20090565 Ver 1_2010 Final Mitigation Plan_20120711

REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON NORTH CAROLINA 28403 1343
July 9, 2012
Regulatory Division
Action ID No SAW 2009 00832
Mr Taylor Downey
Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Development Company (WREDCO)
Post Office Box 12768
New Bern North Carolina 28561
Dear Mr Downey
0 - D&LP.5
JUL 1 1 2o12
Enclosed is one copy of the executed Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) establishing
Bachelors Delight Stream Mitigation Bank located in on the east side of Gum Branch Road (SR
1308), within Bachelors Delight Swamp watershed north of Jacksonville Onslow County North
Carolina
With the execution of this MBI Task 10 in Table 4A and 4B of the MBI has been
completed and the initial 15% of the total credits are now available for immediate use This
credit release consists of 25 6 wetland credits and 3 976 linear feet of stream credits As
disclosed in our February 21 2012 a mail our Nationwide Permit No 27 which authorizes the
physical improvements /construction of the bank has been verified until March 18 2013 Please
be aware that all improvements /construction in Jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands must be
completed by that date or reverification from our office will be required
If you have any questions or comments please contact Mr Mickey Sugg at the Wilmington
Regulatory Field Office telephone [phone]
Enclosures
Sincerely
Jean B Gibby
Acting Chief Regulatory Division
Wilmington District

2
Copies Furnished (with enclosures)
Mr Scott Dahlquist Vice President
Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Development
Company (WREDCO)
32820 Weyerhaeuser Way S
Federal Way, Washington 98003
Mr Christian Preziosi
Land Management Group Inc
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Mr David Ashcraft
NC State Natural Resources
Foundation Inc
Campus Box 8010
Room 3060 Biltmore Hall
Raleigh North Carolina 27695
Mr Glenn Catts
Hofinann Forest Liaison
College of Natural Resources NCSU
2023 Biltmore Hall PO Box 8002
Raleigh North Carolina 27695
Vr In MMillan
No� C olna Departmnt of
Eironment and Natural Resources
Webscape Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699 1650
Mr Jeffrey Garnett
U S Environmental Protection Agency
Wetland Section Region 4
61 Forsyth Street S W
Atlanta Georgia 30303 8960
Mr Roy Brownlow
North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 -3421
Copies Furnished (without enclosures)
Mr John Ellis
U S Fish and Wildlife Service
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh North Carolina 27636 3726
Mr Steve Sollod
North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699 1638
Mr Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Ms Molly Ellwood
North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
Pace Wilber Ph D
Atlantic Branch Chief
Charleston (F /SER47)
Southeast Regional Office NOAA Fisheries
Post Office Box 12559
Charleston South Carolina 29422 2559

3
Ms Joanne Steenhuis
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
Ms Jennifer Derby Chief
Wetlands Section Region IV
Water Management Division
Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta Georgia 30303 8960

APPENDIX A (CD COPY)

BACHELORS DELIGHT
STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION BANK
Onslow County, North Carolina
FINAL MITIGATION PLAN
Sponsor.
Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Development Company
1412 Eatonton Highway, Suite 700
Madison, GA. 30650
Prepared by'
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP ihe.
Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 2522
Wilmington, N.C. 28402
and.
Florence & Hutcheson Consulting Engineers
Raleigh, NC
October 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
I. INTRODUCTION .......................
A. Project Overview ..................
B. Site Location ........................
C. Watershed Characterization
II. MITIGATION GOALS .....................
A. Protect Purpose .........................
B. Geographic Service Area (GSA)
III. SITE DESCRIPTION .............................
A. Community Types ............................
B. Vegetation ........ ...............................
C. Soil Characteristics ..........................
D. Hydrology /Hydraulic Characteristics
IV. STREAM RESTORATION PLAN .............
A.
Introduction ........... ...............................
B.
Priority I Stream Restoration ...............
C.
Zero Order Stream Restoration ...........
D.
Stream Enhancement ..........................
E.
Stream Preservation ............................
F.
Stream and Wetland Buffer ..................
V. WETLAND RESTORATION PLAN ..........
A.
Riparian Wetland Restoration ..............
B.
Riparian Wetland Enhancement..........
C.
Riparian Wetland Preservation ............
D.
Non - Riparian Wetland Restoration ......
E.
Non - Riparian Wetland Preservation ....
F.
Reference Wetland /Stream Monitoring
VI. BANK IMPLEMENTATION
VII. POST- CONSTRUCTION MONITORING ........................
A. Wetland Restoration /Enhancement Success Criteria
B. Stream Restoration Success Criteria .........................
C. Stream Enhancement Success Criteria .....................
VIII. SITE MANAGEMENT..........
A. Adaptive Management....
B. Long -Term Management
2
2
2
3
4
4
5
6
6
6
7
7
..8
..8
..9
13
17
21
24
26
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
36
36
39
43
43
43
44

IX. CONCLUSION
45
X. SOURCES OF INFORMATION ......................................................................... .............................46

LIST OF FIGURES, TABLES, AND APPENDICES
Figure 1 ....................
Figure 2 ...................
Figure 3 ...................
Figure 4 ....................
Figure 5 ...................
Figure 6 ...................
Figure 7 ...................
Figures 7A. thru 7D.
Figure 8 ....................
Figure 9 ...................
Figure 10A. thru 10E
...... Project Vicinity Map
USGS Topographic Map
...... .............................2' LIDAR Topographic Map
................. Geographic Service Area (GSA) Map
.. .........................Onslow County Soil Survey Map
.... ...........................1998 Aerial Photography Map
............ ............................... Restoration Plan Map
........ ............................... Restoration Plan Sheets
Typical Plan View and Cross - Section of Wet Ford
. ............................... Proposed Planting Plan Map
.......... ............................... Monitoring Plan Sheets
Table 1.
Excluded 14 -Digit Hydrologic Units
Table 2.
Restoration Totals by Stream Reach
Table 3.
Wetland Mitigation Acreages
Table 4.
Planting Plan for Small Stream Swamp Community
Table 5.
Non - Riparian Wetland Planting Plan
Table 6.
Projected Stream and Wetland Credit Totals
Table 6A.
Summary of Credits by Mitigation Type
Table 7.
Project Milestone Schedule
Table 8.
Proposed Stream Cross - Sections
Table 9.
Proposed Longitudinal Profiles by Stream Reach
Appendix A.
Ecoregion Map
Appendix B.
Approved Jurisdictional Wetland Plat
Appendix C.
Site Photographs
Appendix D.
USACE Stream Assessment Data Forms
Appendix E.
Reference Reach Study /HEC -RAS Modeling
Appendix F.
Historic Aerial Photography
Appendix G.
Stream Buffer Effectiveness Correction Factor (SBCF) Maps
Appendix H.
NCWAM Assessment

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On behalf of the bank Sponsor, Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Development Company ( WREDCO),
Land Management Group (LMG) is submitting the following comprehensive mitigation plan for the
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project. The bank site (approximately 363 acres)
encompasses land owned by both WREDCO and The Endowment Fund of North Carolina State
University. The site is located near Jacksonville, NC in the headwaters of the New River, a major
tributary of the White Oak River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03030001). The project area consists of a
network of channelized headwater wetland and stream systems that have been historically altered
as a result of silvicultural and agricultural management practices. These practices have
compromised the functions of both the wetlands and streams within the project boundaries and
degraded water quality in the New River watershed.
The goal of the project is to restore the natural hydrologic conditions that existed prior to the
initiation of intensive land management in the early 1970s. At the present time, drainage within the
headwaters of each of the on -site streams has been modified to artificially increase or decrease the
functional size of the surrounding watershed. As a result, channels may become dehydrated due
to lack of flow (associated with truncated watersheds) or may experience erosion due to excessive
flow velocities (associated with artificially enlarged watersheds). These alterations have been
exacerbated by extensive logging within the floodplains and channelization throughout the lower
reaches.
Stream and wetland restoration activities will involve the backfilling and /or plugging of ditches in the
headwaters of each of the reaches and construction of new stream channels where appropriate.
The project will also utilize a zero order restoration approach for headwater streams which maintain
a natural watershed of approximately 25 to 83 acres.
The following restoration plan provides specific information regarding the technical approach for
the proposed stream and wetland restoration activities. Information regarding the proposed
monitoring procedures and long -term stewardship of the project are also included.
1

I. INTRODUCTION
A. Project Overview
The Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank site (approximately 363 acres)
consists predominantly of channelized headwater wetland and stream systems that have been
historically altered as a result of silvicultural and agricultural management practices. The site is
located just east of Gum Branch Road, approximately six miles north of Jacksonville, NC, in
Onslow County. The site consists of rolling terrain and is bisected by three main stream systems
(Hewitts Branch, Huffmans Branch, and Bachelors Delight Swamp). While a majority of the site
contains moderately well- drained soils, several areas along the eastern and western sections
contain poorly- drained soils associated with interstream divide landscape positions. During the
early 1970s, a network of drainage ditches was installed throughout these areas to lower
groundwater tables and intercept surface water. Site drainage flows south through the Bachelors
Delight Swamp, a third order tributary of the New River — part of the White Oak River Basin
(Cataloging Unit 03030001) (DWQ Subbasin 03- 05 -02). Based upon detailed site investigations,
16,761 If of stream restoration, 5,928 If of stream enhancement and 11,400 If of stream
preservation is proposed. A total of 60 ac of riparian wetland habitat has also been targeted for
restoration. Non - riparian wetland restoration, located throughout the interstream flats, will comprise
approximately 85 ac of the proposed project area. As a result, the restoration effort will allow for
increased stream habitat, floodwater storage, nutrient retention /sediment reduction, and intact
headwater wetland habitat for resident and migratory fauna.
B. Site Location
The tract is located east of the junction of Gum Branch Road and Quaker Bridge Road in northern
Onslow County, NC (refer to Figure 1). It is bordered on the northeast by the Hofmann Forest.
The site is located approximately 6 miles north of Jacksonville. The attached USGS 7.5- minute
topographic quadrangle (Jacksonville North quad) depicts the location of the site relative to
mapped blue -line streams and canals (Figures 2 -3).
2

C. Watershed Characterization
The bank site is located within the White Oak River watershed (DWQ Subbasin 03- 05 -02). The
subbasin consists of managed forestry tracts, low- density residential and high density commercial
developments along the Gum Branch Road corridor. Population growth within the subbasin is
primarily focused in the areas north of Jacksonville and south of Richlands. Streams and
waterbodies within the watershed are susceptible to impairment from nutrient loading and low
ambient dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations. According to the White Oak River Basinwide
Water Quality Plan (NC DWQ 2005), a majority of the waterbodies within the subbasin are
impaired due to nutrient enrichment and periodic fecal coliform bacteria contamination.
Surface waters within the project area drain south to Bachelors Delight Swamp, a third order
tributary of the New River. The NC DWQ surface water body classification for Bachelors Delight
Swamp is C -NSW. Class "C waters are defined as those waters protected for secondary
recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic life (including propagation), survival and
maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture. Secondary recreation includes wading,
boating, and other uses involving human body contact with water where such activities take place
in an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental manner. Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) is a
supplemental classification intended for waters needing additional nutrient management due to
being subject to excessive growth of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation. Best management
practices (BMPs), including riparian buffer setbacks, are implemented within NSW basins to help
offset or minimize nutrient loading to susceptible waters.
The site formerly consisted of several expansive areas of Mesic Pine Flatwood communities
dissected by multiple, small stream swamp systems in the headwater areas. Non - riverine
headwater wetlands (pocosin and swamp forest), characteristic of the outer Coastal Plain, existed
throughout the broad interstream flats in the eastern and western borders of the proposed project
area. These type of wetlands support a number of functions /values including, but not limited to the
following: groundwater recharge; floodwater storage and attenuation; filtration and storage of
nutrients, sediments, and /or toxic substances; and refuge /feeding habitat for resident and migratory
fauna. Stream systems work in concert with these wetlands to attenuate flood velocities, provide
aquatic habitat, and elevate the surrounding water table. At the present time, these functions have
3

been compromised through silvicultural management and agricultural practices (including ditching,
clear- cutting, conversion to fields, agri - chemical runoff, etc.). The New River and its tributaries
have exhibited significant water quality impairments associated with low DO, high total nitrogen,
and high total phosphorous. High nutrient concentrations originate from non -point source loading
associated with intensive agricultural practices common throughout the watershed. These
impairments tend to be exacerbated by channelization of streams and ditching of adjacent
headwater wetlands, resulting in diminished nutrient uptake and nutrient/sediment loading to down -
gradient waters.
II. MITIGATION GOALS
A. Project Purpose
The goal of the proposed bank is to provide high - quality compensatory mitigation for permitted
impacts within the White Oak Basin via the restoration, enhancement, and preservation of streams
and wetlands. The proposed activities will restore both the hydrologic and vegetative components
of four separate stream and wetland communities within the headwaters of Bachelors Delight
Swamp. The following categories of functions have been targeted for restoration or enhancement
within the Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank:
• BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING —The restored stream and headwater wetland systems will
capture drainage from the surrounding watershed, dissipating energy in the downstream
environment. The increased retention times will allow for a suite of biotic and abiotic
processes to convert nitrogen and other nutrients into different forms that may be readily
consumed by the surrounding plant community. This retention also allows for sediment to
settle out of solution, reducing downstream pollution. Flow within the system will also
provide a valuable conduit for organic matter which will support downstream food webs.
Cessation of agricultural production within the headwaters will also reduce the nutrient and
sediment delivery to downstream waters.
• HYDROLOGIC /HYDRAULIC — The watershed restoration approach will provide for the re-
establishment of characteristic headwater wetland hydrology and contribute to natural flow
in

regimes for downstream tributaries. Restoration of riparian wetlands and headwater
wetland flats will result in the expansion of the surface and subsurface water storage
component of the ecosystem. The increase in storage volume will reduce peak discharge,
prolong baseflow, and contribute to channel stability.
• PLANT and ANIMAL HABITAT- Plantings associated with the various habitats will restore
the pine and native hardwood assemblages that existed prior to silvicultural and
agricultural management. When coupled with the variation in topography, these areas
provide valuable heterogeneity which supports a more diverse food web within the
ecosystem. This diversity provides a variety of food sources and refuge habitat for local
and migratory species. Increases in plant diversity will also be generated through the
development of microhabitats and organic matter inputs to the soil surface.
• AQUATIC HABITAT — Restoration of the existing watershed boundaries through the
removal of existing drainage ditches will restore natural flow regimes to several reaches
within the project area. New channel construction will also create numerous niche habitats
through the installation of woody debris, natural pools, etc. Restoration of seasonally
driven flow will rehydrate existing channels throughout the headwaters of Hewitts Branch,
Huffmans Branch, and Bachelors Delight Swamp. Both methods of restoration will allow
for macro - invertebrate and amphibian communities to repopulate these previously
inaccessible areas.
B. Geographic Service Area (GSA)
The tract is located within the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain ( Ecoregion 63) as defined by Griffith et
al. (2002) "Ecoregions of North Carolina" (refer to Appendix A). This ecoregion encompasses the
area defined as the `Carolina Flatwoods' — a subregion occurring along nearly level, poorly drained
areas in the outer Coastal Plain including the White Oak River Basin.
The proposed project will serve as a general use wetland and stream mitigation bank serving the
White Oak River Basin (USGS Cataloging Unit 03030001). Note that the GSA has been amended
based upon comments from the IRT and now excludes the 14 -Digit Cataloging Units located to the
south and east of HWY 17 in Pender and New Hanover Counties (Figure 4).
5

Table 1 provides a list of the excluded units.
Table 1. Excluded 14 -Digit HUCs
14 -Digit Cataloging Unit
03030001040005
03030001040010
03030001040020
III. SITE DESCRIPTION
A. Community Types
The tract consists of a variety of former wetland habitat types which coincide with the existing
gradients in topography, drainage patterns, and soil types. The primary wetland types targeted for
restoration are Coastal Plain small stream swamp and wet pine flatwoods. Based upon the
recently developed NC Wetland Assessment Manual (WAM), the targeted community types for the
bank site are (1) Non - Riparian Wetland Pine Flat; (2) Non - Riparian Wetland Pocosin; and (3)
Riparian Non - Riverine Headwater Wetland. Based upon the Cowardin classification for wetland
and deepwater habitats (Cowardin et al. 1979), the wetland community types to be restored are
Palustrine Scrub -Shrub and Forested Wetlands (i.e., broad-leaved deciduous, needle - leaved
deciduous, needle - leaved evergreen, and broad - leaved evergreen). Changes in restored
community types will coincide with changes in topography and soil types across the site.
B. Vegetation
The predominant land use of the tract and surrounding area is silvicultural (managed pine
plantation of various stand stages). Since the tract has been affected by prescribed drainage
improvements for forestry production, species indicative of drier, upland conditions are more
prevalent in areas currently targeted for riparian restoration and /or enhancement. These species
include old field blackberry (Rubus alumnus), dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), bracken fern
(Pteridium aquilinum), broom -sedge (Andropogon glomeratus), and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda).
Non - target species such as sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua) and red maple (Acer ►ubrum) are
dominant througout large sections of riparian habitat. More desirable species such as loblolly bay
31

(Gordonia lasianthus), fetterbush (Lyonia lucida), American holly (Ilex opaca), red bay (Persea
borbonia), and sweet bay (Magnolia virginiana) were observed in isolated areas. Characteristic
hardwoods of the small stream swamp community (e.g. black gum, water tupelo, bald cypress) are
either sparse or absent in the upper stream reaches targeted for restoration. The species
assemblage has clearly shifted in response to long -term site drainage and timber management.
C. Soil Characteristics
The tract is located within a dissected drainage network and includes broad, flat interstream areas
along the perimeter of the project site. Moderately well- drained soils, such as the Goldsboro unit,
are found near the intersections of the existing stream channels. These units transition to the
somewhat poorly- drained Lynchburg series and to the poorly- drained Rains series, situated in the
headwater landscape positions of the existing channels and adjacent to the Hofmann Forest.
Bottomland areas associated with the lower portions of Bachelors Delight Swamp are mapped as
Muckalee loam, a poorly- drained unit commonly associated with active floodplains throughout the
Coastal Plain (refer to Figure 5).
D. Hydrology /Hydraulic Characteristics
The tract is located within a watershed that has historically received drainage improvements for the
purposes of increased timber productivity and /or crop yield (Figure 6). These improvements have
resulted in changes to functional watershed size and disrupted natural flow patterns throughout the
headwaters of this area. An intensive drainage network exists throughout the 156 ac. of cultivated
land in the northeastern portion of the project site. These activities have increased the size of the
Bachelors Delight Swamp drainage area while concurrently diverting flow from Huffmans Branch
and other tributaries. As a result, these other tributaries exhibit significantly reduced flow and lack
evidence of overbank flooding.
Evidence of drained hydric soils (i.e. low - chroma, friable soils exhibiting a relatively high
percentage of uncoated sand grains) was observed throughout the areas mapped as the Rains soil
series. Areas mapped as Goldsboro and Lynchburg have been bedded, but lack a significant
network of drainage improvements. These conditions are reflected in the current wetland
delineation that received USACE approval in October 2007 (refer to Appendix B).
7

Drainage improvements have also directly impacted streams throughout the lower portions of the
watershed. These impacts have increased the cross - sectional area of the natural stream, limiting
interaction with the surrounding floodplain and increasing flow velocities during peak flow events.
In addition, the straightening and excavation of stream channels has resulted in the removal of
large woody debris and other in- stream habitat, reducing biological diversity within the system.
Appendix C documents existing conditions throughout each of the main reaches targeted for
restoration.
IV. STREAM RESTORATION PLAN
A. Introduction
Like other small, blackwater streams of the Coastal Plain, Bachelors Delight Swamp and its
tributaries are susceptible to water quality impairment resulting from non -point source discharges
of contaminants — including nitrogen, phosphorous, and a suite of organophosphate -based
herbicides and pesticides. Currently, intensive agricultural practices in the headwaters, in addition
to concentrated development along the Gum Branch Road corridor, contribute to decreased water
quality of downstream waters. Ditches, channelized tributaries, and canals drain an approximate
ten - square mile area within the watershed. These surface waters serve as direct conduits for
sediment, nutrients, and other pollutants entering both the Bachelors Delight Swamp and the New
River. The channelization of streams contributes to channel instability and reduced attenuation on-
site. This, in turn, results in increased flooding and bank erosion for down - gradient areas. The
natural replenishment of fine sediments and nutrients from floodwaters onto the floodplain wetlands
within the site has been virtually eliminated so that sediment accumulation is occurring along the
stream bed and nutrients are being shunted downstream. The physical alteration of the stream
bed adversely affects biological communities through direct mortality, habitat loss, and shifts in
species composition. See Appendix D for additional stream assessment information.

Restoration of a natural, sinuous channel will provide the variety of habitat features necessary to
support a diverse invertebrate and bacterial community. The re- establishment of these
communities increases the uptake of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) within the stream system.
As DOC is processed, the microbial loop is established, forming a key component of the food web
(Allan, 1995).
Restoration of the natural channel will also assist in the maintenance of an elevated water table
throughout the adjacent floodplain. Elevation of the water table allows for the reestablishment of
hydric soil conditions, which aid in the transformation and sequestration of pollutants. Construction
of an appropriate channel pattern and profile will also reduce flow velocities, increase residence
time, and promote overbank flooding (resulting in the replenishment of fine sediments and nutrients
to adjacent floodplain wetlands).
Each of the four stream reaches targeted for restoration exhibit similar geomorphic positions.
Thus, it is anticipated that the identified functions to be restored or enhanced are fairly uniform
throughout the project area (Figure 7). Table 2 provides specific information for each of the four
sections of the project.
B. Priority I Stream Restoration
The Priority I approach will be applied to reaches that have experienced extensive manipulation to
the natural channel and have been disconnected from their natural drainage basins. The physical
manipulations to the channels have removed a majority of the in- stream structures and increased
the cross - sectional area, resulting in a disconnection from the surrounding floodplain.
Disconnection and /or redirection of flows in the headwaters have dehydrated several reaches on
the northern side of Maready Road, further compromising the aquatic functions within each stream.
Design parameters for this approach were based on the naturally occurring watershed boundaries
and corresponding flow characteristics throughout the site. A reference reach was defined near
the intersection of BD -2 and BD -3 where a distinct shift from a braided, zero order system to a
defined channel was observed. The functional watershed size at this transition point was
determined to be 83 acres. This 83 acre threshold was then applied to reaches targeted for
M

restoration throughout the site. Areas containing a post- construction watershed of greater than 83
acres were designed using Priority I techniques, while those maintaining smaller drainage areas
incorporated zero -order design elements. Assessments conducted at the reach were also used to
determine the dimensionless ratios which determine the final geometry of the Priority I reaches.
Table 2. Restoration Totals by Stream Reach
Name
Restoration
Enhancement L2
Preservation
Hewitts Branch
HE -1
5,103
HE -2
1,900
HE -3
500
HE -4
3,000
Huffmans Branch
HU -1
3,445
HU -1A (Zero- Order)
171
1,200
HU -2 (Zero- Order)
1,233
HU -3
2,000
Bachelor's Delight
Swamp
BD -1/2 (Zero Order)
447
BD -3
1,700
BD -4 (Zero Order)
2,107
BD -4A (Zero Order)
1,274
BD -5
1,728
BD -5A (Zero Order)
949
BD -5B (Zero Order)
0
BD -5C (Zero Order)
0
BD -5D (Zero Order)
0
BD -6
1,700
BD -7
3,600
Half Moon Creek
HM -1 (Zero Order)
901
HM -1
1,131
TOTAL
16,761
5,928
11,400
10

Construction of the restored channel will occur directly adjacent to the existing ditch. Spoil material
generated from the excavation of the new channel will be used to backfill the existing ditch and
restore natural contours within the floodplain. Natural woody material will be used to construct the
in- stream structures throughout each section. Hard structures will not be used. Rather, natural
materials (such as root wads and log vanes) will assist with channel stabilization and grade control.
Hydrologic Modeling: Hydrologic Engineering Center's River Analysis System (HEC -RAS Version
4.0) is a software package designed to perform one - dimensional, steady flow, analysis of water
surface profiles for a network of natural and constructed channels. HEC -RAS uses two equations,
energy and /or momentum, depending upon the water surface profile. The model is based on the
energy equation. The energy losses are evaluated by friction (Manning's equation) and
contraction /expansion (coefficient multiplied by the change in velocity head). The momentum
equation is used in situations where the water surface profile rapidly varies, such as hydraulic
jumps and stream junctions.
Backwater analysis was performed for the existing and proposed conditions for both bankfull and
100 -year discharges. In addition to steady flow data, geometric data is also required to run HEC -
RAS. Geometric data consists of establishing the connectivity of the river system, which includes
cross - section data, reach lengths, energy loss coefficients (friction losses, contraction, and
expansion losses), and stream junction information.
Bankfull Discharge Analysis: HEC -RAS was used to evaluate how the discharge of the restored
channel flows within the proposed channel geometry. This evaluation verifies that the proposed
plan, dimension, and profile would adequately convey the discharge at the bankfull stage; the point
where water begins to overflow onto the floodplain. Bankfull discharge estimates were determined
using on -site conditions, the published regional curve, and the mini - regional curve created by
Ko /Florence & Hutcheson.
11

Rise /No -Rise Analysis: A HEC -RAS analysis has been prepared and completed on existing and
proposed conditions of the project channel(s). The resulting data output has been analyzed to
determine if the design channel is adequately conveying its bankfull discharge, and to determine if
a rise, fall, or no -rise in water surface elevations during the 100 -year flood event has occurred.
See Appendix E for specific information from the reference reach and modeling outputs.
Hewitts Branch — HE -1: The headwaters of this reach have experienced extensive logging and
drainage manipulation since the early 1970s. At the present time, several drainage ditches to the
west of and adjacent to Maready Road bisect the natural watershed, reducing flows to the existing
channel. Extensive logging within the area has also removed target species and a majority of the
mature loblolly pines. As a result, little functional habitat remains throughout this reach.
Construction of the single thread channel will involve grading activities designed to re- establish
proper elevations and hydrology. The initial grading work will remove existing silvicultural bedding
and contour the stream valley corridor to the original grades. Following these activities, each of the
ditches within the headwaters of Hewitts Branch will be backfilled to the existing grade,
approximately +52' MSL. Removal of a portion of the existing access road will provide source
material for the proposed backfilling. Woody debris from recent logging events will be utilized
throughout this section to enhance habitat and microtopography within the valley.
Approximately 2,000 If of single thread channel will be constructed on the western side of Maready
Road. Construction activities for this section will take place within a 400' corridor. A permanent
rock ford (see typical on Figure 8) will be constructed at the intersection of Maready Road,
replacing an existing culvert. At the present time, the existing culvert maintains an invert elevation
similar to the incised channel located downstream. The new culverts will raise the invert elevation
to approximately +50' MSL, which will reconnect the stream to the existing floodplain.
An additional 3,000 If of channel will be constructed downstream of this intersection. As the valley
becomes more defined in this section, the need for contouring will be minimized. Rather, the
proposed earthwork will focus on channel construction while repairing logging damage and
backfilling of the existing channelized feature. Following these activities, this section will be
12

planted with hardwood species associated with the target small stream swamp community. An
estimated total of 5,103 If of restoration, extending from the intersection of the main branch to the
zero order tributary, is proposed for this area (Figure 7).
Huffmans Branch — HU -1: A similar approach will be utilized for this reach, which has been
channelized north of Maready Road. Construction work will focus on the backfilling of ditches
associated with an access road in the northern section of the project. This will re- establish a
drainage connection to a majority of the 110 ac. natural watershed. Installation of new culverts will
also be installed at the intersection of existing access road and Maready Road. An estimated total
of 3,445 If of restoration, extending north from Maready Road is proposed for this area (Figure 7).
Half Moon Creek — HM -1: The headwaters of this reach have been managed for silvicultural
production for over 30 years. As a result, extensive channel modification and removal of the
characteristic riparian vegetation has occurred throughout the entire reach. Given the level of prior
disturbance, the stream corridor will be re- graded to achieve appropriate elevations and contours
throughout the existing valley.
Backfilling of the existing channel will occur between Maready Road and the southern project
boundary. Existing spoil piles and bedding will provide a majority of the source material for this
stage of the project. Removal of non - target species such as loblolly pine and sweet gum will occur
throughout the 200' wide valley to allow for grading activities to reestablish a gradual transition
between riparian and non - riparian habitats. When completed, a functional watershed exceeding 80
acres will provide hydrologic input to downstream section of the reach, restoring up to 1,131 If of
first order stream. Note that zero order stream construction will occur upstream of this section
providing an additional 901 If of restoration within the headwaters.
C. Zero Order Stream Restoration
A zero order approach will be applied to the headwater streams associated with the project. The
restoration design criteria will be consistent with current publish guidelines for the Coastal Plain
(USACE, 2007). Headwater (zero order) streams generally lack a defined bed and bank and are
located in smaller watersheds that are typically greater than 25 acres. Prior to developing the site
13

design, several tools were utilized to define the extent of the zero order stream systems within the
project area. These tools include 1' contour (LIDAR) data, soil survey data, historic aerial
photography, and on -site reference reach surveying. These data were then compared to the
proposed post - project watershed size to determine the applicability of the zero order approach.
Based on an analysis of the data collected, watersheds between 25 and 83 acres in size are
considered suitable for zero order restoration techniques. See Appendix F for historic aerial
photography of the site.
The length of the valley will be used to determine the final linear footage of zero -order stream
restoration. Areas outside of the 100 -ft wide corridor (but still within the valley) are targeted for
riparian wetland restoration. Plantings consistent with small stream swamp and riparian wetland
communities of the outer Coastal Plain will be established as part of the restoration effort. Figure 7
depicts the layout of the stream component of this project.
Restoration of the ecosystems will re- establish diffuse, braided flow patterns throughout the
identified valley corridor. This will be achieved through removal of existing silvicultural bedding and
backfilling and /or plugging of ditches throughout the upper watershed. These activities will allow
runoff to sheet flow across the site and access the restored riparian headwater system. The
elevation of water table depths will also provide valuable base flow.
Huffmans Branch — HU -1A: A small section of zero order restoration is proposed directly upstream
of HU -1. Proposed construction activities will be identical to those associated with the downstream
reach, but will transition into a braided system for approximately 171 If. Modeling indicates that the
watershed associated with this section will not support flow within a single thread channel. As a
result, this section will transition into a zero order, headwater system.
Huffmans Branch — HU -2: This reach will be restored through the backfilling and /or grading of the
existing ditch network in the headwaters. Ditches along the access road are currently diverting
flow from approximately 40 acres to the western tributary (HU -1), resulting in the dehydration of a
majority of the reach. Construction activities will restore a hydrologic connection throughout the 60
acre watershed, restoring 2,273 If of zero order stream and associated riparian habitat.
14

Bachelors Delight Swamp — BD2: The drainage connection between the headwaters of this reach
and the downstream section of Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD -3) has been severed by the
construction of Maready Road. Extensive bedding and logging have also reduced the extent of
riparian habitat associated with this reach. Restoration of this section will reestablish a hydrologic
connection through the installation of properly sized culverts underneath Maready Road. These
features will reestablish the connection to the 60 acre drainage basin, sufficient to provide flow to
approximately 447 If of zero order stream.
Conditions along the northern side of Maready Road have also deteriorated due to logging
practices. Any existing silvicultural bedding will be removed and recontoured to reestablish the
natural valley slope. Channelized sections of BD -1 and 2 will also be backfilled to the natural
grade. As a result of these activities water tables within the surrounding areas will be elevated,
supporting the target riparian community and zero order stream system.
Bachelors Delight Swamp — BD -4A: The headwaters of this reach have been managed for
agricultural production since the 1970s. As a result, a majority of the hardwood species have been
removed and only a limited number of bald cypress saplings remain. Several large collector canals
and a network of lateral ditches currently direct flow to the eastern branch of Bachelors Delight
Swamp (BD -5). These manipulations have reduced the hydrologic input from the natural
watershed significantly and have compromised the aquatic functions of the stream throughout
much of the reach.
Proposed construction activities will focus on reestablishing the hydrologic connection between the
headwaters and the downstream section of this reach. Existing field ditches within the footprint of
the proposed zero -order stream will be backfilled and contoured to match the proposed grades of
the valley. Backfilling of laterals in the vicinity of the zero -order valley will help restore natural
hydrologic inflows (via groundwater contributions and overland flow). The footprint of the proposed
zero order system will be based on historic aerial photography (1938) which includes two narrow
corridors within the headwaters. Note that a critical component of the headwater restoration will be
the backfilling and removal of the collector canal located on the southwestern boundary of the
15

NCSU property. This canal currently dissects the headwater valley and directs flow to the south
and east (into the canal that drains to BD -5). Removal of this canal will allow for unimpeded flow
from the restored headwater valley to BD -4. Final elevations will be contoured to facilitate drainage
into the downstream section of the reach. Following construction activities, a majority of the 80
acre drainage basin will be restored, supporting up to 1,274 If of zero order stream restoration.
Bachelors Delight Swamp — BD -4: The downstream section of this reach has also experienced
flow reductions due to the extensive hydrologic modifications within the headwaters. These
modifications have effectively removed natural hydrologic input from a majority of the reach
resulting direct mortality to the aquatic species. The proposed construction activities associated
with BD -4A will restore the natural drainage pathways, rehydrating the existing braided channel
system. As indicated above, the boundary canal between WREDCO and NCSU property will be
removed and contours graded to match the valley floor. This will provide unimpeded flow from the
restored headwaters to BD -4. Additional earthwork associated with BD -4 will be limited to the
section directly adjacent to Maready Road. At the present time, the existing culverts are clogged
with debris, severing the hydrologic connection to the downstream portion of the reach. As a
result, approximately 600 -800 If of braided channel has been submerged on the north side of
Maready Road. These culverts will be removed and replaced with a permanent rock ford which will
facilitate natural drainage to the downstream section of the reach (refer to typical on Figure 8).
Combined construction activities for the reach will restore up to 2,107 If of zero order stream
habitat.
Bachelors Delight Swamp — BD -5A: Conditions within the headwaters of this reach are similar to
BD -4A. However, due to the existing drainage network constraints from the adjacent tract
(Hofmann Forest), the opportunity to restore the entire subbasin is not feasible. As a result, only
the western branch has been targeted for zero order stream restoration. Construction within the
open fields will remove existing crowns and backfill and /or plug three lateral ditches. The collector
canal located on the southwest boundary of the field will also be plugged and backfilled. Final
elevations will be contoured to facilitate drainage through the existing wetlands located to the south
of the fields. The lower section of BD -5A is also dissected by a forestry road that extends from
Maready Road northeast to the boundary of the WREDCO and NCSU properties. Restoration
16

work will include the removal of this spoil road and contouring of the valley to match grades
between BD -5A and BD -5. Following completion of all construction activities, the functional
drainage area for this reach will exceed the 25 acre minimum threshold and support flow for up to
1,157 If of zero order stream
Half Moon Creek — HM -1A: This section will connect with the single thread channel construction
currently proposed for the downstream section of HM -1. Construction activities will occur on the
north side of Maready Road. During this stage of construction the existing culvert will be removed
and replaced with a permanent rock ford (refer to Figure 8) to facilitate diffuse flow from the
upstream portion of the reach. Work within the headwaters will include backfilling of approximately
2,000 If of existing ditch and recontouring within the 200' wide valley. Following the earthwork
phase, all disturbed areas will be planted with a mixture of hardwood species associated with the
target small stream swamp community. Based on the existing watershed boundary, up to 901 If of
zero order stream will be restored.
D. Stream Enhancement
The proposed enhancement activities will focus on sections to the south of Maready Road, where
direct impacts to the aquatic system are less acute. Stream enhancement will be achieved through
a variety of approaches across the site. Overall, management activities have reduced the aquatic
functions within several reaches via the alteration of storm - driven hydraulics and removal of in-
stream habitat. In addition, the placement of spoil material within the adjacent floodplain
compromises stream /floodplain interaction.
Hewitts Branch — HE -3: This section, located south of Maready Road, includes approximately 500
If of stream that has been historically impacted by road construction and silvicultural management
practices. Areas directly adjacent to the road bed have been channelized and culverted to control
runoff and drainage in the vicinity of the constructed road. The existing culvert has not been
maintained and flows are currently restricted due to sediment deposition on the upstream and
downstream sides. As a result, natural flow is impeded.
Channelization has disconnected the stream from the adjacent floodplain. In addition to this
17

disturbance, a large ditch that parallels the entire western edge of the floodplain intercepts surface
water and groundwater input to the adjacent stream. Spoil piles from the excavation of the stream
currently serve as an artificial boundary to the existing wetlands and divert flow towards HE -1. In
addition to compromising stream function, the incised channel adversely affects the hydroperiod of
the adjacent riparian wetlands. Overall, management activities have reduced the aquatic functions
within this reach via the alteration of storm - driven hydraulics and removal of in- stream habitat. In
addition, reduced connectivity of the wetland floodplain reduces the potential for nutrient/pollutant
retention.
Enhancement of aquatic function will be achieved through the restoration of seasonal variation in
flow dynamics via removal of the road bed and the installation of the wet ford. The restoration of a
natural flooding regime (amplitude, timing, etc.) will promote the re- establishment of characteristic
riparian vegetation. The existing ditch along the western edge of the stream valley will also be
filled and restored to the existing grade. Enhancement of riparian wetland hydrology will contribute
to stream baseflow (particularly important to stream function during periods of reduced surface
water inflow). Based upon the observed conditions, 500 If of Level II Enhancement is proposed for
this section.
Huffmans Branch — HU -3: This section, located south of Maready Road, includes approximately
2,000 If of stream that has been disturbed by road construction and silvicultural management
practices. Due to the flow restrictions present along Maready Road, this section drains only a
small percentage of its natural watershed. As a result, sections of the channel now resemble
braided systems normally associated with headwater wetland areas. Extensive evidence of
historic logging within the floodplain was also observed throughout the reach, as indicated by the
presence of an expansive clear -cut along the western edge of the existing wetlands. Non - target
vegetative assemblages dominated by sweet gum and red maple saplings and trees ranging in age
from 10 to 20 years are also present along the eastern section of the floodplain.
HU -3 exhibits relative morphological stability along much of its reach. Therefore, enhancement will
not require earth work along this section of the tributary. The enhancement of aquatic function will
be realized as a result of the reestablishment of natural hydrologic inflows that have been altered

by prior land -use practices). Restoration of upstream stream channels (both first order and zero
order tributaries) and riparian wetlands will result in functional benefits to downstream waters. The
natural hydroperiod of HU -3 has been compromised by prior channelization and
compartmentalization of the contributing watershed. These land -use practices have resulted in
modifications to channel morphology, floodplain interaction, flow regime, and sediment transport.
The combined effects of upstream channelization and compartmentalization via the road bed that
bisects the stream reach results in more acute, episodic discharge to HU -3. Characteristic pulsed
flooding events will be achieved via the restoration of upstream channels and the removal of an
approximate 25 -ft wide road bed. A stream valley (wet ford) will be graded within the area of the
existing road bed. The existing under -sized culverts will be removed. The eastern ford will
reestablish the connection to a 55 -acre drainage area associated with HU -2 that is currently
serviced by an 18" diameter culvert. The western ford will provide an unrestricted connection to
the 300 -acre drainage area associated with HU -1 and will expand the natural hydrologic
connection to both the restored channel and floodplain associated with the restoration of the HU -1
reach. This connection will support nutrient cycling, invertebrate passage, and reduced flow
velocities within the section targeted for enhancement.
Approximately 3,300 native hardwoods will also be planted within the adjacent riparian zone to help
re- establish the appropriate small stream swamp community. This revegetation within the
floodplain will stabilize the areas along the western floodplain that remain sparsely vegetated
following the logging activities that occurred in 2007 -08. Plantings along the eastern edge will
occur in areas currently dominated by non - target species such as red maple and sweet gum. As
these plantings mature, they will provide additional shading for the stream channel and refuge
habitat for larger fauna.
Bachelors Delight Swamp — BD -5: This section includes 1,728 If of existing channel located
downstream from BD -5A. A majority of this section has been channelized to accommodate
drainage from the adjacent forestry operations. Enhancement of aquatic function within this area
will be achieved through the removal of the existing soil road and spoil piles located within the
floodplain. Following the removal of these features, natural valley contours will be restored to
facilitate overland flow into the existing channel. The restored floodplain will serve to filter
19

pollutants and remove sediment, thus improving water quality throughout the reach.
An existing conditions HEC -RAS model (models the channel with the culvert) was completed for
BD5 which depicts increased water surface elevations for the bankfull, 10 and 100 year storm
events when compared with the proposed conditions model (models the channel without the
culvert and road bed). The existing and proposed conditions were modeled 500 feet upstream and
downstream of the culvert at the soil road to determine the impact on the natural hydrologic regime.
The model results show that the culvert has an increase in water surface elevations of 2.58 feet for
the bankfull storm, 1.76 feet for the 10 year storm and 1.32 feet for the 100 year storm event when
compared with proposed conditions at the inlet of the culvert. These results quantify the extent and
frequency of ponding that occurs under the current conditions. Based on these results, removal of
the existing culvert will restore natural hydraulics and hydrology within the valley of BD5. These
activities will support sediment and debris transport through the system and restore habitat for
fauna and flora that has previously been negatively impacted by unnatural inundation.
Bachelors Delight Swamp — BD -6: BD -6 includes approximately 1,700 If of stream enhancement
along its northwestern and southeastern reaches. Functional uplift along BD -6 will be achieved
through the reestablishment of a hydrologic connection to restored headwater and riparian
wetlands of BD -4, BD -4A, BD -5, and BD -5A. Restoration of upstream zero -order streams, re-
connection of natural watersheds, and removal of flow impediments will contribute to the
enhancement of stream function throughout BD -6. The reestablishment of a characteristic, pulsed
hydrologic regime will promote channel equilibrium, floodplain interaction, and associated
nutrient/sediment retention.
The southeastern section of BD -6 receives continual, increased inflow from a large borrow pit/pond
located immediately east of Maready Road and adjacent to BD -5. A portion of the borrow pit was
excavated from the floodplain of BD -5. Flow from BD -5 is re- directed into this pond prior to
discharging to BD -6 via a submerged pipe. As a result, the receiving watershed is subject to
modified water quality conditions and flow regimes. The altered hydrologic connection between
BD -5 and BD -6 also disrupts the passage of semi - aquatic and aquatic fauna between these
reaches. Proposed enhancement activities will include the removal of the borrow pit via grading
20

(i.e. infilling) and contouring to pre- disturbance elevations and planting of characteristic riparian
vegetation. The outlet pipe underneath Maready Road will be replaced by a large wet ford that will
span the natural valley and provide adequate drainage for the upstream watershed. The result will
be unimpeded, natural flow to downstream segments.
Characteristic hydrologic inflow to the northwestern section of BD -6 will be also be reestablished
through the installation of a wet ford at the intersection of Maready Road. While this section
exhibits relative morphologic stability, hydrologic input from BD -4 is restricted by a poorly
functioning, undersized culvert at the existing road. As a result, flow is not sufficient to maintain
proper channel geometry and reduces the frequency and amplitude of overbank flooding of the
adjacent riparian wetlands. These conditions persist until the reach connects with the perennial
section of Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD -7) (near the confluence of the northwestern and
southeastern sections of BD -6). As a result, floodplain benefits (including nutrient
exchange /transformation and sediment retention) are compromised along this reach of BD -6.
Restoration of the headwater stream and wetlands of BD -4 and BD -4A and the reestablishment of
unimpeded flow regimes will promote channel equilibrium and enhanced stream /floodplain
interaction.
E. Stream Preservation
The Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank site is situated at the headwaters of the New River
watershed, immediately north of the more heavily urbanized areas of Jacksonville, NC. Road
corridors within the immediate vicinity of the bank site (including Gum Branch Road and Western
Boulevard corridors) continue to experience significant residential and commercial expansion
associated in large part with the 2005 federal Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission
(BRAC) and resultant population growth. Preservation of headwater streams and wetlands in
urbanized watersheds is an important component of maintaining and supporting habitat
structure /function and water quality functions of downstream waters (particularly in areas
susceptible to near -term perturbations associated with population growth and development). The
stream preservation reaches of the Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank site are situated at the down -
gradient terminus of the project. Note that a single - family neighborhood is currently under
construction on the parcel directly south of the bank site. Preservation of the streams and
21

wetlands within the lower reaches of the property provides an opportunity to establish a protected
corridor from restored upstream areas to down - gradient waters.
The White Oak River Basin supports some of the most "biologically significant habitats along the
entire U.S. Atlantic Coast" (NCDENR 2007). Habitat conservation within the basin is the focus of
the Onslow Bight Conservation Forum, a landscape -scale collaborative conservation effort. One of
the major goals of this effort (and as supported by the State of NC) is the buffering of military bases
and the protection of natural areas off military lands. The preservation component of the proposed
bank site and the connectivity that it would provide to Hoffman Forest is consistent with such goals.
It is important to note that the receiving waters of New River support expansive areas of primary
nursery area (PNA) and consist of Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) as defined by 15A NC
Administrative Code 031 .0101 and 15A NCAC 02B .0225, respectively. Preservation of
contributing stream reaches is important for the continued functioning of these identified coastal
resources. Areas of New River south of US Hwy 17 also contain submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAV) beds considered Critical Habitat Area under Marine Fishery Council rules. SAV provides
important nursery habitat for many species (including blue crabs, penaeid shrimp, and red drum).
Predatory fish also utilize SAV habitat for foraging. SAV growth and distribution in particularly is
limited by water quality impairments (such as turbidity associated with upstream sediment loading).
Restoration and preservation of streams that drain to coastal waters is consistent with the goals
and recommendations of the Coastal Habitat Protection Program (CHPP) of the NC Division of
Marine Fisheries (DMF). Strategies and recommendations of CHPP include the enhancement and
protection of habitats from physical impacts and incentives to reduce non -point source pollution via
minimizing losses to wetlands and streams. Preservation of the Bachelors Delight streams is
consistent with these strategies.
A number of federally - listed species have been identified as occurring within the larger White Oak
River Basin. A majority of these species are associated with wetland and aquatic habitats. Listed
rare species include the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), Croatan crayfish
(Procamba►us plumimanus), Carolina gopher frog (Rana capito), oak toad (Bufo quercicus), and
black swamp snake (Phalacrocorax auritus). Of the nearly 100 rare species of vascular plant in the
22

White Oak River Basin, sixty -eight (68) are associated with wetland habitats (NCDENR 2007).
Preservation of stream corridors provides functional benefits to the habitats that support these
species.
Approximately 2 miles of Coastal Plain stream will be preserved in conjunction with the
development of the bank site (Figure 7). The areas targeted for preservation range from braided
headwater channels to large bottomland hardwood ecosystems. Stream channels within these
areas retain the characteristic dimension, plan, and profile relative to their watershed. As a result,
the stream /floodplain interaction remains intact and functional. Substantial in- stream habitat, such
as overhanging roots mats, snags, and leaf packs also support a diverse invertebrate community
within each reach (See Appendix D). In addition, sufficient canopy coverage also exists to regulate
stream temperatures during summer months.
Hewitts Branch — HE -2: The upper reach of the Hewitts Branch tributary (HE -2), north of Maready
Road, has experienced relatively minor silvicultural impacts, and retains a wide, intact wetland
community. Preliminary data suggest that this reach would be classified as a DA5 channel. As
with most headwater systems, a majority of the flow is directed through a series of braided
channels of varying widths and depths. The gentle, sloping topography ranging from +40' MSL to
+50' MSL supports a broad floodplain canopy comprised of several native hardwood species.
These species include mature water oak (Quercus nigra), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus
michauxi►), and American holly.
Approximately 1,900 If of braided channel have been proposed for preservation in this reach. The
adjacent riparian wetlands have also been targeted for preservation based upon the native
hardwood assemblage composition and lack of silvicultural disturbance.
Hewitts Branch — HE -4: The remaining length of Hewitts Branch, south of the intersection of HE -1,
has been targeted for preservation. The section includes approximately 3,500 If of a high quality
second order stream that has experienced minimal impact from the surrounding silvicultural
management activities. Data indicate that this reach would be classified as a C5 channel. A
distinct valley is present throughout the lower reaches of the branch with elevations ranging from
23

+30' MSL to +45' MSL. The floodplain is comprised of a natural assemblage of native hardwoods
such as black gum, swamp chestnut oak, and water oak. Approximately 400' of intact floodplain
are present throughout this area.
Huffmans Branch — HU -1A: This section, located to the north of HU -1, contains approximately
1,200 If of small, zero order stream channel. The canopy is comprised of a natural assemblage of
native species such as black gum, red bay, and wax myrtle (Morella cerifera). While existing trees
and shrubs indicate logging within the last 10 to 20 years, the stream appears to be stable and
functional. Preservation of the reach as part of the bank project will ensure long -term protection of
the reach and its associated functions.
Bachelors Delight Swamp — BD -3: This section, located downstream of BD -1/2, has been targeted
for preservation. Located on the south side of Maready Road, this section includes approximately
1,700 If of high quality first order stream that maintains a relatively stable channel and associated
floodplain. Approximately 150' of intact floodplain are present throughout this area with a well -
defined valley that ranges from +32' to +46' MSL. The floodplain is comprised of a natural
assemblage of native species such as black gum, red bay, and water oak.
Bachelors Delight Swamp — BD -7: The remaining section of Bachelors Delight Swamp
encompasses approximately 3,600 If of high quality second -order stream that has been minimally
impacted by the adjacent logging operations (Figure 7). A distinct valley is present throughout this
section with elevations ranging from +28' MSL to +46' MSL. The floodplain is comprised of a
natural assemblage of native hardwoods such as black gum, swamp chestnut oak, and water oak
and would be categorized as a bottomland hardwood ecosystem. Approximately 800' of intact
floodplain are present throughout this area.
F. Stream and Wetland Buffer
Per the 2008 Mitigation Rule, compensatory mitigation may include "the protection and
maintenance of terrestrial resources, such as non - wetland riparian areas and uplands, when these
resources contribute to or improve the overall ecological functioning of aquatic resources in the
watershed" (CFR 332.3(c)(2)). In addition, the North Carolina IRT recently released a draft of the
24

"Regulatory Guidance for the Calculation of Stream and Buffer Mitigation Credit for Buffer Widths
Different from Standard Minimum Widths NC (Version 4.51 Draft) ". The purpose of the guidance is
to provide a mechanism by which stream mitigation credits may be adjusted (upward or downward)
when proposed stream buffers differ from the standard, minimum width (i.e. 50 feet in piedmont
and coastal plain streams). Within the guidance, specific criteria are identified for the application of
the stream buffer effectiveness correction factor (SBCF). Providing additional buffer width (in
excess of 50 feet) will result in a corresponding increase in stream mitigation credit. The proposed
buffer widths for Bachelor's Delight Mitigation Bank are a minimum of 151 ft (corresponding to a
13% increase in stream credit). The actual area of uplands along each reach is variable depending
upon the width of the valley corridor to be restored, enhance, or preserved. The entire width of the
buffer area (both within existing valley corridors and within adjacent uplands) will be protected via
the conservation easement deed to be recorded for the site. Appendix G provides additional
information on specific stream reach totals based upon the application of the SBCF. The proposed
buffer area is also depicted in Figure 7.
Upland buffer areas that have been recently clear -cut (outside of existing valleys) will be restored
via the planting of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris). Based upon project design, approximately 129
acres of upland buffer will be restored and protected in perpetuity via the conservation easement
deed. Of this acreage, approximately 35 acres are associated with first order streams and thus are
incorporated into the SBCF calculations. The upland buffer areas exhibit moderately well- drained
to well- drained sandy soils (Goldsboro and Norfolk series). The upland restoration effort is
intended to restore the Atlantic Mesic Longleaf Woodland community (Peet and Allard, 1993) that
existed prior to anthropogenic disturbances., In addition to longleaf pine, this community includes
southern red oak (Quercus falcata), post oak (Quercus stellata), and water oak. A diverse
herbaceous layer may also develop if fire suppression is minimized. Restoration of this diverse
community offers an excellent opportunity to restore conditions that existed in the late 19th century.
In light of the effort to restore and preserve this upland community type in adjacent uplands, a more
favorable ratio for wetland preservation is requested (see below).
25

V. WETLAND RESTORATION PLAN
A. Riparian Wetland Restoration
Approximately 60 acres associated with the degraded stream systems have been targeted for
restoration. As discussed in the previous section, these areas have been converted to
monoculture pine plantations through silvicultural management activities over the past four
decades. A majority of the targeted areas are located in the transitional zone between the
managed pine stands and the remaining jurisdictional wetlands. The vegetation within these areas
is comprised of red maple, sweet gum, and red bay saplings. Table 3 provides specific information
on the proposed acreages for each wetland type included within the bank site.
Hydrologic Restoration: Characteristic hydrology of riparian areas will be restored through the
reestablishment of natural drainage basins and channel design throughout the site. The proposed
channel work will raise the bed elevation, minimizing subsurface drainage and increasing overbank
flooding within the adjacent floodplain. Restoration of the natural watershed boundaries throughout
the upstream sections will also increase the effective drainage basin size, which will provide
additional hydrologic input. The proposed restoration footprint for these areas was generated
through the use of HEC -RAS modeling, 1' contour LIDAR data, geomorphic data, and observed
field conditions. For example, the existing jurisdictional wetlands associated with HU -1 are found
along the +42' MSL contour. Output from the HEC -RAS modeling projects a flood elevation of 46'
during a 1 Year storm event. This suggests that sufficient hydrologic input from a relatively small
rain event will result in overbank flooding within the valley following stream restoration activities.
These overbank events coupled with the surface inflow of the restored watershed and the elevation
of groundwater levels will re- establish characteristic hydrology of the riparian wetlands.
Vegetative Restoration: The proposed restoration areas will be planted with species typical of a
small stream swamp community (Figure 9). Plantings will include bald cypress (Taxodium
distichum), swamp tupelo (Nyssa biflora), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), and swamp chestnut
oak. Trees will be planted on 9 -ft spacings, corresponding to 538 trees per acre. It is expected
that other characteristic species will recruit naturally into these restored areas upon successful
hydrologic restoration.
26

Table 3. Wetland Mitigation Acreages
Type
Proposed Acreage
Riparian Restoration
60
Riparian Enhancement
28
Riparian Wetland Preservation
48
Non - Riparian Restoration
85
Non - Riparian Preservation
13
SBCF /Upland Buffer
129
TOTAL
363
Table 4 provides more information regarding species quantities and composition for the small
stream swamp community.
Table 4. Planting Plan for Small Stream Swamp Community
Small Stream Swamp
60 ac.
Riparian Restoration
Common Name
Scientific Name
% Composition
# Planted
Bald Cypress
Taxodium distichum
30
9,684
Swamp Tupelo
Nyssa biflora
25
8,070
Red Bay
Persea borbonia
20
6,456
River Birch
Betula nigra
15
4,842
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
10
3,228
TOTAL
32,280
B. Riparian Wetland Enhancement
Approximately 28 acres of existing jurisdictional wetlands have been targeted for enhancement. At
the present time, these areas are located along narrow fringes adjacent to the degraded stream
systems. Characteristic vegetation has been altered through silvicultural management activities
that included clear- cutting, bedding, and ditching. While these areas technically meet the criteria
for jurisdictional wetlands, excavation and maintenance within the existing channels has
27

compromised the natural hydroperiod. As a result, flooding duration and frequency has been
reduced.
Existing wetlands that have been degraded by prior channel excavation will be enhanced via
stream restoration. Elevation of the channel bed and reconnection of the stream to the adjacent
floodplain will re- establish characteristic riparian wetland hydrology. Any areas in which vegetation
is removed as part of the stream restoration effort will be replanted with characteristic riparian
wetland species. As a result of the stream restoration, a natural hydrologic regime and habitat
assemblage will replace the current degraded system. These activities will contribute to additional
biogeochemical cycling and habitat utilization throughout the existing jurisdictional wetland
footprint.
C. Riparian Wetland Preservation
Approximately 48 acres of habitat located along the existing stream reaches has not been
adversely impacted by prior site management activities exhibit relatively natural wetland conditions.
As such, these areas will remain intact and functional via incorporation into the conservation
easement. This area was examined using the methodology outlined in NCWAM User Manual and
data sheets are provided in Appendix H. A relatively mature canopy comprised of native species
(e.g. swamp tupelo and bald cypress) and characteristic sub - canopy species (e.g. ironwood,
American holly, and red bay) was observed throughout the lower reaches of Hewitts Branch,
Huffmans Branch, and Bachelors Delight Swamp. These areas were characterized by natural
hummocks and microtopographic lows capable of retaining 6 to 12 inches of water following
inundation. All floodplains associated with these areas provide ample substrate for sediment and
pollutant retention during high flow events and reduce downstream flow velocities. Protection of
these corridors will also provide valuable habitat connectivity to the vast protected headwater
wetlands of the adjoining Hofmann Forest. Given the relatively undisturbed condition of these
riparian wetlands, calculated NC WAM rating, and the incorporation of upland buffers across the
entire bank site (see Section III (F) above), a 5:1 ratio is proposed for the riparian wetland
preservation.

D. Non - Riparian Wetland Restoration
Approximately 85 acres within the project boundary have been targeted for non - riparian wetland
restoration (Figure 7). This area has been actively cultivated for several decades for the
production of soybeans, cotton, and other commodity crops. As part of the conversion to
agricultural fields, an extensive network of ditches and canals was installed to improve drainage. A
majority of the soils are mapped as Pantego loam, a very poorly drained series commonly
associated with shallow depressional areas and broad, interstream flats in the Coastal Plain.
Spacing between the laterals ranges between 330' and 350'. Lateral ditches range in depth from
3' -4', and the larger collector canals range from 5' -7'.
Hydrologic Restoration: Restoration of the 85 acres of non - riparian wetland habitat will be achieved
via the backfilling and /or plugging of ditches. In addition, removal of the collector canals along the
southern boundary of the fields will allow for surface water to sheetflow into the restore stream
channels. Installation of ditch plugs and associated grading work along secondary and tertiary
ditches will restore characteristic wetland hydrology to the streamhead pocosin and wet pine flat
habitats (refer to Figure 9). Doing so will restore natural groundwater hydroperiods and provide for
increased surface storage.
Vegetation Restoration: Following construction activities the area will be planted with characteristic
wetland species coinciding with gradients in landscape position and anticipated hydrologic
conditions (Figure 9). Plantings will be designed to transition from the small stream swamp
community to a fringe of streamhead pocosin. The streamhead pocosin, located on the outer
valley fringe, will be characterized by a higher density of pond pine concurrent with a decrease in
abundance of bald cypress and black gum. Areas of slightly higher topography occurring within
interstream flats will be planted with increased abundance of pond pine. The shrub layer will be
comprised of American holly and loblolly bay. Other characteristic shrub species (e.g. inkberry,
fetterbush, American titi) will likely volunteer into the area due to the proximity to Hofmann Forest.
Tree seedlings will be planted on 9 -ft spacings (equivalent to a density of 538 stems /acre). Shrub
species will be planted on 8 -ft spacings (equivalent to a density of 680 stems per acre). Table 5
provides additional information on species and quantities.
29

Functional Restoration: Restored wetlands will intercept runoff from adjacent crop fields, dissipate
stormwater velocity, and enhance nutrient and sediment trapping. These restored functions are
likely to have discernible benefits to water quality and habitat downstream. Vegetative restoration
will provide for increased foraging and refuge habitat for resident and migratory species. In light of
acute development pressures in this region of eastern North Carolina, the White Oak River Basin is
particularly susceptible to loss of wetland functions and associated watershed impacts. By
providing for successful restoration of an expansive non - riparian wetland system, the Bachelors
Delight Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank will help to replace wetland functions critical to water
quality and wildlife habitat in the area.
Table 5. Non - Riparian Wetland Planting Plan
Streamhead Pocosin
9 ac.
Non - Riparian Restoration
Common Name
Scientific Name
% Composition
# Planted
Swamp Tupelo
Nyssa biflora
25
1,345
Bald Cypress
Taxodium distichum
20
1,076
Pond Pine
Pinus serotina
20
1,076
Atlantic White Cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
15
807
Tulip Poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
15
807
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
10
538
TOTAL
5,649
Wet Pine Flat
76 ac.
Non - Riparian Restoration
Common Name
Scientific Name
% Composition
# Planted
Pond Pine
Pinus serotina
40
30,558
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
15
11,459
Red Bay
Persea borbonia
15
11,459
Inkberry
Ilex glabra
15
11,459
Huckleberry
Gaylussacia frondosa
15
11,459
TOTAL
76,396
GRAND TOTAL
82,045
E. Non - Riparian Wetland Preservation
Approximately 13 acres of non - riparian wetlands, located within the headwaters of HU -1, will be
30

included within the conservation easement. This area was also rated based on the methodology
described in the NC WAM User Manual which evaluates the overall functions of the system
(Appendix H). Although this block has been managed for silvicultural production, extensive
ditching and /or bedding has been limited to the perimeter of the block. As a result, subsurface
storage has not been significantly impacted, allowing hydrologic input from the block to provide
baseflow for the zero order and first order sections of Huffmans Branch. Ample opportunity for
surface storage, in the form of microtopographic variation within the block was also observed. This
variability modulates peak flow during large rain events which limits the potential for erosion within
the restored channel. Vegetation within the block has been managed for loblolly pine production
but the assemblage does include native hardwoods that have remained undisturbed for 20 years.
The assemblage includes mature loblolly pine, black gum, red maple, and loblolly bay in the
canopy and sub - canopy strata. Understory species include red bay, American titi, high -bush
blueberry, fetterbush, and inkberry. Herbaceous and woody vine species include netted chain fern,
Virginia chain fern, royal fern, and greenbrier. The diverse assemblage is characteristic of
relatively undisturbed non - riparian wetland flats in eastern North Carolina. The relative maturity of
the stand will provide valuable refuge habitat and serve as a corridor for migratory wildlife between
the Hofmann Forest and the surrounding bank site. In light of the functions (both water quality and
habitat) supported by this intact wetland assemblage, a 7:1 ratio is proposed for this section of
preservation.
F. Reference Wetland /Stream Monitoring
LMG has identified multiple reference areas within the existing wetland stream communities within
the property. The preservation areas of Hewitts Branch (HE -2) contain a stable, intact stream
system and adjacent riparian community. This feature will likely serve as a reference for both zero
order stream and riparian wetland habitat, as no alterations to the existing watershed are proposed
for this section. The lower reach of Hewitts Branch (HE -4) contains a single thread channel stream
and a small stream swamp /bottomland hardwood community suitable for use as a reference area.
Hydrologic monitoring equipment will be installed in these two areas 90 days prior to initiation of
construction activities. An array of three monitoring wells (WM -40s) will be installed across the
existing valley at each of the two locations. These gauges will record water table depths within the
31

riparian wetlands and water depth within the stream channel on a daily basis. The calibration point
of the in- stream well will correspond to the bankfull elevation of the stream channel. As a result,
positive readings (calculated above the calibration point) will provide evidence of overbank
flooding. These data will then be compared to those from the adjacent riparian wetlands to
develop a regression analysis that correlates rainfall to stream discharge. Similar monitoring
techniques will be applied to those areas targeted for restoration and enhancement in order to
determine the success of the proposed design.
VI. BANK IMPLEMENTATION
The Bank Sponsor (WREDCO) will enter into a binding agreement with The Endowment Fund of
North Carolina State University to implement the proposed bank. Together, these entities own fee
simple title for the entire bank site. The Sponsor and The Endowment have control of all ditches
affecting groundwater hydrology of the site. Since the restoration is premised on re- establishment
of groundwater hydrology via removal of ditches, all water rights necessary for sustainability of the
bank are secured through the fee simple ownership. Upon execution of the MBI, a conservation
easement deed for The Endowment Fund acreage will be conveyed to the NC State Natural
Resources Foundation (Foundation) (a 501 (c)3 entity).
Both Weyerhaeuser ( WEYCO) and the Foundation have demonstrated experience in mitigation
site implementation and habitat restoration. WEYCO has conducted previous wetland restoration
projects in sites in Louisiana and is routinely engaged in reforestation and habitat restoration
projects. Thus, the Sponsor is well- versed in site restoration techniques, reforestation practices,
and site management. In addition, the Foundation is an integral part of the land grant mission of
NC State University. As a result, it is responsible for the procurement and management of tracts of
land throughout North Carolina. The Foundation is also responsible for the operation and
management of the Hofmann Forest Bank located immediately adjacent to the proposed Bachelors
Delight Bank. Design and monitoring expertise is provided by LMG and Ko- Florence Hutcheson
(stream designer). Both LMG and Ko have designed and implemented numerous large -scale
restoration projects for full - delivery (EEP and NCDOT) and project - specific permit mitigation.
32

Many of the site evaluations (e.g. soil profile descriptions, hydrologic monitoring and modeling, and
vegetative surveys) have been completed for the site. One reach (BD -5) continues to be
monitored in the event a viable restoration design can be developed. If data support a viable
restoration approach, then the design for this reach will be submitted prior to plan approval. The
Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) will also be submitted during the plan review. Upon
acceptance of the final mitigation plan by the IRT and execution of the MBI by all parties, the Bank
Sponsor will record a conservation easement deed for the site and will initiate proposed
construction activities. Mitigation bank credits will be calculated using the following standard:
In addition, the SBCF will be incorporated for determination of the total stream credits. Table 6
provides a summary of the credits for both the stream and wetland components of the bank site.
Table 6A provides a breakdown of quantities (acreage /linear feet) and credits by mitigation type.
Use of credits from the Bank to offset wetland and stream impacts authorized by federal permits or
state water quality certifications must be in compliance with the Clean Water Act, Section 404
(b)(1) guidelines and other applicable federal and state legislation, regulations, and policies. Prior
to release of bank credits, the following requirements will be met: (1) approval of the final mitigation
plan and execution of the MBI; (2) recordation of the conservation easement deed; and (3)
establishment of appropriate financial assurances. Given the aforementioned ratios for wetland
and stream restoration, it is estimated that 249 wetland restoration equivalent credits and 26,507
stream credits will be derived from the establishment of the Bachelors Delight Wetland and Stream
Mitigation Bank.
33
Mitigation Type
Ratio
(1)
Wetland Restoration
1:1
(2)
Wetland Enhancement
2:1
(3)
Wetland Preservation (Riparian)
5:1
(4)
Wetland Preservation (Non- riparian)
7:1
(5)
Stream Restoration
1:1
(6)
Stream Enhancement (Level II)
1.5:1
(7)
Stream Preservation
2.5:1
In addition, the SBCF will be incorporated for determination of the total stream credits. Table 6
provides a summary of the credits for both the stream and wetland components of the bank site.
Table 6A provides a breakdown of quantities (acreage /linear feet) and credits by mitigation type.
Use of credits from the Bank to offset wetland and stream impacts authorized by federal permits or
state water quality certifications must be in compliance with the Clean Water Act, Section 404
(b)(1) guidelines and other applicable federal and state legislation, regulations, and policies. Prior
to release of bank credits, the following requirements will be met: (1) approval of the final mitigation
plan and execution of the MBI; (2) recordation of the conservation easement deed; and (3)
establishment of appropriate financial assurances. Given the aforementioned ratios for wetland
and stream restoration, it is estimated that 249 wetland restoration equivalent credits and 26,507
stream credits will be derived from the establishment of the Bachelors Delight Wetland and Stream
Mitigation Bank.
33

Table 6. Projected Stream and Wetland Credit Totals
Streams (linear feet)
Credits
Stream
26,507*
Riparian (Non - Riverine) Wetland
84
Non - Riparian Wetland
Priority 1
Zero Order
Enhancement
Type
Restoration
Restoration
(Level 11)
Preservation
SBCF
Hewitts Branch
5,103
500
4,900
656
Huffmans Branch
3,445
1,404
2,000
1,200
431
Bachelors Delight Swamp
4,777
3,428
5,300
Half Moon Creek
1,131
901
147
TOTAL
9,679
7,082
5,928
11,400
1,234
CREDITS
9,679
7,082
3,952
4,560
1,234
GRAND TOTAL
26,507
Wetlands (acres)
Proposed
Type
Acreage
Credits*
Riparian Restoration
60
60r
Riparian Enhancement
28
14re
Riparian Wetland Preservation
48
1Ore
Non - Riparian Restoration
85
85r
Non - Riparian Preservation
13
2re
Stream /Upland Buffer
129
0
TOTAL
363
171
*r = restoration credit; re = restoration = equivalent credit (refer to page 33 for ratios)
Table 6A. Summary of Credits by Mitigation Type
Mitigation Type
Credits
Stream
26,507*
Riparian (Non - Riverine) Wetland
84
Non - Riparian Wetland
87
*Includes credits derived from SBCF
The tentative schedule for establishment of the bank site is outlined in Table 7.
Upon execution of the MBI, a conservation easement deed for the site will be conveyed to the NC
State Natural Resources Foundation (a 501 (c) 3 entity). The terms and conditions of the
conservation easement will ensure the protection of the site in perpetuity. The ownership of the
Bank will reside with the Sponsor until completion of the debiting of the Bank. The Foundation will
34

Table 7. Project Milestone Schedule
Task
Project Milestone
Projected Completion
1
Approval of Mitigation Plan and Execution of MBI
December 201 O/January 2011
2
Recordation of Conservation Easement Deed
February 2011
3
Initiation of Site Earthwork
March 2011
4
Mitigation Site Earthwork Completed
September 15, 2011
5
Mitigation Site Planting and Installation of Monitoring
Devices
January 15 through February 15,
2012
6
Submittal of As -Built Report
May 2012
7
First Year Annual Monitoring
October 2012
8
Submittal of Monitoring Report #1 to IRT
February 15, 2013
9
Submittal of Monitoring Report #2 to IRT
February 15, 2014
10
Submittal of Monitoring Report #3 to IRT
February 15, 2015
11
Submittal of Monitoring Report #4 to IRT
February 15, 2016
12
Submittal of Monitoring Report #5 to IRT
February 15, 2017
13
Submittal of Monitoring Report #6 to IRT
February 15, 2018
14
Submittal of Monitoring Report #7 to IRT
February 15, 2019
15
IRT Close -out Meeting
March 2020
be responsible for long -term protection and management of the site. The easement prohibits any
activities (e.g. timbering, farming, building, etc.) that would alter the environmental state of the
Bank site.
The Bank Sponsor will be responsible for securing appropriate financial assurances in the form of
construction, monitoring, and maintenance bonds to cover contingency measures in the event of
Bank default or failure. Performance monitoring will be conducted for a 7 -year period subsequent
to project construction. Annual monitoring will evaluate the development of wetland function and
document site performance relative to established success criteria. In addition, monitoring
activities will identify any site deficiencies that may warrant remedial action. Monitoring reports
documenting site success and /or failure will be submitted to the IRT each year. Upon submittal of
annual monitoring reports demonstrating the fulfillment of site success criteria, stream and wetland
credits will be released according the approved credit release schedule.
The Sponsor shall develop accounting procedures for maintaining accurate records of debits
made from the Bank that is acceptable to the IRT. Such procedures shall include the generation
35

of a debit report by the sponsor documenting all credits used at the time they are debited from
the bank. Debit reports shall be provided to each member of the IRT within 30 days of the date
of credit sale. In addition, the sponsor shall prepare an Annual Report to be provided to each
IRT member within thirty (30) days of each anniversary of the date of execution of the MBI,
showing all credits used and the balance of credits remaining. The sponsor's reporting
obligations hereunder shall end upon the sale of all credits or termination of the MBI, whichever
event first occurs.
VII. POST- CONSTRUCTION MONITORING
A. Wetland Restoratio WE n h an cement Success Criteria
The wetland restoration effort will be evaluated based upon performance criteria related to
vegetative density and wetland hydrology. Monitoring will be conducted at the site an annual basis
for a period of seven (7) years. Note that non - planted individuals of characteristic wetland species
may volunteer into the restored site. Suitable volunteers are an important component to the
restored wetland as they serve as indicators for appropriate hydrologic regimes and provide
increased diversity. The presence of suitable volunteers demonstrates trending of the site toward
vegetative success.
The primary success criteria for the Bachelors Delight Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank will be:
1. Demonstrated density of planted species to meet or exceed 320 trees per acre at the end of three
years (post - planting), 260 trees per acre at the end of five years, and 210 (seven -year old)
character canopy tree species per acre at the end of seven years. The IRT may allow for the
counting of acceptable volunteer species toward the 210 -tree per acre density upon the review and
evaluation of the annual monitoring data.
2. If, within the first three years, any species exhibits greater than 50% mortality, the species will either
be re planted or an acceptable replacement species will be planted in its place.
3. No single volunteer species (most notably red maple, loblolly pine, and sweet gum) will comprise
more than 50% of the total composition at Year 2 or Year 3. If this occurs, remedial action, as
36

approved by the IRT may be required. During Year 4 and Year 5, no single volunteer species,
comprising over 50% of the total composition, may be more than twice the height of the planted
trees. If this occurs, remedial action, as approved by the IRT, may be required. The need to
conduct additional volunteer sampling after Year 5 will be determined by the IRT.
4. The hydrologic criterion is premised on the specific community type to be restored.
(a) For the non - riparian wetland pine flat, the hydrologic criterion will be the
establishment of a static water table at, or within, 12" of the soil surface for 6% of the
growing season, equivalent to 18 days based upon hydrologic monitoring undertaken
from 01Feb through 30Nov of each monitoring year. On Web, soil temperature at
three of the monitoring plots will be measured at 12 inches below the soil surface and
documented within the monitoring report. Should earlier monitoring be considered,
the project sponsor must also document biological activity on the site pursuant to the
applicable Regional Supplement to the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual. Earlier
monitoring must be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to
commencement.
(b) For the non - riparian pocosin, the hydrologic criterion will be the establishment of a
static water table at, or within, 12" of the soil surface for 10% of the growing season,
equivalent to 30 days based upon hydrologic monitoring undertaken from 01 Feb
through 30Nov of each monitoring year. On Web, soil temperature at three of the
monitoring plots will be measured at 12 inches below the soil surface and
documented within the monitoring report. Should earlier monitoring be considered,
the project sponsor must also document biological activity on the site pursuant to the
applicable Regional Supplement to the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual. Earlier
monitoring must be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to
commencement.
(c) For the small stream swamp (headwater riparian) community (zero -order
geomorphic position), the hydrologic criterion will be the establishment of a static
water table at, or within, 12" of the soil surface for 12.5% of the growing season,
equivalent to 38 days based upon hydrologic monitoring undertaken from 01 Feb
through 30Nov of each monitoring year. On Web, soil temperature at three of the
monitoring plots will be measured at 12 inches below the soil surface and
documented within the monitoring report. Should earlier monitoring be considered,
the project sponsor must also document biological activity on the site pursuant to the
37

applicable Regional Supplement to the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual. Earlier
monitoring must be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to
commencement.
Vegetation Monitoring: The vegetation monitoring protocol is adapted from the accepted methods
used for wetland restoration sites within North Carolina. Given the size of the project, 2% of the
planted wetland areas will be monitored via the establishment of permanent 0.10 -acre plots.
These areas include approximately 145 acres in three different habitat types (Figure 10A -10E).
Given the proposed acreage, a total of 29 plots will be established. GPS coordinates for the
centers of each sampling plot will be recorded and included with the `as- built' survey and
subsequent annual monitoring reports. During monitoring, surviving planted individuals and
volunteer individuals will be identified and enumerated within each plot.
Hydrology Monitoring: Shallow groundwater hydrology will be monitored via seven automated
wells (RDS, Inc. WM -20s) located within the non - riparian restoration areas (Figure 10A -10E).
Additional wells (10) will be installed in perpendicular arrays within the riparian zone of the first
order and zero -order stream corridors. Wells will be installed in accordance with installation
methods outlined in the Wetlands Regulatory Assistance Program (WRAP) Technical Note 00 -02
(Sprecher, 2000). Water levels will be recorded once daily. Data will be downloaded from the
wells every three months (i.e. once quarterly). Data from well downloads will be compiled and
graphically displayed to demonstrate hydroperiods of monitored areas. The data will be analyzed
in the context of the antecedent rainfall conditions which will also be displayed on well
hydrographs.
Annual monitoring reports will provide quantitative data of vegetative success, qualitative
observations, and conclusions pertaining to mitigation site development. In addition, comparative
hydrographs of the restoration areas and corresponding reference areas will be provided.
Monitoring reports will be submitted to the IRT no later than February 15th of the following year.
Note that the Year 4 and Year 6 monitoring reports will contain only qualitative data regarding the
condition of the restored stream reaches.

B. Stream Restoration Success Criteria
The primary success criteria for the First Order Stream systems will be:
Documentation of 2 bankfull events using techniques discussed below within a normal rainfall year
in 3 of the 5 years of monitoring. Additional monitoring may be necessary in the event of abnormal
climatic conditions.
The primary success criteria for the Zero Order /Headwater Stream systems will be
Documentation of 2 flow events using techniques discussed below within a normal rainfall year in 3
of the 5 years of monitoring. Additional monitoring may be necessary in the event of abnormal
climatic conditions.
Level 1 Monitoring will be required for the stream portion of the Bachelors Delight Wetland and
Stream Mitigation Bank as detailed in the Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003. Monitoring will
occur every year for the five year monitoring period. Monitoring reports will be prepared each
monitoring year and will include completed Channel Mitigation Monitoring Sheets with current data,
a discussion of any deviations, and whether they are indicative of a stabilizing or destabilizing
situation.
Level 1 Monitoring includes the following:
(1) Photo - Documentation
Extensive photo documentation is proposed for the stream monitoring phase of this project.
Photos will be taken at all permanent cross - sections on a bi- annual basis (winter and summer) in
addition to any problem areas that may develop after construction is completed. Photos will be
georeferenced to the corresponding cross - section and /or problem area as part of the submitted
report. Photo documentation will also be used to document the health of the riparian area
plantings and the effectiveness of any erosion control measures.
39

(2) Ecological Function
The health of the riparian vegetation will be documented as part of the wetland restoration
monitoring efforts. Multiple 0.10 ac. permanent monitoring plots will be established throughout the
riparian wetland restoration including areas directly adjacent to the restored channel. The success
criteria for wetland restoration is provided in Part A of Section V.
(3) Channel Stability /Survey Procedures
a. Cross - Sections (First Order Channel)
The Bachelors Delight Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank will restore 9,679 If of first order
Coastal Plain stream. The restoration will mimic low gradient, low velocity stream reaches
characteristic of the outer Coastal Plain. No hardened materials (i.e. rock structures) will be used.
Rather, natural materials (such as root wads and log vanes) will assist with channel stabilization
and grade control. Given the size, uniform design, and gentle slope (0.005) of the proposed
project, cross - sections will be established every 1,000 feet of stream length (totaling 12 permanent
stations). Placement of these stations will be designed to assess the performance of potential
problem areas (e.g. severe erosion, structural failure, etc.). These stations will also be evenly
distributed between riffles and pools throughout the project. Table 8 lists the number of cross-
sections to be monitored for each reach. Refer to Figure 10A -10E for proposed placement of
cross - section monitoring stations.
Table 8. Proposed Stream Cross - Sections.
Reach Name
Proposed I
Cross - sections
Hewitts Branch (HE -1)
5,103
6
Huffmans Branch (HU -1)
3,445
4
Half Moon Creek HM -1
1,131
2
Total
9,679
12
b. Longitudinal Profiles (First Order Channel)
Guidelines regarding longitudinal profiles for projects totaling over 3,000 If suggest that 30% of the
area be surveyed on an annual basis. Based on this guideline, a total of 4,850 If of profile would
IN

be required for the Bachelors Delight project. The 4,850 If of survey will be divided throughout the
individual reaches and will include the permanent cross - sections (Table 9). Data presented in the
annual monitoring reports will be shown in comparison to as -built conditions.
c. Stream Flow Monitoring (First Order Channel)
Documentation of stream flow within the project will also be conducted. Following stream
construction activities, six (6) stream gauges (two in each first order channel) will be installed
(Figure 10A -10E). Three additional gauges will also be installed throughout the areas targeted for
enhancement. These gauges will measure the elevation of water in the channel on a daily basis
and will be used to determine the cross - sectional area of the channel under a variety of flow
conditions.
Table 9. Proposed Lonaitudinal Profiles by Stream Reach
Reach Name
Proposed (If)
% of Project
Profile (If)
Hewitts Branch HE -1
5,103
53
1,500
Huffmans Branch (HU -1)
3,445
21
1,000
Half Moon Creek (HM -1)
1,131
7
500
9,679
31000
In addition to these data, velocity measurements will be collected within 24 hours of a 0.5, 1.0, and
2.0 inch rain event at each gauge location during Year 1 monitoring. Measurements will be
collected at 1 -foot intervals across the restored channel at depths of 0.5 ft. above the bottom. This
information will be used to compute a total discharge measured in cubic feet per second for each
reach for the duration of the monitoring activities. All data will then be used to develop a
regression analysis which will define the relationship between rainfall events and total stream
discharge. These data will be presented in graphical format with individual bankfull and high flow
events highlighted.
41

d. Stream Flow Monitoring (Zero Order /Headwater)
While the monitoring protocol for restored first order streams is well established, flow
documentation within zero -order stream systems is the topic of on -going research throughout the
Coastal Plain. Both qualitative and quantitative information will be used to document the
occurrence of flow within the proposed restored zero -order stream valley.
Quantitative data will be collected using automated shallow groundwater monitoring wells installed
in perpendicular arrays across the valley to assist in identification of riparian wetlands and to
increase the density of data points for analysis of hydrographs up and across the valley. Arrays
will be approximately 1,000 feet apart (along the long axis) for each valley. The center well in each
array will be in the lowest part of the valley and the number of wells in the array will be dependent
upon width and slope of each valley. Data collected from these wells will then be correlated with
elevation data from the longitudinal profiles to infer flow. Open channel flow monitoring equipment
may be used to calculate specific flow velocities and duration in each of the five restored reaches.
Site visits will also be conducted following rain events to document the upstream extent of
observed flow within each reach. GPS data will be collected to mark this location. These data in
addition to the flow monitoring data will also be used to calibrate a regression analysis which will
establish a relationship between rain event size and stream flow. This analysis will then be
extrapolated to future rain events to highlight the number of flow events on an annual basis.
Qualitative data will be collected during the on -site investigations to document surface water flow.
This shall be accomplished using photographic evidence of observed flow coupled with a
preponderance of field indicators of recent flow events in the form of a natural line impressed on
the bank; shelving; changes in soil characteristics; destruction of terrestrial vegetation; presence of
litter and debris; wracking; vegetation matted down, bent or absent; sediment sorting; leaf litter
disturbed or washed away; scour; deposition; bed and bank formation; water staining; or change in
plant community. All field indicators present will be documented in each monitoring report. All
quantitative and qualitative data will be used to document the upstream limit of flow, which will
provide the basis for length of successful zero order stream restoration (i.e. valley length).
42

While published research supports the restoration of streams with similarly sized watersheds in
eastern North Carolina, inconsistencies in design or construction may result in non - compliance with
the approved mitigation plan. If insufficient flow is observed during the course of post- construction
monitoring the total number of stream credits may be reduced to reflect the extent of documented
flow or converted to wetland credit per the review and approval of the IRT. Prior to any changes in
the amount of available credit, a formal review of the available data would be requested by the
Bank Sponsor.
C. Stream Enhancement Success Criteria
The primary success criterion for the First Order Stream Enhancement will be:
Documentation of increases in flow duration and frequency compared to pre- construction
conditions during periods of normal rainfall.
As discussed in the previous sections, a majority of the stream enhancement will occur through the
reestablishment of interconnectivity with the upstream portions of the watershed. This
reestablishment will increase the functional acreage of the watershed, corresponding to increased
flow frequency and duration in the lower sections of each stream. In order to determine the extent
of flow enhancement, a total of three gauges (one per reach) will be installed 90 days prior to
construction (Figure 10A -10E) within enhancement reaches HE -3, HU -3, and BD -6. Recorded
data will be combined with cross - sectional survey information to determine pre- construction
discharge levels. These data will serve as the baseline for the remainder of the project.
VIII. SITE MANAGEMENT
A. Adaptive Management
The Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank is planned and designed to be self -
sustaining over time, but some active management or maintenance may be necessary to ensure
the long term sustainability of the mitigation efforts. The adaptive management approach involves
analysis of monitoring results to identify potential problems occurring on the site and the
43

identification and implementation of measures to rectify those problems. Remedial actions may
include, but are not limited to, mechanized earth work (e.g. adjustment to the invert elevations of
earthen plugs) or supplemental planting in the event areas do not meet vegetative success criteria.
Prior to initiating any remedial actions the proposed measures will be submitted to the IRT for
review and approval.
Performance and functioning of the mitigation site may be affected by various causative factors,
both natural and anthropogenic. Natural hazards may include invasive species and /or excessive
herbivory. Human errors may include design flaws, construction deviation, and /or inadequate
planting coverage. To minimize these potential problems, the following strategies may be
employed:
1. If herbivory appears to be jeopardizing the survivorship of planted species, discussions
with appropriate agencies will be initiated to determine an appropriate course of action.
2. Beavers will be trapped from the tract if significant damage appears to be caused by
beaver activity.
3. Construction errors will be identified as early as possible via the as -built report. If it
appears as those potential errors jeopardize the integrity of the project, appropriate
remedial action will be identified and submitted to the USACE for concurrence prior to
implementation.
4. Planting errors in spacing density or coverage will be minimized by careful
coordination with planting crews. An account of planted stems will be provided with
the as -built report.
5. If monitoring indicated a potential design flaw, remediation options will be reviewed.
6. In the event groundwater monitoring wells are damaged by bears, barb -wire fencing
and /or other acceptable deterrents may be used to protect wells from further damage.
B. Long -Term Management
The mitigation approach and establishment of mitigation site boundaries has been designed to
minimize long term management issues. As a result, the potential for hydrologic and boundary
conflicts have been minimized. The Sponsor has identified the NC State Natural Resources
IM

Foundation, Inc. (a 501 (c)3 entity of North Carolina State University) as a potential grantee of the
conservation easement deed. The recorded conservation easement deed will ensure the
protection of the project in perpetuity.
IX. CONCLUSION
The establishment, use, and operation of the Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Bank will provide a quality compensatory mitigation alternative for authorized wetland impacts
occurring within the White Oak River Basin. The bank will be established and operating in advance
of development impacts in the area. Therefore, its use will help to reduce uncertainty in the CWA
Section 404 permit program by having established compensatory mitigation credit available to
applicants. In addition, the Bank will more effectively replace wetland and stream functions within
the watershed through consolidation of design, implementation, monitoring, and management of
mitigation activities (Fed. Reg., 1995).
Based upon the current USACE jurisdictional determination and detailed site investigations, over
25,000 If of stream and 246 acres of wetlands have been degraded by historical land -use activities
(including ditch excavation and clearing for timber production). The proposed bank will provide for
a watershed -level restoration approach for the headwater complex of the Bachelors Delight
Stream. Through the implementation of the proposed mitigation activities and the placement of a
protective real estate mechanism (i.e. conservation easement), degraded habitats and associated
functions will be restored. Together with the adjacent protected lands of Hofmann Forest, the
project will provide water quality and habitat benefits on a watershed and regional level.
45

X. SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Allan, J.D. 1995. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters. Chapman and Hall.
London.
Cowardin, L.M., et. al. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United
States. US
Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C.
Mitsch, W.J. and J.G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands (Second Edition). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New
York.
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). 2007. May 2007 White Oak
River Basinwide Water Quality Plan.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. 2001. Watershed Restoration Plan for the White Oak
River Basin. Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. 2006. Standard Operating Procedures for Benthic
Macroinvertebrates. Raleigh, NC.
N.C. Wetland Functional Assessment Team. 2007. N.C. Wetland Assessment Method (NC
WAM), Draft User Manual. 183 pp.
Peet, R.K. and D.J. Allard. 1993. Longleaf Pine Vegetation of the Southern Atlantic and Eastern
Gulf Coast Regions: A Preliminary Classification. Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Fire
Ecology Conference. No. 18. Tallahassee, Fl. pp. 45 -81.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakely. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina. Third approximation. N.C. Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, N.C.
Skaggs, R.W. et al. 1995. Reference Simulations for Evaluating Wetland Hydrology, in Campbell,
K. (ed.), Versatility of Wetlands in the Agricultural Landscape. American Society of
Agricultural Engineers, pp. 1 -10.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Marine Fisheries
Service. 1995. Federal Guidance for the Establishment, Use and Operation of Mitigation
Banks; Notice. Vol. 60, No. 228. 10pp.
Im

FIGURES

0
c
E# r nr�s
Q1
o� ♦ta
G
Loop
s
lands
"r
g
r
G
i
}
{
7
> re t e
r.
olute
lr 258
24
111 ,
0A - a
... I '
i- �
A3AME LAND
Av
to
1 ,..t. _, .y -.� \ -� `rA
�* SITE t � -�. � � - � -�_ ',� �-••- �;, L
AiF-
Cyril �` �• .OF..
♦ — /
1 ti
IFU
nCf F V N
HTE
*Boundaries are approximate and are'
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: North Carolina Atlas & Gazetteer. Pg 77.2003
r
'luui�
� liAMSE� ap,
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank LMG
Onslow County, NC rT GROUP 1—
01 -09 -168 - Cnviromnentgf ConsultQnts
jr} on
r
\� r'
t
.� r •
r
SCALE 1" = 1 Mile
Figure 1.
Vicinity Map
aax�
�16%
N IFtd�r�ci�rwn
� `t
G
i
}
{
7
> re t e
r.
olute
lr 258
24
111 ,
0A - a
... I '
i- �
A3AME LAND
Av
to
1 ,..t. _, .y -.� \ -� `rA
�* SITE t � -�. � � - � -�_ ',� �-••- �;, L
AiF-
Cyril �` �• .OF..
♦ — /
1 ti
IFU
nCf F V N
HTE
*Boundaries are approximate and are'
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: North Carolina Atlas & Gazetteer. Pg 77.2003
r
'luui�
� liAMSE� ap,
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank LMG
Onslow County, NC rT GROUP 1—
01 -09 -168 - Cnviromnentgf ConsultQnts
jr} on
r
\� r'
t
.� r •
r
SCALE 1" = 1 Mile
Figure 1.
Vicinity Map

F
Figure 3.
Bachelors Delight Swamp Mitigation Bank 2ft. LIDAR Contour Map
J 1,200 2,400 3,600
Feet
Onslow County
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP —.
ElIVIYO/1m Pnfal COn Ot-t,

1�
iAkiq!
Pd,

W H I T I
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: Jacksonville NW Quadrangle 7.5 minute (topographic) 1990. SCALE 1" = 3,000'
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank LMG Figure 2.
OnslowCounnty, NC 4T CROUP USGS Topographic Map
01- 09-168 Cnv+romnentgf ConwjtOR15 (Jacksonville NW Quad)
N
f
b
l
ap
-
i
Q
`�51
aH9
Lh
�41a1f Moon
b
li ���aa
ii
E
0
;' ap
. -
F;1fLR0Ao
II
�
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: Jacksonville NW Quadrangle 7.5 minute (topographic) 1990. SCALE 1" = 3,000'
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank LMG Figure 2.
OnslowCounnty, NC 4T CROUP USGS Topographic Map
01- 09-168 Cnv+romnentgf ConwjtOR15 (Jacksonville NW Quad)

*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NRCS Soils Map.
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Onslow County, NC
01 -09 -168
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP —
Lnviromnenrnl Consultants
SCALE 1" = 1,000'
Figure 5.
NRCS Soil Survey

*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1998 NAPP aerial photography
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Onslow County, NC
01 -09 -168
LMG
LAMP MANAGEMENT GRO ,
Environmental Consultonrs
SCALE 1" = 1,000'
Figure 6.
1998 Aerial Photography

HE -2
Wet Ford
HE -4
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement ( -5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If)
Stream Preservation (- 11,400 If)
Riparian Wetland Restoration (60 ac.)
Non - Riparian Wetland Restoration ( -85 ac.) o 0 0 o 0
Riparian Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.)
Non - Riparian Wetland Preservation (--13 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.)
Upland Buffer ( -94 ac.)
Ford
HL
A
BD -1
U-2
Wet Ford 49
BD -3
Wet Ford
BD -7
BD-4
Wet Ford
BD -5
Ford
HM -1
Wet Ford
Project: Date:
Bachelors Delight Swamp 12117/2009
L
1 AND "M '� EN oKOUP Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Envrrenmenls! [ensulrnnes Scale:
Title: 1 =1,zoo
0 300 600 1,200 2,400 Post Office Box 2522 Site Design Dram Sy:
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 Cl
Telephone: [phone]
Stream Design Provided by:
Ko/Flonmcs 6 Hutcheson
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-851 -6086
Revision Date:
9/15/10
Job Number
01 -08352
Sheet Number
Figure 7

Wet Ford
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (9,679 I�
Stream Enhancement ( -5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 10 —
Stream Preservation (- 11,400 10
Riparian Wetland Restoration (60 ac.)
Non - Riparian Wetland Restoration ( -85 ac.) o 0 0 o 0
Riparian Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.)
Non - Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -13 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.)
Upland Buffer ( -94 ac.)
L: \WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES \01 -09 -168 - -- Onslow 19 Batchelors. Downev\ACAD \October 2010\Fio7- RestorationPlan -C
r
HE -1
NE-2
Wet ..
hill
0 250 500 1,000
LMG
uHbN�x�cia Nrcenur
Fnri mnmmin! Con wfro nr,
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
Telephone: [phone]
HE -4
Bachelors Delight Swamp 12117/2009
m and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Scale:
1" =500'
Site Design Drawn By:
CBM
Stream Design Provided by:
Ko/Fiorence & Hutcheson
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27807
919 -851 -8088
Revision Date:
9/15/10
Job Number
01 -08 -352
Sheet Number
Figure 7A

HU -1
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If) sees
Stream Preservation (11,400 ID
Riparian Wetland Restoration (60 ac.)
Non - Riparian Wetland Restoration ( -85 ac.) o 0 0 o 0
Riparian Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.)
Non - Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -13 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.)
Upland Buffer ( -94 ac.)
L: \WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES \01 -09 -168 - -- Onslow 19 Batchelors. Downev\ACAD \October 2010\Fio7- RestorationPlan -O
E
H
7/�/�
Ford
HU -2
Steam Design Provided by:
KolFlonnce & Hutcheson
0 250 500 1,000 5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27807
919 -851 -8088
Project: Date: Revision Date:
LMG Bachelors Delight Swamp 12117/2009 9115/10
,,i,,; ,,, . ii.}_ x t.i. Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Scale: Job Number.
Title: 1" =500' 01 -08 -352
Post Office Box 2522 Site Design Drawn By: Sheet Number
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 CBM Figure 7B
Telephone: [phone] g
ct2010.dwo

FA
BD -1
Wet Ford
Wet Ford
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 10
Stream Preservation (11,400 If)
Riparian Wetland Restoration (60 ac.)
Non - Riparian Wetland Restoration ( -85 ac.) o 0 0 o 0
Riparian Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.)
Non - Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -13 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.)
Upland Buffer ( -94 ac.)
L:\WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES \01 -09 -168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, Downey\ACAD\Octotler 2010 \Fig7- RestorationPlan -C
BD -7
BD -2
Wet Ford
"M
BD -4
BD -6
• • •
Ford
BD -5D
BD -5C
0 250 500 1,000
Project: Date:
Bachelors Delight Swamp 12117/2009
LMG EHTGROtiP .. Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Scale:
Ertvveamenrel [en s�lrnn ra
1" =500'
Title:
Post Office Box 2522 Site Design Drawn ay:
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 CBM
Telephone: [phone]
Stream Design Provided by:
Ko/Florence 6 Hutcheson
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 109
Raleigh, NC 27807
919 - 851 -6088
Revision Date:
9/15110
lob Number
01-08352
Sheet Number
Figure 7C

IRF
IRF
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If)
Stream Preservation (11,400 ID
Riparian Wetland Restoration (60 ac.)
Non - Riparian Wetland Restoration ( -85 ac.) o 0 0 o 0
Riparian Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.)
Non - Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -13 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.)
Upland Buffer ( -94 ac.)
AWETLANDSt2009 WETLANDS FILES \01 -09- 168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, Downey\ACAD\October201(
I �
Wet Ford
IPF
IRF
7'
0 150 300 600
Project: Date:
M1 Bachelors Delight Swamp
■ LANDMAKecEMEIRTGROUP,., Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
' EnWrenmeneel [encWren.ra Scale:
Title:
Post Office Box 2522 Site Design Dmwn By:
Igton, North Carolina 28402
dephone: 910 -452 -0001
Stream Design Provided by:
KolFlomnm & Hutches on
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, INC 27607
919-851 -6066
Revision Date:
12117/2009 9/15110
1" =300'
01 -0"52
CBM
Sheet Number
Figure 7D

WATER DIVERT ^ "'
CHANNEL
(2' WIDE xE
PERMANENT FORD CROSSING
SCALE: NTS
PLAN VIEW
MIN MIN
BANKFULL TO 5 FT BANKFULL WIDTH 5 FT BANKFULL TO
10' OUT 10' OUT
BANKFULL WIDTH FILTER FABRIC
WATER DIVERSION J BANKFULL
CHANNEL DEPTH
(2' WIDE x 6" DEEP)
CROSS- SECTION
CLASS A RIP RAP/
NATIVE GRAVEL /COBBLE
MIN DEPTH 8
COMPACTED /ROLLED
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank FIGURE 8. TYPICAL PLAN VIEW AND CROSS - SECTION OF PERMANENT FORD CROSSING
Final Mitigation Plan - October 2010 (Note: Typical drawing provided by Florence & Hutcheson Consulting Engineers)

Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
— — — — -
- - - - -
Existing Roads
•
Stream Restoration (9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If)
Stream Preservation (11,400 If)
Riparian Wetland Restoration ( -60 ac.) L
__________
Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.)
Sheam Design Provltletl by:
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.)
• •
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.)
Upland Buffer ( -94 ac.)
Ko/Florenee K Hutcheson
Monitoring Plot
•
Monitoring Well
Stream Gauge
•
Stream Cross - Section
• •
• •
Longitudinal Profile
—
Zero -Order Well Array
Raleigh, NC 27607
_: \WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES \01 -09- 168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneyWCAD \October 2010\Fig10- MonitoringPlan -(
— — — — — — — — — —
- — — — — -- — ---
— — — — -
- - - - -
•
,
Sheam Design Provltletl by:
• •
Ko/Florenee K Hutcheson
•
•
5121 gngoom Way, Suite 100
• •
• •
•
•
•
Raleigh, NC 27607
•
• •
•
919A51 -6066
Project:
Date:
Revision Date:
7� �{/
LMG
Baand chelWetors
1/5/2010
9/21/10
Miight Bank
AND MANAGEMENT GROUP
scale :
Job Number
— Envlrenmenler CesrWl a
1" =200'
01-09 -168
Title:
0 50 100 200 400 Post Office Box 2522
Monitoring Plan
Drawn By:
Sheet Number
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
CBM
Figure 10A
g
Telephone: [phone]
10.dwg

��
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (9,679 ID
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 ID
Stream Preservation (11,400 10
Riparian Wetland Restoration ( -60 ac.)
---- - - - - --
Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.)
Upland Buffer ( -94 ac.)
Monitoring Plot
•
Monitoring Well
Stream Gauge
•
Stream Cross - Section
Longitudinal Profile
Zero -Order WeII Array
_:\WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES \01 -09- 168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneyWCAD \October 2010\Fig10- MonitoringPlan -1
0 50 100 200 400
LMG
LAND MAHAGPASP.NT GROUP
�nvlrenmenler [enr�lren�s
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
Telephone: [phone]
rt; Date:
Bachelors Delight Swamp 1/512010
m and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Scale:
1"= 200'
Monitoring Plan Drawn By:
CBM
Stream Design Provided by:
Ill 4 Hutcheson
5121 gngoom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-851 -6066
Reyision Date:
9121/10
Job Number
01 -09 -168
Sheet Number
Figure 10B

NOR
06. W, NO 51
�.
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete P ojec
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration ( -9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration ( -7,082 If)
Stream Preservation (11,400 If) Monitoring Plot •
Riparian Wetland Restoration (-60 ac.) ---- - - - - -- Monitoring Well
..
Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.) Fi Fi Fi Stream Gauge •
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.) Stream Cross - Section Project: Date-
Bachelors
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.) LMG m and Wetland Mitigation amp ,/6/20,0
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Longitudinal Profile EnKI MANAGEMENT
M.1C n g�ouP•
Scale:
Title: , "= 200'
Upland Buffer (-94 ac.) 0 50 100 200 400 Post Office BOX 2522 Monitoring Plan Drawn By:
Zero -Order Well Array Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 CBM
Telephone: [phone]
_: \WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES \01 -09- 168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneyWCAD \October 2010\ Fig10- MonitaringPlan- October2010.dwg
Shea. Design Provided by:
Ko/Flomnce 6 Hutcheson
5121 Kngdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
919 - 851 -6066
Revision Date:
9/21/10
Job Number
01 -09 -168
Sheet Number
Figure 10C

Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
1 "= 200'
Existing Roads
CBM
Stream Restoration (9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If)
Stream Preservation (11,400 ID
Riparian Wetland Restoration ( -60 ac.) L
---- - - - - --
Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.)
Upland Buffer ( -94 ac.)
Monitoring Plot
Oft -
Monitoring Well
Stream Gauge
•
Stream Cross - Section
Longitudinal Profile
Zero -Order Well Array
_: \WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES \01 -09- 168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneyWCAD \October 2010\Fig10- MonitoringPlan -1
_
sow
M Wma Own
0 50 100 200 400
LMG
LARD MAHAGPASP.NT GROUP
�nvlrenmenler [enr�lren�s
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
Telephone: [phone]
rt; Date:
Bachelors Delight Swamp
in and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Smle:
Monitoring Plan I Drawn By
Steam Design Pmvltled by:
Ko /Florence K Hutcheson
5121 gngoom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-851 -6066
1/512010
Reyision Date:
9121/10
1 "= 200'
Job Number
01 -09 -168
CBM
Sheet Number
Figure 10D

Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Di
Property Boundary
For Complete Project)
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration ( -9,679 ID
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration ( -7,082 ID
Stream Preservation (11,400 ID
Riparian Wetland Restoration ( -60 ac.)
---- - - - - --
Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.)
Upland Buffer ( -94 ac.)
Monitoring Plot
•
Monitoring Well
Stream Gauge
•
Stream Cross - Section
Longitudinal Profile
Zero -Order Well Array
: \WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES \01 -09 -168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneyWCAD \October 2(
o°Q °,.,o °o °o° q°Ao
o�000000�oc.
o °o °o° °o °o °o
o °o °o °o °o °o °o
00000 000000
0 0 0� o 0 0
o °o °o °o °o�Oo
oho ° � °� °o ° °
o o
0 0 0 0
o °o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 000
o - o00
o° - o°
o
r
•❑
0 125 250 500 1,000
l • 1
LMG
CRNO MANAGEMENT GROUP n.
E- -r—men rai can rurra" ri
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
Telephone: [phone]
fit; Dab:: Revision Date:
Bachelors Delight Swamp 11/20/2009 9/21/10
m and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Scale: Job Number
1"= 500' 01-09 -168
Monitoring Plan Drawn By: Sheet Number
CBM Figure 10E

APPENDIX A.
ECOREGION MAP

Ecoregions of North Carolina
84' 83° 82° 81° 8o° 79° 78° 77° 76°
66 r ' 63 n �' 65 _ 63L
63e (u
63d
6 vos��eon �
63e
4 Winst 45f S UND 63
36°
pgLE
oxvi�lle� -^� 66<- Green boro ,� / 0M � y g
i 66d� n r
66i
36°
j r O lei
E 63e
, 66. Fm uarew<. x nse,
e
6 w �-
661 45b 45c 63b
66
ee� s evi — — -Il
� eenvil
� 45e L - � °
— —
66' 66g /_ - 45 - - -- - �� 163e Rrx4 b -
63g ou
�i C CO
6 g66d L —
— �+ T nA�tU
6 66d / S I E 63
Char tt 65c, � g
35°
-�.�' — - -6� - -- 66 _1 lake / Fayeti 1 e ��
Green
35°
66 - --
__ s
-�45
r � \
ATLANTIC
/ Wit 'gton
34°
4 65 `� A\ C C E A N
I i
_ 1L �- / —\ 63
34°
A, ens :1
umbia 63
LONG BAY
e Beach
84° 83° 82° 81° so° 79° 78° 77° 76°
45 Piedmont 65 Southeastern Plains Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in
D 45a Southern Inner Piedmont 0 65c Sand Hills the type, quality, and quantity of environmental resources. They
are designed to serve as a spatial framework for the research,
D 45b Southern Outer Piedmont M 651 Atlantic Southern Loam Plains Level III ecoregion assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and
D 45c Carolina Slate Belt 65m Rolling Coastal Plain Level IV ecoregion ecosystem components. The approach used to compile this map is
D 45e Northern Inner Piedmont M 65p Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces County boundary based on the premise that ecological regions can be identified
0 45f Northern Outer Piedmont 66 Blue Ridge - - - -- State boundary through the analysis of the patterns of biotic and abiotic
0 45g Triassic Basins 0 66c New River Plateau phenomena that reflect differences in ecosystem quality and
integrity. These phenomena include geology, physiography,
0 45i Kings Mountain D 66d Southern Crystalline Ridges and Mountains vegetation, climate, soils, land use, wildlife, and hydrology. The
63 Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain D 66e Southern Sedimentary Ridges relative importance of each characteristic varies from one
D 63b Chesapeake - Pamlico Lowlands and Tidal Marshes 0 66g Southern Metasedimentary Mountains ecological region to another regardless of the hierarchical level.
63c Nonriverine Swamps and Peatlands 66i High Mountains o s o o m; The Ecoregions of North Carolina map was compiled at a scale of
15
D 63d Virginian Barrier Islands and Coastal Marshes 66j Broad Basins 1:250,000. Compilation of this map is part of a collaborative
30 20 10 o 60 120 project primarily between the US EPA, USDA -NRCS, NC DENR,
D 63e Mid - Atlantic Flatwoods 66k Amphibolite Mountains A be s Equal Area Proje fion as well as with other state and federal agencies. Comments and
63g Carolinian Barrier Islands and Coastal Marshes 661 Eastern Blue Ridge Foothills suggestions regarding this map should be addressed to Glenn
D 63h Carolina Flatwoods 66m Sauratown Mountains Griffith, USDA -NRCS, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333,
63n Mid - Atlantic Floodplains and Low Terraces (541) 754 -4465, email: griffith.glenn @epa.gov, or to James
Omernik, U.S. EPA - NHEERL, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis,
OR97333, (541)754 -4458, email: omernik.james @epa.gov.

APPENDIX B.
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND PLAT

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 2007 3148 067 County: Onslow U.S.G.S. Quad: Jacksonville North
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Development Co. Agent: Land Management Group Inc.
Address: attn: Sandy McLendon attn: Wes Frvar
1412 Eatonton Hwy Suite 700 P.O. Bog 2522
Madison, GA 30650 Wilmington, NC 28402
Property description:
Size (acres) 2500 Nearest Town Jacksonville
Nearest Waterway Bachelors Delight Swamp River Basin White Oak
USGS HUC 03030001 Coordinates N 34.8542 W 77.4581
Location description The site is located iust north of the intersection of Rhodestown Road and Gum Branch Road on
the east side of Gum Branch Road north of Jacksonville Onslow County.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The wetland on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps.
Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property
which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years.
X The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
— Regulatory Official identified below on 10/8/2007. Unless there is a change in the law -Pr our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.

The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in. Washington, NC, at (252) 946 -6481 to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910 - 251 -4611.
C. Basis For Determination
The subiect area exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Delineation Manual and is adiacent to several
tributaries, primarily Bachelors Delight Swamp _a tributary of the New River, a navigable water of the US
D. Remarks
The site was visited durine two separate site visits on 11/28/2006 and 12/5/2006 The site was also h d� rologically
monitored by Land Management Group Inc.
** All Maps are being returned to the consultant for distribution.
E. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the South Atlantic Division, Division Office at the Following
address:
Mr. Michael F. Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD- ET -CO -R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 11/8/2007.
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official: __tj flue�'
Date 10 /8/2007
Expiration Date 10/8/2012
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit
http:// www.saw.usace.army.mil/WETLANDS /index html to complete the survey online.
Copy furnished:
McKim & Creed 243 North Front Street Wilmington, NC 28401

IVA
Applicant: Weyerhaeuser Real Estate File Number. 2007 3148 067 Date: 10/8/2007
Attached is: D
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of
A
ermission
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
OHLxtr�' *-`z -"n s^'r* cv
45 w'."";F` ,,.i"¢,3 v13� s`
£Y�� Y� „'" '� Mi
��^€ t .� .{$ £ � ��5� '��i.w ��� ����� ����<C}^"`!ia �£� w �.. Y � "`�."- X `~�� 3 "" YY4'9 s.' iii' ,y.6, � ~ b�•.c�i �� �.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district for final
engineer
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit,
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you
may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return
the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of
the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your
letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your
concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having
determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the
district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and
conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal
Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must
be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of
Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the
division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this
notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for funther consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
. M3x� t TE s� �,�,m1011" �€i.s 'r .x.g xt
3 ^ .
gI� SeC {'go ° S rt i' A
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is alreaL in the administrative record.
' ��
w..,
c*.. �^ fix_.,...
..:. ro n. v .mss... .r.... x...
If you have questions regarding.this decision
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you I may contact:
may also contact:
Brad. Shaver
Mr. Michael F. Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Project Manager
CESAD- ET -CO -R
P.O. Box 1890
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Wilmington, NC 28402 -1890
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Dater
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
DIVISION ENGINEER:
Commander
U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -3490

Date: October 8, 2007
ATTENTION PROPERTY OWNER
New Guidance on Jurisdictional Determinations
On June 5, 2007, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) implemented a new method
for performing jurisdictional determinations (JD) pursuant to the Clean Water Act
(CWA). This new process is a result of the recent Supreme Court decisions (United
States v. Rapanos and United States v. Carabell) and now requires the COE to conduct
extensive reviews when determining if certain waterbodies, including wetlands have a
significant nexus (connection) to Traditional Navigable Waters.
Since this Office has reviewed and verbally approved a jurisdictional determination for
your property prior to June 5, 2007, we have finalized this JD using the previous process.
However, if you, as the property owner, are interested in having your property evaluated
under the new guidance or have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Brad
Shaverat 910 -251 -4611.
S. Kenneth Jolly
Chief, Regulatory Division

THIS LY TR mAr IRIS C LY ANS PLAT
TERS ANa xEnANOS Au ARC.
N JERS MtlAXERAWS NEGUTARD PURSUANT TO
BEC RNom>ro-o -o rxrs oArcACE .vxnv
BY
IS A CHANCE N! DE LAW OR OUR PUBLI9IEO REGULADONS
T NO S fiK (EARS F1Nlll MOAT,
A]HAS
m S N MNOgLU'��'AM` mANUAL.4 S
US ARMY C9Q9PPB OE' ENCdVEEAS REPRESENTAAI£
_ Iry:taF NAM ;v
RE
19lE�iw}
W TRWBi.E PAMNDER PRO lvt ANO EXTERNAL ANTENNA HERE USED
FOR LOCATING WITANDS ON "I PRO£CT. ONLY — MANUAL 3 -0
CiEOXM ,AS_ND£DnBY ME RI CA A RU91LRY4£Y (NCCS)
I1/E NCG9 BASE s­ . NEW — NG LAR JS- /P29.923M0 M
LUNG P- 02- S9..M33J0 N'1 WAS u�AIZED A 0 IS LESS DEAN 51 - -EIERs
fROil iNE SHE. Aft MERA —NIS WCOPPoRAIE Al LEAST 10 ]NR£E
dNEN4QNAL 1111 FlAEE COLLECTED AT 1 -1151,114, MOVOU$ REA02NOQ
C1
BASE TA ISR�Y£E qp {AL ACG lY RIE OIfTERENAAILY
NOTES'
I ALL DISY Cis ARF NOPIIONTAL GRGR91 IN U.S SURLEY
FEET UNLESS OJNERNOSE SNONN COMBINED FACTOR D999B99J10.
2. BEARINGS BASER ON NC fRW (WO 83) COBS 9B.
S REFERENCES DEED SOON 2M PAGE 918.
A SW YpP M MADE NO W 4ESRW BCN OR ­NT
SEARCH FOR EASEMENTS I RMWa ENCIMBRM(E;
RfS.0"w W NAN13. OgNERI MP, ARE ENOE C[ IXt
ANY 01MR FACTS 7HAT AN A=RAR' AM (XNBfEM ARE
S UNOERGRgMO URUAES ME SWW Oft Y MHFFE A80lEQ1WNO
.4'RNCES MERE NSMYE
B. SUBSURFA¢ AND ENNRCNAlENTAL CQYMROVS XERC NOT
EXAW&D CR CN.STOERFD AS A PART CF i S SLWAE .. NO
STAI£M(DiT
IS NADE 0.v.0ERAWND ]NE EXISRY/CE OF
UNOER(Y10U O M O V OIINWAMS M FAOMIIES
­T OF RNS
MAC
] XER.INDS SIroMN RASED ON MERANO DE ANON BYLAW
MMAGEMENi (A:OIM
A SUBJECT TO 011 EISEMENIS RIGHT OF WAY$ MO OP ENCUMORAN
RL1T NAY EF£ECi RAG FROV 1,
A — NC LWM]ONAIES SNCXN OV A4S PLAT MFR£ DEBITED BY OWS
L.bS CB_S51.1 NS USN' 2 —5LE S1Ltl RELYiHERS. THE RAW DATA
As SENT l RE NAN QN& C£OOERC 5URKY FOP PROCESSANG
NO SNEEiS 1 -9 ARE — TA9.E5 ONL,
AWL
Y1 MAND8
TOTAL AREA QZ% %1 50 FT.
INATIM OF THE MB
TOTAL ANEA 29,— 50 FT
NIA 18 ACRES
0,. ACRES
SCALE: 1' - 1000'
0�0 1000 2000 J000
243 NgtiN FRONT EE
MLMINCTON, NORTH CAROUNA 2B401
TELE: 910) MJ -1018
FAX. [phone]
MIR: /(xwM.mckMOeatl.can
21
MAP — NOT TO SCALE
0
w vi
w
J l
w °
PROJECT # : 009100163
PROJ. SVYR :OLJ
DRAWN BY :ACS
FIELD BK.: W1013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE Nw101- 009100163 R
SHEET k : SHEET I OF 14
DWG. # :
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
esslo !
FOR
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
seAL
o-38T2
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
i x +'
MCFIIANDS TOWNSJ71P - ONSLOII - NORM CAROLINA
e .1
June Z9, 2007 SCALE: I' - 1000'
MAP — NOT TO SCALE
0
w vi
w
J l
w °
PROJECT # : 009100163
PROJ. SVYR :OLJ
DRAWN BY :ACS
FIELD BK.: W1013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE Nw101- 009100163 R
SHEET k : SHEET I OF 14
DWG. # :

7/V,
FLAG TABLE
FUG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH NORTHING
EAS71NO
G
EASTING
J -21.
24888]1]1
C5
c6
40432.
4041211
248496.63
24545193
.9U5.1]
JBB %zta
4805"'.99
s46een.zr
C1
C]A
408880..
+0.4202
2488110..
243814191
XH.N
24811813. 4
CB
C9
.).]2
498821_
-.,a.
14 %2m.n
]4411"'
IT
216481.5]
2460560.01
CIO
C10A
497)8.05
408) .34
1 ]
397210.2
)147429.
2468]31.1
2986]4193
Ltl
4.]10.+7
440711
2169)481'
z45an5u
344.110
24.&1..5
c12
CL
/04!1,74
2 +5640).4
X7214.-
39848 &82
407841
2466005.4
0.3
0.4
24.]1]"6
20.717
PM15
07216
]96531.88
398359.61
2429!])_2)
RI&8826.92
0.3
CIB
24. "'0116
2X)"'4.80
AY1)
JB63p).b
)8424291
2Ke446,i4
396643.92
a
cte
24614.12
)B' �
.] •
)9880].13
JB4esn
2488®4.86
x40"0"0.41
c19
G
24"'6851
27200267
AM10
021
34"'1.59
341t.6s
x44"'.4.
240453..
cT+
CS2
2410.._
245)631.61
AM21A
Am.
X061 &N
Xen247
x404]110
2460985.02
Cn
C24
­-
20]"31.12
AMn
.24
34721.13
3929_._
24401119
2969721.90
Cn
M
246).0.14
2- ]90&79
AY25
A14»
SX9a..
3421.1
2X7077,4
2-
C27
NM WE
AMn
AMn
2-9122.25
Cn
Cn
244MR)".
21480n.0
__AjE__
]08900.2
X79].L7
2 -91440
244)4.60
WO
WI
Nanwwt
.etl
X]4].0
X]095.78
248914.10
24691"'.11
C2
ry 1
25'
)9]141.]3
X7174.84 1
24"'1.4
246 "'91 BB
CJ9
20 1.72
247990.72
AM.
%1216. W
X)24747
24"2W."
2469281.16
C%
C37
2079 "X
246 70 .71
.UA41
AN+2
X7201.31
X]32361
146 9223.%
24IMX
C%
CX
246V75.71
2471 &X
AM.
X73..1
10
248825 &18
2x4 1.11
C4
G,
R4. 600230
u1M
.74.1.'
391 -6.82
2 469"].2
2X9JJ &X
Cat
U3
Ixmla7'
2- .2
.47
AN.
58)503.81
X ]2X361
x468 %9.12
x44]7.6
d A
")A
2X .14
20 ']882.84
i .
'
X764..7
X704.%
z4. 9170.80
24684117
C-
24 7&-.19
2016 -.02
30..21
X]729..
X»..w I
1X909.87
x4095 ".l0
C.A
CSZA
.34'
].
29]]60.1
72441
24806"'..
24850&)6
70
2-
1 Y
.MIRI%W
X]860.%
24 9568.59
24685]&
G.A
CMA
C%
247)x2."'
2'"Gn.
1,41'
X]86155
34]774.70
21847.'
2- 982900
70]
CSB
24a761.Oz
2016 -.63
2s.3Y
116'
X0028.%
)96701.2
2489820.
2{898719{ '
C59
C.
2- 1418 1
2075MM
7B'
49 fig'
39.98.%
]413x"'
248986488
248967.2
701
13]2
2x ).7.03
AM61
AM.
­Al
38822].80
2 -171LLV1
C72
NWISCIVE
.4'
417Z
)417210
39026&80
3X 9]51.31
2X916.1
C65
C46
2 -nX..
21M
N 41'
.a'
37224.1
39272.05
2 -9]%.%
2X9n7.n
067
CN
M
2 -]e61I.M
1J'
%0413.89
X54&&4
2- 980.7.55
2X462."'
CVI
G1
20]61.64
AN.
38&47&N
2665'4.0.
2X9804.
248980194
C]1
C]z
2 -matt
346 »414
.N'
X852].14
398.4.01
2X9028._
2 -9&51.
C7'
C]4
2-71514
.a'
39881).33
XINInf
z - -71.42
2X-29.
C75
C]6
Y
AN.
.,A
X0715"1
X24.21
2X9888.88
x44"'.97
C77
C78
N
.1.
AYJ]
XBJO&n
X&83307 1
2X111—
29421.71
C.
2- ."
­2
AM1e
M79
X889898
2x4'].72
C'
CBZ
N 1 '
AM.
AWI
X8921.80
39896].1]
2 -9610._
zX9.1.
C2
C72
Y
4)
39614141.1]
X404.72
209188'
2X9.1..
C05
2x)84133
AMe3
AM72
399.2.'
X.1
2X91222
24412.15
W]
CeB
24670.7218
2- ]61294
AYeS
ANN M)
X915129
X299.28
2491498
2491498 240N165
C4
C4
41'
WX
..
X9234.84
390» &4
2X9]88.'
2X01&155
C7
C92
24932276
246431490
7097
M.
34
JB931 B."
x441]155
2X9)80.9"
_
C93
C94
­.l YW
1
7070
wx
XBJ..X 1
X831.18
2...1.73
24X158.31
C95
CAB
2468309.1
17.-
W2
7092
398410.42
X94662
24NJ..26
249]4..
C9J
7
H
DN2
7091
544-.72
24911.22
Z 4.
M
0170
2- 94110
xx9X1%
7'
1.47
'4629)."'
244MJ.50
2087..31
C101
C102
4
MIII M'N'
X .n
)429)2956
2 "' .
706]8229
170
9"
2X920..
x445..51
DB
M"
70100
799 %910
X96.02
24478 &11
244]9614
c�'1a0
2495]&18
249.3.92
9
M102
X4 1571
11
2 4
x46980&81
c48
51
M103
54451.4
M451.
398412"
1x099411
216434"
Cl4
01101
2817.4
W"
701170
389X0.2
34J2.N
2X1830.54
246481'
Gill
G11T
N 8
494
.1.
0X107
36&19 +.22
X6]]429]1
244764
2X9041.]4
C113
C14
N
Wire
DM109
X9400.29
VINN"m
2X 110
CIt5
OI18
586'x8'
44,8'
]}'
'99420.24
24].154
1
011]-
011e .^
- 58+05' •
_ Net']4'.'
s)
X6-2.1&
X942799
2.170)1.4 7.1-
241"'1952
0119
120
N> 9
70114
70113
3694.1.46
X9443.98
247213].%
24)"]"92
C'
122
1470TIEWE
Xl ,t' 4
W117
XBI 447
24]0200.68
24)023,.
0123
C129
N 1'
N 7T TE
M111]
4
.
70119
399401."'
no 49
340246.])
1702"'.4
c12s
3
. '1
w3s
%05"72
24)210.)0
24 .70
127
244 2929
24424.11
M122
308529.7
2­1-
405. &42
24"22."
241110-
--.Uw
3002.47
24 1 .
LINE T'SUO WETLANDS
F AG TABLE
FLAG NO.
FUG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASTING
1300
iml
8]i .
9 '4e3g'E_..
8.]9'
971'
40432.
4041211
248496.63
24545193
7602
TSOS
25]2 •
40606)."
40604.72
408880..
+0.4202
2488110..
243814191
7204
Tm8
"
]90'
4.m'
.).]2
498821_
-.,a.
14 %2m.n
7506
1307
661,5
5 "•
441 M.m
40613262
497)8.05
408) .34
2156 n..
2-M-
)SOB
)SODa
410'
_
4.]10.+7
440711
2169)481'
z45an5u
110
40620012
'6214.61
/04!1,74
2 +5640).4
4- p0q
�q N x 11
g<
841
0
L7E DNA WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
FUG NO. BEARING LENGTH I NORTHING I EASTING
POL /40]24. 3X250.05
DNA2 1].4 40608"2 24p2At +.J
GxaJ 1 •x14 - 4014 249x12»
ROL 1B /0608].95 2489s39:61 2929
LM AM WETLANDS
FUG TABLE
FLAG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASING
Aw
AMR
­"WE
'
41'
4.30.4
408063427
246] ..
20]416..
Am3
ALb
44 '
�2). +4•
40606)."
40604.72
2X747].0)
2x14..)1
_ Mls
AMB
I "
Y_
<Om6i.66
408070.68
246'2462..
2- 1.0.41
AM7 4646
.1
_
N
_
441 M.m
40613262
2-
246]636..
AN10
NnIV13'E
410'
4014.52
400117.9
240)5..02
246.61."'
.11
.12
)
40620012
'6214.61
2Xm61.52
2- ]431.72
AMi3_ -
MAix
T
]
408215,98
40822221
24.]1]"6
20.717
PM15
07216
141' •E
>t•
+023170
406262.08
24. "'0116
2X)"'4.80
AY1)
NlVWn
>
5'
10824.31
24614.12
Aide
AY16
N
N
_
57 .
406.].98
406320.13
24"'6851
27200267
AM10
021
N
.85
34.17'
4.'29"1
40836&53
2410.._
245)631.61
AM21A
Am.
•
N 7'
4
a
406374."'
4(I&3&182
­-
20]"31.12
AMn
.24
ry
n
37
4704].'4
406439.11
246).0.14
2- ]90&79
AY25
A14»
r
2e.
X
{0641.81
17017115
2X]954.94
20 -%
AMn
AMn
16
11&2'
10&512.%
406541.1
244MR)".
21480n.0
AN%
AM31
v
0.1•
4085"'.121
08647..
548.13.
20INIn10
AuS2
-immiia-
1
45n9.m
406]65.19
2"88055.]8
218.1141
AM%
ANSI
N
. e'
40669.1)
)06629.10
20 1.72
247990.72
AM.
N07VV2VW
moll,
4404.)]
40114.3
2079 "X
246 70 .71
.UA41
AN+2
set•2 ,
11'
40]0&194
40]06242
246V75.71
2471 &X
AM.
„
1
'"'0344
R4. 600230
u1M
gig
5]. >'
w X292
07]72"'
Ixmla7'
2- .2
.47
AN.
'W
Et..ttl
w 82.80
07192.
2X .14
20 ']882.84
AM49
'4
1 '
4 .1
Or"—
24 7&-.19
2016 -.02
AMmA
AM9
I
w 171.01
AM2
N
40]20824
2-
M.
AM.
Amm
'4'
41x5!
0.0.81
247)x2."'
2'"Gn.
AM%
ANBT
4.1].21
07237..
071+0..
24a761.Oz
2016 -.63
AM.
ANX
RUCV419,1Z
=7V
4. •
0126/.-
4)262x1
2- 1418 1
2075MM
AW
N
).4'
4]306.%
2x ).7.03
AM61
AM.
W
•
4124'
205
0171_
2 4.11
2"n24.01
AMCS
AM72
'4
N
074..10
40'5425.84
2 -nX..
21M
AN.
AY4
N721CWE
1.
0744.10
')461.
M
2 -]e61I.M
8M8]
N
.]]'
4.
'7-5.20
07510.03
20]61.64
AN.
I. 1'
0.394
0149.))
2 -matt
346 »414
071
1510'
401583.41
2-71514
M72
411
1
4Pm1134
40)629.'
249 »6923
207)'.26
AN.
.,A
N
1
4 "'52&1
40172.
Z
20]MV.21
.1.
AYJ]
N42IRTWE
25,75'
0.65132
47]04."'
2- ."
­2
AM1e
M79
N
N
9 n'
)•
0)]29.1
')152.67
mlanw
24675=47
AM.
AWI
N
1'
4611..
407796'
2X14.4]
]X154.02
AYB2
4
74'
']824.99
2x)84133
AMe3
AM72
N
N
95
']84.28
0]8129_
24670.7218
2- ]61294
AYeS
ANN M)
u1
»2946'
] 8
40112)6
0)930.14
2X7221..
1 2"614..4
LM ON WERAADS
AG TABLE
F NO.
UG
BEARING
LENGTH
NO RTHING
EASTING
Wt
52• '2'E
351.70
..0 .2
0061.."
47010x.59
14.163269
24.)6]3.52
. A
703
704
44'70
�2). +4•
10614.+9
4702 ".et
2 +0.129"
z4nsD.za
WS
I "
Y_
"099).80
402.2.0
24.] "'0.H
1012).10
M 7
DN
9
_
+06212,10
40519 &]2
20n-
2x19 "72
.9
tn4
NnIV13'E
410'
'o
4.74.70
24. 52
2471 n
7011
8 5.
105195.13
2x6.13.1
7012
0x1]
,
-
405360.8)
2 70
2x000.123
ON19
9x15
141' •E
>t•
493160"5
470x4.61
24692017
24692&68
oNle
991]
NlVWn
>
5'
461626&_
405320.63
2Netn.-
24621+.31
DNta
0414
•L7' "W
_
57 .
4 -174!)
10&74119
244261.4
x48621.19 1
04x0
ON2
4' "W
.85
34.17'
.4
102.0.18
x+a83O1zs
2+06)+].4
23
•
N 7'
4
a
+05X8.4
406434.%
246721252 '
118641 %
M
ON34
ry
n
37
40540.7.3'
1 4
2448500.2
Wn
r
2e.
X
909399.21
2166549.])
XA-
NA%
16
11&2'
405/1"9]
2 .70
ON
7029
DN_
v
0.1•
464)5.68
45188.62
2x6.90..
246720»
WS1
91)2
-immiia-
17.
40549172
4.1].]2
240816242
24606x6.4
702
7072
4.9140
. e'
1063)228
403604.19
248822'
29600)290
Wn
ON37
H
1 4.42
054].2
495664.1
2 .72
24.4' 1J
DX%
set•2 ,
11'
41414.2
4671 &s)
244ar,4
1400x0.26
WX
4
„
1
165"'4,
49526.18
x 1.11
2X901..
941
5.
]296x'
405824._
405653.
3471 1)4,76
24.142
WN
M.
M
'W
Et..ttl
403704 - -30
4544.61
24.2041
2 11
WN
M.
'4
1 '
105060 -n
109X."
2471».0]
)?177
149x06.23
0441
4805521
244221.92
X.51
H
NASx
106X4.09
40642'.4)
24.29.60
x169051.]3
961
9452
N
163469.1
2 -pin.%
ON53
4.1].21
17.v -
246"'51.91
M.
RUCV419,1Z
Y
470619.9]
458111)
- "'52.x1
244191.]4
0x57
9I
'
105603._
40580 _
2 -9130..
241%IlUn
IN.
M.
NN
'
4314.4
z487062n
Mao
7
0 Nw"
47150.0
041
M52
4048104
03654._
21890..4
W0J
0x64
'W
.]]'
4.
406660.6]
4X104
x4894.91
2464.7)
W.
WN
29298 '
17036).]4
105566.24
2+6693).10
24"4"'.72
7067
OM6B
1510'
46.0.2
456X.09
404"294
24.8808.2
ON69
1
4 Y
4 0.Z
1956]6.51
24686942]
2'MMKI 36
91]1
4n
N
4.
405517."0
455X.06
4609X71
z .2
701
0X74
B..T
4X10.46
05306.12
2-901 &10
246.1'".]6
.75
.16
'•'E
9 n'
)•
4alea.n
9064/600
24405232
Wn
0x]6
N
1'
46462.93
40721).9
244tH-
2487JP.]0
N.
704
"•7'I
105410.08
05!X1"
24419100
244x0402
0X81
ON
95
4342110
45402."
24682291.
Wm b]
Wet
»2946'
] 8
405)71."'
1A0
24B2eB11
z44xaz17
WX
..
3`0'
40219.03
4052 ".1B
24932276
246431490
7097
M.
=1V5M
1 0T
1052X02
2464_6.64
248)1&.
7070
wx
jUZjTjrW
x70
40315."
2468309.1
17.-
W2
7092
7.
x701"'.%
46115..
248X4"
21.X19]
DN2
7091
4
lat,
470160"'
+05131"'
2- 94110
xx9X1%
DMO
940
19
4,
w 5273
451519]
2084260
20946.75
MIII M'N'
4.1'
40 10.1
154.
2X920..
x445..51
DB
M"
70100
492.-
+0611215
2495]&18
249.3.92
9
M102
t4
4
44.211
- 2
2x62_8 )
M103
N
468
2817.4
W"
701170
N }
N
1 I'
470))
0206).."
x=1 "' "
.1.
0X107
M24W
1J,g'
U.
40570".2
46035."'
34962.21
moss-
Wire
DM109
,2l]3.47'c,M1'e
-
941P9.14
47012 +2929
244160.4
2444 &n
0X110
111
-
774'
970116."'
451x1.
3bHN0.tt
247.21
.112
.113
N
)'
1.4
IM
249 %axe
24434..])
70114
70113
106172.00 M
.41
244 21..
24420).4
W117
• r
4057).86
406251.8;
24427
244 Oat IN
M111]
4
.
70119
1 4702684
4276.
24.9265.70
24 .4
MI.
70121
21,W
470 95
1...
244 2929
24424.11
M122
405. &42
24"22."
241110-
70124
Win
406470._
41.1.12
2 -7129.
216-' )
7011
4072226"
24!70714.4
- 701»
70171
w3_1A)
4549.)4
2470"'.x0
21490....
Wt2D
2S
0.0]
44007.4
246987.%
.1_
Am
Am
405430.01
6.74
244814. D
469 %.n
W1J3
Y
05412
1.60
2 18.01
218.42.12
.1311
701_
/05181.1
10"43).
14662112
7.550
WIT]
Wt%
"703]"2 .2
x44)69.6]
348671"x7
7014
7014
0041"'..
45)4.2
118879.6]
3466691.11
70191
453]&11
x4080.2
.142
.143
mg.
'2)15.0
2_4x6-
247045.9
­4
MIN
105)66.61
{]
48.10.86
0x148
.147
403]54.76
2966.1]2
2 1.80
7014
W14
4257..
40]5]..
2488N0.-
2g my
701.
70161
970)+2]3
106]10.x2
Z .2
44"74..
M!W
90529100
452..x9
4635B.eb
x1802"44
mi.
70151
Piss
43234.85
.nu'.es
246]42){
1400x!._
70158
70:5
186.
91
2466X&%
246"37619
OM%
49.59 n.
208]2.1)
i
OTT.
.63
n
24664.. J
24"960.8)
2
M.
103038.4
).N
2/6851431
UIMMI22 4
one]
7010.4
444."'
4049201
2 .Tx
7012
1
10196.]8
+14".x3
2 -4091
ue4asn
].�0
7 41.2
7016]
W10p
4494.61
24"415.68
LNE DN WETLANDS (00NnIA!ED)
LM P WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG N0, BEARING LENGTH NORiHINC EASTNO
Fe - 41214.47 X445.66
0102].0 24434)5
F6 4' 'W 42.5x' 40694.1 2- 344.1]
2403. -.69
F/ 1 90474» 249629.97 NoloWft o' .1
F .1• 4)071.4 2X5]8).4
Ft '1'70 11"9* 41"7.15 7X6]6456
NO SCALE
LM NA WEn_AN M
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
FASTING
NCI
NC2
52• '2'E
351.70
..0 .2
J
4649211
X]42029_
7X]4"'51
N.
NA4
44'70
�2). +4•
082]8.27
40X "'.0
2X]4.7.2
24749.%
N%
I "
Y_
4060>fl4
40X624.
2X]4165
2X] -265
MAN
_
40584.59
0_X.72
24.14 "'.4
2x]070.0!
NMO
N
y@,;Q',
406951.08
00488."'
54.1142
2410»
NAI'
NA12
8 5.
40'u86 V
40686&57
2473683+
24757&00
_ _ NAt3
NAI"
,
-
40681204
24147.02
NA15
NA1
141' •E
>t•
4804269
246.1.4
NAI]
NlVWn
>
5'
.14
x0641.7
2Nn02t5
Aoz
2447-4 -
NAn
N-
•L7' "W
_
57 .
40611 &29
]%)24x5
240703.61
2461]0.72
NA21
NA1]
4' "W
.85
34.17'
0712 &93
1061..4
14"'4&]9
24"'.,08
..3
•
N 7'
4
a
106161.21
x9"'4.1
24750247
2414..16
Nn25
NA20
ry
n
37
4062".24
108x".86
2470"' e1
246)4x.13
NA2J
NAn
r
2e.
X
'6142&2
406242.1+
2- ]48.15
T
XA-
NA%
16
11&2'
406276.91
2- ]465.)5
NA31
N .
v
0.1•
40821 &61
{0678.12
218.05.28
x4k
-immiia-
17.
4621 7.70
406x0 m
24080x0»
2480 "56a
NA.
NA.
4.9140
.44•
40214
4621)..
218049.R>
246 .70
NA31
71.29
H
_ 171'
406x'283
248814.4
2-7097.51
NA4
'W
]T
!0624".
/06260.62
244016.91
2 .z5
NC39
•W
•W
_yN_7t•
406 »0.W
402]205
2 216
248.2).11
NA4.
NA4
4082]102
2 1
NW
NA0
'W
31,31'
40829&30
406314.12
2x)6187
Il
NAM
NAM
N
1 '
408129.90
46)60.05
248 .
14]969.80.
A.
4'
406 %Zez
466.1.08
z -]8J &4
247827.65
X.51
H
NASx
X7V
106X4.09
40642'.4)
24.29.60
x169051.]3
NA.
N
.72
216.1210
71.72
NA.
1
9"09{4."'
48 -24
z4 46..5'0
2 1729.
NA.
714]
Y
438.80
10&0).2
246"''8.41
2X9614
NAX
9I
x8&61
40.1168
1671
749..4
NA.
NN
406 4 &6B
2/6516255
XXZ.02
7
46X406
47150.0
NAB)
NA72
-75,78
­7 ."'
2X'23.
NMb
NA4
44T4P.]1
408)4.70
x4"'014
4519._
N4)
NA4
1 '
0614»
406.&.
24.8261
216.52.4
N4B
NA"
406.24
4682].83
34.606161
2 7B
NAn
NA72
4 Y
729"1
24..46]7
21b800Y.58
NA 3
.74
N
40fi8'.
7.1
2466729.
2466"].'7
NAT}
rum
108954.83
.N
246053.53
24N
NAT"
NAn
'•'E
u3
4]006.4
47225.65
2-.218
2X29"]._
A.
MA80
N
1!-.
40706].47
246.44.%
241&04.4
NA2
XA2
"•7'I
4712].64
0)146.28
248'0115
14917.9
MAIM
nAN
471.._
40"'91_
2- Bln.te
:w 1 %.n
NA4
0)297.31
w)2DS.n
270 2 m'HM'._
..
.Aft
MA70
MOV
1'
471)"20
4718196
2N&20.11
2462..41
NA2
N.
' 4
4073&17
40714.81
2 n."
246)4].4]
nA9 4
NA4x
071X.9
4n2.n
z
2-6371.00
NA4
wA4
47``ftn
4"'99.)7
24037".
3165591.4
NAN891
4
lat,
10"']607
40"'8454
2.X100.20
7X610691
LM NO WETLANW
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO.
BEARING I
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASING
NCI
NC2
52• '2'E
351.70
..0 .2
1026260-
406]4.05
20 4.34
20905.%
NW
NC{
44'70
�2). +4•
4.3X91
4.306.98
249010."'
244011."'
NOS
Nca
I "
Y_
40229..
44x1._
406907.2
x+04'9.04
NOJ
NCe
_
4 1
442x%
24"0999.51
NW
MCIO
1 "E
46172"'
7
210702].19
Z
NCII
NC12
X
2X60 %61
NC13
,
-
40804.4
20.063.64
_ Nora
N05
141' •E
>t•
4a.]1u
0801220
"424..1"
2 -41'.4
NCt6
H.7
>
5'
4647.7)
)02924.72
242]].02
2X221..
149a
NCB
•L7' "W
_
57 .
0341..
0564.4
40605.11
24410&23
NC20
xrn
4' "W
.85
34.17'
+0.20.4]
90.%.'
247051"'
14670=2"9
N
12]
•
N 7'
4
a
40549..
x70B]t.n
N
: 2 ]029)1
N 4
ry
n
37
)0471294
2469026.10
2 x
HIM
NCR)
M07
r
2e.
X
40."731
z . e
z4eIDe8.'
xae
xC27
16
11&2'
4"004.4
'8106.11
x_471"]
296480.9.
x030
N
0.1•
09128.61
240466.2
NWt
x702
42994' 4•
4
. 7'
401]0.61
4061 .2
2+/86626]
24069716]
XG
xc3+
4.9140
.44•
1061"'.]8
4"02x1.50
x9.496.64
24640/.70
NGS
H
_ 171'
400 +3.22
2464"'.01
244.280
NC
NCX
Y
]T
40.76
492]1.0
2 .
2449r.n
NC39
a
_yN_7t•
406 2
Z
914116
672115
4"81)2.)2
x4400286
mr-m&mm
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 26401
lEa ) 343 -IO-
FAx: [phone]
http: J/9Ww.mcklmaeeflcwn
LNE BM WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING I
LASTING
RTL74UMDS MYNSXIP - ONISLOR - NORTH CAROLINA
..0 .2
05MN
4053..4
2- 620.
2466230.2
I-E
47282"21
Y_
290.2
2M25785
24426]
246821].1)
BY1N
_
40684.91
40650x.4
240"'81.2
24611 H.%
9MIX
405488.41
4054 %.SO
24809+./] _
641.
.1.
405398.06
mom.
24.6"5209
24428.2
mi.9053824
BY1N
mi43
,
-
470%1.
405390.99
2x06070..
2185911.4.
9042
­41
-g
05)4.92
24.54]02
BYt410 "
40538 &59
24588 &21
91139
9d1.
N
40338224
45100..
246'1841.15
245 M
8943)
X,
4054.0.08
4X00.'7
2-
34.6191.69
814134
•
N 7'
7'
4649266
40554 t6
x4851&56
2m46 .'.
BNIJJ
672132
ry
n
37
a707sa7
40:6414
2+0.01.70
1189643.16
"72131
BMt%
N Y
4."'.51
4.0&31
246563 &X
24"586&95
9711
BYtn
40363+.97
4564.27
24"509167
2445!10.82
BIH»
911.
N
'2)00.78
45]'.75
2465735.5]
245162.91
9271
BM124
42994' 4•
4
. 7'
405)"'.)1
"'0295.4
2X.
2 !MI t I &
8123
672122
4.9140
4X)0.15
2X1M
205941.33
9x1 2t
449 1'
415702.87
x 569270
1- 343.81
24"88..58
94119
N
^). 1'
40691219
47090&92
2X34492
24X89.2
X111]
a
_yN_7t•
10.31.18
24S9ss..
914116
672115
/06069.01
40908.81
2N59P7.06
2186024"2
9011
672112
W47WE
.1 '
4 15472
10987."'
24"4042.
2444003.53
472112
971 11
1 '
-m
4098218
x48814).80
24691.12
91110
4'
47071""'
2488161.141
514104
BMi70
400 4141
4082 .10
2486161
24.1X..
BM -197
E4
4&]01.4
409297.67
2466x19..
2448100
kD6
E"
406299..
404"' n
I z4e »"2901 1
24811288.52 2929
193
E1M
4407.15
406292"'
24220._
248]12.65
E7
BM%
400%0.41
4634.13
244x2.12
x00274]]
91451
BM4
.
10631.01
214.1
24443101]
9)35
404391
WMNI,41
&MSS
BMX
448403.21
x00413.10
x4 -"812
2 .1
e1451
408425.4
2+451182
91.
9µB
4844.16
10844._
1 _.5B
3464416.55
eun
910
4"0X44
4049&.
x+47u.1a
344]61.95
914.
914
w0. -l.M
408580.0)
240756.0
74807)29)4
W42
9141
46028.21
x08880.28
xMXUL17
2 -61233
9141
914
908]]1"'
408]41.4
244OV.33
246111."
BY.
4%
'•'E
u3
405]0291
405481"2
3 )7111
34.4. 2
~w1
614%
+' w
40982}18
46588.4
24.14.42
24.07 +an
W35
"•7'I
4851193
0852192
2480"'1.27
249610.21
911,7)
DY'7
485 ".4
408505._
248851.52
248824..
flM'
46X1._
.13
1
F."
.21
00439.52
07214.11
0
1
W2)
BM24
40"0
170459.02
027,4
]
1
W25
3
W24
9123
.7
08428.69
4
2X24.40
BMTZ
BN21
4
7.
41
246622&26
20019+."'
BN2O
9.19
400351.20
x06]1].81
2481x4.
24611528
9110
67211
44 "1.98
408]11
249804.81
2488088. 21
W17
3.
44X]..02
41
44421,01
146404.02
x44692416
&MI6
t4
4004.1.91
40049]"5
2 -544.1
24348.
BYf4
61413
N
Opp &
100511.9+
24.43171
245991.27
_ 911 TA
4.112 -
4"0398x"
x066'.4
z485BB0.17
2 I7
RIG. 11
40088991
+06116.62
2185650.»
2165045.4
mg
9149
BI4
106154._
404005.28
20.28.4.
fiN>
IW6
-
4900.7133
4410..
2X4.1621
x290_6 &21
BY6
W{
xP42 +.37
x0665511
2!8443.22
24430.16.53
40692."
2105909.12
.
912 2
• r
']709.94
4]02."0
24645097.1+
246290x.1
PROJECT I : 009100163
PROJ. SVYR : OLJ
DRAWN BY : ACS
FIELD BIC W1013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE : Nw10T- 009100163_R
SHEET 4 : SHEET 2 OF 14
DWG. IT
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
fj
sEnL "�
ffuR
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
ore"'
D
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RTL74UMDS MYNSXIP - ONISLOR - NORTH CAROLINA
..0 .2
June 29, 2OG7 NO SCALE
PROJECT I : 009100163
PROJ. SVYR : OLJ
DRAWN BY : ACS
FIELD BIC W1013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE : Nw10T- 009100163_R
SHEET 4 : SHEET 2 OF 14
DWG. IT

fz LT +115
FG z
v
LIE A WEBAPDB
LIE A WETLANDS (COM(MED)
FLAG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH I
NONTHING
EASTING
� ®�.•
]ISii�ii7FFi�®
1
-859652
246]]3 m
61
1
47,.,E
+06598.95
409994.23
24
11'80.29
06
'E
1
1099301
Ti .JO
2163]11.11
07
OB
41,E
•4
-8680.52
403888.51
2
24 85]1292 M02
�^
E'�5Fft57E'SICSI��E
'�' 'lE�.7
2.1 ]0.92
2195741 1
�ES'4SRSG'E�CRS��E�
'W
41782.Si
- 9809911
P.S .Il
2.551].11
O�RY•Wi
w Si 51�!1F:�
F'S4��E�
-6101
400099.]9
_
0EF*j.6k-.p��}Fy�MEr",T:9Y
01="'115.
FLY>•�47B!�7
=E1rn
2.]04025
24ON]I.]9
�ETiF!Y!➢�lSF3�
N
^�^
24�01.56
2.3952,0
®E*.T:
-" 3%Y.i!!TiT1♦L^
0 '
r'z3'�E
2463931.98
G21
�4LLL'74'i:7�![F�mEF
1
1
.7029.50
61
20M 02
��icsa�nci�
J4 ]'
41.
1]1611
40]00254
myrTyppgru
0220
G23
1�
]
40212211
4> MI?IS
x.]9)240
M46 1.97
21
025
N0410157E
n1v
-706]2
40720550
2 9861
240389055
��iiiR"�ill♦
%.OT
1321'
'®'�
11990.01
x 40
C29
00
ETFvCG'L7iS[i'��7
7.W'
102029.06
.41
�EiIGFY•"'���E
N 'I
1151
®1�
240101.24
R4 .7x
�E3':F1FYE®
N4 •
N
07415.30
.136.63
2491075.03
2464094.11
G35
G3a
N
u.]5
7S
402464.59
011090
2104112.72
x.413 +.1
®E
R•PW'EEMMONS
1. %• _-
I
- 2510.09
40210.2]
x41166.18
2.419].+2
®
m=o,
��
0)60420
107616.1
241141.38
2411..-
®
®'
S'J��
'.®'*
MR._ '
mm��?F''L��:'�E
0
ELT..1i�E
22.21
1.06
24641021
2.1091.96
oE'L'F'fS��'r•
824•
44 '
01 .
0
241092.52
2104099. 1.
�CF'!'Y[.4ElFS!1��iC^F�'E
N'.3'
1
40281.80 60
- 9
240406+.0
2 ]099
049
N
."SO '
08317931 .02
4086].25
WFUTIMITIM
��TCrx••i'•��xs>,��
OEiF�'ZRi�L7Fii
4]91.51
4195310
.411.21
91.21
2411648
�ETFFFY4T4•��mE
N21
N]BT3'
1
'm' -
1.42 -27
24641]695
0�
X891'
5799
1'
6 . ]'
4000]0.25
40480.19
Ml
oE?':'YSA�7E'dFF2��EZi�7
.1588.11
Cl 1.63
2464188.53
2 4
�E!^nTlFY"J
Y'�S'7SSIF3'��
Z,N
1
ffiffr-'r-13MEE
2.428.07
2.4241.52
�E'TSLIF^.i�7FFi��
�ER4SY!51'i�.�
�YS�7ESR!•��
®'
EL'L4SLIR'�
NEEMMER
EE•:9"1SS7FS8f•
..]3'
1 '
40 %201
400158.1
r -70 TE
�fflETFR^R54^1��E
�E^254'7EV7FT-'��E7
E5'•"iI47�7FF��
ml�
2.a23].M
1.48099
�Ei2FSYF➢7�Tk6i
N 1511 '=
'1��E
40818.22
2464034.69
®E'*4iFTS17���E�
WRINEF
,110010�0
1o6zo9.zx
z +9692'.%
�E
rSF"7i?iF��E
.]338.81
/0138367
1..59.1
2.14]0.02
N07S
N674
.81.8
41918.56
2.44
­­-
�ESSaievil
-���
1. •
4N B
.2 1
2461300.1
x
�ELfFtR'�YE���Ei
680 •
.7116.])
- 7110.96
2.1631.1 9
24111.3{
000
4?T'i67�'3lR��E�
Aw
-7167,8
- 112123
246]689.32
2.6980..
m
ns61
rgoo�E
- 511420
40]552.%
248bffi15
2161660.21
NB33
N364
E*'Fffi3EEiEC��OF
.5/21.81
4052531
2161610.58
1161)16.60
for.,
E.r',FYSYE!!3F't•]
L4ii}1FS]oo[
407/8.15
47213M
E
E
®E
EMPON
I�lmm
.7]10..
40)112.57
2- a14
246 315
oEL'IIYF51'•f�E��E?
EDFIFFIFYIN
. 7705.47
.7780.00
2.1349.61
2464822637
OCLT'iTJLTit7�2FL!•�E
N 'W
'�..�
E®
oEi6Lw!517ilFf�
Y
'i 'W
J 1
18M.83
81.5.02
E
__
r�'3CYi�i.•®�i7
iS3Ei
�E�FIEFE
314731.12
246471031
®C[T�"TJ�21T��ffi�
.,
MEFC .��.�m
.871.]8
17854,0
2464124m
2464164.33
N
N.J.
3
601660.]0
17960.1
2b4M0.1)
2.4]93.7/
�CF'�YFO"JIMF,
1
[o
�
��
NEEMMMENVITFUTOR
�;GSF'YFL7�'.i�i..i1L�lE�E17
>♦1
E iR4F5(E�T2[Fi��E
�L"CCf•GxL�ETi4��
E
E!f4T•�
EZrac"i17
�E"4'YFSi".��il•�
E.LLELYI"�
��
E�
NEE=00�SEFS17�5'F'�
E;(NZTGSP�
Si
m
�EftCF�,7iT1FT��
'E3:.�'
®mTrpyrii
�£�YLL7�!1FF1i�E�
E��P.19YE
E�RL'RiilSIF}��
EMEMENE
Cp;�gcy���Erv3
mg ®N
?Elsa
�E^F!C'9'.7iF.TS'is�ss'
�Ern�a'.%c�
�EFtiF:'l''Si'SlS�'lmE
EF24Yrzmii.Ri
iT3F�t'�R�E;
®®
TtfYESI�EF��E�ia3E:'
�
l
-ems
�E3REY'Pi!!!(T�
E
EMIUMMIE
O�RFv
a�rtrsFnrt6�a�W�m
RBYi�i�
SEC
®E'tS4Y991/�SkT��.^-
t'iI�EC
tom'
�ET'S(.TlSP.7��E�S�
®EyTYiiiN1'.7iS1[5��:�E2
rN 'FRI'r"l�i''1LS'�t.:f3FS'�E.C1�
>•YfYkYa
®Ei74'TR:ii
"��IIW1111hh::��
°i
E
�E?2LFYM19'E�SRF>•�E�''i
EFUTIMIME
�574F4?L7�'RS��
EzYYS FiF4E
�'',
�
®'
Ems'
�E�E2FY?i17�'7FS��E�
1110
�Eaf
1x?434.i��
E1T��
�EiFY!:iNSfE�i>1"��E
®E
�f�Eif'T4i'
FYEE!dF'1•�ErWET'�
�E.2iLSP•r'�'7
®EsreiY(3x'"�s�
�RT��T'7LG�
/�Ee�
@1.caT.:�
LIE A WETLANDS (COM(MED)
LIE B WETLANDS
FLAG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH I
NONTHING
EASTING
� ®�.•
]ISii�ii7FFi�®
1
-859652
246]]3 m
61
1
47,.,E
+06598.95
409994.23
24
11'80.29
06
'E
1
1099301
Ti .JO
2163]11.11
07
OB
41,E
•4
-8680.52
403888.51
2
24 85]1292 M02
�EFaSTF"9�•'1Li
i'
'�' 'lE�.7
2.1 ]0.92
2195741 1
411
G12
'W
41782.Si
- 9809911
P.S .Il
2.551].11
GIJ
Gi♦
Y'
-6101
400099.]9
_
CIS
-900].02
4191601 1
2.]04025
24ON]I.]9
�ETiF!Y!➢�lSF3�
N
^�^
24�01.56
2.3952,0
®E*.T:
-" 3%Y.i!!TiT1♦L^
0 '
r'z3'�E
2463931.98
G21
�4LLL'74'i:7�![F�mEF
1
1
.7029.50
61
20M 02
��icsa�nci�
J4 ]'
41.
1]1611
40]00254
246397].30
2/0381.16
0220
G23
1�
]
40212211
4> MI?IS
x.]9)240
M46 1.97
21
025
N0410157E
n1v
-706]2
40720550
2 9861
240389055
��reassx���E
%.OT
1321'
] A4
.]2BZei
11990.01
x 40
C29
00
ETFvCG'L7iS[i'��7
7.W'
102029.06
.41
�ETSSF4:SGE�
N 'I
1151
®1�
240101.24
R4 .7x
�E3':F1FYE®
N4 •
N
07415.30
.136.63
2491075.03
2464094.11
G35
G3a
N
u.]5
7S
402464.59
011090
2104112.72
x.413 +.1
®EITiL>At5LiE3SF��E
N
N1
1. %• _-
I
- 2510.09
40210.2]
x41166.18
2.419].+2
®E
pg�mm
] •
0)60420
107616.1
241141.38
2411..-
OETSCY7•Sr>•�'��E?
NtPa
N
0205182
-2079.50
24G4139.99
24112210
G4J
044
0
ELT..1i�E
22.21
1.06
24641021
2.1091.96
oE'L'F'fS��'r•
824•
44 '
01 .
0
241092.52
2104099. 1.
7
0.
N'.3'
1
40281.80 60
- 9
240406+.0
2 ]099
049
N
."SO '
08317931 .02
4086].25
2
.1
G6i
051
4]91.51
4195310
.411.21
91.21
2411648
OEFEGS4FSC.7lFh78���s
N21
N]BT3'
1
'm' -
1.42 -27
24641]695
0�
X891'
5799
1'
6 . ]'
4000]0.25
40480.19
Ml
oE?':'YSA�7E'dFF2��EZi�7
.1588.11
Cl 1.63
2464188.53
2 4
�E!^nTlFY"J
Y'�S'7SSIF3'��
Z,N
1
ffiffr-'r-13MEE
2.428.07
2.4241.52
�1•�=
�YS�7ESR!•��
%:r�a�E'.•;•
4199x.58
NEEMMER
EE•:9"1SS7FS8f•
..]3'
1 '
40 %201
400158.1
_SSE
�fflETFR^R54^1��E
�E^254'7EV7FT-'��E7
"LJiTFii��E�
TL715?('Fi
+0%.%.OB
400159.99
2.a23].M
1.48099
�Ei2FSYF➢7�Tk6i
N 1511 '=
'1��E
40818.22
2464034.69
NEEMENN
�E77wquiS7FLli
WRINEF
,110010�0
1o6zo9.zx
z +9692'.%
�E
rSF"7i?iF��E
.]338.81
/0138367
1..59.1
2.14]0.02
N07S
N674
.81.8
41918.56
2.44
­­-
�ESSaievil
-���
1. •
4N B
.2 1
2461300.1
x
�EiFb3YII97�7F���E
680 •
.7116.])
- 7110.96
2.1631.1 9
24111.3{
�Ei3"
4?T'i67�'3lR��E�
Aw
-7167,8
- 112123
246]689.32
2.6980..
m
ns61
1 27,W
- 511420
40]552.%
248bffi15
2161660.21
NB33
N364
7 1
.5/21.81
4052531
2161610.58
1161)16.60
�E'F;^T7i�3Ll�E£1VZIWM
Nl
407/8.15
47213M
f:�l
OE�?L74I9"1�'�®
EMPON
.7]10..
40)112.57
2- a14
246 315
oEL'IIYF51'•f�E��E?
.W
. 7705.47
.7780.00
2.1349.61
2464822637
�Ei•E1'1S�iP��13ti'��`
N 'W
'�..�
E®
oEi6Lw!517ilFf�
Y
'i 'W
J 1
18M.83
81.5.02
E
®EiI
r�'3CYi�i.•®�i7
iS3Ei
�E�FIEFE
314731.12
246471031
®C[T�"TJ�21T��ffi�
.,
MEFC .��.�m
.871.]8
17854,0
2464124m
2464164.33
N
N.J.
3
601660.]0
17960.1
2b4M0.1)
2.4]93.7/
OE:F"RFYF'Gioo
1
[o
0E'NT'jFRS'.7�L1i[�
NEEMMMENVITFUTOR
>♦1
E iR4F5(E�T2[Fi��E
SEEMENS
E
E!f4T•�
E.LLELYI"�
��
®ETDk:YFGi�'TIF'��®
E;(NZTGSP�
Si
m
�EftCF�,7iT1FT��
'E3:.�'
®mTrpyrii
�2FT'¢FYSQ'is!1FSiE�ommynrxvmi
E��P.19YE
��ST'RZL7�iE��E
®E'r�t.L'4•.LSEEf
®E
Cp;�gcy���Erv3
mg ®N
?Elsa
�E^F!C'9'.7iF.TS'is�ss'
�Ern�a'.%c�
�EFtiF:'l''Si'SlS�'lmE
iT3F�t'�R�E;
�
l
�E3REY'Pi!!!(T�
E
EMIUMMIE
O�RFv
a�rtrsFnrt6�a�W�m
RBYi�i�
SEC
�f'P'L'f4iG'.'E!f•�Si�EL'Z1�
�E�iFii��>♦�11i
rN 'FRI'r"l�i''1LS'�t.:f3FS'�E.C1�
®Ei74'TR:ii
"��IIW1111hh::��
°i
LIE B WETLANDS
LIE PWTIW WETLANDS
LIE 0 WETLANDS
F AG TABLE
FLAG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH I
NONTHING
EASTING
%
C2
ss_rsary
S884&3rw
1
-859652
246]]3 m
61
1
47,.,E
+06598.95
409994.23
24
11'80.29
06
'E
1
1099301
Ti .JO
2163]11.11
07
OB
41,E
•4
-8680.52
403888.51
2
24 85]1292 M02
�EFaSTF"9�•'1Li
i'
'�' 'lE�.7
2.1 ]0.92
2195741 1
411
G12
'W
41782.Si
- 9809911
P.S .Il
2.551].11
GIJ
Gi♦
Y'
-6101
400099.]9
211001,91
2.393259
CIS
-900].02
4191601 1
2.]04025
24ON]I.]9
012
010
N
-mm
90208
24�01.56
2.3952,0
G19
0 '
- 9999.53
2463931.98
G21
1
1
.7029.50
61
20M 02
��icsa�nci�
J4 ]'
41.
1]1611
40]00254
246397].30
2/0381.16
0220
G23
1�
]
40212211
4> MI?IS
x.]9)240
M46 1.97
21
025
N0410157E
n1v
-706]2
40720550
2 9861
240389055
02I
B
%.OT
1321'
] A4
.]2BZei
11990.01
x 40
C29
00
n
7.W'
102029.06
.41
G31
N 'I
1151
- 2570.00
10)391.1
240101.24
R4 .7x
�TiF;S17�F1FS��E
N4 •
N
07415.30
.136.63
2491075.03
2464094.11
G35
G3a
N
u.]5
7S
402464.59
011090
2104112.72
x.413 +.1
055
0]0
N
N1
1. %• _-
I
- 2510.09
40210.2]
x41166.18
2.419].+2
09
G4
NOS
X
] •
0)60420
107616.1
241141.38
2411..-
11
12
NtPa
N
0205182
-2079.50
24G4139.99
24112210
G4J
044
N
"46
22.21
1.06
24641021
2.1091.96
oE'L'F'fS��'r•
824•
44 '
01 .
0
241092.52
2104099. 1.
7
0.
N'.3'
1
40281.80 60
- 9
240406+.0
2 ]099
049
N
."SO '
08317931 .02
4086].25
2
.1
G6i
051
4]91.51
4195310
.411.21
91.21
2411648
OEFEGS4FSC.7lFh78���s
N21
N]BT3'
1
-�®"
1.42 -27
24641]695
�ETFFSIT'9EaEEb7('€�E;�
X891'
5799
1'
6 . ]'
4000]0.25
40480.19
2404311.30
2 1
oE?':'YSA�7E'dFF2��EZi�7
.1588.11
Cl 1.63
2464188.53
2 4
O�i'f
Y'�S'7SSIF3'��
Z,N
1
407605.19
2.58
2.428.07
2.4241.52
OAF,!
SFR ,•£7tSRT.��'..''
%:r�a�E'.•;•
4199x.58
G1
G1
EE•:9"1SS7FS8f•
..]3'
1 '
40 %201
400158.1
_SSE
otSLT',6'
m
0EM
"LJiTFii��E�
TL715?('Fi
+0%.%.OB
400159.99
2.a23].M
1.48099
0E'T4iT7.0
0E3SLTf
N 1511 '=
��
FS>•
40818.22
2464034.69
NEEMENN
�E77wquiS7FLli
WRINEF
,110010�0
1o6zo9.zx
z +9692'.%
�E
rSF"7i?iF��E
.]338.81
/0138367
1..59.1
2.14]0.02
N07S
N674
.81.8
41918.56
2.44
­­-
�ESSaievil
-���
1. •
4N B
.2 1
2461300.1
x
�EiFb3YII97�7F���E
680 •
.7116.])
- 7110.96
2.1631.1 9
24111.3{
�Ei3"
4?T'i67�'3lR��E�
Aw
-7167,8
- 112123
246]689.32
2.6980..
4081
MBO2
ns61
1 27,W
- 511420
40]552.%
248bffi15
2161660.21
NB33
N364
7 1
.5/21.81
4052531
2161610.58
1161)16.60
oE'TII[F:Y'1l3I��.''TE3^S�
�EF€'F13ii17���ELiI'
Nl
407/8.15
47213M
f:�l
OE�?L74I9"1�'�®
EMPON
.7]10..
40)112.57
2- a14
246 315
oEL'IIYF51'•f�E��E?
.W
. 7705.47
.7780.00
2.1349.61
2464822637
0E'LST•.'7inFS�
N 'W
'�..�
'�' '
oEi6Lw!517ilFf�
Y
'i 'W
J 1
18M.83
81.5.02
2.471.19
24173406
0N4'
0
E3F'S@: S1i.'�
iS3Ei
�E�FIEFE
314731.12
246471031
Heal
NB98
.871.]8
17854,0
2464124m
2464164.33
N
N.J.
3
601660.]0
17960.1
2b4M0.1)
2.4]93.7/
01 PE TO
1
-22=290*-
0CF.3L�F9'.7ifET��E
E
E!f4T•�
E.LLELYI"�
��
E;(NZTGSP�
Si
m
�EftCF�,7iT1FT��
'E3:.�'
��ST'RZL7�iE��E
Cp;�gcy���Erv3
?Elsa
�E^F!C'9'.7iF.TS'is�ss'
�Ern�a'.%c�
iT3F�t'�R�E;
®EP'S:FP'1�f6F��^
SEC
�f'P'L'f4iG'.'E!f•�Si�EL'Z1�
t t3r>_
rN 'FRI'r"l�i''1LS'�t.:f3FS'�E.C1�
t�E*'LL7'S47�7�5'3P7mwzlrFT,_vm'
�E0
EFUTIMIME
LIE PWTIW WETLANDS
LIE 0 WETLANDS
F AG TABLE
FLAG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH I
NONTHING
EASTING
%
C2
ss_rsary
S884&3rw
1
-859652
246]]3 m
61
1
47,.,E
+06598.95
409994.23
24
11'80.29
06
'E
1
1099301
Ti .JO
2163]11.11
07
OB
41,E
•4
-8680.52
403888.51
2
24 85]1292 M02
CO
i'
0674
409]19.15 LIS
2.1 ]0.92
2195741 1
411
G12
'W
41782.Si
- 9809911
P.S .Il
2.551].11
GIJ
Gi♦
Y'
-6101
400099.]9
211001,91
2.393259
CIS
-900].02
4191601 1
2.]04025
24ON]I.]9
012
010
N
-mm
90208
24�01.56
2.3952,0
G19
0 '
- 9999.53
2463931.98
G21
1
1
.7029.50
61
20M 02
G22
G22A
J4 ]'
41.
1]1611
40]00254
246397].30
2/0381.16
0220
G23
1�
]
40212211
4> MI?IS
x.]9)240
M46 1.97
21
025
N0410157E
n1v
-706]2
40720550
2 9861
240389055
02I
B
%.OT
1321'
] A4
.]2BZei
11990.01
x 40
C29
00
n
7.W'
102029.06
.41
G31
N 'I
1151
- 2570.00
10)391.1
240101.24
R4 .7x
Gm
034
N4 •
N
07415.30
.136.63
2491075.03
2464094.11
G35
G3a
N
u.]5
7S
402464.59
011090
2104112.72
x.413 +.1
055
0]0
N
N1
1. %• _-
I
- 2510.09
40210.2]
x41166.18
2.419].+2
09
G4
NOS
X
] •
0)60420
107616.1
241141.38
2411..-
11
12
NtPa
N
0205182
-2079.50
24G4139.99
24112210
G4J
044
N
"46
22.21
1.06
24641021
2.1091.96
048
G40
824•
44 '
01 .
0
241092.52
2104099. 1.
7
0.
N'.3'
1
40281.80 60
- 9
240406+.0
2 ]099
049
N
."SO '
08317931 .02
4086].25
2
.1
G6i
051
4]91.51
4195310
.411.21
91.21
2411648
053
C1
N21
N]BT3'
1
- 50%,90
419
1.42 -27
24641]695
G55
G58
X891'
5799
1'
6 . ]'
4000]0.25
40480.19
2404311.30
2 1
NB5)
NB58
.1588.11
Cl 1.63
2464188.53
2 4
NB59
NB60
Z,N
1
407605.19
2.58
2.428.07
2.4241.52
082
: 9
4199x.58
G1
G1
8]899'
..]3'
1 '
40 %201
400158.1
111841.58
2.408].30
C85
000
N64R1'1
+0%.%.OB
400159.99
2.a23].M
1.48099
G62
N 1511 '=
.77
40818.22
2464034.69
aea
31 .41'
1o6zo9.zx
z +9692'.%
UE NB WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
lVl`1V1V1C7i..l�Gr D
BEARING
NO 3C
\ \� /// 243 NORTH FRONT STREET
MLWNGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 2101
SEAL
Q L SEAL
y� ltr
nBt
RUE, (910) 343 -1048
FA1: (910) 251 -8282
[ E'
1
10658.7.32
http: / /- ..aki -.d +- '
2 11.]
171
UE NB WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
O
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
FASTING
nBt
N
N
1
10658.7.32
2.3]23.61
2.3]53.28
2 11.]
171
.6596.23
106600.51
2183]]1.82
2.3]%.80
5OW3O
2.W5377
1
40130.85
406)18.50
2.5]00.09
2463]92.13
2650 %0.07
•4
-18.16
40.96.17
2+116x.96
863]6121
I,N
lit
T10B
.25 1081825
.m
40504044
246eo2].ea
24550..52
'W
-
3..
796.1
246561651 '
2463610 w i
606]8
24056631 2b38T
N
8 -19
66010
2.31628
2463664.02
NBI6
eas.l]
2.3330.x1
N %6
M
8%.86
906.]1
2.5660..
5463801.32
18.1
910.91
2W$923.12
]485925.20
X823
NB24
961.68
96].28
193].1]
216.7843.23
NB1
902.]6
=21
2.3965.10
2.83 �A
NE21
N028
1 I
2 N
2 5606
2483858.02
NB8
7.W'
102029.06
.41
246%]5.10
x465990.00
„aw
BJt
NX,
S 2d
101063.66
4P)06356
216%63.%
246 -14.21
NO33
102065.64
2.4000.11
X91
NB35
5 '
. 1
wnoz.n
-2o6a%
2.456.]5
zb4n.e5
NO.
N
-71421
- 1130.]8
2164066.31
2181016.80
N58
N8.
N 'W
N]
] •
-]1321
4213656
1 2.41416
1 2.4W283
N11
8842
..]5
.03
2483998.32
2.5899.1]
8043
NBN
N
1'
15
).11
2 13
2464 %499
NB.
Ne.
N
.10
.03
216.2682
. 2
1164]
N9.
N
-
1.16
E12W
2184059.68
x164063.29
819
NO
27
33
2.406698
2461110A0
N B52
4
.15
2464119.56
2.4/56.04
NB1
N7 •
.58
4'751250
2.41 -72
].410218
NB55
Nam
I
10]620,58
.]532.82
14841 %A]
2.4165.12
NB5)
NB58
.1588.11
Cl 1.63
2464188.53
2 4
NB59
NB60
Z,N
1
407605.19
2.58
2.428.07
2.4241.52
N.1
a2
.1
- z1
2.411430
N863
N654
. 1,1
.135,97
240.0).11
2464295..
-5
ME
10151x.29
40]810.77
M-.,-
2.4349.88
141)
NBae
T. '
+01682.60
.]561.41
2.45]0.96
x.4390.61
NB1
0
31 .41'
40]54.06
- ]541.85
246 w 1
2.44..20
NB
HIM
NI
N4
.]338.81
/0138367
1..59.1
2.14]0.02
N07S
N674
.81.8
41918.56
2.44
­­-
N­
NB]6
N
1. •
4N B
.2 1
2461300.1
x
N B77
NB26
680 •
.7116.])
- 7110.96
2.1631.1 9
24111.3{
NBSB
14980
15
5
Aw
-7167,8
- 112123
246]689.32
2.6980..
4081
MBO2
ns61
1 27,W
- 511420
40]552.%
248bffi15
2161660.21
NB33
N364
7 1
.5/21.81
4052531
2161610.58
1161)16.60
NB1
NBB6
Nl
407/8.15
47213M
21641..18
2101]6648
X937
New
1 '1'E
'W
.7]10..
40)112.57
2- a14
246 315
NB
8890
.W
. 7705.47
.7780.00
2.1349.61
2464822637
8991
maz
N 'W
401319.86
w73s0.67
2.160281
2494155.59
N6a3
8694
Y
'i 'W
J 1
18M.83
81.5.02
2.471.19
24173406
H0B6
NB66
'W -
1
401921.11
-]eaa%
314731.12
246471031
Heal
NB98
.871.]8
17854,0
2464124m
2464164.33
N
N.J.
3
601660.]0
17960.1
2b4M0.1)
2.4]93.7/
01 PE TO
1
-22=290*-
LIE T700 WERANOB
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASING
-
N
- 592112
1x
2 11.]
171
X02
7103
%68
406035,6
5OW3O
2.W5377
71
1
+07055.1
2650 %0.07
T7W
7]07
•4
405066.51
406060.30
x151958.91
2.29%.47
lit
T10B
.m
40504044
246eo2].ea
24550..52
WETLANDS DELINoERATION SURVEY
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RLCHLAAW TOWJ93ALLP - ONSLOW - NORTH CAROL]NA
Juno 20, 2007 NO SCALE
PROJECT N 009100163
PROJ. SV : OLJ
DRAWN BY : ACS
FIELD ON.: W1013/56 - Li
COMP. FILE : -101-009100163R
SHEET B : SHEET 3 OF 14
DWG. X :

M
Ec n
5 M
i j o m
v
FLAG TABLE
FLAG N0,
BEARING
LENGTH
NOKI NG
EASING
El
91
itav
­0
41 77CW
246]051-
N 63807 OD
EJ
E4 iR lO PL
,
37,w
404163.34
401)11.26
- 2413429.0
2463339.03
ALGNG PL
ALONG PL
Nw3lorE
'E
MIX
NW
414] 1.41
404MC24
1140 -
2.53054.05
ALONG R
PL M Ell
IfWE
1'
.4737.86
101362.82
24635tAX
218.321)
E00•.....
­11E
39
24.83l
401561.55
.450.5.09
71151) 59
2/6351190
EI2
J
114
N
N 1
--15L.
404639.49
.03
2 ].I6
24x3412.14
516
'I ,
29
.
71
24x346237
20348&98
Etx
N 4% i '
' Y
M.w
.65
.47
2El.
E20
4242'11'2842
��5'
AG
28135347
E142
E190
'W
1_.7
.59
210.X21.X 41
Ex3
MlISI
.82'
.54
2183102.21
2463]2251
CC
'W
- N20015Yy',
]'
.72
28320).2)
Ell --
19'
42
..
24371.4
2x323286
528
E1
Y
i'
N.
404..42
274966.21
2.3249.)0
203 .10
ES +.
461H
e' 142
44
N.
/0/99147
{05031..
21132 312
x4632]1.)]
533
11 ' •
1971 -40x7
405111.2)
x
2163327...
EX
535
N Ta W
1
13431
.51x].1
2. "1269
14632x].15
EN
E3l
Nta T't
4&15"
105134.60
2163291)1
EN
E%
N f
! .X215
1053557
7/6331472
246
E.
541
N
.14•
. {'
� 1a6N3.o2
406429.42
519X1141 .31
21/33625/
E.
E42
XvY
1
40334.2
405367.4
2.140.0
2462278.71
E.
42
.27'
1056.,10
17423+73
2.SXI.M
54637x6.42
Ea)
r
N'
40310.-
7.3311..
E.
plx f
11470.11
105678.4
2163310.95
21316.17
E50
551
'4TH
N2 .'
16'
45746331255
427750.76 .]8
2
24633]8.52
62
.3
x1'14 'N
1ST.
1.71'
95163.25
4X3474
241332496
2.33112
E54
F.
1
I
.5x5423
11582&85
2463/2223
2.3TIL.62
E.
S Y R
NTTIO'
1.
.54X31
40593683
2463N1.42
7193199.30
ON
ON
'E
T
1'E
11.01'
.1'
4634'
105851.1]
4059..42
2116231
2.NIRL.
E1
fe1
'E
.32'
40.5950.3]
40691x7'/
2.355x.44
24350207
fez
•E
e .
W
4044 &W
40424291
x46363141
a.
5242
•
L . '
4080X.10
402763.1
,4INO
2103x80.13Ea5
203 4040
EBB
E6]
'E
'E
41.]1'
107000..
2.33X10
2.]M9.-
D"
4.}561.27
Nt r2rW
4
/4214).81
40x150.19
x43M W
203511.x5
En
'1142
N JB'
X401
4G61M.
20---
E Et
5151
-E
4061424
44103.87
2....
x.3050.85
[303
EZS4
t
T
4 7Y
106211.3,
40x23..
2.4017..
2 .W
1.
'41'27
6'3842
4127 7
.1267.55
2464 -.18
G PL
PL n 61
I )'
1063x0.74
41402
an
E260 lE . PL
}
06378.87
.6411
2.41EB3
2.412650
ALONG PL
ALg1G PL
11 - - W
121
408452.52
.E42 2.41MM
EH6
.7
_,.T
1 .' 42
108521.81
40x367.01
2.41B6n
20421242
Em
N 'W
21,81'
442670.11
44242342
501242.7
2161161.42
DO
591
YI '
50.9y
406611.11
408681.00
261202.57
26.7289
592
23
N Y +'
x }
48x529
405615.42
246.4906
2181227.19
EB4
275
a
N 1•
514Y
406503.13
406551.
20419284
2464157.13
EBB
E07
C
40550.36
N
211134, -
24641 .
EBB
E99
406418.22
405]6&38
246.74x6
201056.50
EI00
Elm
40633362
4429996
2 5..
2.401965
5102
E10J
x
40625562
106228.6
T 7.04
24150 -.1
5106
Elm
•
I 1'
106202.02
1081..38
24SN51.
2. 1.64
510)
El.
•�r
406174.29
•0616142
2441140
2163426.
... PL
PL TIE TD 319
g
.611.73
21341.X
2 SM 7
19
E32
MCI
_
406012.42
241636.16
El
MI
1070x).0]
05 14
1.56
ME117.615942
4181.26
-1116
24615ro,1D
x1634..65
PL 111 E 271
5321
'W
53
.,1�
1.25
.59)626
2 1.63
1. E.
ESM
1529
_
't{„
3035'
40602146
2 MX24
V21
ea.ed
42.42'
406 3M
4ae117n
246331414
2.329045
1,22
5123
47.84
49117 &5_a
142142.31
.1
2931 4040
EM
1'
'1 '
40024G.32
0020.36
­_-
24035040
E12T
4
48523.1)
3 .
2
2. .2
E12x
'13 E
1.41'
x13
2 11.31
27
T E
7
r
-
N17J
25_ 1242
ON
}'
40564.39
45579.2
7463590.72
fly]
E1N
�11.32
4815358
2.]831.99
21638
ElN
1
Z7122'13DJ1
J1L
4117937
1427..1
Af0
7
2&57X08
5137 37
Et
��'
�,
108519.67
906511.
21757.23
218342744
El.
Et.
=
w
40422161 1
.661318
246 11
2.31 1.86
5141
E141
4
108481.71
11470.0
2.]618.50
2463607.82
E1.
EI42
.645572
46 .0f
El.
02477
246N6.1
Et.
5117
406.253
20116.31
El.
E149
40421687
406451.6
110161.1
2.3420..
El.
1151
_
1
406426.8,
40x126.0
7183]80.96
1
F.
Ei53
42
400439)
40195.4]
Z .01
21633M.
El.
EON
III
19.5r
3]SN
442350.N
..
2.331. 3
Ei57
EIS.
41N4.99
44231190
246
218330242
E, .
5180
40200.08
.3t
2 5.23
248X00.72
5161
Et62
406418.11
108414.91
24632105
20 .6S
Elea
IOBND02
{42]-.42
2112x6.12
2.ST
Et42
E142
408353.1
10333.62
2x3287.16
706
741327.19
E137
E0.
142]4.4)
.62H.w
2461160.12
263761.2)
E10
Elm
101..98
406421.50
21241.09
20522049
Ell'
1-
E1
10x207.01
.8631
241200.69
ii9w.39
E­
51)4
4061..91
1
181 1227
0
E175
•
A Y3p•�
L�74.4�_ _
40611.16
408011,21__..
2141687 18
_. 215.__0._
LB'F F WF71 AAE M 0523
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASING
E-
E)7_
' rW
}'1327
tt &91'
16.7'
40803&88
406 .N
2483198.
2463199.51
ElW
Elm
,
.05'
405927.98
105949.51
2111N123
246319f.A
Eiw
5164
Nw3lorE
'E
MIX
NW
10.82
4584].1
246324.09
2463239.63
Et42
E186
IfWE
63.
.X'
40581.26
l0mST.
248322513
248321647
E
Elm
­11E
39
24.83l
109606.72
142742.01
2"]479.39
1.324.19
El.
514
1a5M n
406)2570
21029927
24831311)
EI91
Ef91
'I ,
29
.5669.32
1 4066..12
2.]21042
2453216.13
193
E114
N 4% i '
' Y
M.w
.562516
4mmm
2463211.75
2.3214.0
El.
Elm
4
7.98'
1L15fi6Y.OB
405556.91
248112).
2463130.9]
E142
E190
'W
40654229
/0552170
2463261,02
2.329.42
5100
5201
MlISI
.82'
405513.9.5
405493.15
2183102.21
2463]2251
E202
E20
'W
- N20015Yy',
]'
.541].04
103420.18
2183300.02
246 .27
Eta
521
19'
4054124)
4534261
2 .ix
248320398
5206
E20T
Y
i'
N.
409355.)1
.532160
2167200.-
218]296.4
5208
5809
461H
e' 142
44
N.
46 74.41
.5274..
2 +9930
24 .TZ
EZIO
E211
11 ' •
.5157.33
405207.
24RW-.-
24 b
E212
5213
N
1
.513].15
4051)1.20
2483190.20
246318909
ETIa
42
4&15"
.42
02.13
40.Ti 756
2 5588
0213
5216
521]
'142
4040
405049.%
248 J1N
2.311513
E21D
1219
.'W
'W
1 .
106919.41
404001.42
246311479
28
E229
5221
846 3^27
171 '16
])
4196913
..37.75
41831..1
(R
T0J11 {.11
[223
5223
W
7r
104602.46
404853.39
2463102.61
24649913
5224
En4A
Sa '.
-11
14.53
.4]39.64
218]99219
246]095.29
E225
E22
41 .00
4171.
24611 13
24 "N.N
-7
E225
Nrw.,E
51-78'
4442100
40467.28
2463184.91
Z M
522
E2N
}9'50'5
'69'5
SL
1016 .31
404801.]9
24CO -91
246331.21
E231
5253
•4Y
i'
404571.0
104553.51
263348.12
246336742
E2X
E>•56
nr.T
1.
.6527.11
46{69.1)
I 2137_26
241X41
5237
F7N
t '
}g
nN,
401 {48404
40423-00
2461425_4
2463423.16
5239
.
18'5
816'01'
430.
.i4'
4146.82
.4353.91
746]45442
2.315..54
5241
E24Z
51 .42
9Y 'W
e .
W
4044 &W
40424291
241435.65
248/0203
a.
5242
.419736
41198.14
2034]162
2/6/38257
5243
E2.
pimwww
50.
104 97]
.125381
2401]3700
20]32259
527
E30
4.}561.27
Nt r2rW
231
14294.4
4.10.80
2483292.8]
2.3213.61
E2.
5270
'1142
N JB'
X401
41168.1
44392.
21832X64
246325742
E Et
5151
4a�242
41380.88
2.]222.%
201185.18
[303
EZS4
N 131442
N 94'27
81. r
41]62.65
.6363]1
2.]10.5.13
246]12493
E25C I PL
ALONG PL
'41'27
6'3842
125,1114'
.1361.16
404354.43
2_6 W
2.X0.30.5
G PL
PL n 61
-W
I )'
40419023
4042]6..
2462]11
2462957.19
an
E260 lE . PL
}
4/27, 10
41221.68
2482423.36
202X.12
ALONG PL
ALg1G PL
11 - - W
121
41003..
2020]3.81
2.268058
ALONG PL
ALONG PL
_,.T
1 .' 42
.400831
401426.42
2.2421.21
2462/00.00
PL TE M Ei08
R. nC TO PL
N 'W
21,81'
.416246
404180.12
246234.33
2/8216946
KONG PL
ALONG PL
N 'W
40418792
412
2.275981
2.232961
11040 PL
ALONO PL
N Y +'
x }
404236.X05 42
4126460
2.26397_
2.2561)8
ALONG PL
KON6 A
a
N 1•
1042 7_
2.223A1
2462410.73
IE 10 519
E1B8 xE 10 PL
C
.4266.31
404 1.17
2481]]1.2
20Z337.0
ALONG PL
KONO PL
.1116.67
. f
t
�PL
'PL i TO EX9
PL
•141396
.41
--t-
- -
2243.03
248
.5309 ME ro PL
ALONG
x
6.
10.16.40
10125]8
.
2 .
2462133.30
1
ALONG PL
ALONG PL
•
I 1'
404353.42
40163541
2l52
246 4
248 251
PL 1E ro E117
E317 TIE TO K
•�r
40410.1
.81
346220314
2. ST
... PL
PL TIE TD 319
w
32
104823.56
2.x10919
2.21LL51
19
E32
.24
404019.08
2.=..w
2.2142.50
E321
Em
MI
405273.21
405D43,m)
240218070
2 8919
E32J 9E TO PL
A11916 PL
405961,19
409090.22
482142.2
2.2130.84
PL 111 E 271
5321
.5130.91
46187..
202116.91
246210)..
ESM
1529
10526AX
403291.63
2.2062]0
240201.61
5330 9E 4 PL
IT,3
42731].26
2.206413
KONG PL
PL TIE 4 EJX
_
W
46343.31
4MI00.0
24520%499
202
EJX
E]]5
%7ik•T;��.7'I3�"E::�izF:_Tz1Ri
.0
10.01
1.Is
2 211. 1
2.2054.
EX]
4
406913.]1
2.1047.85
E336 i
ij.,V
00
4
2462040.04
x 1B
5310
E341
CDCW
/42315..
406613.53
1.2080.92 !
4210142
5313
E
40564.39
45579.2
2.10T9-
248294306
534 5
E
405574.]0
4552.-
24814246
242021.)3
E367
i-9 X
Z7122'13DJ1
J1L
_4MBi3W
_442831 _5t
2.201"5
6b
EJ50
��'
�,
_
405M1Y7
105711 10
_3.j
_
2819{92
14819K 59
ENi
C352
=
w
423.2
405 ]474
W975.M
201913, 71
532
405]92.01
45-9.7
24121.22
24112.16
E3N
49586.2
45159.08
2461931.21
1.19KOB
EN7
E356
409883.)8
45809.12
2.19x0.00
46195366
E]W
ENO
5361 716 ro GR
•05031.0]
405004.8&
4!423 &13
141963.29
241818.19
44142271
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASING
7300
7300
' rW
}'1327
tt &91'
16.7'
4144.22
473..4
2.]1301
2.T9B6e7
TW3
T
,
.05'
7ee2.M
204202..
2.4231,81
1305
T
Nw3lorE
'E
MIX
NW
+0x615.03
.4216.50
.4224.26
20]83171
T307
T308
IfWE
63.
.X'
11]]131
4 -20.a5
2. -13.02
25774 5X
T30D
7310
ls1
­11E
39
24.83l
44297.01
w -30.42
. -9x40&6
245)121
2 {5764.33
x17)42242
IW :. �:yT4b>4"- 4_41 ".1117_1:: =3
FLAG TABLE
FLAG N0,
BEARING
LENGTH
N ORTHING
EASING
P_
8271
_,735740"
4'
Al
407494.11
407460.12
24512 {)4083
2Z423Fn
4202
4203
,
.11.22
.21612
1451x89.10
2/34.710.99
Rea
4205
521]'
.]41.99
461319.63
z .a
x423..42
4'208
Ulm Illy-
1'
1071X69
40'1327.
245 49.19
215.42.81
P1, 12
KW_XIA.
2=7Y
.129928
16.66
744244.42
20414212
8801
212X
.7325.54
741530.4
243036..
421]
R21 3
'I ,
29
.1]]165
4711.10
27.61.32
212610.75
4
R215
N 4% i '
' Y
M.w
.7_
407 41119
4600.2
.50
x 218
2217
4
7.98'
.)442.0]
48.16
x46 -173+..1
1
1454704.19
Rma
R2T9
'W
42214
4716.88
x46113].71
{34997.
4110
R1M
MlISI
.82'
x)44148
b1H>.59
2.69X.7_
21s4m6.10
R221
R223
'W
- N20015Yy',
]'
.34617
40).x.)6
2466018.60
Rn4
4225
19'
.739227
4671.42
2454951,38
2454699..
C..
4.7
4 'E
i'
N.
.IM1.26
.)]x].51
24: _:C7
245462D.X
R229
R22
461H
e' 142
44
N.
.'231909
3x3.
x434794.1
2451M3)l
R230
1231
11 ' •
.]331.11
.7361x3
245+713.6&
23+)01.
RZ32
N
N
70.140
.)348.48
2151682.1
444428.4
RR233
x34
R2.
)I a
4&15"
467199)
.7 LL
43127).
21x492304
R2N
R237
NCa 1. 1•
.127.71
4730400
x414. 1•
24464275
R2N
R2
.'W
'W
1 .
4]761.18
4)210.11
246466971
245457).x3
R2. .
421
42'
7'
47Z44B1
4)Z]6.60
245435x44
1 1454.1.
`313
`312
}
7r
.]717.82
.79.62
23M
P1
P310
42
26.2V
.)1x0.69
242.1
2154158.21
13
30 0x
3
2454154.27
P304
PSN
42
'1Y
4113142 111
4)4].25
2434327.01
1 4113
P342
P31
'W
.3922)
.)11219
2454280.51
246.197
P]OS
PJD2
'1142
i'
.)41405
.1429.25
24U21.7]
145420x.28
PXI
P30D
1.
.].0.18
461.9.05
8.4201461
243420].74
LNE P.T WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO.
BEARING
I LENGTH
NORTHING
EASING
PI
P2
t
i
408058.57
40277_.44
2155138.31
21551X.
PS
Pa
r
08.25
10x105_37
255+31.28
2424113
PC
P)
521]'
40615254
405164,31
2455037.31
205031.2
P6
1'
40817.-
245502342
45801242
P1, 12
13^42
2=7Y
408x5328
25501248
245600.5.81
PIS
1.
11
408267.33
.651629
215 ...
2455838.35
P13
'I ,
29
4010A
.3556.91
243304.39
2450050.%
pli
P6
P16
N 4% i '
' Y
M.w
1 401..12
40834332
243515042
243511.48
PIB
0
4
7.98'
10852.91
905]11.
2 35108..
2.51936]
FN
'W
403724.90
40612x.6)
255223.52
2.
.3
3
P21
MlISI
.82'
408888.96
2 "5
%282 75
=
215121.
P25
P2
'W
- N20015Yy',
]'
4R52..2
4082467_
289161.26
24554).80
P21
19'
{68125.7
.820) .00
24.46.1
245537286
no
710
lII
4 'E
i'
N.
108191.02
408181.1
2 61.
x455.8.68
M
6
461H
e' 142
44
N.
406116-
/08090.18
21554221
255100.2
719
LS
"Z
S87 11,15`V
4060]0.13
17
246a5m4
2451.42.11
i4
T3
N
N
.80x382
408068.46
248515430
2435238.1
rx
T
'442
}6'31'W
4&15"
40605218
408018.00
x155105.4
8453162x0
LINE 7300. P800 WETLANDS
LIE L WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE - - -�_
FLAG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASING
�
t
i
- /OlOw 15 _
407051 91
_-2486019.9!
248807209
'�re�rs49cts�x����s�
r
4- )). 9
0]121.4
4 .91
2.6091.21
f
521]'
40711292
.716).94
2142118.16
246815148
0�!InTFF7�S1S���L�'
�laa?ssscri�?n���l
1'
b>1LL18
21681832
P502
PCIG
13^42
2=7Y
472X02
2466196.51
�i�m¢iY-
�stxi�m
107323) .
.7218..
.- 2455256.64
24661]9 X
11
4)12
'I ,
L '
21156
.1731.24
2186788.86
20625.46
415
KIB
N 4% i '
' Y
1.
4 .41
.1730.17
2466
2 830
K6
6
4
I.8 '
40]23].)]
2166]6].33
. ]
K19
KZO
'W
4on42.1f
. 401243
2.x380.4
2.63a7N
K21
Nowlirw
41,7V
.1260.90
.)296.44
246626446
146627617
413
K2
'W
- N20015Yy',
t '
11]242.3)
46711.60
2180228.17
2466100.42
K26
K26 T
{01..01
4]127.13
216621].96
2166230.&
K27
' 42
.)4091
.7446.34
1 2486 7
280242.1
K.
430
III
40)407.8]
240 =I5
2488 .8t
kJt
I
10274.02
x461].4.42
432
K33
505'.'SCE
II
40]139.66
.7M1.2I
2.6208.80
2466 1 .2
K34
K35
442
444).81
4034].42
2166711.91
246819820
KN
1•E
bn32e1
.32951
5466212x5
216619)...
KX
KN
.'W
'W
w
47Z6B.61
.)233.41
2466118.46
2466149.61
K.
rcN
3]09'7'46'27
'1-2-
42'
7'
.411.11
.CtM-n.65
24 6
240001.. 001.1J.N
K{2
N.
424•X'0
7r
4)15].91
{07127.32
2 TJ.N
2466030..
K42
K
330"!6'X'5
45927'50'5
.TINA 4
470
_Co 50
246601142
248%0.4
246606.15
L I PE iBIF"xl AM
LIE P 9IXT 400 WETLANDS
nFunisr-moff7iI
BEARING
®a
NORTHING
I EASING
�
'w00V
i
412023411
41211.73
2451019.42
459068.60
'�re�rs49cts�x����s�
_
41205195
4120]2.1)
241121.40
20463.30
P417
P500
S27'
521]'
4120)2.31
2454156.93
2464239,23
0�!InTFF7�S1S���L�'
�laa?ssscri�?n���l
1'
41198314
2434236.55
P502
PCIG
13^42
2=7Y
41192442
471637-
24x4119.42
2454149.92
�i�m¢iY-
�stxi�m
414401.99
41160.42
9.0
6.0]
11
4)12
414328.42
1
19.4
1..
��ZS4'!F22G7
N
�Fi81•��?��
414150.63
414.3.61
.00
3].0
R715
8716
I.8 '
4140203
4140].03
245549207
2435349.11
�EFFLlwiF"7t!'7iN�
o!iL4SR'�4'.7N�NFIRBT"
414.134
2165600.50
0i1TfRiyi�
_�_N_
.®I
i{i= 9pib37
�itCCf.4!.PaIS]Ii'���
NI ' E
.
_210'
41
41020.56
14,65
2455551.88
R7T2
- 414081,00
2453551.)3
O�RFFI:4'Sfi7�'7FS3�
' 42
414)11.]3
42]38.61
2455650.12
255530,01
� SPT•�[Q>♦�1�t7
'1
9]8'33'.'.
+78=1251
TIP:1•
�iikiBFfB'Ei>3!IIIII
?3Em
NNI
II
LIE P 9IXT 400 WETLANDS
NO SCALE
LINE R MID P AM P2M WF"11 ANnR
FLAG 40,
BEARING
I LENGTH
NORTHING
I EASING
P-
P.1
N)
zo.my
412023411
41211.73
2451019.42
459068.60
'�re�rs49cts�x����s�
_
41205195
4120]2.1)
241121.40
20463.30
P417
P500
S27'
521]'
4120)2.31
2454156.93
2464239,23
P301
1'
41198314
2434236.55
P502
PCIG
13^42
2=7Y
41192442
471637-
24x4119.42
2454149.92
�i�m¢iY-
�stxi�m
414401.99
41160.42
9.0
6.0]
11
4)12
414328.42
1
19.4
1..
RI13
8114
N
414150.63
414.3.61
.00
3].0
R715
8716
I.8 '
4140203
4140].03
245549207
2435349.11
8117
'E
414.134
2165600.50
0i1TfRiyi�
%�
.®I
i{i= 9pib37
�itCCf.4!.PaIS]Ii'���
NI ' E
.
_210'
41
41020.56
14,65
2455551.88
R7T2
- 414081,00
2453551.)3
O�RFFI:4'Sfi7�'7FS3�
' 42
414)11.]3
42]38.61
2455650.12
255530,01
� SPT•�[Q>♦�1�t7
'1
9]8'33'.'.
+78=1251
TIP:1•
��rv'
0E'iFiT!97lFr��i3�
'.' F''. Y" a!!�'Fi��•1'ZTI93�i'zss!!E193i
0
�E.'LE"iRi7
RIES
�C!7FSY!"97�d6•��7
NO SCALE
LINE R MID P AM P2M WF"11 ANnR
4hfMM&ca;ffiM
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WEIBNGTON, NORTH CAROL94A 2841
IELE: `910 353 -
FA% (910 251 -8282 282
http: / /ewwmcKlmveedcan
LJE Mi00 wETLANDB
LINE E P 400.P800 WEILANDB
FLAG TABLE
FLAG 40,
BEARING
I LENGTH
NORTHING
I EASING
P-
P.1
N)
zo.my
412023411
41211.73
2451019.42
459068.60
P
P402A
_
41205195
4120]2.1)
241121.40
20463.30
P417
P500
S27'
521]'
4120)2.31
2454156.93
2464239,23
P301
1'
41198314
2434236.55
P502
PCIG
13^42
2=7Y
41192442
471637-
24x4119.42
2454149.92
8709
4)10
'4'39
5 L
414401.99
41160.42
9.0
6.0]
11
4)12
414328.42
1
19.4
1..
RI13
8114
N
414150.63
414.3.61
.00
3].0
R715
8716
I.8 '
4140203
4140].03
245549207
2435349.11
8117
'E
414.134
2165600.50
0i1TfRiyi�
%�
.®I
i{i= 9pib37
RT10
4]21
NI ' E
.
_210'
41
41020.56
14,65
2455551.88
R7T2
- 414081,00
2453551.)3
O�RFFI:4'Sfi7�'7FS3�
' 42
414)11.]3
42]38.61
2455650.12
255530,01
4]25
4726_
R]SJ
'1
9]8'33'.'.
4141)0.25
5_4 -4.48
44766..
2466619.
2435510.33
1.330309
��rv'
0E'iFiT!97lFr��i3�
'.' F''. Y" a!!�'Fi��•1'ZTI93�i'zss!!E193i
OIL
0�giM
EI
NI
0�®
ONLEMM
NI
NI
�ica�REi>_
MI
EI
�ENFZSYSfl'.'1�Fi�i
�a�iiixl�a"i�!�I•:��a�
��ItsR3
%7ik•T;��.7'I3�"E::�izF:_Tz1Ri
®is!4ST7L"ai7C���"
®'
7MM
:-.
M
=
Wer
4hfMM&ca;ffiM
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WEIBNGTON, NORTH CAROL94A 2841
IELE: `910 353 -
FA% (910 251 -8282 282
http: / /ewwmcKlmveedcan
LJE Mi00 wETLANDB
LINE E P 400.P800 WEILANDB
FLAG TABLE
FLAG 40,
BEARING
I LENGTH
NORTHING
I EASING
P-
P.1
N)
zo.my
412023411
41211.73
2451019.42
459068.60
P
P402A
_
41205195
4120]2.1)
241121.40
20463.30
P417
P500
S27'
521]'
4120)2.31
2454156.93
2464239,23
P301
1'
41198314
2434236.55
P502
PCIG
13^42
2=7Y
41192442
471637-
24x4119.42
2454149.92
8709
4)10
FLAG TABLE
FLAG N0.
BEARING
I LENGTH
NORTHING
FASTING
4]00
184'2
zo.my
414 -8.60
131)
RM1
R
_
414429.30
41476.38
0.68
1.
R71
S27'
521]'
41/80330
31,15
RMS
®ice
®III
5.29
5.92
8703
R]OB
4456246
41{{90./0
6.2]
11.33
Z2=4
8709
4)10
'4'39
5 L
414401.99
41160.42
9.0
6.0]
11
4)12
414328.42
1
19.4
1..
RI13
8114
N
414150.63
414.3.61
.00
3].0
R715
8716
I.8 '
4140203
4140].03
245549207
2435349.11
8117
'E
414.134
2165600.50
4)16
RTI9
414524.11
411534.82
1 2..303..
245556124
RT10
4]21
NI ' E
.
_210'
41
41020.56
14,65
2455551.88
R7T2
- 414081,00
2453551.)3
R724
' 42
414)11.]3
42]38.61
2455650.12
255530,01
4]25
4726_
R]SJ
'1
9]8'33'.'.
4141)0.25
5_4 -4.48
44766..
2466619.
2435510.33
1.330309
LAE R 400 WETLANDS
PROJECT #, 009100163
PROD. SVYR : DLJ
DRAWN BY : ACS
FIELD BK.: M013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE: 1.1101- 00910016312
SHEET # : SHEET 4 OF 14
DWG. IN .
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
FOR
v r
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
s1'
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
D
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
9•
(
R7CffLANDS 7Y+lIN3NlP -- OJYSLOM -NORTH CIROLNA
June 29, FOOT NO SCALE
�C"`l�FFR1Ri1L'.7�T'��)iELEf�
f3F7
0tR2'CIZSP�ii�3�
�i^S�R��FFl�
®ice
®III
,
PROJECT #, 009100163
PROD. SVYR : DLJ
DRAWN BY : ACS
FIELD BK.: M013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE: 1.1101- 00910016312
SHEET # : SHEET 4 OF 14
DWG. IN .
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
FOR
v r
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
s1'
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
D
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
9•
(
R7CffLANDS 7Y+lIN3NlP -- OJYSLOM -NORTH CIROLNA
June 29, FOOT NO SCALE
PROJECT #, 009100163
PROD. SVYR : DLJ
DRAWN BY : ACS
FIELD BK.: M013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE: 1.1101- 00910016312
SHEET # : SHEET 4 OF 14
DWG. IN .

1+31 v
LINE P WETLANDS
LIE P WETLANDS (COMBINES)
�E�SGRBTPal��t
0BE?'YSFifi��B�
I(raNNS*s>~s�a�sB:ti>,I(r��l.
Na11NB�E 'T'flFe�(IIIIIIIFT!FC1��!•
N0(N(CFiBN4RL'a ..�. ®�
0�T7�'g'Ya(NiI&�I(N�N�
011NiidSFGiTA'.'�i �S��ELEi:T,is'7
I(N�!(INF'T2FRFYaINtdlF4Bl�l�N
OBiiYS'iF4a��p
N�iT�i2lf- F��11N
11N
�9�ra2reT����
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
_
EASTING
011NB"d63BCG�1NiZSSi
m�.c�s�
©�s�T•i�r
T P
40549218
4.53014
4`016/76
2.-X196
0�''L�Niil6��N
f7- ?!$fF7f"1�'3F�
'�'
iLF!Sbn6T>•
I�aiL7Fi91•�EgiQ�.4�
N
.4
1].51
+oX4x11
24333.]1
x4ao3z»
�C'-
*GEYIIaIN�fF7'�I(NB�11NN1
)'
45566x36
4.63,
2433 ».91
200.11x01
IN�r71TBiy'.�)INB=RiFa���
't
37,W
J.
4.7010 W
422720.6T
213310.32
T. 2 9.X
®ra�zTn,
®��(.
• '��i�si��I�
6'�.�1/+7�8.•'TI��'
0 .42'
Ml %,36
10586x99
129 F � _B.Lf•
.
NS'iZ5AF9".1NNtLDIF?��i�jA'3ya
��
IM63.I5
40563295
tae 693
1 210.50.70
LOCIS
1.016
.rte• ies�'��.iiii���®
. 7
)516
4.562]9
2_ 9.04
26.]2.52
II
I '
41'3
> -
10494E.St
1.49398
260]90..
263]6942
1N01N��®�
O�sYSP%Ji�11NaFTRF�(�INI
NFT'TF317NNNi?iZl•INN��•
45646x3
21653866
PL BE N MOGt
ErIMMIM
2II.W
40541]6
2460]3.00
�ETZPBFr'7NNiTfi�
NON�YSLTi�TB!�I�iL'.x'
7 '
E4_
408232!6
.10161
406168.24
^_yam
1011NR'LSTiTPa�!IC�
N5,177ift
'®_
x41413
24148651
�M*LFiF1YaiFSL'�
dFS1iI�S�
4.05531
4090.3
34163..
24144.)3
�E�
N
7 '
4'19]133
w »61.99
_
011NATCFAr.JL'7
EiF'ATia�1N�7sT'TYP?6y�
.p'
offr7ar.7m
r
1142
1141
Nl
k.eY
4
4 %529,04
Q7011,67
2_10.1B.µ
414].3
1141
1140
N1
11
.5
4 .1
4%) ».»
24143256
241015
1138
1139
'W
53.1
1.13'
601-
4)8613
2.16290
2.140x%
24'67
"
B 1
4]63206
51)64_
2.1300.35
2.1]37.3
�E^L'-
YS©�SIF4�
47
4 %610.54
241311.3
0�f[R•.T7�R2�
N 'W
55.94 -��
b »111.4
47610.84
2613..»
1_11 %..
ONN�BT1i�1
�rz�lii)a
'w
N, W
i
ErRIs" 071M.
2611..46
24611 »,_
Itxe
1126
N
N '4 6-w
4
.,
2)]d.
2;,J_ 11.3
261141.67
825
1126
w
Y
w))
2410 .01
2610 .12
1125
1124
41
"W
NIFTIFEM
477)496
4161x01
241064.16
1 261028.90
1123
nzz
NM11' w
r
4 12
.7a3D. 12
2.10 %,56
243ro.b>
10�'R�2"71iCB791♦�
N1W
31
40]518.85
47)065]
248098638
24112184
1116
141V6'07E
j­7­lMM.7S
4])7].95
.57QIM
x4104688
'2601.].01
0
Ei['F!3Pr7
NNiR!5��
2))43.
1(N
1113
M5
1114
•4'
.I'
Zl
'MINK. I
4)893.24
4]6)6.12
2471414
24116643
1113
N3757'
x1
µ
6 %40.15
441183,65
1112
I'll
Y
t'
w
12
1241.4
�EiZB€STwMESx;l:r.>•-
INO�..•ril�i'Y��e��'-
N M'
xn*
1r*.t•snzyfnraf
2412346
21612 0.M
�I(
0�.
8532 !'- F'.�7NNi'f''�IINL6•TF.?5;7
1'�i'7CT'��SET'•�Ei!��
4 '
4]63.61
2 1JR.%
®�SNY:f7aiC5Z!®
�INNP17'R4!:9'a�N
S2AWMEW
6
.751114
.7511853
2.1337.41,1
2.1357.66
��Ff'rTxL.77alT�S.��N
1OS'
2Y
1
4743.%
4745.3
2413]3.51
2107]17.5]
2493
243
'�,bB'•Y•FL'af�'i'i•
12.2,ll
47421.
40742164
241]..]6
24139.06
2451
IfM
w
ise
476`11
407630,3
I 201M.71
241241.02
OEiFi'FIF�7NNiTFri�
11,11'
11
40]4233
4]41203
1♦
'�'
(®
IFUTTMONNE"
20121820
2_124859
194
193
1�'7�7x•T���_
�NNb'LR''>zzYaINE!!BF��i:
.721.641
2733.4
2412 ».75
2.1302..
192
190
.4
M_Ml�
4139122
.)23686
241326.61
3"13126]
180
FREEZE
41-1
4723.29
24131517
0�'i'"�ZY7iR6�
539'
1
ETNZFRT�7
NaNd7[.T711111�1�
0
sJ
�E^.E'D•Y7NEB�1
41'11 ^TYSSii�SxS�
2412]0.14
20128),93
ON�Y2Si11NaFLBSBI�NR.^•'�INIB
w
�1."7F'YF7oxx��7
_A-
24131384
2w131zk
Of'eAr-2ca^i�F�m
OCCii•
1.t$1.911Na6B'J7
4iO24]624
-E...
z.l .31
2.1318.22
111 .
02-M07'It
�N:R'FL•SZrii7i7'BFTi�1'
40.82
.1090.32
2.t31107
1012823
I>]
Ile
N39 T '
NCOwwS
�scry;UrwassEry
4%.119
4141,31
2.13415
200/ 125
N�CL?'�3��NB:
Ni I
• I
r1•a�l
w»M.n
600 ».SO
1•
173
172
w1sIww
1173'
6.94821
10634.]]
2461.311»
2681376.
I�CCd'FIY��4_®�
N]
25.3'
403]124
20136618
fro
189
AM'
.,M.
62810.)]
6068)]12
1.1]6250
2413714
I.
18
I��SSi7i']F':a•�
INB�tF>•T'YI•YaNiLB.'B�@��Fa
4..615
. 9
2,I4A 4
20101.0
160
186
rtse7e•Bx•I9
Oi�TNT�
46 ,6
4.7w.3z
2 14 .%
201488.38
14
163
�,(�'�41•"1F?Y"J
& TT
_SIR=
••
��
T 1
.ro'
"'®.
x61361,.
601]5212
;�ME-
_EEPT��__
MOM
60%..03
2 "133528
2.13 ».61
158
0077- !9"111�IBT•i��
*,X'
10568 7.3
20142262
137
1.
13. T
31
4``65.3
4.03.26
24 0 412
201468 6
I.
Id
-
9000X.0]
4000 %,59
141µ1.1e
241µ9.10
i"r'EN�EiIYFBFL:7
t .441
nos
�-�
2511 430.
zw1H 0
0�
10647.
,10
wt W 3
­W7.92
Iw
S17w.v
J. ll
1.4)2.26
6.11 M
2447.16
2 1 ,M
H]
6.4)2.53
4.4)3.63
2414)407
249f49a3
1_
46416
6..8.3
61
241481. 4
�E2FB54L57.'�
1118': � I�
4
6013441.1. 14
�L',;Zria
141
I.
4.35625
4MX
3MM
.1...
2.1340.x1
raI��TTLTiiG7
�INB;4"'?4'S47,7t'Fai�®�
�;TBI����
1053163
.
,3
24111k2B4
261k11]
137
136
.3
24/36674
2461 4 7
���7iTyT��7
n'
60390.
4011183.19
2/8111243
144,11
�IN!�TSrfl7fa[xBNB�N�EP.i'1L�
..17•.6
400
403123
14 111
24147x47
IN�NNBRRTY±97�OR,91♦�•
1
7. f
2407 a3
Z 1511
��3[L5Z59aN�Y��'
{,T
4.1454
138x]
44.5213
241904.87
IB�iC[58FYr•Jaf�5T!B�I(r�EC�
�INRSiCR1'7E'1EL�
4.1M%
4060]110
141631»
2.15]6.4
125
126
or
nag,
600044.02
456056.4
1.1µ5.9p 1
.1539.11 1
��R14RRCi!'���.•
•r��
405961.66
40593 ®.M
2161 .w
241550,90
12,
120
,>
11
2 153.37
246181).4]
119
116
4.34.3
201 d
8]S 6
HE
246
1'
45%x15
43111.16
4110.3
74,741»
IBIS
�!87�1�1
513".3
1M32.D1
24+ 613
7.1131 .30
�IIN
'7'Y!4FPaNNBiSBTa�.^.'>YFSF�I
4M »555
6.]31]3
148100/1
1.1364
2441
110
119 !
-71 ,y3 r
141 7082?
3 1153.
19
�ursa�ssr>i
4.%2.81
1011)6
B1Fn3462PaINN�TF��N�1(INN
105621.01
40632.10
2.17 .3
2.1 »399
LIE P WETLANDS (COMBINES)
�E�SGRBTPal��t
0BE?'YSFifi��B�
I(raNNS*s>~s�a�sB:ti>,I(r��l.
Na11NB�E 'T'flFe�(IIIIIIIFT!FC1��!•
N0(N(CFiBN4RL'a ..�. ®�
0�T7�'g'Ya(NiI&�I(N�N�
011NiidSFGiTA'.'�i �S��ELEi:T,is'7
I(N�!(INF'T2FRFYaINtdlF4Bl�l�N
OBiiYS'iF4a��p
N�iT�i2lf- F��11N
11N
LIE MW WETLANDS
FLAG N0.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
_
EASTING
f
]'
T P
40549218
4.53014
4`016/76
2.-X196
®'
f7- ?!$fF7f"1�'3F�
'�'
iLF!Sbn6T>•
I�aiL7Fi91•�EgiQ�.4�
N
.4
1].51
+oX4x11
24333.]1
x4ao3z»
��iiiii><"Ja�s�xr•��
'W
)'
45566x36
4.63,
2433 ».91
200.11x01
M03
MO0f0
't
37,W
J.
4.7010 W
422720.6T
213310.32
T. 2 9.X
®ra�zTn,
®��(.
• '��i�si��I�
6'�.�1/+7�8.•'TI��'
0 .42'
Ml %,36
10586x99
129 F � _B.Lf•
AOC13
MDM♦
Is,
��
IM63.I5
40563295
tae 693
1 210.50.70
LOCIS
1.016
.rte• ies�'��.iiii���®
. 7
)516
4.562]9
2_ 9.04
26.]2.52
II
I '
41'3
> -
10494E.St
1.49398
260]90..
263]6942
Af9NC PL
NFT'TF317NNNi?iZl•INN��•
45646x3
21653866
PL BE N MOGt
N
2II.W
40541]6
2460]3.00
1164
IISJ
7 '
E4_
408232!6
.10161
406168.24
x413163
um
I;SD
N5,177ift
wens.»
4038695
x41413
24148651
114
dFS1iI�S�
4.05531
4090.3
34163..
24144.)3
114]
11.
N
7 '
4'19]133
w »61.99
24614564
246146524
114
Itµ
EiF'ATia�1N�7sT'TYP?6y�
.p'
.73).
4»1143
2614249
241453.63
1142
1141
Nl
k.eY
4
4 %529,04
Q7011,67
2_10.1B.µ
414].3
1141
1140
N1
11
.5
4 .1
4%) ».»
24143256
241015
1138
1139
'W
53.1
1.13'
601-
4)8613
2.16290
2.140x%
24'67
"
B 1
4]63206
51)64_
2.1300.35
2.1]37.3
n�
w
47
4 %610.54
241311.3
1133
N 'W
55.94 -��
b »111.4
47610.84
2613..»
1_11 %..
2431
1130
'w
N, W
i
4I x28
4)86114
2611..46
24611 »,_
Itxe
1126
N
N '4 6-w
4
.,
2)]d.
2;,J_ 11.3
261141.67
825
1126
w
Y
w))
2410 .01
2610 .12
1125
1124
41
"W
477)496
4161x01
241064.16
1 261028.90
1123
nzz
NM11' w
r
4 12
.7a3D. 12
2.10 %,56
243ro.b>
1121
1Me
N1W
31
40]518.85
47)065]
248098638
24112184
1116
141V6'07E
j­7­lMM.7S
4])7].95
.57QIM
x4104688
'2601.].01
III]
11116
•
1 W
2))43.
2"105511
4,1213
1113
M5
1114
•4'
.I'
Zl
'MINK. I
4)893.24
4]6)6.12
2471414
24116643
1113
N3757'
x1
µ
6 %40.15
441183,65
1112
I'll
Y
t'
w
12
1241.4
2451
113
N M'
xn*
WiMQ
4]33.4
2412346
21612 0.M
11M
4 'W
4 '
4]63.61
2 1JR.%
nDT
n.
S2AWMEW
6
.751114
.7511853
2.1337.41,1
2.1357.66
IIM
ild
1OS'
2Y
1
4743.%
4745.3
2413]3.51
2107]17.5]
2493
243
1 'W
12.2,ll
47421.
40742164
241]..]6
24139.06
2451
IfM
w
ise
476`11
407630,3
I 201M.71
241241.02
1.6
11,11'
11
40]4233
4]41203
1♦
'�'
(®
IFUTTMONNE"
20121820
2_124859
194
193
>
�NNb'LR''>zzYaINE!!BF��i:
.721.641
2733.4
2412 ».75
2.1302..
192
190
.4
M.M,
4139122
.)23686
241326.61
3"13126]
180
N5313MTE
41-1
4723.29
24131517
Ift
539'
1
ETNZFRT�7
NaNd7[.T711111�1�
13
ft
184
sJ
�E^.E'D•Y7NEB�1
41'11 ^TYSSii�SxS�
2412]0.14
20128),93
��7
w
�1."7F'YF7oxx��7
_A-
24131384
2w131zk
Jw
.MI1
4iO24]624
-E...
z.l .31
2.1318.22
111 .
02-M07'It
�N:R'FL•SZrii7i7'BFTi�1'
40.82
.1090.32
2.t31107
1012823
I>]
Ile
N39 T '
NCOwwS
�scry;UrwassEry
4%.119
4141,31
2.13415
200/ 125
175
17.
Ni I
• I
��'PSEYS7iib7FT��I�
w»M.n
600 ».SO
ming
173
172
w1sIww
1173'
6.94821
10634.]]
2461.311»
2681376.
In
N]
25.3'
403]124
20136618
fro
189
AM'
.,M.
62810.)]
6068)]12
1.1]6250
2413714
I.
18
I��SSi7i']F':a•�
INB�tF>•T'YI•YaNiLB.'B�@��Fa
4..615
. 9
2,I4A 4
20101.0
160
186
rtse7e•Bx•I9
Oi�TNT�
46 ,6
4.7w.3z
2 14 .%
201488.38
14
163
N
& TT
4.71337
1.70.1
266145.93
16141.3
lax
11
T 1
.ro'
4.12.416
40%52.0
x61361,.
601]5212
1%
7 • '
MOM
60%..03
2 "133528
2.13 ».61
158
*,X'
10568 7.3
20142262
137
1.
13. T
31
4``65.3
4.03.26
24 0 412
201468 6
I.
Id
1N01ai7G�a�*B:c�
'L�II' ��T4fZF9'atLl(d�
9000X.0]
4000 %,59
141µ1.1e
241µ9.10
`�
LIE MW WETLANDS
LIE Mw WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG N0.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
_
EASTING
f
]'
T P
40549218
4.53014
4`016/76
2.-X196
®'
f7- ?!$fF7f"1�'3F�
'�'
iLF!Sbn6T>•
I�aiL7Fi91•�EgiQ�.4�
N
.4
1].51
+oX4x11
24333.]1
x4ao3z»
��iiiii><"Ja�s�xr•��
'W
)'
45566x36
4.63,
2433 ».91
200.11x01
M03
MO0f0
't
37,W
J.
4.7010 W
422720.6T
213310.32
T. 2 9.X
®ra�zTn,
®��(.
• '��i�si��I�
6'�.�1/+7�8.•'TI��'
0 .42'
Ml %,36
10586x99
129 F � _B.Lf•
AOC13
MDM♦
Is,
��
IM63.I5
40563295
tae 693
1 210.50.70
LOCIS
1.016
.rte• ies�'��.iiii���®
. 7
)516
4.562]9
2_ 9.04
26.]2.52
II
I '
41'3
> -
10494E.St
1.49398
260]90..
263]6942
LIE Mw WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG N0.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
_
EASTING
f
]'
T P
40549218
4.53014
4`016/76
2.-X196
MOC3
Ml.
7 r
4.9..95
4.61491
2480390.11
160JN.6p
MODS
uD.
N
.4
1].51
+oX4x11
24333.]1
x4ao3z»
M
MD.
'W
)'
45566x36
4.63,
2433 ».91
200.11x01
M03
MO0f0
't
37,W
J.
4.7010 W
422720.6T
213310.32
T. 2 9.X
.0011
MOG1T
1
0 .42'
Ml %,36
10586x99
24326629
240]!24.4
AOC13
MDM♦
Is,
��
IM63.I5
40563295
tae 693
1 210.50.70
LOCIS
1.016
.rte• ies�'��.iiii���®
. 7
)516
4.562]9
2_ 9.04
26.]2.52
MDM7
NOCI616 10 R
I '
41'3
> -
10494E.St
1.49398
260]90..
263]6942
Af9NC PL
NFT'TF317NNNi?iZl•INN��•
45646x3
21653866
PL BE N MOGt
N
2II.W
40541]6
2460]3.00
LIE I WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE -•
FLAG N0.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASTING
11)4
'
T P
406516.»
4.07291
41020__52
24104255
!1]3
1112
7 r
IMINM
4.424 -22
24 107IL
24110127
1171
It>0
N
.4
40B4sa4
I.ak.t6
)61141.43
2681- 183,3 I'
.006
MOEI
1Tdi11L'��T�T`I��!
)'
604HI%
2.1196.92
2107211.37
If%
110
a�!�cT'�ciirl�a�m�
37,W
J.
10613%26
4pkz1.M
2.1238..
261262.10
1185
1
0 .42'
405.7.6
4.364
3 120112
2.1]111]
I1
116p3
IM162
Is,
��
41183)190
408]424
246136x94
2.136].3
243
II.
.rte• ies�'��.iiii���®
. 7
7.
6MM2,.
1402.68
2 14114
113
> -
405]2P.µ
1
2014264
2)
If 57
NFT'TF317NNNi?iZl•INN��•
40631272
406119.24
2414498
1136
1155
N
2II.W
405256.]6
ow.a
2461513.51
24151 4.3
1164
IISJ
7 '
E4_
408232!6
.10161
406168.24
x413163
um
I;SD
N5,177ift
wens.»
4038695
x41413
24148651
114
dFS1iI�S�
4.05531
4090.3
34163..
24144.)3
114]
11.
N
7 '
4'19]133
w »61.99
24614564
246146524
114
Itµ
EiF'ATia�1N�7sT'TYP?6y�
.p'
.73).
4»1143
2614249
241453.63
1142
1141
Nl
k.eY
4
4 %529,04
Q7011,67
2_10.1B.µ
414].3
1141
1140
N1
11
.5
4 .1
4%) ».»
24143256
241015
1138
1139
'W
53.1
1.13'
601-
4)8613
2.16290
2.140x%
24'67
"
B 1
4]63206
51)64_
2.1300.35
2.1]37.3
n�
w
47
4 %610.54
241311.3
1133
N 'W
55.94 -��
b »111.4
47610.84
2613..»
1_11 %..
2431
1130
'w
N, W
i
4I x28
4)86114
2611..46
24611 »,_
Itxe
1126
N
N '4 6-w
4
.,
2)]d.
2;,J_ 11.3
261141.67
825
1126
w
Y
w))
2410 .01
2610 .12
1125
1124
41
"W
477)496
4161x01
241064.16
1 261028.90
1123
nzz
NM11' w
r
4 12
.7a3D. 12
2.10 %,56
243ro.b>
1121
1Me
N1W
31
40]518.85
47)065]
248098638
24112184
1116
141V6'07E
j­7­lMM.7S
4])7].95
.57QIM
x4104688
'2601.].01
III]
11116
•
1 W
2))43.
2"105511
4,1213
1113
M5
1114
•4'
.I'
Zl
'MINK. I
4)893.24
4]6)6.12
2471414
24116643
1113
N3757'
x1
µ
6 %40.15
441183,65
1112
I'll
Y
t'
w
12
1241.4
2451
113
N M'
xn*
WiMQ
4]33.4
2412346
21612 0.M
11M
4 'W
4 '
4]63.61
2 1JR.%
nDT
n.
S2AWMEW
6
.751114
.7511853
2.1337.41,1
2.1357.66
IIM
ild
1OS'
2Y
1
4743.%
4745.3
2413]3.51
2107]17.5]
2493
243
1 'W
12.2,ll
47421.
40742164
241]..]6
24139.06
2451
IfM
w
ise
476`11
407630,3
I 201M.71
241241.02
1.6
11,11'
11
40]4233
4]41203
2 13M..
241198.87
196
115
I X71
�40lM
4]. Q_262
20121820
2_124859
194
193
>
X.Ar
W.W
.721.641
2733.4
2412 ».75
2.1302..
192
190
.4
M.M,
4139122
.)23686
241326.61
3"13126]
180
N5313MTE
41-1
4723.29
24131517
Ift
539'
1
.]250.53
4123&4
24 1)6113
2.1107 23
13
ft
184
sJ
25.55.11
47233.13
47215.,5
2412]0.14
20128),93
161
13
w
4720].13
4n63M
24131384
2w131zk
Jw
.MI1
4iO24]624
-E...
z.l .31
2.1318.22
111 .
02-M07'It
42 N'
40.82
.1090.32
2.t31107
1012823
I>]
Ile
N39 T '
NCOwwS
4%.119
4141,31
2.13415
200/ 125
175
17.
Ni I
• I
SLOW
w»M.n
600 ».SO
2_1]663
3.13 ».60
173
172
w1sIww
1173'
6.94821
10634.]]
2461.311»
2681376.
In
N]
25.3'
403]124
20136618
fro
189
AM'
.,M.
62810.)]
6068)]12
1.1]6250
2413714
I.
18
f '
Ay
FM•
4..615
. 9
2,I4A 4
20101.0
160
186
rtse7e•Bx•I9
]
46 ,6
4.7w.3z
2 14 .%
201488.38
14
163
N
& TT
4.71337
1.70.1
266145.93
16141.3
lax
11
T 1
.ro'
4.12.416
40%52.0
x61361,.
601]5212
1%
7 • '
,9y
60%..03
2 "133528
2.13 ».61
158
*,X'
10568 7.3
20142262
137
1.
13. T
31
4``65.3
4.03.26
24 0 412
201468 6
I.
Id
4'
J9.
9000X.0]
4000 %,59
141µ1.1e
241µ9.10
153
Is2
t .441
nos
400] .4
6MMI.w
2511 430.
zw1H 0
151
150
10647.
,10
wt W 3
­W7.92
Iw
S17w.v
J. ll
1.4)2.26
6.11 M
2447.16
2 1 ,M
H]
6.4)2.53
4.4)3.63
2414)407
249f49a3
1_
46416
6..8.3
61
241481. 4
143
16
4
6013441.1. 14
26141,2
141
I.
4.35625
4MX
3MM
.1...
2.1340.x1
439
130
1
1053163
.
,3
24111k2B4
261k11]
137
136
.3
24/36674
2461 4 7
135
n'
60390.
4011183.19
2/8111243
144,11
113
132
..17•.6
400
403123
14 111
24147x47
1
130
1
19314
4.1314
2407 a3
Z 1511
IYO
118
{,T
4.1454
138x]
44.5213
241904.87
117
126
4.1M%
4060]110
141631»
2.15]6.4
125
126
nag,
600044.02
456056.4
1.1µ5.9p 1
.1539.11 1
133
122
15.14'
405961.66
40593 ®.M
2161 .w
241550,90
12,
120
,>
11
2 153.37
246181).4]
119
116
4.34.3
201 d
8]S 6
HE
246
1'
45%x15
43111.16
4110.3
74,741»
ns
1'
513".3
1M32.D1
24+ 613
7.1131 .30
113
111
4M »555
6.]31]3
148100/1
1.1364
2441
110
119 !
-71 ,y3 r
141 7082?
3 1153.
19
4.%2.81
1011)6
1p
I)
105621.01
40632.10
2.17 .3
2.1 »399
6
x661
15
14 IF TO PL
IILZA
6.514.41 1
40353.31
2511
141071.
LM ADE W!EP ANDS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASTING
PL M TO
'
T P
i 0]611
245!]3.69
uoET
7 r
19wn5r_
496%0,74
z4s6nam
- 26896%.11
MDDI
MDE4
.DES
N
.4
-6 n
. 5
2160]00.66 .
456)2291
.006
MOEI
1Tdi11L'��T�T`I��!
6054131
4504.1.3
2156)]5.52
2468TM,4
MOEB
40EP
a�!�cT'�ciirl�a�m�
37,W
J.
403N.63
143)%.»
49F ]21.09
uDEfO
u0E1f
1
0 .42'
4051{256
40.5209.62
2130]1178
x456696.13
4nE1a
M 3
Is,
��
aM231.72
495259.56
z 45T= ]
woEU
40E16
.rte• ies�'��.iiii���®
7
45266x]
4052)3.)3
24.9x10.99
6sw..3e
2436619.99
N6
0E1]
> -
405]11.69
w52e1,79
2490%0.9`
243317,01
YDEYe
MDEIB
NFT'TF317NNNi?iZl•INN��•
40631272
406119.24
.54
3453.441
MDE20
MDE22
N
2II.W
406369.15
405430.96
24311.4
8i]
MOE24
MOE 1J
N
N
E4_
4.902.]6
406444.]3
2460M.% .10
x45306
MOE24
.E25
N5,177ift
_;051936
245350.6
2 613
I�TB
dFS1iI�S�
405]24.3
4D574a31
Z ]5
2w806S33
4=11
MOE19
N
7 '
515M U 31
4M»t 62
213991.6
2 id .07
MDE30
1
EiF'ATia�1N�7sT'TYP?6y�
71.
4.]1x14
405»24
2433]3.
469.0..
NDE33
MDEM
Nl
4.73x3
4.1338
249013.6
24603].4
-
MOE]6
N1
1
S
40 » 7.
%6590..0
245991).3
MDE.
MDE%
NOM22ow
69,19,
1058x`.3 M
3.6`6751
265800642
343.].29
J6
B 1
10306.81
2459951,11
!L-N3f
0649
.DE.
N
111
47
4MM2.3
Imli6
2 0 .41
IM.%
041
MOEw
N
N •
55.94 -��
460 »..
!039x.4
2 . t
24363.1
M
310Eµ
NS91)T
W T
46tµ.42
406166.1`
246 %%.3
3469119. t
MDE.
Nd
'
4
.,
4620].99
4`231.4
243131.3]
213119.71
M9E47
4 0Ew
N: 1'
N Y
Y
4M212k
4.M5»�
2 112
245A%1111). , M
ImE51
AIOE60
N
Nd
468
4.43113
213/].0
2 166.
MDE51
MDEN
NM11' w
74'
/.488.53
406369.96
246%5356
243915616
MOE54
NOES6
N1W
31
400589.86
a ".J1
2491564
2491 6111
1403
141V6'07E
j­7­lMM.7S
4.624.91
196»83
2691 »,3
243 66 14
NOES!
M
•
1 W
­22
24343911169.9» `
Mw
14DE61
•4'
.I'
Zl
49824.3
40`.125
21591]4,4
2450!9819
MO
IDES]
N3757'
x1
µ
1.69031
!031)2
26 114.05
414 ..
MEd
MOFdS
Y
t'
ke.
]2)4
2459250..
24327185
NOES
N M'
t
4MD116.3
249377..
MOE6l TO 57
4 'W
4 '
433).1]
24%183.16
LINE ADS WETLANDS
LBE ADD WETLANDS _ FLAG TABLE
FLAG NOy BEARING LENGIH NORINING LASTING
M0�3 ux 40541).% 2680.6,88
MDD4 TE TD FL 405521.92 215360.71
ALONG - 450]4.01 213951.38
PL RE TO w001 256x56 2480.9.3
LINE J WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
I LASTING
101�R"4S4!L'.7i2lEf�
'
T P
"w'�,
'®
�w7TG'9Yi�!'
7 r
06a18.>x
4.4163
2.1)99.43
x.1]863
JS
N
ht1p: / /Wn,mc9B9WBep.can
4118819.01
606944.53
2 "160.,3
w ]
2l17116IR1
'®t'%T.
1Tdi11L'��T�T`I��!
1Y:Fr'7•iP-T^i✓14ti�
261908.56
��,•�csi
a�!�cT'�ciirl�a�m�
4p80n,i0
-IM.
201»0.0
241781
JIi
.11
­1111
1
4314.20
4091411
2_I_.
2.1»493
®IN�Tr°rs^�INNNN�n€
N Y
��
409204.
4082316
261»4.14
261)9188
®
.rte• ies�'��.iiii���®
432726
408315.80
211 ]8526
2.1]]21!
N�L'6iLFRTTai,TiFi1♦�i.�v�i
433'1.3]
4814`.3
2.1]69.3
261120.4
�- �•
�NNB`NT'iBT1L7Si4C•�I�
NFT'TF317NNNi?iZl•INN��•
434611
Wk4w
41,'1
�_ 723
724
t'RF iIIB7�71E���
fiRx:PFiC7�Y?4�w
2II.W
>ti4.7�C�
201842.32
246139,16
126
726
N
N
E4_
4861652
49857,26
2.15813
1.1531 .60
�.'C' ��'E"1•SYai4BF�I��T^'^.15�
4B 2 _
48]3612
1.1501
24147x42
731]
731
dFS1iI�S�
'•'
2.1]`139
2413µ34
dli'»P,BFVa�
1396.15
43 »1.4
xws9.o.
2.1296.13
�E'SCRfYa
'.
EiF'ATia�1N�7sT'TYP?6y�
71.
SKI—�
2.125021
241250.6
w
JIB1
H 1'
3
40 8959.13
241M0_
201217.96
1.
Jb
JW
'W
1'
1
43018.41
432.3
21811119
2.11623
LBE ADD WETLANDS _ FLAG TABLE
FLAG NOy BEARING LENGIH NORINING LASTING
M0�3 ux 40541).% 2680.6,88
MDD4 TE TD FL 405521.92 215360.71
ALONG - 450]4.01 213951.38
PL RE TO w001 256x56 2480.9.3
LINE J WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
I LASTING
JT
'
T P
2"'
406636.
2.1610.91
201J9a.
JS _
J6
7 r
06a18.>x
4.4163
2.1)99.43
x.1]863
JS
N
ht1p: / /Wn,mc9B9WBep.can
4118819.01
606944.53
2 "160.,3
w ]
2l17116IR1
JB
N '
10961 &17
261908.56
JB
Jf0
4p80n,i0
-IM.
201»0.0
241781
JIi
.11
­1111
1
4314.20
4091411
2_I_.
2.1»493
JIJ
JI!
N Y
409204.
4082316
261»4.14
261)9188
]165
N 6
432726
408315.80
211 ]8526
2.1]]21!
711
433'1.3]
4814`.3
2.1]69.3
261120.4
720
22
N
434611
Wk4w
211696.02
261660,3
�_ 723
724
N
2II.W
409543.96
4.3
201842.32
246139,16
126
726
N
N
E4_
4861652
49857,26
2.15813
1.1531 .60
127
all
4B 2 _
48]3612
1.1501
24147x42
731]
731
]
4M>217
43]6 M
2.1]`139
2413µ34
Jsz
733
1396.15
43 »1.4
xws9.o.
2.1296.13
J
71.
4%92%
4080241..
2.125021
241250.6
w
JIB1
H 1'
3
40 8959.13
241M0_
201217.96
1.
Jb
JW
'W
1'
1
43018.41
432.3
21811119
2.11623
i.
741
N
»
27.1
.%01.
2011]11
246111831 7
J6
B 1
41311.18
41 111
24111839
24112253
744
JU
' 151
47
6107]13
610776..
2411 %.w
2.1000.94
741
A 7
5'
1'
55.94 -��
41323.69
41024.68
2.10 6253
26103.96
J_
T
w
W T
441 .2113
4104]13
248109621
24108x22
730
>
4
.,
41.043
41424.3
2010B4.M
2.1 .06
752
JSJ
'1'
Y
4w414k
4104485
2411/x%
2481132%
734
755
'E
1
04'10.49
T41131.k
%46113]4
416
N 'N
7AT
M3,S.B1
.]1.3
2.11 M
3to
759
790
'W
31
06
4]06..
x.110.55
762
'E
j­7­lMM.7S
0)».6
4)5164
2.113.»
2.119 .TD
]222
]223
4
0 »D µ
06.»
IIII4.
1611332
]221
722!
.I'
Zl
2134
31297
24119763
241182.87
J0
x1
µ
M73.76
41046.3
2.1.1.
241214.7S
JB9
RD
1•W
4152'
atM %.48
MMM4
x "1x27.
2.1x5665
171
171
'W
•ww
t
41.4218
41048121
2.1264.]1
26113.%
•OJ
.4
'31' W
74'
4106222
4104063
x611 65.26
2_115624
J)5
718
S2AWMEW
6
41MTL.
41.30.15 -
24611..59
261135.60
J))
J].
1OS'
2Y
1
4108561
410416
201132.49
248113.67
99
3
1 'W
4102.22
41.111-
2_1151"
2.1151.58
781
558'
ise
41014134
41M
248116x10
x.113232
743
24.
441 73
249118217
Jes
I X71
410006.63 11
408883,80
2_1IM62
2619x64
Jab
J%
]'
X.Ar
W.W
433/4
4321.15
26122128
2661256,13
789
J3
.4
41.
9.
465XUn
2.139681
261316/1
11,
791
N5313MTE
41-1
7..
267 1
2.133641
2481]1x3
792
JB3
539'
0.14
408056,76
201]82)9
261%7.36
J4
sJ
1330.95
ZNtwl. L
WS
Jw
N IrE
40316.6`
63] ».12
2.162198
2.1_180
Jw
.MI1
108 »9.32
43e46.32
2",50117
NOSH
111 .
11211WIVE
41-
13`16
608910.81
3_1 M
24131.91
JIM
002
N39 T '
NCOwwS
4088 .00
488)1..
2_1216.29
3 16
JIM
J
Ni I
• I
410.],»
61048]31
26186184
13.1
JIM IM
Jim
N ]'
41081,06
41M
VIS'llM..
2411IM.06
J1%
XOI
JIM
N]
9
41.x932
261691,2
20111, 31
A.
J110
44177.66 7,.
4101201
2.1M1]],412
2.112,89
]111
711 -
f '
Ay
FM•
41012610
1f023LJ0
2691 )
261001.32
•113
J.7.
rtse7e•Bx•I9
75'
.:_
410 4].3
410 f
2461.83-04
2416]6.
,118
N
& TT
4102 ».82
41 23.M
2.1 SD.6B
JIiB
JIt
T 1
410273,W
61083.]3
_14tVILM
201702841
2.111
AN
'121
N '1 '
,9y
410 24
41.0.88
%661» .
2_1 246.80
J
J121
*,X'
. ]2x1`
410 199
2616D43
2418660
]125
]0.96'
al 29
4141607
R41B».0
131.12
]126
Jt27
Y
7.1 478.
641064.
221843,3
]120 TIE TO PL
ALONG PL
2151'
441.
410.1.88
41043,70
iM7.J1
.181 .4J
"Al
ALq. PL 10 121
JI2B
{10101.
N57..
_F .24
1.293..
J1X
.2431
S17w.v
J. ll
1
.94x24
2_ 0,25
2.41 zt
JIM
61.24.%
,l
248235.4]
J k
JI
41032 .3
2
1 1
21 0.3
.01NI.
41023.]6
61366.15
26.131.3
x61 %131
J131
71]0
J1X
410 9.95
410 192
246101M,0
2.1810.65
J1_
J141
1
41._.73
410710.23
201619.0
2.1 »7.24
JI42
41.6x20
2.1``6.10
JI43
716
41 .
410M5.81
x61 ,N
241148.%
JI43
..17•.6
410010.95
261»7.92
�35,1J
TI 4!7
Jlw
{,T
40
6 -_.
2_ 37
2_1683.55
JI52
J153
60.1632
4O8aT>.es
241654.4
.1ata9u
]154
]153
456N.05
60JBaM
261384.`6
x.16..2.
A.
57
40%6].11
2607511.35
A3
68
,>
409656.3
! 77.4
2"1611.62
361010.67
1160
<0964i.3
201.1.0
40863.»
x_110190
4162
JfBZ
Ji83
1'
4667..
458561.80
2_11).96
1661)36.81
LINE J WETLANDS (CON ED)
RAG TABLE
FLAG N0.
BEARING
; 'SEAL
NORTHING
NO
243 NOR. FRONT STREET
T P
LJ
SCALE
WILA6NGTON, NORTH CAROIJNA 2841
TELL (910 313-10_
167
x7'
FAX: [phone]
2.1]]2.43
.6'!
C'mwm
ht1p: / /Wn,mc9B9WBep.can
4W39aM
6MU3.7
2.160222
2.1824..
LINE J WETLANDS (CON ED)
RAG TABLE
FLAG N0.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
LASTING
J1µ
A55
T-
1 6'
9490,63
.. 409437.08
119.50
2481]80.48
167
404 84
]._
2.1]]2.43
.6'!
JIM
Jta9
1
4W39aM
6MU3.7
2.160222
2.1824..
110
JI1
63287.67
43).32
261681643.90
960.3
JI12
49198.56
43168,%
24194.k
2_"626
,IN
6311426
43.7.50
2.167242
2.1
076
M]6
1,24
r r•
409D16.3
1oDM5.111
75
24161.]5
x413`.``
Ji]6
101 %.2D
1004.23
3419x426
2.1950 16
Jt3
J,1
40D169%
40MI, 19
244
2 0I 1.T3
710
,in
43210.07
1. ].)f
2482070,91
]184
JIM
2II.W
4011mw
63287.4
239
2.2135.95
JI
4324..
!3332.
>x
2.21. 19
2.2131
JIMa>
80
J+3
401]]113
409SR.30
24MU.31
2.2195.19
]191
43337.93
409]00.3
262186.1,
24217174
v192
JI93
432 ».»
43%x128
3 "zzM.el
2.224220
JI94
JIM
71.
43261.49
4 195
x.233.99
w
JIB1
43U75 .72
43273.94
2)3.]9
2.240574
JI_
713
NIMIM37V
I&
409311]9
43]18.92
2.x.264
4 711,67
JIM
»
27.1
409434.23
24261136
I 2.2535.57
]203
2d
B 1
434563
41.1.3
2.1511.05
262661.92
]20.5
]266
47
108510.3
4il07"I
2.2828.34
2.18x.3
55.94 -��
405]611
246258663
723
723
W T
4332.22
.9621.3
2.2»7.30
241IM13 0
J210
JPIt
'W
4
.,
409838.14
4083256
2_281183
2!8266123
]212
72,3
Y
.43
. /08541 3
2822
2_'.17..
14
015
43674,25
2462»605
2 V.62
416
N 'N
7AT
!343.3
4352356
242113
2.1699..
]218
]219
'W
31
49488.4
43406.0
x.292191
262599.85
]218
]221
37
43415.72
4343.58
2452592.94
24 13
]222
]223
4
433 ».0
43]21.29
2.2517..
2 3144
]221
722!
.I'
Zl
.9]113
403]4.18
1 23012)
242901.1]
12x11
]229
x1
µ
43x...
24z+9a.k
Z 2.6.26
]226
snwww
4152'
409x443
-.4.. 1
22462609]
]230
]231
1
1
43241]]
.=12.
Z 3229
2.2x90.94
Z
J2,6J
5Il1JI,IyIow
941 4
n5r
4325161
43267.46
2.221934
2.2109.73
2436
S2AWMEW
6
409251x4
109230.91
Sµ2,..3
2.23170
h
72]9
43111.W
{081]7..
243.5]]
2.2323
72]6
72]9
43162,.
408086.26
2.I M ,63
2.193.63
724
1241
.90
4090]131.3 M
2 OS
2..11 8641
1142
U
1.%4155
2407323
241 .1 2
J2µ
a
Jew
434.6
2_la3.4P
2.133.92
48
408670.%
x.166 ].32
7247
.
726 1E TO 1
1
40362..
4088]619
3461061.87
24,93164
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RFICMANDS TOWNSHIP - ONSLOM - NORTH CAROLINA
Jun. 29, 2007 NO SCALE
PROJECT N : 009100163
PRO] SV1R : OU
DRAWN BY 'ACS
FIELD SK W1013/56 - U
COMP, FILE ' -101- 009100163]2
SHEET N SHEET 5 OF 14
DWG. #:

T
LIE H WETLANDS
FUG TABLE
FLAG NO.
BEARING I
LENGTH
NORTHING
EAS71NG
[ mwftmfiG
H2
,R«'S0'w
45q
1
40880].63
408889.26
x.a19S�
2484178.18
H3
Hf
S2421'
4 11
408798.5/_
4 .15
2464127.58
HS
H
1.4'
5 '35'13
4164'
A88'
406]]2.94
40M M
2460956]
.65
H7
HB
51'3415"0
94t'44
483Y
)8
40]0469
06668.41
2..4645
2.«002.24
H.
H10
N0'47'w'W
95)58
51'
106831.01
40450.15
248 .12
219]81).]9
Hil
XIi
5}25]00•
.BI'
4069 MM
1085868,
2.3451.74
2463052.62
X13
H14
s
23'
4
75
2163]85.45
2.34503]
H1
H1
®�
.04
6.25'
4064 %.63
24&)11645
X19
H2O
406'4
486/30.84
240]]1,0
0"aif>iFRTi•��
'
40326.13
2.]1836
H2
X21
©�7FF3•
.DS
�.."'"` '�
Fit
.25
'
2-
.M'
4021617
0618666
246156212
2«61511.51
H2]
w0Me618
24611 .2D
H29
W
HJ
mom
214"
SST
)81].71
0451621
4461499..
24830L91
H32
HM
52rTT0
-11,91
S
469D'
b MB.97
445)01.96
2163166.60
MR
tlM H35
sD
a
t sr
wM4i25
1016..36
2463101.0
H36
St 3y el
'
aMo..
.4521.61
2463
2483356.0
HJ6
H59
Slty'
­2'
41.1'
b 002.28
.75MOS
2163339.93
N6 47
X10
51.258'
43 5'
40)92610
I.3M 33 2
H3
5 27'
.50
248333 3
2«365
HH
H45
'W
07380.94
.7334.'
246531.5.13
14831N.16
M.
Ha)
10720.66
4'24597
5463362.]9
X18
N.
..•t Imo+ 71.
iFlFwl��
40]30.51
.7156.21
2.3361.61
24833]411
H51
4F*FR75��IFL1•m�r'.'xTa1:�
now
.710.26
.7081 .09
]0
2031U35. X.
H52
i : FTr f Y • 1 TJ . 7
!��sza.+.c�.xy�
� L ? �
0452634
40881.48
50
248]16].65
N54
Ha
's�•`aar�'
_
1090.22
.8911. 2
243.411
N0
1161
217'47
Sale'
_ 40603469
W.01
2463.9.12
24630)32
H59
E*7Fii
-7
4']461
1081666
:!8x1.24
119x31.15
xso
H6
L74_
4.68861
109641.1]
4.x1.6s
2.3x9..
H82
W
gam_
40659208
4056280
24633890/
x46130.31
HB1
H63
1 '
1053634
.848620
3.3128.0
2483104.23
Hfi6
HM
1.840].1
108.1..
2483271.75
2.n7175
H88
Hey
�i.?+Ti'iF:931�
memo
®�LT..4E�2.Y'.'�®
40473.19
100685
2463201.11
2163208.42
HM
N'11
0�?^RE9".1•�
0�
T'
10199.0
10536.16
.18
2.3345.45
Mx
HTS
11-
mourn=
40410.11
b61]IJi4
2163290,37
?16]27616
N74
H75
108630.1]
4066]1.41
328642
246]284.6]
Hi6
HT)
M.711,
1085928/
1001481
x48348981
20332447
X79
NM
MW3r,,
'41♦
631.29
4056' w
.61111.71
246MM13
Nw
.B2
_
11
49M. 40W
4011.17
2161262.0
216]03.0
H83
Hx
OR=
40]89.50
.845].60
248 19.6
218341 .
NW
N16
or-rum
.66
M
2.x3114
2
NM
U.151
10&59.54
2.3N21
HU
H.
H
Nl '
M
06911.19
2.x..14
H.
KONG 0!Tal
4000.09
4088130
.246310.48
MUM"
24634025
KONG qTC
ALONG
07025.31
216383 .N
216342].8]
ALONG
q4G DIR21
612y
.1.1.25
.715116
1163106.02
2.3321.06
0.-0 DITC
­0 m7CX
012 '
.1x44.57
2.JJ6].M
2.13x.:
KONG q1W
ALCO q1C
1 '
Erzis%a
.4598.24
0135137
2.33K0
1 . x40!1
AL NC DITCH
KCC dTa+
"I"Sr�T'1ATY�7�I�•SI�tN:.hYI#T1
07 Ii
.]41 79
2. .45
2W324.71
KBNG TCX
KONG alai
.7.1.93
-1.
203M4,84
24 6 331111
KCC DITCH
KONG alai
.756 .x
.7686.54
246V22A7
2.3Nx.61
Ka1G pTC
KONG ITC
' e'
r
.4511.0
4'0646)
24633.31
2463357.1:
ALONG qTC
K G qiC
��^.RS2S•J�
0710.07
40'!7..31
216319368
4.]19611
ALONG q
ALONG
.7188.48
45.14
246342696
1.3160.66
GT
DITaN
ALA11G OITC
)"1
t'
0]000.11
-4-
2. .]6
2.501.12
ALp9G OI1C
1-F
1 102J51'
7 22
22
«0809.]4
2483.8.45
2.x90.15
.1, -
KCO DITC
KONG INTCH
)
404581:12
406243.21
2463506.
2.3 .
-
&MO DITC
KCG -ITC
4062)568
7.12
1 M.5
24WO.
KCo pia!
ALwc ara
®�E!F'ST'REG7
445
4.611.93
7 0
240PM.
KON4 ut6
KCO p1C
10308.74
45
1.1458.19
3.3M3.3S
KON
KONO DITC
409.7.10
40x.0
2.1456.
1
ALONG pip!
ALM H
B
14
rasmw
2.]459.1.
KONG gTC11
KCG aTOH
SSD
.80
71
Ka46 pTal
40569.04
246591 ).M
Ka0 aTC
Tw
11.12
4.8896.33
4 .J
x.388638
nKiary 0 INTO
ALONG
1011.13
4074408
x48.4112
2461049.9'1
Dl-
C DITC
KONG aTC
.451609
40601.4E
R«6412115
248.21.16
KONG
164515.91
x.4136'
Pl-
nE W PL
Kouc a
OHM
406694.06
wD9I6..
24x172]5
zw41M.e3
LINE S WETLANDS
LIE UD WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTH14G
EASING
MOt
W
.1 e'
J9959s.90
248913D'
2 0
7301
TJO4
10
)
.TCH
TCH
DITCH
E�E
'W
.1102;
w]818.OD
145616.0
2 51.63
2469641.39
ro PL
38488066
24608]9.14
2
PL
YM
1
40451543
214780265
TO PL
R
'W
4040
199564.8
398556,10
2469347.a6
PL TE TO ND9
... IIE ro PI-
'W
5S
511,
188508.16
/8915604
24592117 .19
2
KONG FL
KONG FL
®�
>
]986450
]06..58
2469234.19
2169228.92
K01. R
KONG PL
8 ZE
31
389365.]1
388328.18
2484561.45
2489122.58
0"aif>iFRTi•��
W1 '
398309.81
188451.16
24!9995.11
2.9fRe.0
®E?'zY
©�7FF3•
to
�.."'"` '�
Fit
KONG PL
ft 4E 10 '4015
p
"7iPR��7�''
1
N'
38978268
]98160.76
1. )1
1 1.41
m
'4015 TIE 10 PL
KOMG PL
31.
38911231
19111.0
2.669294
24/094647
K PL
R TE T TG ND16
mom
1690].60
.
2461 .6
246451342
YDI9
45018 111 10 PL
1
198966.11 11
386882.53.
246889672
24M3932
KONG PL
19.7y
348816.30
3461604.49
PL TE ro MD21
MD.
TRL9CE�•TLT
-ice
]8861].91
�1e36.90
x466686..+
2489631.16
'3
1.
1
) •
30]96Aa
196161
x.049.41
aees51.51
uD21
015
YD26
w
'W;SB.W
J9M4 0
1461.4)s
2/6864474
MOT/ TIE TO PL
KDIW K
6836
186914
N045671
246/6540
KONG PL
ALONG PL
'W
0
10615.16
2466686.01
21S466I.12
®cR�zssl�ES->a
196114.11
. 8
515
®
..•t Imo+ 71.
iFlFwl��
1981)890
3
n'�T '
©t..'
4F*FR75��IFL1•m�r'.'xTa1:�
]96858.08
8].28 M.
OLRffIrR'L7�i
�
i : FTr f Y • 1 TJ . 7
!��sza.+.c�.xy�
� L ? �
� � 7
s t '-. -' . r'' 16 7
0�r3E?SC��'r•zsa
's�•`aar�'
' �
01.89
.-
oEi3I+WSL'7
iF��sA'TCBes•
584582.45
11.62 10.61
�E''S'¢S¢7
E*7Fii
®�i7
3.i8
6.19
OJ31
TIE TO FL
1
398531. ]
39650.51
2 O.0
1N Sx
KONG PL
ALp. PL
I.W
JB06BB.N
2411264.69
2
K PL
45035
391667.16
398556.83
211
246800.4)
��3}iiifli^li�'S♦�_iLF
19031'
39811..
": +?i1�7
810 K
PL PE ro ND39
�i.?+Ti'iF:931�
memo
®�LT..4E�2.Y'.'�®
3 46496
596641 a
24016 6.33
24860.33
MOx 4E N PL
KONG PL
0�?^RE9".1•�
0�
T'
/864/215
3%42212
26459932
1 ]445.19
G FL
K TIE M NDA1
11-
mourn=
38618601
3881)112
MIE�
mrcrsiwsa��xE%�MEN
•
MOAE
MDAS TIE lb PL
_
E
241
548 W 20
®wit.•
��"��%•
'41♦
�iG:SIgFE97�
mi
4S'7ETi4A�
f>��!6''iRiG'iE*7FF�
®ET.'!VPIl'7�}E7��e�7
OR=
or-rum
OL7YYiIlSSe".7E!tN•:Ti
p
'Y- 7F''ffi1
O�;4S"1'd'•L7C37®
INND
Erzis%a
�L' ��
"I"Sr�T'1ATY�7�I�•SI�tN:.hYI#T1
0
IFURM
�3'��EL7�!T4i'•
milt
Ill"3I
��^.RS2S•J�
=6
xFS5iE®
i'r7
ESC'�!614'4I9'.'!im
®�E•R*ft4!P.�
LIE UD WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTH14G
EASING
MOt
W
.1 e'
J9959s.90
248913D'
2 0
7301
TJO4
10
)
.TCH
TCH
DITCH
E�E
'W
.1102;
w]818.OD
145616.0
2 51.63
2469641.39
ro PL
38488066
24608]9.14
2
PL
YM
1
40451543
214780265
TO PL
R
'W
4040
199564.8
398556,10
2469347.a6
PL TE TO ND9
... IIE ro PI-
'W
5S
511,
188508.16
/8915604
24592117 .19
2
KONG FL
KONG FL
®�
>
]986450
]06..58
2469234.19
2169228.92
K01. R
KONG PL
8 ZE
31
389365.]1
388328.18
2484561.45
2489122.58
0.Lp PL
0G PL
W1 '
398309.81
188451.16
24!9995.11
2.9fRe.0
KON6 PL
to
308264.07
2.0.1].64
KONG PL
ft 4E 10 '4015
p
"7iPR��7�''
1
N'
38978268
]98160.76
1. )1
1 1.41
m
'4015 TIE 10 PL
KOMG PL
31.
38911231
19111.0
2.669294
24/094647
K PL
R TE T TG ND16
mom
1690].60
.
2461 .6
246451342
YDI9
45018 111 10 PL
1
198966.11 11
386882.53.
246889672
24M3932
KONG PL
19.7y
348816.30
3461604.49
PL TE ro MD21
MD.
TRL9CE�•TLT
-ice
]8861].91
�1e36.90
x466686..+
2489631.16
'3
1.
1
) •
30]96Aa
196161
x.049.41
aees51.51
uD21
015
YD26
w
'W;SB.W
J9M4 0
1461.4)s
2/6864474
MOT/ TIE TO PL
KDIW K
6836
186914
N045671
246/6540
KONG PL
ALONG PL
'W
0
10615.16
2466686.01
21S466I.12
Ka1G PL
196114.11
. 8
515
E PL
45'1 lE ro PL
1981)890
3
1.52PL
.43
]96858.08
8].28 M.
©�SS�lM19
3996053
4.0 4201
&24,11&
YDS3C
's�•`aar�'
' �
01.89
.-
584582.45
11.62 10.61
YD33G
MD33X
MUM
M
3.i8
6.19
OJ31
TIE TO FL
1
398531. ]
39650.51
2 O.0
1N Sx
KONG PL
ALp. PL
I.W
JB06BB.N
2411264.69
2
K PL
45035
391667.16
398556.83
211
246800.4)
MD37 TE TO R
KONG PL
19031'
39811..
20W12 U
2. 45,26
810 K
PL PE ro ND39
�i.?+Ti'iF:931�
memo
®�LT..4E�2.Y'.'�®
3 46496
596641 a
24016 6.33
24860.33
MOx 4E N PL
KONG PL
0�?^RE9".1•�
0�
T'
/864/215
3%42212
26459932
1 ]445.19
G FL
K TIE M NDA1
11-
4040
38618601
3881)112
2.286231
2464514.99
MOAI
2145911.0
MOAE
MDAS TIE lb PL
_
396351.18
38407.13
241
548 W 20
LIE TWO WETLANDS
FUG TABLE
FLAG NO
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
FASTING
2100
Tap;
E
.1 e'
0741632
49)x1'
2161815.01
2162500.45
7301
TJO4
4' 276
.]1580
1.7.20
x16'2451.6)
230
T30
7A551
w]818.OD
145616.0
14]624.26
215)46384
r347
230
w7nLT1
4 -52665
26113.'
2454515.51
2508
��CF'.3L4'xi17
40451543
214780265
nio
2311 TO P10
0ET?:iES'�iCL7
10]450.86
215]435.33
UNE TROD WCTLANCIS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG N0,
BEARING
LENGTH
NORTHING
FASTING
T900
T'A1
_BEARING
.1 e'
4068120
101117
x48699693
216101183
2502
rsw
50
wee..ez
245S-1
1xI 4s.91
1504
250
40817.12
40123.30
142630
245625
250
7
404545.6
40455134
271.35 .
2456322.09
2508
��CF'.3L4'xi17
40451543
24 3/615
�E!F�Gie7E1?1Ti♦�N..s
0ET?:iES'�iCL7
4001.17
4 .H
110 TO 9241
®�:Si�TiFTTL�®
40x1.74
145561.98
LM PT WETLANDS
LIE PIDO WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE - - - --
FLAG NO.
®�19MEM
NORTHING
! EASING
PTI TO
P101
_BEARING
.1 e'
01199.5]_;
.785191
- -r.7
145]811.]6
145]8)563
%0.S
bte3s "
40]]9].]+
3.
2451851.88
0fa
w)7m.63
101136.0
:4618x4.,6
24518]230
�E!175?_44Z')ilF.1F"ii
��CF'.3L4'xi17
�E!F�Gie7E1?1Ti♦�N..s
0ET?:iES'�iCL7
f�
-T.3�
E�ZSSE'.1
®�:Si�TiFTTL�®
�
®�
�E7fZCT'4L+-
p
"7iPR��7�''
mom
�ER"SYSiT.7tLR*.
-i
momm
�!1♦
TRL9CE�•TLT
-ice
�TS7�
��
,�. r.�7�tp:4tizrsasP.'a�Fi
��E'ZS•�'.7
LIE PIDO WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE - - - --
FLAG NO.
LENGTH
NORTHING
! EASING
PTI TO
P101
_BEARING
.1 e'
01199.5]_;
.785191
- -r.7
145]811.]6
145]8)563
%0.S
bte3s "
40]]9].]+
3.
2451851.88
P105 TO 1311
w)7m.63
101136.0
:4618x4.,6
24518]230
NO SCALE
BOUNDARY LINE TABLES
4NR<J1V1 &1..RGL' V
243 NORM FRONT STREET
WLYINOTON, NORTH GARWNA 28401
TEIE: (910 343 -1010
FAX: [phone]
httP: / /6w M. k,aa I.
�E'ESZS4L+9'!�
®emu` i
i�rNSr�s+'.
��CF'.3L4'xi17
0ET?:iES'�iCL7
®�:Si�TiFTTL�®
�
®�
mom
momm
�TS7�
��E'ZS•�'.7
©�SS�lM19
'-�
��4-
's�•`aar�'
' �
gym'
MUM
�i.?+Ti'iF:931�
memo
®�LT..4E�2.Y'.'�®
0�?^RE9".1•�
0�
�_ixN>R..
4040
0
MI
_
fi.7siq
C'Zfl"mI�
IMAM
�iG:SIgFE97�
mi
4S'7ETi4A�
OR=
or-rum
'Y- 7F''ffi1
O�;4S"1'd'•L7C37®
INND
Erzis%a
S®
milt
Ill"3I
��^.RS2S•J�
=6
xFS5iE®
i'r7
ESC'�!614'4I9'.'!im
®�E•R*ft4!P.�
l�Cl'T•�
��:RCT.Y19".1�
®�E!F'ST'REG7
E5f17�![E"T47L7®
OHM
YiG7
AiZ5547
x9nm
EmmsLam
®�T3TF!9"1iiE:�
�mKsszEZrm
®
ME'=
. +'« ��
FFE
mmm
EXEM
NEEEN
mmall
®r�is�"�r•�
t�AB'TiSYEy7�
®�
-
J
4NR<J1V1 &1..RGL' V
243 NORM FRONT STREET
WLYINOTON, NORTH GARWNA 28401
TEIE: (910 343 -1010
FAX: [phone]
httP: / /6w M. k,aa I.
PROJECT A': 009100163
PRO). SVYN DLJ
DRAWN By ACS
FIELD BK.: 01013/56 - lJ
COMP. FILE : -101-009100163-R
5 WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
G WEYERHAEUSERR REAL ESTATE
S e�z py DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
3 % PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHIANDS TOWN5W - ONSLOW - NORTH CAROLINA
.rL June 29, 2007 NO SCALE
SHEET I :SHEET 6 OF 14
DWG. B
�E'ESZS4L+9'!�
®emu` i
i�rNSr�s+'.
��CF'.3L4'xi17
5 WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
G WEYERHAEUSERR REAL ESTATE
S e�z py DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
3 % PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHIANDS TOWN5W - ONSLOW - NORTH CAROLINA
.rL June 29, 2007 NO SCALE
SHEET I :SHEET 6 OF 14
DWG. B

�m
m
m
n
m
R
v
N
n
m
z
c�
U
Z
N/
RA(PH HUfFN
DB I
MB JCH
usam
0
PROJECT 8 : 009100163
PROJ. SWR D
DRAWN By ACS
FIELD BK.: W1013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE : _101- 009100163 -R
SHEET / : SHEET 7 OF 14
T43m
O ��y��-.r.��� ,�y`' p-r�'
4NFK CREM
s �t.yt
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
FOR
SCALE: I* = 200'
'"
r,e°�
sEa7'z
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
IN �
243 NOR7H FRONT STREET
NLMINOTON, NORTH CARCUNA 2SQ1
4y, g
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
TELE (910) 343'M
E ( 251 -8292
http: / /enr.mdim «.ed.com
14FCNLANW TOWMMP - OMOW - NOME CAROLINA
%une 29, 2007 SMU. f" = 200'
PROJECT 8 : 009100163
PROJ. SWR D
DRAWN By ACS
FIELD BK.: W1013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE : _101- 009100163 -R
SHEET / : SHEET 7 OF 14
T43m

5€
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
� �( r^ REM se 'A i FOR
1 _ z�, ,� f��l —d� u�1��.t�rr ,rh a, y WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
�QIIQI I® 243 Roars FRONT STREET ` SEAL `' DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
u as wuwc� e(oaQ) CAROLINA D 264m L�TZ r PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
FAX: [phone]'
http: / /nmi.mcBmaea0.am !t!ClfJ— 2YJWN37IfP - ON9L0s - . 1, - CAROLINA
.a .2 ✓use EB, E007 3CAL &. 1' � E00'
PROJECT # : 009100163
PROD. SV DLJ
DRAWN BY : ACS
FIELD SK. t013/58 - LJ
COMP. FILE 101- 0091 0 0!63_R
SHEET # : SHEET 6 OF 14
DWG. # :

�a
j&CREED WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
FOR
SCALE: 1• = 200' = ae SEAL 'v WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
243 NORTH FRONT STREET aen DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
1 •s—
4ft u U9NGTO+. NORTH GARMNA 28Q ° 4b PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
TELE: 910) 34}1048 y.
Fox: 910) 251 -8282 L. JC ..,' RICNANW MWNSHIP - ONSLOW - NORTN CAROLINA
http: / /www.mcki -d.com
„p,�Jl Juna 89, 1007 SCALE: 1' = 200'
'A. NEBwR
PROJECT M : 009100183
PROJ. SVYR : DLJ
DRAWN BY ;ACS
FIELD BK.: W1013/58 - LJ
COMP. FILE vw101- 009100163JR
SHEET 9 : SHEET 9 OFI 14
DWG. M :

`s,
ld
vm
o° G
�m
V
N
r7
m
0
z
0
u
NF14IlA&CREM FRONT STREET
WILMINGTON, NORTH CARDIJNA 2101
TEIE: {910 30.Y1016
FAX [phone]
nnp: / /nm.mcNNncraetl.com
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
�E?E�fY
?Y�EfiG�
E
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
a Eaer �
`�y r
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHLAAW TOWNSffiP - ONSLOIF - NORTH CAROLMA
. _q
June 2B, 2007 SCALP: 1' - 200'
�
NF14IlA&CREM FRONT STREET
WILMINGTON, NORTH CARDIJNA 2101
TEIE: {910 30.Y1016
FAX [phone]
nnp: / /nm.mcNNncraetl.com
PROJECT A : 009100163
PROJ. SVYR DLJ
DRAWN BY: ACS
FIELD 3K.: W 013/56 - L.J
WMP. FILE: w101- 009IOD163 -R
SHEET / : SHEET 10 OF 14
DWG. #:
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
FOR
SEAL
E
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
a Eaer �
`�y r
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHLAAW TOWNSffiP - ONSLOIF - NORTH CAROLMA
. _q
June 2B, 2007 SCALP: 1' - 200'
PROJECT A : 009100163
PROJ. SVYR DLJ
DRAWN BY: ACS
FIELD 3K.: W 013/56 - L.J
WMP. FILE: w101- 009IOD163 -R
SHEET / : SHEET 10 OF 14
DWG. #:

N
�m
a
z
0
c2
c�
LEGEND
4Mq�M&akEM
243 STREET
wLMP1OTON. NORTH C,AROUNA 28401
TELE 910 343 -1048
FAX [phone]
http: � /vrvw.mcklrt�aead,can
µ WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
a BFI WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
c Laen DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
L. RMUNDS T0I IM7 - ONELO.W - NORTH CAROLINA
June 29, 2007 SCALE: l• = 200•
PROJECT 4`: 0091- -
PROD. SWR DLJ
DRAWN BY : ACS
FlELD IK.: w1013/56 - LJ
COMP, FILE : vw101- 009100163-Y
SHEET # : SHEET 11 OF 14
Dwc. N :

R3 4( 0
m
v
umm
M-2
v��// WLYINGTON, NORTH CARODHA 29401 243 NORTH FRONT MEET
TELE: 910 343 -1W
FAk (810 251 -5292
http: / /www.mck'vnaeetl.tam
PROJECT M : 009100163
PROJ. SY1R : DLJ
DRAWN BY : ACS
FIELD BK.: W1013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE : - 1 01- 00 910 016 3_R
SHEET y : SHEET 12 OF 14
DWG. 0:
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
FOR
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
04
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHLANM P'01IVWIP - ONSLON - NORTH CAROLINA
June 29, 2007 SCALE. 1'- 200'
PROJECT M : 009100163
PROJ. SY1R : DLJ
DRAWN BY : ACS
FIELD BK.: W1013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE : - 1 01- 00 910 016 3_R
SHEET y : SHEET 12 OF 14
DWG. 0:

N
v
ro
s
U
7
e
e�
r
r
l
1
�r
1fy✓
0. Fi.
ES
\
10204
0.25 ACRES
� ou
e
e
L�
0
A243 NORTH FRONT REM
W%MINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
10 910) 343 -1018
FAX: [phone]
http: / /w.m.mdgricreeE.com
PROJECT / : 009100163
PROD. SVYR OLJ
DRAWN BY : ACS
FlELD BK.: W1013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE - 101-009100163_R
SHEET : SHEET 13 OF 14
DWG. t
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
€
FUR
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
seal
L3912
>�
9•
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHLLms 9YIWNSW - ONSLOW - NORTH CAROLINA
E9, 2007 SGAm I"- 200'
PROJECT / : 009100163
PROD. SVYR OLJ
DRAWN BY : ACS
FlELD BK.: W1013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE - 101-009100163_R
SHEET : SHEET 13 OF 14
DWG. t

19 tg n
A o m
v
M
W
O
a
z
0
U
z
XDI7)'W E
S' (TE 8101 TO CORNER)
SCALE: 1' = 200'
p
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
°4�
SEAL E
WETLANDS DMNoEATION SURVEY
. WEYERffALREAL E,9TA TE
DE VEANT Ci WWNY
b a o 0
w uwc NORTH A 28401
� (()
F/w (910)k 281 -6282
htip: / /www.nkkNritree0.can
L-�
DATE 'w7
PORTION OF OVSLOW 19 7'ACT
AlaMANW 2Y9I1NMff OMAOIF - N07 CA)FLOV,
J— 8B, $667 : SCALE, 7' - ,8p$
41
'PROJECT N : 009100163
FROJ. SVYR OU
DRAWN By ACS
FIELD BK.: W1013/56 - U
COMP. FILE 101- 009100163_R
SHEET r SHEET 14 OF 14
DING: # :

APPENDIX C.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

1) View of channelized section of HU -2
2) View of cultivated fields adjacent to boundary ditch
Batchelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Restoration Plan
01 -09 -168
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP m,
Cnvironmentol Consultants
Site Photographs

3) View of existing conditions at HU-1
4) View existing valley in the headwaters of HU-1
4
ni
t�A
Batchelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Restoration Plan
01-09-168
�W
A
LMG Site Photographs
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP m,
Covironmentol Consultants I

5) View of floodplain adjacent to HU -1
6) View of HE -4 Preservation
Batchelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Restoration Plan
01 -09 -168
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP m,
Cnvironmentol Consultants
Site Photographs

7) View of Impounded area of HU -2 (north of Maready Rd.)
8) View of ponded channel in BD -4 (north of Maready Rd.)
Batchelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Restoration Plan
01 -09 -168
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP w,
Cnvironmentol Consultants
Site Photographs

APPENDIX D.
USACE STREAM ASSESSMENT DATA FORMS

, I- 1 k:e, C - -
IL
IT
d6
A.
Legend
F
Stream Data Point Locations
!6 Existing Streams
0 1,200 2,400 3,600
Feet
IL
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Onslow County
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
Erviro n Men tef Consultants
-L-
A,
—A Icr
Hoffman Forest
.1
rj �L
k
IL
IT
d6
A.
Legend
F
Stream Data Point Locations
!6 Existing Streams
0 1,200 2,400 3,600
Feet
IL
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Onslow County
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
Erviro n Men tef Consultants

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Hew1
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 10:45
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8640 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): 77.4668
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar �s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any):proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: mild,
16. Site conditions at time of visit: warm, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE (2E> yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
50 % Forested 50 % Cleared / Logged D—% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 8 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 32 Comments: Form was completed under drought conditions. Although the
low score accurately reflects the fact that it is a man -made ditch. it is likelv to have water in the channel and /or flow durina the winter
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/8/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
2
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
5
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
1
U(no
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 — 4
0-2
2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
0
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
-
0
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
3
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
1
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
2
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
0
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
32
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Hew2
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 12:30
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8627 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): 77.4630
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar �s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any):proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: mild
16. Site conditions at time of visit: warm, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE (2E> yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
50 % Forested 50 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 7 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2.5 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 37 Comments: Form was completed under drought conditions. Although the
low score accurately reflects the fact that it is a man -made ditch. it is likelv to have water in the channel and /or flow durina the winter
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/8/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
1
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
U(no
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 — 4
0-2
2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
0
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
-
0
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
3
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
2
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
1
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
0
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
2
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
2
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
37
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Hew3
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 13: 00
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8648 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): 77.4604
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar �s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: mild
16. Site conditions at time of visit: warm, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE (2E> yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Smvey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
50 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 4 feet
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
50 % Cleared / Logged D—% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 1/o) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous X Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 73 Comments: proposed area for stream preservation
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/8/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
5
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
3
U(no
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 — 4
0-2
3
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
5
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
4
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
5
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
5
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
-
5
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
4
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
2
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
3
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
1
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
5
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
3
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
73
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Hew4
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 14:20
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: second
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8610 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): 77.4612
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar �s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: mild
16. Site conditions at time of visit: warm, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE (2E> yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Smvey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
50 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 10 feet
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
50 % Cleared / Logged D—% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 1/o) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous X Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 82 Comments: proposed area for stream preservation
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/8/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
5
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
5
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
3
U(no
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 — 4
0-2
4
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
5
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
6
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
5
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
5
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
-
5
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
3
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
2
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
3
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
2
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
4
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
3
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
82
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Hew5
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/9/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 12: 00
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8676 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): 77.4600
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar �s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE (2E> yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Smvey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
40 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 3 feet
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60 % Cleared / Logged D—% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 6 " -1'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 1/o) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous X Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 74 Comments: proposed area for stream preservation
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/9/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
5
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
3
U(no
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 — 4
0-2
4
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
5
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
5
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
5
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
5
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
3
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
3
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
3
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
3
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
2
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
5
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
3
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
74
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Huf2
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 15: 00
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8575 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): 77.4552
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar �s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: mild
16. Site conditions at time of visit: warm, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE (2E> yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Smvey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
60 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 6 feet
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
40 % Cleared / Logged D—% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 1/o) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):47 Comments: proposed area for stream restoration spoil pile running along west
side of ditch channel
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/8/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
1
U(no
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 — 4
0-2
2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
1
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
3
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
3
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
1
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
0
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
2
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
47
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Huf3
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/9/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 14: 00
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8595 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): 77.4528
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar �s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE (2E> yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Smvey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
40 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 2
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2.5'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 1/o) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 31 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/9/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
0
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
1
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
1
U(no
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 — 4
0-2
1
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
0
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
1
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
0
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
4
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
1
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
2
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
0
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
2
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
31
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Huf4
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/13/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 15:45
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8577 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): 77.4539
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar �s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE (2E> yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
40 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 13'
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2.'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 1/o) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 37 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/9/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
2
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
U(no
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 — 4
0-2
2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
1
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
1
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
2
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
2
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
1
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
2
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
0
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
2
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
37
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Ba1
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/13/09
5. Name of stream: Batchelors Deliqht Swam
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 12: 00
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: First
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8575 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): 77.4396
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Ae�and Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an tt ach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, rain
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE (2E> yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? CEDO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
40 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 2
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60 % Cleared / Logged D—% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 6"
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 1/o) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends X Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):46 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/13/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
0
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
2
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
3
U(no
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 — 4
0-2
3
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
3
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
3
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
5
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
4
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
4
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
0
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
3
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
0
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
46
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Ba2
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/13/09
5. Name of stream: Batchelors Deliqht Swam
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 13:30
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: Zero
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8561 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): 77.4405
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Ae�and Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an tt ach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, rain
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE (2E> yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? CEDO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
40 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 50'
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60 % Cleared / Logged D—% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 6"
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) X Gentle (2 to 4 1/o) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends X Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 51 Comments: Swamp, there is no channel
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/13/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
U(no
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 — 4
0-2
3
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
3
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
4
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
-
2
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
2
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
2
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
3
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
0
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 — 5
0-5
4
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
51
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Ba3
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/13/09
5. Name of stream: Batchelors Deliqht Swam
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 10: 30
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: First
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8538 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): 77.4377
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Ae�and Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an tt ach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, rain
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE (2E> yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? CEDO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
40 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 7
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60 % Cleared / Logged D—% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3"
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) X Gentle (2 to 4 1/o) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):41 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/13/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
4
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
1
U(no
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 - 4
0-2
2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
1
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
-
0
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
2
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
1
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
3
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
0
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 — 5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
41
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Ba4
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/13/09
5. Name of stream: Batchelors Deliqht Swam
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 15: 00
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: First
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8533 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): 77.4394
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Ae�and Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an tt ach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, rain
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE (2E> yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? CEDO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
40 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 6
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60 % Cleared / Logged D—% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3"
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) X Gentle (2 to 4 1/o) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander X Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 72 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/13/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
5
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
U(no
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 - 4
0-2
3
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
3
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
4
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
4
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
5
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
-
3
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
3
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
3
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
2
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
5
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
4
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
3
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
72
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

APPENDIX E.
REFERENCE REACH STUDY /HEC -RAS MODELING

Morphological Characteristics of Bachelors Delight: HM -1 and Reference
Reach:
Bachelors Delight: HE -1
County:
Onslow County, INC
Design by:
CLS
Checked by:
RVS
ITEM
Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
Reference Reach
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Conditions
LOCATION
HE -1 Up
HE -1 Down
BD -2 - Downstream of Soil
Road
HE -1 Up
HE -1 Down
STREAM TYPE
No stream associated.
G5 - B5
E5
E5
E5
DRAINAGE AREA, Ac - Sq Mi
179 Ac - 0.28 Sq Mi
227 Ac -
0.35 Sq Mi
83 Ac -
0.13 Sq Mi
83 Ac -
0.13 Sq Mi
182 Ac -
0.28 Sq Mi
BANKFULL DISCHARGE, cfs
The valley's natural
drainage course has been
routed to roadside dithces,
therefore no data could be
collected on channel
dimension.
5.8
cfs
1.0
cfs
2.0
cfs
4.4
cfs
BANKFULL X- SECTION AREA (Abkf), ftZ
6.09
ftZ
2.6
ftZ
2.9
ftZ
8.4
ftZ
BANKFULL MEAN VELOCITY, fps
0.95
fps
0.4
fps
0.6
fps
0.8
fps
BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf), ft
5.4
ft
4.1
ft
6.0
ft
8.0
ft
BANKFULL MEAN DEPTH (dbkf), ft
1.13
ft
0.63
ft
0.57
ft
0.76
ft
WIDTH /DEPTH RATIO W d
( bkf/ bkf)
4.8
6.5
10.5
10.5
BANKFULL MAX DEPTH (d_o, ft
1.31
ft
0.88
ft
0.86
ft
1.14
ft
BANK HEIGHT RATIO
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
TYPICAL BANK HEIGHT ABOVE BANKFULL
2.62
ft
0.88
ft
0.86
ft
1.14
ft
WIDTH Flood -Prone Area (Wfpa), ft
11.6
ft
50.0
ft
50.00 ft
50.00 ft
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO (ER)
2.15
12.2
8.3
6.3
MEANDER LENGTH (Lm), ft
The valley's natural
drainage course has been
routed to roadside dithces,
therefore no data could be
collected on channel
pattern.
Stream has been
channelized and
straightened through the
9 9
vay, displaying no natural
meander pattern.
12.6 -
12.6 ft
18.0 -
60.0 ft
24.0 -
80.0 ft
RATIO OF Lm TO Wbkf
3.1 -
3.1
3.0 -
10.0
3.0 -
10.0
RADIUS OF CURVATURE, ft
2.0 -
4.4 ft
12.0 -
18.0 ft
16.0 -
24.0 ft
RATIO OF Rc TOW
Wbkf
0.5-
1.1
2.0 -
3.0
2.0 -
3.0
BELT WIDTH, ft
9.6-
9.6 ft
10.1 -
34.4 ft
13.5 -
45.9 ft
MEANDER WIDTH RATIO
2.3-
2.3
1.7 -
5.7
1.7 -
5.7
SINUOSITY (K)
1.02
1.25
1.30
1.17
VALLEY SLOPE, ft/ft
0.0028 ft/ft*
0.0049
ft/ft*
0.0027
ft/ft
0.0028
ft/ft
0.0049
ft/ft
AVERAGE SLOPE (S), ft/ft
The valley's natural
drainage course has been
routed to roadside dithces,
therefore no data could be
collected on channel slope
and feature spacing.
0.0010
ft/ft**
0.0024
ft/ft
0.0012
ft/ft
0.0015
ft/ft
RIFFLE SLOPE, ft/ft
0.0010
ft/ft
0.0136
ft/ft
0.0014
ft/ft
0.0018
ft/ft
RATIO OF RIFFLE SLOPE TO AVERAGE
SLOPE
1.0
5.7
1.2
1.2
POOL SLOPE, ft/ft
Pool cross - sectional and
longitudinal data not
collected because the
channel appears to have
little to no naturally forming
pools because the channel
has been straightned
through the valley.
0.0010
ft/ft
0.0000
ft/ft
0.0000
ft/ft
RATIO OF POOL SLOPE TO AVERAGE SLOPE
0.4
0.0
0.0
MAX POOL DEPTH, ft
1.26
ft
1.14
ft
1.52
ft
RAT IO POOL DEPTH TO AVERAGE
BANKFULL DEPTH
2 0
2.0
2.0
POOL WIDTH, ft
7.18
ft
6.60
ft
8.80
ft
RATIO OF POOL WIDTH TO BANKFULL WIDTH
1.76
1.10
1.10
POOL TO POOL SPACING, ft
1 0.00 -10.00
ft
3.3 -
12.9 ft
6.0 -
30.0 ft
8.0 -
40.0 ft
RATIO OF POOL TO POOL SPACING TO
11BANKFULLWIDTH
0.00-10.00
0.8-
3.2
1.0 -5.0
1 1.0 -15.0
* Valley Slope, and Sinuosity were taken from topographical data obtained on the entire site for existing conditions (i.e. data was not taken along reach lengths).
** Average Slope was taken along a reach length for existing conditions.

Morphological Characteristics of Bachelors Delight: HU -1 and Reference
Reach:
Bachelors Delight: HU -1
County:
Onslow County, NC
Design by:
CLS
Checked by:
RVS
ITEM
Existing Conditions
Reference Reach
Reference Reach
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Conditions
LOCATION
HU -1
BD -2 - Downstream of Soil
Road
BD -5 Zero Order
Bachelors Delight: HU -1
Zero Order Channel
Bachelors Delight: HU -1
Single Thread Channel
STREAM TYPE
E5
E5
Zero Order
Zero Order
E5
DRAINAGE AREA, Ac - Sq Mi
64 Ac -
0.10 Sq Mi
83 Ac -
0.13 Sq Mi
20 Ac - 0.03 Sq Mi
75 Ac - 0.12 Sq Mi
157 Ac -
0.25 Sq Mi
BANKFULL DISCHARGE, cfs
2.9
cfs
1.0
cfs
BD -5's remnant, realtively
undisturbed zero order
channel is indicative of a
natural zero order stream.
Existing ditch /channel to
be filled to existing ground
at low point of valley.
3.0
cfs
BANKFULL X- SECTION AREA (Abkf), ft z
2.79
ft z
2.58
ft z
7.3
ft z
BANKFULL MEAN VELOCITY, fps
1.03
fps
0.40
fps
0.8
fps
BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf), ft
4.7
ft
4.1
ft
7.0
ft
VALLEY TOE OF SLOPE WIDTH
NA
NA
52.0 ft
15.0 ft
NA
BANKFULL MEAN DEPTH (dbkf), ft
0.59
ft
0.63
ft
Belays zero order valley
displays various low points
where saturation and
overland flows have
caused depressions,
however, no discernable
channel has formed to
conve y
No meander pattern is to
be constructed for zero
order channel.
Restoration of the
floodplain's natural
groundwater hydrology
g y gy
and surface water flows
(rain events) is expected
to create natural braided
low points throughout the
valley. Proposed valley
width was determined
using contours of the
valley floor following ditch
fill.
0.67
ft
WIDTH /DEPTH RATIO ( °bkddbkf)
8.0
6.5
10.5
BANKFULL MAX DEPTH (dm_), ft
0.82
ft
0.88
ft
1.00
ft
BANK HEIGHT RATIO
1.10
1.00
1.00
TYPICAL BANK HEIGHT ABOVE BANKFULL
0.90
ft
0.88
ft
1.00
ft
WIDTH Flood -Prone Area (Wfpa), ft
13.5
ft
50.0
ft
25.00 ft
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO (ER)
2.87
12.22
3.6
MEANDER LENGTH (Lm), ft
Stream has been
channelized and
straightened through the
vall no natural
y, displaying
meander pattern.
13-
13 ft
21.0 -
70.0 ft
RATIO OF Lm TO Wbkf
3.1 -
3.1
3.0 -
10.0
14.0 -
21.0 ft
RATIO OF Rc TOW bkf
0.5 -
1.1
2.0 -
3.0
BELT WIDTH, ft
9.60-
9.60 ft
11.8 -
40.2 ft
MEANDER WIDTH RATIO
2.35 -
2.35 ft
1.7 -
5.7
SINUOSITY (K)
1.03
1.25
1.20
VALLEY SLOPE, ft /ft
0.0038
ft /ft*
0.0027
ft /ft
0.0017 ft /ft
0.0038 ft /ft
0.0038
ft /ft
AVERAGE SLOPE (S), ft /ft
0.0014
ft /ft **
0.0024
ft /ft
0.0016
ft /ft
RIFFLE SLOPE, ft /ft
0.0058
ft /ft
0.0136
ft /ft
0.0019
ft /ft
RATIO OF RIFFLE SLOPE TO AVERAGE
SLOPE
4.2
5.7
1.2
POOL SLOPE, ft /ft
0.0007
ft /ft
0.0010
ft /ft
0.0000
ft /ft
RATIO OF POOL SLOPE TO AVERAGE SLOPE
0.5
0.4
0.0
MAX POOL DEPTH, ft
1.32
ft
1.26
ft
1.33
ft
RATIO OF POOL DEPTH TO AVERAGE
BANKFULL DEPTH
2.2
2.0
2.0
POOL WIDTH, ft
7.2
ft
7.2
ft
7.70
ft
RATIO OF POOL WIDTH TO BANKFULL WIDTH
1.5
1.8
1.10
POOL TO POOL SPACING, ft
43.42 -
43.42 ft
3.34-
12.94 ft
7.0 -
35.0 ft
RATIO OF POOL TO POOL SPACING TO
BANKFULL WIDTH
9.24-
9.24
0.82-13.16
1.0 -
5.0
* Valley Slope, and Sinuosity were taken from topographical data obtained on the entire site for existing conditions (i.e. data was not taken along reach lengths).
** Average Slope was taken along a reach length for existing conditions.

Morphological Characteristics of Bachelors Delight: HU -2 and Reference
Reach:
Bachelors Delight: HU -2
County:
Onslow County, INC
Design by:
CLS
Checked by:
RVS
ITEM
Existing Conditions
Reference Reach
Proposed Conditions
LOCATION
HU -2
BD -5 Zero Order
Bachelors Delight: HU -2
STREAM TYPE
G-5
Zero Order
Zero Order
DRAINAGE AREA, Ac - Sq Mi
55 Ac -
0.09 Sq Mi
20 Ac - 0.03 S Mi
55 Ac - 0.09 Sq Mi
BANKFULL DISCHARGE, cfs
1.4
cfs
BD -5's remnant, realtively
undisturbed zero order
channel is indicative of a
natural zero order stream.
Existing ditch /channel to be
filled to existing ground at low
point of valley.
BANKFULL X- SECTION AREA (Abkf), ft2
1.05
ftZ
BANKFULL MEAN VELOCITY, fps
1.30
fps
BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf), ft
3.3
ft
VALLEY TOE OF SLOPE WIDTH
15.0
ft
52.0 ft
15.0 ft
BANKFULL MEAN DEPTH (dbkf), ft
0.32
ft
displays
spla s zero order valley ys various low points
where saturation and
overland flows have
caused depressions,
however, no discernable
channel has formed to
convey flow.
No meander pattern is to be constructed for zero order
channel. Restoration of the
floodplain's natural
groundwater hydrology and
surface water flows (rain
events) is expected to create
natural braided low points
throughout the valley.
Proposed valley width was
determined using contours of
the valley floor following ditch
fill.
WIDTH /DEPTH RATIO (Wbkddbkf)
10.3
BANKFULL MAX DEPTH (dm), ft
0.54
ft
BANK HEIGHT RATIO
3.52
TYPICAL BANK HEIGHT ABOVE BANKFULL
1.90
ft
WIDTH Flood -Prone Area (Wfp,), ft
4.6
ft
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO (ER)
1.391
MEANDER LENGTH (Lm), ft
Stream has been
c straightened and
straightened through the
vally, displaying no natural
meander pattern.
RATIO OF Lm TO Wbkf
RADIUS OF CURVATURE, ft
RATIO OF Rc TO Wbkf
BELT WIDTH, ft
MEANDER WIDTH RATIO
SINUOSITY (K)
1.01
VALLEY SLOPE, ft/ft
0.0044
ft/ft*
0.0017
0.0044
AVERAGE SLOPE (S), ft/ft
0.0060
ft/ft
RIFFLE SLOPE, ft/ft
0.0060
ft/ft
RATIO OF RIFFLE SLOPE TO AVERAGE
SLOPE
1.0
POOL SLOPE, ft/ft
Pool cross - sectional and
longitudinal data not
collected because the
channel appears to have
little to no naturally forming
pools because the
channel has been
straightned through the
valley.
RATIO OF POOL SLOPE TO AVERAGE SLOPE
MAX POOL DEPTH, ft
RATIO OF POOL DEPTH TO AVERAGE
BANKFULL DEPTH
POOL WIDTH, ft
RATIO OF POOL WIDTH TO BANKFULL WIDTH
POOL TO POOL SPACING, ft
RATIO OF POOL TO POOL SPACING TO
BANKFULL WIDTH
* Valley Slope, and Sinuosity were taken from topographical data obtained on the entire site for existing conditions (i.e. data was not
taken along reach lengths).
** Average Slope was taken along a reach length for existing conditions.

Morphological Characteristics of Bachelors Delight: BD -2 and Reference
Reach:
Bachelors Delight: 1313-2
County:
Onslow County, INC
Design by:
CLS
Checked by:
RVS
ITEM
Existing Conditions
Reference Reach
Proposed Conditions
LOCATION
BD -2
BD -5 Zero Order
Bachelors Delight: BD -2
STREAM TYPE
F-5
Zero Order
Zero Order
DRAINAGE AREA, Ac - Sq Mi
64 Ac -
0.10 Sq Mi
20 Ac - 0.03 S Mi
65 Ac - 0.10 S Mi
BANKFULL DISCHARGE, cfs
0.4
cfs
BD -5's remnant, realtively
undisturbed zero order
channel is indicative of a
natural zero order stream.
Existing ditch /channel to be
filled to existing ground at low
point of valley.
BANKFULL X- SECTION AREA (Abkf), ft2
1.70
ftZ
BANKFULL MEAN VELOCITY, fps
0.26
fps
BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf), ft
5.2
ft
VALLEY TOE OF SLOPE WIDTH
ft
52.0 ft
30.0 ft
BANKFULL MEAN DEPTH (dbkf), ft
0.33
ft
spla s zero order valley ys various low points
displays
where saturation and
overland flows have
caused depressions,
however, no discernable
channel has formed to
convey flow.
No meander pattern is to be constructed for zero order
channel. Restoration of the
floodplain's natural
groundwater hydrology and
surface water flows (rain
events) is expected to create
natural braided low points
throughout the valley.
Proposed valley width was
determined using contours of
the valley floor following ditch
fill.
WIDTH /DEPTH RATIO (Wbkddbkf)
15.8
BANKFULL MAX DEPTH (dm), ft
0.60
ft
BANK HEIGHT RATIO
3.33
TYPICAL BANK HEIGHT ABOVE BANKFULL
2.00
ft
WIDTH Flood -Prone Area (Wfp,), ft
6.6
ft
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO (ER)
1.271
MEANDER LENGTH (Lm), ft
Stream has been
channelized and
straightened through the
vall dis la in no natural
Y. displaying 9
meander pattern.
RATIO OF Lm TO Wbkf
RADIUS OF CURVATURE, ft
RATIO OF Rc TO Wbkf
BELT WIDTH, ft
MEANDER WIDTH RATIO
SINUOSITY (K)
1.00
VALLEY SLOPE, ft/ft
0.0002
ft/ft*
0.00171
1
AVERAGE SLOPE (S), ft/ft
0.0002
ft/ft**
RIFFLE SLOPE, ft/ft
0.0002
ft/ft
RATIO OF RIFFLE SLOPE TO AVERAGE
SLOPE
1.0
POOL SLOPE, ft/ft
Pool cross - sectional and
longitudinal data not
collected because the
channel appears to have
little to no naturally forming
pools because the
channel has been
straightned through the
valley.
RATIO OF POOL SLOPE TO AVERAGE SLOPE
MAX POOL DEPTH, ft
RATIO OF POOL DEPTH TO AVERAGE
BANKFULL DEPTH
POOL WIDTH, ft
RATIO OF POOL WIDTH TO BANKFULL WIDTH
POOL TO POOL SPACING, ft
RATIO OF POOL TO POOL SPACING TO
BANKFULL WIDTH
* Valley Slope, and Sinuosity were taken from topographical data obtained on the entire site for existing conditions (i.e. data was not
taken along reach lengths).
** Average Slope was taken along a reach length for existing conditions.

Morphological Characteristics of Bachelors Delight: BD -4Aa, BD -4Ab, BD -5A and Reference
Reach:
Bachelors Delight: BD -4Aa, BD -4Ab, and 5A
County:
Robeson County, NC
Design by:
CLS
Checked by:
RVS
ITEM
Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
Reference Reach
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Conditions
LOCATION
BD-4Aa
BD -4Ab
BD -5A
BD -5 Zero Order
Bachelors Delight: BD-
4Aa
Bachelors Delight: BD-
4Ab
Bachelors Delight - BD -5a
STREAM TYPE
Agricultural Field
Agricultural Field
Agricultural Field
Zero Order
Zero Order
Zero Order
HEADWATER CHANNEL
DRAINAGE AREA, Ac - Sq Mi
24.32 Ac 1 0.04 Sq Mi
7.68 Ac 1 0.01 Sq Mi
9.86 Ac 0.02 Sq Mi
20 Ac - 0.03 Sq Mi
24 Ac - 0.04 Sq Mi
8 Ac -10.01 Sq Mi
10 Ac -10.02 Sq Mi
BANKFULL DISCHARGE, cfs
Existing conditions are
dominated by agricultural
fields with lateral drainage
ditches. Remnant
channels or valleys have
been plowed over through
years of agricultural
practices, essential)
p Y
filling in all low points.
Existing conditions are
dominated by agricultural
fields with lateral drainage
ditches. Remnant
channels or valleys have
been plowed over through
years of agricultural
practices, essential) filling
p Y g
in all low points.
Existing conditions are
dominated by agricultural
fields with lateral drainage
ditches. Remnant
channels or valleys have
been plowed over through
years of agricultural
practices, essential) filling
p Y g
in all low points.
BD -5's remnant, realtively
undisturbed zero order
channel is indicative of a
natural zero order stream.
Existing ditch /channel to
be filled to existing ground
at low point of valley.
Existing ditch /channel to
be filled to existing ground
at low point of valley.
Existing ditch /channel to be
filled to existing ground at to
point of valley.
BANKFULL X- SECTION AREA A ft
( bit) z
BANKFULL MEAN VELOCITY, fps
BANKFULL WIDTH (VVbkf), ft
VALLEY TOE OF SLOPE WIDTH
52.0 ft
30.0 ft
30.0 ft
30.0 ft
BANKFULL MEAN DEPTH (dbkf), ft
BD -5's zero order valley
displays various low points
where saturation and
overland flows have
caused depressions,
however, no discernable
channel has formed to
convey flow.
No meander pattern is to
be constructed for zero
order channel.
Restoration of the
floodplain's natural
groundwater hydrology
and surface water flows
(rain events) is expected
to create natural braided
low points throughout the
valley. Proposed valley
width was determined
using contours of the
valley floor following ditch
fill.
No meander pattern is to
be constructed for zero
order channel.
Restoration of the
floodplain's natural
groundwater hydrology
and surface water flows
(rain events) is expected
to create natural braided
low points throughout the
valley. Proposed valley
width was determined
using contours of the
valley floor following ditch
fill.
No meander pattern is to be
constructed for zero order
channel. Restoration of the
floodplain's natural
groundwater hydrology and
surface water flows (rain
events) is expected to create
natural braided low points
throughout the valley.
Proposed valley width was
determined using contours of
the valley floor following ditch
fill.
WIDTH /DEPTH RATIO (Wb, /dbl)
BANKFULL MAX DEPTH (d )
max , ft
BANK HEIGHT RATIO
TYPICAL BANK HEIGHT ABOVE BANKFULL
WIDTH Flood -Prone Area �fia), ft
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO (ER)
MEANDER LENGTH Lm , ft
( )
RATIO OF Lm TO Wb�t
RADIUS OF CURVATURE, f
RATIO OF Rc TO Wbkt
BELT WIDTH, ft
MEANDER WIDTH RATIO
SINUOSITY (K)
VALLEY SLOPE, ft /ft
7003
0.001
0.001
0.0021
0.0031
0.0011
0.001
AVERAGE SLOPE (S), ft /ft
RIFFLE SLOPE, ft /ft
RATIO OF RIFFLE SLOPE TO AVERAGE
SLOPE
POOL SLOPE, ft /ft
RATIO OF POOL SLOPE TO AVERAGE SLOPE
MAX POOL DEPTH, ft
RATIO OF POOL DEPTH TO AVERAGE
BANKFULL DEPTH
POOL WIDTH, ft
RATIO OF POOL WIDTH TO BANKFULL
WIDTH
POOL TO POOL SPACING, ft
RATIO OF POOL TO POOL SPACING TO
BANKFULL WIDTH

Morphological Characteristics of Bachelors Delight: HM -1 and Reference
Reach:
Bachelors Delight: HM -1
County:
Onslow County, INC
Design by:
CLS
Checked by:
RVS
ITEM
Existing Conditions
Reference Reach
Reference Reach
Proposed Conditions
Proposed Conditions
LOCATION
HM -1
BD -2 - Downstream of Soil
Road
BD -5 Zero Order
Bachelors Delight: HM -1
Zero Order Channel
Bachelors Delight: HM -1
Single Thread Channel
STREAM TYPE
G5 - E5
E5
Zero Order
Zero Order
E5
DRAINAGE AREA, Ac - SgMi
62 Ac -0.10
Sq Mi
83 Ac -
0.13 Sq Mi
19.84 Sq Mi 10.03 S Mi
22 Ac -0.04S Mi
83 Ac -
0.13 Sq Mi
BANKFULL DISCHARGE, cfs
2.2
cfs
1.0
cfs
BD -5's remnant, realtively
undisturbed zero order
channel is indicative of a
natural zero order stream.
Existing ditch /channel to
be filled to existing ground
at low point of valley.
2.0
cfs
BANKFULL X- SECTION AREA (Abkf), ftZ
2.20
ft
2.6
ftZ
6.3
ftZ
BANKFULL MEAN VELOCITY, fps
1.01
fps
0.4
fps
0.7
fps
BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf), ft
2.9
ft
4.1
ft
6.0
ft
VALLEY TOE OF SLOPE WIDTH
NA
NA
52.0 ft
30.0 ft
NA
BANKFULL MEAN DEPTH (dbkf), ft
0.75
ft
0.63
ft
displays s zero order valley
displays various low points
where saturation and
overland flows have
caused depressions,
p
however, no discernable
channel has formed to
convey flow.
No meander pattern is to
be constructed for zero
order channel.
Restoration of the
floodplain's natural
groundwater hydrology
g Y gY
and surface water flows
(rain events) is expected
to create natural braided
low points throughout the
valley. Proposed valley
Y d Y
width was determined
using contours of the
valley floor following ditch
fill.
0.57
ft
WIDTH /DEPTH RATIO (Wbkddbkf)
3.9
6.5
10.5
BANKFULL MAX DEPTH (dm_), ft
1.01
ft
0.88
ft
0.86
ft
BANK HEIGHT RATIO
2.97
1.00
1.00
TYPICAL BANK HEIGHT ABOVE BANKFULL
3.00
ft
0.88
ft
0.86
ft
WIDTH Flood -Prone Area W ft
( �a),
7.5
ft
50.0
ft
30.00 ft
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO (ER)
2.571
12.2
5.0
MEANDER LENGTH (Lm), ft
Stream has been
channelized and
straightened through the
vall dis la in no natural
Y. displaying 9
meander pattern.
12.6 -
12.6 ft
18.0 -
60.0 ft
RATIO OF Lm TO Wbkf
3.1 -
3.1
3.0 -
10.0
RADIUS OF CURVATURE, ft
2.0 -
4.4 ft
12.0 -
18.0 ft
RATIO OF Rc TO Wbkf
0.5 -
1.1
2.0 -3.0
BELT WIDTH, ft
9.6 -
9.6 ft
10.1 -
34.4 ft
MEANDER WIDTH RATIO
2.3-2.3
1.7 -5.7
SINUOSITY (K)
1.02
1.25
1.26
VALLEY SLOPE, ft/ft
0.0039
ft/ft*
0.0027
ft/ft
0.002 ft/ft
0.0039 ft/ft
0.0039
ft/ft
AVERAGE SLOPE (S), ft/ft
0.0069
ft/ft**
0.0024
ft/ft
1
1
0.0019
ft/ft
RIFFLE SLOPE, ft/ft
0.0128
ft/ft
0.0136
ft/ft
0.0023
ft/ft
RATIO OF RIFFLE SLOPE TO AVERAGE
SLOPE
1.8
5.7
1.2
POOL SLOPE, ft/ft
0.0025
ft/ft
0.0010
ft/ft
0.0000
ft/ft
RATIO OF POOL SLOPE TO AVERAGE SLOPE
0.4
0.4
0.0
MAX POOL DEPTH, ft
1.34
ft
1.26
ft
1.14
ft
RATIO OF POOL DEPTH TO AVERAGE
BANKFULL DEPTH
1.8
2.0
2.0
POOL WIDTH, ft
5.0
ft
7.18
ft
6.60
ft
RATIO OF POOL WIDTH TO BANKFULL WIDTH
1.71
1.76
1.10
POOL TO POOL SPACING, ft
26.15 -
39.31 ft
3.3 -112.9
ft
6.0 -
30.0 ft
RATIO OF POOL TO POOL SPACING TO
BANKFULL WIDTH
8.96 -
13.46
1 0.8 J3.2
1.0 -5.0
* Valley Slope, and Sinuosity were taken from topographical data obtained on the entire site for existing conditions (i.e. data was not taken along reach lengths).
** Average Slope was taken along a reach length for existing conditions.

APPENDIX F.
HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTGRAPHY

*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1938 Onslow County Aerial
IN1 Ab
_ � A
' Via• �. •'
577
;u
f
SCALE 1" = 1600'

�r {
U - '�fR- Or S',•./ -iia, 7� d�y}�s'GF[�,'`•.. Fari,� r -3�� Ir
' r
't :.'R''� '(��' • 'xrt __ "iy N r',f ` Y ; fir' +`:: �Sl;!'. Y 1� `_i••'•,s i _
'4 � f un'��y ,y. � �- Sh• 8 x #a�s• � M1vi R �= y.- v'
.tii ,:g'' .y1,'2� � r�'��F'�J. /�M ,� �,. 'p�:�' §�: °�1� a�a� _ ♦r-+si tF �,- �_���. �� III I - I
♦y�r
�y�4?' 'l �`i' �: �.", �fi�.e.��, �' f � �'� ?Q�'r'S' `' C Y .P�' � f� .�- y. � .r".r�}� -r-•
•may?._ d -
c • r ` i t :�/ q �
1
a
wr , L. J i
r4. L�flA
XcIf
k h AI
ra
1
A.
1 4.;, f
._ � �.h iS:b M_- :1.Y� �t♦v7 dr�.�'iFs •. Y.� 1~n'
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1949 Onslow County Aerial
SCALE 1" = 1600'

*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1960 Onslow County Aerial
5c 54 A �¢2
'56
zo
2p 4B A
:3ry Y 16 r r .✓
ISA
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Onslow County, NC
01 -09 -168
December 2009
LMG
isaf,'4A?, ULML% 62DUr
I"warcmenfnf Con- whwmT,
www.LMGroup.net
Phone: [phone] •1.866.LMG.1078
Fax: [phone]
P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
1960 Aerial
SCALE 1" = 1600'

*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1970 Onslow County Aerial
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Onslow County, NC
01 -09 -168
LMG
isai,'4A?, ULML% 62DUr
Fn. a'fMRnhd con -wham.
www.LMGroup.net
December 2009 Phone: [phone] •1.866.LMG.1078
Fax: [phone]
P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
1970 Aerial
SCALE 1" = 1600'

6a
k'
h.
r i kk
� r
. _ _x,41 - •h � �•
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 2001 Onslow County Aerial
.ti
SCALE 1" = 1600'

f�
_� IF
1
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 2006 Onslow County Aerial
p
h�
`'l
zl
y _ • d �.
'i
A 4
SCALE 1" = 1600'
�■

tr 1�t.
_.ors yYp
k
-
3li. Y� {v 4 f •.
.. I
R i -
Y.
r::s
•U �'�
-
.�
a•
•� L 1
y
n e
o � � •� s, 1 r � � % z:
'mil- v.•.�y R_'3- 7. _ -' ..�'?. 1�s-- Y•rR•fn ". :4�F yy �••
.n 4 ! ��•�� ' � - Y ��_ 7 F `, ail
v
tilt' �
#r'
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Onslow County, NC
LPAG
L.L,II 1A?"ULMLia 6ADUP
*Boundaries are approximate
and are
01 -09 -168
f"warcmenfnf con- whWaT.
�www.LMGroup.net
2008 Aerial
not meant to be absolute.
December 2009
Phone: [phone] •1.866.LMG.1078
Map Source: 2008 Onslow
County Aerial
Fax: [phone]
P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
SCALE 1" - 1600'

APPENDIX G.
STREAM BUFFER EFFECTIVENESS
CORRECTION FACTOR (SBCF) MAPS

Wet Ford
Wet Ford
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project) •
Property Boundary •
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration ( -9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If) ■
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If)
Stream Preservation (11,400 If)
Riparian Wetland Restoration ( -60 ac.) ---- - - - - --
Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.)
Reach
Hewitts Branch (HE-1)
Design Length
5,103 If
Section
North Side Average Buffer
BCF Multiplier
South Side Average Buffer
BCF Multiplier
Total Credits
1 (0-500')
400
1.13
262
1.13
565
2 (500'- 1,000)
267
1.13
199
1.13
565
3 (1,000'- 1,500')
186
1.13
199
1.13
565
4 (1,500 - 2,000')
306
1.13
161
1.13
565
5 (2,000'- 2,509)
284
1.13
137
1.1
558
6 (2,500' - 3,000')
189
1.13
159
1.13
565
7 (3,000'- 3,509)
197
1.13
198
1.13
565
8 (3,500' - 4,000')
197
1.13
197
1.13
565
9 (4,000'- 4,500')
178
174
1.13
565
1.13
10 (4,500 - 5, 000)
175
1.13
182
1.13
565
11 (5,000' - 5,103')
160
1.13
1922
1.13
116
TOTAL
5,759
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.)
Upland Buffer ( -94 ac.) �
_: \WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES \01 -09 -168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneyWCAD \October 2010WppG- SBCFLayouts -O
• Sheam Design Provided by:
• • Ko/Florence K Hutcheson
•
• • 5121 11ing0om Way, Suite 100
•
• • • Raleigh, NC 27607
• • • • 919.51-6066
7� �{/
Project: Date: Revision Date:
LMG Baand chelWetors Miight Bank 1/5/2010 9/16/10
AND MANAGEMENT GROUP JOb Number
Smle:
— Envlrenmenler [enrWren ,' =200' 01-09 -168
Title:
0 50 100 200 400 Post Office Box 2522 HEA (Downstream) Drawn By: Sheet Number
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 SBCF Sections 1 -6 CBM
Figure 1.
Telephone: [phone] g

Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement ( -5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If)
Stream Preservation (11,400 If)
Riparian Wetland Restoration ( -60 ac.) E ---- - - - - --
Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.)
i�.ai�i
��� !Alw
E-WIMOVI
Reach
Hewitts Branch (HE -1)
Design Length
5,103 if
Section
North Side Average Buffer
BCF Multiplier
South Side Average Buffer
BCF Multiplier
Total Credits
1 (0 - 500')
400
1.13
262
1.13
565
2 (500' - 1,000')
267
1.13
199
1.13
565
3 (1,000' - 1,500')
186
1.13
199
1.13
565
4 (1,500 - 2,000')
306
1.13
161
1.13
565
5 (2,000' - 2,500')
284
1.13
137
1.1
558
6 (2,500' - 3,000')
189
1.13
159
1.13
565
7 (3,000' - 3,500')
197
1.13
198
1.13
565
8 (3,500' - 4,000')
197
1.13
197
1.13
565
9 (4,000' - 4,500')
178
1.13
174
1.13
565
10 (4,500 - 5,000')
175
1.13
182
1.13
565
11 (5,000' - 5,103')
160
1.13
192
1.13
116
TOTAL
5,759
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.)
Upland Buffer ( -94 ac.)
_:\WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES \01 -09 -168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, Downey\ACAD \October 2010WppG- SBCFLayouts -OI
0 50 100 200 400
Wet Ford
��L I
AL
LMG
LAHO MANAOISM"T GROUP
En vffertm -W CenrWren[5
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
Telephone: [phone]
ct: Date:
Bachelors Delight Swamp 1/5/2010
m and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Scale:
1 ..= 200'
HEA (Upstream) D,avm By
SBCF Sections 7 -11 CBM
Stream Design Provided by:
Ko /Florence 8 Hutcheson
5121 Kngdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
919 -851 -6066
Revision Date:
9/15/10
Job Number:
01 -09 -158
Sheet Number
Figure 2.

Wet Ford
i
X
'his'
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Com let P. W W W W W
Property Boundary ..
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration ( -9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration ( -7,082 ID
Stream Preservation (11,400 If)
Riparian Wetland Restoration ( -60 ac.) ---- - - - - --
Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.)
Upland Buffer ( -94 ac.)
L:\WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES \01 -09 -168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneyWCAD \October 2010\A
Reach Huffma ns Branch (HU -1)
Design Length 3,445 Jf
Section East Side Average Buffer BCF Multiplier
West Side Average Buffer
BCF Multiplier
Total Credits
1 (0-172') 159
1_
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Com let P. W W W W W
Property Boundary ..
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration ( -9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration ( -7,082 ID
Stream Preservation (11,400 If)
Riparian Wetland Restoration ( -60 ac.) ---- - - - - --
Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.)
Upland Buffer ( -94 ac.)
L:\WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES \01 -09 -168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneyWCAD \October 2010\A
Reach Huffma ns Branch (HU -1)
Design Length 3,445 Jf
Section East Side Average Buffer BCF Multiplier
West Side Average Buffer
BCF Multiplier
Total Credits
1 (0-172') 159
113
1.13
112
183
297
300
225
1.1
189
2 (172'- 672') 179
3 (672' - 1,172) _194
4(1,172' - 1,672') I 180
5 (1,672'- 2,172') 166
1.13 565 _
1.13 565
1.13 565
1.13 558
1.13
IIA3
1.13
6 (2,172'- 2,672') 167
1.13
177
1.13 565
_ 7 (2,672' - 3,172') 171
8 ( 3,172'- 3,446) 173
II A 3
162
124
1.13
1.1
565 _
304
1.13
TOTAL 3,876
Project: Dab::
Bachelors Delight Swamp 1/5/2010
LMG Stream and Wetland Mitigation an
LAND MANAGEMENT GROW
Scale:
Title: 1'= 200'
0 50 100 200 400 Post Office Box 2522 HU -1 SBCF Sections 1 -8 Dram By:
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 CBM
Telephone: [phone]
Stream Design Provided by:
Ko/Florence 6 Hutcheson
5121 Kngdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
919 -851 -6066
Revision Date:
9/15/10
Job Number
01 -09 -168
Sheet Number
Figure 3.

Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement ( -5,928 If) ■
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If)
Stream Preservation (- 11,400 If)
Riparian Wetland Restoration ( -60 ac.) L ---- - - - - --
Wetland Enhancement ( -28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation ( -48 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)( -35 ac.)
Upland Buffer ( -94 ac.)
_: \WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES \01 -09 -168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneyWCAD \October
— — Wet Ford
MON
WIN
lam
FRI
Reach Half Moan Swamp (HM -1)
Design Length 1,131 If
Section East Side Average Buffer BCF Multiplier West Side Average Buffer BCF Multiplier Total Credits
1 (0 - 500'} 227 1.13 230 1.13 565
2 (500'- 1,000) 183 1.13 176 1.13 565
3 (1,000' - 1,131') 160 1.13 167 1.13 148
TOTAL 1,278
LMG
LANG MAHAGPASP.NT GROUP
nvrrenmenler [enr�irsnes
0 50 100 200 400 Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
Telephone: [phone]
ppG- SBCFLayouts- Oct2010.dwg
Stream Design Provided by:
Ko /Florence 8 Hutcheson
5121 Kngdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
919 -851 -6066
rt;
Date:
Revision Date:
Bachelors Delight Swamp
1/5/2010
9115/10
m and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Soale:
Job Number
1 "= 200'
01 -09 -168
HM -1 SBCF Sections 1 -3
Drawn By:
Sheet Number
CBM
Figure 4.

APPENDIX H.
NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORMS

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 3.0
c:aicuiator version ;s.0
Wetland Site Name
Bachelor's Delight - BD7
Date
6/2/10
Wetland Type
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Assessor Name /Organization
CN,DB / LMG
Level III Ecoregion
Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
Nearest Named Water Body
Bachelors Delight Swamp
River Basin
White Oak
USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit
03030001
M Yes Fl No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude /Lonaitude (deci- dearees)
34.85371 / - 77.44935
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and /or make note below if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past
(for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub - surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear- cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Describe effects of stressors that are present.
Regulatory Considerations
Select all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
® Abuts a 303(d)- listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)- listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (Check all that apply)
® Blackwater
❑ Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition —assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in
the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the
assessment area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ®A Not severely altered
❑B ❑B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], artificial hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub - Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub - surface storage capacity and duration
(Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for North Carolina
hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered
to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub - surface water. Consider tidal flooding
regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
Water Storage /Surface Relief— assessment area/wetland type condition metric
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
®B ®B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
®B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture /Structure — assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoxymorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoxymorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
❑A
Soil ribbon < 1 inch
®B
Soil ribbon ? 1 inch
❑A
No peat or muck presence
®B
A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub - surface pollutants or discharges (Sub)
Examples of sub - surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
Land Use — opportunity metric
Check
all that apply (at
least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment
area (5M), and within 2 miles
and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS
5M
2M
From 80 to < 100 feet
❑A
❑A
❑A
> 10% impervious surfaces
®B
®B
❑B
< 10% impervious surfaces
❑C
❑C
❑C
Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
❑D
❑D
❑D
? 20% coverage of pasture
❑E
❑E
®E
? 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑F
❑F
❑F
? 20% coverage of maintained grass /herb
❑G
❑G
❑G
? 20% coverage of silvicultural land characterized by a clear -cut < 5 years old
❑H
❑H
❑H
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer —assessment area condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? Descriptor E should be selected if ditches effectively bypass the buffer.
®A ? 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels /braids for a total width.
❑ <_ 15 -feet wide ®> 15 -feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑ Exposed — adjacent open water with width ? 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area —wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the appropriate width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT)
and the wetland
complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT
WC
®A
®A
>_ 100 feet
❑B
❑B
From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D
❑D
From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E
❑E
From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F
❑F
From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G
❑G
From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H
❑H
< 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short- duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
®C Evidence of long- duration inundation or very long- duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type /wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear -cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
❑A ❑A ®A ? 500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres
®C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres
❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
❑I ❑I ❑I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear -cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (? 90 %) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and /or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, urban landscapes, maintained
fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
®A ❑A ? 500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D ❑D From 10 to < 50 acres
❑ E ❑ E < 10 acres
❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters /stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
permanent features such as fields, development, two -lane or larger roads (? 40 feet wide), utility line corridors wider than a two -lane road,
and clear -cuts < 10 years old. Consider the eight main points of the compass.
®A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
❑B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
❑C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear -cut
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
®A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected strata are unnaturally absent or dominated by exotic
species or composed of planted stands of non - characteristic species or inappropriately composed of a single species.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
❑A ? 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
®A ®A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
®A
®A
Dense mid - story/sapling layer
❑B
R
Moderate density mid - story/sapling layer
❑C
❑C
Mid - story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A
❑A
Dense shrub layer
®B
®B
Moderate density shrub layer
❑C
❑C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
❑A
❑A
Dense herb layer
®B
®B
Moderate density herb layer
❑C
❑C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric
®A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric
®A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man - placed natural debris.
®A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not
21. Vegetation /Open Water Dispersion — wetland type /open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegeta
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C
22. Hydrologic Connectivity— assessment area condition metric
tion and open water in the growing season. Patterned
❑D
Evaluate for riverine wetlands only. Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill,
sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man -made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Channel anastomosed. Dry conditions at time of observation.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 3.0
Rating Calculator Version 3.0
Wetland Site Name Bachelor's Delight - BD7 Date of Assessment 6/2/10
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name /Organization CN,DB / LMG
Presence of stressor affecting assessment area (Y /N) NO
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y /N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y /N) YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y /N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y /N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y /N) NO
Sub - function Ratina Summar
Function
Sub - function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
HIGH
Sub - surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
LOW
Condition
HIGH
Condition /Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition /Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NO
Soluble Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition /Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition /Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition /Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NA
Habitat
Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
HIGH
Veqetation Composition
Condition
HIGH
Function Ratina Summar
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition /Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 3.0
c:aicuiator version ;s.0
Wetland Site Name
BDMB - NCSU Block
Date
6/2/10
Wetland Type
Pine Flat
Assessor Name /Organization
CN,DB - LMG
Level III Ecoregion
Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
Nearest Named Water Body
Huff mans Branch
River Basin
White Oak
USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit
03030001
M Yes Fl No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude /Lonaitude (deci- dearees)
34.86681 / - 77.45574
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and /or make note below if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past
(for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub - surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear- cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Describe effects of stressors that are present.
Roadside ditches may be affecting hydrology near the roads (outside edges of forest block). Bedding for silviculture has altered the ground
surface but not severely.
Regulatory Considerations
Select all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)- listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)- listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (Check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
❑ Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition —assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in
the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the
assessment area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ®A Not severely altered
❑B ❑B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], artificial hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub - Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub - surface storage capacity and duration
(Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for North Carolina
hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered
to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub - surface water. Consider tidal flooding
regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ®B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
Water Storage /Surface Relief— assessment area/wetland type condition metric
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
®C ®C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture /Structure — assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
®A Sandy soil
❑B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoxymorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoxymorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
®A
Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑B
Soil ribbon ? 1 inch
®A
No peat or muck presence
❑B
A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub - surface pollutants or discharges (Sub)
Examples of sub - surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
Land Use — opportunity metric
Check
all that apply (at
least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment
area (5M), and within 2 miles
and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS
5M
2M
From 80 to < 100 feet
❑A
❑A
❑A
> 10% impervious surfaces
®B
®B
®B
< 10% impervious surfaces
❑C
❑C
❑C
Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
❑D
❑D
❑D
? 20% coverage of pasture
❑E
❑E
❑E
? 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑F
❑F
❑F
? 20% coverage of maintained grass /herb
❑G
❑G
❑G
? 20% coverage of silvicultural land characterized by a clear -cut < 5 years old
❑H
❑H
❑H
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer —assessment area condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
❑Yes ®No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? Descriptor E should be selected if ditches effectively bypass the buffer.
❑A ? 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels /braids for a total width.
❑ <_ 15 -feet wide ❑> 15 -feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
❑Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑ Exposed — adjacent open water with width ? 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area —wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the appropriate width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT)
and the wetland
complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT
WC
®A
®A
>_ 100 feet
❑B
❑B
From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D
❑D
From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E
❑E
From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F
❑F
From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G
❑G
From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H
❑H
< 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
®A Evidence of short- duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long- duration inundation or very long- duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type /wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear -cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
❑A ❑A ®A ? 500 acres
®B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres
❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
❑I ❑I ❑I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear -cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (? 90 %) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and /or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, urban landscapes, maintained
fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
®A ❑A ? 500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D ❑D From 10 to < 50 acres
❑ E ❑ E < 10 acres
❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters /stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
permanent features such as fields, development, two -lane or larger roads (? 40 feet wide), utility line corridors wider than a two -lane road,
and clear -cuts < 10 years old. Consider the eight main points of the compass.
®A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
❑B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
❑C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear -cut
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected strata are unnaturally absent or dominated by exotic
species or composed of planted stands of non - characteristic species or inappropriately composed of a single species.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
❑A ? 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
❑A
❑A
Dense mid - story/sapling layer
®B
®B
Moderate density mid - story/sapling layer
El
El
Mid - story/sapling layer sparse or absent
®A
®A
Dense shrub layer
❑B
R
Moderate density shrub layer
El
El
Shrub layer sparse or absent
❑A
❑A
Dense herb layer
®B
®B
Moderate density herb layer
❑C
❑C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric
❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man - placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
21. Vegetation /Open Water Dispersion — wetland type /open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegeta
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C
22. Hydrologic Connectivity— assessment area condition metric
tion and open water in the growing season. Patterned
❑D
Evaluate for riverine wetlands only. Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill,
sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man -made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Dry conditions at time of observation.

Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 3.0
Rating Calculator Version 3.0
BDMB - NCSU Block Date of Assessment 6/2/10
Pine Flat Assessor Name /Organization CN,DB - LMG
Presence of stressor affecting assessment area (Y /N) YES
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y /N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y /N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y /N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y /N) NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y /N) NO
Sub - function Ratina Summar
Function
Sub - function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
HIGH
Sub - surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
NA
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition /Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NA
Particulate Change
Condition
NA
Condition /Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
NA
Condition /Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NA
Physical Change
Condition
NA
Condition /Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NA
Pollution Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition /Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NO
Habitat
Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
HIGH
Veqetation Composition
Condition
NA
Function Ratina Summar
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition /Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 3.0
c:aicuiator version ;s.0
Wetland Site Name
BDMB- HU1A- Zero Order
Date
6/2/10
Wetland Type
Headwater Forest
Assessor Name /Organization
Corey Novak - LMG
Level III Ecoregion
Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
Nearest Named Water Body
Huff mans Branch
River Basin
White Oak
USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit
03030001
M Yes Fl No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude /Lonaitude (deci- dearees)
34.86371 / - 77.45233
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and /or make note below if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past
(for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub - surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear- cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Describe effects of stressors that are present.
Roadside ditches may be affecting hydrology near road.
Regulatory Considerations
Select all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
® Abuts a 303(d)- listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)- listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (Check all that apply)
® Blackwater
❑ Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition —assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in
the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the
assessment area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ®A Not severely altered
❑B ❑B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], artificial hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub - Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub - surface storage capacity and duration
(Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for North Carolina
hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered
to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub - surface water. Consider tidal flooding
regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
®B ®B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
Water Storage /Surface Relief— assessment area/wetland type condition metric
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
®B ®B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture /Structure — assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
❑A Sandy soil
❑B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoxymorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
®C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoxymorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
❑A
Soil ribbon < 1 inch
®B
Soil ribbon ? 1 inch
®A
No peat or muck presence
❑B
A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub - surface pollutants or discharges (Sub)
Examples of sub - surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
Land Use — opportunity metric
Check
all that apply (at
least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment
area (5M), and within 2 miles
and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS
5M
2M
From 80 to < 100 feet
❑A
❑A
❑A
> 10% impervious surfaces
®B
®B
®B
< 10% impervious surfaces
❑C
❑C
❑C
Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
❑D
❑D
❑D
? 20% coverage of pasture
❑E
❑E
❑E
? 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑F
❑F
❑F
? 20% coverage of maintained grass /herb
❑G
❑G
❑G
? 20% coverage of silvicultural land characterized by a clear -cut < 5 years old
❑H
❑H
❑H
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer —assessment area condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
❑Yes ®No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? Descriptor E should be selected if ditches effectively bypass the buffer.
❑A ? 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels /braids for a total width.
❑ <_ 15 -feet wide ❑> 15 -feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
❑Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑ Exposed — adjacent open water with width ? 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area —wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the appropriate width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT)
and the wetland
complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT
WC
®A
®A
>_ 100 feet
❑B
❑B
From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D
❑D
From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E
❑E
From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F
❑F
From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G
❑G
From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H
❑H
< 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
®A Evidence of short- duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long- duration inundation or very long- duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type /wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear -cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
❑A ❑A ®A ? 500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres
®F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
❑I ❑I ❑I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear -cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (? 90 %) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and /or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, urban landscapes, maintained
fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
®A ❑A ? 500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D ❑D From 10 to < 50 acres
❑ E ❑ E < 10 acres
❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters /stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
permanent features such as fields, development, two -lane or larger roads (? 40 feet wide), utility line corridors wider than a two -lane road,
and clear -cuts < 10 years old. Consider the eight main points of the compass.
®A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
❑B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
❑C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear -cut
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected strata are unnaturally absent or dominated by exotic
species or composed of planted stands of non - characteristic species or inappropriately composed of a single species.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
®A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
❑A ? 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
®A
®A
Dense mid - story/sapling layer
❑B
R
Moderate density mid - story/sapling layer
❑C
❑C
Mid - story/sapling layer sparse or absent
®A
®A
Dense shrub layer
❑B
R
Moderate density shrub layer
❑C
❑C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
❑A
❑A
Dense herb layer
®B
®B
Moderate density herb layer
❑C
❑C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric
❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
®B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man - placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
21. Vegetation /Open Water Dispersion — wetland type /open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegeta
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C
22. Hydrologic Connectivity— assessment area condition metric
tion and open water in the growing season. Patterned
❑D
Evaluate for riverine wetlands only. Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill,
sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man -made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Dry conditions at time of observation.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 3.0
Rating Calculator Version 3.0
Wetland Site Name BDMB- HU1A- Zero Order Date of Assessment 6/2/10
IiVICY IVVVQI�-
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name /Organization LMG
Presence of stressor affecting assessment area (Y /N) YES
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y /N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y /N) YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y /N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y /N) NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y /N) NO
Sub - function Ratina Summar
Function
Sub - function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
HIGH
Sub - surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition
HIGH
Condition /Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition /Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition /Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
LOW
Condition /Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition /Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NA
Habitat
Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
HIGH
Vegetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Ratina Summar
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition /Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y /N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH