year 5

101
100.5
100
99.5
99
e 98.5
> 98
2
w 97.5
97
96.5
96
95.5
Looking at left bank.
Cox. Cross Section 6, Pool
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
-fpa -bkf - As -Buift -Year 1 -Y.2 -Year3 -Year 4 -Year 51

99
98.5
98
x
97.5
0
97
w
96.5
96
95.5
Looking at left bank.
Cox, Cross Section 7, Riffle
Looking at right bank.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
-fps -bkf -As -Built -Year 1 -Year 2 -Year 3 -Year 4 -Year 5

97.5
97
96.5
x
c 96
O
'm 95.5
w
95
94.5
94
Cox, Cross Section 8, Pool
Looking at right bank.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
-fpa -bkf -As -Built -Year 1 -Year 2 -Year 3 -Year 4 Year 5

95.5
95
94.5
F 94
C
is
93.5
d
Mu 93
92.5
92
91.5
Cox, Cross Section 9, Riffle
10 20 30 40 50 BO 70 80
Width (ft)
—fpa —bkf BAS-BuiN —Year 1 —Year 2 —Year 3 —Year 4 Year

93.5
93
92.5
92
c
m
91.5
w 91
90.5
90
89.5
Cox, Cross Section 10, Pool
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (R)
-fpa -bkf -As -Built -Year 1 -Year 2 -Year 3 -Year 4 -Year 5

94
93.5
93
c 92.5
c
0 92
M 91.5
91
90.5
90
Cox, Cross Section 11, Pool
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
—fpa —bkf —As -Built —Year 1 —Year 2 —Year 3 —Year 4 —Year 51

93.5
93
z
92.5
c
°
cc 92
m
w 91.5
91
90.5
Cox, Cross Section 12, Riffle
Looking at right bank.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
L—fpa —bkf —As -Built —Year 1 —Year2 —Year3 —Year4 —Year 5

93
92.5
92
S
r 91.5
0
a
m
m 91
w
90.5
90
89.5
Cox, Cross Section 13, Riffle
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
I -foa -bkf BAs-BuiR -Year 1 -Year 2 -Year 3 -Year 4 -Year 5 1

94
93
92
� 91
0
m 90
w
89
88
87
0 10
Cox, Cross Section 14, Pool
20 30
—fpa —bkf —As -Built
Looking at right bank.
40 50
Width (ft)
Year 1 —Year 2 —
60 70 80
Year3 Year4 — Year5,

91
90.5
90
89.5
c
89
m
Fu 88.5
88
87.5
87
Cox, Cross Section 15, Riffle
0 10 20 30 40 50 80 70 80
Width (ft)
fpa -bkf BAs -Built -Year 1 -Year 2 -Year 3 -Year 4 -Year 5

91.5
91
90.5
90
89.5
0 89
> 88.5
a�
'L 88
87.5
87
86.5
86
Looking at left bank.
Cox, Cross Section 16, Pool
Looking at right bank.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
L_ fpa —bkf BAs -Built —Year 1 —Year 2 —Year 3 —Year 4 —Year 5l

APPENDIX C
2010 Gauge Data

00000000000000000000000000c 000000000000000oo
C. haas.a sit.
A—dM AWbq Rgort1wl07d (Y—V
vff�l 0 =00� ®Mxzm
mln�m�® 0mllxm
�mm�sms0���mmmm ®�m�m�mmmm�
OP-7757 M,
®
mll�m ®���000��0000�0
�m ®�mm�mm�mmmmo�m�m�mmmo�
�om�mm�mm�mm ®mm�m�m�mmm��
�mm�m�mmm�mommm�m�m�mmmm�
m��m�m ®m�mommm�m�m�mmmm�
mffll�mm� ®m�mm�mmm ®mt� ®� ®�mmm��
��m� ®mom ®�mmmm ®�m�m�mmm ©�
�om�m�osm�mmmm ®�m�m�mmm��
�mm�mm�mm�m ®mm ©� ®�m�mmmmt�
�� ®��mm ®m�mmm ®mom ®�mmmmm��
�om� ®mm�m�mmmm�mm�m�mmm��
��m�mmmm��m ®mmm�m�m�mmmm�
�om�m ®mmm�mmmm ®mmmm�mmm��
��mmmmo�m ®m ©�mm�m�mmmm�
�m��mmmmm�mommmmm�m�mmm��
mffnal�m�©�m�mmm� mom ®mmm� ®�mmmm�
�mm�mm ®m��mmmmmmm� ®�mmmm�
moil mm ®m�mmmmmmm�m�mmm��
��m�mm ®® ®gym ®mm ®mm�m�mmmm�
�o��mmmmm�mm ®mmm���m�mmm��
o��mmmm ®�ma�a ®m ®mm� ©�mmm��
�m��m�m ©m�mmmm ®�m� ®�mmmo�
APR dl[ C
mffl
APR dl[ C

cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
cm Ntlptlo su
AmsM&WWftRqwfFmr7didry n
App. dh C
�om�mmmm
®mmm
®mmtm�mmmm�����
��m�mmmmmm�mmmm�
©�
®m���m•�
�o
®mmm
®mm�mmtmtm�
®mmtm�����
��mm�
®
®m
®mm�mmtmtm•�mm
®����m�
�om�mmmmmm�mm
®Er•:a�m�m������
�mm�
®mmmmm�
®mmtm�mmm����o�
'gym
©mmm
®mm�mlm
®mmm
®�m������
�om�
®m
®mmm�m
®mtm•�
®�m������
�m
©�mmmmmm�mo�m�m,mm��0�m�
�m
®gym
®
®mmm�mm
®mmm
®�
®��mt�o�
�o
®gym
®mmmm�mmmtm�m�mm�����
�mm�om
®mmm�mmmt
®�
®�
®����m•�
�m
®mmm
®mtmmmm
®
®m•mmm�m�mt�m•�
Mm
slam
�m
®mmmm�mtmt
®o�
®�
®����m�
11111531�
mm
mm
�mm�
©mm
®mm�mmtmtm.�mm
®����m�
��
®gym
®mmmm�mmtmtm�mmmm��o�m
NE�m
mff�o
MF�imm�m
®mmmm�m
®mt
®�m�m����m�
�om�mmmmmm�mmmt
®�m�m������
�mm�mmmmmm�
mmm
®�m�
®m����r��
�mm�
®
®mmmm�mmmm�m�m����m�
�om�mmmm
®m�mmmlm�mmmm�����
�mm�m
®mmmm�mmmm�mmm����m�
��m�mmmmmm�mt
®mtm.�mmmm���m�
m0nn�m�
®omm
®mmm
®mm�m�
®����m�
��m�
®mmmmm�mmtmtm�m�m������
093!!�m�ommmmm�m
®mm�m�
®����m�
IKHM�mm�
®mmmtmm�
®mt�m�
®�m������
MEOM�om�mmmmmm�m
©mtm.�mm
®������
�om�mmmmtom�mmtmm�mm
®������
�mm�mmmmmm�m
®mm�mtmmm���m�
�om���rx��s�s�m�EEao�mm
•�sr.��s������
IFMMMmm�m
®
®mtmm�mmmm,�mmmm���m�
IFMEMMo
®mmm®
®mmm
®mtm
®�mmmtm�����
MGZM�mm�mm
®m
®mmm
®mmm
®�
®����m�
�mm�
®mmmt
®mmm
®mmm
®�m����m�
�mm�mmmmmm�m
©mtm�m�m������
®mmm
®mmm�mmt
®mmm
®�m������
��
®�mmmmtmm�mmmtm�m������m�
��m�mmmmt
®mmm
®m
®m•�mt�
®������
��mm
®mmm,
®mmm
®mtm.m
®m0mm��m�
��m�mmmmmm�
®m
®
®�m�m����m•�
��
®�mmmmtmm�mmmtm�m�mm�����
�mm�mmm
®mmm
®mtm�mt�
®����m�
�m
®�
®mmmtmm�mmmm•�m�m����
®�
�o
®mmm
®mmm�mmt
®
®�m�mm���m�
�om�mmm
®mmm
®mm�m�mm�����
�mm�mmmmmm�mmmtm�m�
®������
�om�mmmmmm�mmmm�
®�mm����m
�a�om�mmmm
®memo
©m�m�
®m�����
��m�
®mmmmm�
©mmtm�m�mm���m�
App. dh C

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000c
Cm b9tlpd. Stu
A—dM.. R9x a.* rl+mtery n
App-& C
i���OOmml
®0m0mm0mm
®m
®�
®�mmm��
EZ� "..r"��0�000m
®�m00m0m0�m�mmm0�
�S��O0m0
®m
®0�m0
®
®mmm�m�mmm��
��m
®m�0
®0m�m00
®mmm�m�mmm0�
����
®m��m
®mom
®mm
®m0mm�mmm��
�rS6�0
®��
®m00�m
®
®mmmm�0�mmm��
tZ���
®�
®�mm�mm
®mm
®mmm
©�mmm0�
���m
®m��0mmmm0m
®mmm�m�mmm��
iL� ..elm
®�
®
®0
®mom
®mmmtm
®mm�mmm0�
iE��mOmml
®mm0mm0
®m
®m
®mm�mmm��
��m0m
®�mmomm0mmmtmm�
©�mmm0�
���m0m��mmm�m
®mmmmm�m�mmm��
��'^•�m
®��
®mmm�m0
®
®0m
®�o�mmm0�
�'"5�m
®�m0
®O0�m00m0m0m
©�mmm��
���m
®�
®m
®m�mm
®mm
®mm�0�mmm0�
mss -ar�00���
®
®��m0m
®
®mm�m�mmm��
���m0m
©
®
®m�mmmmm
®m0�m�mmm��
��.�mmfmmf�0mmmmm
®m0mm�m�mmm��
=�
®m
®��momm
®mm�
®�mmm0�
m
®mmlmmmmmm0mm0
®
®
®mm�m�mmm��
��.��
®m
®moo
®mmmm
®m
©m
®�m�mmm0�
���mOmmfmOm
®mmmmm0m0�
®�mmm��
�S� .E�m
®mml
®mm0mmmmm
®m0�m�mmm0�
��.E��
����m0mmt�mm
®mml
®
®mmmm
®
®m0m0�mmmmm��
®mmm
®m
®m��
®mmmm0�
��E��Ommf
®m
®
®mmmmmmlm0�m�mmm��
' 64�.E�m
®mml
®
®
®mmm
®mm0m��
®�mmm��
�64�. EII��mfmmlmfmm
®mm
®mmmlm��
®mmmm��
����m0m�
®
®
®mmmm
®mmtm0�m�mmm0�
�SS�mOm
®mmm
®mm�£lmmmlmm�
®�mmm��
�1� .:FamOmmfm
®
®0mmm
®m0mm•�m�mmm0�
�: 5�.: EII1�mmmf�
®m0�m
®mmmlm
®�m�mmm��
dF .E��Ommfmmm0�mmmmmlmm•mm�mmm��
���mmmmmmmmmmmmmmlm
®�
®�mmm��
E!_ �.:f7mmm0mlmm0mmmmm0mt��m�mmm��
EI4� .��
®mmlmlmmmmmm0m0mm•�m�mmm��
���m0m��mmm�m
®mmmfmm�m�mmm��
E�� .S�mOmmDl
®
®m�mmmmmlm0�mmmmm��
E %'L��mOmmmmmm�m
®mm0mm•�mmmmmmt�
EST'E�mmlmm
®mmm�mmm0
®m
®�mmmmm��
�� .EII7�0mm
®m
®
®�mm
®mmlmm�
®mmmm0�
�T"�mom
®O
®0
®mmmmmmlmm•�
®�mmm��
EiSF�m
®mmfm0mm�mm
®m0m0�mmmmmml�
EiS��mmfm
©mmm
®mm
®m
®0m0�mmmmm��
E��.EII7�mfmmfml
©m
®gym
®mm0m0�
®�mmm0�
E'Z��mmmmf
®
®m
®�mmmmmlm
®�m�mmm��
F�L� .F�mOmml�mm
®�mm
®mmlmm•�
®�mmm0�
F�L� .El�mmm
®mmmm�mmmmmlmm�m�mmm��
EZ�.�mmmm
®mmm�mmmmmfmm�mmmmm0�
EZ�.�O
®mom
©m
®m�mmmm
®mm�m�mmm��
ES�.£�m
®m
®
®m
®mom
®mm
®mmmfmmf
®mm0�
d�.F�mmmmmlmmm�mmmm
©mm�m�mmm��
E' S� .EII7�
®m
®
®mm
®�mm0m0mm�m�mmm��
d�.�0mm��m
©m�mOmm
®m0�
®�mmm�0
��mmmmm
®m
®�mmmm
®m
®�m�mmm��
t r •rr•�mmlmm�mmm�mmmm
®mm•�mmmmm��
sr's-ar,��
®mmmmm
®gym
©mmmlm
®�m�mmm��
�!rsar,��mm�
®mm
®gym
©mmmlmm•m
©mmmmo�
•�mmtm
®
®mm��mmmm
®mm•�mmmmm��
�r*z�mmm
®m
©mm�m
®mm
®mm•�
®mmmm��
s! �' s' ar�m0mml�mmm�m
®mmmlmmmE'.L7mmmm0�
s. �s-ar��mlm
®mmm��mmm
®mm
®mmmmmm��
�rzafrt�mtmml�mmm�mmm
®mfmmmmmmmm��
��m�m
®m
®m
®�mm
®m
®mmm
®mmmm��
��mmtm��mmm�mmmm
®mmmmmmmm��
��mmm
®mmmm�mmm
®
®mmmmmmmm��
t+' n's'�mmlm
®�mm
®�mmmmmlmmmmmmmm��
�! n�r,�m
®mmf�mm
®�mmm
®mlmmmmmmmm��
�"R'*�mmmmm
®mm�mmmmmmmm
©mmmm��
�' r "ss*.��Dlmm
®mmm�mm
®
®mmmm
®�mmm��
�'EII7mmmmf
®
®
®
®�mmm
®
®mmmmmmmm��
@C�m
©mm
®mmm�mmmmmlm
®m
®mmmm��
�mnzsTr ,�mmmmmm
©m�mmmmmlmmm
®mmmm��
�mnzsrr ,gyp
®m
©
®mm
®�mmm
®
®m
©mm�mmm��
�crnz -ac��mtm��mmm�mm
®mmlm
®m
®�mmm��
��mmtm�mmmm�mmm
®mlmmmmmmmm��
�crnsr ,�mmtm
®�mmm�mmmm
®mmmm�mmm��
�s�m
©mom
®mmm�mmmmmlmmmmmmmm��
�! rtssrr�mmm�
©mmm�mm�'�mmlmmm
®mmmm��
�r±! �z -,n,�mmfmmmlmmm�mmmm
®mm�
®mmmm��
@!'�mmmmmmmm�mmmmmlm
®m
®mmmm��
@ ^F�Omfmm�mmm�mmmm
©m
®mmmmmm��
�cr�±s�m
©m
©mmmm�mm
®m
®mm�
®mmmm��
�'�mmf
m
®mmm
®�mmm
®mlm
®mmmmmm��
@ S'E�m
©mm!mmm0�mmm
®mlmmmmmm0m0�
@CE�mmmmlmmmm�mm
®
®0m
®mmmmmm��
@PEII7m0mm�
®
©0�m
®
®m
®m
®m0mm0m
®�
App-& C

cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
C. saus.m sir
.ba dd/ -"ft Rwdf- 2#10(Y—n
App. dl. C
.[�ns-ar��m�
mmm
®mmm
®mmm�m�m�mmm��
��mm�
®mm
®mmmm�ammm
®mmmmmmm
��mm�mmmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmm��
�s- �,��m�
mmm
®
©mmmmmmmm�ml�mmm��
s. �mm�mmmmommm0
MMEIMMM
srr�- s-ax�m��mmmmmmmm
®m
®�
®�ml�mmm��
s�r�mm�mmmmmmmm
©mmmmm
®mmmm��
s:.TS-•�om�m�®
©mmm
®mmmmmmmmmmm��
s�r�m
®mmmm
®mm
®m
®mm
®mmmmmmm
�r�om�mm
®mmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmm��
s[s!rs-ar�mm�m
®mm
®mm
®mmmmm
®mml�m
®mmm
szrmr�p0�m
®mmmmm
®mmmm
®mmmmm���
s����-,��mmmmmmmmmm
®mmm
®mmmmm.
s�ns-�mmmmm
©mmm
©mmmmmmmmmmmm
��
s?�•s'*�m0�m
©mm
®mmmmm
®m
®mmm
®mmmmm
s- �s -rr.��m�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
sr�s -,r,��m�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�
s��mm�m
®
®mmmmm��ammmmmmmmmm��
s-�s-,r.�mm�
mmm
®
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�
sus -rr,��m�mmmmmmmm
®m
®m
®mmmmmm
��
s:�•��m�
mmmm
®mm
©m
®mmmmmmm
®mmm
s:�s-.,r•�o
®�
®mmm
®mmmmm
®m
®mmmmmm��
s�r�mm�
mmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmm
��
•moo
®�
®mmm
®mmmmmmmmm
®mmmm��
@r�mm�
mmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmm
��
�r�mm�mm
®mmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmmm
��m�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmtm��
�om�
mmmmmmmmm®
©mmm
®mmmm��
�mm�mmmmmmmmmm
©mmm
®mmmmm
�om�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
�mm�mmm
®mmmmmmom
®mmmmmmm
�om�mmm©
�mm�
®
®m
®mmmm��omm
©mmmmm
®m
®mmmmmm��
®m
®mmmm���
�om�mm
�om�mm
®
®m
©mmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmm
®m
®mmmm��
®mmmmo�
�mm�m©
�mm�mm�ammmm
®mmmmm
®
©mmmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmo�
��
�om�mmmmmmmm
��m�mm
®®
®mmm
®mmm��mmmmmm��
®m
®mmmmmmmmm.
�mm�mmmmmmmmsmmmmmmmmmm��
�m
®�
®
®�ammmmm
©mmmmm
®mmmmo�',
�om�mm
�mm�mmmmmmmommmmmmmmmmm��',
®m
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
�om�mmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
�mm�ommm
®mmmmmmm
®mmmmmm��
�o
�om�
®�
®mmmmmmm
®mmm
®mmm
®mmmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmm��
��
�o
��m�mmm
®mmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmo�,
©mmmmmmmmm
®mmmm��
�mm�m
®mm
®mmm
©mmmmmmmmmm��
��
®mom
®mmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmm.�
�om�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
��m�
mmmmmmmmm
©
®mmmmmmmm0�
�om�mmmmmmmm
�mm�m
®m
®mmmm
®mmmmmmmmmm��
®m
®mmmmmmmmo�
�om�
om
mmmmmmm
®m
®mmmmmmmmm
®mmmm
®mmmmmm��
®mmmmo�
�mm�mm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
��m�mm
®m
®mmm
©�sa
®mmmmmmmmm
�o
®�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
�mm�
om�
mmmmmmm
mmmmmmm
®mmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmm��
®mmmmmmo�
m�mmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmm
��
�om�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
��m�mmmmmmmmmommmm
®mmmm��
�mm�mmmm
©mmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
�mm�mmmm
®mmmmmmm
®mmmmmm��
�om�mmm
®mmm
®ommm
®mmmmmm
��
��
®mmm
®
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmo�
�om�mmm
®mmmmm
®ommmmmmmm��
mmmmmm
®mmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmo�
�mm�mmm
��mm�mmm
®mmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�
®mmmmmmmmmmm
��
�mm�
om�
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
®mmmommmmm
©mmmmmmmmo�
�mm�
®mmmmmmm®
®mmmm
®mmmm��
�mm�m
®mmmmm
®
®mmmmmmmmmmo�
�om�
®ommmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmm��
�mm�
®mmmmmmm
®mmmmm
®mmmmm
�mm�
®mmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
�m��mmmm
®mmmm
®mmmm
®mmmmlO�
�mm�
®m
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
�m
®gym
®mmmmmm
®m
®mmmmmmmm��
�mm�
®
®mm
®mmms�mmmmmmmmmm��
�mm�
®
®mm
®mm
®mmmmmmmmmmm��
om�
®mmm
®mm®
®mmmmm
®mmm
®gym
�mm�
®mm�s�-
�mmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
��
��m�
®m
®mmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmo�
M*—•�19�m�
®
®m
®mmm
©
®mmmmmmmmmm
��
�mm�
®
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmo�
App. dl. C

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000o
cm budpm mw
Amd M..W Abw -ff SOI0 rymA
App-ft C
mmmm
®mmm
©mmm
®m
©mm�mmmlmlmlm�m�
����®
®gym
©mmm
®m
®m0mmmmlmlmlom�
��
®�
®mmmmmmm
®mmmm�mmmmma�
����
®
®�
®mmmmmm
®mmm
®mmmm��
��mm
®m
®mmmmm
®mm.mmm
®mmmmo�
�m
®�®
®mmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmm��
��
®m
®
®mm
©mmm
®mmmmmmmmmmo�
��mm
®mmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmm��
mmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmma�
��mmmm
®
©mmmmmmommmmmmmm��
��
®m®
®mmmmmmm
©mmmm
®mmmm��
mmmm
®m
®m
®mmmmmmmmmm
®mmmm��
mmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmm��ammmmmm��
��mm
®mEammmmmmmmtmmm
®mmmm��
mmmm
®
®
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
mmmm
®mm
®mmmm
©mmmmmmmmmm��
���mm
®
®m
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm,�
��mm
®
®mmmmmmmmmfmmmommmm��
��mm
®
®
®mmmmommmmmmmmmmmm�
��
®m
®
®mmmmmmmmmtmmmmmmmm��
��
©m
®mmommmmmmm.mmmmmmmmm•�
mmmm
®
®
®mmmmmmmmtmmmmmmmm��
mmmm
®
®
®mmmmmmmmtmmm
®mmmmo�
mmmm
®
®mmmmmmmmmtmmm
®mmmm��
��m�
®m®
®mmm
®mmmmmmm
®mmmmo�
��mm
®mmmmmmmmmm.mm�mtmmmm��
��m�
®mm
®mmmmmm�mm�mmmmmo�
�ommmmm
®mmm
®mmmmmm.mm�mmmmm��
�mmm�mmm
®mm
®mmm
®mm
®mm�mmmmmm�
�mmmmmmmmmmmm�m
®m
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmm��
��
®m
®
®mmmmmmmmm.mm�mmmmm��
�mmm�amm
®mm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
mmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
mmmm
mmmmmmaa
m
®mmmmmm
mmmm
m
m
m
mmmm
mmm
mmmm
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
mmmm
m
®
mmmmmmmmm»
®m
m
mmmmmm�a
mmmmmmm
mmmmm�a
mmmmmm�a
m
mmmmmmmmm
m
®�
m
m
m
�
�
�mmm�
mmmm®
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmm��
�m®
m®®
m®
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmms�
�mmm�mm®
mmmmm�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm���i
mmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmms�
mmmmmmm®
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��l
�ommmmm®
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmms�
�mmmmmmmmmt��mmmm�am
®m
®mm
®mm�mmmmmmmmm�mmmm��'
��mmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmms�
mmmmmmmmm
®mmmm
®mmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��,
mmmmmm
®m
®mmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmms�
�mmmmmmmmm�m
®mm
®mmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
mmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmm��
�ov�
®mmmmmmm
®ommmmmmmmmmm��
mmm
mm
®
MOM
mmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmm��
mmmmmm
®m
®mmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmm��
mmmm
®mmm
®mm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
��mmm
®mmm®
®mmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
��
©mmmm
®mmm
®mmmmmmmmmmm��
�ommmmm
®m
®mmmmm
©mmm
®mmmmmm
®mmmm��
��mmmmm
®m
®mmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
��
®m
®mmmmm
®mmmm
©mmm
®mmmmmmm
®mmmmmm
©I
�mr�s�r�
mmmmmm®
®mmm®
mmmmmmmmmmmmm=',
mmmmma�.�mmmmmmmm�m
®mmmmmm
®mmmmmmm
®mmmm��
mmmm���mmmmmmmmm�m
®m
®mmmm
®mmmtmmmmmmmmm�l
��-��
®mmmmmm®
mmmmmmm
®m
®mm
®mmmmommmmmmmmmmmmm��
®mmm
®mm
®mmmtmmmmmmmmm�
���
®�
®m®
®mmm
®mmmmmmm
®mmmm��
mmmmm���
mmmmmm
®mm
®mmm
®
®mm.mmmmmmmmm�
��^��
®�
®mmmmmm
®mmmtmmmmmmmm��
mmmm����mmmmm
®m
®
©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm•�
mmmm�a�
mmmmmmmmm
®m
®mm
®mmmmmmmtmmmmmmmm��
���mmmmmmmmmm®
©mmmm
®mmmmmmmmmm�
mmmmr�R�
mmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmm��
mmmm��.�mmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmm
®mmmmmmm
®mmmmmmm
mmmm�am�
mmmmmmmmm
®m
®mmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmm��
mmmmr���mmmmmmmmmm�m
®mmmmmm
®mm
®mmm��mmmm��
mmmm���mmmmmmmmmm�m
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
����mmmmm
®m
®mmm
®mmmmmmtmmmmmmmm��
sz�.�mmmmmmmmm�m
®mmm
®mmmmmmmmm
®mmmm��
�^m�mm
®mmmmmm
®mm
®mmmmmmmm��
mmmm��t�
mmmmmm
mmmmmmm
m
mmm
m
mmm ®mmmmmmm
®m
m
o
m
m
mt
m
m
m
®m
m
m
m��
mm��m�mmmmmmmmmm�m
®mmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmm
mmmm��e>ammmmmmmmmm�mmmmm
®mmmmmm®
©mmmmmm
©mmm
®mmmm��
mmmm��e>ammmmmmmm
®m
®mmmmmmommm.
mmm
®mmmmm•�
mmmm���
mmmm
mmmmmm
m
mmmm ®m
®mmmm
mmmm
m
m
m
m
m
mm
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
mm
�
mm�Tm�
mmmm
©m
®mmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmm
.cr- ssir,>•pmm
®mmmmmmm
®m
®mmmmmmmm��
mmmm��.saommm
®mmmmmmmmmmtmmm
®mmmmmmm
mmmm����
mmmmmm
®mmmmmmm
®mmm
®mmmmm
®mmmmmmmm��
�� -mmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmm
.m�r,�Ommmmmm
®m
®mmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
mmmm���
mmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmtmmmmmmmmm�
mmmma���
mmmmmmm
®mmm
®mmm
®mmmmmmmmmm��
mmmm���
mmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmtmmm
®mmmmmmm
���
®�
®mmmmmmmmmmtmmm
®mmtmm��
mmmm¢����
mmmmmmmmm
®m
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
App-ft C

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000c
Cm mttptlo Sib
An dAfa&"WRgaflw 1010(Ys3)
Appe d1iC
��mm�mm
®mtmm�
®mmm�mm�m���m�
��mom�
®mmmtmm�mmt�m�mm�������
s�(•�mm�
®
®mmmm�mmmm�mmm����o�
��.mm�m
®m
®mmm
®
®mm�mm�m���o�
Appe d1iC

APPENDIX D
2010 Site Photos

Cox Mitigation Site
DRAFT Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year S)
2010 Stream Observation Area Photos
SOA 1 - Erosion on right bank behind root wads, Sta. 24 +25.
SOA 2 — Mid - channel bar formation, Sta. 43 +00.

Cox Mitigation Site
DRAFT Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year S)
SOA 3 — Mid - channel bar formation, Sta. 44 +35.
SOA 4 — Vegetation in channel, Sta. 45 +50.

Cox Mitigation Site
DRAFT Annual Monitoring Report. for 2010 (Year 5)
SOA 5 — Erosion on left and right banks at log weir, Sta. 46 +85.
SOA 6 — Mid channel bar formation, Sta. 74 +90 to 75 +00.

4r,
MI,
t at f Arl
�;. ,, . a��15' �G10

,ox Vegetation Mor
FF P.Mrd
W?
14, is "Ord
A
.4#
COM
.06
0 9 11-V201D
4M
5/2010
A
.4#
COM
.06
0 9 11-V201D

Cox Mitigation Site
DRAFT Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year S)
Cox Vegetation Monitoring Plot #5
Cox Vegetation Monitoring Plot #6

Cox Mitigation Site
DRAFT Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year S)
Cox Vegetation Monitoring Plot #7
Cox Vegetation Monitoring Plot #8

104
7i4^
4A

'F ' � E =• y. tfj. � J�4 ' � �. Y
;`�. .�; SAC � -�i K� h�` �Jr�� ,,iy,,9w '/ +�•'�`_ ;fit --. '4;
-
�41�3'lci.r„�ti � �• � - '�
-
�s� °09/15/2010
�, .... gays a F �•�r—
p: 1
QL
z
_ � i c`ti a➢
09/1'5/ 211'
,. � j1';: aye j `, ' �: • � � .,

Cox Mitigation Site
DRAFT Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year S)
Cox Vegetation Monitoring Plot #13
Cox Vegetation Monitoring Plot #14
10

Cox Mitigation Site
DRAFT Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 5)
Cox Vegetation Monitoring Plot #15
Cox Vegetation Monitoring Plot #16
11

�i
Y
�y y IV
�.
¢ I
154? 0 1, 0

4b,t SU'll 1 I'm
low
F AR,
Ot
fk-
'Via .
9 '01W"k
4
i.

Cox Mitigation Site
DRAFT Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year S)
Cox Vegetation Monitoring Plot #21
Cox Vegetation Monitoring Plot #22
14