20020991 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20110310

�.� "iti':r:e� - = _ � •: i^�.��'.��e•la:`�..�va.._� us ' r- %!fi,'r�;`:•� j;�rie_i'� : y ":'.,.... -.. , i_,j -•. .
-•-4' U ,.;"��%� J -. h"� r;�•�;'.,.... , r-c. ""ytr� .:�T.;r r:.'.�tiw �+' y: .
t,,�s ' �. • •r: ' �' r.•' fir':::: 1 �� ;' !�J� , .r �. 5 --+'.: 1 � • ,-_ _
?r Ca*-
r7C :':it:tj \\' _
J •r.:. ?. �\ :�::c •. _ 6'fp�:i.J 644% @:�'ti.'..�•at
.x;%;`+`�:; :..r'�;.,•::��" —: lit ._ r•;'; „'::; %a.,;,- �,.,al.r'd;�`J��, ,��:r� y�...
•��' ^ +i^::�i'.` 'r�!�''' `~rG�.\ _ r���R, +:�tYi:.- i`tiii��'j+ I' �- l.',. ,
��: -- :ti'• - ,rot: `., f:'.� � � ,,{{�;v, ,j;
,� CF ;�^.__ - `' :ry ?: :a — �- _s;,e�. _ �•.�.'`F� • -�--- '�M1 - j�� F;�.�,�ifYv{i:
'1= .. LYC _-_ X445 '.� ^T.'Y'.•i- Y�__�`s•s� -'... .��h.

Monitoring Firm
L
1
IN 0-- X
�E U
ENVIRONMENTAL
CO NSULTATOOK & DESIGN
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
828 - 253 -6856
Protect Contact Steve Melton
Email stevegequinoxenvironmental com

Kings Creek Stream Restoration
2010 Monitoring Report (MY 2)
Table of Contents
1 0 Executive Summary / Project Abstract Page 1
20 Methodology Page 2
30 References Page 3
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0

10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The goals and objectives stated in the Kings Creek Mitigation Report (NCEEP 2006) are as
follows
• Restore 2,119 linear feet of channel dimension, pattern, and profile to the extent possible,
• Improve floodplam functionality by matching floodplam elevation with bankfull stage,
thereby increasing watershed attenuation and reducing peak flows,
• Establish native floodplain vegetation, which will allow treatment of diffuse storm flow
and nutrient uptake while establishing part of a wildlife corridor in the watershed,
• Remove invasive exotic vegetation species from the stream corridor,
• Improve the natural aesthetics of the stream corridor, and
• Improve the water quality in the Kings Creek watershed by reducing bank erosion,
increasing nutrient storage and uptake, and increasing dissolved oxygen of the system
The monitoring year two (MY2) vegetation plot data indicate that the project meets the
established criterion for planted stem density, which is a minimum survival of 320 planted stems
per acre at the end of the year three monitoring period Average stem density for planted stems
in MY2 is approximately 634 stems per acre However, when planted and natural stems are
combined, the average stem density is 2,819 stems per acre, which is well above the minimum
established criterion Of the 48 planted stems recorded within the monitoring plots, almost all
(98 %) had vigor codes of good or excellent Problems with vegetation consist of areas of low
stem densities adjacent to the stream reach as well as approximately ten currently isolated
patches of high threat invasive plant species that span the project extent
Stream longitudinal profiles have remained relatively stable among monitoring years The
primary stream issue observed during MY2 was bank erosion resulting from thalweg migration
and low woody stem densities All other morphological metrics indicated performance
percentages averaging between 88 and 100% Based on the presence of wrack lines and crest
gauge monitoring two bankfull events were documented in MY2
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment
and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in
the tables and figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan
documents available on EEP's website All raw data supporting tables and figures in the
appendices is available from EEP upon request
Kings Creek Final 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

2 0 Methodology
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in 2010 were intended to replicate those employed
during previous monitoring years and are based on standard guidance and procedures documents
(Rosgen 1996 and USACE 2003) Vegetation monitoring data were collected following the
standard CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Level II (Lee et al 2008)
Kings Creek Final 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendices
Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1 Vicinity Map and Directions
Table la Project Components
Table lb Component Summations
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts
Table 4 Project Attributes
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2 Current Condition Plan View
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Cross - Sections with Annual Overlays
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table 10a Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 10b Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic
Containment Parameter Distributions)
Table l l a Monitoring Data— Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters — Cross - Sections)
Table 11 b Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E Hydrologic Data
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events

3 0 References
Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4 2
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program) May 2006 Mitigation Report
Kings Creek Restoration Project Raleigh, NC
Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied River Morphology Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa
Springs, CO
USACE (U S Army Corps of Engineers) 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines USACOE,
USEPA, NCWRC, NCDENR -DWQ Wilmington District
Kings Creek Final 3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
Project No 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
C
C,
C
C
C
C
C
C'
C
C
C
C
C
O
C
C

10 .9 RSf
i
80
276 .
d,
v
-
,
27s
"
Kings Creek
Stream Restoration Site
A 11
F a K Ei F '1
,15
5 .
i
" -
I
"
r"
— I
o
..
`
276 ter..
y -1C
` d
r
NeY.vm C—yv �✓ -
C�MnY
Rutlrerbtl
`""
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
- T
°,7
C wYY
� - � ►
7
wcan nansyna.de -
G,.Y _ c.-Y
Kings Creek
~_ .- 5lream Resloral on S -Ie
Kings Creek
E UINOX ECO stem
EN a 11 N h Y. \ T A I. 1
E1111at-
�r
ox >u>.>.e. >..•,o. elt
�.
P�- Geerndle Sperten
Stream Restoration Site
PROGRAM
rr ao�
�u-Kr county r
Project No. 208
Directions: From Raleigh, proceed west on 1.40 W to Asheville.
0 0.5 1 2 3
Take the Sweeten Creek Rd/US -25 A exit (Exit 51). Proceed
Miles
south on US -25 -Alt to NC -280 S in Fletcher. Continue on NC-
280 S Brevard. NC S becomes US SIUS
Transylvania County, North Carolina
towards -280 -276 -64
in Brevard. After passing Brevard College turn left on E French
7.5 Minute series Brevard
Broad St and continue to Park Ave. Turn left on Park Ave for
Quadrangle
approximately 1/4 mile and project site is on the left.

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table la. Project Components
Kin s Creek / Pro' ct No. 208
Project
a
—
O
t
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
C
d C
Restoration
1,926
Component
a,
8 ,',
a
Enhancement II
d °o
Stationing
en
:: :o
d
Comment
or Reach ID
W
. ,
Totals
o°
0.0
0.0
a
0.0
BMP
Count
*Anticipated
S MU Totals
1,631
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
Excavated new off -line bankfull channel and
Reach 1
824
R
P2
990
840
1+00-10+90
1 : 1
840
N/A
constructed floodplain at lower elevation.
Excavated floodplain on left bank and stabilized
Reach II
191
El
-
191
0
10 +90 - 12 +81
2.5 : 1
0
N/A
left bank slopes. No work on right bank.
Excavated new off-line bankfull channel and
Reach 111
800
R
P2
936
791
12 +81 -22 +17
1 : 1
791
N/A
constructed floodplain at lower elevation .
I e anttctpatea mitigation units are uasee on me expectea yteias aue to the iacx of a mu io -toot riparian ourrer on portions or me stream.
Information unavailable.
Table lb. Component Summations
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Restoration
Level
Stream
I
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Non -Ripar
Ac
Upland
Ac
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
x
Riverine Non- Riverine
0 0
Restoration
1,926
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
191
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
mpg •.
. ,
Totals
2,117
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
BMP
Count
*Anticipated
S MU Totals
1,631
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
The anticipated mitigation units are based on the expected y ields due to the lack of a full 30 -foot riparian buffer on
portions of the stream.
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
A -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
.._..___:_.. T Pro' ct o a
Designer Buck Engineering/ Michael Baker Corp.
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, North Carolina 28806
Primary Project Design POC Andrew Bick (828) 350 -1408
Construction Contractor
Construction Contractor POC
L -J, Inc.
220 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 405
Columbia, SC 29210
Richard Goodwin (803) 929 -1181
Survey Contractor
Survey Contractor POC
Joel Johnson Land Surveying
Joel Johnson (828) 586 -6488
Planting Contractor
Planting Contractor POC
Unknown
Unknown
Seeding Contractor
Planting Contractor POC
Unknown
Unknown
Seed Mix Sources
Unknown
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Unknown
Monitoring Performers (YO) -2006
Buck Engineering /Michael Baker Corp.
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, North Carolina 28806
Stream Monitoring POC
Unknown
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Unknown
Monitoring Performers (Yl) - 2008
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
171 Southern Cross Road
Weaverville, North Carolina 28787
Stream Monitoring POC
Jeff Ferguson (828) 231 -3517
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Jeff Ferguson (828) 231 -3517
Monitoring Performers (Y2) - 2010
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Steve Melton (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Sarah Marcinko (828) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y3) - 2011
Stream Monitoring POC
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Monitoring Performers (Y4) - 2012
Stream Monitoring POC
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Monitoring Performers (Y5) - 2013
Stream Monitoring POC
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Unknown - Information was unknown at time of report submittal.
Kings Creek Final A -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Project Co un
Transylvania
Physiographic Region
Blue Ridge
Ecore 'on
Broad Basins
Project River Basin
French Broad
USGS HUC for Project 14 di ft
06010105010050
NCDW Sub -Basin for Project
04 -03 -01
Within Extent of EEP Watershed Plan
No
WRC Class Warm Coot Cold
Cool
% of Project Easement Fenced or Demarcated
0%
Beaver Activitv Observed Duriniz Desijzn Phase
U
Restoration Component
Attributes
Kings Creek
Drainage Area s .mi.
4.2
Stream Order
Second
Restored Length feet
2,119
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Watershed Type
Urban
Watershed LULC Distribution
-
Watershed Impervious, Cover
-
NCDW AU / Index Number
6-30
NCDWQ Classification
C / Tr
303d Listed
No
Upstream of 303d Listed Segment
No
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
N/A
Total Acreage of Easement
6.11
Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement
5.66
Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration
5.56
Ros en Classification of Pre-Existing
-
Ros en Classification of As -Built
E4
Valley Type
-
Valley Slove
-
Valley Side Slope Range
-
VaHey Toe Slope Range
-
Cowardin Classification
N/A
Trout Waters Designation
Yes
Species of Concern Endangered, Etc.
-
Dominant Soil Series and Characteristics
Series
-
Depth
-
Cla %
-
K
-
T
-
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Kings Creek Final A -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

re "2.
Uurrent Condition Flan View
s^
•I.
I'I ,
.I •I
•'•'•`
0.
4
�•. +> by iF a� ;lit t,
Prepared for
E a cement
PROGRAM
1W 4
.,
h �
Project: Kings Creek
Year 2 Monitoring
Transylvania County, North Carolina
Sheet 1 of 1
Date
March 2011
e � o
a.,
o A
,.
•I•
I I
♦•
�I �
•I•I f � i
�I•I f� .. � .�� +ti j�'qp.
• I. I • s s "Y� .,
w .I � • al"�. r
•I
�C • I
4! ,.0
,I•
.I b
O�
4, �• _
— ,•'�
r ,I �
.� -
�;, A
a I
c
Notes: 1) Base Map Data Provided by NCEEP
2) 2009 Aerial Photo
Project Number
NCEEP # 208
r
ti
z
t
r
• r
e
°4 S
Year 2 Conditions
In- Stream Structure Condition
Stressed
BanWBed Condition
Legend
�
Bank - Mass Wasting
—'— Easement Boundary
=Ezm Bank - Scoured / Eroding
-- -' As -Built Centerline
=mow Bank - Undercut
�— As -Built Top of Bank
� Bed Aggradation
Structures
Vegetation Plots
Criteria Met
T Cross Section
Vegetation Problem Areas
Long Pro Start
Invasives - Dense
Crest Gauge
Invasives - Present
1 Control Points
Low Stem Density
EQUINOX
EKF RONMENTAL
.

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
B -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011
Number
Footage
Adjusted°/
Number
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
with
pith
for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable,
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Sub Category
Performing
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Aggfadation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly
1. Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
1
74
96 °0
(Riffle acrd Run Units)
2. Deyadation - Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
L Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
13
13
100%
I. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6).
12
12
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
2_ Length appropriate (>30%of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
12
12
100%
1. Thalweg centering at up stream of meander bend (Run).
7
12
58%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
10
11
91%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
1. Scoured /Fxoding
and /or scor and erosion.
6
313
93%
6
103
95%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
2
119
97%
2
28
98%
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse.
5
223
95%
3
60
96%
13
655
85%
11
191
89%
3. Engineered
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
14
16
88%
Structures
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
21
24
88%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or anns.
24
24
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3. Bank Protection
exceed 15 %.
29
Pool fonuing structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth : Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio? 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
12
12
100
base -flow.
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
B -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
B -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011
Nom:
,yings Creek / Project No. 208
Planted Acreage 5.56
Number of
Combined
% of
Vegetation Category
Definitions CCPV Depiction
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material. N/A
0
0
0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on M Y3, Stipple
2. Low Stem Density Areas
4, or 5 stem count criteria. Black Dots White Background 8 0.06 1%
8 0.06 1%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
N/A 0 0 0%
given the monitoring year.
8 0.06 1%
Easement Acre age 6.11
% of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combined
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Cross Hatch
10
0.13
2%
(Red - Dense /Yellow - Present)
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
N/A
0
0.00
0%
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
B -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Vegetation Plot Data
C -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Monitoring Year 2 — July 20, 2010
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Monitoring Year 2 — July 20, 2010
C -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Monitoring Year 2 — July 20, 2010
C -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011

\hfcn'li\ C'
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Report Prepared By
Sarah Marcinko
Date Prepared
10/5/2010 8:28
Database Name
KingsCreek_2010_MY2.mdb
Database Location
Z: \ES \NRI &M \EEP Monitoring \Kings Creek \KC -MY2- 2010 \Data \Veg
Computer Name
D16TNK71
File Size
136433920
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of
project(s) and project data.
Proj, Planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year.
This excludes live stakes.
Proj, Total Stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This
includes like stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /wlunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (like stems, dead
stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and
percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each
plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and
natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are
excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
208
project Name
Kings Creek
Description
On the campus of Brevard College
River Basin
French Broad
Le ngth(ft)
Stream -to -Edge Width (ft)
Area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
3
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
C -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011

Appendix C
Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means) ;
Current Plot Data (MY2 2010)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
208-01
-0001
208
-01 -0002
208
-01 -0003
MY2
(2010)
P -LS
P -all
T
P -LS
P -all
T
P -LS
P -all
T
P -LS
P -all
T
Acer rubrum var. rubrum
Red maple
Tree
19
3
91
113
Alnus serrulata
Hazel alder
Shrub Tree
6
6
3
3
1
1
10
10
Aronia arbutifoha
Red chokeberry
Shrub
1
2
2
2
2
Betula nigra
River birch
Tree
3
3
3
3
2
2
8
8
Comus amomum
Silky dogwood
Shrub
3
4
1
3
5
Corylus americana
American hazelnut
Shrub
1
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsytvanica
Green ash
Tree
1
1
1
1
Hamamelis vir iniana var. vir ' ' na
American whchhazel
4
4
1
1
1
5
5
Ju lans nigra
Black walnut
Tree
2
2
L' uidambar styraciflua
Sweetgum
Tree
2
2
Liriodendron to ' ifera var. to ' ifera
Tu ' tree
Tree
1
4
7
12
N ssa s lvatica
Blackgurn
Tree
2
2
2
2
Pinus strobus
Eastern white pine
Tree
I 1
I
1
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis
Sycamore
Tree
5
20
3
3
7
16
15
39
Prunus serotina var. serotina
Black cherry
Shrub Tree
1
1
Quercus phellos
Willow oak
Tree
1
1
Salix nigra
Black willow
Tree
2
1
3
Sambucus canadensis
Conunon elderberry
Shrub Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stem Count
Size (ares)
Size (ACRES)
Species Count
Stems per ACRE
0
23
67
1
11
18
0
14
124
1
48
209
1
1
1
3
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.07
0
6
13
1
5
7
0
6
11
1
10
1 18
0
1930.812711
i4O.471445.21728.4
0
1566.615018
13.49
647.5
2819
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
C -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

Appendix D
2115
2114
2113
2112
2111
2110
2109
[ 2108
0
2107
a�
W 2106
2105
2104
2103
2102
2101
2100
0+00
Kings Creek/ Project No. 208
Cross - Section 1 - Riffle
Station 6 +84
Stream Survey Data
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0+50 0+60 0 +70 0 +80
Station (feet)
MY0 5/2006 — MY2 6/22/2010 —
0+90 1+00
Kings Creek Final D -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — June 22, 2010
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — June 22, 2010
Kings Creek Final D -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — June 22, 2010
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Cross - Section 1— Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — June 22, 2010
D -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011

Appendix D
2115
2114
2113
2112
2111
2110
a�
2109
C 2108
0
2107
W 2106
2105
2104
2103
2102
2101
2100
Kings Creek/ Project No. 208
Cross - Section 2 - Pool
Station 7 +85
Stream Survey Data
0+00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0+50 0+60 0 +70 0 +80 0+90 1+00 1 +10 1 +20 1 +30
Station (feet)
MYO 5/2006 —� MY2 6/22/2010 - -- Bkf
Kings Creek Final D -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — June 22, 2010
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — June 22, 2010
D -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — June 22, 2010
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — June 22, 2010
Kings Creek Final D -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
2110
2109
2108
2107
2106
2105
w
c
2104
e�
W 2103
2102
2101
2100
2099
2098
0+00
Kings Creek/ Project No. 208
Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
Station 15 +13
s
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0+50 0+60 0 +70
Station (feet)
MY0 5/2006 t MY2 6/25/2010 —
Stream Survey Data
0 +80 0+90
Kings Creek Final D -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — June 24, 2010
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — June 24, 2010
Kings Creek Final D -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — June 24, 2010
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — June 24, 2010
Kings Creek Final D -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Kings Creek/ Project No. 208
Cross - Section 4 - Pool
Station 16 +17
2110
2109
2108
2107
2106
a 2105
w
C
2104
W 2103
2102
2101
2100
2099
AA
2098
0+00
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 0+60 0 +70
Station (feet)
MY0 5/2006 - MY2 6/24/2010 --- Bkf
Stream Survey Data
0 +80 0+90
Kings Creek Final D -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

pt r
"M
TA
.- a , ` I., op)
14
MV V,
- fl,
NNW
70�
7k
ff

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — June 24, 2010
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — June 24, 2010
Kings Creek Final D -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D Stream Survev Data
Kings Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2120
2118
2116
2114
2112
2110
-------- ----
2108
-------------- - ---------
2106
---- -----------
2104
------------ -----------------
2102
- ----------
-----------
•
-------- --
Yv� V%41i --------
2100
V---- --------------------
2098 -
2096
2094
2092
2090
>
'X* 'YOO
Station (feet)
Thalweg MYO nalwegMYI Thalweg MY2 6/24/10 • Bkf WS 0 Structures Linear (Bkf)
Kings Creek Final D-13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
MENEM
2010
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
0
00/0
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
0.25
0
0%
0%
medium sand
0.50
1
1%
1%
coarse sand
1.00
4
4%
5%
very coarse sand
2.00
6
6%
11%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
5
5%
16%
fine gravel
5.7
2
2%
1 18%
fine gravel
8.0
2
2%
200/6
medium gravel
11.3
2
2%
22%
medium gravel
16.0
11
11%
33%
coarse jUavel
22.3
12
12%
45%
coarse gravel
32
19
19%
64%
very coarse gravel
45
20
20%
84%
very coarse gravel
64
9
9%
93%
Cobble
small cobble
90
5
5%
98%
medium cobble
128
2
2%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
1000/0
very lar e cobble
256
0
0%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
1 4096
1 0
0%
1000/0
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS1
100
100%
100%
In D50 24
D84 45
D95 73
Kings Creek Final D -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
.—
100%
90
80%
a
a
70% F
L
♦
Q
a
50
a
40% F
�
30%
0
U
20
10%
0%
v
CO
Particle Size (mm)
—+—MY2 - 6/2010
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
25%
20%
is
15% o
'a
O
10%
a
5%
0%
N Vl VI to N Q O w `O N N to R O 00 O `O
�D N N .ti N r7 ♦O O\ N 00 V1
N N 7 OD `O Y
e7
V
CO
Particle Size (mm)
■ MY2 - 6/2010
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
MMMERE21P
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
sift/clay
0.062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
0.25
0
0%
0%
medium sand
0.50
4
4%
4%
coarse sand
1.00
4
4%
8%
very coarse sand
2.00
12
12%
20%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
2
2%
22%
fine gravel
5.7
6
6%
28%
fine gravel
8.0
4
4%
32%
medium gravel
11.3
7
7%
390/6
medium gravel
16.0
10
10%
490/6
coarse gravel
22.3
12
12%
61%
coarse gravel
32
11
11%
72%
very coarse gravel
45
14
14%
86%
very coarse gravel
64
6
6%
92%
Cobble
small cobble
90
5
5%
97%
medium cobble
128
3
3%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
IND50 16
D84 43
D95 79
Kings Creek Final D -16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 2 - Pool
100%
90
r
80%
a
a
70% F"
a
a
50
d
40% z
30%
U
20%
YZ
10%
a
0%
Particle Size (mm)
—+—MY2 - 6/2010
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 2 - Pool
25%
20%
m
4
15%
'a
A
rr
G
10%
u
a
5%
0%
N V1 M h ti N �D 00
r+ O N N N O 00 O
00
tO N N R `, Q
h 10 r+ N V O\ u
O O
p
v
Particle Size (mm)
■ MY2 - 6/2010
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
PENERE2010M
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sih/clay
0.062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
0.25
0
0%
0%
medium sand
0.50
2
2%
2%
coarse sand
1.00
5
5%
7%
very coarse sand
2.00
10
10%
17%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
1
1%
18%
fine gravel
5.7
1
1%
190/0
fine gravel
8.0
7
7%
26%
medium gravel
11.3
2
2%
28%
medium gravel
16.0
4
4%
32%
coarse gravel
22.3
4
4%
36%
coarse gravel
32
13
13%
49%
very coarse gravel
45
8
8%
57%
very coarse gravel
64
8
8%
65%
Cobble
small cobble
90
12
12%
77%
medium cobble
128
15
15%
92%
large cobble
180
6
6%
98%
very large cobble
256
2
2%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS1
100
100%
100%
D50 M"M33MI
D84 110
D95 150
Kings Creek Final D -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
O
,J7
70% F
L
W
60 % W
r
y
40%
t
r
a
30%
20%
10%
i
0%
d
Particle Size (mm)
-+— MY2 - 6/2010
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
25%
20%
a
15% 4
r
D
10% i
0�.
5%
I
I,.
0%
d
co
Particle Size (mm)
■MY2 - 6/2010
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
ROMER
2010
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
0.25
0
0%
0%
medium sand
0.50
0
0%
0%
coarse sand
1.00
3
3%
3%
very coarse sand
2.00
16
16%
190/0
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
6
6%
25%
fine gravel
5.7
3
3%
28%
fine gravel
8.0
5
5%
33%
medium gravel
11.3
11
11%
44%
medium gravel
16.0
17
17%
61%
coarse gravel
22.3
22
22%
83%
coarse gravel
32
11
11%
94%
very coarse gravel
45
6
6%
1000/0
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
1000/0
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
1 4096
1 0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
D50 13
D84 23
D95 34
Kings Creek Final D -20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 4 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
a
.a
70% F
s.
ff
D
a
50
AMv
0.i
40% L
30% 13
U
20%
10%
0%
m
Particle Size (mm)
-- MY2 - 6/2010
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 4 -Pool
25%
20%
is
15% i
9
Q
a
10% t
6,
5%
0%
N to V1 to .�
�O N N
N R b W b N N h R O 00 O b N
.+ .� N M I b N OD kn `O
N 7 00 b Y
C O
N .+ N M1
Y
m
Particle Size (mm)
■ MY2 - 6/2010
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Parameter
Gauge Regional Curve Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
LL UL Eq. Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
a
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
- - - _ -
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
24.22
25.48
25.48
26.74
N/A
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
>150
>150
>150
>150
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
- - - - -
_
_
-
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
114
2.17
2.17
2.19
N/A
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
_
_
3.04
3.08
3.08
112
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (R)
- - - - -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
51.9
55.2
55.2
58.50
N/A
2
Width/Depth Ratio
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
_
_
_
_
11.31
11.77
11.77
12.23
1 N/A
2
Entrenchment Ratio
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
>3.60
>3.65
>3.65
>1'
Bank Height Ratio
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
100
1.00
1.00
1.00
N/A
2
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
29.27
46.01
44.37
68.21
13.2
10
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.0026
0.0069
0.0059
0.0153
0.004
10
Pool Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
28.06
52.43
58.61
69.83
15.6
11
Pool MaxDepth(ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.43
2.19
2.26
3.35
0.54
II
Pool Spacing (R) -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
98.45
150.60
14118
220.88
40.9
8
Channel Beltwidth (ft) -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
61.0
110.8
107.5
173.0
35.2
12
Radius of Curvature (ft) -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
41.0
62.0
56.0
139.0
26.7
11
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Meander Wavelength (R) -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
231.0
276.8
240.0
414.0
77.6
5.0
Meander Width Ratio - - - - - -
Reach Shear Stress (competency) (IMR) -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
4.02
4.23
413
4.44
-
-
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull -
Stream Power (transport capacity) (W /mZ) -
-
-
-
-
Rosgen Classification - -
-
_
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) - - - - -
Valley Length (ft) 1,694
-
Channel Thalweg Ungth (ft) 1,815
-
-
2,135
Sinuosity (ft) 1.07
-
-
1.28
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft) -
0.0049
Bmkfull Slope (ft/ft)
0,0044
Bankfull Floociplain Area (acres)
of Reach with Eroding Banks -
-
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Or -
-
mi
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Information does not apply.
Kings Creek Final D -22 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
MPre- Edsting Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design Monitoring Baseline
Ri% /Ru% /P % /G% /S% -
-
-
- - -
-
-
- -
-
-
- - - - - 33% 10% 41%
SC% /SA% /G% /C % /B% /Be% -
-
-
- - - -
- - -
-
-
-
- - -
- - -
dl6/d35/d50/d&4/d95 /diP /diP(mm)
Entrenchment Class
.1.5/1.5-1. 99 /2-4.9/5.0-9.9/>10
_
Incision Class
<1.2 1.2 - 1.49 1.5 - 1.99 >2.0
_
Kt= Mile /Ku= KWI /r= root /u= lruae /b =mep
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
diP = max pave / di' = max sub pave
- Infomration unavailable.
Kings Creek Final D -23 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
- Information unavailable
Kings Creek Final D -24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Cross - Section 1
Riffle
Cross - Section 2
Pool
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
-
-
2108.9
-
-
2108.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
26.74
26.80
31.14
-
30.30
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.19
2.20
2.46
1.90
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.12
3.30
4.74
3.70
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
58.5
58.00
76.6
58.50
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.23
12.40
12.66
15.70
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.7
>5.6
>39
>4.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.10
Cross - Sectional Area Between End Pins (ft)
-
59.60
-
61.60
d50 (mm)
-
2
16
Cross - Section 3
Riffle
Cross- Section 4
Pool
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
-
-
2104.7
-
-
2104.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
24.22
-
25.70
28.31
-
25.80
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
-
>150
>150
-
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.14
-
2.10
1.96
-
2.50
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.04
-
3.20
3.12
-
4.40
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
51.9
-
53.10
55.5
-
63.10
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.31
-
12.40
14.43
-
10.50
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.6
-
>5.8
>3.2
-
>5.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.00
-
1.00
1.00
-
1.00
Cross - Sectional Area Between End Pins (ft)
-
-
60.20
-
-
66.10
d50 (mm)
-
33
-
13
- Information unavailable
Kings Creek Final D -24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Inform... does oot spply.
R,- RiM, /P -Rw /P- Pool /G- Q, & /S -3cp
SC = Sd[ Clay / SA - Sssd I G - Gran. / C ° Cobble / B - BnWd, / Be = Bedrock
Kings Creek Final D -25 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
® ��®®
mmmmmma
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
® ®
® ®mmmaaama
® ® ® ®m ©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®®®®
mmmaaaaa
® ® ® ®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmm®
m ©meeeee
® ® ®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®®®
�m ©meeeee
® ® ®�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
•
®®®®
maaeaeee�
® ®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmm
®m ©vaaaeem
® ®mm ©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
•
®m
®mm ©eeaaaemmmmm
©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®m
®m ®mm
®mmmmmmmm®
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
® ®m
® ® ®
® ®® ®gym
®m ® ® ®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmm®
mmm
®mmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
® ®m
®mmm
®m ®m ®
®m ® ®® ®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
����®
omm
® ® ®m
®mm ® ®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®m
® ® ®®
: r�rr�r�rrr�t��rr�rrr�rrrrrrr�rr>.
n�rw�rr�rrrr�rrri`
rr�mr�wr�r�rr�r�rr
.�rrr�rr.rr�r����c
®m
® ®mm
a�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�
-A
ammmma
�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmr•
�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�
-.
-._ ,. -.. --
!e�mm�-
- • .mmmmma
®mmmm©
-_ �.__,.., . - __..._
__v_,__.__,._... - -.- •mmmmm
ii
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
mm
®mm
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
N/A - Inform... does oot spply.
R,- RiM, /P -Rw /P- Pool /G- Q, & /S -3cp
SC = Sd[ Clay / SA - Sssd I G - Gran. / C ° Cobble / B - BnWd, / Be = Bedrock
Kings Creek Final D -25 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 March 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

Appendix E ,
Hydrologic Data
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
E -I Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
March 2011