20201728 Ver 1_JD Package_20210225

Shaping Communities Together
J
me i 4I I
January 11, 2021
Mr. Chris Hopper
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West 5t" Street
Washington, NC
27889
RE: Pine Level Sewer Force Main Replacement
Jurisdictional Determination
Johnston County, North Carolina
Dear Chris:
This letter is to request confirmation of a Jurisdictional Determination on the above
referenced site. The request is based on data, site observations, and a site visit on
February 4-5, 2020. We are requesting confirmation of the jurisdictional limits of portions
of Moccasin Creek, unnamed tributaries of Moccasin Creek, Bawdy Swamp, and several
associated wetlands. The locations of these features are shown and labeled on the
attached Delineation Map. Included in this letter are the following:
• JD Request Forms
• Agent Authorization Form
• Topographic Location Map
• Soils Map
• Delineation Map
• Photo Sheets
• Stream ID Sheets
Please include McGill Associates on the copy list of all correspondence for this project.
If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact me at 828-386-1920.
Sincerely,
MCGILL ASSOCIATES, PA
JONATHAN HERMAN
Environmental Planner/ Environmental Services
MCGILL ASSOCIATES 1013 STATE FARM ROAD, BOONE, NC 28607/828.386.1920/MCGILLASSOCIATES.COM

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District(Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE&CHARLOTTE REGULATORY WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 Washington,North Carolina 27889
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number:[phone]
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105 Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest,North Carolina 27587 General Number:910-251-4633
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C,D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency,please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D—PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D -NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
Version:May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: N/A (Rights of Way and Easements)
City, State: Pine Level, North Carolina
County: Johnston
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): N/A (Rights of Way and Easements)
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Jonathan Herman
Mailing Address: 1013 State Farm Road
Boone, NC 28607
Telephone Number: 828-386-1920
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
riInterested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other,please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Chandra Cox Farmer, P.E.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2263
Smithfield, NC 27577
Telephone Number: 919-989-5075
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request(copy of Deed,County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version:May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3'4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S.Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps)to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Jonathan Herman & Jon Swaim
Print Name
Capacity: fl Owner fl Authorized Agents
Date )
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
n A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
nI believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties,please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization faun/letter signed by owner(s).
Version:May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)TYPE (Select One)
nI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed(33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner,permit applicant, or other"affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2)who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
ElI am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
171
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
nSize of Property or Review Area acres.
nThe property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version:May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.516837°
Longitude: -78.269968°
InA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than l lx 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water,relatively permanent water,pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters,waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or"Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States,wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
I , l Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled"Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations"to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version:May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form'and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs,please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
El Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
✓ Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g.National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan,previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps,FEMA floodplain maps)
❑✓ Landscape Photos (if taken)
nNCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
nNC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
L Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02AppA Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses:This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local
government agencies,and the public,and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law.Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination(AJD),which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure:Submission of requested information is voluntary;however,if information is not provided,the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version:May 2017 Page 6

Shaping Communities Together
J
me i 4I I
January 11, 2021
Mr. Chris Hopper
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West 5t" Street
Washington, NC
27889
RE: Pine Level Sewer Force Main Replacement
Jurisdictional Determination
Johnston County, North Carolina
Dear Chris:
This letter is to request confirmation of a Jurisdictional Determination on the above
referenced site. The request is based on data, site observations, and a site visit on
February 4-5, 2020. We are requesting confirmation of the jurisdictional limits of portions
of Moccasin Creek, unnamed tributaries of Moccasin Creek, Bawdy Swamp, and several
associated wetlands. The locations of these features are shown and labeled on the
attached Delineation Map. Included in this letter are the following:
• JD Request Forms
• Agent Authorization Form
• Topographic Location Map
• Soils Map
• Delineation Map
• Photo Sheets
• Stream ID Sheets
Please include McGill Associates on the copy list of all correspondence for this project.
If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact me at 828-386-1920.
Sincerely,
MCGILL ASSOCIATES, PA
JONATHAN HERMAN
Environmental Planner/ Environmental Services
MCGILL ASSOCIATES 1013 STATE FARM ROAD, BOONE, NC 28607/828.386.1920/MCGILLASSOCIATES.COM

PINE LEVEL SEWER FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDI
Estimated amount of Geogri
Latitude Longitude Type of aquatic resource
aquatic resource in review the aq
Site Number (decimal (decimal (i.e.,wetland vs. non-
areadegrees) degrees) (acreage and linear wetland waters) subjec
feet, if applicable) Sectio
Wetland B 35.5161 -78.2537 0.229 Acres Wetland Sectio
Wetland C 35.5158 -78.2564 0.039 Acres Wetland Sectio
Wetland E 35.5166 -78.2446 1.635 Acres Wetland Sectio
Wetland F 35.5158 -78.2505 0.252 Acres Wetland Sectio
Wetland G 35.5162 -78.2873 0.012 Acres Wetland Sectio
Bawdy Swamp 35.5163 -78.2767 30 L.F. Non-Wetland Waters Sectio
UT-1 to Moccasin Creek (Reach 1) 35.5160 -78.2563 68 L.F. Non-Wetland Waters Sectio
UT-1 to Moccasin Creek (Reach 2) 35.5153 -78.2507 511 L.F. Non-Wetland Waters Sectio
UT-1 to UT-1 to Moccasin Creek 35.5159 -78.2563 95 L.F. Non-Wetland Waters Sectio
UT-2 to UT-1 to Moccasin Creek 35.5158 -78.2502 94 L.F. Non-Wetland Waters Sectio
Moccasin Creek(Reach 1) 35.5173 -78.2484 58 L.F. Non-Wetland Waters Sectio
Moccasin Creek(Reach 2) 35.5158 -78.2428 1511 L.F. Non-Wetland Waters Sectio

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District(Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE&CHARLOTTE REGULATORY WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 Washington,North Carolina 27889
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number:[phone]
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105 Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest,North Carolina 27587 General Number:910-251-4633
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C,D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency,please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D—PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D -NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
Version:May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: N/A (Rights of Way and Easements)
City, State: Pine Level, North Carolina
County: Johnston
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): N/A (Rights of Way and Easements)
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Jonathan Herman
Mailing Address: 1013 State Farm Road
Boone, NC 28607
Telephone Number: 828-386-1920
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
riInterested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other,please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Chandra Cox Farmer, P.E.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2263
Smithfield, NC 27577
Telephone Number: 919-989-5075
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request(copy of Deed,County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version:May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3'4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S.Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps)to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Jonathan Herman & Jon Swaim
Print Name
Capacity: fl Owner fl Authorized Agents
Date )
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
n A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
nI believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties,please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization faun/letter signed by owner(s).
Version:May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)TYPE (Select One)
nI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed(33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner,permit applicant, or other"affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2)who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
ElI am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
171
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
nSize of Property or Review Area acres.
nThe property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version:May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.516837°
Longitude: -78.269968°
InA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than l lx 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water,relatively permanent water,pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters,waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or"Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States,wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
I , l Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled"Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations"to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version:May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form'and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs,please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
El Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
✓ Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g.National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan,previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps,FEMA floodplain maps)
❑✓ Landscape Photos (if taken)
nNCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
nNC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
L Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02AppA Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses:This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local
government agencies,and the public,and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law.Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination(AJD),which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure:Submission of requested information is voluntary;however,if information is not provided,the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version:May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 12/15/20
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Jonathan Herman, McGill Associates P.A., 1013 State Farm
Road, Boone, NC 28607
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Johnston City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.516837° Long.: -78.269968°
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Bawdy Swamp & Moccasin Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑■ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 2/3/2020
❑■ Field Determination. Date(s): 2/4/2020 - 2/5/2020
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e.,wetland to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be"
(acreage and linear waters) subject(i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404)
See attached spreadsheet
0 0

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
n Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:LOCATION, SOIL, USGS, DELINEATION
n Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
n D• ata sheets prepared by the Corps:
n Corps navigable waters' study:
n U• .S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
n USGS NHD data.
n USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
n U• .S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
n Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
n N• ational wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
n State/local wetland inventory map(s):
n F• EMA/FIRM maps:
n 1• 00-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
n P• hotographs: n Aerial (Name & Date):
or n Other (Name & Date):
n Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
n Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 12/15/20
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Jonathan Herman, McGill Associates P.A., 1013 State Farm
Road, Boone, NC 28607
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Johnston City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.516837° Long.: -78.269968°
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Bawdy Swamp & Moccasin Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑■ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 2/3/2020
❑■ Field Determination. Date(s): 2/4/2020 - 2/5/2020
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e.,wetland to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be"
(acreage and linear waters) subject(i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404)
See attached spreadsheet
0 0

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
n Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:LOCATION, SOIL, USGS, DELINEATION
n Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
n D• ata sheets prepared by the Corps:
n Corps navigable waters' study:
n U• .S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
n USGS NHD data.
n USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
n U• .S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
n Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
n N• ational wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
n State/local wetland inventory map(s):
n F• EMA/FIRM maps:
n 1• 00-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
n P• hotographs: n Aerial (Name & Date):
or n Other (Name & Date):
n Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
n Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM n
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Pine Level Sewer Force Main Replacement
2. Work Type: ❑Private ninstitutional ❑Government ❑Commercial
3. Project Description/Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
The project proposes approximately 20,300 linear feet of new force main sewer line from the existing Pine Level pump station on North
Peedin Ave,following an existing gravity sewer line,and discharging into an existing manhole adjacent to Outlet Center Dr. This will
increase the capacity of the sanitary sewer collection system for Pine Level allowing for the town to grow further in the future as they
are nearing their Flow capacity.Most of the lines will be installed adjacent to existing roads with some being installed cross country
following the existing gravity sewer.
4. Property Owner/Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Johnston County
5. Agent/Consultant [PNC Form A5 —or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Jonathan Herman, McGill Associates, P.A.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location—Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Bib]:
35.516837°, -78.269968°
8. Project Location—Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: N/A (Rights of Way & Easements)
9. Project Location—County [PCN Form A2b]: Johnston
10. Project Location—Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Pine Level
11. Project Information—Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Bawdy Swamp & Moccasin Creek
12. Watershed/ 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:03020201
Authorization: Section 10 Ti Section 404 Ti Section 10 and 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit ❑Pre-Application Request
L. Nationwide Permit# ❑Unauthorized Activity
Regional General Permit# n Compliance
Jurisdictional Determination Request FNo Permit Required
Revised 20150602

PINE LEVEL SEWER FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDI
Estimated amount of Geogri
Latitude Longitude Type of aquatic resource
aquatic resource in review the aq
Site Number (decimal (decimal (i.e.,wetland vs. non-
areadegrees) degrees) (acreage and linear wetland waters) subjec
feet, if applicable) Sectio
Wetland B 35.5161 -78.2537 0.229 Acres Wetland Sectio
Wetland C 35.5158 -78.2564 0.039 Acres Wetland Sectio
Wetland E 35.5166 -78.2446 1.635 Acres Wetland Sectio
Wetland F 35.5158 -78.2505 0.252 Acres Wetland Sectio
Wetland G 35.5162 -78.2873 0.012 Acres Wetland Sectio
Bawdy Swamp 35.5163 -78.2767 30 L.F. Non-Wetland Waters Sectio
UT-1 to Moccasin Creek (Reach 1) 35.5160 -78.2563 68 L.F. Non-Wetland Waters Sectio
UT-1 to Moccasin Creek (Reach 2) 35.5153 -78.2507 511 L.F. Non-Wetland Waters Sectio
UT-1 to UT-1 to Moccasin Creek 35.5159 -78.2563 95 L.F. Non-Wetland Waters Sectio
UT-2 to UT-1 to Moccasin Creek 35.5158 -78.2502 94 L.F. Non-Wetland Waters Sectio
Moccasin Creek(Reach 1) 35.5173 -78.2484 58 L.F. Non-Wetland Waters Sectio
Moccasin Creek(Reach 2) 35.5158 -78.2428 1511 L.F. Non-Wetland Waters Sectio

USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource
Department of Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for
States Department of
RCS Agriculture and other Johnston County,
Federal agencies, State
Natural agencies including the North Carolina
Resources Agricultural Experiment
Conservation Stations, and local
Service participants Pine Level Sewer Force Main
Replacement Project
°VII; Nict-•. ,. 4.;,,,;; .4,4,
400.
-- A )...0 . .....2f.: ....% 6r7. IV i71 _ , •••.,.. . , ,- I! 1 IA: . ..I
r lirmit..--i /./3. ..,..,-. :..,„.1_,.... ..,..., . . ..„
.14_
;iill
\ -'..N...N.A4- ..I 11 ill.--' -16. . .... A
6IIIP - 41. I . s., L i.i " . _..1/44... ...... ,:1\
,...,..w....„, ,,, /i-,.:...... _ ___ca, iiii
r �
,. , .
. • 6 i-1:..-4: .
I- it to
re-r -'- . y .-A4 . 7 0,7.
, . .,.._ . 4
f . ,
1. „...- 1 _7,_1 - ••
\' - j.''':
.-7-41.
9 i
} }r
liri
". 'ft '11 . . :. Ili:'-L1'12:11LI,
to 5.000 ft li. }�-•n..� - .• ..
December 17, 2020

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or(202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface 2
Soil Map 5
Soil Map 6
Legend 11
Map Unit Legend 12
Map Unit Descriptions 12
Johnston County, North Carolina 15
Bb—Bibb sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded 15
CoB—Cowarts loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes 16
GoA—Goldsboro sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 17
Gr—Grantham silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 18
Ly—Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 20
Na—Nahunta silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 21
NoA—Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 23
NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes 24
NuA—Norfolk-Urban land complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes 25
Ra—Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 27
References 29
4

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
m Index Sheet
R
745000 745600 746200 746800 747400 748000 748600 749200
35°32'1"N I I I I I I
40
..., _. .
,____ ___ fut
M
) r- ,.„,,
ISI415,111°' N '
tee;
- No
-
Ly e.a la.a • 2 3 4
Lyc:oe R - \.,
. RaGoA G
•
0.
N—
8 • j
c — 1
- Mm AIM
35°29'59"N I I I
745000 745600 746200 746800 747400 748000 748600 749200 749
m
Map Scale:1:26,400 if printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5")sheet.
Meters
N N 0 350 700 1400 2100
Feet
A
M1000 Z000 4000 6000
ap projection:Web Mercator Comerwordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 17N WGS84
6

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
Map sheet 1 of 4
N
745200 745300 745400 745500 745600 745700 745800 745900 746000 746100 74620C
35°31'14"N -
8 �f
---------- - - i - -, -
'Ill h .,. 1 R':p i
, fir` •
.11
c ,
•S .. -':� ,may... 0uay,11 — �A
A \\
ce
es ' �Ra_..
t -',
GoA GOA
M
1
Gsy , 4
„4 Flyo�er--.,c
aon Hap may noit Pa eaHcil ail o@ walla. �� -____ r
35°30'46"N __
745200 745300 745400 745500 745600 745700 745800 745900 746000 74610 746200
m
Map Scale:1:6,000 if printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5")sheet.
Meters
N N 0 52 100 200 330
Feet
A
0 2y0 y00 1000 1y00
Map projection:Web Mercator Canerwordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zane 17N WGS84
7 1
Map She

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
Map sheet 2 of 4
N
746500 746600 746700 746800 746900 747000 747100 747200 747300 747400 747500
35°31 14"N
s1 4
'"-N-,
8 i
� 1
1 J
3
Ra r , } l_tiy
N GoA ,
A
Na /! �.
�• S H�9hkal% 0�
4 r
k.
/ 4 '
a Y
s® u Hap may noil lia walla ail no@ walla.
35°30'46"N "
746500 746030 746700 746800 746900 747000 747100 747200 747300 747400 747500
Map Scale:1:6,000 if printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5")sheet.
Meters
N N 0 50 100 200 330
Feet
A
0 250 500 1000 1500
Map projection:Web Mercator Comerwordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zane 17N WGS84
8 2
Map She

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
En Map sheet 3 of 4
N
747800 747900 748000 748100 748200 748300 748400 748500 748W0 748700 748800
35°31'14"N
/ . •l 1•.
. - 741.. : J... • ..,
i
•
t�. T1, r
i
• - -....
•
2 ha IFirrp,,,..---
r
L
a
L,y GoA
��yA GoA
, I,
,1a000 Gawp MI5uiot lie e� tl tlfnn@ ba �~ -�
■
35°30'46"N i ■ r . ,.
747800 747900 748000 748100 748200 748300 748400 748500 748600 748700 748800
En
Map Scale:1:6,000 if printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5")sheet.
N N Meters
0 50 100 200 330
Feet
A
0 2y0 y00 1000 1y00
Map projection:Web Mercator Comerworrdinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zane 17N WGS84
9
Map She

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
Map sheet 4 of 4
8
749100 749200 749300 749400 749500 749600 749700 749800 749900 750000 750100
35°31'14"N
A Ji' - - ..
7 . ...:. k_
r -. .,6'yr
l:.
` Bb '
10
OP 111/' ' :
AicN�`
Gr GoA� > . r _
�. .. . coB . ..
G •
`
r ate '
I.
-- M' „ r re fir .7, f 4 J4.
749100 749200 749300 749400 749500 749600 749700 749800 749900 750000 750100
S
Map Scale:1:6,000 if printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5")sheet.
Meters
N N 0 50 100 200 330
Feet
A
0 2y0 y00 1000 1y00
Map projection:Web Mercator Comerwordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zane 17N WGS84
10
Map She

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMA
Area of Interest(AOI) -. Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI 1
n Area of Interest(AOI) Sy Y Sot 1:24,000.
p
Soils Very Stony Spot
0 Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at thi
7. Wet Spot
Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale o
Other misunderstandingof the detail of ma inl
E Soil Map Unit Points pp
Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show th
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been sh
Lw Blowout Water Features scale.
Streams and Canals
14 Borrow Pit
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each mar
Clay Spot I F Rails measurements.
Closed Depression
., Interstate Highways
Source of Map: Natural Resources Con
• Gravel Pit US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EP
Major Roads
• Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are base
A. Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and
distance and area.A projection that pres(
46 Marsh or swamp cis Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,shout
Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area
Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA
▪ Perennial Water of the version date(s)listed below.
Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Johnston County, Noi
• Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 24,Jun 4,2
Sandy Spot Soil map units are labeled(as space alloy
Severely Eroded Spot 1:50,000 or larger.
• Sinkhole Date(s)aerial images were photographer
Slide or Slip 25,2018
oa Sodic Spot The orthophoto or other base map on wh
compiled and digitized probably differs frc
imagery displayed on these maps.As a r
shifting of map unit boundaries may be en
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Bb Bibb sandy loam,0 to 2 percent 7.1 36.7%
slopes,frequently flooded
CoB Cowarts loamy sand,2 to 6 0.0 0.0%
percent slopes
GoA Goldsboro sandy loam,0 to 2 0.8 4.0%
percent slopes
Gr Grantham silt loam,0 to 2 3.9 20.0%
percent slopes
Ly Lynchburg sandy loam,0 to 2 2.6 13.1%
percent slopes
Na Nahunta silt loam,0 to 2 1.0 5.2%
percent slopes
NoA Norfolk loamy sand,0 to 2 0.1 0.6%
percent slopes
NoB Norfolk loamy sand,2 to 6 0.5 2.7%
percent slopes
NuA Norfolk-Urban land complex,0 0.0 0.2%
to 3 percent slopes
Ra Rains sandy loam,0 to 2 3.4 17.3%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 19.5 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Johnston County, North Carolina
Bb—Bibb sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3t3x
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Bibb, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Johnston, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Bibb, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Cg1 - 6 to 60 inches: sandy loam
Cg2- 60 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Johnston, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
A - 0 to 30 inches: mucky loam
Cg1 -30 to 34 inches: loamy fine sand
Cg2-34 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Ponded
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: Frequent
Available water capacity: High (about 9.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
CoB—Cowarts loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3t43
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Cowarts and similar soils: 80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Cowarts
Setting
Landform: Ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy and sandy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 6 inches: loamy sand
Bt- 6 to 34 inches: sandy clay loam
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
C-34 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
GoA—Goldsboro sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3t4c
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Goldsboro and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components:2 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Goldsboro
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
E- 8 to 15 inches: sandy loam
Bt- 15 to 45 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg-45 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Rains, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Gr—Grantham silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3t4d
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Grantham, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Grantham, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Grantham, Drained
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Concave, linear
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: loam
Eg- 6 to 11 inches: loam
Btg- 11 to 77 inches: loam
Cg- 77 to 110 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 10.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Grantham, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Concave, linear
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: loam
Eg- 6 to 11 inches: loam
Btg- 11 to 77 inches: loam
Cg- 77 to 110 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 10.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Ly—Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vx8p
Elevation: 10 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Lynchburg and similar soils: 84 percent
Minor components: 16 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lynchburg
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
E- 8 to 11 inches: sandy loam
Bt- 11 to 21 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg-21 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg- 65 to 85 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 6 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: No
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Rains
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Na—Nahunta silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3t4m
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Nahunta, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Nahunta, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Minor components: 7 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Nahunta, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 8 inches: loam
E- 8 to 12 inches: loam
Btg- 12 to 79 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 12 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 10.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Nahunta, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
A - O to 8 inches: loam
E- 8 to 12 inches: loam
Btg- 12 to 79 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 12 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 10.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Grantham, undrained
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Concave, linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Rains, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
NoA—Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v75w
Elevation: 10 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 83 percent
Minor components: 17 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across-slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E- 8 to 14 inches: loamy sand
Bt- 14 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BC- 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
23

Custom Soil Resource Report
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 9 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Wagram
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, talf
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v75y
Elevation: 30 to 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 83 percent
Minor components: 17 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across-slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E- 8 to 14 inches: loamy sand
24

Custom Soil Resource Report
Bt- 14 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BC- 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Wagram
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser, rise
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
NuA—Norfolk-Urban land complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3t4v
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
25

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils:60 percent
Urban land: 35 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 9 inches: loamy sand
E- 9 to 14 inches: loamy sand
Bt- 14 to 70 inches: sandy clay loam
C- 70 to 100 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Urban Land
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
26

Custom Soil Resource Report
Ra—Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v760
Elevation: 30 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Rains, undrained, and similar soils: 58 percent
Rains, drained, and similar soils:24 percent
Minor components: 18 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rains, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Eg- 6 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Btg- 12 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg- 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
27

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Rains, Drained
Setting
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Eg- 6 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Btg- 12 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg- 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 12 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Pantego, undrained
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Stream terraces, flats, broad interstream divides
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread, talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
28

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
29

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/deta i l/so i is/scie ntists/?cid=nres 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.n res.usda.gov/I nternet/FSE_DOCU M ENTS/n res142p2_052290.pdf
30

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Pine Level Forcemain Project City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: 2/4/20
Applicant/Owner: Johnston County State: NC Sampling Point: WB-IN
Investigator(s): Jonathan Herman Section,Township, Range:
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.516121 Long:-78.253664 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: GR-Grantham Silt Loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
X Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
X High Water Table(A2) Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Iron Deposits(B5) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Sphagnum Moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WB-IN
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer rubrum 40 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 40 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
80 =Total Cover OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
50%of total cover: 40 20%of total cover: 16 FACW species 50 x 2= 100
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FAC species 80 x 3= 240
1. FACU species 0 x 4= 0
2. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
3. Column Totals: 135 (A) 345 (B)
4. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.56
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8. X 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.01
=Total Cover Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Juncus effusus 5 No OBL llndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Arundinaria gigantea 50 Yes FACW present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6. height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
9.
10.
Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
55 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 28 20%of total cover: 11 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WB-IN
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
6-12 10YR 4/2 96 10YR 5/6 4 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grabs. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T,U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck(S12) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) (MLRA 153B, 153D) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) (outside MLRA 150A)
_Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Reduced Vertic(F18)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T,U) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (outside MLRA 150A,150B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T,U) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,T)
_Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) _Redox Depressions(F8) (MLRA 153B)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Marl(F10)(LRR U) _Red Parent Material(F21)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151) Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0, P,T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL,154)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0,S) _Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T,U) _Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix(TS7)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B, 153D)
Sandy Redox(S5) Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A, 150B) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Stripped Matrix(S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T,U) Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
_Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S,T,U) Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Pine Level Forcemain Project City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: 2/4/20
Applicant/Owner: Johnston County State: NC Sampling Point: WC-IN
Investigator(s): Jonathan Herman Section,Township, Range:
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.515759 Long:-78.256427 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: GR-Grantham Silt Loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
X Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
X High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Iron Deposits(B5) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Sphagnum Moss(D8)(LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 1
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WC-IN
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer saccharinum 30 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
30 =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 FACW species 50 x 2= 100
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FAC species 90 x 3= 270
1. FACU species 0 x 4= 0
2. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
3. Column Totals: 140 (A) 370 (B)
4. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.64
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8. X 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.01
=Total Cover Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Arundinaria gigantea 50 Yes FACW ilndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Ligustrum sinense 40 Yes FAC present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6. height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
9.
10.
Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
90 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 45 20%of total cover: 18 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Smilax rotundifolia 20 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
20 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WC-IN
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
8-14 10YR 5/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T, U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck(S12) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) (MLRA 153B, 153D) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) (outside MLRA 150A)
_Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Reduced Vertic(F18)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T, U) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T, U) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,T)
_Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) _Redox Depressions(F8) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Marl(F10)(LRR U) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR O,S) _Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) _Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix(TS7)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B, 153D)
Sandy Redox(S5) Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A, 150B) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Stripped Matrix(S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
_Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T, U) Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
_Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S,T, U) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Pine Level Forcemain Project City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: 2/5/20
Applicant/Owner: Johnston County State: NC Sampling Point: WE-IN
Investigator(s): Jonathan Herman Section,Township, Range:
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope(%): 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.516569 Long:-78.244563 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb Sandy Loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded NWI classification: PF04A
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
X Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
X High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
X Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Iron Deposits(B5) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Sphagnum Moss(D8)(LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 3
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WE-IN
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Quercus montana 35 Yes UPL Number of Dominant Species
2. Acer saccharinum 30 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
3. Nyssa sylvatica 30 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
95 =Total Cover OBL species 10 x 1 = 10
50%of total cover: 48 20%of total cover: 19 FACW species 30 x 2= 60
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FAC species 120 x 3= 360
1. Ligustrum sinense 20 Yes FAC FACU species 0 x 4= 0
2. UPL species 35 x 5= 175
3. Column Totals: 195 (A) 605 (B)
4. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.10
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8. 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.01
20 =Total Cover Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Arundinaria gigantea 30 Yes FACW ilndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Juncus effusus 5 No OBL present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Carex glaucescens 5 No OBL Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6. height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
9.
10.
Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
40 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Smilax rotundifolia 40 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
40 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WE-IN
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
6-12 10YR 5/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T, U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck(S12) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) (MLRA 153B, 153D) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) (outside MLRA 150A)
_Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Reduced Vertic(F18)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T, U) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T, U) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,T)
_Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) _Redox Depressions(F8) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Marl(F10)(LRR U) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR O,S) _Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) _Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix(TS7)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B, 153D)
Sandy Redox(S5) Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A, 150B) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Stripped Matrix(S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
_Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T, U) Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
_Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S,T, U) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Pine Level Forcemain Project City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: 2/5/20
Applicant/Owner: Johnston County State: NC Sampling Point: WF-IN
Investigator(s): Jonathan Herman Section,Township, Range:
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope(%): 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.515793 Long:-78.250498 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Gr-Grantham Silt Loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI classification: N/a
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
X Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
X Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Iron Deposits(B5) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Sphagnum Moss(D8)(LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WF-IN
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
=Total Cover OBL species 60 x 1 = 60
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: FACW species 10 x 2= 20
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FAC species 85 x 3= 255
1. Liquidambarstyraciflua 40 Yes FAC FACU species 0 x 4= 0
2. Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC UPL species 0 x 5= 0
3. Column Totals: 155 (A) 335 (B)
4. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.16
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8. X 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.01
55 =Total Cover Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50%of total cover: 28 20%of total cover: 11
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Juncus effusus 50 Yes OBL ilndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Arundinaria gigantea 10 No FACW present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Andropogon virginicus 15 No FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Typha latifolia 5 No OBL Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. Carex glaucescens 5 No OBL more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6. height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
9.
10.
Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
85 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 43 20%of total cover: 17 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Smilax rotundifolia 15 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
15 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 8 20%of total cover: 3 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WF-IN
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
6-12 10YR 5/1 95 10YR 5/8 5 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T, U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck(S12) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) (MLRA 153B, 153D) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) (outside MLRA 150A)
_Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Reduced Vertic(F18)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T, U) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T, U) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,T)
_Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) _Redox Depressions(F8) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Marl(F10)(LRR U) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR O,S) _Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) _Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix(TS7)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B, 153D)
Sandy Redox(S5) Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A, 150B) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Stripped Matrix(S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
_Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T, U) Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
_Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S,T, U) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

. , a • z.
_�- � - �^
�, ' 'e », � /
it
■� ' .... » ®� a
• ® t N
% d . - - >( 1 em •{
4. `, © 41:1
� a / / `w { is 74
% ■ � , , . � -
:6, ~ � . . ƒ | - / \� ,
. Tray ' 'k r � /
� . . _ r� / '\.1 )
5 ubs|a sun ;a 22 |
., 3 . 0 , r.
. `I '
/ fli
4i1t;
..,I • . r..
. - , . - - � \
{ �� �-._p - - -
•i
® , , _ - ,
_ • ] ■
2 _ j
| • , _
' } - ' - . -
■ i .
) / in . .
, .
7-
a'. \z, . . ,
- - . . - - 4.
VI
. . . • . '
litPe . 4 Vial , ■ ifr
` . . .
, `
c■ �
_ d -
- -
��
\ IF' - •
4a ' .
i :
e / , . _ -
2 1Nfi ii
i /
I /4
. ,
/ �j
/ •
• I.
'�z G
/
; 1:� . . - _ . _ce
/ Lam__| /
I rT / 1 _� .
. • ' � /Q, , it
\ . if o I
° I -
. -
ce
\ k1 13
» w
■-
-w- . _: . .
m . 17
_ i1t . II ' •
\ �4 , • \ ( AP
s - . . ,�
/ I ■
z
r _ ■ . / � !
DATE PROJECTPROJECT« PINE LEVEL
e/29/z, »es SEWER FORCE MAIN REPLACE
1013 State Farm Road OFFICE MANAGER DELINEATOR JOHNSTON ����
• mcg m mz s mmm< :,m»,
s. ,
m em License#c a PROJECT mane REVIEVVER
_i_ c rr,mm !SWAIM JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH C»

41,4
tr„" r
5''''':'' :7:7: }q rrtV3t t\k� < t,�
xe' L , iI�1. 1u"" ;yud+,4y', ''•-•
ve�rtifillt 7e ntie E °$+> 1ylc a�
l-\i f4iii4l4l e1y ,. yt 1; 0. (r t
Yid \e ' ) 4 i t I
9 i 4 4 y
Photo One: View looking north from US-70 ALT Photo Two: View looking northwest at S2 (UT-1
in the foreground and S1 (Bawdy Swamp) in the To UT-1 To Moccasin Creek).
background.
,
w x
o y
o ,
•
T ��.w � 'x t3 r
0 "/ tr �'" �''k a, _ 'T ,,,c a,
_`te`.4� `'''`,,�s/�I n �C d
a
a \_ s= - i ,. a 4f we
w -. h p. r a °.
O r, b .ry t
g
w
0
z
w
,e
K
O
Photo Three: View looking southwest at the Photo Four: View looking east at S3.
Zw intersection of S2 and S3 (UT-1 To Moccasin
o Creek).
Z
0
O
Z
0
F
IIIA DATE
01/9/2020 PINE LEVEL FORCE MAIN SHEET
1 M3 State Farm Road PROJECT#
Boone,NC 28607 PHOTOSHEET
mcgill828.386.1920
19.01806 NC Finn License#C-0469 PROJECT MANAGER
mcgillassociates.com C.SIMMONS JOHNJOHNSTONSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROCOUNTYLINA
a

cii I ;I: 1 !I.4 r
g (.I i 1 �IIt'll
1� ill 4 i " ! ,1 t i 1 k f , 1
i 1 AI i '
to�, Ili IV l ', �i A,• �,'; y4�;, ,r, im
el ' ��� 'i i ) i 11 , , '►
r' �I
t R) rid-a 1' iFar. '! a 11-
! - �'' ', y, t H1, l + .,A,..,:
1ysr -, F< 2ia y i 7
t 1
� rF„k ,y.% s `- j S ,•;0' , ,yr; , y
�
r Cf 4 :r "C; r � �r f P- � it I.
' yid yt, 'y i t ) J 14 t',`gib_:C&k- �'�. - 1S ,{v �� , �el x/y
Photo Five: View looking west at Wetland B. Photo Six: View looking east at Wetland B.
w 4+?
1
nr
o r
0
I
h
t-
2
z GGyy
I
w
O
K
O
Lt Photo Seven: View looking north at S4 Photo Eight: View looking west at Wetland C.
w
Z an(ephemeral stream).
a
z
O
O
z
O
t-
0,
Z
02/10/2020 ATE PINE LEVEL FORCE MAIN SHEET
co 1013 State Fame Road PROJECT#
Boone,NC 28607 PHOTOSHEET
mcg111 828 3 n.License
1901806ROJECT MANAGER JOHNSTON COUNTY 2
NC Finn License#C-0469 P
7 mcgillassociates.com C.SIMMONS JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
a

_,,may*`. '
IF
may+
,: $ /ail 0- -,� �
Photo Nine: View looking west at S6 (Moccasin Photo Ten: View looking west at S6 and W
Creek). Main Street in the background.
\_ 2- "- 4
"A liki
' \ ' 1 i 144, ',,. ,
'Ilk ki ,` '�
o � .4%,i`r t 4,,�aI I� %•''1.*,tr �4j'�1P ire "y M1
is4,
a �, � � � � � GNr, � � 1 et "�� e ap}g�,at i�Pfdt 'r .
w U T} ,.- A 1 y*• ' ,.[1 1 M! �3i 1 tk '� fa.r*VFW° /' � vj4�l,'! •. 1
iot: > 1' , \� �� >�:s. 'ill �',6• m a �4 ,1'�°' a"N' 't";;i
0
�6„ a �' • A,00'
4 r;4 0,,m f:ice, ▪ r ' ' . f l Attu. 3 % �'
144
,. '4' � /�v ;: \ F>j4`. �',rt�. .a.�le"�P' '�-.t\\ 9 } eta . �i��)rY+�,1\`
g
w
p
z
w
0e
K
O
Photo Eleven: View looking north at Wetland Photo Twelve: View looking at Wetland F in the
w
w F. foreground and W Pine Street in the background.
a
z
0
U
z
0
F-
U)
Z
DATE SHEET PINE LEVEL FORCE MAIN SHEET
1013 State Fame Road PROJECT#
Boone NC 28607 PHOTOSHEET
19.01806 JOHNSTON COUNTY 3
• II828.386.1920
NC Finn License#C-0459
7 mcgiIIassociates.com PROJECT MANAGERC.SIMMONS JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
a

I , ^1 v -; 7
F `k " '. \t "is ° . t '--#'•
;. I t, ,'
fin✓ 1 l 3 yap ,:'ref 1 yak. 0 h, d �F s.�,
t
sue• ; azM' y '
f _. 4 ,
�dz A Y �4 P� .� {I
'N( .P :w �r � qr477 qr .y
y a 8; Sri .F sz �� F 1 � ,f� r+ ye �..
Photo Thirteen: View looking southeast at S5 Photo Fourteen: View looking west at Wetland
an (ephemeral stream). E.
t,, 1 ,
x �� 1 � aft
3n, N�, a 7j''r 1i tdf it t P III f,�' ..Y..
If (,_, $fit I, t
d:
Ia s:,
K
7,1 z
LL
xi ems, ', `. <
at -- _ -' ITM ,t2 x'` i f ', , wa.. e
.'' 'cx s'/- ;$ v<Y' ,. Try �'' C-, i \v - _ ,a.
in
t-
2
w
0
rn
w
0
z
1.
w
0
ce
O
Photo Fifteen: View looking northwest at Photo Sixteen: View looking north at Wetland E.
w
Wetland E.
Z
a
a
Z
0
0
Z
0
I')
Z
02/10/2020 ATE o
PINE LEVEL FORCE MAIN SHEET
co 1013 State Fame Road PROJECT#
Boone,NC 28607 PHOTOSHEET
15 MC 111 8CF rn.1g20 19 RODE 06 JOHNSTON COUNTY 4
NC Finn License#C-0469 PROJECT MANAGER
7 mcgillassociates.com C.SIMMONS JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
a

BAWDY
SWAMP
`,
�/ AREA 7 AREA 1 \ ,-----._
\r /
e 4
r
x
.• ilk,
\ 4„„H_ _ ,, ,:_,,,,,,..„,,
re
x ti
z
x
z
O
2
111
h'
0
a
o NOTES: CORPS OF ENGINEERS IS THE ONLY AGENCY
w 1. JURISDICTIONAL AQUATIC RESOURCES THAT CAN MAKE FINAL DECISIONS REGARDING
_, IDENTIFIED ON THIS MAP HAVE BEEN LOCATED JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND OF THE US
• WITHIN SUB-METER ACCURACY UTILIZING A DELINEATIONS.
• THALES MAPPING GRADE GLOBAL POSITIONING
• SYSTEM(GPS)AND THE SUBSEQUENT 3. THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY MCGILL USING
DIFFERENTIAL CORRECTION OF THAT DATA.GPS THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO MCGILL
POINTS MAY DEMONSTRATE UNCORRECTABLE AT THE TIME OF PRODUCTION.THIS MAP IS FOR
2 ERRORS DUE TO TOPOGRAPHY,VEGETATIVE INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD
Z
COVER,AND/OR MULTIPATH SIGNAL ERROR. NOT BE USED TO DETERMINE PRECISE
2 BOUNDARIES, ROADWAYS, PROPERTY AQUATIC
2. THE ILLUSTRATED AQUATIC RESOURCE BOUNDARY LINES, NOR LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS.
• LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.THESE AREAS THIS MAP SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO BE AN NAME
O HAVE BEEN FLAGGED IN THE FIELD; HOWEVER, OFFICIAL SURVEY OF ANY DATA DEPICTED.
o THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED.ALTHOUGH Total Wetla
w MCGILL ASSOCIATES, P.A. (MCGILL)IS 4. BASE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY JOHNSTON
CONFIDENT IN OUR ASSESSMENT,THE US ARMY COUNTY GIS. Total Strea
a
z
O
O
o DATE PROJECT#
01/29/2020 19.01806 PINE LEVEL
o SEWER FORCE MAIN REPLACE
1013 State Farm Road OFFICE MANAGER DELINEATOR JOHNSTON CO U
co
• M C ' Boone,NC 28607 g.ROARKJ.HERMAN
Boone, .1920mNC Firm License#C-0459 PROJECT MANAGER REVIEWER
7 mcgillassociates.com C.SIMMONS J.SWAIM JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CA
a

Wafts
MUM
' ~\ awn
♦ ♦`s•(40 WETLAND B -0.229 AC
nI.
_ _ \ WB-IN ♦ �4,/ POTENTIAL WETLAND
® WATERS OF THE US
,</
4•/--.-. 11:-.- -.-'-'-.-.. ----. ---. %ill,
_ ` ,4I
\ \� ` \ \ /
-\ \ *eft toiii \
AREA 3 - 1 INCH = 50 FEET 4 �ki �
LEGEND '~ .
Study _ - -' • N/F
Limits ,I _ - NORTH CAROLINA _
RAILROAD CO. - NORTF
Stream NCPIN:262414-23-8531 RAIL
_ BK 03729 PG 0763 - NCPIN:2
Limits BK 03z
Wetland
Limits
Data WETLAND F -0.252 A
LePoint POTENTIAL WETLAN
WATERS OF THE L
Z
UT-1 TO MOCCASIN CREEK
(REACH 2) -511 L.F.
POTENTIAL NON-WETLAND
WATERS OF THE US
i
\• i ` �
o d\'
STUpV`'M'T / , •
,„,.............\
Z
o � hc+.... ./\
LIIJ d 44 2*111/14‘
\\ — �/j
� — o
® � mod'-- '
aloft
� ' AREA 4 - 1 INCH = 50 FEET —
C BAWDY SWAMP
z -30 L.F. AQUATIC RESOURCE TABLE
w POTENTIAL
2 AREA 1 - NON-WETLAND NAME AMOUNT
w 1 INCH = WATERS OF Total Wetland 2.167 Acres
20 FEET THE US
a Total Stream 2,367 L.F.
0
U
o DATE PROJECT#
02/17/2020 19.01806 PINE LEVEL
o SEWER FORCE MAIN REPLACE
1013 State Farm Road OFFICE MANAGER DELINEATOR JOHNSTON CO U
mcgul I Boone,NC 28607 B.ROARK J.HERMAN
828.386.1920
NC Firm License#C-0459 PROJECT MANAGER REVIEWER
mcgillassociates.com C.SIMMONS J.SWAIM JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CA
a

AQUATIC RESOURCE TABLE
NAME AMOUNT
Total Wetland 2.167 Acres if
Total Stream 2,367 L.F.
OLINUPIN 2za,55a5,, ,
-- --
•
i \.. '\
ce
z
o \- • .— '- ' • '' \\\ \
o_
WETLAND E - 1.635 AC .
. POTENTIAL WETLAND
o WATERS OF THE US
w
•
w •
0
E!
h
71-
rn
F
K
w
a
z
w
POTE11
O
0
w
AREA6 - 1 INCH = 100 FEET
a
z
O
O
o DATE PROJECT#
I 02/17/2020 19.01806 PINE LEVEL
o SEWER FORCE MAIN REPLACE
o 1013 State Farm Road OFFICE MANAGER DELINEATOR JOHNSTON CO U
m� 'I I Boone,NC 28607 B.ROARK J.HERMAN
828.386.1920
rs
m NC Firm License#C-0459 PROJECT MANAGER REVIEWER
7 mcgillassociates.com C.SIMMONS J.SWAIM JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CA
a