WQ0003016_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
.,drattlan B. Howes, Secretary
-
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 21, 1997
Mr. Robert E. Zimmermann, CPG
Roadway Express, Inc.
1077 Gorge Boulevard
Post Office Box 88
Akron, Ohio 44309
Subject: Lagoon Closure Plan
Roadway Express
Sunset Road Terminal
Permit No. WQ00030 6
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Zimmermann:
This Office is in receipt of a request dated June 5, 1997 from
Charles C. Eberhart, E.I.T., Piedmont Olsen Hensley, for
Division approval of a proposed closure plan for the wastewater
treatment plant (WWTP) located at the Roadway Express Terminal. The
WWTP is no longer being used, with all wastewater having been
directed to the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department's (CMUD's)
sewer collection system. The subject non -discharge Permit has also
been rescinded (effective February 2, 1996).
Although current regulations do not require written approval
from the Division for WWTP closures activities, proper disposal of
anywastewater/residuals contained in the plant is expected prior
to commencing closure. activities. Analytical testing of the water
and residuals at the subject facility have shown them to be non-
hazardous. Per the closure report, anywastewater remaining in the
lagoon is to be directed to CMUD's sewer collection system for
final disposal. Residuals (sludges) that exist in the lagoon are
proposed to be air dried and mixed with on -site soils prior to
final grading.
Please be advised that the onsite disposal of wastewater
residuals requires the issuance of a non -discharge Permit by the
Division. In lieu of on -site disposal, an alternative method of
disposal would be a private or municipal landfill, a WWTP, or other
location that has approval to receive/dispose of wastewater
residuals; however, a Permit amendment may be necessary for the
latter.
919 North Mar Street,
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Voice 704-663-1699
FAX [phone]
Equal OpportunIty/Attirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Robert E. Zimmermann
Y 21, 1997
Page Two
could not be determined from the report what, if any, plans
exist for the closure of the existing groundwater monitoring well.
If it is to be abandoned in conjunction with the WWTP, then Mrs.
Peggy Finley with the Mooresville Regional Office's Groundwater
Section should be contacted to discuss abandonment procedures, plus
the need for any sampling that may be necessary prior to
abandonment,
If you have any questions regarding th s matter, Please
contact Mr. Michael L. Parker with the Division's Water Quality
Section, Ms. Finley in the Groundwater Section or me at (704) 6
1699 or at the letterhead address.
mip
Peggy Finley
Charles C. Ebe hart Piedmont Olsen Hensley
D. Rex Gleason, PE
Water Quality RegionalSupervisor
doc

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
February 22, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert Sledge
THROUGH: Barbara Christian V1-i
FROM: Peggy Finley
Groundwater Section
Mooresville Regional Office
SUBJECT: Abandonment of Monitoring Well
Roadway Express, Inc.
WQ0003016
Mecklenburg County
Recycle System Permit
In response to your request concerning the proposed
abandonment of the monitoring well at the above -referenced
facility, this office conducted a review of the groundwater
compliance monitoring data submitted by the permittee. The review
showed no contravention of the groundwater standards. This office
therefore recommends that the groundwater monitoring requirements
be removed and the well be properly abandoned according to 15A NCAC
2C .0113 (Well Construction Standards).
Please call me at [phone], ext. 238 if you have any
questions.
MAF
cc: GroundwaterSection - Permits & Compliance Unit

Facility Name 44LV9
Address .5oi
P4-0)78* -ZeZ1 2-798 Coun
Well Location iklE Coxpeig_ p (20 °
Type or Use a ba�pont pen and press firrnJy.
Well Identification Number IP-c-A4-1 Well Depth
Well Diameter 2 Sample (Screened) Interval 50 Ft. To
Depth to Water Levet if 9'7 ft, below measuring point (before sampli
Measuring point is 2ift. above land surface
Gallons of water pumped/bated before sampling 4Sq,44."4"'
Field Analysis: pH 6.03 Specific Conductance /coo uMhos Temp.
Date Sample Collected Date Lab Sample Analyzed
Laboratory Name lEA,
SAMPLES FOR METALS WERE COLLECTED UNFILTERED AND FIELD A
FL
Ft.
PERMtT NUMBER: (REQUIRE
Non -Discharge
NPDES
raT OE DISPQSAL OPERATION BEING MONITORED
(REQUIRED)
Lagoon
Spray Field
Land Applicatio
Rotary Distributor
Odor rvcrie Ap
arance
Certification No, 81'
YES NO
Septic Tank/Drain Field
Subsurface Low -Pressure
Piping (Lpla
Sludge N (1.4 DEr
COD mg/1
Conform: MF Fecal 00m1
Conform: MF Total /1 00m1
(Note: Use 114PN method for highly tu
Dissolved Solids: Total mg/I
pH (when analyzed) units
TOC _ mg/I Cd - Cadmium
Chloride mg/I Chromium: Total
Arsenic mg/1 Cu - Copper
Grease and Oils < mg/I Fe - Iron
Hardness: Total mg/I Hg - Mercury
Phenol mg/I
Sulfate mg/1
Specific Conductance
Total Ammonia _
TKN as N
Nitrite (NO2) as N mg/I
Nitrate (NO3) as N mg/1
Phosphorus: Total as P_ mg/1
Al - Aluminum mg/1
Ba - Barium mg/1
Ca - Calcium mg/1
mg/I
mg/1
mg/I
mg/1
mg/I
K - Potassium mg/1
Mg - Magnesium mg/I
uMhos Mn - Manganese
mg/1 Na - Sodium _ mg/1
mg/I
Ni NickeL„ mg/I
Pb - Lead
Zn Zinc _
Pesticides/Herbicides
(Specify Compounds)
Other (Specify Compounds and
Concentration units)
gil
'0911
A
)ug/1
:)ug/I
tag
'Ai
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
Signature of Pqr ittee (or Au horized Agen
Note; Values should reflect dissolved and
colloidal concentrations. (see #3 on back)
* See back for In8trUctions.
** Submit blue, green, and yellow coples only to address above.
GW-59 REV. /9

C01.1CT1011 AND ANALYSIS OF_OROUNDWATER SAMKES
1. Samples should ho analyzed as soon as possible after collection. SAMPLES WHICH ARE NOT ANALYSED WITHIN THE HOLD NG TI
FED FOR THE METHOD USED (SEE #4. BELOW) MUST BE DISCARDED AND NEW SAMPLES COLLECTED.
Metals Analyses: Use Standard Method 3030C for sample preparation(mercury excluded). Q,t1QLEILTR META
Unfiltered samples must be collected for metals, then field acidified th 5 oncntrald ntne acid pe htt of sample, and st
lab within 24 hours,
ample preparation in the laboratory (extraction and filtration) must bt completed within 72 hours of collection.,
3. ANALYSES ARE TO BE MADE OF THE MOBILE CONSTITUENTS (DISSOLVED AS WELL AS COLLOIDAL) 14 THE
GROUNDWATER, I11I IKaa.IkAi tfiE A P ammtm As5QcjATED KITH, iyakQQNUliVQTJQ 4MPU1N
CHECK WITH YOUR LABOR TORY ON PROPER PROCEDURES FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION AND PRESERVATION„
„ --
4. As per 'Title 15, North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 21_, analytical procedures shall be rri accordance with the methods 'desc „d in one af
the following publications, or by other methods approved beforehandby the*Dkeetor, Division of Environmental
Management:
E SPEC1-
(a) Standard Methods for the Examn'.tisn of Water and Wastewater, 16th Edition, 1985 and 17th Edition, 1989, published jontIy by
American Public Health Association, American Water Works Assmiation and Water Pollution Control Federation;
(b) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Waste, 1979, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency publication number
EPA-600/4-79-020, as revised March 1983;
(c) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes: Physical/Chemical Methods, 3rd Edon, 1986, U.S., Environmental Proteotk n Agency
publication number SW-846;
(d) Test Procedures for the Analysis of Polluants Under the Clean Water Act, Federal Register Vol, 49, o. 209, 40 CFR Part
October 26, 1984;
Measure and record the depth of water in
6. At least 3 volumes of water
volumes are rern vett sam
7. 'Determination for pH, Specif
collected.
ih
well prior to pumping or bailing any water from the well,
well shoukf be pumped or bailed prior to collecting a sample for analysis. t e welUs pu npud/baed dry ,before 3 well
an be coffee
ted as soon as the well recovers to the point where enough water is available to collect your sample,
Conductance, temperature, odor and appearance must be made in the field on unhltered samples when the sample is
8. Field equipment must be Libra ed in ac
,nce wtth recommendations by the manufacturer.
9. Samples must be filtered through a 0,45 micron filte
*ately after c ,ction when a thsoved analysis is ,r co, red. (See 4/4. above)
0, The sample container should be labeled at the time of collection with the ta
Tty name, well identification number and date and tme collect
11„"Authorized agent' any corporate officer or public official authorized by the company, .corporation,, or governmental body to sign official docu

ary 9, 1996
1077GORGE BOULEVARD AKRON. C H PC). BOX 4C N 3 44:.0c,L-0471 •
NCDEFINR
Division of Environm ntal .M„anaget
Groundwater Section
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
RE: Compliance Well Sampling
Roadway Express, Inc.,
5201 Sunset Road
Charlotte, NC
Gen lernen:
6) 384-1717
En conformance with monitoring requirements established in our non -discharge permit
#WQ0003016, we have completed compliance well sampling for September 1995. I have
enclosed Geraghty & Millers sampling report dated October 1.3, 1995 and have completed a
GW-59 form. As can be seen, no problems were .identified.
Because we have tied into City Sanitary Sewer and we have requested that our permit be
rescinded (we are no longer using the treatment facility), We are not planning to conduct any
additional sampling of the monitoring well. We plan to permanently close the well in
accordance with State requirements.
Ifyou have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me a 2 6)
258-2412.
Very Truly
Robert E. Zi
Supery sor -
REZ/ling-e:char!
cc r Jim Shilliclay;
Bob Price/T681
ann. CPG
onmental Services

'WGERAGHTY
MILLER, INC.
En troninenial Services
Mr. Robert Zimmerman
Roadway Services, Inc.
1077 Gorge Boulevard
Akron, OH 44310
OCT 16 1B93
A He demi company
October 13, 1995
Re: Analytical Results for the September 7, 1995, Sampling of Compliance Well EP-CMW-1,
Located at the Roadway Express Terminal, 5201 Sunset Road, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Dear Mr. Zimmerman:
This letter report was prepared by Geraghty & Miller, Inc., on behalf of Roadway
Services, Inc. (Roadway). This report presents the results of the September 7, 1995, sampling
event for compliance well EP-CMW-1 located at the above -referenced Roadway terminal. The
location of the terminal is shown on a topographic map in Figure 1. Compliance well EP-CMW-1
is located near the northeast corner of the holding lagoon shown in Figure 2
Prior to sampling the compliance well, a depth -to -water measurement was collected. The
depth to water in compliance well EP-CMW-I on September 7, 1995, was 11.97 feet (Ft) below
the top of casing and the casing of the compliance well extends approximately 2.3 ft above land
surface. Following collection of the depth -to -water measurement approximately 6.50 gallons of
water were evacuated from the well using a disposable bailer. During the evacuation process,
water samples were collected from the well each time an additional 2.25 gallons of water had been
removed. These water samples were analyzed for pH, specific conductance, and temperature
using portable meters calibrated in the field. The results of these field measurements for the
September 7, 1995, sampling event are presented on Table 1. The field measurements indicate
that the pH, specific conductance, and temperature stabilized during the evacuation process.
Following the well purging process, groundwater samples were collected from the well for
laboratory analysis. The samples were collected using a disposable bailer and placed in
appropriately labeled containers, and packed on ice in a cooler. The cooler remained in the
custody of Geraghty & Miler personnel until it was hand delivered to fEA Laboratory. A chain -
of -custody record was enclosed in the cooler to maintain a complete record of all personnel that
had contact with the samples. The laboratory analytical report for the September 7, 1995,
sampling event is presented in Attachment A. A copy of the chain -of -custody record is included
with the laboratory report. The water samples were analyzed for low level volatile organic
compounds using U.S. Environment Protection Agency (EPA) Method 502 2, for total suspended
solids (TSS) using EPA Method 160.2, for pH using EPA Method 150 1, and for oil and grease
using SW-846 Method 9070.
gAapoojettrdmyrvs1.NCO2.32.003
CrossPointe 11 2840 Plaza Place, Suite 350. RjLih North Ca a 27612. [phone]-FAX (919) 571-: 94

GERAGHTY N4ILLE.R, INC,
Mr. Robert Zimmermann
October 13, 1995
Page 2
The laboratory analytical results for the September 7, 1995, sampling event are
summarized in Table 2 Volatile organic constituents and oil and grease were not detected in the
groundwater sample collected from compliance well EP-CMW-1 on September 7, 1995 The pH
of the water was reported by the laboratory at 6 2, and TSS were detected in the groundwater
sample at 590 milligrams per liter (mg/L).
An evaluation of the laboratory analytical report was performed. This evaluation
consisted of a review of analytical methods, sample collection date, analysis date, quantitation
limits, surrogate standard recoveries, matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) results,
laboratory control sample recoveries, and blanks. The data evaluation indicated that the samples
were extracted and/or analyzed by the appropriate methods and within the allowable holding
times. The surrogate standards and the blank results are acceptable with the following exception.
Chlorofonn was detected in both the field sample and in the trip blank at a concentration of 0,625
micrograms per liter (pig/L). Therefore, the chloroform is reported below a modified quantitative
limit of 0,625 pig/L. These data are useable and re1i ile within the confines of this data review.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this report or the enclosed analytical
data package, please call Jim Shilliday at [phone],
Sincerely,
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC,
ames E. Shillay III
Proj ager
/
Tok,
illiam „ Doucette, Jr., PhD., P.G,
AssociateTechnical Consultant
Ivfid-Atlantic Region
jES/Inmj
Attachments
VaprojecArdwysviNCO232.003 \9795samp doc

Table 1. Compliance Wdll
Mg Data, September 7, 1
C otte. North Caro
Roadway Express
ons Purge
6,5
pH
Specific Conductance Temperature
( mhos) (C)
5.65 980 22,0
5.90 1,000 20.0
5.99 1,000 19.5
6,03 1,000 19.5
N 232,003/9795/nm
GER, _MT? INC.

Table 2. Sumnu
Comph
of Analytical Results for Groundwater S. ple Collected From
e Well EP-C 4 on September 7, 1995,
Constituent
Compliance Well Designation
EP-C -1
Low Level Volatile Or,
(EPAMethod 502.2) (
pH
(-EPA Method 150.1)
TSS
(EPA Method 160.2) (rr
Oil and Cyr
(SW446 Method 9070) (
2
3
*c Compounds
BQL2
6„2
590
BOL
Micro!, s per liter,
L Below quantitation limits.
.12IS per liter,
N�232 GO3793 lel lut29
GERAGHTY (5' MILLER, INC

County
Location
SCALE 1: 24000
Contour Interval 10 Feet, Datum i
U.S G S 7,5 Mrnute Series DERITA, N.C. T
GERAGHTY
LLER, INC.
Sea Level
ic Ouodron
SITE LOCATION
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
ROADWAY EXPRESS TERMINAL
5201 SUNSET ROAD
CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROUNA

g:4prviect .y541403232,003 \9795
ATTAC A
Laboratory Anabrtical Report
Sept ber 7, 1995, S: piing Event
GERAGHTY 6.4' mi II ER , INC

An Aquarian Company
Sep
2'7, 1995
Jim ShillidaY
Geraghty & Miller
2 40 Plaza Place, Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27612
P.O. Box 12846
Research Itsangie Park,
NC 27709
Project No. 7E31135/9509206
EA Reference No.: W9509080
Client Project I.D NCO232.003
Shilliday,
Transmitted herewi
hoitted to our
The samples
h are the resulte of analyseson two
atorYi
received in
919 677 0090
919 677 8702 Fax
Analyaea were perfo according to approved thodologies and
the requirement of the IA Quality .,6surance Program except where noted.
Please aee the enclosed reporte for your resulte and a copy of the Chain
of eustody d� ntation.
Th you for selecting IKA for your analysis. Please do not
ate to call your projectanager representative at 1-919-677-0090
or 800-444-9919 should you have any guestiona regarding this report.
We k forward to serving You in the futu,
Very truly yours,
Inc.
R. ago
atory Director

TEA
An AO:, artto Corr Dam,
LEA -NORTH CAROLINAC CA ONS
Cortnecticut
768. 1047
0
PH-0135
Co
DW
87350
E87439
OAP1S30007G
None
Kansas
HW, WW E-158 (DW, WW)
DW, WW
Radiolog,
6771.9
67681
New York
422
1, North Carotins
DW
WW
Ridiok,g
DW 3'7720
101W 84
Rid 37720
Vol Action Program
C
South Carolina
Tiantiter
DW
914
Utah
Radiolog,
RCR.A
E-
6
7
DW
in
05 1010
DW Drinking Water WW = W*stewattr HW=Hazardtrus Waste Radiolog.

PROJECT: 781-135
TCH: 9509206 OD: EPA 0 PA 160.2
Samples: One (1) Water Sample
The samples were received at Industrial and Environmental AnEdysts, Inc, (TEA) on Septemtber 07, 1995.
Each sample was assigned a 9-character TEA" lab identification number (lab ID) and an abbreviated client
ID which is referenced on the TEA Assigned Number Index. All analyses are performed in accordance with
EPA approved methodologies and meet the requirements of the TEA Quality Assurance Program. Please
see the enclosed data package for your results and Chain of Custody documentation.
Unless noted otherwise, all samples for inorganic parameter analyses were received properly preserved
as required by the method.
Any nonconformances associated with the analysis of the samples in this project are as follows:
The analysis date for pH exceeded the protocol holding time specified by the method. The samples were
received out of protocoL
I certify that this data package is incornpliance with the procedures and methods defined for this project,
both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data
contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computer -readable data (if applicable) as submitted
has been authorized by the laboratory manager or his designee, as verified by the following signature.
Wallace L. McAnulty
Inorganic Technical Data Reviswe
lEA, Inc.
September 19, 1995

IA Project 4: 78 135
9589206-81
Client e: Geraghty &
Client Proj ID..NCO232.0
s ple ID: EP -CMW -1
Par eter
PH
TSS
S :
Method
EPA 150.1
EPA 160.2
Environmental Analyata, Inc.
t4Atrix Water
Date Received:09 0°7/95
Date sampled: 9 0'7/95
Quanti
6
a ion Date Date
ts Results Prepared Analyzed
mg/E
9/1
a
Analysis date exceeded the protocol bolding time specified by the hod.
Sample was received out of protocol.
FORM RESP3 ev. 994

industrial & Envi o n a
roject 0; 7 5
pie t 9509206
Client N e Geraghty & M
Client Proj. I D NCO232.003
.D.; QC Blank
Par
====
TSS
od
Inc.
Matrix: Water
Date Received:N/A
Date S pied: N/A
Quantitaticn Date Date
Limits Results Prepared Analyzed Analyst
EPA 160.2 SQL
Co n
corresponding pie: 95�92681
94
NIA 09/13/95 DI.

lndu�trial & Environenta1
yEA project No.:781-125
TEA Sample No.: 9509206
Matrix: Water
Test
Reference No. Par
950921?-01 pH
9509217-01 TSS
S-D
nt s
INORGANIC QC
DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
thod
150.1
EPA 160.2
x 100
corresponding sp1es 9509206-
roRl( IQCSUM Rev 103194
DUPLICATE RESULTS
pie Duplicate
(m9/1) (mg/L)
7.3 7.3
<6 <6
Date
Analyzed
9 9
09/12/95
Control Limita: 20%

ABBREVIATIONS
A = Amenable
Alk = Alkalinity as CaCO3
Bcrb = Alkalinity as Bicarbonate
BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand
BQL Below Quantitation Limit
ci100mL = Colonies per 100 mL of Sample
CEC = Cation Exchange Capacity
Chrom = Chromotropic
COD — Chemical Oxygen Demand
Crb = Alkalinity as Carbonate
D = Dissolved
DO = Dissolved Oxygen
DOC = Dissolved Organic Carbon
DfT = Distillationilltration
E = Extractable (Prepped by Std M 3030C
F = Free
Hex = Hexavalent
Hyd = Hydroxide
ISE = Ion Selective Electrode
mmpy = Millimeter per Year
MPN = Most Probable Number
N/A . Not Applicable
R = Reactivity
SA = Spike Added
SSR = Spike Sample Results
SR . Sample Results
Sp Gond = Specific Conductance
SM = Settleable Matter
SPC = Standard Plate Count
T = Total
TDS = Total Dissolved Solids
TEN = Total lqeldahl Nitrogen
mass . Total Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids
Toc . Total Organic Carbon
TON = Total Organic Nitrogen
TOX = Total Organic Halogens
TS = Total Solids
TSS = Total Suspended Solids
TVS = Total Volatile Solids
VSS . Volatile Suspended Solids
WAD = Weak and Dissociable

PROJECT: 781-135
Samples: (01
a
SDG N
SEMIVOLA 1 FRACTION
BATCH: 09206
METHOD: SW-846 9070
The samples were received at. ndutrin and Envirorn ented 07, 1995.
Each sample was assigned a 9-character TEAlab identification number are
performed in accordance with EPA approved methodologies and meet m lEA
Quality Assurance Program. Plesse see the enclosed data package for your results and Chain of Custody
documentation.
certify ththiadataprkwe is in eompliance with the procedures and methods defined for this project,
both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data
contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computer -readable data (if applicable) as submitted
has been authorized by the laboratory manager or his designee, as verified by the following signature.
1EAT,NDoc1113F00701.NC

Indust
781 135
9509206-01
C1ien.. N Geraghty 9 li11er
Clint Proj. .D.:NCO232.003
I.D.: EP- 1
er
(Gram)
SW-846 9070
d Grease by La1nc:ric
ation Limits
alyste, c.
MAr Wate
Date Received: 09/07/95
Date S pled: 09/07/95

IZA Project
RA Sample
Client Name.
Client Proj.
S pie 1.D.:
Par
dray)
Industrial & nvironmental Analyste, Inc.
Oil and Grease
781-135
9609206
Geraghty &
D.:NCO232.003
QC Blank
hod
SW-846 8070
nts:
(Cray) Oi
Below
N A a Not APP
e ponding 5
er
Mat Water
Date Received; N/A
Date S ed: 14,/A
a ion Data
Results Prepared
mg/L SQL 09/12/95 09 95
d Grease by Gravime ric
ation Limits
9509206-01
Date
ialyzed Maly

EA Pro)
Client e:
Cllent Project
Sample
P eter:
Client•14
781-135
9509206-01
Geraghty &
NCO232.003
EP -CMW -1
O&G
9509206-0161S SW-846 907
Co
O&G v) = Oil and rease by Gr vime
Corresponding Sample: 9509206-01
Sp recovery range: 80% - 120%
S-P Rev. 071991
Da e Re eiv d:
Date
a
Date Analyzed:
Water
09/07/95
09/07/95
09/12/95
09/13/95

1-800 ANUS S
NC
September 21,1995
Ms. Cheryl Steinmiller
lEA
3000 Weston Parkway
Cary, NC 27513
Dear Ms. Steinmiller:
Attached are the certified analytical results for Method 502.2 for Client Sample ID#
EF-CMW-1 and TB-1, Internal Project #781-135. For Inquiries, please refer to our
Project 1D#95-09-015.
Thank you for selecting 1-800-9-Analysis, Inc for your sample analysis. If your have
any question regarding these reports, please contact Rodney Raimonde or myself at
919-558-1111.
Sincerely,
1-800-9-Analysis, Inc.
Elsie Byrd
CIA Manager
96-00-016 104 7AS
P:0, Box 12012, 85 T:W. Alexander Drive. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
Tel: [phone] (1-800-9-ANALYSIS) • Fax: [phone] (1-800-9-FAX-ANALYSIS)

800
ANALYSISI INC.
Lab Name: 1-800-9-
n lysis Inc.
Matrix:(soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol:
Level: (low/med) n/a
% Moisture n/a
g Iml )
Decanted:(Y/N)
ml
Concentrated Extract volume nisi (m1)
Injection Volume: /a
CPC Cleanup: (Y/N) nia
(ul)
pH: 2.00
Client Sample EP-CHW-1
Client Project ID: 781-135
Lab Sample ID: 1658
Lab Project ID: 95-09-015
Date Received: 09/11/95
Date Extracted: n/a
Date Analyzed: 09/18/95
Dilution Factor: n/a
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/I or ug/kg) ug/1 ppb)
TARAHETER
RESULT
DETECTION
LIMIT
Benzene
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodlchloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
p-Butylbenzene
eec-Butylbenzene
tert-Butylbenzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chkyrobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
4-Chlorotoulene
2-Chlorotoulerie
Obrornochioromethane
1,2-Dibrorno-3-c hlorop °pane
1 ,2-Dbrornoet ha ne
Dbrornomethane
,1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1 -Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichlovethane
,1,1-Dichtoroethene
cis-1,1 -Dichloroet hene
trans-1 ,1 -Dichloroethene
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BBL
0.625
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
0.50
0.50
0,50
0.50
050
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0,50
0.50
0.50
0,50
0.50
P,O. Box 12012, 85 T.W. Alexander Drive. Research Triangle Park, North Ca o Ina 27709
Tel: [phone] (1-800-9-ANALYMIVA'. W558-2222 (1-800-9-FAX-ANALYSIS)

Lab Name:
1 800 8 ANA YS SINC
0-9-An 'yell;Inc.
Matrix:(soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol:
Level: (low/med)
% Moisture n/a
n/
Decanted:(Y/N)
Concentrated Extract Volume is
Injection Volume: nits
Client Sample ID: TB-1
Client Project ID: 781-135
Lab Sample ID: 1659
Lab Project ID: 95-09-015
Date Received: 09/11/95
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed: 09/18/95
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) n/a pH: 2.00 Dilution Factor: n/a
ARA14ETER
RESULT
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/1 or ug/kg) (PPb)
DETECTION
LIMIT
nzene
mobenzene
omochloromethane
omodichloromethane
omoform
momethane
utylbenzene
utylbenzene
ty1benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroelhane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
4-Chlorotoulene
,2-Chloroloulene
Dibromochloromelhane
,1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1 ,2-Dbromodhane
'Dibromomelhane
,2-Dichlorobenzene
,3-Dichlorobenzene
hlorobenz en e
Dichlorodifluoromethene
,1 -Dichloroethane
2-Dichloroethane
1.1 -Dichloroel hen e
cis-1 ,1 -Dichloroel hone
trans1 ,1-Dichloroethene _
0.60
0.50
010
060
0.50
OM
BRL OM
BRL 0.50
BRL OM
BRL 0,50
BRL 010
0.625 OM
BRL 0.50
BRL OM
BRL 010
BRL OM
BRL 010
BRL 0,54
BRL 0,54
BRL 010
BRL 010
BRL 0.50
BRL 010
BRL 0,50
BRL 0,54
BRL 454
BRL 0,54
BRL 0.50
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
P.O. Box 12012, 85 T.W. Alexander Drive. Research Triangle Park: North Carolina 27709
Tel: [phone] (1-800-9-ANALTS9§1411i5W-558-2222 (1-800-9-FAX-ANALYSIS)

Figure 14EA S1IBCONTRAcTI1G REQUIS1TION FORM
L) P.O. Number
24. Lab ID
ions:
•p To:
To:
Ap p rovals:
ti.) Initiator Approval:
41) Receiving Lab Approval:
Document # QASOl9OONET
20
Yes / No
25.)Date 26.) Matrix 27.) ParameterfM
Date:
Date:
1de .4-ktt4t
9/04(95
29 Net Price
7
Y o
EL' VTSRDatc
39.) Report To: 49.) Total Number ofCop
41) Use for R
44.) Sending Laboratory
45.) Receiving Laboratory

WGERAGFITY
MILLER! INC,
IrMw1,01,1,1lArdli 5terie'4,1
. „.
A Holdemll Company
Project Number
Project .Lncation
Laboratory
Sampler(s)/Atfiliation
SAMPLE lDENTITY Code
Laboratory Task Order No, CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD Page
DaterTime
Sampled
1-55
1V75
Lab ID
Sample Code L Llowd, S = Solid; A - Air
Relrnquishecl by:
Received by:
Organization:
Organizatiort
E CONTAtNER DE
IFT1ON
Total No of Bottles/
Containers
A
Relinqued
1eceived by:
Organizat[ort
Organjzation:
Special Instructions/Remarks
ime „ „
Seal Intact?.
Yes No N/A
Date J_t_Time
Date / 1 Time
Seal Intact"?
Yes No N/A
Delivery, Method:
n Person [1.-3 Common Carrier
Lab Courier
h

Facility Name
Address
Well Location
Well Identification Number Well Depth as- Ft.
Well Diameter 2" Sampe (Screened) Interval 5.0 Ft. To ._474Ft.
Depth to Water Level ft. below measuring point (before sampling)
Measuring point is 23 ft. above land surface
Gallons of water pumped/bailed before sampling
Field Analysis: pH Z4. Specific Conductance __Egg uMhos Te
Date Sample Collected /-/8-16"" Date Lab Sample Analyzed
Laboratory Name
SAMPLES FOR METALS WERE CO
Type or Use bailpont pen and press firmly.
County.4td/EQ(4i
£4Goo#4 Ool payort
ECTED UNFILTERED AND FIELD ACIDIFIED
COD mg/1
Coliform: MF Fecal ./100m1
Coliform: MF Total /1 00MI
(Note:Use MPN method far highly turbid samples
Dissolved Solids: Total
pH (when analyzed)
TOC
Chloride
Arsenic
Grease and Oils SQL- (45'
Hardness: Total
Phenol
Sulfate
Specific Conductance
Total Ammonia _
TKN as N
PERMIT NUMBER: (REQUIRED)
Non -Discharge _
NPDES _
TYPE OF DISPOSAL OPERATION BEING MONITORED
(REQUIRED)
Lagoon Septic Tnk/Dain Field
pray Field Subsurface Low -Pressure
Piping (LPP)
nd
ta
Odor Appearance..‹164R.
Pee 21 1995
tion No.
NO
mg/1
Nitrate (NO3) as N mg/1
Phosphorus: Total as P mg/1
Al -Aluminum mg/1
mg/1 Ba - Barium mg/I
units Ca - Calcium mg/1
mg/1 Cd - Cadmium mg/1
_.. mg/I Chromium: Total __ mg/1
mg/1 Cu - Copper mg/I
mg/I Fe - Iron mg/I
Nitrite (NO2) as N
mg/I Hg - Mercury mg/1
mg/1 K - Potassium mg/I
mg/1 Mg - Magnesium mg/I
uMhos Mn - Manganese mg/I
_ mg/1 Na - Sodium mg/I
mg/1
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
Signatur
GIA/-59 REV. 6/93
e or Authorized Agen
Ni - Nickel
Pb - Lead
Zn - Zinc
Pesticides/Herbicides
(Specify Compounds)
Other (Specify Compounds and
Concentration units)
SLeSpe?-1,Ee SoLdos•
mg/I
mg/I
mg/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/I
ug/I
Note:, Values should reflect dissolved and
colloidal concentrations. (see #3 on back)
I* See back for lnstnictlons.
** Submit blue, green, and yeftow copies only to address above.
" '

COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUNDWATER SPOKES
samples should be analyzed as soon as possible after collection. SAMPLES WHICH ARE NOT ANALYSED WITHIN THE HOLDING Tt E SPECI.
FIED FOR THE METHOD USED (SEE #4. BELOW) MUST BE DISCARDED AND NEW SAMPLES COLLECTED.
2, Metals Analyses: Use Standard Method 3030C for sample preparation (mercury excluded). DO NOT FIL ER:METALS'
Unfiltered sample,s must be collected for metals, then field acidified with 5 ml concentrated nitric acid per liter of sample,
ab within 24 hours,
Sample preparation in the laboratory (extraction and filtration) must be completed WithOn 72 h s of collectiorO
3„ ANALYSES ARE TO MADE OF THE MOBILE CONSTITUENTS (DISSOLVMAS WELL AS COLLOIDAL) IN. THE
GROUNDWATER, P,jQ 1jj THAE ARE A EI3I QE QJMENT ASSOCIATED, WIIII WELL QN1B1LCILQli OR .$14L.MI1JJ
CHECK w Y ON PROPER PROCEDURES FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION AND PRESERVATION.
OCEDURES
4„ As per 1 tk ¶ 1orth Gaa na mnstratve Code; Stitathapter 2L, analytical procedures shall be in accordance with the meti ods d rbtd n one of
-oubliette'Ljrth r rn thojs approved beforehand by ,the Director, Division of Environmental
Managern
the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th Edition, 1985 and 17th Edition, 1989 publish d jointly by
Health Association, A erican Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation;
emical Analysis of Water and Waste, 1979, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency publication number
EPA-600/4-79-020, as revised March 1983;
'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes: Physical/Chemical Methods, 3rd Edition, 1986, U.S. Environrnental Prolcc'' n Agency
publication number SW-846;
Test Procedures for the Analysis of Polluants Under the Clean Water Act, Federal Register Vol. 49, No. 209, 40 CFR Part 136.
October 26, 1984;
*
Masure and ecord tt e depth of wate ell prior to pumping or bailing any water from the weU
6. At least 3 volumes of'watnt u thvould be pumped or bailed prior to collecting a sampe for analysis. 11 the wefl is p9tripod/
volumes are removed, sa pies can be collected as soon as the well recovers to the point where enough wator is available to collo
, ',,,
7. Determination for pH, Sip " ic Conductance, temperature, odor and appearance, must be made in the field on unfiltered sample when the sample is
collected.
led dry before 3 well
t your sample.
8, Field equipment must be calibrated in accordance with recommendations by the manufacturer.
9, Samples must be filtered through a 0.45 micron filter immediately after collection when a dissolved aralysis is required. #4. above)
1,0,The sample contain should be hibeled at the time of collection with the facility name, weti identification number and date and time collected.
11."Authori agent' is any corporate othcn or public official authorized by thecornpany, corporation, or governmental body 10 sign official documents.

February 10, 1995
Division of Environmental Management
Groundwater Section
P.0 Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
RE: Compliance Well Sampling
Roadway Express, Inc.
5201 Sunset Rd.
Charlotte, NC
Gentlemen:
ROADWAY
SERVICES, INC.
1077 GORGE BOULEVARD
AKRON, OH 44310
P,O, BOX 88
AKRON, OH 44309-0088
[phone]
RC. DEPTI'„ Oft
ENNTRO.NUMENT,
& NATtikAl.,
FE 211995
In conformance with monitoring requirements established in our non -discharge perrnit
#WQ0003016, we have completed compliance well sampling for January 1995. I have
enclosed Geraghty & Miller's sampling report dated February 2, 1995 as well as a
completed GW-59 form. As can be seen, no problems were identified. Our next sampling
date is scheduled for April 1995.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at
[phone],
Very truly yours,
Roadway Services, Inc. for
Roadway Express, Inc.
Robert E. Ziirfiermann, CPG
Supervisor - Environmental Services
ar\rex\wellsamp
cc: Robbie Lowe - T/681 w/attch,
Jim Shilliday - Geraghty & Mil er
Prifited or Recycted Paper

A WGERAGHTY
IV8' MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
A Heidemij company
February 2, 1995
Mr. Robert Zimmermann
Roadway Services, Inc.
1077 Gorge Boulevard
Akron, OH 44310
Re: Analytical Results for the January 18, 1
Sampling of Compliance Well EP-CMW-1,
Located at the Roadway Express Terminal 5201 Sunset Road, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Dear Mr. Zimmermann:
This letter report was prepared by Geraghty & Milier, Inc., on behalf of Roadway
Services, Inc. (Roadway). This report presents the results of the January 18, 1995, biannual
sampling event for compliance well EP-CMW-1 located at the above -referenced Roadway
terminal. The location of the terminal is shown on a topographic map in Figure 1. Compliance
well EP-CMW-1 is located near the northeast corner of the holding lagoon shown in Figure 2.
Prior to sampling the compliance well, a depth -to -water measurement was collected. The
depth to water in compliance well EP-CMW-1 on January 18, 1995, was 12.82 feet (ft) below
the top of casing and the casing of the compliance well extends approximately 2.3 ft above land
surface. Following collection of the depth -to -water measurement approximately 6 gallons of
water were evacuated from the well using a disposable bailer. During the evacuation process,
water samples were collected from the well each time an additional 2 gallons of water had been
removed. These water samples were analyzed for pH, specific conductance, and temperature
using portable meters calibrated in the field. The results of these field measurements for the
January 1995 sampling event are presented on Table 1. The field measurements indicate that
the pH, specific conductance, and temperature stabilized toward the end of the evacuation
process during the sampling event.
Following the well purging process, groundwater samples were collected from the well
for laboratory analysis. The samples were collected using a disposable bailer and placed in
appropriately labeled containers, and packed on ice in a cooler. The cooler remained in the
custody of Geraghty & Miller personnel until it was hand delivered to lEA Laboratory. A
chain -of -custody record was enclosed in the cooler to maintain a complete record of all
personnel that had contact with the samples. The laboratory analytical report for the January
18, 1995, sampling event is presented in Attachment A. A copy of the chain -of -custody record
is included with the laboratory report. The water samples were analyzed for total suspended
solids (TSS) using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 160.2, for pH using
EPA Method 150.1, and for oil and grease using SW-846 Method 9070.
140:1232-00312171medizimzeir.kraSa95
CrossPointe II, 2840 Plaza Place, Suite 350. Raleigh, North Caroli 6 919) 571-1662 .FAX [phone]

GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC
Mr. Robert Zimmermann
February 2, 1995
Page 2
The laboratory analytical results for the January 18, 1995, sampling event are
summarize(' in Table 2. Oil and grease were not detected in the groundwater sample collected
from compliance well EP-CTAW-1 on January 18, 1995. The pH of the water was reported by
the laboratory at 5.9, and TSS were detected in the groundwater sample at 280 milligrams per
liter (mg/L).
An evaluation of the iaboratory analytical, report was performed. This evaluation
consisted of a review of analytical methods, sample collection date, analysis date, quantitation
limits, matrix spike (MS) results for oil and grease, laboratory duplicate results for pH and TSS,
and blanks. The data evaluation indicated that the samples were extracted and/or analyzed by
the appropriate methods. The surrogate standards and the blank results are acceptable. These
data are useable and reliable within the confines of this data review.
The next 1995 sampling event for compliance well EP-CMW-1 is scheduled to occur in
April 1995. If you have any questions or comments regarding this report or the enclosed
analytical data package, please call Jim Shilliday at [phone].
Sincerely,
GERAGHTY &
6James E. Sh
ProjctM.
R, INC.
ingson, Ph.D.
Associa h 'cal Consultant
JES/jbw
Attachments

Table 1 Compliance Well
lotte, No
g Data, Jai
18, 1995, R ay Express Termmal,
Ions Purged pH
c Condit ce Temperature
(jumhos) (°C)
2
4
6.96
6.63
6.62
6.57
720
750
8
18.0
18.0
17.5
17.5

Tabie 2. Summary of A
Compliance Well -C
Corr tituent
Results for Groundwater S pe Co11 From
onJan 18 5,
Compflance
on
0 U
TSS
PA Method
giL
5.9
280
igra
Low quar

County
Location
1000
1030
SCALE 24000
Contour interval 10 Feet, Datum is Mean Sea Level
U.S.G.S 7.5 MInute Series DER1TA, N.C. Topogrophc 0uadron
GERAGHTY
MILLER, INC.
at s
SITE LOCATION
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
ROADWAY EXPRESS TERIIIINAL
5201 SUNSET ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROUNA
FIGURE

AITACIIMFNT
Labotntory 1 Report
Januaty 18, 1995,S piing Event

An Aquarion Company
January 27, 1995
Post Office Box 12846 Phone 919 677.
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Fax [phone]
Jim ShillidaY
Geraghty & Mille
2840 Plaza Place, Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27612
ISA Project No.: 781067/9501269
fEA Reference No.: W9501199
Client Project IDt NCO232003
Dear Mr. sbUliday,
Transmitted herewith are the resulta 0
to our Lratary.
The ) were received intact.
analyses°
le s nitted
Analyses were performed according to approved me hodolog d t
the r' iri'-nta of the IEA Quality Assurance Program except where noted.
Please see the enclosed reports for your results and a copy of the Chain
custodyof documentation.
Th you for selecting your sp1e analY Please do not
hesitateto call your project manager representative at 1-919-677-0090
800-444-9919 should you have any questions regarding this report.
k forward to serving you in the future.
Very trnly Yours*
Suntiseo Schaumburg,
Florida Illinois
305,8461730 708.705 0740
laithipparnr
New Jersey
201i 428.8181

IEA
Aji Aguanon Company
IFA-NORTH CAROLINA C CA ONS
DW
0
pi
117350
ES7439
7
DW, WW, WW E-158 WV)
DW
DW, 11VW
R.dio1og
di
67719
7
DW 37720
WW 114
Rad 37720
DW 99021
HW
DW
Usi
di
0'2914
99E051010
DW=Drinkin. g Water WW= Wastewater HW =Hazardous Waste Ratiolog.=Radiological
IlesCLIVIP

Indust al & Env o .'entai Ana1y5ts,
781-061
9501269-01
Geraghty &
I.D NCO232.003
EP-CNW-1
EPA i5
EPA 160.2
Marixt Wa
Date Received.
Date Sampled: 01 95
no.
Quant i tation
Resul
Date Dat
PreparedAni ed Analyst
N/A /24/95 PC
igfL 280 mg/L N/A /20/95 DL

Par
irdustria1 & Env
a
Inc.
781-067
9501269 Matrix: Water
Geraghty & Milier Date Received:N/A
D.:NCO232.003 Date Saiip1ed: N/A
QC Blank
===te4==============
TSB
Co
Date
Results repared
BQL N/A
Corre dn S p es: 95 2 9-01
FORM s3 Rev 3�99 4
Date
Analyzed Analyst
1/20/95 DE

ust
oject No.:781467
ple No.: 9501269
ix: Water
Teat
Reference No. Parameter
269-01
95 269-41
pa
TsS
al & Env
ntal
alyatt, Inc.
INOR ICQCSU Y
DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
DUPLICME RESULTS
ple Duplicate
Method (mg/L) (mg/L)
EPA 150.1
EPA 1602 2
S-D
(S 2
Corresponding Samples: 9 1269-01
OM XCSUN Rev 103194
Control
2
Date
Analyzed
/24/95
/20/95
20

ABE
Bab
BOD
BQL
c/100mL
CEC
Chrom
COD
Crb
DO
DOC
Hex
Hyd
ISE
MMPY
MPN
N/A
SA
SSR
SR
Sp Cond
SM
SPC
TDS
TIMMS
TOC
TON
TOX
TS
TSS
TVS
VSS
WAD
ABBREVIATIONS
Amenable
Alkalinity as Ca�3
Alkalinity as Bicarbonate
Biochemical Oxygen Dernaind
Below Quantitation Limit
Colonies per 100 triL of Sample
Cation Exchange Capacity
Chrotnotropic
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Alkalinity as Carbonate
Dissolved
Dissolved Oxygen
Dissolved Organic Carbon
DistillationfIltration
Extractable (Prepped by Std M $030C)
Free
Hexavalent
Hydroxide
.1011 Selective Electrode
Millimeter per Year
Most Probable Number
Not Applicable
Reactivity
Spike Added
Spike Sample Results
Sample Results
Specific Conductance
Settleable Matter
Standard Plate Count
Total
Total Dissolved Solids
Total Iceldahl Nitrogen
Total Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Nitrogen
Total Organic Halogens
Total Solids
Total Suspended Solids
Total Volatile Solids
Volatile Suspended Solids
Weak and Dissociable

project i:
S e
C lent
Client I.D
S ple I.D.
OttO av)
Industrial & Frviconinenta1Aa1ytE3, Inc. EA
Oil and Grease
781-067
9601269-01
Geraghty & Mi 1 12r
NCO232003
EP 1
SW-846 9070
ray 01, and Gras by Gravim
Selo Quan itation L
Watri
Date Received:
Date Sampled: 0
m(9/1.
Date Date
Prepared Analyzed Analyst
SQL 01/20/95 01/28/88

A Project I:
EA S ple
ient Name
nt Proj. I.D.
ple 1.D.:
Indust
al & Environmental Analyst Inc. A
011 and Grease
781-067
9501269
Geraghty &Mier
ACO232003
QC Blank
Ma a Water
Date Received: N/A
Date S pled: N/A
Date Date
Prepared Analyzed Analyst
SQL 01/20/95 01/23/95 RJR
ents:
(Grav) Oil and Greas by Gray e ic
Below Quantitation Limits
/A e Not Applicable
:otteaPorldlog Sample: 5501269-01

AlliGERAGHTY
ES? NM ,ER, INC,
pwr Environmental Services
Project Number UCZLoo
Project Location CH con.4..,TrO
Laboratorv==arlk
Laboratory Task Order No.
Sample4s)/Affiliation Wit
SAMPLE IDENTITY
Sample Code: L Liquid, S Solid; A - Air
Relinquished
Received by:
Reiinau#sh:ed
Organization:
Organization:
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
Organization:
Organization:
Special In u n R
arks:
Totat No. o B
Cont
Seal Intact?
Yes No NIA
Date 1 1 Time Seal Intact?
Date 1. / Time Yes No N/A
Delivery Method: 0 In Person
0 Common Carrier
0 Lab Courier

Type or Usti a b
Facty Name
Address
Coun
Location
Well identification Number d _ . Well Depth
Well Diameter __�. . s Sample (Screened) Interval .. Ft. To .2,f2,,%(
Depth to Water Level r/.:« 1_ft. below measuring point (before sampling)
Measuring paint is 07,3 ft. above land surface
Gallons of water pumped/bailed before sampling ,.
Field Analysis: pH .__ ,90,. Specific Conductance uMhos Temp
Date Sample Collected _SL.. __Date Lab Sample Analyzed
Laboratory Name
Ft.
Ft.
SAMPLES FOR METALS WERE COLLECTED UNFILTERED AND FIELD ACIDIFIED
COD
Conform: MF Fecal
Coliform: MF Total
(Note: Use MPN method for highly turbid samples)
Dissolved Solids: Total e mg/I
pH (when analyzed) ____ ., units
TOG. ro mg/I
Chloride,�w,,. ��. mg/I
Arsenic ... ___ mg/I
Grease and Oils _ �� mg/I
Hardness: Total mg/I
Phenol mg/I
Sulfate mg/I
Specific Conductance �.
Total A monia ,.-,_ _ ..
TKN as N
°C
PERMIT NUMBER„ (REQUIRED)
Non -Discharge
NPDES
TYPE OF MSPOSAL OPE
(REQUIRED)
Spray Field
Land Applicatio
Rotary Distributor„
ATION BEING fvtONITO I3Eg
Septic Tank Drain Field
Subsurface Low -Pressure
airr9 d 'P}
Odor
Appearance_
Certification No, 8
YES NO
mg/I Write (NO2) as N - mg/1
/100ml Nitrate (NO3) as N _ mg/I
/1 0gml Phosphorus: Total as P _,_mg/I
Al - Aluminum mg/I
Ba - Barium __ mg/I
Ca - Calcium__ _ mg/I
Cd - Cadmiurrrm., e mg/I
Chromium: Total _mg/I
Cu - Copper . . mg/I
Fe - Iron mg/I
Hg - Mercury mg/I
K - Potassium mg/1
Mg - Magnesium _.
uMhos Mn - Manganese . ____ _�
_.. . mg/I Na - Sodium.,..».
mg/I
CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
Signature of litee (or Authorized Agent*)
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
Ni - Nickel
Pb - Lead..
Zn Zinc
Pesticides/Herbicides
(Specify Compounds)
Other (Specify Compounds and
Concentration units)
TOTA: siI r r� -;t7
gil
g/l
g/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
Note: Values should reflect dissolved and
colloidal concentrations. (see #3 on back)
• See back for instructions,
" Submit blue, green, and yellow copies only to address above.
GW-59 REV,

Wes h ould
PIED FOR THE
Metals Ana.
.=i
rr ,,,par tier in fl1
COL
an,ayz E: iE
ETHER USED (SEE,
Stancia
TON.. i L) A Awa V i ?„F ROUND,M ... ,.k Ewe SA ? ".
SAMPLES WHICH ARE NOT ANAI"Y$EwD WITHIN "`- E HOLDING 'flME. SPFCE„.
MOAB DED AND NE SAMPLES COLLECTED
OW) h
NOL MET
ANALYSES ARE TO SE MADE. OF THE MOBILE CONS"LEA°E1E 'E, (DISSOLVED AS ELEw AS, A. TEE
G.ROUNDWATE" E N ' ,T Dic*E T AT ARE A PART OF SLD Mt T .AS5DCIATED WITH WELL CQNSTE U E EE SAEG EAR LL RE
CHECK. VVE "II YOUR LAE`3 RAtt *M E ' ON PROPER PHOCEDUSE S FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION AND PR SEAR "Al ION,
As per Title 15, , No p`t iCaro A&Il
by other rne
.A r 7 c'r lam
Test
C.,)ct+: bE::r,
depth
r.)a. ip `aew t r°a€ s
9, Sam lies must be Morel
Method) 't.
014;794
r dur .;u f
aan be wita;
r ctf":cta:1t"ld
Association, 1I e is .s l Water r r)
Waste, 1979,
r baited
a:r4:s...pw..
be: in ,x?rdance
rt, 1)tr9, f!ar a a ?
dry t a ' ht rE,
t L ram vIL,s
by
tcy

May 3, 1995
Division of Environmental Management
Groundwater Section
P.0. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
RE: Compliance Well Sampling
Roadway Express, Inc.
5201 Sunset Rd.
Charlotte, NC
Gentlemen:
ROADWAY
SERVICES, INC.
1077 GORGE BOULEVARD
AKRON,OH 44310
P.O. BOX 88
AKRON, OH 44309-0088
[phone]
Its conformance with monitoring requirements established in our non -discharge permit
#WQ0003016, we have completed compliance well sampling for April 1995. I have
enclosed Geraghty & Miller's sampling report dated April 28,, 1995 as well as a completed
GW-59 forrn. As can be seen, no problems were identified. Our next sampling date is
scheduled for September 1995,
If you have any questions or need additional information,. please feel free to conta.c
[phone].
Very truly yours,.
Roadway Services, Inc, for
pre
Robert E. ZimmerCPG
Supervisor - Envir tal Services
arlrexlwellsanip
cc: Jim Shilliday - Geraghty & l' Irller
Printed on Recycled Paper

AdireGERAGFITY
P/` MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
A Heidernij mp ny
April 28, 1995
Mr. Robert Zimmermann
Roadway Services, Inc.
1077 Gorge Boulevard
Akron, OH 44310
Re: Analytical Results for the April 12, 1995, Sampling of Compliance Well EP-CMW-1,
Located at the Roadway Express Terminal, 5201 Sunset Road, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Dear Mr. Zimmermann:
This letter report was prepared by Geraghty & Miller, Inc., on behalf of Roadway
Services, Inc. (Roadway). This report presents the results of the April 12, 1995, biannual
sampling event for compliance well EP-CMW-1 located at the above -referenced Roadway
terminal. The location of the terminal is shown on a topographic map in Figure 1. Compliance
well EP-CMW-1 is located near the northeast corner of the holding lagoon shown in Figure 2.
Prior to sampling the compliance well, a depth -to -water measurement was collected. The
depth to water in compliance well EP-CMW-1 on April 12, 1995, was 11.87 feet (ft) below the
top of casing and the casing of the compliance well extends approximately 2.3 ft above land
surface. Following collection of the depth -to -water measurement approximately 6.75 gallons of
water were evacuated from the well using a disposable bailer. During the evacuation process,
water samples were collected from the well each time an additional 2.25 gallons of water had
been removed. These water samples were analyzed for pH, specific conductance, and
temperature using portable meters calibrated in the field. The results of these field
measurements for the April 1995 sampling event are presented on Table 1. The field
measurements indicate that the pH, specific conductance, and temperature were consisitent
throughout the evacuation process.
Following the well purging process, groundwater samples were collected from the well
for laboratory analysis. The samples were collected using a disposable bailer and placed in
appropriately labeled containers, and packed on ice in a cooler. The cooler remained in the
custody of Geraghty & Miller personnel until it was hand delivered to IEA Laboratory. A
chain -of -custody record was enclosed in the cooler to maintain a complete record of all
personnel that had contact with the samples. The laboratory analytical report for the April 12,
1995, sampling event is presented in Attachment A. A copy of the chain -of -custody record is
included with the laboratory report. The water samples were analyzed for total suspended solids
(TSS) using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 160.2, for pH using EPA
Method 150.1, and for oil and grease using SW-846 Method 9070.
l 2.1=21a1rarlhaemr.wry
CmssPknnte 11, 2840 Plaza Place, Suite 350 • Raleigh, forth Carolina 27612 (919) 571166 FAX [phone]

Mr. Robert Zimmermann
April 28, 1995
Page 2
The laboratory analytical results for the April 12, 1995, sampling event are summarized
in Table 2. Oil and grease were not detected in the groundwater sample collected from
compliance well EP-CMW-1 on April 12, 1995. The pH of the water was reported by the
laboratory at 6.2, and TSS were detected in the groundwater sample at 76 milligrams per liter
(mg/L).
An evaluation of the laboratory analytical report was performed. This evaluation
consisted of a review of analytical methods, sample collection date, analysis date, quantitation
limits, matrix spike (MS) results for oil and grease, laboratory duplicate results for pH and TSS,.
and blanks. The data evaluation indicated that the samples were extracted and/or analyzed by
the appropriate methods. The surrogate standards and the blank results are acceptable. These
data are useable and reliable within the confines of this data review.
The next 1995 sampling event for compliance well EP-CMW-1 is scheduled to occur in
ber 1995. If you have any questions or comments regarding this report or the enclosed
cal data package, please call. Jim Shilliday at [phone].
JES/jbw
Attachments
ER, INC.
Sincerely,
GERAGHTY &
des E. Shilliday III
Project Manager
Stephen B. Ellingson, Ph.D.
Associate/Technical Consultant
GERAGHTY ?III..LEl,1?. t?

Table 1, Compli
C 1
Well Purging
a„ April 12, 1995, R
$
way Exp
Gallons Purged
pH
Specific Conductance Tempe
(limbos)
0 5.43 750
2.25 5.76 750
4.50 5.88 750
6.75 5.90 750
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC

Table 2. Sumrnary of A ytical Results for G water Sample Coll� From
Comp1 Wdll -C 4 on April 12, 1995.
Constituent
pH
(EPA Method 150.
TSS
d Grease
(SW846 Method %PO)
6.2
76
RACIFITY \IIU ER, NC

County
Location
1000 0
SCALE 1; 24+000
Contournte+rv+al 10 Feet, Dotum is Mean Sea Level
U.S.G.S '7.5 Minu
GERAGHTY
MILLER, INC.
©ERITA, N.C. Topographic Quadr©n
SITE LOCATION
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
ROADWAY EXPRESS TERMINAL
5201 SUNSET ROAD
CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROUNA
FIGURE

ATI'A(HMENT A
Laboratory Ana1 Report
April 12, 1995, S p Ev
GERAGHTY &"`

Post Office Box 12846 Phan^e 919 677 0090
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Fax G'^y 677 04;`7
IEA
An Aquarion Company
April 26, 1995
JIm Shilliday
Geraghty & Miller
2840 Plaza Place, Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27612
IEA Project No.: 781078/9504339
IEA Reference No.: W9504167
Client Project I.D.: NCO232.003
Dear Mr. Shilliday,
Transmitted herewith are the results of analyses on one sample submitted
to our laboratory.
The sample(s) were received intact.
Analyses were performed according to approved methodologies and meet
the requirements of the IEA Quality Assurance Program except where noted.
Please Bee the enclosed reports for your results and a copy of the Chain
of Custody documentation.
Thank you for selecting IEA for your sample analysis. Please do not
hesitate to call your project manager representative at 1-919-677-0090
or 1-800-444-9919 should you have any questions regarding this report.
We look forward to serving you in the future.
Very truly yours,
IEA, Inc.
Monroe, Sunrise, Schaumburg. N. 8+4fr ICa, Whippany,.
Connecticut. Florida Illinois Massar_nusehs New Jersey
201261 4458 305 846,1730 708.705 0740 508,667.1400 201 428-8181

iEA
An Aquanon Compa*Y
MA -NORTH CARD A
CATIONS

Client N
Client
1
Par
Indust
o act St 78
9504339-01
Geraghty
:SCO232.00.3
EP-CMW 1
Envi onmen
hod
Al .2
Inc
Matrix: Water
Date ved : 04 /13/95
Date S •pied: 04/12/95
Quanti a on Date
Resuis d Analyzed Maly
6.2 N/A 04/ 9
mg/L 04/ 95
s Re, 0 94

Industrial strial Environmenta
781-078
9504339
Client Geraghty &
Client ? oi. i.D.INCO232.003
Sample QC Blank
Par
TES
EPA 160.2
y
Inc.
atri : dates
Date Reeived./A
Date Ssipled N/A
Quantitation
ow; eft.B.
Resul
ate Date
Prepared Analyzed Analyst
BQs NiA
Corresponding B. deer 9 04 9-01
ram RESP3Rev. 191 994
84/18 9 DL

ndust ial & Enviro
ntal
INORGANIC
DUPLICATE
oj c so..701-078
ple No.: 9504339
ix: Water
Tea
Reference No. Pa am t.er Met
9504295-01 pH EPA
9504295-01 TsS EPA 160,2
Inc.
NO
ALE
(S+D 12
x 10 0
Corresponding 9 04339-01
PORE IQCSU14 Rev 103194
control - 20%

0
CEC
orn
Crb
DPI
Hex
Hy d
N/A
p Cond
SPC
TON
TOX
Amenable
ONS
y as Bi nate
jihenca1 0 •en Demand
elow Qi1JtfltiLat1LM1
es
Exe
onto pie
Oxygen. De
as
Disso
1)ii1ved Cory
Dissolved Or e Carbon
Distillation/Titration
Extractable (Prepped by Std 03
Free
11 en
Hydroxide
Ion Sel e Electrode
per Year
Probable Number
Se
To Solids
rr)tI Kjel. Nitrogen
rltil d Liquor
Total 0 bon
T 0 Nitru
Total 0
Total Soli
Total Suspended Solids
Total Volatile Solids
VoHtile Suspended Solids
d Dissociate
nd

Industrial
EA Project #:
IPA S ple I:
Client Name
Client Pro. I»D.
Sample I.D.
Par
O&G (Cray)
C _n
O& ay) = Oil and
elow Quanitat
781-078
9 04 9-01
Geraghty &
S 0 003
E - -1
Environmental Analysts.
Oil and Grease
nc., (IEA)
Matrix: Water
Date Received: 04/1./99
Date Sampled: 04/1 /99
0ntat i an
Limit
SE-846 9070
Date
Prepared
04/21/95
ease by ravi
n Limits
c
Gat
Analyzed
04/22/95 RJR

Indust
ISA Project : 781-078
1A S ple 9504339
Cl Geraghty & i ier
Client: N 0 3 .003
S <ip1e LD. Blank
Par = .+
thud
SW-846 9070
Envirenmentat AnInc.. (
Oil and Grease
Matrix Water
date Received:
Date Sampled: i
Quant
Oil and Grease by
Quantitation 1
tpplicatle
nding Sample: 9 04339- 1
Bete
Results Pre red Analyzed..
SQL 04/ 95 04/22/95

Industria
IE Project I
ISA Sample #
Client
Client Project I D
Sample 1.,
Parameter;
Client N,
+ 50433 -011
and Env ir ntal Analysts,
ASS Report for Gil & Grease
781-078
9504339-01
Geraghty &Hiller
NCO232.003
W-G -1
090 (Grav)
Method
SW-846 9070
Spike Spike g)
Added Revered
25 mg 20.9 mg
:no.
EA)
MatrixWater
pate Rec ved 4 13 '95
Date Sampled 04/12/95
etPrepared: 04/ 1 95
Gate Analyzed: 04/22/95
Recovery
84
c
G el e Oi and ase by Gravl
Spike recovery range. SG% - 120%
Corresponding Sample: 5 4 3 -01
FO S- Rev. 0"71'1
et
S Ple
Conc..
0.0

AVGERAGHTY
AIKS! MILLER, INC.
A Kodemal company
Laboratory Task Order Na
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD Page 1 of I
Project Number „1•3C., Q‘Z• 3 ^ DC*SAMPLE BOtTLE / CONTAINER DESCRIPTION
Project Location CAI Pornorrt
Laboratory _i_G
Sampler(s)/Aftiliation t.
Date/Time
SAMPLE IDENTITY Code Sampled Lab I
olss
Samole Code:
Relinquished
Received by: _
iquid; S Solid; A = Air
Organization:
„ Organization: „.
A
Total No, of Bottles/
Containers
Date_4_02.11c„ Time
DateA___LLe) /(17Time_
Seal Intact'?
lies No N/A
Seal Intact?
Yes No N/A
Relino4ish
Received
Organization:
Organization:
_ Data_ / Time,
Datei___1_ Time
ructio
Delivery Method:
Gam Fom,
n Person E Common Carrier
0 Lab Courier 0 Other
SoAdhp,o 91 lAto#

Facility Name
Address 5201
'+Fell Location.
Well Identification Nu
Well Diameter 2"
Type or Use ball-point' pen and prey firmly.
Well Depth Ft.
ple (Screened) Interval a S.0 Ft. To 26.0 . Ft.
Depth to Water Level Imo. ILA ft. below measuring point (before sampling)
Measuring point is zr"3 ft. above land surface
Gallons of water pumped/bailed before sampling
Field Analysis: pH yE Specific Conductance !_ . uMhos Ter
Date Sample Collected , "Pt6 Date Lab Sample Analyzed
Laboratory Name J4.
SAMPLES FOR METALS WERE COLLECTED UNFILTERED AND FIELD ACID
COD mg/1
Coliform: MF Fecal
/1 OOml
Coliform: MF Total . /1OOm1
(Note: Use MPN method for highly turbid samples)
Dissolved Solids: Total mgA
pH (when analyzed) units
TOC mg/I
Chloride
Arsenic
Grease and Oils
Hardness: Total
Phenol
Sulfate
Mg - Magnesium
Specific Conductance uMhos Mn - Manganese
Total Ammonia mg/I Na - Sodium
TKN as N, mg/I
mg/I
mgA
mg'/I
mg/1
mgA
mgA
I CERTIFYTHAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
Signature of P
GW-59 REV. 6/9'
e (or Authorized Agent')
Nitrate (NO3) as N.,,..
Phosphorus: Total as P
Al - Aluminum, .y.�
Ba - Barium
Ca - Calcium,
PERMIT NUMBER: (REQUIRED)
Non -Discharge
NPDES
TYPE OF DISPOSAL OPERATION BEING MONITORED
(REQUIRED)
Lagoon Septic TOW it Field
Spray Field Subsurface La -Press[:
Piping (LPP)
Land Application of Sludge
Other
Rotary Distributor
Appearance cC
Cert►fication No.
IEt YES q NO
Nitrite (NO) as N mgA
mgA
mgA
mgA
mg/1
mg/l
Cd - Cadmium .. mg/I
Chromium: Total mgA
Cu - Copper mgA
Fe - Iron mgA
Hg - Mercury mg/1
K - Potassium mgA
mg/I
mgA
mgA
Ni - Nicks
Pb - Lead
Zn - Zinc
Pesticides/Herbicides
(Specify Compounds)
Other (Specify Compounds and
Concentration units)
fare
gA
mgA
ug/I
u g/I
ug/l
ugA
ug/I
JitA
Note: Values should reflect dissolved and
colloidal concentrations. (see #3 on back)
R See back for instructions.
" Submit blue, green, and yellow copies only to address above.

COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
Sarnpies should be analyzed as soon as possible after collection, SAMPLES WHICH ARE NOT ANALYSED WITHIN THE HOLDING TI E SPECI-
FIED FOR THE METHOD USED (SEE #4, BELOW) MUST BE DISCARDED AND NEW SAMPLES COLLECTED,
2, Metals Analyses: Use Standard Method 3030C for sample preparation (mercury excluded). N. i r;ER METAL,; AF
Unfiltered samples must be collected for metals, then field acidified with 5 , l concentrated nitrle acid per liter of sample, and shoultf be sl.rlrraitted to the
lab within 24 hours,
ample preparation in the laboratory (extraction and filtration) must be completed within 72 t'lours of collection,
ANALYSES ARE TO BE MADE OF T E OBILE CONSTITUENTS (DISSOLVED AS WELL AS COLLOIDAL) EN THE
GROUNDWATER, N.Q1 AK A Of DIM tn: TER Willi Cc) ! .P A
CHECK WITH YOUR LABORATORY ON PROPER PROCEDURES FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION AND PRESERVATION,
4, N per Title t , North Carolina Admit') ative Code, Subchapter 2L, analytical procedures shall be in accordance with the rraethod den' 'bed in one of
the foafow fig publications, or by other methods approved beforehand by the Director, Division of Environs ental
Management w
(,a) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th Edition, 1985 and 17th Editkn, 1989, pufurlisf od jointly by
American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation
(b) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Waste, 1979, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency publication number
EPA-600/4-79-020, as revised March 1983;
(c) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes: Physical/Chemical Methods, 3rd Edition,, 1986, U.S. Environmental Protect' Agency
publication number SW-846;
(d) Test Pr,ceduros for tho Analysis of Poiluants Under the Clean Water Act, Federal Register Vol. 49, No, 209, 40 CFR Part 136,.
October 26, 198 ;
5„ Measure and record the depth of water Li' r tl° e well prior to pumping or bailing any water from the well.
6. At least 3 volumes of water in the well should be pumped or bailed prior to collecting a sample for analysie if the well is purrrped/bailed dry before 3 well
volumes are removed, samples can be collected as soon as the well recovers to the point where enough water is available. to collect your sample,
7. Determination for pH, Specific Conductance, tet'nperature, odor and appearance must be made in the field on unfiltered samples f'at n the sample is
collected,
8. Field equipment rnd st be calibrated in accordance with r000rrr r rendations by the manufaacturcru.
9. Samples must be filtered through a 0.45 micron filter IfT1rnediat Jy after collection when a dissolved analysis is required (See #4. above)
10. The sample container should belabeled,at the time of collection with the facility name, writ identification nua r and date and time collected,
11, "Authorized agent is any corporate officer or public official authorized by the company, corporation, or governmental body to,sign official documents.

Facility Na
Address _-..1g<21
Well Location N
Well Identification Num
Well Diameter 2.1.
Depth to Water Level _It
Measuring point is
Gallons of water pumped/bailed
Field Analysis: pH .549
Date Sample Collected
Laboratory Name
SAMPLES FOR METAL
COD
Coliform F Fecal
Coliform: MF Total
(Note: Use MPN method for hlghly turbid samples)
ample
or Use a ba l-p
int<
Ft.
nterval 5O FI, To Ft_
below measuring point (before sampling)
above land surface
before sampling 4.7s
Specific Conductance uMhos Temp.
Date Lab Sample Analyzed_V
COLLECTED UNFILTERED AND FIELD ACID FIED
mg/I Nitrite (NO2) as N
/100m1 Nitrate (NO3) as N
/100m1 Phosphorus: Total
Al - Aluminum
Dissolved Solids: Total mg/I Ba - Barium
pH (when analyzed) _units Ca - Calcium
TOC mg/I Cd - Cadmium
Chloride mg/1 Chromium: Total
Arsenic mg/I Cu - Copper
Grease and Oils 5 mg/I Fe - Iron
Hardness: Total mg/1 Hg - Mercury
Phenol _ mg/I K - Potassium
Sulfate mg/I Mg - Magnesium
Specific Conductance uMhos Mn - Manganese
Total Ammonia mg/I Na - Sodium
TKN as N mg/I
PERMIT NUMBE
Non -Disc
NPDES
PE QF DISPOSAL OPE ATION BEING MONITORED
(REQUIRED)
Lagoon
Spray Field
Septic Tank/Drain Field
Subsurface Low -Pressure
Piping (LPP)
_ Land Application of Sludge
Rotary Distributor
Appearance CfrlZ
ton No, #
Y S NO
mgi
mg/I
mg/I
mg/1
mg/I
mg/I
mgil
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
mg)!
mg/I
Ni Nickel_
Pb - Lead
Zn - Zinc
Pesticides/Herbicides
(Specify Compounds)
Other
Other (Specify Compounds and
Concentration units)
9/1
mg/1
mg/I
ug/1
ug/I
ug/I
ug/1
ug/I
I CERTIFY THAT THIS
Signature o
GW-59 REV, 6
EPO
T IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
ee (or Authorized Agent')
Note; Values should reflect dissolved and
colloidal concentrations. (see #3 on back)
See back for instruciions.
** Submit blue, green, and yellow copies only to address above.

COLLECT ON AND ANALYSIS OF GROUNDWATER sAmptEg
Samples should b malyzed as soon as possible after collection. SAMPLES WHICH ARE NOT ANALYSED WITHIN THE HOLDNG T E SPEa
FIED FOR THE METHOD USED (SEE #4. BELOW) MUST BE DISCARDED AND NEW SAMPLES COLLECTED.
2. Metals Ana, ndardWethed 3030C for sample preparation (mercury excluded). QQ14Q1EELTERMJ
Unfiltered samples must be collected for metals, then field acidified with 5 ml concentrated nitric acid per liter of sample,a,
lab within 24 hours.
Sample preparation in the laboratory (extraction a d filtration) must be completed:Witt:ring2 ffoUrS,oftel
-
3, ANALYSES ARE TO BE MADE OF THE MOBILE CONSTITUENTS (DISSOLVEDAS WELL AS COLLOIDAL) IN THE
CHECK will: YOUR LABORATORY ON ROPER PROCEDURES FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION AND PRESERVATION„
GROUNDWATER, „ 1 NIE A DE AssMATgp „ c ti 015.44
Codi%-Stjtchapter 2L, analytiCal procedures shall be4tY accordance with the meth
approved .eforehand y 117001reOtor, DiVision of EnvironMental
4, AS per Titre 15, North Caron
tfte folloWjng publications, or by ct
nt:
Jibed n o e of
) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th Edition, 1985 d 17th Edition, 1989, published jolt ty by
American Public Heath Association, American Water Works Association a d Water Pollution Control Federation:
(b) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Waste, 1979, U.S, Environmental Protection Agency publication number
EPA-60014-79-020, as revised March 1983;
(c) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes: Physical/Chemical Methods, 3rd Edition, 1986, U.S. Environmental Protection Agony
publication number SW-846;
(d) Test Procedures for the Analysis of Polluants Under the Clean Water Act, Federal Register Vol. 49, No. 209, 40 CFR Part 136,
October 26, 1984;
5. Measure and record the depth of water in the well prior to pumping or bailing any ,wator fromthe
6„ At least 3 volumes of water in the well should be pumped or bailed prior to collecting a sa ple for ,analysis, if the.wel 'pumped/bailed dry b fore 3 well
,volu es are removed., samples can be collected as soon as the weltrecovers to the point where enough water is avai able to coIkct your sarnple
„
7.
,diternmaation,forApt4 :,S,p.ecific:Conduc,t4oce temperature odor and appearance must be made in the field on unfiltered samples when the sample is
Collected.
8. Field equipment rnust hecalibraedin ance with ommendations by the manufacturer.
9. Samples must be filtered through a 0,45 micron filter immediately after collection when a d ssolved analysis is required, (S e #4above)
10.The sample contair u shouldbo labeled ,at the time of collection with the facility name, well identification number and date and ti
effected.
11 ."Authorized agent" is any corporate oflicer or public official authorized by, thecompany, coiporation, or governmental body to sign official documents.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
/A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 1,, 1996
/ROBERT E ZJMMERMAN CPG
4i: ROADWAY EXPRESS
P 0 BOX 471
AKRON OH 44309-0471
Dear Mr. Zimme
14',33'.;333 r3y3:
Subject: Acknowledgment of Perrnit Rescission Request
Roadway Express
State Permit No, WQ0003016
Mecklenburg County
Recycle System Permit
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that State Permit No. WQ0003016 be
rescinded, Your request indicated that this facility has attached to city sewer and the permit
is no longer needed.
Please note that the Groundwater Section of the Division must concur with the
abandonment of the groundwater monitoring well before the abandonment of the well can
occur or the permit be rescinded. Please contact Barbara Christian or Peggy Finley of the
Mooresville Regional Office at [phone], concerning the proper abandonment of the
groundwater monitoring well.
By copy of this letter, I am requesting confirmation from our Mooresville Regional
Office that this permit is no longer needed. After verification by the regional office that the
permit is no longer needed, State Permit No. WQ0003016 will be rescinded.
If there is a need for any additional information or clarification, please do not hesitate
to contact Robert Farmer at [phone], ext. 531.
Sincerely,
Z: f,1.
Robert L. Sledge, Supervisor
Compliance/ Enforcement Group
cc: Mooresville Water Quality Regional Supervisor - wiattachments
Mooresville Regional Groundwater Supervisor - w/attachments
Permits & Engineering Unit - Carolyn McCaskill- w/attachnients
Compliance/Rescission Files - w/attachments
Groundwater Section - Permits &. Compliance Unit - iv/attachments
Central Files- wiattachments
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

1077 GORGE BOULEVARD • AKRON, OH 44310 • PO. BOX 471 • AKRON, OH 44309-0471 (216) 384-17
January 9, 1996
Ms. Coleen Sullins.
NCDEHNR
Permits and Engineering
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
RE: Water Quality Permit No, WQ0003016
Roadway Express, Inc„
5201 Sunset Road
Charlotte, NC
Dear Ms. Sullins:
Pursuant to several letters we have received from your office, I am writing to you to request thltt
the above referenced permit be rescinded. As you know, we have tied into city sewer and
and no longer discharge into the surface impoundment (evaporation pond)
As you may know, we sampled a monitoring well situated hydraulically downgradient otthe
mpoundment on a semi-annual basis. As we no longer discharge, we will cease our monitoring
of this well, As a matter of information, we plan to begin closure of the surface impoundment
and treatment system and plan to simply remove the back wall so that it will no longer retain
water, Are there any specific requirements for closure of such a facility? Please call me at (216)
258-2412 to discuss our situation
REZ/Img-c.su ns
cc: Bob Pricerf681
Very Truly Yours,
Express, Inc.
Robert E. Zi errnann, CPG
Supervisor jV vironmental Services
RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 1996
FACILITIES ASSESSMENT UNIT

NON NPDES FACILITY AND PERMIT DATA
UPDATE OPTION TRXID 50U KEY 410000,3016
PERSONAL DATA FACILITY APPLYING FOR PERMIT APP/PERMIT FEE -$ 200.00 REGION
FACILITY NAME) ROADWAY EXPRESS. INC-TRUCK0w004 COUNTY> MECKLE BURG 03
ADDRESS: MAILING (REQUIRED) ENGINEER:
STREET; 1077 GORGE BLVD,;PO BOX 471 STREET:
CITY: AKRON ST OH ZIP 4130.9 CITY: ST ZIP 27511
TELEPHONE [phone] TELEPHONE:
STATE CONTACT> KEPLER FACILITY CONTACT ROBERT E. Z1 MERMANN
TYPE OF PROJECT) RECYCLE SYSTEM 09 LAT: 3518460 LONG: 08050350
DATE APP RCVD 11/11/94 N=NEW,M=MODIFICATION.R=REISSUE> R
DATE ACKNOWLEDGED 11/15/94 DATE REVIEWED 12/07/94 RETURN DATE / /
REG COMM REQS 11/18/91 DATE DENIED / / NPDES u-
REG COMM RCVD 12/02/94 DATE RETURNED / / TRI8 0 ,0000 MGD
ADD INFO REQS / / OT AG COM REQS 11/18/94 TRIB DATE- / /
ADD INFO RCVD / / OT AG COM RCVD 02/22/95
END STAT APP P 02/12/95 DATE ISSUED 02/28/95 DATE EXPIRE 01/31/00
FEE CODE( 9 )1=(.1MGD),2=010KGD).3=DIKGD),4=01KGD+SF),5=(S)300A),6=(S(=300A
7=(SENDEL),8=(SEDEL)9=(CLREC),0=(NO FEE) DISC CODES 02 37 73 78 ASN/CHG PRMT
ENG CERT DATE 11/11/91 LAST NOV DATE 10/23/95 CONBILL( )
COMMENTS: 7,900 GPD RECYCLE FACILITY:ATTACHED TO CMUD-RF ;SUNSET RD TERMI
MESSAGE: m410 DATA MODIFIED SUCCESSFULLY swm
01/26/96 08 56 :52

Jan 26 '96 8:48 P. 01/02
NCH - WO Fax:[phone]
1077 GQIICE ecui FVADD• AKPC)M1L CH 4431C 4 PO, X 471 • AgRON, CM 44309-0471 • (210 334-1717
January 9, 1996
P
Ms, Co1ccn Sullins
NCDE.I4NR
Permits and Engineering
Box. 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
RE: Water Quality Permit No, WQ00030 6
Roadway Express, Inc
5201 Sunset Road
Charlotte, NC
Dear Ms. Sullins:
Pursuant to several letters we have received from your office, 1 am writitig to you to request tiiht
the above referenced pennit be rescinded. As you know, we have tied into city sewer and w
and no longer discharge into the surface impoundment (evaporation pond).
As you may know, we sampled a monitoring well situated hydraulically downgra ent 0 e
impoundment on a semi-annual basis. As we no longer discharge, we will cease our monitoring
of this well. As a matter of information, we plan to begin closure of the surface impoundment
and treatment system and plan to simply remove the back wall so that it will no longer retain
water. Are there any specific requirements for closure of such a facility? Please call me at (216)
258-2412 to discuss our situation.
Very Truly Yours,
Robert CPG
Supervisor vironmental Services
REZ/lIng-c.sullins
cc; Bob Price/T681

ERRTIONS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone]
Jan 26
8:49 P. 02 02
State of Noah Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., PE., Director
January 26,1995
GREG SAWYERS PLANT ENGMER
TAYLOR BROTHERS - TOBACCO MANUFA 6
P 0 BOX 597
\WINSTON-SALEM NC 27102
Subject: Acknowledgment of Permit Rescissiofl Request
Taylor Brothers-Tobacw Ri 6
State Permit No. WQ0005013
Forsyth County
Spray Irrigation System Permit
yers:
This is to acknowiedge receipt your request that State Permit No, WQ0005013 be
rescinded. Your request mdicated that this facility no longer utilizes this Spray Irrigatioa
System and the associated Lagoon as a means of waste disposal and that the permit is no
longer needed. Please note that the Croundwater Section of the Division must concur with
the abandonment of the groundwater monitoring wells before the abandonment of the wells
shall occur.
By copy of this letter, 1 am requesting confirmation from our Winston-Salem Regional
office that this pvainit is no longer needed. After verification by the Regional Water Quality
and Groundwater Sections that the permit and wells are no longer neeAlcd, State Permit No.
WQ0005011 will be rescinded.
If there is a need for any additional information o lanfication, please do not hesitate
to contact Robert Fanner at [phone] ext. 531.
Sincerely.
Robert Supervisor
ConwlianceJ Enforcerncnt Group
GC: Water Quality Regional Su nts
Regional Groundwater Supervisor nts
Permits & Engineering Unit - Carolyn M w achments
ComplianceiResci ssion Files - wiattachme
Central Files- Ai/attachments
P,O, Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27628-035 Telephone [phone] FAX 0 7
An Equal Opportuntty Affirmative Action Ernpiover 50% recycled( 10% post-coneurner aper

OPERRTIO% BRRNCH W0 Fax :[phone]
Jan, 26 '96 10:04
P. 01/01
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
January 27, 1996
ROBERT B
ROADWAY EXPRESS
P 0 BOX 471
AKRON OH 44309-0471
Subject; Acknowledgment of Permit Resc
Roadway Express
State Permit No. WQ0003016
Mecklenburg County
Recycle System Permit
Dear Mr. Zimmerinan:
10
Request
to acknowledge receipt of your1ues1 that State Permit No. WQ0003016 be
Your recluest indkated that this facility no longer unitizes this Recycle System as
a means of waste disposal and that the permit is o longer needed. Please not that the
Groundwater Section of the Division must concur with the abandonment of the
groundwater monitoring well before the abandonn3ent of the well can occur. Please contact
Barbara Christian Of Peggy Finley of the Mooresville Regional Office @ (7(4) 663-1699,
concerning abandonment of the groundwater monitoring well.
By copy of this letter, I am requesting confirmation from our Mooresvi1h Regional
Office Groundwater Section that this permit is no longer needed. After verification by the
Regional Groundwater Section that the permit and well are no longer needed and properly
abandoned, State Permit No. WQ0003016 will be rescinded.
If there is a need for any additional information or clatification, please do not hesitate
to contact Robert Farmer at [phone]. ext. 531.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Sledge, Supe:rvisor
Compliance/ Enforcement Group
cc: Mooresville Water Quality Regional Supervisor - wia clunents
Mooresville Regional Groundwater Supervisor - w/attachments
Permits ik Engineering Unit - Carolyn McCaskill- wiattaehments
ComplianceiRescission Piles - wfattachmenN
Central Files- wiattachments
P.O. Box 29535, Ralei h, North CaroIna 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal ORportunity AffIrmativa Action Empioyer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

!iF
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., RE., Director
Mr. Robert E. Zimmermann,CPG
Roadway Express, Inc.
1077 Gorge Boulevard
P.O. Box 88
Akron, Ohio 44309
Dear Mr, Zimmermann:
Nor. .
VTRON MFT
RP.5.
Subject: Perrnit No. WQ0003016
Roadway Express, Inc.
Sunset Road Terminal
Wastewater Recycle / Evaporation
Treatment Facility
Mecklenburg County
In accordance with your application received November 14, 1994, we are forwarding herewith
Permit No. WQ0003016, dated February 28, 1995, to Roadway Express, Inc. for the continued operation
of the subject wastewater recycle system. Be advised of condition 23 of this permit requiring connection
of the sanitary and vehicle wash wastewater to Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department's (CMUD)
collection system. Modification of this pemnt must be requested upon completion of the sewer connection
to the CMUD system.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until January 31, 2000, shall void Permit
No. WQ0003016 issued June 25, 1993, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified
therein. Please pay particular attention to the monitoring requirements in this permit Failure to establish
an adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required operational information will result in future
compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the
right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of
this permit. This request rnust be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of North
Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447,
Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

If you need additional
[phone]
auon concerning this maner,please contact Mr Randy K pl
cc: Mecklenburg County Health p ent
Mooresville Regionalt fice, Water Quality tion
Moo vide glottal, Office, Groundwater troll
Jack Floyd, Central Office Groundwater Section
Mr. Robbie Lowe, Terminal M ger-Roadway Expres
Tr ing and Certification Unit
Facilities Assessment Unit

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
RECYCLE SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with e provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Caroiina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Roadway Express, Inc.
Mecklenburg County
FOR THE
continued operation of a 7,885 GPD wastewater recycle system which has been converted to an
evaporation facility consisting of a septic tank, a dosing tank with dual alternating siphons, 2,544 square
feet of dual surface sand filters, chlorination facilities for domestic waste, a flow measuring device, a
365,000 gallon holding lagoon, a recycle pump, a settling basin, an oil/water separator with oil storage
tank and a carbon absorption unit designed to treat 2,880 GPD of contaminated groundwater prior to being
discharged to the recycle facility to serve Roadway Express, Inc's Sunset Road Terminal, with no
discharge of wastes to the surface waters, pursuant to the application received November 14, 1994, and in
conformity with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and
approved by the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources and considered a part of this
permit.
This pemiit shall be effective from the date of issuance until January 31, 2000, shall void Permit
No. WQ0003016 issued June 25, 1993, and shall be subject to the following specified conditions and
limitations:
1. This permit shall become voidable unless the facilities are constructed in accordance with
the conditions of this perrnit, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting
data.
This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes described in
the application and other supporting data.
3. The facilities shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
4. This permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the facilities to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request must be
submitted to the Division of Environmental Management accompanied by an application
fee, documentation from the parties involved, and other supporting materials as may be
appropriate. The approval of the request will be considered on its merits and may or may
not be approved.

5. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those
actions that may be required by this Division, such as the construction of additional or
replacement treatment or disposal facilities.
The residuals generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed in accordance with
General Statute 143-215,1 and in a manner approved by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management.
The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for damages
to surface or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this facility.
10. The facilities shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to
prevent the discharge of any wastewater resulting from the operation of this facility.
11. Diversion or bypassing of untreated wastewater from the treatment facilities is prohibited,
12. Freeboard in the holding lagoon and settling basin shall not be less than two feet at any
time.
13. Any monitoring deemed necessary by the Division of Environmental Management to insure
surface and ground water protection will be established and an acceptable sampling
reporting schedule shall be followed,
14. Adequate inspection, maintenance, and cleaning shall be provided by the Permittee to
insure proper operation of the subject facilities.
15. The Permittee or his designee shall inspect the wastewater recycle facilities to prevent
malfunctions and deterioration, operator errors and discharges which may cause or lead to
the release of wastes to the environment, a threat to human health, or a nuisance. The
Permittee shall maintain an inspection log or summary including at least the date and time of
inspection, observations made, and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken by
the Permittee. This log of inspections shall be maintained by the Permittee for a period of
three years from the date of the inspection and shall be made available to the Division of
Environmental Management or other permitting authority, upon request.
16. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property,
premises or place on or related to the recycle system at any reasonable time for the purpose
of determining compliance with this permit, may inspect or copy any records that must be
maintained under the terms and conditions of this permit, and may obtain samples of
groundwater, surface water, or leachate.
17. The annual administering and compliance fee must be paid by the Permittee within thirty
(30) days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly may cause
the Division to initiate action to revoke this permit as specified by 15A NCAC 2H .0205
(c)(4),
18. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may subject the
Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Environmental Management in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6(a) to 143-215.6(c).
19. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with any and
all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other government
agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
20. A set of approved plans and specifications for the subject project must be retained by the
Permittee for the life of this project.
2

21. Noncompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office, telephone
number 704-663-1699, as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the
next working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of
the following:
a. Any occurrence at the wastewater treatment facility which results in the treatment of
significant amounts of wastes which are abnonnal in quantity or characteristic, such as
the durnping of the contents of a basin or tank, the known passage of a slug of
hazardous substance through the facility, or any other unusual circumstances;
b. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that renders the facility
incapable of adequate wastewater treatment, such as mechanical or electrical failures of
pumps, aerators, compressors, etc.;
c. Any failure of a pumping station, sewer line, or treatment facility resulting in a by-pass
directly to receiving waters without treatment of all or any portion of the influent to
such station or facility; or
d. Any time that self -monitoring information indicates that the faciLity is not in compliance
with its permit limitations.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter
form within 15 days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report must outline
the actions taken or proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem does not recur.
22. Upon classification of the facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall
employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in responsible charge (ORC) of
the wastewater treatment facilities. The operator must hold a certificate of the type and
grade at least equivalent to or greater than the classification assigned to the wastewater
treatment facilities by the Certification Commission. The Permittee must also employ a
certified back-up operator of the appropriate type and grade to comply with the conditions
of Title 15A, Chapter 8A, .0202. The ORC of the facility must visit each Class I facility at
least weekly and each Class II, III, and IV facility at least daily, excluding weekends and
holidays, and must properly manage and document daily operation and maintenance of the
facility and must comply with all other conditions of Title 15A, Chapter 8A, .0202.
23. The Permittee shall pursue a permit to discharge its domestic and vehicle wash wastewater
to the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department's wastewater collection system. Upon
connection of the service, the Permittee shall request modification to the wastewater recycle
permit to reflect the appropriate changes. At modification, the groundwater monitoring
requirements will be reevaluated and removed if appropriate.
24. The monitoring well (MW-1) shall be sampled every January, April, and September for the
following parameters:
pH
Water Level
Oil and Grease
Total Suspended Solids
Volatile Organic Compounds -In September only (by Method 1 or 2 below)
Method 1: Method 62301) (Capillary - Column), "Standard Methods for the Examination of
Water and Wastewater", 17th edition, 1989
Method 2: Method 502.2 " Methods for the Deterrnination of Organic Compounds in
Drinking Water", United States Environmental Protection Agency - 600/4-88/0 9
3

The measurement of water leveis rnust be made prior to sampling for the re aming
parameters. The depth to water in each well shall be me
the top of the casing.
red from the surveyed point on
The measuring points (top of well casing) of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed to
provide the relative elevation of the measuring point for each monitoring well.
If TOC concentrations greater than 10 mg/1 are detected in any downgradient monitoring
well, additional sampling and analysis must be conducted to identify the individual
constituents comprising this TOC concentration. If the TOC concentration as measured in
the background monitor well exceeds 10 mg/1, this concentration will be taken to represent
the naturally occurring TOC concentration. Any exceedances of this naturally occurring
TOC concentration in the downgradient wells shall be subject to the additional sampling
and analysis as described above.
The results of the sampling and analysis shall be sent to the Groundwater Section, Permits
and Compliance Unit, P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535 on Form GW-59
[Compliance Monitoring Report Form} every February, May, and October.
25. The COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations in
15A NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. The Compliance Boundary
for the disposal system constructed prior to December 31, 1983 is established at either (I)
500 feet from the waste disposal area, or (2) at the property boundary, whichever is closest
to the waste disposal area. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond
the Compliance Boundary is subject to immediate remediation action in addition to the
penalty provisions applicable under General Statute 143-215.6A(a)(1).
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2L, a REVIEW BOUNDARY is established around the
disposal systems midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the
waste disposal area. Any exceedance of standards at the Review Boundary shall require
remediation action on the part of the perminee.
26. Oil drained from engine crankcases, antifreeze or degreasing solvent wastes shall not be
discharged into the disposal system.
27. The effluent from the groundwater remediation system shall be analyzed every January,
April, and September by EPA Method 6230D. The results shall be submitted with the
groundwater monitoring data as indicated above.
28. Any additional groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division, shall
be provided.
29. A weekly maintenance log shall be kept indicating all repairs and inspections conducted.
This information shall be submitted to the Mooresville Regional Office on or before
January 31st of the following year.
30. Stormwater in excess of that permitted to be treated and disposed of, pursuant to the
following paragraph, shall be diverted away from the treatment facilities.
31. This permit authorizes the treatment and disposal of 400 GPD of domestic wastewater,
1,300 GPO of equipment washdown, 5,250 GPD of stormwater, and 2,880 GPD of
contaminated groundwater only. Any increase of wastewater from any source will require
a permit amendment prior to discharge of any additional wastewater to the treannent
facility.
32. Oil shall be disposed of in an approved manner.
4

No sludge shall he disposed of unless prior wriuen approval is obtained from the Division
of Environmental Management.
34. Any modification of the treatment or disposal facilities without prior approval from the
Division will subject the permittee to the Enforcement Authority of the Environmental
Management Co sion and can subject the pemu to a fine not to exceed $10, per
day per violation.
35. The Perrnittee, at 1. t six (6) months pdor to the expiration of this permit, shall request its
extension. Upon receipt of the request, the Commission will review the adequacy of the
facilities described therein, and if w tzd, will extend the permit for such period of time
and under such conditions and limitations as it may deem appropriate,
Permit Issued this the twenty eighth day of February, 1995
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRO
A. Presto oward, Director
Division ofEnvironrnental Management
By Authority of the Environmental ManagementCommission
AG
'COMMISSION
Permit Number WQ0003016

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
F-ealt-1 and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., PE,, Director
March 7, 1995
Roadway Express, Inc.
1077 Gorge Boulevard
Post Office Box 88
Akron, OH 44309
Attn: Mr. Robert E. Zimmerman, CPG
SUBJECT: Permit No. WQ0003016/GW94248
Roadway Express, Inc.
Sunset Boulevard Terminal
Wastewater Recycle/Evaporation
Treatment Facility
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr, Zimmerman:
N.0
ENVIRONMENT, HEAL ,
& NATURAL RESOURCES
MAR 1 4 1995
IIIISIUN Ot 91111WRIAINIAL MOMENT
MOOKIVILLE DIM
In accordance with the policy of the Division of Environmental
Management to ensure the good quality of North Carolina's
groundwater, the referenced Permit requires several activities
related to groundwater monitoring. The following guidelines and
forms are presented to assist you in complying with those
requirements. If you have any questions concerning these matters,
you should contact Barbara Christian at the address shown below to
discuss the requirements relevant to your specific facility:
Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Condition No. 24: Sampling of the referenced wells
schedule and for the constituents listed below:
SCHEDULE:
on the
The monitoring well MW-1 shall be sampled every
January, April, and September.
CONSTITUENTS: Oil and Grease
PH
Volatile Organic Compounds
Method 1 or 2 below)
Total Suspended Solids
Water Level
- in September only (by
P,O, Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Zimmerman
March 7, 1995
Page 2
Method 1.: Method 6230D (Capillary - Column),
"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater", 17th ed., 1989
Method 2: Method 502.2 "Methods for the
Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking
Water", U.S. EPA - 600/4-88/039
The measurement of water levels must be made prior to sampling
for the remaining parameters.
If any volatile organic compounds are detected by Method 6230D,
or the equivalent Method 502.2, then EPA Methods 604 and 611 must
also be run to detect other organic compounds which may be present.
The results of all analyses specified in the monitoring
requirements, including 604 and 611 if required, must be submitted
simultaneously.
* A sumply of forms (GW-59) on which the analytical results
mugt be reported are attached. Instructions are provided on the
reverse of the white copy of each four part form. The analytical
results should be sent the address shown at the top of the form and
are due in our office no later than the last working day of the
month following sample collection.
* FOR ANYADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO REQUIREMENTS FOR
GROUNDWATER OUALITY PROTECTION, PLEASE REFER TO YOUR pERMIT. A
copy of the Groundwater Requirements for Permit NO. WQ0003016 is
attached for your reference.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
me at [phone] EXT. 435.
Since e y,
Cynthia A. Boyles
Hydrogeological Technician II
Permits and Compliance
Groundwater Section
Attachments
cc: a baa Ciwastian
Central Files
Compliance Monitoring Files

Noncompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office, telephone
number 704-663-1699, as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the
next working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of
the following;
a. Any occurrence at the wastewater treatment facility which results in the treatment of
significant amounts of wastes which are abnormal in quantity or characteristic, such as
the dumping of the contents of a basin or tank, the known passage of a slug of
hazardous substance through the facility, or any other unusual circumstances;
b. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that renders the facility
incapable of adequate wastewater treatment, such as mechanical or electrical failures of
pumps, aerators, compressors, etc.;
c. Any failure of a pumping station, sewer line, or treatment facility resulting in a by-pass
directly to receiving waters without treatment of all or any portion of the influent to
such station or facility; or
d. Any time that self -monitoring information indicates that the facility is not in complianee
with its permit limitations.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter
form within 15 days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report must outline
the actions taken or proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem does not recur.
22. Upon classification of the facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall
employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in responsible charge (ORC) of
the wastewater treatment facilities, The operator must hold a certificate of the type and
grade at least equivalent to or greater than the classification assigned to the wastewater
treatment facilities by the Certification Commission, The Permittee must also employ a
certified back-up operator of the appropriate type and grade to comply with the conditions
of Title 15A, Chapter 8A, .0202. The ORC of the facility must visit each Class I facility at
least weekly and each Class II, III, and IV facility at least daily, excluding weekends and
holidays, and must properly manage and document daily operation and maintenance of the
facility and must comply with all other conditions of Title 15A, Chapter 8A, .0202.
The Permittee shall pursue a permit to discharge its domestic and vehicle wash wastewater
to the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department's wastewater collection system. Upon
connection of the service, the Permittee shall request modification to the wastewater recycle
permit to reflect the appropriate changes. At modification, the groundwater monitoring
requirements will be reevaluated and removed if appropriate.
The monitoring well (MW-1) shall be sampled every January, April, and September o
following parameters:
pH
Water Level
Oil and Grease
Total Suspended Solids
Volatile Organic Compounds -In September only (by Method 1 or 2 below)
Method 1: Method 6230D (Capillary - Column), "Standard Methods for the Examination of
Water and Wastewater", 17th edition, 1989
Method 2: Method 502,2 " Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in
Drinking Water", United States Environmental Protection Agency - 600/4-88/039
3

The measurement of waler levcls must be made prior to sampling for the remaining
parameters. The depth to water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed point on
the top of the casing.
The measuring points (top of well casing) of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed to
provide the relative elevation of the measuring point for each monitoring we
If TOC concentrations greater than 10 mg/1 are detected in any downgradient monitoring
well, additional sampling and analysis must be conducted to identify the individual
constituents comprising this TOC concentration. If the TOC concentration as measured in
the background monitor well exceeds 10 mg/l, this concentration will be taken to represent
the naturally occurring TOC concentration. Any exceedances of this naturally occurring
TOC concentration in the downgradient wells shall be subject to the additional sampling
and analysis as described above.
The results of the sampling and analysis shall be sent to the Groundwater Section, Permits
and Compliance Unit, P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535 on Form GW-59
[Compliance Monitoring Report Form] every February, May, and October.
The COMPLIANCE BOUNCIARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations in
15A NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. The Compliance Boundary
for the disposal system constructed prior to December 31, 1983 is established at either (1)
500 feet from the waste disposal area, or (2) at the property boundary, whichever is closest
to the waste disposal area. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond
the Compliance Boundary is subject to immediate remediation action in addition to the
penalty provisions applicable under General Statute 143-215.6A(a)(1).
In accordance with 15.A NCAC 2L, a REVIEW 1301.3\IDARY is established around the
disposal systems midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the
waste disposal area. Any exceedance of standards at the Review Boundary shall require
remediation action on the part of the permit -tee.
IIP Oil drained from engine crankcases, antifreeze or degreasing solvent wastes shall not be
discharged into the disposal system.
The effluent from the groundwater remediation system shall be analyzed every January,
April, and September by EPA Method 6230D. The results shall be submitted with the
groundwater monitoring data as indicated above.
Any additional groundwater quality moni ormg, as deemed necessary by the Division, shall
be provided.
29. A weekly maintenance log shall be kept indicating all repairs and inspections conducted.
This information shall be submitted to the Mooresville Regional Office on or before
January 31st of the following year.
30. Ston-nwater in excess of that permitted to be treated and disposed of, pursuant to the
following paragraph, shall be diverted away from the treatment facilities.
31. This permit authorizes the treatment and disposal of 400 GPD of domestic wastewater,
1,300 GPD of equipment washdown, 5,250 GPD of stormwater, and 2,880 GPD of
contaminated groundwater only. Any increase of wastewater from any source will require
a permit amendment prior to discharge of any additional wastewater to the treatment
facility.
32. Oil shall be disposed of in an approved manner.
4

To: Carolyn McCaskill
Through: Bob Cheek
From: Jack Floyd, P.E.
Subject: Request for Renewal of .Permit No. WQ0003016
Roadway Express, Inc.
Recycle Lagoon System
Mecklenburg County'
WQ0003016/GW9L1248
Randy Kepler: Review Engineer
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
February 10, 1995 t4;k3: DfiFrr.(14V
tisIVIRoNmEN7iT, Mit.
N Attitim tots. (Ii4lA
OM ffIS
0%0 Of ENVIRONMENTAL MANANIM
MOORLSVILLE NM
The Groundwater Section has reviewed the subject permit renewal request for
continued operation of a 7900 GPD recycle lagoon system. The system has recently been
modified to eliminate the domestic and industrial wastewater streams from the system. These
are now tributary to the CMUD .municipal sewer system. The only waste stream still tributary
to the lagoon is an onsite groundwater remediation system. The 365,000 gallon lagoon has a
clay liner an is used to evaporate wastewater.
A review of the groundwater monitoring data indicates relative compliance with the
groundwater standards, As the used of the lagoon has dramatically changed and the evidence
from the groundwater monitoring program, the Groundwater Section is recommending
elimination of the groundwater monitoring. program..
Therefore, the Groundwater Section has n.o objection to reissuance of the permit
provided the permit includes the following conditions:
All monitoring wells associated with the recycle lagoon shall be abandoned in
accorclanui with 15A NCAC 2C (\Veil Construc7ion Standards).
Any groundwater quality rnonitoring, as deerned necessary by the Division,
shall be provided.
The COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by
regulations in 15A NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. The
Compliance Boundary is for the disposal system constructed after December 31,
1983 is established at either (I) 250 feet from the waste disposal area, or (2) 50
feet within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the waste disposal
area. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the
Compliance Boundary is subject to immediate remediationaction in addition to
the penalty provisions applicable under General Statute 143-215.6A(a)(1).

cc:
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2L, a REVIEW BOUNDARY is established
around the disposal systems midway between the Compliance Boundary and the
perimeter of the Waste disposal area, Any execedance of standards at the
Review Boundary shall require remediation action on the part of the permittee.
If there are any questions, please let me knovh
Barbara Christian
Central Files
Permit Files
jf\c:94248

DATE:

DIVISION OF ENVIRONNENTAL MANAGEMENT
January 9, 1995
MEMO TO: Jack Floyd
FROM:
THROUGH:
SUBJECT:
Peggy Finley').-01e
Mooresville Regional Office
Barbara Christian La-
GW Regional Supervisor
Renewal of Non -Discharge Permit for
Roadway Express, Inc.
Sunset Road Terminal
WQ#00316/GW#94248
Mecklenburg County, N.C.
After further review, wish to recommend a change in the
conditions for the above referenced permit due to a change in use
at this site. Use is limited now to domestic wastewater and
stormwater.
The recommendation is to replace the monitoring requirement
with monitor well abandonment in accordance with Title 15A,
Subchapter 2C .0113.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
MAFirsc

DATE:
Faciiity
County:
Type of Project:
Central Office Ca
Applicable Permit
The
DIVISION OF
A
office please le
Environmen
has been
Specialist.
specialist.
DEH
EPA
of P
prn
on has received a copy of the above referenced
A copy of the application package is attached.
has received a copy of the Above referenced
'oh has beensent to the regional office water
a copy has not been sent to the regional
know.
on has received the subject Division of
project for review. A copy of the application
o , Regional Soil
Please coordinate your review with the regional soil
Please review the applicati
any request for,additional
or before tha, j,L-7
additional infornticr. will
If you do not require any additional
please provide your final comments by
for completeness and submit
to the central office contact on
A copy ofthe formal request for
to you.
If you have any questions, please let me know as

Department State of North Carolina
of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form ENVIR. ()NM
l',1,0VIT.IRA
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
RECYCLE FACILITIES
GENERAL JINFORMATION:
1. Applicant's name (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, e
ROA DIVA( EXPRE's /A1C,
2. Print Owners or Signing Official's name and title the person who is legally responsible o
Rosewd
Mailing address: ,4044./
City:
Telepbonc N
Project Name please specify the name of the facility or establishment - should be consistent on all docurnents eluded:
".0:SC6 R (
acir
d its compliance):
utegvi.s012, 5-Ez2.1.11LeCs"
St.
State:
.z4(2.
Zip:
4430
5. Location of Recycle Facility (Street Address):
City: C124.0/7E
6. Contact person who can answer questions abou
Name: ROEbEizr
7. Latitude:
8. Application Date:
9, Fee Submitted: $ 20 c°
10. County where project is located:
PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Application No. (will be completed by DEM);
; Longitude:
Telephone number: (
soi.ze
Zip: Z8Z0-2.7/8
2„ Specify whether project is: / renewal*;
* For renewals, complete only secUons i, 11, and applicant
three copies of each). Engineer's signature not required for re
of recycle facility location
sing fee should be as specified in 15A NCAC 2H .0
odification
ture(onpage
ewal without o
5
Submitonly pages 1 and 6 (original and
er modifications,
lf this application is being submitted as a result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, existing permit
number 1A/000030go and itsissue date ,,,X..),46 2s- 1113
4. Specify whether the applicant is public or V. private.
FORM: RF 06/94 Page 1 of 6

Nane and Complete Address of Engineering Firm:
City: State: Zip:
Telephone Number: (
Professional Engineer's Certification:
, attest that this application for
reviewed by me and is accurate and compiete to the best of my knowledge. 1 further attest that to the best ofmy
the proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations. Although certain portions of this sub
package may have been developed by other professionals, inclusion of these materials under my signature and seal signifies thatl have
reviewed this material and have judged it to be consistent with the proposed design.
North Carolina Professional Engineer's Seal, Signature, and Date:
Applicant's Certification:
I, gag 61V- E ZimmER01414•J , attest that this application for g /410 p sz.44-04.
foi EXPlae SZ5 C ,
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be rej toas thcornpletc.
Signature
'14
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND
MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: RF 06/94 Page 5 of 6

DRA
SUBJECT -TO REVt
FACILITY
COUNTY
TYPE OF D OSAL
SYSTEM
SITE EVALUATIONINSPECTION CHECKLIST
(Post -Facility Construction/Waste Disposal)
ER"
REVIE
DATE
(A) Facility operation
1. Evidence of waste water ponding
Yes No
Comment:
2. Lagoons
a. Status of Lagoori Walis
Comments:
,c;•?•.,
b. Status of Lagoon Liner (note especially
gullying along inside walls)
Comment:
Condition of Spray Irrigation Fields
Comment:
4. Land Application of sludge sites - evidence of
improper application/maintenance (includes
petroleum contaminated soils)
Comment:

r riti.NAGEMENT
tiFf
RECEIVw,
DE!'t Gli:GUND
9ti
Division of Environmental Management
Groundwater Section
P,O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
RE: Compliance Well Samp
Roadway Express, Inc.
5201 Sunset Rd.
Charlotte, NC
Gentlemen:
3
zc.
PM' 3: 44
November 9, 1994
ROADWAY
SERVICES, INC.
1077 GORGE BOULEVARD
AKRON, OH 44310
P.O. BOX 88
AKRON, OH 44309-0088
[phone]
In conformance with monitoring requirements established in our non -discharge
permit #WQ003016, we have completed compliance well sampling for March and
September 1994. I have enclosed Geraghty & Miller's sampling report dated
November 3, 1994 as well as completed GW-59 forms for each of the sampling dates,
As can be seen, no problems were identified. Our next sampling date is scheduled
for January 1995,
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to
contact me at [phone].
REX/ar-c:\wellsamp
Very truly yours,
Roadway E
Inc. for
Inc.
Robert E. Z CPG
Supervisor onmental Services
cc: Robbie Lowe - T 6 w/attch.
Jim Shilliday - Geraghty & Miller
Printexl on Recycled Paper

WGERAGHT)''
"6? MILLER, INC,
Environmental Services
November 3, 1994
Mr. Robert Zimmermann
Roadway Services, Inc.
1077 Sorge Boulevard
Akron, OH 44310
Re: Analytical Results for the March 1994 and September 1994 Biannual Sampling of
Compliance Well EP-CWW-1, Located at the Roadway Express Terminal, 5201 Sunset
Road, Charlotte, North Carolina,
Dear Mr. Zimmermann:
This letter report was prepared by Geraghty & Miller, Inc., acting as consultant for
Roadway Services, Inc. (Roadway). This report presents the results of the first and second
1994 biannual sampling events for compliance well EP-CMW-I located at the above -referenced
Roadway terminal. The location of the terminal is shown on a topographic map in Figure 1.
Compliance well EP-CMW-1 is located near the northeast corner of the holding lagoon shown
in Figure 2. The first and second biannual sampling events for compliance well EP-CMW-1
occurred on March 24, 1994, and September 21, 1994, respectively.
Prior to sampling the compliance well in March and September 1994, approximately 7
to 8 gallons of water were evacuated from the well using a disposable bailer. During the
evacuation process, water samples were collected from the well each time an additional 2 to 3
gallons of water had been removed. These water samples were analyzed for pH, specific
conductance, and temperature using portable meters calibrated in the field. The results of these
field measurements for the March and September 1994 sampling events are presented on Tables
1 and 2, respectively. The field measurements indicate that the pH, specific conductance, and
temperature stabilized toward the end of the evacuation process during both of the sampling
events.
Following the well purging process, groundwater samples were collected from the well
for laboratory analysis. The samples were collected using disposable bailers and placed in
appropriately labeled containers, and packed on ice in a cooler. The cooler remained in the
custody of Geraghty & Miller personnel until it was hand delivered to IEA Laboratory. A
chain -of -custody record was enclosed in the cooler to maintain a complete record of all
personnel that had contact with the samples. The laboratory analytical reports for the March 24,
1994, sampling event and the September 21, 1994, sampling event are presented in
Attachment A and Attachment B, respectively. Copies of the chain -of -custody records are
included with the laboratory reports. The water samples were analyzed for low level volatile
organic compounds using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 502.2, for total
suspended solids (TSS) using EPA Method 160.2, for pH using EPA Method 150.1, and for oil
and grease using SW-846 Method 9070.
Hat2:32A03akAirandlairmwritt/O3Novii4
CrossPointe 11, 2840 Plaza Place, Suite 350. Raleigh, North
na 276 571-1662. FAX
91
7 94

GERAGHTY C4'N11LLER. INC,
Mr. Robert Zimmermann
November 3, 1994
Page 2
The laboratory analytical results for the March 1994 and September 1994 sampling events
are summarized in Table 3 and Table 4, respectively. Volatile organic constituents and oil and
grease were not detected in the groundwater samples collected from compliance well EP-CMW-1
on March 24, 1994, and September 21, 1994. The pH of the water was reported by the
laboratory at 6.3 on March 24, 1994, and 6.2 on September 21, 1994. TSS were detected in
the groundwater samples at 2,200 milligrams per liter (mg/L) on March 24, 1994, and 1,300
mg/L on September 21, 1994.
An evaluation of the laboratory analytical reports was performed. This evaluation
consisted of a review of analytical methods, sample collection date, analysis date, quantitation
limits, surrogate standard recoveries, matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) results,
laboratory control sample recoveries, and blanks. The data evaluation indicated that the samples
were extracted and/or analyzed by the appropriate methods and within the allowable holding
times. The surrogate standards and the blank results are acceptable. These data are useable and
reliable within the confines of this data review.
The first 1995 biannual sampling event for compliance well EP-CMW-1 is scheduled to
occur in March 1995. If you have any questions or comments regarding this report or the
enclosed analytical data package, please call Jim Shilliday at (919) 5714662.
Sincerely,
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
ames E. Shilliday 11
Project Manager
William H. Doucette, Jr., Ph.D., P.
Associate/Technical Consultant
Mid -Atlantic Region
JES/jbw
Attachments
NCO232.073/2068roodhimme Eck:A.31'00:94

Compliance Well Purging Data, March 24, 1994, Roadway Express Ter
Charlotte, North Carolina,
Gallons Purged pH
Specific Conductance
(Antos)
Temperature
('C)
2.25
4.50
6.75
6.07
6.04
5.99
480
480
480
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.

Table 2.
Compliance Well Purging Data, September 21 1994, Roadway Express
Terminal, Charlotte, North Carolina,
tons Purged
6
pil
Specific Conductance
(prnhos)
Temperature
(*C)
6,97 270 18.4
6.96 310 17.8
6.94 310 17.9
GERAGHTY 6? ‘11
ER, INC

Summary of Analytical Results for Groundwater Sample
Compliance Well EP-CMW-I on March 24, 1994.
From
Constituent
Compliance Well Designa
EP-CMW-1
Low Level Volatile Organic Compounds
(EPA Method 502,2) (Jg/L)1
pH
(EPA Methoc
0,1)
TSS
(EPA Method ,2)
d Grease
46 Method 9
7
BL)L2
6.3
2,200
BDL
Agit Micrograrns per liter,
BDL Below detection limits,
ingiL Milligrams per liter.
GERAGHTY &P.
R INC,

Table 4. Summary of Analytical Results for Groundwater Sample Collected From
Compliance Well EP-CMW4 on September 21, 1994.
Compliance Well Designation
Constituent EP-CMW-1
Low Level Volatile Organic Compounds
(EPA Method 502.2) (pg/L)BDL'
pH
(EPA Method 150 ) 6.2
TSS
(EPA Method 160.2) (mg/L)3.
1,300
Oil and Grease
(SW-846 Method 9070) (mg/L) BDL
„Kg/I, Micrograms per liter.
2 BDL low detection limits.
nig/L Milligrams per liter.
NO3232 Ori3)2048 rortikda 4.111173N erk,94
GERAGHTY & SELLER, INC,

C yrsk
ckert.
Airpor
SCALE F24000
Contour Interval 10 Feet, Datum is Mean Sea Level
U.S.G.S 7 5 Minute Series DERITA, N.C. Topographic Ouadran e,
GERAGHTY
MILLER, INC.
En ronmenica Services
SITE LOCATION
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
ROADWAY EXPRESS TERMINAL
5201 SUNSET ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROUNA

ATmALaboratory Analytical Report
March 24, 1994, Sampling Event
`
. .
-''

Post Office Box 12846 Phone [phone]
Reseafch Triang!e Park NC 27709 Fax [phone]
Monroe,
Connecticut
203-261 4458
IEA
An Aquarian Company
April 14, 1994
Jim Shilliday
Geraghty & Miller
2840 Plaza Place, Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27612
IEA Project No.: 781031/9403615, 9403618
IEA Reference No.: W9403583
Client Project I.D.: ROADWAY
Dear Mr. Shilliday,
Transmitted herewith are the results of analyses on 12 samples submitted
to our laboratory.
The sample(s) were received chilled and intact.
Analyses were performed according to approved methodologies and meet
the requirements of the IA Quality Assurance Program except where noted.
Please see the enclosed reports for your results and a copy of the Chain
of Custody documentation.
Thank you for selecting IRA for your sample analysis. Please do not
hesitate to call your project manager representative at 1-919-677-0090
or 1-600-444-9919 should you have any questions regarding this report.
We look forward to serving you in the future.
yours,
Inc.
R. Drago
ory Diredto
State Certification:
Georgia - 4816
New Jersey - 467719
California - 41768
Massachusetts - NC039
Sunrise,
Florida
305-848,1730
Tennessee - 400296 Alabama - 140210
Virginia - 400179 South Carolina - 499021
West Virginia - #9908C North Carolina - 437720/484
Kentucky - 490049 Kansas - E-158/8-1189
Schaumburg.,
Illinois
708 705,0740
N Billerica,
Massachuserts
617.272-5212
Whippany,
NewJersey
201.428'8181

PH
?SS
industri Environmentala y Inc.
Project 781-031 f 9403615-04 MatrixWater
Geraghty & Kilier Date Received 25/94
I.D NCO232.003 (ROADWAY) Date pled: 24/94
EP-CM67-1
eter
Quaiitjtation Date Date
thod Limita Resulta Prepazed Analyzed knalyat
EPA 150.1
EPA 160.2
tants t
4 m
0SP3 Rev 030994
6.3
2200 mg/L Ni
/29/94 PC
/94 ED

Indutri1 & Pnviro ental na1yBts Inc.
jeer 4: 781-031
ple 1: 9403615 Matrix: Water
ClientN Geraghty & MilierDate Recsaved:N/A
client Proj. 1D NCO232.003 (ROAD AY) Date S pled: N/A
S ple I.D.: QC Blank
co
EPA 160.2
Corre onding 940 6
YORESP3 Pee.
04

Project #:
S pie
Client N e:
Client Proj.
S p
Industrial Environmental Analysts, Inc.
011 and Grease
781 0
9403615-04
Geraghty & Milier
:ROADWAY
Bp_
Matrix. Water
Date Received; 03/25/94
Date Sp1ed 0 /24/94
Detection
Limits
low Quantitation Limits
w 011 and Grease by G av ic

IndutrLa1 & Envronmenta1
Project No781031
ple No.. 9403615
Water
x
Te
Reference Par.*et
940358101 pH
9403662-01 TSS
CO
S+
2
NORGANIC QC SU
DUPLICATE ANL1S1S
EPA
EPA 1602
Inc.
DUPLICATE RESULTS
Duplicate
(mg/L)
9
espond.ing Samp1ee« 940361504
FORM IQC5
Rev 030994
7.9
4
Date
Analyzed
29/94
0 /94
Control 21

Cl
Idutria1 & Enviro enta1 Analy�te,Inc.
Oil ard Grease
Project #: 781-03
S ple 9403615
nt N e: Geraghty &
.D. :ROADWAY'
lank
Detect
ter
Received: N/A
e S pled: A
or: Date Date
Reaulte Prepared Analyzed kralyst
slow Quantitatjon Limits
Applicable
v) s Oil and Grease by 0ravimtric
nding S ple: 940361 -04
04/05/94 04/11/94

Industrial and Environmental Analysis, Inc, (IA)
MtX1 Spi RspOrt for Oil an Grease
IEA Project #1
Sample *:
Client Name:
Cljent Project, I,D.:
Semple I ti
Parameter:
781-03:
940361S
Geraghty & Miller
SCADtk/A,Y
940.35'';6-03
O&O (Gray)
Spike
Client Number Method Added
sPiks (mg)
Recovered
Matilx. Water
Date Received: 03/25/94
Date sampled. 03/24/94
Date Prepared: 04/08/94
Date Analyzed; 04/11/94
V
Recovery*
Sample
Conc.
—82.2888228888-8-88=888-888Q-8--=====s8ft888888-888888-
9409284-0181S S4-846 5070 12 $ mg 82 8 mg 96 0.8 mg
Comment
*Acceptance range 80t - 120V
G&G (Gray) a. Oil and Grease y Gravimetric
SQL a Below Quantitatioe Limits
N/A = Not APPliwable
Corresponding Sample: 940361t, -04
FORM RES-P Rev. 0/1991

Barb
BOD
BQL
c/100mT,
CEC
Chrom
COD
Crb
DO
DOC
DIT
Hex
Hyd
ISE
NIA
Sp Cond
TVS
VSS
Wik13
ABB ONS
ty as Bi
Biochemical Oxygen De d
Below Quantitation Limit
Colonies per 100 nag of S ple
Cation Ex
Chromotropic
Chemical Ovgeri Demand
y as Carbonate
Dim d
Dissolved 0 gen
Dissolved Organic Carbon
D trati on
Ex table (Prepped by Soi
Free
Hexavalent
Hydroxide
Ion Selective Elevar
e r Y
Pro N
To
Total Or
Total 0
Total
Total Sob
Total Suspend
Total Volatile Soli
Volatile Suspended. Solids
d Dissoeiable
rid

WG ERAGHTY
A P'& MILLER, INC
AWEnvironmental Services
Project Number
Project Location C46.7 •rsTr1
-
Laboratory
SampIer(s)/Affthaton
Laboratory Task Order No_.„___„_____
Date/Time
E IDENTITY Code Sampled Lab ID
Sample Code: L = Liquid; S = Sod, A = Air
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY. RECORD
CONTAINER DESCRIPTION
Page_ / of_
4.4
Total Na o Bottles/
Containers
Relinquished
Received by.
Organization:
Organization:
RelinquIshed by: Organization:
Received by: Organization:
Special Instructions/Remarks:
Date
Date_3.1L)
I Seal Intact?
Yes No NIA
Date L, „/. Time „„ Seat Intact?
Date.J„L Time f Yes No N/A
Time /IS/
Time 12:n
.Delivery Method:
n Person El Common Carrier
spEory
Lab Courier L Other
F„ Pi:CA Y

An Aquar on Company
August 9, 199
Mr. Jim Shilliday
Geraghty & Miller
2840 PI Place, Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27612
D. Mr, Shilliday:
133 awgrass Corporate Parkway Phore 305 846-1730
n se, Florida 33323,2805 Fax 305 846'9878
The enclosed analytical report is being sent to you at the request of our TEA -North CrnIina
laboratory. The results were orignially sent to the NC laboratory on April 19, 1994.
Plea do not hesitate to call me if you need additional information.
Sincerely,
r
Linda Ercole
Director of Operations
enclosure
Connec
203-2614458
Schaumburg, N. 8i13erMa Wh3ppany,
111 no Massachusetts New Jersey
708'705'0740 617'272'5212 201'428'81131
Research Tng1e Pk
North Caroline
912'677,

IEA
AQua«o,
CLIENT: I.E.A., INC.
3000 WESTON PARKWAY
CARY, N.C. 27513
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/29/94
SAMPLE DESIGNATION: EP-CMW-1
DATE: APRIL 19, 1994
DATE SAMPLED: 03/24/94
SAMPLED BY: CLIENT
LABORATORY NO: 94-0637
PROJECT NAME: GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC PROJECT NO: 781-031-S
PARAMETER
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
LIMIT OF DATE O1'
RESULT UNITS METHOD DETECTION ANALYSIS
Benzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Bro;©benzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Bromochloromethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Bromodichloromethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Bromoform < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Bramamethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
n-Butylbenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
sec-Butylbenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
tert-Butylbenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Carbon tetrachloride < 0.50 uq/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Chlorobenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Chioroethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Chloroform < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Chloromethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
2-Chlorotoluene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
4-Chlorotoluene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Dibromochloromethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane< 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,2-Dibroinoethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Dibromomethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,1-Dichloroethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,2-Dichloroethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,1-Dichloroethene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
* Analyzed by Sarah Serrano.
** Date extracted 04/06/94.
The above analysis was performed in accordance with E.P.A., A.S.T.M.,
Standard Methods or other approved methods.
Laboratory I.D.-I83011, E-83170.

TEA
Aquanco Company
CLIENT: I.E.A., INC.
3000 WESTON PARKWAY
CARY, N.C. 27513
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/29/94
SAMPLE DESIGNATION: EP-CMW-
PROJECT NAME: GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC
REPORT OF AN
PARAMETER RESULT UNITS
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroepropane
1 3-Dichloropropane
2,2-Dichloropropane
1,1-Dichloropropene
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethylbenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Isopropylbenzene
4-Isopropylto1uene
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Propylbenzene
Styrene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
DATE: APRIL 19, 1994
DATE SAMPLED: 03/24/94
SAMPLED BY: CLIENT
LABORATORY NO: 94-0637
PROJECT NO: 781 031-S
YSIS
METHOD
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
* Analyzed by Sarah Serrano.
** Date extracted 04/06/94.
The above analysis was performed in accordance with
Standard Methods or other approved methods.
Laboratory I.D.-#83011, E-83170.
LIMIT OF
DETECTION
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
E.P.A.
DATE OF
ANALYSIS
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
A.S.T.M.

IEA
An Aqua/ion Company
CLIENT: I.E.A., INC.
3000 WESTON PARKWAY
CARY, N.C. 27513
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/29/94
SAMPLE DESIGNATION: EP-CMW
PROJECT NAME:
DATE: APRIL 19 1994
DATE SAMPLED: 03/24/94
SAMPLED BY: CLIENT
LABORATORY NO: 94-0637
GERAGHTY & MILLER INC PROJECT NO: 781-031 S
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
PARAMETER RESULT
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trich1oroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes
UNITS METHOD
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
* Analyzed by Sarah Serrano.
** Date extracted 04/06/94.
The above analysis was performed in accordance with
Standard Methods or other approved methods.
Laboratory I.D.-#83011, E-83170.
Respectfully submitted;
Sarah Serrano
Laboratory Manager
IEA, Inc.
LIMIT OF
DETECTION
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
E.P.A.,
DATE OF
ANALYSIS
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
A.S.T.M.

IEA
An anon Compar'ty
CLIENT: I.E.A., INC.
3000 WESTON PARKWAY
CARY, N.C. 27513
DATE: APRIL 19, 1994
DATE SAMPLED: 03/24/94
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/29/94 SAMPLED BY: CLIENT
SAMPLE DESIGNATION: TB-1 LABORATORY NO: 94-0637
PROJECT NAME: GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC PROJECT NO: 781-031-S
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
PARAMETER
LIMIT OF DATE C.
RESULT UNITS METHOD DETECTION ANALYSIS
Benzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Bromobenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Bromochlor©methane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Bromodichloromethane < 0.50 ug/l EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Brom©farm < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
BromoHethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
n-Butylbenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
sec-Butylbenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
tert-Butylbenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Carbon tetrachloride < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Chlorobenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Chloroethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Chloroform < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Chlaromethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
2-Chlorotoluene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
4-Chlorotoluene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Dibromochloromethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloroprapane< 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,2-Dibr©moethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Dibromomethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,4-Dichlorabenzene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
Dichlaradifluoromethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,1-Dichloroethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,2-Dichlor©ethane < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
1,1-Dichloroethene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene < 0.50 ug/1 EPA 502.2 0.50 04/06/94
* Analyzed by Sarah Serrano.
** Date extracted 04/06/94.
The above analysis was performed in accordance with E.P.A., A.S.T.M.
Standard Methods or other approved methods.
Laboratory I.D.-/83011, E-83170.

IEA
AJ AguarionComparri
CLIENT: I.E.A., INC.
3000 WESTON PARKWAY
CARY, N.C. 27513
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/29/94
SAMPLE DESIGNATION: TB-1
PROJECT NAME: GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC
REPORT OF AN
PARAMETER RESULT
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroepropane
1,3-Dichloropropane
2,2-Dichloropropane
1,1-Dichloropropene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethylbenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Isopropylbenzene
4-Isopropy1to1uene
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Propylbenzene
Styrene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
DATE: APRIL 19 1994
DATE SAMPLED: 0
/24/94
SAMPLED BY: CLIENT
LABORATORY NO: 94-0637
PROJECT NO: 781-031-S
YSLS
UNITS METHOD
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
* Analyzed. by Sarah Serrano.
** Date extracted. 04/06/94.
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
The above analysis was performed in accordance
Standard Methods or other approved methods.
Laboratory I.D.-#83011, E-83170.
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
502.2
LIMIT OF
DETECTION
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
with E.P.A.
DATE
ANALYSIS
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
0.506/94
A.S.T.M.

IEA
An Aquanorro Company
CLIENT: I.E.A., INC.
3000 WESTON PARKWAY
CARY, N.C. 27513
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/29/94
SAMPLE DESIGNATION: TB-1
PROJECT NAME: GERAGHTY
DATE: APRIL 19, 1994
DATE SAMPLED: 03/24/94
SAMPLED BY: CLIENT
LABORATORY NO: 94-0637
& MILLER, INC PROJECT
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
PARAMETER RESULT
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trich lorof luoromethane
1,2,3-Trichloropr©pane
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes
UNITS METHOD
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
< 0.50 ug/1
* Analyzed by Sarah Serrano.
** Date extracted 04/06/94.
EPA 502.2
EPA 502.2
EPA 502.2
EPA 502.2
EPA 502.2
EPA 502.2
EPA 502.2
EPA 502.2
EPA 502.2
EPA 502.2
The above analysis was performed in accordance with.
Standard Methods or other approved methods.
Laboratory I.D.-I83011, E-83170.
Respectfully submitted;
Sarah Serrano
Laboratory Manager
IEA. Inc.
NO: 781-031-S
LIMIT OF
DETECTION
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
E.P.A.
DATE OF
ANALYSIS
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
04/06/94
A.S.T.M.

VOL11 LE ORG ICS IOD BI,A S
ISA Projec
Matrix:
Units:
Date Ana yzed:
Method:
Analyst.
94 0637
Liquid
ug/1
09/06/99
S02.2
Saran Serr no
Parameter Quan
a
on Li Sian Resu s
2.2

IEA
An Aquarion Company
1 133 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway Phone [phone]
Sunrise. Florida 33323-2805 Fax 305°846°9878
IEA Pro
Matrix:
Units:
Date Analyzed:
Method:
Analyst:
VOLATILE SPIKE / SPIKE DI PLICATE EC ' ' Y
Compound
O..
94-0637
Water
ug/1
04/06/94
EPA 502.2
Sarah. Serrano
Spike Sample MS
Added Concentration Concentration % Recovery
BEN Z ENE
TOLUENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1, 2, 2-TCE
MS = Matrix Spike
Compound
20 -< 0.50
20. ,. < 0.50
40
20
0.50
0.50
Spike MSD
Added Concentra
20.5
18.4
32.1
15.5
102
92.0
80.3
77.5
MSD
ecovery % RPD
BENZENE 20
TOLUENE 20
VINYL CHLORIDE 40
1,1,2,2-TCE
20 •;
18.4
36.8
20 15.3
MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate
SPIKE RECOVERY LIMITS = 70-130
% RPD LIMITS = 0-20 %
Monroe,
Connecticut
203.161 4458
Schaumburg,
fllinois
708 105.0740
N. Billerica,
Massachusetts
617 272 5212
102
92.0
92.0
76.5
Whippany,
New Jersey
201 478 6181
0.5
0.0
13.6
3
Research Triartiple Park
North Carolina
919 677 0090

Aquanon Company
Sunrise, Fionda 33323,2805
VOLATILE S ROOM CO
3 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway Phone [phone]
x 385 846'9878
IEA Projec
Matrix:
units:
Date Analyzed:
Method:
Analyst:
Sample ID
PRODUCTION
TB -1
:
94-06 7
Watei
PS/
04/06/94
EPA 602.2
Jane Taylo
Surrogate
1 Added
100
100
100
% Recovery
Surrogate 1
92 • 0
96.
90.4
SURROGATE RECOVERY L ITS: 70- 01
Monroe
Coorash
203261 4468
haurT
huuta
-705 0740
Surrogate % Recovery
2 Added
100
100
100
ATE 1- PLUOROBENZENE
OGATE 2= ORTHOCHLOROTOLUEN
N, Billow*,
Massachoserts
61P27Z5212
Wht
Now Jersey
201 428 8181
Surrogate 2
94.3
92.3
Research T noe Park,
North Carol na
919 67P

3000 WESTON PKWY.
CARY, N.C. 27513
PH 0 919-677-0090
An Aquanon Company FAX [phone]
COMPANY
PROJECT #
PLEBS: (SlGNARE)
RELINQUISHED BY (Sl 'NAT AE
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
ON Y CLASSNFIGATJON - PLEASE " PECIFY
❑ NPDES ❑ DRINKING WATER (] RCRA 0 OTHER
PROJECT NAME
REMARKS ON SAMPLE RECEIPT
BOTTLE INTACT ® CUSTODY SEALS
PRESERVED SEALS INTACT
CHILLED 0 SEE REMARKS
STATION LOCATION
RECEIVED BY
RECEIVED FOR LAB BY
ATRIX
REQUESTED PARAMETERS
Page of
SUBCONTRACT
PORT.71ELIVERARE
REQUEST
I�BLANK DATA
7 DUPLICATE DATA / % RPD
SURROGATE / % RECOVERY
MS/MSD SUMMARY WITH % RECOVERY,
% RPD
RETURN SIGNED COC
ANALYSTS` FULL NAME
'DATE ANALYZED
DATE EXTRACTED
CLP PACKAGE
C SPECIAL ANALYTICAL REQUEST
PROJECT MANAGER PLEASE PRINT) P.O. NO.
FIE
D REMARKS

Laboratory Task Order No. CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY- RECORD Page.. / of /
AllrEnvironmenial Services
AIWGERAGHTY
Art& MILLER, INC.
Project Number t4C-PZ_ :-Z•c2025,
Project Location C-Ack.71-c,71-e-
Laboratory =0711
Sampler(s)/Affiliation
Dateffime
SAMPLE IDENTITY Code Sampled
Sample Code: L = Liquid; S = Solid; A = Air
3A.C5tti
Total No: of Bottles/
Containers
TOTAL
Relinquished
Received :
Relinquished by:
eceived by:
Organization:
Organization:
Date-1S
Date
Time 1..1-?;.
Organization Date L ,/ Time„
Organization: Date-1. Time
Seal Intact?
Yes No N/A
Seal Intact?
I Yes No N/A
Special Instructions/Remar
Method: n Person El Common Carrier _ Lab Courser El Other
SPLCIFY
SPECIFY

tACHM T B
Laboratory An1 teiIReport
Septembe 21, 1994 S.inipling Event
GERAGH LLER, INC

Post Office Box 1284-6 Phone [phone]
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Fax [phone]
IEA
An Aquarion Company
October 13, 1994
Jim Shilliday
Geraghty & Miller
2840 Plaza Place, Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27612
IEA Project No.: 781039(S)/9409373
IEA Reference No.: W9409345
Client Project I.D.: NCO232003
Dear Mr. Shilliday,
Transmitted herewith are the results of analyses on two samples submitted
to our laboratory. Please note that this report includes data provided
by a subcontract laboratory.
The sample(s) were received intact.
Analyses were performed according to approved methodologies unless noted
otherwise. Please see the enclosed reports for your results and a copy
Chain of Custody documentation.
Thank you for selecting IEA for your sample analysis. Please do not
hesitate to call your project manager representative at 1-919-677-0090
or 1-800-444-9919 should you have any questions regarding this report.
We look forward to serving you in the future.
Very truly yours,
Inc.
WilliamDrag
Laboratory Dire
Monroe, Sunrise, Schaumburg,
Connecticut Florida Illinois
203 261 4458 305 846 1730 708i705 0740
N
Massachusetts
617•272•5212
Whippany,
New Jersey
201 428 8181
privi/tv:7 ,ecyc4,1 paper

abama #40210
768
rida #87350/#
Georgia - #816
Kentucky #90049
North Carolina - #3°7720 84
South Carolina -
Tennessee -
Utah #E226
Virginia - #001'79
est Virginia #9908C
ssachusetts M-N 9
New Jersey - #67719
e.
052394
consm - #998051010

Post Office Box 12846 Phone 91 .677 l
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Fax 919.677• 9427
An Aquarion CoCompany
ISA Assigned Number Index
ISA Project 781-039(S)
ISA
Monroe,
Connecticut
203 261 4458
ISA-gF
Lab Sample ID
9409373-01 SP- ®1
9409373- 2 TB-1
Sunrise,
Florida
305•846'1730
Geraghty iller
S e ID
EP-
TB-1
Schaumburg,#„ Balteric4;
Illinois Massachusetts
708 705.OE 40 617-272•5212
Whippany,
New Jersey
201 428 8181

An Aquarion Company
AITENTION:
CLIENT: IEA NORTH CAROLINA
3000 WESTON PARKWAY
CARY,NC.27513
SITE A ON: EP-CMW-1
CLIENT PROJE NO: 781-039S
PARAMETERS
Br TIZene
Bromobs rat ne
Bromochloromethane
r omodichloromet bane
Broinoform
Bromomethane
n-Butylbertzene
sec-Burylbenzene
Et rt-But)Tbenzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Cciobnzcnc
Chloroethane
Chloroform
alorometh-sne
2-Clioro4oluene
4-Chlorotoluene
Dihromochloromethane
EtRnomo-3-chloropropane
1,2-Dibromoethane
Dibromornethane
1,.2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4- DichloroberIZene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1 -Dichloroettiane
1,2- Dichloroe thane
LI-Dichloroethene
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
trans-1,2- DkhiorocThene
1,2-Dichk)ropropane
1,3 Dkhloroproparie
2,2-Di•chloropropane
1,1 -Dich loropt opc ne
cis-1,3- D ichlorop rope n e
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethylbe num
1 lexacillo rob u tad ie n
Isoprorylberizene
4-Isopropyltoluene
RESULT
1133 Savvgrais Corporate Parkvvay Phone aos 8451730
Sunrise, Flora 33323-2805 Fax [phone]
DATE: October 3, 1994
IFA LAB NO: 94-2420
CLIENT 13,0.#:
EDER Cow pQAP# 870200G
IIRS CERTIFICATION# 86111X-86101
SUBCONTRACT LAB ID
SAMPLE ID. EP-CMW-1
DATE COLLECTED: 09/21/94
RECEIVED: 09/23/94
COLLECTED BY: CLIENT
LIMIT OF DATE OF DATE OF
UNITS MEriioD L1'ECT1ON EXTRAcrioN ANALYSIS ANALYST
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09r30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0,50 09/30/94 00/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502,2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 PAL
u ug/L EPA 5022 030 09/30/94 09130/94 MI,
u IX EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/*74 ML
u ug/L EPA 502,2 0.50 09/30/94 09130/94 ML
u ug/L. EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 99/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502,2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 5022 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug-, EPA 502_2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09130/94 ML
u ug/L ETA 502/ 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0,50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 PAL
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 PAL
u ug/L EPA 502-2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML,
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L ETA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ugrL EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/1.. EPA 502.2 030 09/3094 09a0/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502,2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
II ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 NIL
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 1150 09/30/94 09r30/94 ML
u ug/L ETA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 5021 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09130/94 ML
Monroe, Schaumburg, N. Billertca,
Connecticut Illinois Massachusetts
203-2614458 n11705.0740 6172725212
Whippany, Research Triangle Park,
4evi Jersey North Carolina
714288181 919'677-0090

EA
An Aquanon Company
A"ITENTION:
CLIENT: 1 A NORTH CAR©LINA.
3000 WESTON PARKWAY
CARY,NC.27513
SITE LOCATION: EP-CMW-I
CLIENT PROJECT NO: 781-039S
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Propy!be nzene
Styrene
1,1,1,2-Tctrachioroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachlor©ethcne
Toluene
1,2,3-Trich lorobcnzcne
1,2, 4-Tic h for obc nze n c
1,1,1-Trichloroe thane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichlorocthenc
Ttichlorofluorome thane
1,43 ••trichlcuopropane
1,2,4-Trimethylberue ne
1,33-Trintc t hylbe nit n e
Vinyl chloride
Total Xylenes
RESULT
u
u
u
u.
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
••• Una otherwise noted mg/kg denotes wet well
••• u s the result reported is less than the detection
ubmitted;
Sarah Serrano
Labor to Manager
TEA, Inc.
1133 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway Phone [phone]
Sunrise, Florida 33323-2805 Fax [phone]
DATE: October 3, 1994
I'EA LAB NO: 94-2420
CLIENT P.O.#:
FDER CvrtrpQAP# 870200G
FIRS CERTIFICAT1©N# 86111,E-86101
SUBCONTRACT LAB ID
SAMPLE 1.D.: EP-CMW-1
HATE COLLECTED: 09/2494
RECEIVED: 09/23/94
COLLECTED BY: CLIENT
L1M1T OF DATE OF DATE OF
UNITS METHOD DETECTION EXTRACTION ANALYSIS
ugI EPA 502-2
ug/L EPA 502-2
ug/L, EPA 502,2
ug/L EPA 502_2
ug/L EPA 502-2
ug/L EPA 502.2
ug/L EPA 502_2
ug/L EPA 502-2
ug/L EPA 502_2
ug/L EPA 502-2
1eg/L EPA 502-2
ug/L EPA 502.2
ug/L EPA 502_2
ug/L EPA 502-2
ug/L EPA 502-2
ug/L EPA 502.2
ug/L EPA 502_2
ug/L EPA 592-2
ug/L EPA 502.2
0.50 09/3094
050 09/30,94
050 09/30,94
030 09/30,94
030 09(30R4
050 09/3094
050 09/3094
0,50 09/30944
030 09/30/94
030 09/3094
050 09/3094
0.50 09/3094
050 09/3094
0.50 09/3094
050 09/3094
050 0913094
050 09/3.094
050 09/30/94
050 09/30/94
09/30,94 ML
09/30,94 ML
091.094 ML
09/3094 ML
09/30,94 ML
09/30,94 ML
09/30,94 ML
09/30/94 ML
09/30/94 ML
09r3094 ML
09/3094 ML
09/30/94 ML
09/3094 ML
0913094 ML
09/30/94 ML
09/30/94 ML
0913094 ML
09/3094 ML
09, 3094 M L
Monroe, Schaumburg„ N. Billerica, whtlpp ny, Research Triangle Park,
Connecticut Minois Massachusetts New iers y North Carolina
203 261 °4458 708°705.0740 617,272 5212 201.428 8181 919 677 0090

TEA
An Aquanon Company
ATTENTION:
CLIENT: IEA NORTH CAROLINA
3000 WESTON PARKWAY
CARY,NC.27513
SITE A ON: TB-1
CLIENT ROJECT NO: 781-039S
Benzene
Bromobertzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichkbromethane
Bromoform
Bromome thane
n-Butylbennue
sec- B utylbenzene
Lcrt-Ry1bazoe
Carbon tetrachkxicle
Chlotobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chlorome thane
2-Chloroto4uene
4-Chloro4oluene
Dalromochlocomethane
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
11,2-Dibromcethane
Damomomethane
1,2-Dechlorobenzene
,3-Dich1orobenzent
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dkhlorodifluoromethane
Ll-Dkhlorcethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dich1oroethene
cis-1,2 Dichloroethene
trans-1,2- Dichloroethene
1,2- D ic h loropr ()pane
1,3-Dichloropropane
2,2-Dichloropropane
1,1-Dichloroproperte
cis-13-Dichloropropene
trarts- 1,3- Dichloroprope ne
FAhylbenzene
llexachlorobutaclkne
Isopropylbcnzene
4-Lsopropyholuene
1133 Sawgtass Corporate Parkway Phone [phone]
Sunrise, Florida 33323-2805 Fax 305 846'9878
DATE: October 3, 1994
EA LAB NO: 94-2420
CLIENT P.0.#:
EDER CompQAP# 870200G
!IRS CERTIFICATION# 86 )11,E-86101
SUBCONTRACT LAB ID
SAMPLE I.D. TB-1
DATE COLLECTED: 09/21/94
RECEIVED: 09/23/94
COLLECTED BY: CLIENT
LIMIT OF DATE OF DATE OF
RESULT UNITS M ['MOD D ETECTI ON EXTRACTION ANALYSIS ANALYST
1,1 giL EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 MI,
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 0950/94 09/30/94 ML
u eil-, EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 0950/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09r30f94 mt
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0,50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/1.. EPA 502.2 0.50 0950/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 0950/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L E.PA 502.2 030 09/30/94 0950/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502/ 030 09/30/94 0950/94 ML
u uel., EPA 5021 030 09/30i94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 0950/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502-2 0.50 0950/94 09130/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 0930/94 ML
u ug/L. EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 NIL
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30N4 09/3494 ME
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L FTA 502_2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 0950/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30194 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 5021 030 09/30/94 0950/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L E.PA 502.2 0,50 09/30/94 0950/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 0950/94 0950t94 ML
u ugiL EPA 502_2 030 09/30/94 09/30194 ML
u ug/L EPA 502,2 0,50 0930/94 09/30/94 ML
u uWL EPA 502,2 030 09/30/94 0950/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 0930/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
ti ug/L EPA 502.2 030 0950/94 0950/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502-2 0.50 0950/94 0950/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/3094 09/30194 ML
ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 0950/94 0950,94 ML
Monroe, Schaumburg, N. Billerica, Whippany, Research T6angle Park.
Connecticut Illinois Massachusetts New Jersey North Carolina
2031814458 708 705-0740 617.272.5212 201428 8181 919677'0090

IEA
An Aquarion Company
ATTENTION:
CLIENT: lEA NORTH CAROLINA
3000 WESTON PARKWAY
C.ARY,NC.27513
SITE LOCATION: TB-1
CLIENT' PROJECT NO: 781-039S
ETE
1133 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway Phone [phone]
Sunrise, Florida 33323-2805 Fax 305•8469878
DATE October 3, 1994
IF.A IAB NO: 94-2420
CLIENT PA.#:
FDER CompQAP# 870200G
IIRS CERTIFICATION# 86111,E-86101
SUBCONTRACT LAB ID
SAMPLE I.D.: TI3-1
DATE COLLECTED: 09/21/94
RECEIVED: 0923/94
COLLECTED BY: CLIENT
[JMIT OF DATE OF DATE OF
RESULT UNITS !METHOD DEl hCTION EXTRACTION ANALYSIS ANALYST
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Propylbenzene
Styrene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2•Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachlorcre thene
Toluene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2, 4-Trick for obe me n e
1,1,1 •Trichlorocthane
1,1,2•Trichloroethane
Trichloroethcne
Tric.hlorotlu€ rornethane
1,2,3-trichlaroprrlpane
1,2,4-Trimcthylbenze e
1,3,5-Trime thyibcnzene
Vinyl chloride
Total Xylenes
u ug/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502,2 0.50 09130/94 09/30/94 ML.
u ug/L EPA 502.2 050 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 050 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug,/L EPA 502.2 0.50 09/30/94 09f30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502,2 050 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 050 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 050 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502,2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 030 09(30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug,/L EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ugJL EPA 502.2 030 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 050 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 050 09/30/94 09(30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502,2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 050 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ugJL EPA 502,2 0.50 09/30/94 09/30/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502.2 050 09/30/94 09/39/94 ML
u ug/L EPA 502,2 050 09/30/94 09/30,94 ML
•" Unkss otherwise noted, mg/kg denotes wet awed
1" u= the result reported is less than the detection
Monroe, Schaumburg, N• 8ilWhippany,
Connecticut Illinois Massachusett New Jersey
203 261 445$ 708.705 0740 617 272 5212 201 428 8181
Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina
919 677°0090

OD B
Pi
s:
Lod:
Analyst:
Paraiue
502 2
N * 94 2420
Li• d
ugieL
EPA 02.2
Quan
0.50
O. 0

VOLATILE SP SPJKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
IEA Pro ct No.:
Matrix:
Unitas
Date Analyaed:
Method:
Analyst:
CompouLd
EENZENE
TCE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENEENE
MS Matrix Spike
CoMpoUnd
BENZENE
TCE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBEN4ENE
MSD = Ma
94-2420
Liquid
%moll
09/29/94
EPA 502.2
MEL
Spike
Added
Sample
Concentration
5.0
5.0
5,0
5.0
0.50
< 0 . 5,0
< 0.50
o
0.50
Spike MSD
Added Concentr
5.0
5.0
s
5 0
ix spike Duplicate
MS
concentration % RecoVery
4.9
4.9
5.0
5.0
MSD
% Recovery
4.9
4.9
4.8
4.9
4.9
102
98
% RPD
9,8
96
96
90
98
4.0
O*0
2.1
2.0
2.0

3002 WESTON PKWY,
121 CARY, N.C. 27513
PH M 919477-0090
At rn Company FAX N 919-677 O427
OEA-iJ
PROJECT #
7310395
SAMPLE
REUN ISHED BY'
COMPANY
G2�
TIME
P'
REMARKS ON SAMPLE RECEIPT
© BOTTLE INTACT 0 CUSTODY SEALS
© PRESERVED © SEALS INTACT
CHILLED Q SEE REMARKS
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
ULATORY C: A SIPICATION- PLEASE SPECI Y
NPDES 0 DRINKING 'WATER f❑ RCRA © OTHER
STATION LOCATION
TIME
D BY
E�EIVED FOR
Z ?'3 F
DATE
DATE
Page
REQUESTED PARAMETERS SUBCONTRACT
ME
NK DATA
UPLICATE DATA / % RPD
E SURROGATE / % RECOVERY
MS/MSD SUMMARY WITH % RECOVERY,
% RPD
RETURN SIGNED COC
ANALYSTS' FULL NAME
DATE ANALYZED
El DATE EXTRACTED
CLP PACKAGE
0 SPECIAL ANALYTICAL REQUEST
EA RUSH NO.
PROJECT MANAGER (PLEASE PRINT) I P.O. O.
FIELD REMARKS

IlOGERAGHTY
l& 'MILLER, INC.
"will.' Environmental Services
Project Number N1Q23
Propect Location
Laboratory _T. tAL
-
Sa.mpler(s)/Aff liation
Date/Time
DENT1TY Code Sampled
Laboratory Task Order No a.732— CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
Lab ID
Sample Code: L Liquid, S = Solid: A = Air
Relinquished
Received by:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
nstructions/Remarks:
Organization:
Organization:
CONTAINER DESCRIFThON
Date. /„. Time
Date__ Time
Page of
Total No of E3ottlesl
Containers
A
Seal Intact?
Yes No N/A
Seal Intact?
Yes No N/A
Delivery Method:
n Person
0 Common Carrier
Lil Lab Courier 0 Other

Post Office Box 12846 Phone 919,677.0090
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Fax 919 67T0427
IEA
An Aquarion Company
October 13, 1994
Jim Shilliday
Geraghty & Miller
2840 Plaza Place, Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27612
IEA Project No.: 781039/9409374
IEA Reference No.: W9409345
Client Project I.D.: NCO232003
Dear Mr. Shilliday,
Transmitted herewith are the results of analyses on one sample submitted
to our laboratory.
The sample(s) were received intact.
Analyses were performed according to approved methodologies and meet
the requirements of the IEA Quality Assurance Program except where noted.
Please see the enclosed reports for your results and a copy of the Chain
of Custody documentation.
Thank you for selecting IEA for your sample analysis. Please do not
hesitate to call your project manager representative at 1-919-677-0090
or 1-800-444-9919 should you have any questions regarding thie report.
We look forward to serving you in the future.
Very truly yours,
William R. Drag
Laboratory Dire
Monroe, Sunrise, Schaumburg, N. eitlericm,
Connecticut Florida Illinois Massachusetts
203 261.4458 305 846-1730 708.705 0740 617-272°5212
Whippany,
New Jersey
201, 428 48181
PaPV

Kansas - E-158/E 1
Kentucky #90049
North Carolina - 7720/#84
South Carolina - #99021
Tennessee - #01814
Utah - #E226
Virginia
West Virginia - #9908C
052394

Indust a Envi.rnnr
A Project : 71-9
ntal
alyte rInc.
le jw 9 9374_01 Matrix:: "atea
Client N,age: Geraghty & Miller Date Received 09/ /94
Client Prof. T. :Nc0232003 Date pled: 89/ 1/94
S:, a e I.D. EP- -1
TSS
thod
EPA 150.1
EPA 160
Commenta a
Quan
6mg/L
Pig SP3 Rev. 994
Date
Prepared
6.2
1300 mg/L
/
Date
Analyzed Analyst
09/26/94 PC
09/26/94

Induatrial & Enviro e
IBA eject #: 781-039
/EA Sp1e #: 9409374
Client e: Geraghty
Client Proj. / D.:NCO232003
Pie 1.D.: QC Blank
Par e
TSB
Co 'ants:
Inc.
Matrix: Nat
Date Received:N/A
Date Sampled: N/A
at on Date Date
Resuits Prepared Analyzed Analyst
mg/L BQL N/A 09/26/94 DL
Corresponding Samples: 9409374-
FORM RESP3 Rev. 030994

Inthistria1 & EnTir
EA Project No.:7 9
IA Sample No 9409374
Matrix: lister
Test
repos No. Par et
94 9399-17
9409399-17
ental
alysts, Inc. EA)
INORGANIC QC SU I
DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
Co ents:
EPA 15
EPA 1602
cor ponding p 9409 4 0
FORM IOCSUM Rev 030994
DUPLICATE RESULTS
pie Duplicate
(mga)
6.7 6.7
<6
Date
Analyzed
09/26/94
09/26/94
Control L' 2

HOD
00
0
DO
DOC
Hex
Hyd
ISE
PY
SA
SSE
SR
Sp Cond
SM
SPC
TON
TOX
TVS
VSS
1XX
CAt
ABB ONS
03
bonate
Bioche en De d
Below on I
Colonies per 100 rot,
on Ex e Ca
onioixopic
Oxygen De d
as Carbons
DissoN
DissoN
Dissolved 0 bon
tion
Ext epped by Std 0C)
Free
Hexawdent
Hydroxide
Ion Selective
limeter per Year
Most Pro
Not Applicable
Re 'xity
Spike Added
Spike ple Results
ple Results
S Conductance
Settleable Matter
PWte Count
To
Total ed Solids
Total KJtLih1. Nit n
Total Liquor nded Sohds
Total 0 Carbon
Total 0 Nitrogen
Total 0 1 J;1ivens
Total Soli
Total Suspended Solids
Total Volatile Solids
Volatile S nded Solids
Weak and ble

IRA Project #:
IEA Sample #:
Client Name:
Client Proj. I.D
sample D.
Parameter
- _
O&G av)
Indust
781-039
9409374-01
GeraghtY &
NCO232003
EP-CMW-1
Comment
O&G (Grav) Oil and
BQL = Below Quantita
Method
846 9070
Environmental Analysts, Inc.
Oil and Grease
er
Ma x Water
Date Received: 09/22/94
Date Sampled: 09/21/94
Quanti a on
Limits Resu
mg/L
rease by G v' et
on its
Date Date
Prepared Analyzed Anal
=
09/26/94 09/26/94

Industrial nv.,,,onmenta Analysts,
1 and Grease
IAA project 781-039
TEA Sample ;; 9409374
client Name: Geraghty & Miller
Client Prof, I.D . 00232003
Sample I,.: QC Blank
Parameter
O&G(Gray)
nc,
Matri Water
Date Received : N/
Date Sampled: N/A
Qar�ttatian Date Date
Method units Results Prepared Analyced A alyst
46 9070 S mg/T SQ% 09/2 /94 09/26/94 18.113
Comments:
& (Gray) Oil and Grease by avi.r etric
SQL = Below Quantitati n Limits
N/A = Not Applicable
Corresponding Sample 9409374-01

Indus
TEA Project
TEA Sample
Client Name:
Client Project ID.
Sample 1.D.:
Parameter:
9409284-01MS
a and Environmental Analysts,Inc.
atrix Spike Report for Of
781-039
9409374
Geraghty &
NCO232003
9409284-01
O&G (Gray)
SW 846 9070
ei
and Grease
Spike Spike D850
Added Recovered
12.5mg 10.5 mg
Comments
O&G (Gra and Grease by Gravim
BQL a Below Quantitation Limits
N/A = Not Applicable
Corresponding sample: 9409374-01
Matrix:
Date
Date
Date
Date
Received:
Sampled:
Steliateb:
Analyzed:
Recovery
84
Wate
09/16 4
09/15/94
09/26/94
09/26/94
Sample
Conc.
2=a= a
c2D
FOR
RES-P Rev, 071991

Laboratory Task Order No L3-132— CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
1Y
LER, INC.
Environmental Services
Project Number 1‘4
Project Location
Laboratory I . .
Sampier(s)/Affiliatio
Date/Time
SAMPLE IDENTITY Code Sampled
Sample Code: L = Liquid: S = Solid; A = Air
Relinquished by:
Received by -
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Special Instructions/Remarks.
Organization.
Organization:
CONTAINER DESCRIPTION
Date Time
Date j i Time
Page
Total No. of Bottles/
Container
of
A
Seal Intact?
Yes No N/A
Organization: Date / Time_ _ Seal Intact'?
Organization: Date. L. 1 « Time_ Yes No N/A
Delivery Method: rS in Person
0 Common Carrier 0 Lab Courier El Other
sptic,r,

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., PE., Director
August 4, 1993
Roadway Express Inc.
5201 Sunset Road
Charlotte, NC 28213
Attn: Mr. Robbie Lowe
SUBJECT: Permit No. WQ0003016
Sunset Road Terminal
Wastewater Recycle/Evaporation
Treatment Facility System
Mecklenburg County:
Dear Mr. Lowe:
6 1993
In accordance with the policy of the Division of
Environmental Management to ensure the good quality of
North Carolina's groundwater, the referenced Permit
requires several activities related to groundwater
monitoring. The following guidelines are presented to
assist you in complying with those requirements. If
you have any questions concerning these matters, you
should contact Barbara Christian at the address shown below
discuss the, requirements relevant to your specific facility:
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
919 N. Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
P,O, Box 29535, Raleigh,, North Carolina 27626-0835 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Condition No. 23: The instaiiation of monitor wells as
approved by the Department
Office.
Mooresville Regional
THE MONITOR WELLS MUST BE DEVELOPED TO A TOTAL
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LEVEL NOT EXCEEDING 5 mg/L.
Note: Arrangements to satisfy this requirement should
be made by you with the well contractor prior to
the installation of wells. Prior to accepting a
new well, you should verify that the_driller has
developed the well to an acceptable level as
stated above. Failure to ensure proper
development may result in samples containing
excessive amounts of suspended solids and
sediment which could lead to analysis and
compliance problems. Such samples may generate
analytical data exceeding standard limits in
violation of 15A NCAC 2L regulations and may
ultimately result in fines and/or revocation of
your permit.
You should contact the appropriate Regional Office
personnel as described above, to discuss the
location and construction requirements relevant to
your specific facility.
Condition No. 24: Sampling of the referenced wells on
the schedule and for the constituents listed
below:
SCHEDULE:
CONSTITUENTS:
The monitor wells must be sampled
initially after construction and
thereafter every January, April, and
September.
pH (6.5-8.5 standard units) Water Level
Total Suspended Solids Oil & Grease
Volatile Organic Compounds (in September Only
by Method 1 or 2 below)
Method I: Method 6230D (Capillary - Column),
"Standard Methods For The
Examination of Water and
Wastewater", 17th ed., 1989
Method 2: Method 502.2 "Methods For The
Determination Of Organic Compounds In
Drinking Water', U.S.
EPA - 600/4-88/039

The measurement of water levels must be made prior to
sampling for the remaining parameters.
The numbers in parentheses represent the maximum
allowable concentrations ingroundwater for the
various analytical parameters, as specified in 15A
NCAC 21, [Groundwater Classifications and Standards].
Unless otherwise specified, the units for these
concentrations are expressed as milligrams per liter.
If any volatile organic compounds are, detected by
method 6230D, or the equivalent method 502.2, then EPA methods
604 and 611 must also be run to detect other organic compounds
which may be present. The results of all analyses specified in
the monitoring requirements, including 604 and 611 if required,
must be submitted simultaneously.
A supply of forms GW-59 on which the anal a
results must be reported are attached. Instructions are
provided on the reverse of the white copy of each 4-part
form. The analytical results should be sent to the address
shown at the top of the form and are due in our office no
later than the last working day of the month following
sample collection.
Additional forms will be provided upon receipt of the
attached form GW-59 RO.
FOR ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO REQUIREMENTS
FOR GROUNDWATER QUALITY PROTECTION, PLEASE REFER TO
YOUR PERMIT.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Brian Wootton
Hydrogeology Technician
Permits and Compliance
Groundwater Section
BW:ja/EXPRESS.
Attachments
cc: Barbara Christian
Central Files
Compliance Monitoring Files

DEC ,!:15 19941
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural iiirr.4sn's":-"TA
Division of Environmental Management UEFA
512 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Director
June 25, 1993
Mr. Robbie Lowe, Terminal Manager
Roadway Express, Inc.
5201 Sunset Road
Charlotte, NC 28213
Subject: Permit No. WQ0003016
Roadway Express, Inc.
Sunset Road Terminal
Wastewater Recycle/Evaporation
Treatment Facility System
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Lowe:
In accordance with your application received November 14, 1991, we are forwarding herewith
Permit No. WQ0003016, dated June 25, 1993, to Roadway Express, Inc. for the continued operation of
the subject evaporative wastewater treatment system. Please be advised that this permit is being renewed
for a period of two years only. Also, please be advised of condition no. 22, which requires that a permit
modification be applied for once connection of the facility's domestic and vehicle wash water streams to
the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department's wastewater collection system has occurred. Stormvvater
and remecliated groundwater may continue to be ticated in the lagoon system.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 31, 1995, shall hereby void
Permit No. WQ0003016 issued July 23, 1990, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as
specified therein. Please pay particular attention to the monitoring requirements in this permit. Failure to
establish an adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required operational information will result
in future compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have
the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within 30 days following receipt of this
pemiit. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of North
Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447,
Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
Regional Offices
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/571-4700 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7037
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephorie 919-733-7015
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

If you need additional
919/ 733-5083.
orrnation conc
enburg County Health De ent
svide Regional Office, Water Quality Section
ville Regional Office, Groundwater Sectiori
Jack Floyd, Central Office Groundwater S on
Training and Cortifioaticiri (no revised ratin.
Facilities Assessment Unit
er, please
Sincerely,
A. Presthh HowarcL Jr P.E.

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
RECYCLE SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina
as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Roadway Express, Inc.
Mecklenburg County
FOR THE
continued operation of a 7885 GPD wastewater recycle system which has been converted to an
evaporation facility consisting of a septic tank, a dosing tank with dual alternating siphons, 2544 square
feet of dual surface sand filters, chlorination facilities for domestic waste, a flow measuring device, a
365,000 gallon holding lagoon, a recycle pump, a settling basin, an oil/water separator with oil storage
tank and carbon absorption unit designed to treat 2880 GPD of contaminated groundwater prior to being
discharged to the recycle facility to serve Roadway Express, Inc.'s Sunset Road Terminal with no
discharge of wastes to the surface waters, pursuant to the application received November 14, 1991, and in
conformity with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and
approved by the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources and considered a part of this
permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 31, 1995, shall hereby void
Permit No. WQ0003016 issued July 23, 1990, and shall be subject to the following specified conditions
and limitations.
1 This permit shall become voidable unless the facilities are constructed in accordance with
the conditions of this permit, the approved plans, specifications, and other supporting data.
2. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes described in
the application and other supporting data.
3. The facilities shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
4. This permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the facilities to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request must be
submitted to the Division of Environmental Management accompanied by an application
fee, documentation from the parties involved, and other supporting materials as may be
appropriate. The approval of the request will be considered on its merits and may or may
not be approved.

5 In the event that the facilities fail to perfomi satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate con-ective action, including those as
may be required by this Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement
wastewater treatment or disposal facilities.
6. The Mooresville Regional Office, telephone number 704/6634699, shall be notified at least
forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an in -place
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during
the normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday,
excluding State Holidays.
7. The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance with
General Statute 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management..
8. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for damages
to surface or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this facility.
The facilities shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system o
prevent the discharge of any wastewater resulting from the operation of this facility,
10. Diversion or bypassing of untreated wastewater from the treatment facilities is prohibited.
11. Freeboard in the holding lagoon and settling basin shall not be less than two feet at any
time.
12 Any monitoring deemed necessary by the Division of Environmental Management to insure
surface and ground water protection will be established and an acceptable sampling
reporting schedule shall be followed.
13 Adequate inspection, maintenance, and cleaning shall be provided by the Pe
insure proper operation of the subject facilities.
14. The Permittee or his designee shall inspect the wastewater recycle facilities to prevent
malfunctions and deterioration, operator errors and discharges which may cause or lead to
the release of wastes to the environment, a threat to human health, or a nuisance. The
Permittee shall keep an inspection log or summary including at least the date and time of
inspection, observations made, and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken by
the Perrnittee. This log of inspections shall be maintained by the Permittee for a period of
three years from the date of the inspection and shall be made available upon request to the
Division of Environmental Management or other permitting authority.
15. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property,
premises or place on or related to the recycle system at any reasonable time for the purpose
of determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be
kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater,
surface water, or leachate.
16. The annual administering and compliance fee must be paid by the Permittee within thirty
(30) days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly may cause
the Division to initiate action to revoke this permit as specified by 15A NCAC 2H .0205
(c)(4).
17. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may subject the
Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Environmental Management in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
2

18. The issuance of this pemut does not preclude the Permittee from complying with any and.
all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be unposed by other government
agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
19. A set of approved plans and specifications for the subject project must be retained by the
Permittee for the life of this project..
20. Noncompliance Notification:
The Perrnittee shall report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office, telephone
number 704/663-1699, as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the
next working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of
the following
a. Any occurrence at the wastewater treatment facility which results in the treatment of
significant amounts of wastes which are abnormal in quantity or characteristic, such
as the dumping of the contents of a basin or tank; the known passage of a slug of
hazardous substance through the facility; or any other unusual circumstances.
b. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that renders the
facility incapable of adequate wastewater treatment such as mechanical or electrical
failures of pumps, aerators, compressors, etc.
c. Any failure of a pumping station, sewer line, or treatment facility resulting in a by-
pass directly to receiving waters without treatment of all or any portion of the
influent to such station or facility.
d. Any time that self -monitoring information indicates that the facility is not in
compliance with its permit limitations.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter
form within 15 days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report must outline
the actions taken or proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem does not recur.
21. Upon classification of the facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall
employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in responsible charge (ORC) of
the wastewater treatment facilities. The operator must hold a certificate of the type and
grade at least equivalent to or greater than the classification assigned to the wastewater
treatment facilities by the Certification'Commission. The Permittee must also employ a
certified back-up operator of the appropriate type and grade to comply with the conditions
of Title 15A, Chapter 8A, .0202. The ORC of the facility must visit each Class 1 facility at
least weekly and each Class II, III, and IV facility at least daily, excluding weekends and
holidays, and must properly manage and document daily operation and maintenance of the
facility and must comply with all other conditions of Title 15A, Chapter 8A, .0202.
22. The Permittee shall pursue a permit to discharge its domestic and vehicle wash wastewater
to the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department's wastewater collection system. Upon
connection of service, the Permittee shall request modification to the wastewater recycle
permit to reflect the appropriate changes.
23. Within 90 days of permit issuance, one monitoring well shall be installed near the lagoon as
indicated on the attached site map. The well shall be constructed such that the water level in
the well is never above or below the screened (open) portion of the well at any time during
the year. However, the exact location and construction details for this well shall be
approved by the Mooresville Regional Office, from which a well construction permit must
be obtained.

24. The monitor well shall be sampled initially after construction and thereafter every January,
April, and September for the following parameters:
pH
Water Level
Oil & Grease
Total Suspended Solids
Volatile Organic Compounds - In September only (by Method 1 or 2 below)
Method 1: Method 6230D (Capillary - Column), "Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater", 17th edition, 1989
Method 2: Method 502.2 " Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds
in Drinking Water", United States Environmental Protection Agency -
600/4-88/039
The measure ent of water level must be made prior to sampling for the remaining
parameters.
The measuring points (top of well casing) of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed to
provide relative elevations of the measuring point for each of the monitoring wells. The
depth of water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed point on the top of the
casing.
If TOC concentrations greater than 10 mg/1 are detected in any downgradient monitoring
well, additional sampling and analysis must be conducted to identify the individual
constituents comprising this TOC concentration. If the TOC concentration as measured in
the Dackground monitor well exceeds 10 mg/1, this concentration will be taken to represent
the naturally occurring TOC concentration. Any exceedances of this naturally occurring
TOC concentration in the downgradient wells shall be subject to the additional sampling
and analysis as described above.
If any volatile organic compounds are detected by method 6230D, or the equivalent method
502.2, then EPA methods 604 and 611 must also be run to detect other organic compounds
which may be present. The results of all analysis specified in the monitoring requirements,
including 604 and 611 if required, must be submitted simultaneously.
The results of the sampling and analysis shall be sent to the N.C. Division of
Environmental Management on Form GW-59 (Compliance Monitoring Report Form) every
February, May, and October.
25. The Compliance Boundary for the disposal system is specified by regulations in 15A
NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. An exceedance of Groundwater
Quality Standards beyond the Compliance Boundary is subject to penalty provisions
applicable under General Statute 143-215.6A. The sale of property, by the Permittee,
which is within or contiguous to the disposal system site may alter location of the
Compliance Boundary.
For facilities permitted prior to December 30, 1983, the Compliance Boundary is
established at the lesser of 500 feet from the lagoon or the property boundary, whichever is
less.
If the title to any property which may affect the location of the Compliance Boundary is
changed, the permittee shall notify the Division Director within 14 days. The Director shall
then establish a modified Compliance Boundary which will be done as a modification to the
Permit.
4

The REVIEW BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations in 15A
NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. A REVIEW BOUNDARY is
established around disposal systems midway between the Compliance Boundary and the
perimeter of the waste disposal area. When the concentration of any substance equals or
exceeds the maximum allowable concentration of that substance at the REVIEW
$OUNDARY, as determined by monitoring, the permittee shall either (i) demonstrate,
through predictive calculations or modeling, that natural site conditions, facility design and
operational controls will prevent a violation of standards at the Compliance Boundary; or,
(ii) submit a plan for the alteration of existing site conditions, facility design or operational
controls that will prevent a violation of standards at the Compliance Boundary, and
implement that plan upon its approval by the Director.
26. Oil drained from engine crankcases, antifreeze or degreasing solvent wastes shall not be
discharged into the disposal system.
27. The effluent from the groundwater remediation system shall be analyzed immediately after
start-up and thereafter every January, April, and September by EPA Method 6230D. The
results shall be submitted with the groundwater monitoring data as indicated above.
28. Any additional groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division, shall
be provided.
29. A weekly maintenance log shall be kept indicating all repairs and inspections conducted.
This information shall be submitted to the Mooresville Regional Office on or before
January 31st of the following year.
30. The carbon adsorption unit shall be installed as an integral part of the treatment system for
the contaminated groundwater, prior to effluent discharge.
31. Stormwater in excess of that permitted to be treated arid disposed of, pursuant to the
following paragraph, shall be diverted away from the treatment facilities.
32. This permit authorizes the treatment and disposal of 400 GPD of domestic wastewater,
1300 GPD of equipment washdown, 5250 GPD of stormwater, and 2880 GPD of
contaminated groundwater only. Any increase of wastewater from any source will require
a permit amendment prior to discharge of any additional wastewater to the treatment
facility.
33. The Permittee, at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall request its
extension. Upon receipt of the request, the Commission will review the adequacy of the
facilities described therein, and if warranted, will extend the permit for such period of time
and under such conditions and limitations as it may deem appropriate.
34. Oil shall be disposed of in an approved manner.
35. No sludge shall be disposed of unless prior written approval is obtained from the Division
of Environmental Management.
36. Any modification of the treatment or disposal facilities without prior approval from the
Division will subject the permittee to the Enforcement Authority of the Environmental
Management Commission and can subject the permittee to a fine not to exceed $10,000 per
day per violation.
5

t issued this e 25th day ofiune, 1993
NORTH 0 1 A r ONMENTAL AGE
A. Preston
Division o
By Authotity of
Pennit No. WtH43O16
d, Jr, Pt Director
nmenta1 age n
e &PATO nui Manageu n
mon
SS1ON

Oanerr, or.. Contact`'Pe
Mailing Address:
N - /3
County: Telephone:,
NeDES Permit No.. NCOO Nondisc. Per. No.
Issue©ate:" Expiration Date:
Existing Facility
Rated By: [,
z
New Facility
Date: l
Reviewed (Train. & Cert.) Reg. Office
Reviewed (Train. & Cert.).
QRC
Industrial Pretreatment Units andlor.
Industrial Pretreatment Program
(see`detinilion No. 33)
DESIGN FLOW OF PLANT IN GPO
(not applicable to non•conlarninaied cooling
waters, sludge handling facilities for water
purification plants, totally closed cycle
systems (def. No. 11), and facilities
consisting only of Item (4) (d) or Items
'nd (11) (d))
0 — 20,000 ...............
20,001 — 50,000 ..... . ........ .
50,001 -- 100,000 .. . . .
100,001 — 250,000 .. . .......... . .
250,001 •, 500,000 ... . ....... . . .
500,001 ••1,000,000 ............. , . , . - . - „ ,
1,000,001 •- 2,000,000 ....... ............ . ....
2,000,001 (and up) - rate 1 point additional for each
200,000 gpd capacity up to a
maximum of 30
eletv
POINTS
Flow (gpd) = /r ,9
(4) (d)
'IfLtt!NARY UNITS (see definition no. 32)
(a) Bar Screens ........................ . ...... .
Of
(b) Mechanical Screens, Static Screens or
Comminuting Devices ....... . ... ...........
(c) Grit Removal ................. . ............ .
Or
(d) Mechanical of Aerated Grit Removal ,
(e) Flow Measuring Device „•,,,,,•,,,.,.
or
(f) Instrumented Flow Measurement . , .... , ..
(g) Preaerahon ......... . . . ................ . ..�.�
(h) Influent Flow Equalization ... . .
(i) Grease cir Oif Separators • . Gravity.,
Mechanical ... , .. , ...
Dissolved Air Flotation.
(f-) Pr
Central Office„
Grade
ITEM
(4) PRIMARYTREATMENT UNITS
(a) 'Septic Tank (see definition no. 43) ..
4 (b) Imhoff Tank ............. ... .
(c) Primary Clarifiers . ,.. , .. „ , .. .
(d) Sewing Ponds or Settling Tanks for tnorg
Non-loxic Materials (sludge handling facilities
for water purification plants, sand, gravel,
stone, and other mining operations except
recreational activities such as gem or gold -
3
4
5
10
2
1
2
2
3
8
5
•
• POINT
(5) SECONDARY TREATMENT UNITS
(a) Carbonaceous Stage
(i)Aeration High Purity Oxygen System .... .
Diffused Air System .......... •
Mechanical Air System (fixed,
floating or rotor) .... , , ......
Separate Sludge Reaeralion ...
(it) Trickling Filler
HighRale. ..L... ..........
Standard Rage..' .............
Packed Tower ....... . ...... .
(Ili) Biological Aerated Fuller or Aerated
Biological Filler ......................
(iv) Aerated Lagoons . l.-,............
Rotating BiologicalContactors .... , . .
Sand Filters -
inter nt biological , . . ,
recirculating biological , ..
(vii) Stabilization Lagoons ..... . ........ . .
(viiii) Clar icier ................... ......
(ix) Single %lige system for combined
carbonaceous removal of BO0 and
genous removal by nitrification
del. No. 12) (Points for this item
to be in addition to kerns (5) (a)
ugh (5) (a) (vr� , . ... , .'
additions to enhance BAD
Biological Culture (-Super Bugs') addition
to enhance orflanic compound removal .
2
2 r"
7
5
5
10
10
10
8
5
5

Purity',
'se d ASy
hanical:Ai
ting.-or'roto
rate Sludge Reaeral
Trickllng Fitter -
High Rate -----
Standard Rate
Packed Tower ........
(Ili) 8oiocai Aerated Filter or Aerated
Biokogical Filter ............ — .........
) Rotating Biological Contactors .........
Sand
intermittent biological . • . .
circulaling biological
(id) Chuifier. _ . . 5
6) TERTIARY OR ADVANCED TREATMENT UNIT
(a) Activated Carbons Beds -
vrithout carbon regeneration 5
with carbon regeneration . _ . ........... 1 5
Powdered or Granular Activated Carbon Feed -
without carbon regeneration 5
with carbon regeneration — .... 15
Air Stripping — .................... 5
Denitrificalion Process (separate process) . 1 0
Electrodialysis _ _ _ ....... 5
Foam Separation ...... 5
Ion Exchange _ _
Land Application of Treated Effluent
(see definition no. 22b) (not applicable for
sand, gravel, stone and other similar mining
operations)
:X) on agriculturally managed sites (See def.
(ii) by high • rate infiltration on non-agricutturally
managed sites(includes rotary distributors
and similar fixed nozzle systems) — . 4
' (iii) by subsurface disposal (includes low pressure
pipe syslems and gravity systems except at
plants consisting of septic tank and nitrifica-
tion lines only) — ..........
Mitroscreens ................. • - -
Phosphorus Removal by Biological Processes
(See del. No. 26) •
Polishing Ponds - without aeration . .
with aeration .........
Post Aeration - cascade ....... — •
diffused or mechanlr.a1 . .
(b)
Reverse Osmosis.
n) Sand or Mixed -Media
'gh re
Treatment pc.ocesses for removal of rneta
Trealrnent processes for removal of toxic
materials other than rnelal or cyanide .....
DGE TREATMENT
Slud
Digeslion Thrk Healed .........
. .
Unhealed — . —
Sludge Stabilization (chemical or thermal)
Sludge Drying Beds- Gravity . —
Vacuum Assisted — . .
p:11,1dge Elutriation —
Slidge .Conditiope'r (chemical or thermal) . .
Thickener (g.ravity) ............ ........
ed Air 'Flotation Unit
poicablii to a unit ;ales as (3) (i) , .
Gas Utilization (including gas storage
2
3
10
4
5
2 0
5
5
2
5
1 5
5
1 0
5
3
2
5
5
5
2
SLUDGE D1SP
, (a) Lagoons.--
(b) Land Application ( nd subsur(ace)
(see definition'
-where the facility holds e land app. per -10
-by contracting to a, and spplication operator who
holds the land application permit ........... — 2
and epplication of sludge by a contractor who does
not hold the permit for the WASIeWiLitt treatment
Jacility where the *fudge Is generated ..... . 10
(c) Laindfilled (burial) _ ..„ . _ . 5
(9) DISINFECTION
(a) Chlorirsalion — .......... _
(b) Dechlotinalion . _ _ _ _
110) CHEMICAL ADDITION SYSTEM (S) (See definition No. 9)
(nol applicable lo chemical additions rated as item
(3) 0:(5) (e) (ei). (6) (a). (6) (b). (7) (b). (7) (e).
(9) (a), (9) (b), or (9) (c) 5 points each: List:
5
5
5
1 ) MISCELLA EOUS UNITS
(a) Holding Ponds, Holding Tanks or Settling Ponds
for Organic or Toxic Materials including wastes
from rnining operations containing nitrogen andior
phosphorous compounds in amounts significantly
greater than is common for domestic wastewater ........ 4
(b) Effluent Flow Equalization (not applicable to storage
basins which are inherent in land application systems) 2
(c) Stage Discharge (not applicable to storage basins
inherent in land application
(d) Pumps
(e) Stand -By Power
(I)
Thermal Polkition Control 3
Facilities havin
do not require
facilities requir
charge.
TOTAL POINTS
CLASSIFICATION
5 25 Points
26. 50 Points
51- 65 Points
66- Up Points
ough four points, inclusive.
operator. ation ol all other
ornarabte grade operator In responsible
Facilities having an activaled sludge process will be assigned
a minimum classifi ion cal Class II.
oval of :metal
or cyanide will be assigned a minimum assification al Class II.
Facilities having treaiment procelses for
Facilities having trealmeni processes for the biological removal
of phosphorus will be assigned a minimum classilicalion of Class`
111.

COM M. t op N.1 ENT
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Re
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
June 25, 1993
Mr. Robbie Lowe, Terminal Manager
Roadway Express, Inc.
5201 Sunset Road
Charlotte, NC 28213
Dear Mr. Lowe:
VIR MEM At A.M0
IE 111111111a OfflCit
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Director
Subject: Permit No. WQ0003016
Roadway Express, Inc.
Sunset Road Terminal
Wastewater Recycle/Evaporation
Treatment Facility System
Mecklenburg County
In accordance with your application received November 14, 1991, we are forwarding herewith
Permit No. WQ0003016, dated June 25, 1993, to Roadway Express, Inc. for the continued operation of
the subject evaporative wastewater treatment system. Please be advised that this permit is being renewed
for a period of two years only. Also, please be advised of condition no. 22, which requires that a permit
modification be applied for once connection of the facility's domestic and vehicle wash water streams to
the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department's wastewater collection system has occurred. Storrnwater
and remediated groundwater may continue to be treated in the lagoon system.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 31, 1995, shall hereby void
Permit No. WQ0003016 issued July 23, 1990, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as
specified therein. Please pay particular attention to the monitoring requirements in this pemiit. Failure to
establish an adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required operational information will result
in future compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have
the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within 30 days following receipt of this
permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of North
Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447,
Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
Asheville Fayetteville
704/251-6208 919/486-1541
Regional Offices
Mooresville Raleigh Washington
704/663-1699 919/571-4700 919/946-6481
Wilmington Winston-Salem
919/395-3900 919/896-7007
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Teiephone 919-733-7015
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

you need additional information concerning this matter,please contactMs, Angela Y. Griffin at
919/ 73 5083.
enburg County Health Dep. ent
esville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Jack Floyd, Central Offiee Groundwateron
Training and Certification (no revised rating
Facilities Assessment Unit

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
RECYCLE SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina
as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Roadway Express, Inc.
Mecklenburg County
FOR THE
continued operation of a 7885 GPD wastewater recycle system which has been converted to an
evaporation facility consisting of a septic tank, a dosing tank with dual alternating siphons, 2544 square
feet of dual surface sand filters, chlorination facilities for domestic waste, a flow measuring device, a
365,000 gallon holding lagoon, a recycle pump, a settling basin, an oil/water separator with oil storage
tank and carbon absorption unit designed to treat 2880 GPD of contaminated groundwater prior to being
discharged to the recycle facility to serve Roadway Express, Inc.'s Sunset Road Terminal with no
discharge of wastes to the surface waters, pursuant to the application received November 14, 1991, and in
conformity with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and
approved by the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources and considered a part of this
permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 31, 1995, shall hereby void
Permit No. WQ0003016 issued July 23, 1990, and shall be subject to the following specified conditions
and limitations:
1 This pea Inn shall become voidable unless the facilities are constructed in accordance with
the conditions of this permit, the approved plans, specifications, and other supporting data.
2. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes described in
the application and other supporting data.
3. The facilities shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
4. This permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the facilities to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request must be
submitted to the Division of Environmental Management accompanied by an application
fee, documentation from the parties involved, and other supporting materials as may be
appropriate. The approval of the request will be considered on its merits and may or may
not be approved.

5. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as
may be required by this Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement
wastewater treatment or disposal facilities.
6. The Mooresville Regional Office, telephone number 704/663-1699, shall be notified at least
forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an in -place
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during
the normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday,
excluding State Holidays.
7 The sludge generated from these treatment faciiities must be disposed of in accordance with
General Statute 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Managemeni
8. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for daznages
to surface or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this facility.
9 The facilities shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to
prevent the discharge of any wastewater resulting from the operation of this facility.
10. Diversion or bypassing of untreated wastewater from the treatment facilities is prohibited.
1 1. Freeboard in the holding lagoon and settling basin shall not be less than two feet at any
time.
12. Any monitoring deemed necessary by the Division of Environmental Management to insure
surface and ground water protection will be established and an acceptable sampling
reporting schedule shall be followed.
13 Adequate inspection, maintenance, and cleaning shall be provided by the Perrnittee to
insure proper operation of the subject facilities,
14. The Permittee or his designee shalt inspect the wastewater recycle facilities to prevent
malfunctions and deterioration, operator errors and discharges which may cause or lead to
the release of wastes to the environment, a threat to human health, or a nuisance. The
Peanittee shall keep an inspection log or summary including at least the date and time of
inspection, observations made, and any rnaintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken by
the Permittee. This log of inspections shall be maintained by the Permittee for a period of
three years from the date of the inspection and shall be made available upon request to the
Division of Environmental Management or other permitting authority.
15 Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property,
premises or place on or related to the recycle system at any reasonable time for the purpose
of determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be
kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater,
surface water, or leachate.
16. The annual administering and compliance fee must be paid by the Permittee within thirty
(30) days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly may cause
the Division to initiate action to revoke this permit as specified by 15A NCAC 2H .0205
(c)(4).
17 Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may subject the
Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Environmental Management in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215,6A to 143-215.6C,
2

24. The monitor well shall be sampled initial after construction and thereafter every January,
April, and September for the following parameters:.
pH
Water Level
Oil & Grease
Total Suspended Solids
Volatile Organic Compounds - In September only (by Method 1 or 2 below)
Method 1: Method 6230D (Capillary - Column), "Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater", 17th edition, 1989
Method 2: Method 502.2 " Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds
in Drinking Water", United States Environmental Protection Agency -
600/4- 88/039
The measurement of water level must be made prior to sampling for the remaining
parameters.
The measuring points (top of well casing) of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed to
provide relative elevations of the measuring point for each of the monitoring wells. The
depth of water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed point on the top of the
casing.
If TOC concentrations greater than 10 mg/I are detected in any downgradient monitoring
well, additional sampling and analysis must be conducted to identify the individual
constituents comprising this TOC concentration. If the TOC concentration as measured in
the background monitor well exceeds 10 mg/1, this concentration will be taken to represent
the naturally occurring TOC concentration. Any exceedances of this naturally occurring
TOC concentration in the downgradient wells shall be subject to the additional sampling
and analysis as described above..
If any volatile organic compounds are detected by method 6230D, or the equivalent method
502.2, then EPA methods 604 and 611 must also be run to detect other organic compounds
which may be present. The results of all analysis specified in the monitoring requirements,
including 604 and 611 if required, must be submitted simultaneously.
The results of the sampling and analysis shall be sent to the INC. Division of
Environmental Management on Forrn GW-59 (Compliance Monitoring Report Form) every
February, May, and October.
25. The Compliance Boundary for the disposal system is specified by regulations in 15A
NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. An exceedance of Groundwater
Quality Standards beyond the Compliance Boundary is subject to penalty provisions
applicable under General Statute 143-215.6A. The sale of property, by the Perrnittee,
which is within or contiguous to the disposal system site may alter location of the
Compliance Boundary.
For facilities permitted prior to December 30, 1983, the Compliance Boundary is
established at the lesser of 500 feet from the lagoon or the property boundary, whichever is
less.
If the title to any property which may affect the location of the Compliance Boundary is
changed, the permittee shall notify the Division Director within 14 days. The Director shall
then establish a modified Compliance Boundary which will be done as a modification to the
Permit.
4

The REVIEW BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations in 15A
NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. A REVMW BOUNDARY is
established around disposal systems midway between the Compliance Boundary and the
perimeter of the waste disposal area. When the concentration of any substance equals or
exceeds the maximum allowable concentration of that substance at the REVIEW
BOUNDARY, as determined by monitoring, the permittee shall either (i) demonstrate,
through predictive calculations or modeling, that natural site conditions, facility design and
operational controls will prevent a violation of standards at the Compliance Boundary; or,
(ii) submit a plan for the alteration of existing site conditions, facility design or operational
controls that will prevent a violation of standards at the Compliance Boundary, and
implement that plan upon its approval by the Director.
26 Oil drained from engine crankcases, antifreeze or degreasing solvent wastes shall not be
discharged into the disposal system.
27 The effluent from the groundwater remediation system shall be analyzed immediately after
start-up and thereafter every January, April, and September by EPA Method 6230D. The
results shall be submitted with the groundwater monitoring data as indicated above.
28. Any additional groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division, shall
be provided.
A weekly maintenance log shall be kept indicating all repairs and inspections conducted.
This information shall be submitted to the Mooresville Regional Office on or before
January 31st of the following year.
30. The carbon adsorption unit shall be installed as an integral part of the treatment system for
the contaminated groundwater, prior to effluent discharge.
31, Stormwater in excess of that permitted to be treated and disposed of, pursuant to the
following paragraph, shall be diverted away from the treatment facilities.
32. This pernnt authorizes the treatment and disposal of 400 GPD of domestic wastewater,
1300 GPD of equipment washdown, 5250 GPD of stormwater, and 2880 GPD of
contaminated groundwater only. Any increase of wastewater from any source will require
a permit amendment prior to discharge of any additional wastewater to the treatment
facility.
33. The Permittee, at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall request its
extension. Upon receipt of the request, the Commission will review the adequacy of the
facilities described therein, and if warranted, will extend the permit for such period of time
and under such conditions and limitations as it may deem appropriate.
29
34. Oil shall be disposed of in an approved manner.
35. No sludge shall be disposed of unless prior written approval is obtained from the Division
of Environmental Management.
36. Any modification of the treatment or disposal facilities without prior approval from the
Division will subject the permittee to the Enforcement Authority of the Environmental
Management Commission and can subject the permittee to a fine not to exceed $10,000 per
day per violation.

Permit issued this the 25th day of June, 1993
NORTH cAROLLNA E
0
NTAL
A. Preston ward, Jr., P. Director
Division of Ehvironmental Management
By Auth • *ty of the En ntal. Management Co
AGE
Permit No. W it 03016
SSION
°ssion
6

State of North Carolina
Departni ent of Environment, Health, and Natu
Mooresville Regiona Office
James C. Maftn, Governor
X'iIliam W. Cobe' Jr, Secretary
Resources
Abert F. Hilton, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONNENTAL MANAGEMENT
January 9
Mr. Robbie Lowe, Terminal Manager
Roadway Express, Inc.
5201 Sunset Road
Charlotte, North Caroltha 28213
Subject:
Dear Mr. Lowe:
992
Non -Discharge Facility
Inspection
Septic tank/Surface Sand Filter
Evapo-Transpiration Pond
Perrnit No. WQ0003016
Meckienburg County, N. C.
This letter is a follow-up to the inspection perforned on
January 7, 1992 by Mr. G. T. Chen of this 0ffice in conjunction
with your request for the subject Non -Discharge Permit renewal.
The inspection indicated that the subject facility is properiy
inaintained anc3 operated. However, it was noted that the
evapo-transpiration pond has been heavily infested with algae which
needs to be controlled..
Your request for permit renewal has been recomirended by this
Office for approval. If you have any questi.ons regarding this
rnatter, please contact Mr. Chen or ine at 704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quaiity Regional Supervisor
GTC/d
cc: Ieck1enburg County DEP
oundwater Section - MRO
P0
919 North Mari Srret,
NC 281I5O95O • Tekphone 704-6634699 * FAX 7i
An Equal 0pporwnity Afhrma,vc ¼tion Ernployer

�e,,,, ifr4/sL
GROUNDWATER SECTION
PirjrDIVISION' OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RECORD OF WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
REVIEW BY lar r cl+ c►4e7 . DATE //f Z.
FACILITY NAME / + «,atir vair £ pc es C, NC,
LOCATION 7 w,'% ea
TYPE OF DISPOSAL SYSTEM ( LAGOON. ETC. ) _ r-JA
DESCRIPTION OF FACILTCY , +e:` ter yc ( 1 0
sQK6/ .r; f fr i arc. gi5J r -raeY►*AL,+ i i'uri y
w
�% � M's Rt e x
f.
� � & OR SIZE OF APPLJCATIaN AREA
of IMPOUNDMENT FT. SQ) 6 � _ f SI ( � � ,`�
PRRiIVARY ['SECONDARY 0 TERTIARY
c.k wa$l N,, ft 91.4,, reltfr +j+cd-Alba 1-1471, est
FT., WELL- 300 FT.
PUMP RATE ( EST.) PA
WHAT DESIGN CONDITIONS WILL I EDUO / INCREASE CHANCE OF GW CONTAMINATION :. 7fP.u..f q5
remecta4 b 0 pfeat n4 �, rel eari oi's ad* rp7 ?J ,c M/t r{iti r fd aVic + er5te �',n�a %aq,�, w,".C, day Pm_ ere_
WHAT NATURAL SITE CONDITIONS WILL REDUCE f INCREASE CHANCE OF GW CONTAMINATION : PP rAn We
CeCs v l+.fk over lyi n3 i'd.t-o-ugedi heti rock ..
DEPTH TO: BEDROCK To FT, , SEASONAL HIGH W. T.
WASTE SOURCE : MUN. SLUDGE MUN, W. WATER :
0IND. SLUDGE :IND. W. WATER W TH ERE 4410
DISTANCE FROM WASTE SOURCE TO NEAREST: STREAM
FOR WELL: TYPE OF USE Mon' . DEPTH "'" 4 0
GW g
FIELD .INVESTIGATION ? (Y/N
COUNTY A"ii tau
W44 , a c 1 /1.4' ° a;2(
DESIGN CAP. (GP'D) 7R8
I ra 0, 1+.4 tee 04t�?`� Al ysicer
SURFICIAL AQUIFER
GEN, LITHOLOGY Sar t, d4
HYD. COND. I�+" FT./DAY
THICKNESS FT.
ASURED
TI MATE D
NO. OF MONITOR WELLS: PROPOSED: UP i DOWN
FROM WORKSHEET: SITE NUMERICAL DESCRIPTION = _..
PRO
RE
SITE GRADE (HYDROGEOL.)
SED SAMPLING SCHEDULE & PARAMETER(S)
)O FT, , ANNUAL W. T. FLUX : ,?�3- FT.
BEDROCK f' ARTESIAN AQUIFER-
6 rcs,
r
�04
FT. DAY E
; EXISTING : UP
2 4
SITUATION GRADE =
eied
MEASURED
MATED
DOWN
3049
ARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS
GW-48
sed
7
HYD. REGIONAL SUPERVISOR

TA 1S 5
111 pre V 4)(4 S
7r.c ie14,4C71-1'0 ft)
tAiaXii 1.5
eM4tua 5 ei ewe,
‘Ti1
re tac4142
lecause
reece tit
e -1-0
ere e
/10 M/c1e r 9rourot wes-er
ite eyed in -to #
5754-e hi- .14 5 OS ye4- teen 11-'5-4 /fetkel:
t wet-i-ei- down lca_cit'evd-- or -74 c one
C e5.eq/ 10119A1:740r tve/6 dee
5-71--ireerw 4r0,41:1 7144,/,-141/4/ aet/
priet'+ 15recompeterecierf "IC et 410 r 44)e/el
4-eel/ e1-74X-e- coLl-cecX,e, "ma
row trAva4ec ipecl;'eurt.'0"
-"C
richta4er.
er i's preei4,
eie he /
oci A, e ee..cseret evt
Ceect ri5
€2,1Ce.
c-71
,4)

ss, Inc.
Sunset R ad Terminal
FIGURE NO. 1 DATE 4 /20 /90
SCALE 1:24,000
PROJECT NO. 79-001-01

DRAIN PROPERTY LINE
Soil
Aeration/
Storage
Area
Site Map
Roadway Express, Inc.
Sunset Road Terminal
criArJafr. Nr,
NA A
BUILDING
Stockpiled
Soil
vP
SEPTIC TANK
SAND FILTER BED
HOLDING LAGOON
GASOLINE TANK
SHOP
EDGERTON
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
FIGURE NO. 2
SCALE 1" = 200'
PROJECT NO. 79-00,1
DATE 4 /20 /90

M E
DIVISICV
February 5, 1992
ORANDUM
Don Safrit
Bob Cheek
Jack Floyd,
Request for Renewal of Permit Nb. WQ0003016
Roadway Express, Inc.
Evaporative Wastewater Treatment Lagoon
Mecklenburg County
WQ0003016/C v91340
Dana Bolden : Review Engineer
FEB17
N+A7-URAX,
E.4ANI)
E VEL<3Pm dNT
1992
NY!RO jgfNtAt
The Groundwater Section has received the subject renewal request
for a 7,885 GPD wastewater disposal facility. This facility consist of
a septic tank, sand filters, and disinfection facilities for domestic
waste and an oil/water separator and carbon absorption designed to
treat 2880 GPD of treated gr undwater. Other waste sar is into the
evaporative lagoon include stormwater runoff and a
operation.
r
This facility ha: undergone many recent changes. First, the
facility is receiving less water than previous years. There are only
80 employees, down from 460 three years ago and trucks are only washed
once per quarter. The volumes associated with these changes are
unknown. Secondly, the groundwater remediation system has yet to be
installed. Regional office staff is pursuing operation of the
groundwater remediation system through enforcement actions.
The location of the lagoon ,near a flood plain and, stream makes it
impossible to locate wells for downgrad.ent groundwater monitoring.
Any contamination of groundwater will manifest itself in the stream
before it will in. the groundwater. However, we still would like to
have a monitoring well near the lagoon. when the groundwater remediation
system begins operation. This would give us some indication as to how
the lagoon is affecting groundwater.
Also, it has came to our attention that municipal sewer service is
available. If this is confirmed, then we would reci rraend connecting
the domestic and vehicle wash water streams to the sewer. Starmwater
and remediated groundwater may continue to be treated in the lagoon
system.

Therefore, the Groundwater Section recaunds reissuance of the
permit contingent upon inclusion of the following conditions:
1. Within 90 days of permit issuance, one monitoring well
shall be installed near the lagoon as indicated on the
attached site map. The well shall be constructed such that
the water level in the well is never above or below the
screened (open) portion of the well at any time during the
year. However, the exact location and construction details
for these wells shall be approved by the Mboresville Regional
Office, float which a well construction permit must be
obtained.
2. The monitor wells shall be sampled initially after
construction and thereafter every January, April, and
September for the following parameters:
pH
Water Level
Oil & Grease
Total Suspended Solids
Volatile Organic Qn1po
or 2 below)
In September cly by method 1
Method 1: Method 6230D (Capillary - Column), "Standard
Methods For The Examination of Water and
Wastewater", 17th ed., 1989
Method 2: Method 502.2 "Methods For The Determination
Of Organic Compounds In Drinking Water", U.S.
EPA - 600/4-88/039
The measurement of water level must be made prior to sampling
for the remaining. parameters.
The measuring points (top of well casing) of all monitoring
wells shall be surveyed to provide relative elevations of the
ffaSuring point for each of the monitoring wells. The depth
of water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed
point on the top of the casing.
If TOC concentrations greater than 10 mg/1 are detected in
any downgradient monitoring well, additional sampling and
analysis must be conducted to identify the individual
constituents comprising this TOC concentration. If the WC
concentration as measured in the background monitor well
exceeds 10 mg/1, this concentration will be taken to
represent the naturally occurring IOC concentration. Any
exceedances of this naturally occurring TOC concentration in
the downgradient wells shall be subject to the additional
sampling and analysis as described above.

If any volatile organic canpDunds are detected by method
6230D, or the equivalent rnethcxi 502-2, then. EPA methods 604
and 611 must also be run to detect other organic
compounds which may be present. The results of all
analyses specified in the monitoring requirenents,
including 604 and 611 if required, must be submitted
simultaneously.
The results of the sampling and analysis shall be sent to the
N.C. Division of ErvironnnLa1 Management on Form GW-59
[Compliance Monitoring Report Form] every February, May, and
October.
. The Compliance Boun Ary for the disposal system is specified
by regulations in 15A NCAC 2L, Gxoundwater Classifications
and Standards. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality
Standards beyond the Compliance Boundary is subject to the
penalty provisions applicable under General Statute
143-215.6(1)a. The sale of property, by the Permittee, which
is within or contiguous to the disposal site, may alter the
location of the COmpliance Boundary.
For facilities permitted prior to, December 30, 1983, the
Compliance Boundaxy is established at a distance of 500 feet
from the lagoon, or the property boundary, whichever is less.
If the title to any property which may affect the location of
the Compliance Boundary is changed, the Permittee shall
notify the DEM Director within 14 days. The Director shall
then establish a modified Compliance Boundary which will be
done as a modification to. the Permit.
The REVIEW BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by
regulations in 15A NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and
Standards. A REVIEW BOUNDARY is established around disposal
systems midway between the Compliance Boundary and the
perimeter of the waste disposal area. When the concentration
of any substance equals or exceeds the maximum allowable
concentration of that substance at the REVIEW BOUNDARY, as
determined by monitoring, the permittee shall either (i)
demonstrate, through predictive calculations or modeling,
that natural site conditions, facility design and operational
controls will prevent a violation of standards at the
Compliance Boundary; or, (ii) submit a plan for the
alteration of existing site conditions, facility design or
operational controls that will prevent a violation of
standards at the Canpiiance Boundary, and implement that plan
upe its approval by the Director.

4. Oil drained from engine crankc ses, antifreeze or degreasing
solvent wastes shall not be discharged into the dispsa
system.
The eff uent from the groundwater remediation system shall be
analyzed immediately after start-up and thereafter every
January, April, and SepteMber by EPA Method 6230D. The
results shall be submitted with the
data as indicated above.
6. Any additional groundwatei
necessary by the Division,
The permittee should also be r
disposal permit if appropriate.
If there areany questions piease
BC/JF:ja/91340
cc: Barbara. Christian
Central Files
Permit. Files
y 111Ji toring
be provided.
ter monitoring
red to Obtain a stormwater
me know.

DIV]: IS OF ENV.1RONMENrAJ, MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
E
TO: 0, ti. 6 cs. •, '
DATE: 2 3
FROM:
Jack Fl
ir
1991
SUBJECT: Application for ' Renewal/Amend.ment of Permit 'No.30 fto
New Permit
Facility Name
County
Type of Project:
Central Office Contact;
Applicable Permit Numbers ; WQ QC. 3 0(a GW 314 ti
EPA
AC
We have received a copy of the above referenced application,
which was sent to your regional office for comment on or about
3 ; 19 71
You should review the application package for completeness
and adequacy of relevant information and submit your request for
additional information to me (via telephone or memo) by
19geo that all required information can be
requested from the applicant at one time. A copy of our formal
request to the applicant for additional information will be
provided to you.
If you do not require additional information from the
applicant to complete your evaluation of the project, you should
review the application package and submit your comments to me by
If a copy of the application package has not been. ma
available to your office, PLEASE LET ME KNOW IMMEDIATELY so
a copy can be forwarded to you as soon as possible.
JF: ja/Appl shi

GROUNDWATER SECTION
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RECORD OF WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION REV E
GW #
REVIEW BY
FACILITY NAME
LOCATION Traue I I- 7 7 5
DATE
TYPE OF DISPOSAL SYSTEM (LAGOON. ETC. )
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY ,
SIZE OF IMPOUNDMENT ( FT,
FIELD INVESTIGATION ? ( YiN )
COUNTY ii/eCk L.E,A.)./34.ie&
brr
DESIGN CAP. ( GPD ) 7, 3 7,5'
d/767(1LCI
& OR SIZE OF APPLICATION AREA
WASTE SOURCE MUN. SLUDGE MUN. W, WATER:
IND. SLUDGE IND, W. WATER OTHERS
DISTANCE FROM WASTE SOURCE TO NEAREST: STREAM
FOR WELL: TYPE OF USE nrA VA1 r , DEPTH J
PRIMARY SECONDARY TERTIARY
WELL
, PUMP RATE ( EST,)
FT,
WHAT DESIGN CONDITIONS WILL REDUCE / INCREASE CHANCE OF GW CONTAMINATION
41f C,rr% 011 /Ode( frit(' l'hicuqh t.:!6xkn4:tbSC^1
WHAT NATURAL SITE CONDITIONS WILL REDUCE / INCREASE
IN.(1("tcK /(..,ticarier 4.abIt„d.
DEPTH TO: BEDROCK D F. SEASONAL HIGH W. T.
SURFICIAL AQUIFE
GEN, LM-IOLOGY.90)/
D. COND. FT./DAY
THICKNESS
NO. OF MONITOR WELLS: PROPOSED:
cFf
c (large, 41
CHANCE OF GW CO
1 bc, ar
EASURED
STIMATED
8,1,3
DOWN
FROM WORKSHEET; SITE NUMERICAL DESCRIPTION --?1
SITE GRADE (HYDROGEOL)
PROPOSED SAMP NG SCHEDULE & PARAMETER(S)
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS: Th°
GW48 Revised 8187
t
NATION :
FT., ANNUAL W. T. F
BEDROCK / ARTESIAN AQUIFER I
FT./DAY
1 2 3 4
SITUATION GRADE =
FT.
MEASURED
ESTIMATED
DOWN
C
nrt,
REGL AL SUPERVISOR

3
78 - 149 35.49
1a3-74 29-
e,
10-19
251 593 101 16© 31 d41
161.250 61-1C
tYfllril: ft water table h permecabte bedrock pt. vn*.re -5 h poorly permeable bedrr>ck
. _ pi, value .«.4
Feel
S7�ct 3
&fie water
fade t7ractiert
from cent crnh-
0
63.
meters
20 -24
15. 19
10.1#
3-9
Lew thorn 3
Pos rt at cx nc.rn to" IFIVCWCI to contramhorf . akro. le
Koala Ariatbrxai °Jam r (arc. Qr One)
OA
IC
CtC 2C
00 36
18
61.X) 36.60
ID
tE
IF
4
8-11
26-35
3-4
16,25 9-15
Q-9
0-30
7 t ES 9
15-25 5.1
3-8 0-2 0
2 percent 2 percent t1 tart 2 tt Cacti 2
toward 1e3,,.aed percent percent
valet wafer tp.rord toward
KAPPtir bvI eupPty water water
rot she crtd KW* supply
creticlpc4 d rnticlpatea bat not crid Is the
direction as d<reclkxl al the anti. anticl tea
low how cipated ckectkan
(Areclkxr of Bow
cat flow
4c
2E 78
6©.
6C 7C
80 98
tVpr• : tt 8•ckeck al land wrfc oa, llee 10
very axar r t
8 . Foley coohbo al
C -vrh low onnak konor
W - near bti •o.d
aping / abeam
©- perimeter aru rnpfaersoe
F . 0Scane . h the ry1 booedon .eperoilon from
ac ado r * "al p&rry rcth+t Ft r) f +y eoUrae
-'''dad• .ourpy kaui.rrarsf er ono,
thus r r * * r..1 ©t:K rr„►.00W corecerehoha d (irpft / Clik rrco
K - Ave urglesecei by aOwMOw fr"neykane
90
Olson
9A
9t
9J'
6©-74
46-59
2e-45
OVI . hid rrxUOCinp Under rlt• h1C - y
P - Sae has poem piroobrkan odor/bug Nolo. al 3 Cx bo. h 91ep 4 )
Q . Wo to .oar>re In cyco ut+-vler reehc.B2e area
T . wallet I able h v./Hy N #y Aoclu'ed ar' cv enDul roc
Y - I1+e unclur oln by 1 or move Woman o#aMeo
P1. Value
{Step 23
(Step 3)
p
(57eP 65)

Step 1
Salop 2
Hazard PatyntioKkrtru identifier ( 11PNV
(Choceo One )
A
( kop7)
0) PAP VALUE (S1We 3)
(7)
SPop 3 Slop
Told
(2

tr!,i N,41
rlmttrgl 4.a+I.00r144
1 .ry,1,441
LL'litx.,y,'l ,1'r•0',11
t:eta'c.A pnuimd
441041,"1130, a
7PPBSo PrPot•u 5JP,Prt'+p
YI°,�4Ar'
;Pilo; propot.pq
t11e4.0 n". t41 \Y\IIkFI \11 0 I\I \:I i s\C
11.1 Yi1,101111 .51t ip
Ai}I.INI\ IYL L \. 1..I.( )rI (1H\'7V1
.>94t'.n r1Ip,11a,,1014Y!41d.at
P..Yin.tc .3.
"tit°dt,ttas r,111010104/440i, n°q:°e vkro.:l Yt,ro.,111„
.z .a.rw„1 za.r,awq*. ,w al o-ap'an,'c1- , ~2°1n v, „as In. -tea v�,hu4 aryserxyl .,1,a^en1 I�,arr 1+.1
ttlo=ta>m1s°stsa,.t,po spr .'tlpt, 1-1644 sor,, 1,111 tiuus.+rr, 10e001e100,• 10 .ai
tlt
riot Ist:p
avolvai' >nw. errxgA;r�. m 4.'a01a0.4 ,4urp ,nr.A.Vow,t , 4C4
txrahgaa. muckvt...4.,,Ne, 44 Ora n5 W°'4°{w a..111
ppunoptli Darti paxrr .p.,,.fkkc,1:� .'±idF.
•
ippmupp apt;
N +z _ io n ixt purl* 1v+,x.1,3t:t_ 7,njl aaa,' kkxs
put uAlsrtprsC,xr.),. „,,nuv 014
rViN 1q ,,,4410,110 x+u t^u+' irirth
irstah4,350 tk9.1419 Vpx y
.a1 M.:KW pMMUS,tla lurFo ae a^tlei
aut,.wt wool xtparar ty aiNpuip t"'ynti
'pro,tr p.pot .,yp at" '„*+ w+'F'44 ttt"tt ikhb t-'W.SwYA:,104,4 004 .u@tl410411,14,0
• _e o,wtexrifn.f, p. 1^uer OoprIft 'team, 4:04, wtw lLay, , * 33.4,41 Okt ,•, a�C*q'Ra
tul:++ sesrpegisiroasaarastr4,csstzvct1.Ria `p,,,,4uau
Vain, IsSiniroir
rt,etteppa41, nor
Pprroptda..yPt=qM� �'acispatcpu., as teas
1,aP140,nsgart,-4,,PPanps 441..nac1'pu:atx, r;pMrvn= irs,40o1, rum ns00.11141,10 ;y„.wr;.au
'.fl 'U ;,t> t n'i i Otit,f., tt,'.,,engwa x,101.0 as 00044x0s 1,3014 di,1,"0p 4141,410 eaatt 11,00,0y
u rv,aixr gskhna,,cz'..w prr.vu t,P .,1r n.,putt°at, ra44,10s agc;c.aas„aupxrpttnau ak",1ni'.w r, ai point
.,1'a'twxteyoti.; 1.444u410041114110 u°.' ^Y
+s,`axNoop4.3 ,pea r,ata 1 x auan:at ug 11,40aarsam J1a \.Ndix.Pma
(WS w ttty tttspepipp ,10
;mt :Atp9 fig@ Jap¢? anpm l..
:tji'11h !qo tii Jmt1AQj,'I.'e3tu .1.4
metmrtwtptattx,-as tse,}aR*ea+<d Yuiptt.at.
*,axoaata, reps ttt. 0.10004ae11
144,1
.xl y.ilij A„
.ipkl;l:c]4
$ daa5
,1404444,10,4
401,1111104rz, 1a» 4110 aptipat.ya1a No., ,t ➢ pep:iaa
lath! .xi. it 11a1041414vpa1,014,,
•
B `.."1mti.aft" p tpo, ul'tllr
at,
1 11 ixt ,144 i0 t isiii4) +i,¢rith:rol.n'..Wei
,'mnw'p 4 t4%yn;
Aqs av y,.xr .
4 hpinulad" .V.*„nz€1 *IY ',gdiir
0p40e44,.04 .44,1 411,10101111 111 11.4,10,
+.a 041010 11411 Air 4111010 4a111 411,04414 exagy,,
ae;,^~t;i 4*° Ix4r d;lAtsvaata
f4 *tl:YRp1 s.e{a rra 1v,1. a, Hbasu'Jti4
s,,w.ro¢nfl,e,M.au+'a .aap:e. p'naaan N^ P4°p^ 4a1:atw141r mn msas ua!� :r4drvt_aµYrp,p.—.gyp
k nt t.bint},ro.t+t�a't°?.,4zp 4* 110 t:Yt6 t6`1ti,Yon 0,0110 11140r-041I cp11J 1j0 * -"p
,ao,, 1i•,.rstx, 4014131,11€u p,11+14a° 0141111sla a,t t^,aarr lli .tins:,pw tzar - p
.1,,14,01i.ti7174, 04410, t,° 4,04' 400047> aiat raasr 01 .4,101 ISti"11 1,44444l.40s°44
.asaraa;pat,.i1<e., rtr.Inllx Wit ps, A+at°' e#st41,111,sna r_,01 aq:rtr.s. a¢^p,rr
root pp ph,,irp e. pt1',ipp� pd finhlr ,'kp
s,1,44 0s07410141 sq 0,10 7141010 .+pp
440444,0 bald 4 * §.F 01, 11.0pa) .41411441, 441140
1
▪ 10P:''..;rnia ',nllweet (a'i lkt,h
to ti !.4.4 1,S 4411 .4.4413741

d Site Grade Based on Critical FIrtrosealogis n
Critical IlydrrmcoloE:
Execlient
11 Very good
C C,o04.1
Fair
%try pour
Tout
points
<10
11-14
15-17
18-20
>20
Distance
0
2
3
Water
(bent
Permeability
-
sorption
(maxi mum)
2
3
4
5
TUATION RATING TABLE
To be used for Step 9 ( Natural ) and Step 10 ( hAodifled ) (Step 10)
SiTUADON RATING PROBABIUTY OF SITUATION
(Combined Value) COMAMINATPON DEGREE Of ACCEPTAUTY GRADE
or
-7 to -4
-31'0+3
+4 16 +7
*ft a' more
lropratabie
Very Probeiole
Prototiy acceptable A
ProbablyOCCOlDtrable or
nughaly uno=eplable
Acceplonoe uncerloti C-C7)
Flotabily unccceptitie
of margtlaty ocaspiable
certah to be
unacceptable
The probability of contornamlnation from sttuattons nerving values between t 7 and • 7 Is el
sattsfactorly. Therefore, this range of VOlitiva4 represented by grades B and C, IS designed only by a clues
Acceptance or rejection of oa Ole for the Intended punx)se Is a reisacnslolitty of the rxrItcular regulatory agency
arid rnay depend on speckil requkernents of this agency or on feastblitty and executan of approved
engineering of a sae ( Stoge 4 ),

RIM 1IWAY
SERVICES. INC.
1077 GORGE BOULEVARD
P.O.BOX 88
AKRdN 0H 44309•0088
August 31, 1988
Dr. Eric J. Klingel, Ph.D.
Groundwater Regional Supervisor
Division of Environmental. Management
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
Moorseville Regional Office
P. ©. Box 950
Moorseville, North Carolina 28115-0950
Re: Roadway Express, Inc. ("Roadway`")
5201 Sunset Road, Charlotte, NC
Progress Report - Diesel Fuel Spill
and Holding Pond Permit
No. 2743R Renewal
APN 011231/GW88073
Dear Dr. Klingel:
6-384•81 84
Thank you for your time and that of Thurmund Horn in meeting with me at your
office on Thursday, August 25, 1988. At that time, I presented a draft report
of supplemental information requested in a letter of April 22, 1988 from J.
William Reid, Environmental Engineer in the Groundwater Section at. the Raleigh
office.
The key points of the report and our discussion were:
(a) The holding pond is located well onto Roadway' s property.
(b) The. holding pond is designed with a minimum of 8" of a
clay liner such that there is no discharge from the pond.
(c) T se water quality in
1e pond is good for this type of
pond based upon our chemical analysi
(d) Because the seasonally -high water table may approach the
bottom of the clay liner, you felt that there may be some
exchange between the liner and the water table, although
this was not considered to impair the use of the groundwater
as a. resource.

Dr. E. Klingel
Page Two
August 31, 1988
The chemical analysis of the recovery wells in the diesel
fuel plume shows trace amounts of dissolved petroleum
constituents. Roadway will use best available technology,
in this case carbon absorption, to assure that the recovered
groundwater discharged to the pond will protect the
groundwater resources in the area. Roadway reserves the
right to discontinue the use of the carbon absorption should
the dissolved hydrocarbons drop to acceptable levels once
pumping begins.
The DNRCD will add a clause to the no discharge permit
on theholding pond which allows the DNRCD to require the
installation of monitor wells as necessary. However, as
indicated in our meeting, the topography of the site between
the pond and the creek is so undulating and overgrown with
vegetation that the installation of monitor wells would
be extremely difficult. Although we respect your analysis
of the situation, actual inspection of the area suggests
that groundwater would be affected bythe drainage swale
on the west downcutting behind the pond to the creek.
Therefore, several monitor wells sampled several times
would be necessary to make a technical distinction between
the affect upon groundwater from the pond and the creek.
Based on the foregoing, you thought the use of carbon absorption the treatment
of recovered groundwater for dissolved hydrocarbons prior to discharge to the
holding pond would be sufficient rather than installation of monitoring wells
around the pond.
We will proceed in that direction, unless advised otherwise. We will be
collecting the water balance data for Mr. Horn- If the no discharge calculations
prove successful, we understandthat our holding, pond permit will be renewed.
At that time, we will submit remedial plan details on the carbon absorption
so that we may gain approval to depress the groundwater to recovery free and
dissolved product.
In Roadway's opinion, it is the remaining 6,000-7,000 gallons of diesel fuel
in the ground that threatens Roadways water well and the regional water
resources in the area rather than the use of a well -managed holding pond.
We look forward 10 continued cooperation
• properly handling this situation.

Dr. E. J. Klingel
Page Three
August31j988
Again, if any questions arise or if Roadway can be of further service, please
call me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
Roadway Services, Inc. for
Roadway Express, Inc.
Mark T. Baumgardner
Engineer - Environmental Services
MTB:rg
cc: Thurmund Horn, Water Quality Division
(same address as above
J. William Reid, Environmental Engr.,
Groundwater Section, State of N.C. DNRCD,
512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, NC 27611
Assad Shamsi, Water Quality Div.,
Permits & Engineering
(Raleigh address as above)
J. C. Swart
R. E. Lowe (681)

North Caro Inc Depa
Resources &Gommu
James B. Hunt, Jr.. Governor
DIVISION OF ENVI.R0
E. TAL MANAGEMENT
Mr. Robbie E. Lowe, T
Roadway Express, Inc.
5201 Sunset Road
Charlotte, North Caro
Dear Mr. Lowe
final Manager
28213
SUBJECT:
ment o Natural
ity Development
Joseph W. Grimstey, Secretary
vember
2743-R.
Roadway Express, Inc.
Sunset Road Terminal Wastewater
Treatment/Recycle Facilities
Mecklenburg County
1982
In accordance *it your letter of request received September 15, 1982, we
are forwarding herewith Permit No. 2743-R, dated November 12, 1982, to
Roadway Express, Inc. for the continued operation of the subject r i:Ling
ncndischarge type wastewater treatment and recycle facilities.
This permit shall be effective frotr
1987, shall be subject to the conditions
and shall void Permit No. 2743, dated 4a
the date of issuance until. December 1,
and limias specified therein,
22 1si3.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations cont� this permit a
unacceptable to vou, you have the. rto an adjud±catory hearin before
hearing officer u on written i n t` .' I,Tirector within i.n t. i t. v". days
llow] ng receipt of this permit,
contended. Unless such a lei&`fanA
binding.
C c .
s t o n s or need a
ple se contact x r. H. Da_rrLL %crisp, telephone No.
le,
Mr. Forrest R.
til res F.il.le Regional uporviL
Moores i:lle Regional Ma11.0ger
FOR
to
final and

Permit No. 2743-R
Page Two
Solids a
wastewatar treat
such a manner as
ground waters of
or other pollutants removed or resulting from the
ent process shall be contained and disposed of in
to prevent any contamination of the surface or
the State.
6. the Permittee shall employ a certifiad wastawater treatment plant
operator in responsible charge of the wastewater treatment facilities.
Such operator must hold a certificate of the grade at least equivalent
to the classification assigned to the wastewater treatment fsiiities
by the Certification Commission.
7. Diversion or bypassing of the untreated wastawater fro the treatment
facilities is prohibited.
In event the facilities fail to
creation of nuisance conditions
immediate corrective action en as
for eati.factoriiy ineluding the
e Permittee shall take such
be required by this Division.
9. Any monitoring deemed necessary by the Division of Environmental Management
to iasure surface and ground water protection will be established and
an acceptable sampling reporting schedule shall be followed.
10. The Permittee, at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of this
Permit, shall request its extension. Upon receipt of the request, the
Commission will review tha adequacy of the facilities described therein
and if indicated, will extend the Permit for such period of time and
under such conditions and limitations as it may deem appropriate.
11. Freeboard in the holding and settling lagoons hall not be less than
1 foot at any time.
12. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve Roadway Express Inc.
of the responsibility for damages to surface or ground w&tet resulting
from the operation of this facility.
13. The facilities shail be effectively maintained and operated as a, non -
discharge system, to prevent the discharge of any wastewater into the
surface waters of the State.
Permit Issued this the 12th day of November
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONNENTAL MANAG
Original Signed By
FORRFST R. WESTALL
FOR
Robert F. Helms, Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Menigement Commission
Perntt No 2743-R

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY D
RALEIGH
P E 11,14TT
For the Discharge of Sewage Iiu1uatria1 Wastes, or Other Wastes
OPME
In accordance with the provisions of Article, 21 of Chapter 143, General
Statutes of North Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws* Rules, and
Regulations
1/
FERMIS ON IS
Roadway Express
Mecklenburg County
'OR TaE
continued operation of a 7,875 GPD non -discharge type domestic wastewater
treatmeut and recycle facility consisting of a septic tank, a dosing tank
with -dual alternating siphons, 2,544 square feet of dual surface sand filters,
chlorination facilities, a flow measuring device, a 365,000 gallon holding
lagoon, a recycle pump, a settling basin, au oil/water separator with oil
storage tank and associated piping, valving, and appurtenances to serve
Roadway Express, Inc.'s Sunset Road Terminal with no discharge of wastewater
from these facilities to the surface waters of the State,
pursuant to the lettered request received September 15, 1982, and in conformity
with the project plans, specifications, and other supporting data, subsequently
filed and approved by the Department of Natural Resources and Community
Development and considered a part of this Permit.
This Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 1,
1987, shall void Permit No. 2743, dated May 22, 1987, and shall be subject
to the following specified conditions and limitations:
1. This permit shall become voidable un1s the facilities were
constructed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications
and other supporting data.
2. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and
volume of wastes described in the application and other
supporting data.
3. The facilities shall be properly maintained and operated at all
times.
4. This permit is not transferable.

WATER QUALITY SECTION STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
PART I - INSPECTION OF PROPOSED/EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT
PLANT SITE
1. a. Place Visited: Roadway Express, Inc.
b. Mailing Address:
5201 Sunset Road
Charlotte, NC 28213
Mecklenburg County
2. Date of Investigation: 4/15/88 Date of Report: 6/9/88
3. By: J. Thurman Horne, P. E.
4. a. Person Contacted: Mr. Charles Hicks
b. Phone No.: 704/596-6370
5. Directions to Site: From the intersection of 1-77 and
Sunset Road, travel east on Sunset Road approximately 0.2
mile, Roadway Express is located on the left (north) side
of Sunset Road.
6, USGS Quad No.: F 15 SE (see attached map)
7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading): The
existing facilities are located on a site, encompassing less
than 1/4. acre. The area available for expansion and
modification is limited-
8. Topography: The general terrain in the area is mildly
rolling with slopes generally less than 10%. The existing
site appears to be removed from any potential flood plain.
9. Location of Nearest Dwelling: None within 500 feet.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED/EXISTING TREATMENT FACILITIES
1. Existing Facilities: The existing facilities consist of a
septic tank, a dosing tank with dual alternating siphons,
dual surface sand filters, chlorine disinfection, a flow
measuring device, a holding lagoon with spray headers, a
recycle pump, a settling basin, an oil/water separator and
an oil storage tank.
The treatment facility was designed to receive domestic
wastewater and truck washing wastewater and to recycle
water from thelagoon for reuse in truck. washing.

Page Two
2. Proposed Modifications: The applicant is in the midst of
cleaning up groundwater contamination resulting from the
leaking of diesel fuel from an underground pipe. The
applicant proposes to separate oil from the recovered
groundwater. Oil will be removed and taken off site by a
waste oil hauler. The remaining groundwater is proposed to
be discharged into the existing treatment system.
The applicant estimates that the maximum flow rate from the
groundwater recovery will be 4,320 gpd.
PART III - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Performance Evaluation: The existing facility was
originally permitted as a recycle system. Discussion with
the applicant has revealed that wastewater is no longer
recycled. The applicant installed spray headers in the
holding lagoon at some point in time to facilitate
evaporation and has now come to refer to the system as
being an evaporative lagoon. Whereas our State is located
in a region of the country where the annual precipitation
exceeds the rate of evapotranspiration, it is obvious that
evaporation alone does not account for all water losses.
It appears likely that there is some loss to groundwater
through leakage or percolation through the lagoon bottom
and/or walls. During the investigation, it was revealed
that the lagoon'does periodically fill to a point where it
becomes necessary to temporarily spray irrigate on lands
surrounding the treatment facility. Although there was no
spray irrigation to land occurring during the inspection,
the areas shown to have been used are clearly unsuitable,
especially from the standpoint of providing adequate
buffers. The need to periodically spray irrigate onto land
lends support to our observation that the existing facility
was not intended nor should it be expected to function as
an evaporative system. This situation can only be worsened
by the proposed addition of recovered groundwater.
2. Recommendations andJor Special. Conditions:
The application actually represents two (2) requests. The
applicant has requested renewal of the existing Permit,
which expired December 1, 1987, and revision to allow
introduction of up to 4,320 gpd of recovered groundwater.
It is recommended that the Permit be denied for the
following reasons:
1. The existing facility is not being utilized as a
recycle system as originally permitted and
subsequently renewed.

Page Three
2. The facility is now receiving considerably less flow
than the facility was originally designed to receive
and is not able to function as an evaporative system
as the application indicates. The addition of more
flow to this system cannot be expected to improve this
situation.
The use of land applicationhas been employed due to
the inability of the system to function otherwise as a
nondischarge system during periods of heavy
precipitation. The land application is unpermitted
and has occurred onsites that are considered to be
inadequate.
4. Municipal sewers exist within such proximity that it
is reasonable to expect that the wastewater can be
connected to the sewer and the existing system
converted to a more suitable function such as
spill/runoff protection.
gnhtctre of Repott Prepa er
Water Quality R4iona1 supervisor

ME 0 UM
TO: Carolyn McCaskill
FROM: Bob Cheek
RE:
April 19, 1990
Roadway Express Inc.
Sunset Road Terminal, Mecklenberg County
Contaminated Groundwater Treatment/Disposal Facility
GW90045/WQ # 0003016
We have received and reviewed information submitted by
Roadway Services, under cover letter dated February 19, 1990,
containing plans and specifications for a carbon absorption
system to be added to the treatment system prior to effluent
disposal.
Based upon our review, we recommend that the permit be
issued with the added following stipulations:
1. That the carbon absorption unit, as
described in and attached to the 2/10/90
letter from Roadway, be installed as an
integral part of the treatment system for
the contaminated groundwater, prior to
effluent discharge.
2. The effluent shall be analyzed, imiuediateiy
after startup, and thereafter every three months,
for the presence of hydrocarbons. The analyses
shall be conducted using Standard Methods No.
6230-D.
The results of the effluent analyses shall be
provided to the Mooresville Regional Office,
919 N. Main Street, Mooresville NC, 28111
within thirty (30) days of sample collection.
If you have any questions, please advise.
cc: Rob Gelblum Office Of General Counsel
Don Safrit
Jesse Wells, MR0
Groundwater Files

VIStUN F NVIRONMENTAL MANAGE(
G ,5
DE:: MP. ) OF WASTE DISPOSAL, pERmiT P PLIC VA fl ON REVIEW
R E VI E '','S .EjS , 5: SiL , Ed 1Tij.j.,2_, _ „.„, ___ _ „„_„„ RED) !NYE:SIN:7D\ 1 i( )`'j ? (':,: YIN ) (AQ
3,
3 "LIE. 41,L, ,-,s, t,'2,- h s g(1„„ g.--.a.,,,.&(..., 1,,,t.y_ :41 ,.., ( ...'idea.
D E SC RIP I I 0 [5J. 0 IT 15.4 ED 6. U TY Cel&f3i A (.L el 1,4t:, ,, s. La i4.,',,,,, 4.,e,..L, 1,,.),k,,— ,4,,..,:25 /effect, isL,?,
4
4,„...,A1,5fIlia.f.s.v, Lao Locoti_„/Vi.,,,,isfkoi, 1-65:: ' tte, ILitaLaisihe.:21.4f:rii:,4-411 L.- 1,622,46_11.araRKticJth„:12,4: clti rf.C.6 Vtly_f4cRie,t,„:
i ,,
(:, .., ,,,, k. i
SIZE OF IN-^1:".01.„,IND tvIENT ( FT SQ ) ,E(. / (l) 1 ,..), S 1 / [ , or
VER:L(00: c'ER: idc'fs .1 1 PRIMARY
"
iND. SW DGE- IND w \NATE R
H 1ILJL 1ii
DIST 7-A,NCE FROM WASTE SOURCE. TO NEAREST: STMAM FT„ \AIE L L FT ,
FOR WELL : TY PE (EN' USE _./ELLi, ezi" _ , PUMP RA.T E (ESP)
W AI DESIGN CONC.); T.I 0 NS WILL IREDLJCII: / INCREASE C1-.4 ANCr OF GliV CO NT A MINATION
04./j2_011 s.-y 4jii 1:c‘ - inL,„
VVHAT NAIL! IV\ SITE_ CE)NDITIoN,:•; wiLL REDUCE/ INCREASE CHANCE OF OW CONTAMINATION
DEPTH TO: BEDROCK FIL SEASONAL HIGH W. T. FT. ANNUAL W T WX
EMRFICIAL
BEDROI:KI ARTESIAN AQUIFERii
GEN, LITHOLOGY e
E 'MATED FL/DAY" [771 MEASURED,
-s L AEASURED
RYE), COND. Jo -j FT./DAY
, ESTIMATED
gy-
THICKNESS If FT.
A?0,0'we.y cia.:411 3//0g7
NO. or MGNFFOR WELLS: PROPOSED)UP_ DOWN
FROM WORKSHEET: SITE NUMERICAL DESCRIPTION
EXISTING : DOWN
1C, J3
T 1 2 3 4 5
SIT GRADE (HYDROGEOL.) = SITUAllON GRADE
PROPOSED SAMPLING SCHEDULE & PARAMETER(S) 4)uarilfr
4 25
REMARKS/RFCOMMENDATIONS 1JIP Lrm P;
64\
66 f-r.?, 60.44-7
I/0 ___C_,[211111
CI
(,W-48 Revised 8/87
4-4'7,54 r 1 at? Q 144.7„.Q 5 r
YD. REGIONAL SUPERVLSOR

101.;
rv;.)15
1,0C-'11 01
101)40 a..1.-S0
o-n•h--
OT •%*
Wai I orYe,
cd 1001 or,d
D.-0-*-• o oxInc14-rcA3 h occurky vokxt
rix.,1-oft
c c,-n not.f. ftr
cY rgcf
rag7i,
cOrr".
trcri a313
p-o.rc)ri
br.f1
r 1"ho
0.0
c*•
1407..0
a aDr-fly ocoki.pn
C 4)ve oonalKirir,o,
Adz* .1'0(101 0.,100444-1 (Ord* Oriy Or.)
•• Con4 of do prih.Lon o{ ir.otrby pu-rcAN we I hoi.
of wit IL.4"..in'1LJrroc. orlforrert row
- cr.>. In P-rep 1 boti-cf cx) p+po-crtIon from
pkrn4. rcr'hortt pohr bou-o.
F Wc.rr • sooro* In cyourrd..rof
11)."rn.61.-r)7X cw..)cror" "Ion c cth f cirromo•
K Ert oo.,,wfocA Ihrr***or.
G40t0.1
* 1 h.:04
2 p-r,,r ri
I c-wo
00224Y
Or'od k I t".0
ciocC1',0:1 0(
ccoot
2-r4(11 ri
cr....-o"d
r
I-024?
ttra cx.-16-
cicrce.
Gr004-r-Ir
cr*.d
2
2.*tcenf
frr
cryi
cnII.:1001rW
crf
17:0K1 0004
Caorz5,)rx
P 54 • to.. po-cep.toxj,t1.1 p("1.01.1 (401*./.. 01 3 or /..-/kr 5(..p )
(2) W04-• wtx_ro. hce caLl
h v.-ry Nfft-,H, h-oc1 urrcl or rock
Y unO4-ftk) trry 1 or /wry ol

1
•dx-)s, uti.Ne.rj
S) KriVA WYCI C-9
3
0 e,L10
.1(4,31' ) >1.,Jicy+-)cuu(+'_-ki Dou:11
!Not

icpclt
d<a traarrrprirti .aa rak rrn.nl
paairsasibla arairiai.i#neatrt
ararrrritir irate. x sart a, q, r prlsa Irk
rap, r ear, Sena
rbfiOrl site t e. ar at.l
.taro trrr. 6nrar' saris, arias tarsal,
k:a sipasairn.'" X.n donrr, Ri'r vir
dau'toerare pr. vlsn ra Wars,. rP
.t i , r % Para •skr spars:
a riri irairriar aarsarniarsn,',tdx'*
parisisra'bat pia tick x;ev nnrnel Ceda'tae nt'taba'[Yt m
I,arr iirut a .shall k'r,rt.r irk r.a ht .a{mirar ca aaa
r s3irr.aa air
Tha: pOSilibil in the Martin floe' cas,11 ra'¢tnng, is Cntsnd lay Caiiiiadin
scsa:riad' avnical lu and aqt.tif,,e seositisityhoaaanullg until they meal. 1't'+c k^renrrirn ¢hi .yciaa
should be added (preceded lay a *) to the as miscellaneous letter othamiliier or at
dtxrlohon from Step 7.
t `''li^YF tYff rioust'ea:ss
aZ¢r i- At5 tit olit rloo
'ohs ;NJ rair'alpir art'a rare
aanrFNflhn n'cd xki
oar,- `r.9^'[isartif ranuxa Jttxl
oho "a S`pnn^"w,iu MS aril lasiatitm- e. liaa: $tits prirsarr_
sae la s4 sz„ aitsr air afait lay Ow Vona, 4. 1.firna alaalttb x'ar
lkdriPast f;kt ta4k it.VL:3risi a isio airal Primicdi, ati MP;d` i¢Ya' Ir
aria-Ca.:4' kfdltryfri.Urria, aura"rrrki atTrresinitannriXAT.AreFr fkkPrrrrtirittrrhHd,
wiz w3r5.ei Ifl' H9 siar araiHasad t astari Terisria Das plair'd iaN.,• ,pret Ps, narakegs vndrc"arips a
'.ih{t*krdociar rw."tr+.aranxr',.T t rnra4b-rrsratrarir rand a mart aaxxraa"° is
8q_hvc soma "larrap rs`cnr and !Salina.- car) Par: iraPrraaeae
iat>le' bare
'saw ra A
garlarr
DEC;R
d,l.twlcs atcip, High
SS ,
E. OF SERS(7LISNES
Rearltivcly low
A
Tank ars,B
ikrlittr.d1 WrI,1t',r
rapra
iVe; sr Teak b.
iiaiPiaarial earl" 4i'T^i0t.'

I \1 1 S lON OF
RECE V
mum omulog
FPI 6 mo
EMORANDUM
e!
TO: 6
DATE:
FROM:
/1'
Bill Reid
MOORESVILLE
itEGTFEERI, OMR
SUBJECT: Application
Facility Name
County
Type of Project :
Applicable Permit Nu ers : WQ 000 /0//k°
0NMENTML MANAGEMENT
'ER SECTION
for LRenewal e dm n
New Perm
Perinit No.?2Vk
Gil 9 0 471'S
AC
We have received a copy of the above referenced application,
which was sent to your regional office for comMent on or about
19
YoU should review the application package for completeness and
adequacy of relevant information and submit your request for
additional information to Me (via telephone or memo) by
/
requested 1940 so that all required information can be
om the applicant at one time. A copy of our formal
request to the applicant for additional information will be
provided to you.,
If you do not require additional
applicant to complete your evaluation o
review the application package and subm
d V a 1.1 a bl
copy can
EPA
ormation from the
the project, you should
your omments to me by
opy of the applj ti.on package has nOt been made
'o your office, PLEASE LET ME KNOW IMMEDIATELY so that a
be forwarded to you as soon as possible.
MDC/APPMEMO

DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COM
Office of I,ogal Affairs
UN
DATE:
MEMO: To SUBJECT:
\ff EC)
mom/4E141mi
JUL fi 1039
m000ssaa.
if.GtoNAL aita

WILLIAM E.
VICE PRESID'
PROPEPT4 ;S ANC) MATFRIA
Wp
NT
S MANACCM!N?
June 19, 1989
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R. Paul Wilms, Director
North. Carolina Department of
Natural Resources and
Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Wilms:
ROADWAY
SERVICES, INC.
1077 GORGE BOULEVARD
PO.BOX BB
AKRON, OH 4.4309 0088
Re: Project Denial APN0112:34
Roadway Express, Inc. ("Roadway")
5201 Sunset Road, Charlotte, NC
Reissuance of Permit No. 2743R.
Wastewater Treatment/Recycle Facility
[phone]
JU!1 22 1989
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
RESOURCE MA
Request for Adjunicatory Hearing
Pursuant to N..C.G.S. Chapter 150E
Roadway Express, Inc. has respectfully requested an adjudicatory hearing on
the Director's denial of the Reissuance of Permit 2743R for our Charlotte,
North Carolina facility. The proper notices have been filed with the Office
of Administrative Hearings.
Before stating our basis for the request for the hearing, Roadway would like
to state that we feel we have good relations with the Department of Natural
Resources and Community Development ("DNRCD") and would like to continue that
relationship. By requesting this adjudication hearing, Roadway does not want
to give the impression that we are seeking an adversarial position with the
DNRCD. We would like to suggest a ,meeting with the appropriate persons to
resolve this situation prior to an adjudication hearing, if possible. The
appropriate persons must have the technical knowledge of both wastewater and
groundwater treatment, as well as a policy -making role within the DNRCD.
Roadway believes that by properly understanding and weighing all the technical
and material facts unique to Roadway's situation, a reasonable solution may
be reached without proceeding to an adjudication hearing.
With respect to the Director's letter of May 19, 1989, a copy of which is
attached as Exhibit A, Roadway provides the following information as a ha sia
for the hearing or, preferably, the technical meeting and/or discussion:

NC DNRCD
Page Two
June 19, 1989
The permit as issued December 1, 1987 does not properly define the
existing facilities and waste treatment operations at Roadway. The
descriptions apparently were carried over from permits issued by
your predecessor, the North Carolina Department of Natural and Economic
Resources.
A. in 1973, Roadway's term nal and operations were expanded
necessitating an upgrade of the wastewater treatment facilities.
B. The Mecklenburg County Health Department appeared to be the lead
agency and required an installation permit. The installation
permit required a "no discharge" system to protect a nearby creek
on Roadway's property.
C. The County permit initially called for a 365,000-gallon holding
pond followed by a 365,000-gallon emergency pond. A compromise
was reached and one pond of 558,000 gallons was actually installed.
D. If any calculations were made by the DNRCD staff using 365,000
gallons as stated in the permit, then the calculations may be
off and invalid conclusions reached causing a recommendation
for denial of the permit renewal.
2. The system continues to be utilized as permitted. The pond essentlally
receives treated domestic wastewater and treated runoff from the
areas of the yard where material handling occurs and
petroleum/chemicals are transferred.
A. The operations of the terminal have changed since 1973 and have
reduced the treated wastewater discharge to about half of design
capacity. This is because the operations at the terminal have
been changed from a regional distribution center to a local pick-up
and delivery operation. Employment, amount of freight and number
of total vehicles have been reduced by about half. This has
been explained to the Moorseville Regional Staff verbally and
in writing. In reality, the "no discharge" system is oyerdesigned
for its current use.
B. The recycle: system is operable and used on a daily basis to
circulate and aerate water in the pond. The system can be used
to initially rinse trucks before washing. However, the reduction
in the number and type of tractor/trailers at the facility no
longer necessitates daily or weekly washing of vehicles. The
local (pick-up and delivery) tractors are washed once per period
(every four weeks) by an outside vendor using a pressure washer.
The amount of water needed to wash trucks and essentially sent
to the pond has been substantially reduced. Recycling activity
is not critical to maintain the no discharge status of the pond.

NC DNRCD
Page Three
June 19, 1989
C. In 1985, a moat was placed around the fueling pad to better collect
petroleum drippage and storm water sheet wash tributary to the
oil/water separator described in the permit. This has essentially
excluded large amounts of uncontaminated storm water tributary
to the oil/water separator and the pond. The storm water
containing oils or petroleum can receive better treatment because
the oil/water separator is not hydraulically surged with excess
uncontaminated storm water.
D. The spray headers in the pond were added in 1984 to keep the
water in the pond aerated. Due to the reduced hydraulic loading
on the pond, the waters in the pond became stagnant and we risked
causing a nuisance. Installation of the spray headers is
consistent with Condition No. 8 of the permit which requires
Roadway to prevent nuisance conditions from developing.
The facility is a "no discharge" system.
A. As stated above, the system was designed and permitted as a no
discharge system. Reduced flow to the pond in the past gives
even more assurance of this situation being maintained. No
discharge has occurred.
The addition of spray headers in the pond had the ancillary effect
of achieving some enhanced evaporation, but the spray headers
were placed in the pond to facilitate aeration and only operate
one -fifth to one-third of the time. As an experiment, the spray
headers were left on continually during the late fall and early
winter of 1988. The water level in the pond became so low that
the sprayers had to be turned off in early 1989. (Rainfall in
Charlotte was less than average during this period.) This was
done to partially verify the water balance data submitted to
the DNRCD in December of 1988. The data shows that a no discharge
condition can be maintained even if some 4,000 gallons per day
of groundwater is loaded onto the pond, provided that additional
spray headers are added to the system and the system is operated
at 150 gallons per minute for approximately 12-14 hours per day.
In reality, this 4,000 gallons of water will only replace
approximately 4,000 gallons of water no longer discharged by
the sanitary wastewater treatment system when operations were
scaled back.
C. As mentioned above, past practice shows that the pond has been.
operated as a no discharge system and calculations can be
maintained as a no discharge system. While Roadway agrees that
the regional geography and climate allow for a net gain in water,
the data unique to Roadway's pond and limited water intake suggests
that a net water 1oss (evaporation) applies to Roadway's situation,

NC DNRCD
Page Four
June 19, 1989
4. The additional concerns should be addressed as follows:
A. Roadway has not used spray irrigation to dispose of water from
the pond system in order to circumvent its no discharge status.
For about three years after the pond system was installed, the
outward banks of the pond system were watered to establish and
support vegetative cover. During this time, Mr. Jesse Wells
of the DNRCD Mooresville Regional Office inspected our facility
on several occasions and raised no objections to this procedure.
After the vegetative cover was established, this practice was
discontinued. During the permit renewal inspection conducted
by Mr. Thurmund Horn, Mr. Horn was advised of this past practice
and apparently construed this to be an ongoing problem. During
a meeting with Mr. Horn and Dr. Klingel of the Moorseville Regional
Office on August 15, 1988, Mr. Mark Baumgardner, Roadway's Manager
- Environmental Services, learned of this mispreconception. Upon
returning to Roadways Charlotte terminal to investigate this
concern, Mr. R. Lowe (Roadway's Terminal Manager for the past
seven years), Mr. C. Hicks (Roadway's Certified Operator since
the terminal was opened) and Mr. Baumgardner advised Mr. Horn
by conference call that watering of the banks of the pond was
a practice in the years immediately following the pond construction
in order to establish vegetation and not a means of disposing
of excess water. This procedure is not practiced now.
On April 11, 1987, Roadway experienced a corrosion -related
catastrophic leak of the piping of its underground diesel tank
system. This was reported to the DNRCD and clean-up is ongoing.
Ultimately, a groundwater depression system needs to be constructed
in order to recover diesel fuel floating on the water table.
This means that excess groundwater must be handled. The rate
was estimated at 2,000-4,000 gallons per day. An investigation
of a means to handle, this excess water was conducted by J. C.
Swart, then Roadway's Environmental Services Manager, in May
of 1987. The results were as follows:
(i) Discharge to Creek: NPDES permit takes a long time to
get and may not be approved as the receiving stream is
too small.
(ii) Infiltration
per Dr. Klinge
ryz Would not be approved by DNRCD
(iii) Discharge to Sanitary Sewer: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sewer
Authority did not have sewers in the immediate area, but
Roadway might be able to build a lift station and one-half
to one mile of force main.

NC DNRCD
Page Five
June 19, 1989
The Sewer Authority would accept sanitary sewerage (3,000
gallons per day) and truck washing wastewater (1,500-2,000
gallons per month) but not groundwater or storm water.
This was because the groundwater was essentially clean
and would unfairly utilize sewer and treatment capacity.
Any storm water contaminated with petroleum was not wanted
because of Charlotte's previously bad experiences with
it. Therefore, Roadway could build an expensive conveyance
system to transport 3,000-5,000 gallons of wastewater
that would already receive treatment and not solve its
excess groundwater problem.
Further, the regional sewer plan calls for a sewer to
be built on the north side of Roadway's property. Roadway's
original permit from the County calls for Roadway to tie
into this sewer when it becomes available. The entire
Roadway sewer and treatment system was designed to hook
onto this gravity sewer when it becomes available.
(iv) Discharge to the existing pond system as the pond was
taking on less water than before. This was the only viable
option and was pursued.
If the State's or County's position has sinced changed regarding
disposal of excess groundwater, such as approval of an infiltration
gallery, Roadway will consider this a means of complying..
C. With respect to the permit renewal, Roadway's Terminal Manager
expected to see a renewal notice, reminder mailed to him as is
the customary procedure. He did not receive such a reminder
and was unaware that the permit had expired. As Mr. Baumgardner
had met with Dr. Klingel the first time in December of 1987
concerning the remediation of the diesel spill, Dr. Klingel
inquired as to whether the pond had a no discharge permit. Mr.
Baumgardner was surprised to learn that such a permit was required
as many other states do not require it. Mr. Baumgardner checked
and found that a permit did exist and it had expired several
months earlier. A renewal request was then promptly sent to
the DNRCD. (Because of my absence at that time, the permit
application was signed by Mr. A. C. Snelson, Roadway's Vice
President - Corporate Support Services, so to not unnecessarily
delay getting the renewal application to your department.)
5. Additional considerations should be integrated into the total
environmental picture at the facility.

NC DNRCD
Page Six
June 19, 1989
A. The storm water inanagetnent system at the Charlotte terminal is
ahead of its time as 11 complies with the proposed NPDES
regulations on storm water discharges. Contaminated storm waters
are segregated and treated. Uncontaminated sheet wash runs off
into the creek. The water quality is probably better than storm
water leaving Sunset Road, 1-77 or commercial developments in
the area. These discharges all affect the water quality of the
creek at the rear of Roadway's property.
B. Roadway's attempts to make significant progress in cleaning up
its diesel fuel release have been frustrating.
Free product skimming has li ited effectiveness.
(ii) Roadway's water well is threatened.
(iii) The diesel plume is beginning to, fan out and emulsify.
In the long run, down gradient waters may be adversely
affected- Clean-up will be more difficult, costly and
require the withdrawal of more groundwater. Treatment
of the excess groundwater, if any is required, cannot
be firmed up until an ultimate disposal is determined.
(No details on the treatment of contaminated groundwater
were proposed to the DNRCD until a place to handle the
excess groundwater can be determined.)
C. Without a legal means for handling its wastewater, Roadway's
ability to continue operations is severely restricted.
Roadway appreciates the opportunity to clarify this situation and looks forward
to resolving this situation without adjudication if possible.
If any questions arise please contact Mark Baumgardner at [phone].
Very truly yours,
Roadway Services, Inc. for
dway Expresyin
ani 1. iug
WFK:rg Vice President - Pr
Attachment and Materials Manag
cc: Arthur Mouberry, P.E., Supervisor,
Permits & Engineering (same address as above)
Ms. Carolyn McCaskill (same address as above)
R. E. Lowe (681)
M. T. Baumgardner

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Mr. A. C. Snelson, Vice President
Roadway Express, Inc.
5201 Sunset Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28213
Dear Mr. Snelson:
May 19, s989
MAY 25 1989
PPQ`°.:.tiire.
R. Paul Wilms
Director
Subject: Project Denial (APNO112344)
Roadway Express, Inc.
Sunset Road Terminal
Reissuance-Permit No. 2743R
Wastewater Treatment/Recycle Facility
This is in response to your request for reissuance of Permit No. 2743R for arnendment to the
permit to allow the addition of 4,320 gallons per day of recovered contaminated groundwater,
received on March 21, 1988,.to serve Roadway Express, Inc. in Mecklenburg County.
The Division's Water Quality and Groundwater Sections have reviewed the information
submitted in reference to the request for permit amendment. It has been determined that the
existing facilities are not adequate and are not operating in accordance with the original permit. The
permit was originally issued to serve a recycle facility. This facility has since been modified,
without prior Division approval, to include the installation of spray headers in the lagoon and is
currently, as Roadway has indicated, operating as an evaporation facility. In this geographic
location, the seasonal variation of rainfall versus evapotranspiration cannot compensate for the
difference between the average rate of precipitation per year combined with the amount of
wastewater discharged to the facility from the terminal and the runoff tributary to the facility during
rainfall events. Therefore, this facility cannot operate as a nondischarge system.
Additional items of concern include the following: it has been noted that spray irrigation of
wastewater onto adjacent larids may have occurred, this, in violation of the North Carolina General
Statutes; the subject permit required that a request for permit renewal be received, at least six (6)
months prior to expiration of the permit, which was not complied with, and this permit has
expired; and if it were possible for the subject facility to operate as a nondischarge treatment
facility, the proposed treatment of the contaminated groundwater prior to discharge to the lagoon is
inadequate. It also has been noted that regional sewers are in close proximity to this site and
therefore, this facility should be connected. In light of the aforementioned items, the Division of
Environmental Management must hereby deny your application for permit amendment.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr, Snelson
page -2-
If this decision is unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an adjudicatory hearing
upon written request within 30 days following receipt of this denial. This request must be in the
form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 1508 of North Carolina General Statutes, and
filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 11666, Raleigh, North
Carolina, 27604. Unless such demands are made, this denial shall be final and binding.
Please be advised that the subject permit expired on December 1, 1987, and operation of this
facility without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215,1 and is
subject to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission. In addition,
Roadway Express, Inc. failed to request permit renewal as required by condition number 10,
Permit No. 2743R issued November 12, 1982, and is considered in violation of the terms and
conditions of that permit; this is also subject to the enforcement authority of the Commission.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Ms. Carolyn McCaskill
telephone [phone], extension 540.
cc: Mooresville Regional Supervisor
Bill Reid, Groundwater Section
Mecklenburg County Environ mental Health

IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
IN THE COUNTY OF WAKE
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
ROADWAY SERVICES, INC., )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. )
)
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, )
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL )
RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY )
DEVELOPMENT, )
)
Respondent. )
)
PETITION
FOR A
,CONTESTED CASE HEAR
IN RE PROJECT DENIA
APNO 11234
PERMIT NO. 2743R
Petitioner, herein, Roadway Services, Inc.. files this
Petition on behalf of Roadway Express, Inc. and the accompanying
affidavit of J. Dawson Cunningham, Vice -President, Secretary and
Treasure of Roadway Express, Inc., pursuant to Article 3 of
Chapter 159E of the North Carolina General Statutes and requests
a contested case hearing based on the following facts:
1. Roadway Express, Inc. owns and operates a terminal
located in the City of Charlotte, County of Mecklenburg, the
State of North Carolina ("Char'
to Terminal") the main purpose
f which is the loading, loading and maintenance of commercial
transportation vehicles.
2. By way of letter dated March 16, 1988, Roadway
Services, Inc. on behalf of Roadway Express, Inc. filed a request
for reissuance of non -discharge perm
t No. 2743R with the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Co
ment ("NRCD") for purposes related to the opera
facility at the Charlotte Terminal.
unity Develop -
an of the

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 11, 1989
MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Reid
FROM: Eric J. Klingel & Jei1s
SUBJECT: Roadway Services, Inc vs. NRCD_/
Permit No. 2743R
GW No: 89213
Mecklenburg County, N.C.
The Groundwater Section has reviewed the information submitted
by Roadway Services, Inc. concerning the denial of Permit No. 2743R
and their request for a hearing. On page four, item 4A makes
reference that Jesse Wells inspected the Roadway facility on several
occasions and raised no objections to the spray irrigation of
wastewater onto the land surface.
The Mooresville Regional Office records indicate that Mr. Wells'
first visit to the Roadway facility on April 13, 1987 was in response
to the underground fuel oil leak which occurred on or about April 11,
1987. This, visit was made to evaluate the incident and to discuss
with Roadway Services further steps to be taken in defininj the
extent of the fuel oil contamination. This visit in no way concerned
the wastewater treatment facilities at the terminal.
On March 16, 1989 information was submitted by the Mooresville
Regional Groundwater Staff in reference to the non -discharge
treatment works. I have attached a copy of this review for your
information. The comments concerning this project remain essentially
unchanged until such time that Roadway Services, Inc. submits revised
plans or the information requested in your March 29, 1989 memorandum
to Arthur Mouberry.
In the letter to Paul Wilms, dated June 19, 1989, from William
F. Klug, it states in part 4.B.(ii) that Eric Klingel stated an
infiltration gallery would not be approved. At no time did Dr.
Klingel make that statement. The Regional Hydrogeologic Supervisor
does not have the authority to deny or approve a non -discharge permit
for an infiltration gallery.
If you should have any questions, please contact this Office.
cc: Mr. Robert Gelbl
Mr. Rex Gleason

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
February 5, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Carolyn McCa kill
FROM: Bill Reid
SUBJECT: Roadway Express, Inc.
Mecklenburg County
I talked to Jesse Wells of our Regional Office staff on February
1, 1990 regarding the subject project. It was his opinion that carbon
absorption equipment should be installed as indicated in our August
15, 1989 memorandum. I also contacted Robert E. Zimmermann,
Environmental Geologist with Roadway Services, Inc. on February 1,
1990. He indicated that Roadway Services was still willing to install
carbon absorption equipment. He was informed of the need to submit
plans and specification for this wastewater treatment system
modification. We should send an "add -in" letter requesting this
information.
cc: Rob Geibiurn, Office of Legal Affairs
Jesse Wells
Permit Files

FROM: Mike Clea
DATE : 716 °t
SUBJECT:
GROUNDWATER SECTION
Attached is a copy of the additional
information we have received on the subject
project.
It is our understanding that a copy of the
additional information that we have received
concerning this project has been sent directly
Please review this information and provide. your
comments and recommendations by 49t4-51.- 3 , 1989.
If for any reason you find that the stZpplied additional
information is still insufficient to make an evaluation.
of the project, please let us know immediatelL, so that
either the needed data can be requested -from tie,
applicant, or some other appropriate action taken.
If you have any questions concerning this matter,
or require additional information, please advise.
mdc/adinnot

FEDEI
EX? RE S S
July 18) 1989
Ms. Carolyn D. McCaskill
Supervisor, State Erigineering Group
North Caroliria Department of Natural
Resources and Comxnunity Development
Division of Environmental Nanagement
Water Quality Sectiori
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Ms. McCaskill:
ROADWAY
SERVICES, INC.
O77 GORGE BOULEVARD
P0. BOX BS
AKRON, OH 443O90Q8B
Re: Roadway Express, Inc. Y'Roadway')
5201 Sunset Road, Charlotte, NC
Nondischarge Perinit Renewal
No. 2743R - AJ'N011234/GW88073
216) 3848184
Thank you for your time and that of Nike Cleary iri meeting with J. L. Mihelick,
Brent Chambers of T. R. Edgerton and rnyself at your offices ori Wednesday,
July 12, 1989, concerning the above -captioned permit. Based upon our meeting,
Roadway presents the foliowing:
1. Roadway requests that the permit be renewed to include spray
evaporation. (A further review of our plans draw-n in 1973 shows
there were wet welis iristalied in the lift station n the pond.
Only one pump was installed to recycle water to the garage. The
ather purnp was to be installed for spray evaporation purposes on
an as -needed basis. Roadway wishes to do this now; however, it
was implied in the design of the system that evaporation was necessary
to maintain the water balance in the pond, whether by recycle
evaporation or spray evaporation. Roadway wishes to have the perrnit
aniended to specificaliy acknowledge spray evaporation,)
2. Construction of the sanitary sewer on the north edge of Roadway's
property is imrninent, Additional progress reports are ericlosed
for your review. Even only if two of four of Raadway!s waste streams
are accepted in the sewer, the hydraulic loading will be reduced
everi further thari what is going on now.

rirs.C. D. McCaskill
Page Two
July 18, 1989
3. Information on the hydraulic mass balance is attached with relevant
supporting documentation. The documentation suggests that, under
the worst case, there only would be a buildup of 1,500-3,350 gallons
per month in a 558,000-gallon pond that often only has a
200,000-gellon average usage. Various hydrology reference sources
(e.g. Fair, Geyer and Ohen "Elements of Water Supply and Wastewater
Disposal", Second Edition, John Wiley and Sons) indicate that bodies
of water with characteristics similar to Roadway's pond can have
natural evaporation rates up to 907.-957 of precipitation.
I think it is the situation that has prevailed over the last several
years which has allowed Roadway's pond to maintain an average level
of around 5 feet with more than adequate retention to assure a no
discharge system. This is despite the fact that the recycle system
is operable but not currently used to wash trucks. (The drought
situation in the preceding two years has reduced the levels even
further.)
4. It is our understanding that the Regional Office - Groundwater Section
has approved reissuance of the permit. Reissuance of the permit
would allow Roadway to begin its pump and treat operation in order
to recover diesel fuel lost during an underground piping leak. As
stated in our August 22, 1988 supplemental information package,
a copy of which is attached, "A carbon adsorption system could be
used to remove most of these components prior to discharging water
to the pond. However, the pond has already received trace amounts
of fuel components in the past at a higher loading. The pond also
has biological activity which can reduce these components in the
long run."
Roadway has installed an 8 inch recovery well in anticipation of
using the pond (or other option to remove groundwater). Roadway
had not finalized its Remedial Action System for review by Dr. Klingel
of the Moorseville Regional Office until disposition of the water
was determined. Roadway agrees to use activated carbon adsorption
if constituents in the recovered groundwater are present at levels
that require treatment to protect water quality in the pond.
In the meantime, it is imperative that Roadway move forward with
free product recovery in the linehaul tank farm as the product is
beginning to emulsify and spread out. Roadway's water well could
eventually be threatened,
5. Roadway will ask for an extension of its request for hearing and
hopes its request will be honored pending technical discussion that
can resolve any outstanding issues.

Ms. C. B. McCaskill
Page Three
July 18 1989
Roadway appreciates this opportunity to review the situation with you and
believes that sufficient information has been submitted to justify a renewal
of its permit. Roadway does not object to ianguage requiring it to discharge
all waste streams permitted by the City of Charlotte to the sanitary sewer
when such a sewer becomes avaiiable.
1 will be caliing you periodically to see if 1 can answer any quescions ar
problems that arise.
Very truly yours,
Roadway Services, Inc. for
Roadway Express, Inc.
/7
Mark T. Baumgardner
Manager - Environmental Services
MTB rg
Enclosures
rc: Mike Cleary, NCDNRCD,
Croundwater Section
J. L. Mihelick
R. E. Lowe (681)

RECEIVE
OF IlYVADNIrtrr/
PAR 31 1989
IlioOkf.SUILLE
tEGRati4. Off42
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
March 29, 1989
DUM
TO: Arthur Mouberry
AN,,C•
THROUGH: Bob Cheek
2
FROM: Bill Reid
0
SUBJECT: Roadway Services, Inc.
Amendment and Renewal of Permit No. 2743R
proposed Treatment of Recovered Groundwater
Evaporation Lagoon System
Mecklenburg County
APN011234/GW88073
(Carolyn McCaskill: DEM SERG Review Engineer)
On April 22, 1988 the. Groundwater Section requested
additional information on the subject project. Since- this
information was not submitted, we recommended that the
application be returned as incomplete in an August 19, 1988
memorandum to your Office. It was our understanding, at
that time, that a denial letter had been drafted, citing
regional water quality concerns. We were recently informed
that the Water Quality Section had. decided natto deny the
permit. Since our recommendation to return the application,
additional information was submitted to the Regional Office.
Most of the previous concerns have been. addressed. This
Office however is of the opinion. that an oil/water separator
alone will not provide adequate treatment of the recovered
contaminated groundwater prior to discharge to the lagoon.
Our Regional Office has recommended that a carbon absorption
system be installed to treat the effluent from the oil/water
separator. The Permittee has expressed. a willingness to
include carbon. absorption in. the treatment system (Reference
attached August 31, 1988 letter from Mark T. Baumgardner,
Engineer - Environmental Services, Roadway Services, Inc.)
however, as of this date we have not received plans or
specifications for this addition.
We do not recommend issuance of the. permit amendment
for the project as currently submitted. The recovered
groundwater treatment system should be revised to include a
carbon absorption system and associated design
specifications, submitted for review. Until this
information is submitted, we consider the application to be
incomplete.
cc:
Eric Klingel
Central Files
Permit Issuance Files

RIJA DWAY
SERVILES INC
1077 GOAGE BOULEVARD
P0, BOX 88
AKR0N,0U 3090088
August 31, 1988
Dr. Eric J Klingei, Ph.D
Groundwater Regional Supervi-sor
Division of Environmental Management
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources
and Community Deveiopment
Moorseviile Regional 0ffice
P. 0. Box 950
Moorseville, North Carolina 28115-0950
Re: Roadway Express, Inc. ('1Roadway")
5201 Sunset Road, Charlotte, NC
Progress Report - Diesel Fuel Spili
and Holding Pond Perrnit
No. 2743R Renewal
APN 0112317GW88073
])ear Dr. Klingel:
210 3848184
Thank you for your tirne and that of Thurmund Horn in meeting with me at your
office on Thursday, August 25, 1988. At that time, 1 presented a draft report
of supplemental information requested in a letter of April 22, 1988 from J.
Wiiliam Reid, Envirorirnental Engineer itt the Groundwater Section at the Raleigh
office.
The key points of the report and our discussion were:
(a) The holding pond is iocated e11 onto Roadway's property.
(b) The haiding porid is designed with a minimum of 8" of a
clay liner such that there is no discharge from the pond.
(c) The water quality in the pond is good for this type of
pond based upon our chemical analysis.
(d) Because the seasorially-high water tahle may approach the
bottom af the clay liner, you felt that there may be sorne
exchange between rhe liner and the water table, although
this was not considered t:o impair the use of the groundwater
as a reSOurc.

Dr. E. J. Klingel
Page Two
August 31, 1988
The chemical analysis of the recovery we. in the diesel
fuel plume shows trace amounts of dissolved petroleum
constituents. Roadway will use best available technology,
in this case carbon absorption, to assure that the recovered
groundwater discharged to the pond will protect the
groundwater resources in the area. Roadway reserves the
right to discontinue the use of the carbon absorption should
the dissolved hydrocarbons drop to acceptable levels once
pumping begins.
(f) The DNRCD will add a clause to the no discharge permit
on the holding pond which allows the ➢NRC➢ to require the
installation of monitor wells as necessary. However, as
indicated in our meeting, the topography of the site between
the pond and the creek is so undulating and overgrown with
vegetation that the installation of monitor wells would
be extremely difficult. Although. we respect your analysis
of the situation, actual inspection of the area suggests
that groundwater would be affected by the drainage swale
on the west downcutting behind the pond to the creak.
Therefore, several monitor wells sampled several times
would be necessary to make a technical distinction between
the affect upon groundwater from. the pond and the creek.
Based on the foregoing, you thought the use of carbon absorption in the treatment
of recovered groundwater for dissolved hydrocarbons prior to discharge to the
holding pond would be sufficient rather than installation of monitoring wells
around the pond.
We will proceed in that direction, unless advised otherwise. We will be
collecting the water balance data for Mr. Horn. If the no discharge calculations
prove successful, we understand that our holding pond peLmit will be renewed.
At that time, we will submit remedial plan details on the carbon absorption
so that we may gain approval to depress the groundwater to recovery free and
dissolved product.
In Roadway's opinion, it is the remaining 6,000-7,0 a gallons of diesel fuel
in the ground, that threatens Roadway's water well and the regional water
resources in the area rather than. the use of a well -managed holding pond,
We look forward. to continued cooperation
operly handling this s ituation.

Dr. E. J. Klingel
Page Three
August 31, 1988
Again, if any questions arise or if Roadway can be of further service, please
cali me at [phone].
Very truly yours
Roadway Services, Inc for
Roadway Express, Inc.
WL/a aLL
Mark T. Baumgardner
Engineer - Envirorimental Services
MTB: rg
cc: Thurrnund Horn, Water Quality Divisiort
(same address as above)
J. Wiiliam Reid, Environmental Engr.,
Groundwater Section, State of N.C. DNRCD,
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27611
Assad Shamsi, Water Quality Div.,
Permits & Engineering
(Raleigh address as above)
J. C. Swart
R. E. Lowe (681)

Industrial & Environmental Analysts, Inc.
P0. Box 128466 • Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.919-4.67 9919
RE VEI
Aug t 4, 1988
Shot on i layer
T.R. Edgerton Inc.
102 F Woodwinds Ind Ct4
Cary, NC 27511
Reference; !EA Report Ida. 308037
Project I.O.: 10'79-G87-001-1
Deer 1
Transrnttted herewith ere the results oi° n lie.
laboratory on July 20, 1988.
Please see the enclosed reports for your results.
Yery truly
INDUSTRIAL ; EN'
Randall
Senior Chemist
TA L AI LYSTS,INC
Atli; 19gt
n three samples ubnaitted to our
Offices and laboratories located in; Essex Junction, Verrr t
Rese©rth Triangle Pork, North Co

Lornments 1 EQL BELOW QLIANHTMI
I[ Srnp1e No 30B037
Di'e NIricted Julq :5 195E
RECEIVEO AUG 0
Sunple 1dentf icn
DneAnaItjzed uaut., D
Bq V1:,
GL/tls Uis€/Nutr al lxtractuliles Qunttion L1ri 1rerfafl
Cc'rnr'uri pq L
1 ACEr1PHTH[N[ 5
2 ACENP1THLENE 5
3 ANTNPACENE 5 80L
4 EENZ0 (a) INT11PACEJ1E 5 E0L
5 6ENZO (8) PYREUE 5 EJL
8EMZO (b) FLUORIINTHENE 5 8uL
7 B[NZD (ghi) PEPYLErif 5 E0
8ENZO (k) FLU0PNTHEriE 5 ECIL
515 (2-CNL0R0ETH0;:Y) M[TNE 5 EOL
E!5 (2-CHL0k0ETHL) Efl$EP 5
11 E13 (2-CHLORUISOPPOP/L) ETHER 5 E:OL
615 t 2-ETHLHE:WL) PH 9LTE 5
3 4- 6P0H0PHNYL RHLNYL ETHEP 5
14 5[NYL 6UT'L FHTHAL1TE 5
1 5 2-LHLORCINAPHTHLEtJE 5
1 4C1LrJP0PHErhi PHENL ETHEP 5
1 CHPYSENE 5 EL
1 [I SEUZO (,h) AUTHPALEME 5 EJL
1,2- DICHL0kEENIENE 5 EOL
1 3-[ij1HL0P0EiEIiZEt1[ 5 E'L
1 ,4-EijCHLOPObENIEUE 5 E0
22 33 [ijCHLORL'BEICILINE 5 EUL
:3 DIETHL PHTNALTE
24 DIMETHYL PNTHLTE 5 E1L
:15 DHN-8UTIL PHTHALATE 5
= 2.4- Di NITPOTOLUEH[ 5 EUL
27 26DN1TP0T0LUUJE 5 FJL
DL-t-OCTYLPHTHALTE 5 EUL
FLIJ0RANTHErE 5 E0L
30 FLUORENE 5 25
3 H[XACHLOPOBENZUft 5
32 HEXACHL0P0BUTt1lENE .5 8QL
33 hEXACHL0P0[L0PENTAD1ENE 5 SQL
34 HEXACHLOROETHANE 5 FOL
35 1 NDEO (1 23-cd) PYRENE 5 E;LL
36 JSOPHOPONE 5 EQL
37 N#PHTHLENE 5 20
38 NITROBENZEUE 5
39 N-NITPOSO-DI-N-PPOPYLMIINE 5 SOL
40 N-NITR0S0DlPHErJ LAMINE 5
4! PNENANTHPENE 5
42 PVRENE 5 SOL
43 1 2 4-IRrnHLOROSEUZENE E'L
44 SENZIEINE :5 EL
45 1 2- EPHENTLHYDPAZINE EUL
46 N-NITP050D1METHLA11INE 5 EL

lornmentI [LOW QUAITITATIONLIIJIT
RECEIVED AU 5 0 a i988
a, 3 ample Identif itatir“'t
,i,J11_125., 198.13 Date Anal qzed A U'7,11) 19
GLI 15 Base/Neutral Extractables
Coriound
1 ACENAPHTHENE
2 ACENAPHTHYLENE
3 ANTHRACENE
4 BENZ() (.8) ANTHPACENE
5 BENZ° (a) PYRENE
BENZO (b) FLUOPANTHEUE
7 BEN20 (ghi) PERYLENE
8 BEN20 FLUOPANTHENE
BIS (2-CHLOPOETH0X,1) METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
11 BIS (2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
12 BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
13 . 4- BPONOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.4 BENIZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
15 -CHLORONAPHTHALENE
16 4-CHLOPOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
I 7 CHRYSENE
1 MEW.° (a„h) ANTHPACFNE
1 9 I ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
20 1,3-D1CHLOROBENZENE
21 1,4- DICHLOPOBE ICE NE
3,31-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
23 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
24 DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
25 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
26 2,4-DINITROTOLLIENE
27 2,6- DINITROTOLUENE
28 DI-N-OCTYLPHTH'ALATE
29 FLUORANTHENE
30 FLUORENE
31 HEXACHLGROBENZENE
32 HEgACHLOROBUTADIENE
33 HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE
34 HEXACHLGROETHANE
35 I NDENO (1,23-cd) PYRENE
36 ISOPHORDNE
37 NAPHTHALENE
NITROBENZENE
39 N-WITM-DI-N-PROPYLAMINE
40 N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
41 PHENANTHRENE
42 PYRENE
43 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
44 BENZ1DINE
4s, 1,2- DIPHENYLHYDPA2INE
N-NITROSIDDINETHYLAVIINE
JJ-VL
5 E10L
5 BOL
5 BQL
5 SQL
5 BOL
5 BOL
5 BOL
5 BOL
5 B0L.
5 BQL
5 EQL
5
5 SOL
5
5 BOL
5
BQL
5 BQL
5 SQL
EQL
5 EQL
RQL
5 EUL
5 SQL
5
5 BQL
BOL
5 EQL
5 BQL
5 BQL
E1QL
L
5 BOL
5
SQL
5 EOL
5 BQL
5 BQL
5 BQL
5 SQL
5 EL
5
5 FOL.
5 EL
25 EQL
-2.
5

RECEIVED AUG 0
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
4€
Cornment
BQL - B[LQW
IEA mp1e No 308037
Sj rnzk
T
Extracted Juhl 25. 1925 lThte Annhjzed
TIS F3ase/Neutri Extracttibles
t1 u m b r
2
3
4
5
5
7
Co rnpo u rd
AC E NA P HT H E N [
AC E NAP NT HY 1 E N E
NT H RAC E N £
BENZO (e) ANTMPC[NE
BENZO (a) PYPENE
BENZO (b) FLU0ANTH[NE
ENZ0 (ghi) PERYLENE
ENZ0 (k) FLUORAHTHENE
83 (2-cHLoPuETNo:v) IIETHANE
ES (2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHEP
BIS (2-CHLOROISOPPOPYL) ETHER
12 b15 (2LTft LffXY1) PIITHALATE
13 4-Bpor1oPHENyL PHENYL ETHER
1 4 EENZYL 8UTYL PHTHALATE
1 5 2CHL0R0NAPHTHAiENE
1 6 4-CHLOP0PHE1YL PHENYI ETHER
17 CJIRYSENE
18 LBEN0 (h) AUTHPACENE
19 1,2-lCHL0P0EENZENE
20 1 3-DCHL0P0ENZENE
21 1 ,4-DICHL0R0ENZENE
22 3,3'-IJCHL0P05ENZID1NE
23 DIETHYL PHTHALATE
24 DIMETHYL PHTHALTE
25 D1-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
26 214-DINITRQTOLUENE
27 26-DINTR0T0LUENE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
29 FLUORANTHENE
30 FLUORENE
31 NEXACHLORDBENZENE
HEXACHLOPOBUTA[ij ENE
HEXACHL0F0CYC LOP ENTAD E NE
HEXAMLOR0ETHANE
INDENO (1 ,2,3-cd) PYRENE
150 P HO P0 N E
NA P NT HA L E N E
NTR0BENZENE
U4ITROSO-DI-N-PR0PYLAMIr1E
N- tJITROSODI PHE NYLAIli ?1 E
P HE NA NT HP E N E
PY R E N E
1 ,24-TRCHL0P0ENZENE
1,2- DIPHENYLH\DRAZIN[
N- NTR050DI tIETHYLAMiNE
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
F
5
5
5
r
5
s
5
5
25
EQ 1
E0 1
EQ 1
EO L
EQ L
60 L
E) L
601
601
60
60
60 L
60 L
801
60 L
6Q 1.
601
601
601
601
60 L
601
60 L
60 L
601
601
601
60 L
[L
801
601.
60
601
601
601
601
FOL
60 L
601
60 L
80 L
r
L
601

T.R. Edgerton
PROD, NO, PROJECT NAME
STA. NO.
ATE TIME
fished by: (S,gnrru+r/
she by: (S,pnrturel
fished by: (S•enarurel
7
... C.
Inc.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RF'COR
NO.
OF
CON.
TAINERS
STATION LOCATION
d by: (S'pnrrurrl Relinquished by:
Date /Time Received by: (Sierteturrl'
Late 1" Time
yr Labarat,ty by; Oete /Tune
Clisu.bot+on, Orivnai Accompanies Shipment; Corr i TO CocrcrinatorFierd Foes
Bete /' Time
1.02 F Woodwinds
Industrial Court
Cary, NC 27511
ceived by::

DIV:[ SION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 15, 1989
NATVUL
MEMORANDEJM
k MVP
TO: Dale Overcash
THROUGH: Bob Cheek
FROM Bill Re1d(k'
SUBJECT: Roadway Services, Inc.
Amendmerit and Renewal of Permit No. 2743R
Proposed Treatment of Recovered Groundwater
Evaporation Lagoon System
Mecklenburg County
GW89213
(Carolyn McCaskill: DEM SERG Review Engineer)
As mentioned in our March 29, 1989 memoranduni to Arthur Mouberry,
the Groundwater Section feels that the oil/water separator alone
will not provide adequate treatrnent of the recovered contarninated
groundwater prior to discharge to the lagoon. Our Regional Office has
recommended that a carbon absorption system be instailed to treat the
effluent from the oil/water separator. The Permittee has previousiy
expressed a willingness to include carbon absorption in the treatrnent
system (Reference August. 31, 1988 letter from Mark T. Baumgardner,
Engineer-Envirorimental Services, Roadway Services, Inc. to Dr. Eric J.
Kiingel, Ph.D.). As of this date we have not received plaris or
specifications for this addition. In a June 19, 1989 letter from
i11iam F. Klug, Vice President, Properties and Materials Management,
Roadway Services, Inc. to Paul Wiims, they (Roadway Services) indicate
that details on the treatment of contaminated groundwater have not
been proposed because of uncertainty regarding ultirnate disposai.
To address Groundwater Section concerns regarding the proposed
project, the recovered groundwater treatrnent system shouid be revised
to inciude a carbon absorption system and associated design
specifications, subrnitted for review. adequate treatment is
provided, we wouid recominend perrnit issuance with conditions
specifying routine monitoring an3 inspectiori of the system.
The June 19, 1989 letter from Roadway Services, Inc. requesting
an adjudicatory hearing, makes several statements in Items 4A and B
which are misieading. These issues are addressed in the July 11, 1989
mernorandum frorn Eric J. Klingel and Jesse Welis (attached).
JWR/MC/dlp
cc: Eric Klingei
Central Files
Permit Issuance Files

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 11, 1989
MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Reid
FROM: Eric J. Klingel & el.ls
SUBJECT: Roadway Services, Inc: Vs. NRCD.._�
Permit. No. 2743R
GW No: 89213
Mecklenburg County, N.C.
The Groundwater Section has reviewed the information submitted
by Roadway Services, Inc. concerning the denial. of Permit No. 2743R
and their request for a hearing. On page four, item 4A makes
reference that Jesse Wells inspected the Roadway facility on several
occasions and raised no objections to the spray irrigation of
wastewater onto the land surface.
The Mooresville Regional Office records indicate that Mr. Wells'
first visit to the Roadway facility an. April 13, 1987 was in response
to the underground fuel oil leak which occurred on or about April 11,
1987. This visit was made to evaluate the incident and to discuss
with. Roadway Services further steps to be taken in defining the
extent of the fuel oil contamination. This visit in no way concerned
the wastewater treatment facilities at the terminal.
On March 16, 1989 information was submitted by the Mooresville
Regional Groundwater Staff in reference to the non -discharge
treatment works. I have attached a copy of this review for your
information. The comments concerning this project remain essentially
unchanged until such time that Roadway Services, Inc. submits revised
plans or the information requested in your March 29, 1989 memorandum
to Arthur Mouberry.
In the letter to Paul Wilms, dated June 19, 1989, from William
F. Klug, it states in part 4.B.(ii) that Eric Klingel stated an
infiltration gallery would not be approved. At no time did Dr.
Klingel make that statement. The Regional Hydrogeologic Supervisor
does not have the authority to deny or approve a non -discharge permit
for an infiltration gallery.
you should have any questions, please contact this Office.
Robert
Rex Gleason

DIVISION OF ENVIRONNENTAL MANAGEMENT
MEMORPLNDUN TO: Bill Reid
THROUGH:
FROM:
RE:
Eric J. Kiinge
Jesse Welis
Roadway Express, Iric
GW No. 89213
Mecklenburg County, N. C.
August 4, 1989
The Regional Groundwater Section has reviewed the additionai inforination
dated July 18, 1989 surnitted by Roadway Express, Inc., concerning planned
groundwater remediation activities, The foliowing comments address iteni No. 4
of their correspondence:
1. On August 22, 1988 Roadway Express subrnitted supplementai inforrntion
concerning their present and planned operation. An itein addressed in
this inforination was the ability of an oii/water separator to remove
dissolved hydrocarbon constituents prior to the effiuent being
discharged into the evaporation pond. The effiuent indicated levels
of Oii & Grease at 40 ng/i and Total Organic Halides at 450 mg/i.
(Analysis Attached) These levels reflected the effluent prior to
inclusion of potentiai dissolved constituents from the gromdwater
rernediation activities. Based upon this infortnation, it is this
Office's recornmendation that a carbon absorption systern be required as a
of perrnit issuance with required perIodic effiuent monitoring (EPA Method
as outlined in the initiai review date Karch 16, 1989.
2 As far as free prothact recovery, a letter dated July 9, 1987 from Kr.
Baurngarner to this Office indicated that Roadway Express, Inc., had
contacted Mr. Doug Dixon, fornieriy of the Central Office Staff, and
was granted perinission to initiate free product recovery
If you should have any questions, please advise.
JW4:pb

im
oh 1 t
m
n itt
i3 L )lr; t: i'
r .i1
11 3
I•lII
b:y
T s 1
lv L
.4' 4

Site History
The Roadway Express, Inc. facility was constructed in several stages in the
mid-1960s. The portion of the terminal closest to Sunset Road was built first
and was served by a septic tank and leach field as there were no sanitary sewers
serving the area. The septic tank system was located behind what is now the
existing garage area.
Shortly thereafter, the terminal was expanded towards the north (away from Sunset
Road) and a maintenance garage was added on the west side. At that time, the
terminal served multiple purposes such as pickup and delivery (P&D) of freight
in the Charlotte area, some linehaul operations, some breakbulk activity,
maintenance and fueling of both linehaul and P&D vehicles.
Part of the maintenance of the vehicles was the washing of tractors and some
trailers. The amount of water used in the washing of the tractors and trailers
overtaxed the existing septic system. Working with local and state environmental
officials, an evaporation pond was installed with the purpose of handling sanitary,
storm and truck washing wastewaters. The sanitary wastewaters were from a new
10,000-galion septic tank, dual on ground sand filters and a tablet -type chlorinator
prior to discharge to the evaporation pond. The old septic tank and leach field
were abandoned.
The stotul water discharged to the pond consists of whatever falls on the truck
washing pad, outside the rear of the garage during rainfall events. The truck
washing involved drawing water from the rear (north side) of the pond, pumping
it to the garage to holding and pressurizing tanks, and then using it to rinse
the tractors and trailers after washing. All wastewater (other than sanitary
wastewater) from the garage operation passes through an oil/sediment trap and
an oil/water separator prior to flowing to the pond through underground piping
by gravity. This water enters the pond separately from the sanitary wastewater.
Based upon interviews of Roadway personnel familiar with the situation in the
1960s, the evaporation pond was installed to manage all of Roadway's sanitary,
truck washing and contaminated storm water on site as there were no sanitary sewers
in the area, and also, to prohibit (at the request of governmental officials)
a discharge to the unnamed creek and drainage swale that surround the terminal
on three sides. Note that storm water from Sunset Road, Statesville Road, adjoining
properties and most of Roadway's yard (other than the garage and fueling areas)
does find its way to the creek.
Cuent Site Operations
As time progressed, Roadway improved and expanded its breakbulk and satellite
terminal network in the Carolinas. Most linehaul and relay functions are handled
out of the Winston-Salem facility. Satellite facilities in the smaller cities
now receive freight direct from Winston-Salem rather than through Charlotte- Major
maintenance and automated truck washing are handled through the breakbulk facilities
such as Winston-Salem.
The Charlotte terminal now handles mostly local freight via P&D vehicles. Over
half of the doors at the terminal are unused. Linehaul and relay functions have
substantially decreased, with the garage handling only emergency maintenance and
topping off of fuel tanks. The garage is now essentially dedicated to the
maintenance, fueling and manual washing of P&D tractors (not trailers).

The net result of the decrease of business activity has been a decrease in the
arnount of vastewater ioaded onto the evaporation pond. Sanitary sewerage has
decreased by about haif. Truck washing wastewater has decreased significantly.
Storrn water has increased because a spill control moat has been added (circa 1986)
around the fueling islands next to (east of) the garage. The rnoatreceives storm
water and any fuel frorn drips, ieaks and spilis froin the fueling activities. The
water gces to the oii/water separator before going to the pond. (The current
mass loading an the pond is discussed later in this report.)
Future Activities
0n April 17 1987, Roadway experienced an underground diesel fuei pipe leak on
the discharge side of its submersible pump in the underground tank battery adjacent
to its maintenance garage. Over 7,000 galions of diesel fuel was lost overnight.
Sirice that tine, two other minor piping ieaks have occurred. All have been
repaired. A corrosion evaluation of the fueiing system has been made. The resuits
indicate that the environment is somewhat corrosive and the systern should be
repiaced in 3-5 years. This will also be required by the Federal regulations.
Ariy contarninated soil could be addressed at that time. Iri the meantirne, Roadway
is faced with removing diesel fuel floating on the groundwater around the fuei
tanks. Numerous reports have been subrnitted to the NCDNRCD Noorsevilie Regional
0ffice. These reports define the horizonta]. and vertical extent of the piume,
as well as free product removal.
Free product rernoval has been limited to oil skimniing. The oii skimsing has been
effective but is a slow process. Roadway's consultant, T. R. Edgerton, has proposed
a two -pump recovery system rather than a one -pump oil skirnnier. The two -pump system
wouid depress the groundwater at a depth of about 40' . This groundwater is
essentiaily "clean" and would eventually be discharged to the evaporation pond
at the rate of one gailon per minute (CPM) or 1,440 galions per day (GPD). Roadway
initially proposed two GPM (2,880 CPD) in the event two such system needed to
be insta11ed Tbe addition of 2,880 GPD of "clean" groundwater to the
365,000-galion capacity evaporation pond is expected to have a negligible effect
on the pond.
The diesel fuel that would be recovered by tbe second oil skimmer purnp of the
two -pump system would be collected for reprocessing by Cherokee Resources of
Charlotte, North Carolina. Cherokee selis the reprocessed oil as fuel for
industrial boilers in conformance with USEPA and NCDNRCD requirements.
Regulatory 0versite
The evaporation pond is operated under NCDNRCD Perrnit No. 2743R. In early 1988,
Roadway requested a renewal of this perinit and an aniendment to use the evaporation
pond for handling "clean" groundwater from the two-purnp diesel fuei recovery system.
In April of 1988, the NCDNRCD requested additional information from Roadway prior
to renewing the perinit. The information has been gathered and is presented in
the forniat of the request.
-2-

!Fr
3. Dissolved Hydrocarbon Removal_in the_Oil aterSeparator Exhibit 2:
Oil/water separators are designed to remove floating oil products.
Dissolved constituents are usually not at issue because their amounts
are usually so small.
Because of construction of the monitor wells, recovery system and other
activities, a large amount of sediment had accumulated in the oil/water/
separator. Both the sediment and water in the separator were sampled
in July, 1988 by T. R. Edgerton. The results are presented in Exhibit
2. The results show that the sludge is non -hazardous. The sludge
(sediment) has already been removed, is being dried to remove free liquids
and will be placed in the terminal's normal solid waste going to the
sanitary landlill. Residual liquids are drained back into the separator.
Higher oil and grease in the separator are usually associated with solids
saturated with oil that carry over, or the age of the material. Aged
oil or diesel fuel has a tendency to emulsify at the oil/water interface.
Roadway personnel have removed this with absorbent material. The spent
absorbent material is handled in the same manner as the sediment. The
Total Organic Halide (TOX) value may reflect interferences (chlorides)
and will be resampled as necessary. Improved sediment removal from
the separator will result in lower oil and grease values.
4a. Characterization of the Water in the Pond:
Evaluation of the pond indicates that water quality in the pond will
vary by loading. Because the treated sanitary wastewater, stoat,: water
and tractor washing wastewater enter the front (south part) of the pond,
and works its way north, the water was sampled at the front and back
parts of the pond using a spacial composite in each case.
The oxygen consuming (carbon, nitrogen) parameters are low for a pond
of this type and indicate biological activity is taking place reducing
the organic matter. Nitrogen appears to be the limiting factor as ammonia
is converted to nitrate. Phosphorous (1.7 mg/L) is at a level to support
algae growth. Algae is present, especially in the front part of the
pond, contributing to the relatively high value TSS of 39 mg/L.
Coliform levels can originate from both the sanitary sewerage (which
is chlorinated) and storm water runoff (soil bacteria). Given the closed
nature of the pond and the fact that it receives storm water, it is
not surprising to see the presence of Total Conforms.
Related chemical parameters such as oil and grease, MBAS, TOC, TOX and
Total Phenols are quite low. TOX values at these levels (14 mg/L) are
not reliable as contributions from chlorides and chlorination of the
sanitary effluent can interfere.
Dissolved salt concentrations (chloride, pH, TDS) indicate the soluble
components of the pond are well mixed and relatively elevated (chloride,
TDS) indicating evaporation is increasing the salt content.
- 4 -

Loading on the Pond:
To gauge the loading on the pond systeni, several actions were taken:
(1) All storrn and sanitary sewers were cleaned out the week of May
13, 1988.
(2) The septic tank system was rnonitored to see how often the system
dosed the sand filter. The dosing occurred consistently every
4-5 days The dosing averaged about 1,600 gallons (which amounts
to about 400 GPD) which is consistent with the 12-15 persons per
shift at the faci1ity
(3) About 26 P&D tractors are washed every four weeks with a
biodegradable soap solution. This is done by an outside vendor
who brings in a "steam jenny" or pressure washer. Past experience
indicates about 50 gallons per truck (depends on how dirty the
truck is) or about 1,300 gailous on a Saturday every four weeks.
The lant washing occurred on June 26 Pond sarnples were taken
about July 20, after the pond had supposedlyreached a steady state.
(4) The water in the pond is recirculated to the garage and back dowri
to tbe pond using the old truck wash recycle system. The system
draws water from the northeast end of the pond through a 75 GPM,
1750 RPM, 3-phase, 5 HP submersible punip. Water filis a tank at
the garage and fiows by gravity back to the pond via a separate
line. The purnp is controiled by a float in the tank. The purnp
also sends water to 14 spray heads mounted on 58' of 1" PVC pipe.
The spray heads spray over the pond frorn the east bank. Water
from the purnp is controlled by a gate vaive which diverts water
to the tank and the spray heads. The pump cycles are curreritly
set at 14 minutes on and 40 minutes off.
4b. CharacterizatiOl of the "Clean" Groundwater - Exhibit 4:
Samples were taken of the deep welis lying outside the diesel plume
and anaiyzed for dissolved hydrocarbons. These welis, Roadway's drinking
water well (100' deep) and MW-15 (deep well to characterize the vertical
hydrogeology) did not show any constitueflts per an EPA 625 analysis.
MW-1 (a shaliow well now containing the oil skimrner) was sampled. This
well does have free product in it. An unsuccessful attempt was ade
to rernove the free product with a separator funriel prior to analysis.
The analysis showed the presence of some diesel constituents at trace
levels. The highest was Naphthalene at 220 ug/L.
To keep the project moving along, Roadway directed T. R. Edgerton to
install the 8"-diameter recovery well but not order the two -pump recovery
system until State approval could be gained This well also showed
free product. A teflon tube was lowered through the free product (several
inches thick) about 20' into the grourtdwater. About 40 gallons of water
were rernoved arid another sainpie was taken and ana1yzed for EPA Method
625 parameters. Sorne constituents were again found, but in lesser
concentrations, the highest being 120 ug/L Naphthalene at 120 uglL.
- 5 «

There is a possibility that these components came from the product in
the well as the sampling tube was lowered through the product. Also,
R-1 may be purged of these constituents as the well is started up. If
not, a carbon absorption system could be used to remove most of these
components prior to discharging the water to the pond. However, the
pond has already received trace amounts of fuel components in the past
at a higher loading. The pond also has biological activity which can
reduce these components in the long run.
Discussion and Summary
Based upon the foregoing.
The sanitary and storm water system is underloaded hydraulically and
on a mass basis when compared to previous operations.
The water quality in the pond system is relatively good for this type
of system. The addition of "clean" groundwater to the system will not
overload the system from a hydraulic or water quality perspective, If
necessary, the groundwater can be passed through carbon absorption before
discharge to the pond. However, concentrations of dissolved parameters
are already low, probably lower than what has gone to the pond in the
past, and can be reduced by the biological activity of the pond.
The hydrology of the pond is designed to separate pond water and
groundwaters which eventually flow to the creek. Water quality in the
creek is probably no better than that of the pond. Evaporation in the
pond can be enhanced by operating the spray system at longer intervals
or by adding more spray heads. There are no groundwater wells in the
immediate area other than Roadway's well. Roadway's well is threatened
by a diesel spill which requires groundwater depression to remediate.
Any concern about possible groundwater infiltration at the pond is
marginal as the groundwater would get to the creek. The water quality
in the creek is probably no better than the pond. Also, further delay
in recovering free product from the diesel plume offers a far greater
threat to regional groundwater, as well as Roadway's own water well.
6

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDATER SECTION
MEMOR1NDUM
TO:
DATE:
FROM: Bill Reid
SUBJECT: Application for
Faeility Narne
County
Type of Project
Applicable Perrnit Numbers
EPA
endment of Permit No74'3'
GW
AC
We have received a copy of the above referencecl application,
which was sent to your regional office for cornment on or about
YuIv L 1989.
You should review the application package for cornpleteness and
adequacy of relevant information and subrnit your request for
additionai inforrnation to me (via telephone or memo) by
j) 1989 so that aLt required information can be
request'd from the applicant at one time. A copy of our formai
request to the applicant for additional infonnation will be
provided to you.
If you do not require additional inforrnation frorn th e
appiicant to cornpiete your evaluation of the project, you shouid
review the appiicajion package and subniit your cornments to me by
1989.
If a copy of the application packacje has not been rnade
availabie to your office, PLEASE LET ME KNOW IMMEDIATELY so that a
copy can be forwarded to you as soon as possible.
MDC /APPMEMO

7 f.
WILIJAMFKWG
VICE PIE
0110PERT,ES AND MATEPW,5
June 19, 1989
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R. Paul Wilms, Director
North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources and
Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Re: Project Denial APN011234
Roadway Express, Inc. ("Roadway")
5201 Sunset Road, Charlotte, NC
Reissuance of Permit No. 2743R
Wastewater Treatment/Recycle Facility
Request for Adjunicatory Hearing
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. Chapter 1508
ROADWAY
SERVICES, INC.
107GORGEBOULEVARD
PO 601(88
AKRON,OH44309-0088
384-8184
AN 2 7 1989
PERNATIT-F*
!4
, A 7 E SECTIC
P G
Dear Mr. Wilms:
Roadway Express, Inc. has respectfully requested an adjudicatory hearing on
the Director's denial of the Reissuance of Permit 2743R for our Charlotte,
North Carolina facility. The proper notices have been filed with the Office
of Administrative Hearings.
Before stating our basis for the request for the hearing, Roadway would like
state that we feel we have good relations with the Department of Natural
Resources and Community Development ("DNRCD") and would like to continue that
relationship. By requesting, this adjudication hearing, Roadway does not want
to give the impression that we are seeking an adversarial position with the
DNRCD. We would like Co suggest a meeting with the appropriate persons to
resolve this situation prior to an adjudication hearing, if possible. The
appropriate persons must have the technical knowledge of both wastewater and
groundwater treatment, as well as a policy -making role within the DNRCD.
Roadway believes that by properly understanding and weighing all the technical
and material facts unique to Roadway's situation, a reasonable solution may
be reached without proceeding to an adjudication hearing.
With respect to the Director's letter of May 19, 1989, a copy of which is
attached as Exhibit A, Roadway provides the following information as a basis
for the hearing or, preferably, the technical meeting and/or discussion:

NC DNRCD
Page Twa
June 19, 1989
i989
Lr
1. The permit as issued Decernber 1, 1987 daes nat proer1y define the
exiting facliities and waste treatrnent operations t Roadway. The
descriptjons apparently were carried over from permit8 fssued by
your predecessor the North Caroliria Departnient of Natural and Economic
Resources.
A, In 1973, Roadway's ter-ina1 and operatjona vere expanded
neceasitating an upgrade of Che wastewater treatnent facilities.
B. The Mecklenburg County Eealth Department appeared to be the ]ead
agency and required an iristailation perit. The instaliatjon
permit requlred a "no discharge" system to protect a nearby creek
on Roadway's property.
C. The County perinit initially called for a 365,000-galjon holding
pond followed by a 365,000-gailon emergency pond. A comproniise
was reached and one pond of 558,000 gailous was actually instailed.
D. If any calculations were niade by the DNRCD staff using 365,000
galions as stated in the perrnit, then the calculatjons may be
off and inva1d conclusions reached causing a recornmendatjon
for denial of the permit renewal.
2. The system continues to be utilized as permitted. The pond essentially
recejves treated domestjc wastewater and treated runoff from the
areas of the yard where rnaterial handling occurs and
petroleum/chernjcais are transferred.
A. The operatjons of the terininal have changed since 1973 and have
reduced the treated wastewater discharge to about haif of design
capacity. This is because the operations at the terminal have
been changed from a regional distribution center to a local pick-up
and delivery operatjon. Ernploytnent, amount of freight and number
of total vehicies have beec reduced by about haif. ThiB has
bn explained to the Moorseville Regionai Staff verbaily and
i. writing. In rea1ty, the "no discharge" systera is overdesigned
for its current use.
B. The recycle system is operable and used on a daily basis to
circulate aid aerate water in the pond. The system can be used
to initially rinse trucks before washing. Hovever, the reduction
in the number and type of tractor/trajjer at the facility no
longer necessftates daily or weekly washing af vehicles. The
local (pick-up and delivery) tractors are washed once per period
(every four weeks) by an outside vendor using a pressure washer.
The amount of water needed to wash trucks and essentially sent
to the pond has been substantially reduced. Recycling activity
is not critical to maintain the no discharge status of the pond.

NC DNRCD
Page Three
June 19, 1989
C. In 1985, a moat was placed around the fueling pad to better collect
petroleum drippage and storm water sheet wash tributary to the
oil/water separator described in the permit. This has essentially
excluded large amounts of uncontaminated storm water tributary
to the oil/water separator and the pond. The storm water
containing oils or petroleum can receive better treatment because
the oil/water separator is not hydraulically surged with excess
uncontaminated storm water.
D. The spray headers in the pond were added in 1984 to keep the
water in the pond aerated. Due to the reduced hydraulic loading
on the pond, the waters in the pond became stagnant and we risked
causing a nuisance. Installation of the spray headers is
consistent with Condition No. 8 of the permit which requires
Roadway to prevent nuisance conditions from developing.
. The facility is a "no discharge" system.
A. As stated above, the system was designed and permitted as a no
discharge system. Reduced flow to the pond in the past gives
even more assurance of this situation being maintained. No
discharge has occurred.
B. The addition of spray headers in the pond had the ancillary effect
of achieving some enhanced evaporation, but the spray headers
were placed in the pond to facilitate aeration and only operate
one -fifth to one-third of the time. As an experiment, the spray
headers were left on continually during the late fall and early
winter of 1988. The water level in the pond became so low that
the sprayers had to be turned off in early 1989. (Rainfall in
Charlotte was less than average during this period.) This was
done to partially verify the water balance data submitted to
the DNRCD in December of 1988. The data shows that a no discharge
condition can be maintained even if some 4,000 gallons per day
;if groundwater is loaded onto the pond, provided that additional
spray headers are added to the system and the system is operated
at 150 gallons per minute for approximately 12-14 hours per day.
In reality, this 4,000 gallons of water will only replace
approximately 4,000 gallons of water no longer discharged by
the sanitary wastewater treatment system when operations were
scaled back.
C. As mentioned above, past practice shows that the pond has been
operated as a no discharge system and calculations can be
maintained as a no discharge system. While Roadway agrees that
the regional geography and climate allow for a net gain in water,
the data unique to Roadway's pond and limited water intake suggests
that a net water loss (evaporation) applies to Roadway's situation.

NC DNRCD
Page Four
June 19, 1989
4. Th additj081 concerns should be addressed as follow8:
A. Roadway h88 not uaed pray irrigatjon to dlspose ef water frotn
the pond ytern in order to circuwvent its no discharge Status.
For about three years after the pond aysten was installed, the
outward banks of tlie pond system were Watered to establish and
support vegetative cover. During this time, Mr. Jease Welia
of the DNRCD Mooresvj11e Regional Office inspected our faciiity
on several occasjons and raised no objectjons to this procedure.
After the vegetative cover was established, this practjce was
discontinued. During the permit renewal inspectiou conducted
by Mr. Thurrnund torn1 Mr. Horn was acivised of this past practice
and apparently Construed this to be an ongoing problern. During
a meeting with Mr. Horri and Dr. Klingei of the Moorsevjije Regioua].
Office on August 15, 1988, Mr. Mark Baurngardner, Raadway'o Manager
Erwirorenta1 Services, learned of this Inispreeonceptjon. Upon
returning to Roadway'a Charlotte terminai to investigate this
concera, Mr. R. Lowe (Roadway's Terminal Manager for the past
seven years), Hr. C. Hicks (Roadway"s Certified Operator since
tbe terminal was opened) and Mr. Baurngardner advised Mr. ibm
by conference call that watering of the banks of the pond was
a practice in the years irnmediateiy foliowing the pond constructjon
in order to establjsh vegetatjon and flOt 8 means of disposing
of excess water. This pracedure is riot practjced now.
L On April 11,, 1987, Roadway exnerintp
catastrophjc leak of the piping of 1t8 underground diesel tank
system. This was reported to the DNRCD and clean-up is ongoing.
Ultimately, a groundwater depressjon system needs to be Constructed
in order to recover diesel fuel floating on the water table,
This means that excess groundwater tnust be handled. The rate
was estjmated at 2,000-4,000 gailoas per day. An thvestigation
of a ineans to handle this excess water was conducted by J. C.
Swart, then Roadway's Environmentai Servi,ces Manager, in May
of 1987. The results were as fo11ow;
(1) Discharge to Creek; NPDES permit takes a long time to
get and may not be approved 88 the receiviug streatn is
too sja11.
ii; Infi1tratjon Callery: Would not be approved by DNRCD
per Dr. Kiingel.
(iii) Discharge to Sanitary Sewer Charlotte/Meeklenburg Sewer
Authority did not have sewers In the itmiedtate area, but
Roadway aiight be able to buiid a lift static,n and one-half
to one mile of force niain.

NC DNRCD
Page Five
June 19, 1989
The Sewer Authority would accept sanitary sewerage (3,0Q0
gallons per day) and truck washing wastewater (1,500-2,000
gallons per month) but not groundwater or storm water.
This was because the groundwater was essentially clean
and would unfairly utilize sewer and treatment capacity.
Any storm water contaminated with petroleum was not wanted
because of Charlotte's previously bad experiences with
it. Therefore, Roadway could build an expensive conveyance
system to transport 3,000-5,000 gallons of wastewater
that would already receive treatment and not solve its
excess groundwater problem.
Further, the regional sewer plan calls for a sewer to
be built on the north side of Roadway's property. Roadway's
original permit from the County calls for Roadway to tie
into this sewer when it becomes available. The entire
Roadway sewer and treatment system was designed to hook
onto this gravity sewer when it becomes available.
(iv) Discharge to the existing pond system as the pond was
taking on less water than before. This was the only viable
option and was pursued.
If the State's or County's position has signed changed regarding
disposal of excess groundwater, such as approval of an infiltration
gallery, Roadway will consider this a means of complying.
C. With respect to the permit renewal, Roadway's Terminal Manager
expected to see a renewal notice reminder mailed to him as is
the customary procedure. He did not receive such a reminder
and was unaware that the permit had expired. As Mr. Baumgardner
had met with Dr. Klingel the first time in December of 1987
concerning the remediation of the diesel spill, Dr. Klingel
inquired as to whether the pond had a no discharge permit. Mr.
Baumgardner was surprised to learn that such a permit was required
as many other states do not require it. Mr. Baumgardner checked
and found that a permit did exist and it had expired several
months earlier. A renewal request was then promptly sent to
the DNRCD. (Because of my absence at that time, the permit
application was signed by Mr. A. C. Snelson, Roadway's Vice
President Corporate Support Services, so to not unnecessarily
delay getting the renewal application to your department.)
Additional considerations should be integrated into the total
environmental picture at the facility.

NC DNRCD
Page Six
Jure 19, 1989
A. The storm water management system at the Charlotte ternina1 is
ahead of its tirne as it compljes with the proposed NPDES
regulatjons on storm water dlscharges. Contaminated 8torin Waters
are 8egregated and treated. Uncontainated sheet wash runs off
into the creek. The water quality is probably better than storin
water leaving Sunset Road 1-77 or cowxnercjal deve1oprnerts in
the area. These discharges all affect the water quaiity of the
creek at the rear of Roadway'a property.
L Roadway's atternpts to rnake s1gnifican progress in cleaning up
its diesel fuel. release have been frustrating,
(i) Free product skimming has ]imited effectiveness.
(ii) Roadways water well is threatened.
(iii) The dlesel plume is beginning to fan out and emulsify.
In the long run, down gradient waters iay be adverseiy
affected. Ciean-up wili be more dlfficult, costly and
require the withdrawal of more groundwater. Treatment
of the excess groundwater, if any is required, catrnot
be firmed up until an ultimate disposai is determined.
(No detajls on the treatment of contamjnated groundwatr
were proposed to the DNRCD until a place to haridle the
excess groundwater can be determjned.)
C. Without a legal means for handling its wastewater Roadway's
ability to continue operations is 8everely restricted.
Roadway apprecjates the opportunity to c1arfy this situatjo and looks forward
to resolving this situatjon without adjudicatjon if possible.
If any questions arise, please contact Nark Baumgardner at [phone].
Very truiy yours,
Roadway Services, Inc. for
Roadway Express, Inc.
WFK: rg
Attachment
CC:
William F. Klug
Vjce Presjdent - Propertjes
and Materjals Managemert
iCrthur Mouberry, IP. E. Supervisor,
Perniits & Engineering (same address as above)
Hs. Caro1y McCaskjll (saine address as above)
R. E. Lowe (681)
M. T. Baurngardner

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Mr. A. C. Snelson, Vice President
Roadway Express, Inc.
5201 Sunset Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 2821.3
Dear Mr. Snelson:
May 19, 1989
MAY
1989
R. Paul Wilms
Director
Subject: Project Denial (APN011234)
Roadway Express, Inc.
Sunset Road Terminal
Reissuance-Permit No. 2743R
Wastewater Treatment/Recycle Facility
This is in response to your request for reissuance of Permit No. 2743R for amendment to the
permit to allow the addition of 4,320 gallons per day of recovered contaminated groundwater,
received on March 21, 1988, to serve Roadway Express, Inc. in Mecklenburg County.
The Division's Water Quality and Groundwater Sections have reviewed the information
submitted in reference to the request for permit amendment. It has been determined that the
existing facilities are not adequate and are not operating in accordance with the original permit, The
permit was originally issued to serve a recycle facility, This facility has since been modified,
without prior Division approval, to include the installation of spray headers in the lagoon and is
currently, as Roadway has indicated, operating as an evaporation facility. In this geographic
location, the seasonal variation of rainfall versus evapotranspiration cannot compensate for the
difference between the average rate of precipitation per year combined with the amount of
wastewater discharged to the facility from the terminal and the runoff tributary to the facility during
rainfall events. Therefore, this facility cannot operate as a nondischarge system.
Additional items of concern include the following: it has been noted that spray irrigation of
wastewater onto adjacent lands may have occurred, this, in violation of the North Carolina General
Statutes; the subject permit required that a request for permit renewal be received at least six (6)
months prior to expiration of the permit, which was not complied with, and this permit has
expired; and if it were possible for the subject facility to operate as a nondischarge treatment
facility, the proposed treatment of the contaminated groundwater prior to discharge to the lagoon is
inadequate. It also has been noted that regional sewers are in close proximity to this site and
therefore, this facility should be connected. In light of the aforementioned items, the Division of
Environmental Management must hereby deny your application for permit amendment.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone 919
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
7f]15

Mr. Snelson
page -2-
If this decision is unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an adjudicatory hearing
upon written request within 30 days fo1iowing receipt of this deniai, This request rnust be in the
forui of a written petitien, conforrning to Chapter 50B of North Carolina General Statutes, and
filed with the Office of Administratjve Heai-ings, Post Office Drawer 1 1666, Raleigh, North
Carolina, 27604. Unless such demands are made, this denial shail be final and binding.
Please be advised that the subject permit expired on December 1, 1987, and operation of this
facility withow a valid permit isa violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and is
subject to the enforcernent authority of the Environmental Managernent Cornmission, In addition,
Roadway Express, Inc. failed to request permit renewal as required by condition nurnber 10,
Perrnjt No. 2743R issued November 12, 1982, and is considered in vioiation of the terms and
conditions of thar perrnit; this is also subject to the enforcement authority of the Commission.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, p1eae contact Ms. Carolyn McCaskill,
teiephone 919/733-5083, extension 540,
cc: Mooresvillc Regional Supervisor
Bill Reid, Groundwater Section
Mecklenburg County Environmental Health

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNTY DEVELOPMENT
Offic of egai Affajrs
DATE:
SURJECT:
7

F C OFFICE OF
A :1 !-TJ FINGS
IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
IN THE COUNTY OF WAKE JUN I Li 56 M
N THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
ROADWAY SERVICES, INC.,
Petitioner,
VS.
THE STATE OF' NORTH CAROLINA,
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
PETITION
FOR A
CONTESTED CASE HEA
IN RE PROJECT DENIA
APNO 11234
PERMIT NO. 2743R
Petitioner, herein, Roadway Services, Inc. files this
Petition on behalf of Roadway Express, Inc. and the accompanying
affidavit of J. Dawson Cunningham, Vice -President, Secretary and.
Treasurer of Roadway Express, Inc., pursuant to Article 3 of
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and requests
a contested case hearing based on the following facts:
1. Roadway Express, Inc. owns and operates 'a terminal
located in the City of Charlotte, County of Mecklenburg, the
State of North Carolina ("Charlotte Terminal") the main purpose
of which is the loading, loading and maintenance of commercial
transportation vehicles.
2. By way of letter dated March 16, 1988, Roadway
Services, Inc. on behalf of Roadway Express, Inc. filed a request
for reissuance of non -discharge permit No. 2743R with the North
Carolina Department of Natural. Resources and Community Develop-
ment ("NRCD") for purposes related to the operation of the
facility at the Charlotte Terminal.

3. By letter dated Hay 19, 1989 to ?4r. A.C. Sneiso
Vice Presjdent of Roadway Express, Inc., the NRCD notifjed Road-
way ot its Project Denjai (APiO 11234) of Roadways request for
reissuance of permjt No. 2743R for the Charlotte Terminal.
4. in the May 19, 1989 letter mentjoned above, the
NRCD stated, inter alia, that:
a) existing faciljtjes at the Charlotte Terminal
are not adequate and are not operated in
accordance with the original permit;
b) the facjljtjes had been modifjed without
prior Divjsjon approval;
c) in this geographjca iocatio, the 5easonal
varjatjon of rainfajl versus evapotrans_
piration cannot compeflsate for the difference
between the average rate of precipitatjon per
year combined with the arnount of wastewater
diScharged to the faciiity from the terrninal
and the runoff tributary to the facility dur-
ing rajnfall events prevents the facility
from °perating as a flofl-discharge system;
d) spray irrigatjon of wastewater may have
occurred in violatjon of North Caroljna Gen-
eral Statutes;
-2-

e) the subject permit required a request for
renewal, which was not complied with; and
f) the proposed treatment of contaminated
groundwater prior to discharge to the lagoon
is inadequate.
5. The foregoing are set forth in the accompanying
facsimile reproduction of the Affidavit of J. Dawson Cunningham
Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer, Roadway Express, Inc.
Such facsimile will be supplemented with the original Affidavit
in a timely manner.
6. The NRCD's failure to renew or reissue Roadway's
permit No. 2743R based upon the alleged facts and assumptions set
is letter of May 19, 1989, has substantially prejudiced
the Petitioner's rights and the NRCD in making this decision:
a) erroneously based its decision on various
unsupported assumptions and mistakes of fact;
out in
b) failed to use proper procedures by basing i
decision upon an incomplete file and under-
standing of the matter; andfor
c) acted arbitrarily or capriciously by failing
to properly assess all relevant facts related
to this matter.

WHEREFORE, Roadway Servjces, Inc. Petitioner herejn o
behalf of Roadway Express, Inc., respectfully requests this
Adrnjfljstratjve Body to grant a Petition for a COntested case
hearing.
Respectfully submitted,
WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE
By: _____
Brad. DeVore
Post Office Drawer 84
NC 27102
Telephone: [phone]
Courisel for Petitioner,
Roadway Services, Inc.

IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
IN THE COUNTY OF WAE
IN THE OFFICE OF ADM NI TRATIVE HEARINGS
ROADWAY SERVICES, INC .
Petitioner
v
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL; RESOURCES
AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
J. Dawson Cu
deposes and sayer
AFFIDAVIT
AFFIDAVIT OF
J. DAWSON CUNNINGHAM
nghaxa, being duly sworn, upon his oa
h
1. My posit is n with Roadway Express, Inc. ie Vice Preei
dent, Secretary and Treasurer and I snake this affidavit of myown
personal knowledge.
2` By way of letter dated March 16, 1988 Roadway Ser-
vicee,, Inc., notified the North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources and. Community Development ( "NRCD") of Roaadway ' e request for
reiasuance or renewal of permit No. 2743R.
3. O"n May 2S, 1989, Roadway Services, Inc. received
NRCD's letter dated May 19, 1989, which constituted a project denial
APNO 11234 to Roadway'8 request for reissuance or renewal of permit
No. 2743R.
4. Upon, review
9, Roadway Services
the above -referenced NRCD letter of May
nc. and Roadway ExpreaQ Inc. have

underitax
i do©i*ion to deny the riquoat !or roiiiUinvi . q!
rla baud upon unsupported asrun ptioni, xn Lnoor
nq a! th• imttor and an i,nco pinto !il• on tha mat«
by tatzurr to adaq
d*rtng it. deatataa vn nnrupport.d Ir.
a rNi,x'abia taCt!! and
hone *roc[ incompxlti
analy.Lj,. th$ubitintiiij . pra udicad Rai�Tway rxpxaai, ino,
right. Irid •at.d erronioutside o! propux prvosduro, Ind i
trariXy and c1prLcL0u13,y in donyinRoadway axpraa., zaa. 'e regzs
!ar renorraX or reiseu.nal .of permit No. 2743R
b.d and ewvrn to
this .day of Juno
n
14
Jun n.*
dent
and T'rouur,r

IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
IN THE COUNTY OF WAKE L
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS)U
ROADWAY SERVICES INC.,
Petitioner,
vs.
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
MD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Respondent..
Q_T 1 0
TO
MOTION TO STAY
CONTESTED AGENCY
ACTION IN RE PROJECT
DENIAL AP NO. 11234
REISSUANCE OF [E
NO. 2743R
T A Y
Comes now Petitioner, Roadway Services Inc. on b
of Roadway Express,
FILED, OFFICE �F
AD Ic;Q!NGS
515 f'
this Administrative Body pur-
suant to Article 3 of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes of
North Carolina for its Order to stay the enforcement of the deci-
sion of the North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and
Community Development ('NRCD') in the State of North Carolina to
deny the reissuance of permit No. 2743R for Roadway Express,
Inc.'s Charlotte Terminal located in the City of Charlotte,
County of Mecklenburg in the Sate of North Carolina, pendig
the outcome of the above -styled case upon such terms as are
proper and consistent with the provisions set forth in Rule 65 of
Chapter 1A of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
Inc., and moves
WOMI3LE CARLyLE SANDRIDGE & RJCE
By:
Brad DeVore
Post Office Drawer 84
Winston-Salem, NC 27102
Phone: [phone]
Attorneys for Petitioner
Roadway Services, Inc.

Hydrogeoogy
f Rvapo
Prepared for
\/))§#yExpress,.
arlotte, \ ?

July 25, 1988
O1Y
2
This report is an evaluation of the hydrogeology in the vicinity of
an evaporation pond operated by Roadway Express, Inc., 2501 Sunset Road,
Charlotte, North Carolina The purpose of this report is to supplement
an application for a permit from the North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources and Community Development.
DISCUSSION
Figure 1 is a general site map exhibiting buildings, the
evaporation pond, and an interrnittent creek that flows northwestward.
The subsurface of the southern part of the site has been sampled to a
depth of sixty feet as part of another investigation. Slightly sandy,
clayey silt saprolite overlying bedrock comprise the site stratigraphy.
According to Stewart Pump and Well Co. who installed a potable -water
well (location B on Figure 1) in the 1960's, depth to bedrock is
approximately one hundred feet. At location A', depth to bedrock is
greater than sixty feet as this was the maximum depth sampled. Depth to
bedrock in the vicinity of the pond is unknown, but may be greater than
thirty feet.
Figure 2 is a cross-section of the site from a monitoring well
through the pond and to the creek. Elevations for the cross -sections
were accurately surveyed and locations were taken from other maps.
Depth to ground water in the vicinity of A is approximately eighteen
feet. Here ground water flows westward to northwestward. Over the rest
of the site, however, ground water is expected to flow more northward

July 25, 1988
towards the creek based on topography. The pond is approximately
thirteen feet deep from the berm and contained approximately seven feet
of water when surveyed an July 19, 1988. Elevation of water in the
creek is approximately three feet below the elevation of the bottom of
the pond. A crude estimate of the location of the water table in the
vicinity of the pond has been determined by connecting a line between a
r
point where the elevation of the water table is known (a monitoring
well) and a point believed to be at or near the water table (water level
in the creek). By this method, depth to ground water in the vicinity of
the pond is expected to be approximately ten to thirteen feet or
shallower closer to the pond. Based on this data, it is likely that the
bottom of the pond penetrates or is very near the water table. Seasonal
fluctuations of the level of the water table is expected to be less than
five feet based on water level readings spanning four consecutive months
of monitoring wells on -site.
According to communications with Roadway personnel, the pond was
constructed using a clay liner covered with gravel. The effectiveness
of the clay liner as a barrier to infiltration from the pond cannot be
determined from this investigation. However, hydraulic conductivity of
the native sandy silt saprolite is estimated at approximately two
feet/day based an a slug test using Hvorslev"s Method (1951).of a
monitoring well on site.

� air
r� 1uttiny
:p
t

ion Pppd
1B
A
1©0 - 200
Feet
Gneral Site Map
Roadway Express, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
T. R. Edgerton, Inc.
Environmental Consultants
f�i .
Fi

Cross --Section
M
T. R. Edgerton, Inc. Figure 2
Environtal Consultants

Elevations
LAocatioil
water in Well
Top of Pond
Bottom of Pond
Water Level in Pond
Water Level in Creek

1989
1
Analytical Results
Roadway 'Express, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Prepared for
Roadway Services, Inc.
Akron, QR.
Prepared by
T. R. Edgerton, Inc.
Cary, NC
August 8, 1988

August 8, 1988 2
to extract a same of fuel and water. The water from the bailer was
transferred to a separatory funnel and allowed several hours to sepa►zte
from any remaining fuel. A water sample was then transferred from the
bottom of the funnel and into a sample jar. Ilowever, eve►i with these
precautions, a sheen was observed on the water in the sampling bottle.
Consequently, analytical results of MW-1 may be I►igher than the
e
concentration of dissolved constituents in ground water below the fuel..
Water to be produced by the proposed recovery system is expected to
contain dissolved constituents at these or lower concentrations. No
dissolved constituents of diesel fuel were detected in either the deep
well (MW-
5) or thepotable-water well (RC-1).
Task 2
Two spatially composited water samples were taken from the
evaporation pond. RP-1 was taken from the southern end and RP-2 from
the northern end. Floating algae had to be pushed aside in order to
retrieve samples with 'bailers. It was observed that the southern end
(RP-1) was more turbid and these water samples may contain very trace
amounts of algae and suspended sludge. Tlee RP-2 samples contained none
of the floating algae and sludge.
Activities that may affect sample results are as follows.
Twenty-six trucks were washed on June 25, 1988. The following week,
approximately one hundred gallons of sludge were removed from the truck
wash -catch basin and approximately fifty gallons of sludge reniained.
The septic tank sand filter is not periodically dosed with chemlcals.

N
■r
August 8, 1988
It is, however, periodically turned. Chlorine is added to the
water -treatment system between the sand filter area and the pond at a
rate of about fifty-five gallons per three weeks to a month The
chlorine Is injected automatically.
Task 5
The ail,/water separator was sampied. OW-1 refers,to the sludge
sample taken from the bottom of the oil/water separator. OW-2 is a
sample of water exiting the oil/water separator. The sludge as analyzed
is not considered a hazardous waste.
Fiease call if you have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
T. R EDGERTON, INC.
Pete Moncla, P.G.
Hydrogeologist
Ij kb
028

':T TJ'w 1(
c
-
c h [c (7

Supplemental 'Information
Presented to the.
North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources and Community Development
Environmental Protection Division
for
Roadway Express, Inc.
5201 Sunset Road
Charlotte, North Carolina
Mechlenburg County
Evaporation. Pond System
APN011234/GW88473
Permit No. 2743R
by
Mark T. Baumgardner
Engineer - Environmental Services
Roadway Services, Inc.
1077 Gorge Boulevard
Akron, Ohio 44309
August 22, 1988

Site History
The Roadway Express, Inc. facility was constructed in several stages in the
mid-1960s. The portion of the terminal closest to Sunset Road was built first
and was served by a septic tank and leach field as there were no sanitary sewers
serving the area. The septic tank system was located behind what is now the
existing garage area.
Shortly thereafter, the terminal was expanded towards the north (away from Sunset
Road) and a maintenance garage was added on the west side. At that time, the
terminal served multiple purposes such as pickup and delivery (P&D) of freight
in the Charlotte area, some linehaul operations, some breakbulk activity,
maintenance and fueling of both linehaul and P&D vehicles.
Part of the maintenance of the vehicles was the washing of tractors and some
trailers. The amount of water used in the washing of the tractors and trailers
overtaxed the existing septic system. Working with local and state environmental
officials, an evaporation pond was installed with the purpose of handling sanitary,
storm and truck washing wastewaters. The sanitary wastewaters were from a new
10,000-gallon septic tank, dual on ground sand filters and a tablet -type chlorinator
prior to discharge to the evaporation pond. The old septic tank and leach field
were abandoned.
The storm water discharged to the pond consists of whatever falls on the truck
washing pad, outside the rear of the garage during rainfall events. The truck
washing involved drawing water from the rear (north side) of the pond, pumping
it to the garage to holding and pressurizing tanks, and then using it to rinse
the tractors and trailers after washing. All wastewater (other than sanitary
wastewater) from the garage operation passes through an oil/sediment trap and
an oil/water separator prior to flowing to the pond through underground piping
by gravity. This water enters the pond separately from the sanitary wastewater.
Based upon interviews of Roadway personnel familiar with the situation in the
196as, the evaporation pond was installed to manage all of Roadway's sanitary,
truck washing and contaminated storm water on suite as there were no sanitary sewers
in the area, and also, to prohibit (at the request of governmental officials)
a discharge to the unnamed creek and drainage swale that surround the terminal
on three sides. Mote that storm water from Sunset Road, Statesville Road, adjoining
properties and most of Roadway's yard (other than the garage and fueling areas)
does find its way to the creek,.
Current Site Operations
As time progressed, Roadway improved and expanded its breakbulk and satellite
terminal network in the Carolinas. Most linehaul and relay functions are handled
out of the Winston-Salem facility. Satellite facilities in the smaller cities
now receive freight direct from Winston-Salem rather than through. Charlotte. Major
maintenance and automated truck washing are handled through the breakbulk facilities
such as Winston-Salem.
The Charlotte terminal now handles mostly local freight via P&D vehicles. Over
half of the doors at the terminal are unused. Linehaul and relay functions have
substantially decreased, with the garage handling only emergency maintenance and
topping off of fuel tanks. The garage is now essentially dedicated to the
maintenance, fueling and manual washing of P&D tractors (not trailers),

The net result of the decrease of business activity has been a decrease in the
amount of wastewater loaded onto the evaporation pond Sanitary sewerage has
decreased by about half. Truck washing wastewater has decreased significantly.
Storm water has increased because a spill control moat has been added (circa 1986)
around the fueling islands next to (east of) the garage. The moat receives storm
water and any fuel from drips, leaks and spills from the fueling activities. The
water goes to the oil/water separator before going to the pond. (The current
mass loading on the pond is discussed later in this report.)
Future Activities
0n April 17, 1987, Roadway experienced an underground diesel fuel pipe leak on
the discharge side of its submersible pump in the underground tank battery adjacent
to its maintenance garage. Over 7,000 gallons of diesel fuel was lost overnight.
Since that time, two other minor piping leaks have occurred. All have been
repaired. A corrosion evaluation of the fueling system has been made. The results
indicate that the environment is somewhat corrosive and the system should be
replaced in 3-5 years. This will also be required by the Federal regulations.
Any contaminated soil could be addressed at that time. In the meantime, Roadway
is faced with removing diesel fuel floating on the groundwater around the fuel
tanks. Numerous reports have been submitted to the NCDNRCD Moorseville Regional
Office. These reports define the horizontal and vertical extent of the plume,
as well as free product removal.
Free product removal has been limited to oil skimming. The oil skimming has been
effective but is a slow process. Roadway's consultant, T. R. Edgerton, has proposed
a two -pump recovery system rather than a one -pump oil skimmer. The two -pump system
would depress the groundwater at a depth of about 40'. This groundwater is
essentially "clean'" and would eventually be discharged to the evaporation pond
at the rate of one gallon per minute (GPM) or 1,440 gallons per day (GPD). Roadway
initially proposed two GPM (2,880 CPD) in the event two such system needed to
be installed, The addition of 2,880 CPD of "clean" groundwater to the
365,000-gallon capacity evaporation pond is expected to have a negligible effect
on the pond.
The diesel fuel that would be recovered by the second oil skimmer pump of the
two -pump system would be collected for reprocessing by Cherokee Resources of
Charlotte, North Carolina. Cherokee sells the reprocessed oil as fuel for
industrial boilers in conformance with USEPA and NCDNRCD requirements.
Regulatory 0versite
The evaporation pond is operated under NCDNRCD Permit No 2743R. In early 1988,
Roadway requested a renewal of this permit and an amendment to use the evaporation
pond for handling "clean" groundwater from the two -pump diesel fuel recovery system.
In April of 1988, the NCDNRCD requested additional information from Roadway prior
to renewing the permit. The information has been gathered and is presented in
the format of the request.
2

3. Dissolved Hydrocarbon Removal in the Oil/Water Separator - „E'xhibit 2:
Oil/water separators are designed to remove floating oil products.
Dissolved constituents are usually not at issue because their amounts
are usually so small.
Because of construction of the monitor wells, recovery system and other
activities, a large amount of sediment had accumulated in the oil/water
separator. Both the sediment and water in the separator were sampled
in July, 1988 by T. R. Edgerton. The results are presented in. Exhibit
2. The results show that the sludge is non -hazardous. The sludge
(sediment) has already been removed, is being dried to remove free liquids
and will be placed in the terminal's normal solid waste going to the
sanitary landfill. Residual liquids are drained 'back into the separator.
Higher oil and grease in the separator are usually associated with solids
saturated with oil that carry over, or the age of the material. Aged
oil or diesel fuel has a tendency to emulsify at the oil/water interface.
Roadway personnel have removed this with absorbent material. The spent
absorbent material is handled in the same manner as the sediment. The
Total Organic Halide (TOX) value may reflect interferences (chlorides)
and will be resampled as necessary. Improved sediment removal from
the separator will result in lower oil and grease values.
4a. Characterization of the Water in the Pond:
Evaluation of the pond indicates that water quality in the pond will
vary by loading. Because the treated sanitary wastewater, storm water
and tractor washing wastewater enter the front (south part) of the pond,
and works its way north, the water was sampled at the front and back
parts of the pond using a spacial composite in each case.
The oxygen consuming (carbon, nitrogen) parameters are low for a pond
of this type and indicate biological activity is taking place reducing
the organic matter. Nitrogen appears to be the limiting factor as ammonia
is converted to nitrate. Phosphorous (1.7 mg/L) is at a level to support
algae growth. Algae is present, especially in the front part of the
pond, contributing to the relatively high value TSS of 39 mg/L.
Coliform levels can originate from both the sanitary sewerage (which
is chlorinated) and storm water runoff (soil bacteria). Civen the closed
nature of the pond and the fact that it receives storm water, it is
not surprising to see the presence of Total Coliforms.
Related chemical parameters such as oil and grease,, MBAS, TOC, TOX and
Total Phenols are quite low. TOX values at these levels (1.4 mg/L) are
not reliable as contributions from chlorides and chlorination of the
sanitary effluent can interfere.
➢issolved salt concentrations (chloride, pH, TDS) indicate the soluble
components of the pond are well mixed and relatively elevated (chloride,
T➢S) indicating evaporation is increasing the salt content.
4

Loading on„the Pond:
To gauge the loading on the pond system, several actions were taken:
(1) All storm and sanitary sewers were cleaned out the week of May
13, 1988.
(2) The septic tank system was monitored to see how often the system
dosed the sand filter. The dosing occurred consistently every
4-5 days. The dosing averaged about 1,600 gallons (which amounts
to about 400 GPD) which is consistent with the 12-15 persons per
shift at the facility,
(3) About 26 P&D tractors are washed every four weeks with a
biodegradable soap solution. This is done by an outside vendor
who brings in a "steam jenny" or pressure washer. Past experience
indicates about 50 gallons per truck (depends on how dirty the
truck is) or about 1,300 gallons on a Saturday every four weeks.
The last washing occurred on June 26. Pond samples were taken
about July 20, after the pond had supposedly reached a steady state.
(4) The water in the pond is recirculated to the garage and back down
to the pond using the old truck wash recycle system. The system
draws water from the northeast end of the pond through a 75 GPM,
1.750 RPM, 3-phase, 5 HP submersible pump. Water fills a tank at
the garage and flows by gravity back to the pond via a separate
line. The pump is controlled by a float in the tank. The pump
also sends water to 14 spray heads mounted on 58' of 1" PVC pipe.
The spray heads spray over the pond from the east bank. Water
from the pump is controlled by a gate valve which diverts water
to the tank and the spray heads. The pump cycles are currently
set at 14 minutes on and 40 minutes off.
4b. Characterization of the "Clean" Groundwater - Exhibit 4:
Samples were taken of the deep wells lying outside the diesel plume
and analyzed for dissolved 'hydrocarbons. These wells" Roadway's drinking
water well (100' deep) and MW-15 (deep well to characterize the vertical
hydrogeology) did not show any constituents per an EPA 625 analysis.
MW-1 (a shallow well now containing the oil skimaner) was sampled. This
well does have free product in it. An unsuccessful attempt was made.
to remove the free product with a separator funnel prior to analysis.
The analysis showed the presence of some diesel constituents at trace
levels. The highest was Naphthalene at 220 ug/L.
To keep the project moving along, Roadway directed T. R. Edgerton to
install the 8"-diameter recovery well but not order the two-purnp recovery
system until State approval could be gained. This we11 also showed
free product. A teflon tube was lowered through the free product (several
inches thick) about 20' into the groundwater. About 40 gallons of water
were removed and another sample was taken and analyzed for EPA Method
625 parameters. Some constituents were again found, but in lesser
concentrations, the highest being 120 ug/L Naphthalene at 120 ug/L.
5

There is a possibility that these components came from the product in
the well as the sampling tube was lowered through the product. Also,
R-1 may be. purged of these constituents as the well is started up. If
not, a carbon absorption system could be used to remove most of these
components prior to discharging the water to the pond. However, the
pond has already received trace amounts of fuel components in the past
at a higher loading. The pond also has biological activity which can
reduce these components in the long run.
Discussion and Sumanary
Based upon the foregoing:
The sanitary and storm water system is underloaded hydraulically and
on a mass basis when compared to previous operations.
- The water quality in the pond system is relatively good for this type
of system. The addition of °"clean`° groundwater to the system will not
overload the system from a hydraulic or water quality perspective. If
necessary, the groundwater can be passed through carbon absorption before
discharge to the pond. However, concentrations of dissolved parameters
are already low, probably lower than what has gone to the pond in the
past, and can be reduced by the biological activity of the pond.
The hydrology of the pond is designed to separate pond water and
groundwaters which eventually flow to the creek. Water quality in the
creek is probably no better than that of the pond. Evaporation in the
pondcan be enhanced by operating the spray system at longer intervals
or by adding more spray heads. There are no groundwater wells in the
immediate area other than Roadway°s well. Roadway°s well is threatened
by a diesel spill which requires groundwater depression to remediate.
Any concern about possible groundwater infiltration at the pond is
marginal as the groundwater would get to the creek. The water quality
in the creek is probably no better than the pond. Also, further delay
in recovering free product from the diesel plume offers a far greater
threat to regional groundwater, as well as Roadway°s awn water well.
6

4 - I S1.
s
Industrial & Environmental Analysts, Inc.
P.C. lox 12846 ' Research Triongle Park, NC 2779.919-467-9919
Date: Auvust 15, 1988
Sharon Ii8yer
T.R. EdQeI tan Inc
182 F Woodwinds Ind. Ct
Cary, NC 2751 I
Peference: IEA Pepart No 306041
Project I.[),: 1079-687-001 -9
Dear I1s.I1eyer,
Tr�nsrnittei her e°pith are the results of en& ses on one aannple subrnitted to our
1eboretory an August 1, i 988..
Piease vpe the enclosed reports for your results.
very truly (jours,
TPIAL S, ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSTS, INC,
r k Pa nda11
Chernist
Offices or)d Iaboratorie5 located 'in: Essex Junction, Vermont
Research Triangle Pork, North Car©lino

[tL -EEL !iTITTO4 LII flT
U ' rnp1e Mo 5JH41
ripe tdeniticion
[rtI -1 1 !)nte rm!ijzit
Mw ULt
t/113 Dse/Neutrn1 Exir oc 1 ubl 3s Raj' rli(ti:r Lirt r
t4 C 'J r1 ti L
A[UPt1THErff 5
EAPHHLE1IE 5 EL
4UTH4Et1{ 5 EL
Ar1TH EE 5 E'L
5 5 E»3L
EEN:] ('L) IiHEUE 5 E)L
PENIO (I) PE'LEU[ 5
(1) FLUi1T-.NTHE4E 5
E5 (:_HLr1P:ETHr: 15T11E '5 E1L
1Ci E5 (-CHLL'F?ETH Lti ETHEP '5 II
E (-CHLuDOuL) ETHEP 5
E _-ETN LHE P LT1 '5
1 T 4 4r lir HLfl L PUi i. ET11E 5
L ET L H11LL;i E
HT '5
- 1[HLruHlu1L I HNL E HEP '5
-, U 9P E11'5 '5
1 tVEE'FC F1 All! rr[1 '5 EL
1 -[JCHI 'EETEN 5 P1
: 1 3- flC NLPE[1LEN '5
1 4- [HLDrE ENIENE '5 E't.
3 3 -1 Li EE1lEINE 5
r.irTH.,PHTI TE '5
[d11ETL rHTH.I TE EL
:s N- ‚5JT 1 PHTH1 5
5
-tfUIIiufCILLtEtIE 5
1 - W - fl TY L NT 1A L4 T E '5 EJ L
ELVIJE'ANTHENE EL
FLLIJrE!IE 5 1
'5
h [Hi Ei-[ =ENE '5 E L
11HVC[ rnJfp: '5
HE rat HLL:ETIE 5
111[^ErIR a;z— UPENE 5 Pft
'5
liPHTHAE1E '5 1
NTP(EE1[EUE '5 LL
N- 4lTPC- (1 - N- 1I1E '5
- NT L1 11 NE '5
41 [THEE '5
FENE '5
1 4- TkHLfl EN:EuE E
4 EEEI[ItJE :s
45 1 L- [lPHEN LH 'PflUE 5 EL
N- IJ1 T F J{LI 1 1ET H L1 N NE 5 EtWi1.

T.R. Edgerton, Inc.
CHA
N OF CUSTODY
d by: !s�"p•�ew�rl
y : l Sign. rvre)
ATION LOCATION
Time Received by: tSipnjwr.1
©•l1 bvlsont Qripnsl Accump*nief $hp
NO.
OF
�CON
TA4NEAS
ived 10, Liboritory by:
Copy ,o Coord+n�lgr fr.rd FiI.{
R
Relinquished by: ISdynarur.l
ECQR
Date / Time
D ze 1 Trrrle
102 F Woodwinds
Industrial Court
Cary, NC 27511
ceived by: fS�sx++rur.

LVAPO?P-FIOt.)
Industrial) & Environmentol Ano!ysts, Inc.
P0, E3ox 12846 • Research Triangle Pork, NC 27709 • 91 946799 19
Date: August 8, 1988
Sheron Mr
T.P. Edgerton Inc.
102 F Woodrri nds Ind. Ct.
Cry, NC 2751
Reference: IEA Report No, 308036
Project LD.: 1079-687-001
Dear MsMayer,
Trntt r.'Uh ere the results ofane1se3 en one semple submitted to our
18'retort' on July 20, 1988.
Please see the enclosed reports for your results_
* Due to matrix interferences the semple exhibited a non -characteristic behavior
(non -blue color) for this procedure.
'‚ The enclosed reu1t3 do not satisfy North Carolina State Laws regarding maximum
bacteriological contamination.
Very truly yours,
INDUSTRIAL & ENVIRONMENT
senior
Offices and labororones ocated in Essex Junction, Vermont
Research Triangle Por1. North Carolina

1 RP-1
2 RP- 2
1 RP-1
2 P.P- 2
1 P.P-1
2 RP-2
1 PP-
2 RP-2
1 PP-1
2 RP 2
1 RP-1
2 PP-2
1 RP-1
2 RP-2
1 RP-1
2 RP-2
1 RP-1
2 RP-2
1 RP-1
2 RP--2
1 RP-1
2 PP-2
1 RP-1
2 RP-2
1 RP-1
2 RP-2
1 RP-1
2 RP-2
1 LA'
Client $a
Amrmnta N
Amrnania-N
8iochemica1 Oxygen Demand
6iochenice1 0xygen Demand
Chloride
Chloride
IlBAS
11BA5
Ni trete-U
Nit rate - N
0il & Grease
011 &. Grease
pH
PB
Residue -Total, rltereble
Residue -Total, filterable
Residue-Total,Non-filterable
Residue-Total,Non-filterable
T-Phosphate as P
T-Phosphate es P
Total Caliform
Total Coliform
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Halide
Total 0rganic Fielide
Total Phenols
Total Phenols
Results
0.96 mg/L
0.48 rxuQ/L
9.0 rnq/L
6.0 mg/L
250 mg/L
250 rnq/L
<0,05 mg/L
0.59 mg/L
0.34 rnq/L
<2.0 mg/L
<2.0 mg/L.
7.6
7.5
590 mg/L
550 mg/L
39 mg/L
31 mg/L
1.7 mg/L
1,6 mg/L
# 16 Co1 / 100m1
Confluent
19 mq/L
21 mg/L
0.62 mg/L
1.4 mq/L
<0.005 mg/L
<0.005 rnq/L
Comments
A nal zed
8/1/88
8/1/88
7/31/88
7/31/68
8/1/88
8/1/88
7/22/88 3EE REP!N
7/22/88
7/22/88
7/22/88
7/22/S8
7/22/88
7/27/88
7/27/88
7/29/88
7/29/88
8/2/86
8/2/88
7/22/88
7/22/88
7/22/88 }}5EE REPORT
7/21/68 *#SEE REPORT
8/1/88
6/1/88
6/3/88
8/3/88
8/1/68
8/1/88

STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Part 1 - INSPECTION OF EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SITE
1. a. Place visited: Roadway Express, Inc.
h. Mailing Address: 5201 Sunset Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28213
2. Date of Investigation:
3. By: Michael L. Parke
4. a. Person contacted: Mrs Charles Hicks
b. Phone No.: [phone]
10/27/82 Date of Report:
10/28/82
5. Directions to site: Travel south from Mooresville approximately 20
miles on 1-77 and take the Sunset Road Exit. Turn left on Sunset
Road. Roadway Express 15 located approximately ¼ mile on the left.
6. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading): Limited area is
available for any expansion or upgrading.
7. Topography: Hilly, 5-12% slopes.
8. Location of nearest dwelling: None within 500 feet of the treatment
facility.
Part 11 - DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING TREATMENT FACILITIES
1. Existing Facilities: The existing treatment facilities consist of a
7,875 gallon septic tank, dosing tank with dual alternating siphons,
a 2,544 square foot surface sand filter bed, dual chlorination
facilities (one chlorinator is in use at all tines and one is used for
stand-by in case of a malfunction), a flow measuring device, a 365,000
gallon holding lagoon, a wash water settling basin and an oil
separator with storage tank.
Part 111 - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. 0 & M Evaluation: The treatment facility at Roadway is designed to
treat the wastewater from two different sources. The domestic waste-
water from Roadway is sent through the septic tank -dosing tank and then
through the sand filter bed. The effluent from the sand filter bed is
first chlorinated and then is discharged to the lagoon where the tine
solids settle out. The effluent from the lagoon is then recycled to be
used in the truck washing operation. The wastewater from the truck
washing operation is sent through a settling basin and an oil/water
separator with an oil storage tank The oil is pumped out and removed
by a local recycling firm. The effluent wastewater from the oil/water
separator is then channeled through the chlorination facilities and is
also discharged to the lagoon.

Page Two
On the day of the site investigation the facilities appeared in
excellent condition. It was apparent that good operation and
maintenance practices had heen utilized at this facility.
3. Recommendations and/or Special Conditions: It is recommended that the
Permit for this facility be renewed for a period of "until rescinded"

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 28, 1990
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
PREPARED BY: Michael L. Parker
SUBJECT:
Carolyn McCaskill
D. Rex Gleason
WQ 0003016
Roadway Express, Inc.
Groundwater Rernediation Facilities
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
This Office has conducted a review of the plans for the
proposed carbon adsorption system to be constructed at the
Roadway Express -Sunset Road Terminal. The addition of the carbon
adsorption system should enhance the wastewater treatment
efficiency of Roadways existing facilities as they begin the
cleanup of on -site contaminated groundwater.
The proposed carbon adsorption facilities appear adequate,
provided they receive a favorable technical review from the ERG.
Pending a favorable review, approval is recommended.
If you have any questions, please advise.
MLP: se

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
December 15, 1989
MEMORANDUM TO: Don Safrit
FROM: D. Rex G1eason7
PREPARED BY: Michael L. Parker
SUBJECT:
Renewal of Permit No. 2743R
Roadway Express, Inc.
Non -Discharge Wastewater Treatment Facility
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Additional information received by this Office has prompted
a resubmittal of the staff recommendations originally submitted
on June 9 1988. The additional information and subsequent staff
visits on October 3 and December 7 by Mr. Ron Phelps and Mr.
Michael L. Parker, respectively, have shown that the facilities
are indeed operating as originally permitted as indicated by the
following comments by Mr. Parker regarding the condition and
operation of the wastewater treatment facility:
The site appeared to be well maintained and in good
operational condition at the time of the site inspection. The
lagoon, although partially covered with duckweed, had
approximately six (6) feet of freeboard and there was no evidence
of an overflow or breech. The sand filter bed was well
maintained and in good operational condition.
Originally this facility was designed to treat the
wastewater from a truck washing operation and approximately 300+
employees. Reductions in force have reduced this number to 80+
employees and Roadway no longer has a. truck washing operation. A
request to allow the introduction of approximately 4320 gpd of
treated groundwater was submitted by Roadway in their last permit
request, and was initially recommended for denial by this Office
in the June 9, 1988 staff report. The original reasons for
denial were: