20052147 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20101222

-WR
Ux-
s
Or

Table of Contents
I Executive Summary / Protect Abstract
1
II Protect Background
2
1 Protect Goals and Objectives
2
2 Protect Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
3
3 Location and Setting
5
4 Project History and Background
5
5 Monitoring Plan View
7
III Protect Condition and Monitoring Results
8
A Vegetation Assessment
8
1 Problem Areas Plan View (Vegetation)
11
2 Vegetative Problem Areas Table Summary
12
3 Vegetative Problem Areas Plan View
12
B Stream Assessment
12
1 Problem Areas Plan View (Stream)
13
2 Problem Areas Table Summary
14
3 Numbered Issues Photo Section
14
4 Fixed Photo Station Photos
14
5 Stability Assessment
14
6 Quantitative Measures Summary Tables
15
IV Methodology Section
19
Tables
Exhibit Table I Protect Restoration Components
5
Exhibit Table II Project Activity and Reporting History
5
Exhibit Table III Project Contact Table
6
Exhibit Table IV Protect Background Table
6
Exhibit Table V Verification of Bankfull Events
12
Exhibit Table VII Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
14
Exhibit Table VIII Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary
15
^;—Plibit
Table IX Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
17
ter•
igu l- Protect Vicinity Map
Gray Farm Stream Restoraiii Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year Five Momtormb _ I S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
December 2010 �% Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

i
1
Append >tx A - Vegetation Raw Data
1 Vegetation Survey Data Tables (V -1 — V -5)
2 Vegetation Problem Area Table (Al)
3 Vegetation Problem Area Photos
4 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix B - Geomorphologic Raw Data
1 Bankfull Events
2 Exhibit Table B1 - Stream Problem Area Table
3 Representative Stream Problem Area Photos
4 Stream Photo - Station Photos
5 Exhibit Table B2 - Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
6 Annual Overlays of Cross Section Plots
7 Annual Overlays of Longitudinal Plots
8 Annual Overlays of Pebble Count Frequency Distribution Plots
Appendix C - Integrated Problem Area Plan View
1 Monitoring and Problem Area Plan View, Reach 1
2 Monitoring and Problem Area Plan View, Reach 2
A
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
_ Year Five Momtorml, a S &EC Job # 9385 DI 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

I Executive Summary / Protect Abstract
The Gray Farm Stream Restoration project consists of two separate stream reaches (Reach 1 and
Reach 2) along unnamed tributaries of Buffalo Shoals Creek, a tributary of the Catawba River
(Cataloging Unit 03050101) The site is located approximately 10 imles due west of the City of
Statesville in western Iredell County, NC This restoration was contracted by Restoration
Systems LLC (Contract # D05016 -2) as a full - delivery project for the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NCEEP) This report summarizes the monitoring efforts for Year Five
(2010) of the Gray Farm Stream Restoration Project
Restoration construction of Reach 2 began in early March 2006 and was completed in mid -April
2006 Restoration construction of Reach 1 began in rind -April 2006 and was completed in early
July 2006 Demobilization and minor contractor punch list items were completed shortly
thereafter Installation of monitoring devices and As -built surveys for both reaches were
performed as construction progressed
Year Five monitoring of the vegetated buffer was performed by Soil & Environmental
Consultants, PA (S &EC) in the fall of 2010 Stem counts were performed within the established
vegetation monitoring plots, resulting in an average live stem density of approximately 398
stems per acre
Physical monitoring of the restored channels for Year Five was also performed by S &EC and
consisted of the collection of cross - section and representative longitudinal profile data, in
conjunction with visual stability assessment of the stream This work was performed in the fall of
2010 Collected data was then compared with As- built, Year One, Year Two, Year Three, and
Year Four Monitoring data
Based on Year Five Monitoring results, the overall site has met the prescribed success criteria
Detailed analysis of the success of localized areas is discussed within
The completion of Year Five monitoring marks the end of the prescribed monitoring period
duration
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year Five Monitoring 1 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

II Protect Background
The Gray Farm Stream Restoration project is located in the Catawba River Basin within
Hydrologic Cataloging Unit 03050101 The site consists of two separate reaches (Reach 1 and
l l Reach 2) along unnamed tributaries of Buffalo Shoals Creek, a tributary of the Catawba River
The site is located approximately 10 miles due west of the City of Statesville in western Iredell
GCounty, NC
The restoration project objective was to restore the unpaired streams to appropriately sized
stream channels that were stable and self - maintaining, and would not aggrade or degrade over
C
time Restoration was accomplished with Rosgen -based natural channel design procedures and
techniques Reach 1 restoration was a combination of a Priority I (reconnection of the channel
with its historic floodplam) restoration and a Priority II (construction of a new floodplam at a
lower elevation) restoration Reach 2 was a Priority I restoration Restoring an appropriate
sinuosity lengthened both channels, thereby lowering their bankfull slopes
Restoration construction of Reach 2 began in early March 2006 and was completed in mid -April
2006 Restoration construction of Reach 1 began in mud -April 2006 and was completed in early
July 2006 The buffers of both reaches of the restored stream channel were planted with native
tree and shrub species and seeded with a native grass seed mix During construction, site
topography and grading allowed for the creation of vernal pools, oxbows, or pocket wetlands
within the riparian zone along the restored stream reaches Planting operations were performed
in April 2006 Supplemental planting was performed in December of 2006
Demobilization and minor contractor punch list items were completed shortly after the
ricompletion of construction Installation of monitoring devices and As -built surveys for both
reaches were performed as construction progressed
1 Protect Goals and Objectives
The goals of the Gray Farm Stream Restoration project are
1) Improve local water quality within the restored channel reaches as well as the
downstream watercourses through,
a The reduction of current channel and off site sediment loads by restoring
appropriately sized channels with stable beds and banks
b The reduction of nutrient loads (both soil enhancement practices and
cattle) from adjacent agricultural fields with a restored riparian buffer
c The reduction of water temperatures provided by shadmg of the channel
from canopy species along with the resultant increase in oxygen content
2) Improve local aquatic and terrestrial habitat and diversity within the restored
channels and their vicinity through,
a The formation of varying bed form within the channels to provide for
fish, amphibian, and benthic species
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year Five Monitoring 2 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl I
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

b The restoration of a suitable riparian buffer corridor which will provide
both vertical and horizontal structure and connectivity with adjacent
upland areas
c The restoration of understory and canopy species which will provide
forage, cover, and nestmg for a variety of mammals, reptiles, and birds
3) Improve local watershed conditions through the restoration of two low order
streams (one first order, one second order) and the placement of permanent
conservation easements
Through the restoration process the following objectives were accomplished
1) Restore approximately 7,610 lmear feet of appropriately sized stream channel that
is stable and self- maintaming, and will not aggrade or degrade over time
Restoration was accomplished with Rosgen -based natural channel design
procedures and techniques
2) Develop restored channels with the appropriate morphological characteristics
(cross - sectional dimension, pattern, and longitudinal profile) utilizing collected
reference reach data as a guide Allow for no net loss of overall channel length in
the process
3) Create and/or improve bed form diversity (riffles, runs, pools, and glides) and
improve aquatic and benthic macroinvertebrate habitat
4) Construct a floodplam (or local bankfull bench) that is accessible at the proposed
bankfull channel elevation
5) Ensure channel and stream bank stabilization by integrating in- stream structures
and native bank vegetation
6) Establish a native forested and herbaceous nverme buffer plant community within
a muumum width of 50 feet from the edge of the restored channel This new
community will be established in conjunction with the eradication of any existing
exotic and/or undesirable plant species
7) Improve water quality within the subject channels and the downstream receiving
waters
8) Supplement the education and conservation efforts for natural resources in Iredell
County as indicated in program goals for the local Soil & Water Conservation
District and the NC Cooperative Extension Service
2 Protect Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
The restoration project was intended to restore the impaired streams to appropriately
sized stream channels that are stable and self - mamtammg, and will not aggrade or
degrade over tune Restoration was accomplished with Rosgen -based natural channel
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year Five Monrtonnt, 3 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

design procedures and techniques Restoring an appropriate sinuosity lengthened both
FJ channels, thereby lowering their bankfull slope A total of 8,004 linear feet of stream
channel was restored onsrte (8,004 SMU s)
(� Reach 1
J
Reach 1 restoration was a combination of a Priority I restoration (reconnection of the
channel with its historic floodplain) and a Priority II restoration (construction of a new
floodplam at a lower elevation) Reach 1 consists of 5,813 linear feet (5,813 SMU's) of
restored Type C4 channel Approximately 800 linear feet of this length was previously
mundated by an existing farm pond that was removed during the channel restoration
The pre - restoration length of this channel segment was approximately 4,340 linear feet
(J One additional piped farm road crossing previously existed approximately 700 feet
downstream of an existing dam and farm pond near the upper end of Reach 1 This piped
crossing was removed and replaced with an at -grade in-stream crossing Immediately
downstream of the dam for a distance of approximately 1,000 feet, severe bank erosion,
channel incision, and an over - widening of the stream channel had occurred This
degradation appeared in large part due to previous uncontrolled releases from the existing
dam spillway
The lower two thirds of the reach were characterized by overly steep and undercut banks
Significant localized erosion had occurred along this lower portion Trees of large
diameter lined the banks, many of which were undercut, suspended, or had collapsed into
the stream The channel had down cut and over widened in many locations along the
reach allowing no access to its floodplam The last 200 feet (approximately) of the pre-
existing channel was not down cut due to a change in surrounding topography
J Reach 2
Reach 2 was a Priority I restoration Reach 2 consists of 2,191 linear feet (2,191 SMU's)
of restored Type B4 channel A small impoundment previously existed near the lower
end of the reach, however, it was drained and removed a number of years prior to the
channel restoration A piped farm road crossing existed at roughly the same location (the
old dam embankment) This was (and remains) the only existing crossing along the
reach The pre - restoration length of this channel segment was approximately 1,600 linear
feet
P
`1
Throughout Reach 2, severe bank erosion, channel incision, and an over - widening of the
stream channel had occurred This impairment appeared in large part due to previous
uncontrolled grazing operations The reach was characterized by overly steep, sloughing,
and undercut banks
Sigmficant localized erosion had occurred along the entire reach Trees of large diameter
lined the banks, many of which were undercut, suspended, or collapsed into the stream
The channel had down cut and over widened in many places along the reach allowing no
access to its floodplain
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year FiNe Momtorinf,
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

3 Location and Setting
The Gray Farm Stream Restoration project is located in the Catawba River Basin,
Cataloguing Unit 03050101 The site consists of two separate reaches (Reach 1 and Reach 2)
along unnamed tributaries of Buffalo Shoals Creek, a tributary of the Catawba River The
site is located approximately 10 miles due west of the City of Statesville in western Iredell
County, NC
Reach 1 is located immediately north of Bolick Road (SR 1532) Reach 2 is located
immediately west of the mtersection of New Sterling Road (SR 1525) and Gray House Road
The watershed areas for Reaches 1 and 2 are estimated at approximately 0 91 square miles
(582 acres) and 0 085 square miles (54 acres) respectively See attached Figure 1
4 Project History and Background
The following tables summarize the project history and background
Exhibit Table I Protect Restoration Components
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project # 92219
Protect
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
Aug 05
Nov 05
Construction
Reach 1
Jul 06
Reach 2
Segment or
Q
Apr 06
n°
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments 1 & 2
U
w e
Stationing
Comment
Reach ID
Mitigation Plan/ As built (Year 0 Monitoring baseline)
May 06
Jun 06
Year 1 Monitoring
Dec 06
Dec 06
Supplemental Planting
Dec 06
Year 2 Monitoring
Nov 07
Dec 07
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov 08
Dec 08
Year 4 Monitoring
Nov 09
Reach I
3,000
R
PI
4,119
1 1
4,119
0+00 to 41 +19
Reach I
1 340
R
PII
1 694
1 1
1 694
41 +19 to 58 +13
Reach II
1 600
R
PI
2 191
1 1
2 191
0+00 to 21 +91
Mitigation Unit Summations
Stream 00
Riparian
Nonnpanan
Total Wetland
Buffer (Ac)
Comment
Wetland (Ac)
Wetland (Ac)
(Ac)
8 004
N/A
N/A
N/A
1838
Exhibit Table H Project Activity and Reporting History
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site/EEP Protect # 92219
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
Aug 05
Nov 05
Construction
Reach 1
Jul 06
Reach 2
Apr 06
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
Apr 06
Apr 06
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments 1 & 2
Apr 06
Apr 06
Plantings for reach/segments 1 & 2
Apr 06
Apr 06
Mitigation Plan/ As built (Year 0 Monitoring baseline)
May 06
Jun 06
Year 1 Monitoring
Dec 06
Dec 06
Supplemental Planting
Dec 06
Year 2 Monitoring
Nov 07
Dec 07
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov 08
Dec 08
Year 4 Monitoring
Nov 09
Dec 09
Year 5 Monitoring
Nov 10
Dec 10
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & EnN ironmental Consultants PA
Year Five Monitoring 5 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

Exhibit Table III Protect Contact Table
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site/EEP Protect # 92219
Designer
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Primary Project Design POC
11010 Raven Ridge Rd
Reach 2 0 085 square miles (54 acres)
Raleigh NC 27614
< 20%
Patrick K Siruth P E [phone]
Construction Contractor
North State Environmental
Construction Contractor POC
2889 Lowery St
Ecoregion
Winston Salem NC 27101
Rosgen Classification of As built
Darrell Westmoreland 336) 725 2010
Planting Contractor
North State Environmental
Planting Contractor POC
2889 Lowery St
Reach 1 Cw CxB
Winston Salem NC 27101
Reference site ID
Darrell Westmoreland [phone]
Seeding Contractor
North State Environmental
Seeding Contractor POC
2889 Lowery St
Reach 1 03 08 32 / 03 04 02
Winston Salem, NC 27101
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference
Darrell Westmoreland [phone]
Monitoring Performers
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
No
11010 Raven Ridge Rd
No
Ralei h NC 2761
Stream Monitoring POC
David Gainey [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
David Gaine (919 ) 846 5900
Exhibit Table IV Protect Background Table
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site/EEP Protect # 92219
Project County
Iredell
Drainage area
Reach 1 0 91 square miles (582 acres)
Reach 2 0 085 square miles (54 acres)
Drainage impervious cover estimate ( %)
< 20%
Stream Order
Reach 1 2nd order
Reach 2 1 st order
Physiograpbic Region
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Northern Inner Piedmont
Rosgen Classification of As built
Reach 1 C4
Reach 2 B4
Cowardm Classification
N/A
Dominant soil types
Reach 1 Cw CxB
Reach 2 CsE2
Reference site ID
Reach 1 Tributary of Turkey Creek
Reach 2 Basin Creek
USGS I UC for Project and Reference
3050101
NCDWQ Sub basin for Project and Reference
Reach 1 03 08 32 / 03 04 02
Reach 2 03 08 32 / 03 07 01
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference
Reach 1 WS IV CA / C,NSW
Reach 2 WS N CA / C Tr ORW
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed?
No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d
listed segment?
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
N/A
% of project easement fenced
Reach 1 — No Fence Reach 2 100%
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year Five Momtorml, 6 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl I
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

5 Monitoring Plan View
Six (6) tree and shrub buffer vegetation plots (four (4) on Reach 1 and two (2) on Reach 2)
and four (4) bank vegetation plots (two (2) on Reach 1 and two (2) on Reach 2) were
established All vegetation monitoring occurs within these plots throughout the monitoring
period for as long as they continue to be representative of the community
For all buffer monitoring plots, Level 1 of the Carolina Vegetation Survey- Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (CVS -EEP) Protocol for Recording Vegetation was utilized for
vegetation sampling in Years 1 and 2 Beginning in Year 3, Level 2 of the CVS -EEP
protocol was utilized in order to record and report woody plant volunteers within vegetation
monitoring plots along with planted stems A corner of each vegetation monitoring plot will
be used as a permanent photo point for vegetation monitoring photos Locations of these
photo points are shown on the attached Monitoring Plan View
Benthic macro invertebrate sampling was performed at a total of five (5) previously
established sampling stations Reach 1, Station 1 is located immediately upstream of the
restored Reach 1 Reach 1, Station 2 is located within the restored Reach 1 Reach 1, Station
3 is located immediately downstream of the restored Reach 1 Reach 2, Station 1 is located
within the restored Reach 2 Reach 2, station 2 1s located immediately downstream of the
restored Reach 2 Locations of these benth>c macromvertebrate sampling points for Year 3
are shown in Appendix D 1 Benthic macro invertebrate sampling was performed during
Monitoring Years 1 through 3
A total of seven (7) nested riffle and pool cross - section pairs was established along Reach 1,
and two (2) nested riffle and pool cross - section pairs were established along Reach 2 Each
cross - section also serves as a designated photo point that is photographed annually
The locations of all monitoring devices are shown in Appendix C 1 (Monitoring Plan View,
Reaches 1 and 2)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year Five Monrtorml, 7 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl i
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

r
jIII Project Condition and Monitoring Results
A Vegetation Assessment
r ,
The success of the adjacent riparian buffer will be based on the combined survival of
tree and shrub species for the five -year monitoring period
In order to be considered successful, survival of woody (tree and shrub) species
planted within the restored buffers will be at least 320 stems /acre through year three,
~ 290 stems /acre at year four, and 260 stems /acre at year five The stem count will be
based on an average of the stem counts of the evaluated tree and shrub buffer
vegetation plots
The success of the bank vegetation plots along the restored channels will be based on
the survival of live stake (or other) bank plantings for the five -year monitoring period
Survival of bank plantings will be based on a linear average of approximately 50
percent of the planted stems within the restoration reaches
The approximately 18 4 acre restoration area was planted with various hardwood tree
and shrub species native to the area Reaches 1 and 2 were planted in April 2006
Supplemental plantmg was performed in December of 2006
The following tree species were planted in the Riparian Buffer Area
• Alnus serrulata (Tag Alder)
• Betula nagra (River Birch)
• Carpanus carolanaana (Ironwood)
• Fraxinus pennsylvanaca (Green Ash)
• Ilex opaca (American Holly)
• Lindera bemoan (Sp>cebush)
• Lariodendron tulapafera (Tulip Poplar)
• Platanus occadentalis (Sycamore)
• Quercus machauxaa (Swamp Chestnut Oak)
• Quercus nagra (Water Oak)
• Quercus phellos (Willow Oak)
• Viburnum nudum (Possumhaw)
Stream banks were planted with live stakes in two offset rows The following shrub
species were planted as live stakes
• Cornus amomum (Silky Dogwood)
• Sahx sencea (Silky Willow)
• Sambucus canadensis (Elderberry)
As previously described, a total of six (6) buffer vegetation monitoring plots was
- established on -site in 2006 The success criteria for the site require a minimum of
I 260 live stems per acre at the end of the five (5) years of monitoring Year Five
vegetation monitoring shows 398 live stems per acre Vegetation monitoring data for
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year Five Monitoring 8 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

buffer plots was collected using Level 2 of the CVS -EEP monitoring protocol and is
presented in Appendix A
NOTE Level 2 of the CVS -EEP monitoring protocol includes both planted and
natural (volunteer) woody stems For this reason volunteer specimens are
included in the total number of species as reflected in Tables V -2 through V -4
Table V- 5 (Stem Count by Plot and Species) does not include volunteer /natural
woody stem data only planted stems
A summary of Dlanted vegetation survival is Dresented in the followins table
* Denotes resprouts following a drought year
Four (4) bank vegetation plots were also established (two on each reach) to monitor
survival of live stake plantings along stream banks Live stake survival is based on
baseline data collected during Year 1 Monitoring in 2006 Live stake survival from
Monitoring Year One to Monitoring Year Five for the site overall is approximately
812%
Live stake counts by species and by Dlot are Dresented in the followma tables
2006 - REACH 1
Common Name
REACH 1
REACH 1
Species Total
% of Total
Planted Stems /Acre
BANK 1
BANK 2
Plot
Year 1 2006
Year 2 2007
Year 3 2008
Year 4 2009
Year 5 2010)
1
688
486
445
324
324
2
607
486
405
364
283
3
607
607
567
567
567
4
445
445
1 445
445
445
REACH 2
Cot nusamomum
4
9
13
Planted Stems /Acre
Silky Willow
Sala set icea
Plot
Year 1 (2006)
Year 2 200 Year 3 2008
Year 4 2009
Year 5 2010
1
931
486 567*
567
526
2
607
202 243*
243
243
Average of All
Plots
647
452 445
418
398
* Denotes resprouts following a drought year
Four (4) bank vegetation plots were also established (two on each reach) to monitor
survival of live stake plantings along stream banks Live stake survival is based on
baseline data collected during Year 1 Monitoring in 2006 Live stake survival from
Monitoring Year One to Monitoring Year Five for the site overall is approximately
812%
Live stake counts by species and by Dlot are Dresented in the followma tables
2006 - REACH 1
Common Name
Species
REACH 1
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
BANK 2
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
12
17
29
39%
Silk Willow
Saba. sencea
30
16
46
61%
TOTAL
42
33
75
100%
2007 - REACH 1
Common Name
Species
REACH 1
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
BANK 2
Silky Dogwood
Cot nusamomum
4
9
13
27%
Silky Willow
Sala set icea
27
9
36
73%
TOTAL
31
18
49
100%
Live Stake Survival =
73 8%
545%
653%
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Em ironmental Consultants PA
Year Five Monitoring 9 S &EC Job # 938 Dl 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D0 >016 2

r
1
L`
1
�l
2008 - REACH 1
Common Name
Species
REACH 1
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
BANK 2
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
10
9
19
36%
Silky Willow
Salix sencea
30
4
34
64%
Elderberry
TOTAL
40
13
53
100%
Live Stake Survival =
952%
394%
707%
100%
2009 - REACH 1
Common Name
Species
REACH 1
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
BANK 2
Silk Do wood
Cornus amomum
10
9
19
32%
Silky Willow
Salix sencea
30
10
40
68%
Elderberry
TOTAL
40
19
59
100%
Live Stake Survival =
952%
57 6%
787%
100%
2010 - REACH 1
Common Name
Species
REACH 1
Species Total
% of Total
2008 - REACH 2
Common Name
BANK 1
BANK 2
Species Total
% of Total
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
10
6
16
32%
Silky Willow
Salix sencea
26
8
34
68%
Silky Dogwood
TOTAL
36
14
50
100%
Elderberry
Live Stake Survival =
857%
424%
667%
2%
2006 - REACH 2
Common Name
Species
REACH 2
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
BANK 2
Silky Willow
Salix sencea
7
4
11
23%
Silk Do wood
Cornus amomum
1 9
25
34
72%
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
0
2
1 2
4%
TOTAL
16
31
47
100%
2007 - REACH 2
Common Name
Species
REACH 2
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
BANK 2
Silk Willow
Salix sencea
6
4
10
29%
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
5
20
25
71%
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
0
0
0
0%
TOTAL
11
24
35
100%
Live Stake Survival =
688%
774%
745%
2008 - REACH 2
Common Name
Species
REACH 2
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
BANK 2
Silky Willow
Salix seiicea
7
4
11
24%
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
8
25
33
73%
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
0
1
1
2%
TOTAL
15
30
45
100%
Live Stake Survival =
93 8%
968%
957%
I 1 Gray Fann Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
_ Year Five MomtorinE 10 S &EC Job # 9385 DI I
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

2009 - REACH 2
Common Name
Species
REACH 2
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
BANK 2
-
Silky Willow
Salix sencea
7
4
11
24%
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
8
25
33
73%
Elderbeny
Sambucus canadensis
0
1
1
2%
TOTAL
15
1 30
45
100%
Live Stake Survival=
93 8%
1 968%
957%
2010 - REACH 2
Common Name
Species
REACH 2
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
BANK 2
Silky Willow
Salu sencea
7
4
11
24%
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
8
25
33
73%
Elderbe
Sambucus canadensis
1 0
1
1
2%
TOTAL
1 15
1 30
45
100%
Live Stake Survival
1 93 8%
1 968%
957%
Most surviving live stakes appear healthy and are growing vigorously
Herbaceous vegetation varies widely throughout the restoration site The native
herbaceous species have become densely established and are dominant throughout the
site Herbaceous species observed along stream banks and in the buffer and wetlands
onsnte include
• Jewelweed — Impatiens capensis
• Soft Rush — Juncus effusus
• Cutgrass — Leersia oryzoides
• Monkeyflower — Mimulus ringens
• Sedges — Carex spp
• Swntchgrass — Pamcum virgatum
• Duck Potato — Sagittaria latifolia
• Goldenrod — Solidago sp
• Dog - fennel — Eupatorium capillif6hum
• Boneset — Eupatorium perfoliatum
1 Problem Areas Plan View (Vegetation)
During field inspections on October 25th -28th and November 10th, 2010, a total of one
(1) localized area of bare floodplan was observed on Reach 1 This area appears to be
due primarily to surface flows Continued revegetation of previously bare areas
within both reaches was observed during Monitoring Year Five Vegetation Problem
Areas are shown on Sheets 6 through 9 (Reach 1) Photos are included in Appendix
A
During Monitoring Year Two, small amounts of the non - natives Johnsongrass
(Sorghum halepense) and tall fescue (Lohum arundinaceum) were observed at the
edges of the buffer restoration areas that border the agricultural fields on both
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year Five MomtonnL 1 1 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

reaches These populations have not become dominant, nor have they excluded
native vegetation
An area of Kudzu (Pueraria lobata) was noted at the site in early June 2007, on the
west side of Reach 1 between stations 16 +00 to 19 +00 Although the majority of the
Kudzu was along and in the edge of the woods immediately outside the easement
r area, some had encroached into the easement area The area (approximately 0 5 acre)
was treated with the herbicide Translme (clopyral>d) at a rate of one pint per acre in
2007 A small portion of this area was again treated in 2008 During 2008, a small
area (approximately 0 009 acre) of Kudzu was observed immediately east of station
' 13 +00, within the easement area During 2009, two very small areas of kudzu
(totaling approximately 350 sq feet) were treated with Translme (clopyralid) in the
upper part of Reach 1 During 2010, kudzu was observed within a localized area east
of station 18 +00, including a portion of buffer Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Based on vegetative success criteria the overall site currently exhibits strong
vegetative success
2 Vegetative Problem Areas Table Summary
Vegetative problem areas observed are described in Table Al in Appendix A
3 Vegetative Problem Areas Plan View
Vegetative problem areas are shown on Sheets 6 through 9 for Reach 1 (Problem
Area Plan View) During 2010, it was noted that Vegetation Plot 2 on Reach 2 did not
meet the required planted stem survival rate of 260 planted stems per acre for Year
Five However, volunteer stems within the plot include several large, healthy
specimens of Box Elder, Red Maple, and Sycamore If these volunteer stems are
- taken into account, this vegetation plot not only meets but exceeds the required
success criteria
B Stream Assessment
A review of available on -line U S Geological Survey (USGS) gauge sites was
performed to determine if a suitable surrogate gauges was present in the area No
nearby gauge was identified The closest USGS gauge to the site was on the Lower
Little River (near Healing Springs, NC, Gauge Identification Number 02142000)
which is approximately 15 miles from the project site Based on this large distance,
significant disparity in watershed sizes, and topographic variation, it is unlikely that a
conclusive determination regarding the number of bankfull events experienced on the
restoration site could be made ,
Based upon recommendations provided by NCEEP a crest gauge was installed on site
(at Cross - section 3 on Reach 1) The gauge was installed in June of 2008 and checked
during subsequent site visits for evidence of bankfull events In addition, site
r observations during visits performed this monitoring year including wrack lines,
i staining of vegetation, displaced/flattened vegetation, and observable sediment
deposition indicate that multiple overbank events have occurred Photographs
fGray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year Five Monitoring 12 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

documenting overbank conditions during Monitoring Year Five are provided in
Appendix B The dates of site visits where evidence of bankfull events were observed
are listed in the table below
Exhibit Table V Verification of Bankfull Events
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site /EEP Project # 92219
Date of Data
Date of
Method
Photo #
Collection
Occurrence
4/24/2006
Unknown
Onstte observations (wrack lines staining
of vegetation displaced/flattened
vegetation and observable sediment
deposition and select crest gauge readings)
N/A
6/22/2006
Unknown
N/A
10/19/2006
Unknown
N/A
11/27/2006
Unknown
N/A
12/18/2006
Unknown
N/A
03/01/2007
Unknown
N/A
03/22/2007
Unknown
N/A
04/05/2007
Unknown
N/A
08/22/2007
Unknown
N/A
11/27/2007
Unknown
N/A
5/19/2008
Unknown
N/A
6/25/2008
Unknown
N/A
8/26/2008
Unknown
N/A
Year 3 Report
9/17/2008
Unknown
Photos 1 2 4
Year 3 Report
11/19/2008
Unknown
Photo 3
Year 4 Report
10/27/2009
Unknown
Photo 1
11/11/2009
11/11/2009
Observation of bankfull event — Reach 1
Year 4 Report
Photo 2
11/11/2009
11/11/2009
Observation of bankfull event — Reach 2
Year 4 Report,
Photo 3
Onstte observations (wrack lines staining
10/27/2010
of vegetation, displaced /flattened
(am)
Unknown
vegetation and observable sediment
1
de osttton and crest gauge reading)
10/27/2010
10/27/2010
Observation of bankfull event — Reach 1
2
(pm)
Onsrte observations (wrack lines staining
11/10/2010
10/27/2010
of vegetation displaced /flattened
3
vegetation and observable sediment
deposition)
1 Problem Areas Plan View (Stream)
An assessment of channel stability was performed on November 10'l', 2010 Areas of
concern that were observed and documented included some minor localized bank
scour, burred structures, and stressed structures Detail of scour is evident in cross -
section 6 (pool) These problem areas are shown on Sheets 6 through 9 for Reach 1
and Sheets 14 through 16 for Reach 2 (Problem Area Plan View) The minimal extent
of scour and erosion around structures does not warrant repair at this time
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year Five Monitoring 13 S &EC Job # 9385 D11
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

The previously noted stressed log J -hook structure at station 41 +50 on Reach 1 was
investigated by North State Environmental on April 7, 2010 and was observed to be
stable Bank erosion immediately downstream of the structure was repaired by hand
grading the banks and installation of a brush mattress to further protect the bank from
erosion
Although a beaver dam was previously noted on October 27, 2009 at station 56 +40
j within Reach 1, no beaver dams were observed within the restored stream reaches
during the 2010 stream monitoring
JThe upper portion of Reach 1 has demonstrated pool development since the as -built
survey Significant sediment entered the pools at the upper end of Reach 1 shortly
after construction This sediment came from upstream sources to the north of the
restoration site including areas of cattle pasture and areas previously mundated due to
the old pond This sediment was flushed from the system during the first year,
causing these pools to deepen to their previously excavated depth During
Monitoring Year Three, sediment from the upstream cattle pasture again entered the
upper portion of Reach 1 Based on the Year Four assessment, this sedimentation
continued and increased Year Four monitoring showed that the area between station
0 +00 and station 5 +20 contained significant sediment, pools had filled, and structures
had been buried From station 5 +20 to station 9 +50, sediment was present, but less
severe, and the riffle -pool sequence was more easily observed Observations of this
area during Year Five show that sedimentation from the upstream cattle pasture has
continued to increase Continuous, heavy sediment now exists between station 0 +00
and station 7 +50 From station 7 +50 to station 17 +75, sediment depth is variable,
with some pools containing deep sediment It is important to note that the cattle
pasture north of the restoration site is not under the ownership of the Grays
2 Problem Areas Table Summary
Stream problem areas observed are shown in Table B 1 in Appendix B
3 Numbered Issues Photo Section
Representative photos of each category of stream problem area are shown in
Appendix B
4 Fixed Photo Station Photos
Photos from established photo stations (at each cross - section) were collected during
the stream survey (October 25 -28 and November 10, 2010) These photos are
included in Appendix B
5 Stability Assessment
A visual qualitative assessment was performed to inspect channel facets, meanders,
bed, banks, and installed structures This visual assessment was confirmed and
enhanced with a quantitative assessment of the physical stream survey The goal of
this assessment is to provide a percentage of the features listed in Table VII that are in
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year Five Momtorm& 14 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

a state of stability Table VII was compiled from the data in Table 132 in Appendix B
of this report
Table VIIa Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Gray Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site/EEP Project # 92219 Reach 1
Feature
MY -1
2006
MY -2
2007
MY -3
2008
MY4
2009
MY -5
2010
A Riffles
100%
100%
98%
100%
95%
B Pools
100%
100%
100%
99%
88%
C Thalweg
99%
99%
99%
99%
98%
D Meanders
100%
100%
1 100%
99%
99%
E Bed General
96%
99%
99%
99%
99%
F Bank Condition
100%
99%
99%
99%
99%
G Vanes/ J Hooks etc
99%
98%
98%
98%
95%
H Wads and Boulders
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Table VHb Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Gray Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site/EEP Protect # 92219 Reach 2
Feature
MY -1
2006
MY -2
2007
MY -3
2008
MY4
2009
MY -5
2010
A Riffles
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
B Pools
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
C Thalwe
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
D Meanders
99%
98%
98%
97%
97%
E Bed General
100%
100%
100%
99%
99%
F Bank Condition
100%
100%
99%
100%
100%
G Vanes/ J Hooks, etc
99%
96%
95%
96%
96%
H Wads and Boulders
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6 Quantitative Measures Summary Tables
The following tables (Table VIII and Table IX) summarize the quantitative data
collected from the cross - sectional and representative longitudinal stream survey
These data were analyzed and summarized, and then compared with baseline data
available for this project
The Quantitative Morphology Tables illustrate the degree of departure, if any, of the
current channel from the baseline data Tables VIII and IX were compiled from the
cross - section and profile raw data and plots located in Appendix B of this report
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Em ironmental Consultants PA
Year Fne Momtonnb 15 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

E
f-
Table VIII Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION SITE (EEP Project #92219)
REACH 1
Parameter
Pre Existing Condition
Project Reference Stream
Design
As built
Dimension
Mm
Max
Avt,
Mut
Max
Av6
Mm
Max
Avg
Mm
Max
Avi,
BF Width (fl)
1577
1577
1577
3208
3208
3208
152
15 2
152
1362
1948
1602
Floodprone
1941
5254
2039
100
47
9034
47
3749
8967
61 53
Width (fl)
BF Cross
Sectional Area
1787
1787
1787
7979
7979
7979
1784
1784
1784
1101
1792
1379
(ft)
BF Mean Depth
ft
1 13
1 13
1 13
249
249
249
1 17
1 17
1 17
07
094
086
BF Max Depth
ft
149
149
149
361
361
361
171
171
171
1 36
204
161
W idth/Depth
Ratio
1396
1396
1396
1243
1243
1243
1267
1267
1267
1863
2007
1946
Entrenchment
1 29
1 29
1 29
347
347
347
309
309
309
275
46
384
Ratio
Wetted
1652
1652
1652
348
348
348
1601
1601
1601
1326
1641
1567
Penmet ft
Hydraulic radius
108
229
1 11
069
092
083
ft
Pattern
Channel
6762
13729
9827
708
9193
8435
261
61 8
4075
5932
9389
72 85
Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of
648
121 04
81 58
1336
3657
2656
1997
3785
2823
1664
4088
2573
Curvature ft
Meander
71691
71691
71691
148 13
29109
221 56
7708
117 13
9507
7708
117 13
948
Wavelength ft
Meander Width
429
8 71
623
221
2 87
263
1 72
407
268
37
586
455
ratio
Profile
Riffle length (fl)
N/A
N/A
N/A
3294
4835
4029
1931
5486
3086
25 87
542
3785
Riffle slope (fU11)
000632
000657
000647
000809
001395
001074
00057
000092
00187
00062
Pool len&th (fl)
938
15947
1196
896
4109
2641
229
33 17
2966
741
24447
23 01
Pool Slope (tuft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
00009
00029
00013
00007
00064
00016
Pool spacmb (fl)
34707
525 3
444
4408
13073
6798
51 66
8292
6779
1235
142
7094
Substrate
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d84 (mm)
N/A I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Additional
Reach
Parameters
Valley Lent_th (fl
4258 3
64835
4258 3
42583
Channel Len&th
4939 628
758 58
5622
5813 3
ft
Sinuosity
1 16
1 17
1 29
1 36
Water Surface
000647
001074
00057
000544
Slope fl/fl)
BF slope (fl/fl)
000647
001074
00057
000544
Rosben
F4
C4
C4
C4
Classification
Habitat Index
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
•Macrobenthos
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
i
{ Gray Farm Stream Restoration
Year 5 Momtonnb
December 2010
16
Soil Lnvironmental Consultants PA
S EC Job #9385 Dl 1
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

Table Vlll Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION SITE (EEP Project #92219)
REACH 2
Parameter
Pre Existing Condition
Project Reference Stream
Design
As built
Dimension
Mm
Max
Av&
Mm
Max
Av&
Mm
Max
Av&
Mm
Max
Avb
BF Width (ft)
534
534
534
486
486
486
69
69
6 9
738
821
7 8
Floodprone
Width (ft)
704
704
704
8 73
8 73
8 73
124
124
124
1396
3905
2653
BF Cross
Sectional Area
3 88
3 88
3 88
194
194
1 94
396
396
396
414
677
546
ft
BF Mean Depth
(ft)
073
073
073
04
04
04
057
057
057
056
082
069
BF Max Depth
(ft)
1 13
1 13
1 13
061
061
061
087
087
087
086
1 3
108
Width/Depth
Ratio
732
732
732
1215
1215
12 15
1211
12 11
12 11
101
1318
113
Entrenchment
Ratio
1 32
1 32
1 32
1 8
1 8
1 8
1 8
1 8
1 8
1 9
47
34
Wetted
603
603
603
528
528
528
736
736
736
768
8 77
8 23
Penmeter(ft)
Hydraulic radius
064
037
094737
094737
094737
078261
1 11594
095652
(ft)
Pattern
Channel
43 58
68 11
5422
697
227
13 32
949
165
12 65
1183
2205
1696
Beltwidth (ft)
Radius
3254
5264
4125
4 1
888
593
671
99
805
463
9 1
643
( (fl) Curvature )
Meander
20946
39466
33446
2247
6878
4657
31 6
37 12
3408
2751
3472
31 75
Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width
8 16
12 75
10 15
143
467
274
1 38
239
1 83
1 52
2 83
2 17
ratio
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
552
76
639
493
724
5 88
3 36
116
56
Riffle slope (ft/ft)
00179
003688
002444
003022
005058
004025
00258
00053
00555
00279
Pool length (ft)
2627
5441
4034
756
1065
878
625
1046
845
52
1008
759
Pool Slope (ft/ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
00017
00087
0 003
0 001
00092
00022
Pool spacm& (11)
125 7
47465
265 15
20 17
7004
4672
15 73
2384
1922
943
2894
1951
Substrate
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d84(imn)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Additional
Reach
Parameters
Valley Length
1872
21655
1872
1872
(ft)
Channel Lenbth
19656
26636
2114
2191
(ft)
Sinuosity
1 05
1 23
1 16
1 2
Water Surface
00286
0 039
00258
0 025
Slope (tuft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
00286
0 039
00258
0 025
Rosl,en
64
B4
134
B4
Classification
*Habitat Index
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
•Macrobenthos
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Soil Environmental Consultants PA O
Year 5 Monitoring SEC Job # 9385 Dl I
December 2010 17 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

®
®
..
..
.. .
-as
�o
0
-
Ir
�m,m
®m
®
®ommmomtomm,
ommom
®gym
�m,m
®
®
®m
®
®
®ommm
®mm�a��
®mt
®
®
®mmmmmm��®
®o�mm
®mom®
®
®o
�mm
®mommmmmtmtmm
®
®m
®mmmm
®�
®m
®oo
®m
®mm
®mmm
®
®®
®mmm
pmt
®m
®
®
®mmm
®�>•m
®
®
®
®mtmmmtmmmmmm
®mom
®m
®mm
®�mm
©v0�
®
®
®®
�
®mommmmm
�mto
®
®m
®mm,
®m
®
®m
®
®
®mmm
®
®m
®
®m®
®mm•m
®mom
®
®
®m
®m
®
®mmmtmmm
®mtmtm
®�
®m
®�
®
®®
®
�mtm
®
®m
®
®
®
®v
®vo
®mrmtmmm,mm
®mom®
®mom
®
®mma
®mmm
®o
®mm®
®
®
®
®
®mmmom
®m
®m
®mo
®
®
®mmt
®
®m
®
®mm
®mm��ommmm
®
®
®
®®
®
®�
®mm
®mmm
®�ramm�mm
®
®mm
MEN�m�o�a
��m�mmmmmmm��mm�mmmmmmmmm
®m
®
®m
®m
®
®m
®m®
®mom
®®
®mm•
®m
®
®
®mm
®mt
®
®
®
®
®
®
®mm
®m®
®
..
.. .
0
Ir
�m,m
®
®
®
®mmmm
®mm�a��
®mtmv�mmmm
®�������uammmm
®o�mm
®mom®
�mm
®
®m
®mmmm
®�
®oo
®
®mmm
®mmm
®m
®
®m
®�>•m
©m
©mt�Iram�
®mom
®m
®mm
®�mm
©v0�
®
®mm
®®
®m®
�mto
®
®m
®m
®m
®�
®mm
®
®m
®ommmm®
®mom
®mmmmm
®mtmtm
®�
®m
®
®
®
®
®mm
��
®
®
®m
®vo
®mom®
®mom
®
®mmm
®mm®
�mtm
®m
®m
®mo
®
®
®m
®�
®mm��ommmm
®
®�
®mm
®mmm
®�ramm�mm
®
®mm
MEN�m�o�a
��m�mmmmmmm��mm�mmmmmmmmm
®m
®
®m
®m
®
®m
®m®
®mom
®®
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 5 Monitoring
December 2010
18
Sod Environmental Consultants PA
S EC Job #9385 DI I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
0
Ir
®
�r����c
+ra■�a
®mm�a��
®�������uammmm
®mom®
�mm
®
®m
®mmmm
®�
®oo
®
®mmm
®mmm
®mm■mmmmm
®mom
®m
®�mm
®
®mm
®m®
�mto
®
®m
®m
®m
®�
®mm
®
®m
®ommmm®
®mom
®mmmmm
®mtmtm
®�
®m
®
®
®
®
®mm
��
®
®
®m
®vo
®mom®
®mom
®
®mmm
®mm®
�mtm
®m
®m
®mo
®
®
®m
®�
®mm��ommmm
®
®�
®mm
®mmm
®�ramm�mm
®
®mm
®mo
��m�mmmmmmm��mm�mmmmmmmmm
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 5 Monitoring
December 2010
18
Sod Environmental Consultants PA
S EC Job #9385 DI I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

00 o ro 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�
Irmo
o
v
©�0
©v0�
©0ov00o0
®
©m
o
r
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil Environmental Consultants PA
Year 5 Monitoring S EC Job #9385 DI I
December 2010 19 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 5 Momtonn&
December 2010
20
Soil Environmental Consultants PA
S EC Job #9385 DI I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
0
71 7m
m
®
®0
®
©0v
©0m
©0
©v0v
©0
�mtm
®
®
®
®m
®mm
®mtom�
®mm
�mtm�m
®®
®mmm
®
®mm
®mmm
®
®
®m
®mmmmm
®mt
®m
®
®mm
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®mo
®v
®
©mm
®mmm
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®m
®
®®
©ono
®mmmmmmm
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 5 Momtonn&
December 2010
20
Soil Environmental Consultants PA
S EC Job #9385 DI I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
m
®
®0
®
©0v
©0m
©0
©v0v
©0
�mtm
®
®
®
®m
®mm
®mtom�
®mm
�mtm�m
®®
®mmm
®
®mm
®mmm
®
®
®m
®mmmmm
®mt
®m
®
®mm
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 5 Momtonn&
December 2010
20
Soil Environmental Consultants PA
S EC Job #9385 DI I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

I�
(� IV Methodology Section
(�
With the exception of the aforementioned use of Level 2 (Planted and Natural Woody
I
Stems) of the CVS -EEP Vegetation Monitoring Protocol, no deviations from initially
prescribed methodologies were implemented as a part of Monitoring Year Five
(2010) activities
F-
r-
U
_J
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
_ Year Five Momtorm6
December 2010
t _�
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
21 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

Feet
2 000_ ` I/ r 1( r F --
,�r a , / ^_f\ _ \ �.ti—N,} fs1�o
fJ
--0 32 t
Reach I Priority
`� coo
{ 073 -2
Reach I Priority 11
r J \ J f rr�� /r ( \ LINDEN ROADD
? —� t
YBOL 2—
Oov
v C
/1 F(y 131 \ �� \�hL� � ` I �r\ y �� !! /' y \ l�N /1
�sc-, Reach 2 Priority I
,p L ' 111 t
O� �ir s rv/ 1(n . \ ` j �/ er L— t i / i —
O , �Y f Y ! Directions
From 140 West take exit 144 Old Mountain Road
North (5R 1005)
Take a left at Sterling Road (SR 1 526)
k2 ( _ Then right at Linden Road (5R 1 527)
Right on Bolick Road (5R 1 532) West
v� } \j Reach 1 is located Immediately north of Bolick Road
(SR 1 532)
From Reach I return East on Bolick Road (SR 1 532)
Take a right onto Linden Road (SR 1 527)
1`{�� I J -�i) Then right at New Sterling Road (SR 1 526)
Reach 2 Is located Immediately west of the intersection
of New Sterlmg Road (5R 1 525) and Gray house Road
(5R 1 525) -
—
Project Number Map Title
9385 D8
Project Manager Figure I - Project Location
PKS Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
EEP Job # 92219 ' soa.s., ,�4 .S"wM` rn
Scale Iii = 2,000' Iredell Count y NC
Date Source
DECEMBER 2007 Stony Point Quadrangle

APPENDIX A
VEGETATION RAW DATA

APPENDIX A 1 —
Vegetation Survey Data Tables

Table V -1 — Vegetation Metadata
Report Prepared By David Cooper
Date Prepared 11/16/2010 9 53
database name DRAFT-2008 Gray Farm level2 mdb
database location \ \Sec2 \jobs7 9k\9385 D7 Dl l \YEAR 5 Dl l\Momtormg_Data
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT -- --
Metadata This worksheet which is a summary of the project and the project data
Plots List of plots surveyed
Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes
Vigor by Slip Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each
Damage by Slip Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Stem Count by Plot and Spp Count of living stems of each species for each plot dead and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY - - -- - - -- - --
Project Code
project Name
Description
length(ft)
stream-to-edge width (ft)
area (s m)
Regmred Plots
(calculated)
Sampled Plots
Gray Farm stream
restoration Reach
GF 1
Gray Farm Reach 1
1
4
Gray Farm stream
restoration Reach
GF2
Gray Farm Reach 2
2
2
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 5 Monitoring 1 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

r-
U
F,
I'
E I
f l
Table V -2 — Vegetation Vigor by Species
Gray harm Stream Restoration Site
Year 5 Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
2 S &EC Job # 9385 DI I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
Species
4
3
2
1
0
Missing
Alnus serrulata
2
2
1
Betula mgra
2
1
Cornus amomum
1
1
1
Diospyros virg7mana
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1
I 1
I 1
Liquidambar
styraciflua
Ptnus taeda
Pinus virgimana
uercus mtchauxu
1
uercus hellos
3
4
7
4
Salix m ra
Sambucus canadensis
Viburnum nudum
1
Viburnum
1
Viburnum dentatum
1
Ilex o aca
1
1
Betula lenta
Carptnus carohmana
1
Jum erus vtr tmana
uercus rubra
2
1
Ltndera benzoin
1
Driodendron tuh t era
2
1
Platanus occidentalis
12
7
4
1
Prunus serotina
A ne undo
Acer rubrum
TOT
26
25
17
17
11
Gray harm Stream Restoration Site
Year 5 Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
2 S &EC Job # 9385 DI I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

Table V -3 — Vegetation Damage by Species
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 5 Monitoring 3 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
Species
All Damage
Categories
(no
damage
Flood
Insects
Site Too
Wet
Vine
Strangulation
Acer ne undo
2
2
Acer rubrum
6
6
Alnus serrulata
5
3
2
Betula lenta
1
1
Betula ni ra
3
2
1
Ca anus carohmana
2
2
Cornus amomum
3
3
Diospyros virgintana
3
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4
4
Ilex o aca
2
2
Juni eras virginiana
1
1
Lindera benzoin
1
1
Liquidambar
styraciflua
2
2
Liriodendron tulip fera
4
3
1
Pinus taeda
1
1
Pinus vir imana
1
1
Platanus occidentahs
28
26
2
Prunus serotina
2
2
Quercus michauxii
1
1
Quercus phellos
18
16
1
1
Quercus rubra
4
4
Sahx ni ra
1
1
Sambucus canadensis
1
1
Viburnum
1
1
Viburnum dentatum
1
1
Viburnum nudum
1
1
TOT
26
99
89
1
3
1
5
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 5 Monitoring 3 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

Table V -4 — Vegetation Damage by Plot
Table V -5 — Stem Count by Plot and Species
Species
All Damage
(no
avg#
stems
Gray
Farm
Reach 1,
Buffer
Plot 1,
Year 5
Site Too
Vine
Gray
Farm
Reach 1,
Buffer
Plot 4,
Year 5
lot
Categories
damage)
Flood
Insects
Wet
Strangulation
2
GFRI 01 bufferl
1
1
Betula nigra
2
year 4
13
11
1
1
1
GFRI 01 buffet-2
Carpinus
carohmana
1
1
1
year 4
17
15
1
Cotnus amomum
1 1
2
1 5
GFRI 01 buffer3
1
2
Ft axtnus
ennsylvamca
year 4
21
18
1
1
1
2
GFRI 01 buffer4
Ilex o aca
2
2
1
year 4
18
17
1
Lit todendron
tulipafera
3
2
GFR2 01 Bufferl
1
2
year 4
20
20
3 83
1 2
2
9
7
GFR2 01 Buffer2
1
uercus hellos
14
4
3 5
2
year 4
10
8
9
1
2
TOT
6
1 99
1 89
1 1
1 3 1
1
1 5
Table V -5 — Stem Count by Plot and Species
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 5 MomtormL 4 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
Species
Total
Stems
#
plots
avg#
stems
Gray
Farm
Reach 1,
Buffer
Plot 1,
Year 5
Gray
Farm
Reach 1,
Buffer
Plot 2,
Year 5
Gray
Farm
Reach 1,
Buffer
Plot 3,
Year 5
Gray
Farm
Reach 1,
Buffer
Plot 4,
Year 5
Gray
Farm
Reach 2,
Buffer
Plot 1,
Year 5
Gray
Farm
Reach 2,
Buffer
Plot 2,
Year 5
Alnussenulata
4
3
133
2
1
1
Betula nigra
2
2
1
1
1
Carpinus
carohmana
1
1
1
1
Cotnus amomum
3
2
1 5
1
2
Ft axtnus
ennsylvamca
3
3
1
1
1
1
Ilex o aca
2
2
1
1
1
Lit todendron
tulipafera
3
2
15
1
2
Platanus
occtdentahs
23
6
3 83
1 2
2
9
7
2
1
uercus hellos
14
4
3 5
2
2
9
1
Quercus rubra
2
2
1
1
1
Viburnum dentatum
1
1
1
1
Viburnum nudum
1
1
1
1
TOT
12
59
12
8
7
14
11
13
6
Total Plot Density (Stems Per Acre)
324
283
567
445
526
243
Average Plot Density (Stems Per Acre)
398
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 5 MomtormL 4 S &EC Job # 9385 Dl 1
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

APPENDIX A 2 —
Vegetation Problem Area Tables

Exhibit Table A 1 Vegetative Problem Areas
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site /EEP Project #92219
Reach 1
Feature /Issue
Station # / Range
Probable Cause
Photo #
Bare Flood lam
42 +75 43 +30
Surface flow / Poor soil quality
1
Vegetative Problem Areas Improved
from Last Year
All other previous problem
areas
Revegetahon of previously bare areas
2
Reach 2
Feature /Issue
Station # / Range
Probable Cause
Photo #
No Vegetative Problem Areas
Observed
N/A
Revegetation of previously bare areas
N/A
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 5 Monitonn6
December 2010
Soil and Environmental Consultants Pf 0
SEC Job No 9385 Dl l
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
P,
L3

li
ri
J
L'
L1
nl
APPENDIX A 3 -
Vegetation Problem Area Photos

Appendix A
Vegetation Problem Area Photos
Photo 1 — Bare Bench/Floodplain — Reach 1— Year 5 (2010)
Photo 2 — Typical Vegetated Bank, Improved from Year 4 — Reach 1— Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

APPENDIX A.4 —
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 1 —Year 5 (2010)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 1 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 1 —Year 3 (2008)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 1 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC lob # 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 2—Year 5 (2010)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 2—Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 2 —Year 3 (2008)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 2 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 2—Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1)11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 3 —Year 5 (2010)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 3 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 3 —Year 3 (2008)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 3 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 3 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 4 —Year 5 (2010)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 4 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1) 11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 4 —Year 3 (2008)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 4 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.DI I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 4 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.Dl 1
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Bank 1 —Year 5 (2010)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Bank 1 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Bank 1 —Year 3 (2008)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Bank 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Bank 1 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1) 11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Bank 2—Year 5 (2010)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Bank 2—Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Bank 2—Year 3 (2008)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach I— Bank 2 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year Five Monitoring S &EC Job # 9385.D11
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1 —Bank 2 —Year 1(2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

r.2
Nil
1114

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Buffer 1 —Year 3 (2008)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Buffer 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Buffer 1 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1) 11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

1 °F
;' " w f ��`'�! � ��1= � ��'' �'_ �,� =• � �' � ! `� l Tom'
1r r_ 1
ilk" J
�4 1.
=�f'� _ r , oo

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Buffer 2 —Year 3 (2008)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Buffer 2 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Buffer 2 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 1 —Year 5 (2010)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 1 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank I —Year 3 (2008)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 1 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.13 11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 2—Year 5 (2010)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 2—Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D1 I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 2 —Year 3 (2008)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 2 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1)11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 2—Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

APPENDIX B
GEOMORPHOLOGIC RAW DATA

APPENDIX B.1 —
Bankfull Events

Appendix B
Bankfull Event Documentation Photos
Photo 1 — Reach I — Flattened vegetation near Cross - section 6
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Photo 2 — Reach 1— Overbank Event 10/27/2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1) 11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Bankfull Event Documentation Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Photo 3 — Reach 2 — Wrack pile above channel
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

APPENDIX B.2 —
Stream Problem Area Table (Table 131)

Exhibit Table B1- Stream Problem Areas
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project #92219
Reach 1
Feature Issue
Station
numbers
Suspected Cause
Photo number
Bank Scour
24 +75
Surface flow
1 -2
30 +00
Surface flow
41 +60
Surface flow
43 +05
Surface flow - Settling fill
Undercut Bank
47 +00 - 47 +50
Increased water velocity from nearby
tributary
3
Structures
0 +30
Buried Structure - Upstream Sediment
4
1 +50
Buried Structure - Upstream Sediment
11 +75
Stressed structure - Bank Scour
1 -2
24 +75
Stressed structure - Bank Scour
31 +60
Stressed structure - Bank Scour
41 +60
Stressed structure - Bank Scour
43 +05
IStressed structure - Bank Scour
Reach 2
Feature Issue
Station
numbers
Suspected Cause
Photo number
Bank Scour
2 +50
Surface Flow
5
4 +80
Surface flow
6 +00
Surface flow
16 +60
Surface flow
12 +70 - 12 +80
Surface flow
Channel Scour
16 +10
High Stormwater Flow
N/A
Structures
2 +50
Stressed Structure - Bank Scour
5
4 +80
Stressed structure - Bank Scour
6 +00
Stressed structure - Bank Scour
16 +60
Stressed structure - Bank Scour
12 +70 - 12 +80
Stressed structures - Bank Scour
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 5 Monitoring
December 2010
Soil Environmental Consultants, PF
SEC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

APPENDIX B.3 —
Stream Problem Area Photos

Appendix B
Stream Problem Area Photos
Photo 1— Typical Stressed Structure/Bank Scour — Reach 1— Year 5 (2010)
Photo 2 — Typical Stressed Structure/Bank Scour — Reach 1 — Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Stream Problem Area Photos
Photo 3 — Typical Undercut Bank — Reach 1— Year 5 (2010)
Photo 4 — Sediment from Off -site — Reach 1 near Beginning of Restoration — Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.DI
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Stream Problem Area Photos
Photo 5 — Typical Stressed Structure/Bank Scour — Reach 2 — Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

APPENDIX B.4 —
Stream Photo - Station Photos

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1— Riffle 1 —Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross- Section I— Reach 1 —Ri ne 1 —Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Riffle 1 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross- Section 1— Reach 1 —Riffle 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Riffle 1 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Pool 1 —Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Pool 1 —Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Pool 1 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Pool 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.13 11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section I— Reach 1 —Pool l —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC lob No. 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Riffle 2 —Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 1 —Riffle 2 —Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1) 11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross- Section 2 —Reach 1 —Riffle 2 —Year 3 (2008)
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 1 —Riffle 2 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.13 11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 1— Riffle 2 —Year 1(2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1—Pool 2—Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 1 - Pool 2 —Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 1- Pool 2 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 1 - Pool 2 —Year 2 (2007)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 1- Pool 2 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

W i!% � •
im
MAW �' r.
AL
�4
� ♦ J
z�.
♦ten, � �n

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 3 —Reach 1 —Riffle 3 —Year 3 (2008)
Cross - Section 3 —Reach 1 —Riffle 3 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 3 —Reach 1 —Riffle 3 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Pool 3 —Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 3 —Reach 1 - Pool 3 —Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D1 I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 3 —Reach 1- Pool 3 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 3 —Reach 1 - Pool 3 —Year 2 (2007)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 3 —Reach 1- Pool 3 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Riffle 4 —Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 4 —Reach 1 —Riffle 4 —Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

i'
F
'000l
� tilt R

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 4 —Reach 1— Riffle 4 —Year 1(2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D1 I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross- Section I— Reach 1 —Pool 4 —Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 4 —Reach 1 —Pool 4 —Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 4 —Reach 1 —Pool 4 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 4 —Reach 1 —Pool 4 —Year 2 (2007)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 4 —Reach 1—Pool 4—Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Riffle 5 —Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 5 —Reach 1 —Riffle 5—Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D1 I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 5 —Reach 1 —Riffle 5—Year 3 (2008)
Cross - Section 5 —Reach 1 —Riffle 5 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 5—Reach 1 —Riffle 5 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1) 11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

�f

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 5 —Reach 1 —Pool 5—Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 5 —Reach 1 —Pool 5 —Year 2 (2007)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 5 —Reach 1 —Pool 5 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.DI I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Riffle 6 —Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 6 —Reach 1 —Riffle 6 —Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D1I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 6 —Reach 1 —Riffle 6—Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 6 —Reach 1 —Riffle 6 —Year 2 (2007)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 6 —Reach 1 —Riffle 6 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Pool 6—Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 6 —Reach 1 —Pool 6 —Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 6 —Reach 1 —Pool 6—Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 6 —Reach 1 —Pool 6 —Year 2 (2007)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 6 —Reach 1 —Pool 6 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1)11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Riffle 7 —Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Riffle 7 —Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Riffle 7 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Riffle 7 —Year 2 (2007)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Riffle 7 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1) 11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Pool 7 —Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Pool 7 —Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Pool 7 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Pool 7 —Year 2 (2007)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1) 11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Pool 7 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1311
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 2 —Riffle 1 —Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 1 —Reach 2 —Riffle 1-Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.DI I
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section I —Reach 2 —Riffle 1 —Year 3 (2008)
s
a
IF
4
a s�'
i
/ y
J• Y
�f i•
.t
Cross - Section 1 —Reach 2 —Riffle I —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year Five Monitoring S &EC Job No. 9385.1311
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 1 —Reach 2 —Riffle 1 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 2 —Pool I —Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 1 —Reach 2—Pool 1 —Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1 —Reach 2—Pool 1 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 1 —Reach 2—Pool 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 1 —Reach 2 —Pool I —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1) 11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 2 —Riffle 2 —Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 2 —Riffle 2 —Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 2 —Riffle 2 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross- Section 2 —Reach 2 —Riffle 2 —Year 2 (2007)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 2 —Riffle 2 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 2 —Pool 2 —Year 5 (2010)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 2 —Pool 2—Year 4 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 2—Pool 2 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 2—Pool 2—Year 2 (2007)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Five Monitoring
December 2010
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 2 —Pool 2 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D11
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

APPENDIX B 5 —
Exhibit Table B2 - Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment

Table B2 - Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
Date NOVEMBER 2010
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION - REACH 1
Feature Category
Metnc (per As built and reference baselines
A Riffles 1 Present?
2 Armor stable a g no displacement)?
3 Facet grade appears stable?
4 Stable interval grade?
5 Featurespacing appropriate?
6 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
7 Depth appears appropriate for current dischar e�
8 Length appropriate?
B Pools 1 Presents a g not subject to severe a radation?
2 Sufficiently deep Max Pool D Mean Bkf >1 6
3 Thalweg located outer bend?
4 Spacmq appropriate?
Project # 9385D11
(# stable)
Number
>erformmg
as
intended
Total
number
Per As
bbuilt
Total
Number/
feet in
unstable
state
% perfor
in stable
condition
Feature
Perform
Mean or
Total
34
34
NA
100%
1 34
34
34
NA
100%
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
33
34
NA
97%
34
34
NA
100%
N/A
34
34
NA
100%
NA
22
34
NA
65%
49
34
34
NA
100%
1 General channel bed a radation areas bar formation
34
34
NA
100%
95%
35
49
NA
71%
98%
48
49
NA
98%
NA
49
49
NA
100%
NA
49
49
NA
100%
3 Apparent cut or scour from flood water re entry to chann
e inadequate flood lam access?)
C Thalweg
11 Upstream of meander bend run/inflection centering?
34
1 34
1 NA
100%
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centenn
33
1 34
1 NA
95%
98%
D Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
48
49
NA
98%
2 Of those eroding # w/ concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
49
NA
N/A
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
49
49
NA
100%
4 Sufficient flood lam access and relief?
49
49
NA
100%
99%
E Bed General
1 General channel bed a radation areas bar formation
NA
NA
25
99%
Channel a egra a on areas o in creasing ow
cuttin or head cutting?
NA
NA
75
98%
99%
G Banks
1 Apparent scour points from channel processes
NA
NA
35
99%
2 Apparent cut points from overland flow
NA
NA
150
96%
3 Apparent cut or scour from flood water re entry to chann
e inadequate flood lam access?)
NA
NA
0
100%
4 Tension cracks
NA
NA
0
100%
5 Bank aradient in excess of 40 %?
NA
NA
0
100%
6 Collapse/slumping
NA
NA
25
1 99%
7 Ratio of bank height bankfull height elevated
NA
NA
0
1 100%
99%
H Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour?
26
28
N/A
93%
2 Height appropriate?
28
28
N/A
100%
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
26
28
N/A
93%
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
26
28
N/A
93%
95%
1 Wads/Boulders
11 Free of scours
0
0
N/A
N/A
2 Footing stables
1 0
0
WA
N/A
N/A
Notes
Gray Farm Stream Restoration
Year 5 Monitoring S EC Job #9385 Dl I
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

Table B2 - Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
Date NOVEMBER 2010
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION - REACH 2
Feature Category
Metric (Der As built and reference
A Riffles 1 Present?
2 Armor stable a g no displacement)?
3 Facet grade appears stable?
4 Stable interval grade?
5 Featurespacing appropriate?
6 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
7 Depth appears appropriate for current d
8 Length appropriate?
B Pools
C Thalweg
D Meanders
E Bed General
G Banks
1 Present? (e g not subject to severe aggradation?
2 Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D Mean Bkf >1 6)
3 Thalweg located outer bend?
4 Spacing appropriate?
5 Non aggradmg (not filling)?
6 Length appropnate?
1 Upstream of meander bend (run /inflection) center
2 Downstream of meander (glidehnflection) centenr
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
2 Of those eroding # w/ concomitant point bar form
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
4 Sufficient floodplam access and relief?
1 General channel bed aggradati0n areas (bar form
anne a egra a ion areas of increasing
cutting or head cutting?
1 Apparent scour points from channel processes
2 Apparent cut points from overland flow
3 Apparent cut or scour from flood water re entry to
(e g inadequate floodplain access ?)
4 Tension cracks
5 Bank gradient in excess of 40 %?
Project # 9385 D11
(# stable)
Number
performing
as
intended
Total
number
per As
built
b
Total
Number/
feet in
unstable
state
% perfor
in stable
condition
Feature
Perform
Mean or
Total
51
51
NA
100%
53
51
51
NA
1000
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
51
51
NA
100%
51
51
NA
100%
94%
51
51
NA
100%
0
51
51
NA
100%
51
51
NA
100%
51
51
NA
100%
100%
52
52
NA
100%
52
52
NA
100%
52
52
NA
100%
52
52
NA
N/A
52
52
NA
100%
52
52
NA
N/A
100%
51
51
NA
100%
51
51
NA
100%
100%
49
52
NA
94%
N/A
N/A
NA
N/A
52
52
NA
100%
52
52
NA
100%
97%
NA
NA
0
100%
NA
NA
25
98%
99%
NA
NA
25
98 %�
NA
NA
0
100%
NA
NA
0
100%
NA
NA
0
100%
NA
NA
0
100%
H Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour?
50
53
NA
94%
2 Height appropriate?
53
53
NA
100%
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
51
53
NA
96%
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
50
53
NA
94%
96%
I Wads /Boulders
1 Free of scour?
0
0
NA
N/A
Notes
Gray Farm Stream Restoration
Year 5 Momtonng S EC Job #9385 Dl j
December 2010 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

APPENDIX B 6 —
Annual Overlays of Cross Section Plots

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CROSS - SECTION I (RIFFLE)
(5TA. 4 +25)
943
942
941
940
a�
939
0 938
w 937
936
935
934
933
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO
5tation (feet)
1-0—Year 5 NI Year 4 X Year 3 (Year 2 +Year I —4—A5 Built
0 +70

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CRO55- 5ECTION I (POOL)
(STA. 4 +G5)
943
942
941
940
939
4-
0 936
w 937
936
935
934 - -
933
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO
Station (feet)
Year 5 0 Year 4 —xYear 3 (Year 2 - --Year I -+-As Built
0 +70

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CR055- 5ECTION 2 (RIFFLE)
(5TA. 13 +55)
937
93G
935
u
0 933
.N
932
931
930
929 ' ' i
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50
5tation (feet)
Year 5 —W Year 4 X Year 3 Year 2 * Year I B As Built
O +GO

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CRO55- 5ECTION 2 (POOL)
(STA. 13+00)
937
93G
935
934
a�
a�
0 933
M
a�
w 932
931
930
929
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50
Station (feet)
- +Yea r 5 * Year 4 - x Year 3 —f —Year 2 Year I A5 Built
O +GO

934
933
932
931
a�
930
0
> 929
w
928
927
926
925
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CRO55- 5ECTION 3 (RIFFLE)
(5TA. 23 +40)
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO 0 +70 0 +80
5tation (feet)
-
Year 5 * Year 4 WYear 3 (Year 2 —Year 1 -4--A5 Built
0 +90

934
933
932
931
a�
93C)
0
> 929
0
w
928
927
92G
925
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I — CROSS — SECTION 3 (POOL)
(5TA. 23+20)
5tation (feet)
Year 5 — M —Year 4 —Year 3 --w-Year 2 -A Year I --o— A5 Built

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CROSS- SECTION 4 (RIFFLE)
(STA. 32 +95)
927
92G
925
924
a�
a�
0 923
v
U-' 922
921
920
919 ' i i i i i i
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO
Station (feet)
--*--Year 5 —m Year 4 x Year 3 —*- -Year 2 —A Year I tAs Built
0 +70

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CR055- 5ECTION 4 (POOL)
(STA. 33 +30)
927
92G
925
924
0 923
a�
lu '32 2
921
920
919 ' ' '
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO
Station (feet)
1-0—Year5 0 Year 4 XYear 3 —0—Year 2 - -Year I BAs Built
0 +70

924
923
922
Om
0 920
Zi
a�
::
UnS
wim
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CROSS - SECTION 5 (RIFFLE)
(STA. 39 +30)
I
I
I
I
I
916
0 +00
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO 0 +70
Station (feet)
Year 5 *Year 4 M Year 3 (Year 2 —Year I —0—A5 5uilt

924
923
922
A
a�
2 920
"U 919
i!][:]
917
O I G +-
0+00
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CROSS - SECTION 5 (POOL)
(5TA. 38 +95)
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO 0 +70
5tation (feet)
--9-- Year 5 )m Year 4 X Year 3 f Year 2 — i Year 1 6 A5 Built

921
920
919
918
ON
0
0
916
0
915
0
w
''
913
912
911
910
0 +00
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CRO55- 5ECTION 6 (RIFFLE)
(5TA. 42+80)
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 0 +60
5tation (feet)
1-0–Year 5 —Year 4 XYear 3 –0-Year 2 –A Year I –*–AS 5uilt
0 +70

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CRO55- 5ECTION G (POOL)
(5TA. 43+ 1 O)
921
920
919
918
917
� 916
0 915
4-A
914
w
913
912
911
910
909
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO
Station (feet)
Year 5 X Year 4 X Year 3 Year 2 Year 1 0 As Bu It '1
0 +70

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CROSS - SECTION 7 (RIFFLE)
(5TA. 54 +05)
917
91G
915
914
913
912
a�
911
c
0
910
v
w 909
908
907
9OG
905
904
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO
Station (feet)
—Year 5 W Year 4 M Year 3- *-Year 2 —Year 1 -4--A5 Built
0 +70

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CRO55- 5ECTION 7 (POOL)
(STA. 54 +45)
917
916
915
914
913
912
v
a�
911
0
9IO -
w 909
908
907----
9OG - -
905
904
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO
Station (feet)
-}Year 5 *Year 4 Year 3 --m—Year 2 - A Year I --4—A5 Bu It
0 +70

939
a�
z
O 938
Q
w
w
937
936
935 4-
0+00
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION
REACH 2 - CROSS - SECTION I (RIFFLE)
(5TA. G +30)
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40
STATION (feet)
0 +50 O +GO
– *—Year 5 WYear 4 MYear 3– M–Year 2 A Year I A5 -Built

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH 2 - CROSS- SECTION I (POOL)
(STA. G +00)
939
v
v
z
O 938
Q
w
J
W
937
936
935 1 ' ' i i
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40
STATION (feet)
1--*--Year 5 *Year 4 XYear 3 —Year 2 � Year I As -Built
0 +50

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH 2 - CRO55- 5ECTION 2 (RIFFLE)
(STA. 19+30)
919
918
917
0 1 G
915
Z 914
0
Q 913
w
J
9 1 2
911
910
909
908 ! ' I I I
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO
STATION (feet)
—*--Year 5 —W Year 4 XYear 3 --E—Year 2 +Year I BAs -5uilt
0 +70

919
918
917
9 1 G
4 915
a�
u
Z 914
O
Q 913
w
J
U-1 912
911
910
909
908
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH 2 - CR055- 5ECTION 2 (POOL)
(5TA. 1 9 +45)
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO
STATION (feet)
Year 5 A Year 4 X Year 3— -Year 2 -- —Year I A5 -Built
0 +70

APPENDIX B.7 —
Annual Overlays of Longitudinal Plots

945
935
Z
O
Q
w 930
W
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I -LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
(STA. 0 +00 TO 18 +70)
r
i
4 +00 6 +00 8 +00 10 +00 12 +00 14 +00 16 +00 18 +00
STATION (feet)
+Year 5 *Year 4 NE Year 3 —Year 2 -* Year I s As -Built ♦ X5
20 +00

930
925
920
Z
O 915
Q
W
J
W
910
905
wo•
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
(5TA. 37 +50 TO 55 +50)
X5 -5
XS -6
X5 -7
I
37 +00 39 +00 41 +00 43 +00 45 +00 47 +00 49 +00
STATION (feet)
—a Year 5 *Year 4 xYear 3 (Year 2 - -- Year 1 0 As -Built ♦ X5
51+00 53 +00 55 +00

945
N
N
Z
O 935
Q
W
J
W
930
925
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH 2 - LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
(STA. 4 +G5 TO I O +GS)
4 +G5 5 +G5 G +G5 7 +G5 8 +G5 9 +G5
STATION (feet)
Year 5 Year 4 —Year 3 — Year 2 --Year I —•—AS -Built ♦ X5
O +G5

Z
O
Q
W
J
W
925
920
915
905
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH 2 - LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
(STA. 15+G8 TO 20+ 18)
I
I
X5 -2
—
i
i
ry
AM
15+G(5 I G+ 1 8 I G +G8 17+18 1 7 +G8 18+18 18 +G8 19+18 1 9 +G8 20+15
STATION (feet)
+ Year 5 * Year 4 —w Year 3 + Year 2 * Year 1 —•— As -Built ♦ XS

APPENDIX B.8 —
Annual Overlays of Pebble Count Frequency Distribution Plots

Pebble Count, Gray Farm Reach 1
100%
90%
80%
70%
c
c�
60%
L
Qi
E 50%
c
a�
40%
tl
30%
20%
10%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
Particle Size (mm)
—0--- Cumulative Percent - AsbuiIt Cumulative Percent - Year 1 -*-- Cumulative Percent - Year 2
w Cumulative Percent - Year 3 IN Cumulative Percent - Year 4 -4-Cumulative Percent - Year 5
10000

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
a�
LL 50%
C
40%
d-
30%
20%
10%
0%
Pebble Count, Gray Farm Reach 2
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
—*.--Cumulative Percent - Asbuilt Cumulative Percent - Year 1 f Cumulative Percent - Year 2
- x Cumulative Percent - Year 3 — Cumulative Percent - Year 4 —*---Cumulative Percent - Year 5
I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I 1 I I I I
I
1 I
I
I
I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I
1 I 1 I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I
I 1 I I I I I
I I I I 1
I 1 I I 1
I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I i
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I
1 I I I I i l
IT I
I 1 I I I
I I I I I I
I i I i i t
I I 1 I I I I I
1 I I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 1 1
I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I 1 I I I
I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I
I
I I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I 1 1
I I I 11 I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I l i
i
I
I
I I 1 I I
I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I I � I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I t I I I I
I I I I I I
I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
i I i i
i I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
1 I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I 1 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I 1 1 1 1
I 1 I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I
I
I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I C I
I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I i l l
I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I
I I I I I I
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
—*.--Cumulative Percent - Asbuilt Cumulative Percent - Year 1 f Cumulative Percent - Year 2
- x Cumulative Percent - Year 3 — Cumulative Percent - Year 4 —*---Cumulative Percent - Year 5

APPENDIX C
INTEGRATED PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW

APPENDIX C.1 —
Monitoring and Problem Area Plan View, Reach 1

,w...m­ -­4 m_n I I,v F _ n nn­,­RPAfH I. r - Fn KA- M PAPV -Ye 9 daa
O
N
O
0
N
0
w
M
5
o'
3
D
D
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT
O
NOTES:
PERMANENT ACCE55 I . DATA AS DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
EASEMENT PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR STREAMS, LIDAR CONTOURS, -_
i -_- AND NCDOT ROAD5 TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMEN51ON5 ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND 15A5ED ON AN ASSUMED
ELEVATION OF I00' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
V �
VEGETATION PLOT COORDINATES -REACH I
EXISTING TREELINE -
O END UPPER
LONG PROFILE Q
O
�^ __.
�` •- ��1�� -� BEGIN LOWER
LONG PROFILE
BANKFULL GAUGE
LOCATION
PEBBLE COUNT -
LOCATION
RESTORED
NORTHING
EXISTING
BUFFER I
STREAM CHANNEL
7543G4.3G
CONTOURS
1 38G 1 51 .38
EXISTING
BUFFER 3
EXISTING
752569.75
NCDENR STREAMS
1 38697 I .65
�,
DOT ROADS
NOTES:
PERMANENT ACCE55 I . DATA AS DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
EASEMENT PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR STREAMS, LIDAR CONTOURS, -_
i -_- AND NCDOT ROAD5 TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMEN51ON5 ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND 15A5ED ON AN ASSUMED
ELEVATION OF I00' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
V �
VEGETATION PLOT COORDINATES -REACH I
EXISTING TREELINE -
O END UPPER
LONG PROFILE Q
O
�^ __.
�` •- ��1�� -� BEGIN LOWER
LONG PROFILE
BANKFULL GAUGE
LOCATION
PEBBLE COUNT -
LOCATION
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
END LOWER
LONG PROFILE
t
\'✓
BENTHIC SAMPLING ✓
--{`
POINT
rn�_��r�: � / �. �� /✓ / ''fir i ✓%-_ �_
rn NORTH
200 100 0 200
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
� ' BCO L I C K ROAD
�
BENTHIC SAMPLING
JOINT
(SR
KEY SHEET
INDEX
1�
/532)
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
YEAR FIVE MONITORING
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Client: NC ECOSYSTEM
11010 Raven Ridge Rwd • Raleigh, North Cm mine 27614 • Phn : [phone] • Fox(919)846-9467 1�U _U CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
_.SandEC.- Sheet Title:
REACH I RE5TORATION 517E LAYOUT
4 KEY5110ET
D1
I" = 200
:t No.:
I OF I G
NORTHING
EA5TING
BUFFER I
1385846.18
7543G4.3G
BUFFER 2
1 38G 1 51 .38
753549.82
BUFFER 3
1 38G51 7.37
752569.75
BUFFER 4
1 38697 I .65
752535.59
BANK 1
1385719.13
754523.63
BANK 2
1 38G297.12
752693.45
CROSS SECTION
COORDINATES
NORTHING
EA5TING
CROSS SECTION 1
1385544.53
755250.67
RIFFLE 1
1385494.08
755292.77
POOL I
1385457.5G
755221 .71
CROSS SECTION 2
1385714.1 1
754599.75
RIFFLE 2
1 385729.62
754657.4 I
POOL 2
1375770.59
754609.35
CROSS SECTION 3
1385927.02
753997.26
RIFFLE 3
1 385893.90
7539 14.02
POOL 3
1385574.14
7539GG.3G
CP055 SECTION 4
1 38G 175.52
753301 .89
RIFFLE 4
1 38G 1 20.46
753338.88
POOL 4
1 38G 1 2 1.44
753264.47
CROSS SECTION 5
1 38G23G.38
7529 1 3.75
RIFFLE 5
1 38G293.2G
752869.42
POOL 5
138G303.28
752926.82
CROSS SECTION G
138G408.7
752648.1 I
RIFFLE G
1 386341 .1 7
752644.43
POOL G
138G3G9.35
752594.7
CROSS SECTION 7
1387272.25
752583.14
RIFFLE 7
1 387227.69
752627.95
POOL 7
1 387286.9 I
752G48.3G
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
END LOWER
LONG PROFILE
t
\'✓
BENTHIC SAMPLING ✓
--{`
POINT
rn�_��r�: � / �. �� /✓ / ''fir i ✓%-_ �_
rn NORTH
200 100 0 200
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
� ' BCO L I C K ROAD
�
BENTHIC SAMPLING
JOINT
(SR
KEY SHEET
INDEX
1�
/532)
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
YEAR FIVE MONITORING
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Client: NC ECOSYSTEM
11010 Raven Ridge Rwd • Raleigh, North Cm mine 27614 • Phn : [phone] • Fox(919)846-9467 1�U _U CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
_.SandEC.- Sheet Title:
REACH I RE5TORATION 517E LAYOUT
4 KEY5110ET
D1
I" = 200
:t No.:
I OF I G

O
N NOTES:
O
O I . 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
o_ PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOURS,
�. AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE G15 LAYERS)
r-n
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3
'Y 3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF I OO' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
n
0
3
N
v
D
D
I�
a
rn
D
C>
s
I
O
z
O
z
z
rn
L�
EXISTING THE
LEGEND F
MONITORING F
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT
PERMANENT ACCE55
EASEMENT
NORTH
SCALE 1 " = 50'
50 25 O 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
DRAWINGS PRINTED
UPPER LIMITS AT H A L S C A L E
OF RESTORATION
LEGEND FOR
A515UILT FEATURES
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
g LOG J -HOOK (L)H)
/1�1 ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CR055 ROCK VANE
(CKV)
CREATED /RESTORED
WETLANDS
1.
EX15TING STREAMS
:ON5ERVATION
)UNDARY
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION 93b5.01 1
- YEAR FIVE MONITORING Prq. Mgr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM 5cal : DGC
11010 R:wrn Ridge Ruad • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Ph, (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone] IREDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM I' = Sd
www.SandEC.cnm 5heet Title: Sheet No.:
-in REACH I - MONITORING PLAN VIEW -A 2 OF 16
BUFFER
VEGETATI
BANK
VEGETAT
'
PERMANE
POINT
CR055 -°
5'
LOCATI01'
BENTH IC
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT
PERMANENT ACCE55
EASEMENT
NORTH
SCALE 1 " = 50'
50 25 O 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
DRAWINGS PRINTED
UPPER LIMITS AT H A L S C A L E
OF RESTORATION
LEGEND FOR
A515UILT FEATURES
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
g LOG J -HOOK (L)H)
/1�1 ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CR055 ROCK VANE
(CKV)
CREATED /RESTORED
WETLANDS
1.
EX15TING STREAMS
:ON5ERVATION
)UNDARY
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION 93b5.01 1
- YEAR FIVE MONITORING Prq. Mgr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM 5cal : DGC
11010 R:wrn Ridge Ruad • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Ph, (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone] IREDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM I' = Sd
www.SandEC.cnm 5heet Title: Sheet No.:
-in REACH I - MONITORING PLAN VIEW -A 2 OF 16

N
O
O
N
0
rn
's
0
3
D
K
N
END UPPER
LONG PROFILE
EXISTING TREELINE
X5
'UFf�E I
1
O
PERMANENT LOW -WATER
CRO55ING ti
rn .,
PEBBLE COUNT
LOCATION
IZA
O DWI NGS PRINTED
z AT HALF- SCALE
O-- _ RESTORED
_._ CHANNEL ALIGNMENT
z
NORTH
SCALE 1 " = 50'
rn �,
50 25 0 50 \
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
1
N OTE5:
I . 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR STREAMS, LIDAR CONTOUR5,
AND NCDOT ROAD5 TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATION5, AND DIMEN51ON5 ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATION5 ARE APPROXIMATE AND BA5ED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF I OO' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
53
BANKFULL GAUGE
LOCATION
LEGEND FOR
A5BU I LT FEATURES
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
b LOG J -HOOK (UH)
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CROSS ROCK VANE
(CRV)
CREATED /RESTORED
WETLANDS
EXISTING STREAMS
LEGEND FOR
MONITORING FEATURE
I Z PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
N
31
0
.v,<O4t P %led: Predect No.:
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION 9385.D I I
YEAR FIVE MONITORING Prod. .QGQ
Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Ghent: NC EC05,5TEM dle:
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Caroline 27614 • Phonc: [phone] • Faa: (9W- *467)467 IREDELL CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
www. SandEC.com 5heet Title: 3hect No.:
REACH I - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - 5 3 OF I G
BUFFER
VEGETATION PLOT
BANK
VEGETATION PLOT
'
PERMANENT PHOTO
POINT
CROSS - SECTION
X51
LOCATION
I Z PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
N
31
0
.v,<O4t P %led: Predect No.:
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION 9385.D I I
YEAR FIVE MONITORING Prod. .QGQ
Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Ghent: NC EC05,5TEM dle:
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Caroline 27614 • Phonc: [phone] • Faa: (9W- *467)467 IREDELL CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
www. SandEC.com 5heet Title: 3hect No.:
REACH I - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - 5 3 OF I G

i
N
O
O
U1
0
rr
5
0
3
c�
3
;v
n
0
rn
N
(C
(0
Q
rn
D
C>
Z
O
z
O
z
z
C
rn
i, n—...e,PFefn i . r— F.— eln,n M PAPV . Y— , A-
31
BEGIN LOWER
LONG PROFILE
X5 5 O
O
4
2
56
NORTH
SCALE I " = 50'
50 25 O 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
NOTE5:
I . 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING 5URVEY
PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR STREAMS, LIDAR CONTOUR5,
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYER5)
2. ALL LOCATION5, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BA5ED ON AN A55UMFD
ELEVATION OF 100' ADJU5TED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EA5EMENT BOUNDARY
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT 1
EX15TING TREELINE
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RESTORATION y:ooD.0 1 1
YEAR FIVE MONITORING rod. Mgr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Locaton: Client: NC EC05Y5TEV caleo DGC
11010R .... Ridgn R-1 • Raleigh, North Caroline 27614 • Pho— (919) 8465900 • F.: (919) y46 -9467 IREDELL CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 1"— 50
www.SandEC.— 5heet Title: 5hect No.:
REACH I - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - C 4 OF I G

\\5a 2\jobs7- 90385. D7 -D I WEAR 5 - D I 1 \Drawmg5\RFACH I- Gay Farm Mont.ard FAFV - Y� 5.dwg
N
O
3
0
3
a
v
n
0
3
N
D
_D
N
co
a
rn
n
I
O
Z
O
z
G>
z
C
rn
NOTE5:
I . 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOURS,
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYER5)
2. ALL LOCATION5, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
LEGEND FOR
ASBUILT FEATURES
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
LOG J -HOOK (LJH)
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CROSS ROCK VANE
(CRV)
CREATED /RESTORED
WETLAND5
EX15TING 5TREAM5
Q4
NORTH
SCALE 1 " = 50'
50 25 O 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
LEGEND FOR
MONITORING FEATURED
PERMANENT PHOTO
POINT
CR055- 5ECTION
LOCATION
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT
DRAWI NG5 PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
DOWNSTREAM LIMIT
OF RE5TORATION
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Ra%en Ridge Ruud • Raleigh. North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SundEC.cum
GRAY FARM STREAM RE5TORATION y:snS.0 I I
YEAR FIVE MONITORING rod. Mgr.: awn
Location, lient: NC ECO5Y5TEM tale:
IREDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 1" 50
Sheet Title: Theat No.:
REACH I - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - D 5 OF I G
BUFFER
VEGETATION PLOT
BANK
VEGETATION PLOT
PERMANENT PHOTO
POINT
CR055- 5ECTION
LOCATION
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT
DRAWI NG5 PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
DOWNSTREAM LIMIT
OF RE5TORATION
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Ra%en Ridge Ruud • Raleigh. North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SundEC.cum
GRAY FARM STREAM RE5TORATION y:snS.0 I I
YEAR FIVE MONITORING rod. Mgr.: awn
Location, lient: NC ECO5Y5TEM tale:
IREDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 1" 50
Sheet Title: Theat No.:
REACH I - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - D 5 OF I G

G
N
O
O
U)
0
rn
s
o'
3
sv
D
rn
lTJ
--u
O
rrn
rn
z
rn
p- �Mwi
MIN
NOTES:
517E DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING 5URVEY
PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOUR5,
AND NCDOT ROAD5 TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
2. ALL LOCATION5, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MAM' 2 FOOT CONTOUR5.
BURIED 5TRUCTURE5
EX15TING TREELINE
PAPV LEGEND
PERMANENT ACCE55
EASEMENT
UPPER LIMITS
Of RE5TORATION
5TRE55ED STRUCTURE
#I
7
NORTH
SCALE I " = 50'
50 25 0 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = Z
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
LEGEND FOR
AC--RI III T FFATI IPFC
DEBP15 PILE IN STREAM
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
:b LOG J -HOOK (LJH)
�J ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CR055 ROCK VANE
(CRV)
CREATED / RESTORED
WETLANDS
EXISTING STREAMS
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
Project: rroject No.:
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION 9385.D I I
YEAR FIVE MONITORING Prg1. Mqr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Client: NC ECOSYSTEM tale: D C
11010 Ravrn Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Caroline 27614 • Ph— (919) 8465900 • Fax: [phone]fii I heel T, le: NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM I " = Sd
wwa.SnndECsom Sheet Title: heft No.:
REACH I - PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - A G OF 16

N)
O
O
N
O
0
c�
sv
0
c
R
N
D
D
coo
a
rn
l J
,I r
I
0
O
END UPPER 7 O
LONG PROFILE
EXISTING TREELINE
--U
0 C D�
�
rn
rn
D
z
rn
cot
(1
r
PERMANENT LOW -WATER
CP0551NG
2
1%
N OTE5:
I . 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING 5URVEY
PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR STREAMS, LIDAR CONTOURS,
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE G15 LAYERS)
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF I00' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
PAPV LEGEND
❑ STREAM PROBLEM AREAS — STRESSED
❑ VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS — MODERATE
SEDIMENT FROM UPSTREAM,
HEAVY DEPOSITION
SEDIMENT FROM UPSTREAM,
VARIABLE DEPOSITION
5TRE55ED STRUCTURE
# 2 / BANK SCOUR # I
2
C
N
BANK 5COUR #2 — —�
31
1`,11
�1\
32
LEGEND FOR
\5BUILT FEATURE5
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
b LOG J -HOOK (LJH)
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CR055 ROCK VANE
(CRV)
CREATED /RESTORED
WETLAND5
Ej EXISTING 5TREAM5
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
5TKE55ED STRUCTURE #3
Hroject: rrodect No,
GRAY FARM STREAM RE5TORATION 9385.D I I
YEAR FIVE MONITORING Prod. Mgr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA Locat,on: Client: ca ° C
7 NC ECOSYSTEM I" = 5d
11010 Raven Ridge Ruud • Ralciph. North Carolina 27614 • Phone, 1919) 946 -5900 • Fax: (%W- N46N467 IREDELL CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
— SundEC,i o Sheet Title: 5hect No.:
REACH I - PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - 5 7 OF 16

c�
a
rn
D
n
s
I
70
O
rn
rn
f
z
rn
BEGIN LOWER
LONG PROFILE
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALE- SCALE
NOTES:
I . SITE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING 5URVEY
_ PERFORMED BY 5*12C. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOURS,
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYER5)
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATION5 ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
3�
r
3
O
X5 5
5TRE55ED 5TKUCrURE #4
BANK SCOUR #3 \
- 5TRE55ED 5TRUCTURE #5
BANK SCOUR #4
NORTH
SCALE I " = 50'
50 25 O 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
PERMANENT CONSERVATION -
4 EASEMENT BOUNDARY
BARE FLOODPLAIN # I _ UNDERCUT BANK
2 - ___ _ _ _ _ CHANNEL 5COUR
BUFFER 3
•�
Wl�l
EX15TING TREELINE
_ LEGEND FOR
- — ASBUILT FEATURES
- - - _ - _-_ RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
- -- - " " C LOG J- HOOK(LJhi)
- - - ROCK J -MOOK (RJhi)
- CR055 ROCK VANE
(CRV)
FAFV LEGEND
❑ STREAM PROBLEM AREA5- 5TRE55ED
❑ VEGETATION FROBLEM AREAS- MODERATE
CREATED /RESTORED
WETLAND5
ElEXISTING STREAMS
rode d: rrodecc rvo.:
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION 93b5.D I f
YEAR FIVE MONITORING Prod. Mgr.: Drawn:
• Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA D D
Location: Chent: NC ECOSYSTEM ca le:
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Caroline 27614 • Phnne: (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone] IREDELL CO.. NG ENFIANCEMEN7 PROGRAM I" ° Sd
www.$undEC.com 5heet Tdle: nhact No.:
REACH I - PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - C 8 OF I G

N9mZjobs7.90385.07.01 I \YEAR 5 -[)I IWrawinj5WEACH I- Gray Farm Mont.and FAPV - Ycar 5.dwg
C@J
N
o_
w
o'
3
c�
3
m
n
0
3
N
N
N
e
N
(0
2
a
rn
-0
70
O
rn
rn
z
rn
U
NOTES:
1. 517E DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING 5URVEY
PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCOENR STREAMS, LIDAR CONTOURS,
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATION5 ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF I OO' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
LEGEND FOR
A55UILT FEATURES
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
b LOG J -HOOK (L)H)
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CR055 ROCK VANE
(CRV)
CREATED /RESTORED
WETLAND5
ElEX15TING STREAMS —
i
NORTH
SCALE I " = 50'
JO 25 O 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
X5 7 LO
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
PERMANENT CON5ERVATION
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
to
,'3
DOWNSTREAM LIMIT
Of U5TORATION
END LOWER
LONG PROFILE-- ",
—_ \�
EXISTING TREELINE
PAPV LEGEND
❑ STREAM PROBLEM AREAS - STRESSED
❑ VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS - MODERATE
' GRAY FARM STREAM RE5TORATION rq. Mg05 n1 1
' YEAR FIVE MONITORING
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM tale:
11010 R— Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] IREDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM I" - 50
www.SondEC.com 5heet Title: meet No.:
REACH I - PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - D 9 OF I G

APPENDIX C.2 —
Monitoring and Problem Area Plan View, Reach 2

N
O
O
N
O
w
D DRAWI NG5 PRINTED
N AT HALF- SCALE -
MONITORING FEATURES COORDINATES - REACH 2
RESTORED EXISTING
NORTHING
EA5TING
CROSS SECTION 1
1390081.29
746853.93
RIFFLE I
1390079.60
746799.51
POOL I
1390109.67
746817.05
CROSS SECTION 2
1389209.5G
7462 15.22
RIFFLE 2
1389254.G9
74G 167.9 1
POOL 2
1389238.99
74G 155.98
BUFFER I
13599G 1.8G
74r.771.34
BUFFER 2
1389300,47
74G281.07
BANK 1
1389733.94
746553.76
BANK 2
1 1359408.G I
I 746305.49
n
RESTORED EXISTING
-tiffs.
STREAM CHANNEL CONTOURS
9+
EXISTING EXISTING
-
� - - -'�
oto
NCDENR STREAMS DOT ROADS
00
BEGIN UPPER
LONG PROFILE
+00
--
4 WOO
END UPPER
5+
J
LONG PROFILE _
- -
+
O
O
Z END LOWER
(� LONG PROFILE
- PERMANENT ACCESS
EASEMENT,
O '
C'
BEGIN LOWER
LONG PROFILE
� y
:�'-/
i�
rn
V'
rn
rn
w
ti
3
w
Z
BENTHIC SAMPLING
G POINT
AN
i
+00
bmK
+ EXIST ING TREELINE
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT ;
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT S FENCELINE
PEBBLE COUNT
LOCATION .
\_ KEY SHEET
INDEX
i
NORTH
SCALE I " = 100'
100 50 O 100
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION :).0 Prod. Mgr0.: I I :
YEAR FIVE MONITORING DG DGC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM ale:
- -- - - 11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]REDELL CO., NG I ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM I " = 100'
w .SandEC.com 5heet Title: heel No.:
51TE LAYOUT 4 KEY5HEET 100F I G
-tiffs.
9+
oto
:�'-/
i�
rn
V'
rn
rn
w
ti
3
w
Z
BENTHIC SAMPLING
G POINT
AN
i
+00
bmK
+ EXIST ING TREELINE
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT ;
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT S FENCELINE
PEBBLE COUNT
LOCATION .
\_ KEY SHEET
INDEX
i
NORTH
SCALE I " = 100'
100 50 O 100
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION :).0 Prod. Mgr0.: I I :
YEAR FIVE MONITORING DG DGC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM ale:
- -- - - 11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]REDELL CO., NG I ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM I " = 100'
w .SandEC.com 5heet Title: heel No.:
51TE LAYOUT 4 KEY5HEET 100F I G

O
N
0
0
0
s
0
3
ct,
v
C)
0
N
9
NOTES:
I . 517E DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOURS,
AND NCDOT ROAD5 TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATION5, AND DIMEN51ON5 ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BA5ED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
D LEGEND FOR
ASIBUILT FEATURE5
rn
N LEGEND FOR
MONITORING FEATURES
0
_z
0
z
rn
BUFFER I.
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
b LOG J -HOOK (IJH)
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CROSS ROCK VANE
(CRV)
CREATED /RESTORED
WETLANDS
ElEXISTING STREAMS
N
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
EA I •o
i�
5-+ . 0.
+0
7 +O
PERMANENT CON5ERVATION
EASEMENT 4 FENCELINE
NORTH
SCALE I " = 30'
30 15 O 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
UPSTREAM LIMIT
OF RE5TORATION
+00
+00
EXISTING TREELINE
BEGIN UPPER
LONG PROFILE
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION
YEAR FIVE MONITORING
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Locaton: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM
11010 Ra%en Ridge Rudd • Releigh. North Carolina 27614 • Phooe: (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone] IREDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
_.SandEC.c"m 5heet Trtle:
REACH 2 - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - E
B
1 " -3a
:et No.:
II OFIG
BUFFER
VEGETATION PLOT
BANK
VEGETATION PLOT
PERMANENT PHOTO
POINT
CR055- 5ECTION
S
LOCATION
N
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
EA I •o
i�
5-+ . 0.
+0
7 +O
PERMANENT CON5ERVATION
EASEMENT 4 FENCELINE
NORTH
SCALE I " = 30'
30 15 O 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
UPSTREAM LIMIT
OF RE5TORATION
+00
+00
EXISTING TREELINE
BEGIN UPPER
LONG PROFILE
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION
YEAR FIVE MONITORING
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Locaton: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM
11010 Ra%en Ridge Rudd • Releigh. North Carolina 27614 • Phooe: (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone] IREDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
_.SandEC.c"m 5heet Trtle:
REACH 2 - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - E
B
1 " -3a
:et No.:
II OFIG

N)
0
0
N
0
rn
3
s
o'
3
rn
N OTE5:
I . 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING 5URVEY
PERFORMED BY 5*EC. (NCDENR STREAMS, LIDAR CONTOURS,
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE G15 LAYERS)
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATION5, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
D
D
LEGEND FOR
A5BUILT FEATURES
Z RESTORED
a STREAM CHANNEL
g LOG J -HOOK (LJH)
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CROSS ROCK VANE
(C RV)
CREATED/RESTORED
WETLANDS
rn
ElEXISTING STREAMS
N LEGEND FOR
I MONITORING FEATURES
K
0
z
0
70
z
G�
r
D
z
rn
j
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
Y4,- 4
NORTH
SCALE I " = 30'
30 15 0 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
END UPPER
LONG PROFILE i
110AM
BAN K�I
+
i
I +
13 +01
15+0
PERMANENT CON5ERVATION
If k FENCELINE
I I +
EX15TING TREELINE
BEGIN LOWER
LONG PROFILE
C4
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION 9355.D I 1
Prod. Mg
YEAR FIVE MONITORING r.: Dra DGC wn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Client: NC ECOSYSTEM cale:
11010 Ra%= Ridgc Road • ROcigh, North Carolina 27614 - Ph— (919) 8465900 • Fw (919) 846 -W7 I�DELL CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 1" = 30
www.SandEC.com 5heet Title: Sheet No.:
REACH 2- MONITORING PLAN VIEW - F 12 OF I G
BUFFER
VEGETATION PLOT
BANK
VEGETATION PLOT
'
PERMANENT PHOTO
POINT
CROSS - SECTION
51
LOCATION
z
G�
r
D
z
rn
j
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
Y4,- 4
NORTH
SCALE I " = 30'
30 15 0 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
END UPPER
LONG PROFILE i
110AM
BAN K�I
+
i
I +
13 +01
15+0
PERMANENT CON5ERVATION
If k FENCELINE
I I +
EX15TING TREELINE
BEGIN LOWER
LONG PROFILE
C4
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION 9355.D I 1
Prod. Mg
YEAR FIVE MONITORING r.: Dra DGC wn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Client: NC ECOSYSTEM cale:
11010 Ra%= Ridgc Road • ROcigh, North Carolina 27614 - Ph— (919) 8465900 • Fw (919) 846 -W7 I�DELL CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 1" = 30
www.SandEC.com 5heet Title: Sheet No.:
REACH 2- MONITORING PLAN VIEW - F 12 OF I G

N
O
O
N
0
'<
Cb0
3
3
z
n
0
c
D
D
a
rn
C�
Z
IN
NOTES:
I . 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOURS,
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF I OO' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOUR5.
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
LEGEND FOR LEGEND FOR
A515UILT FEATURES MONITORING FEATURE5
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
b LOG J -HOOK (LJH)
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CROSS ROCK VANE
(CRV)
CREATED /RESTORED
WETLANDS,
EX'STING STREAMS
k � we 10' 1
/ L7
•
0
NORTH
SCALE I " = 30'
30 15 0 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT
-�R.2
_ / O I
9 +0
O PEBBLE COUNT
-Z 2 0+0 0 LOCATION
PERMANENT ACCE55
EA5EMENT
EXISTING CULVERT
j TO REMAIN
OO
' BENTHIC SAMPLING /
POINT
c
i
EXISTING TREELINE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT 4 FENCELINE
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Ra%en Ridge Road • Ralcigh. Nonh Carolina 27614 - Phonc: (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone]
_.SandEC.com
GRAY FARM STREAM RE5TORATION
YEAR FIVE MONITORING
ccation: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM
REDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
iheet Title:
REACH 2 - MONITORING PLAN VIEW -G
Oil
1• -30
:et No.:
13 OF I G
BUFFER _
VEGETATION PLOT
BANK
VEGETATION PLOT
' PERMANENT PHOTO
POINT
71J
CR055- 5ECTION
ZX5
LOCATION
- END LOWER
_
.----LONG PROFILE
k � we 10' 1
/ L7
•
0
NORTH
SCALE I " = 30'
30 15 0 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT
-�R.2
_ / O I
9 +0
O PEBBLE COUNT
-Z 2 0+0 0 LOCATION
PERMANENT ACCE55
EA5EMENT
EXISTING CULVERT
j TO REMAIN
OO
' BENTHIC SAMPLING /
POINT
c
i
EXISTING TREELINE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT 4 FENCELINE
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Ra%en Ridge Road • Ralcigh. Nonh Carolina 27614 - Phonc: (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone]
_.SandEC.com
GRAY FARM STREAM RE5TORATION
YEAR FIVE MONITORING
ccation: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM
REDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
iheet Title:
REACH 2 - MONITORING PLAN VIEW -G
Oil
1• -30
:et No.:
13 OF I G
71J
--
v
DOWNSTREAM
LIMIT OF RESTORATION/
z
rn
k � we 10' 1
/ L7
•
0
NORTH
SCALE I " = 30'
30 15 0 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT
-�R.2
_ / O I
9 +0
O PEBBLE COUNT
-Z 2 0+0 0 LOCATION
PERMANENT ACCE55
EA5EMENT
EXISTING CULVERT
j TO REMAIN
OO
' BENTHIC SAMPLING /
POINT
c
i
EXISTING TREELINE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT 4 FENCELINE
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Ra%en Ridge Road • Ralcigh. Nonh Carolina 27614 - Phonc: (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone]
_.SandEC.com
GRAY FARM STREAM RE5TORATION
YEAR FIVE MONITORING
ccation: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM
REDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
iheet Title:
REACH 2 - MONITORING PLAN VIEW -G
Oil
1• -30
:et No.:
13 OF I G

\\5ea2\.pb57- 90385. D7 -D I I \YEAR 5 - DI I\ Drawmys \REACN2- Gayra— MortandPAPV YevrJ.d..j
CU
N
O
N OTE5:
0
rn
0
3
fD
3
9
D
N
a
51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOUR5,
AND NCDOT ROAD5 TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYER5)
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF I00' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
rn
C�
z
N
-0
713
O
Fn
INA
r-
z
rn
rn
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
LEGEND FOR PAPV LEGEND
ASBUILT FEATURES ❑ STREAM PROBLEM AREA5- 5TRE55ED
STREAM CHANNEL ❑
VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS- MODERATE 1',,]
NORTH
SCALE I " = 30'
30 15 O 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
UPSTREAM LIMIT
DRATION
ZUCTURE # I
#I
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RESTORATION
' YEAR FIVE MONITORING
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Ghent: NC ECOSYSTEM
11010 Recen Ridge Rued • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Ph— (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone] IREDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
— .SandEC.ann 5heet Title:
MR3910i
REACH 2- PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - E 1 14 OF I G

�1
N
O
p NOTE5:
0
1 . 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED 5Y LIMITED ENGINEERING 5URVEY
4w PERFORMED BY 5REC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5. LIDAR CONTOUR5,
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE G15 LAYER5)
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
ct APPROXIMATE.
K
n 3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
o ELEVATION OF I00' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
9
7
D
D
N
rn
a
rn
n
s
INVE
70
O
rn
rn
-o
z
C
rn
LEGEND FOR
A55UILT FEATURES
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
°b LOG J -HOOK (IJH)
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT H ALE- SCALE
PAPV LEGEND
❑ STREAM PROBLEM AREAS- STRESSED
❑ VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS- MODERATE
0
NORTH
SCALE I " = 30'
30 15 0 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION Mgrs =Dra wn:
YEAR FIVE MONITORING QGC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Locatan: Chent: NC E005Y5TEM scale,
11010 Ra, -m Ridge Road • R kigh. North Cuolino 27614 • Ph,— (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone] % IREDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 1 • = 30
www.SandEC - 5heet Title: Sheet No.:
REACH 2- PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - F 15 OF I G

L)
N
O
O
<s
C)
_
4.
rn
s
0
3
rn
3
;v
C)
0
c
NOTES:
I . 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
PERFORMED BY 5 *EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOUR5,
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATION5, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BA5ED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF I00' ADJU5TED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOUR5.
D LEGEND FOR PAPV LEGEND
N ASBU f LT FEATURES ❑ STREAM PROBLEM AKEA5- 5TRE55ED
RESTORED ❑ -
a
STREAM CHANNEL VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS - MODERATE
°D LOG J- HOOK (LJH) - - - --
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH) - - -- - -- =
CROSS ROCK VANE - - - -
END LOWER
rn CREATED /RF5TORED --,_LONG PROFILE
WETLANDS /
EXISTING STREAMS
Vr
21 C)0
70 -- _ 2 0.
rn EXISTING TREELINE
DOWNSTREAM PERMANENT CON5ERVATION
LIMIT Of RE5TORATION EASEMENT 3 FENCELINE
z
/ IP5
C
NORTH
SCALE 1 " = 30'
30 15 O 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
i
9+
+OQ-
PERMANENT ACCE55
EASEMENT
+00
rtwsoHt r %(ect: rrojecc NO.:
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION Mjr.: 0 1 1
� YEAR FIVE MONITORING DG Pro). Mgr.: Drawn: p�
Soil &Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Clent: NC ECOSYSTEM Scale:
11010 Ra%m Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phon (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone] IREDELL CO., NG ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM I" = 30
www.SwalEC. . Sheet Title: 5beet No.:
REACH 2- PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - G I G OF I G