SW8010220_Historical File_20140522

RIMMA
Aoy"WA,
RCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
May 22, 2014
Richard A. Brvenik, President
Carteret General Hospital Corporation
3500 Arendell Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
Subject: Stormwater Management
Carteret General Hospital
High Density Commercial
Carteret County
Dear Mr. Brvenik:
Permit No. SW8 010220 Mod.
infiltration Basin Project
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Effective August 1, 2013 the State Stormwater program has been transferred from the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) to the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (DEMLR). All previous
references to DWQ will remain in older stormwater permits issued prior to August 1, 2013 until they are
modified. Please note that this permit now references DEMLR as the Division responsible for issuance
of the permit
The Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources received a
complete, modified Express State Stormwater Management Permit Application *for Carteret General
Hospital on April 28, 2014 with final information received on May 22, 2014. Staff review of the modified
plans and specifications has determined that the project, as proposed, will comply with the Stormwater
Regulations set forth in Session Law 2008-211 and Title 15A NCAC 2H.1000. We are forwarding
modified Permit No. SW8 010220 dated May 22, 2014, for the construction, operation and maintenance
of the BMP's and built -upon area associated with the subject project.
On August 5, 2009, the Govemor signed Session Law 2009-406. This law impacted any development
approval issued by the former Division of Water Quality under Article 21 of Chapter 143 of the General
Statutes, which was current and valid at any point between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2010.
The law extended the effective period of any stormwater permit that was set to expire during this time
frame to three (3) years from its current expiration date. On August 2, 2010, the Governor signed
Session Law 2010-177, which granted an extra year for a total of four (4) possible years extension.
Accordingly, this permit, which had previously been renewed and was set to expire on July 23, 2021,
shall now be effective from the date of issuance until July 23, 2025. The permittee and the project shall
be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified in this permit. Please pay special attention to
the conditions listed in this permit regarding the Operation and Maintenance of the BMP(s), recordation
of deed restrictions, certification of the BMP's, procedures for changing ownership, transferring the
permit, and renewing the permit. Failure to establish an adequate system for operation and
maintenance of the stormwater management system, to record deed restrictions, to certify the BMP's,
to transfer the permit, or to renew the permit, will result in future compliance problems.
The modifications covered by this permit include the following:
1. Added new permeable pavement drainage areas and renumbered the existing drainage areas.
2. The approved plan set includes the July 23, 2001 and the May 22, 2014, plans. The July 2001
plans remain in force and effect as to the existing infiltration basin, labeled as #4 on the July
2001 plans, and renumbered to DA-10 on the May 22, 2014 plans. The September 17, 2013
plans are no longer in effect.
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Section — Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 - [phone] / Fax: [phone]

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 010220 Mod.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the
right to request an adjudicatory hearing by filing a written petition with the Office of
Administrative Hearings (OAH). The written petition must conform to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes, and must be filed with the OAH within thirty (30) days of receipt of
this permit. You should contact the OAH with all questions regarding the filing fee (if a filing fee
is required) and/or the details of the filing process at 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
27699-6714, or via telephone at 919-431-3000, or visit their website at www.NCOAH.com.
Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact
Linda Lewis in the Wilmington Regional Office at (910) 7:96-7343.
Sincerely,
ZC�-
'�7"-14e
9m Tracy Davis, P.E., Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
GDS/arl: G:1WQ1Shared\Stormwater\Permits & Projects120011010220 HD12014 05 permit 010220
cc: Ginger Y. Turner, P.E., Stroud Engineering
Town of Morehead City Building Inspections
Carteret County Engineering
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
Page 2 of 9

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 010220 Mod.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL AND LAND RESOURCES
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
HIGH DENSITY COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of
North Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Carteret General Hospital Corporation
Carteret General Hospital
3500 Arendell Street, Morehead City, Carteret County
FOR THE
construction, operation and maintenance of one (1) infiltration basin, seven (7) areas of
permeable pavement (some treating additional BUA), and the redevelopment of 72,475
square feet of existing BUA, in compliance with the provisions of Session Law 2008-211
and 15A NCAC 2H .1000 (hereafter collectively and separately referred to as the
"stormwater rules') and the approved stormwater management plans and specifications
and other supporting data as attached and on file with and approved by the Division
and considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 23, 2025, and shall be
subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
I. DESIGN STANDARDS
1. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of stormwater
described in the application and other supporting data.
2. The tract is a combination of pre-1988 existing BUA, previously permitted BUA
that is being removed and replaced, redeveloped BUA, and proposed new BUA.
There is 347,387 sf of pre-1988 existing BUA called DA-1), and there is 72,475
sf of existing BUA in DA-2 that is being redeveloped. The design premise is to
treat the amount of BUA that exceeds what previously existed, after taking into
account what has been removed, what is proposed, and any BUA credit for the
use of permeable pavement.
3. This stormwater system has been approved for the management of stormwater
runoff as described in Sections 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8 of this permit. The infiltration basin
stormwater control in DA-10 has bean designed to handle the runoff from 43,644
square feet of built -upon area (BUA). The seven (7) permeable pavement areas
(DA-3, DA-4, DA-5, DA-6, DA-7, DA-8 and DA-9) will treat the footprint of the
permeable pavement, and in the case of DA-5, A-6, DA-7, DA-8 and DA-9 only,
adjacent BUA will be treated. The total BUA treated in DA-3, DA-4, DA-5, DA-6,
DA-7, DA-8 and DA-9, is 625.5, 504, 3760, 2392, 3760, 3743 and 28,000,
respectively.
4. The infiltration basin (DA-10) must be operated with a 50-foot vegetated filter,
designed to bypass the excess design storm in a diffuse and non -erosive
manner.
Page 3 of 9

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 010220 Mod.
5. The runoff from all BUA within the permitted drainage areas of this project must
be directed into the appropriate permitted stormwater control system. Each of
the permitted BMP's is limited to treating only that amount of BUA listed on the
application and in the approved calculations.
6. The following design criteria have been permitted for the infiltration basin (DA-
10) and must be provided in the system at all times and maintained at design
condition:
a.
DrainaArea, acres:
gnsite,
1.26
ft.
54,871
Offsite, ft .
0
b.
Total Imperviou Surfaces, ft2:
43,644
Onsite,
43,644
Offsite, ft2:
0
C.
Design Storm, inches:
1.5
d.
Basin Depth, feet:
1.48
e.
Bottom Elevation, FMSl :
23.4
f.
Bottom Surface Area, ft :
2,979
g.
Bypass Weir Elevation, FMSL:
24.88
h.
Permitted Storage Volume, ft :
7,579
i.
Predevelopment 1 yr 24 hr peak flow, cfs:
n/a
j.
Post -development 1 yr 24 hr peak flow, cfs: n/a
k.
Type of Soil:
Wando
I.
Expected Infiltration Rate, in/hr:
4
M.
Seasonal High Water Table, FMSL:
21.4
n.
Time to Draw Down, hours:
6
o.
Receiving Stream/River Basin:
Bogue Sound / WOK03
P.
Stream Index Number:
20-36-(8.5)
q.
Classification of Water Body:
"SA HQW"
7. A 72,475 ft2 portion of DA-2 (West Campus) is excluded from State Stormwater
permitting requirements under the following conditions:
a. The project must be constructed as shown on the plans submitted to this
Office;
b. The currently proposed built -upon area is 98,908 square feet within DA-2.
The existing built -upon area of 72,475 square feet is not required to be
treated. The excess of 26,433 square feet is proposed to be treated by
permeable pavement designed to infiltrate (DA-3, DA-4, DA-5, DA-6, DA-7
and DA-8), and;
C. The runoff from the existing BUA of 72,475 square feet is proposed to
continue to sheet flow over grassed areas to existing drainage outlets,
which provides equal protection of surface waters as the existing
stormwater control, which is sheet flow over impervious surfaces to
existing drainage outlets.
Page 4 of 9

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 010220 Mod.
8. The following design criteria have been approved for the permeable pavement
areas, and shall be installed and maintained at design condition:
DA3
DA4
DA5
DA6
DA7
DA8
DA9
a
HSG
-
A/B
A/B
A/B
A/B
A/B
A/B
A/B
b
Drainage Area
SF
2502
2016
6604
4648
6700
5999
44800
c
PP Area
SF
2502
2016
3008
3008
1 3008
3008
22400
d
Effective BUA
SF
625.5
504
752
752
752
752
5600 .
e
Adjacent BUA
SF
0
0
3008
1640
3008
2991
22400
f
Design Storm
in
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
10 yr 24:hr DS P
in
6.87
6.87
6.87
6.87
6.87
6.87
6.87
h'
Infiltration Rate
In/hr
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
i
DW Aggregate Depth
in
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
'
Volume Treated
CF
1001
806
1203
1203
1203
1203
8960
k
D,N Ponding Time
days
.06
.06
.13
.10
.13
.12
.21
II. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
1. The stormwater management system shall be constructed in its entirety,
vegetated as required, and operational for its intended use prior to the
construction of any built -upon surface.
2. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded areas of
the system will be repaired immediately.
3. The facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the conditions of this
permit, the approved plans and specifications, and rather supporting data.
4. If the stormwater system was used as an Erosion Control device, it must be
restored to design condition prior to operation as a stormwater treatment device,
and prior to occupancy of the facility. The drainage area must be stabilized prior
to the construction of the permeable pavement. During site construction,
drainage from unstabilized areas of the project must be diverted away from the
permeable pavement and into suitable erosion control measures.
5. The permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance
necessary to assure the permitted stormwater system functions at optimum
efficiency. The approved Operation and Maintenance Plan must be followed in
its entirety and maintenance must occur at the scheduled intervals including, but
not limited to:
a. Semiannual scheduled inspections (every 6 months).
b. Sediment removal.
C. Mowing and revegetation of slopes and the vegetated filter.
d. immediate repair of eroded areas.
e. Maintenance of all slopes in accordance with approved plans and
specifications.
f. Debris removal and unclogging of bypass structure, infiltration media, flow
spreader, .catch basins, piping and vegetated filter.
g. Routine vacuum sweeping of the permeable pavement areas.
6. A copy of this permit and the approved plans and specifications shall be
maintained on. file by the Permittee at all times.
7. Records of maintenance activities must be ke t for each permitted BMP. The
reports will indicate the date, activity, name of�person performing the work and
what actions were taken.
Page 5 of 9

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 010220 Mod.
8. Upon completion of construction, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a certification must be received
from an, appropriate designer for the system installed certifying that the permitted
facility has been installed in accordance with this permit, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting documentation. Any deviations from the
approved plans and specifications must be noted on the Certification. A
modification may be required for those deviations.
9. Access to the stormwater facilities shall be maintained in an unobstructed
manner and via appropriate easements at all times.
10. The permittee shall submit to the Director and shall have received approval for
revised plans, specifications, and calculations prior to construction, for any
modification to the approved plans, including, but not limited to, those listed
below:
a. Any revision to any item shown on the approved plans, including the
stormwater management measures, built -upon area, details, etc.
b. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -upon area or to the
drainage area.
C. Further development, subdivision, acquisition, lease or sale of any, all or
part of the project area.
d. Filling in, altering, or piping of any vegetative conveyance shown on the
approved plan.
e. The construction of any designated future BUA on the application.
11. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one
or more of the minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time frame
specified in the notice, the permittee shall submit a written time schedule to the
Director for modifying the site to meet minimum requirements. The permittee
shall provide copies of revised plans and certification in writing to the Director
that the changes have been made.
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS
Approved plans, calculations, supplement forms, operation and maintenance
agreements and specifications for this project are incorporated by reference and
are enforceable parts of the permit.
2. Any individual or entity found to be in noncompliance with the terms and
conditions of this permit or with the stormwater rules, is subject to enforcement
action by the Division, in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143,
Article 21.
3. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances, which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) having jurisdiction.
4. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily the Permittee shall take
immediate corrective action, including those as may be required by this Division,
such as the construction of additional or replacement stormwater management
systems.
5. The permittee grants DENR Staff permission to enter the property during normal
business hours for the pur ose of inspecting all components of the permitted
stormwater management facility.
Page 6 of 9

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 010220 Mod.
6. This permit is not transferable to any person or entity except after notice to and
approval by the Director. The permittee shall submit a completed and signed
{Tame/Ownership Change Form, accompanied by the supporting documentation
as listed on the form, to the Division at least 60 days prior to any one or more of
the following events:
a. An ownership change inciuding the sale or conveyance of the project area in
whole or in part;
b. The sale or conveyance of the common areas to a Homeowner's or Property
Owner's Association, subject to the requirements of Session Law 2011-256;
c. Bankruptcy;
d. Foreclosure;
e. Dissolution of the partnership or corporate entity;
f. A name change of the current permittee;
g. A name change of the project;
h. A mailing address change of the permittee;
7. The permittee is responsible for compliance with all permit conditions until such
time as the Division approves the transfer request.
8. The permit issued shall continue in force and effect until revoked or terminated.
The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause. The
filing of a request for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance or
termination does not stay any permit condition.
9. Unless specified elsewhere, permanent seeding requirements for the stormwater
controls must follow the guidelines established in the North Carolina Erosion and
Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual.
10. The issuance of this permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and
modifying the permit, revoking and reissuing the permit, or terminating the permit
as allowed by the laws, rules and regulations contained in Session Law 2008-
211, Title 15A NCAC 2H.1000, and NCGS 143-215.1 et. al.
11. The permittee shall submit a permit renewal application at least 180 days prior to
the expiration date of this permit. The renewal request must include the
appropriate documentation and the processing fee.
Permit modified and reissued this the 22"d day of May 2014.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 7 of 9

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 010220 Mod.
Carteret General Hospital
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 010220 Mod.
Carteret County
Designer's Certification
I, , as a duly registered in the
State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/ weekly/ full
time) the construction of the project,
(Project)
for (Project Owner) hereby state that, to the
best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the project
construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
The checklist of items on page 2 of this form is included in the Certification.
Noted deviations from approved plans and specification:
Signature
Registration Number
Date
SEAL
Page 8 of 9

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 010220 Mod.
Certification Requirements:
The drainage area to the system contains approximately the permitted
acreage.
2. The drainage area to the system contains no more than the permitted
amount of built -upon area.
3. All the built -upon area associated with the project is graded such that the
runoff drains to the system.
4. All roof drains are located such that the runoff is directed into the system.
5. The bypass structure weir elevation is per the approved plan.
6. The bypass structure is located per the approved plans.
7. A Trash Rack is provided on the bypass structure.
8. All slopes are grassed with permanent vegetation.
9. Vegetated slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
10. The inlets are located per the approved plans and do not cause short-
circuiting of the system.
11. The permitted amounts of surface area and/or volume have been
provided.
.12. All required design depths are provided.
13. All required parts of the system are provided.
.14. The required system dimensions are provided per the approved plans.
cc: NCDENR-DEMLR Wilmington Regional Office
Town of Morehead City Building Inspections
Page 9 of 9

DWQ USE ONLY
Date,Receivefil
Jqe Paid
Permit umber
Applicabl ules- Coastal SW - 5 ❑ Coastal SW - 2008 ❑ Ph II - Post Construction
(select all that apply) ❑ Non -Coastal SW- HQW/ORW Waters ❑ Universal Stormwater Management Plan
❑ Other WQ Mgmt Plan: WfflW=M=MA=ff
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Naturai Resources APR 2 8 10%
Division of Water Quality
BY:
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
Carteret General Hospital
2. Location of Project (street address):
3500 Arendell Street
City:Morehead City County:Carteret Zip:28557
3. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
From the intersection of US Hwy 70 and NC Hwy 24 take US Hwy 70 East approximtely 2.5 miles to
35th Street. Carteret General Hospital located on the left.
4. Latitude:34° 43' 33" N Longitude:76* 45' 18" W of the main entrance to the project.
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. a. Specify whether project is (check one): ❑New ®Modification ❑ Renewal w/ Modification}
tRenewals with modifications also requires SM-102 - Renewal Application Form
b.If this application is being submitted as the result of a modification to an existing permit, list the existing
permit numberSW8 010220 , its issue date (if known)7-23-01/9-17-13 , and the status of
construction: ❑Not Started ®Partially Completed* ® Completed* *provide a designer's certification
2. Specify the type of project (check one):
❑Low Density ®High Density ❑Drains to an Offsite Stormwater System ❑Other
3. if this application is being submitted as the result of a previously returned application or a letter from DWQ
requesting a state stormwater management permit application, list the stormwater project number, if
assigned, and the previous name of the project, if different than currently
proposed,
4. a. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks; information on required state permits can be
obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at 1-877-623-6748):
❑CAMA Major ®Sedimentation/Erosion Control: 5 ac of Disturbed Area
❑NPDES Industrial Stormwater ❑404/401 Permit: Proposed Impacts
b.If any of these permits have already been acquired please provide the Project Name, Project/Permit Number,
issue date and the type of each permit:
5. Is the project located within 5 miles of a public airport? ®No []Yes
If yes, see S.L. 2012-200, Part VI: http:ltportal.ncdenr.orgLweb/wq./ws/su/statesw/rules laws
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 1 of 6

III. CONTACT INFORMATION
1. a. Print Applicant / Signing Official's name and title (specifically the developer, property owner, lessee,
designated government official, individual, etc. who owns the project):
Applicant/Organization: Carteret County General Hospital Corporation
Signing Official & Title: Richard A. Brvenik, President
b. Contact information for person listed in item 1a above:
Street Address: 3500 Arendell Street
City: Morehead City State: NC Zip: 28557
Mailing Address (if applicable): P.O. Drawer 1619
City: Morehead City State: NC Zip: 28557
Phone: ( 252 ) 808-6094 Fax: ( )
Email: dbrvenik®ccgh.org
c. Please check the appropriate box. The applicant listed above is:
® The property owner (Skip to Contact Information, item 3a)
❑ Lessee* (Attach a copy of the lease agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below)
❑ Purchaser* (Attach a copy of the pending sales agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and
2b below)
❑ Developer* (Complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below.)
2. a. Print Property Owner's name and title below, if you are the lessee, purchaser or developer. (This is the
person who owns the property that the project is located on):
Property Owner/Organization:
Signing Official &
b. Contact information for person listed in item 2a above:
Street Address:
City: State: Zip:
Mailing Address (if applicable):
City: State: Zip:
Phone: ( ) Fax: ( )
3. a. (Optional) Print the name and title of another contact such as the project's construction supervisor or other
person who can answer questions about the project:
Other Contact Person/Organization:
Signing Official & Title:
b. Contact information for person listed in item 3a above:
Mailing Address:
City: State: Zip:
Phone: ( ) Fax: ( )
Email:
4. Local jurisdiction for building permits: Town of Morehead City
Point of Contact:
Phone #: ( 252 ) 726-5243
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 2 of 6

IV. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, briefly summarize how the stormwater runoff will be treated.
Previously permitted infiltration trench and basin as well as installation of pervious pavement to
maintain the net effective BUA
2. a. If claiming vested rights, identify the supporting documents provided and the date they were approved:
❑ Approval of a Site Specific Development Plan or PUD Approval Date:
❑ Valid Building Permit Issued Date:
❑ Other: Date:
b. If claiming vested rights, identify the regulation(s) the project has been designed in accordance with:
❑ Coastal SW -1995 ❑ Ph II - Post Construction
3. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the White Oak River basin.
4. Total Property Area: 17.05 +/- acres 5. Total Coastal Wetlands Area: 0 acres
6. Total Surface Water Area: 0 acres
7. Total Property Area (4) - Total Coastal Wetlands Area (5) - Total Surface Water Area (6) = Total Project
Area+: 17.05 +/_ acres
+ Total project area shall be calculated to exclude the following: the normal pool of im Mounded structures, the area
between the banks of streams and rivers, the area below the Normal High Water (NJ line or Mean High Water
(MHM line, and coastal wetlands landward from the NHW (or MHM line. The resultant project area is used to
calculate overall percent built upon area (B LA). Non -coastal wetlands landward of the NHW (or MHM line may
be included in the total project area.
8. Project percent of impervious area: (Total Impervious Area / Total Project Area) X 100 = _ 66.27 %
9. How many drainage areas does the project have?10 (For high density, count 1 for each proposed engineered
stormwater BMP. For low density and other projects, use 1 for the whole property area)
10. Complete the following information for each drainage area identified in Project Information item 9. If there
are more than four drainage areas in the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area
provided in the same format as belovPre'88 Main Main \campus Pre'88 West West Camnus
Basin Information
Draina Area _
Drainage Area 1
Drainage Area _
DrainageArea 2
Receiving Stream Name
Bogue Sound
Bogue Sound
BogueSound
Bogue Sound
Stream Class *
SA;HQW
SA;HQW
SA;HQW
SA;HQW
Stream Index Number *
20-36-(8.5)
20-36-(8.5)
20-36-(8.5)
20-36-(8.5)
Total Drainage Area (sf)
609,964
609,964
132,949
112,789
On -site Drainage Area (sf)
609,964
609,964
132,949
112,789
Off -site Drainage Area (sf)
0
0
0
0
Proposed Impervious Area** s
85,458
20,240.5
i % impeMous Area** (total)
56.95%
1 71.32%
1 54.51%
87.69% 1
Im ervious" * Surface Area
Drainage Area _
Drainage Area 1
Drainage Area _
Drainage Area 2
On -site Buildings/Lots (sf)
45,690
On -site Streets (sf)
On -site Parking (sf)
33,308
48,709
On -site Sidewalks (sf)
6,460
Other on -site (sf)
Future (sf)
Off -site (sf)
Existing BUA*** (sf)
347,387
349,572
72,475
50,199
Total (sf):
1 347,387
435,030
72,475
98,908
* Stream Class and Index Number can be determined at: htW.Y ortal.ncdenr.org ebfWq[ps/csu/classifications
Imppervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc. ECEIVE
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 3 of 6 APR 2 6 2014
BY:

00
v
a`
m
1O
c
a
a
n
m
o
Q
tD
0
0
a
o
to
N
N
C
O
N
l0
10
`
N
Ln
co
10
c
N
O
M
0
to
`
N
a
I
Ln
rl
m
m
o
m
m
s
to
m
`
N
Q
LA
I,
ON1
0�0
W
co
m
C
N
rl
O
N'
O
fn
Ln
W
N
a
i
co
tio
LA
m
m
c
'm
rri
0
tri
.
0
a
d
a
Ln
m
co
1-1
Ln
0
M
l0
y�
Q
O7
N
w
w
Itp
N
'o
C
•�
Lr
O
lV
�
7
A
O
~
�
`J
Q
�
N
O
•N
O
v�i
C
N
10
v
p
m
coN
tl
to
c
N
0
0
0
0
0
t7L
O
w

'Report only that amount of existing B UA that will remain after development. Do not report any existing B UA that
is to be removed and which will be replaced by new BUA.
11. How was the off -site impervious area listed above determined? Provide documentation. NA
Proiects in Union County: Contact DWQ Central Off ice staff to check if the project is located within a Threatened &
Endangered .Cnecies watershed that may be. subiect to more. stringent stormwater requirements as per 1 SA NCAC 02B .0600.
V. SUPPLEMENT AND O&M FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement and operation and maintenance (O&M) forms
must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project. The latest versions of the forms can be downloaded
from httv://l)ortal.ncdenr.orL,/web/wa/ws/su/bmv-manual.
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
A complete package includes all of the items listed below. A detailed application instruction sheet and BMP
checklists are available from http://12ortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms dots. The complete
application package should be submitted to the appropriate DWQ Office. (The appropriate office may be
found by locating project on the interactive online map at hgp://12ortal.ncdenr.org/web/wg/ws/su/maps.)
Please indicate that the following required information have been provided by initialing in the space provided
for each item. All original documents MUST be signed and initialed in blue ink. Download the latest versions
for each submitted application package from http://Rortal.ncdenr.org/web/wa/ws/su/statesw/forms dots.
niti
1. Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form.
2. Original and one copy of the signed and notarized Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants
Form. (if required as per Part VII below)
3. Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) (sealed, signed and dated) and O&M
ho -,I—
agreement(s) for each BUT.
4. Permit application processing fee of $505 payable to NCDENR. (For an Express review, refer to
hn://www.envhelp.org/12a&es/onestopexi2ress.html for information on the Express program
and the associated fees. Contact the appropriate regional office Express Permit Coordinator for
additional information and to schedule the required application meeting.)
5. A detailed narrative (one to two pages) describing the stormwater treatment/management fo�,� �J
6. A USGS map identifying the site location. If the receiving stream is reported as class SA or the T�
receiving stream drains to class SA waters within 1h mile of the site boundary, include the ih
mile radius on the map.
7. Sealed, signed and dated calculations (one copy).
8. Two sets of plans folded to 8.5" x 14" (sealed, signed, & dated), including:
a. Development/Project name.
b. Engineer and firm.
c. Location map with named streets and NCSR numbers.
d. Legend.
e. North arrow.
f. Scale.
g. Revision number and dates.
h. Identify all surface waters on the plans by delineating the normal pool elevation of
impounded structures, the banks of streams and rivers, the MHW or NHW line of tidal
waters, and any coastal wetlands landward of the MHW or NHW lines.
• Delineate the vegetated buffer landward from the normal pool elevation of impounded
structures, the banks of streams or rivers, and the MHW (or NHW) of tidal waters.
i. Dimensioned property/project boundary with bearings & distances.
j. Site Layout with all BUA identified and dimensioned.
k. Existing contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations.
1. Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures.
m. Wetlands delineated, or a note on the plans that none exist. (Must be delineated by a
qualified person. Provide documentation of qualifications and identify the person who
made the determination on the plans.
n. Existing drainage (including off -site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations.
o. Drainage areas delineated (included in the main set of plans, not as a separate document).
p. Vegetated buffers (where required).
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 4 of 6

9. Copy of any applicable soils report with the associated SHWT elevations (Please identify
elevations in addition to depths) as well as a map of the boring locations with the existing
elevations and boring logs. Include an 8.5 x11" copy of the NRCS County Soils map with the
project area clearly delineated. For projects with infiltration BMPs, the report should also
include the soil type, expected infiltration rate, and the method of determining the infiltration rate.
(Infiltration Devices submitted to WiRO: Schedule a site visit for DWQ to verify the SHWT prior
to submittal, [phone].)
10. A copy of the most c»*rent property deed. Deed. book: 251,1053,1019,1027,1027,1109 Page No:
280,218,285,17,16,68
11. For corporations and limited liability corporations (LLC): Provide documentation from the NC
Secretary of State or other official documentation, which supports the titles and positions held
by the persons listed in Contact Information, item 1a, 2a, and/or 3a per 15A.CAC 2H1003(e).
The corporation or LLC must be listed as an active corporation in good standing with the NC
Secretary of State, otherwise the application will be returned.
hn://www.secretaiy.state.nc.us/CorRorations/CSearr-h.aspx
VII. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
For all subdivisions, outparcels, and future development, the appropriate property restrictions and protective
covenants are required to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly or the proposed
BUA allocations vary, a table listing each lot number, lot size, and the allowable built -upon area must be
provided as an attachment to the completed and notarized deed restriction form. The appropriate deed
restrictions and protective covenants forms can be downloaded from
hgp://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms does. Download the latest versions for each
submittal.
In the instances where the applicant is different than the property owner, it is the responsibility of the property
owner to sign the deed restrictions and protective covenants form while the applicant is responsible for ensuring
that the deed restrictions are recorded.
By the notarized signature(s) below, the permit holder(s) certify that the recorded property restrictions and
protective covenants for this project, if required, shall include all the items required in the permit and listed
on the forms available on the website, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons claiming
under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the NC DWQ and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
VIII. CONSULTANT INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION
Applicant: Complete this section if you wish to designate authority to another individual and/or firm (such as a
consulting engineer and/or firm) so that they may provide information on your behalf for this project (such as
addressing requests for additional information).
Consulting Engineer: Ginger Y. Turner, PE
Consulting Firm: Stroud Engineering, PA
Mailing Address: 107 B Commerce Street
City: Greenville State: NC Zip: 28557
Phone: ( 252 ) 756-9352 ext 234 Fax: ( 252 ) 756-2345
Email: [e-mail]
IX. PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION (if Contact Information, item 2 has been filled out, complete this
section)
I, (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item 2a) , certify that I
own the property identified in this permit application, and thus give permission to (print or type name of person
listed in Contact Information, item 1a) with (print or type name of organization listed in
Contact Information, item Ia) to develop the project as currently proposed. A copy of
the lease agreement or pending property sales contract has been provided with the submittal, which indicates the
party responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater system.
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 5 of 6

As the legal property owner I acknowledge, understand, and agree by my signature below, that if my designated
agent (entity listed in Contact Information, item 1) dissolves their company and/or cancels or defaults on their
lease agreement, or pending sale, responsibility for compliance with the DWQ Stormwater permit reverts back to
me, the property owner. As the property owner, it is my responsibility to notify DWQ immediately and submit a
completed Name/Ownership Change Form within 30 days; otherwise I will be operating a stormwater treatment
facility without a valid permit. I understand that the operation of a stormwater treatment facility without a valid
permit is a violation of NC General Statue 143-215.1 and may result in appropriate enforcement action including
the assessment 9L4vil penalties of up to $25,000 per day, 019suant to NCGS 143-215.6.
/ter
Signature: w Date: zo-t-oI
I, a Notary Public for the State of NJ e County of
do hereby certify that 1 C.h&Y--- A i 6xsonally appeared
before me this a day of �v i �, and acknow dge the du executi n of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,
S •U=
• G•Z—
i V�
r f.•' O:
E���
X. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
SEAL
My commission expires 9—ow w A
I, (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item 1a) Richard A. Brvenik, President
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be recorded, and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of the
applicable stormwater rules under 15A N"C 2H .1000 Najd any other applicable state stormwater requirements.
Signature: Date:
I� s a N tary Public for the State of County of
do hereb certify that j� C1p� r/Q / % personally appeared
before me iris day of ,and ackno !edge the d execu on of the application for
e AA
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,
ID- WIC
•2
G
Pus
••••...0 V•••• O,
SEAL
My commission expires 9—DI — L
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 6 of 6

Permit No. 560-3 ChiU220
(to be provided Gv DW00
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER M A NACE'MENT PERM:T ^ PPIrTC:tiTION F^vRlvi
INFILTRATION BASIN SUPPLEMENT
This Ibrin inay be photocopied for rise as an original
DWO Stormwater Management Plan Review:
A complete storinwater management plan submittal includes a stormwater management permit application, an
infiltration basin supplement for each system, design calculations, soils report and plans and specifications
showing all stormwater conveyances and system details.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name: Carteret General Hospital
Contact Person: Fred Odell, President Phone Number: (252 )247-1616
This worksheet applies to: Basin No. Infiltration S stem T �j OtA.—%
PP y in Drainage Area
(as idcnillied on plane) (rvan Fneyn SW11_101)
II. DESIGN INFORMATION - Attach supporting calculations/documentation. The soils report must be
based upon an actual field investigation and soil borings. County soil maps are not an acceptable source
of soils information. All elevations shall be in feet mean sea level (finsl).
Soils Report Summary
Soil Type Wando
Infiltration Rate 4-12 pmlsir
�'f (circle appropriate imits)
SHWT Elevation 21.4 (Seacoiial High Waler Table elevation)
Basin Design Parameters
Design Storm
Design Volume
Drawdown Time
Basin Dimensions
Basin Size
Basin Volume Provided
Basin Elevations
Bottom Elevation
Storage Elevation
Top Elevation
1.5 inch (1.5 inch eveni for Sri ►valets, 1 inch event fbr others)
5596
c.f.
0.24
days
112
ft. x
7579
c.f.
23.4
finsl
24.88
finsl
25.4
finsl
42 ft. = 2979 sy. ft. (bonow diniensioiis)
Form ti1VU-101 Rev 3.99 Page I of 3

III. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
The following checklist outlines design requirements per the Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual
(N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, February 1999) and Administrative Code
Section: 15 A NCAC 2H .1008.
Initial in the space provided to indicate that the folIcwi.:g design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If the applicant has designated an agent in the Stormwater Management Permit.
Application Form, the agent: may initial below. Attach justification if a requirement has not been met.
Applicants Initials
Ele-K I a. System is located 50 feet from class SA waters and 30 feet from other surface waters.
b. System is located at least 100 feet from water supply wills.
c. Bottom of system is at least 2 feet above the seasonal high water table.
G d. Bottom of the system is 3 feet above any bedrock or impervious soil horizon.
ye. System -iis(�not •ited on or in fill material or DWQ approval has been obtained.
�� f" .'ys n ii.S l'o a ed in a recorded drainage easement for the purposes of e
g p p operation and
maintenance and has recorded access easements to the nearest public right-of-way.
g. Drainage area for the device is less than 5 acres.
h. Soils have a minimum hydraulic conductivity of 0.52 inches per hour and soils report is
attached.
Avc- i. System captures and infiltrates the runoff from the first 1.0 inch of rainfall (1.5 inch event for
�20areas draining to SA waters ). Design volume and infiltration calculations attached.
�' j. System is sized to take into account: the runoff at the ultimate built -out potential from all
surfaces draining to the system, including any off -site drainage. Calculations. attached.
C k. All side slopes stabilized with vegetated cover are no steeper than 3:1 (H:V).
1. A. pretreatment device such as a catch basin, grease trap, filter strip, grassed Swale or
• sediment trap Ivicc
provided.
III. of o t i is covered with a layer of clean sand to an average depth of 4 inches or
dense vegetative cover is provided. .
n. Vegetated filter is provided for overflow and detail is shown on plans (Required minimum
length is 50 feet for SA waters, 30 feet for other waters).
OP6 o. Flow distribution mechanism within the basin is provided.
iaz p. A benchmark is provided to determine the sediment accumulation in the pretreatment device.
q. Runoff in excess of the design volume bypasses off-line systems (bypass detail provided).
r. System is designed to draw down the design storage volume to the proposed bottom
elevation under seasonal high water conditions within five days. A soils report and all
pertinent draw -down calculations are attached.
G s. Plans ensure that the installed system will meet design specifications (constructed or
restored) upon initial operation once the project is complete and the entire drainage area is
stabilized.
Form SWU-103 Rev 3.99 Page 2 of 3

IV. INFILTRATION BASIN OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
1. After every runoff producing rainfall event and at least monthly inspect the infiltration system for erosion,
trash accumulation, vegetative cover, and general condition.
2. Repair eroded areas immediately, re -seed as necessary to maintain adequate vegetative cover, mow
vegetated cover to maintain a maximum height of six inches, and remove trash as needed.
3. After every runoff producing rainfall event and at: least monthly inspect the bypass, inflow and overflow
structures for blockage and deterioration. Remove any blockage and repair the structure to approved design
specifications.
4. Remove accumulated sediment from the pretreatment system and infiltration basin annually or when depth
in the pretreatment unit is reduced to 75% of the original design depth. The system shall be restored to the
original design depth without over -excavating. Over -excavating may cause the required water table
separation to be reduced and may compromise the ability of the system to perform as designed. Removed
sediment shall be disposed of in an appropriate manner and shall not be handled in a manner that will
adversely impact water quality (i.e. stockpiling near a stormwater treatment device or stream, etc.).
A benchmark shall be established. in the pretreatment unit. The benchmark will document the original
design depth so that accurate sediment accumulation readings can be taken. The measuring device used to
determine the depth at the benclmark shall be such that it will give an accurate depth reading and not
readily penetrate into accumulated sediments.
When the design depth reads 1. & feet in the pretreatment unit, the sediment shall be
removed from both the pretreatment unit and the infiltration basin.
5. If the Division determines that the system is failing, the system will immediately be repaired to original
design specifications. If the system cannot be repaired to perform its design function, other stornwater
control devices as allowed by NCAC 2H .1000 must be designed, approved and constructed.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I ain responsible for the performance of the five
maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any
changes to the system or responsible party.
Print Name and Title: Mr. Fred Odell, President
Address: 3500 Arendell Street Morehead City, NC 28557
Phone: 252` 247-1616 Date: 02/08{01
Sienature '::�& (�
Note: The legally responsible pau ty should not he a honneowners association unless snore than 50 u of the lots have been sold and a
resident of the subdivision Qhas� been natneid the president.
Notary/P�ublic for the State of �C� , County of do hereby certify that �. • (d a �-1� personally appeared before roe this EP11--
day of , and acknowledge the due execution of the forgoing infiltration basin maintenance requirements.
Witness my hand and official se ,
My commission expires —
SEAL
Form SWU-103 Rev 3.99 Page 3 of .3

N
Permit Number: __�5A�✓ e2
(to be provided by DWQ)
Drainage Area Number: 10
Infiltration Basin Operation and Maintenance Agreement
I will keep a maintenance record on this BMP. This maintenance record will be kept in a
log in a known set location. Any deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be
corrected, repaired or replaced immediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity
of structures, safety of the public, and the removal efficiency of the BMP.
Important maintenance procedures:
- The drainage area will be carefully managed to reduce the sediment load to the
infiltration basin.
- Immediately after the infiltration basin is established, the vegetation will be
watered twice weekly if needed until the plants become established (commonly
six weeks).
- No portion of the infiltration basin will be fertilized after the initial fertilization
that is required to establish the vegetation.
The vegetation in and around the basin will be maintained at a height of
approximately six inches.
After the infiltration basin is established, it will be inspected once a quarter and within
24 hours after every storm event greater than 1.0 inches tar 1.5 inches if in a Coastal
County). Records of operation and maintenance will be kept in a known set location
and will be available upon request.
Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall
be repaired immediately.
BMP element:
Potentialproblem:
How I will remediate theproblem:
The entire BMP
Trash/debris is present.
Remove the trash/debris.
The perimeter of the
Areas of bare soil and/or
Regrade the soil if necessary to
infiltration basin
erosive gullies have formed.
remove the gully, and then plant a
ground cover and water until it is
established. Provide lime and a
one-time fertilizer application.
The inlet device: pipe or
The pipe is clogged (if
Unclog the pipe. Dispose of the
swale
applicable).
sediment off -site.
The pipe is cracked or
Replace the pipe.
otherwise damaged (if
applicable).
Erosion is occurring in the
Regrade the swale if necessary to
swale (if applicable).
smooth it over and provide erosion
control devices such as reinforced
turf matting or riprap to avoid
future problems with erosion.
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin O&M-Rev.3
DECEIVE .. APR 2 8 2014
BY: —Page 1 oC-3— --

BMP element:
Potentialproblem:
How I will remediate theproblem:
The fcrway
Sediment has accu r.—calated
Sear&, fo, the source of the
and reduced the depth to 75%
sediment and remedy the problem if
of the original design depth.
possible. Remove the sediment and
dispose of it in a location where it
will not cause impacts to streams or
the BMP.
Erosion has occurred or
Provide additional erosion
riprap is displaced.
protection such as reinforced turf
matting or riprap if needed to
prevent future erosion probleIns.
Weeds are present.
Remove the weeds, preferably by
hand. If pesticides are used, wipe
them on the plants rather than
spraying.
'
The main treatment area
A visible layer of sediment
Search for the source of the
has accumulated.
sediment and remedy the problem if
possible. Remove the sediment and
dispose of it in a location where it
will not cause impacts to streams or
the BUT. Replace any media that
was removed in the process.
Revegetate disturbed areas
immediately.
Water is standing more than
Replace the top few inches of filter
5 days after a storm event.
media and see if this corrects the
standing water problem. If so,
revegetate immediately. If not,
consult an appropriate professional
for a more extensive repair.
Weeds and noxious plants are
Remove the plants by hand or by
growing in the main
wiping them with pesticide (do not
treatment area.
spray).
The embankment
Shrubs or trees have started
Remove shrubs or trees
to grow on the embankment.
immediately.
An annual inspection by an
Make all needed repairs.
appropriate professional
shows that the embankment
needs repair.
The outlet device
Clogging has occurred.
Clean out the outlet device. Dispose
of the sediment off -site.
The outlet device is damaged
Repair or replace the outlet device.
The receiving water
Erosion or other signs of
Contact the NC Division of Water
damage have occurred at the
Quality 401 Oversight Unit at 919-
outlet.
733-1786.
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin O&M-Rev.3
APR 2 8 20%
BY:
Page 2 of 3

Permit Number:
(to be provided by DWQ)
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the
performance of the maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any
problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party.
Project name: Carteret General Hospital
BMP drainage area number:
Print name: Richard A. Brvenik
Title: President
Address: 3500 Arendell Street, Morehead City, NC 28557
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of
the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
I, bXLhr' , a Notary Public for the State of
, County of , do hereby certify that
Mdiand- A r v1 personally appeared before me this
day of and acknowledge the due execution of the
forgoing infiltration basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official seal,
( K (10_�
A4&pe
SEAL
My commission expires q_—D1..dB
APR 2 8 2014
By- J
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin O&M-Rev.3 Page 3 of 3

Permit Number;
L�
(to be provided by DW q
Drainage Area / fir: (p Z $ I
1
Permeable Pavement Operation and Maintenance Agreement
I will keep a maintenance record on this BMP. This maintenance record will be kept in a
log in a known set location. Any deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be
corrected, repaired or replaced immediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity
of structures, safety of the public, and the removal efficiency of the BMP.
At all times, the pavement shall be kept free of-
- Debris and particulate matter through frequent blowing that removes such
debris, particularly during the fall and spring.
- Piles of soil, sand, mulch, building materials or other materials that could deposit
particulates on the pavement.
- Piles of snow and ice.
- Chemicals of all kinds, including deicers.
The permeable pavement will be inspected once a quarter. Records of operation and
maintenance will be kept in a known set location and will be available upon request.
Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall
be repaired immediately.
BMP element:
The perimeter of the
permeable pavement
The surface of the
permeable pavement
—' Potential problem:
Areas of bare soil and/or
erosive gullies
A vegetated area drains
toward the pavement.
—' Trash/debris present ry
Weeds
Sediment
Rutting, cracking or slumping
or damaged structure
Observation well Water present more than five
jdays after a storm event
Educational
or is
Form SW401-Permeable Pavement O&M-Rev.4 10/03/2012
How to remediate the problem:
Regrade the soil if necessary to
remove the gully, then plant ground
cover and water until established.
._............................._._._._._._._._..._..._...._._.............._........._......._...._._._......._._._._.................
Regrade the area so that it drains
away from the pavement, then plant
ground cover and water until
established.
Remove the trash/ debris.
Do not pull the weeds (may pull out i
media as well). Spray them with a
systemic herbicide such as
glyphosate and then return within
the week to remove them by hand.
(Another option is to pour boiling
water on them or steam them.)
.... ...... .... ...... ._._._._.............._._._._
Vacuum swee the avement. _
Consult an appropriate professional.
Clean out clogged underdrain pipes.
Consult an appropriate professional
_for clogged soil subgrade.
Replace the sign.
APR 2 8 20%
Page 1
BY:

Permit Number: 5 (A) g U 10 Z 2 V
(to be provided by DWQ)
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the
performance of the maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any
problems with the system or prior io any changes io the system or responsible party.
Project name:_ Carteret General Hospital
BMP drainage area or lot number: 3 . 4• , 5. (p . -7 g 8
Print name: Richard A. Brvenik
Title: President
Address:_ 3500 Arendell Street, Morehead City, NC 28557
Phone: [phone]
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of
the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
I, A a Notary Public for the State of c� D—, \ a
County of , do hereby certify that
(h,AArd, A, f- V 6Ak- personally appeared before me this
day of �o�, and acknowledge the due execution of the
forgoing permeable pavement maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official
seal,
R•••......••'Gp'
TER
My commission expires
EcErVEiP,
APR t e 20lr
BY.
u
Form SW401-Permeable Pavement O&M-Rev.4 10/03/2012 Page 2 of 2

MEMORY TRANSMISSION REPORT
TIME :05-23-2014 14:56
FAX NO.I
NAME
FILE NO. 223
DATE 05.23 14:54
TO 912527562345
DOCUMENT PAGES 10
START TIME 05.23 14:54
END TIME 05.23 14:56
PAGES SENT 10
STATUS OK
**`SUCCESSFUL TX NOTICE'
(state of Nortri Carollom
10Pspartment or Envlronmeat and W tarat ltmonrroeo
WLmtn*ton Rs=lonal Cornce
Fat "cociw,y Gavoraor l / FA7K COVER Cal EET Jolt» jr AFA lfa 111 Suretary
No. Ptegas c—A. --3:
`ro:
cam �c/s�� i.y .rO �/' rhoam. C21 Q1 796-7336
Faac: (01 m z Sn-7n 4 ..
l27 Condtnel'pri— IDtt—ia . V nlmina%oa, NC 26405 . [phone] . An. 8gos1 dpp—l—t y ABhn Mw A ff— HMV103�

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
Pat McCrory, Governor FAX COVER SHEET John Eavarla III, Secretary
Date: � 17 /
To: ;1 E / �� --Z
Fax, � 7� _ Z.� 7,--�
Re:
Cam
�' lf, ? cizo z 0--®
No. Pages (excl. cover):
From: Jo Casmer
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405 • [phone] • An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

MODW 204-0 PNIO Shefm( 2W (PANNO

'pt
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. A 1 12,-1 AJW7
151-A H24
MORHEAD CITY, NORTH
H CAROLINA 28557 SHEET NO. OF
FEIN 56-1593304 CALCULATED BY DATE
License # C 0647
[phone] CHECKED BY DATE
. ...... . .............. ..... . ...... ............
PROW2*1 j8ln9Teae"MrW QW00

Example Permeable Pavement Calculations
Commercial project located in Piedmont region.
P = 1.0"
Low Density Threshold = 24%
Property Area = 60,984 sf
Building=10,400 sf
Parking = 19,908 sf (of which 6,220 sf are parking stalls, 10,280 sf hatched drive aisles)
Sidewalks =1,292 sf
Total Impervious Area = 31,600 sf (if not counting any permeable pavement)
Estimated BMP DA = 1.0 ac.
HSG C => use 50% BUA credit
fi�nJF« MvFo.. ?Popr-2TY AjMA = 1.IYO +e-
Owl-rna4 = IO)gOO sr-
?4F-kM- = 114)TOO.5F
SIDIFwA&Kf. , = 1;2.RZsF
'ro,rAL 1MP. = 31 600. -sF
NW A, SP4c-1= AQ1FA - 6) 2x 0 sF
Wh'fuirt> 'DgmE AIbLa A4-IFA =. 10) 2 VO st
FNIKAW-RlGXrz *o-r-,4 = 3) i1 a7 SF
' I^
_ 8
k
N
Y
f"
J
d
ai M VA"K
PARKIA�¢ SPAGfi S Cza'x� SL'�
i
I
P�eKuAi. 4QAG1� S (,zo' x 1 oN �}
Rev. 170ct2012

Example Permeable Pavement Calculations
Scenario 1: No Permeable Pavement Proposed
Determine whether the project is low density or high density:
% R►I 4 _ (impervious Area) X 100 _ r31,6001 X 100 = 51,8
\ Property Area 1 — \60,984) -
51.8%> 24%therefore, it is High Density, must provide structural BMP(s).
Calculate the minimum required treatment volume:
R„ = 0.05 + 0.91; where 1 = (ImperviousArea\ _ 31,600 0.725
Drainage Area J 43560
R„ = 0.05 + 0.9(0.725) = 0.7025
V = 3630 P R. DA = 3630(1)(0.7025)(1.0) = 2,550 cf
Could construct a 2,550 sf bioretention cell.
Scenario 2: Permeable Pavement in Parkins Stalls Onl
Step 1: Determine whether the project is low density or high density:
Pervious Area of parking spaces = 50% of 6,220 sf = 3,110 sf
Total Impervious Area=10,400 + 1,292 + (19,908 — 3,110) = 28,490 sf
%Impervious Area 28,490
BUA = Property Area ) X 100 = (60,984) X 100 = 46.7
46.7%> 24%therefore, it is High Density, must provide structural BMP(s).
Step 2:
Calculate the minimum required treatment volume:
Parking stalls are considered 100%treating themselves. Also, treating % of the building area in the permeable
pavement. So, remove all parking stall area and % of the building area from treatment volume talc.
R„ = 0.05 + 0.91; where 1 = (Impervious Area) _ (31,600-6,220-(o.5X10,400)) 0.463
Drainage Area 43560
R„ = 0.05 + 0.9(0.463) = 0.4667
V = 3630 P R, DA = 3630(1)(0.4667)(1.0) = 1,694 cf
Could construct a 1,694 sf bioretention cell to treat the traditional pavement and other % of building.
Step 3:
Soils info from onsite investigation: HSG C, Ksat = 0.24 in/hr, SHWT > 4' deep
Step 4:
Determine if it can be an infiltration permeable pavement system.
T, = P(1+R) _ 1(1+(szzoszoo)) _ 1.6 days
_
24 SF i 24*0.2*0.24
1.6 days < 5 days, so can do infiltration permeable pavement system. YEAH H
Step 5:
Choosing PICP for surface course; with No.8 stone bedding and No.2 stone aggregate base. Note: the No.8
bedding layer cannot be used for storage.
Rev. 170ct2012

Example Permeable Pavement Calculations
Step 6:
Set subgrade at 0%
Porosity of aggregate, n = 0.40
% building area treated=10,400/2 = 5,200 sf
1 1+ szoo
DWq = P e) = (0.4020) = 4.6 inches
Verify that 4.6 inches meets manufacturer's minimum for structural requirements.
Step 7: Chose one of the overflow options.
To infiltrate the 10-yr, 24-hr storm (Dlo):
.11 1+(52001 (24*0..
D10 _ P1o(1+Rn40 24*02) — d i SF _ 51e22o� = 20.6 inches
D10 > Dwq; so use D10 for depth of aggregate needed below the pavement course (and bedding layer).
Could also decide to not infiltrate the 10-yr, 24-hr storm, and instead route the 10-yr, 24-hr storm event to
determine the additional storage aggregate needed above the Dwq.
Step 8:
Observation well(s) required since it is a commercial project.
Scenario 3: Permeable Pavement in Most of Parkins Area:
Step 1: Determine whether the project is low density or high density:
Pervious Area of parking parking area = 50% of 10,280 + 6,220 = 8,250 sf
Total Impervious Area=10,400 + 1,292 + (19,908 — 8,250) = 23,350 sf
%BUA = (Impervious Area) x 100 = (za,ssol X 100 = 38.3 %
lk Property Area JJ 1160,984J)
38.3%> 24% therefore, it is High Density, must provide structural BMP(s)
Step 2:
Calculate the minimum required treatment volume:
Parking stalls and hatched drive aisles are considered 100% treating themselves. Also, treating entire building,
sidewalks, and entrance/exit pavement area in the permeable pavement. So, remove all parking stall area,
hatched drive aisles, road entrance drive, sidewalks, and all of the building area from treatment volume talc. So,
impervious area left to treat goes to zero ... no additional BMP needed beyond the permeable pavement.
Step 3:
Soils Info from onsite investigation: HSG C, Ksat = 0.24 in/hr, SHWT > 4' deep
Step 4:
Determine if it can be an infiltration permeable pavement system.
1 1+ 10,400t1,292t3,408
T, _ 1(1+R) _ ( 1a,zso+s,zzo �) = 1.7 days
24 SF i 24*0.2*0.24 y
1.7 days < 5 days, so can do infiltration permeable pavement system. YEAH l l
Step 5:
Choosing PICP for surface course; with No.8 stone bedding and No.2 stone aggregate base. Note: the No.8
bedding layer cannot be used for storage.
Rev. 17Oct2012

Example Permeable Pavement Calculations
Step 6:
Set subgrade at 0%
Porosity of aggregate, n = 0.40
Non -permeable entrance drive area = 3,408 sf
1 1+ 10,400+1,292+%408
D _ ( 10,280+6,22�) — 4.8 inches
wq n 0.40
Verify that 4.8 inches meets manufacturer's minimum for structural requirements.
Notice that with very minimal additional aggregate storage depth than Scenario 2, all the BUA for this site can
be captured and treated... with no other BMP needed beyond the permeable pavement!
Step 7: Chose one of the overflow options.
To infiltrate the 10-yr, 24-hr storm (D10):
10,400+1,292+3,408
_ P10(1+R)- d i SF _ 5.11 1+( 1o,2eo+6,zzo �)-(24*0.24*0.2)
D10 — n 0.40 21.6 inches
D10 > DN,q; so use D10 for depth of aggregate needed below the pavement course (and bedding layer).
Could also decide to not infiltrate the 10-yr, 24-hr storm, and instead route the 10-yr, 24-hr storm event to
determine the additional storage aggregate needed above the D,,q.
Step 8:
Observation well(s) required since it is a commercial project.
Rev. 17Oct2012

B C D E F G H I
J
K L
1
2
THE BUA CREDIT CALCULATION FOR PERMEABLE
PAVEMENTS.
3
1
1
requires input
4
Name of Applicant
5
Mailing Address
6
City
State
ZIP
7
Phone Number
s
9
SW Permit No. SW8
010220
Lot No.
Max. BUA, sf
n/a
10
11
Property Address:
12
13
Signature of Lot Owner:
14
15
Name of the receiving stream
Bogue Sound
16
lClassification of the receiving stream
SA HQW
*If SA, within 1/2 mile? Yes
No
(circle one)
17
Has a soils report been submitted?
YES
NO
(circle one)
19
DA3
DA4
DA5
DA6
r)A7
DA8
DA9
21
HSG from soils report
A/
A!
A/B
B
B
22
Bottom Elevation o PP, msl
4.90
5.25
24.85
4.
21.4
23
HWT, fmsl
.5
.5
20
24
1 Minimum 2' to S
YE
--YET-YE
25
Area (AP), s
26
Effective BUA, sf
25.5
504
752
752
752
752
56
27
Aajacent El UA TFT, S
26
Max BUA for I otJ=n
a
n a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
29
Remaining Lot BUA,
if applicable
n/a
n/a
n/a
n a
n a
n/a
n a
30
31
PAVEMENT DEPTH & VOLUME
CALCULATIONS
- for infiltration/detention
only
32
33
DA3
DA4
DAa
DA6
DA7
DA8
DA9
34
Drainage Area, sf
2502
2016
Od^'
4648
6700
5999
44800
35
Impervious area, sf
625.5
504
3760
2392
3760
3743
28000
36
10.275
0.275
0.562
0.513
0.555
0.612
.613
37
Design Storm Rd, inches
1.5
1 Z
1.5
1.5
15
1.5
1.5
38
Runoff Volume, cf
86
69
464
298
465
459
3430
39
Dwq aggregate depth required, in
3.75
3.75
7.50
5.79
7.50
7.48
7.50
40
Dwq aggregate depth provided, in
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
41
10 year 24 hour storm, P, inches
6.87
6.87
6.87
6.87
687
687
6.87
42
Infiltration rate, I, in/hr 1
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
43
D10 aggregate depth required, in
-42.83
-42.83
-25.65
-33.46
-25.65
-25.75
-1.65
44
D10 aggregate depth provided, in
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
45
D10 or Dwq depth controls?
Dwq
Dwq
Dwq
Dwq
Dwq
Dwq
Dwq
46
Volume Provided, cf r
1001
806
1203
1203
1203
1203
8960
47
Dwq Ponding Time, T, days
0.06
0.06
0.13
0.10
0.13
0.12
0.21
48
D10 Ponding Time, T, days
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
49
50
The DA size of DA's 5 and 7 are larger than
the total of the BUA being treated because they
are treating
additional
51
BUA beyond the 1:1 ratio, but are not receiving additional credit
52
53
g:lwglshared\stormwaterlpermits & projects120011010220 HD12014 05 excel -PP
010220
54

MCEIVE
APR 2 8 204
BY.- 8 �
STORMWATER CALCULATIONS
CARTERET GENERAL HOSPITAL
OWNER:
CARTE RET COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION
ENGINEER: STROUD ENGINEERING, PA
valuelilt 107-� COMMERCE STREET
.. T
r °
o -
SEq� gam: m
36970
s a a
dp
•• • r
a,�� r y TU ego
GREENVILLE, NC 27858
. - 117 liq
. Turner, PE 36970

oPage 1- Carteret General Hospital
Tract Area = 742912.44 SF
Existing % Impervious = 56.52%
Bain Campus
Drainage Area = 609964 SF
Total Existing Impervious = 405772 SF
Total Existing Impervious Treated = 58385 SF
Pre 1988 Impervious = 347387 SF
Existing % Impervious = 56.95%
Impervious Removed
Asphalt =
47467 SF
Concrete Sidewalk & Misc =
6185 SF
Buildings =
2548 SF
Total =
56200 SF

Page 2 - Carteret General Hospital
Impervious Proposed
Buildings =
45690 SF
Parking =
33308 SF
Sidewalks/Concrete =
6460
Toical =
85458 SF
Additional Proposed Impervious = Efige— 29258 SF
Exchanging Asphalt to Pervious Pavement = 22400 SF
(does not inlcude the 850sf lower than elevation 22.5)
Additional Area Treated by Pervious Pavement = 22400 SF
Impervious treated by Ex. Infiltration Basin =
43644 SF
Impervious remaining in original DA 1, 2 & 3 =
14367 SF
(must be treated elsewhere onsite)
Total Impervious
Total Existing impervious =
349572 SF ,
Proposed Impervious =
85458 SF
(25% Impervious) = (22400 X .25)
— 5600 SF
Total Proposed Impervious = see suealned f 2l
68658 SF
Total Impervious-.=
418230
Total Area Treated by BMP(s
Area treated by Ex. BMP = 43644 SF
Area treated by Pervious Pavement = 22400 SF
Total = 66044 SF
Effective BUA with Treatment = 346586 SF
Proposed % Impervious with Treatment = ! 56.82%
Additional Impervious Treated = 5ee, 5 t., JV" 6,41 21 801 SF
CzBoW

24
STROUD ENGINEERING_ P-A_ JOB 1 IZ7~' C41*0 ]A 5pm
PPMUCT 204-1 (SkVID SWAQ 205-1 Aftd)

fg. 3
West Campus
Drainage Area =
Total
132949 SF
Ex. Buildings
Ex. Asphalt
jfx. Gravel
Ex. Concrete
892
2094
1283
56
996
496
1062
241
2305
34305
9062
20
759
680
450
473
268
738
2315
84
8829
441
85
F,
857
3684
20133
37575
1 11857
2910
Total Existing Impervious (Pre 1988 Impervious) = 72475 SF
Existing % Impervious = 54.51%
Impervious Removed
Asphalt =
2094 SF
Concrete Sidewalk & Misc =
790 SF
Buildings =
7535 SF
Gravel =
11857 SF
Total =
22276 SF
Impervious Proposed
Parking Proposed = 48709 SF
Remaining Existing Impervious = (12475-- 2227� 50199 SF
Proposed % Impervious = 74.40%
Proposed Pervious Pavement= 16100 SF
(25% Impervious) _ " 4025 SF
Additional Area Treated by Pervious Pavement = 10647 SF/
Total Proposed BUA = 4870q- Av1O6f 4OZ5 01 36634 SF
Total Impervious Area = 5ci99 -+ Ro 34 86833 SF
Total Effective BUA with Treatment = AP733 -/0647--4a25 72161 SF
Proposed % Impervious with Treatment = 54.28%
Additional Impervious Treated = 314 SF
Total Main & West Campus
Total Proposed BUA 105292 SF
Total Existing Impervious = 399771 SF
Total Impervious = 505063 SF
Total Effective BUA = 418747 SF

Page 4 - Carteret General Hospital
Main Campus
Actual Paver
Impervious
Pervious
Drainage Area
Area (sf)
Impervious
Area Treated
Pavement (sf)
(75% credit)
(sf)
1
510293
0
0
0
9
44800
22400
5600
22400
10
54871
0
0
43644
Total
609964
22400
1 5600
66044
Western Campus
Drainage Area
Area (sf)
Pervious
Pavement (sf)
Actual Paver
Impervious
(75% credit)
Impervious
Area Treated
(sf)
2
104480
0
3
2502
2502
625.5
0
4
2016
2016
504
0
5
1 6604
3008
752
3008
6
4648
3008
752
1640
7
6700
3008
752
3008
8
5999
3008
752
2991
Total
132949
16550
4137.5
10647
Pervious Pavement Desien
PWq = 1.5
SF = 0.2
n = 0.4
Plo = 6.87
Drainage Area
Ratio
i(in/hr)
Ponding
Time TWq
Depth
Aggregate
DWq
Depth
Aggregate
Dip
Ponding
Time Tip
3
0.00
5
0.063
3.75
-42.83
0.29
4
0.00
5
0.063
3.75
-42.83
0.29
5
1.00
5
0.125
7.50
-25.65
0.57
6
0.55
5
0.097
5.79
-33.46
0.44
7
1.00
5
0.125
7.50
-25.65
0.57
8
1 0.99
1 5
1 0.125
1 7.48
-25.75
0.57
9
1 1.00
1 3
1 0.208
1 7.50
-1.65
0.95
Note: Minimum depth allowable water quality stone for AquaBrick is 4" #57 and 8" #2 or #4, therefore
minimum depth of aggregate is met.

Narrative
Stormwater Management Plan
Erosion & Sedimentation Control Plan
Carteret General Hospital
CEIE
APR 2 6 2014
BY:
I. General Information
August 15, 2013
Revised: August 20, 2013
April 17, 2014
Owner:
Carteret General Hospital
Richard A. Brvenik, President
3500 Arendell Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
[phone]
Engineer: Stroud Engineering, P.A.
151-A Hwy 24
Morehead City, NC 28557
�1JP O
°°°....°ss, Imo,
:Q 2:7
a SEAE
3691
0
�I C•°°°°�INEEQ;•°° �. ���
Carteret General Hospital received a modification to SW8 01022 on September 17, 2013 for the
construction of a major addition to the hospital which incorporated additional parking on the main
campus and a smaller parking area on west campus. It has been decided that more parking is needed
to meet the needs of the hospital so a larger parking area is being proposed on west campus. There
have also been a few minor changes to the main campus which are all incorporated into this
modification.
II. Stormwater Information
The site has been broken into two main Drainage areas with one being the Main Hospital (DA1, 9
& 10) campus and the second is the remaining acreage west of the main tract (DA2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8).
The existing impervious on the Main campus (606,964 square feet) is 405,772 square feet and 56,200
square ebet will be removed during demolition. The proposed additions and parking areas total
85,458 square feet resulting in a net increase of 29,258 square feet.
The existing permit requires treatment for 58,385 square feet of impervious from the 2001
hospital expansion. The BUA within DA10 for the infiltration basin has remained the same and the
basin remains as permitted, treating 43,644 square feet. The original existing drainage areas 1-3 with
proposed modifications proposed 14,367 square feet of impervious which must be treated elsewhere
on the tract within the Main Campus. The site proposes that this area be treated within the pervious
pavement area designated as DA9. Approximately 22,400 square feet of the existing parking north of
the proposed pervious pavers drains to this BMP and receives credit for being treated. This decreases
the net effective BUA to 801 square feet less than the Pre-1988 impervious.
DA 2 (132,949 square feet) had a total of 72,474 square feet of Pre-1988 impervious. Of this
existing impervious 22,276 square feet have been removed from the tracts. This drainage area is
proposing a parking lot to maintain the required parking for the facility. The parking lot is 48,709
square feet of impervious which exceeds the allowable redevelopment of this tract by 26,433 square
feet. Pervious pavers are being proposed within the parking area to reduce the effective BUA of the

Carteret General Hospital
Page 2
drainage area. There are 16,100 square feet of pavers proposed and 10,647 square feet of additional
asphalt parking is being treated within the paver BMP. This provides an effective BUA of 72,161
square feet which is 314 square feet less than the existing impervious allowable.
Ili. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
The permit allows for 5.3 acres of disturbance, however the revised plan needs 5.98 acres of
disturbance. The application fee initially covered 6 acres. The following measures are proposed for
the site. If it becomes evident that additional erosion and sedimentation control measures are needed,
they shall be installed immediately. It is intended that all grading and excavation activities within a
certain area will be protected as soon as that activity is complete.
1. Sediment Fence — Sediment fence will be utilized as necessary in locations as shown on
plans or as deemed necessary by the engineer to insure that off -site sedimentation is
controlled.
2. Seeding — Soil stabilization shall be achieved on any area of the site where land -
disturbing activities have temporarily or permanently ceased according to the following
schedule:
a. Any areas steeper than 3:1 slope shall be provided temporary or permanent
stabilization within 7 calendar days from the last land -disturbing activity.
b. All other disturbed areas shall provide temporary or permanent stabilization
within 14 calendar days from the last land -disturbing activity.
3. Stone Construction Entrance — Stone construction entrance will be used to reduce
transport of sediment off site.
The site has been broken up into seven phases (See the attached Construction Sequence), with
each phase having close to one acre or less of land disturbance. The construction sequence requires
that each phase must be stabilized prior to the start of the next phase. The new parking located at the
employee parking lot (Phase 2) on the west portion of the main campus propose an excavation with
no fill within the area allowing for very little to no movement of sediment from the area disturbed.
4. Maintenance Plan
1. All erosion and sediment control measures shall be checked for stability and effective
operations following every runoff producing rainfall event or at least once per week.
Repairs required shall be completed immediately to the dimension and functions
indicated on the plans.
2. Sediment shall be removed from behind the sediment fencing when it becomes 0.5 feet
deep at the fence. The fence shall be replaced or repaired as necessary to maintain a
barrier.
3. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, seeded and mulched within 14 calendar days of
disturbance. Disturbed areas shall be fertilized, reseeded and mulched as necessary
according to the Contract documents to establish and maintain a dense vegetative cover.

`
a ` GiZ•,
r
71
77
_� �-- L ! •`� .• r/ �— In 1^f. .k �•' -� i ..%- i r � •
—
¢•fir � � r,,�`�:;� � ,,;5...r � �., � � _ ' • r; , -
Cr
� '] =.,,a ' �.,�, �• ,..,. �i,.... In' tom,". �,,, s �'Li � "y-'l ,[ , � � � la J
r s �'r. w �sr /•� : �' f L � `,�... i(9 .F�_ -�C� ; - -., ti :p.- �'\k, ' + ` � .. i
`lkhi`w'-'J
t Y
T�SITE
n 41 �� :.•'•�, L �l � tip/;•• ,� � 4 1 :i ° i�k4, t f .. � 1 X ��•,ti
16
1 1 f J „GCS i .ir - -�.. �'' iF
' :` — ■ ! •■ •i t • 1 _ "i
�' (��'!�' i.; J, • a �� ��k. $�` 7 Q _)7 r .: ..•: I' � t}�'iiG � � � t i',:t-:
}}
77
� C
ifl'$II�dpCR Vyf' ,
�. 1 I era .
1/2 MIL E
b •
•-..^' ,�
Zo
1
- rr` ti• 1
dt3. �. � r% �s��,- - _ r-. _- - - _�'i••ey i .. .... ,.� f}' •' 111ii:2s'h -'
Y.. `7' .. _ r-. w� i•7� % S - .£ i ` _ .
�,� �"'� �� r •'=6•t � ''' - ! � ! �i j ��� c.•�'i,/~"'a'',� - Y y�i
til
T 1 '1? s- .,4: � i i'7 i.zi�t _ : � - f '� .... JT" r � �z'•� ��'�E J, I`"".-'�� _
�..,- Y r . _—�_..__.., ,:-r.__ ...-.. •.- n3_.��: .-r.•n.*a wasr:•. �.W��..3.. >`•!;_.�� _4. �'.��ix�ii%.:_ . ._ vw ar �tk
VoQAh CA *A& @ M Dalmm Yx=u4 ME OM see Dm& uses i 750 ft Scale: l : 2%000 Dab: lU DA= KADV

CCvrteret
CmattY Register
euefneef
'
pl,6pp.0B
Reel Esters
Exclas Tax
StderTu
8 1600.00
NORTH CAROUNA. CAiifERET COUNTY
The iomg ft esd lmw(s) of Notary PdA*) iskm
seemed b bs opirect. Thin Imeiansnt and ttia esipe-
eats are duly reordered at em dare and eme and in
the Book and Pape shown on the Bret page hereof.
h fir, ZR o es
BY
e■,s
ltnie"Rrpur - 3P
r untyy Regist:e stet ar'ijf Dpe s
CS pate O1/31fi! 1 Tine 15t14r00
OR 619456 Page 1 of 3
Time. Book Mod
Tax Lot No .....:....:.........: :' ............ Parcel Identifier No. .02141.44.12G3i...fcA376..101 32702.......'
Varitied by :...........:..- :......................... _... :.................... I County on the :............... day of ................ :...:................... _..............
, - ............
by -.. ..................................
......_.........:........._-:......._...............................-...................................._.._-................................-...................._...._.....
NE DRRNIS M. DASDT ........................................................................•-
Mail after recording to ....:.........................................................�Q............._.
- ......................................................... .............................. _.............................
_
This Instrumeat was peeparid by ...Edith..B:.-Masaa,..Attornay...at..Las[..................................................._.
Brief description for the Inds: Lore lb 6 17 MediEel Park S D
NORTH CAROUNA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
=16 DEED Vide this'..29.th.. day 'of ......dAltaaxY............... - ........ ............ , 2QQ.1......, by and between .
' uaerTvn.
E.R.V. IKVESTEEM, a North Carolina General
Partnership
(1031 Exchanger)'
(farmarly and which took title a': "TMF
INVESTMENTS". a North Carolina General
Partnership)
GRANTEE
CARTERET COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION,
a North Carolina Ron -Profit Corporation
C/o F.A. Odell, III
3100 Arendell Street
Morehead City, NC 26557
idler in awrepAar alsek I".reh part rt a■me, addten, and, N ipp olidst% aharaalo at sates, at amperes Nq er prladw"
The desiffuntloa Grantor and Grantee as and fimin sbalt include said partlae, their heirs, sueeessura, and aestgm,, ■nd
shall include singular, plural,' mescaline. feminine or neuter an required by coutexk
WTFNESSETIL that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby
sclmowledged, has and by these. preesuts dpee giant, bargain, sell and convey sate the Grantes in fee simple, all that
certhin 14 or parcel of land siteated in the City of......Havebead....................... .......... ...... Morehead ...... _............... Township,
............... County, North Carolina and lure particularly described as follows: .
.BEING all of Lots 16 6 17 ol-the "MEDICAL PAGE" Subdivision, as shown on the map thRreof
recorded lu Nap Book 13, at Page 79'of the Office of the Register of Deeds of Carteret
County, North carotins.. - -
This conveyance in.'part of an IRC Section 1031 Tax -Deferred Exchange for the benefit of
the GRANTOR/,ExCBANGOR. ..
BWK 6 & IPAGE��"
N. C. per Nne, raw No. ee real, aer od a Hn-wN.aeir..a a..,aw m. warr.a a rear
IMM,NN,w�N.w■MMN.M■.MNa-,ml '
ECEIV�
APR 2a2Mp

The )Property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in..........................................................:...
Deed Book 548. Pa.a 378
........................-..... .......................... ........................................................... ...................... ................................
A map showing the above described property is recorded In Plat Book....13........................... page ................ T
TO HAVE AND TO BALD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto; belonging to
the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants:witli the 'Grantee,. that Grantor Is seised of the premises in Tee simple, has the right to.convey
the same In fee -simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantorwill warrant and
defend the title against the lkwful claims of all poisons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
EASEItENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RIGHTS-00-RAY OF RECORD, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
REST9tChVE COVENANTS OF RECORD IN BOOK 384, PAGE 101. CARTERET COUNTY REGISTRY.
1 ,
AD VALOREM TARES FOR'THE YEAR 2001" NOT, YET DUE OR PAYABLE.
of wlTNaas waaaanF.. La. oeent- ka. kmae.t. Nt me head sad Y, a W .Lante, Au d •kte seteaneent to b ''.11aaned la nd •. ��q
garb ham. by 1t. dnb antk.rhed .ltl.n and M deal ed a. he.—*. eM ed by a tk.rSy-N un Rwed ,sr Dkaetarr, toe day nL Tear nag
!
aYan wrlasa. .- Y , •, ,�
M.R.V. INVESTMENTS, a North Car.11Aa,GnhErgr/)4 _.
-- -------------------------------------- et Partasrahip_-- :---y-
(Comende Nam*) ¢ - 1l!
-,
by- ---------- = =- p} BY. /
&402-- - ---------__-..•34_#,._: tss4ttl;
----------------------------reead..e - . L60N N. M.ORRISO PARTNER' ` .: �: t� Y :•�) .; .Z
"ATTaeT:
�BYtw C:-
---------------------------
,.__------------- ----- - ------- ---- .D
----------------- - ------ -_s.emi.1y(ceap—le".all m � c; :�•,:
--'L' bHLIS,- - - $ARTNER ' , • ' o`�
aswl,-srwNr WoarN e+utouaw,___Q4r4RtR1___________________c..ev. -•/-�'
L ■ NOW" rekn* of the c.anb W etas ahruaed, ...t4 we Leon_Itr_.N.QTCj epAa.. .6M 2,^ i '•
_Partner.af_ll.B,.Y..zo�tentmenta._----_------------------------------- —_------
'
ti
n F—minty aFDeseed Gahm as thte 9.7 Me acknowledged tke aseenteen W tole famestai teetrnm.e((rJltYl.� J
6 rase and .meal at..F er —1. tkr �-_ day./ ---- JAR AXY--=-----------------; ."
iSy.emml.:les.eaNr..t_+1:31_2oC1�i _:-.•&t`ii•y4 -•ruri �rsihir
axAUBTANF NOSTe CAi11LIK4------------- --- ---------------- county. - :.: •' 1
16 a Watery !oldie of 00 Conaly end Used ah,e.al{ .r11{y that ------- —----- ------------------------ .
aN F.ra.nalb um" isr.a as Ws W end "k"Whdana a" ---- he In __-------- __________—___.- @".Lary ar
nr ___—_ a Warta hratlun ser Wan, W4L t atun --- ----------------------------------
y aorfty dais
.. it... and .. the at ada. e.rnaa fta, the females ter"neent was Monad 1. a. .am. ay Ra_______________
S Fr"NQast, ended trIek M eareans heel W alltMW by -------- —_ as ae ___________________________ Ne.esq..
P
waa.a. my hand W e1MW AWS, .r east, {ale --- ----day 91 -------- — ----- ----------- ----------
Myeanededon.qlrNt------------- ---------------- ----- —----------------------- --------- Natary rukae
:
Ti. Hredslai ce.orhnsep of -------- ._--_—....... .......... .--------- --- _-------------------------------------
----- .- ---- — -------- ------
Were -rented to be aaeraeL Thle,setr.man{ and this anrmleate era only Moistens at the date and ones and La re the Seek and Pan chews an the
nut Foie kar..r. .
--------- —------ __—_____________--------------- :__._--.-..-_DxCraTEa or DSLDa►Ca_—---- — ------- — ------------------ CDVMT
n7_-_----^-------------•--..... —....... —................ ---_•-----D.71ty/Awla4mt-aailsler NDoIW�
BOOK
PAG
N. C. eer Aeeoe. F— Ne.3 D 1976. Rni.ed 0 19i7-am,waaiaa p..uti..a --a.—
nwye,a...e.la..eaN.aa�Ae.-late • .

NORTH CAROLINA,
CARTERHT CO Y
I� Notary Public, do hereby
certify that. Ni iam C. Rawle, Jr., General Partner of M.R.V.
Investments,'perdonally appeared before me and acknowledged the dUe.
execution of the foregoing instrument.
witness "my hand and notarial seal this the ?day. of • •..,:,
January, 2001.
Vtiri • ,
terY PublIC 1.17�:f FI
My Commission` expires: IveM.,m t
NORTH CAROLINA
CARTSRST
I, �J•nnd Notary Public, do hereby
certify that Th66s T. Vradelis, General Partner. of M.R.V.
Investments, personally appeared before me and acknowledged -the due
execution of -the .foregoing instrument.
-Witness my hand and notarial seal this the CA dey•of
January; 2001. - • r ` ........;
e.
tary Pub c ' '{Z, . e
My Commission expires : i 1 sa1 • aQ4� s� ` 6

Care ret County Register
01/32120e1
i1,Bee.Oe
,,�TltWool Estate
`xcise Tax
NORTH CAROLINA, CARTERET COUNTY
The lom9ohrl certaicate(s) of Notary Pd llc(s) Were
oerelied to be conoct. This Inotnenent and this ceifis.
Bale are duly fogistored at the dais mtl lime and in
Dra Bock and Page shown on the &at page hereol.
s. h+r. Rego ads '
Y' dpwe,
Feria Arthur JP
err ret auntyy Register of Dgge a
CS Data O1/31/Bol Time 15r1t100
OR 649456 Page 1 of 3
Reenrding Time. Book end Pate
Tex Lot No.
................... . ....... : ................................................... Parcel Identifier No. .612.019t4.12Gx5. L.0.3I15.144327R2.......
Verldedby .............................. .............. _...:...................... County on the :........,...... day of .................... :........................ I .......... I ............
by
..... ............................. ............
........:........................................................................... ........................ _...................................... ..........................
..
Ball after recording to ....:....... ......... ...... ... ............. DENNIS..Ks,.MA1t4UARU1......................_....................................................
This instrument was prepared by-..&4ith..41...Masane..Attorne.y at..Lam...:...................................................................................
Brief description for the Index Lots 16 6 17 Medical Park B/D
NORTH CA.ROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED made thin - 29.th..... day of......dalupAry..................................... 2001,....... by and between
GRANTOR GRANTER
M.R.V. INVESTMENTS, a North Carolina General CARTERET COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION,
Partnership a North Carolina Non -Profit Corporation
(1031 Exchangor)'
(formerly and which took title es: "TMF c/o P.A. Odell, III
INVESTMENTS", a North Carolina General 3500 Arendell Street
Partnership) Morehead City, MC 28557
gater In approprlats btoek for cash party,- cams, addrers, am% if epprepoiste, chancier of madly, as. earperallon or parlavahtp
The desigmatloh Grantor and Granted as used Herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and
shall Include mingulan plural, masculine, feminine or neuter an required by context.
WITNESSETB, that the Grantor, fora valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of. which Is hereby
acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that
certain lot or parcel of land situiated in the City of ......Morehead ....................... ............ ..... Mor..ahead..:.................... Township,
Carteret ............. . County, North Carolina and tnore particularly described as follows:
BEING all of .Lots 16 E 17 ai-the "MEDICAL PARR" Subdivision, as shown on the map thpreof ;
recorded'in Map Book 13, at Page 79'of the Office of the Register of Deeds'ef Carteret
County, Worth,CaroAna.
This conveyance is.'part of an IRC Section 1031 Tex -Deferred Exchange for the benefit of
the GRANTOR/',EXCWGOR.
C 0 -
10
BOOK E!2 PAGE u�
'N.t. oar Aex.Fwnt No.3at97a. Rwlordele77-,..�.ewr.an.a.. a..+n.v.rx.+.a awwa _
IrY,YI,Arr..w M„Ye. e.wr.-ea+

The property hereinabove described was alkuired by Grantor by Instrument recorded in ................. _......... I .....................
......:._
Deed Boot 548,,PaRe_338
A map showing the above described property is recorded la Plat Hook ,.._13, ......, a
TO HAVE AND TOHOLD the atorm!d hd or parentof land and all privileges aid appurtananoss thereto belonging to
the Grantee in fee simple. .
And the Grantor covasanta.with the -Orestes,. that Grantor Is seised of the promisee in Yee simple, ham the right to -con v q
the Same in fee -simple, that title is marketableand free and clear of,all encumbrances, and that Gram" -will. warrant aced �
ddfend the title against the lawful claims of all. persons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described in subject to the following exceptions:
EASE1tENTS, lUnBTRICTIOPB AND BIGBTS-OIi-RAY OF RECORD. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS OF RECORD IN BOOK 384. PAGE 101, CARTERET COUNTY REGISTRY.
AD VALOBStd TABS FOR'THE YEAR 2001, NOT. YET 111E OR PAYABLE.
rx wtMus wffmzw.. we Grantor W h—t. see hb be" ate sal, at 1f teey���1e Wowed Mb brr.tsa,t ft . se6 i d •. Y•�'
.aq...ft'ewae by K. W aathetbad efrM�. a W sot ft b \want. mm.N .F aawe6r. ar Ib costs-.1 nb.ata. tm i.7M e� rear nwt � 3i•A
.Mr. wrlan. _ -
M.R.V. INVESTNSNTS, a North C1.
argnstaiCefiff Vs:,'�
---------------- -------------
- i------------------- a, Partt-ara"pr.- - --- ----- ---
Sol - ----'--------- --------
' ear: S.VGI.t ter
--- ----------------- ----rn.wn .. - LBON N. tIOR{(R/I! PARTNER
J y
• r. . - e i
S419__-_ , P8 R. Uv i� Y
--- ------------- - ---------
meweftrFtcerr...ft SWi r - V
7 BYTAOPAb` T-.- DBF.YS,.�S6�-BBB-A�-�AEYNc`_� � �,?-�•'.
OaAL-STAMP xt/nrx. CAxat�t�4 ... iYCTiiriiAR................... C.W.
. 1. a itelwF 1P.1011..9 0. Mob and Sent .fenal4 earab Into AA9A.1tr..VAMdLRAAF.-' k
t v
Pertaer_of_II,R Its.?�aPlttmenGt—- -------------------------------------r_-- ;Md°aF"_.
'PaMeeaW .rse.:r aN.ra a,e M7. der nd ataaewl.dred W mends .t tea taresWF
$ h..d cad .mew .I..m er ..I, MI._. d.r .t .... datmarY--------------------- *__: 2001 Z . . d i
rot.meir.n.wVlrw,_i�Ldofx4----------- -4-y�(j
xOME cam ' ssAw:wfP---------- ^--------------cameF. ......
y a E.I.q needs, .9 M. C..nb cad Ss1. afwa.fd, bmw Mat------- .-_ -,. •.
aA Petwdnr tags aatwt roe fate tar rnd aehsewbdSet Moe .... W I- ----------- --_____-- PltteMrr al
------ —---- — -------------- ------------- ---- a Eats r-M--,vatztbn, Whit by naiaear Saw
eba and -. M. aid at Me-.V—di.% a. r m.fte ft.bt...d ents .teed ft Qa caw eF as ------------
6 r[era..y .:.w .w m tats.ew ewe and MkMd er It ---------- —.---------- se.r.t.w..
Mara.. w aW sae aNW rbme or net aft--'.-Axr of ------------ --- --.—.'----------
hw —dribs soft«t------------ — -------------
--- MCAM raft
'rho e—OW.r Cerdoc.1do at -'----------_-------------'-•
10
---- ---------------------- —_'---•__.-.._.—..-•------------ -------•--•----------------- ------------------------
1= 140i b. sacrist xhbMb nrafb.L art d rr tarbgrN tt Me daft Md Mat aad In toe n.N cad Pare m.wa as a.
r—------- —------ — --- — .----- i...---- —----------- a .........—naam4aa OP Downs PGl...... .----- — --- — ...............coning
or _—___--_—_____---..--__________________----._-_-..-.---.-- Mfl.b[Mat _ pPab/4.tteat. .d. f
BOOK PAG
iL C sr Anal. Fww N..1 a INS, N,bad to I•y'f-Aawleba ea.ea, e,at>; v+rr,aatne. ,
!.aa.b.erw.n.Yata6ria�a-1a11

NORTH CAROLINA.
CARTERET COUNTY
I, \ Notary Public, do hereby
certify that Wi iam C. Rawls, Jr., General Partner of M.R.V.
Investments, personally appeared before me and acknowledged the due. -
execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and notarial seal this the da o& ••
!.••-,�. '
January, 2002.
..
tary Pu c
My Commission` expires :„�� •a� i`%` f.t @ �i 's!�
,,,,•.....'„,�
NORTH CAROLINA
CARTERET C
I �T-
Investments,Notary Public, do hereby
certify that T General Partner. of M.R.V.
personally appeared before me and acknowledged the due
execution of..the 'foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and notarial seal this the � d.!y-'of
January; 2001. ; *
(�• tary Public
My Commission expires: ��,at•aba� :4 .'' `:.° _.
f

MA
CARTERET COUNTY
14421 11/12/2003
$1489,80
AAL Real Estate
Exotse Tax
Melanie Arthur 2P
CARTERET COUNTY
PL Date 11/12/2003 Time 15:5000
OR 1027017 Page 1 of 2
NORTH CANXINA, CARTERET COUNTY
The foreydng earhticate(s) of Notary Pubfk(s) Wars
owtO&d to be correct This Inaft meat and this eSOW
Cate are duly registered at the date and time and in
the Book and page shown an the first page hereet_
Mel r N r, pgl rww�
BY
io.aq, �.r+y.
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Excise Tax: $ 1100.00
Parcel Identifier No637614325722 Verified by County on the _ day of 20_
By.-
Mail/Box to:
This instrument was prepared by: e.t;rh ra_ Mann, arrnrnny At, I ---
Brief description forthe Index: Tnrc g—lI, Hpx Rrutnn S/n
THIS DEED made this 11th day of�u^"roMher2Q13,,,byand between
GRANTOR GRANTEE.
CARL L. PRICE, JR. and GEORGE C. PRICE CARTERET COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL
(1031 Exchangors) (with the joinder of their CORPORATION
spouses: BEVERLY B. PRICE and DEBORAH 0.
PRICE) 3500 Arendell Street
Morehead City, NO 28557
Enter in appropriate block for each party: name, address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, e.g. corporation or partnership.
The designation OAantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include
6Wdar, plural, masculine, feminine or muter as required by context.
WITNESSE111, that the lirantor, for a valuable constderabon paid by the UrattOx, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has
and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in
theCityof Morehead City I Mnrahiaad Township, Carteret County,
North Carolina and more particularly dmribed as follows:
BEING all of Lots Number Eight (8), Nine (9), Ten (10), and Eleven (11), of the Rea
Bruton Subdivision and shown and designated on map of same recorded in Map Buuk 1,
at Page 289, Carteret County Registry.
(This conveyance is part of an IRC Section 1031 Tax --Deferred Exchange transaction
for the benefit of the Grantors.)
613 36
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 527 page 228
A map showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book 1 page 289
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 ® 1976, Revised 0 1977, 2002 + James Williams bt Co., Inc
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association - 1981 www.JameswiilEams.c
� ��_ pAQ'E�

TO HA E AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appwlenarues thereto lxlongirrg to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in tee simple, has the right to convey the same in fee
simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, other than the following exceptions:
EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF RECORD
By:.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the=LPRICE,
ay and year first above written.
(SEAL)
(Entity Name) JR.
a• at
z ;�".c4,� • C• ' (SEAL)
Title: x GEO GE C. PRICE r
By: W (SL'AL)
Title: BE ERLY B. PRICE
By:
y �¢Jp3r�7�j 0 �iru� (SEAL)
DEBORAI 0. PRICE
-n� -.
d� wt', . ,.' a State of North Carolina - County of Carteret
O1 the undersigned Notary Public oftheCounryartdState aforesaid,certifythat cars T.. Pricer _ir..
•� r Gteorge G. Price, Beverly_B.. Price and personally appeawdbeforemethisday and
p U e; ac e g the ue execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein expressed. Witness my
_' ; d hand and Notarial stamp or seal this �7 1 3 day of November 2003
�'�•pT�`RET GOUa�� ', W My Commission Expires; 0
�.....,..�"'� Notary Public
:i%'^i-`••°�q,.i' State of North Carolina - County of
I, the undersigned Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that
personally came before me this day and
Q acknowledged that _he is the of
a North Carolina or cotporation/limited liability company/general parmershipAimited
Se parmetship (strike Ilaough the inapplicable), and that by authority duly given and as the act of each entity.
td� he signed the kugoing insimmenl in its name on its behalf as its act and deed. Witness my hand and
m Notarial stamp or seal this day of 120_-
My Commission Expires:
Notary Public
!' •' >: s . t.;. ` State of North Carolina - County of
z
I the undersigned Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certifythat
Witness, my hand and Notarial stamp or seal this day of , 20_.
WMy Commission Expires:
Notary Public
The foregoing Certificates) of Ware certified to be correct.
This instrument and this certificate are duly registered at the date and time and in the Book and Page shown on the first page hereof.
Register of Deeds for County
By: Deputy/Assistant - Register of Deeds
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 Q 1976, Revised ® 1977, 2002 * James Williams & Co., Inc.
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association - 1981 www.JamesWilliams.com
-8W PtAG&

Tex Lot No.
Verified by.
by
n. kAwLhk(j
CARTERET COUNTY
18543
09/05/2904
$754.00
°� H�
1�rA
Real Estate
Exclae Tax
Fsdse Tax S764,00
Plelanie Arthur 3P
CARTERE:T COUNTY
JL Date 05/05/2004 Time 15s23e00
GR 1053218 Page 1 of 3
The totegoirp Awtilcatsid erT� Pt lots)
000ftd to M coM.L Th►a insineewM ante "a eane"W"
at to date and time
ewe are duty nt0istand on. itry fad i s hereof.
yre Book and PAW shown
pp,, At41ax Dasds
By a,p,,,aNnnadr
Reardmg Timq Bank and Page
Parcel Identifier No. 6376.14.32.7990 6376.1438.8952 6376.14.32.9807
Comity on the __ day of 20
Mail alter recording to WHEATLY, WHEATLY, NOBLES, WEEKS, VALENTINE ,Sr II.UP]'ON, P.A.
This instrument was prepared by Claud R. Wheaw, III
Brief ])ascription for the index aec K Beaten Subdivbbn
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
tiRANTOR
MHN Company, A North Carolina General Partnership
Consisting of Merlin R. Huckemeyer and Nancy L.
Hucluneyer
517 Ashy Lane
Morehead City, NC 29557
GRANTEE
Carteret County General Hospital Corporation
3500 Arandell Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
Fair M yprapriNe block Iureeck puryr. nurse, addreaa, and, ifsypapi^ c#wmw of moldy, e.s, oujm = w pwbwsb%
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their hehs, successors, and assigns, and shall include
singular, phial, masculine, fenhrme or neuter as requited by context
W[TNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby aclmowledged, has and
by these presents does grant' bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the
Town of Morehead, Carteret County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
The property her, inabove doscr1ed was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 756, Page 455 and Book 546, Page 335.
A map showing the above described property is rid in Book 1, Page 289,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee
simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized oftha premises in fee simple and has the right to convey the same in fee
simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following erteeptions:
Any rights of way, easements, conditions or restrictions or record.
Ad valorem taxes for the year 2004.
N. C. Bar Assoc. From No, 3 O 1977
Printed by AVament with the N.C. tern Assoc
#003
( Dt5
,BOOK 10S3 PAGE__�

IN WITNESS WHF,.RFOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this instrument to he signed in its corporate
name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hemrto affixed by authority of its Board of Directors, the day and year first above written.
(SEAL.)
MHN Comp■ sy, a North Carolina G ral Partnership by
By: Merlin R. iluckmeyer, General Party
President �Ihrltn
ru TMHN Co ny, a iarth Carolina Generip by i
Secretary Nancy I. ekemey r, General Partner
ATIFSjgslels^awegrrs•. (SEAL)
r ^wr7/g% 4,,: (SEAL)
rrq-.r • � Ai�Y'�'
.�
caRot3NA, Carteret County.
MSter apt► •2 , the tmdersignal, a Nab" Public of the County and Stale aramsaid. cetify that Martin R. Huekemeyer, General Partner fir
1.,9'fAMP� J ; MNN Campmhy, Grantor, pmunelly appeared
'q QQ•R'•.• • •.aal�d wknowdgd execution of te f«egang instrument,
Wims my hand and official stamp, or seal
,
this,�• Ri
0
IM xnmiaone expires: 0 } Nat Public - Pic /�i4 NORTHCAROUNA,Carteret County.
' � rj 1, the undersigned. a Notary Public of Ole Coyhgate tend Slaforea sid, certify that Nancy L Hm aekeeyer, General Partner far
foe
_A/aMTP S rr'MFIN Company, GraMot, personally appearedeW me this day and aelphowWpd otecution of the fon�oing insbm. une
V r �witnw my hued and official stamp orIaeal, aria J f May, 2004.
. pti B 1.AG ? �` My com L ion eapi.: • V� Notary Public
••1IIIII Ir.•
islare certified to be correct. This instrument and this certifieare are duly registered at the date and time and in the Bank and Pageshown on the arst page haeof.
RE4TSIER OF DEMS FOR COUNTY
By --- - Deputy/Assists t-Regislerof Uxds
N. C. Bar Assoc. From No. 3 C 1977
Printed by Agraemem with the N.C. Bar Assoa 80OK ' O�� -'^• T / i�t
a003 FrVIJf� g�llGE C/•� 1

EXH[BIT KA"
T tl:
StruBegin n!Ag at an, meting iron stake in the southern right-of-way knargin of Budges
t in the -northwest corner of Lot 6 in the Rea X Bruton Subdivision as the same
appears in Map Book 1, Page 289, Carteret County Registry, which point is also the
norteast corner of Bruton Drive.
I+rom eaid Point of Beginning running thence S 2300 E and along Me eastern right
al -way tnargin of Bruton Drive a distance of 99.00 feet to an iron pipe; running thence N
67-57 E it distance of 51.42 feet to an iron pipe rip the west line of Lot 7 in the aforeauid Rex
X Byaton subdivision; running thence N 23-47-!s0 W and along the dividing line between
sald.Lots 6 and 7 in the Rex K Bruton Subdisvision a distance of 99.53 feet to the southern
rlgh of -way Margin of Bridges Street; running thence s 67-21-20 W and along tine souther
righ�of-way of Bridges Street a distance of 50.00 feet to the Point of Place orSeginning.
Being the northernmost portion of Lot 6 fn said Rex K. Bruton Subdivision as per
sarv�y by W-D Daniels, Jr., dated Deeeuuber 18,1986.
R. GaSold property acquired by John T. Capps, III and Wife'3ame it, Capps from Francis
brielsen by deed recorded In Book 5S4, Page 396, Ggrteret County.. gsgistry.
Tract 2: - - ----
Beginning at as existing aria hab, the southwest corner of Lot 6, and northwest
corer of Lot 27 of the Rex X Bruton Subdlvlslon as shown In Map Book 1, Page 289,
Carteret Cou ntv Registry; thence with the south line of Lot 6 N 71-06-50 E 52SO feet to an
iron} pipe the southeast corner ofsaid Lot 6; thence N 23-47-50 W 97.09 feet to an existing
irotj pipe, the southeast corner of that land owned by John Capps as shown In deed of
record in Book. 554, Page 396, Carteret County Registry; thence with the Capps Mae S 67-
55 �V 51.42 feet to an iron pipe in the east right of -way line of Bruton Drive; thence with
said east right-of-way llne S 23-00 E 94.12 feetto the point or place of beglnuing and being
all of Grantor's retraining IRterest in Lot 6, of the Rex X Bruton Subdivision as shown in
Map Book 1, Page 289 Carteret County Registry and being further shown ou that survey
by W.D. Daniels, Jr. dated December 18,1986. Said property was acquired by John T.
Capps, Ill and Wife Jane X Capps from Francis P. Gabrielsen by deed recorded in Book
647,E Page 377, Carteret Cotuaty Registry.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF CARTERET
I, allotaryPublic of the county and state aforesaid, do herebycer ifythat John T. Capps, HI
and wife Jane YL Capps personallycame before me this day and acknowledged the execution ofthe
foreg" instrument.
�,.• CH ..... my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of 2005.
=: tt 0 TA
<ipwp Notary Public
.cpIt nission expires:
�
"
r1
SEAL

WITNESSETH:
That the GRANTOR, for a valuable consideration paid by the GRANTEE, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto
the GRANTEE in fee simple, all that certain lot, tract or parcel of land situated in Morehead
Township, Carteret County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
BEING all of Lot 6 of the Rex K. Bruton Subdivision as shown on that survey by W.
D. Daniels, Jr. dated December 18, 1986, and as more particularly described in the
attached Exhibit A.
Deed preparation only; no title search or certification by preparing attorney.
The above described property is conveyed and accepted subject to such easements,
restrictions and rights of way as appear of record in the Carteret County Registry.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot, tract or parcel of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereto belonging to the GRANTEE in fee simple.
And the GRANTOR covenants with the GRANTEE, that GRANTOR is seized of the premises
in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and five and
clear of all encumbrances, and that GRANTOR will warrant and defend the title against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever excluding the exceptions stated herein and designated on the map
referred to above.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set its hand and seal, the day and
year first above written.
r
O!1►� (SEAL)
Capps' in
` (SEAL)
IC. Capps
B P,AG ��

A
O2206-3 COUNTY
a5/02/2005
S�8B.80
n��,
-VyiAW _ Real Emlale
/ i-f ee %.
Prepared By: Dennis M. Marquardt, PA
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF CARTERET
i
p elanie plmERET COUNTY
V
JL Date 05/02/2005 Time 11;11e00
-OR 1109068 Page i of 4
NTH CAROL•INA. CA►rrEIlcT
. The-tmgaing eertdiGateW) :;i v, ta�v :: �, :e(e; !e✓isrs `,''
ewWred to be eorrec-t.11w; +-« }.r ... 44 inh e.;:!,w
caw dM duty iF.1919 m?a S :} Win. 13 ,;Ir& S11 FM:
iha80ekandpawrj::h:•,e,',u�ul�f. pfZ�:IOI.•�q a
cr �
Parcel #: 6376.14.32.3648 &
6376.14.32.3599
Documentary Stamps: $ 380.00
THIS WARRANTY DEED made and entered into this Q day of May, 2005 by and
between:
John T. Capps, III and wife,
Jane K. Capps
Of
Morehead City, North Carolina
(hereinafter "GRANTOR")
Old
Carteret County General Hospital Corporation,
a North Carolina non-profit corporation
whose address is:
3500 Arendell Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
(hereinafter "GRANTEE")
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE as used herein shall include said parties, their
heirs, successors and assigns and shalt include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as
required by context.
raocyc ll09

EXHIBIT "A"
Being the east one-half of Lot 16 and all of Lot 17 and that portion of Seashore Lane lying to the
east of Lot 17 as shown on the map of Rex Bruton Subdivision as shown on plat recorded in Map
Book 1, Page 289, Carteret County Registry and being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the southern right of way of Bridges Street, which point is Carteret
General Hospital's current northwest comer, said point also being where the now or former
Sunset Lane would have intersected with the southern right of way of Bridges Street; running
thence S 09-16-02 W, 225.82 feet to an iron rod; thence S 86-03-55 W, 26.63 feet to an iron rod;
thence S 71-37-15 W, 24.85 feet to a point; thence N 17-59-36 W, 207AI feet to a point in the
southern right of way of Bridges Street; running thence with the southern right of way of Bridges
Street N 76-24-35 E, 26 feet to a point; thence continuing with the southern right of way of
Bridges Street N 76-35-33 E, 101.83 feet to an existing iron pipe; thence continuing with the
southern right of way of Bridges Street N 78-04-00 E, 26.84 feet to the Point or Place of
Beginning.
See map entitled, "Physical Survey for Carteret General Hospital Corporation", dated 30 April
2004, prepared by Powell Surveying Company, PA, which map is incorporated herein by
reference.
gig

SOSID: 0024237
Date Filed: 10/25/2011 12:40:00 PM
Elaine F. Marshall
North Carolina Secretary of State
C201129700126
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
STATEMENT OF CHANGE OF REGISTERED
OFFICE AND/O'R REGISTERED'AGENT
Pursuant to §55D-31 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the undersigned entity submits the following for the purpose of
changing its registered office and/or registered agent in the State of North Carolina.
I INFORMATION CURRENTLY ON FILE i
The name of the entity is:
Entity Type: []Corporation, ❑Foreign Corporation, [Xonprofit Corporation, ❑Foreign Nonprofit Corporation,
❑Limited Liability Company, []Foreign Limited Liability Company ❑Limited Partnership, []Foreign Limited Partnership,
[]Limited Liability Partnership, ❑Foreign Limited Liability Partnership
The street address and county of the entity's registered office currently on file is:
Number and Street: ?r5�00 Areridul c5freef - /� _ �L�,�,"�
City, State, Zip Code: W � 0 {� !e d Ci �� County: i►i'.AK TC� l&+
The mailino adduce ii'ditifbrvnt Tram the street address of the registered•office currentiv on file. i-
The name of the current registered agent is:
NEW INFORMATION
1. The street address and county of the new registered office of the entity is:
(complete this item only if the address of the registered office is being changed)
Number and Street:
City, State, Zip Code:
County:
2. The mailing address Ifdii ferent from the street address of the new registered office is:
(complete this item only if the address of the registered qfflce is being changed)
3. The name of the new registered agent and the new agent's consent to appointment appears below:
(complete this item only if the name of the registered agent is beinZchad))
Type or Print Name of New Agent * Signature & Title
4. The address of the entity's registered office and the address of the business office of its registered agent, as changed,
will be identical.
5. This statement will be effective upon filing, unless a date and/or time is specified:
This is theAQqhday of O ,L(MY- . 20-LL.
Entio Name
tL j' @,®S)ignature
5uf)le) i S, AsAisfa r* Sec eiuol
TyWr.11rint Name and Title J
Notes: Filing fee is MO. This document must be tiled with the Secretary of State.
* legend of signing here, the new registered agent may sign a separate written consent to the appointment, which must be attached to this statement.
CORPORATIONS DIVISION P. O. BOX 29622 RALEIGH, NC 27626-0622
Revised January 2002 Form BE-06

CE V
APR 2 8 20%
BY.
DATE: March 30, 2014
SUBJECT: Land and soils evaluation of the Carteret General Hospital NW Parking Expansion Area (-1.4
acres) to determine site and soil characteristics for general usability with stormwater treatment
systems. Tract located at the SE intersection of Bridges Street and Bald Street within the Town of
Morehead City, Morehead Township, Carteret County, North Carolina.
PIN# 637614323648000; 637614324616000; 637614325722000
TO: Mr. Ron Cullipher, PE and Ms. Ginger Turner, PE
Stroud Engineering, PA
151-A NC Hwy 24 W, Hestron Plaza II -A
Morehead City, NC 28557
[phone] [o]; [phone] x-233
The land and soils within the Carteret General Hospital NW Parking Expansion Area (-1.4 acres) were evaluated
on a qualitative and quantitative basis to determine the potential for on -site stormwater infiltration usage.
NCDENR-DEMLR "Stormwater Management" rules (NCAC 15-2H-.1000) and guidelines werg used in making this
evaluation. New and revised NCDENR-DEMLR coastal stormwater rules became effective October 1, 2008 (NC
Session Law 2008-211) and are more rigorous than previous rules. This soil and site evaluation that consisted of
transects across the tract, free -style soils mapping and hand -auger soil boring descriptions, qualitative estimates of
the land and soil properties, quantitative hydraulic conductivity testing, and review of existing maps or information of
this area. This evaluation is a soil and site characterization for final engineering design of 'a proposed pervious
pavement stormwater control and treatment system (see Stroud Eng drawing), and to fulfill the requirements of
NCDEMLR stormwater permitting.
According to NCDENR-DEMLR rules, coastal stormwater may be treated by infiltrative devices, detention treatment
basins, or an equivalent alternafive method when the proposed project is greater than 1 acre in size, has >12%
residential impervious surfaces, >10,000 sqft non-residential impervious surfaces, and are *!thin % mile of Class
S.A. Waters or their unclassified tributaries. Coastal lands that are >% mile from Class S.A. Waters or their
unclassified tributaries allow up to 24% residential impervious surface for low -density development, or 10,000 sqft
non-residential impervious surfaces, before requiring engineered stormwater treatment systems.
Bridges Street appears to be an approximate hydrologic minor watershed divide, based upon general topography,
morphological position, and water table depths (see USGA, Stroud topo, and water table lepths). Lands to the
north of Bridges Street appear to drain towards an unnamed tributary of Calico Creek (S.Ci-H.Q.W. waters) and
-1800 - 2300 linear feet (<0.45 mile) away. Lands to the south of Bridges Street, including the evaluated tract,
appear to drain south towards Bogue Sound (S.A.-H.Q.W. waters) -900 - 1500 feet (<0.3 mile) away. The
evaluated tract appears to drain indirectly to south through subsurface flow toward Bogue 'Sound with no open
drainageways or ditches presently located on the property as points of direct discharge. Thus the tract appears to
be located within a % mile radius of S.A. Waters. A high density project within this tract would likely require
prescriptive engineered stormwater treatment methods and design if the development's "built upon area" exceeds
>12% impervious surface area. Infiltration methods or infiltrative °best management practices' (BMP) are utilized
for stormwater treatment on coastal high density projects to preserve space or due to inadegt ate drainage outlets.
Detention stormwater treatment ponds may also be used if they do not directly discharge to S.A. waters through
"effective infiltration" methods. Low density projects defined as <12% to <24% residential impervious surface or
<10,000 sqft non-residential impervious surface should not require engineered stormwater treatment systems. All
historically existing impervious surfaces should be exempted from stormwater density calculations, and then any
new development should comply with current NCEMLR stormwater requirements as much as practicable.

Principle soil ana site standards for high density development with an engineered infiltration system are: ---the
infiltration system's bottom must be 2:2 ft above the seasonal high water table; --must be capable of complete
draw -down within a >3 to <5 days; ---the soil's hydraulic conductivity must be >0.52 in/hr; --must have >12
inches natural soil without a seasonal water table before fill material is utilized; ---historic fill materials (<1977) can
be used as natural soils if it meets the minimum site criteria stated above; ---stormwater runoff must be controlled
and treated on -site for a 1.5 inch rainfall, or the difference in run-off from pre / post development conditions for the 1
year 24 hr annual storm event (-3.8 inches), whichever is greater. Detention stormwater ponds are to be designed
to hold the calculated run-off volume for a >3 to <5 day time period, and maintain the permanent pool elevation +/-
6 inches of the seasonal high water table.
This tract is located within the lower coastal plains and geomorphic setting. The tract was historically developed
(<1970's) as three separate tracts with commercial buildings, driveways, and parking areas (see aerial photo). All
of these historically developed areas should be credited as prior existing impervious surfaces for any new
stormwater design purposes and calculations. Slopes range between 1 - 3%. General surface elevations are >22
- 27 ft (amsl, see USGS topo map and Stroud base topo map). The natural soils are thick (>6 - 7 ft), fine to
medium sandy textures, with loose structure. The tract has been recently cleared of all structures and leveled
which resulted in shallow (1 - 2.5 ft), loose surface fill and/or rubble within the eastern portions of the tract (see
"red" box on soils map). General non -point surface and subsurface drainage within this area appears to be in a
north to south direction through subsurface drainage and no direct point discharge conduits.
The enclosed land & soils map shows the land/soil types found (see soils map). The following is a brief description
of the land and soil types found, and potentials for stormwater treatment usage:
The "Green" Areas (see soils map) are natural, well to somewhat excessively well drained, sandy soil materials,
with possible minor to moderate surface disturbance or sandy rubble fill to 0 - 2.5 ft depths pending location. The
estimated seasonal high water static water table is +48 - -70 inches from the present surface, pending location and
based upon soil wetness indicators and general elevations. Tested and estimated hydraulic conductivity is >5 - 15
in/hr (4 - <12 min/in) to +70 inch depths from present surface, based Ksat testing or soil texture and structure.
General surface elevations range from -24.5 to 27 ft (amsi). The bottom of infiltration stormwater treatment
structures should be placed moderately shallow (2 - 4 ft depths from present surface) to maintain a 2 ft separation
from seasonal high water soil indicators. In areas with surface disturbances or fill we recommend the general
stormwater infiltration area to be excavated 1.0 - 2.5 ft deep (pending location) down to the natural native soil
materials and backfilled with clean fine -medium sand materials. A recommended long-term loading rate for
stormwater infiltration is -% the averaged estimated soil hydraulic conductivity or -5 in/hr. Another option could be
utilizing "zero discharge" best management practices, where the stormwater volume is widely dispersed over
grassed areas at low velocities towards low retaining berms through precise landscaping and soil amendments. A
last alternative would be detention pond treatment with discharge to grassed secondary treatment medians with
"effective infiltration".
The "Yellow" Areas (see soils map) are natural, moderately well to well drained, sandy soil materials, with
possible minor to moderate surface disturbance or sandy rubble fill to 0 - 2.5 ft depths pending location. The
estimated seasonal high water static water table is +36 - 48 inches from the present surface, pending location and
based upon soil wetness indicators and general elevations. Tested and estimated hydraulic conductivity is >5 - 15
in/hr (4 - <12 min/in) to +70 inch depths from present surface, based Ksat testing or soil texture and structure.
General surface elevations range from -23.5 - +24.5 ft (amsl). The bottom of infiltration stormwater treatment
structures should be placed shallow (1 - 2 ft depths from present surface) to maintain a 2 ft separation from
seasonal high water soil indicators. In areas with surface disturbances or fill we recommend the general
stormwater infiltration area to be excavated 1.0 - 2.5 ft deep (pending location) down to the natural native soil
materials and backfilled with clean fine -medium sand materials. A recommended long-term loading rate for
stormwater infiltration is -'/ the averaged estimated soil hydraulic conductivity or -5 in/hr. Another option could be
utilizing "zero discharge" best management practices, where the stormwater volume is widely dispersed over
grassed areas at low velocities towards low retaining berms through precise landscaping and soil amendments. A
last alternative would be detention pond treatment with discharge to grassed secondary treatment medians with
"effective infiltration".

The "Brown" Areas (see soils map) are natural, moderately well drained, sandy soil materials, with possible minor
to moderate surface disturbance or sandy rubble fill to 0 - 2.5 ft depths pending location. The estimated seasonal
high water static water table is +24 - 36 inches from the present surface, pending location and based upon soil
wetness indicators and general elevations. Tested and estimated hydraulic conductivity is >5 - 15 in/hr (4 - <12
min/in) to +70 inch depths from present surface, based Ksat testing or soil texture and structure. General surface
elevations range from -22.5 - +23.5 ft (amsl). The bottom of infiltration stormwater treatment structures should be
placed shallow or ultra -shallow with sidewall berms (0 - 1 ft depths from present surface) to maintain a 2 ft
separation from seasonal high water soil indicators. In areas with surface disturbances or fill we recommend the
general stormwater infiltration area to be excavated 1.0 - 2.5 ft deep (pending location) down to the natural native
soil materials and backfilled with clean fine -medium sand materials. A recommended long-term loading rate for
stormwater infiltration is -% the averaged estimated soil hydraulic conductivity or -5 in/hr. Another option could be
utilizing "zero discharge" best management practices, where the stormwater volume is widely dispersed over
grassed areas at low velocities towards low retaining berms through precise landscaping and soil amendments. A
last alternative would be detention pond treatment with discharge to grassed secondary treatment medians with
"effective infiltration".
The "Blue Dots" (see map) are locations of what appear to be historically existing monitoring wells. These
monitoring wells should be properly abandoned.
The "red dots" (see soils map) are locations of soil boring descriptions which are attached as an amendment to
this report. Soil borings #8 thru #15 are within the proposed stormwater infiltration pervious pavement area, and
are marked in the field with orange pin flags. For reference and at each soil boring, the following table depicts
approximate surface elevation, relative to approximate seasonal high static water table indicator depth elevation:
Soil Boring #
Approximate Ground
Elevation feet
Seasonal High Water Table Depth
inches / feet
Seasonai High Water Table
Elevation feet
1
26.8ft
66" / 5.5ft
21.3ft
2
25.5ft
40" / 3.3ft
22.2ft
3
23.8ft
36" / 3.0ft
20.8ft
4
23.0 ft
30" / 2.5 ft
20.5 ft
5
25.5 ft
65" / 5.4 ft
20.1 ft
6
26.5 ft
65" / 5.4 ft
21.1 ft
7
24.0ft
36" / 3.0ft
21.0ft
8
27.1 ft
55" / 4.6 ft
22.5 ft
9
26.5 ft
53" / 4.4 ft
22.1 ft
10
25.0ft
48" / 4.0ft
21.0ft
11
26.1 ft
55" / 4.6 ft
21.5 ft
12
24.5 ft
50" / 4.2 ft
20.3 ft
13
23.9 ft
43" / 3.6 ft
20.3 ft
14
24.0ft
36" / 3.0ft
21.0ft
15
25.5ft
48" / 4.0ft
21.5ft
The "pink dots" (see map) represent saturated hydraulic conductivity test sites at Borings #8 thru #15 which are
within the proposed pervious pavement infiltration areas. The constant head permeameter method (CHP) was
used with an Amoozemeter device and data solved by Glover's equation. All tests exceeded the max limits of the
Amoozementer to measure the rapid conductivity of these sandy sediments (>5 in/hr) as a constant 6" head could
not be maintained within representative soil horizons. The results of CHIP tes ing are as follows:
Soil Boring #
Depth Tested inches
Hydraulic Conductivity in/hr
8
25 - 31"
>5
9
21 - 27"
>5
10
30 - 36"
>5
11
31 - 37"
>5
12
24 - 30"
>5
13
30 - 36"
>5
14
21 - 27"
>5
15
26 - 32"
>5

Since hydraulic conductivity is greater than the capabilities of the CHP, it is expected the saturated conductivity of
these soils to range between >5 to 15 in/hr, based upon the known CHP site testing, soil texture, soil structure, and
established test references for these fine to medium sand textures. The averaged range of saturated hydraulic
conductivity would be 10 inthr. A recommended long-term design rate for stormwater infiltration use is one-half the
site's expected hydraulic conductivity rate which would be -5 in/hr, or -75 gal/day/sqft.
Within the "red box" (see soils map) is an area with surface disturbances, coquina, and/or mixed loose soil &
rubble to -1 - 2.5 ft depths, pending location. Within these areas and the general vicinity of the proposed
stormwater infiltration structures, it should be excavated to +1 - 2.5 ft depths or down to natural soil materials, with
removal of these sediments from the site, and back -filled with imported clean, fine to medium sand materials to
ensure uniformity and compatibility with the natural soils. The reference soil boring descriptions should assist in
knowing the depth to excavate, or we can oversee this process if given proper notification.
With pervious pavement stormwater structures, current NCDEMLR guidelines require a post site and soils
evaluation after the treatment area has been site prepared and before any rock or pavement materials are placed
on -site. We will be glad to conduct these additional soil and site evaluations when properly notified to do so.
Careful planning and design should be exercised to insure adequate and usable soil areas are reserved and
protected within the proposed on -site stormwater treatment areas. The soil areas evaluated have slight limitations
for usage with on -site stormwater infiltration systems, pending final design, location, and minor site improvements.
We recommend using % or less of the average natural permeability rate for the infiltrative stormwater system's
design rate. Historically existing impervious surfaces were extensive across this tract and should be measured and
given full credit for any new development stormwater calculations. NCDENR-DEMLR or local Universal stormwater
rules have the regulatory authority over stormwater systems, and they have final review, approval, and permitting
authority. These and other regulatory agencies must be contacted for their reviews, general concurrences, and
required permits before initiating any development activities. We recommend NCDEMLR and appropriate agencies
to review application plans or a site review for their concurrence as to site conditions and locations for any final
design considerations or concerns, and before actual construction.
Larry F. Baldwin, CPSS/SC
ARCPACS #2183; NCLSS #1040
Land Management Group, Inc.

h1
caoacya�
^ �
c
° 0
m
='a m ac'4 �)
2c
L
(1)
(DU
c0
o mom co
C E
d
+' 'iC
J m
—
o f6 L t > a) 'O
Co
d p.
LL L C
m
O
�+
a7
> a)
r C
cu m.. l 3 CL-Se m
N 1 O y U to
rL
O CLUJ
o
o
CL
�o
y r U 03
m.o�
cocc
II
CD
J
"` O-
(M-0+
C a m 'p
CD
� A
L
N
O
U)
a?
F-
O
v 4) 0 W 0
'X m .O C - C
V `
v
_
O
Cu
�O
a) 't a) a) O O
O U C
Y
�'ip �
rn N O
3oECL
d CL
a
O
CL
=
C
o dp (DQ
C
C p
cA
U
x
w m
o
Q MM4= o U U
O
•
y (
a
J �
N
b y Y
i L --
f
Y
\ \\ `, ■ `r-� l�
$ i
:t
\ w
to2 \
> >CD`\ �\ ■
rn OY d
CL
ron cW -2 r
-o = y \
E
m
C c c -
ow
m
> CL) mY \ ��
OLm 3 44) / \
y Z k \�
c
ca aC•C N / `\
D O1 f6 N
y • € W \
D CDN CD
>'D— O-U
co C O la
r C
O O W C
7 DI p C.)N
cr.—
Co C N C
C
U)rD�� z
��_
Pw
0
U
:w
y
rn ami
Ca)
QO
UO1UN
Co
1
y E -
y N
W +
co _co
E � O
55 m.
ai ~
O) Q y
W U W L
�Cma
C �
0co(D
to '
y= al C y
C d�-"p
a�nEd
r U)
O10
_�
�OC�y
y 1 O
OCO
C C
+ m
y O O
y '
N w LO
+
m
vmi m vmi .E
Y to
C'
ter'
U
y
� m
rn a�
L E
C a�
O 'a N
co
Co :: 1
N co
W + L
CL
E C -O
a o a>
a�
Lu
N ~ a)y
cu
CMWv
U y
owa)
c (D O
(D
■� fA C a)
Ca)-O
CD CL E C
NENO
3-
1
O V m
y 1 O
f0
y + ca
O
:o m
+
+ m
m --
D 3Ycn
0
U
w a
rn (D
s Et2
� Q lt7
o7M
y N
Cc :: 1
a caca N M
CO a
E� �v
ID
;? o
W (D CU
>
N~ d y
rn ��
c
p
c o
to
N C a)
C a)�O
NaEC
ONCiT
1
QM� m
yl�o
0 N �
+co�o o
O N r
y .0 1 O
m ca M 'E
3Yio
d
a
z
LLI
2
LLI
Q
0
z
i'

Lewis,Linda
From: Lewis,Linda
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 9:19 AM
To: Lucas, Annette
Subject: Question on Permeable pavement and redevelopment
Annette:
I have a redevelopment site. We are trying to calculate the amount of BUA that is in excess of the existing amount and
which will require treatment.
These are the numbers:
Existing pre-88 impervious 72475
Impervious Removed -22276
Remaining Existing Impervious 50199
Impervious proposed 48709 (to be constructed)
Pervious pavement 16100 (of the 48709 total,161OO is pervious pavement)
75% BUA credit 4025 (net BUA from the pervious pavement)
Total proposed Impervious (48709 —16100 + 4025) = 36634
Total on -site impervious (36634 + 50199)=86,833
Additional Impervious area required to be treated (86833 — 72475)=14,358
Adjacent proposed BUA treated by permeable pavement=10,647
Still need to treat (14358—10647) = 3,711 sf.
The consultant is arguing that the footprint of the pervious pavement, 4025, should also be counted as being treated,
resulting in (4025 — 3711) 314 sq. ft. of excess BUA being treated. I feel like this is "double-dipping" in a way — the 4025
has already been credited once to reduce the total amount of proposed BUA. I'm not sure I understand how it can also
be claimed again as being treated? Am I off -base with this?
Thanks for any help. I know you are busy.
Linda Lewis
Environmental Engineer III
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Main Office — 910-796-7215
Direct Line — 910-796-7343
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.

Lewis,Linda
From: Ginger Turner <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 7:21 AM
To: Lewis,Linda
Subject: RE: SW8 010220 Express Addinfn
Yes I agree with the rationale below except for needing additional permeable pavement. The only thing that the
calculations below did not account for is the fact that the permeable pavement treats itself so therefore there 4025-
3711=314sf additional area treated. Please let me know if you agree with this. Now I know how to handle a
redevelopment with permeable pavement for the future. Thanks for all your help with this project.
Ginger
From: Lewis,Linda [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 5:47 PM
To: Ginger Turner
Subject: RE: SW8 010220 Express Addinfo
Ginger:
Those supplemental calculations explained what I needed to know.
One other question regarding the calculation of the effective BUA with treatment number for the West Campus. First let
me say that the wording of my August 1, 2013 email may have mislead you into thinking that you could lower the
percent impervious of a site by removing the additional 1:1 BUA treated by the permeable pavement from the total BUA
for the site. The credit is only applied to the footprint of the permeable pavement. Any additional BUA treated by the
permeable pavement can't be used to lower the amount of BUA on the site, or to lower the percent impervious.
The "Total Effective BUA with Treatment" appears to include the 10,647 sf of additional BUA treated by the permeable
pavement to come up with the net effective BUA of 72,161 sf. Per Section 18.2.1 of the BMP Manual, for permeable
pavement designed for infiltration, you can only claim the 75% BUA credit for the actual footprint of the permeable
pavement, or 4025 square feet. You cannot lower the percent impervious of the site by removing the 10,647 of
additional BUA being treated by that permeable pavement from the BUA total.
don't think the term "Effective BUA" applies here. I think what you want to do here is the same as was done for DA-1.
The goal is NOT to stay below the pre-88 BUA, but to provide treatment for any excess BUA over the pre-88 amount. You
calculate that excess amount by accounting for the BUA credit for the use of infiltrating permeable pavement (up to 75%
of the area of the PP footprint counted as pervious). Whatever is left needs treatment.
The West Campus is a redevelopment project. That's what redevelopment is — treating the BUA beyond what previously
existed on the site. This is what I came up with:
Existing pre-88 impervious 72475
Impervious Removed -22276
Remaining Existing Impervious 50199
Impervious proposed 48709
Pervious pavement 16100
75% BUA credit 4025 (net BUA)

Lewis,Linda
From:
Lewis,Linda
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 5:47 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron
Subject: FW: SW8 010220 Express Addinfo
FYI
From: Lewis,Linda
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 5:47 PM
To: 'Ginger Turner'
Subject: RE: SW8 010220 Express Addinfo
umger:
Those supplemental calculations explained what I needed to know.
One other question regarding the calculation of the effective BUA with treatment number for the West Campus. First let
me say that the wording of my August 1, 2013 email may have mislead you into thinking that you could lower the
percent impervious of a site by removing the additional 1:1 BUA treated by the permeable pavement from the total BUA
for the site. The credit is only applied to the footprint of the permeable pavement. Any additional BUA treated by the
permeable pavement can't be used to lower the amount of BUA on the site, or to lower the percent impervious.
The "Total Effective BUA with Treatment" appears to include the 10,647 sf of additional BUA treated by the permeable
pavement to come up with the net effective BUA of 72,161 sf. Per Section 18.2.1 of the BMP Manual, for permeable
pavement designed for infiltration, you can only claim the 75% BUA credit for the actual footprint of the permeable
pavement, or 4025 square feet. You cannot lower the percent impervious of the site by removing the 10,647 of
additional BUA being treated by that permeable pavement from the BUA total.
I don't think the term "Effective BUA" applies here. I think what you want to do here is the same as was done for DA-1.
The goal is NOT to stay below the pre-88 BUA, but to provide treatment for any excess BUA over the pre-88 amount. You
calculate that excess amount by accounting for the BUA credit for the use of infiltrating permeable pavement (up to 75%
of the area of the PP footprint counted as pervious). Whatever is left needs treatment.
The West Campus is a redevelopment project. That's what redevelopment is — treating the BUA beyond what previously
existed on the site. This is what I came up with:
Existing pre-88 impervious
Impervious Removed
Remaining Existing Impervious
Impervious proposed
Pervious pavement
75% BUA credit
72475
-22276
50199
48709
16100
4025 (net BUA)
Total proposed Impervious (48709 —16100 + 4025) = 36634
Total on -site impervious (36634 + 50199)=86,833
Additional Impervious area required to be treated = 86833 — 72475=14,358

Additional BUA treated by permeable pavement=10,647
Still need to treat 3,711 sf.
Let me know your thoughts on this.
Linda
From: Ginger Turner[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 11:07 AM
To: Lewis,Llnda
Cc: 'Ron Cullipher'
Subject: RE: SW8 010220 Express Addinfo
Linda,
Yes I agree that the pre-88 BUA is 347,387sf and treatment must be provided for any amount exceeding this amount. I
have attached a hand calculation representing the values given in the spreadsheet. Hopefully I have shown the thought
process that went into the spreadsheet and where the numbers came from.
With regards to the separation to the SHWT we would like the reduction to a minimum of 1'.
Please let me know if you need any other information or further clarification on the calculations.
Thanks,
Ginger
From: Lewis,Linda fmailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 9:27 AM
To: Ginger Turner
Subject: FW: SW8 010220 Express Addinfo
Ginger:
I've gone over the previous narratives, notes and permits for Carteret Co. General. I think I now have a better
understanding of what transpired in the past and how to move forward.
In 2013, we were having a difficult time identifying the pre-88 BUA, so we just decided to accept that whatever amount
was left over after subtracting the treated BUA (58385) from the existing BUA in DA-1(405772 in 2013), would be the
pre-88 BUA. The pre-88 amount is currently permitted to be 347,387 which is the same value that you show on the 2014
application in the "pre-88 main campus" column.
I think part of my confusion is stemming from the use of the word "existing". For this particular project, both the pre-88
BUA and the previously permitted BUA are being referenced as "existing". Just for clarification, although previously
permitted BUA may be "existing" on the ground with subsequent modification, it is still essentially "proposed" BUA as
far as the permit itself is concerned it's just no longer "proposed new" as part of this modification.
Does it simplify things for you if we agree that the goal is to provide treatment for any amount of BUA in the Main
Campus (DA-1) that exceeds 347,387? This would be after you have accounted for the permeable pavement footprint
BUA credit (but not the adjacent treated area), and any BUA reductions resulting from demolition and any BUA increases
from proposed construction.
Keeping this in mind, please refer to the attached scanned page 2 of the 2014 calculations.

Lewis,Linda
From: Lewis,Linda
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 9:27 AM
To: 'Ginger Turner'
Subject: FW: SW8 010220 Express Addinfo
Attachments: 2014 05 scan 010220.pdf
Ginger:
I've gone over the previous narratives, notes and permits for Carteret Co. General. I think I now have a better
understanding of what transpired in the past and how to move forward.
In 2013, we were having a difficult time identifying the pre-88 BUA, so we just decided to accept that whatever amount
was left over after subtracting the treated BUA (58385) from the existing BUA in DA-1(405772 in 2013), would be the
pre-88 BUA. The pre-88 amount is currently permitted to be 347,387 which is the same value that you show on the 2014
application in the "pre-88 main campus" column.
I think part of my confusion is stemming from the use of the word "existing". For this particular project, both the pre-88
BUA and the previously permitted BUA are being referenced as "existing". Just for clarification, although previously
permitted BUA may be "existing" on the ground with subsequent modification, it is still essentially "proposed" BUA as
far as the permit itself is concerned it's just no longer "proposed new" as part of this modification.
Does it simplify things for you if we agree that the goal is to provide treatment for any amount of BUA in the Main
Campus (DA-1) that exceeds :347,387? This would be after you have accounted for the permeable pavement footprint
BUA credit (but not the adjacent treated area), and any BUA reductions resulting from demolition and any BUA increases
from proposed construction.
Keeping this in mind, please refer to the attached scanned page 2 of the 2014 calculations.
1. Currently, 56,200 sf is being removed and 85,458 sf is being put back. But not all of that 85,458 is counted as
BUA;
2. Next, you reduced the 85,458 to account for the BUA credit for the permeable pavement, i.e., the (25%
impervious) number, which is 22400 x 0.25 = 5600 sf. Then, (22400 — 5600=)16800 sf, leaving (85458 —16800 =)
68,658 as the net "total proposed impervious".
3. After that, I can't follow the process. It would seem that you would subtract 56200 (removed) from 68658 (net
BUA after PP accounted for) to arrive at an additional 12,458 sf to be treated?
Regarding the rest of the submittal, the separation to the SHWT in Drainage areas 7 and 9 is less than 2 feet. For DA 7
it's 1.75' and for DA 9, it's only 1.4 feet. You've got a pretty good soils report, so we can accept a reduction to a
minimum of one foot. Is that your intention?
I need to hear back from you by next Wednesday, May 21, 2014, regarding these questions.
Thanks.
Linda
From: Lewis,Linda
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 2:28 PM
To: 'Ginger Turner'
Subject: RE: 14_0507 SW8 010220 Express Addinfo Response

did receive the information and I'm waiting for the fog in my brain to clear out enough to take a stab at understanding
the pre-88 situation.
From: Ginger Turner fmailto:gturner(&stroudengineer.coml
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 2:02 PM
To: Lewis,Linda
Subject: RE: 14_0507 SW8 010220 Express Addinfo Response
Did you receive the plans requested below?
What is the current time line for review of the information and comments addressed from last week?
Thanks,
Ginger Turner, P.E.
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
107 B Commerce Street
Greenville, NC 27858
Office: [phone] ext 233
Fax: [phone]
Email Address: [e-mail]
From: Ginger Turner fmaiito:gturner(d� roudenoineer.com1
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 11:29 AM
To: 'Lewis,Linda'
Subject: RE: 14_0507 SW8 010220 Express Addinfo Response
Certainly.
From: Lewis,Linda[mailto:Iinda.lewis(&ncdenr.govl
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 11:26 AM
To: Ginger Turner
Subject: RE: 14_0507 SW8 010220 Express Addinfo Response
Thanks for the reminder about the adjacent BUA being more than the 1:1 ratio. Because my memory is fuzzy at best, it's
always a good idea to include copies of that kind of "agreement" email with any subsequent application.
I'll just have to sit down and try my best to understand and document what's been done in regard to the existing BUA. I
apologize for my mental block — I'm tired and it's just not clear to me yet.
Can you send me copies of those plan sheets? I don't have the ability to print them full-size here. The best I can do is
11x17.
Thanks.
From: Ginger Turner fmaiito:gturnerCc-Dstroudenoineer.comj
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:40 AM
To: Lewis,Linda
Cc: dbrvenikCa_bccgh.org; Weaver, Cameron; 'Ron Cullipher
Subject: 14_0507 SW8 010220 Express Addinfo Response

Please accept this email as response to your review comments as stated below.
Thanks,
Ginger Turner, P.E.
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
107 B Commerce Street
Greenville, NC 27858
Office: [phone] ext 233
Fax: [phone]
Email Address: [e-mail]
From: Lewis,Linda fmailto:linda.lewisOncdenr.govl
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 9:47 AM
To: Ginger Turner
Cc: dbrvenik(@Mh.org; Weaver, Cameron
Subject: SW8 010220 Express Addinfo
Ginger:
The Division received the subject express application for Carteret County General Hospital on April 28, 2014. 1 offer the
following. review comments:
1. 1 am still very unclear as to why the pre-1988 existing BUA has increased with each application over the years.
The narrative does not do enough to explain that. 1 still believe that the amount of existing pre-1988 BUA should
be a constant or might decrease, but never increase. A decrease might occur if some of it were being collected
and treated in lieu of treating new BUA, but I cannot understand how the amount of pre-88 BUA could ever
increase.
The modification submitted in 2013 is the first time I recall calculating the total BUA for the hospital campus. Please
compare Sheet C-2 from August 2013 (13 0823 C2.pdf) and April 2014 (14 0428 C2.gdf) which keeps the Pre-1988 BUA
at 347,387 square feet. I did not provide a separate column for Pre-1988 on the application submitted as indicated in
the permit issued 9/27/13. The hand written portion above the individual drainage areas do not reflect what is actually
included the columns. This naming of the columns was never discussed. Each column reflects the drainage area,
impervious area, whether existing or proposed, as shown in the colored drainage area map provided during that
submittal. In our meeting April 28, 2014 it was decided that the columns could be treated differently since the
application isn't geared towards redevelopment projects, so the application was modified as requested providing the
347,387 square feet of Pre-1988 BUA.
2. The drainage area number of the infiltration basin, which was #5 under the September 2013 permit, has now
changed to DA-10. Since the design parameters of the infiltration basin are not changing, I will revise the DA
number from 5 to 10 on the existing supplement form that was part of the 2013 permit, and add the new signed
O&M.
No response needed
3. For DA-3, the supplement and the calculations list the permeable pavement area as 2502 sf, but the drainage
area column on the application has it as 2052 sq. ft. Please correct the typo and submit a revised DA application
sheet.
The permeable pavement area for DA3 has been modified to 2,502 sf and is attached. (25071 _Revised Additional
Dom)

4. DA-5 and DA-7 listed on the application propose to direct more adjacent BUA onto the permeable pavement
than is allowed under the BMP manual,. The maximum amount of adjacent BUA that can be treated by a
permeable pavement is equal to the size of the permeable pavement. You cannot direct more BUA onto the
pavement, while only claiming credit for treating a smaller number. For both DA-5 and DA-7, no more than 3008
sq. ft. of additional BUA can be directed onto the permeable pavement for treatment. Although the
supplements and the calculations appear to use 3008 sq. ft. for adjacent BUA, the DA column from the
application reports larger numbers, 3596 and 3692 respectively, which do not agree with the supplements.
Please correct the DA columns and submit a revised DA sheet.
This was discussed during the last modification and it was determined that additional BUA could be directed to the
permeable pavement however no additional credit would be allowed. Please see the attached email. 13 0801
Additional BUA to Pervious Pavement.pdf)
Please note that the adjacent BUA being treated by permeable pavement is not "removed" from the impervious
calculation nor does it lower the net effective BUA or the percent impervious. Only the actual area of the
permeable pavement is subject to BUA crediting.
Not sure if I need to do anything for this item. I understand that it this area is not removed however it is treated which
allows the proposed redevelopment as proposed given the treatment maintains the Pre-1988 conditions. Please let me
know if I need to address this in any way.
Please submit the requested information by May 14, 2014.
Linda Lewis
Environmental Engineer III
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Main Office - 910-796-7215
Direct Line - 910-796-7343
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.

2 Carteret General Hospital
Impervious Proposed
Buildings = 1"
Parking = RA--lrr (W
Sidewalks/Concrete =
Total =
Additional Proposed Impervious =
Exchanging Asphalt to Pervious Pavement =
(does not inicude the 850sf lower than elevation 22.5)
Additional Area Treated by Pervious Pavement =
Impervious treated by Ex. Infiltration Basin =
Impervious remaining in original DA 1, 2 & 3 =
(must be treated elsewhere onsite) w O
,
Total Impervious ef» (3U
Total Existing Impervious = ( 405*77Z $CPZW
Proposed Impervious
(25% Impervious) = 3
Total Proposed Impervious =
Total Impervious =
Total Area Treated by BMP(s)
Area treated by Ex. BMP =
Area treated by Pervious Pavement =
Effective BLIA with Treatment =
Proposed % Impervious with Treatment =
Additional Impervious Treated =
West Campus
Drainage Area =
Tota I =
45690 SF
33308 SF - Y)ef Q'"�J II ?
6460
85458 SF
29258 SF
22400 SF
22400 SF
43644 SF
14367 SF 5�7O1 I
349572 SF GK
85458 SF
5600 SF i�i�f l S ��I S ?
68658 SF 2
418230 ��
43644 SF
22400 SF
66044 SF
E4i586 SF
56.82 %
801 SF
132949 SF
?5+5S - SVn
�
f I OSOQ
_ (24-SQ Sf'
Ex. Buildings
Ex. Asphalt
Ex. Gravel
Ex. Concrete
892
2094
1283
56
996
496
1062
241
2305
34305
9062
20
759
680
450
473
268
738
2315
84
8829
441

Lewis,Linda
From: Ginger Turner <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 201410.40 AM
To: Lewis,Linda
Cc! [e-mail]; Weaver, Cameron; 'Ron Cullipher'
Subject: 14_0507 SW8 010220 Express Addinfo Response
Attachments: 13_0823 C2.PDF; 13_0428 C2.pdf, 050714 Revised Additional DA.pdf, 13_0801
Additional BUA to Pervious Pavement.pdf
Please accept this email as response to your review comments as stated below.
Thanks,
Ginger Turner, P.E.
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
107 B Commerce Street
Greenville, NC 27858
Office: [phone] ext 233
Fax: [phone]
Email Address: [e-mail]
From: Lewis,Linda fmailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 9:47 AM
To: Ginger Turner
Cc: [e-mail]; Weaver, Cameron
Subject: SW8 010220 Express Addinfo
Ginger:
The Division received the subject express application for Carteret County General Hospital on April 28, 2014. 1 offer the
following review comments:
1. 1 am still very unclear as to why the pre-1988 existing BUA has increased with each application over the years.
The narrative does not do enough to explain that. I still believe that the amount of existing pre-1988 BUA should
be a constant or might decrease, but never increase. A decrease might occur if some of it were being collected
and treated in lieu of treating new BUA, but I cannot understand how the amount of pre-88 BUA could ever
increase.
The modification submitted in 2013 is the first time I recall calculating the total BUA for the hospital campus. Please
compare Sheet C-2 from August 2013 (13 0823 C2.pdf) and April 2014 (14 0428 C2.pdf) which keeps the Pre-1988 BUA
at 347,387 square feet. I did not provide a separate column for Pre-1988 on the application submitted as indicated in
the permit issued 9/27/13. The hand written portion above the individual drainage areas do not reflect what is actually
included the columns. This naming of the columns was never discussed. Each column reflects the drainage area,
impervious area, whether existing or proposed, as shown in the colored drainage area map provided during that
submittal. In our meeting April 28, 2014 it was decided that the columns could be treated differently since the
application isn't geared towards redevelopment projects, so the application was modified as requested providing the
347,387 square feet of Pre-1988 BUA. .

2.= The drainage area number of the infiltration basin, which was #5 under the September 2013 permit, has now
changed to DA-10. Since the design parameters of the infiltration basin are not changing, I will revise the DA
number from 5 to 10 on the existing supplement form that was part of the 2013 permit, and add the new signed
0&M.
No response needed
For DA-3, the supplement and the calculations list the permeable pavement area as 2502 sf, but the drainage
area column on the application has it as 2052 sq. ft. Please correct the typo and submit a revised DA application
sheet.
The permeable pavement area for DA3 has been modified to 2,502 sf and is attached. (050714 Revised Additional
DA. pdf)
4. DA-5 and DA-7 listed on the application propose to direct more adjacent BUA onto the permeable pavement
than is allowed under the BMP manual,. The maximum amount of adjacent BUA that can be treated by a
permeable pavement is equal to the size of the permeable pavement. You cannot direct more BUA onto the
pavement, while only claiming credit for treating a smaller number. For both DA-5 and DA-7, no more than 3008
sq. ft. of additional BUA can be directed onto the permeable pavement for treatment. Although the
supplements and the calculations appear to use 3008 sq. ft. for adjacent BUA, the DA column from the
application reports larger numbers, 3596 and 3692 respectively, which do not agree with the supplements.
Please correct the DA columns and submit a revised DA sheet.
This was discussed during the last modification and it was determined that additional BUA could be directed to the
permeable pavement however no additional credit would be allowed. Please see the attached email. (13 0801
Additional BUA to Pervious Pavement.ndf)
S. Please note that the adjacent BUA being treated by permeable pavement is not "removed" from the impervious
calculation nor does it lower the net effective BUA or the percent impervious. Only the actual area of the
permeable pavement is subject to BUA crediting.
Not sure it + need to do anything for this item. I understand that it this area is not removed however it is treated which
allows the proposed redevelopment as proposed given the treatment maintains the Pre-1988 conditions. Please let me
know if I need to address this in any way.
Please submit the requested information by May 14, 2014.
Linda Levis
Environmental Engineer III
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Main Office — 910-796-7215
Direct Line — 910-796-7343
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.

Ginaer Turner
From: Lewis,Linda [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 8:59 AM
To: Ginger Turner
Subject: RE: Carteret General Hospital and Permeable pavement
Ginger:
Yes, Annette and others agreed that directing more than a 1:1 ratio to the permeable pavement would be fine,
with the caveat that you could only claim a credit for treating the BUA at a 1:1 ratio.
I hope that addresses all your questions and you are able to move forward in your design. Please let me know
if I can assist you in any other way.
Linda Lewis
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7215
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may
be disclosed to third parties.
From: Ginger Turner[maiito:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 12:19 PM
To: Lewis,Unda
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Carteret General Hospital and Permeable pavement
Linda,
Did Annette give you any indication when she might have the answers to my questions? We are soon in a position to
submit for a Fast Track submittal, however her responses may cause some significant revisions to the plan.
Thanks,
Ginger
From: Lewis,Unda fmailto:linda.lewis(&ncdenr.govl
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 11:10 AM
To: Ginger Turner
Cc: rcullipherCalstroudengineer.com
Subject: RE: Carteret General Hospital and Permeable pavement
Ginger- I'm going to have to defer the final answer to that question to our permeable pavement guru when she
returns to work on Monday the 29tn
For projects within Y2 mile of SA waters, the volume to treat for the new proposed BUA would be based on the
larger of the pre/post 1 yr 24 hr volume difference or the 1.5" volume. If the 1.5" volume is larger, I'd say you'd
be correct to design the pavement to detain/infiltrate the 1.5" volume.
Linda Lewis
NC Division of Water Quality

Lewis,Linda
From: Lewis,Linda
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 9:47 AM
To: 'Ginger Turner'
Cc: '[e-mail]'; Weaver, Cameron
Subject: SW8 010220 Express Addinfo
Ginger
The Division received the subject express application for Carteret County General Hospital on April 28, 2014. 1 offer the
following review comments:
1. 1 am still very unclear as to why the pre-1988 existing BUA has increased with each application over the years.
The narrative does not do enough to explain that. I still believe that the amount of existing pre-1988 BUA should
be a constant or might decrease, but never increase. A decrease might occur if some of it were being collected
and treated in lieu of treating new BUA, but I cannot understand how the amount of pre-88 BUA could ever
increase.
2. The drainage area number of the infiltration basin, which was #5 under the September 2013 permit, has now
changed to DA-10. Since the design parameters of the infiltration basin are not changing, I will revise the DA
number from 5 to 10 on the existing supplement form that was part of the 2013 permit, and add the new signed
O&M.
3. For DA-3, the supplement and the calculations list the permeable pavement area as 2502 sf, but the drainage
area column on the application has it as 2052 sq. ft. Please correct the typo and submit a revised DA application
sheet.
4. DA-5 and DA-7 listed on the application propose to direct more adjacent BUA onto the permeable pavement
than is allowed under the BMP manual,. The maximum amount of adjacent BUA that can be treated by a
permeable pavement is equal to the size of the permeable pavement. You cannot direct more BUA onto the
pavement, while only claiming credit for treating a smaller number. For both DA-5 and DA-7, no more than 3008
sq. ft. of additional BUA can be directed onto the permeable pavement for treatment. Although the
supplements and the calculations appear to use 3008 sq. ft. for adjacent BUA, the DA column from the
application reports larger numbers, 3596 and 3692 respectively, which do not agree with the supplements.
Please correct the DA columns and submit a revised DA sheet.
5. Please note that the adjacent BUA being treated by permeable pavement is not "removed" from the impervious
calculation nor does it lower the net effective BUA or the percent impervious. Only the actual area of the
permeable pavement is subject to BUA crediting.
Please submit the requested information by May 14, 2014.
Linda Lewis
Environmental Engineer III
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Main Office - 910-796-7215
Direct Line - 910-796-7343
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.

7
.,0 ENGINEERING, P.A.
107-B Commerce Street
GREENVILLE, NC 27858
[phone]
TO
VV I )5-
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
ILIEVIVMU2 W 4 c e LJV11MUVV&1L
DATE rs JOB NO.
ATTENTION
RE:
❑ Samples
the following items:
❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
/t
L/
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval
❑ For your use
?_'�'srequested
For review and comment
❑ FORBIDS DUE
REMARKS
❑ Approved as submitted
❑ Approved as noted
❑ Returned for corrections
❑ -
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
—
COPY TO
SIGNED.
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at o .

STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. L'G j
107-B Commerce Street -
GREENVILLE, NC 27858 O
022
[phone]anr ' �/+
TO f ('1� � Qiw�
WE ARE SENDING YOU
❑ Shop drawings
❑ Copy of letter
❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Change order ❑
11-ff4CEn W 4 ° a�CVM��44L�d
ATTENTION
BY' the ollowing items:
❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
�1
ROF01MAZZ0
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as c' eckedrel&4:1'�':' ) E�AI rr&a. �'�
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted
❑ As requested
For review and comment
/❑_FORBIDS DUE
REMARKS
❑ Returned for corrections
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
COPY TO
t
SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at on

For DENR Use ONLY
Reviewer: �•
At North Carolina Department of Environment and Submit
Natural Resources
NCDENR Request for Express Permit Review Time:
Confirm:
FILL-IN all the information below and CHECK the Permits) you are requesting for express review. Call and Email the completed form to the
Permit Coordinator along with a completed DETAILED narrative, site plan (PDF file) and vicinity map (same items expected in the application
ap ckaQe of the project location. Please include this form in the application package.
• Asheville Region -Alison Davidson 828-296-4698;alison.davidsonC ncdenr.aov
• Fayetteville or Raleigh Region -David Lee 919-791-4203; davidleewncdenrpov
• Mooresville & Ifnston Salem Region - Patrick Grogan 704-235-2107 or PatrickgroggpOncdenryov
• Washington Region -Lyn Hardison 252-948-3842 orlvn.hardisonOncdenrgov
• Wilmington Region Janet Russell 910-796-7302 or innet.russelldIncdenrgov
• Wilmington Region -Cameron Weaver 910-796-7303 or cameron.weaverdwncdenrgov
NOTE: Project application received after 12 noon will be stamped in the following work day.
acrnrits of Ri guest
Project Name: CARTERET GENERAL HOSPITAL County: CARTERET
Applicant: RICHARD A. BRVENIK, PRESIDENT Company: CARTERET COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION
Address: 3500 ARENDELL STREET City: MOREHEAD CITY, State: NC Zip: 28557-_
Phone: [phone], Fax: _ _ Email: [e-mail]
Physical Location:3500 ARENDELL STREET
Project Drains into BOGUE SOUND waters - Water classification SA (please visit here to look up stream Classification)
Project Located in WHITE OAK River Basin. Is project draining to class ORW waters? N, within % mile and draining to class SA waters Y or within
and draining to class HQW waters? YIN
Engineer/Consultant: GINGER TURNER, PE Company: STROUD ENGINEER, PA
Address:107 B COMMERCE STREET City: GREENVILLE, State: NC Zip: 27858-_
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone], Email: [e-mail]
SECTION ONE: REQUESTING A SCOPING MEETING ONLY
❑ Scoping Meeting ONLY ❑ DWQ, ❑ DCM, ❑ DLR, ❑ OTHER: .
SECTION TWO: CHECK ONLY THE PROGRAM (S) YOU ARE REQUESTING FOR EXPRESS PERMITTING
❑ 401 Unit ❑ Stream Origin Determination: _ # of stream calls - Please attach TOPO map marking the areas in questions
❑ Intermittent/Perennial Determination: _ # of stream calls - Please attach TOPO map marking the areas in questions
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification ❑ Isolated Wetland (_linear ft or acres)
❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization ❑ Minor Variance ❑ Major General Variance
mile
® State Stormwater ❑ General ❑ SFR, ❑ SFR < 1 ac. ❑ Bkhd & Bt Rmp, ❑ Clear & Grub, ❑ Utility ❑ Other
❑ Low Density ❑ Low Density -Curb & Gutter _ # Curb Outlet Swales ❑ Off -site [SW (Provide permit #)]
❑ High Density -Detention Pond _ if Treatment Systems ❑ High Density -Infiltration _ #Treatment Systems
❑ High Density -Bio-Retention _ # Treatment Systems ElHigh Density -SW Wetlands # Treatment Systems
® High Density -Other 90 Treatment Systems /® MOD:❑ Major ❑ Minor ❑ Plan Revision ❑ Redev, Exclusion SW (Provide permit #)
❑ Coastal Management ❑ Excavation &Fill ❑ Bridges & Culverts ❑ Structures Information
❑ Upland Development ❑ Marina Development ❑ Urban Waterfront
❑ Land Quality ❑ Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with 5 acres to be disturbed.(CK # (for DENR use))
SECTION THREE - PLEASE CHECK ALL THAT IS APPLICABLE TO YOUR PROJECT (for both scoping and express meeting request)
Wetlands on Site ❑ Yes ® No
Wetlands Delineation has been completed: ❑ Yes ❑ No
US ACOE Approval of Delineation completed: ❑ Yes ❑ No
Received from US ACOE ❑ Yes ❑ No
Buffer Impacts: ® No ❑ YES: —acre(s)
Isolated wetland on Property ❑ Yes ® No
404 Application in Process wl US ACOE: ❑ Yes ❑ No Permit
For iY NR use only
Fee Solit for multiple permits: (check # 1 - Tntal Fop Amm•d 4
SUBMITTAL DATES
Fee
- - - - - - -------- -
SUBMrrTAL DATES
Fee
LAMA
$
Variance (❑ Maj; ❑ Min)
$
SW (❑ HD, ❑ LD, ❑ Gen)
1
$
401:
$
LQS
$
Stream Deter,_
$
NCDENR EXPRESS June 2011

1V
Narrative
Stormwater Management Plan
Erosion & Sedimentation Control Plan
Carteret General Hospital
August 15, 2013
Revised: August 20, 2013
April 7, 2014
Owner:
Carteret General Hospital
Richard A. Brvenik, President
3500 Arendell Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
[phone]
Engineer: Stroud Engineering, P.A.
151-A Hwy 24
Morehead City, NC 28557
General Information
Carteret General Hospital received a modification to SW8 01022 on September 17, 2013 for the
construction of a major addition to the hospital which incorporated additional parking on the main
campus and a smaller parking area on west campus. It has been decided that more parking is needed
to meet the needs of the hospital so a larger parking area is being proposed on west campus. There
have also been a few minor changes to the main campus which are all incorporated into this
modification.
II. Stormwater Information
The site has been broken into two main Drainage areas with one being the Main Hospital (DA1, 9
& 10) campus and the second is the remaining acreage west of the main tract (DA2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8).
The existing impervious on the Main campus (606,964 square feet) is 405,772 square feet and 56,200
square feet will be removed during demolition. The proposed additions and parking areas total
85,458 square feet resulting in a net increase of 29,258 square feet.
The existing permit requires treatment for 58,385 square feet of impervious from the 2001
hospital expansion. The BUA within DA10 for the infiltration basin has remained the same and the
basin remains as permitted, treating 43,644 square feet. The original existing drainage areas 1-3 with
proposed modifications proposed 14,367 square feet of impervious which must be treated elsewhere
on the tract within the Main Campus. The site proposes that this area be treated within the pervious
pavement area designated as DA9. Approximately 22,400 square feet of the existing parking north of
the proposed pervious pavers drains to this BMP and receives credit for being treated. This decreases
the net effective BUA to 801 square feet less than the Pre-1988 impervious.
DA 2 (132,949 square feet) had a total of 72,474 square feet of Pre-1988 impervious. Of this
existing impervious 22,276 square feet have been removed from the tracts. This drainage area is
proposing a parking lot to maintain the required parking for the facility. The parking lot is 48,709
square feet of impervious which exceeds the allowable redevelopment of this tract by 26,433 square
feet. Pervious pavers are being proposed within the parking area to reduce the effective BUA of the

Carteret General Hospital
Page 2
drainage area. There are 16,100 square feet of pavers proposed and 10,647 square feet of additional
asphalt parking is being treated within the paver BMP. This provides an effective BUA of 72,161
square feet which is 314 square feet less than the existing impervious allowable.
III. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
The permit allows for 5.3 acres of disturbance, however the revised plan needs 5.83 acres of
disturbance. The application fee initially covered 6 acres. The following measures are proposed for
the site. If it becomes evident that additional erosion and sedimentation control measures are needed,
they shall be installed immediately. It is intended that all grading and excavation activities within a
certain area will be protected as soon as that activity is complete.
1. Sediment Fence — Sediment fence will be utilized as necessary in locations as shown on
plans or as deemed necessary by the engineer to insure that off -site sedimentation is
controlled.
2. Seeding — Soil stabilization shall be achieved on any area of the site where land -
disturbing activities have temporarily or permanently ceased according to the following
schedule:
a. Any areas steeper than 3:1 slope shall be provided temporary or permanent
stabilization within 7 calendar days from the last land -disturbing activity.
b. All other disturbed areas shall provide temporary or permanent stabilization
within 14 calendar days from the last land -disturbing activity.
3. Stone Construction Entrance — Stone construction entrance will be used to reduce
transport of sediment off site.
The site has been broken up into seven phases (See the attached Construction Sequence), with
each phase having close to one acre or less of land disturbance. The construction sequence requires
that each phase must be stabilized prior to the start of the next phase. The new parking located at the
employee parking lot (Phase 2) on the west portion of the main campus propose an excavation with
no fill within the area allowing for very little to no movement of sediment from the area disturbed.
4. Maintenance Plan
1. All erosion and sediment control measures shall be checked for stability and effective
operations following every runoff producing rainfall event or at least once per week.
Repairs required shall be completed immediately to the dimension and functions
indicated on the plans.
2. Sediment shall be removed from behind the sediment fencing when it becomes 0.5 feet
deep at the fence. The fence shall be replaced or repaired as necessary to maintain a
barrier.
3. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, seeded and mulched within 14 calendar days of
disturbance. Disturbed areas shall be fertilized, reseeded and mulched as necessary
according to the Contract documents to establish and maintain a dense vegetative cover.

............
ovAl
A
pot nv
LLJ
to
A
, ","`fir
Jr
If
J7
-941
q.;
er

<��
r�:
;tea; �<
���

se
• -i � 1�' l� a ��
x
JIB
IMF
,4

Weaver, Cameron
From: Ginger Turner [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 201410:00 AM
To: Weaver, Cameron
Cc: 'Ron Cullipher'; 'Trogdon, Carlton'; 'Dan Isenogle'; Lewis,Linda
Subject: FW: Carteret General Hospital (Express Modification)
Attachments: Revised REQUEST _FOR_EXRRESS.pdf
Cameron,
Please see the attached request. It has been requested by the Owner's Rep to have the submittal meeting on a
Monday. It may be best for us to meet with Linda since she is most familiar with the project and reviewed the last
modification.
a
Also plans need to be submitted for a Plan Revision to Land Quality due to removing and relocating disturbance areas.
The amount of disturbance has increased from 5.3 to 5.83, however the initial fee was for 6 acres.
Also please provide the express fee for this modification.
Let me know if you need any additional information.
Thanks,
Ginger` Turner, P.E.
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
107 B Commerce Street
Greenville, NC 27858
Office: [phone] ext 233
Fax: [phone]
Email Address: [e-mail]