WQCS00364_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210225

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
February 25, 2021
Lance Metzler, County Manager
Rockingham County
P.O. Box 101
Wentworth, NC 27375
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report
Wastewater Collection System Permit WQCS00364
Rockingham County Wastewater Collection System
Dear Mr. Metzler:
On February 10, 2021, Gary Hudson of the Division of Water Resources (Division),
Winston-Salem Regional Office met with Eric Thompson, Operator in Responsible Charge
(ORC), to conduct a Compliance Evaluation Inspection of the above referenced Wastewater
Collection System.
This inspection consists of (1) a review of the permit and accompanying documentation
to determine compliance with permit conditions, and (2) an on -site inspection of collection
system components. The attached inspection form notes the areas that were evaluated for the
inspection, with notable findings outlined as follows.
Site Inspections
1. Pump Stations — The Fishing Creek Pump Station was inspected, and no issues were
noted.
2. High Priority Lines — All four of the high priority lines were inspected, and no issues
were noted.
The inspection was considered satisfactory. If you should have any questions, please do
not hesitate to contact Gary Hudson or our office at [phone].
Enclosures — Inspection Report
CC: Laserfiche
D_E
NOR! H CAHOI INA
Sincerely,
r DocuSigned by:
8 E225 94EA.
Lon 1. Snider, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800
kgWNmB�t of EmI�O�mB�I quAl�

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQCS00364 Effective: 11/01/16 Expiration: 10/31/24 Owner : Rockingham County
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Rockingham County Collection System
County: Rockingham
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Ronnie Tate
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: CS2,
Primary ORC: Eric Wayne Thompson
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title: Dir Eng & Public Utilities Phone: [phone]
Certification: 990703 Phone: [phone]
NC0021873 Town of Mayodan - Mayodan WWTP
NC0025071 City of Eden - Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/10/2021 Entry Time 10:OOAM
Exit Time: 12:OOPM
Primary Inspector: Gary Hudson Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
Permit Inspection Type: Collection system management and operation
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
▪ Miscellaneous Questions
▪ Capital Improvement Plan
▪ Inspections
▪ Lines
(See attachment summary)
▪ General
▪ Map
▪ Spill Response Plan
▪ Pump Stations
▪ Sewer & FOG Ordinances
▪ Reporting Requirements
▪ Spills
Page 1 of 6

Permit: WQCS00364 Owner - Facility: Rockingham County
Inspection Date: 02/10/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
*The permit became effective November 1, 2016 and expires October 31, 2024.
*The FOG educational document is in the June and January customer news letter.
*Mr. Thompson provided a Capital Improvement Plan that covered a five year period that included several large projects.
*The collection system had reportable SSOs during Hurricane Micheal in 2018.
*The system has 4 HPLs, and all 4 were inspected during the inspection.
*An adequate Spill Response Action Plan was presented and is available to all personell.
*The system is free of known points of bypass.
*Hydro Structures does the cleaning, jetting, and T.V. of 10% of the system yearly.
*The Fishing Creek Pump Station was inspected and no problems were noted.
Page 2 of 6

Permit: WQCS00364 Owner - Facility: Rockingham County
Inspection Date: 02/10/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
General
Is there a properly designated primary ORC and at least one back-up of proper grade?
Are logs being reviewed by the system management or owner on a regular basis?
# What is that frequency?
# Are there any issues being addressed currently or any in the planning stages?
Is there a specific pump failure plan available for all pump stations?
Does plan indicate if pump parts/new pumps are in spare parts/equipment inventory?
Are new/significantly upgraded pump stations equipped with anti -corrosion materials?
Does the permittee have a copy of their permit?
# Is permit expiring within the next 6 months?
If Yes, has the Permittee applied for renewal?
Comment: The permit became effective November 1, 2016 and expires October 31, 2024.
Sewer and FOG Ordinances
Is Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) or other Legal Authority available?
Does it appear that the Sewer Use Ordinance is enforced?
Is there a Grease Control Program that legally requires grease control devices?
What is the standard grease trap cleaning requirement in the FOG ordinance?
Is Grease Control Program enforced via periodic inspections/records review?
Is action taken against violators?
# Have satellite systems adopted an equivalent or more stringent ordinance?
Is grease/sewer education program documented with req'd customer distribution?
# Are other types of education tools used like websites, booths, special meetings, etc?
If Yes, what are they? (This can reduce mailing to annual.)
Comment: The FOG educational document is in the June and January customer news letter.
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Weekly
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Every 3 months.
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Capital Improvement Plan Yes No NA NE
Has a Capital (CIP) or System Improvement Plan been developed and adopted? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is it designated for wastewater only or does it have a dedicated section? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP cover three to five year period of earmarked improvements? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP include description of project area? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP include description of existing facilities? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP include known deficiencies? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP include forecasted future needs? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Mr. Thompson provided a Capital Improvement Plan that covered a five year period that includes
several large projects.
Page 3 of 6

Permit: WQCS00364 Owner - Facility: Rockingham County
Inspection Date: 02/10/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Map
Is there a overall sewer system map?
Does the map include:
Pipe Type (GS/FM)
Pipe sizes
Pipe materials (PVC, DIP, etc)
Pipe location
Flow direction
Approximate pipe age
Pump station ID, location and capacity
# Force main air release valve location & type
# Location of satellite connections
Is the map being updated for changes/additions within 1 year of activation?
Comment:
Reporting Requirements
# Have there been any sewer spills in the past 3 years?
If Yes, were they reported to the Division if meeting the reportable criteria?
If applicable, is there documentation of press releases and public notices issued?
Is an Annual Wastewater Performance Report being filed with the Division, if required?
Is the report being made available to all its sewer customers?
# How is it being made available?
Comment: The collection system had reportable SSOs during Hurricane Micheal in 2018.
Inspections
Are adequate maintenance records maintained?
Are pump stations being inspected at the required frequency?
# Is at least one complete functionality test conducted weekly per pump station?
Is there a system or plan in place to observe the entire system annually?
Is the annual inspection documented?
# Does the system have any high -priority lines/locations?
Are inspections of HPL documented at least every 6 months?
Are new lines being added to the HPL list when found or created?
Comment: The system has 4 HPLs, and all 4 were inspected during the inspection.
Spill Response Action Plan
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available?
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available for all personnel?
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ •
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑❑❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 4 of 6

Permit: WQCS00364 Owner - Facility: Rockingham County
Inspection Date: 02/10/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Does the plan include:
24-hour contact numbers
Response time
Equipment list and spare parts inventory
Access to cleaning equipment
Access to construction crews, contractors, and/or engineers
Source of emergency funds
Site sanitation and cleanup materials
Post-overflow/spill assessment
Does the Permittee appear to respond within 2 hours of first knowledge of a spill?
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: An adequate Spill Response Action Plan was presented and is available to all personell.
Spills
Is system free of known points of bypass?
If No, describe type of bypass and location
The system is free of known points of bypass.
Are all spills or sewer related issues/complaints documented?
# Are there repeated overflows/problems (2 or more in 12 months) at same location?
# If Yes, is there a corrective action plan?
Comment:
Lines/Right-of-Ways/Aerial Lines
Please list the Lines/Right of Ways/Aerial Lines Inspected:
Are right-of-ways/easements maintained for full width for access by staff/equipment?
If No, give details on temporary access:
Is maintenance documented?
Are gravity sewer cleaning records available?
Has at least 10% of lines older than 5 yrs been cleaned annually?
Were all areas/lines inspected free of issues?
Comment: Hydro Structures does the cleaning, jetting, and T.V. of 10% of the system yearly.
Pump Stations
Please list the Pump Stations Inspected:
The Fishing Creek Pump Station was inspected and no problems were noted.
# Number of duplex or larger pump stations in system
# Number of vacuum stations in system
# Number of simplex pump stations in system
# Number of simplex pump stations in system serving more than one building
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
14
0
0
0
Page 5 of 6

Permit: WQCS00364 Owner - Facility: Rockingham County
Inspection Date: 02/10/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
How many pump/vacuum stations have:
# A two-way "auto polling" communication system (SCADA) installed?
# A simple one-way telemetry/communication system (auto -dialer) installed?
For pump stations inspected:
Are they secure with restricted access?
Were they free of by-pass structures/pipes?
Were wet wells free of excessive grease/debris?
# Do they all have telemetry installed?
Is the communication system functional?
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted ?
Does the sign include:
Owner Name?
Pump station identifier?
# Address?
Instructions for notification?
24-hour emergency contact numbers?
Are audio and visual alarms present?
Are audio and visual alarms operable?
# Is there a backup generator or bypass pump connected?
If tested during inspection, did it function properly?
Is the back-up system tested at least bi-annually under normal operating conditions?
# Does it have a dedicated connection for a portable generator?
# Is the owner relying on portable units in the event of a power outage?
# If Yes, is there a distribution plan?
If Yes, what resources (Units/Staff/Vehicles/etc) are included in Plan?
# Does Permittee have the approved percentage of replacement simplex pumps?
Is recordkeeping of pump station inspection and maintenance program adequate?
Do pump station logs include at a minimum:
Inside and outside cleaning and debris removal?
Inspecting and exercising all valves?
Inspecting and lubricating pumps and other equipment?
Inspecting alarms, telemetry and auxiliary equipment?
Comment:
14
14
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑•❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑•❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ •
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 6 of 6