20052147 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20091216

os��)qv
Gray Farm Stream Restoration
Monitoring Report — Year Four
Contract # D05016 -2
EEP Project # 92219
Iredell County, North Carolina
December 2009
Cataloging Unit — Catawba Basin 03050101
Prepared For
E 'COWtem
S 7 ment ,�{�
PROGRAM I
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652 DEC 1 6 2QO9
NC ENHANCEMENT PR�,,l

Table of Contents
I Executive Summary / Protect Abstract
II Protect Background
1 Protect Goals and Objectives
2 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
3 Location and Setting
4 Project History and Background
5 Monitoring Plan View
III Project Condition and Monitoring Results
A Vegetation Assessment
1 Problem Areas Plan View (Vegetation)
2 Vegetative Problem Areas Table Summary
3 Vegetative Problem Areas Plan View
B Stream Assessment
1 Problem Areas Plan View (Stream)
2 Problem Areas Table Summary
3 Numbered Issues Photo Section
4 Fixed Photo Station Photos
5 Stability Assessment
6 Quantitative Measures Summary Tables
7 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Assessment
IV Methodology Section
Tables
1
2
2
4
5
6
S
9
9
12
13
13
13
14
14
15
15
15
16
21
22
Exhibit Table I
Project Restoration Components
6
Exhibit Table II
Project Activity and Reporting History
6
Exhibit Table III
Project Contact Table
7
Exhibit Table IV
Project Background Table
7
Exhibit Table V
Verification of Bankfull Events
13
Exhibit Table VII
Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
15
Exhibit Table VIII
Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary
17
Exhibit Table IX
Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
19
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring
I S &FC Job # 9385
D 10
December 2009
Restoration Systems
Contract # D05016 2

Figure 1 - Protect Vicinity Map
Appendix A - Vegetation Raw Data
1 Vegetation Survey Data Tables (V -1 — V -5)
2 Vegetation Problem Area Table (Al)
3 Vegetation Problem Area Photos
4 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix B - Geomorphologic Raw Data
1 Bankfull Events
2 Stream Problem Area Table (131)
3 Representative Stream Problem Area Photos
4 Stream Photo - Station Photos
5 Exhibit Table B2 - Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
6 Annual Overlays of Cross Section Plots
7 Annual Overlays of Longitudinal Plots
8 Annual Overlays of Pebble Count Frequency Distribution Plots
Appendix C - Benthic Macromvertebrate Assessment Data
Appendix D - Integrated Problem Area Plan View
1 Monitoring and Problem Area Plan View, Reach 1
2 Monitoring and Problem Area Plan View, Reach 2
Gray Fann Stream Restoration Site Soil & Enviromnental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring a S &hC Job # 9385 D 10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

I Executive Summary / Project Abstract
The Gray Farm Stream Restoration project consists of two separate stream reaches
(Reach 1 and Reach 2) along unnamed tributaries of Buffalo Shoals Creek, a tributary of
the Catawba River (Cataloging Unit 03050101) The site is located approximately 10
miles due west of the City of Statesville in western Iredell County, NC This restoration
was contracted by Restoration Systems LLC (Contract # D05016 -2) as a full - delivery
project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) This report
summarizes the monitoring efforts for Year 4 (2009) of the Gray Farm Stream
Restoration Project
Restoration construction of Reach 2 began in early March 2006 and was completed in
mid -Apnl 2006 Restoration construction of Reach 1 began in mid- Apn12006 and was
completed in early July 2006 Demobilization and minor contractor punch list items were
completed shortly thereafter Installation of monitoring devices and As -built surveys for
both reaches were performed as construction progressed
Year 4 monitoring of the vegetated buffer was performed by Soil & Environmental
Consultants, PA (S &EC) in the fall of 2009 Stem counts were performed within the
established vegetation monitoring plots, resulting in an average live stem density of
approximately 418 stems per acre
Physical monitoring of the restored channels for Year 4 was also performed by S &EC
and consisted of the collection of cross - section and representative longitudinal profile
data, in conjunction with visual stability assessment of the stream This work was
performed in the fall of 2009 Collected data was then compared with As- built, Year 1,
Year 2, and Year 3 Monitoring data
Based on Year 4 Monitoring results, the overall site has met the prescribed success
criteria Detailed analysis of the success of localized areas is discussed within
Year 5 Monitoring will commence in January of 2010
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Momtonng I S &EC Job # 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

II Protect Background
The Gray Farm Stream Restoration project is located in the Catawba River Basin within
Hydrologic Cataloging Unit 03050101 The site consists of two separate reaches (Reach
1 and Reach 2) along unnamed tributaries of Buffalo Shoals Creek, a tributary of the
Catawba River The site is located approximately 10 miles due west of the City of
Statesville in western Iredell County, NC
The restoration project objective was to restore the impaired streams to appropriately
sized stream channels that were stable and self - maintaining, and would not aggrade or
degrade over time Restoration was accomplished with Rosgen -based natural channel
design procedures and techniques Reach 1 restoration was a combination of a Priority I
(reconnection of the channel with its historic floodplam) restoration and a Priority II
(construction of a new floodplam at a lower elevation) restoration Reach 2 was a
Priority I restoration Restoring an appropriate sinuosity lengthened both channels,
thereby lowering their bankfull slopes
Restoration construction of Reach 2 began in early March 2006 and was completed in
mid- Apri12006 Restoration construction of Reach 1 began in mid -April 2006 and was
completed in early July 2006 The buffers of both reaches of the restored stream channel
were planted with native tree and shrub species and seeded with a native grass seed mix
During construction, site topography and grading allowed for the creation of vernal pools,
oxbows, or pocket wetlands within the riparian zone along the restored stream reaches
Planting operations were performed in April 2006 Supplemental planting was performed
in December of 2006
Demobilization and minor contractor punch list items were completed shortly after the
U completion of construction Installation of monitoring devices and As -built surveys for
�J both reaches were performed as construction progressed
(� 1 Project Goals and Objectives
The goals of the Gray Farm Stream Restoration project are
1) Improve local water quality within the restored channel reaches as well as
the downstream watercourses through,
CJ a The reduction of current channel and off site sediment loads by
restoring appropriately sized channels with stable beds and
banks
b The reduction of nutrient loads (both soil enhancement practices
and cattle) from adjacent agricultural fields with a restored
riparian buffer
c The reduction of water temperatures provided by shading of the
C channel from canopy species along with the resultant increase in
oxygen content
Gray Farttt Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 2 S &EC lob # 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

(� 1
l 2) Improve local aquatic and terrestrial habitat and diversity within the
Crestored channels and their vicinity through,
a The formation of varying bed form within the channels to
Cprovide for fish, amphibian, and benthic species
b The restoration of a suitable riparian buffer corridor which will
provide both vertical and horizontal structure and connectivity
Cwith adjacent upland areas
c The restoration of understory and canopy species which will
provide forage, cover, and nesting for a variety of mammals,
reptiles, and birds
3) Improve local watershed conditions through the restoration of two low
order streams (one first order, one second order) and the placement of
permanent conservation easements
Through the restoration process the following objectives were accomplished
1) Restore approximately 7,610 linear feet of appropriately sized stream
channel that is stable and self - maintaining, and will not aggrade or
degrade over time Restoration was accomplished with Rosgen -based
natural channel design procedures and techniques
2) Develop restored channels with the appropriate morphological
F characteristics (cross - sectional dimension, pattern, and longitudinal
profile) utilizing collected reference reach data as a guide Allow for no
net loss of overall channel length in the process
C3) Create and /or improve bed form diversity (riffles, runs, pools, and glides)
and improve aquatic and benthic macromvertebrate habitat
Ll 4) Construct a floodplain (or local bankfull bench) that is accessible at the
proposed bankfull channel elevation
5) Ensure channel and stream bank stabilization by integrating in- stream
structures and native bank vegetation
6) Establish a native forested and herbaceous riverme buffer plant
community within a minimum width of 50 feet from the edge of the
restored channel This new community will be established in conjunction
with the eradication of any existing exotic and/or undesirable plant
species
7) Improve water quality within the subject channels and the downstream
receiving waters
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil R Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 3 SREC lob # 9385 D 10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

8) Supplement the education and conservation efforts for natural resources in
Iredell County as indicated in program goals for the local Soil & Water
Conservation District and the NC Cooperative Extension Service
2 Protect Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
The restoration project was intended to restore the impaired streams to
appropriately sized stream channels that are stable and self - maintaining, and will
not aggrade or degrade over time Restoration was accomplished with Rosgen-
based natural channel design procedures and techniques Restoring an
appropriate sinuosity lengthened both channels, thereby lowering their bankfull
slope A total of 8,004 linear feet of stream channel was restored onsrte (8,004
SMU's)
Reach 1
Reach 1 restoration was a combination of a Priority I restoration (reconnection of
the channel with its historic floodplam) and a Priority II restoration (construction
of a new floodplam at a lower elevation) Reach 1 consists of 5,813 linear feet
(5,813 SMU's) of restored Type C4 channel Approximately 800 linear feet of
this length was previously inundated by an existing farm pond that was removed
during the channel restoration The pre - restoration length of this channel segment
was approximately 4,340 linear feet
One additional piped farm road crossing previously existed approximately 700
feet downstream of an existing dam and farm pond near the upper end of Reach 1
This piped crossing was removed and replaced with an at -grade in- stream
crossing Immediately downstream of the dam for a distance of approximately
1,000 feet, severe bank erosion, channel incision, and an over - widening of the
stream channel had occurred This degradation appeared in large part due to
previous uncontrolled releases from the existing dam spillway
The lower two thirds of the reach were characterized by overly steep and undercut
banks Significant localized erosion had occurred along this lower portion Trees
F11
of large diameter lined the banks, many of which were undercut, suspended, or
had collapsed into the stream The channel had down cut and over widened in
many locations along the reach allowing no access to its floodplam The last 200
L feet (approximately) of the pre - existing channel was not down cut due to a change
in surrounding topography
Reach 2
Reach 2 was a Priority I restoration Reach 2 consists of 2,191 linear feet (2,191
SW's) of restored Type B4 channel A small impoundment previously existed
near the lower end of the reach, however, it was drained and removed a number of
years prior to the channel restoration A piped farm road crossing existed at
( roughly the same location (the old dam embankment) This was (and remains) the
Gray Fann Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year Monitoring 4 S &EC Job # 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

only existing crossing along the reach The pre - restoration length of this channel
segment was approximately 1,600 linear feet
L Throughout Reach 2, severe bank erosion, channel incision, and an over - widening
of the stream channel had occurred This impairment appeared in large part due
to previous uncontrolled grazing operations The reach was characterized by
overly steep, sloughing, and undercut banks
Significant localized erosion had occurred along the entire reach Trees of large
diameter lined the banks, many of which were undercut, suspended, or collapsed
into the stream The channel had down cut and over widened in many places
along the reach allowing no access to its floodplam
3 Location and Setting
The Gray Farm Stream Restoration project is located in the Catawba River Basin,
Cataloguing Unit 03050101 The site consists of two separate reaches (Reach 1 and
Reach 2) along unnamed tributaries of Buffalo Shoals Creek, a tributary of the
l j Catawba River The site is located approximately 10 miles due west of the City of
l Statesville in western Iredell County, NC
C Reach 1 is located immediately north of Bolick Road (SR 1532) Reach 2 is located
immediately west of the intersection of New Sterling Road (SR 1525) and Gray
House Road The watershed areas for Reaches 1 and 2 are estimated at
�I approximately 0 91 square miles (582 acres) and 0 085 square miles (54 acres)
respectively See attached Figure 1
r—,
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 5 S &EC Job # 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

4 Protect History and Background
The following tables summarize the project history and background
Exhibit Table I Proiect Restoration Components
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site /EEP Proiect # 92219
Project
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
s
Nov 05
c
a
Jul 06
Reach 2
Segment or
= Q
a
Apr 06
L
en a
eio a
Stationing
Comment
Reach ID
j
F"
Q
D ot
a
Dec 06
Supplemental Planting
Dec 06
Year 2 Monitoring
Nov 07
Dec 07
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov 08
Dec 08
Year 4 Monitoring
Nov 09
Reach I
3 000
R
PI
4 119
1 1
4 119
0 +00 to 41 +19
Reach 1
1 340
R
P1I
1 1 694
1 1
1 694
1 41 +19 to 58 +13
Reach 11
1 600
R
PI
1 2 191
1 1
2 191
0 +00 to 21 +91
Mitigation Unit Summations
Stream (if)
Riparian
Nonnpanan
Total Wetland
Buffer (Ac)
Comment
Wetland (Ac)
Wetland (Ac)
(Ac)
8 004
N/A
N/A
N/A
1838
Exhibit Table II Protect Activity and Reporting History
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site /EEP Protect # 92219
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
Aug 05
Nov 05
Construction
Reach 1
Jul 06
Reach 2
Apr 06
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
Apr 06
Apr 06
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments 1 & 2
Apr 06
Apr 06
Plantings for reach/segments 1& 2
Apr 06
Apr 06
Mitigation Plan/ As built Year 0 Monitorin baseline
May 06
Jun 06
Year 1 Monitoring
Dec 06
Dec 06
Supplemental Planting
Dec 06
Year 2 Monitoring
Nov 07
Dec 07
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov 08
Dec 08
Year 4 Monitoring
Nov 09
Dec 09
Year 5 Monitoring
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 6 S &EC Job # 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

Exhibit Table III Protect Contact Table
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site/EEP Protect # 92219
Designer
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Primary Project Design POC
11010 Raven Ridge Rd
Reach 2 0 085 square miles 54 acres
Raleigh NC 27614
< 20%
Patrick K Smith P E 919 846 5900
Construction Contractor
North State Environmental
Construction Contractor POC
2889 Lowery St
Ecore ion
Winston Salem NC 27101
Rosgen Classification of As built
Darrell Westmoreland 336 725 2010
Planting Contractor
North State Environmental
Planting Contractor POC
2889 Lowery St
Reach 1 Cw CxB
Winston Salem NC 27101
Reference site ID
Darrell Westmoreland 336 725 2010
Seeding Contractor
North State Environmental
Seeding Contractor POC
2889 Lowery St
Reach 1 03 08 32 / 03 04 02
Winston Salem NC 27101
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference
Darrell Westmoreland 336 725 2010
Monitoring Performers
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
No
11010 Raven Ridge Rd
No
Raleigh NC 2761
Stream Monitoring POC
David Gaine 919) 846 5900
Vegetation Monitoring POC
David Gainey 919 846 5900
Exhibit Table IV Protect Background Table
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site /EEP Project # 92219
Project County
Iredell
Drainage area
Reach 1 0 91 square miles 582 acres
Reach 2 0 085 square miles 54 acres
Drainage impervious cover estimate ( %)
< 20%
Stream Order
Reach 1 2nd order
Reach 2 1 st order
Ph sio ra hic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Northern Inner Piedmont
Rosgen Classification of As built
Reach 1 C4
Reach 2 B4
Cowardm Classification
N/A
Dominant soil types
Reach 1 Cw CxB
Reach 2 CsE2
Reference site ID
Reach 1 Tributary of Turkey Creek
Reach 2 Basin Creek
USGS HUC for Project and Reference
3050101
NCDWQ Sub basin for Project and Reference
Reach 1 03 08 32 / 03 04 02
Reach 2 03 08 32 / 03 07 01
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference
Reach 1 WS W CA/ C NSW
Reach 2 WS IV CA / C Tr ORW
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed?
No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d
listed segment?
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
N/A
% of project easement fenced
Reach 1 —No Fence Reach 2 100%
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 7 S &EC Job # 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

5 Monitoring Plan View
Six (6) tree and shrub buffer vegetation plots (four (4) on Reach 1 and two (2) on
Reach 2) and four (4) bank vegetation plots (two (2) on Reach 1 and two (2) on
Reach 2) were established All vegetation monrtonng occurs within these plots
throughout the monitoring penod for as long as they continue to be representative of
the community
For all buffer monitoring plots, Level 1 of the Carolina Vegetation Survey- Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (CVS -EEP) Protocol for Recording Vegetation was utilized
for vegetation sampling in Years 1 and 2 Beginning in Year 3, Level 2 of the CVS-
EEP protocol was utilized in order to record and report woody plant volunteers within
vegetation monitoring plots along with planted stems A corner of each vegetation
monitoring plot will be used as a permanent photo point for vegetation monitoring
photos Locations of these photo points are shown on the attached Monitoring Plan
View
Benthic macromvertebrate sampling was performed at a total of five (5) previously
established sampling stations Reach 1, Station 1 is located immediately upstream of
the restored Reach 1 Reach 1, Station 2 is located within the restored Reach 1 Reach
1, Station 3 is located immediately downstream of the restored Reach 1 Reach 2,
Station 1 is located within the restored Reach 2 Reach 2, station 2 is located
immediately downstream of the restored Reach 2 Locations of these benthic
macromvertebrate sampling points for Year 3 are shown in Appendix D 1 Benthic
macromvertebrate sampling was performed during Monitoring Years 1 through 3
A total of seven (7) nested riffle and pool cross - section pairs was established along
Reach 1, and two (2) nested riffle and pool cross - section pairs were established along
L Reach 2 Each cross - section also serves as a designated photo point that is
photographed annually
The locations of all monitoring devices are shown in Appendix D 1 (Momtonng Plan
View, Reaches 1 and 2)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
L Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
C
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
S &EC Job # 9385 D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

III Protect Condition and Monitoring Results
A Vegetation Assessment
The success of the adjacent riparian buffer will be based on the combined
survival of tree and shrub species for the five -year monitoring period
In order to be considered successful, survival of woody (tree and shrub)
species planted within the restored buffers will be at least 320 stems /acre
through year three, 288 stems /acre at year four, and 260 stems /acre at year
five The stem count will be based on an average of the stem counts of the
evaluated tree and shrub buffer vegetation plots
The success of the bank vegetation plots along the restored channels will be
based on the survival of live stake (or other) bank plantings for the five -year
monitoring period Survival of bank plantings will be based on a linear
average of approximately 50 percent of the planted stems within the
restoration reaches
The approximately 18 4 acre restoration area was planted with various native
hardwood tree and shrub species native to the area Reaches 1 and 2 were
planted in April 2006 Supplemental planting was performed in December of
2006
The following tree species were planted in the Riparian Buffer Area
• Alnus serrulata (Tag Alder)
• Betula nigra (River Birch)
• Carpinus carohniana (Ironwood)
• Fraxinus pennsylvanica (Green Ash)
• Ilex opaca (American Holly)
• Lindera bemoan (Spicebush)
• Liriodendron tulipifera (Tulip Poplar)
• Platanus occidentalis (Sycamore)
• Quercus michauxaa (Swamp Chestnut Oak)
• Quercus nigra (Water Oak)
• Quercus phellos (Willow Oak)
• Viburnum nudum (Possumhaw)
Stream banks were planted with live stakes in two offset rows The following
shrub species were planted as live stakes
• Cornus amomum (Silky Dogwood)
• Salix sericea (Silky Willow)
• Sambucus canadensis (Elderberry)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Fnvironmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 9 S &EC Job # 9385 D 10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

As previously described, a total of six (6) buffer vegetation monitoring plots
was established on -site in 2006 The success criteria for the site require a
minimum of 288 live stems per acre through the first four (4) years of
monitoring Year 4 vegetation monitoring shows 418 live stems per acre
Year 5 buffer vegetation monitoring data will be compared with previous
monitoring data to determine survival rates and stem densities for woody
vegetation planted within the riparian buffer Vegetation monitoring data for
buffer plots was collected using Level 2 of the CVS -EEP monitoring protocol
and is presented in Appendix A
NOTE Level 2 of the CVS -EEP monitoring protocol includes both planted
and natural (volunteer) woody stems For this reason volunteer
specimens are included in the total number of species as reflected in
Tables V -2 through V -4 Table V- 5 (Stem Count by Plot and Species) does
not include volunteer /natural woody stem data only planted stems
Four (4) bank vegetation plots were also established (two on each reach) to
monitor survival of live stake plantings along stream banks Live stake
survival is based on baseline data collected during Year 1 Monitoring in 2006
Future bank vegetation monitoring data will be compared with previous
monitoring data to determine survival rates for live stakes planted along
stream banks Live stake survival from Monitoring Year 1 to Monitoring
Year 4 for the site overall is approximately 85 9 %, an increase from the Year
3 live stake survival percentage This increase in live stake survival can be
attributed to the resprouting of Silky Dogwood in Reach 1 Bank Plot 2
Live stake counts by species and by plot are presented in the following tables
2006 REACH 1
Common Name
Species
REACH 1
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
BANK 2
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
12
17
29
39%
Silky Willow
Sahxseiicea
30
16
46
61%
TOTAL
42
33
75
1 100%
2007 REACH 1
Common Name
Species
REACH 1
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
1 BANK 2
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
4
9
13
27%
Silky Willow
Salix sencea
27
9
36
73%
TOTAL
31
18
49
100%
Live Stake Survival =
73 8%
545%
653%
2008 REACH 1
Common Name
Sp ecies
REACH 1
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
I BANK 2
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
10
9
19
36%
Silky Willow
Salu seiicea
30
4
34
64%
TOTAL
40
13
53
100%
Live Stake Survival =
952%
394%
707%
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Fnvironmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitonng 10 S &EC Job # 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

2009 REACH 1
Common Name
Species
REACH 1
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
BANK 2
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
10
9
19
32%
Silky Willow
Salix serrcea
30
10
40
68%
Elderberry
TOTAL
40
19
1 59
100%
Live Stake Survival =
95 2%
57 6%
1 787%
100%
2006 - REACH 2
Common Name
Species
REACH 2
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
1 BANK 2
Silky Willow
Salix serrcea
7
4
11
23%
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
9
25
34
72%
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensrs
0
2
2
4%
TOTAL
16
31
47
100%
2007 REACH 2
Common Name
Species
REACH 2
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
BANK 2
S11 Willow
Sahz serrcea
6
4
10
29%
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
5
20
25
71%
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensrs
0
0
0
0%
TOTAL
11
1 24
35
100%
Live Stake Survival =
68 8%
1 774%
745%
2008 REACH 2
Common Name
Species
REACH 2
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
I BANK 2
Silky Willow
Salix serrcea
7
4
11
24%
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
8
25
33
73%
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensrs
0
1
1
1 2%
TOTAL
15
30
45
100%
Live Stake Survival =
93 8%
968%
957%
2009 REACH 2
Common Name
Species
REACH 2
Species Total
% of Total
BANK 1
BANK 2
Silky Willow
Salix serrcea
7
4
11
24%
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
8
25
33
73%
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensrs
0
1
1
2%
TOTAL
15
30
45
100%
Live Stake Survival =
93 8%
968%
957%
Li The increase from Year 3 to Year 4 in number of Silky Dogwood counted
within Reach 1 Bank Plot 2 is most likely due to the less dense herbaceous
� vegetation in this area during Year 4, which allowed live stakes to grow or re-
J
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
U Year 4 Monitoring 1 I S &EC Job # 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

sprout and facilitated observation of these stems Most surviving live stakes
appear healthy and are growing vigorously
Herbaceous vegetation varies widely throughout the restoration site The
native herbaceous species have become densely established and are dominant
throughout the site Herbaceous species observed along stream banks and in
the buffer and wetlands onsite include
• Jewelweed — Impatiens capensls
• Soft Rush — Juncus effusus
• Cutgrass — Leersia oryzoides
• Monkeyflower — Mimulus ringens
• Sedges— Carex spp
• Switchgrass — Panicum virgatum
• Duck Potato — Sagittaria latafolia
• Goldenrod — Sohdago sp
• Dog - fennel — Eupatorium capillifolium
• Boneset — Eupatorium perfoliatum
1 Problem Areas Plan View (Vegetation)
During field inspections on October 27th -29th and November 5th, 2009, a total
of six (6) localized areas of bare bank and floodplam were observed on Reach
1 These areas appear to be due primarily to either surface flows or poor soil
conditions Continued revegetation of previously bare areas was observed
during Monitoring Year 4, especially within Reach 2 Vegetation Problem
Areas are shown on Sheets 6 through 9 (Reach 1) Photos are included in
Appendix A
During Monitoring Year 2, small amounts of the non - natives Johnsongrass
(Sorghum halepense) and tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum) were observed at
the edges of the buffer restoration areas that border the agricultural fields on
both reaches These populations have not become dominant, nor have they
Cexcluded native vegetation
C An area of Kudzu (Pueraria lobata) was noted at the site in early June 2007,
on the west side of Reach 1 between stations 16 +00 to 19 +00 Although the
majority of the Kudzu was along and in the edge of the woods immediately
outside the easement area, some had encroached into the easement area The
Ci area (approximately 0 5 acre) was treated with the herbicide Transline
(clopyralid) at a rate of one pint per acre in 2007 A small portion of this area
was again treated in 2008 During 2008, a small area (approximately 0 009
C, acre) of Kudzu was observed immediately east of station 13 +00, within the
easement area During 2009, two very small areas of kudzu (totaling
approximately 350 sq feet) was treated with Translme (clopyralid) in the
Ci upper part of Reach 1 These areas will be monitored and treated if Kudzu
continues to encroach into the easement area
C, Gray Fame Stream Restoration Site Soil & Fnvironmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 12 S &EC Job # 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
Ll'

While we will continue to monitor these areas, based on vegetative success
criteria the overall site currently exhibits strong vegetative success
[ 2 Vegetative Problem Areas Table Summary
Vegetative problem areas observed are described in Table Al in Appendix A
C3 Vegetative Problem Areas Plan View
C' Vegetative problem areas are shown on Sheets 6 through 9 for Reach 1
(Problem Area Plan View) No vegetative problem areas were noted on Reach
2
B Stream Assessment
A review of available on -line U S Geological Survey (USGS) gauge sites was
performed to determine if a suitable surrogate gauges was present in the area
No nearby gauge was identified The closest USGS gauge to the site was on
the Lower Little River (near Healmg Springs, NC, Gauge Identification
Number 02142000) which is approximately 15 miles from the project site
Based on this large distance, significant disparity in watershed sizes, and
CI topographic variation, it is unlikely that a conclusive determination regarding
the number of bankfull events experienced on the restoration site could be
made
Based upon recommendations provided by NCEEP a crest gauge was installed
on site (at Cross - section 3 on Reach 1) The gauge was installed in June of
2008 and checked during subsequent site visits for evidence of bankfull
events In addition, site observations during visits performed this monitoring
year including wrack lines, staining of vegetation, displaced/flattened
vegetation, and observable sediment deposition indicate that multiple
overbank events have occurred Photographs documenting overbank
conditions during Monitoring Year 4 are attached in Appendix B The dates of
site visits where evidence of bankfull events were observed are listed in the
table below
Exhibit Table V Verification of Bankfull Events
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project # 92219
Date of Data
Date of
Method
Photo #
Collection
Occurrence
Onsite observations (wrack lines staining
of vegetation displaced/flattened
10/27/2009
Unknown
vegetation and observable sediment
1
deposition and select crest gauge readings)
11/11/2009
11/11/2009
Observation of bankfull event — Reach 1
2
11/11/2009
11/11/2009
Observation of bankfull event — Reach 2
3
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 13 S &EC Job # 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

I Problem Areas Plan View (Stream)
An assessment of channel stability was performed on October 27th, 2009
[ Areas of concern that were observed and documented included some minor
localized bank scour, burled structures, stressed structures, and a single beaver
dam Detail of scour is evident in cross - section 6 (pool) These problem areas
C� are shown on Sheets 6 through 9 for Reach 1 and Sheets 14 through 16 for
Reach 2 (Problem Area Plan View) One stressed log J -hook structure at
station 41 +50 on Reach 1 will need to be repaired and stabilized to fill a scour
Carea behind the structure With the exception of this structure, the minimal
extent of scour and erosion around structures does not warrant repair at this
time
l The beaver dam noted on October 27, 2009 at station 56 +40 within Reach 1
had raised the water level in the stream to approximately station 53 +00, and
structures between these two stations were entirely submerged In order to
preserve the restored physical parameters of Reach 1, beavers and their dams
will need to be removed from this area
CThe upper portion of Reach 1 has demonstrated pool development since the
as -built survey Significant sediment entered the pools at the upper end of
C Reach 1 shortly after construction This sediment came from upstream
sources to the north of the restoration site including areas of cattle pasture and
areas previously inundated due to the old pond This sediment was flushed
from the system during the first year, causing these pools to deepen to their
previously excavated depth During Monitoring Year 3, sediment from the
upstream cattle pasture again entered the upper portion of Reach 1 Based on
C the Year 4 assessment, this sedimentation has continued and increased during
the last year The area between station 0 +00 and station 5 +20 contains
significant sediment, pools have filled, and structures have been buried From
station 5 +20 to station 9 +50, sediment is present, but less severe, and the
nffle -pool sequence is more easily observed It is important to note that the
cattle pasture north of the restoration site is not under the ownership of the
Ci Grays
i
The above - mentioned structure will be repaired and beavers removed from
Reach 1 Other areas will continue to be monitored to ensure that the site
continues to exhibit stable conditions and meet the requirements for physical
success based on physical success criteria
[ 2 Problem Areas Table Summary
Stream problem areas observed are shown in Table B1 in Appendix B
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 14 S &EC Job # 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

3 Numbered Issues Photo Section
Representative photos of each category of stream problem area are shown in
Appendix B
4 Fixed Photo Station Photos
Photos from established photo stations (at each cross - section) were collected
during the stream survey (October 27 -29 and November 5, 2009) These
photos are included in Appendix B
5 Stability Assessment
A visual qualitative assessment was performed to inspect channel facets,
meanders, bed, banks, and installed structures This visual assessment was
confirmed and enhanced with a quantitative assessment of the physical stream
survey The goal of this assessment is to provide a percentage of the features
listed in Table VII that are in a state of stability Table VII was compiled
from the data in Table B1 in Appendix B of this report
Table VIIa Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Gray Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site /EEP Protect # 92219
Reach 1
Feature
MY 1
2006
MY -2
2007
MY -3
2008
MY 4
2009
MY 5
2010
A Riffles
100%
100%
98%
100%
B Pools
100%
100%
100%
99%
C Thalwe
99%
99%
99%
99%
D Meanders
100%
1 100%
100%
99%
E Bed General
96%
99%
99%
99%
F Bank Condition
100%
99%
99%
99%
G Vanes/ J Hooks etc
99%
98%
98%
98%
H Wads and Boulders
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Table VIIb Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Gray Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site /EEP Protect # 92219
Reach 2
Feature
MY 1
2006
MY -2
2007
MY 3
2008
MY 4
2009
MY -5
2010
A Riffles
100%
100%
100%
100%
B Pools
100%
100%
100%
100%
C Thalwe
100%
100%
100%
100%
D Meanders
99%
98%
98%
97%
E Bed General
100%
100%
100%
99%
F Bank Condition
100%
100%
99%
100%
G Vanes/ J Hooks etc
99%
96%
95%
96%
H Wads and Boulders
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 15 S &EC Job # 9385 D 10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

6 Quantitative Measures Summary Tables
The following tables (Table VIII and Table IX) summarize the quantitative
data collected from the cross - sectional and representative longitudinal stream
survey These data were analyzed and summarized, and then compared with
baseline data available for this project
The Quantitative Morphology Tables illustrate the degree of departure, if any,
of the current channel from the baseline data Tables VIII and IX were
compiled from the cross - section and profile raw data and plots located in
Appendix B of this report
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Momtonng 16 S &EC Job # 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

R
U
Table V111 Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION SITE (EEP Project #92219)
REACH 1
Parameter
Pre Existin6 Condition
Project Reference Stream
Design
As built
Dimension
Mm
Max
ANg
Min
Max
I AN6
Min
Ma
Arg
Min
Max
Ar6
BF Width (ft)
15 77
1577
1577
3� 08
3108
1 3108
151
151
151
1361
1948
1601
Floodprone
I9 41
51 54
1039
100
47
90 34
47
3749
8967
6153
Width ft
BF Cross
Sectional Area
17 87
1787
1787
7979
7979
7979
1784
1784
1784
1101
1791
13 79
(ft')
BF Mean Depth
1 13
1 13
1 13
149
149
149
1 17
1 17
1 17
07
094
086
ft
BF Max Depth
149
149
1 49
361
361
361
171
171
171
1 36
104
161
Fl
Width/Depth
1396
1396
1396
1143
1143
1143
1167
1167
1167
I8 63
10 07
1946
Ratio
Entrenchment
119
119
1 �9
347
347
347
309
3 09
309
1 7i
46
3 84
Ratio
Wetted
165
165
1651
348
348
348
1601
1601
1601
1316
1641
1567
Penmeter ft
Hydraulic radius
1 08
1,9
1 11
069
09,
083
fl
Pattern
Channel
6761
13719
98 �7
708
91 93
8435
161
61 8
4075
59 3�
9389
71 85
Beltwidth ft
Radius of
648
P] 04
81 58
1336
36 57
1656
1997
37 85
�8 3
1664
4088
15 73
Cun ature Fl
Meander
71691
71691
71691
148 13
191 09
"1 56
77 08
117 13
9507
7708
117 13
948
Waielen th ft
Meander Width
419
871
613
1 11
1 87
163
1 71
407
168
3 7
586
4 5�
ratio
1
Profile
Riffle lenbth (fl)
N/A
N/A
N/A
3194
4835
4019
1931
5486
3086
15 87
541
37 85
Riffle slope (fl/ft)
0 00631
000657
000647
000809
001395
001074
00057
0 00091
00187
00061
Pool lenbih (Fl)
93 8
15947
1196
896
41 09
1643
119 33 17 1966
741
14447
1301
Pool Slope (fl/ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
00009 00019 00013
00007
00064
00016
Pool spacin6 (ft)
4707
515 3
1 444
4408
13073
6798
5166 8191 6779
11 35
141
7094
Substrate
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d84 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
I N/A
Additional
Reach
Valley Lenbth (it)
41583
64835
458 3
41583
Channel Lenbth
4939 618
758 58
5611
5813 3
ft
Sinuosity
1 16
1 17
1 19
1 36
Water Surface
000647
001074
00057
000544
Slope fl/ft
BF slope (fl/ft)
000647
001074
00057
000544
Rosben
F4
C4
C4
C4
Classification
Habitat Index
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Macrobenthos
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Gray Farm Stream Restoration
Year Momtonnb
December 2009
17
Sod Lnvironmental Consultants PA
S CC Job #9385 DIO
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

U,
C
Table VI11 Baseline Morpholog) and Hydraulic Summary
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION SITE (EEP Project #92219)
REACH 2
Parameter
Pre Existing Condition
Project Reference Stream
Design
As built
Dimension
Mm
Max
Avb
Mm
Max
Avb
Mtn
Max
Avg
Mm
Max
Avb
BF Width (ft)
5 34
534
5 34
486
486
486
6 9
69
69
738
8 21
78
Floodprone Width
704
704
704
8 73
8 73
873
124
124
124
1396
3905
2653
(ft)
BF Cross
Sectional Area
3 88
3 88
3 88
194
1 94
194
396
396
396
4 14
677
546
(ft )
BF Mean Depth
073
073
073
04
04
04
057
057
057
056
082
069
(ft)
BF Max Depth
1 13
1 13
1 13
061
061
061
087
087
087
086
1 3
108
(fl)
W idth/Depth
732
732
7 32
1215
12 15
12 15
12 11
12 11
12 11
101
11 18
113
Ratio
Entrenchment
132
1 32
1 32
1 8
1 8
1 8
1 8
1 8
1 8
1 9
47
34
Ratio
Wetted
603
603
603
528
5 28
528
736
736
736
768
877
823
Penmeter(ft)
Hydraulic radius
064
037
094737
094737
094737
078261
1 11594
095652
(ft)
Pattern
Channel
4358
68 11
5422
697
22 7
13 32
949
165
12 65
11 83
22 05
1696
Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of
32 54
5264
41 25
4 1
8 88
593
671
99
805
463
91
643
Curvature (fl)
Meander
20946
39466
33446
2247
6878
4657
316
37 12
3408
27 51
3472
3175
Wavelen th (ft)
Meander Width
8 16
1275
10 15
143
467
274
1 38
2 39
1 83
1 52
2 83
2 17
ratio
Profile
Riffle lenbhh (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
5 52
76
639
493
724
5 88
336
116
56
Riffle slope (ft/fl)
00179
113688
002444
003022
005058
004025
00258
00053
00555
00279
Pool len6th (ft)
2627
5441
4034
756
1065
8 78
625 1046 845
52
1008
759
Pool Slope (ft/fl)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
00017 00087 0 003
0 001
00092
00022
Pool spacm& (ft)
125 7
47465
265 15
20 17
7004
4672
15 73 2384 1922
943
2894
1951
Substrate
d50(nim)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d84 (min)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Additional
Reach
Parameters
Valley Lenbth (ft )
1872
21655
1872
1872
Channel Len6th
19656
26636
2114
2191
(ft)
Sinuosity
105
1 23
1 16
12
N ater Surface
00286
0 039
00258
0 025
Slope (ft/fl)
BF slope (ft/ft)
00286
0 039
00258
0 025
RosEen
G4
B4
B4
B4
Classification
Habitat Index
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Macrobenthos
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
L Gray Farm Stream Restoration
Year 4 Momlonnb
December 2009
18
Soil Environmental Consultants PA
SEC Job # 9385 D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

LI
Cl
F
�I
GRAI FARM STREAM RESTORATION
0
0
©
moo
®mm
t
®
®mmo
®mom
®0000�
®oomov
®mom
. ENE, , r. •n
'gym
®
®m
�aJ�voa
®
®om
®m
®
®mm
©ommmmom®
®m
®o�mmo®
®mmt
®
®m
®
®
®m
��
®
W®®
®mmomm
®
®��®
1-+�+�++mt
®m
®
®
®
®mm0mmmmm
mommm
�s�
®o0
®
®om
®mommy
®m
®m
®
®®
�,:s
mtom•m
®om
®mmm
®mt©
®mmm
®
®
®.
®
®
®�v
®ovomm
®000mo
®v
©0
®vomomom,
®o
®m
®®
�mtm■
®mmmv®
®
®moovm
®omm
®
®
®mtmv
®voom,
��0®
azmm
®v
®
®
®
®m
®
®
®mmmt
®omm
®
®vvom
®.
�m
®mmmm®
®mmm
®
®m
®mm
®
®®
®
®m
®
®m
®
®m
®
®m
®mmm
®m
®m
®m
®®
mmmmm
0
�.a�mt
®m•
®
®
®
®m
®
®
®om
®m®
®omm
®m■
®m
®
®mmmmm
®
®m0
®
®
®mm
®m
®m
®
®m
®
©ommomm
®mo
®®
®
®m.mm
®
®mm
®o
®m,mommmmm
�m
®m•mmmmm
®mt
®
®
®m
®mm
®m®
X00
®m
®
®m
®
®
®mm
®m
®
®mm
©®
����mmmmmm�mm�mmmmmmm
®0
®ommm
®m
®mmmm
®m
®m
®®
�o�m•ovmmm
®
®m
®mmm
®
®mm®
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 MomtontiF,
December 2009
19
Soil Environmental Consultants PA
S EC Job #9385 DI0
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
0
0
moo
®mm
®
®mmo
®mom
®0000�
®oomov
®mom
. ENE, , r. •n
'gym
®
®m
®
®om
®
®m
©ommmmom®
®o�mmo®
©vim
��
®
®m
®mmomm
�s�
®o0
®
®om
®mommy
®m
®m
®
®®
®
®m
®
®o
®ovomm
®v
©omm
®o
®m
®®
®mmmv®
®omm
®
®moomm
��0®
®mmmv
®v0mm®
®omm
®o
�m
®mmmm®
®mmm
®
®m
®mm
®
®®
®
®m
®
®
®
®mm
®®
®mmm
®
®m
®®
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 MomtontiF,
December 2009
19
Soil Environmental Consultants PA
S EC Job #9385 DI0
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
0
moo
®mm
®
®mmo
®mom
®0000�
®oomov
®mom
. ENE, , r. •n
®o�mmo®
©vim
��
®
®m
®mmomm
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 MomtontiF,
December 2009
19
Soil Environmental Consultants PA
S EC Job #9385 DI0
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

C
C
i
CI Gray Fann Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Momtormt
December 2009
20
Soil Environmental Consultants PA
S EC Job #9385 D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
0
r- r-
. .- ----
-�
�m,0m�
®sm
®0�
�o
®Q>•mtmm�mm
®mm
®om
®
®
®
©om11
®�0
®mo
©v
®o
®m
©mm�omo
®v
�����mmmmmm�mm�mm
�m,m•m.
®mmom
®
®m
®
®m®
�
®m•
®
®m
®
®m
®
®mm
®
®m
�a
®mm
®
®mv
®gym
®
®
®0
�,�
®m•m.mm
®mmm®
®mom®
�m0m.mmmm
®mom
®m
®
®m
a
����mmmmmm�mm�mmmmmmm
�m
®mmm
©m
®
®m
®o
®
®om
®mmm
CI Gray Fann Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Momtormt
December 2009
20
Soil Environmental Consultants PA
S EC Job #9385 D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
o
r- r-
. .- ----
-�
os�
®sm
�o
®
®mm
®om
®
®
®
©om11
®�0
®mo
©v
®o
®m
©mm�omo
®v
�����mmmmmm�mm�mm
�a
®mm
®
®mv
®gym
®
®
®0
����mmmmmm�mm�mmmmmmm
�m
®mmm
©m
®
®m
®o
®
®om
®mmm
CI Gray Fann Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Momtormt
December 2009
20
Soil Environmental Consultants PA
S EC Job #9385 D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
o
r- r-
. .- ----
-�
os�
®sm
®�mmomo�mm
©v
®o
®m
©mm�omo
®v
�����mmmmmm�mm�mm
�a
®mm
®
®mv
®gym
®
®
®0
CI Gray Fann Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Momtormt
December 2009
20
Soil Environmental Consultants PA
S EC Job #9385 D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

7 Benthic Macroi;nvertebrate Assessment and Interpretation of Data
Year 3 benthic sampling was performed by professionals with the necessary
DWQ certification credentials Samples were preserved in the field in 95%
denatured Ethyl alcohol Following collection, samples were sent to
Pennington and Associates, a certified laboratory, for identification
As stated in the Gray Farm Stream Restoration Mitigation Report (July 2006),
biological monitoring will be used as a general indicator of restoration
success, however, no specific biological criteria apply to the success of the
restoration reaches
As previously described, benthic sampling was performed at five (5) sampling
locations Where possible, each monitoring station consisted of a riffle -pool
sequence At each station, the Qual -4 sampling method, as described in the
NCDENR -DWQ's Standard Operating Procedures for Benthic
Macromvertebrates The Qual -4 method consists of
1 Kick Net Sample (from riffle)
L 1 Sweep Net Sample (from bank)
1 Leaf Pack Sample
C� I Visual Observation Sample
Ephemeropteran, Plecopteran, and Tricohopteran (EPT) taxa and abundance
and NC Biotic Indices (NCBI), as well as a list of all taxa collected at each
sampling point during previous monitoring years, are provided in Appendix C
CI The benthic macromvertebrate assessment presented in this report is based on
Year 3 benthic sampling conducted in November 2008
( j Benthic data for Year 3 indicate that water quality within Reach 1 is poor in
(� the uppermost portion of the site abutting the cow pasture and upstream
degraded channel segment, and increases within the restoration reach and the
�( area downstream of the restoration reach At all three (3) Reach 1 benthic
I monitoring stations the abundance, species diversity, EPT taxa, and EPT
abundance are similar to or better than the pre - restoration conditions These
C data indicate that the restoration of Reach 1 has been successful in improving
water quality within the subject channel and the downstream receiving waters
Within Reach 2, the NCBI rating for Year 3 at Station 1, within the restoration
reach, is 9 11 indicating many tolerant taxa and relatively poor water quality
No EPT taxa were collected at Station 1, however, EPT taxa, species diversity
and abundance increased between Station 1 and Station 2 During Monitoring
Year 3, Station 2 received a low NCBI score (5 02), indicating few tolerant
taxa and relatively high water quality
NOTE In the previously submitted Year 3 Monitoring Report benthic
macroinvertebrate data for Year 2 were entered for actual numbers of
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 21 S &EC Job # 9385 D 10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

Ci
C�
J
�1
I I
organisms collected This has been corrected and the Year 4 Monitoring
Report reflects the assigned values for all organisms collected in all
monitoring years For this reason the data from Year 2 appear differently in
this report than in the previously submitted Year 3 Monitoring Report
IV Methodology Section
With the exception of the aforementioned use of Level 2 (Planted and Natural
Woody Stems) of the CVS -EEP Vegetation Monitoring Protocol, no
deviations from initially prescribed methodologies were implemented as a part
of Monitoring Year 4 (2009) activities
Gray Kann Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
22 S &EC Job # 9385 D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

Feet
bou
2000 . 0
X4. S31
Z
A.
0
< 7
Reach I Priority I
/*
&3—
N
Z
Reach I Priority 11
Reach
ROAD
4111
"'1 EB30L/ 4- -
V
'0.
A
ZF
Sc Reach 2, Priority I
0.
01 Directions
7 from 1-40 West, take exit 144, 011 Mountain Road
0
North (5R 1005) • Take a left at 5terlincj Road (5P 152G)
. . . . . . Then right at Linden Road (5K 1527)
"ht on Bolick Road (5K 1532) West
X", Reach I is located immediately north of Bolick Road
(5R 1532)
From Reach I , return East on Bolick Road (5K 1532)
Take a right onto Linden Road (5K 1527)
Then right at New 5terlinq Road (5K 1 52G)
_
x NY Reach 2 is located immediately west of the intersection
of New 5terlincj Road (5P 1525) and Gray house Road
5 P 1525)
roject Number: Map Title:
9385.D 10 Figure I Project Location
Project Manager: N.-
DG Gray farm Stream Restoration Site
SolIkEnro—mu C�funtv, PA
EEP Job # 922 10
1 2,000' Iredell County, NC tell]
r 0111"
Date: Source:
DECEMBER 2009 Stony Point Quadrangle

APPENDIX A
VEGETATION RAW DATA

APPENDIX A 1 —
Vegetation Survey Data Tables

Table V 1 — Vegetation Metadata
Report Prepared By David Cooper
11/12/2009
Date Prepared 1451
database name DRAFT_ 2008 Gray Farm level2 mdb
database location \ \Sec2yobs7 9k \9385 D7 D11 \YEAR 4 1310 \MONITORING DATA
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT --
Metadata
This worksheet which Is a summary of the project and the project data
Plots
List of plots surveyed
area (sq
m )
Frequency distribution of vigor
Vigor
Gasses
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor Gasses listed by species
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and
Damage
percent of total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Stem Count by Plot and
Spp
Count of living stems of each species for each plot dead and missing stems are excluded
Don IFrT CI IMMADV --
Project Code
project Name
Description
ten th ft
stream to edge width
ft
area (sq
m )
Required Plots calculated
Sampled
Plots
Gray Farm stream
Gray Farm
restoration
GF1
Reach 1
Reach 1
4
Gray Farm stream
Gray Farm
restoration
GF2
Reach 2
Reach 2
2
G F St mR m I SI S IRE m m t IC It t PA
) lbf t y 1 SRECI bN9195D10
D fi w) R 9 mi S I m C Im 1# DO 01( 2

Table V -2 — Vegetation Vigor by Species
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 2 S &EC Job # 9385 D 10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
S ectes
4
3
2
1
0
Missing
Alnus serrulata
2
2
3
Betula nigra
2
1
1
Cornus amomum
3
Dtos ros virgintana
Fraxtnus
enn lvantca
1
1
1
3
Ltqutdambar
s ract ua
Pinus taeda
Ptnus vtr tntana
uercus mtchauxtt
1
uercus nigra
2
uercus hellos
3
8
3
1
1
2
Saki nt ra
Sambucus canadensts
Viburnum nudum
1
1
Viburnum
1
Viburnum dentatum
1
Ilex o aca
2
3
Betula lenta
Car tnus carohntana
1
Junt erus vtr tntana
uercus sp
6
uercus rubra
2
1
Ltndera benzotn
4
Ltrtodendron tuh t era
2
1
3
Platanus occtdentahs
10
13
5
Prunus serot[na
Acer ne undo
Acer rubrum
TOT
28
24
33
4
1
2
34
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 2 S &EC Job # 9385 D 10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

Table V -3 — Vegetation Damage by Species
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 3 S &EC lob # 9385 D 10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
Species
All Damage
Categories
(no
damage)
Deer
Insects
Acer ne undo
2
2
Acer rubrum
6
6
Alnus serrulata
7
7
Betula lenta
1
1
Betula ingra
4
4
Carprnus
carohnrana
2
2
Cornus amomum
3
2
1
Drospyros
vir unana
3
3
Fraxtnus
enn lvamca
7
6
1
flex o aca
5
5
Jumperus
v[r uuana
1
1
Ltndera benzoin
4
4
Liqurdambar
styraciflua
2
2
Lrrtodendron
tulr i era
7
7
P[nus taeda
1
1
Pntus vtr nuana
1
1
Platanus
occrdentahs
30
30
Prunus serotina
2
2
uercus sp
6
6
uercus nttchauxrr
1
1
uercus ni ra
2
2
uercus hellos
18
18
uercus rubra
4
4
Salcz nr ra
1
1
Sambucus
canadensrs
2
2
Viburnum sp
1
1
Viburnum
dentatum
1
1
Viburnum nudum
2
2
TOT
28
126
124
1
1
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 3 S &EC lob # 9385 D 10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

Table V -4 — Vegetation Damage by Plot
Table V -5 — Stem Count by Plot and Species
lot
All Damage
Categories
(no
damage)
Deer
Insects
Gray
GFR1- 01- buffer1-year 3
20
20
Gray
GFR1- 01- buffer2- year 3
21
20
Farm
1
Farm
GFR1- 01- buffer3- year 3
22
22
Total
GFR1- 01- buffer4- year 3
18
17
1
Reach 1,
Reach 1,
GFR2 01- Buffer1- ear 3
28
28
Species
Stems
plots
GFR2 01- Buffer2- ear 3
17
17
Buffer
Buffer
TOT
6
126
124
1
1
Table V -5 — Stem Count by Plot and Species
Gray Fann Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 4 S &EC Job # 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2
Gray
Gray
Gray
Gray
Gray
Gray
Farm
Farm
Farm
Farm
Farm
Farm
Total
#
Avg #
Reach 1,
Reach 1,
Reach 1,
Reach 1,
Reach 2,
Reach 2,
Species
Stems
plots
stems
Buffer
Buffer
Buffer
Buffer
Buffer
Buffer
Plot 1,
Plot 2,
Plot 3,
Plot 4,
Plot 1,
Plot 2,
Year 4
Year 4
Year 4
Year 4
Year 4
Year 4
Alnus serrulata
4
3
133
2
1
1
Betula nigra
2
2
1
1
1
Carprnus
1
1
1
1
carohniana
Cornus amomum
3
2
15
1
2
Fraxinus
3
3
1
1
1
1
enns Ivanica
Ilex o aca
2
2
1
1
1
Liriodendron
3
2
15
1
2
tuli r era
Platanus
23
6
3 83
2
2
9
7
2
1
occidentalis
uercus michauxii
1
1
1
1
uercus hellos
15
4
3 75
2
2
10
1
uercus rubra
2
2
1
1
1
Viburnum
1
1
1
1
Viburnum
1
1
1
1
dentatum
Viburnum nudum
1
1
1
1
TOT
14
62
14
8
9
14
11
14
6
Total Plot Density Stems Per Acre
324
364
567
445
567
243
Average Plot Density Stems Per Acre
418
Gray Fann Stream Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Year 4 Monitoring 4 S &EC Job # 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

APPENDIX A 2 —
Vegetation Problem Area Tables

Exhibit Table Al Vegetative Problem Areas
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site /EEP Project #92219
Reach 1
Feature /Issue
Station # / Range
Probable Cause
Photo #
Bare Floodplam
2+002+60
Surface Flow / Poor Soil Quality
1 2
4 +50 5 +75
Surface flow / Poor soil quality
6 +10 6 +90
Surface flow / Poor soil quality
42 +00 42 +50
Surface flow / Poor soil quality
42 +75 43 +30
Surface flow / Poor soil quality
Bare Bank
40 +70 41 +00
Bank Scour
3
Reach 2
Feature /Issue
Station # / Range
Probable Cause
Ph
Vegetative Problem Areas Improved
from Last Year
21 +00 et al
Revegetahon of previously bare areas
4
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil and EnN ironmental Consultants PA
Year Momtonnb SEC Job No 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract 4 D05016 2

APPENDIX A 3 —
Vegetation Problem Area Photos

Appendix A
Vegetation Problem Area Photos
Photo 1— Typical Bare Bench /Floodplain — Reach 1— Year 4 (2009)
Photo 2 — Typical Bare Bench /Floodplain — Reach 1 — Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D 10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Problem Area Photos
Photo 3 — Typical Bare Bank, Improved from Year 3 — Reach 1— Year 4 (2009)
Photo 4 — Typical Vegetated Bench/Floodplain, Improved from Year 3 — Reach 2 — Year 4 (2009)
Gray Fame Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1) 10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

APPENDIX A.4 —
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 1 —Year 4 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 1 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 1 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1310
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 2 —Year 4 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 2 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1) 10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 2 —Year 2 (2007)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 2—Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 3 —Year 4 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 3 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S&EC Job # 9385.1310
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 3 —Year 2 (2007)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 3 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1310
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 4 —Year 4 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 4 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1310
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 4 —Year 2 (2007)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Buffer 4 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016-21

� t
R
� O
t
y
i

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Bank 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Bank 1 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1310
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Bank 2 —Year 4 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Bank 2—Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Bank 2—Year 2 (2007)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 1— Bank 2 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1) 10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Buffer 1 —Year 4 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Buffer 1 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Buffer 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Buffer 1 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Buffer 2 —Year 4 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Buffer 2 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Buffer 2—Year 2 (2007)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Buffer 2 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 1 —Year 4 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 1 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S&EC Job # 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 1 —Year 1(2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D 10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 2—Year 4 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 2 —Year 3 (2008)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.DI0
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2— Bank 2—Year 2 (2007)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot —Reach 2 —Bank 2 —Year 1(2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

APPENDIX B
GEOMORPHOLOGIC RAW DATA

APPENDIX B.1 —
Bankfull Events

Appendix B
Bankfull Event Documentation Photos
Photo 1— Reach 1— Wrack Piles near Cross - section 3
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Photo 2 — Reach 1 — Overbank Event 11/11/2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.1310
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Bankfull Event Documentation Photos
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Monitoring
December 2009
Photo 3 — Reach 2 — Bankfull Event 11/11/2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

APPENDIX B 2 —
Stream Problem Area Table (Table B1)
f'
C1

Exhibit Table 131 Stream Problem Areas
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Stte/EEP Project #92219
Reach 1
Feature Issue
Station
numbers
Suspected Cause
Photo number
Bank Scour
24 +75
Surface flow
1 2
30 +00
Surface flow
32 +60
Surface flow
41 +60
Surface flow
43 +05
Surface flow Settling fill
Undercut Bank
47 +00 47 +50
Increased water velocity from nearby
tnbutary
3
Structures
0 +30
Burled Structure Upstream Sediment
4
1 +50
Burled Structure Upstream Sediment
24 +75
Stressed structure Bank Scour
1 2
31 +60
Stressed structure Bank Scour
41 +60
Stressed structure Bank Scour
43 +05
1St ressed structure Bank Scour
Beaver Dam
1 56 +40
1 Beavers
5
Reach 2
Feature Issue
Station
numbers
Suspected Cause
Photo number
Bank Scour
2 +50
Surface Flow
6
4 +80
Surface flow
6 +00
Surface flow
16 +60
Surface flow
12 +70 12 +80
Surface flow
Channel Scour
16 +10
High Stormwater Flow
7
Structures
2 +50
Stressed Structure Bank Scour
6
4 +80
Stressed structure Bank Scour
6 +00
Stressed structure Bank Scour
16 +60
Stressed structure Bank Scour
12 +70 12 +80
Stressed structures Bank Scour
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site Soil Environmental Consultants PA
Year Monitoring SEC Job No 9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

APPENDIX B 3 —
Stream Problem Area Photos

Appendix B
Stream Problem Area Photos
Photo 1 — Typical Stressed Structure /Bank Scour — Reach 1 — Year 4 (2009)
Photo 2 — Typical Stressed Structure /Bank Scour — Reach 1 — Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Stream Problem Area Photos
Photo 3 — Typical Undercut Bank — Reach 1 — Year 4 (2009)
Photo 4 — Sediment from Off -site — Reach 1 near Beginning of Restoration — Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1310
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Stream Problem Area Photos
Photo 5 — Beaver Dam — Reach 1 near End of Restoration — Year 4 (2009)
Photo 6 — Typical Stressed Structure /Bank Scour — Reach 2 — Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.13 10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Stream Problem Area Photos
Photo 7 — Area of Channel Scour (Station 16 +10 in Long Profile Section 2) — Reach 2 — Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.13 10
Restoration Systems Contract tl D05016 -2

APPENDIX BA —
Stream Photo - Station Photos

Appendix B
Cross- Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Riffle 1 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Riffle 1 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section l— Reach 1 —Riffle 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Riffle 1 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1) 10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Pool 1 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Pool 1 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Pool 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Cross - Section 1— Reach 1 —Pool 1 —Year 1 (2006)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1310
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 1 —Riffle 2 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 1 —Riffle 2 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 1 —Riffle 2 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Fann Stream Restoration Site
Year Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 1 —Riffle 2 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1)10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 1 - Pool 2 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross- Section 2 —Reach 1 - Pool 2 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1310
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 1 - Pool 2 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 1 - Pool 2 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1) 10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 3 —Reach 1 —Riffle 3 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 3 —Reach 1 —Riffle 3 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 3 —Reach 1 —Riffle 3 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross- Section 3 —Reach 1 —Riffle 3 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 3 —Reach 1 - Pool 3 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 3 —Reach I - Pool 3 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 3 —Reach 1 - Pool 3 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 3 —Reach 1 - Pool 3 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 4 —Reach 1 —Riffle 4 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 4 —Reach 1 —Riffle 4 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 4 —Reach I —Riffle 4 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 4 —Reach 1 —Riffle 4 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1310
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 4 —Reach 1 —Pool 4 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 4 —Reach 1 —Pool 4 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 4 —Reach 1 —Pool 4 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 4 —Reach 1 —Pool 4 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

A4

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 5- -Reach 1 —Riffle 5—Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 5 —Reach 1 —Riffle 5 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 5—Reach I —Pool 5 -Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 5- -Reach 1 —Pool 5—Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract #F D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 5 —Reach 1 —Pool 5 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 5 —Reach I —Pool 5 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross- Section Photos
Cross - Section 6 —Reach I —Riffle 6—Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 6 —Reach I —Riffle 6 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 6 —Reach 1 —Riffle 6 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 6 —Reach 1 —Riffle 6 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 6 —Reach 1—Pool 6—Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 6 —Reach I —Pool 6 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 6 —Reach I —Pool 6 —fear 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 6 —Reach I —Pool 6 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Riffle 7 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Riffle 7 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Riffle 7 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Riffle 7 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1310
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Pool 7 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Pool 7 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1) 10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 7 —Reach I —Pool 7 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 7 —Reach 1 —Pool 7 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1 —Reach 2— Riffle 1 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section I —Reach 2 —Riffle 1 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1)10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1 —Reach 2 —Riffle 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 1 —Reach 2 —Riffle 1 —Year 1(2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1310
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1 —Reach 2—Pool 1 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 1 —Reach 2 —Pool 1 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1310
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 1 —Reach 2—Pool 1 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 1 —Reach 2—Pool 1 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 2 —Riffle 2 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 2 —Riffle 2 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 2 —Riffle 2 —Year 2 (2007)
Cray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 2 —Riffle 2 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 2—Pool 2 —Year 4 (2009)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 2 —Pool 2 —Year 3 (2008)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.D10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

Appendix B
Cross - Section Photos
Cross- Section 2 —Reach 2 —Pool 2 —Year 2 (2007)
Gray Farm Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Cross - Section 2 —Reach 2 —Pool 2 —Year 1 (2006)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 9385.1) 10
Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 -2

APPENDIX B 5 —
Exhibit Table B2 - Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
I'
r
1 17

'n
L I
Table B2 - Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
Date NOVEMBER 2009 Project # 9385D10
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION - REACH 1
Feature Category
Metric (per As built and reference baselines
(# stable)
Number
performing
as
intended
Total
number
per As
built
Total
Number/
feet in
unstable
state
% perfor
in stable
condition
Feature
Perform
Mean or
Total
A Riffles
1 Present?
34
34
NA
100%
2 Armor stable a g no displacement)?
34
34
NA
100%
3 Facet grade appears stable?
33
34
NA
97%
4 Stable interval grade?
34
34
NA
100%
5 Featurespacing a ro nate?
34
34
NA
100%
6 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
34
34
NA
100%
7 Depth appears appropriate for current discharge?
34
34
NA
100%
8 Length appropriate?
34
34
NA
100%
100/
B Pools
1 Presents a g not subject to severe a radation?
48
49
NA
98%
2 Sufficient) deep Max Pool D Mean Bkf >l 6
48
49
NA
98%
3 Thalweg located outer bend?
49
49
NA
100%
4 Spacing appropriate?
49
49
NA
100%
5 Non aggrading (not filling)?
48
49
NA
98%
6 Length appropriate?
49
49
NA
100%
99%
C Thalweg
11 Upstream of meander bend run /inflection centering?
34
1 34
NA
100%
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering?
33
1 34
NA
97%
99%
D Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
48
49
NA
98%
2 Of those eroding # w/ concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
49
NA
N/A
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
49
49
NA
100%
4 Sufficient flood lain access and relief?
49
49
NA
100%
99/0
E Bed General
11 General channel bed a radation areas bar formation
NA
NA
0
100%
anne a egra a ion areas OT increasing down
cuttin or head cutting?
NA
NA
75
o
98 /0
0
99 /°
G Banks
1 Apparent scour points from channel processes
NA
NA
35
99%
2 Apparent cut points from overland flow
NA
NA
150
96%
3 Apparent cut or scour from flood water re entry to channel
e g inadequate flood lam access
NA
NA
0
100%
4 Tension cracks
NA
NA
0
100%
5 Bank aradient in excess of 40 %?
NA
NA
0
100%
6 Collapse/slumping
I NA
NA
0
100%
7 Ratio of bank height bankfull height elevated
I NA
NA
0
100%
99%
H Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour?
27
28
N/A
96%
2 Height appropriate?
28
28
N/A
100%
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
27
28
N/A
960/
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
28
28
N/A
100%
98°/
1 Wads /Boulders
11 Free of scours
1 0
0
N/A
N/A
2 Footing stables
1 0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
Notes
Gray Farm Stream Restoration
Year 4 MomtonnL S EC Job #9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract 4 D05016 2

Table B2 - Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
Date NOVEMBER 2009 Project # 9385D10
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION - REACH 2
Feature Category
Metric (per As built and reference baselines
(# stable)
Number
performing
as
intended
Total
number
Per As
built
Total
Number/
feet in
unstable
state
% perfor
in stable
condition
Feature
Perform
Mean or
Total
A Riffles
1 Present?
51
51
NA
100%
2 Armor stable a g no displacement)?
51
51
NA
100%
3 Facet grade appears stable?
51
51
NA
100%
4 Stable interval grade?
51
51
NA
100%
5 Feature spacing appropriate?
51
51
NA
100%
6 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
51
51
NA
100%
7 Depth appears appropriate for current discharge?
51
51
NA
100%
8 Length appropriate?
51
51
NA
100%
100%
B Pools
1 Presents a g not subject to severe a radation?
52
52
NA
100%
2 Sufficient) deep Max Pool D Mean Bkf >1 6
52
52
NA
100%
3 Thalweg located outer bend?
52
52
NA
100%
4 Spacing appropriate?
52
52
NA
N/A
5 Non aggrading (not filling)?
52
52
NA
100%
6 Length appropriate?
52
52
NA
N/A
100%
C Thalweg
11 Upstream of meander bend run /inflection centering?
51
1 51
NA
100%
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering?
51
1 51
NA
100%
100%
D Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
49
52
NA
94%
2 Of those eroding # w/ concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
N/A
NA
N/A
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
52
52
NA
100%
4 Sufficient flood lain access and relief?
52
52
NA
100%
97%
E Bed General
11 General channel bed a radation areas bar formation
NA
NA
0
100%
anne a egra Fri areas o increasing down
cuttin or head cutting?
NA
NA
15
o
99 /0
0
99 /o
G Banks
1 Apparent scour points from channel processes
NA
NA
25
98%
2 Apparent cut points from overland flow
NA
NA
0
100%
3 Apparent cut or scour from flood water re entry to channel
e g inadequate flood lain access
NA
NA
0
100%
4 Tension cracks
NA
NA
0
100%
5 Bank ciradient in excess of 40 %?
NA
NA
0
100%
6 Collapse/slumping
I NA
NA
0
1 100%
7 Ratio of bank height bankfull height elevated
NA
NA
0
100%
100%
H Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour?
50
53
NA
94%
2 Height appropriate?
53
53
NA
100%
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
51
53
NA
960/
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
50
53
NA
94%
960/
1 Wads /Boulders
11 Free of scour?
0
0
NA
N/A
2 Footing stable?
0
0
1 NA
N/A
NIA
Notes
I Gray Farm Stream Restoration
�U! Year 4 Monuorml, S 6C Job #9385 D10
December 2009 Restoration Systems Contract # D05016 2

APPENDIX B 6 —
Annual Overlays of Cross Section Plots
0
r�
L

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CROSS - SECTION I (RIFFLE)
(5TA. 4 +25)
943
942
941
940
u
939
u
0 938
y
f6
1
w 937
93G
935
934
933
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50
Station (feet)
w w Year 4 X Year 3 f Year 2 * - Year I * A5 Built
O +GO 0 +70

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CRO55- 5ECTION I (POOL)
(STA. 4 +G5)
943
942
941
940
939
u
v
0 938
Cu- 937
93G
935
934
933
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50
Station (feet)
Year 4 —XYear 3 ——Year 2 - -Year I +A5 Built
O +GO 0 +70

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CRO55- 5ECTION 2 (RIFFLE)
(STA. 13 +55)
937
93G
935
934
a�
0 933
z
932
931
930
929
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50
Station (feet)
)m Year 4 X Year 3 f Year 2 —*---Year I * A5 Built
O +GO

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CRO55- 5ECTION 2 (POOL)
(STA. 13+90)
937
93G
935
934
v
u
v
0 933
R
u
w 932
931
930
929
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50
Station (feet)
W W Year 4 X Year 3 —W-Year 2 —A Year I _-*- A5 Built
O +GO

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CROSS - SECTION 3 (RIFFLE)
(5TA. 23+40)
934
933
932
931
u
.:? 930
0
> 929
u
w
928
927
92G
925
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO 0 +70 0 +80 0 +90
5tation (feet)
Year 4 XYear 3 —Year 2 --Year I A5 Built

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CROSS - SECTION 3 (POOL)
(STA. 23 + 20)
934
933
932
931
a�
.°? 930
0
u
929
w
928
927
92G
925
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO
5tation (feet)
Year 4 X Year 3 —Year 2 Year I +As Built

927
92G
925
owl
a)
0 923
to
922
921
920
919 �--
0+00
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CROSS - SECTION 4 (RIFFLE)
(STA. 32 +95)
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO 0 +70
Station (feet)
-W Year 4 X Year 3 Year 2 Year I B As BUllt

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CRO55- 5ECTION 4 (POOL)
(5TA. 33 +30)
927
92G
925
924
v
0 923
a�
w
922
921
920
919
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO 0 +70
Station (feet)
—M Year 4 W Year 3 —0--Year 2 Year I B As Bu It

GRAY FARM STREAM RE5TORATION
REACH I - CRO55- 5ECTION 5 (RIFFLE)
(5TA. 39 +30)
924
923
922
921
v
0 920
a�
LL' 919
918
917
9 1 G
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50
Station (feet)
CIF Year 4 X Year 3 f Year 2 -,&--- Year I * A5 Built
O +GO 0 +70

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CROSS - SECTION 5 (POOL)
(STA. 38 +95)
924
923
922
921
u
u
v
0 920
w 919
918
917
9 1 G
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50
Station (feet)
Year 4 XYear 3 -m Year 2 - A Year 1 - 6 As Built
O +GO 0 +70

921
920
919
918
917
a�
916
0
915
u
w
tiAVAI
913
912
911
910
0 +00
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CRO55- 5ECTION G (RIFFLE)
(STA. 42+80)
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO 0 +70
Station (feet)
-W Year 4 X Year 3 f Year 2 -- Year I --#— As BUllt

921
920
919
918
a�
916
0
915
w
• /'
913
912
911 -
910
0 +00
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CROSS - SECTION 6 (POOL)
(5TA. 43+ 1 0)
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO 0 +70
5tation (feet)
��Year 4 X Year 3 {- Year 2 Year I A5 Built

917
9 1 G
915
914
913
912
911
c
O
@ 910
u
LU 909
908
907
90G
905
904 -I--
0+00
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACh I - CRO55- 5ECTION 7 (RIFFLE)
(STA. 54 +05)
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO 0 +70
Station (feet)
—W Year 4 XYear 3 --W— Year 2 - A Year I --*--A5 Built

917
9 1 G
915
914
913
i, 912
a�
a�
911
c
0
910
�
I N
908
907
90G
905
904
0 +00
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I - CROSS - SECTION 7 (POOL)
(5TA. 54 +45)
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO
Station (feet)
��Year 4 X Year 3 —0— Year 2 --A —Year I +A5 5uilt
0 +70

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACh 2 - CROSS - SECTION I (POOL)
(STA. G +00)
an
•••
939
z
O 938
Q
w
J
W
937
936
935
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50
STATION (feet)
IME Year 4 XYear 3 —Year 2 A Year I BAs -Built

GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH 2 - CROSS- SECTION I (RIFFLE)
(STA. G +30)
941
•"•
939
u
z
O 938
Q
w
937
93G
935
0 +00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40
STATION (feet)
Year 4 XYear 3 (Year 2 ---* —Year I BAs -Built
0 +50 O +GO

919
918
917
9 1 G
up
Z 914
O
Q 913
w 912
911
910
909
908
0 +00
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH 2 - CROSS - SECTION 2 (RIFFLE)
(5TA. 19+30)
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO 0 +70
STATION (feet)
Year 4 XYear 3 - -*—Year 2 — Year I +A5 -Built

919
918
917
91G
915
a�
z 914
O
Q 913
w
J
L' 9 1 2
911
910
909
908
0 +00
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH 2 - CROSS- SECTION 2 (POOL)
(STA. 19 + 4 5)
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 O +GO
STATION (feet)
—
Year 4 X Year 3 --F Year 2 - -Year I A5 -15uilt
0 +70

APPENDIX B.7 —
Annual Overlays of Longitudinal Plots

945
940
935
Z
O
H
Q
W 930
J
W
925
920
0 +00
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH I -LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
(5TA. 0 +00 TO 18+70)
X5 -1
2 +00 4 +00 6 +00 8 +00 10 +00 12 +00
STATION (feet)
—Year 4 -*-Year 3 -40- Year 2 A Year 1 --0- A5-Built ♦ X5
X5 -2
14 +00 16 +00 18 +00 20 +00

930
925
920
Z
O 915
Q
W
J
W
910
905
900 i
37 +00
X5 -5
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REAC11 I -LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
(5TA. 37 +50 TO 55 +50)
X5 -6
X5 -7
39 +00 41 +00 43 +00 45 +00 47 +00 49 +00 51 +00 53 +00 55 +00
STATION (feet)
-*-Year 4 - M -Year 3 --B-Year 2 -A Year I --s-A5 -Built ♦ XS

945
X5 -1
[:ISM]
Z
O 935
Q
w
J
W
930
925
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION
REACH 2 - LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
(5TA. 4 +G5 TO I 0 +G5)
4 +G5 5 +G5 G +G5 7 +G5 8 +G5 9 +G5 10 +G5
STATION (feet)
- #-Year 4 - *-Year 3 - +-Year 2 —Year I —A5 -Built ♦ X5

GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION
REACH 2 - LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
(5TA. 15 +G8 TO 20+ 18)
925
920
N
Z
O 915
F-
Q
W
J
W
910
905
15 +G8 IG +I8 IG +G8 17 +15 17 +G8 18 +18 18 +G8
STATION (feet)
- M-Year 4 - *-Year 3 - m Year 2 -+- Year 1 —As -Built ♦ XS
X5 -2
19 +18 19 +G8 20 +18

APPENDIX B.8 —
Annual Overlays of Pebble Count Frequency Distribution Plots

100%
90%
80%
70%
M
60%
L
ii 50%
L 40%
^a)
I _
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
Pebble Count, Gray Farm Reach 1
I I I I I
I I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I 1 I 1 1 1 1
1 1 I I I I I I
I I 1 I 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 I I I I I
1 1 1 1 1 1
I I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I
I I I 1 1 I
I
i I I
I I I I
I I I 1 I 1
I I I I I
I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I i 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
1 I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
I I 1 I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
1 I I 1 1 1 1 1
1 I I I I 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
1 1 I I I I I I
I I 1 I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 1 1 1 1
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I 1 1 I I I I I
I 1 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I
I I t I I I I
I I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I 11
I I I i I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I 1 1 1 1
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I 1 I I I I
I I I ri I
I I I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1
I I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 I
I I I 1 1 I
I I 1 I I I
I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I 1 I I I I
I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I I
1 I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
0.1 1
Particle Size (mm)
10 100 1000 10000
—*---Cumulative Percent- Asbuilt + Cumulative Percent - Year 1 f Cumulative Percent - Year 2
X Cumulative Percent - Year 3 — Cumulative Percent - Year 4

100%
90%
80%
70%
c
cc
60%
L
W
50%
Q�
40%
a_
30%
20%
10%
0%
Pebble Count, Gray Farm Reach 2
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I 1 1 1
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
1 I 1 I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I 7; I 1 1
I I 1 I I I 1 1
I I 1 I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
t I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I 1 I
I I I 1 I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I 1 1 I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I I
I I I 1 1 1
I 1 I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I
1 I I I I I I
1 I I I I I
1 1 I I I I
I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I I
I I I I 1
I I 1 I 1 1 1 1
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I 1 I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
1 I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1
1 I I 1 1 1
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I i l
I I I I 1 1 1 1
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
1 I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I 1 1 1 1 1
1 I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I 1 1 I I I
I 1 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I 11 I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
1 1 I I I i l l
1 1 I I I I I I
I 1 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I I
I I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I 1
I I I I x.LLL
I 1 I I I I I I
I 1 1 I I I
I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I
1 I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
1 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I l i
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I
I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I 1 1 1 1
I 1 I I I I I
I 1 1 I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I 1 I I I I
i I 1 I 1 1 1 1
1 I I I I I I I
1 I 1 I I I I I
I I 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I * ►-�w
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 1 I I I I I I
I
I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I
I I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I 1 I I 1 1 1 1
1 I I I 1 1 1 1
I I 1 t 1 1 1 1
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1
1 I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I
I I 1 I 1 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1
I 1 I I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle Size (mm)
100 1000 10000
—4-- Cumulative Percent - Asbuilt —+— Cumulative Percent - Year 1 f Cumulative Percent - Year 2
X Cumulative Percent - Year 3 Cumulative Percent - Year 4

APPENDIX C
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE ASSESSMENT DATA

Gray Farm Stream Restoration
Benthic Analysis - Reach 2 Station 2
100
90
32
■TOTAL NO. OF ORGANISMS
■ TOTAL NO. OF TAXA
❑ EPT TAXA
❑ EPT ABUNDANCE
i►
17
15
,4n 1
3
2007 2008
Year 2 Year 3
14

130
110
91
90
70
50
30
10
-10
Gray Farm Stream Restoration
Benthic Analysis - Reach 1 Station 2
------------ � .— .._.._----- ._._._.---- - -._ —_ — ----------- - - - - -- ❑TOTAL NO. OF ORGANISMS
11 ■ TOTAL NO. OF TAXA
❑ EPT TAXA
❑ EPT ABUNDANCE
2005
Pre
51 50
2006
Year 1
2007
Year 2
13
2008
Year 3
73

Gray Farm Stream Restoration
Benthic Analysis - Reach 1 Station 3
❑TOTAL NO. OF ORGANISMS
■ TOTAL NO. OF TAXA
❑ EPT TAXA
❑ EPT ABUNDANCE
2006 2007
Year 1 Year 2

Gray Farm Stream Restoration
Benthic Analysis - Reach 2 Station 1

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Gray Farm Stream Restoration
Benthic Analysis - Reach 2 Station 2
■TOTAL NO. OF ORGANISMS
■ TOTAL NO. OF TAXA
❑ EPT TAXA
❑ EPT ABUNDANCE
106 NONE �M
2005
Pre
2006
Year 1
28
7 15 14
4
'1 I 11 3F
2007
Year 2
2008
Year 3

u
U
F,
Ir��
l �

APPENDIX D
INTEGRATED PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW

APPENDIX D 1 —
Monitoring and Problem Area Plan View, Reach 1

i5m7\ ob 7.90385. D7 -0 I I \YEAR 4- D 1
O
IV
0
c�
i- Gray Farm MoM.anA °APV - Ymr
CD
DRAWINGS PRINTED
rn
AT H ALE- SCALE
3
CD
N
0
N
\n
D
D
3
N
a
N
a
2
co
rn
I
V �
O
O
z
V �
rn
O
C
rn
z
rn
rn
O -
j PERMANENT ACCE55
EA5EMENT
NOTES:
1. 517E DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING 5UKVEY
PERFORMED 5Y 54EC. (NCDENR STREAMS, LIDAR CONTOUR5,
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE G15 LAYER5)
9 Al I I nCATION5. ELEVATION5. AND DIMEN510N5 ARE
)N AN ASSUMED
FOOT CONTOURS.
INATE5 - REACH I
RESTORED
EA5TING
EX15TING
7543G4.3G
STREAM CHANNEL
753549.82
CONTOURS
752569.75
EXISTING
752535.59
EXISTING
754523.63
NCDENR 5TREAM5
752693.45
�
DOT ROAD5
EA5TING
14.83
755250.67
14.08
O -
j PERMANENT ACCE55
EA5EMENT
NOTES:
1. 517E DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING 5UKVEY
PERFORMED 5Y 54EC. (NCDENR STREAMS, LIDAR CONTOUR5,
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE G15 LAYER5)
9 Al I I nCATION5. ELEVATION5. AND DIMEN510N5 ARE
)N AN ASSUMED
FOOT CONTOURS.
INATE5 - REACH I
ING
EA5TING
G.18
7543G4.3G
1.38
753549.82
7.37
752569.75
1.65
752535.59
9.13
754523.63
17.12
752693.45
)ORDINATES
IING
EA5TING
14.83
755250.67
14.08
755292.77
S7.5G
755221.71
4.1 1
754599.75
'9.62
754657.41
'0.59
754609.35
'7.02
753997.26
33.90
753914.02
14.14
753966.36
75.52
753301.89
?0.46
753338.88
1.44
753264.47
36.38
752913.75
33.26
752869.42
)3.28
752926.82
08.7
752648.11
41.17
752644.43
X9.35
752594.7
72.28
752583.14
27.69
752627.95
5G.91
752648.36
(CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2' I •
80 L I CK_ -R QA D ( S
R �S�
Project: Project No.:
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION Mqr.: 10
YEAR 4 MONITORING Pro. Mgr.: Drawn:
• Soil &Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Client: NC `C05Y5TEM D Dcc
11010 R- Ridgn Road • RalciEh. North Caroline 27614 • Phonc: 1')19) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone]
IF CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM I" = 200'
w .SandEC.com 5heet Title: Sheet No.:
REACH I RE5TORATION 517E LAYOUT I OF 16
4 KEY5HEET

�Sr 2\ bs7.9F\9385. D7 -D I ] \YEAR 4 - D I 00rawm s \REACH I -Cray Farm Mont.aM PAPV - Year 4.dw
OO
C)
O NOTES:
O
51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
o PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR STREAMS, LIDAR CONTOURS,
w AND NCDOT ROAD5 TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
z
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
o APPROXIMATE.
zl
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
D �
K BENTHIC 5AMPLING
" POINT
rn
ll
I
0
z
0
z
z
C
rn
C
�►
J
Eas
EX15TING TREELINE
LEGEND FOR
MONITORING FEATURES
BEGIN UPPER
LONG PROFILE
N
3
PERMANENT ACCE55
EASEMENT
UPPER LIMIT5
OF RESTORATION
N
G
0
X5 I
G
NORTH
SCALE I " = 50'
50 25 O 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
DNAWI NGS PRINTED
AT HALE- SCALE
LEGEND FOR
A5BUILT FEATURES
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
b LOG J -HOOK (UH)
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CR055 ROCK VANE
(CRV)
CREATED/RESTORED
WETLANDS
ElEXISTING STREAMS
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
K
Project: rroject No.:
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION 9385.D 10
YEAR 4 MONITORING Prod. Mgr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM =ale: DQC
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh. North Carolina 27614 • Pbom: (919) 846 -5900 • Paa: (919) W,9467 IREDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 1" = 50
wwwSandEC.eom Sheet Tdle: Sheet No.:
REACH I - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - A 2 OF I G
BUFFER
VEGETATION PLOT
BANK
VEGETATION PLOT
'
PERMANENT PHOTO
POINT
CROSS - SECTION
51
LOCATION
BENTHIC 5AMPLING
POINT
BEGIN UPPER
LONG PROFILE
N
3
PERMANENT ACCE55
EASEMENT
UPPER LIMIT5
OF RESTORATION
N
G
0
X5 I
G
NORTH
SCALE I " = 50'
50 25 O 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
DNAWI NGS PRINTED
AT HALE- SCALE
LEGEND FOR
A5BUILT FEATURES
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
b LOG J -HOOK (UH)
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CR055 ROCK VANE
(CRV)
CREATED/RESTORED
WETLANDS
ElEXISTING STREAMS
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
K
Project: rroject No.:
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION 9385.D 10
YEAR 4 MONITORING Prod. Mgr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM =ale: DQC
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh. North Carolina 27614 • Pbom: (919) 846 -5900 • Paa: (919) W,9467 IREDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 1" = 50
wwwSandEC.eom Sheet Tdle: Sheet No.:
REACH I - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - A 2 OF I G

77 -D I I \YEAR 4 - D) I . Gray Farm Mort aril 'APV -Year 4.Aw
G
N
pO
cD
XS
0
4.
z NOTES:
a BANK I
I . 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING 5URVEY
o PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOURS,
W AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
n
0 2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
N APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN ASSUMED
ELEVATION OF ! 00' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 F007 CONTOURS.
0
s UFFE I
N
LEGEND FOR
END UPPER ASBUILT FEATURES
Q
LONG PROFILE
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
Cb LOG J -HOOK (LJH)
EXISTING TREEUNE O
ti ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
PERMANENT LOW -WATER CROSS ROCK VANE
CROSSING Ali (CRV)
rn - CREATED /RESTORED
WETLANDS
n
Z
XS 3 El EX15TING STREAMS
BANKFULL GAUGE
I
PEBBLE COUNT 2 LOCATION LEGEND FOR
LOCATION MONITORING FEATURES
BUFFER
O D RAWI N GS PRINTED VEGETATION PLOT
Z O � BANK
-
AT HALF SCALE F VEGETATION PLOT
O ' PERMANENT PHOTO
RESTORED POINT
CHANNEL ALIGNMENT CROSS - SECTION
zx"-,LOCATION
Z 2 0
-0 0
r p u W sl °I Z PERMANENT CON5ERVATION
1 E� EASEMENT BOUNDARY
Z
NORTH
C
--- 5CALE I" = 50' N FER
rn
50 25 0 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
I
3! 0
32
O
XS 4
Proled: Project No.:
GRAY FARM STREAM RE5TORATION 9385 -D 10
YEAR 4 MONITORING Prod. Mgr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA location: CNent: NC EC05Y5TEM tale:
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh. North Caroline 27614 • Phnnc: (919) 8465900 • Fax: (%0. 94673467 j��LL CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 11 - 5d
— Sandill 51 Title: Meet No.:
REACH I - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - B 3 OF I G

\U`w0 ob,7 -9k \9385. D7 -D I 1 \YEAR 4 - D I GDrawin e\REACH I- Gray Farm Mont.aM PAPV - Y- 4. i.
N
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
rn
3
3 NOTES:
I . 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
PERFORMED BY 5 #EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOURS,
S l AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE G15 LAYER5)
N
2. ALL LOCATION5, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMEN51ON5 ARE
u \�) APPROXIMATE.
\ / 3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BA5ED ON AN A55UMED
D 3� ELEVATION OF I OO' ADJU5TED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOUR5.
K
N
(C
3
fl BEGIN LOWER
LONG PROFILE
X5
,O
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
4 EA5EMENT BOUNDARY
rn o
2 -
56
BENTHIC 5AMPU G
POINT i
BUFFER 3 % O
z
O
EXISTING TREELINE
" - LEGEND FOR
z - A5BU I LT FEATURES
NORTt1 - -- --
C RESTORED
SCALE I" = 50'
STREAM CHANNEL
50 25 6 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2' i _ ':b LOG J-HOOK (LJH)
LEGEND FOR
- -- MONITORING FEATURES ROCKJ- HOOK(RJH)
. -- - - - - -- " /.- BUFFER CR055 ROC -
VEGETATION PLOT Q� ROCK VANE
- "- / - BANK v
VEGETATION PLOT
CREATED /RESTORED
' PERMANENT PHOTO �/ WETLANDS
POINT
CROSS - SECTION
51 LOCATION
BENTHIC SAMPLING �.. EXISTING STREAMS
POINT
Project: Project No.:
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION 9385.D 10
YEAR 4 MONITORING Prod. Mgr.: raven:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Location: Chento NC ECOSYSTEM tale:
11010 Raven Ridge Ruud • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phoi- [phone] • Fax: [phone] IREDELL CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM I = 5d
www.SandEC— 5heet Title: 5heet No.:
REACH I - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - C 4 OF I G

\ \S-2\
obs7- 9N9365. D7 -D 111YFAR 4 - D I D\Or— rgs\REACH J- Gray Farm Mont —A PAPV -Year 4. dv;m
CSI
N
O
O
o
N OTES: DRAWI NG5
PRINTED
w
I . 517E DATA AS DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
Fn Z
PERFORMED BY 54EC. FROM R STREAMS, LIDA CONTOURS, AT h A L F
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN EN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
SCALE
0
9
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMEN51ON5 ARE NORTH
'.
v
APPROXIMATE.
0
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN ASSUMED SCALE 1 = 50'
'n
I ELEVATION OF ' 00' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
3
50 25 0 50
N
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
v
D
LEGEND FOR LEGEND FOR
ASBUILT FEATURES MONITORING FEATURES
RESTORED BUFFER
VEGETATION PLOT
n
STREAM CHANNEL
BANK
VEGETATION PLOT
� LOG J -HOOK (LJH)
' PERMANENT PHOTO
POINT
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH) GROSS- SECTION
X51 LOCATION
BENTHIC SAMPLING
CRO55 ROCK VANE POINT
(CRV)
CREATED /RESTORED
WETLANDS
EXISTING STREAMS
OPERMANENT
Z
CONSERVATION
BOUNDARY
EASEMENT
0
z
0
h
Ln
00
3
S X5 7
DOWNSTREAM LIMIT
OF RESTORATION
\ ✓
�
Z
$UPPER 4
\
END LOWER
C
LONG PROFILE
BENTHIC SAMPLING
-
EX15TING TREELINE
POINT
rn
P'oject:
GRAY FARM STREAM
YEAR 4
RE5TORATION
MONITORING
Project No.:
9385.010
Prof- Mor.: Drawn:
Soil &Environmental Consultants PA
DG DGC
Scale:
-
Location: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM
—
11010 Ra%m Ridge Road • Rzlcigh. North Carotin 27614 • Phonc: (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone]i
IREDELL Cd., NC
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1 ° = Sd
Sheet T,tle:
Sheet No.:
— .SandEC.com
REACH I - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - D
5 OF I G

15-21 ob±7- 90385.D7 -D 111YEAR 4 - M 'API, - r1.,r 4 nv.c
6
N NOTE5:
O
51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
o PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOURS,
AND NCDOT ROAD5 TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
rn
< ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3
rn
' 3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN ASSUMED
ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
0
N
N
D
a
70
rn
l J
-0
(O
j
rn
rn
D
z
C
rn
i_ PERMANENT ACCESS
EASEMENT
UPPER LIMITS
Of RESTORATION
O 00
BEGIN UPPER
LONG PROFILE
O
BURIED STRUCTURES
O
N
3
C
6
EXISTING TREELINE
PAPV LEGEND
❑ STREAM PROBLEM AREA5-5TRE55ED
8
O
❑ VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS - MODERATE
SEDIMENT FROM UPSTREAM,
HEAVY DEP051TION
SEDIMENT FROM UP5TREAM,
MODERATE DEPOSITION
NORTH
SCALE I " = 50'
50 25 0 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
BARE FLOODPLAIN #I
LEGEND FOR
ASBUILT FEATURES
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
b LOG J -HOOK (UH)
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CR055 ROCK VANE
(CRV)
CREATED/RESTORED
WETLANDS
EXISTING 5TREAM5
BARE FLOODPLAIN #2
BARE FLOODPLAIN #3
PERMANENT CON5ERVATION
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
O
— a3a5.vly
YEAR 4 MONITORING GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION Prod. Mgr.: Drawn:
• Soil & Environmental Consultants PA Location Client: 5-11: Dec
� NC ECOSYSTEM � , = 50,
11010 Raven Rid_ee Road • Raleigh. North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]', IREDELL CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT GROGRAM
-, -- -- -- - -- www.SandEC.e— Sheet Title: Sheet No.:
- - -- - REACH I - PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - A G OF I G

\ \5-2\ obs7- 90385. W -D i i D'PAR 4 - Di O,Draw,n s \ROACH I - Gray Farm Mont and PAPV - Year 4.dw
O
N
O
O
cfl
0
rn N OTE5:
z
o I . 517E DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
3 PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NGDENR STREAMS, LIDAR CONTOURS,
AND NCDOT ROAD5 TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYER5)
v
n 2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMEN5ION5 ARE
0
APPROXIMATE.
O 3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN ASSUMED
N ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
D 0
n
s
r
° O
� END UPPER 7
LONG PROFILE
PAPV LEGEND
J ❑ STREAM PROBLEM AREAS- 5TRE55ED
❑ VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS- MODERATE
EXISTING 7REELINE
O
ti LEGEND FOR
A55UILT FEATURES
0
KE5TORED
PERMANENT LO B ti\ STREAM CHANNEL
OSSING
rn
^� Cb LOG J -HOOK (UH)
l 1 22
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
2 O /%,.Zy
""
I
CR055 ROCK VANE
STRESSED STRUCTURE
(G RV)
# I 1 BANK SCOUR # I
70 CREATED /RESTORED
/ �U1/
DRAWINGS FRI NTED 2 WETLANDS
0i o
r- AT HALF- SCALE EXISTING 5TREAM5
rn
� � z
rn �
1m 2 PERMANENT CONSERVATION
r EASEMENT BOUNDARY
z NORTH
C SCALE 1 " = 50' N
BANK SCOUR #2
rn 50 25 0 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
31 O
5TRE55ED STRUCTURE #2
32
O
3
O
Project: Project No.:
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION 9385.D I O
YEAR 4 MONITORING Prod. Mgr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA Location: Client: DGC
NC ECOSYSTEM tale:
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh. North Caroline 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] IRFDELL CO.. NC ENHANCEMEM °ROGRAM 1'= 50
— .SandECcom Sheet Tdle: Sheet No.:
REACH ' - PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - 15 7 OF 16

145-2\ bz7- 91,19385. D7 -D I I \YEAR 4 - D 1001 —in \REACH I- Gay Farm M-ft am PAPV - Year 4.dw
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
3 O
o NOTE5:
3
c�
Z 11. SITE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING 5URV
O PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR STREAMS, UDAR CONTOURS,
o AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
N 2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
Y 3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN ASSUMED
\ ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
N
(0
3
BEGIN LOWER
LONG PROFILE
X5
BARE FLOODPLAIN #4
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
BARE BANK # I /
BARE FLOODPLAIN #5 UNDERCUT BANK
n CHANNEL SCOUR
5TRE55ED STRUCTURE #3 2
BANK SCOUR #3
6
5TRE55ED 5TRUCTURE #4 -0
BANK SCOUR #4
BUFFER 3 V-
713 /
0
rn
EXISTING TREELINE
rn
LEGEND FOR
A5BU I LT FEATU RE5
z NORTH
- � RESTORED
C SCALE 1 " = 50' 5TREAM CHANNEL
rn 50 25 0 50 g LOG J -HOOK (UH)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
l J
Q� CROSS ROCK VANE
(CRV)
_ - PAPV LEGEND WETLAND STORED
STREAM PROBLEM AREAS- 5TRE55ED
F-1
❑ VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS - MODERATE EXISTING STREAMS
ProOed: Project No.:
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION 9385.D10
YEAR 4 MONITORING Prod. Mgr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA location: Ghent: NC EC05Y5TEM SGIDG DGC
11010 R.— Ridge Road • Raleigh. Notth Caroline 27614 • Phonc: [phone] • Fax: [phone] IREDELL CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM I " = 50
— .SandEC.c= Sheet Title: Sheet No.:
REACH I - PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - C 8 OF I G

\K-2\ nbs7 -9k \9385. D7.D 1 I VrAR 4 - D I W1..m sHZEACH j- Gray Farm MOft -A PAPV - Year 4.Aw
CnJ
N
O
NOTE5: D RAWI N GS PRINTED
1 . SITE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
# PERFORMED BY 5*EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOURS, AT h A L F SCALE
AND NCDOT ROAD5 TAKEN FROM REFERENCE G15 LAYER5)
3 2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATION5, AND DIMEN51ON5 ARE NORTH
Q APPROXIMATE.
C1 3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED SCALE 1 II = 50'
o ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOUR5.
" 50 25 O 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
N
D
D
LEGEND FOR
A55U I LT FEATU RE5
Q RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
C LOG J -HOOK (LJH)
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CR055 ROCK VANE
(CRY)
rn CREATED /RESTORED
WETLANDS
EXISTING STREAMS
1
70
O
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EA5EMENT BOUNDARY
RECENT BEAVER DAM
- -- -- - - -- - O O
00
Ln
s' X5 7 'n 3
" — DOWN5TREAM LIMIT
- OF RE5TORATION
Z - -- END LOWER - -- -
LONG PROFILE
EX15TINGTREELINE
PAPV LEGEND
❑ 5TREAM PROBLEM AREA5- 5TRE55ED
VEGETATION PROBLEM AREA5- MODERATE
P ^oJect: Project NC.:
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RESTORATION 9385.010
YEAR 4 MONITORING Prot. Mgr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA Locaton: Chent: cafe: DGC
� NC ECOSYSTEM � n = 5d
11010 Riven Ridge Road • Raleigh. North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] IREDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
_.SndEC.c— 5heet Title: Sheet Na:
REACH I - PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - 0 9 OF 16

APPENDIX D 2 —
Monitoring and Problem Area Plan View, Reach 2

6
N
C)
O
co
N
0
4»
3
0
3
3
c�
3
9
D7-DI I \YEAR 4- DI
NOTE5:
I . 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOUR5,
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYER5)
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATION5, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF 100' ADJU5TED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOUR5.
DRAWINGS PRINTED
N AT HALF- SCALE
N
(D
Z
(D
®RESTORED EXISTING
STREAM CHANNEL CONTOURS
EXISTING EXISTING
NCDENR STREAMS \, DOT ROADS
BEGIN UPPER
LONG PROFILE
I
MONITORING FEATURES COORDINATES - REACH 2
NORTHING
EA5TING
CROSS SECTION 1
1390081.231
746853.93
RIFFLE I
1390079.60
746799.51
POOL 1
1390109.67
746817.05
CR055 SECTION 2
1 389209.56
7462 15.22
RIFFLE 2
1 389254.69
74G 1 67.9 I
POOL 2
1 389238.99
7461 5538
BUFFER I
1389961 .8G
746771 .34
BUFFER 2
1 389300.47
74r.251.07
BANK I
1389733.94
746553.76
BANK 2
1 389408.6 I
I 746305.49
4
i
r +oo
EX15TING TREELINE
F
PERMANENT CON5ERVATION
/ a ! EA5EMENT 4 FENCELINE
PEBBLE COUNT
LOCATION
J
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT G
rn
2 KEY SHEET
INDEX
rn
rn
i
+oo
E
:'tq 4-ya
NORTH
SCALE i " = 100'
100 50 0 100
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
Y ^oject: —j— —,
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION 9385.° 10
YEAR 4 MONITORING Pro. Mgr.: Drawn: DG
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA LocaGOn: Cheat: -1e:
� NC ECOSYSTEM 1 � _ I �,
-- 11010 Ra— RiJgc Road • Releigh. North Carolina 27614 - Phonc: (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone]REDELL CO., N , ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
www.SandFGcom Sheet Title: Sheet No.:
REACH 2 - RESTORATION
-- 517E LAYOU- t KEY51-1EET 1 0 OF 1 6

2\ bs7- 9k\9385.D7- DII \YEAR4 -DI O,Drawi \REACH2 -Gray FartnMontanrlPAPV Year4.1w
" °T DRAWI NG5 FRI NTED
N 1 . SITE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING 5UKVEY
L)_ PERFORMED BY 54EC. FR R STREAMS, LIDACONTOURS, AT HALF - 5 C A L E
++ AND NGDOT ROADS TAKfN EN FROM REFERENCE G15 LAYERS)
NORTH
5 2. ALL LOCATION5, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMEN51ON5 ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3
3. ELEVATION5 ARE APPROXIMATE AND BA5ED ON AN A55UMED SCALE I 30'
" =
ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
30 15 0 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
N
D LEGEND FOR
A55UILT FEATURES
s
cn
RESTORED ___ - - --
2 STREAM CHANNEL - - _
u i U LI
PSTREAM MIT
OF RESTORATION
Cb LOG J -HOOK (UH)
0
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH) -
CF055 ROCK VANE
(CRV)
CREATED /RE5TOR.ED
WETLANDS +00
rn
EjEXISTING 5TREAM5
1
N LEGEND FOR
MONITORING FEATURI=5
BUFFER
VEGETATION PLOT
BANK
OVEGETATION PLOT
Z PERMANENT PHOTO 3+00
POINT
- CR055- 5ECTION
O51 LOCATION
/� -- 4+00
EXISTING TREELINE
r n BEGIN UPPER
LONG PROFILE
+O
BUffE -.R
+0 i.
F'n PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT # FENCELINE
8 +00
9+
cw Project: Protect No.:
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION 9385.D 10
YEAR 4 MONITORING Prod. Mgr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Locat,,,: Ghent: NC EC05Y5TEM 5cal : = 30
11010 Rai en RiJgc Rued • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phoric: (919) X46 -5900 • Fax: (919)84( -9467 IREDELL CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
w .SwWEC.com 5heet Title: Sheet No.:
REACH 2 - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - E I I OF 16

BSc .2 obz7- 90385. 07-DJ I \YEAR 4 - D I aDrawm s\REACH2- GrayF.-Mor t.n4PAPV Yt r4. i
0 NOTE5:
cn 517E DATA A5 DETERMINED 5Y LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
PERFORMED 13Y 5 4EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOURS,
" AND NCDOT ROAD5 TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
rT
S 2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATION5, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
0
3 APPROXIMATE.
>v 3. ELEVATION5 ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
n ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
0
N
N
D
D
LEGEND FOR
N A5BU I LT FEATU RE5
czo
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
g LOG J -HOOK (fJH)
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CR055 ROCK VANE
(C RV)
CREATED /RESTORED
C
I G+
�V- BAN
17+00
i
15+
DRAWI NG5 PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
NORTt1
SCALE 1 " = 30'
30 15 O 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
END UPPER
LONG PROFILE
BAN K I
UEN
13+0
14+
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT 4 FENCELINE
EX15TING TREELINE
BEGIN LOWER
LONG PROFILE
c
r,oject: rrojecc'—
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RESTORATION
9355.1)10
YEAR 4 MONITORING Prot. M Dr1) n
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA Location: Client: 5cal : °G�
NC ECLAT PROGRAM I" = 3d
11010 Rug en Ridge Road • Raleigh. Notch Carolina 27614 • Ph,eic: (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone] IREDELL CO.. NG ENHANCEMENT PR06RAM _
— S.MEC —ni Sheet Title: Sheet No.:
REACH 2 - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - F 12 OF 16
WETlAND5
rn
J
EX15TING STREAMS
N
LEGEND FOR
1
MONITORING FEATURES
BUFFER
VEGETATION PLOT
VEGETATION PLOT
OBANK
z
O
'
PERMANENT PHOTO
POINT
CROSS - SECTION
51
LOCATION
z
G>
D
z
C
rn
C
I G+
�V- BAN
17+00
i
15+
DRAWI NG5 PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
NORTt1
SCALE 1 " = 30'
30 15 O 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
END UPPER
LONG PROFILE
BAN K I
UEN
13+0
14+
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT 4 FENCELINE
EX15TING TREELINE
BEGIN LOWER
LONG PROFILE
c
r,oject: rrojecc'—
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RESTORATION
9355.1)10
YEAR 4 MONITORING Prot. M Dr1) n
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA Location: Client: 5cal : °G�
NC ECLAT PROGRAM I" = 3d
11010 Rug en Ridge Road • Raleigh. Notch Carolina 27614 • Ph,eic: (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone] IREDELL CO.. NG ENHANCEMENT PR06RAM _
— S.MEC —ni Sheet Title: Sheet No.:
REACH 2 - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - F 12 OF 16

X5-2\ obs7 -9k \9385. D7.D I I \YEAR d- D I D,DfaW in s \REACH2- GayFa,.nMo- Ranr.PAPV YevrA dw
O
N
p NOTES:
co
U 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
9 PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR STREAMS, LIDAR CONTOURS,
a.
r7 AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
0 2. ALL LOCATION5, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATION5 ARE APPROXIMATE AND BA5ED ON AN A55UMED
C> ELEVATION OF 109 ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
D
IN
c>,
rn
C�
Z
N
I
0
z_
0
z
V �
z
C
rn
N
LEGEND FOR
A5BUILT FEATURES
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
D LOG J —HOOK (LJH)
ROCK J —HOOK (RJH)
CR055 ROCK VANE
(CRV)
CREATED /RESTORED
WETLANDS
EXISTING 5TREAM5
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
LEGEND FOR
MONITORING FEATURE
END LOWER
LONG PROFILE
124�4
DOWN5TREAM
LIMIT OF RESTORATION/ 1 p�
i
1Z�
/ BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT
—.
21-�00
I
I L.
NORTH
SCALE I " = 30'
30 15 0 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT
OFFER 2
19 +0
rp
BUFFER
X
VEGETATION PLOT
BANK
VEGETATION PLOT
'
PERMANENT PHOTO
POINT
Z_
CR055- 5ECTION
X51
LOCATION
END LOWER
LONG PROFILE
124�4
DOWN5TREAM
LIMIT OF RESTORATION/ 1 p�
i
1Z�
/ BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT
—.
21-�00
I
I L.
NORTH
SCALE I " = 30'
30 15 0 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
BENTHIC SAMPLING
POINT
OFFER 2
19 +0
rp
PEBBLE COUNT
X
0+0 LOCATION
PERMANENT ACCESS
EASEMENT
\�
EXISTING CULVERT
TO REMAIN
EXISTING TREELINE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT 4 FENCELINE
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RE5TORATION 99$5.13 10
Fro j. M r.: Drawn:
YEAR 4 MONITORING pG DGC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Ghent: NC EC05Y5TEM tale:
11010 Rneen Ridge Road • Raleigh. North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • F":(919)80-9-w/ IREDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM ill = 30
www.SandECsom Sheet Title: Sheet No.:
REACH 2 - MONITORING PLAN VIEW - G 13 OF 16

\15-2\ bs7- 90385. D7 -D I I \YEAR 4 . D I CkDrawm \REACH &GrayFa— MnatenoFAPV Y-4 i
N
N OTES` DRAWINGS FRI NTED
o I . 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
`7 PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR STREAMS, LIDA5 CONTOURS, AT h A L F S C A L E
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GIS LAYERS)
s
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE NORTH
3 APPROXIMATE.
ct
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND 5A5ED ON AN A55UMED SCALE 1 " = 30'
ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
N 30 15 0 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
N
D
LEGEND FOR PAPV LEGEND
N A513UILT FEATURE5 STREAM PROBLEM AREAS - STRESSED
N
D RE5TORED
❑ VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS - MODERATE
a STREAM CHANNEL
UPSTREAM LIMIT
OF RESTORATION
°b LOG J -HOOK (LJH)
0 0
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CRO55 ROCK VANE
"'VVV
(CRV)
rn CREATED /RESTORED +00
WETLANDS
EXISTING STREAMS
N BARE FLOODPLAIN # 1 2+00
0
3+00 STRESSED STRUCTURE # I
BANK SCOUR # I
rn "
� -
STRESSED STRUCTURE #2 4 +00
BANK SCOUR #2
FT1
STRESSED STRUCTURE #3
BANK SCOUR #3
5 +00
EXISTING TREELINE
z = --
BEGIN UPPER
rn LONG PROFILE
BUFFER 1 7+0
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
rn EASEMENT k FENCELINE
8 +00
r
9 +00
Project: Project No.:
GRAY FARM STREAM RESTORATION 9385.010
YEAR 4 MONITORING Prq. Mac: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA DG DGC
Locatron: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM Scale: _ 30
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Cuotina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]' IREDELL CO., NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM _
www.SandEC.com 5heet Title: Sheet No.:
REACH 2- PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - E 14 OF I G

\5rc2\ ob37- 90385. D7 -D I I \YEAR 4 - D I aDrawiO e\REACN 2.GrayFamMontannPAPV Yr r4.Ew
N
O
NOTE5:
1 . 517E DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
+* PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOURS,
s AND NCDOT ROAD5 TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYER5)
3 2. ALL LOCATION5, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
o APPROXIMATE.
3
n 3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
a ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
N
c
N _
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
S
LEGEND FOR PAPV LEGEND
A513UILT FEATURE5 FI—] STREAM PROBLEM AREA5- 5TRf551fD
Cb
N
(C
a
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
b LOG J -HOOK (LJH)
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CROSS ROCK VANE
(CRV)
❑ VEGETATION PROBLEM AREA5- MODERATE
[� CREATED / RE5TORED =
WETLANDS
n
EX15TING 5TREAM5
O
Fn
rn
C --BED SCOUR
END UPPER
LONG PROFILE
NORTH
SCALE I " = 30'
30 D 0 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
5TRE55ED 5TRUCTURE5 #4 and #5,
+ O DOWNCUT RIFFLE
PERMANENT CON5ERVATION
EA5EMENT 4 FENCELINE
_1 f6
BEGIN LOWER
LONG PROFILE
i ^7 STRESSED 5TKUCTUKE #G
1 / + O BANK SCOUR #4
- EXISTING TREELINE .
GRAY FARM 5TREAM RESTORATION
YEAR 4 MONITORING Pro). Mgr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: Client: NC EC05Y5TEM Scale D
11010 Ra%en Ridge Road • Raleigh. North Carolina 27614 • Phoac: (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone] IREDELL CO., NG ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 1"- 30
www.SandEC.com 5heet Title: nheet No.:
REACH 2- PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - F 15 OF I G

N
N
0
rn
3
s
0
3
c�
R
v_
n
0
N
v
3
N
D
D
�o
a
I I \YCAR 4- DI
NOTES:
I . 51TE DATA A5 DETERMINED BY LIMITED ENGINEERING SURVEY
PERFORMED BY 54EC. (NCDENR 5TREAM5, LIDAR CONTOURS,
AND NCDOT ROADS TAKEN FROM REFERENCE GI5 LAYERS)
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON AN A55UMED
ELEVATION OF 100' ADJUSTED TO MATCH 2 FOOT CONTOURS.
rn
l 1
IE
I
70
(0
rn
rn
z
rn
LEGEND FOR
A515UILT FEATURE5
DRAWI NG5 PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
PAPV LEGEND
❑ STREAM PROBLEM AREA5-5TRE55ED
F1VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS- MODERATE
DOWNSTREAM
LIMIT OF RE570RATI0�
'�'z
END LOWER
LONG PROPILE
�O
X
21 +'00
0 +0
EXISTING TREELINE
\_ PERMANENT CON5ERVATION
I PF EASEMENT 4 FENCELINE
P5
0�
cc
NORTH
SCALE I " = 30'
30 15 O 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
+00
11 ov�
PERMANENT ACCE55
EA52MENT
r -j—t: —jecc iw.:
- GRAY FARM 5TREAM RESTORATION 93b5.D10
YEAR 4 MONITORING Prq. ) qr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA Location: Chent: D6 DGC
NC EC0515tEM Scale:l = 30
11010 Rarer Ridge Road • Raleigh. North Carolina 27614 . Phonc: (919) 846 -5900 - Fax: [phone] IRE DELL CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
— .SaxlEC.com Sheet Title: Sheet No.:
REACH 2- PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - G I IS OF I G
RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL
LOG J -HOOK (UH)
INC
ROCK J -HOOK (RJH)
CROSS ROCK VANE
(CRV)
CREATED /RESTORED
WETLANDS
ElEXISTING
STREAMS
DRAWI NG5 PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
PAPV LEGEND
❑ STREAM PROBLEM AREA5-5TRE55ED
F1VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS- MODERATE
DOWNSTREAM
LIMIT OF RE570RATI0�
'�'z
END LOWER
LONG PROPILE
�O
X
21 +'00
0 +0
EXISTING TREELINE
\_ PERMANENT CON5ERVATION
I PF EASEMENT 4 FENCELINE
P5
0�
cc
NORTH
SCALE I " = 30'
30 15 O 30
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
+00
11 ov�
PERMANENT ACCE55
EA52MENT
r -j—t: —jecc iw.:
- GRAY FARM 5TREAM RESTORATION 93b5.D10
YEAR 4 MONITORING Prq. ) qr.: Drawn:
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA Location: Chent: D6 DGC
NC EC0515tEM Scale:l = 30
11010 Rarer Ridge Road • Raleigh. North Carolina 27614 . Phonc: (919) 846 -5900 - Fax: [phone] IRE DELL CO.. NC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
— .SaxlEC.com Sheet Title: Sheet No.:
REACH 2- PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW - G I IS OF I G