20100691 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20101008

lo - 06`� I
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 1 (2010)
HEATH RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Contract No 002280)
Prepared for
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
-.-
Ehia�tnie t
PNOCR"
Prepared by
Restoration Systems, L L C
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
And
Axiom Environmental, Inc
20 Enterprise Street, Suite 7
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
October 2010
all-noto

a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems LLC completed riparian buffer restoration at the Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site ") through the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCEEP) Full Delivery Process (RFP 16- 001383) to provide 59 45 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units
The Site is located approximately 3 4 miles southeast of Dover in Craven County within United States
Geological Survey Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed 03020202080010 (North Carolina
Division of Water Quality Subbasm 03- 04 -08) of the Neuse River Basin Site streams drain to Core
Creek (Stream Index 27 -90), which is included on the draft 2008 303(d) list for impaired biological
integrity and low dissolved oxygen resulting from agricultural crop production
Prior to construction the Site was characterized by ditched agricultural land used for row crop
production Land use practices including the maintenance and removal of vegetation, regular plowing,
and use of agricultural chemicals had resulted in degraded water quality
The goals and objectives of this project focused on improving local water quality, enhancing flood
attenuation and restoring aquatic and riparian habitat These goals were accomplished by the following
1 Removing nonpomt sources of pollution associated with agriculture production by a) ceasing the
application of agricultural herbicides, pesticides fertilizers, and other agricultural materials into
and adjacent to Site ditches and open waterways and b) providing a vegetative buffer adjacent to
ditches and waterways to treat surface runoff that may be laden with sediment and/or agricultural
pollutants
2 Reducing sedimentation/siltation within on -Site and downstream receiving waters by a)
increasing retention time for surface waters entering and leaving the Site, b) reducing erosion
associated with vegetation maintenance and agricultural plowing to Site ditches and c) planting a
forested vegetative buffer adjacent to Site ditches and waterways
3 Promoting floodwater attenuation by ripping compacted soils and revegetating the Site to increase
frictional resistance on floodwaters crossing the Site
4 Providing terrestrial wildlife habitat including a forested riparian corridor within an area that was
previously cleared and highly dissected by agricultural land use
This project was constructed in late winter /early spring 2010 Planting of the entire 60 632 -acre Site
resulted in 59 45 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units The Site will be protected by a permanent
conservation easement As a whole, the densities of vegetation plots across the Site were above the
required 320 stems per acre with an average of 826 planted stems per acre in the First Monitoring Year
(20 10) In addition each individual plot met success criteria based on planted stems alone
Annual Monitoring Report I Executive Summary
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i
1 0
INTRODUCTION 1
1 1
Location and Setting 1
1 2
Project Goals and Objectives 1
1 3
Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach 1
20
MONITORING PLAN 2
2 1
Vegetation Success Criteria 2
22
Maintenance and Contingency 2
23
Vegetation Sampling Results and Comparison to Success Criteria 2
30
CONCLUSIONS 2
Summary of Planted Stem Vegetation Plot Results 3
40
REFERENCES 4
APPENDICES
Appendix A Figures
Figure 1 Site Location
Figure 2 Monitoring Plan View
Appendix B General Tables
Table 1 Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attributes Table
Appendix C Vegetation Data
Table 5 Planted Woody Species
Vegetation Survey Data Tables
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photographs
Annual Monitoring Report Table of Contents
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

10 INTRODUCTION
11 Location and Setting
Restoration Systems, LLC has completed riparian buffer restoration at the Heath Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Site (hereafter referred to as the `Site') through the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP) Full Delivery Process (RFP 16- 001383) to provide 59 45 Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Units The Site is located approximately 3 4 miles southeast of Dover in Craven County (Figure I
Appendix A) The Site is located in United States Geological Survey Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local
Watershed 03020202080010 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality Subbasm 03- 04 -08) of the Neuse
River Basin (USGS 1974)
Directions to the Site from Kinston North Carolina
➢ Take 70 East for approximately 8 miles
➢ Take the Dover exit and follow Old 70/Wilson Street for approximately 4 3 miles east
➢ Turn right over the railroad tracks to wire gate
➢ Site coordinates
o Latitude 35 19627N, Longitude 77 38060 °W (NAD83 /WGS84)
12 Project Goals and Objectives
The goals and objectives of this project focused on improving local water quality, enhancing flood
attenuation and restoring aquatic and riparian habitat These goals were accomplished by the following
1 Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agriculture production by a) ceasing the
application of agricultural herbicides pesticides fertilizers, and other agricultural materials into
and adjacent to Site ditches and open waterways and b) providing a vegetative buffer adjacent to
ditches and waterways to treat surface runoff that may be laden with sediment and/or agricultural
pollutants
2 Reducing sedimentation/siltation within on -Site and downstream receiving waters by a) increasing
retention time for surface waters entering and leaving the Site b) reducing erosion associated with
vegetation maintenance and agricultural plowing to Site ditches and c) planting a forested
vegetative buffer adjacent to Site ditches and waterways
3 Promoting floodwater attenuation by ripping compacted soils and revegetating the Site to increase
frictional resistance on floodwaters crossing the Site
4 Providing terrestrial wildlife habitat including a forested riparian corridor within an area that was
previously cleared and highly dissected by agricultural land use
13 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
Prior to construction, the Site was characterized by ditched agricultural land used for row crop production
Land use practices including the maintenance and removal of vegetation, regular plowing, and use of
agricultural chemicals had resulted in degraded water quality
As constructed, Site activities restored historic riparian buffer functions by planting the entire 60 632 -acre
Site with native riparian vegetation This resulted in 59 45 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Umts (Table 1,
Appendix B and Figure 2, Appendix A) Approximately 0 632 acres of the Site is surface water associated
with Site ditches and 0 55 acres of the Site received no credit due to diffuse flow requirements These areas
were planted, however, the area is not eligible to provide credit The target natural community consisted of
Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood Forest (Schafale and Weakley 1990) Table 5 (Appendix C) outlines
Annual Monitoring Report Page 1
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

woody species planted within the Site Completed project activities reporting history completion dates
project contacts, and background information are summarized in Tables 2 -4 (Appendix 13)
20 MONITORING PLAN
Monitoring of Site restoration efforts will be performed for vegetation components of the Site for five years
or until success criteria are fulfilled After planting was completed an initial evaluation was performed to
verify planting methods were successful and to determine initial species composition and density Twenty -
nine sample vegetation plots (10 -meter by 10- meter) were installed within the Site as per guidelines
established in CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4 0 (Lee et al 2006) In each sample
plot vegetation parameters to be monitored include species composition and species density Visual
observations of the percent cover of shrub and herbaceous species will also be documented by photograph
2 1 Vegetation Success Criteria
Characteristic Tree Species include woody tree and shrub species planted at the Site (Table 5 Appendix C)
or outlined for the appropriate plant community in Schafale and Weakley (1990) An average density of
320 stems per acre of Characteristic Tree Species must be surviving after year 5 monitoring
22 Maintenance and Contingency
In the event that success criteria are not fulfilled, a mechanism for contingency will be implemented If
vegetation success criteria are not achieved based on average density calculations from combined plots
over the entire restoration area supplemental planting may be performed with tree species approved by
regulatory agencies Supplemental planting will be performed as needed until achievement of vegetation
success criteria
23 Vegetation Sampling Results and Comparison to Success Criteria
Quantitative sampling of vegetation was conducted in September 2010 Results are provided in Appendix
C Vegetation success criteria for year 1 (320 stems per acre) were exceeded for the 2010 annual
monitoring year with an average density of 826 planted stems per acre across the Site In addition each
individual plot met success criteria based on planted stems alone
30 CONCLUSIONS
As a whole the densities of vegetation plots across the Site were above the required 320 stems per acre
with an average of 826 planted stems per acre in the First Monitoring Year (2010) In addition, each
individual plot met success criteria based on planted stems alone
Annual Monitoring Report Page 2
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

40 REFERENCES
Lee, M T R K Peet, S D Roberts and T R Wentworth 2006 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4 0 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Raleigh North Carolina
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) 2007 Redbook, Surface Waters and Wetlands
Standards North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water
Quality Raleigh North Carolina
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) 2008a Draft North Carolina Water Quality
Assessment and Impaired Waters List (2008 Integrated 305(b) and 303(d) Report) (online)
Available http / /h2o enr state nc us /tmdUdocuments /B Draft2008303dList pdf [November 10,
2008] North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh North
Carolina
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) 2008b Draft Basmwide Planning Program Neuse
River Basmwide Water Quality Plan -June 2008 North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality Raleigh, North Carolina
Schafale M P and A S Weakley 1990 Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina
Third Approximation North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Raleigh, North
Carolina
United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1974 Hydrologic Unit Map - 1974 State of North Carolina
Annual Monitoring Report Page 4
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Appendix A
Figures
Figure 1 Site Location
Figure 2 Monitoring Plan View
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Restoration Systems, LLC
Figure 1: Heath Riparian Buffer
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211 P
Raleigh, NC 27604 Site Mitigation Site 1:24,000 N
tel: [phone] Location Craven County, NC
Feel

Qwn. by. FIGURE
20 Enterprise Street MONITORING PLAN VIEW CAF
Suite 7 HEATH Date
Raleigh, NC 27607 Aug 2010 L
(919) 216 -1693 RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
Craven County, North Carolina Project:
Axbm Env,�ptmenl,]I. arc.
10 -001

Appendix B
General Tables
Table 1 Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attributes Table
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Table 1 Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Riparian buffer mitigation was completed by planting the entire 60 acre Site
with native forest vegetation credit was received for 59 45 acres of the Site
Riparian Buffer Restoration
59 45 Buffer Mitigation Units
Table 2 Protect Activity and Reporting History
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Final Restoration Plan
--
Aril 2010
Site Planting
--
Late winter /early
spring 2010
Mitigation Plan
A n12010
August 2010
Year 1 Monitoring
September 2010
October 2010
Table 3 Pro ect Contacts Table
Designer
Restoration Systems LLC
Physiographic Region
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Ecoregion
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Project Mver Basin
(919 ) 755 -9490
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics
NCDWQ Subbasm
908 Indian Trail Road
Within EEP Watershed Plan Extent`'
Edenton, North Carolina 27932
WRC Class
Dwight McKinney (252) 482 -8491
Monitoring Performer
Axiom Environmental Inc
Beaver activity observed during design phase
20 Enterprise Street, Suite 7
Raleigh North Carolina 27607
Grant Lewis (919) 215 -1693
Table 4 Pro ect Attribute Table
Project County
Craven County North Carolina
Physiographic Region
Coastal Plain
Ecoregion
Carolina Flatwoods and Mid Atlantic Floodplain&Tow
Terrace
Project Mver Basin
Neuse
USGS 14 digit HUC
03020202080010
NCDWQ Subbasm
03 0408
Within EEP Watershed Plan Extent`'
Yes Targeted Local Watershed
WRC Class
Warm
% of project easement fenced
0%
Beaver activity observed during design phase
No
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Appendix C
Vegetation Data
Table 5 Planted Woody Species
Vegetation Survey Data Tables
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photographs
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Table 5 Planted Woody Vegetation
Species
Quantity
American elm (Ulmus amencana)
6300
Black gum (Nyssa sylvatica)
3200
Green ash (Fraxmus nns lvamca)
9500
Ironwood (Carpinus carohnrana)
3200
Mockemut hickory (Carya tomentosa)
6300
Sugarbe (Celtis laevigata)
3200
Swamp chestnut oak (Quercus mrchauxu )
9500
Sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia vrr tmana )
3200
Water oak (Quercus ni ra)
6300
Willow oak ( ercus hellos )
9500
TOTAL
60,200
CVS Database Output
Living planted stems, excluding live stakes, per acre Negative (red) numbers
indicate the project failed to reach requirements in a particular year
Project Code
Project Name
River Basin
Year 1
Heath
Heath
Neuse
82612
Total stems, including planted stems of all kinds (including live stakes) and
natural /volunteer stems
Project Code
Project Name
River Basin
Year 1
Heath
Heath
Neuse
909 8449629
Vigor
vigor
I Count
Percent
0
17
26
1
2
03
2
56
87
3
264
409
4
270
419
Damage
Damage
Count
Percent Of Stems
(no damage)
488
757
Insects
54
84
Deer
47
73
Unknown
46
71
Diseased
5
08
Rodents
3
05
Human Trampled
1
02
(other damage)
1
02
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Vigor by Species
Species
CommonName
4
3
2
1
0
Missing
Unknown
Carya alba
mockernut hickory
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
0
9
1
Celtls laevigata
sugarberry
4
9
2
hickory
1
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
72
26
4
Carya alba
5
0
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
16
23
6
2
Celtis laevigata
Persea palustris
swamp bay
12
1
1
2
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
54
64
11
5
1
6
12
Quercus nlgra
water oak
47
12
2
3
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
42
32
18
Nyssa
tupelo
5
7
Carpinus carohnlana
American hornbeam
4
4
1
blackgum
Quercus
oak
10
11
6
1
3
5
Carya
hickory
1
6
1
Magnolia vlrglnlana
sweetbay
3
9
1
29
6
1
Nyssa
tupelo
4
7
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
35
101
7
Ulmus
elm
15
6
10
Quercus nigra
water oak
4
Ulmus amerlcana
American elm
13
52
5
1
5
Quercus phellos
Unknown
26
71
2
1
3
3
16
16
15
270
264
56
2
17
36
Damage by Snecies
Species
CommonName
a
C
7 E W 4/
7
M
S
0
w
o
M
E E
= ~
N
'OO
°C
Y
5
L E
-S -O
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
0
9
Carya
hickory
1
7
1
Carya alba
mockernut hickory
0
1
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
6
12
3
1
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
18
89
5
12
1
Magnolia vlrglnlana
sweetbay
3
17
2
1
Nyssa
tupelo
4
7
3
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
21
26
13
4
4
Persea palustris
swamp bay
0
1
Quercus
oak
7
29
1
1
5
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
35
101
7
3
15
10
Quercus nigra
water oak
4
59
1
1
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
26
71
1
8
16
1
Ulmus
elm
2
4
2
Ulmus amerlcana
American elm
29
47
11
2
1
9
2
4
Unknown
1
8
1
16
15
157
488
47
5
1
54
3
46
1
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Damaze by Plot
plot
O
ta
3 E N
O O M
ucu
T
E
M
=
41
4►
o
O
%n
�
c
c 2
CL
E E
3 �
xP
N
C
y�
'Op
O
3
Y
c
t0
L
C M
1
6
20
2
4
2
5
24
2
3
3
8
15
4
2
2
4
6
22
4
2
5
4
23
3
1
6
3
22
2
1
7
4
21
2
1
1
8
8
11
8
9
6
16
3
2
1
10
8
19
3
2
2
1
11
17
9
1
16
12
7
16
3
4
13
8
13
3
2
2
1
14
4
20
3
1
15
6
15
4
2
16
5
15
2
3
17
4
20
2
1
1
18
1
19
1
19
3
17
1
2
20
4
22
2
2
21
12
14
1
1
10
22
6
20
1
1
4
23
3
23
3
24
5
22
1
4
25
2
10
2
26
3
9
2
1
27
4
8
1
3
28
2
10
1
1
29
3
13
1
2
29
157
488
47
5
1
54
3
46
1
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Plot Information
O
G.
>
J
++
O
a
�-
4J
to
C_
> N
J
'O W
0) M
++ V)
C
_N
a
40 Z
C N
> -V
J J
X -W
M W W
C N>
f0
d w J
b0
C
yyj N
CC
G d
\ 4+
"O V1
M
G
N
C
3 N
d
4.
Vf
N
Z
£
0
V1
b0
C
>
J
O
E j
i0+ J
V) N
b0 0
C Z f0
> G
J 4
�„�
O tXLJ
DQ
O U
Q
J L
47 O.
NC
C G
a Va+Of
bq Z W
C O d
>> N
J J Q� W
� X t0 U
r W N Q
C N
C (U J
UJI
41 �
C V
7 Q
w
� W
0
, £
f4'6 1
Z
is
+O+ W
V)
40 U
C Q
J W
d
O
E > cc
N
to �
C Z d
J N
J d
O yXj
w
0.
N
1
2
1
22
22
4
2
24
24
890
890
81
971
971
6
2
2
1
24
24
5
3
27
27
971
971
121
1093
1093
7
3
2
1
21
21
2
0
21
21
850
850
0
850
850
6
4
2
1
25
25
3
1
26
26
1012
1012
40
1052
1052
6
5
2
1
23
23
4
0
23
23
931
931
0
931
931
6
6
2
1
21
21
4
3
24
24
850
850
121
971
971
7
7
2
1
25
25
0
0
25
25
1012
1012
0
1012
1012
9
8
2
1
17
17
2
0
17
17
688
688
0
688
688
5
9
2
1
21
21
1
0
21
21
850
850
0
850
850
8
10
2
1
25
25
2
0
25
25
1012
1012
0
1012
1012
7
11
2
1
23
23
3
0
23
23
931
931
0
931
931
5
12
2
1
21
21
2
0
21
21
850
850
0
850
850
8
13
2
1
18
18
3
4
22
22
728
728
162
890
890
7
14
2
1
22
22
2
3
25
25
890
890
121
1012
1012
6
15
2
1
21
21
0
6
27
27
850
850
243
1093
1093
6
16
2
1
18
18
2
3
21
21
728
728
121
850
850
7
17
2
1
23
23
1
0
23
23
931
931
0
931
931
7
18
2
1
18
18
2
0
18
18
728
728
0
728
728
7
19
2
1
18
18
2
7
25
25
728
728
283
1012
1012
6
20
2
1
26
26
0
1
27
27
1052
1052
40
1093
1093
7
21
2
1
26
26
0
1
27
27
1052
1052
40
1093
1093
5
22
2
1
23
23
3
0
23
23
931
931
0
931
931
7
23
2
1
25
25
1
0
25
25
1012
1012
0
1012
1012
6
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Plot Information (continued)
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)
t10
ba Z
00
r
=
LU
t10
00 Z W
LU
OJ 0C
Lu
£ >_ OC
C
>
C D VI
> D Y
C
in
C
3
0/
y+
H
01
+., J
V1
O U
> Q
c O a
>
C U
Q
+' W
to
+' _5 U
(A Q
en
M
>
w
L
J N
.:1 J M
N N
N
to
00 Z w
Z
J �.
J J W LU
w
Ct0 U
h0 0L
Z
w
°
J
N
'$ 0w1
M X N
Gd1
> G41
C
C
m
'p O.
W X R U
> a
C Q
O
d
t,n
=
a
C >
J
o01 f
cu
J
O
U
a
d
�
O
O X
''a
d
3 0
O
X
O y1 ++
Ln
Z
H
H
24
2
1
24
24
3
15
39
39
971
971
607
1578
1578
7
25
2
1
12
12
0
5
17
17
486
486
202
688
688
6
26
2
1
12
12
0
4
16
16
486
486
162
647
647
4
27
2
1
12
12
0
1
13
13
486
486
40
526
526
6
28
2
1
11
11
1
1
12
12
445
445
40
486
486
3
29
2
1
15
15
1
0
15
15
607
607
0
607
607
7
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Planted Stems by Plot
Species
Common Name
d
'^
s"
a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
8
4
2
3
3
1
1
Carya
hickory
8
7
1.14
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
5
2
1
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
15
7
2.14
3
3
3
4
1
1
2
1
3
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
102
26
3.92
2
3
5
1
2
4
2
7
3
2
3
1
2
1
4
4
5
3
11
8
10
2
4
2
5
5
Magnolia virginiana
sweetbay
13
10
1.3
1
2
2
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
Nyssa
tupelo
11
6
1.83
3
2
2
4
1
2
1
1
3
4
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
45
12
3.75
2
2
5
1
2
1
7
5
8
6
3
3
1
3
1
4
3
5
3
11
8
10
2
4
2
5
5
Persea palustris
swamp bay
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
Quercus
oak
28
1 18
1.56
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
129
26
4.96
10
4
1 6
6
16
4
1
1
2
2
2
3
2
4
9
10
3
4
8
3
3
1 4
7
13
1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
61
19
3.21
1
3
1
2
10
3
1
8
6
2
1
1
6
1
6
5
5
4
2
2
3
1
4
Quercus phellos
I willow oak
92
24
3.83
2
1
6
3
7
2
3
8
13
7
4
9
3
2
2
1
2
3
2
1
2
3
1
Ulmus
elm
6
3
2
2
1
3
1
1
2
3
2
Ulmus americana
American elm
70
19
3.68
6
11
2
7
1
1
6
2
2
10
4
2
2
1
3
4
3
2
Unknown
black cherry
3
2
1.5
d23
2
1
10
15
14
592
15
1.63
22
24
21
25
1
21
25
17
21
25
23
21
18
22
21
18
23
18
18
26
26
23
25
24
12
12
12
11
Total Stems by Plot Includes Planted and Natural Recruit Stems)
Species
Common Name
�
d
'^
o
n
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Acer rubrum
red maple
1
1
1
1
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
28
13
2.15
1
3
1
2
3
1
5
2
1
1
5
2
1
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
8
4
2
3
3
1
Carya
hickory
8
7
1.14
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
Carya alba
mockernut hickory
1
1
1
1
Celts laevigata
sugarberry
16
7
2.29
3
4
2
2
1
3
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
102
26
3.92
2
3
5
1
2
4
2
7
3
2
3
1
1
4
4
5
3
11
8
10
2
4
2
5
5
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
7
4
1.75
1
1
3
2
Magnolia virginiana
sweetbay
19
11
1.73
1
3
2
1
1
1
3
2
1
1
Nyssa
tupelo
11
6
1.83
2
2
1
4
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
45
12
3.75
2
2
1
7
5
8
6
3
3
1
4
3
Persea palustris
swamp bay
1
1
1
1
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
11
7
1.57
1
1
1
1
2
3
2
Platanusoccidentalis
American sycamore
1
1
1
1
Prunus serotina
black cherry
10
1
10
10
Quercus
oak
31
19
1.63
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
3
1 2
1 1
4
1
1
1
3
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
130
26
5
10
4
6
6
16
4
1 1
1 1
2
2
2
3
2
4
9
1 11
3
4
8
3
3
4
7
13
1
1
Quercus ni ra
water oak
62
19
3.26
2
3
10
3
1
2
1
6
1
6
5
5
4
2
2
3
1
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
92
24
3.83
2
1
6
3
7
2
3
8
13
7
4
9
3
2
2
1
2
3
2
1
2
3
1
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
2
1
2
2
Ulmus
elm
6
3
2
2
1
3
Ulmus americana
American elm
71
19
3.74
6
11
2
8
1
1
6
2
2
2
1
3
4
3
2
Unknown
6
5
1.2
1
1
2
1
1
;[��
23
22
669
23
25
28
21
28
24
24
25
18
21
25
24
22
22
25
27
23
24
19
25
25
40
1 1 7
1 16
1 13
13
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Heath
Year 1 (2010)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Taken September 2010
LI LI�:JI� ll
t
D 0 r(
WIN
5
Plot 6
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Heath
Year 1 (2010)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Taken September 2010
(continued)
i`
Annual Monitoring Report
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)
f'
Appendices

Heath
Year 1 (2010)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Taken September 2010
(continued)
Plolt 01
Pot2�3
No photo available
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

A 0
Heath
Year 1 (2010)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Taken September 2010
(continued)
Plat 2�8
Annual Monitoring Report
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)
Plot 21
Appendices