20120615 Ver 1_Individual_20120625

1�m
0
U01
A world of 1
capabilities i,
delivered locally
0
610M,
-th
VP
f i T I I i 771 r7,71

February 2012
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project No 0636562024
Carolina Power and Light Company doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas Inc (PEC) is
submitting the enclosed Application for Department of the Army Permit (Application) for the proposed
Mayo Coal Combustion Product (CCP) Monof ll Site (hereafter referred to as site) in Person County
North Carolina The purpose of the Application is to seek authorization for impacts to jurisdictional waters
of the United States (U S ) that include filling intermittent streams and a perennial stream crossing that
are necessary to construct the proposed facility Due to the long term nature of the project PEC is
requesting authorization for the entire site but proposes to construct the CCP monofill in phases along
with the appropriate compensatory mitigation Therefore PEC proposes to construct only Phase I of the
project at this time and mitigate for Phase I impacts in accordance with the April 2008 Final
Compensatory Mitigation Rule The second and subsequent phases of the project will be mitigated for in
accordance with the mitigation standards applicable at the time stream impacts are to be taken
Compensatory mitigation for subsequent project phases will be proposed in advance of construction
activities when additional capacity in needed Information provided in this report provides additional detail
and clanfication beyond the standard Application forms
Waters of the U S were identified based on the 1987 U S Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) Wetland
Delineation Manual and the subsequently issued Regional Supplement to the USACE Wetland
Delineation Manual Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Streams were then classified as
perennial intermittent or ephemeral based on the Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and their Origins Version 411 issued by the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Raleigh NC
The Mayo CCP Monofill Site covers approximately 660 acres The site is located on the east side of
Woodys Store Road approximately 14 miles west of the intersection of Bethel Hill Road and Boston
Road (US 501) in Person County North Carolina (see Figure 1 Vicinity Map) The intersection of Bethel
Hill Road and Boston Road (US 501) is approximately 2 miles south of the Virgmia/North Carolina state
line on US 501
PEC evaluated four sites to determine the best location for the CCP monofill project The four potential
properties were owned by Progress and within close proximity to the Mayo Electric Plant The purpose of
this alternative site analysis was to avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the U S and maximizes the
CCP storage capacity The site and design selected by PEC avoids wetland impacts and reduces the
amount of stream impacts Additionally the size of the final CCP monofill footprint as proposed is a
condensed version of the original design footprint that further minimizes disturbance to waters of the U S
Through extensive alternatives analysis to avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the U S it has been
determined that no other alternatives exist to the proposed impacts
g 1proteds%progess energy ndmayo -rr s tel nd vndual- permdtp-020912 doex
02n Golder
Associates

February 2012 ES 1 Project No 0636562024
The proposed impacts total 4 676 75 linear feet of permanent stream impacts including 2 074 03 linear
feet impacts from Phase I PEC is seeking authorization from the USACE pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and from the NCDENR DWQ pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
g 1prolects1progess energy ndmayo- ecb- siteundividual- penmflip- 020912 docx
(VIOROGolder
Associates

February 2012
Project No 0636562024
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES 1
ITEMS 1 THRU 4
1
ITEMS 5 THRU 10 APPLICANT INFO
1
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
1
NAME LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
1
17 DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
2
18 NATURE OF ACTIVITY
2
Project Description
2
Base Liner System
2
Leachate Management System
2
Stormwater Management
3
Access Road
3
19 PROJECT PURPOSE
3
Purpose
3
Schedule
3
BLOCKS 20 23 DREDGED AND /OR FILL MATERIAL
4
20 Reason(s) for Discharge
4
21 Type(s) of Material Being Discharged
4
22 Surface Area in Acres
4
23 DESCRIPTION OF AVOIDANCE MINIMIZATION AND COMPENSATION
2
Avoidance and Alternate Site Analysis
2
Minimization
3
Compensation
4
24 IS ANY PORTION OF THE WORK ALREADY COMPLETE?
4
25 ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS
5
26 LIST OF OTHER CERTIFICATES OR APPROVALS /DENIALS
5
27 SIGNATURE
6
PROPERTY DETAILS
6
CLOSING
6
REFERENCES
7
g 1prolectsXprogess energy ncXmayo- ccb-site \individual- permitUp-020912 docx
Golder
Associates

February 2012
List of Figures
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Figure 2
Alternate Site Analysis Map
Figure 2A
Alternate Site A
Figure 2B
Alternate Site B
Figure 2C
Alternate Site C
Figure 2D
Alternate Site D
List of Drawings
Drawing 1 Site Development Plan
Drawing 2 Stream Impacts Map
List of Appendices
Appendix A NCEEP Mitigation Letter
g 1proledslprogess energy ndmayo- ccb- 8delmd vidual- permiNp-020912 docx
Project No 0636562024
(;= DO Golder
Associates

February 2012
Project No 0636562024
U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
OMB APPROVAL NO 0710 -0003
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
EXPIRES 31 AUGUST 2012
33 CFR 325
Public reporting for this collection of information Is estimated to overage 11 hours per response including the time for reviewing Instructions. searching
existing data sources gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of Information including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense
Washington Headquarters Executive Services and Communications Directorate Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget Paperwork Reduction Project (0710 -0003) Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of low no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of Information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having Jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10 33 USC 403 Clean Water Act. Section 404 33 USC 1344 Mamie Protection Research and Sanctuaries
Act. Section 103 33 USC 1413 Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers Final Rule 33 CFR 320.332. Principal Purpose Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit Routine Uses This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal state and local government agencies and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal low
Submission of requested information is voluntary however If information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be
Issued One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and/or Instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having Junsdwbon over the location of the proposed
activity An application that is not completed in full will be returned
ITEMS 1 THRU 4 (TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1 APPLICATION NO
2 FIELD OFFICE CODE
3 DATE RECEIVED
4 DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
ITEMS 5 THRU 10 APPUCANT INFO (TO BEFlU10 BY APPLICANT)
5 APPLICANTS NAME
8 AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE
(agent is not required)
First Steve Middle Last Cahoon
First William Middle J Last Thacker
Company Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc
Company Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc
E mad Address -
E mail Address steve cahoon @pgnmall com
6 APPLICANT S ADDRESS
9 AGENTS ADDRESS
10660 Boston Road
300 Spring Forest Drive
Roxboro, NC 27674
Raleigh, NC, 27616
7 APPLICANTS PHONE NOS w /AREA CODE
10 AGENTS PHONE NOS; WAREA CODE
a Business b Mobile c Fax
a Business b Mobile c Fax
336 -597 -7331
919 -546 7457 919632 -0129 919 - 646.4409
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11 1 hereby authorize 5MLif to act In my behalf as my agent In the processing of this
application and to furnish upon request s pplementaI information in support of this permit application
Z
SIGNA E OF APPLICANT DA E
NAME LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12 PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Mayo CCP Monofill Site
13 NAME OF WATERBODY (if known /applicable)
14 PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Bowes Branch
15 LOCATION OF PROJECT
Lat ( N) 78 924140 Lon ( W) 36 531610
16 OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID Municipality Person County
Section Township Range
ENG FORM 4345 OCT 2010 EDITION OF OCT 2004 IS OBSOLETE Proponent: CECW OR
4W►o�tsWtgestsanor ®Y ruVnaYarsb- SiteUnbw�Que►perndtUp-020�t�0oa
(btsodates O a r'

17 DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
The site is located on a vacant parcel of land owned by PEC approximately one mile west of US 501 from
the Mayo Plant The site is east of North Carolina Route 1327 ( Woodys Store Road) south of the Norfolk
Southern railroad right of way and west of Bowes Branch in Roxboro North Carolina (Figure 1)
From the Virginia/North Carolina state line drive south approximately 2 miles on Boston Road (US 501)
and turn west on Bethel Hill Rd Take the first right onto Woodys Store Road (Route 1327) and the site
entrance is approximately 14 miles on the right
18 Nature of Activity (Description of project include all features)
Proiect Description
PEC plans to construct a coal combustion product (CCP) monofill site at its Mayo Plant Modifications to
the Mayo Plant s current ash handling system and disposal methods are necessary Proposed
modifications include converting the current wet system for handling bottom ash to a dry system in order to
minimize environmental nsk Fly ash was converted in 2009 With this modification a new dry ash
monofill facility will be required The CCP monofill site will be a synthetically lined industrial landfill as
defined by state regulation with a leachate collection system for the disposal of CCPs generated from the
production of electricity The waste management unit will occupy approximately 103 8 acres of the 659 9
acre site Only CCPs from PEC power plants will be permitted into the proposed Mayo CCP Monofill
facility
Conceptual development of the site includes an approximate 103 8 acre monofill access roads leachate
tanks maintenance /office budding and potential future rail access to the site
Base Liner System
The proposed composite liner system will consist of the following components from top to bottom
• 24 inch granular protective /drainage layer
• Double -sided drainage Geocomposite (GC) with a triaxial geonet core
• 60 and high density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane
• Double -sided drainage Geocomposite (GC) with a triaxial geonet core
• 60 and high density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane and
• Gundseal (or equivalent) geosynthetic clay liner with bonded 60 and and high density
polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane
The composite liner system is proposed for use in all disposal areas as shown on the design plans
Leachate Management System
The leachate collection and removal system will include the following components
• 24 inch granular protective /drainage layer
• Network of leachate lateral and header collector pipes
• Double -sided drainage Geocomposite (GC) with a triaxial geonet core and
• Three leachate holding /storage tanks
g tprotects\progess energy ndmayoocb srteind dual- penmtup- 020912 docx
Golder
Associates

February 2012 3 Project No 0636562024
Stormwater Management
Stormwater management systems are included that meet state design criteria Within each disposal unit
or monofill phase a temporary system of berms dikes and one or more surface pumps and hoses will be
used to divert and transport uncontaminated stormwater from coming into contact with CCP material and
entering the leachate collection system
This will be accomplished by covering inactive areas with an intermediate cover and diverting stormwater
runoff to a temporary impoundment area for collection and then pumping or siphoning it to a drainage ditch
that flows directly into a sediment basin(s)
Access Road
A new access road is proposed to accommodate hauling vehicles for the transportation of CCPs from the
Mayo Plant to the proposed CCP monofill site This roadway will be owned operated and maintained by
PEC and access will be restricted This corridor will include a proposed bridge spanning Bowes Branch at
a point where the stream is 26 82 feet wide at the top of bank and the stream bed is approximately 16 feet
wide The proposed bridge will be 18 67 feet wide constructed with two (2) box culverts
19 Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project see instructions)
Purpose
CCPs are disposed of in industrial solid waste landfills and the proposed CCP monofill site is necessary
for the Mayo Plant to continue to operate The ash handling modifications and proposed CCP Monofill
are integral to ensure that a sufficient supply of power is available to the existing and future residents of
Person County and the surrounding area
The Mayo Plant uses a single unit coal fired boiler to generate 727 megawatt (MW) of electricity per
hour the single largest coal fired unit in PEC s system PEC has installed state -of the art flue -gas
desulfurization controls at the Mayo Plant to reduce emissions PEC anticipates its total emission - control
investment in the Person County plants to be about $800 million (1995 2009)
Flue gas desulphurization (FGD) products are classified as either wet or dry Wet products such as
those generated at the Mayo Plant are those produced by wet scrubbing and primarily consist of water
calcium sulfite /sulfate solids and small quantities of fly ash The wet FGD product may also contain
magnesium sulfite /sulfate barium sulfite /sulfate boron and traces of fly ash Wet FGD products are non
hazardous
CCPs are the byproduct of generating electricity from coal and include byproducts from the emission
controls The Mayo Plant generates approximately 180 000 tons of ash and 170 000 tons of gypsum and
other coal combustion byproducts per year As designed the monofill has approximately 55 years of
disposal capacity approximately 17 000 000 cubic yards
Schedule
The project will be constructed in multiple stages with the monofill expected to be in service by August
2013 Only a portion of the monofill the leachate tanks and the access roads will be developed in the
first five years of site operations The monofill is expected to be built in approximately 11 phases each
with an approximate 5 year capacity as required by State Regulation The anticipated construction
activities associated with the first phase 5 year phase of the facility will require approximately six months
The maintenance budding and rail access /unloading facilities may not be built during the first five years of
operation and have yet to be designed The date of the additional phases is dependent on site
operations and monofill usage Detailed designs of the maintenance budding and rail access /unloading
g 1projectslprogess energy ndmayo -cc -site\ nd wdual- wMitlip-020912 docx
= D%A
Golder
Associates

February 2012
4 Project No 0636562024
facilities will be produced and submitted to the Person County Planning Department for approval prior to
their construction
BLOCKS 20 23 DREDGED AND /OR FILL MATERIAL TO BE DISCHARGED
20 Reason(s) for Discharge
The majority of intermittent stream impacts will result from excavating the proposed monofill in
preparation for disposal of CCPs The remainder of intermittent stream impacts will result from
necessary grading and slope stabilization The perennial stream impact will result from the construction
of an access road to the proposed CCP monofill
21 Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Type — concrete Type — stone rip rap Type clean soil fill
Amount in cubic yards — 30 4 Amount in cubic yards 16 Amount in cubic yards unknown
The proposed road crossing will require triple box culverts and rip rap aprons within the stream channel
The proposed CCP monofill project is a synthetically lined industrial landfill for disposal of coal
combustion products Development of the monofill is expected to require approximately 16 million yards
of sod cut and 10 million yards of sod fill to achieve base grades (i a grades below the liner) Grading to
support the monofill will include either cutting or filling areas to grade and the quantities of cut/fill
associated with the stream impacts is not known
22 Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Construction equipment to be used will include excavators and dozers
Acres NA
or
Linear Feet The proposed Phase I impacts total 2 074 04 linear feet of permanent impacts to
streams 1990 04 intermittent streams and 84 linear feet are to perennial streams
The project total proposed impacts are 4 732 88 linear feet of permanent impacts to
streams 4 648 88 linear feet of intermittent and 84 linear feet of perennial streams
Phase
Impact ID
Linear Feet
Classification
_
HP
84 00 ft
perennial
d
XI
1 068 53 ft
intermittent
t
a
YI
921 51 ft
intermittent
Phase I Total
2 074 04
intermittent & perennial
II
308 34 ft
intermittent
y
MI
138 77 ft
intermittent
U)
NI
325 77 ft
intermittent
a
OI
242 62 ft
intermittent
d
TI
852 61 ft
intermittent
'
UI
790 75 ft
intermittent
U.
XI
1 068 53 ft
intermittent
YI
921 51 ft
intermittent
Future Phases Total
2 658 85 ft
intermittent
Pro ect Total
4 732 88 ft
intermittent 8 perennial
g 1projeetslprogess energy ncMayoccbsde \individual- penmt�p-020912 docx
9MI"Golder
Associates

23 Description of Avoidance Minimization and Compensation (see instructions)
An alternate site analysis was completed by Golder on the behalf of Progress that identified and
evaluated potential sites for the proposed CCP monofill The analysis initially identified four potential
properties owned by Progress within close proximity to the Mayo Plant (see Figure 2) The four sites
their suitability and impacts are discussed below
Site A
Potential Site A is located west of the Mayo Plant across US 501 and north of the Norfolk Southern rail
line as shown on Figure 2A The potential monofill footprint is located between two perennial streams
and straddles a public gravel surface road In order to develop a CCP monofill the public gravel road
would have to be relocated Based on a preliminary site assessment the proposed monofill would
impact several ephemeral /intermittent streams and forest wetlands Relocating the existing gravel road
would impact the perennial stream located north of the potential facility and is expected to result in
additional wetland impacts
Although a Jurisdictional Determination was not obtained to confirm the streams and wetlands on this
site it was estimated that 5 000 linear feet of perennial and intermittent stream impacts would result from
the preliminary monofill design
Due to the extent of site constraints the projected life of the facility would be approximately 20 years
Considering the amount of projected impacts to wetland intermittent and perennial streams and the low
projected life of the facility (approximately 20 years) Site A was not evaluated further for its potential
suitability as a CCP Monofill
Site B
Potential Site B is located west of the Mayo Plant across US 501 and south of the Norfolk Southern rail
line as shown on Figure 2B During a preliminary site assessment the proposed footprint was found to
impact multiple intermittent streams and two perennial stream reaches The estimated stream impacts
would exceed 10 000 linear feet Due to the extensive impacts to intermittent and perennial streams
siting a CCP disposal facility at Site B was not evaluated further
Site C
Potential Site C is located immediately southeast of the Mayo Plant between the Plant and Mayo
Reservoir as shown on Figure 2C The proposed CCP monofill would have been located on a northwest
trending upland area bound to the north and south by southeast trending drainages filled by waters of
the Mayo Reservoir Steep slopes on either side of the upland area have natural drainage features that
discharge to the reservoir
This site was extensively evaluated a subsurface investigation preliminary design and wetland
delineation (including submission of a Request for Jurisdictional Determination) were completed for this
site The wetland delineation identified several ephemeral and intermittent streams as well as extensive
wetland areas and portions of Mayo Reservoir
The estimated impacts resulting from the preliminary CCP monofill design would include approximately
one acre of wetlands and 4 000 linear feet of perennial and intermittent streams Preliminary design of
the proposed monofill was revised to avoid wetlands as much as possible but the resultant CCP monofill
had an expected life of less than 8 years Therefore due to the limited life stream impacts (after
redesign) proximity and potential impacts to Mayo Reservoir siting a CCP disposal facility at Site C was
not considered practicable and was not evaluated further
g \projectslprogess energy nclmayoccb-sitebnd vidual- permit\ip-020912 doex
9MI"Golder
Associates

Site D
Potential Site D is located west of the Mayo Plant across US 501 and south of the Norfolk Southern rail
line as shown on Figure 2D The proposed CCP monofill will be located on a northwest trending upland
area bounded to the east by a northeast trending drainage Steep slopes on either side of the upland
area have natural drainage features most becoming intermittent streams that flow east into Bowes
Branch a perennial stream or west into a perennial tributary to Bowes Branch
This site was extensively evaluated a subsurface investigation preliminary design and wetlands
evaluation (including submission of a Request for Jurisdictional Determination) were completed for this
site The wetlands evaluation indentified several ephemeral and intermittent streams within the site and
a perennial stream (Bowes Branch) with moderate wetland areas along the eastern project study limits
Phase I of the CCP monofill at Site D will impact approximately 1 990 linear feet of intermittent stream
and the access road will impact a small section of a perennial stream (approximately 84 linear feet)
Total project development of a CCP monofill at Site D will result in impacts to approximately 4 650 linear
feet of intermittent streams (including Phase 1) and the 84 linear feet of perennial stream impacts from
the access road However the proposed impacts associated with Site D are less than the amount of
impacts that would be necessary at the other Sites especially considering the proposed CCP monofill
facility at Site D will provide more than 50 years of disposal life No wetland impacts or perennial stream
impacts are necessary at Site D
Site D was selected for development of the CCP monofill due to the reduced amount of impacts to
intermittent streams lack of impacts to wetlands and perennial streams and the increased site longevity
of approximately 50 years
Minimization
The proposed impacts are the minimum necessary to satisfy the project purpose and need Impacts to
streams and wetlands were avoided to the greatest practicable extent Where intermittent stream
impacts were unavoidable measures were taken to minimize the areas affected The design and site
layout avoids all wetlands on the site Due to the dendritic pattern formed by the intermittent streams on
the site impacts to the smaller intermittent streams were unavoidable These intermittent streams
fragment the uplands and make most of the non wetland areas too small and misshapen for use as CCP
monofill sites The design team strove to minimize impacts to intermittent streams and this is evident in
that the proposed impacts are limited to the upper limits (headwaters) and intermittent streams that
fragment the usable upland space
The proposed CCP monofill requires an access road that the design team has successfully laid out to
avoid all stream and wetland impacts except an unavoidable crossing over Bowes Branch To minimize
impacts the road crossing is proposed at the location of an existing logging road crossing This area
already contains rip rap to provide stability for logging equipment
During the design process the limits of the CCP monofill were pulled back to avoid wetlands located
northeast of the proposed project and south of the rail road The original footprint was reduced to avoid
impacting the intermittent stream located south of the proposed CCP monofill The original footprint was
also reduced to minimize impacts to streams located west of the proposed CCP monofill
g tprotectstprogess energy ndmayo- ccb- site \jndividual- permit�p-020912 docx
!Golder
Associates

February 2012 4 Project No 0636562024
Compensation
Compensatory mitigation for the initial phase Is proposed through the purchase of credits from the North
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( NCEEP) The NCEEP is willing to accept payment for
compensatory mitigation for the Mayo CCP Monofill Site A copy of NCEEP s letter dated January 18
2012 is included in Appendix A
Compensation for the initial phase includes
HP 84 00 ft
XI 1 068 53 ft
YI 921 51 ft
Compensation for the initial phase totals 2 074 04 ft
No further disturbance is expected for 15 20 years after commencement of construction on the initial
phase Since the need for impacts to intermittent streams beyond the impacts associated with the initial
phase are anticipated 15 to 20 years from the date of this permit application no specific method of
providing compensatory mitigation is proposed at this time Compensatory mitigation for future stream
impacts beyond those required in the initial phase (Phase 1) will be provided by PEC in a manner that is
acceptable to the USACE at the time of taking Possible methods of providing compensatory mitigation
include preservation of perennial intermittent and ephemeral streams on the PEC s adjacent property
located east of the proposed monofill purchase of commercially available credits purchase of credits
from NCEEP payment of an in lieu fee or a combination of available compensatory mitigation approved
by the USACE
24 Is Any Portion of the Work Already Completes No If yes describe the completed work
9 \protectslprogess ene gy n6mayo- ccasite\md vidual-perm t\ p-020912 docx
920 Golder
Associates

25 Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners Lessees Etc Whose Property Adjoins the
Waterbod if more than can be entered here please attach a supplemental list
a Halls Agri Business 975 Claude Hall Rd Roxboro NC 27574
PIN 0021 00 05 5121 000 0010 00 86 2767 000 0011 00-60 5713 000
b James E Bowes 2048 Woodys Store Rd Roxboro NC 27574
PIN 0011 00 93 -6050 000
c Susie M Seamster 2000 Woodys Store Rd Roxboro NC 27574
PIN 0011 00 92 -6763 000
d Cannon Queen/Wllliam /Joi/Victo 2515 Bayberry Ct Burlington NC 27215
PIN 0021 00 02 1473 000
e Otelia Brandon & Others 156 Nanrne Brandon Rd Semora NC 27343
PIN 0011 00 92 -9292 000
f Willoree & Robert Perry PO Box 25010 Durham NC 27702
PIN 0021 00 01 -4813 000
g Donna Ray Lattimore 115 Wildwood Dr Morganton NC 28655
PIN 0021 00 01 3152 000
h Leron Brandon 304 Hawthorne Dr Roxboro NC 27574
PIN 0011 00 91 8680 000
i Louis Lawson 156 Nannie Brandon Rd Semora NC 27343 c/o Obra
PIN 0021 00 01 0120 000
Nathaniel Lawson 1550 Woodys Store Rd Roxboro NC 27574
PIN 0021 00 00 3628 000
k Johnny J Downy 1235 Woodys Store Rd Roxboro NC 27574
PIN 0020 00 19 0298 000
I Andrew H & Sheila Walker 1212 Woodys Store Rd Roxboro NC 27574
PIN 0020 00 29 0422 000
m Ronnie R Bowes 922 Woodys Store Rd Roxboro NC 27574
PIN 0020 00 28 3894 000 & 0020 00 28 5534 000
n Ronnie R & Kenneth Bowes 922 Woodys Store Rd Roxboro NC 27574
PIN 0020 00 38 1109 000
o Jonathan K Adam 890 Woodys Store Rd Roxboro NC 27574
PIN 0020 00 28 7249 000
p Ronnie R & Sandra H Bowes 922 Woodys Store Rd Roxboro NC 27574
PIN 0020 00 28 -6317 000
q Roy Kevin & Aimee Wllmoth 728 Woodys Store Rd Roxboro NC 27574
PIN 0020 00 37 3800 000
r Louisiana Pacific Corporation PO Box 130 New Waverly TX 77305
PIN 0020 00 57 0857 000 0020 00-67 8622 000 & 0020 00-68 -6834 000
s Jimmy & Sandra Blanks 930 RT Hester Rd Roxboro NC 27574
26 List of Other Certificates or Approvals /Denials received from other Federal State or Local
Agencies for Work Described in This Application
AGENCY
TYPE APPROVAL
IDENTIFICATION
NUMBER
DATE APPLIED
DATE APPROVED
DATE DENIED
USACE
JD
201100181
8/3/2010
1/27/2011
NA
NCDENR
PFD **
10/27/2010
3/21/2011
NA
Would include but is not restricted to zoning building and flood plain permits
* *PFD = perennial flow determination
g kprojects\progess energy ncMayoccbsdeWdrvadual- permrtup- 020912 dom
Golder
Associates

February 2012 6 Project No 0636562024
27 Signature
Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application 1
certify that this information in this application is complete and accurate I further certify that I possess the
authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant
SIGNATUR O AP ICA DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant)
or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement In block 11 has been filled out and signed
18 U S C Section 1001 provides that Whoever in any manner within the Jurisdiction of any department
or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies conceals or covers up any trick scheme
or disguises a material fact or makes any false fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or
makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false fictitious or fraudulent
statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both
PROPERTY DETAILS
Applicant/Owner Progress Energy Carolinas Inc
USGS Quad Cluster Springs
Watershed Lower Dan (HUC 03010104)
Neares - Waterway Bowes Branch
CLOSING
Please review the information enclosed in this Application for a Department of the Army Permit and
contact William Thacker at [phone] If you have any questions or need additional information
Thank you in advance for your time and assistance
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS INC
William J Thacker
KLVS /CH
Go
9aro0axlproaossenergy nc-4oad-sdeUNbv4at-PWmrip 420.712d0a (VA mlri i Im s

REFERENCES
Project No 0636562024
Cowardin L M V Carter F C Golet and E T LaRoe 1979 Classification of wetlands and deepwater
habitats of the United States U S Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Seance Washington
DC
National List of Hydric Sods 2010 United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource
Conservation Service http / /sods usda qov /use /hydric/
National Soil Information System (NASIS) database selection criteria for hydnc soils
http / /sods usda qov /use /hydric /criteria html
NC Division of Water Quality 2010 Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams
and their Origins Version 4 11 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality Raleigh NC
Radford A E H E Ahles and C R Bell 1968 Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas
University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill N C
Web Soil Survey United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service
http / /websoilsurvev nres usda qov /app/
U S Army Corps of Engineers 2010 Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region ed J S Wakeley R W Lichvar C
V Noble and J F Berkowitz ERDC /EL TR 10 9 Vicksburg MS U S Army Engineer Research and
Development Center
USDA NRCS 2010 PLANTS Database Natural Resource Conservation Service U S Department of
Agriculture Accessed June 2010 (http //plants usda aov /)
U S Fish and Wildlife Service 1988 National list of vascular plant species that occur in wetlands U S
Fish & Wildlife Service Biological Report 88 (26 9)
U S Fish and Wildlife Service 1993 1993 supplement to list of plant species that occur in wetlands
Northeast (Region 1) Supplement to U S Fish & Wildlife Service Biological Report 88 (26 9)
United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory http / /www fws Qov /nwi/
Wetland Training Institute 1995 Field Guide for Wetland Delineation 1987 Corps of Engineers Manual
Wetland Training Institute Glenwood NM USA
g \projects\progess energy n6mayo- ccb- siMndividual -perm Np-020912 docx
Golder
Associates

Figures
and
Drawings

N
VIRGINIA �..
Btu W.W a.aw�..��a�.�•1.+`*iti Ti7i •ff�7�. �. w.�.�.�.«r• .��4Va�w w.�,�•y�w�•�r +���.#17
tttt r NORTH CAROLINA
f.
,
-
ti
•
s
f
4
I
y
r
n
03010104 H
Mayo Stea
Electric Phant`�.
�i-
A" W2 �
' y
h.r • _ � � III y"
Legend
r.
Projection: NAD 1983. = Project Study Limits
0 2,050 4,100
Feet
1 in = 2,000 feet
2108 W Labumum Ave. Project: Title
aiRichmond, VA 23227 0636562024
Golder Date: 8 -31 -2011
Associates Design:
File: Review: Clier
WetlandMapinxd
Progress Energy
VICINITY MAP
Mayo CCP Monofill Site
Person County, North Carolina
Progress Energy Figure 1

• �r
S
s , U.A • r "O • (lR'*
e
\ ®i

ft ,
Legend
® Alternate Site Boundaries
ftgress
0 500 1,000 Corporations, Surdex, 200904, Person County, NC 2008 1" = 100' Orthophotography.
Feet Projection: NAD 1983.
1 in = 500 feet
2108 W Labumum Ave. Project: Title
- -1 Richmond, VA 23227 0636562024 ALTERNATE SITE C
►� Date:
Golder 10 -12 -2011 Mayo CCP Monofill Site
Associates Design: Person County, North Carolina
File: Review: Client
Fig- 2C- AlternateSiteC.m d Progress Energy Figure 2C

. sue,^' ♦ ,a
t
t 1
' I 1
I
� 1
1
I4 1
I 1
1 .
I
1
o I
f 0
f l"
e
x n
L�
I 4r
- - -
•
I
�
,
f
I
f
I
,
f
I
I 4r
- - -
•

ROAD SURFACE: 396'
393'
— 389.5'
FLOW - - - 11 - - - - - - - FLOW - - - - -I INV. 381'— — J - FLOW
8" COMPACTED #57 STONE
(TO LEVEL CULVERT)
1'COMPACTED ROAD BASE
8" COMPACTED #57 STONE /
(TO LEVEL CULVERT)
CONCRETE LIP FORMED /
TO PREVENT LOW FLOW /
FROM ENTERING CULVERT
8'X8' MAXIMUM FLOW BOX CULVERT
(10" WALL THICKNESS). INVERT
ELEVATION SET AT 382.25
NOTES
1. BOX CULVERT TO BE OVER EXCAVATED AND PLACED WITH
INVERT ELEVATION AT EXISTING STREAM ELEVATION
(AP PROX. 382')
2. CONCRETE WING WALLS TO BE REINFORCED AND CAST IN
PLACE.
3. DRAWING IS NOT TO SCALE. DETAILED CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS TO BE PROVIDED.
EXISTING SUBGRADE
COMPACTED STRUCTURAL
FILL
CAST IN PLACE
CONCRETE WINGWALL
B'XB' LOW FLOW BOX CULVERT
(10" WALL THICKNESS). INVERT
ELEVATION SET AT 381' AS BEDROCK
ALLOWS. MAXIMUM INVERT AT 382'.
REV OAIE OES REMSON DESOIP11014 CAM CHK RVW
PROJECT
MAYO CCP MONOFILL SITE
PERSON COUNTY, NC
STREAM CROSSING SECTION
PROJECT No 0636562.024 FILE No.
DESIGN CH 1 2/21/12 1 SCALE Nis RI
CADD LKB 2/21/12
a }pQ CHECK DWG 2
GREEN980RO, NC REMEW

Appendix A
NCEEP Mitigation Letter

!r ;10-
mJL
PROGRAM
January 18, 2012
Steve Cahoon
CP & L ft/a/ Progress Energy Carolinas
410 South Wilmington St
Raleigh NC 27601 Expiration of Acceptance July 17 2012
Project Mayo CCP Monofill Site County Person
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below Please
note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for project impacts It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be
approved You must also comply with all other state federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated
with the pMsed activity including SL 2009 337 An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by
S L 2011 343
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire It is the applicant s
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP Once NCEEP receives a copy of the pennrt(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www nceep net
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table The amount of mitigation required for this impact is determined by permitting agencies
Impact
River
Basin
CU
Location
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
(Sq Ft )
Buffer II
(Sq Ft )
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Roanoke
03010104
0
1 0
2075
0
0
0
0
0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation The mitigation will be performed in
accordance with the N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program In Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28 2010
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Kelly Williams at
[phone]
Sincerely
Mich Ihson
Deputy Director
cc Karen Higgins NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Eric Alsmeyer USACE Raleigh
Lauren Witherspoon NCDWQ Raleigh
File
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program 1652 Mail Sernce Center Raleigh NC 27699 -1652 / 919- 715-0476 / www nceep net

At Golder Associates we strive to be the most respecte4l global group of
companies specializing in ground engineering and environmental services.
Employee owned since our formation in 11b6Q, we have created a unique•
culture with pride in ownership, resulting in long -term organizational stability.
Golder professionals take the time to build an understanding of client needs
and of, the specific environments in which they operate. We continue to expand
our technical capabilities and have experienced steady growth with employees
now operating from offices located throughout Africa, Asia, Australasia,
Europe, North America and. South America.
(07,VIA
Africa
+ 27 11 254 4500
Asia
+ 852 2512 3658
Australasia
+ 61 3.9862 3500
Europe
+ 356'2142 30 20
North America
+ 1 900 275 3281
South America
+ 55 21.3095 5500
solutimst?a'Nder.com
www.5oldercom