20050408 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20120117 403

UT to Sandy Creek
1Zandolhh County, North Carolina
2011 Year 4 Monitoring Report -Final
EEP Project Number: 403
USGS HUC 03030003020010
EcoEngineering Project Number: EEP -08030
Prepared for:
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
2728 Capital Blvd., Suite 1 H 103
Raleigh, NC 27604
irq f
r Nw'
�
�Y
EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK
P. 0. Box 14005 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
919- 287 -4262 FAX [phone]
www.ecoengr.com

UT to Sandy Creek EEP Project Number 403 USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report Randolph County North Carolina November 2011 (Updated January 2012)
Table of Contents
l 0 Executive Summary/Project Abstract
1 1 Project Goals and Objectives
1 2 Vegetation Condition and Comparison
l 3 Stream Stability /Condition and Comparison
1 4 Wetland Conditions and Performance
1 5 Monitoring Plan View
2 0 Methodology
3 0 References
Project Conditions and Monitoring Data Appendices
Appendix A — General Figures and Plan Views
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Consolidated Current Condition Plan View
Appendix B — General Project Tables
Table 1 Project Restoration Components
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attribute Table
Appendix C — Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 6 Vegetation Metadata Table
Table 6A Vegetation Condition Assessment
Table 7 Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
— Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos (see Appendix F — Project Photo Stations)
— Vegetation Problem Area Photos (submitted electronically)
— Vegetation Problem Area Inventory Table (submitted electronically)
Appendix D — Stream Assessment Data
Table 8 Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Table 9 Verification of Bankfull Events
— Stream Station Photos (see Appendix F — Project Photo Stations)
— Cross Sections with Annual Overlays
— Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
— Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
— BEHI and Sediment Export Estimates Table (omitted, not applicable)
— Baseline Stream Data Summary Table [Exhibit Table VIII] (submitted electronically)
— Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary [Exhibit Table IX] (Cross Section and Reach
Parameters submitted electronically)
— Stream Problem Area Photos (submitted electronically)
— Stream Problem Area Inventory Table (submitted electronically)
1
2
2
2
4
Faa-]EcoEngineering
A dmvon of Th John R McAdams Company Inc

UT to Sandy Creek EEP Project Number 403 USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report Randolph County North Carolina November 2011 (Updated January 2012)
Appendix E — Wetland Assessment
Table 10 Wetland Criteria Attainment (omitted, not applicable)
— Precipitation and Water Level Plots (omitted, not applicable)
Appendix F — Protect Photo Stations
ii FFI]EcoEngineering
Ad vision ofThc John R McAdann Company Inc

UT to Sandy Creek EEP Project Number 403 USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report Randolph County North Carolina November 2011 (Updated January 2012)
10 Executive Summary/Proiect Abstract
I I Project Goals and Objectives
The goal of the restoration project is to improve the water quality and biological habitat of
the site's streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers through the following
- Restoration (pattern, dimension, and profile) of unstable streams using natural channel
design techniques
-Re- establishment of riparian buffers (Kimley -Horn, 2008)
- Enhancement of aquatic and terrestrial habitats
- Reduction in nutrient and sediment loading into stream
12 Vegetation Condition and Comparison
Vegetation Plots 1, 2, and 3 are located in a planned low- height planting zone Vegetation
Plots 1, 2, and 3 were abandoned for MY -04 Three new Vegetation Plots (7, 8, and 9) were
added to the project for sampling during MY -04 outside of the planned low - height planting
zone Vegetation Plots 7, 8, and 9 were established by EEP and sampled by EEP during the
2011 Monitoring Year 4 period EcoEngineering survey located Vegetation Plots 7, 8, and 9
during the 2011 Monitoring Year 4 field investigations The location of Vegetation Plots 7,
8, and 9 are depicted on the Consolidated Current Conditions Plan View Appendix A For
Vegetation Plots 4, 5, and 6, original baseline vegetation monitoring data was not provided
prior to the 2008 Monitoring Year 1 and 2008 is also considered a drought year The 2009
Monitoring Year 2 is considered the baseline datum because after two years of monitoring it
is assumed all planted stems within a vegetation monitoring plot have been surveyed and
accounted for Therefore, any additional species observed in proceeding monitoring years
are considered volunteer species The 2011 Monitoring Year 4 data was provided by
Carolina Vegetation Survey and was not manipulated for presentation within Table 7 - Stem
Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Appendix C
Current stem counts were calculated using vegetation plot monitoring data Final stem count
criteria are 320 trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring As for Monitoring
Year 4, UT to Sandy Creek had 6 vegetation plots encompassing 0 15 acres, containing a
total of 88 planted stems excluding live stakes When examining total stems within all 6
vegetation plots, there were 106 planted stems including volunteer stems In total, the 6
vegetation plots yielded a density of 593 planted trees per acre excluding live stakes When
examining the density total of all trees within all 6 vegetation plots, there was a density of
715 planted trees including volunteer trees These density totals exceed the requirements by
10% for both planted trees per acre excluding live stakes and planted trees including
volunteer trees With regard to each individual vegetation plot, all of the vegetation plots
exceeded the requirements by 10% when examining planted stems excluding live stakes and
when examining planted stems including volunteer stems
Exotic /invasive species were observed at the site The following invasive species were
observed at the site Chinese privet (Ligustrum smense) and cattail (Typha latifolia) There
�EcoEngineering
A di ism of The John R. McAdams Company Inc

UT to Sandy Creek EEP Project Number 403 USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report Randolph County North Carolina November 2011 (Updated January 2012)
are sixteen areas in which exotic/invasive species were observed totaling approximately 0 47
acres in size and are approximately 4 61% of the easement acreage The extent of
exotic /invasive species is depicted in the Consolidated Current Condition Plan View
Appendix A
During the previous monitoring period there were 11 areas, totaling approximately 2 26 acres
in size, which were determined to be low stem density areas EEP prescribed supplemental
plantings for these 11 low stem density areas and conducted planting operations on March 8,
2011 The areas which received supplemental plantings are depicted in the Consolidated
Current Condition Plan View Appendix A There were a total of 355 containerized stems
planted and consisted of the following species black cherry (Prunus serotina, 22 stems),
cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda, 25 stems), ironwood (Carpinus carohniana, 70 stems), red
maple (Acer rubrum, 8 stems), red oak (Quercus rubra, 66 stems), river birch (Betula nigra,
7 stems), water oak (Quercus mgra, 50 stems), willow oak (Quercus phellos, 62 stems),
arrowwood (Viburnum dentatum, 25 stems), red chokeberry (Aronta arbuttfolta, 20 stems)
13 Stream Stabthty/Condition and Comparison
Overall, the stream system appears stable and is not migrating toward lateral or vertical
instability Based on the prior year comparison using longitudinal profile data, it appears that
minor systemic aggradat>on has occurred throughout the reach, although this condition does
not appear to pose an imminent threat to the overall stability of the system
The primary concern at UT to Sandy Creek is the sporadic flow conditions observed in the
channel in past momtor>ng years although flow was observed during the 2011 Monitoring
Year 4 field investigation The stream was dry during previous site visits during the month of
August Flowing water in the stream channel has been observed approximately half of the
time the site has been monitored To document bankfull events a crest gage is located
approximately 50 feet upstream of cross - section 4 and is depicted in the Consolidated
Current Condition Plan View Appendix A Evidence of a bankfull event was observed this
monitoring year
14 Wetland Conditions and Performance
No wetlands are being monitored for mitigation credits at this project site
15 Monitoring Plan View
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment
and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found
in the tables and figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration
plan documents available on the EEP website All raw data supporting the tables and figures
in the appendices is available from EEP upon request
2 [JEcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company Inc

UT to Sandy Creek EEP Project Number 403 USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report Randolph County North Carolina November 2011 (Updated January 2012)
2 0 Methodolozy
All monitoring methodologies follow the most current templates and guidelines provided by
EEP (EEP, 2006, EEP, 2009) Photographs were taken at high resolution using an Olympus
FE -115 5 0 megapixel digital camera GPS location information was collected using a
Trimble Geo XT handheld mapping grade GPS unit Stream and vegetation problem areas
were noted in the field on As -Built Plan Sheets
The methods used to generate the data In this report are standard fluvial geomorphology
techniques as described In Applied River Morphology (Rosgen, 1996) and related
publications from US Forest Service and the interagency Stream Mitigation Guidelines
(USACE, 2003)
Vegetation monitoring methods followed the 2008, Version 4 2 CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation (Lee et al , 2008) Vegetation plot photographs were collected for
each vegetation plot Vegetation monitoring plots were re- marked in the field by replacing all
old flagging with new orange flagging Monitoring taxonomy follows Flora of the Carolinas,
Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas (Weakley, 2007) Stem height was measured with
a folding one -meter rule Diameter at breast height and decimeter height were measured with
calipers
3 [JEcoEngineenng
A d %isum of The John R McAdmns Company Irc

UT to Sandy Creek EEP Project Number 403 USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report Randolph County North Carolina November 2011 (Updated January 2012)
3 0 References
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), 2006 Monitoring Report Guidelines, November
16, 2006
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), 2009 Monitoring Report Guidelines, June 1, 2009
Klmley -Horn and Associates, Inc, 2008 UT to Sandy Creek Stream Mitigation Report
Submitted to NCDENR -EEP, March 2008
Lee, Michael T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation, Version 4 2 (http //cvs bio unc edu/methods htm)
Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied Morphology Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2003 April 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2005 Information Regarding Stream Restoration In
The Outer Coastal Plain of North Carolina US Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District, Regulatory Division and North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, December 1, 2005
Weakley, A S , 2008 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, Northern Florida, and
surroundm2 areas University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina
Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, working Draft as of
April 7, 2008
4 FI]EcoEngineenng
A do ism of The John R McAdams Compaw 1W

APPENDIX A
General Figures and Plan View

�••'�' "'i ; -- � - �`� !� try � � �. � 'r �i r
t
jk
A /
8 ? .i
qP
r 5 <3 .— tee. f� E+.. � 1 •
USGS, 7.5 MINUTE, TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE;
GRAYS CHAPEL, N.C.; 1974; LAT: 35.8380510' N
LON: 79.6601200' W c
PROJECT N0.
EEP -08030
E7Le "AME: EEP -08030
UT TO SANDY CREEK
AEcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.
d SCALE:
1 "= 1, 000
S
tent
VICINITY 71 n
Y 1 1 1 lVltir
ENGINE M • PLANNERS • SURMORS • ENVMNMENTAL
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. CHARLOTPS
l
RANDOLPH COUNTY NORTH CAROLIN
f
246 Ker d �n iml-d Durham NC 27 N
800.733 -568 • www.jahmmradm.c®. license No.: C -02Y3

U
m
L °
I
U
rl Pl O
Q
z
a
lr O O O O �� IMO MM�� M^ V~ � Q 1r t W V ■ � � - - T^ j-r -� I - 1 1 ll J 1 I
0 � O Z O U x ,W � � a ►Q 'Z rWQ J oJ -
- KKF °N 4�n �$♦ -p0 j \ i > <FrmN N m�~ p vmm N pp0 m i�r2� m8(n i1 NN � Q � nn ♦ 0 NuKN P m�l oNW f n� H ¢v`m O t yV< Z :� p Yh A °iSO� I yV< N �n� m N 3� S � I yI< $Vm � �~ mA �f y4<Z mmmN � W + on� 1 . �Z3ttNYQ m N �`pp O m �� n P��y�fI � �^m� � °�g�� � I �nh �bp O � m� gU 8 l O � O Z �rmN a��i��U b� p 'I l KS n � �P N �ww Yl O W ��p W x a Zw KNa op p � iii , �h W���� °�Yn Upp�
Z wa✓� °Pono p oF3 wwA�A-1 o .yJZ �� m O �monW W , � o 3 uado FAAN ;2 Z Z
iaP
Z VNJo.eO r%0�W W p 11 f i \ Z 148PP J8 ppVm N � � p 1 � an $ Z Z
-
p n I� °io2 yJRh 7W W
2
�4Bm N ppO _pNpO2 �. N �� �N m SrOZ
2
z x I I Vw yNBn$m 0
_ / Si ,
b.
/
� v
� a A ,� 7 y
d" d -
77� 5
-
r
.Z7. ,F b Q pp� c g
�.
r r �
�0 X X X w 0z GW ■
W OEn�
QrC
hJ M Ml O N h 0 P N N , % � °N�� SS���SSSS�� S�P S 3 �SSS 0
1 1 8 2$i 2 n �r
0 6 J z
O n nn 00nEll
008 °V V_mmO
JZ IL
OLfi
zLC)
w N
M J o
0000 o
H ITT zZ o� o > z
w�
U) w
C) LLJ
000
zzz zowww m 000 o c � zoA ,� .'
. o
•'� d 0
3:
�o z a ° o � N
cq
U O Lr-)
W O + oa0 a-
uj
Nvnm an3wv
IWO sv4vm 0 t
D .

EASEMENT MARKER FOUND ROCK OR STONE
IRON MARKER FOUND ROOT WAD
OVERHEAD WIRE Ow ROCK VANE
EXISTING FENCE LINE x x CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THALWEG OF CREEK 50 FOOT BUFFER
INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR ----- - - - - -- INVASIVE /EXOTIC VEGETATION
INDEX CONTOUR — — — — — —
TOB OF BANK -- TB -- PHOTO POINT
BOTTOM OF BANK - -BB --
CREST GAGE
LOG VANE
2011 SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING ® STREAM PROBLEM AREA
AREAS /LOW STEM DENSITY AREAS **
NOTE: SURVEY DATES OF THALWEG AND
TOP -OF -BANK - 04/19/11 TO 04/21/11.
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE ENCROACHMENT
r /
50 FOOT BUFFER/ /
VEG.
PLOT #2*
F
CROSS SECTION 2
/
4 '
/
i
i
_6
i
i
i
►s���
/
/
II
VEG.
PLOT #7 *.
1 2011 SUPPLEMENTAL
PLANTING AREAS
i'
TB-- --- Tg----- TB - - - -' , ',
i
i L
I
J I
I
till'
/
�0 00
VEG.
003
�QROSS SECTION 1
5002
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE ENCROACHMENT
F
I'
C3
\�4-
.
I _
0 \
/
f
U
/ I
/ x
`2011 SUPPLEMENTAL 1
PLANTING AREAS
xr1l50 FOOT BUFFER
NOTES: \ \
* VEGETATION PLOTS 1, 2, AND 3 ARE LOCATED IN A PLANNED LOW— HEIGHT
PLANTING ZONE. VEGETATION PLOTS 1, 2, AND 3 WERE NOT SAMPLED DURING
MY -04. VEGETATION PLOTS 7, 8, AND 9 WERE ESTABLISHED BY EEP AND SAMPLED /
BY EEP DURING MY -04. ECOENGINEERING SURVEY LOCATED VEGETATION PLOTS , 8
7 ,
AND 9 DURING MY -04.
** ON MARCH 8, 2011, EEP PRESCRIBED SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITHIN AREAS J °�
DEEMED TO BE OF LOW STEM DENSITIES DURING PREVIOUS MONITORING YEAR.
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
SHEET 1 OF 4
W 4
0.
0 0
v .S a
W<
a
W
W
U
Q
z
0
z
O
cC
Iz
ip
iz
E-
O
I U
i=
a.
1 �
Q
I �
0 x
o
o n o
00 0
0 00 m
0 0l II N
w 0-
w w o
w
0
z
F
h z
McADAMS
r
D
T2 �M.
IN V. X57
72 578.7
A
INV.
Z)
VEG.
PLOT #2*
F
CROSS SECTION 2
/
4 '
/
i
i
_6
i
i
i
►s���
/
/
II
VEG.
PLOT #7 *.
1 2011 SUPPLEMENTAL
PLANTING AREAS
i'
TB-- --- Tg----- TB - - - -' , ',
i
i L
I
J I
I
till'
/
�0 00
VEG.
003
�QROSS SECTION 1
5002
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE ENCROACHMENT
F
I'
C3
\�4-
.
I _
0 \
/
f
U
/ I
/ x
`2011 SUPPLEMENTAL 1
PLANTING AREAS
xr1l50 FOOT BUFFER
NOTES: \ \
* VEGETATION PLOTS 1, 2, AND 3 ARE LOCATED IN A PLANNED LOW— HEIGHT
PLANTING ZONE. VEGETATION PLOTS 1, 2, AND 3 WERE NOT SAMPLED DURING
MY -04. VEGETATION PLOTS 7, 8, AND 9 WERE ESTABLISHED BY EEP AND SAMPLED /
BY EEP DURING MY -04. ECOENGINEERING SURVEY LOCATED VEGETATION PLOTS , 8
7 ,
AND 9 DURING MY -04.
** ON MARCH 8, 2011, EEP PRESCRIBED SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITHIN AREAS J °�
DEEMED TO BE OF LOW STEM DENSITIES DURING PREVIOUS MONITORING YEAR.
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
SHEET 1 OF 4
W 4
0.
0 0
v .S a
W<
a
W
W
U
Q
z
0
z
O
cC
Iz
ip
iz
E-
O
I U
i=
a.
1 �
Q
I �
0 x
o
o n o
00 0
0 00 m
0 0l II N
w 0-
w w o
w
0
z
F
h z
McADAMS

STREAM CROSSING
,lob.
TB- - - -IIs
/
-2011 SUPPLEMENTAL
PLANTING AREAS
- - - N-1
X9903
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE
Te - - --
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE
_re - - - -,
/ / 3
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
SHEET 2 OF 4
z�
v
� 0)
e e
W 4
3
0 0 Ell
V g�
W<
a
?
r Q-3^
W
W
U
Q
z
0
z
¢
U
F-
CC
O
z
z
O
U
2
a.
O
z
n o
ao o n o oS
o 00 0) a N II N
W w o
w
0
z
m
F �
McADAMS

TB
re
�
F
2011 SUPPLEMENTALJi
/ PLANTING AREAS //
n /
i
i
/ / �50 FOOT BUFFER
If / I 1
/ � r
I
P \I
STREAM CROSSING
TYPHA LATIFOLIA
/'ENCROACHMENT
I
TYPHA LATIFOLIA
ENCROACHMENT
i
2011 SUPPLEMENTAL
PLANTING AREAS
7(119 CI In01 C\ICAITAI
JItt' I,KUJJ -V /ANL
STRUCTURE; LOOSE
BOULDER
2011 SUPPLEMENTAL
PLANTING AREAS
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE
ENCROACHMENT
_c,r_Y— Y�Yy�— YY —�EYY Y�
�.0 O
GRAPHIC SCALE y
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
SHEET 3 OF 4
.L
I` VU
•� O
W�
/O g
V
W<
I
5 e
Fa
HI
W
W
U
Q
z
0
I ¢
iz
IoI
u
Iz
ip
iz
I
'O
I U
Z
r p„
I Q
I ¢
I
O x
n O
� 0
ao o co o
O
d O �� N
W d �
W W p
W
0
Z
z
o
Me ADAMS
9
%
2011 SUPPLEMENTALJi
/ PLANTING AREAS //
n /
i
i
/ / �50 FOOT BUFFER
If / I 1
/ � r
I
P \I
STREAM CROSSING
TYPHA LATIFOLIA
/'ENCROACHMENT
I
TYPHA LATIFOLIA
ENCROACHMENT
i
2011 SUPPLEMENTAL
PLANTING AREAS
7(119 CI In01 C\ICAITAI
JItt' I,KUJJ -V /ANL
STRUCTURE; LOOSE
BOULDER
2011 SUPPLEMENTAL
PLANTING AREAS
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE
ENCROACHMENT
_c,r_Y— Y�Yy�— YY —�EYY Y�
�.0 O
GRAPHIC SCALE y
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
SHEET 3 OF 4
.L
I` VU
•� O
W�
/O g
V
W<
I
5 e
Fa
HI
W
W
U
Q
z
0
I ¢
iz
IoI
u
Iz
ip
iz
I
'O
I U
Z
r p„
I Q
I ¢
I
O x
n O
� 0
ao o co o
O
d O �� N
W d �
W W p
W
0
Z
z
o
Me ADAMS

9924A
Of
e
b age
LVI I .)urrLr-Mt.IN IHL
PLANTING AREAS
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE ENCROACHMENT
2011 SUPPLEMENTAL
PLANTING AREAS
ENCROACHMENT,J�
re
s
re
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE
ENCROACHMENT
x
e
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
NEW-
1 inch = 40 ft.
SHEET 4 OF 4
U � U
p
• � .d�q?i � a �
"LUG V
W t°
O a �;
W<
O
n
O
O
I
d
w
w
0
z
F
U
O
C
Q
z
�J
x
O
r)
0 a)
O II N
� c d-
Lw O
vi
t` to O
McADAMS

APPENDIX B
General Prod ect Tables

Exhibit Table 1 Protect Restoration Components
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Project/EEP Project Number 403
Project
Segment or
Reach ID
� j 1�6
�'
Q
110 Q
=
Stationing
Comment
Mitigation Units exclude 2
ford structures which total 50
Reach 1
1 000
R
P1
1 400
1
1 350
100 +00 114 +00
feet
Reach II
870
R
P1
900
1
900
114 +00 123 +00
Reach III
290
R
P1
384
1
384
200 +00 203 +84
Pond Tnbutary
Mitigation Unit Summations
Riparian
Nonnparian
Stream
Wetland
Wetland
Total Wetland
Buffer
Comment
2,634
0
0
0
179 903
R= Restoration EII= Enhancement II P1= Priority I P3= Priority III
EI= Enhancement S= Stabilization P2= Prionty 11 SS= Stream Bank Stabilization

Exhibit Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Project/EEP Project Number 403
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
Winter 04
Jan 05
Final Design — 90%
Summer 06
Winter 06
Construction
Summer 07
Fall 07
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
Summer 07
Fall 07
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments 1 & 2
Fall 07
Fall 07
Contamenzed and B &B plantings for reach/segments 1 & 2
Fall 07
Winter 07
Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monitoring — baseline
Winter 07
Mar 08
Year 1 Monitoring
Oct 08
Nov 08
Year 2 Monitoring
Sep 09
Nov 09
Year 3 Monitoring
Jun 10
Oct 10
Year 4 Monitoring
Apr 11
Jun 11
Note Timeframe estimated from information provided by EEP
C

Exhibit Table 3 Project Contacts Table
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect Number 403
Designer
Kimley Horn and Associates Inc
P O Box 33068, Raleigh North Carolma 27636
Primary project design POC
POC name and phone [phone]
Construction Contractor
Shamrock Environmental
PO Box 14987
Construction contractor POC
Greensboro NC 27415
Planting Contractor
Contact Appalachian Environmental Services
PO Box 52 Webster NC 28788
Planting contractor POC
phone [phone]
Seeding Contractor
Contact Appalachian Environmental Services
PO Box 52, Webster NC 28788
Planting contractor POC
phone [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Contact Appalachian Environmental Services
phone [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Contact Appalachian Environmental Services
phone [phone]
Monitoring Performers
EcoEngmeermg A Division of The John R McAdams Co
2905 Meridian Parkway Durham NC 27713
Stream Monitoring POC Jim Halley
919 287 4262
Vegetation Monitoring POC Jun Halley
919 2874262
Wetland Monitoring POC NA INA
Note lntormatlon obtamed trom ELF documents and bid tabulation results Use contacts in table for additional
information or to verify data

Exhibit Table 4 Protect Background Table
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Pro ect/EEP Project Number 403
Project County
Randolph County
Drainage Area
4 2 square miles
Drainage impervious cover estimate ( %) For example
Estimated at 1%
Stream Order
1 st for UT to Sandy Creek
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Carolina Slate Belt
Rosgen Classification of As -built
C
Cowardin Classification
R3UBH
Dominant soil types
Chewacla loam, Vance
Reference site ID
Reference Reach Tributary to Sandy Creek
USGS 14UC for Project and Reference
3030003020010
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project and Reference
03 -06 -09
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference
WSIII
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed9
No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d
listed segment9
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
NA
of project easement fenced
100%

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Assessment Data

Table 5 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
UT to Sandy Creek Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect ID 403
Planted Excludin g Live Stakes Summary
Tract
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold
Met9
Tract Mean
UT to Sandy Creek
VP4
Y
VP5
Y
100%
VP6
Y
VP8
Y
VP9
Y
Total Planted and Volunteer Stem Summary
Tract
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold
Met9
Tract Mean
UT to Sandy Creek
VP4
Y
VP5
Y
100%
VP6
Y
VP8
Y
VP9
Y

Table 6 Vegetation Metadata
UT to Sand Creek Restoration Pro ect/EEP Project ID 403
Report Prepared By
George Buchholz
Date Prepared
5/16/2011 14 45 PM
database name
EcoEngmeermg 2010 C mdb
database location
X \Projects\EEP\EEP 08030 (UT to Sandy Creek) \Storm \CVS Vegetation Data\2011
Ve eation Data
computer name
BUCHHOLES
file size
49008640
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN
THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file the report worksheets and a summary of project(s) and
proiect data
Pro j, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre for each year This excludes
live stakes
Pro j, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre for each year This includes live
stakes all planted stems and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems dead stems missing
etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor b Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total
stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by e for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by e for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot dead
and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined ) for each plot dead and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
403
project Name
UT to Sandy Creek Williams Tract
Description
UT to Sandy Creek Restoration Project
River Basin
Cape Fear
len h ft
2 680
stream-to-edge width ft
25
area (sq m
0 02 sq miles 10 2
Required Plots calculated
6
Sampled Plots
6

Table 6A Vegetation Condition Assessment
UT to Sandy Creek Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect ID 403
Planted Acreage 7 11
Easement
Acreage 1018
Number
Vegetation
CCPV
of
Combined
Easement
Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Area
Very limited cover of
-Mapping
4 Invasive Areas
both woody and
0 1 acres
diagonal
red
0
0
1 Bare Areas
herbaceous material
Woody stem densities
clearly below target
2 Low Stem
levels based on MY3
0 1 acres
0
0
00%
Density Areas
4 or 5 stem count
Encroachment
polygons at map
none
T at 1
o
®
®�
00%
Areas
Areas with woody
stems of a size class
3 Areas of Poor
that are obviously
0 25 acres
0
0
00%
Growth Rates or
small given the
i or
monitoring year
Cumaltiv"e Total
®�
! ! � owl
Easement
Acreage 1018
Number
o Of
egetation
CCPV
of
Combined
Easement
Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Areas or points (if too
-Mapping
4 Invasive Areas
small to render as
polygons at map
1000 SF
diagonal
red
16
047
4 61 %
of Concern
scale
Areas or points (if too
5 Easement
small to render as
Encroachment
polygons at map
none
0
0
00%
Areas
scale)

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
UT to Sandy Creek Restoration Project /EEP Project ID: 403
Pape I
Notes:
a) Data presented in table was prorided to EcoEngincering from the Carolina Vegetation Sum n Data was not manipulated by EcoEngincering. Fonmalting of table was performed M EcoEng.=nng.
b) Vegetation Plots 1. 2, and 3 are located in a planned low- height planting zone. Vegetation Plots 1. 2, ar d 3 —m abandoned for MY4n4. Three new Vegetation Plots (7. g. and 9) were added to the project for sampling durng MY414 outside of the planned low - height
planting zone. The location of Vegetation Plots 7. g. and 9 are depicted on the Consolidated Current Conditions Plan View.
c) For Vegetation Plots 4. 5, and 6, original baseline regelation monitoring data was not prim ded prior to the 200g Monitoring Year I and 2008 is considered a drought Scar. The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the baseline datum because after two pears of monitoring it
is assumed all planted stems within a vegetation monitoring plot here been summed and accounted for Themfom. am additional species observed in proceeding monitoring cars are considered rolunte r species.
d) An Acer rubmm was summed during 21HI8 monitoring season men though it is not a species listed as being planted. Although acer mbmm is a volunteer s(em. it was determined that this specific stem would continued to be monitored in the proceeding monitoring Nears .
c) PnoLS = Planted Excluding Lire Stakes: P -all = All Planted Stems, T = Total Planted and Volunteer Stems
Current Plot Data (MY4 201 1)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
T e
403- alien -VP7
403 - alien -%'P8
403 - alien -N'P9
E403- 01 -VP4
6403- 01 -VP5
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoI.S 111-all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer rubru n
red maple
Tree
1
1
3
Aronia arbutifolia
Red Chokeberry
Shrub
I
I
I
Baccharis halimifolia
eastem baccharis
Shrub Tree
Betula ni ra
river birch
Tree
1 1
11
11
4
4
4
Carpinus carohniana
American hornbeam
Shrub Tree
I
I
I
1 2
?
2
Carya
hickory
Tree
11
131
13
13
Cehis laevi rata
sugarberry
Shrub Tree
Comus
dogwood
Shrub Tree
I
I
rrmm
Comusaou
silk dogwood
Shrub
to
10
12
Corpus florida
flowering dogwood
Shrub Tree
I
I
I
Corpus sericea ss . sericea
redosier dogwood
I
1
I
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1 5
5
5
6
6
8
1
Hamamelis virginiana
American witchhazel
Shnib Tree
I
I
1 1
41
4
9
i
5
5
Ju glans nigra
black walnut
Tree
Juni etas
uni er
1
1
1
Lindera benzoin
northern s icebush
Shrub free
Li uidambar
sweet rum
I
Mimosa
sensitive plant
Vine Shrub
N ssa s Ivatica
black nun
Tree
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
I
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Shrub Tree
I
11
21
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
uercus
oak
Shrub Tree
1
1
1
uercus nigra
water oak
Tree
I
I
I
I
I
uercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
I
I
Rhus co allinum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub Tree
Unknown
unknown
I
Viburnum dentatum
southem arrowwood
Shrub Tree
1
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
151
151
18
191
19
26
17
17
17
20
201
24
R
8
Il
1
I
I
I
I
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
51
51 7
9
9 11
5
5 5
5
5 5
4
4 5
607.03
607.03
768.9
768.9
687.97
687.97
809.37
809.37
323.75
323.75 5
Notes:
a) Data presented in table was prorided to EcoEngincering from the Carolina Vegetation Sum n Data was not manipulated by EcoEngincering. Fonmalting of table was performed M EcoEng.=nng.
b) Vegetation Plots 1. 2, and 3 are located in a planned low- height planting zone. Vegetation Plots 1. 2, ar d 3 —m abandoned for MY4n4. Three new Vegetation Plots (7. g. and 9) were added to the project for sampling durng MY414 outside of the planned low - height
planting zone. The location of Vegetation Plots 7. g. and 9 are depicted on the Consolidated Current Conditions Plan View.
c) For Vegetation Plots 4. 5, and 6, original baseline regelation monitoring data was not prim ded prior to the 200g Monitoring Year I and 2008 is considered a drought Scar. The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the baseline datum because after two pears of monitoring it
is assumed all planted stems within a vegetation monitoring plot here been summed and accounted for Themfom. am additional species observed in proceeding monitoring cars are considered rolunte r species.
d) An Acer rubmm was summed during 21HI8 monitoring season men though it is not a species listed as being planted. Although acer mbmm is a volunteer s(em. it was determined that this specific stem would continued to be monitored in the proceeding monitoring Nears .
c) PnoLS = Planted Excluding Lire Stakes: P -all = All Planted Stems, T = Total Planted and Volunteer Stems

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
UT to Sandy Creek Restoration Project /EEP Project ID: 403
Page 2
Notes:
a) Data pmem[cd in [able was provided to E- Enginecring from the Carolina Vegetation Surwy Data was not manipulated by EcoEngineer og. Formatting of table was performed by EcoEnginccnng.
h) Vegetation Plots 1, 2, end 3 are located in a planned low - height planting zone. Vegctaticm Plots 1, 2, and 3 were abandoned for MY -04. Three new Vegetation Plots (7, 8, and 9) were added to the project for sampling during MY-04 outside of [he planned low - height planting zone.
The location of Vegetation Plots 7, 8, and 9 are depicted on the Consolidated Curren[ Condition Plan View.
c) For Vcge[aim Plots 4, 5, and 6, original baseline vegetation monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Monitoring Year 1 and 2008 is considered a drought year The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the baseline datum because after two years of monitoring it is
assumed all planted sterna within a vegetation monitoring plot have been surveyed and accounted for. Thmefum, any additional speces observed in proceeding monitoring years are considered volunteer species.
in An Acer rubrum was surveyed during 2008 monitoring season even though it is no[ a species listed as being planted. Although acer ruhrnun is a volunteer stem, it was detemnined that this specific atom would continued to be monitored in the proceeding matitonng Veers.
0 Pnol.S = Planted Excluding Live Stakes. P -all = All Plsntxl ti_,, I = I rnal Planted and Volunteer Stems
Current Plot Data
MY4 2011
Annual b1eans
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
E403- 01 -VP6
M14 (2011)
M13 (2010)
MY2 (2009)
1111 (2008)
PnoI.S
P -all
T
PnoI.S
P -all
T
PnoI.S
P -all
T
PnoI.S
P -all
"1'
Pool's
P -all
'I
Acer rubrum
red ma le
Tree
1
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
1
Aronia arbutifolia
Red Chokebeny
Shrub
I
I
I
I
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub Tree
I
Betula ni rra
river birch
Tree
4
4
5
19
19
20
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
Ca inns caroliniana
American hornbeam
Shrub Tree
3
3
Ca rya
hickory
Tree
1
131
131
14
Celtis laevi rata
sugarberry
Shrub Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Comas
dogwood
Shrub Tree
I
I
Comus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
10
10
12
18
18
24
19
19
25
14
1.41
14
Comus florida
flowering, dogwood
Shrub Tree
1
Comus sericea ss . sericea
redosier dogwood
1
Fraxinus enns lvanica
green ash
Tree
II
II
14
17
17
25
11
II
11
14
14
14
Hamamelis vir iniana
American witchhazel
Shrub Tree
10
10
15,
7
7
7
7
71
7
3
3
3
Ju lans ni rra
black walnut
Tree
I
I
1
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Juni erus
juniper
I
I
I
Lindera benzoin
northern s icebush
Shrub -Free
I
I
1
I
I
Li uidambar
sweetgunt
I
Mimosa
sensitive plant
Vine Shrub
35
N ssa s Ivatica
black nun
Tree
I
I
I
Pines taeda
lobiolly pine
Tree
I
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Shrub Tree
5
5
6
I
I
uercus
oak
Shrub Tree
I
I
I
uercus ni rra
water oak
Tree
2
2
?
uercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
31
3
3
1
1
Rhos co allinum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub Tree
2
I
Unknown
unknown
I
Viburnum dentatum
southern arrowwood
Shrub Tree
4
4
4
5
51
5
10
101
10
9
9
9
71
7
7
Stem count
size (arcs)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
91
91
10
881
8
106
651
6511
83
59
59
104
481
481
48
1
6
6
6
6
0.02
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
3
3 3
18
18 21
ll
11 12
ll
11 14
II II Il
364.22
364.22
593.54
593.54
438.41
438.41
397.94
397.94
323.75
Notes:
a) Data pmem[cd in [able was provided to E- Enginecring from the Carolina Vegetation Surwy Data was not manipulated by EcoEngineer og. Formatting of table was performed by EcoEnginccnng.
h) Vegetation Plots 1, 2, end 3 are located in a planned low - height planting zone. Vegctaticm Plots 1, 2, and 3 were abandoned for MY -04. Three new Vegetation Plots (7, 8, and 9) were added to the project for sampling during MY-04 outside of [he planned low - height planting zone.
The location of Vegetation Plots 7, 8, and 9 are depicted on the Consolidated Curren[ Condition Plan View.
c) For Vcge[aim Plots 4, 5, and 6, original baseline vegetation monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Monitoring Year 1 and 2008 is considered a drought year The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the baseline datum because after two years of monitoring it is
assumed all planted sterna within a vegetation monitoring plot have been surveyed and accounted for. Thmefum, any additional speces observed in proceeding monitoring years are considered volunteer species.
in An Acer rubrum was surveyed during 2008 monitoring season even though it is no[ a species listed as being planted. Although acer ruhrnun is a volunteer stem, it was detemnined that this specific atom would continued to be monitored in the proceeding matitonng Veers.
0 Pnol.S = Planted Excluding Live Stakes. P -all = All Plsntxl ti_,, I = I rnal Planted and Volunteer Stems

APPENDIX D
Stream Assessment Data

Table 8a Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect Number 403
Reach 1 1,410 Linear Feet
Feature Category
Metnc (per As built and reference baselines)
(# Stable) Number
Performing as Intended
Total number per
As built
Total Number / feet in
unstable state
% Perform in Stable
Condition
Feature Perform
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1 Present 9
12
12
NA
100
2 Armor stable e g n o dis lacement 9
12
12
NA
100
3 Facet grade appears stables slo e 5 design range)
1
12
NA
12
4 Minimal evidence of embeddin finin 9
12
12
NA
100
5 Length appropriate?
NA
NA
NA
NA
78
B Pools
1 Present9 (e g not subject to severe aggrad or migrat ?)
15
15
NA
100
2 Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D Mean Bkf>l 69)
Max Pool / 12 > 1 6
12 of 15
Design = 3 5/1 2 =
29 15
NA
77
3 Length appropriate9 (p p spacing)
NA
NA
NA
NA
89
C Thalwe
1 Upstream of meander bend (run/inflection) centering?
10
10
NA
100
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centermg9
9
10
NA
100
100
D Meander
1 Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion9
10
10
NA
100
2 Of those eroding # w /concomitant point bar formation
10
10
NA
100
3 Apparent Re within spec?
8
10
NA
85
4 Sufficient flood lam access and relief?
10
10
NA
100
95
E Bed General
1 General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation)
NA
NA
5/25
99
2 Channel bed degradation — areas of increasing down
cutting or head cuttm 9
NA
NA
NA
100
100
F Bank
1 Activclycroding wasting or slum in bank
NA
1 /18
NA
99
99
G Vanes
1 Free of bank or arm scour9
10
10
NA
100
2 Height appropriate9
10
10
NA
100
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate9
10
10
NA
100
4 Free of piping or other structural fadures9
10
10
NA
100
100
H Wads/ Boulders
1 Free of scour?
NA
NA
NA
100
2 Footing stable?
NA
NA
NA
100
100

Table 8b Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Project/EEP Project Number 403
Reach II 886 Linear Feet
Feature Category
Metric (per As built and reference baselines)
(# Stable) Number
Performing as Intended
Total number per
As built
Total Number / feet in
unstable state
% Perform in Stable
Condition
Feature Perform
Mean or Total
A Riffles
I Present 9
13
13
NA
100
2 Armor stable e g n o dis lacement v
13
13
NA
100
3 Facet grade appears stables slo e 5 design range)
2
13
NA
12
4 Minimal evidence of embeddm fimn 9
13
13
NA
100
5 Length appropriate?
NA
NA
NA
NA
78
B Pools
1 Present? (e g not subject to severe aggrad or migrat ?)
16
16
NA
100
2 Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D Mean Bkf>l 6 ?)
Max Pool / 12 > 1 6
12 of 16
Design = 3 5112 =
29 16
NA
77
3 Length appropriate? (p p spacing)
NA
NA
NA
NA
89
C Thalwe
1 Upstream of meander bend (run/inflection) centering?
10
10
NA
100
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering?
10
10
NA
100
100
D Meander
1 Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion?
10
10
NA
100
2 Of those eroding # w /concomitant point bar formation
10
10
NA
100
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
9
10
NA
85
4 Sufficient flood lam access and rehef?
10
10
NA
100
95
E Bed General
1 General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation)
NA
NA
5/25
99
2 Channel bed degradation — areas of increasing down
cutting or head cutting?
NA
NA
NA
100
100
F Bank
1 Activelyeroding wasting or slum m bank
NA
1/18
NA
99
99
G Vanes
1 Free of bank or arm scour?
11
11
NA
100
2 Height appropriate?
11
11
NA
100
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
11
11
NA
100
4 Free of piping or other structural fadures9
8
11
NA
73
93
H Wads/ Boulders
I Free of scour?
NA
NA
NA
100
2 Footing stable?
NA
NA
NA
100
100

Table 8c Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Prolect/EEP Project Number 403
Reach III 384 Linear Feet
Feature Category
Metric (per As built and reference baselines)
(# Stable) Number
Performing as Intended
Total number per
As built
Total Number / feet in
unstable state
% Perform in Stable
Condition
Feature Perform
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1 Present 7
7
7
NA
100
2 Armor stable e g n o displacement)?
7
7
NA
100
3 Facet grade appears stables (slope 5 design range)
5
7
NA
71
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
7
7
NA
100
5 Length appropriate?
NA
NA
NA
NA
93
B Pools
1 Present? (e g not subject to severe aggrad or migrat 9)
5
5
NA
100
2 Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D Mean Bkf>l 6 ?)
Max Pool / 0 5 > 1 6 4
of 5
Design= 1 9/05=
3 8 5
NA
80
3 Length appropriate? spacing)
NA
NA
NA
NA
90
C Thalweg
1 Upstream of meander bend (run/inflection) centering?
7
8
NA
100
C Thalwe
2 Downstream of meander (glide /inflection) centering?
8
8
NA
100
100
D Meander
I Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion?
8
8
NA
100
2 Of those eroding # w /concomitant point bar formation
8
8
NA
100
3 Apparent Re within spec?
8
8
NA
100
4 Sufficient flood lam access and relief?
8
8
NA
100
100
E Bed General
1 General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation)
NA
NA
1/200
48
2 Channel bed degradation — areas of increasing down
cutting or head cutting?
NA
NA
NA
100
74
F Bank
1 Actively roding wasting or slum m bank
NA
NA
NA
100
100
G Vanes
1 Free of bank or arm scour?
5
5
NA
100
2 Height appropriate?
5
5
NA
100
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
5
5
NA
100
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
5
5
NA
100
100
H Wads/ Boulders
1 Free of scour?
NA
NA
NA
100
2 Footing stable?
NA
NA
NA
100
100

Table 9 Verification of Bankfull Events
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Project/EEP Protect Number 403
Method
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Photo # (if available)
On Site Crest Gage located at
Between 09/09/09 and
Station 115 +32 Observed
06/29/10
Not Available
06/29/10
elevation on gage at elevation
56663
On Site Crest Gage located at
Between 06/29/10 and
Station 115 +32 Observed
04/21/11
Not Available
04/21/11
elevation on gage at elevation
56751
Note A crest gage was installed during the 2009 Monitoring Year 2 field investigations so that bankfull events can be
documented during subsequent monitoring years Monitoring Year 3 is the first monitoring year in which bankfull events
were documented The crest gage is located at Station 115 +32 and is depicted in the Consolidated Current Condition Plan
View located in Appendix A

UT to Sandy Creek EEP PrQlect Number 403 USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report Randolph County North Carolina June 2011
UT to SANDY CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 403
CROSS SECTION
I
Year
0
Year 1
Year
2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Station ft
Elev ft
Station
Elev
Station ft
Elev ft
Station ft
Elev ft
Station ft
Elev ft
Station ft Elev ft
Station ft Elev ft
000
58265
000
58268
021
58267
008
58263
009
58267
014
58265
1300
58105
700
581 64
1444
58077
1544
58067
1049
581 20
3200
58035
2026
58075
3437
58021
338
58031
1742
58072
� 43 00
580 10
2973
58039
4419
57990
4252
580 1
4354
57995
4620
57965
3896
580 19
4963
57947
4333
58007
4860
57896
4900
57927
4359
58005
5082
578 80
4454
57983
5060
578 81
5000
57891
4781
57948
5404
57870
45 88
57973
53 53
57863
51 10
57869
5108
57896
5734
578 79
47 15
57963
5521
57871
5200
57880
5225
57882
6002
579 19
4857
5793
5730
57881
5270
57869
5364
57878
6801
58045
4924
57941
5888
57922
53 10
57856
5489
57871
9349
58039
4959
57943
6087
579 14
5360
57867
5599
57867
11782
581 37
5003
57923
6491
57993
5400
578 57
5768
57876
5035
579 12
6693
58020
5450
57852
6081
57907
5054
5789
6969
58036
5490
57856
6469
57989
5057
578 84
10436
58042
5520
57867
6808
58030
51 16
57873
11802
58143
55 80
57875
7326
58043
51 67
578 85
118 10
58143
5660
578 80
8364
58045
5233
57885
5700
57901
9912
58040
5303
57881
5980
579 19
11873
581 37
536
57871
6260
57952
5451
57866
6750
58035
5539
5787
6920
58049
5608
578 78
8700
58039
5674
57882
10420
58047
57 18
57893
11800
58140
5724
578 88
5751
57902
5993
57923
64 1
57993
775
58045
101
58037
11789
581 38
r�
L�COSstem
k n I lI ulunl
Fa-l]EcoEngineering
Ad in J h R M Ad—C mp. y l

583
582
�R 581
e
0
580
a�
W 579
578
577 —
UT to Sandy Creek Cross Section 1 - Riffle
--- — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — Bankfull
�— Year -0, 8/22/07
— Year -1, 9/16/08
Year-2, 9/11/09
9 Year -3, 6/30/10
— I(Year-4, 04/21/11
UT to Sandy Creek • EEP Project Number: 403 • USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Randolph County, North Carolina • June, 2011
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR-4,2011 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 1
PROJECT SANDY CREEK FEATURE: Riffle
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH SANDY CREEK
DATE 04/19/2011 to 04/21/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
17.80
sq. ft.
Bankfull Width
26.00
ft.
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.70
ft.
Bankfull Max Depth
1.40
ft.
Width/Depth Ratio
38.00
Entrenchment Ratio
3.90
Classification
C
Bankfull Elevation:
580.10
ft.
rl�
tem
1�I1 'CIIic]I
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
[Ja]EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.

UT to SANDY CREEK
Year -3
EEP PROJECT # 403
Elev. ft
Year -0
Year -1
Year -2
Station
Elev. (R)
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
0.00
582.59
0.00
582.55
0.36
582.58
0.09
582.59
8.00
581.44
5.18
582.05
3.22
582.21
16.30
580.54
10.34
581.13
11.17
581.00
19.60
580.36
16.37
580.57
19.11
580.47
21.10
579.95
19.88
580.32
23.93
578.88
21.70
579.70
22.34
579.57
24.00
578.71
22.50
579.40
23.74
577.17
26.75
577.62
23.20
578.01
24.07
577.05
28.41
576.54
23.20
576.90
24.73
576.90
29.38
576.37
24.70
576.82
25.37
577.15
3039
576.40
25.80
575.04
26.60
577.48
32.48
576.65
26.80
575.02
27.69
577.36
34.08
577.32
27.40
575.06
29.11
577.33
35.39
577.60
28.50
575.11
30.15
577.37
38.60
577.99
29.60
575.20
31.58
577.55
42.65
578.71
30.80
575.45
32.96
577.64
62.56
579.23
32.30
575.85
33.99
577.75
80.54
579.51
33.60
577.00
34.58
578.39
84.82
579.31
33.70
577.56
37.02
578.27
84.91
579.31
34.90
577.74
41.11
578.54
36.60
577.84
43.99
578.82
38.40
577.94
58.87
579.26
40.80
578.38
69.36
579.33
43.20
578.74
86.12
579.38
45.60
578.90
48.30
579.07
61.30
579.18
67.60
579.23
85.30
579.22
r�
,,�cos�!s�tem
I_n IiII ruu�n
CROSS - SECTION:
Year -3
Station ft
Elev. ft
0.17
582.56
10.14
581.21
21.00
579.74
24.01
576.25
24.39
575.17
26.62
575.22
29.11
576.15
30.42
577.25
30.77
577.78
37.03
579.17
46.30
579.06
69.44
579.32
84.81
579.25
UT to Sandy Creek • EEP Project Number: 403 • USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Randolph County, North Carolina • June, 2011
2
Year -4
Station ft
Elev. ft
0.15
582.59
8.64
581.44
12.99
580.91
17.09
580.48
19.03
580.47
20.01
580.12
20.69
580.00
21.16
579.69
21.55
579.48
21.86
578.30
21.98
577.03
22.49
576.19
23.05
575.81
23.47
575.57
24.21
575.43
25.11
575.20
25.40
575.09
26.90
575.22
28.18
575.64
29.27
576.02
30.12
576.75
31.22
577.29
31.74
577.88
32.40
577.83
32.89
577.85
32.91
578.30
33.10
578.36
33.99
578.31
34.48
578.73
36.05
578.88
38.33
579.20
40.92
578.81
43.66
579.13
53.65
579.18
65.14
579.45
84.72
579.25
Year -5 Year -6
Station ft Elev. ft Station ft Elev. ft
[JEcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company. Inc.

584
583
582
—581
,680
579
0 578
577
576
575
574
UT to Sandy Creek • EEP Project Number: 403 • USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Randolph County, North Carolina • June, 2011
UT to Sandy Creek Cross Section 2 - Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — t
— Bankfull
Year -0, 8122/07
--- Year -1, 9/16/08
---N--Year -2, 9/11/09
9 Year -3, 6/30/10
---It— Year -4, 04/21/11
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 8!
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR4, 2011 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 2
PROJECT SANDY CREEK FEATURE: Pool
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH SANDY CREEK
DATE 04/19/2011 to 04/21/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
64.6
sq. ft.
Bankfull Width
63.6
ft.
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.0
ft.
Bankfull Max Depth
4.6
ft.
Width/Depth Ratio
62.5
Entrenchment Ratio
0.0
Classification
n/a
Bankfull Elevation:
579.69
ft.
r�
tern
I�,n 1a1 rnx�n
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
AEcoEngineering
A division W1'M J.M R. McAdams Company, Inc.

UT to Sandy Creek • EEP Project Number: 403 • USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Randolph County, North Carolina • June, 2011
UT to SANDY CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 403
CROSS- SECTION:
3
Year
-0
Year -1
Year
-2
Year -3
Year -11
Year -5
Year -6
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. (ft)
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
0.00
568.02
0.00
568.03
-0.62
568.02
0.37
568.11
0.01
568.13
0.09
568.02
17.00
567.86
10.62
568.12
17.28
567.99
5.09
568.22
9.21
568.14
22.50
567.60
18.89
567.71
24.28
567.38
12.2
568.1
23.76
567.49
25.00
567.04
23.48
567.43
26.91
566.64
16.87
567.92
25.00
566.95
28.00
565.96
25.40
566.76
28.95
566.13
19.15
567.76
29.60
565.22
28.70
565.55
26.42
566.41
29.31
565.12
20.91
567.79
31.28
564.86
29.00
565.15
28.69
565.81
29.73
564.94
22.66
567.67
32.56
564.86
29.50
564.95
29.16
565.08
29.82
564.80
23.63
567.47
35.05
564.85
30.40
564.70
29.81
564.72
31.04
564.63
25.08
567.14
35.31
565.18
31.30
564.61
30.68
564.58
31.97
564.58
27.06
566.49
39.92
566.95
32.40
564.54
31.84
564.51
32.45
564.58
28.47
566.35
43.70
567.12
33.10
564.65
32.82
564.57
33.32
564.54
29.13
566.02
52.54
566.95
34.00
564.65
33.59
564.58
34.18
564.62
29.52
565
61.36
566.85
34.70
564.74
34.21
564.64
34.99
564.71
29.53
565.07
61.50
566.85
35.20
565.27
34.76
564.68
35.44
565.14
29.75
564.88
36.40
565.83
35.46
565.55
35.92
565.81
30.21
564.72
40.00
566.82
37.39
566.14
39.81
566.94
30.93
564.57
41.00
56693
40.15
566.86
49.89
567.09
31.75
564.49
48.00
566.93
48.11
566.90
61.37
566.93
32.45
564.45
61.50
566.86
61.47
566.88
33.1
564.44
33.75
564.51
34.5
564.55
34.98
564.62
35.32
564.99
35.56
565.52
36.31
565.88
37.43
566.18
38.57
566.55
39.88
566.94
41.94
567.09
45.43
567.08
52.62
567.03
61.33
566.87
r�
[JEcoEngineering
A diviaiun,f Me John R. McAdams Company, Ine.

UT to Sandy Creek a EEP Project Number: 403 • USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Randolph County, North Carolina • June, 2011
UT to Sandy Creek Cross Section 3 - Riffle
569
568
X567-------------------------
c
t6 566
d _
— •Bankfull
ua 565 —s— Year -0, 8/22107
- -o— Year -1, 9/16/08
—M— Year -2, 9/11/09
564 — g— Year -3, 6/30/10
- -)K--Year-4, 04/21/11
563
-2 3 8 13 18 23 28 33 38 43 48 53 58 63
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR-4,2011 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 3
PROJECT SANDY CREEK FEATURE: Riffle
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH SANDY CREEK
DATE 04/19/2011 to 04/21/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
19.0
sq. ft.
Bankfull Width
14.2
ft.
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.3
ft.
Bankfull Max Depth
2.5
ft.
Width/Depth Ratio
10.6
Entrenchment Ratio
7.0
Classification
C
Bankfull Elevation:
566.99
ft.
r�
1{�Yn 'VSteI1I
t II D;II, i!li�'il
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
[AEcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.

UT to Sandy Creek • EEP Project Number: 403 • USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Randolph County, North Carolina • June, 2011
UT to SANDY CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 403
CROSS - SECTION:
4
Year
-0
Year
-1
Year
-2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
0.00
567.19
0.00
567.20
0.03
567.23
0.00
567.30
0.16
567.17
0.07
567.19
12.00
567.31
8.62
567.22
17.27
567.51
8.2
567.21
17.84
567.46
20.00
567.31
17.85
567.48
24.76
566.99
16.15
567.51
24.27
567.17
22.60
567.24
23.91
567.20
29.31
566.19
20.07
567.38
27.39
566.55
22.90
567.22
24.58
567.12
31.10
565.54
24.3
567.24
28.73
566.10
25.00
566.91
29.38
566.26
32.37
564.53
26.83
566.63
29.60
565.97
29.70
565.87
31.79
565.27
32.40
563.89
28.45
566.45
32.11
564.78
31.80
564.94
32.50
564.59
32.51
564.14
30.05
566.15
34.04
563.41
32.30
564.61
33.79
563.92
33.93
562.86
30.9
565.82
34.88
563.22
33.20
564.19
34.15
563.41
35.92
562.92
31.35
565.58
36.03
563.17
34.00
563.29
34.24
563.23
36.79
563.14
31.81
565.15
39.56
564.32
35.00
563.10
35.00
562.96
37.79
563.54
32.12
564.59
42.14
564.77
35.70
563.33
35.73
562.95
38.49
564.38
32.23
564.34
45.37
565.44
36.90
563.50
36.43
562.97
38.75
564.01
32.52
563.98
47.50
565.97
37.90
563.80
37.00
563.19
40.05
565.41
33.07
563.65
47.74
566.10
39.00
564.30
37.93
563.33
43.69
565.49
33.86
563.18
53.16
567.13
39.50
564.63
38.59
563.60
53.25
567.36
34.55
562.98
66.62
567.03
41.60
564.98
39.29
563.93
61.84
567.03
35.31
562.94
85.71
567.08
47.40
566.05
39.78
564.27
85.78
567.27
36.39
563.05
86.21
567.18
53.70
567.12
40.61
564.91
37.36
563.39
86.29
567.18
66.00
567.09
45.05
565.52
38.67
564.04
86.30
567.25
51.46
566.48
38.95
564.57
63.23
566.92
39.27
564.35
87.29
567.32
39.48
565.13
40.58
565.55
43.6
565.4
50.38
566.45
56.17
567.28
86.11
567.28
co( _\'A'11i
FE2JEcoEngineering
A division fThe Jnhn R. McAdams Cnm{wny, 1-.

569
568
.. 567
4~
c 566
565
w
564
563
562
UT to Sandy Creek Cross Section 4 - Pool
------------------
- — — - Bankfull
-­&--- Year -0, 8/22/07
• Year -1, 9/16/08
—M— Year -2, 9/11/09
9 Year -3, 6/30/10
—)IE— Year -4, 04/21/11
UT to Sandy Creek - EEP Project Number: 403 - USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report - Randolph County, North Carolina - June, 2011
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR4, 2011 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 4
PROJECT SANDY CREEK FEATURE: Pool
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH SANDY CREEK
DATE 04/19/2011 to 04/21/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
31.4
sq. ft.
Bankfull Width
21.9
ft.
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.4
ft.
Bankfull Max Depth
3.5
ft.
Width /Depth Ratio
15.3
ft.
Entrenchment Ratio
0.0
ft.
Classification
n/a
Bankfull Elevation:
566.45
ft.
c�
t�
�' d l 1,11 'CI11t'11
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
[AEcoEngineering
A division of The Jahn R. McAdams Company, tnc.

UT to Sandy Creek a EEP Project Number: 403 a USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report a Randolph County, North Carolina a June, 2011
UT to SANDY CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 403
CROSS- SECTION:
5
Year
-0
Year -1
Year
-2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
0.00
568.53
0.00
568.57
-0.49
568.61
0.20
568.64
0.22
568.58
0.09
568.53
15.00
568.53
13.72
568.67
17.05
568.40
8.26
568.52
13.42
568.56
25.00
568.17
18.08
568.44
26.23
568.14
16.73
568.46
28.15
567.90
25.80
568.14
21.40
568.50
29.84
567.40
23.46
568.29
29.56
567.39
28.30
567.81
26.64
568.07
30.89
567.26
24.28
568.19
31.60
567.39
29.50
567.41
29.10
567.68
32.76
567.57
25.74
568.2
32.47
567.20
30.40
567.23
29.70
567.51
34.34
567.78
27.28
568.04
33.55
567.42
30.70
567.22
30.75
567.35
37.47
568.41
28.39
567.95
35.00
567.90
31.10
567.27
31.43
567.45
48.74
569.39
28.9
567.81
36.06
568.37
32.50
567.25
32.17
567.40
54.10
569.50
29.4
567.71
45.50
569.05
33.80
567.41
32.75
567.44
29.88
567.64
53.56
569.52
34.30
567.70
33.44
567.51
30.22
567.47
53.69
569.52
36.60
568.37
34.12
567.74
30.32
567.59
38.00
568.40
35.07
567.99
30.73
567.5
46.00
569.08
35.86
568.27
31.1
567.44
53.90
569.51
36.94
568.42
31.4
567.27
40.46
568.72
31.81
567.34
43.26
568.97
32.16
567.43
49.66
569.42
32.58
567.45
53.98
569.58
33
567.47
33.02
567.59
333
567.62
33.81
567.6
34.42
567.88
35.99
568.37
43
568.99
53.73
569.54
::1
[JEcoEngineering
A di, won of 7M John R. McAdams Company, Inc.

UT to Sandy Creek • EEP Project Number: 403 • USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Randolph County, North Carolina • June, 2011
UT to Sandy Creek Cross Section 5 - Riffle
570
569
-------------------------
0
0567- — — — • Bankfull
--�— Year -0, 8/22/07
—� — Year -1, 9/16/08
566 —Year -2, 9/11/09
—A— Year -3, 6/30/10
-- 31E— Year4, 04/21/11
565
-1 4 9 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR-4,2011 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 5
PROJECT SANDY CREEK FEATURE: Riffle
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH SANDY CREEK
DATE 04/19/2011 to 04/21/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
4.2
sq. ft.
Bankfull Width
9.6
ft.
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.4
ft.
Bankfull Max Depth
0.9
ft.
Width /Depth Ratio
22.0
ft.
Entrenchment Ratio
10.4
ft.
Classification
C
Bankfull Elevation:
568.19
ft.
r�
Will
I' 11 1�I1 C11K'll
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
[AEcoEngineering
A dm m- of The Jnhn R. McAdams rompvny. Inc.

UT to Sandy Creek • EEP Project Number: 403 a USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Randolph County, North Carolina • June, 2011
UT to SANDY CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 403
CROSS - SECTION:
6
Year-0
Year -1
Year
-2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
Station ft Flev. ft
0.50
568.58
0.00
568.57
-0.37
568.62
0.08
568.64
0.21
568.56
0.68
568.58
17.00
568.35
10.17
568.63
13.95
568.53
9.36
568.54
12.89
568.59
31.20
568.16
17.91
568.36
33.81
567.84
18.09
568.44
28.12
568.41
34.10
567.65
25.12
568.46
35.85
567.29
25.18
568.35
31.34
568.24
35.70
567.24
29.87
568.33
37.13
566.63
28.87
568.39
36.54
567.12
36.40
567.04
32.73
567.90
38.34
566.39
31.46
568.18
37.49
566.46
37.70
566.39
33.48
567.84
40.59
566.46
33.34
567.85
38.98
566.10
38.90
566.19
34.07
567.68
42.27
567.50
34.33
567.71
39.82
566.29
40.10
566.33
34.77
567.54
43.07
567.86
35.16
567.59
41.29
567.15
41.00
566.80
35.55
567.34
49.14
568.57
35.5
567.49
43.08
567.92
41.70
567.21
36.26
567.06
57.65
569.62
35.72
567.32
43.76
568.13
42.70
567.60
36.73
566.81
35.83
567.45
44.00
568.24
45.60
568.39
37.18
566.56
36.11
567.12
44.80
568.50
50.00
568.59
37.97
566.54
36.55
566.97
51.46
568.90
57.90
569.57
38.61
566.45
36.97
566.8
58.25
569.65
39.50
566.48
37.5
566.59
58.30
569.65
40.41
566.52
38.17
566.49
40.79
566.91
39.04
566.19
41.52
567.38
39.86
566.32
42.29
567.68
40.45
566.39
43.52
568.15
40.99
566.7
45.41
568.54
41.4
567.39
51.85
568.86
42.23
567.42
57.89
569.65
43.37
568.07
57.79
569.61
r�
Ii lal �cteu'1
[4EcoEngineering
A di m.. fnTh Jahn R. McAdams Company, Im

571
570
569
x
c 568
567
w
566
565
564
UT to Sandy Creek Cross Section 6 - Pool
— — — • Bankfull
A Year -0, 8/22/07
— • Year -1, 9/16/08
—N— Year -2, 9/11/09
—6— Year -3, 6/30/10
---I—Year -4, 04/21/11
UT to Sandy Creek • EEP Project Number: 403 • USGS HUC 03030003020010
Fourth Year Monitoring Report • Randolph County, North Carolina • June, 2011
-1 4 9 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR-4,2011 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 6
PROJECT SANDY CREEK FEATURE: Pool
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH SANDY CREEK
DATE 04/19/2011 to 04/21/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
8.0
sq. ft.
Bankfull Width
9.6
ft.
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.8
ft.
Bankfull Max Depth
1.7
ft.
Width/Depth Ratio
11.7
Entrenchment Ratio
0.0
Classification
n/a
Bankfull Elevation:
567.85
ft.
r-'I
hicosWill
11111 t'lIR'I1
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
IaEcoEngineering
A dwism ofThe John R. MCAd— Company, Inc.

580
579
578
577
576
Z
0
F
Q 575
W
W 574
573
572
571
UT to Sandy Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2011 (Year -4) Monitoring
Reaches I & II
Reach 1 1
— — — YR -0 TW Profile 2/29/08
YR -1 TW 10/1/08
O
YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/9/09
A
YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 6/30/10
O
YR -3 Structures
YR -4 TW 4/21/11
X
YR -4 Structures
—
—YR -4 WS
570 '
10000 10100 10200 10300
STATION (feet)
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
10400 10500
®EcoEngineering
A Aivil. If MAn R. McAdvna Cw y. lis.

577
576
575
574
a�
573
Z
0
F
572
W
R.7
W 571
570
569
568
567
— — — YR -0 TW Profile 2/29/08
YR -1 TW 10/1/08
O
YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/9/09
A
YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 6/30/10
O
YR -3 Structures
YR -4 TW 4/21/11
X
YR -4 Structures
—
—YR -4 WS
UT to Sandy Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2011 (Year -4) Monitoring
Reaches I & 11
r - --`\
1 1
1 1 �
I / 1
1 / A � r
ll
I
10500 10600 10700 10800
STATION (feet)
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
10900 11000
®EcoEngineering
d--ofi I.A.R. WAd ('omp. 1rc

572
571
570
569
568
Z
0
Q 567
W
a
W 566
565
564
563
562
1 1
1
1
—t r
/
1 ►- / ^ 1 J
— — — YR -0 TW Profile 2/29/08
YR -1 TW 10/1/08
O
YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/9/09
A
YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 6/30/10
O
YR -3 Structures
YR -4 TW 4/21/11
X
YR -4 Structures
—
—YR -4 WS
UT to Sandy Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2011 (Year -4) Monitoring
Reaches I & II
1
f— Reach I I Reach II 0
11000 11100 11200 11300 11400
STATION (feet)
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
11500
®EcoEngineering
A divisi -orT j— R. WAd Cuvpny,I-

567
565
563
Z
0
F
Q 561
W
W
559
557
f
— — — YR -0 TW Profile 2/29/08
YR -1 TW 10/1/08
O YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/9/09
A YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 6/30/10
O YR -3 Structures
YR -4 TW 4/21/11
X YR -4 Structures
AYR -4 WS
UT to Sandy Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2011 (Year -4) Monitoring
Reaches I & II
555 '
11500 11600 11700 11800
STATION (feet)
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
ti
miFmC%ill
11900 12000
®EcoEngineering
A Jir-of The l.hn R. hh Advrn('.m ,Inc.

563
562
561
w 560
Z
0
Q 559
w
a
w
558
557
556
555
UT to Sandy Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2011 (Year -4) Monitoring
Reaches I & II
T
\---- .wow`R.
—� -- - - --
i
/
1
1 I
11 I
— — — YR -0 TW Profile 2/29/08
YR -1 TW 10/1/08
O YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/9/09
A YR -2 Structures
Reach II
YR -3 TW 6/30/10
O YR -3 Structures
YR -4 TW 4/21/11
)IC YR -4 Structures
— —YR -4 WS
12000
12100
12200 STATION (feet) 12300
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
12400 12500
®EcoEngineering
AJimisi— FTheJ —R. MCAd <'wny I-

578
576
574
572
w
Z
0
F 570
W
W 568
566
564
M Reach II110
UT to Sandy Creek - Tributary
Longitudinal Profile
2011 (Year -4) Monitoring
Reach III
1 \
— — — YR -0 TW
YR -1 TW 10/1/08
O
YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/9/09
0
YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 6/30/10
O
YR -3 Structures
YR -4 TW 4/21/11
X
YR -4 Structures
—
—YR -4 WS
L
I
Reach III
562 1 1 1 1 1 1
20000 20050 20100 20150 20200 20250 20300 20350 20400
STATION (feet)
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally on average 10 feet. Structures were used as a guide. Year -3 water surface was sporadic
due to low / absent flow; therefore, when connecting water surface data points the dashed line is plotted below ground surface in some locations.
®EcoEngineering
A-11— .'1 3-1R McAdams ('mmpmYlnc.

4 YEAR, 2011 SURVEY DATA PROJECT NAME UT TO SANDY CREEK
TASK LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
FEATURE/FACET SLOPE REACHES UT to Sandy Creek and Minor Tributary
LENGTH, AND SPACING AND DATE 04/19/2011 to 04/21/2011
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE DATA CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH
Sandy Creek 4 Year Monitoring Data Sheet 1 of 3
UT to Sandy
Creek Reach I
Overall water surface slope =
10%
DESIGN
AVG
Riffle
04%
WS sta start =
10005 27 ft
Run
WS sta end=
11405 34 ft
p p spacing
62
ELEV Start=
579 53 ft msl
ELEV End=
566 03 ft msl
Results
Results
n =
MIN
MEDIAN
AVG
MAX
Riffle slopes measured =
16
034%
290%
441%
2227%
Run slopes measured =
14
008%
820%
916%
2870%
Pools measured =
23
14
56
59
109
All data reported in units of feet unless otherwise specified
UT to Sandy
Creek Reach II
Feature Station
Overall water surface slope =
1%
DESIGN
AVG
UT to Sandy Creek I
Riffle
04%
WS sta start=
11427 87 ft
16
Run
RIFFLE 261
WS sta end =
12349 06 ft
034%
p p spacing
62
ELEV Start=
566 01 ft msl
290%
RIFFLE 342
ELEV End=
560 59 ft msl
441%
RIFFLE 403
11 332%
MAX =
Results
RIFFLE 462
14 498%
n=
MIN
MEDIAN
AVG
MAX
Riffle slopes measured =
8
065%
220%
306%
752%
Run slopes measured =
9
011%
6 09%
8 31 %
2053%
Pools measured =
14
17
48
63
168
Sandy Creek 4 Year Monitoring Data Sheet 1 of 3
UT to Sandy
Creek Reach III
Overall water surface slope
= 2%
DESIGN
AVG
Riffle
17%
WS sta start=
20008 47 ft
Run
WS sta end=
20390 92 ft
p p spacing
46
ELEV Start =
573 98 ft msl
ELEV End=
565 40 ft msl
Results
n =
MIN
MEDIAN
AVG
MAX
Riffle slopes measured =
3
206%
864%
703%
1039%
Run slopes measured =
4
177%
588%
894%
2222%
Pools measured =
6
30
54
60
122
All data reported in units of feet unless otherwise specified
Feature Station
Length Slope
UT to Sandy Creek I
RIFFLE 136
23 176%
n =
16
RIFFLE 261
15 614%
MIN =
034%
RIFFLE 303
7 776%
MEDIAN =
290%
RIFFLE 342
18 3 15%
AVG =
441%
RIFFLE 403
11 332%
MAX =
2227%
RIFFLE 462
14 498%
RIFFLE 571
20 218%
RIFFLE 706
2 2227%
Sandy Creek 4 Year Monitoring Data Sheet 1 of 3

RIFFLE
751
16
245%
RIFFLE
904
24
034%
RIFFLE
1005
25
462%
RIFFLE
1099
15
368%
RIFFLE
1158
15
235%
'
RIFFLE
1191
17
265%
RIFFLE
1270
31
192%
RIFFLE
1405
21
091%
Feature
Station
Length
Slope
UT to Sandy
Creek II
RIFFLE
1759
37
156%
n =
8
RIFFLE
1873
17
202%
MIN =
065%
RIFFLE
1939
10
532%
MEDIAN =
220%
RIFFLE
2028
21
238%
AVG =
306%
RIFFLE
2100
13
752%
MAX =
752%
RIFFLE
2124
5
065%
RIFFLE
2178
7
202%
RIFFLE
2230
12
304%
Feature
Station
Length
Slope
UT to Sandy
Creek Ill
RIFFLE
20114
8
206%
n =
3
RIFFLE
20234
9
1039%
MIN =
206%
RIFFLE
20325
2
864%
MEDIAN =
864%
AVG =
703%
MAX =
1039%
Feature
Station
Length
Slope
UT to Sandy Creek I
RUN
159
2
1129%
n =
14
RUN
276
8
4 51 %
MIN =
008%
RUN
310
1
986%
MEDIAN =
820%
RUN
360
8
262%
AVG =
916%
RUN
414
25
3 11%
MAX =
2870%
RUN
476
1
2870%
RUN
591
3
160%
RUN
767
16
088%
RUN
928
9
1936%
RUN
1030
15
1024%
RUN
1114
11
1960%
RUN
1174
6
903%
RUN
1207
2
737%
RUN
1300
13
008%
Feature
Station
Length
Slope
UT to Sandy
Creek II
RUN
1426
2
2053%
n =
9
RUN
1797
6
662%
MIN =
011%
RUN
1890
2
1515%
MEDIAN =
609%
RUN
1949
19
552%
AVG =
831%
RUN
2049
18
011%
MAX =
2053%
RUN
2113
5
210%
RUN
2128
8
1683%
RUN
2185
10
181%
RUN
2242
2
609%
Sandy Creek 4 Year Momtonng Data Sheet 2 of 3

Feature
Station
Length
Slope
UT to Sandy
Creek III
RUN
-20001
61
294%
n =
4
RUN
20122
1
177%
MIN =
177%
RUN
20243
4
2222%
MEDIAN =
588%
RUN
20327
8
882%
AVG =
894%
MAX =
2222%
Feature
Station
Length p -p
spacing
UT to Sandy
Creek I
POOL
39
21
n =
23
POOL
102
25
63
MIN =
14
(p p spacing)
POOL
186
34
83
MEDIAN =
56
POOL
229
43
43
AVG =
59
POOL
285
24
56
MAX =
109
POOL
324
24
40
POOL
375
34
51
POOL
439
37
63
POOL
484
27
45
POOL
527
37
43
POOL
604
38
77
POOL
699
12
95
POOL
713
36
14
POOL
794
36
80
POOL
850
32
57
POOL
937
18
87
POOL
954
10
17
POOL
978
25
24
POOL
1045
27
66
POOL
1074
31
29
POOL
1124
38
51
POOL
1218
57
94
POOL
1327
28
109
Feature
Station
Length p -p
spacing
UT to Sandy
Creek II
POOL
1431
9
n =
14
POOL
1449
22
17
MIN =
17
(p p spacing)
POOL
1564
51
115
MEDIAN =
48
POOL
1674
10
110
AVG =
63
POOL
1696
34
22
MAX =
168
POOL
1807
12
111
POOL
1831
25
24
POOL
1894
12
63
POOL
1914
15
19
POOL
2082
44
168
POOL
2118
8
36
POOL
2137
32
19
POOL
2207
40
71
POOL
2255
21
48
Feature
Station
Length p -p
spacing
UT to Sandy
Creek III
POOL
20071
12 '
n =
6
POOL
20126
7
54
MIN =
30
(p p spacing)
POOL
20247
8
122
MEDIAN =
54
POOL
20277
25
30
AVG =
60
POOL
20336
24
59
MAX =
122
POOL
20372
7
36
Sandy Creek 4 Year Monitoring Data Sheet 3 of 3

30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Histogram
I I, Year 4
i
INS
11 1111 7M 1 r ��111
(�K
Particle Size (mm)
EEP PROJECT ID: 403
CROSS - SECTION: 1 FEATURE: RIFFLE
'N.
111 TV F V �m'l lt
PROJECT UT to SANDY CREEK
TASK PEBBLE COUNT
REACH UT to SANDY CREEK
DATE 04/19/2011 to 04/21/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ /PARRISH
Material
Size Ran a mm Count
UT Sandy
silt/clay
0 0.062
- --
very fine sand
0.062 0.13
fine sand
0.13 0.25
Nnte:
medium sand
0.25 0.5
coarse sand
0.5 1
Riffle Pebble Count, UT Sandy
very coarse sand
1 2
100 °!° - --
90 °!°
very fine gravel
2 4
80 °!°
fine gravel
4 6
fine gravel
6 B
medium gravel
8 11
70%
~ 60%
medium gravel
coarse gravel
coarse gravel
11 16
16 22 r
22 32
ii 50%
very coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
32 45
45 64
40%
'
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
64 90
90 128
128 180
a 30%
20%
10%
t
4.
°!°
very large cobble
180 256
small boulder
256 362
0
small boulder
362 512
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
medium boulder
large boulder
512 1024
1024 2048
Particle Size (mm) Cumulative Percent ♦ Percent Item
very lar a boulder
2048 4096
Size pet-cent less than mm
Percent by substrate type
bedrock
D16
D35
D50
1)84
D95
—silt/clay
sand
I gravel
I cobble
boulder
bedrock
Total Particle Count 100
0 195
0.47
133
27
38
0%
1 46%
1 54%
r 6%
1 0%
i 0°!°

30
25
c 20
15
10
0
5
0
O� O
Histogram
■Year 1
■Year 2
OYear 3
■Year 4
Opp
Particle Size (mm)
EEP PROJECT ID: 403
CROSS - SECTION: 3 FEATURE: RIFFLE
�111a11 '('.11�1C11t
PROGRAM
PROJECT UT to SANDY CREEK
TASK PEBBLE COUNT
REACH UT to SANDY CREEK
DATE 04/19/2011 to 04/21/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ /PARRISH
Material
Size Range mm Count
UT Sandy
silt/clay
0 0.062
- --
very fine sand
0.062 0.13
- --
fine sand
0.13 0.25
Note:
medium sand
0.25 0.5
coarse sand
very coarse sand
0.5 1
1 2
2 4
Riffle Pebble Count, UT Sandy
100% --
90%
very fine gravel
80%
fine gravel
4 6
fine gravel
6 8
medium gravel
8 11
70%
'
L
~ 60 °!°
r_■
medium gravel
11 16
°'
� 50%
coarse gravel
16 22
coarse gravel
22 32
very coarse gravel
32 45
a 40 °!0
very coarse gravel
45 64
small cobble
64 90
a 30%
medium cobble
large cobble
90 128
128 180
20%
10%
+
very large cobble
180 256
small boulder
256 362
0%
small boulder
362 512
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
medium boulder
large boulder
512 1024
1024 2048
Particle Size (mm) Cumulative Percent ♦ Percent Item
very large oulderl
2048 4096
Size percent less than mm
Percent by substrate type
bedrock
D16
D35
D50
D84
D95
silt/clay
sand
I gravel
I cobble
I boulder
bedrock
Total Particle Count: 100 1
11
0 120 1
0.34
0 7
6
64
0%
60%
r 35%
r 5%
1 0%
1 0%

Histogram
50
m 40
t31
30
r 20
10
0
■Year 1
■Year 2
DYear 3
■Year 4
O'Zrp 'p '� O ��O 01. ODD ��O
O
Particle Size (mm)
EP PROJECT ID: 403
ROSS - SECTION: 5 FEATURE: RIFFLE
E lai me nt
�eaa+rwr
PROJECT UT to SANDY CREEK
TASK PEBBLE COUNT
REACH UT to SANDY CREEK
DATE 04/19/2011 to 04/21/2011
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH
Material
Size Ran
0
a mm Count
0.062
UT Sandy
silt/clay
- --
very fine sand
0.062 0.13
fine sand
0.13
0.25
Note:
medium sand
0.25 0.5
coarse sand
0.5
1
100%
Riffle Pebble Count,
UT Sandy
very coarse sand
1
2
90%
very fine gravel
2 4
fine gravel
4
6
fine gravel
6
8
80%
medium gravel
8
11
t
70%
medium gravel
11
16
~
60%
coarse gravel
16
22
coarse gravel
22
32
iL
50%
very coarse gravel
32
45
40 °r6
very coarse gravel
45
64
64
90
a
30%
small cobble
medium cobble
90
128
20%
large cobble
128
160
10%
very large cobble
180
256
0%
small boulder
256 362
small boulder
362
512
0.01
0.1
1 10
100 1000 10000
medium boulder
512
1024
Particle Size (mm)
—
F— cumulative Percent
♦ Percent Item
large boulder
1024
2048
Size percent less than rnm
Percent b substrate type
very lar a boulder
2048 4096
bedrock
D16
D35
D50
D84
D95
silt/clay
sand
ravel
I cobble
I boulder
bedrock
Total Particle Count: 100
0.089
0.13
0.2
0
60
0%
1 91%
r 5%
r 4%
1 0%
1 0%

APPENDIX E
Wetland Assessment
(Omitted, Not Applicable)

APPENDIX F
Project Photo Stations

PHOTOGRAPH I: RIP -RAP. HEAD OF UT -I.
PHOTOGRAPH 2: GRO55 VANE. 5TA: 100+12.

PHOT06RAPH 3: GRO55 VANE. 5TA: 100 +-73.
PHOTOGRAPH 4: GONSTRUGTED RIFFLE. 5TA: IOI +Oq.
Peo,ecr �o. EEP -08030
`
UT to SANDY CREEK
T �/�/'�T
�.(.E` ' ■ , �.( 110N
1` j
AftoEngineering
A division of T'6e John R McAdam Company, Inc.
� FTLENAYE: EEP08030X.DWG
t�
9 SCALE: NTS
{
StI
\,J �,/1�(,
MONM11MG PHO'POGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
DATE:
Q4 -26 —jj
I �� ��x ,t.��I`'�'�
1 ,�.`
�DOLPH COUNTY, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 361 -5000

PHOT06RAP14 5: GROSS VANE. 5TA: 101 +40.
PHOTOGRAPH b: GON5TRUGTED RIFFLE. 5TA: 102 +25.
PROJECT NO. EEP -08030 UT to SANDY CREEK E�jEcoEngineering
> eiLeraArE: EEP0 1 0X.DWG Dom, ` MR pnn0N
ljri►7 j <Jj�� 1� A division of TLe John R McAdams Compny, Inc.
a scAi E: N TS Steffi MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
}� 1 RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARR, NC
04 -26 -11 l� a�ll`C_]ll1�l (91 BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
RANDOIPFi
COUNTY, NC
(919) BOX

PHOT06RAPH -1: CRO55 VANE. 5TA: 102 +85.
PHOT06 ZAPH 8: CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE. 5TA: 103 +15.
eRalecr No. EEP -08030
In
��
UT to SANDY CREEK
�� /��O�T
1`[� l�
® A division of The John R McAdams �y,�.
F"E ""E: EEP08030X.DWG
9
a SCALE: NTS
�m
MONMR ING PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
ATEi 04 -26 -11
E ' ' �E_ Il
RANDOUgi COUMY, NC
P.0. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(91a) aal -soon

PHOTOGRAPH q: RIP -RAP FOR WETLAND AREA.
PHOTOGRAPH 10: GONSTRUGTED RIFFLE. 5TA: 103 +88.
PROJECT NO. EEP -08030
r4i
OJT to SANDY CREEK
1 <Jj\C1
STO PnON
RlEcoEngineering
A division of TLe Jo}m R McAduma ComVany, Inc.
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG
9
tv SCALE: N
}
s+sleni
MONTPORIIVG PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TTtIANGIE PARK, NC
S
!
P.O. BOX 14005 UP 27709 -4005
[n DATE: 04 -ZG —� �
f 1 i 1
+� - +�� 1
/���/�� �L7 7�T
DO PH COUNTY, 1�C
(919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 11: GROSSING. STA: 104+23.
PHOTOGRAPH 12: GRO% VANE. 5TA: 104 +75.
PROJECT !vo. EEP -08030 ` UT to SANDY CREEK ®F°F"A"E EEP08030X.DWG RE D TIOl\ n i`(, A diviaon of'I3e Joim R M9 SCALE: N TS ( MONMRING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARR, -4 NC
(/? OATE: V%-stem
,1 P.O. BOX 14005 2B: 27709 -400
04 -26 -11 1.��� l� RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 13: CROE75 VANE. 5TA: 105 +b2.
PHOTOGRAPH 14: "A" VANE. 5TA: 106 +60.
A Peoiecr No. EEP -08030
r �
UT to SANDY CREEK
l�`���Oj�T
lv
ElEcoEngineering
A divirion of The John R McAdams Canny, Inc.
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG
[4
a SCALE: N TS
"-stem
MONI'T'ORING PHOrPOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRUNDLE PARK, NC
�, .A. 04 -26 —��
I r'j1
1 i'l �l�'ll
TT1��1
RANDOI�%i CO ^` , NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4D05
(919) 381 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 15: RIP -RAP.
PHOTOGRAPH lb: CRO55 VANE. 5TA: 107 +4q.
CT NO. EEP -08030
UT to SANDY CREEK
R &MR /ApON j�
E�jEcoEngineBring
A division of T e John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
AME: EEP08030X.DWG
IF
: N TS
'1 ��
MONTPURING PHO"POGRAPHS
RsseARC6 TaIANCIE PARI{, xC P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
04 -26 -��
,�Ltem�
RANDOLPH COUNTY. NC
(919) 961 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 17: GROSS VANE. STA: 108 +11.
PHOTOGRAPH 18: GONSTRUGTED RIFFLE. STA: 108 +77.
P -08030
��
UT to SANDY CREEK
it
�RA�ON
®EcoEngineering
A divirioo of T'he Joha R McAd�e Coapmy, Inc.
8030X.DWG
ED
�'M�.
N TS
tem 4
MONMIUNG PHOTOGRAPHS
BOXH1400 GZIP
— ZF) —��
Ill ,Cll
i�L11 \LV1dH l.�lJl \lls l�li
P.O. 270 9-4005
(919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 19: "A" VANE. STA: I0G +14.
PHOTOGRAPH 20: GONSTRUGTED RIFFLE. 5TA:109 +58.
(!IDATE: PROJECT No' EEP -08030 �� to SANDY CREEK ®EcoEngineering
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG RC/17 MR TION
i�j A division of 1Le John R McAdms Conq my, Inc.
SCALE: N TS
5te[ll Mob=RING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
04 -26 -11 Ill RANDOIPH C.OU1�TlY. NC (919)H38115000 ZIP 27709 -4005

PHOTOGRAPH 21: GRO55 VANE. STA: 110 +26.
PHOTOGRAPH 22: 60N5TRUGTED RIPPLE. 5TA: 110 +58.
PROJECT No. EEP -08030 UT to SANDY CREEK E�jftoEngineering
> e�'eN""E: EEP08030X.DWG DEMR TION c�s'.�.
1` i�(111 A division of The John R McAdams
v SCALE: N TS
liff tL'lC/Il_I MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
ATE: 04 -26 -11 .�l`'�l P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 29909 -4005
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 381 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 23: GROSSING. STA: III +32.
PHOTOGRAPH 24: GROSS VANE. STA: III +66.
Peaecr No. EEP -08030
�y
to SANDY CREEK
1 <,JI`[i
���E��,.C���D /��ON
©EcoEng iring
A division of The Joh m}my, Inc.
�"�"A1`E EEP08030X.DWG
�
scale: N TS
j�(j�� SteM
/w./
MONTIPURING PHONOGRAPHS
REsEARCB TRIANGLE PARK, NC
DATE: 04 -26 —��
I2ANWLPH COUNTY, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -400
(919) 961 -5000

PHOT06RAPH 25: GONSTRUGTED RIFFLE. STA: 112 +15.
PHOTOE�RAPH 26: GR055 VANE. STA: 112 +70.
IN VDATE: . EEP -08030 ��- UT to SANDY CREEK AEcoEngineering
FILENAME: EP08030X.DWG PEAMI� HON
►J 1 <Jl\L ] A divmm of TLe John R McAdm Campmy, Inc.
N TS �}
E j �j[IIl_I MONTPORIlVG PHOTOGRAPHS RMEARCH MANGLE PARK. NC
04 -26 —�� p it i(Il�,�ll'll P.O . BOX 14005 ZIP 27708 -4005
RiiNDOIBH COLTNIY, NC (919) 381 -5000

PHOT06RAP14 27: "A" VANE. 5TA: 113 +60.
PHOT06RAPH 28: GRO55 VANE. 5TA: 115 +15.
EDATE: EP -08030 ��- UT to SANDD�Y /CREEK [aEcoEngineering
08030X.DWG ��1�L'�C�/jYll�l lON
}p 1 N 1 V A division of Tbc John R. McAdams Cerny, Inc.
N TS S ll [ ll MONTPORING PHOTOGRAPHS
1l t]� ((jl RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
4 —Z6 —� ill ' �1� ll1 �! 1 If P.O. BOX 14005 UP 27709 -4005
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 2G: "A" VANE. STA: 116 +2G.
PHOTOGRAPH 30: "A" VANE. STA: II-7 +58.
ff ECT NO. EEP -08030 � UT to SANDY CREEK ©EcoEngineenng
AME: EEP08030X.DWG �1`�� /►/�O�►T x('111 lr A division of The John R McAdams (omp�y, Inc.
: N TS ' ISGStITI MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS t yy II rr PP..O. BOX 1 005 G P 27 09 -4005
04-26-11 ! �.�� P.�.. � r�. l RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 361 -5000
.a.

PHOTOGRAPH 31: "A" VANE. STA: 10 +46.
PHOTOGRAPH 32: GROSS VANE. STA: IIq +O-1.
ff4FILENAME: CT No. EEP -08030 UT to SANDY CREEK ©EcoEnginearing
EEP08030X.DWG R(,�`�M F flO T ['�7i `, J jam, lv A division of The John R McAdams Comp®y, Inc. : N TS SteCil mowmRING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
04 -26 -1 l� -��y P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
P� RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 33: GONSTRUGTED RIFFLE. STA: 120 +25.
PHOTOGRAPH 34: RIP -RAP. WETLAND DRAINAGE.
PROJECT N0. EEP -08030 UT to SANDY CREEK I EcoEngineering
4
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG REM Rt / nnON
1.71 <Jj�('1 it A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.
CSCALE: N TS
�C(ISV!+teljl MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
DATE: O4 —Z6 —� it l�. P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 35: RIP -RAP. WELTAND DRAINA67E.
PH0T06RAPH 36: GRO55 VANE. 5TA: 122 +00.
P -08030
��-
UT to SANDY CREEK
RT,�`�rj R PnON
GJ 1 <JItCi lr
®EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
8030X.DWG
E.A
d N TS
,
i{tem
MONrmRING PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
—26 -11
I Ill lal ,ll��L�ll
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
P.O. BOX 14000 ZIP 27709 -4005

PHOTOGRAPH 37: RIP -RAP. HEAD OF UT -2.
PHOTOGRAPH 38: GRO55 VANE. STA: 200 +5-7.
PROJECT N0. EEP -08030 �� OJT to SANDY CREEK ©EcoEngineering
FILENAME EEP08030X.DWG �� /��ON
1\L i lr A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.
tC SCALE: N TS
1SVste[ll1 MONnx)RING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PAR-, -
S ��'d11C'C111Ci1 P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
DATE: 04 -26 -11 1 RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 3G: GRO55 VANE. 5TA: 201 +I6.
PHOTOGRAPH 40: GRO55 VANE. 5TA: 202 +64.
® PROJECT NO. EEP -08030 UT to SANDY CREEK ®
eILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG REC/j�nR TION
0 REM RATION
V 1�C� 1 j 1 r A division of The John k McAdams Company, Inc.
dSCALE: N TS L,
svti{tem MONPTORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARR, NC
'1L1L��il P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
DATE: 04 -26 -11 i l �DOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 41: GROSS VANE. STA: 203 +15.
PHOTOGRAPH 42: GROSS VANE. STA. 203 +58.
PROJECT N0. EEP- 08030 L7 to SANDY CREEK ©EcoEngineering
E "NAME: EEP08030X.DWG I�`�� /��ON
4 �('j A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.
a ,
t7 SCALE: N TS
' )SYSte[ll . mowmRING PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
S 1 - UA1�T 7 n *T P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
RANDOLPH COUNIY, NC (919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 43: GROSS SECTION I LOOKING UPSTREAM.
PHOTOGRAPH 44: GROSS SECTION I LOOKING DOWNSTREAM.
PROJECT EEP -08030
�~
UT to SANDY CREEK
�EcoEngineering
P08030X.DWG
I<(
REMD / nON
A division of The John R McAdams Company , Inc.
N TS
titCM :
MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
04-26 -11
��: :���.`�.'i11. L I
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 45: GROSS SECTION I LOOKING AT THE LEFT BANK.
PHOTOGRAPH 46: GROSS SECTION I LOOKING AT THE RIGHT BANK.

PHOTOGRAPH 41: GR055 5EGTION I LOOKING AT THE 5UB5TRATE GOMP051TION.
PHOTOGRAPH 48: GRO55 SEGETION 2 LOOKING UPSTREAM.
® PROJECT No. EEP -08030
r.y
UT to CREEK
AEcoEngineering
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG
NSMDY
RE 1 RATION
A division of The John R_ McAdam Company, Inc.
9 SCALE: N TS
,
ti{{ t3�[Lj]
MONITORING PHONOGRAPHS
RES EARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
DATE:
04-26-11
77
,I i
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC:
919)H36115000 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) BOX

PHOTOGRAPH 4G: GROSS 5EGTION 2 LOOKING DOWNSTREAM.
PHOTOGRAPH 50: GRO55 5EGTION 2 LOOKING AT THE LEFT BANK.
OJECT No. EEP -08030 r� to SANDY CREEK AftoEngineering
ENAME: EEP08030X.DWG ����� /� 'nON
jam, A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.
SCALE:
N TS Stefla MONMIUNG PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
O4- 26 —��� 1'lv' llll,�l' P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
[ 1 LOL�H COUNTY, NC (919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 51. GROSS SECTION 2 LOOKING AT THE RIGHT BANK.
PHOTOGRAPH 52: GROSS SECTION 2 LOOKING AT THE SUBSTRATE COMPOSITION.
IS PROJECT N0. EEP -08030
�y
UT to SANDY CREEK
�1`�� /�/j�Ojr\T
1�('i 11 lv
E�jftoEngineering
A division of 1 he )o}m R McAdams Company, Inc.
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG
4
a SCALE: N TS
' r 'VStelll
MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
DATE:
04 -26 —�
1 1d110E111�
sDQ�H
COUNTY. N('.
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 381 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 53: GROSS SEEGTION 3 LOOKING UPSTREAM.
PHOTOGRAPH 54: GROSS SECTION 3 LOOKING DOWNSTREAM.
PR OJECT "O. EEP -08030 tT to SANDY CREEK ®EcoEngineering FILE "AME: EEP08030X.DWG ����D /tIPnON
�'j A 8ivision of 13e John R McAdams Coa�any, Inc. SCALE: N TS , t 1 jy`(tr1I1_I MONTPORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PAR%. NC
(L!� DATE: 04 -26-1 1 .1l l"llll ]]](1111 RANDOLPH COUNTY. NC BOX ZIP 27709 -4005

PHOTOGRAPH 55: GROSS SEGTION 3 LOOKING AT THE BANK.
PHOTOGRAPH 56: GROSS SECTION 3 LOOKING AT THE RIGHT BANK.
PROJECT N0. EEP-08030
4
UT to SANDY CREEK
®EcoEngineering
F11eNa1sE: EEP08030X.DWG
�� ?lE�� e/�Oj�T
N 1 V 11 1 \
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.
9 SCALE: N TS
,
`J i �[
SVStr[ll ,
MONTTORING PHO'T'OGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
GATE:
04 -26 -11
�`'
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 981 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 57: GROSS SECTION 3 LOOKING AT THE SUBSTRATE COMPOSITION.
PHOTOGRAPH 58: GROSS SECTION 4 LOOKING UPSTREAM.
Is PROJECT N0. EEP -08030 r'" UT to SANDY CREEK E�IftoEngineering
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG ]�,�{�C/jY>� /�/�ON
9 j� 1 <,Jjt(111 A division of The John R McAdams Company, Ire.
a SCALE: N TS
j 71S4ti(t�Injl- MONrmRING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
04 -26 —� it il�_ �Uw lT���111 T �7�� 1�T P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(/] DATE: 1�„ 1 �DOLCH COVI� 11 , 1�C (919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 5G: GROSS SEGTION 4 LOOKING DOWNSTREAM.
PHOTOGRAPH 60: GROSS SEGTION 4 LOOKING AT THE LEFT BANK.
FFFILENAME: ECT N0. EEP -08030 �~ UT to SANDY CREEK MEcoEngineering
EEP08030X.DWG ���E`� /��ON
(�!g
nJ 1 <Jl�('� A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.
: N TS ,
system MONTI'ORIlVG PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
04 -26 -11 k , iall) llld P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (ale) 981 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 61: GRO55 SECTION 4 LOOKING AT THE RIGHT BANK.
PHOTOGRAPH 62: GROSS SECTION 4 LOOKING AT THE SUBSTRATE GOMPOSITION.
® PROJECT "o. EEP- 08030
UT to SANDY CREEK
AlEcoEngineering
r. FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG
j ` J j� j
REC�MR /��oN
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.
t7
a SCALE: NTS
1SYSteM
MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
04 -26 -11
1811W) Wil
RANDOLPH COUNTY. NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 3e1-5000

PHOTOGRAPH 63: GROSS SECTION 5 LOOKING UPSTREAM.
PHOTOGRAPH 64: GROSS SECTION 5 LOOKING DOWNSTREAM.
KDATE EEP -08030 to SANDY CREEK lEcoEngineering
P08030X.DWG REj MROTIOj�T
iJ1J 1 \ 11�C� 1 \ A division of The John R McAdam Company, I=.
tW NTS WSW MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
l P O. BOXH 14 05NG P 27 09-4005
0 4-26-1 1 I�r,. RA7�7DO PH CO7T1� lY, NC 919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 65: GROSS SECTION 5 LOOKING AT THE LEFT BANK.
PHOTOGRAPH bb: GROSS SECTION 5 LOOKING AT THE RIGHT BANK.

PHOTOGRAPH 67: GROSS SECTION 5 LOOKING AT THE SUBSTRATE COMPOSITION.
PHOTOGRAPH 68. GR055 SEGTION 6 LOOKING UPSTREAM.
a PROJECT No. EEP -08030 �� UT to SANDY CREEK AEcoEngineering
4 FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG T
]��� K e�ON A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.
C7 sCALE: NTS 1�L i
' St�[il MONI PORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE P,�, NC
S p �� P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
m
DATE: 04 -26 -11 M a� �1�k�1 RANDOLPH COUNM NC (919) 301 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH bG: GROSS SECTION b LOOKING DOWNSTREAM.
PHOT06RAPH -70: GROSS SECTION b LOOKING AT THE LEFT BANK.
PROJECT No. EEP -08030 to SANDY CREEK �EcoEngin
eILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG �y`�� /r►�ON
n i`(1 A division of TLe John R Mcc S�A>�: stem MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS � N TS RESEARCR TRIANGLE PARR, NC / DATE: 04 -Z6 —� 1111d11CLIl�RANDOLPH �.DUNTY, NC. P.O. ZIP 27709 -400

PHOTOGRAPH 71: GROSS SEGTION b LOOKING AT THE RIGHT BANK.
PHOTOGRAPH 72: GROSS SEGTION b LOOKING AT THE SUBSTRATE COMPOSITION.
PROJECT EEP -08030
r
UT to SANDY CREEK
���E`� /��Oj�T
%1.711,J11('1 lr
®EcoEngine"C=Vwy, �Inc.
A division of The John R McAdams
P08030 X.DWG
V.A
N TS
►SYtite(/Il
MONI'T'ORING PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEAR CH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
04 —•zs —�
11 �-i l }l'� .l ll l �.
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919> 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH -73: VEGETATION PLOT 4
PHOTOGRAPH -74: VEGETATION PLOT 5.
EDATE: EP-08030 ` OJT to SANDY CREEK ®EcoEngin�er g
0803OX.DWG
]E�;�R Q 'nON A division of TLe Joho R McA, Inc.
N TS 1 �L ,
j7 stem MONTPORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
�Il IaIICJ llll'll P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
4 -26 -11 RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC [phone]

PHOTOGRAPH -75: VE6ETATION PLOT 6.
PHOTOGRAPH -76: VIEW OF FLOODPLAIN LOOKING DOWNSTREAM.
OJECT N0. EEP -08030
UT to SANDY CREEK
�1�� /��i�iol►T
®EcoEngineering
A divvion of The John R McAdams Comp�ay, Inc.
ENAME: EEP08030X.DWG
!f.CATE:
LE: N TS
SYtit�[ll
1\[i 11 lr
MONUORING PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
04 -26 -11
-
�� aIXL l }CIS'
RANDOLPH COUNTY. NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 77: VEGETATION PLOT q LOOKING INTO MONITORING PLOT FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER.
VEGETATION PLOT G HAS ESTABLISHED BY EEP AND SAMPLED BY EEP DURING MY -04. ECOENGINEERING SURVEY
LOCATED AND PHOTOGRAPHED MONITORING PLOT.
PHOTOGRAPH 78: VEGETATION PLOT 8 LOOKING INTO MONITORING PLOT FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER.
VEGETATION PLOT 8 WAS ESTABLISHED BY EEP AND SAMPLED BY EEP DURING MY -04. EGOENGINEERING SURVEY
LOCATED AND PHOTOGRAPHED MONITORING PLOT. J
PROJECT "o. EEP -08030
�y
UT to SANDY CREEK
AffiEcoEngineering
E "e "AxE: EEP0803OX.DWG
���� /��ON
j`[, lv
A division of The John K McAdams Company, Inc.
a SCALE: N TS
,
1SVsteni
mowmRING PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
DATE: 04 -26 -11
jj 1 }}�( II lll j I
il� ,.��ll,l_1 E�'LI
�QLPH COUNT , 1�C
COUNTY,
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
[phone]

PHOTOGRAPH 7a: VEGETATION PLOT 7 LOOKING INTO MONITORING PLOT FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER.
VEGETATION PLOT 7 WAS ESTABLISHED BY EEP AND SAMPLED BY EEP DURING MY -04. EGOENOINEERINO SURVEY
LOCATED AND PHOTOGRAPHED MONITORING PLOT.
EDATE JECT No. EEP -08030 �~ OJT to SANDY CREEK ®EcoEngineering
FILENAME: EEP0803OX.DWG �1�� /��O�T
j�Ci lr
A division of T he John R McAdams Cody, Inc. E: N TS MowmRING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC : 04 —ZB —�� ! �" la��'`���� P.O. BOX ZIP 27709 -4005
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 361 -5000