Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200941 Ver 1_WRC Comments_20210224Strickland, Bev From: Munzer, Olivia Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 2:44 PM To: Jim Mason Cc: Hamstead, Byron A; Johnson, Alan; Roden Reynolds, Bryan K CIV (USA); Etchison, Katherine; Ferris, Michael Subject: NCWRC Comments - Albemarle Corporate Center PCN - Stanly County Attachments: NCWRC Comments -SAW-2018-00566 - Albemarle Corporate Center.pdf Mr. Mason, Please see the attached comments on the Albemarle Corporate Center PCN. Thank you. Olivia Olivia Munzer Western Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator NC Wildlife Resources Commission Rogers Depot 1718 NC Hwy 56 W Creedmoor, NC 27522 Office: 919-707-0364 Cell: 336-269-0074 olivia.munzer@ncwildlife.or>; www.ncwildlife.org 13 91 n Lm%J Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 1 9 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9 Cameron Ingram, Executive Director 22 February 2021 Mr. James Mason Three Oaks Engineering 324 Blackwell Street, Suite 1200 Durham, North Carolina 27701 SUBJECT: Pre -Construction Notification for the Albemarle Corporate Center in Albemarle, Stanly County, North Carolina. USACE Action ID: SAW-2018-00566; DEQ No. 20200941. Dear Mr. Mason, Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the subject document. Comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as amended) and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.). On behalf of the City of Albemarle and Chambers Engineering, Three Oaks Engineering has submitted a Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) application for the Albemarle Corporate Center located west of Groves Street, south of the terminus of Leonard Avenue, and east-northeast of Highway 52 Business in the City of Albemarle, Stanly County, North Carolina. The 283-acre site consists of agricultural fields and wooded bottomlands. Poplin Branch and its unnamed tributaries flow through the site. Poplin Branch in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River basin is classified as a Class C stream by the NC Division of Water Resources. The applicant requests to permanently impact 263 linear feet (If) of streams, 0.084 acre (ac) of wetlands, and 1.13 ac of ponds. The project would temporarily impact 471 if of streams and 0.043 ac of wetlands. The ponds will be drained to restore Poplin Branch. We have records of the federally endangered Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii); federal candidate and state threatened Georgia aster (Symphyotrichum georgianum); and state significantly rare tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus) near the site. Records of state -listed plants include the endangered western rough goldenrod (Solidago radula); threatened thick -pod white wild indigo (Baptisia alba), glade milkvine (Matelea decipiens), ravine sedge (Carex impressinervia), ringed witch grass (Dichanthelium annulum), prairie dock (Silphium terebinthinaceum), and Seneca snakeroot (Polygala senega). The lack of records from the site does not imply or confirm the absence of federal or state -listed species. An on -site survey is the only means to determine if the proposed project may impact federal or state rare, threatened, or endangered species. Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721 Telephone: (919) 707-0220 • Fax: (919) 707-0028 Page 2 22 February 2021 Albemarle Corporate Center USACE Action ID: SAW-2018-00566 Consider the following changes to the design of the development to minimize or avoid impacts to surface waters. 1. We recommend impacts to wetlands and streams be further minimized. It also appears to be a culvert or ford located along Stream SE; consider routing Leonard Avenue at this culvert location since it is already partially impacted. Consider moving the sewer line slightly to avoid or further minimize temporary impacts (i.e., see Environmental Impacts dated 9.28.20 Sheets 4, 6, 12, and 13). 2. Impacts could be lessened by having the sewer line cross Stream SE at the location of the road (see Environmental Impacts dated 9.28.20 Sheet 7). In general, all utility crossings should be kept to a minimum, which includes careful routing design and the combination of utility crossings into the same right-of-way (provided there is not a safety issue). 3. The directional bore stream crossing method should be used for utility crossings wherever practicable, and the open cut stream crossing method should only be used when water level is low and stream flow is minimal. Manholes or similar access structures should not be allowed within buffer areas. Stream crossings should be near perpendicular (75' to 1050) to stream flow. 4. We recommend using a bridge for road crossings or using stream simulation design to install a bottomless culvert where footers are positioned outside the bankfull and storm surge. Should the permit be issued, we offer the following recommendations to minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources: 5. During the draining of the pond, we are pleased to see that a screen will prevent fish and wildlife from entering the receiving waters. We recommend a slow drawdown of the pond, preferably outside the brumation period for turtles (i.e., summer). Since fish should not be released from the pond and fish cannot be relocated to another pond, we recommend a pond/lake management company be contacted to remove the fish appropriately. Ensure no invasive or nuisance aquatic species, including plants, are released downstream. 6. In the restoration of Poplin Branch, we recommend using state-of-the-art natural channel design and restoration techniques. We prefer natural materials such as coir fiber rolls, biodegradable erosion -control blankets, and vegetation instead of rip rap. NCWRC would like to review the final planting plan; however, we recommend minimal amounts of red maple, tulip poplar, and sweetgum since they are pioneer species and less than 5% green ash. We recommend looking at reference sites and community types for a more diverse planting list, but we suggest including oaks and hickories. 7. Sewer lines should be kept out of riparian buffer areas. We recommend a minimum 100-foot setback for perennial streams and a 50-foot setback for intermittent streams and wetlands. 8. Incorporate the following elements into erosion and sediment control plans: minimize clearing and grading, protect waterways, phase construction for larger construction sites (>25 acres), stabilize soils as rapidly as possible (<2 weeks), protect steep slopes, establish appropriate perimeter controls, employ advanced settling devices, implement a certified contractors program, and regularly inspect erosion control measures. Ensure all silt fencing is removed once vegetation has reestablished and soils have stabilized. 9. If any underground mines, shafts, or mine -like features occur onsite, please contact me or Katherine Etchison at (828) 545-8328 to ensure bats are excluded prior to any disturbance. 10. Disturbed stream banks and wetlands should be restored to original contours and re -vegetated with native plant materials. Riprap may be used to stabilize the bank in the area of the ordinary high-water stage and vegetation (bioengineering) should be used above this stage. Riprap should not be placed on the streambed. Page 3 22 February 2021 Albemarle Corporate Center USACE Action ID: SAW-2018-00566 11. Although the development will be low density, we recommend stormwater control devices particularly with the increase in frequency and intensity of rainfall events. Limit impervious surface to less than 10% or use stormwater control measures to mimic the hydrograph consistent with an impervious coverage of less than 10%. Where feasible, trees and shrubs should be planted around stormwater ponds. This would provide habitat benefits that offset those functions lost by development, partially restore aquatic habitats, reduce exposure of the water surface to sunlight to minimize thermal pollution, and provide essential summer and winter habitats. 12. Use Low Impact Development (LID) technology and native plants in landscaping. Using LID technology in landscaping will not only help maintain the predevelopment hydrologic regime, but also enhance the aesthetic and habitat value of the site. LID techniques include permeable pavement and bioretention areas that can collect stormwater from driveways and parking areas. Additional alternatives include narrower roads, swales versus curbs/gutters and permeable surfaces such as turf stone, brick, and cobblestone. Compared to conventional developments, implementing appropriate LID techniques can be more cost-effective, increase property values, provide space -saving advantages, reduce runoff, and protect water quality (Roseen et al. 2011). Also, additional information on LID can be found at the NC State University LID guide: http://www.onsiteconsortium.org/npsdeal/NC LID Guidebook.pdf. 13. Disturbed areas should be re -seeded with seed mixtures that are beneficial to wildlife. Avoid fescue -based mixtures (i.e, tall fescue) and lespedeza as these species are non-native and/or invasive. Native, annual small grains appropriate for the season are preferred and recommended. For landscaping, we recommend native shrubs, grasses, and wildflower mixes. Avoid using invasive and/or non-native plants in seed mixtures or landscaping plants, such nandina and privet (http://www.ncwildflower.org//plant ,galleries/invasives_list). 14. Sediment and erosion control measures should be installed prior to any land -disturbing activity. The use of biodegradable and wildlife -friendly sediment and erosion control devices is strongly recommended. Silt fencing, fiber rolls and/or other products should have loose -weave netting that is made of natural fiber materials with movable joints between the vertical and horizontal twines. Silt fencing that has been reinforced with plastic or metal mesh should be avoided as it impedes the movement of terrestrial wildlife species. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have detrimental effects on aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills. We encourage each of the local governments to consider integrating additional measures to address the secondary and cumulative impacts of development on water quality and aquatic and terrestrial wildlife habitat before degradation of area streams occurs. Adopting ordinances that protect wide forested riparian corridors and the 100-year floodplain and that adequately treat stormwater in development areas in and outside of water supply areas are essential to protect water quality and aquatic habitat in developing landscapes. Measures to address the issues of development can be found in NCWRC's Guidance Memorandum to Address and Mitigate Secondary and Cumulative Impacts to Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife Resources and Water Quality (August 2002; http://www.ncwildlife.org/Portals/O/Conserving/documents/2002 GuidanceMemorandumforSecondaryan dCumulativeImpacts.pdf). We recommend the City of Albemarle consider green planning, which allows for growth while conserving wildlife and natural resources. The NCWRC Green Growth Toolbox program provides technical guidance, habitat conservation recommendations, and datasets to assist communities in green planning(http://www.ncwildlife.org/Conservin /g Pro,grams/GreenGrowthToolbox.aspx). Thank you for the opportunity to provide input for this project. If I can provide further assistance, please call (919) 707-0364 or email olivia.munzerkncwildlife.org. Page 4 22 February 2021 Albemarle Corporate Center USACE Action ID: SAW-2018-00566 Sincerely, C22 Olivia Munzer Western Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator Habitat Conservation Program Literature Cited Roseen, R. M., T. V. Janeski, J. J. Houle, M. H. Simpson, and J. Gunderson. 2011. Forging the Link: Linking the Economic Benefits of Low Impact Development and Community Decisions. Available at: https://owl.cyT.org/mdocs::posts/roseen-et-al-201 1-forging-the-link/. ec: Bryan Roden -Reynolds, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Alan Johnson, N.C. Division of Water Resources Byron Hamstead, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Michael Ferris, City of Albemarle Katherine Etchison, NCWRC