20021882 Ver 1_Mitigation Site Visit_20110414

Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review �I)-�'iu Evaluators Names)
Date of Report Report for Monitoring Year
Date of Field Review Evaluators Name(s)
Other Individuals /Agencies Present
Weather Conditions (today S recent)
Directions to Site 5 5 mi NW of Trenton bordered by SR 1317 on north and Beaver Creek on south
I Office Review Information
Project Number 20021882
Project Name McCotter /Raines Farm
County(ies) Jones
Basin & subbasin Neuse 03020204
Nearest Stream Beaver Creek
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream
Mitigator Type Full - Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status non -DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland 0
Stream 0
Buffer I a 145 24 acres
Nutr Offset 10 g(S G(_
rl�
Approved mitigation plan available?
Yes No
Monitoring reports available?
Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports?
Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site?
Yes No
Mitigation required on site
Associated impacts (if known)
Proiect History
Event Event Date
Report Review Buffer 2/26/2008
Site Visit Buffer 2/27/2008
Report Review Buffer 12/8/2009
�,�� out - r- e_C��► 31q 1 �I
"Add significant project related events reports
received construction planting repairs etc
During office review note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results Record relevant data in Sections II and III
On back of sheet note other information found during office review and /or to be obtained during site visit
II Summary of Results
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20021882 -1 24 4 acres Buffer Restoration
9
Vernon 10 (August 22 2007) Page 1 of 2

Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS
Compared to the approved mitigation plan this project is s ccess ul partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project
Additional comments (e g DWQ follow -up actions recommendations etc)
Version 10 (August 22 2007) Page 2 of 2

Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component 24 4 acres Buffer Restoration Component ID 20021882 1
Description 200 -foot wide buffer (grandfathered prior to Oct 2007) trees in inner 150 shrubs in outer 50
Location within project
III Buffer Site Details
Riparian Buffer (Streams Only) Nutrient Offset (Streams or Ditches)
Streams verified by DWQ es No Buffer Width .a, 0c)
Cam: � n ent
^ s
Total Acres
Restored Acres
Enhanced Acres
Buffer Width 50 > 5
Grandfathered Site? (EEP Only) es No
IV Success Criteria Evaluation
Comments
Total Acres in 9(D
Restored Acres
Enhanced Acres
VEGETATION
NOTE Success Criteria is 320 spa
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/lo cover
3uf c-k awn
Monitoring report indicates success? Ye No
Average TPA for entire site (per report)
% -a& red �-r�G-pu -� SLO o kG
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
Date of last planting
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
General observations on condition of riparian /buffer areas and associated stream bank (e g bank stability
overall health of vegetation etc )
r),o Y`(1 C� 1�J1�OY Y`Q �Su��S �D
U�JL 1 �12d CVi 2 c�S cSl v I S 1
Version 12 (March 5 2009) Page 1 of 2
m�

Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas
Invasive species on site (species location(s) and % cover)
-Few pviva uAdvd_uo is ooakucd
Easement Marking Method
List any remaining issues to address (e g plant survival easement encroachment etc )
MITIGATION SUCCESS
Compared to the mitigation plan this component is s ces ul partially successful not successful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component
Additional Comments (e g DWQ follow -up actions recommendations etc)
During site visit document representative conditions and areas of concern Label and attach photos to
this report
Attach maps showing photo locations problem areas and /or important field observations
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component
Vernon 12 (March 5 2009) Page 2 of 2