20060404 Ver 1_Closeout Report_20120601

Beaverdam Creek
EEP ID #92217
FDP CONTRACT # D05016
USACE ACTION ID # 200630735
DWQ 404 #06 -0404
CLOSEOUT REPORT
Project Settina & Classifications
County
Mecklenburg
General Location
Charlotte
Basin:
Catawba
Ph sio ra hic Region:
Piedmont
Ecore ion:
S. Outer Piedmont
USGS Hydro Unit:
03050101170040
NCDWQ Sub - basin:
03 -08 -34
Wetland Classification
N/A
Thermal Regime:
Warm
Trout Water:
No
Minor Channel Repair
March 2009
Minor Replanting
March 2009
Project Performers
March 2009
Source Agency:
EEP
Provider:
River Works, Inc
Designer:
Baker Engineering, Inc
Monitoring Firm
Baker Engineering, Inc
Channel Remediation
River Works, Inc
Plant remediation
River Works, Inc
Property Interest Holder
EEP
Closeout Submission
June 2012
Overall Proiect Activities and Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Project Instituted
May 2005
Permitted
May 2006
Construction Completed
February 2007
As -built survey
June2007
Invasive Treatment
June 2007
Monitoring Year -1
December 2007
Invasive Treatment
September 2008
Monitoring Year -2
December 2008
Minor Channel Repair
March 2009
Minor Replanting
March 2009
Invasive Treatment
March 2009
Monitoring Year 3
December 2009
Invasive Plant Control
February 2010
Monitoring Year 4
December 2010
Supplemental Planting and
Invasive Treatment
April 2011
Monitoring Year 5
December 2011
Beaver Management and
Invasive Treatment
Dec. 2011 to
March 2012
Hand Repairs /Brush Mat
Aril 2012
Closeout Submission
June 2012

Project Settine and Background Summary
Implementation of the Beaverdam Creek stream project was completed in March 2007 along approximately 15,500 feet of two unnamed tributaries of Beaverdam Creek in Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina. Subsequently, 24 vegetation plots, 18 stream cross sections, and 3,600 feet of stream longitudinal profile were monitored for a period of 5 years to track project condition and
evaluate success. Based on year -5 data collection, the vegetation plots averaged 470 planted stems per acre which exceeds the year-5 success criteria of 260 planted stems per acre. Repeat
surveys of stream cross sections document stability of channel capacity with only subtle changes related to filling or scour, mostly in pools units. Similarly, repeat surveys of the Unnamed
Tributary I longitudinal profile document maintenance of thalweg heterogeneity and as-built channel grade. Channel stability was documented along with multiple bankfull events per year along
the project. Stage monitoring sites 13132 and BD3 recorded bankfull events in 2 or more separate months during 2009, 2010, and 2011. Year-5 stream visual stability assessment indicated that all
categories (riffles, vanes, rootwads, etc.) rated at or above 96% successful.
Goals and Objectives
The speck goals for the Beaverdam Creels Restoration Project were as follows:
• Preserve /Restore/Enhance 15,806 LF of stream channel.
• Create geomoiphically stable stream channel and floodplain conditions along UT1, UT2 and their
associated tnibutaties within the Beaverdatu Creek watershed.
• Improve the local hydrology through increased groundwater recharge, groundwater storage; and
hydrologic connectivity between the channel and the adjacent floodplain.
• Improve water quality in the Beaverdam Creek watershed by increasing dissolved oxygen
concentrations and reducing nutrient and sediment loads.
• Improve aquatic and riparian terrestrial habitat through improved hydraulic and biologic
diversity.
Page 2 of 20
Project Background Table
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site
Mecklenburg County, NC
Drainage Area:
UT 1 (Reach 1)
0.70 miz
UTI (Reach 2 -5)
1.73 mil
UT1B
0.34 miz
UTIC
0.15nu'
UTID
0.16 nu I
UT2
0.3 miz
UT2A
0.1 mi'
Estimated Drainage % Impervious Cover:
UTI (Reach 1)
15%
UTI (Reach 2 -5)
12%
UT 1 B
10%
UTIC
5%
UTID
21%
UT2
4%
UT2A
2%
Stream Order:
UT (Reach 1)
1
UTI (Reach 2 -5)
2
UTIB
1
UTIC
1
UTID
I
UT2
1
UT2A

Success Criteria
The interim measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the suuz ival of at least 320 3 -year old
planted trees per acre at the end of year three of the monitoring period. The final vegetative success
criteria will be the survival of 260 5 -year old planted trees per acre at the end of year five of the
monitoruig period.
The approved Mitigation Plan requires the following criteria be met to achieve stream restoration success:
Bankfidl Events: Two bankfull flow events must be documented within the five -year monitoring
period_ The two bankfull events must occur in separate years.
• Cross- Sections: There should be little change in as -built cross - sections. If changes to channel cross -
section take place, they should be minor changes representing an increase in stability (e-g., settling;
vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in widtiv'depth ratio)_
Longitudinal Profiles: The longitudinal profiles should show that the bedforrn features are remaining
stable (not aggi -ading or degrading). The pools should remain deep with flat water surface slopes and
the riffles should remain steeper and shallower than the pools_
• Bed Material Analysis: Pebble counts should indicate maintenance of bed material.
• Photo Reference Stations: Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate charnel agWadation or
degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation and effectiveness of erosion control
measures. Photos should indicate the absence of developing bars within the charnel; no excessive
bank erosion or increase in channel depth over time, and maturation of riparian vegetation.
Page 3 of 20

Page 4 of 20
Restoration
Segment /Reach
STREAM
UT1 (Reach 1)
Pre —
Construction
(acreage/linear
feet)
542
Mitigation
Approach
R
Watershed
Acreage
448
As -Built Linear
Footage /Acreage
567
Mitigation Ratio
1.0
Mitigation Units
(SMU/WMU)
567
UT1 (Reach 2 -5)
5796
R
1107
6310
1.0
6310
UT1B
7433
R
217
778
1.0
778
UT1C
744
R
96
624
1.0
624
UT1D
323
R
102
338
1.0
338
UT2
3130
R
192
3298
1.0
3298
UT2A
886
R
64
1088
1.0
1088
Beaverdam Creek
1641
P
1641
5.0
328
UT2
962
P
962
5.0
192
TOTAL
13523
Page 4 of 20

rk— Eixr R:d IL.TO In ikc-0,
.c�krne dtlre ntmativn r_H �_ _ �y� �
Sft,;, _-1, R—L
I
I• I r
'11
I
4
iy,
D00,16 Ln 4.
�.: e4, •.4 lit .� 't— �°rl- �,,- ..,�•4 � - � -.
L'1'2
�'_ •d+° �
`� .... .� 911 all
0l .gmi !F
11le
t 1p
`f1 x591 Jre. tll y
w .. Calh line W
liral5cisl• EPlC.I r..Yo.: Dri5C•161 Fina+ %:eT•pep.fhk_
LEGEND IE-p
Q ra,jay wmhni Bcaa3rp — Cm i.
�� E•ar.rd.m Crnk
— Pejad 7:.dr —1-d.
5'wr : llceicar�t
blet
rr ,�
0
N
Cd
Z

0
N
c,..
O
y
oA
a

Yml 3V3 186 117 501 t2a I 6592 6995
Ni P.W
W4
----------- . ..... ................... . ............ . ... ...... . ................................. ---
ml
wJ
to 116 M 130 W 150 160 1-0
-BUWM it.-i . l..l . 1.1,
14b I low "I
X4 itiffit
I,- BU 11-BU
T.OB .
X7 RM
397.3
"6.5
. ...................... ......................................
..........
593.5
59.1.9 ..• -BnlfiB - M a" -Y-I
-Y-2 -Y-3 -Y- 4 -Y-5
511$ - - -------------
100 Ito lm In 110 00 I00 170
S."
11=1. 6.1 Ek, TDB
.Pane BEFAIa BIe. GE L-o [ LOLL*] I - I , 1 7 .
X2 RUflr
........ ..
600
L 596
IN Ito Co 130 IN M lw 170
i,.. i i-Z . T. I
- DA
X5 RIM,
WI
A,B 11 1
M 170
MaHea
SRaa Arw Am III_
BU M-M
Dopilt Dv& 1_.l BUM.
\9 P.1
...................
'1 593
SW
597
1. 110 U. INI W 190 to 170
IuMY
�J Pool
fw
_V-Z -y- -y-
1. 110 1. 1.40 M LW 16cBW 708
LW
SUUm
I - .. T,,,
1..iimj
I'=
I we
Infludal
at
I Il"MW I
vw
16.9
W41
X6 Pod
SW
Y-4
Ualia
6k1am BAT Dq& Dp& I61 Eft I BU
11111B
T- IF WD SHR0
I
RIIe c ]B3 Ii LO I 1W j 241 1 11. 1 1 1 +2 �bOW 550M
X9 RIM
WS
591
1F !90
369
AO"'* -Y-:
-4
IN 110 120 110 140 1" Im 170

Ba1pm
Bu
sln Bill
7Da
F3wr
T7x
BXF AIN
Bl3 wlea
D—w&
wiD
60.We
Q
813 FJn
0n
rw
ns
lsw
065
rn
uas
1
sv 'W
w'rw
\II Pool
10 Paul
593
�yy
591
j519
j
591
'sat
$y0
.._.__..
Sas
n_dpmr
+ -MBW __.
+1M1
SBS
�Yea2 tirYea)
rt•Ya13
�1Br5
Spl
IN
110 120
Iw
140 Iw
IN IIY
flµ
sums
+ ^Bi1WIB w ^FlwirywS
+ -M Blip
—\'w 1
sa--
Y.v2l'..v s
Slaav
—lia 5
BCF
1W BI:F
WO
160 170
7OH
Fmr1
Bill A10
Bill waY
WAD
Bti Rabe
Q
Hi318n
FIc9
Petl
145863
82
201;
389
It6
9BI
1
BEF Arta
W16
SB676
WAD
BH RaIq
.W POd
1D:F Eln'
EM'
596
5yl . . ....................................... .. .......
......_.._.............. . ^....�...��.._...._......._... _.
r9p
588
W �
363
380
578 -BaeBfoO ..s..Fbodp9r +M"I _Yal
�Yav2 -IrYm! +Ysi —Ym5
-
1N 11!1 IN 150 130 150 160 170
8uaw
Su.aa Bi:F lin BCF' TOB
hMw Am BCE Wl6h wtD 81IBYi6 Q &ff E115' 09v
Pod MO DM 118 ])e 12N 1 SJIN 5)10!
\16 Pad
18'
.......... .._........ _ ................. ......._..........._ --- _._.......... .... ........ . «.._..................a
310
576 �y
576 w�r�
573
7: ( ^
^1-- B1aIdIJ1 a•••hloadpalc -�- -A. 8.11 -l'al
50
�1'm2 - u-1'w3 _Vwl —Yw5
37
IN 110 120 150 130 Ib
E11BBY
591 -
589 —.___ ............._........._....._.._-......_..._.._....__.....__ ............. _..._...._ ...........
q
58T
P
S383 _ ............. __.............
Mf
381 o..gapWl o..3)wdpor ---A, BM —Y-1
�tiaa —YmS
Sig
IN Ito 120 150 1. ISO 160 110
S.W.
FNlve T5P3 BICF Aa1 lTJ wNOI D"
Bu I51D39mFI R'.➢ IBH Ratio Q- BCEEW. 0!9
RIM C M NN 111 1 2W 171.5 3J 9311 51111
Sp PAW
S78
577 `.___........_.__ ..._ �._. .._..._..._....___..._.__.._^..
576
)75
,57J
57.
571
- w..BalF61 ...._Fbodpau +MBih -�l'IV 1
570
-�Ym: - 9. -1'm S �ljari —5ia S
56y
IN 110 120 M IN ISO IN 170 IW
S."
Bw .1_.
590.5
5".5
j 169
y 166.1
y Sp
567.1
47
566.5
too
\I2 RMI,
Ito 1.10 130 130 190 160 170
S."
SYSm BRF 115 BCF TOB
Fwa9 BCE Ata 813 Wf611 WiD I.S. R31ie Q I MCF Elw' ETa•
aa4 G b3 AIB 1N 1➢ 52 1 39 !/9!5 lJyY
\l$ RIIDF
<62
iSN
j
571
!70
57J ,w,.,� .- w••Fluu,yr,v. �A. Buhl - � -Yral
-I�Yw) Ilia J —1'ra 3
fT
IN 110 120 IW 130 ISO IN 170
l3Nua
SY— BI:F 1111 BCF TOB
Flrw T BCF Aa1 BliFwal w.D BR 0.1m E0. BI3 EYy EW
11/1 C 0 .9 3 0." 075 111 16 1 32 61175 61275
M Rllik
Of
613
i�
S 611
615 \
r
611 Bao1(ull w. FOwdpar -�-A, BuJI _Vial
610
IN 103 110 113 120 123 130 IN IN
8YB1a
1Deph
Fsmae
T7x
Alo
BWwdh
D—w&
W/D
I�Bata
Q
BI3 EkY
17ey
rw
ns
lsw
065
rn
uas
1
sv 'W
w'rw
\II Pool
593
592
591
$y0
.._.__..
1 5e3
SW
SQ
flµ
+ ^Bi1WIB w ^FlwirywS
+ -M Blip
—\'w 1
sa--
Y.v2l'..v s
+VNri
—lia 5
5xt1W
110 120 130 110
WO
160 170
slam..
TOO
515m
B,17
145863
FwuS
Tip,
BEF Arta
Hl3 www
WAD
BH RaIq
Q
1D:F Eln'
EM'
1114
L
521
1158
ly
JIJ
lON
1
]5
SBSM
51526
\1i RII'BF
591 -
589 —.___ ............._........._....._.._-......_..._.._....__.....__ ............. _..._...._ ...........
q
58T
P
S383 _ ............. __.............
Mf
381 o..gapWl o..3)wdpor ---A, BM —Y-1
�tiaa —YmS
Sig
IN Ito 120 150 1. ISO 160 110
S.W.
FNlve T5P3 BICF Aa1 lTJ wNOI D"
Bu I51D39mFI R'.➢ IBH Ratio Q- BCEEW. 0!9
RIM C M NN 111 1 2W 171.5 3J 9311 51111
Sp PAW
S78
577 `.___........_.__ ..._ �._. .._..._..._....___..._.__.._^..
576
)75
,57J
57.
571
- w..BalF61 ...._Fbodpau +MBih -�l'IV 1
570
-�Ym: - 9. -1'm S �ljari —5ia S
56y
IN 110 120 M IN ISO IN 170 IW
S."
Bw .1_.
590.5
5".5
j 169
y 166.1
y Sp
567.1
47
566.5
too
\I2 RMI,
Ito 1.10 130 130 190 160 170
S."
SYSm BRF 115 BCF TOB
Fwa9 BCE Ata 813 Wf611 WiD I.S. R31ie Q I MCF Elw' ETa•
aa4 G b3 AIB 1N 1➢ 52 1 39 !/9!5 lJyY
\l$ RIIDF
<62
iSN
j
571
!70
57J ,w,.,� .- w••Fluu,yr,v. �A. Buhl - � -Yral
-I�Yw) Ilia J —1'ra 3
fT
IN 110 120 IW 130 ISO IN 170
l3Nua
SY— BI:F 1111 BCF TOB
Flrw T BCF Aa1 BliFwal w.D BR 0.1m E0. BI3 EYy EW
11/1 C 0 .9 3 0." 075 111 16 1 32 61175 61275
M Rllik
Of
613
i�
S 611
615 \
r
611 Bao1(ull w. FOwdpar -�-A, BuJI _Vial
610
IN 103 110 113 120 123 130 IN IN
8YB1a

Susam B1T MaxBBP TOB
PrMwr Mo .Wish WID BHWda BR BVIrJev flee
Fail tDJ tD OD 098 tH 20]3 61150 61159
U Pool
6H
613
el]
o BaulfWl oFloodlumlc +Ar Buih - r-Yrvl
+Yrar 2 M -Yrar 3 H -Yrat J Ycm !
als
100 IOa IIO II! ISO Il! 130 1!5 IJO
wrw
buem BIT AIo BKF TOB"
Fa1vr i BhF MS BRFWidY W/D . BBltrie Et Bull..'.
Wee C 23.6 16W 1.N IM 13.6D 1 24 SYS93 506A
Xs Rim
...................._........_.._._ ��.................__.... ... _ .............................. ... .. ....
487
SS!
563 ° "BJWiWI � Fl,-11 t —AIBud. —11.1
- 1�1'Car3 tYCYJ 1 "ta5
593
too 105 It.i III I_u 115 130 135 140
S-I..
Seeam a" I Bu
F— T B/TMea B Wielh Dwh Ek, W
Wer C "A 1].N — 11 101 t A.1 1 3] l�W RIW
V RIME
6'3 �
a
--•1W 105 110 114 110 121 130 135 1J0
SYIbY
saY.m BxP AtuBIT — -
rFcuue TJVC BST Aru BKF Width m DCph W:D (BHILIIr EB WY M. Ekr
I Ibel 2J.1 IJ Ul 1 w 141 a JY j wJ.SS SBJ SS
\6 PDDI
$67
___ ._.—....___"__.__.._._.__ —._._
I
485
W
j Sbi
sb_
581
$79
too 105 110 115 IN 115 130 135 110
SuHY I
Page 9 of 20
etream BKF —BKF B1.F TDB .
F.— T BIT M. BIT W.&h W U BH Nara kN kl Elw
Pool 30A IYYI 1 W 21S 1l.S/ I 61Y 1 619.1
Xi Nd
611
_._.____......_.____._..._ ...._.- _____....__._...__._._.o
611
- :•IS
DI'
nle � ~��� '�••Flmdpl+lw ��A1 Bwh �YVI
-+-Y —Yr Y J Y !
61t
100 105 110 115 110 115 150 135 110
SWIM

Beaverdani (Peek I`fl Nlain%tem ProNe (2011 Monitoring)
m
i
Bova I I.Tn
605 • RTB
)i� i.. : \f -Built Tkahreg
600 ....a..•_ {1
565 � r
i I b •• f
1!
Beaverdam Creek I'T i maimtem Pmme (2o11 \lonitoring)
Nw
Slanou

Verification of Bankful Events
Bea%erdam Creek Restoration Site
Station Number
Date of Data
Collection
Date of Occurence
of Banldoll Event
Method of
Data
Collection
Gage
Height
feet
BDl
N/A
2/13/2007
Datalogger
2.75
BD
N/A
8/26/2008
Datalogger
N/A
1/612009
Data er
N/A
3/1/2009
Data logger
V6.66
N/A
3/28/2009
Data logger
N/A
5/5/2009
Datab er
0
N/A
5/26/2009
Datab er
N/A
6/5/2009
Datalogger
6.67
N/A
1/25/2010
Datalogger
7.18
N/A
2/5/2010
Datalogger
6.44
N/A
6/1/2010
Data logger
6.35
N/A
4/912011
Data logger
5.78
N/A
5/11/2011
Datalogger
6.56
BD3
N/A
2/142007
Data logger
0.84
N/A
826/2008
Data logger
0.86
N/A
1/4/2009
Data logger
0.972
N/A
1/6/2009
Datalogger
1.496
N/A
2/282009
DataloMer
1.075
N/A
3/1/2009
Data logger
N/A
3/9/2009
Data er
N/A
3/152009
Datab er
N/A
3282009
Datab er
41�.759
N/A
4/102009
Datab er
N/A
4/202009
Datab er
N/A
5/5/2009
Data logger
1.409
N/A
5/242009
DataloMer
1.453
N/A
5262009
Datalogger
1.762
N/A
6/5/2009
DatakiMer
1.828
N/A
9202009
Datalmizer
0.96
N/A
1/252010
Datalogger
2.66
N/A
2/5 /2010
Datalogger
2.01
N/A
3/122010
Datalogger
1.76
N/A
6/1/2010
DatabMer
1.7
N/A
4/9/2011
Data logger
1.75
N/A
1 5/112011
Data logger
1.72
BDj
N/A
1 2/132007
Datalogger
2.54
Comparison of Historic Average vs. Observed Rainfall
6.00
5.00
— Arerag
L
4.00 0^ —
70%
C 3.00
-30v
0
.q 1.00
- Obam<d ?UlU•II
a
Praipnaam
0.00
o
Month
Page 11 of 20

Reach: Beaterdam Creek UTI (Reach l)
Cross Section 1 Cross Section 2
I. Cross -Section Parameters Pool Riffle
MYl bfY2 NfY3 D•lY4 >;rY5 1,1Y-1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
3nbstrate
BF NVidth (ft)
22.1
19.9
18A
169
18.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
75.1
75.2
75.0
75 -1
75.1
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft21 )
33.1
31.8
28.1
243
272
BF i+fean Depth (ft)
1 -5
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.5
BF tifax Depth (ft)
3.1
2.9
2.9
2.8
3.1
[iiidth,Depth Ratio
14.8
12-4
12.1
11.8
12.6
Entrenchment Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
25.1
23.1
21.5
19.7
21.4
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
13
1.4
13
1.2
1.3
d50 (mt)l <0 -063 0.1 0.097 -0.063 -0.063
d84 (ama) <0.063 0.3 033 036 <0.063
Rn&- &averdam creek VII (Reaches 2 -51
13.1
12.8
12.7
13.0
13.0
74.6
74.7
74.6
74.8
74.6
18.8
17.8
16.9
17.6
18.8
1.4
1.4
1.3
IA
IS
2.1
2.0
1.9
2.1
22
92
9.1
9.6
9.7
9.0
5.7
5.9
5.9
5.7
5.7
16.0
15.6
15.4
15.7
15.9
12
1.1
1.1
1.1
1 2
42
50
59
38
-0.063
75
110
110
97
-0.063
'3a7
L Gross -SeNoa Parameters
Cross Stttin 5
Rime
Reach- Beaverdam Creek Un (Reuic 2-5) ward
Cross
i17m 6
Pool
Cross Sectim 9
Ri1Be
Cross
SectM 70
Pro:
27.0
Mn Yn 1813 M14 h1Y5
MY! 3ffi 3R3 M14 M1i)
MFI Mr h113 M14 MIS
MY1 OIF2 3,Y3 Sm
h815
Diaensaa
BF Width (ft)
151
153
151
149
153
13.5
23.6
233
233
24.5
17.8
17.6
17.4 179
18.0
22.2
214
23.3
21.6
22.0
Floo#me Width (ft)
749
74.8
749
749
74.9
75.0
75.0
710
75.0
75.0
75.1
75.1
75.1 75.0
75.1
74.9
74.9
74.9
749
749
BF Crass SxdawlAm (M)
23.8
33.6
22.8
219
212
41.1
411
41.3
423
45.9
793
29.4
28.1 283
283
44.8
417
45.0
503
45.5
BF Meat Depth (k)
1.6
13
13
1.5
1.5
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.6
1.7
L6 1.6
1.6
20
l9
19
23
2.1
BFMaaDepth(0)
23
2.4
23
11
2.1
33
3.4
3.6
39
4.0
2.7
2.8
18 29
17
33
34
3.6
43
4.0
71. it rA0diRrtio
9.7
99
10.0
101
10.6
13.4
Rd
13.2
13.0
13.0
10.8
10.6
10.1 113
11.4
11.0
11.1
123
91
10.7
EctteLCm®t Ratio
49
49
5.0
5.0
4.
-
-
-
3.5
3.7
41
43
43 41
41
-
-
-
3.8
-
Wetted Pamem(2)
183
18.4
IRl
179
181
27.0
27.1
20.9
273
261
21.1
21.0
20.7 211
21.1
263
261
37.3
263
261
iirdrmbc Radius (ft)
13
13
13
11
11
1.5
1.5
13
14
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.4 1.4
13
1.7
1-6
1.6
19
1.7
Substrate
25A
255
313 303
30.1 31.1 305
24.4
251
36.8
273
27.8
HrdrauticRa&z(ft)
11
23 2.2
10
2A
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
d50 (mn)
45
64
70
86
3
0.2
4.063
-0.063
4063
-0.063
36
40
63 10
75
-0.063
0.08
<0.063
cb.063
4.063
d14 (mm)
85
145
140
125
130
0.45
014
03
01
0.141
3
110
120 135
13
0.7
5
0.45
OS
-0.063
I. Cross - Section Parameters
Reach. Beaivertd>rm Creek IM Qtemkes i
Cro =s Secdom. IS
VY "5 5fS _ SIY3 -Sm VY
D3mPU51Q11
Reach- Beaverdam Creek Un (Reuic 2-5) ward
BF Width (ft)
27.0
Cross Secum:3
24.3
72.9
o i
22.5
Cro Sedo l5
22.7
(Sors Sactiea 16
24 -1
L Cross- Sectma Parameters
673
?001
67.4
67.3
672
80.7
? le
80.7
80.6
80.7
Rime
332
36.1
POW
22.1
22.1
hm
}117 31Y3
MY4
UY5
MYi
MV-
Mn
UY4
M13
MY 131Y2 bM 3114 BM
Mn
M17
MY3
MY4
MYS
1.4
Ditumnion
2.5
4.4
3.1
3 -0
2 -9
2.7
2.7
2.8
2 -7
2.9
'REdiLDepthRaire
219
15.1
213
23.7
20 -1
3F W:dth(A)
30.0
28.64 27.0
27.6
28.4
19.1
202
21.4
21A
2L.6
269 26.0
26.0 27.7 26.8
20.9
21.6
71.6
23.6
239
Floodproce Widih(8)
909
90.9 909
90.8
909
75.2
751
33
751
731
779 78.0
77.7 78.0 77.8
$2.1
52.1
479
511
52.1
BF Cross Secdomal Am (ft2 )
71.7
7756 691
66.4
820
379
39.4
42.7
438
417
59.7 62.4
54.0 46.6 502
36.5
453
47.1
463
46.6
BF Mma Dath(ft)
24
3.7 26
14
29
3.0
2.0
2.0
20
2.0
22 24
21 1.7 19
1.8
21
2.1
20
20
BF Nas Demth (ft)
53
6.6 6.1
6.0
71
3.1
33
3.5
3.7
3.7
4.1 4.7
17 3.1 4.1
3.4
3.7
3.8
3.8
3.8
'd Depth Ra%o
116
1037 103
115
91
9.6
103
10.7
10.6
109
121 L0.8
125 16.4 143
11.8
103
10.8
130
121
Emecdment Rato
-
- -
-
-
39
33
3.4
3.7
33
29 3.0
3.0 3.1 29
-
-
-
-
-
Weited Pmsseca (ft)
34.8
34.1 32.1
324
34.1
23.1
24.1
25.4
25A
255
313 303
30.1 31.1 305
24.4
251
36.8
273
27.8
HrdrauticRa&z(ft)
11
23 2.2
10
2A
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
14 20
1.1 1.5 1.6
1.5
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.7
inbstrate
d5O*W
03
0.1 0.063
0.54
0.18
30
0.4
026
<0.063
30
- 0.4
0.33 0,125 0.4
-
4.063
<0.063
<0.063
0.07
d14 (tom
0.8
0.4 036
115
11
70
50
20
40
t0
- 1.0
0.55 0.47 1.4
-
01
0.085
<0.063
11
I. Cross - Section Parameters
Reach. Beaivertd>rm Creek IM Qtemkes i
Cro =s Secdom. IS
VY "5 5fS _ SIY3 -Sm VY
D3mPU51Q11
BF Width (ft)
27.0
23.3
24.3
72.9
21.1
22.5
13-4
22.7
22.4
24 -1
Floo ftmr a Width (ft)
673
67.2
67.4
67.3
672
80.7
90 -6
80.7
80.6
80.7
BF Crags Sectional Area (W )
332
36.1
28 -1
22.1
22.1
34.7
34..8
33.8
31 -5
34 -0
BF Mean Depth (f1)
1.2
1.6
1.2
1.0
1.1
1.5
1.5
1.5
1 -4
1.4
BF Max Depth (ft)
2.5
4.4
3.1
3 -0
2 -9
2.7
2.7
2.8
2 -7
2.9
'REdiLDepthRaire
219
15.1
213
23.7
20 -1
14.6
15.7
15.2
15 -8
173
Ewrer chment Rate
-
-
-
-
-
3.6
3.5
3.6
3.6
3.3
T , eltelAwimerer (t)
295
26.4
26..8
24.9
232
25.6
26 -4
25.7
25.2
27.0
Hy auLic Radius (13)
1 -1
1.4
1.0
0-9
1.0
1.4
1.3
1.3
13
1.3
Substrate
d50 (mm)
-
0.3
0.26
4.55
042
-
22
32
40.063
4
d84 (-)
-
0.8
0.5'
01. P5
93
-
45
45
40
46
Page 12 of 20

Reach. Baserdam Greek UrlB
Cmis Section 3 rosi 5eoioc 4
I. Gross - Section Parameters I Pool Ri le
MYI MY2 Nn-3 MY4 MY5 MYI MM MY-2 Vl'= hfY5
Dimension
322
Cmis Section 7
12 -6
11.8
Cross
e "too S
I. Cross - Section Parameters
19.2
19.8
Riffle
BF Width (ft)
153
14.S
139
17.3
15.5
11.8
11.1
US
11.1
109
Floodpraca Width (3)
75.1
75.1
75.1
75.1
75 -1
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
BF Cross Sec donaLArea (ft2 )
16.4
19.4
163
19.8
17.6
16.5
15.6
14.1
14.8
14 -5
BFMeac Death (fl)
1.1
1.3
1.2
1 -1
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.3
13
1.3
BF Male Depth (fr)
2.3
3.0
2.7
2:6
2-5
2.3
2.4
2.4
25
2.5
lKdth,DeothRalio
143
11.4
119
15.1
13.6
8.5
7.9
S.3
13
8.1
EureEdment Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
6.3
6.S
6.9
6.8
69
Welted Paimeta (3)
17.5
17.4
162
19.6
17.8
14.6
L39
13.4
13.8
13.5
Hr_ draubc Radras (R)
09
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
I.i
1.1
1.1
1.1
Sabstrate
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.7 0.6
0.6
0 -6
0.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.6 1.7
Sabstrate
d50 (mm)
0.16
0.14
0.1
028
z:0-063
4.063
0.11
<0.063
0.32
QO
d14 (=I
0.42
0.5
0.38
0.56
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.13
1.75
01
013
0.17
0.22
0.5 = =0.063
18.1
3.4
Rarh_ Besserdam Greek LTiG
221
BF Widrh (A)
322
Cmis Section 7
12 -6
11.8
Cross
e "too S
I. Cross - Section Parameters
19.2
19.8
Riffle
Floodproce Width (s3)
39.8
39.9
399
Pool
399
40.0
MYI VIY2 M13
MY4
MIS
MY1
MY2
MU
M174 MY5
Dimension
8.8
9A
20.4
213
17.8
18.1
199
BF Meac Depth (ft)
0.8
BF WP3drh (fl)
12.0
13.2
12A
11.2
10.8
13.6
114
13.8
13-5 13A
Floodptane Width (1l)
70.6
71.2
71 -1
70.4
69.7
75.0
75.0
74.9
75A 75.0
BF Crws Sectional. Area (ft2 )
8.8 9.5
9.6
7.7
71
31.6
303
31.6
293 30.4
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.7 0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
2.3
2.4
2.3
22 2.3
BF Max Depth (fr)
1.1 1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
3.2
3.2
3.1
29 2.8
W.d1tvC,epthRatio
163
18.4
169
16.5
163
5.9
5.1
6.0
62 5.9
EcirecchmentRata
5.9 5.4
5.9
63
6.5
-
-
-
- -
Wetted Peaiimecer (ft)
13.5
14.6
135
12.6
12.1
18.2
173
18.4
179 179
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.7 0.6
0.6
0 -6
0.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.6 1.7
Sabstrate
d84 (t»m}
53
60
57
<0.063
801
<0.063
<0.063
[0.063
d50 (Inm)
42 64
60
93
71
<0.063
1-0.063
0.09 <-0.063 <0.063
d64 (mm)
75 110
130
120
.45
013
0.17
0.22
0.5 = =0.063
18.1
3.4
33
221
209
21.1
Rarll_ Baserdam Greek VIED
173
119
CI035 Section -I
11.7
184
Cross
Secdom. 12
I. Cross - Section Parameters
0.6
0.6
pool
1.1
1.0
09
1.0
?a=1e
13
MYI MY2 MY3
MY4
MY5
MYI
7rfY2
3fY3
iVL-' MY-z
Dimension
BF U, idrh (ft)
153 15.1
20.1
18.4
159
12.7
11.4
13.1
110 11.0
Floo#one Width (3)
75 -7
75.6
752
75.7
75 -6
75.5
755
75.3
75.5 75 -5
BF Cross Sectional Area (132 )
209 18.9
16 -1
15.5
13.5
9.2
9.0
8.6
7.1 6.0
BF Mean Depth (ft)
1.4 1.3
0.8
0.1
09
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.6 0.6
BF Max Death (fl)
2.5 2.2
1.8
17
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
09 0.9
Arldwk Not Ralio
113 12.0
25.0
21.9
18.8
173
14.4
19.9
203 199
Eettet chment Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
6.0
6.6
5.8
63 6.9
Wetted Amitheter (ft)
18 -0 17.6
21.7
20.1
17 -6
14.1
13 -0
14.4
131 12.1
Hydrauic Radios (13)
12 11
03
0.1
0 -1
0.7
0.7
0.6
OS 05
Sabstrate
d50 (mm)
1-0.063 033
0.3
038
0.29
43
38
26
35 33
d84 (mm)
0.22 0.85
0.43
0.98
0.41
85
60
50
SO 55
-
Roach:
BwFerdme
Cswk
11122A
Cross
Section I
CTOW 5
- e 2
I. Cross- Seceion Parameters
Rule
I
PooL
MYl VIY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
I MYl Ml-- MY3 MY4 MY5
BF Widrh (A)
322
13.4
12 -6
11.8
12-4
20.1
20.6
19.2
19.8
20 -0
Floodproce Width (s3)
39.8
39.9
399
399
399
40.0
40 -0
40.0
401
40 -0
BF Crass Sectiomal A- (1t2 )
9.6
10.4
9.3
8.8
9A
20.4
213
17.8
18.1
199
BF Meac Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.8
1.0
1.0
0.9
09
1.0
BF Max Depth (ft)
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1 -1
1.9
2.2
1.8
19
1.8
SLr:dlL CSaprh ltairo
155
17.2
17-4
159
165
19.8
19.9
20.7
21 -6
20.7
Fmuimcltcaenr Ratio
3.3
3.0
3.2
3.4
33
-
-
-
-
-
Wevad Penc2cier (R)
13.7
15.0
13.0
13.3
139
212.1
M2 7
21.1
21.6
219
Hydraulic Radius (th)
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.7
0 -7
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
Sabstrate
15
23
23
21
21
1.9 19 11 ZO 24
2.6
16
2.7
2.6
d50 (t0rta}
35
40
42
1-0.063
391
<0.063
<0.063
<0.053
00.063
--0.063
d84 (t»m}
53
60
57
<0.063
801
<0.063
<0.063
[0.063
<0.063
<0.063
a..A. Anra -r-r ii t7
L Cross -Semis Puaueters
Cross Section
BiBk
:Fuss Sc<ao04
Pool
Cuss Secdae5
11&
Cross Section
2001
5051 3A1 3513 0 MYS
0 3131 3117 MY+ Mil
mn 31Y2 M53 im MF5
5n-i M51 363 h" -.
M55
D menston
BF8'iel(b)
10.1
173 17.05
165
17.4
109
'.0.1
199
189
119
10.6 161 17.0 174 169
14.0
14.4
H.7
151
149
noo$m W- idds(A)
40.0
409 3995
394
399
40.1
40.1
401
1.01
40.1
399 399 39.8 399 39.8
28.0
219
i9.7
2293
229.7
BFCrcis SNwnal.tret(a2)
109
111 11)
111
11.6
359
15.1
229
195
20A
?i.6 21.4 3A 33 216
31
249
3.8
26.4
23.3
BFM=Depl(5)
0.7
0.7 0.7
0.7
0.7
11
11
11
1.0
1.1
IA 13 IA 1.4 13
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.6
BF Mu Both (R)
1.1
1.1 1.0
1.1
1.1
15
23
23
21
21
1.9 19 11 ZO 24
2.6
16
2.7
2.6
15
lW- .ftDeLXRao
39
16 259
24.5
26.1
10
173
17.1
181
174
I21 L3 L4 12.4 124
8.5
14
8.4
8.1
9.4
rRats
23
23 13
14
23
-
-
.
.
.
3.4 23 13 23 14
-
-
-
.
lre*d kistea(0)
173
lt6 it,
179
18.1
3.4
33
221
209
21.1
19.4 124 19.7 19.7 19.6
173
119
111
11.7
184
Erka01ic 3U" (a)
0.6
0.6 0.6
0.6
0.6
1.1
1.1
1.0
09
1.0
11 1.1 11 11 11
13
14
1.4
1.4
L3
Sabstrate
d50 (mm)
39
40 31
:0463
4.003
-0.063
1.003
4.063
1-0.063
38 36 38 34 3
.063
9.06,
0.063
1-0.063
4.003
d84 (mm),
i9
61 i8
+'_
SI
4.D63 4.063 -0.063 4.063 4.063
59 60 +3 52
4.063 9.063
0.16
10.00
O.1

Beaverdam Creek Restoration
lnus semi (a
,swuna ruiloba
Cercis canadensis
Celtis laevigata
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Site
2 2 0 0 0
3
3
2
1
21
I8
13
13
10
9
42.9
3
3
1
1
0
0
0.0
I
I
2
6
3
3
4
4
4
66.7
I
1
I
1
1
0
0.0
Courts amomum
Cornus Jlonda
Jiospyros virginiana
lbazinus pennsvlvanica
htglan.s nigm
.inodendmn tnlipikrra
'latanus occidentalis
Nyssa sylvatica
Quercus michattsi!
Qternts phellos
I
1
0
1
0
1
1
0.0
2
3
0
0
0
0
0.0
1
I
3
3
2
2
2
2
66.7
4
6
1
6'
1
1
3
3
3
6
5
3
13
2
8
6
1
77
76
75
76
74
75
97.4
1
4
1
1
6
3
2
31
28
21
20
23
21
67.7
I
I
2
3
2
3
2
I
I
2
36
29
21
20
22
21
58.3
2
4
4
5
2
1
1
7
4
1
1
54
46
36
35
35
34
63.0
2
1
3
3
1
1
1
6
4
2
5
3
3
2
5
2
55
50
46
38
43
44
80.0
1
4
7
2
4
1
1
3
3
2
1
?f.
3
6
2
1
55
57
47
48
48
48
87.3
1
1
2
I
1
1
1
1
4
1
_
1
20
20
18
18
18
19
95.0
Chwmus ntbar
Sambucus candensis
I
1
1
3
2
2
2
200.0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Vibernnmdenialum
l /irmis alata
Unkii —n htercu.s
I
2
2
1
1
1
1
50.0
'.1'
0
0
0
0
0
1
100.0
4
1
1
0
0
0
00
Stems/plot Years
10
9
14
13
12
10
14
17
3
II
9
13
16
II
12
13
9
14
13
II
12
14
15
7
375
343
290
279
284
282
75.2
Sterns/am Years
400
360
560
520
480
400
560
680
120
440
360
520
640
440
480
520
360
560
520
440
480
560
600
280
470
S tems/a— Year
440
360
560
520
520
400
560
680
160
480
360
520
600
440
480
520
320
560
520
440
480
560
600
280
473
Stems /acre Year
Stems/acre Year 2
440
480
400
400
520
600
520
520
560
480
400
400
480
520
760
640
160
280
480
480
360
320
440
520
640
680
480
440
480
480
560
560
320
320
520
520
520
520
440
440
520
520
560
560
560
640
280
280
q75
483
Average
Stems loan, Year 1
520
490
520
600
560
480
600
1
440
560
440
680
720
480
560
600
600
680
520
440
640
680
680
280
572
Tree # 3.7 was mslabelled as Platanus occidentalis in As-built Initial Counts
Tree # 3 -16 was rdslabelled as Iinodendron tulipifera in As -built Initial Counts
Tree # 7 -10 was rnslabelled as Astrana tuiloba in As -buih Initial Counts
Tree # 7-2,-3,4 were inslabelled as Fra>anus pennsylvantca in As-built Initial Counts
Tree # 14-5,-8, -10 were labelled as unknown in As -built Initial Counts
Tree # 7 -21 was labelled as Lnodendron tulipifera in the field but was not added in the As -built Initial Counts
Tree # 74 was i islabelled as Quercus nichaumi in the Year I Monitoring Counts
Tree # 16-6 was rnslabelled as Nyssa sylvatica in the Year I Monitoring Counts
Tree # 9-1 was incorrectly counted as Cercts canadensis instead of Comus anorrum in the Year I Monitoring Counts
Tree # 8-10 was mislabelled as Quercus phellos in the As -buih Initial Counts
Tree it 1.6 was mislabelled as Quercus phellos in the As -built Initial Counts
Tree 4-2 and 4-4 were mislabelled as Plantanus occidentalis and Framnus pennsylvanica respectively through Year 3 monitoring.
Tree 9-5 was rnslabelled as Ce halanthus occidentalis through Year 4 Monitonn k
O
N
O
bq
0.

EEP Recommendation and Conclusion
Based on 5 years of stream morphologic and riparian vegetation monitoring data it is apparent
that the Beaverdam Creek stream project has performed successfully. Stream and vegetation
components have met success criteria stated in the project mitigation plan as there has been little
change in channel capacity, slope, or riffle particle caliber, and vegetation plots have exceeded
260 planted stems/acre when averaged. Additionally there have been numerous bankfull flow
events across numerous years during the monitoring period.
Based on this documented performance EEP considers the project successful and proposes it for
regulatory closure with 13, 534 stream mitigation units.
Contingencies
There are no project closeout contingencies at this time.
Page 15 of 20

Preconstruction Photos
Post Construction Photos
Page 16 of 20

APPENDIX A WATERSHED PLANNING
The Beaverdam Creek stream project is not located in a Local Watershed Planning area or
Targeted Local Watershed
Page 17 of 20

APPENDIX B — Land Ownership and Protection
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The land required for the construction management and stewardship of this mitigation
project Includes a portion of the following parcels
http / /www nceep net/GIS DATA/PROPERTY /92217 BeaverdamCreek pdf
LONG TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT) the site will be
transferred to the DENR Stewardship Program which will be responsible for periodic
inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement
are upheld
Page 18 of 20
Site Protection
Deed Book &
Acreage
Grantor
County
Instrument
Page Number
protected
William H Kelley III
Mecklenburg
Conservation
19993/946
058
Easement
M/I Homes of Charlotte LLC
Mecklenburg
Conservation
19997/341
153
Easement
Dixie River Land Company
Mecklenburg
Conservation
19751/936
14 03
LLC
Easement
William A Shaw Jr
Mecklenburg
Conservation
19477/923
252
Easement
Burris Holdings LLC
Mecklenburg
Conservation
19477/882
0 165
Easement
Waters Construction Co
Mecklenburg
Conservation
20030/529
1591
Inc
Easement
Bellasera Berewick LLC
Mecklenburg
Conservation
20025/633
2 53
Easement
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg
Conservation
20020/976
22 53
Easement
http / /www nceep net/GIS DATA/PROPERTY /92217 BeaverdamCreek pdf
LONG TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT) the site will be
transferred to the DENR Stewardship Program which will be responsible for periodic
inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement
are upheld
Page 18 of 20

U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
,- Action ID 200630735 County Mecklenburg USGS Quad Charlotte West
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent Riverworks / Attn Will Pederson
Address 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27511
Telephone No 919 - 459 -9001
Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc ) The site for the proposed
stream channel restoration is located on the north and south side of Dixie River Road, in Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Description of projects area and activity This permit authorizes excavation, placement of fill, and
installation of in- stream structures associated with the restoration/enhancement of approximately
12,000 linear feet of unnamed tributaries to Beaverdam Creek This permit authorizes temporary
impacts to 12,620 linear feet of stream channel
Applicable Law ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act 33 USC 403)
Authorization Regional General Permit Number
Nationwide Permit Number 27
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the
attached Nationwide conditions and your submitted plans Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation
from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order a restoration order and/or appropriate
legal action
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified reissued, or revoked All of the existing NWPs are
scheduled to be modified reissued, or revoked prior to March 18 2007 It is incumbent upon you to remain
informed of changes to the NWPs We will issue a public notice when the NWPs are reissued Furthermore if you
commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the date that the relevant nationwide permit is
modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or revocation of the NWP
to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit If pnor to the expiration
date identified below the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified this verification will remain
valid until the expiration date identified below provided it complies with all new and/or modified terms and
conditions The District Engineer may at any time exercise his discretionary authority to modify suspend, or
revoke a case specific activity s authorization under and NWP
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N C Division of Coastal Management
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal State or local approvals /permits
If there are any questions regarding this verification any of the conditions of the Permit or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program please contact Amanda Jones at 828 271- 7980 x231
Corps Regulatory Official Amanda Jones Date June 16, 2006
Expiration Date of Verification March 18, 2007

r-
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Revised 8113104
U S ArmN Corps of Engineers
DISTRICT OFFICE Wilmington
FILE NUMBER 200630735
PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION
State NC
Count) Mecklenburg
Center coordinates of site (latitude /longitude) 3!) 1812 / 80 9713
Approximate size of area (parcel) rex sewed including uplands
Name of nearest waterway Beaverdam Creek
Name of watershed Catawba River
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Completed Desktop determination ® Date
Site visit(s) ® Date(s) June 13 2006
Jurisdictional Determination (JD)
❑ Preliminary JD Based on available information ❑ there appear to be (or) ❑ there appear to be no waters of the
United States and/or navigable waters of the United States on the project site A preliminary JD is not appealable
(Reference 33 CFR part 33 1)
l
® Approved JD — An approved JD is an appealable action (Reference 33 CFR part 33 1)
Check all that apply
There are navigable waters of the United States (as defined by 33 CFR part 329 and associated guidance) within
the reviewed area. Approximate size of jurisdictional area
® There are waters of the United States (as defined b) 33 CFR part 328 and associated guidance) within the
reviewed area. Approximate size of junsdictional area
There are isolated non navigable intra state waters or wetlands within the reviewed area.
�� ❑Q Decision supported by SWANCC/Migratory Bird Rule Information Sheet for Determination of No
Jurisdiction
BASIS OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
A Waters defined under 33 CFR part 329 as `navigable waters of the United States
❑ The presence of waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide and/or are presently used or have been used in
the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
B Waters defined under 33 CFR part 328 3(a) as waters of the United States'
❑ (1) The presence of waters which are currentl} used or were used in the past_ or may be susceptible to use in
interstate or foreign commerce including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
(2) The presence of interstate waters including interstate wetlands,
❑ (3) The presence of other waters such as intrastate lakes rivers streams (including intermittent streams) mudflats
sandflats wetlands sloughs prairie potholes wet meadows playa lakes or natural ponds the use degradation or
destruction of which could affect interstate commerce including any such waters (check all that apph)
❑ (i) which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
❑ (u) from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
❑ (m) which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
❑ (4) Impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the US
® (5) The presence of a tnbutary to a water identified in (1) — (4) above
❑ (6) The presence of territorial seas
❑ (7) The presence of wetlands adjacent to other waters of the US except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands
Rationale for the Basis of Jurisdictional Determination (applies to any boxes checked above) The site contains
stream channels that exhibit indicators of ordinary high water marks The stream channels on the property are
unnamed tributaries to Beaverdam Creek which flows into the Catawba River River and ultimately flows to the
Atlantic Ocean through the Santee Cooper River system in South Carolina
Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (Reference 33 CFR parts 328 and 329)
❑ Ordinary
High Water Mark indicated bN
❑ High Tide Line indicated bN
❑
clear natural line impressed on the bank
❑
oil or scum line along shore objects
Q
the presence of titter and debris
❑
' fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑
changes in the character of soil
❑
physical markings/charactenstics
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑
tidal gages

❑ shelving
❑ other
❑ other
J
Q Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ surve) to available datum ❑ physical markings ❑ vegetation hnes/changes in vegetation types
[� Wetland boundaries as shown on the attached wetland delineation map and/or in a delineation report prepared b)
Basis For Not Asserting Jurisdiction
The reviewed area consists entirely of uplands
Unable to confirm the presence of waters in 33 CFR part 328(a)(1 2 or 4 7)
❑ Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 33 CFR part 328 3(a)(3)
❑ The Corps has made a case specific determination that the following waters present on the site are not Waters of the
United States
❑ Waste treatment systems including treatment ponds or lagoons pursuant to 33 CFR part 328 3
❑ Artificially irrigated areas which would revert to upland if the irrigation ceased
❑ Artificial lakes and ponds created b) excavating and/or diking dry land to collect and
retain water and which are used exclusively for such purposes as stock watering imgation settling basins or
rice growing
❑ Artificial reflecting or swimming pools or other small ornamental bodies of water created
by excavating and/or diking dry land to retain water for primarily aesthetic reasons
❑ Water filled depressions created in dry land incidental to construction activity and pits excavated in dry land for
the purpose of obtaining fill sand. or gravel unless and until the construction or excavation operation is
abandoned and the resulting body of water meets the definition of waters of the United States found at 33 CFR
328 3(a)
❑ Isolated intrastate wetland with no nexus to interstate commerce
❑ Prior converted cropland. as determined by the Natural Resources Conservation Service Explain rationale
❑ Non tidal drainage or irrigation ditches excavated on dry land Explain rationale
❑ Other (explain)
DATA REVIEWED FOR JURSIDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (mark all that apply)
Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant
®
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant
® This office concurs with the delineation report, dated March 15 2005 prepared by (company) Buck Engineering
❑ This office does not concur with the delineation report, dated prepared by (compan) )
❑Q
Data sheets prepared by the Corps
®
Corps navigable waters studies
®
U S Geological Survey Hvdrologic Atlas
®
U S Geological Survey 7 5 Minute Topographic maps Charlotte West
®
U S Geological Survey 7 5 Minute Histonc quadrangles
®
U S Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic quadrangles
0
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey
Q
National wetlands inventory maps
Q
State/Local wetland inventory maps
FEMA/FIRM maps (Map Name & Date)
100 year Floodplain Elevation is (NGVD)
®
Aerial Photographs (Name & Date)
ED
Other photographs (Date)
Advanced Identification Wetland maps
®
Site visit/determination conducted on June 13 2006
®
Applicable /supporting case law
Other information (please specif%)
Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i e
occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation hydric soils and wetland hvdrology)
'The term adjacent means bordering, contiguous or neighboring Wetlands separated from other waters of the U S by man made dikes or
barriers natural river berms beach dunes and the like are also adjacent

11--�
licant Riverworks / Attn Will Pederson File Number 200630735
Date June 16, 2006
Attached
is
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of
A
permission)
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
X
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
5 CTIO 3 The°�followuig�i eritifies °your rights anti options *regardu g`an administrative aj eaf ofithe above
�decision�'Additional �nform,�atio�nmay�`b�e found; at��http / / ?www, -usace aimy miUmet/fimctians/cw /cecwolreg ors° �,�
A INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or object to the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP) you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the
permit including its terms and conditions and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit
i-
• OBJECT If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future Upon receipt of your letter the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written After evaluating your objections the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration as indicated in Section B below
B PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP) you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit
• APPEAL If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section H of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice
C PERMIT DENIAL You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice
D APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information
• ACCEPT You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD
• APPEAL If you disagree with the approved JD you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
11--�

E PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD The Preliminary JD is not appealable If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed) by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also you may provide new
- -formation for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD
jf x � r. �,� f1� ' � �r >SC_ � �'•�� .-��1 FZ J`y S { '� �`� f _���_ w � � YF� �t ��4 �f-`
`hb �
9 fX^ �j�,�. � s � f �� " S �r � k' N.? - i '°S `6 F �r� 35� �c ° y •-� — . `'�.+s � � �`�! � �'„ �B +..,
.� ...$._
SECTION II R� VEST FOR APPEALS` of OBJECTIONSJO -AN INITIAL- PROFFERED PERMIT,
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an irutial proffered permit in clear concise statements You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record )
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record
��INTAOF�CONTAC�T�F�R=
If you have questions regarding this decision
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact
may also contact
Amanda Jones
Mr Michael F Bell, Administrative Appeal Review
1 Patton Ave
Officer
VI 208
CESAD- ET -CO -R
Asheville, NC 28806
U S Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
828 -271 -7980
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY) Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
I
I
investigations
Date
Telephone number
Signature of appellant or agent
DIVISION ENGINEER
Commander
U S Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -3490

Mitigation Project Name Beaverdam Creek
EEP IMS ID 92217
River Basin CATAWBA
Cataloging Unit 03050101
AnnhPri r:rarlit Rnfins 1 1 1 5 1 2 5 1 S 1 1 1 3 1 91 5 1 1 1 3 1 91 51 1 1 31 21 51 1 1 31 0 5 1 1 1 1 1
NOTE No debits have been made against this project yet All stream credits associated with this project are being held for NCDOT TIP U 3321 (Gaston East West Connector)
0 00
0 00
12100
t0 O
0 00
q
0 00
qQ
W E
0 00
O
m 0
$�
0 00
qC C
O
�
C CC
C p
aV.
C�
8.3
W
C C
y 0
S.
11M
L�
L� w
L C
e O
�z
m
Io
m
Ol
g
o
=
Beginning Balance (feet and acres
1300300
000
000
0 00
0 00
0 001
0 001
0 00
000
000
000
000
000
000
0001
NCDOT Pre EEP Debits fe
lNotApplicable
EEP Debits feet and acres
DWQ Permits
USACE Action IDs
Im act Pro ect Name
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
3 003 00
520 00
—E]
NOTE No debits have been made against this project yet All stream credits associated with this project are being held for NCDOT TIP U 3321 (Gaston East West Connector)

X-OW
Project
Segment or
a
Reach ID
° "
°"
"� °
°
Comment
10+00-
T1 (Reach 1)
542
R
Pi
555
567
1 1
567
15+67
15+67-
Existing LF from Final
T1 (Reach 2)
1,572
R
Pi
1,597
1 1
1,597
31 +64
Mitigation Plan
31+64-
Existing LF from Final
T1 (Reach 3)
855
R
Pi
900
1 1
900
0 +64
Mitigation Plan
40+64-
TI (Reach 4)
660
1 1
660
47+24
,155
T1 (Reach 4)
47+24-
Existing LF from Final
1,414
1
26
1 5 1
17
Easement
50 +50
itigation Plan
50+50-
T1 (Reach 4)
604
1 1
604
56+54
56+54-
Existing LF from Final
T1 (Reach 5)
1,955
R
PI
2,223
1 1
2,223
78 +77
Mitigation Plan
10+07-
Station 10 +00 - 10 +07 is
T1B
743
R
P2
790
771
1 1
771
17 +78
outside CE
10+09-
Station 10 +00 - 10 +09 is
TIC
744
R
Pi
628
615
1 1
615
16 +24
outside CE
10+00-
TID
323
R
Pi
352
38
1 1
338
13+38
T2 (Before CE
10+03-
Station 10 +00 - 10 +03 is
130
1
67
1 1
967
Break)
19 +70
outside CE
19+70-
T2 (CE Break)
3,130
R
Pi
3,290
155
-
21+25
1 +25 -
T2
3,130
1
,323
1 1
,323
4 +48
Not included in original
T2A
6 +16 -
88
5 1
77
F could do as
reservation
10 +00
Preservation
10+00-
T2A
1,037
1 1
1,037
20+37
0 +37
T2A Easement
886
R
PI
1,099
-
_
0 +91
20+91-
T2A
47
1 1
1
47
21+38
eaverdam
1,641
- --
1,641
1,641
51
28
Creek
-
T2
1962
P
- --
962
62
51
192
Total Proposed
Mitigation Units 13,204
Total linear ft of channel restored or
reserved 15,966
itigation Unit Summation for
Streams 13,463
Page 4 of 20