20201479 Ver 1_More Info Received_20210219

Strickland, Bev
From: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2021 11:21 AM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA); Homewood, Sue
Cc: Haywood, Casey M CIV (USA)
Subject: RE: [External] RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
Attachments: Riley's Meadow JD Request_Updated.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Chris,
I have attached the updated PJD document to include the minor changes from last week. Thanks again for a productive
and efficient site visit. I have asked the engineer to look at the small wetland we added near the crossing to see if it
would be affected. If so, I will send an updated permit drawing and any impact data. Please let me know if you have
any questions.
Have a good weekend.
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Senior Scientist — Natural Resources
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2401 Brentwood Rd., Suite 1071 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
D [phone] 1 M [phone]
ieff.harbour(o)terracon.com I terracon.com
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 2:57 PM
To: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>; Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; josh
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>; Haywood, Casey M CIV (USA)<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
Thanks, Jeff:
The Agent Authorization Form specifies tracts 152456 and 152443. The access you propose would traverse 152472. We
are glad to first meet where you propose, but unless the form can be updated, Casey and I will wait by the vehicles until
we can relocate to the cul-de-sac on Atlas Drive. We'll view the crossing from 152456.
We have another site visit after this and are eyeing the weather tomorrow. We're also interested in being as expedient
as possible tomorrow.

Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 35
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey can
be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser:
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0. Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete
the survey.
From: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 12:50 PM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA)
<[e-mail]>; josh <[e-mail]>

Cc: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>; Haywood, Casey M CIV (USA)<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
I would recommend that we initially meet at the following coordinates: 36.0544,-79.3430
This will get us to the sewer crossing location much faster and from there we can see the other few items that were
delineation. This is also land is owned by the Scotts and we have permission through the agent authorization.
Then if you wanted to g arou8nd to the other side then we can. I only have 3 hours tops to be onsite tomorrow so we
need to make it as efficient as possible. See you all at 10am
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Senior Scientist — Natural Resources
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2401 Brentwood Rd., Suite 1071 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
D [phone] 1 M [phone]
jeff.harbour(o)terracon.com I terracon.com
From: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 11:13 AM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>; Harbour, Jeff W
<[e-mail]>; josh <[e-mail]>
Cc: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>; Haywood, Casey M CIV (USA)<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
Thanks for confirming Chris.
I'll see you all there unless someone suggests a different meeting location.
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
Sue. [e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
ti... x... t x.t x. V ..+x.. ;x. ... x x. .. ..
t x.: ,..,,.. €,. e rh* a ,.°.ra ...#..a++
+.,:.
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 10:13 AM
To: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>; josh <[e-mail]>; Homewood, Sue
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>; Haywood, Casey M CIV (USA)<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Good Morning, Everyone:
I'm writing to confirm tomorrow's site visit at 10 am for Riley's Meadow, and to firm up a meeting location. It appears
the cul-de-sac immediately west of the site provides the most direct access (36.049041-79.347902). Does this sound like
a good spot to meet, or did you have somewhere else in mind Jeff? If this has already been shared, my apologies for the
oversight.
They're calling for rain, but through the morning and early afternoon the amounts are very low (0.03 in./hr).
Thanks!
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 35
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey can
be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser:
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0. Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete
the survey.
From: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 1:03 PM
To: Josh Johnson <[e-mail]>; Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA)
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
Josh,
We did not request a determination from Sue and just submitted the PCN for the 401 WQC. The soils map makes it
extremely hard to ID mapped features as you can see. The main stream along the north boundary is buffered and the
mapped feature along the east side has an origin point just inside the site. We will look at it with Sue next week
Sue, I do think the original soil map I sent with the PCN is incorrect. This one should be accurate
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Senior Scientist — Natural Resources
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2401 Brentwood Rd., Suite 1071 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
D [phone] 1 M [phone]
ieff.harbour(o)terracon.com I terracon.com
From: Josh Johnson <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 10:51 AM

To: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>; Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Hopper,
Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [External] RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
Good Morning Jeff,
We can (and will) accept Sue's field determination or you can coordinate directly with us on the field work. I've
copied Phil Ross onto this email if you need to coordinate the field work. A first step in that would be to
submit a copy of the package that you submitted to DWR. For the actual buffer authorization, you'll need to
complete the attached authorization application and include with it the appropriate exhibits and the field
determination from Sue.
Thanks
Joshua S. Johnson, P.E.
Vice President, Head of Engineering
Alley, Williams, Carmen, and King, Inc.
Tel. [phone]
Cell: [phone]
From: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 10:35 AM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA)
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Josh Johnson <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
Josh,
Just checking with you regarding this email string.... Thanks
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Senior Scientist — Natural Resources
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2401 Brentwood Rd., Suite 1071 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
D [phone] 1 M [phone]
ieff.harbour(o)terracon.com I terracon.com
From: Harbour, Jeff W
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 11:29 AM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA)
<[e-mail]>

Cc: josh <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
Thanks Sue. Josh, please let me know what you may need from me regarding this proposed project.
Regards,
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Senior Scientist — Natural Resources
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2401 Brentwood Rd., Suite 1071 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
D [phone] 1 M [phone]
jeff.harbour(o)terracon.com I terracon.com
From: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 9:59 AM
To: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>; Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA)
<[e-mail]>
Cc: josh <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
Hi Jeff,
On another note, the Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer rules are delegated to the local municipalities to implement, therefore
my review and final decision will not include the impacts you listed on the PCN for the riparian buffers. Those will have
to be applied for and approved by the Town. I'm copying Josh Johnson with Alley, Williams, Carmen and King who is
contracted by the Town to handle their buffer program. See you in a couple weeks.
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
Sue. [e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
... *.. t ...:.... xs.....s s.ux
From: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 10:20 AM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.

Chris,
By "application" are you referring to a PJD request? If so, I can put together and get it to you asap. 10am on the 11t" is
good.
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Senior Scientist — Natural Resources
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2401 Brentwood Rd., Suite 1071 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
D [phone] 1 M [phone]
[e-mail] I terracon.com
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 6:00 AM
To: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
Thanks, Jeff:
You are correct that a PJD doesn't have to be issued to secure a permit, but in my system I first have to identify a feature
as subject to 404 before I can authorize impacts to it. All stream lengths/widths/permanence/names and wetland
areas/types/etc. need to be recorded. If an application was prepared, please send it along so I can establish my
jurisdiction to issue a permit.
It sounds like the 11t" of February is a common date — lets aim for 10am?
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 35
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey can
be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser:
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0. Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete
the survey.
From: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 6:01 PM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
I am open the 11t". The delineation was straight forward with no problem areas. Therefore I didn't submit a PJD
request since its not a requirement for the application. The one main stream is the only mapped and buffered feature
that we encountered onsite. No features that we are asking for a buffer exemption on. Let me know what time and
we'll set it up.

Thanks
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Senior Scientist — Natural Resources
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2401 Brentwood Rd., Suite 1071 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
D [phone] 1 M [phone]
jeff.harbour(o)terracon.com I terracon.com
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 5:04 PM
To: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
Thanks for the agent authorization form, Jeff:
You mention in the application that areas have been delineated but no verification has been performed. I looked
through my files but I don't see an application pending for this site. Has one been submitted (I've only had Alamance
County for about a year so it's possible I need to retrieve that from someone else)?
I'd like to set up a site visit for this if possible. At the moment I have February 5, 10, and 11 open. I have cc'd Sue
Homewood to check her availability as well. The local governments often request a staff member participate due to
their riparian buffer program (as an FYI).
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 35
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey can
be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser:
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0. Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete
the survey.
From: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 9:15 AM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] FW: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
Did you have questions about the application?
Thanks
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Senior Scientist — Natural Resources
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2401 Brentwood Rd., Suite 1071 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

D [phone] 1 M [phone]
jeff.harbour(o)terracon.com I terracon.com
From: Harbour, Jeff W
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 1:03 PM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
Chris,
See attached, sorry about that
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Senior Scientist — Natural Resources
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2401 Brentwood Rd., Suite 1071 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
D [phone] 1 M [phone]
ieff.harbour(o)terracon.com I terracon.com
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 9:24 AM
To: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>
Subject: SAW-2021-00065 - Riley's Meadow Subdivision
Good Moring Jeff:
Can you please complete the agent authorization letter included in your application (name, email, phone, address, site
information — are all left blank). Once I receive it I have a couple questions for you about the application.
Thanks in advance,
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 35
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey can
be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser:
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0. Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete
the survey.

v»u
+m.ee GRAHAM
mve
nnn
Im4m
1"WI
Imem
z "ex � inm

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington NsNct
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (J➢) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http:Ilwww.saw.usace.army.milIMissions/Regulatg PermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aWx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: (919) 5544884
Fax Number: (9.19) 562-0421
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requesters must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOTIUSACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 1822 Cherry Lane
City, State:
County:
Haw River, NC
Alamance
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 152443 and 152456
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Jeff Harbour
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address
Select one:
Terracon, 2401 Brentwood Rd, Suite 1(
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-805-4208
[e-mail]
❑ I am the current property owner.
�✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: see attached
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
i Must provide completed Agent Authorization FormlLetter.
Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION' 4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner
2/2/2021
Date
Signature
0 Authorized Agents
I I Dlglm y &/goad by Harbour, Jaff W
ar ❑urf DP4 GrnHal!leer, Jaff W,
Jeff W Date 202 02.0022I a::OB 1C05W
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to constructldevelop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOTfUSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owners).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approve d JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
parry" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
® I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
❑ Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
❑✓ Size of Property or Review Area +1- 65 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
36.0517
Longitude:-79.3422
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11 x 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Nan -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. htW://www.saw.usace.army.nullMissions/RegElatory-Permit-
Prop,ram/Juri sdictionl
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AdDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Formg
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
1-1 NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
❑ Other Assessment Forms
www.saw.usace.army.millPortals/59/dots/regulatory/repdocs(JDIRGL_08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.millMissions/RegulatoU-Permit-ProgramlJurisdictionl
Principal Purpose: The infonnation that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Jeff Ffarbour, Telr8Con. 2401 Brentwood Rd, suite 107, Raleigh, NC 27604
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Alamance City: Haw River
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 36.0517 Long.:-79.3422
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Haw River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH -MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated amount
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority
number
(decimal
(decimal
of aquatic resource
resource (i.e., wetland
to which the aquatic
degrees)
degrees)
in review area
vs. non -wetland
resource "may be"
(acreage and linear
waters)
subject (i.e., Section
feet, if applicable)
404 or Section 101404)
WA
36.0518
-79.3451
.1
wetland
404
WB
36.0511
-79.3424
El
wetland
404
SA
36.0517
-79.3442
2,000
non -wetland waters
404
S B
36.0517
-79.3428
300
non -wetland waters
404
SC
36.0478
-79.3414
25
non -wetland waters
404
WC
36.0526
-79.3465
0.04
wetland
404

9 ) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJ❑ before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based an a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there `may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there `may be"navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester:
Map: Potential Wetlands and Waters
❑■ Data sheets preparedlsubmitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey maps). Cite scale & quad name:
1:24000 Mebane, NC
X Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: N RC5 1960
❑ National wetlands inventory maps). Cite name:
❑ Statellocal wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMAIFIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): Potential wetlands and waters April 2020
or ❑■ other (Name & Date): Landscape photos April 2020
❑ Previous determinations). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ other information (please specify): PJd Is hemg rersu�rwt by the NC D��:s�on or ErtergV. Mrrrml a Land Resources as nor[ urine owners rrikiing perm:[ renewal
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
{� �{ Digitally egnatl 6y 1.ro—, Jeff W
Harbour, JeII VV ena�kaocUir@�r cenerauses,
DoW 2021.02.6213-11:04-001 '
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
Districts may establish timeframes far requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to f€naIizing an action.

Riley's Meadow, Alamance County, NC
Property Owners Involved
Parcel ID: 152443 Deed Book/Page 0290/0585
SCOTT JANET L ETAL
2921 LENOX RD NE UNIT 205
ATLANTA, GA 30324
Parcel ID: 152456 Deed book/Page 559/439
SCOTT ASSOCIATES
C/O MIKE WHITE
5500 TILLEY LN
GASTONIA, NC 28056

r
V
-J
w
5 �/. r �t• •� g� J P
4... I /• q `��
•• � y Aiter�de � _ � \ \ \r�r-
Project Study Area
Location and extent is approximate. ��-
0 1000 2000 aIN
b
d
Feet
Source: 2011 National Geographic Society/ESRI,
L.%
i-cubed seamless USGS quadrangles (Mebane, �'� /
NC); Project Study Area approximated by ESI -
based on Alamance County Parcel Data. • '� ,
Disclaimer: The information depicted in this file is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for and is
notsuitable forlegal orengineering purposes. This -.• • 't
information presented is not for regulatory review and is
intended for use only byaProfessional Land surveyor prior
to regulatory review.
,T
IN
o �•, ��
_ 6m ,
611
614
e •a ,
i• .
Fear River Basin
• so. wvriaht:© 201
Project Location Project: HL207195
Irerracon Date: Jan 2021
Riley's Meadow
Drwn/Chkd: CW/JH
Alamance County, North Carolina Figure: 1
;\2020\HL297195_Rileys Meadow\Maps\Topo.mxd Date: 1/4/2021 4:04:46 PM

SA and SC are subject to a 50 - foot Jordan Lake Watershed Riparian Buffer. Flagging Sequence
Buffer for SC starts at SC buffer origin point. N
SA: 1-55
USACE and NCDWR site visit was conducted on 2/11/21
����,� �SB: 1-1111
SC: 1-8
SHA:1-8'
WA: 1-8
WB:1-19
WC WC: 1-6
E
Project Study Area
Potential Wetlands of the US
Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the US (Stream)
• SC buffer origin
Location and extent is approximate.
0 250 500
Feet
Source: Latest High -Resolution NC Statewide Orthoimagery, NC OneMap Server; Project
Study Area approximated by ESI based on Alamance County Parcel Data.
Disclaimer: The information depicted in this file is forinformational purposes only and was not prepared for
and is notsuitable forlegal orengineering purposes. This informaton presented is not for regulatory review
and is intended for use only by a Professional Land Surveyor prior to regulatory review.
WB
�Z.,-
SC buffer
origin
Cape Fear River Ba i
Potential Wetlands and Waters Project: HL207195
Irerracon Date: Feb 2021
Riley's Meadow
Drwn/Chkd: CW/JH
Alamance County, North Carolina Figure: 3
\GIS\2020\HL207195_RileysMeadowNapsWerial—c! Date: 2/19/20218:27: 12 AM

Project No. HL207067 IrLff7C011
coe»ftlog e.el—L a s�WonLLL
9:Lrx a •- .•ti, : :r': �7•:'-.--� _.:� �• i. �� � •: �.. r. 1 ri ,
fA
i "v k•Je
•3 Sin;•,'
> - - •� "„� � � '�'e may=;. ,�r�;'.�ylsA'F;, �yi�
P""'•y�. I.. �s - � � i�:i::� •... '{�:.a;'r . ' � �' - .fir � --�v � ,� . _ . �•q. - _
]] .,} �, - ':�'IA-:�� : -fin' `".-�•' '.='r��'� _. i �•
�i.' . yam:*�: •."''�;:.'_•._wr�' }} ... �:f .^ ._ � r.< •:
�y� : :ice, {� ....;. -y1 '��,• ::»': '.*.
Photograph 3: SB upstream.
'��'�.:- d .�4'a if �; l,,{{�•�b;,L Sr i�.s '~�
rir' - __ • . it �•r••` �I .y.11 � ,
-----------
it
Y _
Ati
' i. 1 fr.i" :;'ass �� i':� �y;'c':ad5;•i,isy •'i'� .
IF
j��y.�.;r a �,�: ' • � �'6w.�i rte �-.� � '• � -
��yy its e � ��� i� `,,^•" : � ..=y��L:i �• �?`,�, y: �': .;^ `Y �7.,.
Ir .�� I �a� �Vf • r: �'��.': hr. `�.. � .: � '7 ri�.ii,��ii• J•i ' � ,i..•-f r� a
Photograph 4: SB downstream draining to SA.
Scott Property

" NN
mo
fe,
N

1.7
W I �d..' .
F, � 1.
1 . . m 0
4-1 -
Vj
74z.
:AR
1

ocel
kill
A
•
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7ij'
8 L
PC
Ir W 14
"Ar I d 31
a

Project No. HL207067
1 ierracon
C.... IIiug E.11 , a S�Wvht,
Photograph 13: Clear cut area in the northeastern section of the property.
Scott Property

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecVSite: Scott Property City/County: Alamance Sampling Date: 30 Mar, 2020
Applicant/Owner: Carolina Land Group State: NC Sampling PointWA up
Investigator(s): ESI-R, Graham Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none). Convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat-. 36.05190 Long: -79,34513 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Cullen clay loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes, moderately eroded NWI classification: NA
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ Na (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators.
Secondary indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators [minimum of one is required: check all that apply]
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1 ]
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (Bi)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (152)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
T Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust {84)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (65)
Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC-Neutral Test {D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): NA
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): '20„
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): '20"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA up
Tree Stratum [Plot size: 30ft. X 30ft. )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Quercus alba
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 30
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 301t. X 30ft.
1 Acer rubrum
7 Carolnus caroliniana
4.
5.
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OSL, FACW, or FAG:
3
(A)
15 Yes FAC
25
Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
20
Yes
FACU
Species Across All Strata:
7
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG:
42 86%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
20% of total cover:
12
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
_
FACW species 0 x 2 =
0
15
Yes
FAC
FAC species 50 x 3 =
150
15
Yes
FAG
FACU species 75 x 4 =
300
UPL species 0 x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 125 (A)
450
(B)
7.
8.
9.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft. X 30it. )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 No FAC
2 Podophyllum peltatum 15 Yes FACU
Prevalence Index = BIA = ' .0 I
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' {Explain}
g Elaeagnus umbellata 10 Yes FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4 Lonicera japonica 5 N❑ FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6 Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7. height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10. m) tall.
11 • Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
35 = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover: 1705 20% of total cover: 7
30ft. X 30ft. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ] height,
1. none present
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA up
Profile Description: (describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 313 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11 ]
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrx.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SoiW.
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al0) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyyalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (FS)
Very Sha]low Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Flcodpiain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecVSite: Scott Property City/County: Alamance Sampling Date: 30 Mar, 2020
Applicant/Owner: Carolina Land Group State: NC Sampling PointWA wet
Investigator(s): ESI-R, Graham Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none). Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat-. 36,05189 Long: -79•34518 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Cullen clay loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes, moderately eroded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ Na (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators.
Secondary indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators [minimum of one is required: check all that apply]
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
✓ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1 ]
✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (Bi)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (152)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
T Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust {84)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (65)
Geomorphic Position (132)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test {D5)
Field observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 3"
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): Surface
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA wet
Tree Stratum [Plot size: 30ft. X 30ft. )
1. none present
2.
3.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 0
Sao€inalShrub Stratum (Plot size: 301t. X 30ft.
1 none present
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OSL, FACW, or FAG:
4
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
4
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG:
100%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply
by:
= Total Cover
0
0
20% of total cover: 0
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species a x 2 =
0
FAC species 0 x 3 =
0
FACU species a x 4 =
0
UPL species 0 x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 0 (A)
0
(B)
7.
8.
9.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft. X 30it. )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2 Carex lurida 10 Yes OBL
Prevalence Index = B/A = I
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' {Explain}
g Acer negundo 5 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4 Juncus effusus 5 Yes OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6 Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7. height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10. m) tall.
11. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
25 = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover: 1205 20% of total cover: 5
30ft. X 30ft. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ] height,
1. none present
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA wet
Profile Description: (describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tyne Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 412 95 10YR 316 5 C M CL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11 ]
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrx.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SoiW.
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al0) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyyalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Very Sha]low Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Flcodpiain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecVSite: Scott Property City/County: Alamance Sampling Date: 30 Mar, 2020
Applicant/Owner: Carolina Land Group State: NC Sampling PointWB up
Investigator(s): ESI-R, Graham Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none). Convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: Long: Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Riverview loam. 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI classification: NA
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ Na (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators.
Secondary indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators [minimum of one is required: check all that apply]
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1 ]
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (Bi)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (152)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
T Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust {84)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
Iron Deposits (65)
Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC-Neutral Test {D5)
Field observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): NA
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): '20„
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): '20"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WI3 up
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum [Plot size: 30ft. X 30ft. )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Cuercus alba
25
Yes
FACU
That Are OSL, FACW, or FAG: 5
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
25
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3. Acer rubrum
25
Yes
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 8
6.
7.
50% of total cover: _
Saolinal5hrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft. X 30ft.
1 Acer rubrum
7 Carous carolinia
4.
5.
7
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG:
62.5%
—
Prevalence Index worksheet:
75 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply
bye
37.5 20% of total cover: 15
CBL species 0 x 1 =
0
FACW species 0 x 2 =
0
15 Yes FAC
FAC species 0 x 3 =
0
15 Yes FAC
FACU species a x 4 =
0
_
UPL species 0 x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 0 (A)
0
50% of total cover: 15
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft. X 30ft. )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
g Podophyllum peltatum
3 Lonicera japonica
4.
7.
8.
10
11
50% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft. X 30ft. )
1. none present
4.
5.
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
30 = Total Cover 6
20% of total cover:
—
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5 Yes FAC
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' {Explain}
10 Yes FACU
5 Yes FACU
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
20 = Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
20% of total cover: 4
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiaht.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: wB up
Profile Description: (describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) Color (moist) % Type Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 413
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11 ]
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrx.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SoiW.
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al0) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyyalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (FS)
Very Sha]low Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Flcodpiain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecVSite: Scott Property City/County: Alamance Sampling Date: 30 Mar, 2020
Applicant/Owner: Carolina Land Group State: NC Sampling PointWB wet
Investigator(s): ESI-R, Graham Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none). Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat-. 36,05113 Long: -79•34248 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Riverview loam. 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI classification: PFG
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ Na (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators.
Secondary indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators [minimum of one is required: check all that apply]
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1 ]
✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (152)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
T Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust {84)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (65)
Geomorphic Position (132)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test {D5)
Field observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): NA
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): Surface
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WS wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum [Plot size: 30ft. X 30ft. )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Piatanus occidentalis
25
Yes
FACW
That Are OSL, FACW, or FAG:
8
(A)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
25
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.-Acer rubrum
25
Yes
FAC
Species Across All Strata:
8
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG:
10n°�
(A/B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
75
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
37.5 20% of total cover:
15
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft. X 30ft.
}
FACW species 0 x 2 =
0
1 Acer rubrum
15
Yes
FAC
FAC species 0 x 3 =
0
2
FACU species a x 4=
0
3
UPL species 0 x 5=
0
d
Column Totals: 0 (A)
0
{B}
5• Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50°/°
9• 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
15 -
= Total Cover 4 - Morphological Adaptations' {Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 7•5 20% of total cover: 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: -
30ft. X 30ft. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
) 1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'
{Explain}
2 Carex lurida 10 Yes OBL
g Acer rubrum 5 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4 Juncus effusus 5 Yes OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6 Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7. height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10. m) tall.
11 • Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
25 = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
50% of total cover: 12.5 20% of total cover: 5
30ft. X 30ft. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ] height,
1. none present
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WB wet
Profile Description: (describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tyne Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 412 B5 10YR 316 15 C M CL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11 ]
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrx.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SoiW.
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al0) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyyalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Very Sha]low Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Flcodpiain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0