20201281 Ver 1_PCN_20210224

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions WEPGWetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
SAW — 2015 - 00562 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Villages at Cramerton
2. Work Type: Private - Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial ❑
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
JD and PCN 29 request for a residential development
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Robert Bowman, VCM Bowman LLC
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Len Rindner, WEPG, PLLC
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
35.2233 N-81.0774 W, Cramerton Mills Parkway
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: 358401 1865
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Gaston
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Cramerton
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: South Fork Catawba River
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:Catawba/03050102
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓ Section 10 & 404
Regulatory Action Type:
❑Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 29
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
0 Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

DWR Pre-Fil ing Meeting Req u est Form
ID#*Ve rsion *
Re gional Office *
Re v ie we r List *
Contact Name *
Contact Email Addre ss *
Proje ct Name *
Proje ct Owne r *
Proje ct County *
Owne r Addre ss:
Is this a transportation proje ct?*
Type (s) of approv al sought from the DWR:
Doe s this proje ct hav e an e xisting proje ct ID#?*
Do you know the name of the staff me mbe r you would like to re que st a me e ting with?
Ple ase giv e a brie f proje ct de scription be low.*
20201281 1
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Alan Johnson
Pre-Filing Me eting Reque st submitte d 9/24/2020
Heath Caldwell
[e-mail]
Villages at Cramerton
VCM Bowman, LLC
Gaston
City
Huntersville
State / Province / Region
NC
Postal / Zip Code
28078
Country
USA
Street Address
13815 Cinnabar Place
Address Line 2
Yes No
401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular
401 Water Quality Certification -
Express
Individual Permit Modification
Shoreline Stabilization
Yes No
Alan Johnson
The forthcoming PCN will propose a NWP #29site on +/- 41.9 acres located
south of Cramer Mountain Road near the intersection with Baltimore Road
in Cramerton, NC. The site is a proposed residential development and
consists of six streams and four wetlands. A Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination will be submitted with the permit application. The proposed
application will include 203 lf of permanent stream impacts to two streams
for road crossings.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
Ple ase attach the docume ntation you would like to hav e the me e ting about.
Signature
Submittal Date
10/15/2020
Villages at Cramerton Overview.pdf 345.78KB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:

· This form completes the requirement of the Pre-Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
· I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre-filing
meeting request.
· I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.

Your project’s thirty-day clock started upon receipt of this application.  You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary.  You will receive notification when the thirty-day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
9/24/2020

1

February 24, 2021
Ms. Krysta Stygar
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262

Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDENR
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115

Mr. Paul Wojoski
NCDENR
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604

Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801

Subject: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Pre-Construction Notification for
NWP #29 for the Villages at Cramerton Site, Gaston County, NC

Ms. Stygar and Messrs. Johnson, Wojoski, and Hamstead,

Enclosed is a request for a Jurisdictional Determination and Nationwide Permit #29 associated
with the proposed Villages at Cramerton Mills site in Cramerton, Gaston County, NC. The site
consists of four streams and three wetland areas. Total linear feet of stream and acreage of
wetlands onsite are approximately 5,290 and 0.09, respectively. Currently, the site is associated
with an expired Jurisdictional Determination and permit verification (SAW-2015-00562). Please
refer to the Jurisdictional Determination Information section and the Approvals/Authorizations
section for an updated request for verification of onsite surfacewaters and associated permit
verifications, respectively.

2
Included in this application are references to the previous permit for this site and include
proposed impacts that have either been permitted and constructed, were eliminated, or were
installed without acquiring a permit. Portions of the previously permitted permanent stream and
wetland impacts have already occurred. All proposed wetland impacts (Impact ID# W1, W2 and
W3) and the proposed stream impacts S2 and S3 (see Section S2 Impacts) were completed under
SAW-2015-00562. Proposed impacts associated with the previously permitted S1 were avoided
as a result of modified access routes and development orientation.

Impacts associated with the road crossing at Impact #1 include an existing 132LF culvert. As
indicated in the previous authorization, only 77LF of stream impact were originally permitted at
this proposed location (2015-00562). Due to steep grades and incorrect topography used in the
previous design, it was determined, during construction, that a longer culvert was necessary to
maintain stability of the crossing. At that time (circa 2019), a 55LF extension of the culvert was
installed to establish a more stable crossing.

Modeling of the current conditions and necessary design parameters for the proposed crossing
established that an additional extension to the currently installed culvert would need to be added
to provide additional stability at this crossing. This application proposes an additional 28LF
extension of the existing culvert (160LF of permanent stream impact due to culvert) as well as
48LF of permanent impacts associated with rip rap installation required for additional streambed
stability and construction access. This application requests a total loss to Waters of the US of
208LF. No additional impacts are proposed as part of this application.

To compensate for the currently installed and proposed permanent impacts to onsite streams due
to road crossings, the applicant is proposing payment to the North Carolina Division of
Mitigation Services In-Lieu Fee Program at a 2:1 ratio for 273 linear feet of perennial stream.

Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site. No listed
species were identified within the project area and we believe that there will be no effect on
listed species, or their critical habitat as designated under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act. Please refer to the Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation Section for additional
details on the terrestrial species evaluation. Thank you for your consideration and please contact
me if you have any questions, [phone] or email at [e-mail].

Sincerely,

Len Rindner, Principal
Permit Application Permit Application
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. _____________
DWQ project no. _______________
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
Yes No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in-lieu fee program.
Yes No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. Yes No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
2b. County:
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Villages at Cramerton Mills
Gaston
Cramerton
VCM Bowman LLC
4654, 2441
Robert Bowman
13815 Cinnabar Place
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
[e-mail]
29
Page 2 of 10
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Len Rindner
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group, PLLC
10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
[e-mail]
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: Longitude:
1c. Property size: acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions.
SAW-2015-00562 expired. Two of three permitted culverts were installed. Extensions to one of the installed culverts were
necessary to provide stable crossings. This application will include impacts associated with extensions for the previously
permitted culvert at Impact#1.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
3584011865
-81.0784
41
South Fork Catawba River
WS-V
Catawba (03050102)
The topography consists of upland ridges above moderate slopes grading into drainages and unnamed tributaries to South Fork Catawba River, with
the elevation ranging from 590 to 700 ft. The site is partially disturbed from construction, and partially wooded on the lower slopes and stream
corridors.
0.09
To construct a residential housing development
Fill and grading of the site will use standard equipment, excavator, dump truck, track hoe, etc. One culverts will be placed in stream channels for access
WEPG
This site was verified by W. Elliott (USACE) on 4/9/15. A copy of the signed JD approval is included in the Approvals section.
This application is for construction of the final of 3 Phases. No additional phases are proposed.
35.2248
5,290
PJD request attached
Nic Nelson
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
C.Proposed Impacts Inventory
1.Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams – tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction
2.Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
W6
2g.Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3.Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Choose one
Choose one Yes/No -
Yes/No -
Yes/No -
Yes/No -
Yes/No -
Yes/No -
Culvert Stream B PER Corps 6 160
Stream B 6 48
208
77LF of impacts for Impact S1 were permitted under 2015-00562. A culvert extension of 55LF was installed for necessary stability of the crossing but
was not permitted prior to construction. An additional extension of 28LF to the existing 132LF culvert is requested in this application. The 48LF of
additional impact is proposed for stream stabilization and access.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
P
P
-
-
-
-
Construction Access
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
PER
-
-
-
-
Corps
-
-
-
-
Page 5 of 10
4.Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
O1
O2
O3
O4
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5.Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1
P2
5f.Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin? Neuse Tar-Pamlico Catawba Randleman Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number –
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
6h.Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Choose one Choose
Choose one
Yes/No
-
-
-
-
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose
Choose
Choose
Choose one
-
-
-
-
-
-
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
)
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.Avoidance and Minimization
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
2.Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
Mitigation bank
Payment to in-lieu fee program
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Type:
Type:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5.Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection, design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots and
access routes. Large headwalls are proposed for the crossing and 2:1 slopes will be implemented where possible. Original plans included a third
crossing; however, that crossing was avoided as a result of modified access routes and redesigned development orientation.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
Utilities will cross through the proposed roadway crossings.
273
warm
mitigation will be paid for currently proposed 208LF of impacts as well as the previously installed 65LF of culvert
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Page 7 of 10
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f.Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Yes No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:

2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
Phase II
NSW
USMP
Water Supply Watershed
Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? Yes No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
Coastal counties
HQW
ORW
Session Law 2006-246
Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? Yes No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No
39.66
Storm water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has not yet been submitted to Gaston County
but will be designed to meet their criteria.
Gaston County
Gaston County
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
F. Supplementary Information
1.Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No
1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Yes No
1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
Yes No
2.Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
Yes No
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No
2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Portions of the proposed impacts have already occurred. Impacts associated with the road crossing at Impact #1 include an existing 132LF culvert. Only 77LF
of stream impact were permitted at this proposed location (2015-00562). Due to steep grades and incorrect topography used in the previous design, it was
determined during construction that a longer culvert was necessary to maintain stability of the crossing. Modeling of the current conditions and necessary
design parameters for the proposed crossing established that an extension of the culvert would need to be installed to provide necessary stability at this
crossing. This application proposes and additional 20LF extension of the existing culvert (160LF of permanent stream impact) as well as 48LF of permanent
impacts for streambed stability and construction access.
3.Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No
3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description.
4.Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Final phase of construction proposed in this application. No additional development is anticipated.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
Page 10 of 10
5.Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat? Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts? Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6.Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7.Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
_______________________________
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)

Date
-
A threatened and endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat may occur for the Northern long-eared
bat but the project is except as described in the attached T&E report.
No essential fish habitat in this region.
SHPO's website: https://nc.maps.arcgis.com/
www.fema.gov ; https://gis.gastongov.com/
Leonard Rindner 2/24/2021
Villages at Cramerton Cramerton Mills Parkway, Cramerton, NC04713104
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D.PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3 ·4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on­
site investigations, if neces sary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner ofrecord of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: [Z] Owner D Authorized Agent5
1· Zl> ·lt:>
Date
�
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
D I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources. D I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority. [Z] I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process. D I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process. D I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide. D A Corps JD is require d in order obtain my local/state authorization. D I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel. D I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land. D Other: _________________________ _
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet. 5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).Version: May2017 Page 3
October 29, 2020
Robert Bowman
VCM Bowman LLC
13815 Cinnabar Place
Huntersville, NC 28078 Expiration of Acceptance: 4/29/2021
Project: Villages at Cramerton County: Gaston
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in-
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant’s responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in-lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location
(8-digit HUC) Impact Type Impact Quantity
Catawba 03050102 Warm Stream 315
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In-Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in-lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Heath Caldwell, agent
Maps/Plans Maps/Plans
VILLAGES AT CRAMERTON MILLS
Gaston Co., NC
VICINITY MAP
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
FIGURE
1 6/19/20
Prepared for: Acres:
+/- 41.9
Drawn By:
BLK
Reviewed By:
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
SITE
ŽǁŵĂŶĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
'ƌŽƵƉ
ALL
VILLAGES AT CRAMERTON MILLS
Gaston Co., NC
AERIAL MAP
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
FIGURE
2 6/19/20
Prepared for: Acres:
+/- 41.9
Drawn By:
BLK
Reviewed By:
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
ALL
Bowman Development
Group
Aerial Imagery Provided by
Google Maps 2020
IRWIN CREEK
VILLAGES AT CRAMERTON MILLS
Gaston Co., NC
USGS MAP
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
FIGURE
3 6/19/20
Prepared for: Acres:
+/- 41.9
Drawn By:
BLK
Reviewed By:
LOCATION
Lat: 35.2248 ºN
Long: -81.0784 ºW
HUC: 03050102
SOUTH FORK
CATAWBA
USGS QUAD
Belmont, NC
1993
SCALE
1:24,000
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
SOUTH FORK
CATAWBA RIVER
ŽǁŵĂŶĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
'ƌŽƵƉ
ALL
VILLAGES AT CRAMERTON MILLS
Gaston Co., NC
SOIL SURVEY MANUSCIPT MAP
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
FIGURE
4 6/19/20
Prepared for: Acres:
+/- 41.9
Drawn By:
BLK
Reviewed By:
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
Soil Survey Manuscript
Gaston County 1977
ŽǁŵĂŶĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
'ƌŽƵƉ
ALL

VILLAGES AT CRAMERTON MILLS
Gaston Co., NC
FLOODPLAIN MAP
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
FIGURE
5 6/19/20
Prepared for: Acres:
+/- 41.9
Drawn By:
BLK
Reviewed By:
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
NO FEMA FLOODPLAIN
AS PER GASTON COUNTY
ONLINE GIS
ŽǁŵĂŶĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
'ƌŽƵƉ
ALL
Floodplan Imagery Provided
by Gaston Co GIS
FIGURE NO.
6
VILLAGES AT CRAMERTON MILLS
Gaston County, NC
Parcel Map Approximate
Boundary Depiction Gaston
County GIS
DATE:
8/7/2020
Drawn By:
ALL
Reviewed By:
South Fork Catawba River
Parcel # 221176, 221177
PIN # 3584011865, 3584035857
Neighborhood # 4A069
Name RIVER BLUFF CRAMERTON
Owner ID 1636194
Owner 1 VCM BOWMAN LLC
13815 CINNABAR PL, HUNTERSVILLE, NC
Property Boundary
HAC
Parcel Information Provided
by Gaston Co GIS
EXISTING 8" SANITARY SEW
E
R
EXISTING 30' SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
(DB AND PG UNKNOWN)
RJH
[phone] Fax: [phone] Stonecrest Blvd. Tega Cay, SC 29708
PLAN VIEW - EXISTING CONDITION
CRAMER
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

R
O
A
D
60' PUBLI
C

R
/
W
HAMRICK
ROAD
6
0
'

PUBL
IC
R
/WSOUTHFORK RIVERFUTURE
PHASE 1C
VILLAGES AT CRAMERTON
MILLS PHASE 1B
9.67 ACRES
VILLAGES AT CRAMERTON MILLS
PHASE 1A
15.62 ACRES
WETLAND $
0.06 ACRE
STREAM $ (pRPW)
2,303 LF/0.21 ACRE
WETLAND B

0.0 ACRE
(IMPACTED/FILLED)
WETLAND C

0.012 ACRE
(IMPACTED/FILLED)
WETLAND E
0.02 ACRE
(NO IMPACT)
WETLAND Z
(0.006 ACRE)
STREAM B (pRPW)
1,318 LF/0.12 ACRE
STREAM C (pRPW)
501 LF/0.03 ACRE
EXISTING 30' SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
(DB AND PG UNKNOWN)
EXSIT. 42" CULVERT
EXISTING SEWER LINE
STREAM ' (pRPW)
1,168LF/0.08 ACRE
EXISTING SEWER LINE
(IMPACTED/FILLED)

 SHUPLWWHGXQGHU6$:
7
CRAME
R
T
O
N
MI
L
L
S
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
(60' R/W)EMORY LANE
(50
'
R
/W
)
MEYER
S
RI
D
G
E
R
O
A
D
(50' R/W
)LIV
I
LANE
(60
'
R
/W
)AMICA COURT(60' R/W)
MAC ALLEY

(
2
0'

R
/
W
)
KEATS ALL
E
Y

(
2
0
'

R
/
W
)
GREEN STR
E
E
T

"
A
"
GREEN STREE
T

"
B
"CRAMERTON MILLS PARKWAY(60' R/W)7 PKG.
SPACES8 PKG
.
SPACES8 PKG
.
SPACES
610
612
61
4
616
618
620
622
62462
6
608
607
609
611
610
612
61
4
616
618
620
622
62462
6
608
607
609
611
[phone] Fax: [phone] Stonecrest Blvd. Tega Cay, SC 29708
PLAN VIEW - OVERALL SITE
IMPACT #1&2
IMPACT #2

PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
(STREAM') ±65 LF
HAMRICK
ROAD60' PUBL
IC
R/W
CRAMER
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

R
O
A
D
60' PUBLI
C

R
/
W
RJH
IMPACT #1
PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
EXIST. CULVERT TO BE
EXTENDED FROM BOTH ENDS
(STREAM %) ± 200.46LF
FUTURE
PHASE 1C
VILLAGES AT
CRAMERTON MILLS
PHASE 1B
9.67 ACRES
VILLAGES AT
CRAMERTON MILLS
PHASE 1A
15.62 ACRES
PHASE A &B:
THE IMPERVIOUS AREA FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY
HOMES WAS BASED ON MAXIMUM FOOTPRINT OF
2,100 SQUARE FEET FOR THE BUNGALOW LOTS,
1,600 SQUARE FEET FOR THE COURTYARD COTTAGES,
1,000 SQUARE FEET FOR THE PARKSIDE COTTAGES,
AND 800 SQUARE FEET FOR THE VILLAGE COTTAGES.
PHASE C:
Min. Lot Width: 22FT
Min. Lot Size: 1,415 SF
No. of Lots: 70 (Proposed)
Density: 4.22 Units per Acre
Road Lengths: TOTAL - 1379 LF
PHASE C IMPERVIOUS= 60.75%
AVARAGE IMPERVIOUS % FOR ALL
SITE PHASES (A+B+C)= 39.66%
PHASE A & B IMPERVIOUS= 34 %
WETLAND B

0.0 ACRE
(IMPACTED/FILLED)
WETLAND C

0.012 ACRE
(IMPACTED/FILLED)
WETLAND E
0.02 ACRE
(NO IMPACT)
WETLAND Z
(0.006 ACRE)

 SHUPLWWHGXQGHU6$:
(IMPACTED/FILLED)
8
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970RJH
[phone] Fax: [phone] Stonecrest Blvd. Tega Cay, SC 29708
IMPACT #1
PLAN VIEW - OVERALL SITE
CRAM
E
R
T
O
N
MI
L
L
S
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
(60' R/
W)
FUTURE
PHASE 1C
VILLAGES AT
CRAMERTON MILLS
PHASE 1B
9.67 ACRES
IMPACT #1
PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
EXIST. CULVERT TO BE
EXTENDED FROM BOTH ENDS
(STREAM %) ± 200.46LF
EXIST. SEWER LINE
9
13
14
15
16
1718192021
56
57
58
59
ss
RJH
[phone] Fax: [phone] Stonecrest Blvd. Tega Cay, SC 29708
PLAN VIEW - PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
IMPACT #1
TOP OF BANK
30' UPLAND SWIM BUFFER
CENTER LINE OF STREAM
HEAD WALL#1
(TYP.) ±28.4LF
PERMANENT
IMPACT (TYP.)
(TYP.) INSTALLATION OF
MATERIAL FOR BANK
STABILIZATION WILL BE PLACED
ABOVE OHWM (SEE FIG 14)CRAMERTON M
ILLSPARKWAY
(57
'
R
/W
)
EXISTING SEWER TRUNK
LINE WITH 30' EASEMENT
EXISTING 42" CONCRETE
CULVERT 132.4LF
CROSSING UNDER
CRAMERTON MILLS
PARKWAY
INV IN.=625.29'
INV OUT=611.91'
STATION 1+36.65
IMPACT #1
PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
(STREAM %) ±200.46LF
(TYP.) ±20LF
PERMANENT
IMPACT (TYP.)
HEAD WALL#2
(TYP.) INSTALLATION OF
MATERIAL FOR BANK
STABILIZATION WILL BE PLACED
ABOVE OHWM (SEE FIG 14)
10
ELEV:644.49ELEV:644.71CRAMERTONMILLS PKWY50' PUBLIC R/WBOCBOCCL610620630640650660PLAN VIEW - PROPOSED STORM CULVERTIMPACT #1RJH(803) 802-1799 Fax: [phone] Stonecrest Blvd. Tega Cay, SC 29708 2:1 SLOPE2:1 SLOPEEXISTING GRADENOTE: CULVERT INVERTS HAVE BEEN FIELDVERIFIED FOR DESIGN. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY CULVERT LOCATION & INVERTSAGAIN PRIOR TO CULVERT PLACEMENT.PROP. HEADWALL #1PROP. CULVERTINV. IN 625.29EX. GROUNDINV UP 626.00PROPOSED GRADEPROP. HEADWALL #2PROP. CULVERT INV. OUT 611.91EX. GROUNDINV DOWN 612.911+200+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+400+0042" RCP 132.4LF CROSSING UNDER CRAMERTONMILLS PARKWAYSLOPE=10.10%PIPE TO BE BURIED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1.0'EXIST. 8" PVC SEWER LINEEXIST. 8" WATER LINE7.4 LF 42" RENFORCED CONCRETEPipe @ 10.10% CONNECTEDTO EXISTING PIPE20.66 LF 42" RENFORCED CONCRETEPipe @ 10.10% CONNECTEDTO EXISTING PIPE11
618
620
630
640
650
660
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00
1.00%
4.72%
-1.00%
PVI STA: 1+33.84
PVI ELEV: 643.75
K: 20.00
LVC: 74.41
BVCS: 0+96.64BVCE: 643.38EVCS: 1+71.05EVCE: 645.50PVI STA: 2+65.77
PVI ELEV: 649.97
K: 20.00
LVC: 114.38
BVCS: 2+08.57BVCE: 647.27EVCS: 3+22.96EVCE: 649.40HIGH PT. STA: 3+02.98
HIGH PT ELEV: 649.50
CB#335CB#325PROP. 15" RCP
INV = 642.37±
CB#327
CB#32415" RCP
15" RCP
PROFILE VIEW - CENTERLINE OF ROAD CROSSING
IMPACT #1
42" RCP 132.4LF CROSSING UNDER
CRAMERTON MILLS PARKWAY
INV IN.=625.29'
INV OUT=611.91'
STATION: 1+36.65
21.2'
12
CRAME
R
T
O
N
MI
L
L
S
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
(60' R/W
)EMORY LANE
(50
'
R
/W
)
MEYER
S
RI
D
G
E
R
O
A
D
(50' R/W
)LIV
I
LANE
(60
'
R
/W
)AMICA COURT(60' R/W)
MAC ALLEY

(
2
0'

R
/
W
)
KEATS ALL
E
Y

(
2
0
'

R
/
W
)
GREEN STR
E
E
T

"
A
"
GREEN STREE
T

"
B
"CRAMERTON MILLS PARKWAY(60' R/W)7 PKG
. SPACES8 PKG
.
SPACES8 PKG
.
SPACES662664
610
612
61
4
616
618
62
0
622
62
4626
60
8
60
7
609
611
66
6
610
612
61
4
616
618
62
0
622
62
4626
60
8
60
7
609
611
[phone] Fax: [phone] Stonecrest Blvd. Tega Cay, SC 29708
PLAN VIEW - STORM CONTROL MEASURES (SCMs)
IMPACT #1&2
IMPACT #2
PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
(STREAM '
) ±65 LF
H
A
M
R
I
C
K

RO
A
D
60
'

P
U
B
L
I
C

R
/
W
CRAMER
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

R
O
A
D
60' PUBLI
C

R
/
W
RJH
IMPACT #1
PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
(STREAM %) ±200.46LF
FUTURE
PHASE 1C
SST-5
SST-6
VILLAGES AT
CRAMERTON MILLS
PHASE 1B
9.67 ACRES
VILLAGES AT
CRAMERTON MILLS
PHASE 1A
15.62 ACRES
SF #1
IN PHASE C
SF #1
IN PHASE B
WETLAND B

0.0 ACRE
(IMPACTED/FILLED)
WETLAND C

0.012 ACRE
(IMPACTED/FILLED)
WETLAND E
0.02 ACRE
(NO IMPACT)
WETLAND Z
(0.006 ACRE)

 SHUPLWWHGXQGHU6$:
(IMPACTED/FILLED)
13
EXISTING 8" SANITARY SEW
E
EXISTING 30' SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
(DB AND PG UNKNOWN)
FE
S
-
2
4
JB-
4
7
FES-22
FES-23
DI-
4
6
DI-
4
9
DI-
4
8
DI-
5
2
DI-
5
3
FE
S
-
1
5
FE
S
-
1
6
FE
S
-
1
7
FE
S
-
1
8
JB-
3
4
CB
-
3
5
CB
-
3
7
JB
-
3
6
DI-
3
9
DI-
3
8
DD
I
-
4
2
DI-
4
3
DI-
4
4
42"RCP
48"
R
C
P
RP
P
L
-
2
RP
P
L
-
3
DI-
5
4
FE
S
-
2
6
ssss
ss
ssssss
ss
ss
ss ssss ssssss ssssssssssssss ssss
ss
ss
ss ssssss
ss ssssss
ss
ss
DD
I
-
5
57 PKG
. SPACES8 PKG
.
SPACES8 PKG
.
SPACES
FE
S
-
2
0
FE
S
-
1
9
CB
-
5
1
A
CB
-
5
1
B662664
610
612
61
4
616
618
620
62
2
624626
608
607
609
611
66
6
DI-
5
0
DI-
4
5
DI-
4
1
DD
I
-
4
0
610
612
61
4
616
618
620
62
2
624626
608
607
609
611
MH
#
3
0
1
M
H
#
3
0
2
M
H
#
3
0
3
CB
#
3
0
4
CB
#
3
0
5
CB
#
3
0
6
CB
#
3
0
8
DD
I
#
3
0
9
CB
#
3
1
0
C
B
#
3
1
1
CB
#
3
1
2
CB
#
3
1
3
CB
#
3
1
4
C
B
#
3
1
5
C
B
#
3
1
6
CB
#
3
1
7
CB
#
3
1
8
CB
#
3
1
9
CB
#
3
2
0
CB
#
3
2
1
CB
#
3
2
2
CB
#
3
2
3
CB
#
3
2
4
C
B
#
3
2
5
C
B
#
3
2
7
CB
#
3
2
8
CB
#
3
2
9
CB
#
3
3
0
CB
#
3
3
1
CB
#
3
3
2
CB
#
3
3
3
CB
#
3
3
4
CB
#
3
3
5
CB
#
3
3
6
CB
#
3
3
7
C
B
#
3
3
8
C
B
#
3
3
9
CB
#
3
4
0
CB
#
3
4
1
CB
#
3
4
2
C
B
#
3
4
3
FE
S
#
3
0
0
CB
#
3
2
6
CB
#
3
0
7
[phone] Fax: [phone] Stonecrest Blvd. Tega Cay, SC 29708
PLAN VIEW - STORM & SEWERS
IMPACT #1&2
IMPACT #2

PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
(STREAM ') ±65 LF
H
A
M
R
I
C
K

RO
A
D
60
'

P
U
B
L
I
C

R
/W
CRAMER
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N

R
O
A
D
60' PUBLI
C

R
/
W
RJH
FUTURE
PHASE 1C
VILLAGES AT
CRAMERTON MILLS
PHASE 1B
9.67 ACRES
VILLAGES AT
CRAMERTON MILLS
PHASE 1A
15.62 ACRES
IMPACT #1
PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
(STREAM %) ±200.46LF
EXISTING SEWER LINE
EXISTING SEWER LINE
NOTE:
PROPOSED STORM AND SEWERS ARE NOT
IMPACTING ANY STREAM OR WETLAND
PROPOSED SEWERS ARE CONNECTED TO THE
TWO EXISTING SEWER LINES
PROPOSED STORM ARE DRAINING TO BMP's

 SHUPLWWHGXQGHU6$:
14
RJH
[phone] Fax: [phone] Stonecrest Blvd. Tega Cay, SC 29708 15
SAW-2015-00562 S2 Impact DetailsSAW-2015-00562 S2
Impact Details
EMORY LANE
(50
'
R
/W
)
MEYER
S
RI
D
G
E
R
O
A
D
(50' R/W
)
61
0
61
2
61
4
61
6
61
8
62
0
62
2
62
4 62
6
60
8
60
7
60
9
61
1
61
0
61
2
61
4
61
6
61
8
62
0
62
2
62
4 62
6
60
8
60
7
60
9
61
1
RJH
[phone] Fax: [phone] Stonecrest Blvd. Tega Cay, SC 29708
IMPACT #2
IMPACT #2

PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
(STREAM ') ±65 LF
PLAN VIEW - OVERALL SITE
VILLAGES AT
CRAMERTON MILLS
PHASE 1B
9.67 ACRES
VILLAGES AT
CRAMERTON MILLS
PHASE 1A
15.62 ACRES
WETLAND Z
(0.006 ACRE)
WETLAND B

0.0 ACRE
(IMPACTED/FILLED)
WETLAND C

0.012 ACRE
(IMPACTED/FILLED)
WETLAND E
0.02 ACRE
(NO IMPACT)

 SHUPLWWHGXQGHU6$:
(IMPACTED/FILLED)
16
DDI-42
DI-43
48"RCP
RPPL-3
ss
ss
ss
624
626626624624DL-6BDL-7622
626
620
627
646644642640638636634DL-6BDL-6B630626654652644642634632624
626626624624DL-6BDL-7622
626
620
627
646644642640638636634DL-6BDL-6B630626654652644642634632EX.
MH14
EX.
MH13
EX.
MH12
RJH
[phone] Fax: [phone] Stonecrest Blvd. Tega Cay, SC 29708
PLAN VIEW - PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
IMPACT #2
TOP OF BANK
30' UPLAND SWIM BUFFER
CENTER LINE OF STREAM
HEAD WALL
(TYP.)
NO IMPACT.
INSTALLATION OF
MATERIAL FOR BANK
STABILIZATION WILL BE
PLACED ABOVE OHWM
(SEE FIG 13)CRAMERTON MILLSPARKWAY (57' R/W)8" EXISTING SEWER TRUNK
LINE WITH 30' EASEMENT
675($0'

48" CONCRETE CULVERT
65LF CROSSING UNDER
CRAMERTON MILLS
PARKWAY
INV IN.=614.2'
INV OUT=612.5'STATION:
8+74.3'
NO IMPACT.
INSTALLATION OF MATERIAL
FOR BANK STABILIZATION
WILL BE PLACED ABOVE
OHWM (SEE FIG 13)
WETLAND B

0.0 ACRE
(IMPACTED/FILLED)
WETLAND C

0.012 ACRE
(IMPACTED/FILLED)
WETLAND E
0.02 ACRE
(NO IMPACT)

 SHUPLWWHGXQGHU6$:
17
600610620630640CRAMERTONMILLS PKWY60' PUBLIC R/WBOCBOCPLAN VIEW - PROPOSED STORM CULVERTIMPACT #2RJH(803) 802-1799 Fax: [phone] Stonecrest Blvd. Tega Cay, SC 29708 NOTE: CULVERT INVERTS HAVE BEEN FIELDVERIFIED FOR DESIGN. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY CULVERT LOCATION & INVERTSAGAIN PRIOR TO CULVERT PLACEMENT.8" SEWER MAINHEAD WALLSEE WALL PLANSFOR SPECIFICATIONS2'-6" STANDARD C&G(STAT. 8+74.3)EX. CREEK C/LPROP ROW30' FROM C/LPROP. HEAD WALLPROP. HANDDRAILSEE GP-848" RCP, CLASS IIIINLET INV. ELEV.= 614.2OUTLET INV. ELEV.= 612.50LENGTH = 65.0'SLOPE = 2.62%PIPE TO BE BURIED ATA MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1.0'6" WATER MAINPROP ROW30' FROM C/LNOTE: RCP TO BE EMBEDDEDINTO CREEK BOTTOM 20%0+0.000+32.500+32.500+60.630+70.45CL18
DI-43STAT: 9+84.99RIM: 624.70INV. OUT: 622.00DI-42STAT: 10+10.48RIM: 624.30INV. IN: 621.55INV. OUT: 621.0518"RCP
48"RCP
3.5' MIN.
8" WM
CRAMERTON MILLS PARKWAY
RJH
1186 Stonecrest Blvd. Tega Cay, SC 29708
PROFILE VIEW - ROAD PROFILE
48" RCP, CLASS III
INLET INV. ELEV.= 606.00
OUTLET INV. ELEV.= 609.00
LENGTH = 65.0'
SLOPE = 4.62%
PIPE TO BE BURIED AT
A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1.0'
IMPACT #2
610
620
630
640
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50
2+00 2+50
19
Jurisdictional Determination Jurisdictional
Determination Information
1 January 2020
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Wilmington District - Regulatory Division
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
(For Jurisdictional Status and Identifying Wetlands and Other Aquatic Resources)
I.PROPERTY AND CONTACT INFORMATION
A.Site Details/Location:
Site Name/Number:Request Date:
County: Acreage: Latitude*: Longitude*:
Parcel ID Number (PIN) #(s):
Property Address: City: State: Zip Code:
File number(s) of previous determinations associated with the site:
*Coordinates must be provided in decimal degrees ONLY.
B.Property Owner Information (if there are multiple property owners, complete an additional owner sheet)
First Name: Last Name:
Company Name (if applicable):
Address: City: State: Zip Code:
Daytime Phone: Email:
C.Requestor of Jurisdictional Determination/Delineation ______Same as Property Owner
First Name: Last Name:
Company Name (if applicable):
Address: City: State: Zip Code:
Phone: Email:
D.Agent Acting on Behalf of the Requestor (must include an agent authorization signed by requestor):
First Name: Last Name:
Company Name (if applicable):
Address: City: State: Zip Code:
Phone: Email:
II.REASON FOR REQUEST
III.TYPE OF REQUEST: (check all that apply)
Approved1 Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)
Preliminary2 Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)
I am uncertain and request and require additional information to inform my decision
1Approved – An AJD is defined in Corps regulations at 33 CFR 331.2. As explained in further detail in RGL 16-01, an AJD is used to indicate that this
office has identified the presence or absence of wetlands and/or other aquatic resources on a site, including their accurate location(s) and boundaries,
as well as their jurisdictional status. AJDs are valid for 5 years.
2Preliminary – A PJD is defined in Corps regulations at 33 CFR 331.2. As explained in further detail in RGL 16-01, a PJD is used to indicate that this
office has identified the approximate location(s) and boundaries of wetlands and/or other aquatic resources on a site that are presumed to be subject
to regulatory jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers. Unlike an AJD, a PJD does not represent a definitive, official determination that there are, or that
there are not, jurisdictional aquatic resources on a site, and does not have an expiration date.
Villages at Cramerton Mills 02/24/2021
Gaston 41.9 35.2248 N -81.0784 W
3584011865
Camerton Mills Pkwy Cramerton NC 28032
200630728; 201500562 (both expired)
Robert Bowman
VCM Bowman,LLC
13815 Cinnabar Place Huntersville NC 28078
704-875-9704 [e-mail]
Robert Bowman
VCM Bowman,LLC
13815 Cinnabar Place Huntersville NC 28078
704-875-9704 [e-mail]
✔
Len Ridner
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
10612-D Providence Road Charlotte NC 28277
[phone] [e-mail]
Jurisdictional Determination Request for a Residential Developement
✔
2 January 2020
IV. SUPPORTING INFORMATION (agents/environmental consultants only) – please list the number and date of all
figures/maps/datasheets included in the delineation report – all sources must be properly cited on the figure/map.
Delineation Map
USGS Topo
NRCS Soils Survey
USFWS NWI
FEMA/FIRM Maps
USGS NHD
USGS HUC
Navigable waters' study
Aerial Imagery
Wetland Datasheet (data point labels)
Photo Log
Other sources:
V.AGENT/REQUESTOR CERTIFICATION (agent or requestor listed in Section I (C) or (D) of this request)
By signing below, I certify that the information in this document and any attached documents is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge.
Signature Printed Name and Date
VI. LEGAL RIGHT OF ENTRY (owner listed in Section I(B) of this request - if there are multiple property owners, complete
an additional owner sheet)
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter
upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a
jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of record or easement holder of the property identified
herein or have other legal or statutory authority to allow right-of entry onto this property.
Signature Printed Name and Date
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
CHARLOTTE REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
Please use the Asheville Field
Office phone contacts for the
Charlotte Regulatory Field
Office until further notice
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
General Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27889
General Number: [phone]
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project
area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made
available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved
jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a jurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor
can a jurisdictional determination be issued.
>ĞŶZŝĚŶĞƌ
Please see attached
Add Aquatic Resource Table Validate and SubmitAdd Additional Owner Sheet Add Agent Authorization Sheet
Photo 1-4 (6/26/20)
Figure 7 (12/10/20)
Figure 3 (6/19/20)
Figure 4 (6/19/20)
USACE Wetland Data Form C/CC and USACE Wetland Data Form Upland DP1 (6.26.20)
Figure 2 (6/19/20)
Figure1- Vinitity Map (6/19/20) Figure 5-Floodplain Map (6/19/20), Figure 6 (Parcel Map, 8/7/20), DWQ Stream A form(6.26.26) DWQ Stream F form(6.26.26)
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES WITHIN REVIEW AREA
Waters
Name
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Quantity
of
resources
in review
area
(number)
Measurement
Type
Cowardin
Code
Geographic
authority (i.e.,
404 and/or 10) U.S. State
Rapanos
Waters Type
(For AJDs
only)
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to
federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a
public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved jurisdictional determination (AJD),
which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a jurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor can a
jurisdictional determination be issued.
-DQXDU\
tĞƚůĂŶĚ:35.2262 -81.0790 0.06 acre RP 404 NC
Stream A 35.2250 -81.0810 2303 feet R5 404 NC
Stream B 35.2260 -81.0760 1318 feet R5 404 NC
Stream C 35.2217 -81.0756 501 feet R4 404 NC
Stream D 35.2223 -81.0759 1168 feet R5 404 NC
Wetland E 35.2220 -81.0768 0.02 acre RP 404 NC
Wetland I 35.2255 -81.0777 0.01 acre RP 404 NC

450 225 0 450(Feet)SCALE
FIGURE NO.
20
VILLAGES AT CRAMERTON MILLS
Gaston County, NC
DELINEATION MAP – WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION
DATE:
2/20/2015
Drawn By:
HAC ALL
Reviewed By:
South Fork
Catawba River
PERENNIAL STREAM A
2,303 lf / 0.21 acre
WETLAND A
0.06 acre
PERENNIAL STREAM D
1,168 lf / 0.08 acre
WETLAND E
0.02 acre
INTERMITTENT STREAM C
501 lf / 0.03 acre
PERENNIAL STREAM B
1,318 lf / 0.12 acre
Property Boundary
REVISED 12/10/20
WETLAND I
0.01 acre
NCDEQ STREAM
FORM D
USACE WETLAND
DATA FORM E
USACE
UPLAND DP1
4
1
2
3
Villages at Cramerton Mills
Gaston Co., NC – 6/26/20
PHOTO 1 – VIEW INTERMITTENT STREAM B
DATE/TIME 2020:06:26 – 10:14:00
COORDINATES: 35.2233, -81.0777
PHOTO 2 – PERENNIAL STREAM D
DATE/TIME 2020:06:26 – 10:01:00
COORDINATES: 35.2223, -81.0759
Villages at Cramerton Mills
Gaston Co, NC – 6/26/20
PHOTO 3 – VIEW STREAM C-CC
DATE/TIME 2020:06:26 – 09:15:00 COORDINATES: 35.2217, -81.0756
PHOTO 4 – VIEW WETLAND I
DATE/TIME 2020:06:26 – 11:28:00 COORDINATES: 35.2251, -81.0786
STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:6/26/20 Evaluator:NRN Easting:-81.0759
Project:Villages at Cramerton Mills: Perennial Stream D Northing:35.2223
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
(right-click the purple number and left-click Update Field to summarize points)
35.0
A. Geomorphology
Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2
3. In-channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence 0 1 2 3 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 2
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
Geomorphology Subtotal 18.0
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria 0 1 2 3 2
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based Evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3 3
Hydrology Subtotal 10.0
C. Biology
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0 0
Biology Subtotal 7.0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:Feature has non-native material from adjacent development throughout.
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Origins.
(version 4.11)
Wtld E
ChA: Chewacla Loam, 0 – 2% slopes
N 35.2222
Villages at Cramer Mills Gaston County
NC
MLRA 136
valley
LSR
0 – 2%
WGS84
X N
N N
N N
N
X
X
X
X
Precip Total (in.) for previous 30 days: 5.6
Precip Total (in.) for previous 60 days: 13.5
X
X
X
X 0 - 2
X 0 - 8
X 0
Concave
W 81.0768
X
X
X
X
Y
6/26/20
VCM Bowman, LLC
Wtld E
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fagus grandifolia
Ligustrum sinense
Elaeagnus umbellata
Sambucus nigra
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Ligustrum sinense
Lonicera japonica
10
5
15
15
15
15
10
10
5
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
FACW
FACU
FACW
NI
FACU
FACW
FAC
FACU
FAC
5
9
55.5%
x
X
30’
30’
30’
30’
30’
2.5 1
5
17.5 7
35
15 6
30
7.5 3
15
7.5 3
15
0 - 18 7.5YR 4/1 95 5 C PL
Wtld E
Sandy Clay Loam
X
X
7.5YR 5/8
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Long:
x
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No x
No x X
No x
Yes x
Yes x
Yes x X
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Upland Data Point 1 was taken approximately 15' East of Wetland C-CC.
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Villages at Cramerton Mills Cramerton/Gaston Co
Upland DP1
6/26/20
NC
No
Section, Township, Range:NRN
15-25ConcaveValley
Datum:-81.0768
NWI classification:
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Yes No
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.2210
Soil Map Unit Name: TaE: Tatum gravelly loam
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
VCM Bowman
X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X18
=Total Cover35
35 Yes FACU
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5'
=Total Cover
FACYes
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
50 20
30
0
Yes
Yes
FACU
FACU
120
0
640
Multiply by:
0
3.80Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
Prevalence Index worksheet:
FAC
Total % Cover of:
40
160
(A)
(B)
(A)
2
1128
5
15'
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30')
Lonicera japonica
10
55
Microstegium vimineum 10
55
Elaeagnus angustifolia
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Liriodendron tulipifera
Fagus grandifolia
Liquidambar styraciflua
30')
100
Indicator
Status
35
35
Yes
Dominant
Species?
Yes FACU
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
33.3%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
Upland DP1
2
6
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
760
0
200
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Matrix
7.5YR 4/6
7.5YR 4/4
3-20
0-3
Upland DP1SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%Texture
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Threatened & Endangered Species Report Threatened & Endangered Species
Report

Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation

For Villages at Cramerton
Gaston County, North Carolina

By: Lisa R. Gaffney
July 23, 2020

Field investigation conducted during the week of July 19, 2020

Villages at Cramerton - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation

#00713 2
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:

The Villages at Cramerton site (+/-41.9 acres) is located just south of Cramer
Mountain Road, and just north of Hamrick Road in Gaston County, North
Carolina. It can be found on the Belmont, NC USGS Topographic Quadrangle
Map; latitude is 35.2248 N, longitude is -81.0784 W. The topography consists of
upland ridges above moderate slopes grading into drainages and unnamed
tributaries to South Fork Catawba River, with the elevation ranging from 590 to
700 ft. (Figure 1). The site is partially disturbed from construction, and partially
wooded on the lower slopes and stream corridors.

Figure 1:

Villages at Cramerton - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation

#00713 3
METHODOLOGY:

The US Fish and Wildlife Service website http://www.fws.gov/endangered/ was
referenced to determine the occurrence of Threatened, Endangered and
Protected species for Gaston County North Carolina, the results of which are
listed below (Table 1). Maps and aerial photographs were assembled, and the
site was investigated during the week of July 19, 2020.

Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for Gaston
County
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Data search on July 19, 2020

Group Name Status
Flowering Plants Dwarf-flowered heartleaf
(Hexastylis naniflora)
Threatened
Flowering Plants Schweinitz's sunflower
(Helianthus
schweinitzii)
Endangered
Reptiles Bog turtle (Glyptemys
muhlenbergii)
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
Mammals Northern Long- Eared Bat
(Myotis septentrionalis)
Threatened
Birds Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus)
Protected under the
Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act

Villages at Cramerton - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation

#00713 4
SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS:

Two plant species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Gaston County:

• Schweinitz’s Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have
been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most
occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility
rights-of-way (ROW).

• Dwarf-flowered Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora), listed as Federally
Threatened, is only found in the upper Piedmont of North and South
Carolina. It grows in acidic soils along bluffs and adjacent slopes, often in
association with mountain laurel.

Three animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Gaston County:

• Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large bodies of
open water such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers, where there are
suitable fish populations and tall trees for nesting and roosting.

• Bog Turtle (Glyptemys muhlenburgii), Bog turtles live in the mud, grass
and sphagnum moss of bogs, swamps, and marshy meadows. These
wetlands are usually fed by cool springs flowing slowly over the land,
creating the wet, muddy soil needed by the turtles.

• Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally
Threatened. During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in
colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead
trees. Males and non-reproductive females may also roost in cooler
places, like caves and mines. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in
structures like barns and sheds. Northern long-eared bats spend winter
hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.

Villages at Cramerton - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation

#00713 5
RESULTS:

The site is partially disturbed from residential construction on the uplands and
partially wooded on the lower slopes and stream corridors which are composed
of a mixed hardwood forest community.

Mixed Oaks and Hickories dominate the forest cover. Canopy trees present
include White Oak (Quercus alba), Red Oak (Q. rubra), Southern Red Oak (Q.
falcata), Mockernut Hickory (Carya tomentosa), Pignut Hickory (C. glabra), Tulip
Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and
Shortleaf Pine (Pinus echinata). The subcanopy is composed of Red Maple (Acer
rubrum), Sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), American Beech (Fagus
grandifolia), Flowering Dogwood (Cornus florida), Redbud (Cercis canadensis),
American Holly (Ilex opaca), Winged Elm (Ulmus alata), Black Cherry (Prunus
serotina), and Black Gum (Nyssa sylvatica). The shrub layer includes Black Haw
(Viburnum prunifolium), Strawberry bush (Euonymus americanus), Chinese
Privet (Ligustrum sinense), Multiflora Rose (Rosa multiflora), Blueberry
(Vaccinium spp.), and Russian Olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia). Buckeye
(Aesculus sylvatica) is common on lower slopes. Vines include Japanese
Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus
quinquefolia), Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), Catbrier (Smilax sp.), and Poison Ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans). The herb layer includes Christmas Fern (Polystichum
acrostichoides), Spotted Wintergreen (Chimaphila maculata), Running Pine
(Lycopodium flabelliforme), Downy Rattlesnake Plantain (Goodyera pubescens),
and Japanese Stilt Grass (Microstegium vimineum). Many areas are over-run by
Ground Ivy (Glechoma hederacea), an invasive perennial creeper.

The roadside along Cramer Mountain Road has turf grass shoulders and ditches,
along with patches of narrow weedy buffers along the tree line and is relatively
shady. Transitional species in un-mowed spots include Blackberry (Rubus sp.),
Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), Goldenrod (Solidago sp.), Ragweed
(Ambrosia sp.), Pokeweed (Phytolacca americana), Wingstem (Verbesina sp.),
and Dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium). The roadside along Hamrick Road is
landscaped with turf grass and frequently mowed.

Villages at Cramerton - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation

#00713 6
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Results

• The wooded slopes and drainages were examined for Dwarf-flowered
Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora), and no individuals of this species or any
species of Hexastylis were observed.

• The potential habitat along the roadsides was closely examined for
Schweinitz’s Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii). No individuals of
Schweinitz’s Sunflower were observed.

• The site has no suitable habitat for Bog Turtles (Glyptemys muhlenbergii) .
No individuals were observed during the survey nor would any be
expected on-site.

• There is no suitable habitat for Bald Eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) on
this site. No Eagles were observed.

• Comparing this site location to the USFWS Asheville office’s website
(http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html) it
appears that the site meets the “exempt” criteria which requires no further
action under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for the Northern
Long-eared Bat.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

Based on the site investigation and the review of available data, WEPG did not
identify any protected species occurring on the subject property. No further
investigation of the presence of protected species on this site is recommended at
this time.

Respectfully submitted,

_________________
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
July 23, 2020

Villages at Cramerton - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation

#00713 7
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist / Botanist

B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained botanist and natural resource biologist and
has conducted field work and investigative studies covering thousands of
cumulative acres in both North and South Carolina since 1996, including:

• Discovered Schweinitz's Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC.
which led to the purchase of the site by the State of North Carolina Plant
Conservation Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This population has
become a Recovery Site for the species.

• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Federally Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).

• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora).

• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed,
and conducted field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.

• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed, and
conducted field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.

• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 55,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 -
present.

• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in both
North and South Carolina.

Approvals Approvals /
Authorizations
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. SAW-2015-00562 County: Gaston USGS Quad: NC-BELMONT
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner I Authorized Agent: Robert Bowman, VCM Bowman,LLC
Address: 13815 Cinnabar Place
Huntersville, North Carolina 28078
Telephone No.: 704-875-9704
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The project is located on
Cramer Mountain Road At Villages at Cramerton Mills subdivision, near Cramerton in Gaston
County, NC. Coordinates 35.224471N, -81.077397W
Description of projects area and activity: This permit authorizes excavation and placement of fill
material associated with Residential Development. Authorized impacts are listed in the table
below.
Applicable Law: r8] Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) D Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403) Authorization: Regional General Permit Number: Nationwide Permit Number: 18 & 29
Summary of Authorized Impacts and Required Mitigation
Impact ID# NWP / Open Water ( ac) Wetland ( ac) Stream (lf)
GP# Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent
Wl 29 .013
W2 29 .012
W3 18 0.006
Sl 29 89
S2 29 77
S3 29 65
S4 29 30
Impact Totals .031 30 231
Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (ac) .031 Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (lf) I 231
Required Wetland I Required Stream Mitigation (lf) I 231
Mitigation ( ac)
Additional Remarks and/or Special Permit Conditions
*Culverts greater than 48 inches in diameter will be buried at least one foot below the bed of the
stream. Culverts 48 inches or less shall be buried at an appropriate depth to maintain aquatic
passage as defined in Final Regional Condition 3.6 attached to this NWP. Any impact deviation to
the approved plan must be approved by prior notification from the Corps before these impacts can
occur.
MITIGATION
"In order to compensate for impacts associated with this permit, mitigation shall be provided in accordance
with the provisions outlined on the most recent version of the attached Compensatory Mitigation
Responsibility Transfer Form. The requirements of this form, including any special conditions listed on this form,
are hereby incorporated as special conditions of this permit authorization." As compensatory mitigation, the
applicant will provide payment to the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) for 231 If
of Warm Stream credits. Payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work.
Corps Regulatory Official _William Elliott ��°'�' ,.,.",� / Date:

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form
Permittee: Robert Bowman
Project Name: Villages at Cramerton Mills Phase 1
Action ID: SAW 2015-00562
County: Gaston
Instructions to Permittee: The Permittee must provide a copy of this form to the M itigation Sponsor, either an approved
M itigation Bank or the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP), who will then sign the form to verify the
transfer of the mitigation responsibility. Once the Sponsor has signed this form, it is the Permittee's responsibility to
ensure that to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Project Manager identified on page two is in receipt of a signed
copy of this form before conducting authorized impacts, unless otherwise specified below. If more than one mitigation
Sponsor will be used to provide the mitigation associated with the permit, or if the impacts and/or the mitigation will occur
in more than one 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC), multiple forms will be attached to the permit, and the separate forms
for each Sponsor and/or HUC must be provided to the appropriate mitigation Sponsors.
Instructions to Sponsor: The Sponsor must verify that the mitigation requirements (credits) shown below are available at
the identified site. By signing below, the Sponsor is accepting full responsibility for the identified mitigation, regardless of
whether or not they have received payment from the Permittee. Once the form is signed, the Sponsor must update the
bank ledger and provide a copy of the signed form and the updated bank ledger to the Permittee, the USACE Project
M anager, and the Wilmington District M itigation Office (see contact information on page 2). The Sponsor must also comply
with all reporting requirements established in their authorizing instrument.
Permitted Impacts and Compensatory Mitigation Requirements:
Permitted Impacts Requiring Mitigation* 8-digit HUC and Basin: 03050102, Catawba River Basin
Stream Impacts (linear feet) Wetland Impacts (acres)
Warm I Cool I Cold Riparian Riverine I Riparian Non-Riverine I Non-Riparian
231 I 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0
I CoastalI 0
*If more than one mitigation sponsor will be used for the permit, only include impacts to be mitigated by this sponsor.
Compensatory Mitigation Requirements: 8-digit HUC and Basin: 03050102, Catawba River Basin
Stream M itigation (credits) Wetland M itigation (credits)
Warm I Cool I Cold Riparian Riverine I Riparian Non-Riverine I Non-Riparian I Coastal
231 I 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0
Mitigation Site Debited: NC =D�M�S�--------------------------------­
(List the name of the bank to be debited. For umbrella banks, also list the specific site. For NCDMS, list NCD M S. If the
NCD M S acceptance letter identifies a specific site, also list the specific site to be debited).
Section to be completed by the Mitigation Sponsor
Statement of Mitigation Liability Acceptance: I, the undersigned, verify that I am authorized to approve mitigation
transactions for the M itigation Sponsor shown below, and I certify that the Sponsor agrees to accept full responsibility for
providing the mitigation identified in this document (see the table above), associated with the USACE Permittee and Action
ID number shown. I also verify that released credits (and/or advance credits for NCEEP), as approved by the USACE, are
currently available at the mitigation site identified above. Further, I understand that if the Sponsor fails to provide the
required compensatory mitigation, the USACE Wilmington District Engineer may pursue measures against the Sponsor to
ensure compliance associated with the mitigation requirements.
Mitigation Sponsor Name: ___________________________________ _
Name of Sponsor's Authorized Representative: ___________________________ _
Signature of Sponsor's Authorized Representative Date of Signature
Page 1 of 2 Form Updated 23 October, 2013
USACE Wilmington District
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form, Page 2
Conditions for Transfer of Compensatory Mitigation Credit:
•Once this document has been signed by the Mitigation Sponsor and the USACE is in receipt of the signed form, the
Permittee is no longer responsible for provi_ding the mitigation identified in this form, though the Permittee remains
responsible for any other mitigation requirements stated in the permit conditions.
•Construction within jurisdictional areas authorized by the permit identified on page one of this form can begin only
after the USACE is in receipt of a copy of this document signed by the Sponsor, confirming that the Sponsor has
accepted responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein. For authorized impacts conducted by
the North Carolina Department of Transportation {NCDOT), construction within jurisdictional areas may proceed upon
permit issuance; however, a copy of this form signed by the Sponsor must be provided to the USACE within 30 days of
permit issuance. NCDOT remains fully responsible for the mitigation until the USACE has received this form, confirming
that the Sponsor has accepted responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein.
•Signed copies of this document must be retained by the Permittee, Mitigation Sponsor, and in the USACE
administrative records for both the permit and the Bank/lLF Instrument. It is the Permittee's responsibility to ensure
that the USACE Project Manager {address below) is provided with a signed copy of this form.
•If changes are proposed to the type, amount, or location of mitigation after this form has been signed and returned to
the USACE, the Sponsor must obtain case-by-case approval from the USACE Project Manager and/or North Carolina
lnteragency Review Team {NCIRT). If approved, higher mitigation ratios may be applied, as per current District
guidance and a new version of this form must be completed and included in the USACE administrative records for both
the permit and the Bank/lLF Instrument.
Comments/ Additional Conditions:
This form is not valid unless signed below by the USACE Project Manager and by the Mitigation Sponsor on Page 1. Once
signed, the Sponsor should provide copies of this form along with an updated bank ledger to: 1) the Permittee, 2) the
USACE Project Manager at the address below, and 3} the Wilmington District Mitigation Office, Attn: Todd Tugwell,
11405 Falls of Neuse Road, Wake Forest, NC 27587 (email: [e-mail]}. Questions regarding this form
or any of the permit conditions may be directed to the USACE Project Manager below.
USACE Project Manager:
USACE Field Office:
William Elliott
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Email: [e-mail]
'I oJJ/ � L-�✓/744/ta�):(1 ��USACE Project Manager Signature
April 9, 2015
Date of Signature
Current Wilmington District mitigation guidance, including information on mitigation ratios, functional assessments, and
mitigation bank location and availability, and credit classifications (including stream temperature and wetland groupings) is
available at http://ribits.usace.army.mil.
Page 2 of 2
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the
Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http://regulatory.usacesurvey.com/ to complete the survey online.
A.VA NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
VCM Bowman, LLC
c/o Mr. Robert Bowman
13815 Cinnabar Place
Hunter sville, NC 28 078
Donald van der Vaart
Secretary
April 7, 2015
DWR# 15-0218
Gaston County
Subject: APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Villages of Cramerton Mills
Dear Mr. Bowman:
You have our approval, in accordance with the General Certification and those
conditions listed below, for the purpose proposed in your application dated February 20,
2015, and received by the Division of Water Resources (the Division) on February 23,
2015. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by
Water Quality General Certification Number 3890 which can be viewed on our web site at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wg/swp/ws/401. The General Certification allows you to use
Nationwide Permit Number 29 once ii is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE). Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits
before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 40 4 permit expires
unless otherwise specified in the General Certification. It is advised that all conditions of
the Certification are reviewed prior to initiation of the project. In addition to the
requirements of the Certification, you must also comply with the following conditions:
1.This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your
application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may
be required to send us a new application for a new Certification. If the property is
sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter;
and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. 15A NCAC 02H .0506
and 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
2.The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the
approved impact areas has commenced. 15A NCAC 02H .0502 (e)]
Mooresville Regional Office, 610 East Center Avenue, Mooresville. North Carolina 28155 Phone: [phone]\ Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity\ Affirmative Ac\lon Employer -Made 1n part by recycled paper
DWR# 15-0218
3.Approved Impacts:
Type of Impact Amount Approved Amount Approved
Temporary Impact Permanent Impact
Stream 30 linear ft. 231 linear ft.
Wetland 0 acre. 0.31 acre
4.Diversion Ditches and other storm water conveyances as related to the sediment and
erosion control measures shall be matted and/or stabilized to reduce sediment loss
and turbidity. This includes interior/exterior slopes of sediment basins. 15A NCAC
02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c )(3)
5.Bare/fill slopes in excess of 10-feet in height and within 30-feet of surface waters shall
be matted. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3)
6.You are required to provide one copy of the approved SMP, including plan details
on full-sized plan sheets, with proof of approval. The approved SMP shall be
submitted to the DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit (1617 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617) before any impacts authorized in this certification occur.
After it is approved and submitted to the Division, the SMP may not be modified
without prior written authorization from DWR 401 Unit or delegated program. If the
SMP is modified in the future, then you shall provide one modified SMP with proof
of approval to the DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit prior to the commencement of
the modifications. 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5)
7.Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques is
recommended where practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods.
If riprap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the streambed, unless approved by
DWR.
8.Mitigation [15A NCAC 02H .0500(h}] must be provided for the proposed impacts as
specified in the table below. The Division has received notification/acceptance from
the City of Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank to meet this
mitigation requirement. Until the City of Charlotte receives and clears your payment,
and proof of payment has been provided to this Office, no impacts specified in this
Authorization Certificate shall occur. For accounting purposes, this Certification
authorizes payment to meet the following compensatory mitigation requirement:
Compensatory Mitigation River and Sub-basin Number
Required
Stream 231 (feet) Catawba (03050102) 1:1 ratio
Wetlands 0 (acres)
DWR# 15-0218
9.Stormwater discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such
that the potential receiving streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to
sediment accumulations, scouring or erosion of the stream banks. 15A NCAC 02H
.0506(b)(5)
10. Heavy equipment may be operated within the stream channels however; its usag e
shall be minimized to the extent practical. 15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)
11.During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is
permitted in waters of the U.S., or protected riparian buffers. 15A NCAC 02H
.0506(b)(3)
12. The Permittee shall ensure that the final design drawings adhere to the permit and
to the permit drawings submitted for approval. 15A NCAC 02H .0507 (c) and 15A
NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2)
13. Heavy equipment shall be operated from the banks rather than in the stream
channel in order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the introduction of other
pollutants into the stream. 15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)
14.AII mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected
and maintained to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials. 15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)
15.Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment
in or adjacent to surface waters is prohibited. 15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)
16. The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary located within the construction corridor
approved by this authorization shall be clearly marked by highly visible fencing prior
to any land disturbing activities. Impacts to areas within the fencing are prohibited
unless otherwise authorized by this certification. 15A NCAC 02H.0501 and .0502
17.The permittee shall report any violations of this Certification to the Division of Water
Resources within 24 hours of discovery. 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of the General
Statute 150B by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of the
Administrative Hearings (hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from
the OAH at http://www.ncoah.com/or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at [phone].
Within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with
the OAH. A petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any
applicable OAH filing fee is received in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday
through Friday, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm, excluding state holidays).
DWR# 15-0218
The petitio ns may be faxed to the OAH at [phone], provided the original and
one (1) copy of the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the
OAH within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission. Mailing address for the
OAH:
Office of Administrative Hearings Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center 1711 New Hope Church Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714 Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Mr. Sam M. Hayes, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review by the Division under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the
Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 or Ms. Karen Higgins in the Central Office in
Raleigh 919-807-6360.
Attachments
Sincerely,
Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office, DENR
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville, [e-mail] (email)
Karen Higgins, Wetlands Unit
Len Rindner, Len.rindner@wetlands -epg.com (email)
MRO, Land Quality