20090048 Ver 2_Year 1 Monitoring Report_2020_20210219

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20090048 Version*2
.................................................................
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 02/19/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal -2/19/2021
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* d Yes Q No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
l� Stream rJ Wetlands E Buffer ❑ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Harry Tsomides [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:* 20090048 Version:*2
Existing IDV# Existing Version
Project Type: C' DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Little Pine 2
County: Allegheny
Document Information
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Little Pine II_856_MY1_2020.pdf 38.93MB
Rease upload only one R7F of the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Harry Tsomides
Signature:*
' 7-41-4 l c2 td

Annual Monitoring Report
Final
Little Pine Creek II
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
NCDMS Project No. 856
DWR Project No. 20090048 (v.2)
Contract No. LP082819
USACE Action ID: SAW-2009-00591
Alleghany County, North Carolina
Data Collected: April 2020 — October 2020
Date Submitted: February 2021
a.�
Se •
Y4 i � A.1k i 7. '.
p ! m l h
k
ft-
1
' $5,---f47-P1;!,'''''••t
� C K a
w
Prepared for: Avg*
;:.a NCDEQ-Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center - a`
M Raleigh NC 27699-1652 EQUINOX
Mitigation Services
E N Y I R O N MEN TAL O U AL I TY balance through proper plonning

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

ors, EQUINOX
balance through proper planning
February 3, 2021
Danvey Walsh, Project Manager
EW Solutions
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject:Draft MY01 Monitoring Report
Little Pine Creek II Mitigation Project, Alleghany County
DMS Project#856
DEQ Contract#LP082819
Dear Harry,
Equinox has completed the review of the Little Pine Creek II Draft MY01 Monitoring Report comments.
Following are the responses to those comments (in Red)
Report and tables
• Cover page contract#/ID info is not all correct(DWR project number). Please use the correct info
from the approved MYO/Baseline report cover. Updated
• References throughout of the stream to "LPCII Creek" should be changed to "LPC" or "Little Pine
Creek". If referencing the project name, it should be LPC II or Little Pine Creek II. Updated within
text, tables, and graphics.
• Please include the IRT's 4/3/2020 MYO approval email (attached) in the MY1 Appendices for
reference. Please also reference the approval email in the report text. Inserted in Appendix F and
Referenced in the document.
• Please include the responses to the IRT's 4/3/2020 MYO approval comments (attached) in the
MY1 Appendices for reference. Inserted in Appendix F and referenced in the document.
• Please correct the indentation inconsistencies in the project sections and subsections. Reviewed
and edited indentation structure.
• Appendices/tables etc— Except for CCPVs, if possible all pages should all be letter sized; 11x17
tables and figures should be formatted to fit the letter size report. Please tri-fold any 11x17 CCPV
foldout sheets in the final hard copies. Condensed tables and figures to letter size pages where
legibility can be maintained.
• Section 1.4 project components - Credits stated do not reflect approved MYO/Baseline report.
Please correct. Please also take out credits to the appropriate decimal places to match the asset
37 Haywood Street,Suite 100 Asheville NC 28801 828.253.6856 www.equinoxenvironmental.com

Airs, EQUINOX
balance through proper planning
table. Please indicate that the project credits reflect those that were approved as part of the Little
Pine Creek II—Project As-Built Update and Mitigation Plan Addendum(downward adjustment)
and include that memo in an addendum (attached). Eliminate the reference to the as-built survey
as this was handled in the baseline report. Credits and number formatting updated in Table 1 and
text, Credit reference updated and added to Appendix F.
• Table 1 /Assets — Credits listed do not reflect approved MYO/Baseline report. Please correct.
Please also tabulate credits to the appropriate decimal places to match the asset table. Attached
is the current table format needed.This is basically the same as what you all used for the Fletcher
MYO/baseline, with some minor changes. Updated Table 1,
• Table 2 — Annual monitoring report delivery should not be a separate project event. The
monitoring report delivery date (month-year) should be reflective of each year's stream and
vegetation surveys. Updated table accordingly.
• Please indicate that a supplemental warranty-related planting will occur in January 2021 by the
construction contractor.The results of this planting event will be summarized in the MY02 report.
This need not be captured in the events table in this MY1 report, as it was not during calendar
year 2020. Inserted in Section 1.5.1
• Table 4—All project restoration reaches were listed in the PCN and permitted as perennial. Please
change the designation in this table of the tributary C listed as intermittent. Updated.
• Hydrology/ Verification of bankfull events (Table 12) — Crest gage and stage recorder data is
missing, in this table and the graphs. Please provide as contracted (2 crest gages on Tribs A and B,
and 2 stage recorders on LPC and Trib C), and list bankfull event verifications from these devices.
If there was a problem with the equipment it should be explained in the Project Performance
section.Text and graphics updated/added to report and supporting files.
• Bankfull events with no data should not be listed. Events table should appear as the following
example or similar: Updated table
MY of Date of
Reach Occurrence Method
Occurrence {Approximate)
MY1 7/11/2016 Crest Gage
MY2 6/20/2017 Crest Gage/Strea m Gage
9/17/2018
MY3 10/12/2018
10/27/2018 Stream Gage
11/5/2018
MY4 4/5/2019
2/7/2620
UT1 3/25/202D
4/30/202D
5/21/2020
5/28/2020
MY5 8/16/2020 Stream Gage,Photos
8/15/2020
9/25/2020
10/11/2020
11/1/2020
MY1 7/11/2016
10/0/2016 Crest Gage
MY2 6/20/2017
UT2 MY3 11/5/2018 Wrack Lire
MY4 4/5/2619 Bankfull Flaw Photo
3/25/2020 Wrack Line
MY5
11/1/2020 Wrack Line
Section 2.2 (vegetation) indicates "warranty" plots. Please change this to reference "random" plots per
the IRT guidance. Report text changed. Likewise. "temporary" plots should be indicated as"random" plots
in Table 8. Table 8 has been updated accordingly. Random plots should be shown as polygons
appropriately shaped/sized on the CCPVs. Random plots and CVS plots should be combined into the
37 Haywood Street,Suite 100 Asheville NC 28801 828.253.6856 www.equinoxenvironmental.com

EQUINOX
balance through proper planning
sitewide average as follows; random plots should be speciated; random plots should be incorporated into
Table 9 as the example that follows:
Iable 9,Stem Connt Total curl Platted br Plot Species
Catbird Current Plot Data(MY12020) Random Plot Data Annual Means
100022-01-0001 100022-01-0002 100022-01-0003 100022-01-0004 0591 MYI(2020) MYD(2020)
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acernegundo baxelder Tree 5 5
Betule nigra aver birch Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 7 7 7 8 8 8 19 19 19 17 17 17
Celt,laevigata sugarberry Tree 1 1 1
Cereiseanadensl s eastern re dbud Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4
Corm,amamum silky dogwood Shrub 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4
D ospyrosvirginiana common pc rsimmon Tree 12 12 12 1 1 1 13 13 13 15 15 15
Fraxln us pennsylvanica green ash Tree 10 10 10 2 2 2 5 5 5 17 17 17 18 18 18
Juglans nigra black walnut Tree 4 4 4
Li riodendron tulipiiera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 8 8
Mal us anguntifolia southern crabapple Tree 3 3 3
Platanusoccidentalis American sycamore Tree 3 3 3 5 5 5 1 1 1 4 4 4 13 13 13 8 8 8
Quercus oak Tree 31 31 31
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 2 2 5 5 5 1 1 1 8 8 8 5 5 5
Quercus phellos willow oak True 6 6 6 1 1 1 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 18 16 13 9 9 9
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 7 7 7
Salix mgr.] black wil low Tree 6 6
Stem count 22 22 27 15 15 15 25 25 31 23 23 23 13 13 13 97 97 109 163 163 163
size tares) 1 1 1 1 1 5 5
size(ACRES) D.02 D.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.12 D.10
Species count 5 5 6 7 7 7 6 6 7 7 7 7 4 4 4 10 1D 12 14 14 14
Stems perACRE 890 890 1093 607 607 607 1012 1012 1255 931 931 931 526 526 526 785 785 882 1649 1649 1649
Species information was not collected for RVP in MY1, but will be included in subsequent
monitoring events and displayed accordingly in future monitoring reports.
• Per IRT guidance, plot vegetation data collected must include:
1. Within each fixed plot: species, height, grid location, planted versus volunteer, and
age (based on the year the stem was planted, or first observed for volunteers)
2. Within each random plot: species and height
Due to a misunderstanding regarding the data collection parameters for random
vegetation plots (RVP), species and height information were not recorded during
MY1 RVP monitoring. Species and height parameters will be recorded during RVP
monitoring for the remainder of the monitoring years. The report text has been
updated accordingly.
3. For both fixed and random plots, all woody stems, including exotic and invasive
species, should be counted (exotic/invasive species will not count toward success of
performance standards).
• Please add all common names to CVS table; please only use one common name per species (see
MVO report). Table updated to include common names.
CCPVs
• If possible, please refine invasives polygons to better reflect field conditions; the larger areas
shown on the map are not reflective of the scattered invasive occurrences on the ground. Adjust
Table 6 accordingly. Current polygons were reflective of invasive presence on the ground in
addition to vines within the woodline. Report text and the CCPV updated to better describe the
density and composition of invasive vegetation.
• Failing vegetation plots should be colored orange or red and captured in the legend. Failing
vegetation plots are colored red.
• Reach break between LPC 2A and 2B should be shown on the CCPVs. Reach break inserted.
• Continuous stage recorders and crest gages are missing from the CCPVs and legend. Please add.
Continuous stage recorders and crest gauges added to CCPVs.
• Please change the color of the OHW to gray/neutral color so as not to conflict with the cross
sections. OHW line color changed to gray.
37 Haywood Street,Suite 100 Asheville NC 28801 828.253.6856 www.equinoxenvironmental.com

ors, EQUINOX
balance through proper planning
DIGITAL SUPPORT FILES
From MYO to MY1 the length of Reach 2A increased by 30 feet, but it is unclear why. Please explain, and
either provide an updated feature or fix the asset table. An incorrectly segmented line was submitted for
the draft report. An updated feature has been provided which matches the asset table.
Please include the temporary veg plot features as polygons rather than points. Temporary random
vegetation plots added as polygons.
• Please include features illustrating the undercut and habitat segments that were outlined in Table
5 in the CCPV and submit these features. Observations from LPC Reach 1 were reviewed and
deemed insignificant for mapping at this time. Table 5 updated and the text was expanded to
better describe the current conditions and concerns.
• DMS has 13 photo point features, but the photos submitted indicate that there are 14 photo
points. Please include a feature for photo point 14 and resubmit. Feature included for photo point
14.
• The report suggests that the 2 crest gauges and continuous stage recorders displayed in the MYO
CCPV are still on site, but they are not represented spatially in the MY1 CCPV, and the data for the
continuous stage recorders were not included in the report. Please either include these data, or
explain why these gauges were removed. Continuous stage recorder and crest gauge geospatial
and hydrologic data has been added to geodatabase and report.
Sincerely,
aL(
Danvey Walsh
Equinox Monitoring Manager
37 Haywood Street,Suite 100 Asheville NC 28801 828.253.6856 www.equinoxenvironmental.com

Prepared by:
#1°P1Pri411'
EQUINOX
balance through proper planning
37 Haywood Street,Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28801

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary 1
1.1. Project Setting and Background 1
1.2. Goals and Objectives 1
1.3. Restoration Type and Approach 1
1.4. Project Components and Success Criteria 2
1.5. Project Performance 2
1.5.1 Vegetation 2
1.5.2 Geomorphology 2
1.5.3 Hydrology 3
2.0 Methods 3
2.1 Geomorphology 3
2.2 Vegetation 4
2.3 Hydrology 4
3.0 REFERENCES 4
Appendix A Background Tables
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Appendix D Stream Geomorphology Data
Appendix E Hydrologic Data
Appendix F Other

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
1.1. Project Setting and Background
The Site is located in eastern Alleghany County, NC, approximately eight miles east of the Town of
Sparta, NC and approximately four miles south of the Virginia border. The Site is within the New River
Basin; 14-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 05050001030030 and located in the Blue Ridge Belt of the
Blue Ridge Province (USGS, 1998), (Figure 1).
The Site is located within a TLW in the New River RBRP plan (NCDENR,2009), and is identified in the
Little River and Brush Creek LWP Project Atlas (NCDENR,2007). Numerous stressors were identified
including heavily grazed buffers, livestock access to streams,eroded stream banks, land-disturbing
activities on steep slopes,and storm water runoff. The LWP Project Atlas identified the Little Pine
Creek II Stream and Wetland Restoration Project(LPC1-04, LPC1-W10) as a stream and wetland
restoration opportunity with the potential to improve water quality, habitat, and hydrology within the
Brush Creek watershed.Tables 1-4 in Appendix A present the project details.
1.2. Goals and Objectives
The following goals are outlined in the Final Mitigation Plan, and include:
• Restore riparian buffers
• Exclude cattle
• Stabilize eroding banks
• Construct stream channels that are laterally and vertically stable
• Improve stream habitat
• Improve channel and floodplain connectivity
• Permanently protect the project site from harmful uses
The following project objectives are proposed for accomplishing the goals as outlined in the Final
Mitigation Plan:
• Plant native tree and understory species in the riparian zone.
• Install fencing along the conservation easement and cattle pasture boundaries
• Reconstruct stream channels with stable dimensions, add bank revetments and in-stream
structures to protect restored/enhanced streams.
• Construct stream channels that will maintain a stable pattern and profile considering the
hydrologic and sediment inputs to the system, landscape setting and the watershed
condition.
• Install habitat features such as constructed riffles and brush toed into restored/enhanced
streams,add woody materials to channel bed, and construct pools of varying depth.
• Reconstruct stream channels with bankfull at or near the floodplain elevation and bank
height ratios ranging from 1.0- 1.1.
• Establish a conservation easement on the site.
1.3. Restoration Type and Approach
The project includes six restoration reaches;three Priority 1(P1) reaches on Little Pine Creek,one
Priority 2(P2) reach on Tributary A,one P1 reach on Tributary B,and one P1 reach on Tributary C. The
preservation portion of the Site includes Tributaries D, E,and F.The wetland portion of the LPC II Site
Little Pine Creek II MY1 Monitoring Document
NC DMS Project No 856 1 Equinox
Monitoring Year 1 2020

includes three wetland zones.Wetland 1 is a riparian, non-riverine wetland enhancement zone.
Wetland 2A is a riparian, non-riverine wetland enhancement zone.Wetland 2B is preservation only.
1.4. Project Components and Success Criteria
The LPC II Site is expected to provide 3,195 SMUs and 1.484 WMUs.The components and mitigation
credits Project credits reflect those approved as part of the March 13,2020 Little Pine Creek II-Project
As-Built Update and Mitigation Plan Addendum (downward adjustment),Appendix F. Refer to the
Project Assets Map (Figure 2)for the stream and wetland features and Table 1 and 4 for the project
components, assets, and mitigation credit information for the LPC II Site (Appendix A).
The initial credit release for LPC II was received on April 3,2020. A copy of the Notice of Initial
Credit Release and the responses to the IRT Review of the Little Pine Creek II Initial Credit Release can
be found in Appendix F.
1.5. Project Performance
1.5.1 Vegetation
Visual assessment of vegetation indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is well established
throughout the project. MY1 annual mean for planted stems was 331 stems/acre and ranged from 121
to 607 planted stems per acre. Eight species were documented within the vegetation monitoring
plots.
Monitoring of both permanent(n=8) and random vegetation plots (n=6) was completed in
October 2020. Summary tables and photographs associated with MY1 vegetation monitoring are
located in Appendix B and Appendix C. MY1 monitoring data indicates that all but one permanent
vegetation plot was failing to meet the MY3 interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre
(Table 7 and 8,Appendix C.)
Vegetation problem areas appear to be restricted to the immediate floodplain of Little Pine Creek
where areas of scour and deposition have had the greatest impact on stem density. Some of the low
stem density areas noted in MY0 are still present, particularly those within the channel belt width on
Reach 2A(Table 6 and CCPC,Appendix B). A supplemental warranty-related planting is scheduled for
January 2021.
Areas of exotic vegetation are depicted within the CCPV. Multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora),Oriental
bittersweet(Celastrus orbiculatus) and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) were the dominant
observed species. Invasive vegetation was identified in low density throughout LPC Reach 2A. In the
most contiguous area of invasives noted within the CCPV, a more significant density of oriental
bittersweet was identified along the forested edge and within the canopy. While the size of the
polygon is significant,the overall density of invasive vegetation is low.The location and density of
invasive vegetation will continue to be monitored in future site visits.
1.5.2 Geomorphology
Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability,such as
eroding banks,structural instability,or excessive sedimentation. Reaches 1 and 2 both experienced
some impacts due to a high flow events in April and May of 2020. The first area on LPC II Reach 1 is
located on the left descending bank of Cross-section 1. In this area,overbank flows have eroded a
portion of the left descending floodplain and is depicted within the cross-section and photos. The
Little Pine Creek II MY1 Monitoring Document
NC DMS Project No 856 2 Equinox
Monitoring Year 1 2020

second area in Reach 1 is located near STA 101+50. In this area a transverse riffle has formed and is
currently directing stream flow towards the left descending bank. This area is not currently
considered a problem area but will be monitored for any changes in stability. Two areas of concern
were noted on LPC II Reach 2. The first is located between Cross-sections 3 and 5. This area has
received a significant level of overbank deposition and debris wracking along the easement boundary.
The second area of concern is a line of scour located mid-reach at STA 112+00. This area is located
along the midline of the right descending bank floodplain and drains to a vernal pool. High flows and
increased velocity coming out of the straight portion of Little Pine Creek exiting the NCDOT bridge
right-of-way have scoured out this area for approximately 20 feet. These areas were not identified as
stream problem areas as they have stabilized over the course of MY1. Low stem density was identified
as the only residual effect, (Table 6 and CCPV,Appendix B). These areas will continue to be monitored
in future site visits for further signs of instability.
Geomorphic data for MY1 was collected during October 2020. Summary tables and cross-section
data plots related to stream morphology are located in Appendix D. Cross-sectional dimensions
remained relatively stable between baseline conditions and MY1 monitoring efforts. The most
substantial changes took place at cross-sections 1,2,3,and 4. Cross-section 1 had the bankfull width
increase by 7.3 feet and the width/depth ratio decreased by 10.1. Additionally, a significant change in
the flood-prone area was noted with both,scour and deposition visible in MY1. Cross-section 2, has
shown a significant change in dimension between MYO and MY1. Bankfull max depth decreased by 1.1
feet and significant over-bank deposits were observed. Cross-sections 3 and 4 had a less drastic
change in dimension,showing distinct over-bank deposits (Appendix D,Cross-Section overlays and
Table h a). Riffle dimensions for Reach 2 remained relatively similar between baseline conditions
and MY1 monitoring. Similarly to Reach 1, new overbank deposits are evident from the cross-
sectional surveys (Appendix D,Table 11b). No areas of instability were noted. The site will continue
to be monitored for signs of instability.
Additionally,the condition of the water-gate at the beginning of Reach 2A was documented and a
photo is included below. No areas of encroachment or fence failure were observed during the
assessment, although a significant amount of flood debris has accumulated on the fence line at the
start of LPC II Reach 2. The next site visit is planned for spring 2021.
1.5.3 Hydrology
Since project completion in late 2019, a minimum of five bankfull events have been documented
at the LPC II Site. Based on precipitation and stage recorder data the events were recorded over
6 days; January 12,January 24th, February 7,April 13,April 29,July 19, and May 21,2020 (Table 12,
Appendix E). Five events were recorded on Little Pine Creek, and three events were recorded at the
Tributary C, and one at Tributary B. No bankfull events were recorded on Trib A during MY1. Data
indicated that the May 21,2020 storm event buried the continuous stage recorder located on Little
Pine Creek. This recorder was subsequently recovered,downloaded, and reset during the MY1
geomorphology monitoring.
2.0 METHODS
2.1 Geomorphology
Geomorphic measurements were taken during low flow conditions using a Nikon NPR 332 Total
Station. Three-dimensional coordinates associated with cross-section data were collected in the field
Little Pine Creek II MY1 Monitoring Document
NC DMS Project No 856 3 Equinox
Monitoring Year 1 2020

and geo-referenced (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data were collected at 13
cross-sections. Survey data was imported into CAD,ArcGIS,and Microsoft Excel for data processing
and analysis. Channel substrate was characterized using a Wolman Pebble Count as outlined in
Harrelson et al(1994) and processed using Microsoft Excel.
2.2 Vegetation
Vegetation success in MY1 is being monitored at 8 permanent monitoring plots in conjunction
with random vegetation plots. Permanent vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2
Protocol for Recording Vegetation,version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species
composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the
field,the four corners of each permanent plot were permanently marked with metal t-posts and PVC
pipe. Photos of each plot were taken from the plot origin each monitoring year. In MY1, random
vegetation plot monitoring was conducted erroneously using the warranty vegetation plot protocol of
total planted stems per plot. In future monitoring years random vegetation plots will be monitored as
per Section V of the Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update
(USACE 2016). Data is processed analogous to the CVS data entry tool. In the field,the four corners of
each plot were temporarily marked.
2.3 Hydrology
Two crest gages,two continuous stage recorders,two groundwater gages, and a rain gage were
utilized to monitor, meteorological,surface, and groundwater within the site. Additionally,visual
observations of bankfull event indicators will be documented throughout the project. Data will be
recorded and reported through subsequent monitoring reports.
3.0 REFERENCES
Harrelson,Cheryl C., Rawlins,C. L., Potyondy,John, P., (1994) Stream Channel Reference Sites:An
illustrated guide to field technique.
Lee, Michael T., R.K. Peet,S.D. Roberts, and T.R.Wentworth.2008.CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation,Version 4.2 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm)
NCDENR.2009. New River Basin Restoration Priorities. Retrieved from
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-services/dms-planning/watershed-planning-
documents/new-river-basin
NCDENR.2007. Little River&Brush Creek Local Watershed Plan (LWP) Project Atlas. Retrieved from
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-services/dms-planning/watershed-planning-
documents/new-river-basin
Turner Land Surveying.2019.As-Built Survey of Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Restoration
Project. Prepared for North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation
Services.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),2003.Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR-
DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
Little Pine Creek II MY1 Monitoring Document
NC DMS Project No 856 4 Equinox
Monitoring Year 1 2020

United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update (October 24,2016). USACE, NCDENR- DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
Wild lands Engineering.2019. Restoration Plan Addendum - Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project
Prepared for North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation Services.
DMS Project No.856.
Little Pine Creek II MY1 Monitoring Document
NC DMS Project No 856 5 Equinox
Monitoring Year 1 2020

.... .. . _. ..
.1. ..mma .
••.".• . ... •
4- ap-"•IF . • .. . . , . . . rir• . V7- _
lb„ 9..*.,to - •. • . . • - • •94.5.- • , --,:i. -:.' ' 11•., .
. ,
•'.• ,r. '-r- •!, -• 1..)• _ . .• • 4 .." ., 15... i•4
4 -
•- - -...7%. • . : . •
.
..x....
_.•
qr-r-r•-•':-.11 .1; r...`••• I - II • ,•.1.
• •.
.- -•'.• •
li .&
III,ZP
. •r 'I; -..-. .r . t A
• y _ 4 •
- ' -•.
14.•.• :'-•• 1 . : -
... k:'.
.-.1...j. r'44"111 .....• i....
• .1.ar. -.0
#4.-....• .,..'r , . . •1
ti •-. 1111L' f
fl
_r_..,... • i Par.-1.t .. .1 . . ..
I• • .
Pr .d• e I., II.
1 ilttiV
•
• .
• ,I •I . 'I :
. •.
..• li '' z. • 4.11-. ' '...2q,..
" . .
igo:. ,'- .... .sic t.
Id i• - le
, :NI4er . 7...-_ *14% .• arc
IA-
. ••-. ..; k'• V .
4 -tillig.6...4111 • _.• .....
*.; (
•11
r
• ':'•NC''. •- -0
• 1.% 1
IL
... , •:.:•;17...- • _ . ...-,'.• . ._• ••. V
-If .1•—• ••Or-... --141:111;)r....4P'7:i'i Ver'- : •- • ' I• .
1.1.r......41:..• 45. -:
.40t • 411; • ' • I • •.- •,Ili
--• ...re ii, .5... - .. . • !il % ..'. ; 'r 4 ii 1 6 . .: A . 1 y 1:4./.114;51 .. •
. 41;1•14. IA..t7 I:r • . . •• I.. ..
. •... ,...r. .
. ii . *lit .• • 04
it. 7,
-, .2.jak..Er)..-• .1*••r-..: .. '
% - '• 4if-",- ..-" " • ..
•..
" ':*1. ..e. - ..C.V. •
• ,
!iii. . • • ., _..- .1.
..... - ,
. . . .. • . •
* .. 11051141P -` .` ' '' • f — -- . _- LA •01 1.r.eh .,..; -4... .-
.• . .
...
..,..,_
. • -. .. .
-... . ...4,.. -
- •..... • .----.
•Ni .: ..... i..' , ..
..I.
:dll ' C. .. ,
I \ ... .
• •
• . . . •" ..- . .
W •I' 11 • ...?::: .-•-r, -
: - . ,
' .
• • 1 4
. .
. • SPKIA . '..1 . c...': _ „ .
..
•'...
• ... -1-.0, • . . _ . .
_ .
...4,1 .I.
•• r. Y- - ..1.11,0
.
.. .
... .
. /
.. .Y5 E-r•nSI.re Me p(land I oar&• . . ., • --. X*Ii.glbt4dT.11.9;_e7.4.714 ar-e-k'... vr• C17- •-r.-: ilt .••• •'• " . ••• ari,illeior
. .-
N
A Figure 1.Vicinity Map
Littie Pine Creek li Conservuti Easemml cn
Ai legiva ny County NC 0 U5 1.250 2 500
:.hilgyir.me,R-r higro Feet
....0•4.1...11.11..I MI •I

Appendix A
Background Tables

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Table 1.Project Mitigation Assets and Components
Little Pine Creek 11 Stream and W etland Mitigation Site/Project No.856
As-Built
Mitigation Centerline
Plan Footage Footage or Mitigation Restoration Mitigation Mitigation
Project Segment or Acreage* Acreage" Category Level Ratio(X:1) Plan Credits* Comments
I
Reach 1 530 517 Cold R 1:1 517.000 length
0'LF Not-credited due to OHW ROW,minor change in as-built
1,512 1,476 Cold R 1:1 1,476.000 Began farther downstream due to cattle crossing;30'LF Not-
Reach 2A credited due to OHW ROW
Reach 2B 321 334 Cold R 1:1 334.000 Additional 13'LF at end of project
Tributary A 86 82 Cold R 1:1 82.000 Sinuosity less than design;confluence with Reach 2A farther
upstream than proposed
Tributary B 104 78 Cold R 1:1 78.000 Confluence with Reach 2A farther upstream than proposed
Tributary C 578 577 Cold R 1:1 577.000
Tributary D 655 655 Cold P 5:1 131.000
Tributary E 50 50 Cold P 5:1 10.000 Not-credited due to poor as-built condition
Tibutary F 153 153 Cold P 5:1 30.600 Not-credited due to poor as-built condition
Wetland 1 0.32 0.322 R E 2:1 0.161
Wetland 2A 0.88 0.878 R E 2:1 0.439
Wetland 2B 4.42 4.420 R P 5:1 0.884
*Mitigation plan footage accounts for breaks in conservation easements and are based on design stream stationing and taken from the approved mitigation plan.
^Based on centerline calculations from the as-built survey,accounts for breaks in conservation easement and utility right-of-ways.
Project Credits
Stream Riparian Wetland Non-Rip Coastal
Restoration Level Warm Cool Cold Riverine Non-Riv Wetland Marsh
Restoration - - 3.064 - - - -
Re-establishment - - - -
Rehabilitation - - - -
Enhancement - 0.600 - -
Enhancement I - - -
Enhancement II - - -
Creation - - - -
Preservation - - 131 - 0.884 -
Total Credits% - - 3,195 - 1.484 - -
%Project credits reflect the sum of credits consistent with as-built condition.
Total Stream Credit 3,195.000
Total Wetland Credit 1.484
Wetland Mitigation Category Restoration Level
CM Coastal Marsh HQP High Quality Preservation
R Riparian P Preservation
NR Non-Riparian E Wetland Enhancement-Veg and Hydro
EII Stream Enhancement II
El Stream Enhancement I
C Wetland Creation
RH Wetland Rehabilitation-Veg and Hydro
REE Wetland Re-establishment Veg and Hydro
R Restoration

Table 2.Project Activity and Reporting History
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/Project No.856
Data Collection Completion or
Activity or Report Complete Delivery
Project Institution Date(Contract Date) - Dec-2007
Restoration Plan - Jan-2016
Construction(substantial construction complete 05/21/19) - May-2019
Planting - Apr-2019
As-built MYO Stream Survey Jan-2020 Mar-2020
Vegetation Survey Nov-2019 Mar-2020
Stream Survey Oct-20 Dec-20
Monitoring Year-1
Vegetation Survey Oct-20 Dec-20
Table 3.Project Contacts Table
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/Project No.856
Wildland Engineering,Inc/1430 South Mint St#104
Designer
Charlotte NC 282013
Primary project design POC Jeff Keaton/919.851.9986
Construction Contractor Wright Contracting/453 Silk Hope Liberty Rd Siler City,NC 27344
Construction contractor POC Ross Kennedy/336.736.4585
Survey Contractor Turner Surveying/P.O.Box 148 Swannanoa,NC 28778
Survey contractor POC David Turner/919.827.0745
Planting Contractor Carolina Silvics 908 Indian Trail Rd,Edenton,NC 27932
Planting contractor POC Mary Margaret McKinney 252.482.8491
Seeding Contractor Wright Contracting/453 Silk Hope Liberty Rd Siler City,NC 27344
Contractor point of contact Ross Kennedy/336.736.4585
Seed Mix Sources Green Resource,LLC
Nursery Stock Suppliers Mellow Marsh Farm
Mo nito ring Performers Equinox/37 Haywood St Suite 100 Asheville NC 28801
Stream Monitoring POC Danvey Walsh/828253.6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC Owen Carson/828.253.6856
Wetland Monitoring POC Danvey Walsh/828.506.6856

I Table 4.Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Project Information
Project Name Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
County Alleghany
Project Area(acres) 14.61
Project Coordinates(latitude and longitude) 36.5069°N,-80.9878°W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Blue Ridge
River Basin New River
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digitI 5050001 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit I 5050001030030
DWR Sub-basin 05-07-03
Project Drainage Area(acres) 3.34
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area <1%
CCHA Land Use Classification Pasture/Hay
Reach Summary Information
Little Pine Creek Little Pine Creek Little Pine Creek
Parameters Reach 1 2A 2B Tit butary A Tributary B Tributary C' Tributary D Tributary E Tributary F
Length of Reach(linear feet)^ 533 1,506 334 82 77 577 899 50 153
Valley Confinement(Rosgen) VI VI VI VI VI VI VI VI VI
Drainage area(miles') 2.93 3.31 3.34 0.39 0.26 0.11 0.13 0.04 0.05
Perrenial,Intermittent,Ephemeral Perrenial Perrenial Perrenial Perrenial Perrenial Perrenial Perrenial Perrenial Perrenial
NCDWR Water Quality Classification C C C C C C C C C
Stream Classification(existing) C C C C C G C C C
Stream Classification(proposed) C C C C C C C C C
FEMA classification - - - - - - - - -
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters Wetland 1 Wetland 2A Wetland 2B
Size of Wetland(acres) 0.32 0.88 4.42
Wetland Type(non-riparian,riparian riverine or riparian non-
Riparian Riparian Riparian
riverine)
Mapped Soil Series Alluvial land,wet(nikwasi) Alluvial land,wet(nikwasi) Alluvial land,wet(nikwasi)
Drainage class Very Poorly Very Poorly Very Poorly
Soil Hydric Status Hydric Hydric Hydric
Source of Hydrology Spring Spring Spring
Agriculture/Livestock
Hydrologic Impairment Cnazin Agriculture/Livestock(lazing Agriculture/Livestock(lazing
g
Native vegetation community Mountain Bottomland Forest Mountain Bottomland Forest Mountain Bottomland Forest
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation 0% 0% 0%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation aPPe,r Resolved? Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States—Section 404 Yes Yes Jurisdictional Determination
Waters of the United States—Section 401 Yes Yes Jurisdictional Determination
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes ERTR
Historic Preservation Act No N/A ERTR
Coastal Zone Management Act(CZMA)/Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA) No N/A N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance Yes Yes Yes
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A
^Based on actual thalweg calculations from the as-built survey,accounts for breaks in conservation easement and utility right-of--nays.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

'3 'F
a®.
.-�.^ .-� �.: •w: n.'. 'is
•
' 4 P
4.
ri
F.
r..
�
?: y._ N „•.•.::. sue.
" J...•
n yip:y. • '�•
� ,or. .... ..t..,-"...",,..
x:'.'. w_ a.
•
.
0110.,
,s,
v.
4.40* _ _,-
..- a .. ... .< • ..
� •� � , .�2 � � an
♦
•
I. 'r.- • -
•
:.,..-...:
r
h•
C�
i'
do A • J_ -
# - - ....4.....
5
` :
•
a
_ •� �� ••fir'
{
..x
-
3' -CY
b .•u •'.s - _..- -
h
lii3
F_
a- • J x
'•--11.:-...';Ap...".44,.':-. . . , .'r,...- , .- ;-,,-- 4,,-,:
imp
a
., x h �YS6 Q- 1 rr a :: �y, -Y. ^.L
•
TribD � .
4,
nm
,- gym, ... �..•� ,.. . . .� • .. - ..:.
r �,' :.:�.... .... , -. Wetland 2A
y ..
t • /F /
G
/
•% /
/./i -/,` r
•
,..k.lifti •- . - • / I . //
F• I• I /F /49 / :' JE
.- ' ' • '' 'rss'a. -,r- /. ;.�•;I/ // %.. :•ram .
' ,: Win.
•
10
r
?a t.:
.i
•
'�•a, ter at'• �s. �-��".
•w, x �S4.
V
ar
.krl ehP � y;.s
.r•
•
� �Y. ► • .
•-4.-1•L't•- • .4h.-105e . -'.-;..'. v..1..„. ii•,,1(0,0- ..,-Ir rt.-. A •--
5„..,,.,..., , .. ..
:.=. ... .. . ...,. ...
ek*.to iv . k'r- .,- .-':'''. - .;--.:.-:.:v!%15..,-.-'.- 'ilLip,,.-1°-'.j--.. "' ''', - - .,.7.V.,7Z,,,,./Z'elNiir4•I,;;;..i-nlv.p..pg.r.-.. ,5,'A ebw,vi
3k. �yr�� >�'
• Yr_ •. . .„.... o-.<
,,.
':Rr'u aC'A� F. k '1'` .d iN' .,. ,J . ._. ,:.,.....,...1. .f .x
w SFr i 'l iw 3
� �:id`.
- � ti
4 '� y •t,
•.a1%4 �s- r u.r.� ;o�-
a . - .. r :..77 k � .�f,.. .. .. � . �>aa � -. � ' a-' C R. lam:��..
t
,..
AmluYag
i• .. �. 4 �. � H � � Y -n. - - 1.
. .. . .1' ..gyp
�- � .$ • ..� �.• 14 -. -" i '. �' ^tea• �'
a
,�p. 411k, t p
a .
... ._ .:.:
4 •• �1J•� N r si Y , • 1j is
w to
,
m ->. �' .a :e. - � �..,.�. .:e. ,. -G�ff�P���Gil hic In"formation Fs
Integrated CCPV Conservation Easement Streams Wetlands N
;... MY1 Non Credit ,fir.:: ' Jrr•: Enhancement
•
`. '' Little Pine Creek IINM
ReachBreak
Allegheny County, NC OHW Preservation Preservation
Restoration Vernal Pool
Mitigation Services Overview I I Utility Easement 0 125 250 500
ENVIRONMENTALQUALITY -- Feet

!it 4, • '
1 ryI. :
.•s �. ;;zc . a_ . •
• '
`�' ' • • ;
1f'
4. ~ .4 •-.�. i� is ; w _ i .
•
.1144 • ` 4 Y fe ,�. 'z=�. .. •y L� ,,tee :.`
':
■•-• 5., ,- . • -.- ' 1 0 .0+50 . . • \ .- ...• .•,...•• ,,.•••...,•.••••,•• -
l .f. .. �� RVP3 ;ra7..-'11)".1111-
_ .�1
,,, . . ..... „
..
t.
.; , , ., ..„.... , .. .:.
. pis
Reach2A ■ I ... •. . i.
,s". ' ;y�. , ': s. 1+ t. ■
i-;' ter "`', Qed :. •
+ PP4 •7 eh ,
';, `� _ •, , c - i-,1-. RVP1 •
" J - ' Y"
eV...14
r.. - . 4,i T.-, L .iill -:.
• ?ke.440.,p\' „it. ',L.:: 114 .
It ?}r, !.•' RMrrrArl ism■-or {' � , -
' =,' i- • Wetland 1
:pit v • • r 1 . 1.
tgg
e -
•
`" �^
j.
'•
' f f • •_*' fir•
•
,../..- 1 .
,, ..
•
• /
I.
.. , r MCgC PitoPa°°m O6 ItihIffut1111411AGii-ice
Integrated CCPV
MY 1 Conservation Easement A Photopoints Permanent Vegetation Plot Streams Invasive Problem Areas Wetlands
' '� OHW O Crest Gauge Failing>10% Non-Credit Present �i_' _'a"'•"•.' Enhancement
Little Pine Creek II ''' -'
Alleghany County, NC _JUtility 0 gauge Meeting>10% Restoration Low Stem Density Areas EasementWetland au a ����
Sheet 2 of 4 Random Vegetation Plot 0 20 40 $ Feet
Mitigation Services Cross Sections
ENVIRONMENTALQUALITY Meeting>10%

._,..........• •----^:=.—., 7 ;• ,;‘,41-t:•_., - . . .,
. . .., . ..
.. -. L.: *1), .[.
•-• ,3 . . . ..,
• . • . ,_•,.•..,v,• ••.w. ...
1 ..„ .. _ -• _ ,._, • xsi;,\4.1410-
, • , , . ,
o
r10
am.-:iYi� .. , . - • _ �C - Gam_-•, • '' ^'?.
• Pf. 1 ..
lr
,
fig•— .. PP10 • • .
r.
_.—. .: .—.—._.—. ,
_
•
.
err a r� _ • r
_ _ lily t •• ;" i r'.•. s"of.-'}:•, .',�: I e oh..
. ..
_:—r_�r'`'..YQ� rs� �. ,• � '?'' - �.Ar _ - ' I�. I �'
; „.1 .c 7
` • y + f }
.5. •' ... .. .-,..... .....m10550. . 17'. • i #‘r"' /041::: '- , . ., . ..: .1..::-,--.'j:'''.-...'‘..''... 4 ...
At
y . .�*�•- RVPS.. gip. lam/ P y '� F �%U it ;
2. ... :.� _y jai* ► • PP14 _ ,
•
l..v", _ ',r. •t y>il"jii �-u.y�`�► `<s4a�f�rMa• •- '1 .. _ •
• s rr■ �., .l t •
=w.r� , _ '1c -ooaaaaMart•
.. _ 220110▪.6 �ti _
,..al-
, . . �.. : + ,; y'�y�,�a, }?; u;�r▪rrMariaa+._ ? y,
p.. . : y�y�+-�:--_: -�aMrrrarass1 {
�Trib +rrraar**► Irl i I' i
' • r -•--, ti+.�,D 1 rLJ-a"•�uiissir*. i
CL}- semis.. ,+ 'i.
1i , _�.► ____.rr".tea„ j,„„„,•� P _ _ s
i�sli� sssfrM�• 71
■r. t L.
t.
in.
. . .: ' -�w
� �-i • i t L71 ' .wri i' 'CO�O PP13'
•
' • J
: z,-
e
,..,
..4ti. ....10.4)L
,'r -- r i 4} �
dir
� rn.
...1_174___.1...i .
'! "` $�} r 11
` . � I
. ..
jpr` i ',S.':� � � — •
b.
-! • F , y ,
•
i - •
tir /'';ij y: "/fi,.Y s J _
'r-
•
•'41
'
i i. ; _ .}. • a _` :f !:
_ •,
, iy
'.10kii 1•00 ! t. .. . -- - •
,•'''''''''b ' i
•
•
•
r•
4nI
•y , r -�� , . .^'" � � y { _`ltr1. . r .'~ jr � . ..�;r � y * � _arm + :i.r ' ,� i .k _4 �e• ��•
IN tr. 11*444 .*: •
--''. Yif • - 1 ' ''t 4- A. . • • 4,:e -.- -f . -.— ., 4. % . ta •,.. ,se•m., - • "
• .k , ,, - 4 -
,. .of . t ...0. _ , .ti,.. , . I._ ... .,. - '- NE
tics ., -.
. • r •* ' {' t.: : NC Cnt-P f fr Cf Vo mfrub U illoya ltliIM A G l •.
•
•
Integrated CCPV Conservation Easement A Photopoints Permanent Vegetation Plot Streams Invasive Problem Areas Wetlands
MY1 Reach Break O Crest Gauge Failing>10% Non-Credit Present •.•,i Enhancement
' Little Pine Creek II >10% Preservation Low StemDensit Meetin Preservation1
OHW • Stream Gauge g y Areas �/
Alleghany County, NC --I Utility Easement 0 Wetland gauge Random Vegetation Plot Restoration ■ Vernal Pool
Sheet 3 of 4 L—J I + g 0 40 so 160
MitigationEIVICeS Meetin >10%
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY • Rain Gauge Cross Sections Feet

_ ty .4„- 'c ',•. •-• .. ,
r� 7 e �.
•
.. 1�. ... 1 4:- r -- f.r�yorr _ s 5,'• v. ` fir.. ,-• �1 • rr.
••"T - .; ..:• � L ', :T' r' r. fry .i 1 • Y:,),'P' r •
.likr i'' fTY a4 �I • ,'.Ld yrr- +R: • -• IL�r' 7�j. `fir . +'• '/, 4.,
, . . .,. ,
.. . .
, ... ... . . .
. . .... .. .
. •• • . .. _ ......
„. ... .. : _
, .48 .
. ,
. ,... .:.•..
% • • •,,,., •,, ,. , . . .
1.
:• , . ' Ati .
. ...
• . -..:, •-. . •s•
� 'OA l e��f I a �'�r + wJ • r .. r� . ! -
e.
.". . _ ,L` 3 '' ,•- •
! ` :,Vie • -t+ f •r i'
..4!N4. ' .
1 - s :t :r, .i. Reach 2B _ •
►k rii*stir' , t •
0•k.:..
`r- 4.r
f• r, _ _•_ 1. .' "• lsri..1.1:_11•r' 1rr.". __
'jib - - _ _ _ - -sl tt _T'. '.�M. J i**itimSl ' _ =N ' ..
.1..m1.1..11:...._.,,•...
•.+•• •••.+•'',:.
.:;-:•,,,:,,,,.1i-,V"...,?-k,
..._1_4.7,:_....r._...,7,._0,:.
.,1A1.-0ATh1A.A1o..l..'4l'4......1„1;Av.L•1/..V;=d."1.'•.•..1r'._•1aa.6••1.4•--41v..•.z.1_.64..1.=1=...:.a01.E:..7171k../....66i,...1:....'--Th...`..,1-....t1.._-..63...,.,....-4_7i..ai.-1d.'i..1/._...1l.'..-.”,.d_,....11r-h-1.:,:j./..Ia1.__'...—:.:.:'-..l1a....:'..I...:.F i.11.-.K.7O..i'W;.-.,._'g',1 W..'.1•.'7..'-'_i
1'.41M 1:'.-s.1•
1:._1;:.-."_-a.%g..'...:_'=.7d..-...._:a-7-.7-1.r-•...1.•-..:--:.-.:•:1•"-.
_ - +��.i rrr XS
- - _ - - - - - ►.. `[ �L.li•IY _uil_u.�*rail • •——y _ _.r.
— _ _ =! _.r.r — • — __—_ ..ram•_ •-��_•5 1.-.L���L3 -'-. — Y .rrr.r.r
_ _ay ilia r r.•r.�Y._•-- �.�.7-Jr
.r. _.r+r r r _ _• ....err•-..-r ,, 1
• • •—_ r • _ _-r•—•-- .rill._ _ _ _ .r'rf ,y.r.r---_._r ._•
-y y>_+—+— ~ .r:fI. ii�•Y- .•r11.1ri. • — _ 7Y_rT_ •_- • = ..If_• ' ._. .- •• • - - -
, ... • ;,�,.r — _ _ .�r;�. —..++.M•— aiti (tea
. .r•�' —•_ — _ _ — _� r�.r._•• r ._ _•�•��._.r.�• •— — _roc—•�-� - _ +°"" al. T"t tt'r 1•
• .ii��:1 — _—._ _ - .ice~+��.r•_•_•r.r. •_._•— = •_ _ — _ _ _ — •_• r •_ _
�yr�l+-_ : ' sr . _— rr .4+_•_•_•_ — — __ _ — — — - r��•_.�'. !...glom.
•Y
r' y`y _ v-r caw:r�r_.r.r-_- r ��w�.�—• 7.G_ I,di
'au
y, _ r•am►- —.
a I•r " •� k . jl . ]" — -• _ — — _ —•_ — — — —•_ ••__rYrr.rw_:�Yi -ems .i,r•�_•—•_ —�_ _• _ •— �•_ .i•_•r.+
. W r .." ! 4'r p ,�'a` - - - _- _- - - _ ..rY ;r' . � . yeµ.. . — —
-r4.. •
Tk L AO i •�'af r� lam+r~ — - y •.� • - .� — — - ice- . 11.011.114 M�
4' /� •
• � t! f k.-.+ r .• � • C. r ram_._ �_ --- � _ - - —� _ _ •__ - _. - �•� •1�AMr�
•
_ Yr•r•
4 Ni... ,-.,:,
gi
' aYr ..•{` r •j . .���--'. __ — _— — 7. y�1r4�73 _-- �e�r
Ati•
_47
l" 7ff�! � .. K1.. f. F'�4e. Alig [ r [ rsGPUP Hof r
ir
f 3; A604 Pr: r 1.d.a.6m'forma'tion&_Ana.lyksis
Integrated CC PV
MY 1 Conservation Easement 0 Photopoints Permanent Vegetation Plot Streams Invasive Problem Areas Wetlands
Little Pine Creek II
ReachBreak Cross Sections Failing>10% Non-Credit Present MI Preservation
Allegheny County, NC
ICF.
Preservation ■ Vernal Pool
Mitigation Services Sheet 4 of 4 0 30 60 120eet
ENVVRONMENTAL QUALITY Restoration

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site-Little Pine Creek Reach 1 -Restoration(P2)
Assessed Length 533 feet
Number Footage Adjusted%
Number Total Number of Amount of %Stable, with with for
Major Channel Channel Stable,
Metric Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Category Sub-Category Performing
As-built Segments Footage as Intended Woody Woody Woody
as Intended
Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1.Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
1. Scoured/Eroding 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
and/or scour and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely.Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving or collapse. 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
Totals 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
3.Engineered 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 19 19 100%
Structures
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 19 19 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 19 19 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3. Bank Protection exceed 15%. 19 19 100%
Pool forming structures maintaining^Max Pool Depth:Mean
4.Habitat Bankfull Depth Ratio 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at 18 19 95°0
base-flow.
N/A-Item does not apply.
Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site-Little Pine Creek Reach 2a -Restoration(P1)
AssessedLength 1506 feet
Number Footage Adjusted%
Number Total Number of Amount of %Stable, with with for
Major Channel Channel Stable,
Metric Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Category Sub-Category Performing As-built Segments Footage as Intended Woody Woody Woody
as Intended
Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1.Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
and/or scour and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely.Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving or collapse. 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
Totals 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
2.Engineered 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 22 22 100% -
Structures
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 22 22 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 22 22 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3. Bank Protection exceed 15%. 22 22 100%
Pool forming structures maintaining^Max Pool Depth:Mean
4.Habitat Bankfull Depth Ratio 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at 22 -- 100°0
base-flow.
N/A-Item does not apply.

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site-Little Pine Creek Reach 2b -Restoration(P1)
Assessed Length 334 feet
Number Footage Adjusted%
Number Total Number of Amount of % Stable, with with for
Major Channel Channel Metric Stable, Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Category Sub-Category Performing As-built Segments Footage as Intended Woody Woody Woody
as Intended
Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1.Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
1. Scoured/Eroding 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
and/or scour and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely.Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse. 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
Totals 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
2.Engineered 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 12 12 100%
Structures
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 12 12 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 12 12 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3. Bank Protection exceed 15%. 12 12 100%
Pool fonning structures maintaining'"Max Pool Depth:Mean
1111
4.Habitat Bankfull Depth Ratio>1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at 12 12 100°o
base-flow.
N/A-Item does not apply.
Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site-Trib A-Restoration(P2)
AssessedLength 82 feet
Number Number Footage Adjusted%
Total Number of Amount of % Stable, with with for
Major Channel Channel Metric Stable, Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Stabilizing Stalilizing Stalilizing
Category Sub-Category Performing As Alt Segments Footage as Intended Woody Woody Woody
as Intended
Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
and/or scour and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse. 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
Totals 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
2.Engineered
1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 1 1 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 1 1 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 1 1 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3.Bank Protection exceed 15%. 1 1 100%
Pool forming structures maintaining'"Max Pool Depth:Mean
4.Habitat Bankfull Depth Ratio>1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at 1 1 100%
base-flow.
N/A-Item does not apply.

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site-Trib B-Restoration(P1)
Assessed Length 77 Iset
Number Footage Adjusted%
Number Total Number of Amount of %Stable, with with for
Major Channel Channel Stable,
Metric Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Category Sub-Category Performing As-built Segments Footage as Intended Woody Woody Woody
as Intended
Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1.Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
and/or scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely.Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping calving,or collapse. 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
Totals 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
2.EngineeredI
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 1 1 100% I
Structures
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 1 1 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 1 1 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3. Bank Protection 1 1 100%
exceed 15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining^M ax Pool Depth:Mean
4.Habitat Bankfull Depth Ratio>1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at 1 1 100%
base-flow.
N/A-Item does not apply.
Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site-Trib C-Restoration(P1)
Assessed Length 577 feet
Number Footage Adjusted%
Number Total Number of Amount of %Stable, with with for
Major Channel Channel Stable,
Metric Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Category Sub-Category Performing
As-built Segments Footage as Intended Woody Woody Woody
as Intended
Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1.Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth 0 0 100°ro 0 0 100%
and/or scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely.Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping calving or collapse. 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
Totals 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A
2.Engineered 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 42 42 100%
Structures
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 42 42 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 42 42 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3. Bank Protection exceed 15%. 42 42 100%
Pool forming structures maintaining^M ax Pool Depth:Mean
4. Habitat Bankfull Depth Ratio>1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at 42 42 1(1(1°0
base-flow.
N/A-Item does not apply.

Table 6.Vegetation Condition Assessment
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Planted Acreage: 7.7
Mapping CCPV Number of Combined % of Planted
Vegetation Category Definitions
Threshold Depiction Polygons Acreage Acreage
1. Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous materiaL 0.1 acres o'a 0 0 0.00%
2. Low Stem Density Areas Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on 0.1 acres 10 0.29 2.07%
MY3,4,or 5 stem count criteria.
Total 10 0.29 2.07%
3.Areas of Poor Growth Rates Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously
0.25 acres n/a 0 0 0.00%
or Vigor small given the monitoring year.
Cumulative Total 10 0.29 2.07%
Easement Acreage: 14
Mapping CCPV Number of Combined % of
Vegetation Category Definitions Easement
Threshold Depiction Polygons Acreage
Acreage
Areas or points(if too small to render as polygons at map °
4.Invasive Areas of Concern 1000 SF 7 0.42 3.00/u
scale).
5.Eas ement Encroachment Areas or points(if too small to render as polygons at map °
none n'a 0 0 0.00%
Areas scale).

Permanent Vegetation Plot Photos
if
,11
}g
, .j' ' v 0,a ,`, r
d
yC .itr r \
/
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
_... .i: A_a _ - y. ems -. -..,,De,- _f=
�kd'
`� 4., 4,ll.�fi n. i 8,4 i .• -.:
^ �ry1 `3� shy V , V by i .
Y y�
44i X
p'Y r a -� -
a -' „. ��., - i ,
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2

f h Mtnyy rw..
. e .�roi� r-,u
'� �, '�i R 'Pry-t ;i: ?� .�, . 74
�k
f Jv T f - A;,�r, r '^Ss.:. - '' yy. ,.4 ;.. ter, k, ; 'A '3 4 .
6 ,,,,.:-..
, 2 i^ r11 �' / c�;, ,,'b ' i'''' , i' s -.P,-e'4 - -Vt 1 y� .w x
.` 4r r F d , f 4 4�� .;- t14,; �. t t ..7, i ,u ,,F .['� ..i a
hp r '{ a s ^' �.Y4Yxr ''+v�\4 4^. rSX
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
e,
u 1
4•
s
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4

Ig< s i i 844,r Srrkb 411/ r
,t. Y k air
T dil ,�C {I /
1'11,;' .1'1'. i i '. -,
F 1
,,, . , •:,.': , , %/-..-:..i,•.„,„. .'_,'
(4 t , Y ,
r '{F sR; c 1 r Zia y ia?i 4..I.01'tY.• � 'c._%�y.. 4l
e A:.yt "fir t713 Yca n , t I '
.s �' ,-..,h:•/� .. 6 stiff•i!°WF.0 t.,,,'a:Alf.:
kro ...5 Ls, � ��."ra� • . . . .,....L... .1
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
•
ya z -- 1t `� y
a✓
' a
•
J - `ma c I gY`9. .4f -
•
".c I \.if
• •� z 7" ax
1'^„Hn<;' .+ d+- '_ � y 6,Y
,Ys,-1..r^ tt
Lo
t ,,."I t r\ it -- n
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6

Mr** - . .,
: I
•
4. .,. . , ,,..:,,,, ,_ _,.., „ . -
l Ns.A ?� . _ . , .\..„ ,•1„4,,,.„, .. .,-ot-T_ _, 4.:. _,.._
by 4'R u„
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
e
A
e 4
. ' t, \.. .''Mrt z a t. ny;,;'
F
q y y it
`,
� ✓S �.'�,� h: i y ..'�Fy .jli�je.f.
iY 4 £5 r, 'J
r
P....G3q� .s „
sa .,, c ,cal .s' r 4 , 3 1'
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8

Permanent Photo Stations
r �
x
ti ,
A , m t a ,s ue
:14,::' ,-=!;i-L.- .:4,:q!*1:..i,,F..:7;,,,, ,::',-,:,"
� ba rs j ) x i • 'a
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 1
Looking Upstream
. `
Zvi'°{` ,¢ •11 h 7` 14+ -' - - -
d :
b .
I
•
' Ali 6 S:,
Little Pine Creek II -Permanent Photo Station 2a
Looking Upstream

„-,V&- :_ - , ^ AltMl.i.1*;-.'
. r,
Y � , xa �
' ���A - ��� f jll,.bi �^"S�'�'h ,W{'u€i A i �5 a i``�f ,.
� . � l u �y � �� � � ld.�td _ ▪a .�. x
g7.f.r4, rt ar t
i+ � (N ��.�pS,H� l N o- r� � ll��i � F ��� 1�sh�Yl��m� `' °� �'�� � f�i� ��� 'c
I' � ..� I $ h Pt
�' 1 r1 140,
. �i r�i 11 . u a v '4 .1▪ � • t& ra k
'f e ?:—d ,a 7 { .�1 Yh x 1' ,dl , �i �� a �,w �� � �h�tk#q
f.,
e �' '� _$ �Y y41. J -I�Ib 1..,
�i I a Ill:c � 54 iCyk
r�1 I�Y 1Cs r A i x Y 1, (' r.''t '� 1 III b q
Yr 1-"P �!i Y. �' i/1 > ,, -�' 1 �� �' Lm V / d• r 1 ..� i � x� F.A.'
1� $. J hViu v,. 1+
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 2b
Looking Downstream
,. .„. .,,
11
ti.
d
,gy� s' i ” .`4 y "• 4� a d"xf. yMw ' r.r cG � f ° r1` 3��,� r i ,Hr ' ". bz t -- x� r t , a�,I .. . �V t �
•
Lvi•
� y• �-^r • (' !
y.
bl
z17-'i' /
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 3a
Looking Downstream

}
h„ C` �. k .�Y-0 TiS`�.r, K, 1, 1�., 5 ,,gam't
& �' ^�i ;fit 'k. ' ;) 'P i ( '�
�?r47$�44 a J '
5 } 2 ,:-..
. i.,.."tee.°,er�' �7 t r
� a a s7-: t "�°° "" l V` ,yr ' `g „ am t
Little Pine Creek II - Perm.- . ,..-,- -.7,-.,:..-..,..;-,--;,,4&-T.-y -. anent Photo Station 3b
Looking Upstream tp
Y
}
Ilk
.F. ,v}'cF Y
' tit .
_
ya
to
r , ,., .a t`&i a y}S,t
sb „`*W z 't , ,ds s '6 , -.g r �s`r` t L.
.ready ASP , �'T�f .5�{S'1& R OFF.S ai -V ly+,- .0 ELL
R"`p4� �� �'rn �M � i 4 W �e 'D Y -
+' G � n ° ` 3tR _ 1 3 '1 '& ,,-
F �aV ,� fix , �.Lti:T,'s" . r R .'t
y ., .:i �[4' b s f ' �'' • `�p "-i
s�i-i;i d C �=1" a °. ,� ?a'xk :4:i. v a�u, `.=ra' ' + -v
y
Little Pine Creek II — Permanent Photo Station 4a
Looking Upstream

,f—. ,,,,_ -R ,I.:':'1/4‘...-&:,,o; '''', --' .,
.-4:;:,,--,4'' �,„„,
,...., .
�'-, ,... ,- moo ,t--
ck
m 3 ,- s
,, t " ;� 3
x- 7 '-, c''F•v ,f R..y � - ye.'`rT y E?,,` .
a ,
x, a w x5 6smay .p ? 4t -nq
pia t` d'} b , $ SaK - $ Rd, Yy , ��:
P-.. T/" I +s 4- 4 i`�1, +'-d• a,�sd, Aa :4-4.
' .a t- `;, ,,'.-�a a.-. ... s a��
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 4b
Little Pine Creek confluence with Trib A
ram
4
f.
-_ - ;114;4.-VW,41:1,ri'1,i'fl.:-.e;f:f-4:::k:i3PV's1,:$ , ' •'..-'.'•1„tiq •"-; ,,,6•,k 1 f,',: :,'-' -• t„4-,,,,
!F�"1�r - o-rat 1;'� �4'�'."h ak' y
'„-„,.'T..q,I„:*s-7,-.i--::,-:4',,74
' '--d -! 1, `' ''dr rj {''P Flan '''.,; t1 "` r # • -
---_,,,,--LAr-,fi,L .i---1.'i4.,.:',.-wf'0,, -,A,1-,*!k:.f.wr''.,-,,,r ,..- - ,i"-,iff-J., ,...,,,i..,;,:,;,. ,,„,- .,4,,,--i=,..,.,,...: H
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 5
Looking Downstream

•
iik
N *� r
vy.. ` a , ` .� '" .' { ' .v Pii,' ,, 7�Ate' " :" 's'� 5 .�, '� 4e— --. --' ' 4-- ----wfts.24:',,,,-, ;:k.',..-,,c1,-:.-,_, .-- #4,,...,,,4*-,...' , ., ,„,,,,117.--,.,,.,..ti,p,.4,...!,,!-=
,r- ;-•' :,f.X � y .� 1 7" it �. '',' art
,� f r.• .✓ _ .-,fit ,.. ". .�"� �� ao rs 1' "" Ck eF 'A'.
Gx ,o " sue• v. ra:: §P�m ��� �"Y.
Little Pine Creek II — Permanent Photo Station 6a
Looking Upstream
r
:-..41,,.;,7t, ,,, 0.1„,..7?..i.,_...,.,.......„. .. ..i., , ,.. , .. _ ., ,,. ..,,,,..,...1 _,...z. ..„,,„....:„..,,,,,_ ,:,..
, . ...... ,,N,,... : .,..,, ,,,,..4.,',,kz-44$?..e- -
S Mn t `' p1 2 ',
j w
' ` r ay l�-. > is 4i: :. da; w rY'e % �_. -
yr - am` i �I . ',� A `CC:T`v ? J� „`�). Y�' y �»,
"�"+. �F. oie'e- r.`a' r- +q Rf +� - ...
•
--,: ',-, '4''''''''.."...V''!''' ''..2..'' '...'.''ailY.1-Zi`SVP7e 1,-: .,. '4,...'X'..,t,',,- ..,:',.p.- ' 4,-,6,',`,.?
�k•$ �.� k s, 'y^+tSia`' ': d -. r „ 4.
a 'dg ca •a.�,i�' � i A f' a �r.'L, T •- ivy Cr- _ii •+'4 '.�' �'�:°,
1., 'iM ✓.r s i. st7 �.w.;,-, N ` :r a -. , n .a �. . r. .b �a,}i . r ,
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 6b
„::;'''' Looking Downstream

- T
4
L-1-64-- --iltta_.' : . , , „ ,..,--,':.%.,:,,44.4„gifrIttif.,-.44,4vvi-itit,*w.;74:,,--.?
10-
S - i aIti cep #45 r� J'd 7 - 7y " $
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo station
Looking Northeast
•
;;�
? 6
t s
� - ` rr � •, , ` iart� ' � ' �.
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 7b
Looking East

-1711111111
•
`x' Y` •
�
rr _`T' n r ?•
"'2.
..
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 7c
Looking Southwest
•
A
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 8a
Looking over vernal pool

•
,„ K f 1 t, sa:tt�s r.
^f n , "fit.,> .. ,g a r °ra
tam r t— xx�. ' d'� a e - r�+?.tL
n. .. ✓ ..-..E 9 ,," h F M �+'.J'+ fs�A t�N P,...hik
'/ t - 5 ' .� .^k R�`V` ERA
_ ,,ff� " 'a- ti" � 'a '` ° - `� 1 - r od e G
�1 �t 11'r" ' ar • � ` �L' a.3!I N
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 8b
Looking Downstream
w�
r6
ti
R
`z� 9h 'hE
y ,
z
T3* � fir
1 � �F- �
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo,1:,;;;;`,..,. . '4t -'' Station 9a
Looking Upstream

p^
`8 , i r .
' 1
�s tl.' - Yv+�s f
Wry.
' a
•
/ `' - ,., ,,, r°+` • . '" r yam, /
y- dram ra'» x i F •:.- ,r + • 7
��
a
i °�f gyp,,
n. > �fc�@ �' y,L'i . l,o.n a. 1\ a` I �.F.k i,�9,eka
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 9b
Looking Downstream
� a i'
_.
f' ,,,,,,,-,11,,,,,.,.,_.,:•:,,,,,„....,,,,,,...,,•_,..„.•.,,,„.,.•
••• .,.•.,,,,,,,,,..,,,,,--._...........• :".. ,,,,-.,-,.-„..-,. ...„
.• . „,,,,.,.-,. 1,,,,,:,,,...- - ,,- ,,..,.#4,-0.,,...e,•,,,
v
,-.:„.....„.:.......„,„
n r
.,,...,.,.„,... ,. ,
. ....„:„...,.,„:
. . 1 Tw Lj
•
F' •r$' fir. S °z ••,:,, y t'-F..:-X
.k . r F. i s
t:
-i... "gyp'
.
Tit
� 'Y
i
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station lOa
Looking Upstream

„14,H16-1°,,iii:9".' 'd,,...A,..< , t ' .,.,',1„,,„,-ti,.,.,-.4„,, ,,.._,-4,,,,-,'!„, - ..,-:- , -,,, :,,.-.1,,?,•„,„7,s.,,..,.._..,,-.„.4.„,-
A .
,.-*,-,,,.,,-,.-'',1,.,,-'
-' p ';:, 1x *- ' ter:
h �`
4� � n j �� d fl'wf"� M_.. �- Yid. � '� P�� Ni 3 c. 34't Y
T f (' .,�-- -t.n ,v :y e,,Ar' 4/-rr.z :K
-1: trJ4 i f 3,,,,,,I,71,40,00.,,,,,„r,„%iik L, ., ,,,,,,,...,-, .,;,../
� L� 4
_ ` ALL••'�** ..ryry d .P'
y r iFs 13 . w. l r „p k.j',,
! u ,' ° '' ,a R lain! �:
Little Pinem Creek II — Peranent Photo Station lob
Looking Downstream
:,i-
!4{
e. - ., w.-
a1 ,' 1'"-T,147 7 x } 4L m
Y y
h X` xzw , ''a `fir , a?3,.€ "-` ��'n� � .
s.a � - s n
, t
qy
+f T�`4 eke ' § �,-
a; - ”, ,,-`. ,, as ,,r
+ a , -- 3 '
4
Little •Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station lla
Looking Upstream Trib D

, - •---,,I.,:.1 w.".:.,--,..,.;.:.-,?;-::,44'"',', ;le?:..,. 1:, --/y ' .i 71;')".!:-''' ' ''
:-.:-'-'; , i tit,'''fi,.•1s,illttf.:1!-'i' ,V.';'3::S.4.,;-,.' •,[1?,,:-,trAt'.fti'r-.t'1 if ,4'''' 'Ve•.:1- 3,-;'' ' 7,
.4.
.. . _ ., „,„,, ,,,,. 4.,,11 t;!ti*.,.: .1.,..ko,s,vi;,5,,,,,q.%, 4.-,..g,'....; -,•]•.:/..7.i'Y.,• .. --:.',.",...'•-: '.'.•,•;:,.,. '',../,•-,.-: — .
• lc
, , ,. 19,1 ;:
--.P ii:-'e4.:cel.4,.,...,.. _,:....,..7,..,„,,,_,.., ...:,„,..-,-,--4.i•e*i,,,—',--1-.,...,,,:...,„:wri,„•,-,--.*.,,,y •-.45 - _ _ , ,,, v---
,am '1. r"`
�=�` � � � � sue'
4.-N-
3,4;›,::
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station lib
Looking Downstream
if d 2t t�
T'i
is
.0,..-tyt..N.. -,,;,_.:::,-.4:-.,,,,,k;,...,c0,..,,, ,,. „,..„,.,- - N.,,,,,,- •' -- .
tter: ,c- '�_
a s- - ' F s
- a
} yy'"( r ¢ R`r} %�i"At ., "t �k .ri Y#e s :;� t a`i,.
`�3X'p •ffi n. n �, 3,,M,N �',,F.{1 u<i`,, e ,�r, <2' r-,. ,x l .,
L i A1* 1 l} t S Y .r Ih' S
Little Pine Creek II - Panent Photo Station lic
erm
North Looking

-•.:;'--;.:.' ''!'' ' ,,,---ei,-
r
ilksi
3 w f t «�'.:r-.7,,,_:_- _-. ..,,, -'rod a �.. a -
Y r' f i - ♦V
'1.',.57'''.1.1:, '.":--s.".7,V41"" \ , ",S,.'''.F ' t ,,,;IA',,,..„:,,, :,'-`4,..",'1.',..
k
'4 S
I '.�q 4� d �AE R 'S
lf. YAh+S
\yam ^� - - .ter`,
YYY 74 uT 0. '. S}
tJ a �✓.
Litte Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 12a
Looking Downstream
l
xw
.. -f.w, vex zg€1. F e
:4 1 A
,rsue , - r' `", Ili
-
K s''" �• ..1°; ,y S a b i t t n ;
a _
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 12b
Looking Upstream

b l
i''t''-,;...7;,!';t.i.'-4''- _
t ."'k''''
'' '3Y 5 v 01 qt
r 1 4. M
psi �.y., x i� A{
4 .: r. w= x r
6. y
. i
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 13a
Confluence with Trib B
sx
I
' � ., f
s=ae� 4 � �;J```�- obF /
" ` m! Nos" ' x
4 ors- _ �. g_
4 .e ` fA r
e a - i, r v x e 3� 1 - r ,: ,",` s F
r .y 54. t ;§f R ?n •€
�[r
y€'ryS22 'y�g la n.'p .,.x -•.�ti�'r'..):✓:f. (, 'W ��,,�.'v„ �.g' §,z gti,..A,.'.4,.4"- ""^<,„4„.„ ",,,t',,,ge4-,.....C"-'11- — '
-47, K �,
,� �.< � � .. _ 9P� \ ys' 1.... ' f� �!{ S�R-, v�6-�" Pt ffY �"t ..
rt7Ir
/-'/ i I' ", '..---. - ''''''''''.g.-----:i-tt•t•:4,,,VX-i"lk.,:t i• •;,.0,§... I IA.,4. ..••q:',,,,n 0.,''t. I -,
d '
� 1'�'v �.:.r, f ''.'''' I a3 . 4 ) . �. . .fY�.* u'rStati u'. 5'r_ '..i:.5$s.
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 13b
Looking Downstream

,
i- r - ` /,
_ I( .' 4 A �. l 1#tW e -';" s'y its � , �k1 ,,-.
i °,"`` , �,' ; !4. , III. `�! � `.446 � • `,
to3 " -7 t r ,': - ' ' 6
{ � ��� � =f � $ 1� 1 t- V �"
• 4� t g� �g I� i3gla F1 'k'�A
{
iY`, f. .4 't,
'
''' r .- 'a > �d� I t
�, ,.. .0 ,'. y, ,vi�� b,r t'ti "t' -- Iss nt x ''v t ^ .
.. R ',gaS .ice' ya -" 1 „ "�...
.fir 5 �,a. �+,k � 4.,�t': 4 ra t t' r t7 n ' . 1 .�
,r,
filt-,-. ..'4'''.''.OF...^-..‘•'... ', '14;f:- Kr.,.- '.,..444,,,,,;!- -x•-,:44‘uff.',-../ .,.,-.2. .,-....,.;.;11,3.,„„t, tikr....__.,,,,,,7,,,:,:.:_,'",,;:l
a i s
1 z .\ � i
tw { : 'f-.3 om '' c,
�2# , i ; . "sS - � �: ,eN , ,i. eg t yd:Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 14a
Looking at floodplain pool
4
k�hF
. Y e ,. -.A
Y r� 4*f it ;"
� a
Ej 4,.`'' 4 4y. 1
�' ate x �'` t <- � 2 �y � i
�- - '' - ` ssr . s may-`�r ; 5 "�i',, {a
sn gam �. � �'' t, ;_ r�` s1��� � 4"�' � �
,„,t6
sx .. H:.- --4 ",, x .'; -t$,'rk Y a Vi"' c'9"' 1 f^} .,i°,.
-II - c""� is��. _ •i v j.� 1
f � ; r r-. m c, . y` ''., 4 .ma's G y 4 *a. ,ae
N
Little Pine Creek II - Permanent Photo Station 14b
Looking Upstream

•
-3'+ ; i$ j3a F`�vr3r, � aRta i• p e §- 't ,-r x s.
ir.,'''.',;....i',,,,,,,,.:".;.,:%.4.-,.,''''4.,,...',-;,.-1'.*-.'" ;i:11,1,,,A.-k-4414%,:-'.:'
�s aaA" A a , ,qx
yy N4ti-.0'4 Alt.-Otcliati;,,t,',:-.:i,:„.:,:-.,...*
• Y k
r,- r �ittl ._ - . rea r, - _a. c .. , .m. ax... - -
LittlePine Creek II — Permanent Photo Station 14c
Looking North

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Table 7.Planted Stem and Total Stem Counts(Species by Plot)
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/Project No.856
Current Plot Data(MY1 2020)
Species 082819-01-0001 082819-01-0002 082819-01-0003 082819-01-0004 082819-01-0005 082819-01-0006 082819-01-0007 082819-01-0008
Scientific Name Common Name Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree 2 2 2
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood Shrub Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree 2 2 2 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 2 2
Ilex verticillata Winterberry Shrub Tree 2 2 2
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
Salix nigra Black Willow Tree 1
Unidentified Planted stem N/A Tree
Stem count 3 3 3 3 3 3 10 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 6 6 6 4 4 5
size(arcs) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4
Stems per ACRE 121.4 121.41111..4 121.4 121.4 404.7 404.7 404.7 202.3 202.3 202.3 202.3 202.3 202.3 121.4 121.4 242. 242.8 242.81111 161.9 202.3
Table 7.Planted Stem and Total Stem Counts(Species by Plot)
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/Project No.856
_
Random Plot Data(MY12020) Annual Means
Species *RVP 0001 *RVP 0002 *RVP 0003 *RVP 0004 *RVP 0005 *RVP 0006 MY1(2020) MYO(2019)
Scientific Name Common Name Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree 2 2 2 10 10 10
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 10 10 10 18 18 18
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood Shrub Tree 4 4 4 9 9 9
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree 12 12 12 6 6 6
Ilex verticillata Winterberry Shrub Tree 2 2 2
Liriodendron tulipifera Yellow Poplar Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 8 8 8 7 7 7
Salix nigra Black Willow Tree 1
Unidentified Planted stem N/A Tree 11 11 11 15 15 15 13 13 13 9 9 9 10 10 10 9 9 9 67 67 67
Stem count 11 11 11 15 15 15 13 13 13 9 9 9 10 10 10 9 9 9 106 106 107 54 54 54
size(arcs) 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 8
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.32 0.20
Species count 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 8 9 6 6 6
Stems per ACRE 445.2 445.2 445.2 607 607 607 526.1 526.1 526.1 364.2 364.2 364.2 404.7 404.7 404.7 364.2 364.2 364.2 331.3 331.3 334.4 273.2 273.2 273.2
*Species and heights not recorded in MY1
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 8.Total Planted and Natural Stem Recruits (Random Plots) Color for Density
LPC II/Project No.856 Exceeds requirements by 10%
Temporary Plot 1 Temporary Plot 2 Temporary Plot 3 Temporary Plot 4 Temporary Plot 5 Temporary Plot 6 Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
10mx10m 5mx20m 5mx20m 5mx20m 10mx10m 10mx10m Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Stem Count 11 15 13 9 10 9 Fails to let requirements by more than 10%
Size(Ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1
Size(Acres) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Stems Per Acre 445 607 526 364 405 364
*Specific species were not collected per plot however the majority of the stems included Betula nigra,Fraxinuspennsylvanicum, Lddodendron tuliip fera,Acer rubrum,
Plantanus accidentally,Salix nigra,and Comus amomum.
Table 9. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
LPCII Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Vegetation Plot ID Vegetation Survival Tract Mean
Threshold Met?
VP1 No
VP2 No
VP3 Yes
VP4 No
VP5 No
VP6 No
VP7 No
50.0%
VP8 No
RVP 1 Yes
RVP2 Yes
RVP3 Yes
RVP4 Yes
RVP5 Yes
RVP6 Yes

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Project Name: LPC II XS Number: 1 Station: 100+77
Reach Name: Little Pine Creek XS Type: Riffle
2580
2579
y 2578
a',
2576
2575i"
2574 II
: 7rfl
2573 F'
2572
2571
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80
Station (feet)
MYO MY1 BKF
CHANNEL,DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width(ft) 25.5 18.2 - - - - - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 100.0 100.0 - - - - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.2 1.7 - - - - - -
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 2.7 2.8 - - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 31.6 31.6 - - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio 20.6 10.5 - - - - - -
Entrenchment Ratio 3.9 5.5 - - - - - -
Bank Height Ratio 1.1 0.9 - - - - - -
•
ct�ka534I.f ,
•
- 1 f
/� w
Left Descending E3ank Right Descending Bank

Project Name: LPC II XS Number: 2 Station: 100+91
Reach
2578 Name: Little Pine Creek XS Type: Pool
2577 Lai2576
br
2571 ��
2570
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0ti
Station (feet)
MYO - MY1
BKF
CIIANNE DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 b1Y4 b1Y5 b1Y6 b1Y7
Bankful Width(ft) 23.7 25.9 - - - - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 70.0 70.0 - - - - -
BankfullMean Depth(ft) 1.8 1.6 - - - - -
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 4.0 2.9 - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft�) 42.3 42.3 - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio 13.3 15.8 - - - - -
Entrenchment Ratio 3.0 2.7 - - - - -
Bank
Height Ratio 1.1 0.8 - - - - -
aF
T
Yfi '43:'-.1'-'1;41':.-'' :P.' 1 '''.'1. ,,,,..,..,t.,:r.,,:,v,,,Alliiiii,,,,,,,i,,,,:,...,,,,,,k‘;,,,.;,,,,,,,,::1,...1,,c,..i,.;?.,,tc.,4",:,..,i::;:.:,,..,,,,,,,,,,:•...,i„....:iiis,4"!._
�' r e.,Est g �e.: �r-
•
•-. .
„, i
x } '!r
'ANY _�r 9�y S`
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank

Project Name: LPC II XS Number: 3 Station: 107+50
Reach Name: Little Pine Creek XS Type: Pool
2573
2572 -- ---- - --
2571
0
1 2570
b
2569
2568
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70
Station (feet)
MYO MY1 BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width(ft) 27.0 24.0 - - - - - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 100.0 100.0 - - - - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.3 1.4 - - - - - -
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 3.0 3.0 - - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 34.3 34.2 - - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio 21.3 16.8 - - - - - -
Entrenchment Ratio 3.7 4.2 - - - - - -
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 - - - - - -
1 "N'
m
'
: , 3 kr c...
. B - - I, frtr e �, %
, ...,-, ,. ,. . ,-,A,/-1.1
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank

Project Name: LPC II XS Number: 4 Station: 108+69
Reach Name: Little Pine Creek XS Type: Riffle
2572
2571 �i'-�_
f
c 2570
a4
b 2569
2568
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80
Station (feet)
MYO MY1 BKF
CIIANNE DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 b1Y4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width(ft) 21.3 37.2 - - - - - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 100.0 100.0 - - - - - -
BankfullMean Depth(ft) 1.7 1.0 - - - - -
-
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 2.7 2.6 - - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft�) 36.4 36.4 - - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio 12.5 38.1 - - - - - -
Entrenchment Ratio 4.7 2.7 - - - - - -
BankHeightRatio 1.1 1.1 - - - - - -
'.
- ,
o "' , x
H1
L'iii...,' ' .411;'-',' :;:,: '
.. 4.>4 ;': ✓ j #x 9#. ;•fax. . a#t
Left Descendmg Bank Right Descending 13ank

Project Name: LPC II XS Number: 5 Station: 109+64
Reach Name: Little Pine Creek XS Type: Pool
2572
2571
---- - - ---- -------
w 2570
c 2569
2568
b
2567
2566
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80 0+85 0+90 0+95 1+00
Station (feet)
MYO MY1 BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MY6 MY7
Bankful Width(ft) 22.2 27.3 - - - - - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 100.0 100.0 - - - - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.7 1.4 - - - - - -
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 3.1 4.1 - - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 37.9 37.9 - - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio 13.0 19.7 - - - - - -
Entrenchment Ratio 4.5 3.7 - - - - - -
Bank Height Ratio 1.1 1.0 - - - - - -
.
x.,y. ray�
r "mow .E z� y 4
1.1 ( st.
r
ram.
a
.g "k Qrat€ sue - . c /
a Ale"
Looking Downstream Looking Upstream

Project Name: LPC II XS Number: 6 Station: 112+81
Reach Name: Little Pine Creek XS Type: Riffle
2569
2568
w iv
,=.Th
c 2567
7
1.4
b 2566
2565 11.i� did'
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80 0+85 0+90 0+95 1+00
Station (feet)
MYO MY1 BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MY6 MY7
Bankful Width(ft) 40.4 42.0 - - - - - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 100.0 100.0 - - - - - -
BankfullMean Depth(ft) 0.9 0.9 - - - - - -
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 2.6 2.4 - - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft�) 37.4 37.4 - - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio 43.6 47.1 - - - - - -
Entrenchment Ratio 2.5 2.4 - - - - - -
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 - - - - - -
ti
Yx 4 -„: may' T
`` v •F'y -� � . f*' 4;..-:
.g* hv" i[ 3 U r v,� x F! i (9r zr .
w w pi ;
.y t �. x
rc . * ' _.
t1,
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank

Project Name: LPC II XS Number: 7 Station: 117+00
Reach Name: Little Pine Creek XS Type: Riffle
2565
•
2564 I
c 2563
b 2562
2561
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80 0+85 0+90 0+95 1+00 1+05 1+10 1+15
Station (feet)
MYO - MY1 BKF
CHANNELDIMENSIONS SUMMARY MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width(ft) 29.7 22.2 - - - - - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 100.0 100.0 - - - - - -
BankfullMean Depth(ft) 1.3 1.8 - - - - -
-
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 2.4 2.7 - - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 39.2 39.2 - - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio 22.5 12.6 - - - - - -
Entrenchment Ratio 3.4 4.5 - - - - - -
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 - - - - - -
y t x 1 L � `w a -� 4
7.:4
k
a �.k 4 'w :::b11: !' ` l.,
ter., 3 ; ,4' ,
emu. v r .:' '' � t
�( r3� F a
- .°
m
to � 4 �,� 4�,' g s �t ��:
*. .., -J` 3 4`` ' ,A?i. � ' r"as k.
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank

Project Name: LPC II XS Number: 8 Station: 117+79
Reach Name: Little Pine Creek XS Type: Pool
2565
2564
c 2563 t --
a- ~ -
w
2562
2561
b 2560
2559
2558
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80 0+85 0+90 0+951+001+051+101+151+20
Station (feet)
MYO - MYl BKF
CHANNELDIMENSIONS SUMMARY MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width(ft) 22.8 20.1 - - - - - -
Floodprone Width 0 - - - - - -
BankfullMean Depth(ft)(ft) 100.0 2.3 2.6100. - - - - - -
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 4.1 4.0 - - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional (ft� 52.8 - - - - - -
Width/DepthArea Ratio) 9.952.8
7.7 - - - - - -
Entrenchment Ratio 4.4 5.0 - - - - - -
Bank Height Ratio 1.1 1.1 - - - - - -
i Y A k 4
.� i u Y'q
`A •
s' ,,,V,...04.y. , s gal fa-
r 'cf.,`r, kt�.�„ tt f, "q�.' `r'yam, 44 ' 1:
a t "wit x r .10 lt:irlp; ,
,,a,,
„,..\,. ._,, :tatr.y„,..,...(,,,..r--'41
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank

Project Name: LPC II XS Number: 9 Station: 122+77
Reach Name: Little Pine Creek XS Type: Pool
2561
2560 =
c 2559
`'2558
0
1 2557
b 2556
2555
2554
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70
Station (feet)
MYO MY' BKF
CHANNELDIMENSIONS SUMMARY MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 IYS IY6 1Y7
Bankful Width(ft) 36.7 23.6 - - - - - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 100.0 100.0 - - - - - -
BankfullMean Depth(ft) 1.2 1.8 - - - - - -
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 4.1 4.3 - - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 42.3 42.3 - - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio 31.9 13.2 - - - - - -
Entrenchment Ratio 2.7 4.2 - - - - - -
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 - - - - - -
-- 6
�q -s- € _ tom'
—. ' ' -* t':.
: -1. �
- is-.., �/
A
ry,, 4.. a 'l,
v
OCT-6-20 `�,v� h. �3h, z+7;
Looking Upstream XS9 Left Descending Bank

Project Name: LPC II XS Number: 10 Station: 200+31
Reach Name: Tnb A XS Type: Pool
•
2574
s-------.4%......4:11
2573
c 2572
b 2571
1.4
2570
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35
Station (feet)
MYO MY1 BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Ban
Width(ft) 12.6 21.6 - - - - - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 40.0 40.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.7 0.4 - - - - - -
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 1.6 1.9 - - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft�) 9.2 9.2 - - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio 17.4 50.3
Entrenchment Ratio 3.2 1.9
Bank He
Ratio 1.2 0.9
'` -*'� . �` � 1:''''' ''
Yam` °w '� '��S €*
Pn „w � °r^ ,�-. 1�y4 `..: a ;�4. � g>.faar.� 1� 'am r
is;
�, 1 + ;?'S` �' tiF , ., -'err .%0. �a
—..-',- ,.-.„1--,-.,i,--le. ,:"0.4:*;...,..wt,z...'.• •
VVV '0 sY 4-� \"i
d OCT 6 20 Fy °Cai ' ' � '� �`„ i`'" s
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank

PReachroject Name:Name: LPC B II XS Number: 11 Station: 300+45
Tnb XS Type: Riffle
IRb-
2569
w 2568
r—
0
E 2567
b
2566
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0
Station (feet)
MYO MY BKF
CHANNE DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width(ft) 10.6 16.1 - - - - - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 30.0 30.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.6 0.4 - - - - - -
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 1.4 1.5 - - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 6. 6.5 - - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio 175.1 40.1 - - - - - -
Entrenchment Ratio 2.8 1.9 - - - - - -
BankHeight Ratio 1.1 0.9 - - - - - -
44
M1a w s�..: to ,-; ' £ a �' �,r,a ,� t a Y n4
��5"x , r.,+-ro r. `+�*, 'r k- Rt8 'Zt } f ' r, pa- i' 4 ,
�� � �'` $ a V 0 e *�.' . `,i ; ',10
" �.
:.,,,,,,,,,:,,,,":::::-,-,,,,,,,,,i.,,,,,,,:
FilS''';''.:!'''':"lr.'1'..--4+_,t.. ::5-.1";A,':' .11%'4‘.%''''.-'''''''1::r Z`1,--'A.:':;t':1;'-''''''''''-;:'4:::4''f::11P7''''e''''; 7‘',$ac'.'4%;:-,.•::;,.."*"1:„.'1‘-'
v z
- !' Las iti�� �' Y Cg`^ '�& ^}A Ll M � F ' 1 P�? : m OCT`17 b
" `4 �,u [ r !�'•r as >s'��.k
t fvw a1 ,nlar '--
Left Descending Bank Looking Downstream

Project Name: LPC II XS Number: 12 Station: 402+52
Reach Name: Tnb C XS Type: Pool
2572
11=----_,..., AL_________ i ------------------- ._._.__4_
I
2569
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+A:. 0+30 0+35
Station (feet)
MYO MY1 BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MY0 MY1 An-2MY3 An-4 b1Y5 MY6 b1Y7
Bankful Width(ft) 8.7 19.2 - - - - - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 40.0 40.0 - - - - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.0 0.5 - - - - - -
BankfullMax Depth(ft) 2.1 2.0 - - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 8.7 8.7 - - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio 8.7 42.2 - - - - - -
Entrenchment Ratio 4.6 2.1 - - - - -Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.9 - - - - - -
�: - . u ,>. i a+
ski !. 4 L q� �, '+lx w' , P,
y '�`"}�,
$ f
:.,--":;'N'''.11'''4'''':i::: . - e�
z o- f \ N+ - 2-`,N:6-07 Ao-.-549' .- *„ "' --4 ,--�.4 4 .
,:.,:,:,,,,„,t,;t:.,,,,T,;,:w;tii,:z4tR:'..4t,kt,:;;..4:,k:!.i..i:,;;;__,;f:;.:: 6,,,....,,,„ i...: • : \\ ,,,,:‘Tc.,,,'61,#,N__„; ',...c.,,ir,:',#—F—4,,,I...,,Ait'',—. --1-:",;",,,l''14'`.'..',V-5°-.7,,Vgg'."Y 5
.. "..• _ d,ems^to•it,,,..v;. f,. ..» e,
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank

Project Name: LPC II XS Number: 13 Station: 402+75
Reach Name: Tnbutary C XS Type: Riffle
2572
w 2571 ----------
•
2570
b
2569
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30
Station (feet)
MYO MY1 BKF
CHANNE DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width(ft) 9.3 8.6 - - - - - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 40.0 40.0
Ban Mean Depth(ft) 0.6 0.6
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 1.2 1.3 - - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft�) 5.3 5.3 - - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio 16.4 14.0 - - - - - -
Entrenchment Ratio 4.3 4.6 - - - - - -
BankHeight Ratio 1.0 1.0
7, s
f N { ,: b�^sT 1jF. p
� t 1 � -.� t :' v�
„ r
'{ °k S qF d ?K
a.td'� � f �t�°�-�r��`�NN�'a a r� 4 `•,�?yy??��s��� " t�.�k-`:'������..++ ems:.
t-A,,:t. 3..,1,,ib, ,..,—"i1,444- _,-,,,-,74"0.
4 b x r rj,': Y,, t'# .'4 ry F "r R,, 7-,R
_ ' '' ' '-g-F--.*144 '`'''' , ' •
,rt m-` `, � 4. � 34 ro-a ,�d �t
,:k.".1'',1'qe.*IZ,.'":34, t i''''... '
,54.ki:',',4.'-i'rtl'..;
i y R a �'7-_,4 Air'
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank

Table 10.Baseline Stream Data Summary
Little Pine Creek II Mitigation Site-Little Pine Creek Reach 1(533 feet)
Parameter Regional Curse Pre-Fisting Condition Reference Reach Data Design As-Built/Baseline
Dimension&Sobs[rate-Rime LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Max Min Mean Med Max SD N
Bankfull Width(ft) - 23.7 - - - 1 16.4 - - 21.4 - 2 - 24.0 - - 25.5 - - - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) - 100+ - - - 1 70.0 - - 200 - 2 - >50 - - 100.0 - - - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) - 1.9 - - - 1 1.9 - - 2.1 - 2 - 1.7 - - 1.2 - - - 1
Bankfull MaxDepth(ft) - 3.4 - - - 1 2.5 - - 3.1 - 2 - 2.5 - - 2.7 - - - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ftr) - 45.6 - - - 1 18.0 - - 27.2 - 2 - 41.3 - - 31.6 - - - 1
Width/Depth Ratio - 12.3 - - - 1 12.0 - - 14.0 - 2 - 14.0 - - 20.6 - - - 1
Entrenchment Ratio - 4.1+ - - - 1 >2.2 - - >2.3 - 2 - >2.2 - - 3.9 - - - 1
Bank Height Ratio - 1.4 - - - 1 1.0 - - 1.1 - 2 - 1.0 - - 1.1 - - - 1
d50(mm) 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 36.4 58.4 52.5 80.1 19.8 12
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.006 0.010 0.013 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.001 12
Pool Length(ft) 16.4 25.0 26.5 32.2 6.0 5
Pool MaxDepth(ft) 2.6 4.2 4.5 5.4 1.1 5
Pool Spacing(ft) 36.0 87.0 138.0 66.1 105.5 107.1 128.2 25.3 5
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 46.0 53.0 35.4 46.0 47.9 52.6 6.8 4
Radian of Curvature(ft) 48.0 96.0 51.0 55.0 54.0 60.0 3.7 3
Re:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 2.0 4.0 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.4 0.1 3
M eander Wavelength(ft) 168.0 288.0 160.0 170.0 170.0 180.0 7.5 2
M eander Width Ratio 2.0 5.0 1.4 1.8 1.9 2.1 0.3 4
S ubstrate,Bed and Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress(Competency)Ib/ftr - - 0.74 -
M ax Part Size(mm)M obiliz ed at Bankfull - - 122 -
Stream Power(Transport Capacity)W/m - - - -
Addi ti onal Reach Parameters
Drainage Area(me) 2.57 2.4;6.8 2.93 2.93
Rosgen Classification C E4;C4 C4 C4
Bankfull Velocity(fps) - 5.1 3.4 -
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) - 224 140 -
Valley Length(ft) - - - -
^Channel Thalweg Length(ft) - - - -
Sinuosity - 1.1 1.09 1.09
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) - - - 0.004
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) - 0.01 - 0.005
Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) - - -
%of Reach with Eroding Banks - - -
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric - - -
Biological or Other - - -
-Information unavailable.
Non-Applicable.
^Channel Centerline(ft):Based on stream centerline stationing from design stream stationing accounts for breaks in conservation easement and utility right-of-uay.

Table 10.Baseline Stream Data Summary
Little Pine Creek II Mitigation Site-Little Pine Creek Reach 2A(1,506 feet)
Parameter Regional Curse Pre-Fisting Condition Reference Reach Data Design As-Built/Baseline
Dimension&Sobs[rate-Rime LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Max Min Mean Med Max SD N
Bankfull Width(ft) - 31.9 - - - 1 16.4 - - 21.4 - 2 - 24.0 - 21.3 24.8 23.5 29.7 3.5 3
Floodprone Width(ft) - 106+ - - - 1 70.0 - - 200 - 2 - >53 - 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 3
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) - 1.9 - - - 1 1.9 - - 2.1 - 2 - 1.6 - 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 0.2 3
Bankfull MaxDepth(ft) - 3.4 - - - 1 2.5 - - 3.1 - 2 - 2.3 - 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.7 0.1 3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ftr) - 45.6 - - - 1 18.0 - - 27.2 - 2 - 39.3 - 36.4 37.6 37.4 39.2 1.2 3
Width/Depth Ratio - 12.3 - - - 1 12.0 - - 14.0 - 2 - 14.6 - 12.5 16.6 14.7 22.5 4.3 3
Entrenchment Ratio - 4.1+ - - - 1 >2.2 - - >2.3 - 2 - >2.2 - 3.4 4.1 4.3 4.7 0.5 3
Bank Height Ratio - 1.4 - - - 1 1.0 - - 1.1 - 2 - 1.0 - 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.1 3
d50(mm) - 72.0 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 22.1 50.4 52.3 86.9 18.7 12
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.004 0.06 0.006 0.016 0.014 0.030 0.007 12
Pool Length(ft) 14.0 56.6 53.9 109.4 26.4 16
Pool MaxDepth(ft) 1.6 4.6 4.1 7.3 1.6 16
Pool Spacing(ft) 36 168 35.0 122.6 124.9 215.4 49.9 15
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 48.0 120.0 52.5 86.4 86.2 109.4 15.8 8
Radius of Curvature(ft) 48.0 96.0 54.2 63.6 61.5 78.8 8.3 7
Re:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 2.0 4.0 2.2 2.6 2.5 3.2 0.3 7
Meander Wavelength(ft) 168 288 172.9 242.1 232.3 301.3 39.6 8
Meander Width Ratio 2 5.0 2.1 3.5 3.5 4.4 0.6 8
Substrate,Bed and Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress(Competency)Ib/ft2 - - 0.74 -
M ax Part Size(mm)M obiliz ed at Bankfull - - 122 -
Stream Power(Transport Capacity)W/m - - - -
Addi ti onal Reach Parameters
Drainage Area(me) 3.31 4.4 3.31 3.31
Rosgen Classification C/F E4/C4 C4 4
Bankfull Velocity(fps) - 5.1 4.5 -
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) - 224 170.0 -
Valley Length(ft) - - - 1,840
^Channel Thalweg Length(ft) - - - 1,479
Sinuosity - 1.1 1.23 1.24
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) - - 0.013 0.010
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) - - 0.011 0.010
Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) - - -
%of Reach with Eroding Banks - - -
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric - - -
Biological or Other - - -
-Information unavailable.
Non-Applicable.
^Channel Centerline(ft):Based on stream centerline stationing from design stream stationing accounts for breaks in conservation easement and utility right-of-uay.

Table 10.Baseline Stream Data Summary
Little Pine Creek II Mitigation Site-Little Pine Creek Reach 2B(334 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach Data I Design As-Built/Baseline
Dimension&Substrate-Rime LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Mau SD N Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Max Nfin Mean Med Max SD N
Bankfull Width(ft) - - - - 31.9 - - - 1 16.4 - - 21.4 - 2 - 24.0 -
Floodprone Width(ft) - 106+ - - - 1 70.0 - - >200 - 2 - >53 -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) - 1.9 - - - 1 1.9 - - 2.1 - 2 - 1.6 -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) - 3.4 - - - 1 2.5 - - 3.1 - 2 - 2.3 -
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft) - - 45.6 - - - 1 18.0 - - 27.2 - 2 - 39.3 -
Width/Depth Ratio - 12.3 - - - 1 12.0 - - 14.0 - 2 - 14.6 -
Entrenchment Ratio - 4.1+ - - - 1 >2.2 - - >2.3 - 2 - >2.2 -
Bank Height Ratio - 1.4 - - - 1 1.0 - - 1.1 - 2 - 1.0 -
d50(mm) - 72.0 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 36.9 50.2 50.2 63.5 18.8 2
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.024 - - - 0.004 - 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 - 2
Pool Length(ft) 14.0 54.6 47.5 109.4 43.4 4
Pool Max Depth(ft) 3.1 6.2 6.7 6.7 7.3 0.5 4
Pool Spacing(ft) 224 36 168 35.0 90.2 96.3 133.2 46.6 4
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 105.0 48.0 120.0 83.5 1
Radius of Curvature(ft) 76.7 133.8 48.0 96.0 70.9 1
Re:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 2.5 4.36 2.0 4.0 2.9 1
Meander Wavelength(ft) 350 168 288 256.3 1
Meander Width Ratio 3.2 2 5.0 3.4 1
Substrate,Bed and Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress(Competency)Ib/ft2 - - 0.74 -
M ax Part Size(mm)M obilized at Bankfull - - 122 -
Stream Power(Transport Capacity)W/mm - - - -
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area(min) 3.34 4.4 3.34 3.34
Rosgen Classification C/F E4/C4 C4 C4
Bankfull Velocity(fps) - 5.1 4.5 -
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) - 224 170 -
Valley Length(ft) - - - 282
^Channel Thalweg Length(ft) - - - 334
Sinuosity - 1.1 1.23 1.18
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) - - 0.013 0.017
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) - - 0.011 0.010
Bankfull Floodplam Area(acres) - - -
%of Reach with Eroding Banks - - -
Charmel Stability or Habitat M ctric - - -
Biological or Other - - -
-Information mavailable.
Non-Applicable.
^Channel Centerline(ft):Based on stream centerline stationing from design stream stationing;accomts for breaks in conservation easement and utility right-of-ways

Table 10.Baseline Stream Data Summary
Little Pine Creek II Mitigation Site-Little Pine Creek Tributary A(82 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach Data Design I As-Built/Baseline
Dimension&Substrate-Riffle LL LI. Eq. NE Mean Med Max SD N ND Mean Med Max SD N ND Mean Max Nhn Mean Med Max SD N
Bankfull Width(ft) - 6.6 - - - 1 6.2 6.8 - 12.6 5.8 3 - 9.5 -
Floodprone Width(ft) - 61.1 - - - 1 14.3 23.7 - 46.3 22.7 3 - >18 -
BankfullM can Depth(ft) - 1.6 - - - 1 0.05 0.8 - 0.7 0.16 3 - 0.72 -
BankfullMax Depth(ft) - 2.2 - - - 1 0.8 1.0 - 1.03 0.02 3 - 1.1 -
BankfullCrossSectionalArea(fta) - 10.5 - - - 1 3.8 3.1 - 5.1 2.05 3 - 6.8 -
Width/Depth Ratio - 4.1 - - - 1 9.1 12.7 - 24.3 11.7 3 - 13.2 -
Entrenchment Ratio - 9.3 - - - 1 1.3 4.3 - 7.5 3.25 3 - >2.2 -
Bank Height Ratio - 1.0 - - - 1 1.0 1.6 - 2.1 0.55 3 - 1.0 -
d50(mm)
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 15.8 25.2 25.2 34.5 13.3 2
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.04 0.05 2 0.018 - 0.032 0.011 0.017 0.017 0.023 0.008 2
Pool Length(ft) 7.4 7.8 7.8 8.2 0.6 2
Pool MaxDepth(ft) 0.7 1.7 1.9 2.5 0.7 4 - 1.1 - 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 0.0 2
Pool Spacing(ft) 15.8 61.4 78 90.5 32.7 3 14 - 67 - 15.3 - - - 1
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 19.0 26.0 2 19.0 77.0 10.1 12.0 12.0 13.9 1.9 2
Radius of Curvature(ft) 22.0 66.0 2 19.0 - 43.0 - 21.4 - - - 1
Rc:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 2.65 8.75 2 2.0 - 4.0 - 1.9 - - - 1
M eander Wavelength(ft) 55 140 2 77 - 124 - 51.1 - - - 1
Meander Width Ratio 7.3 18.6 2 2.0 5.0 - 4.6 - - - 1
Substrate,Bed and Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress(Competency)Ib/ftc - - - -
M ax Part Size(mm)Mobilized at Bankfull - - - -
Stream Power(Transport Capacity)W/ma - - - -
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area(miz) 0.37 0.051;0.12 0.38 0.38
Rosgen Classification E B4/C4;AB4 C C5
Bankfull Velocity(fps) - - 3.7 -
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) - - 28.0 -
Valley Length(ft) - - - 78
^Charnel Thalweg Length(ft) - - - 82
Sinuosity - - 1.06 1.04
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) - - - 0.013
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) - - - 0.007
Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) - - -
%of Reach with Eroding B anks - - -
Channel Stability or Habitat M etric - - -
Biological or Other - - -
-Information snavailable.
Non-Applicable.
^Channel Centerline(ft):Based on stream centerline stationing from design stream stationing accmnts for breaks in conservation easement and utility right-of-ways

Table 10.Baseline Stream Data Summary
Little Pine Creek II Mitigation Site-Little Pine Creek Tributary B(77 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach Data Design I As-Built/Baseline
Dimension&Substrate-Riffle LL LI. Eq. Mtn Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Max Min Mean Med Max SD N
Bankfull Width(ft) 6.2 6.8 - 12.6 5.8 2 - 11.0 - - 10.6 - - - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 14.3 23.7 - 46.3 22.7 2 - >18 - - 30.0 - - - 1
BankfullM can Depth(ft) 0.05 0.8 - 0.7 0.16 2 - 0.8 - - 0.6 - - - 1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.8 1.0 - 1.03 0.02 2 - 1.1 - - 1.4 - - - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ftz) 3.8 3.1 - 5.1 2.05 2 - 8.5 - - 6.5 - - - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 9.1 12.7 - 24.3 11.7 2 - 14.3 - - 17.1 - - - 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 4.3 - 7.5 3.25 2 - >2.2 - - 2.8 - - - 1
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.6 - 2.1 0.55 2 - 1.0 - - 1.1 - - - 1
d50(mm)
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 19.4 21.0 21.0 22.6 2.3 2
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.04 0.05 2 0.008 - 0.015 0.005 0.015 0.015 0.025 0.014 2
Pool Length(ft) 4.19 9.16 9.16 14.1 7.04 2
Pool MaxDepth(ft) 0.7 1.7 1.9 2.5 0.7 4 - 1.1 - 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.7 0.4 2
Pool Spacing(ft) 15.8 61.4 78 90.5 32.7 3 17 - 77 - 32.5 - - - 1
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 19.0 26.0 2 22.0 - 77.0 - 5.5 - - - 1
Radius of Curvature(ft) 22.0 66.0 2 22.0 - 44.0 21.8 24.6 - 2-.3 - 2
Rc:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 2.65 8.75 2 2.0 - 4.0 2.1 2.4 - 2.6 - 2
M eander Wavelength(ft) 55 140 2 77 - 132
Meander Width Ratio 7.3 18.6 2 2.0 - 5.0
Substrate,Bed and Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress(Competency)Ib/ftc - - - -
M ax Part Size(mm)Mobilized at Bankfull ll - - - -
Stream Power(Transport Capacity)W/m° - - - -
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area(miz) 0.11 0.051;0.12 0.26 0.26
Rosgen Classification - B4/C4;AB4 C CS
Bankfull Velocity(fps) - - 2.5 -
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) - - 21.0 -
Valley Length(ft) - - - 75.6
*Channel Thalweg Length(ft) - - - 77.8
^Channel Centerline(ft) - - - -
Sinuosity - - 1.09 1.03
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) - - - 0.015
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) - - - 0.008
Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) -- -
%of Reach with Eroding B anks - - -
Channel Stability or Habitat M etric - - -
Biological or Other - - -
-Information unavailable.
Non-Applicable.
*Channel T halweg Length(ft):Based on actual thalweg cak:ulations from the as-built survey,accounts for breaks in conservation easement and utility right-of-says.
^Channel Centerline(ft):Based on stream centerline stationing from design stream stationing accounts for breaks in conservation easement and utility right-of-ways.

Table 10.Baseline Stream Data Summary
Little Pine Creek II Mitigation Site-Little Pine Creek Tributary C(577 feet)
Parameter Regional Curse I Pre-listing Condition Reference Reach Data Design I As-Built/Baseline
Dimension&Substrate-Riffle LL EL Eq. NMI Mean Med Mau SD N NMI Mean Med Mau SD N Min Mean Max NM Mean Med Max SD N
Bankfull Width(ft) - 8.0 - - - 1 6.2 6.8 - 12.6 5.8 2 - 6.5 - - 9.3 - - - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) - 16.9 - - - 1 14.3 23.7 - 46.3 22.7 2 - >13 - - 40.0 - - - 1
BankfullM can Depth(ft) - 0.9 - - - 1 0.05 0.8 - 0.7 0.16 2 - 0.5 - - 0.6 - - - 1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) - 1.6 - - - 1 0.8 1.0 - 1.03 0.02 2 - 0.7 - - 1.2 - - - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft') - 7.1 - - - 1 3.8 3.1 - 5.1 2.05 2 - 3.1 - - 5.3 - - - 1
Width/Depth Ratio - 8.9 - - - 1 9.1 12.7 - 24.3 11.7 2 - 13.7 - - 16.4 - - - 1
Entrenchment Ratio - 2.1 - - - 1 1.3 4.3 - 7.5 3.25 2 - >2.2 - - 4.3 - - - 1
Bank Height Ratio - 2.0 - - - 1 1.0 1.6 - 2.1 0.55 2 - 1.0 - - 1.0 - - - 1
d50(mm)
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 9.4 24.3 20.2 52.9 13.4 13
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.04 0.05 2 0.023 - 0.042 0.005 0.021 0.010 0.042 0.013 13
Pool Length(ft) 3.5 12.3 12.4 21.1 5.7 15
PoolMaxDepth(ft) 0.7 1.7 1.9 2.5 0.7 4 - 0.7 - 0.6 1.5 1.3 2.6 0.8 15
Pool Spacing(ft) 15.8 61.4 78 90.5 32.7 3 10.0 - 46.0 15.7 33.3 28.1 56.6 14.1 14
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 19.0 26.0 2 13.0 - 46.0 13.3 24.2 23.8 32.1 4.9 13
Radius of Curvature(ft) 22.0 66.0 2 13.0 - 26.0 9.3 14.3 13.3 25.8 4.0 13
Rc:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 2.65 8.75 2 2.0 - 4.0 1.0 1.5 1.4 2.8 0.4 13
M eander Wavelength(ft) 55 140 2 46 - 78 44.3 59.0 58.7 75.5 11.0 8
Meander Width Ratio 7.3 18.6 2 2.0 - 5.0 1.4 2.5 2.5 3.5 0.6 13
Substrate,Bed and Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress(Competency)Ib/ft2 - - - -
M ax Part Size(mm)Mobilized at Bankfull - - - -
Stream Power(Transport Capacity)W/mm - - - -
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area(miz) 0.11 0.051;0.12 0.11 0.11
Rosgen Classification G B4/C4;AB4 C C
Bankfull Velocity(fps) - - 2.9 -
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) - - 10.0 -
Valley Length(ft) - - - 1,616
*Channel Thalweg Length(ft) - - - 577
^Channel Centerline(ft) - - - -
Sinuosity - - 1.23 1.31
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) - - - 0.022
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) - - - 0.021
Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) - - -
%of Reach with Eroding Banks - - -
Channel Stability or Habitat M etric - - -
Biological or Other - - -
-Information unavailable.
Non-Applicable.
*Channel T halweg Length(ft):Based on actual thalweg calculations from the as-built survey,accounts for breaks in conservation easement and utility right-of-ways.
^Channel Centerline(ft):Based on stream centerline stationing from design stream stationing accounts for breaks in conservation easement and utility right-of-ways.

Table lla.Monitoring Data-Dimensional Morphology Summary(Dimensional Parameters-Cross Sections)
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Cross Section 1(Riffle) Cross Section2(Pool) Cross Section3(Pool)
little Pine Creek Reach 1 little Pine Creek Reach 1 little Pine Creek Reach 2A
Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 AIY7
Record Elevation(datum)Used 2574.7 2574.7 2574.5 2574.9 2571.7 2571.9
Low Bank Height Elevation(datum)Used 2574.7 2574.5 2574.5 2574.4 2571.7 2571.9
Bankfull Width(ft) 25.5 18.2 23.7 25.9 28.0 24.0
Floodprone Width(ft) 100.0 100.0 70.0 70.0 100.0 100.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.2 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.4
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 2.7 2.8 4.0 2.9 3.1 3.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(If) 31.6 31.6 42.3 42.3 36.7 34.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 20.6 10.5 13.3 15.8 21.4 16.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 3.9 5.5 3.0 2.7 3.6 4.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.1 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.0
Low Top of Bank Depth(ft) 2.8 2.5 3.9 2.4 3.1 3.0
Cross Section 4(Riffle) Cross Section 5(Pool) Cross Section 6(Riffle) little
little Pine Creek Reach 2A little Pine Creek Reach 2A Pine Creek Reach 2A
Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Record Elevation(datum)Used 2571.1 2571.0 2570.9 2570.4 2567.6 2567.6
Low Bank Height Elevation(datum)Used 2571.1 2571.2 2570.9 2570.6 2567.6 2567.6
Bankfull Width(ft) 21.3 37.2 22.2 27.3 40.4 42.0
Floodprone Width(ft) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.7 1.0 1.7 1.4 1.6 0.9
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 2.7 2.6 3.1 4.1 2.5 2.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft°) 36.4 36.4 37.9 37.9 37.4 37.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 12.5 38.1 13.0 19.7 14.7 47.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 4.7 2.7 4.5 3.7 4.3 2.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0
Low Top of Bank Depth(ft) 2.9 2.8 3.6 4.2 2.6 2.4
Cross Section 7(Riffle) Cross Section 8(Pool) Cross Section 9(Pool)
little Pine Creek Reach 2A little Pine Creek Reach 2A little Pine Creek Reach 2B
Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MI'7
Record Elevation(datum)Used 2564.1 2564.2 2563.4 2563.1 2558.8 2558.7
Low Bank Height Elevation(datum)Used 2564.1 2564.2 2563.4 2563.4 2558.8 2558.7
Bankfull Width(ft) 29.7 22.2 24.4 20.1 36.7 23.6
Floodprone Width(ft) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.3 1.8 2.2 2.6 1.2 1.8
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 2.4 2.7 4.1 4.0 4.1 4.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 39.2 39.2 53.2 52.8 42.3 42.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 22.5 12.6 11.2 7.7 31.9 13.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 3.4 4.5 4.1 5.0 2.7 4.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0
Low Top of Bank Depth(ft) 2.4 2.7 4.3 4.4 4.1 4.3
Cross Section 10(Pool) Cross Section 11(Riffle) Cross Section 12(Pool)
Tributary A Tributary B Tributary C
Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MI'7
Record Elevation(datum)Used 2572.8 2572.5 2567.9 2567.8 2571.4 2571.4
Low Bank Height Elevation(datum)Used 2572.8 2572.4 2567.9 2567.6 2571.4 2571.2
Bankfull Width(ft) 12.6 21.6 10.6 16.1 8.7 19.2
Floodprone Width(ft) 40.0 40.0 30.0 30.0 40.0 40.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.4 1.0 0.5
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 1.6 1.9 1.4 1.5 2.1 2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 9.2 9.2 6.5 6.5 8.7 8.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 17.4 50.3 17.1 40.1 8.7 42.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 3.2 1.9 2.8 1.9 4.6 2.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.2 0.9 1.1 0.9 1.0 0.9
Low Top of Bank Depth(ft) 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.3 2.1 1.8
Cross Section 13(Riffle)
Tributary C
Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 NIY7
Record Elevation(datum)Used 2571.1 2571.0
Low Bank Height Elevation(datum)Used 2571.1 2571.0
Bankfull Width(ft) 9.3 8.6
Floodprone Width(ft) 40.0 40.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.6 0.6
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 1.2 1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 5.3 5.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 16.4 14.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 4.3 4.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0
Low Top of Bank Depth(ft) 1.3 1.3

Table 11 b.Monitoring Data-Stream Reach Data Summary
LPCII-Little Pine Creek Reach 1(533 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-5 MY-7
Dimension&Substrate-Rime Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width(ft) - 25.5 - - - 1 - 18.2 - - - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) - 100.0 - - - 1 - 100.0 - - - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) - 1.2 - - - 1 - 1.7 - - - 1
Bankfull Ma,Depth(ft) - 2.7 - - - 1 - 2.8 - - - 1
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft°) - 31.6 - - - 1 - 31.6 - - - 1
Width/Depth Ratio - 20.6 - - - 1 - 10.5 - - - 1
Entrenchment Ratio - 3.9 - - - 1 - 5.5 - - - 1
Bank Height Ratio - 1.1 - - - 1 - 0.9 - - - 1
Profile
Rifle Length(ft) 36.4 58.4 52.5 80.1 19.8 12
Rifle Slope(ft/ft) 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.001 12
Pool Lengh(ft) 16.4 25.0 26.5 32.2 6.0 5
Pool Max Depth(ft) 2.6 4.2 4.5 5.4 1.1 5
Pool Spacing(ft) 66.1 105.5 107.1 128.2 25.3 5
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 35.4 46.0 47.9 52.6 6.8 4
Radius of Curvature(ft) 51.0 55.0 54.0 60.0 3.7 3
Rc:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.4 0.1 3
Meander Wavelength(ft) 160.0 170.0 170.0 180.0 7.5 2
Meander Width Ratio 1.4 1.8 1.9 2.1 0.3 4
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C4
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) 533
Sinuosity(ft) 1.11
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.004
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) 0.005
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% 50%110%I 21%I 19%I 0% I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-Information Unavailable
N/A-Information does not apply.
Ili=Ruffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glirp/S=Step
Table llb Cont'd.Monitoring Data-Stream Reach Data Sununary
Little Pine Creek II-Little Pine Creek Reach 2A(1,506 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-5 MY-7
Dimension&Substrate-Rime Min Mean Med Max SD n Mia Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD o Min Mean Med Max SD o Mia Mean Med Max SD a Mia Mean Med Max SD o
Bankfull Width(ft) 21.3 24.8 23.5 29.7 3.5 3 22.2 33.8 37.2 42.0 10.32 3
Floodprone Width(ft) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 3 100 100 100 100 0.00 3
BaukfullMean Depth(ft) 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 0.2 3 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.8 0.48 3
BaukfullMaxDepth(ft) 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.7 0.1 3 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.7 0.15 3
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft) 36.4 37.6 37.4 39.2 1.2 3 36.4 37.7 37.4 39.2 1.42 3
Width/Depth Ratio 12.5 16.6 14.7 22.5 4.3 3 12.6 38.1 38.1 47.2 17.91 3
Entrenchment Ratio 3.4 4.1 4.3 4.7 0.5 3 2.4 3.2 2.7 4.5 1.15 3
Barak Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.1 3 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.06 3
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 22.1 50.4 52.3 86.9 18.7 12
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.006 0.016 0.014 0.030 0.007 12
Pool Length(ft) 14.0 56.6 53.9 109.4 26.4 16
PoolMaxDepth(ft) 1.6 4.6 4.1 7.3 1.6 16
Pool Spacing(ft) 35.0 122.6 124.9 215.4 49.9 15
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 52.5 86.4 86.2 109.4 15.8 8
Radius of Curvature(ft) 54.2 63.6 61.5 78.8 8.3 7
Rc:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 2.2 2.6 2.5 3.2 0.3 7
Meander Wavelength(ft) 172.9 242.1 232.3 301.3 39.6 8
Meander Width Ratio 2.1 3.5 3.5 4.4 0.6 8
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C4
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) 1,506
Sinuosity(ft) 1.24
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0099
B aukfull Slope(ft/ft) 0.0082
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% 32%13% 1 48%116%10% I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-Information Unavailable
N/A-Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Rep

Table 1 lb Cont'd.Monitoring Data-Stream Reach Data Summary
Little Pine Creek II-Little Pine Creek Reach 2B(334 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-5 MY-7
Dimension&Substrate-Ri®e Min Mean Med Max SD a Min Mean Med Max SD a Min Mean Med Max SD a Min Mean Med Max SD a Min Mean Med Max SD a Min Mean Med Max SD a
Bankfull Width(ft)
Floodprone Width(ft)
BaukfullMean Depth(ft)
BaukfullMaoDepth(ft)
Baukfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft')
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Bank Height Ratio
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 36.9 50.2 50.2 63.5 18.8 2
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 N/A 2
Pool Length(ft) 14.0 54.6 47.5 109.4 43.4 4
PoolMasDepth(ft) 6.2 6.7 6.7 7.3 0.5 4
Pool Spacing(ft) 35.0 90.2 96.3 133.2 46.6 4
Pattern
Charnel Belt Width(ft) - 83.5 - - - 1
Radius of Curvature(ft) - 70.9 - - - 1
Rc:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) - 2.9 - - - 1
Meander Wavelength(ft) - 256.3 - - - 1
Meander Width Ratio - 3.4 - - - 1
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C4
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) 334
Sinuosity(ft) 1.18
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.017
Baukfull Slop e(ft/ft) 0.010
Ri%/Ro%/P%/G%/S% 33%I 4% 145%119%I 0% I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-Information Unavailable
N/A-Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Aide/S=Rep
Table 1 lb Cont'd.Monitoring Data-Stream Reach Data Summary
LPC II-Trib A(82 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 AR'-3 MY-5 MY-7
Dimension&Substrate-Rife Min Mean Med Max SD a Miu Meat] Med Max SD n Miu Meat] Med Max SD n Miu Meat] Sled Sfax SD u Min Meat] Med Max SD n Miu Mean Sled Sfax SD a
Bankfull Width(ft)
Floodprone Width(ft)
BaukfullM can Depth(ft)
BaukfullMaoDepth(ft)
Bankfrll Cross-Sectional Area(ft)
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Bank Height Ratio
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 15.8 25.2 25.2 34.5 13.3 2
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.011 0.017 0.017 0.023 0.008 2
Pool Length(ft) 7.4 7.8 7.8 8.2 0.6 2
PoolMaxDepth(ft) 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 0.0 2
Pool Spacing(ft) 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 N/A 1
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 10.1 12.0 12.0 13.9 1.9 2
Radius of Curvature(ft) 9.8 11.0 11.0 12.2 1.2 2
Re Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.1 2
Meander Length(ft) 51.1 51.1 51.1 51.1 N/A 1
Meander Length Ratio(Ls/Wute)(ft) 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 N/A 1
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C5
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) 82
Sinuosity(ft) 1.04
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0130
Baukfull Slope(ft/ft) 0.0070
Ri%/Ro%/P%/G%/S% 61%111%119%1 9% 1 0% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-Information Unavailable
N/A-Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Rep

Table 1 lb Cont'd.Monitoring Data-Stream Reach Data Sununary
LPC II-Trib B(77 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-5 MY-7
Dimension&Substrate-Riffle Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD a Min Mean Med Max SD a Min Mean Med Max SD a Min Mean Med Max SD a
Bank full Width(ft) - 10.6 - - - 1 - 16.1 - - - t
Floodprone Width(ft) - 30.0 - - - 1 - 30 - - - 1
BaukfullM can Depth(ft) - 0.6 - - - 1 - 0.4 - - - t
Baukfull Max Depth(ft) - 1.4 - - - 1 - 1.5 - - - t
Baukfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft) - 6.5 - - - 1 - 6.5 - - - t
Width/Depth Ratio - 17.1 - - - 1 - 40.1 - - - t
Entrenchment Ratio - 2.8 - - - 1 - 1.9 - - - l
Bank Height Ratio - 1.1 - - -
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 19.4 21.0 21.0 22.6 2.3 2
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.005 0.015 0.015 0.025 0.014 2
Pool Length(ft) 4.2 9.2 9.2 14.1 7.0 2
PoolMaxDepth(ft) 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.7 0.4 2
Pool Spacing(ft) - 32.5 - - - 1
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) - 5.5 - - - 1
Radius of Curvature(ft) 21.8 24.6 - 27.3 - 2
Rc:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 2.1 2.4 - 2.6 - 2
Meander Length(ft)
Meander Length Ratio(LSWtor)(ft)
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C5
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) 78
Sinuosity(ft) 1.03
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0150
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) 0.0080
Ri%/Ro%/P%/G%/S% 54%I 6% 124%116%I 0% I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-Information Unavailable
N/A-Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Aide/S=Rep
Table 1 lb Cont'd.Monitoring Data-Stream Reach Data Summary
LPCII-Trib C(577 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 AR'-3 MY-4 MY-5
Dimension&Substrate-Riffle Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD a Min Mean Med Max SD u Mix Meat] Med Max SD a Min Mean Med Max SD a
Bank full Width(ft) - 9.3 - - - 1 - 8.6 - - - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) - 40.0 - - - 1 - 40.0 - - - 1
BankfullMean Depth(ft) - 0.6 - - - 1 - 0.6 - - - 1
Baukfull Max Depth(ft) - 1.2 - - - 1 - 1.3 - - - 1
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft) - 5.3 - - - 1 - 5.3 - - - 1
Width/Depth Ratio - 16.4 - - - 1 - 14.0 - - - 1
Entrenchment Ratio - 4.3 - - - 1 - 4.6 - - - 1
Bank Height Ratio - 1.0 - - - 1 - 1.0 - - - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 9.4 24.3 20.2 52.9 13.4 13
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.005 0.021 0.010 0.042 0.013 10
Pool Length(ft) 3.5 12.3 12.4 21.1 5.7 15
PoolManDepth(ft) 0.6 1.5 1.3 2.6 0.8 17
Pool Spacing(ft) 15.7 33.3 28.1 56.6 14.1 14
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 13.3 24.2 23.8 32.1 4.9 13
Radius of Curvature(ft) 9.3 14.3 13.3 25.8 4.0 13
Rc:Baukfull Width(ft/ft) 1.0 1.5 1.4 2.8 0.4 13
Meander Wavelength(ft) 44.3 59.0 58.7 75.5 11.0 8
Meander Width Ratio 1.4 2.5 2.5 3.5 0.6 13
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C4
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) 577
Sinuosity(ft) 1.31
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.022
Baukfu1 Slope(ft/ft) 0.021
Ri%/Rn%/P%/G%/S% 54%1 7% 1 31%1 6% 1 2% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-Information Unavailable
N/A-Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Rep

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/Project No 856.
Date of Data Approximate Date of Photo #
Reach
Collection Occurrence Method (if available)
LPC Reach 1 4/7/2020 Unknown Wrack Lines n/a
10/6/2020 Unknown Wrack Lines n/a
10/6/2020 1/12/2020 Stage Recorder n/a
10/6/2020 1/24/2020 Stage Recorder n/a
4/7/2020 2/7/2020 Stage Recorder/Wrack
LPC Reach 2A Lines 1
7/10/2020 4/13/2020 Stage Recorder/Wrack
Lines n/a
10/6/2020 4/29/2020 Stage Recorder n/a
10/6/2020 *5/21/2020 Stage Recorder n/a
Tributary B 10/6/2020 5/21/2020 Crest Gage 3
10/6/2020 1/12/2020 Stage Recorder n/a
Tributary C 10/6/2020 5/21/2020 Stage Recorder n/a
10/6/2020 7/19/2020 Stage Recorder n/a
* Stage recorder buried during this event.
.i d ::•:,-11.4:4., s.
N
x a* 6-'4
ter ' x�
'-,> 3 �-2 - -fir
1. Wrack lines and sediment deposits, LPCII Reach 2a.

z
44 -
�4*
k e
1.
t raq �a
, r Yy� yNc. < sr yam �`` �
2. Residual wrack lines and sediment deposits LPCII Reach 2a
' sy�`'. ,� -o- a fir` _ 9 t::
. , O =.
_
r a Ky� �L 'srNyr IP
t ..5 c. ..,,,..,.,.....,v;,:.7.....,,, .:..-.,./-,:.,1-----,:':,.... ..,,;.;.*.i.,,I, a tt
a �a 4kY $� � ' 4 i .�1 4
$ 4
'fit a � s � � � y $ �
f 3
•
x
„•..4'",:?:'''.-Or-A,44,A,A- ,,Fe. -,-,!,.1.it, ' ..,''"'N 4 A.-,, -4;t....,--
-,..i,..i.,„oc.---c?,,-. .....4. , .. .----‘,..:::, , .,:,f..:„...:.,...74: : .-.„11,,,,,.,.. . .5.,_.,,t. ,. , .
41/4
}y �r3' 'yy ', zk kk �' '_ ' nb'iQn Crr 6, ZQ?0
3. Crest gage corklines, LPCII Trib B.

2567.5 Little Pine Creek Stage
The Continuous Stage Recorder on Little Pine
Creek was discovered displaced and buried under
2567 several inches of sediment on 10/06/20.The
5.38in precipitation event on 05/21/20 is
suspected to be responsible.Subsequent
pressure readings and stage data are suspect due
2566.5 to burial.
2566
x
c
2565.5
2565
2564.5 +In
NNilLriLkkj 11%44
2564
2563.5
1/1/2020 1/31/2020 3/1/2020 4/1/2020 5/1/2020 6/1/2020 7/1/2020 7/31/2020 8/31/2020 9/30/2020 10/31/2020
Trib C Stage
2570 —
2569.8 —
2569.6
2569.4 -
A,,,,„--Bankfull Elevation
2569.2
c 2569
W 2568.8 I-
2568.6 I- j
p44$'40
2568.4
2568.2
01/01/20 01/31/20 03/01/20 04/01/20 05/01/20 06/01/20 07/01/20 07/31/20 08/31/20 09/30/20 10/31/20

Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Precipitation Graphic
14.0
I
- Growing Season
12.0 -
10.0 -
tn
w
s
c0
C 8.0 -
C
0
'.. f
6.0
N /
1/
L
a 4.0
2.0 -
0.0 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I
Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20
Monthly Rainfall ----30th Percentile - - 70th Percentile Average
Monthly Rain Gauge Data
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Month Monthly Monthly Monthly 30th 70th Percentile Average
Rainfall Rainfall Rainfall Percentile
Jan-20 5.28 0.00 0.00 2.85 5.05 4.22
Feb-20 7.50 0.00 0.00 2.4 4.34 3.62
Mar-20 2.89 0.00 0.00 3.47 6.05 5.07
Apr-20 9.15 0.00 0.00 3.12 5.94 4.93
May-20 13.08 0.00 0.00 3.8 6.92 5.77
Jun-20 5.20 0.00 0.00 3.33 6.21 5.16
Jul-20 2.41 0.00 0.00 3.56 6.07 5.11
Aug-20 10.12 0.00 0.00 3.05 5.97 4.94
Sep-20 9.10 0.00 0.00 3.22 6.83 5.61
Oct-20 5.81 0.00 0.00 2.53 5.69 4.67
Nov-20 - 0.00 0.00 2.75 5.68 4.67
Dec-20 - 0.00 0.00 2.79 5.01 4.19
Total 70.54 0.00 0.00 50.95 63.38

Little Pine Creek!!Precipitation Data(inches)
6
5
r.
4
s;
0
5 3
w
Cl.
c.
P.
4'2
A
1
0 11 .. . I 1 i . .. I 11 111 II ...1iI . I 11111 .Ili.. 11..11, . 11111 it 1% . . . II III . III 1I I I .I.1 III I I III 1
1/1/20 2/1/20 3/1/20 4/1/20 5/1/20 6/1/20 7/1/20 8/1/20 9/1/20 10/1/20
Date
14.0 —
Growing Season
12.0 —
10.0 —
N
0
s
0
C 8.0 —
C
o ...
.
.0 — — — — `
• 6 � — - - - � � .
0
•
a 4.0 — `
���_ ��� may' ___���.
2.0 —
0.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20
Monthly Rainfall ---.30th Percentile — — 70th Percentile Average

Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Groundwater Monitoring Well Graphics
Gauge ID: MW1
Total Number of Consecutive Days Water Table within 12 inches of Soil Surface: 153
Percentage of Growing Season Water Table within 12 inches of Soil Surface: 91.1%
5.0 - - 25.0
End of - 20.0
4.5 Grow ing Season
Beginning of / - 15.0
Growing Season �/
4.0 - - 10.0
Ground Surface_ 5.0 c
3.5 I V
- 0.0 y
C i,
3.0 - Required - -5.0
C Depth
C 1 10.0 0
+' 2.5 - 0
+ - -15.0 0
2.0 - - -20.0 CD
i - -25.0 +0'
O. 1.5 - t
- -30.0 Q
a)
1.0 - - -35.0 Q
- -40.0
0.5 - - -45.0
0.0 It ?I'll! 1111,1i +IYi I 1 i 1111111 ..14. III 01'1.1•II pi. III. i1i, II III I I I I I I I I I -50.0
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N CNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Cal
N D) fV f0 a- N 00 fV co O co r N 6 fV 43 0 M r Cr- el. fV 00
N N N CVN N f0 F.,- N a- N D) N 0 N a- M
a- fV fV M M V 0 0 r r 0 0 6- 0 N N
Gauge ID: MW2
Total Number of Consecutive Days Water Table within 12 inches of Soil Surface: 156
Percentage of Growing Season Water Table within 12 inches of Soil Surface: 93%
5.0 - 25.0
End of
Growing Season - 20.0
4.5
Beginning of - 15.0
Growing Season
4.0 - - 10.0
Ground Surface_ 5.0 c
3.5 - L
0.0 y
y al
3.0 _T #" �`��y �rY�,�M��' � Required -5.0
C �/ # ` A7 - -10.0 -0
2.5 -
3
- -15.0 0
2.0 - - -20.0 CD
i - -25.0 +0+
d 1.5 - t
- -30.0 Q
1.0 - - -35.0 Q
- -40.0
0.5 -
L lb'
p+ iJi11. - -45.0
0.0 IY Jill! 11 �I�Ii +I,�I1.1 i 111111 ' I'IL111 T+' '1.1•I1 111 r 1ILI1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I -50.0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Cal
N D) fV f0 N 00 fV co O cor N 6 fV f0 M r V W fV io O
N N N N N N f0 Fs-. N a- N d) N G N a- M
a- fV fV M M 4 0 0 r r 0 0 0 N N

Appendix F
Other

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

From: Browning,Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)
To: Haupt,Mac;Davis,Erin B;Tugwell,Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW(US);Wilson,Travis W.;Bowers,Todd;byron hamsteadCalfws.gov;
McLendon,C S CIV USARMY CESAW(USA);Jones,M Scott(Scott)CIV USARMY CESAW(USA);Crumbley,Tyler A CN USARMY CESAW
(USA)
Cc: Allen,Melonie;Stanfill,Jim;Baumgartner,Tim;Tsomides,Harry;Harmon,Beth;Wiesner,Paul
Subject: [External]Notice of Initial Credit Release/NCDMS Little Pine II Stream and Wetland Site/SAW-2009-00591/Alleghany Co.
Date: Friday,April 3,2020 11:45:34 AM
Attachments: Little Pine II 856 New 01 Initial Credit Release 2020 signed.pdf
Little Pine II 856 MP Addendum Memo 3-13-20.pdf
CAUTION:External email.Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify.Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Good afternoon,
The 15-Day Record Drawing review for the Little Pine II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site(SAW-2009-00591)ended March 31,
2020.Per Section 332.8(o)(9)of the 2008 Mitigation Rule,this review followed the streamlined review process.All comments received
from the NCIRT are incorporated within this email.Please address the IRT concerns by replying to this email.There were no objections
to issuing the initial credit release,or approving the Mitigation Plan Addendum.Please find attached the current signed ledger.
DWR Comments:
1. The meeting minutes dated 11/14/2019,state that supplemental planting will be completed during the next dormant period.The
MY0 Report CVS Table shows that 5 of the 8 veg plots do not meet success criteria.Yet,the report does not mention plans for
supplemental planting.Please confirm.In addition to low stem counts,the veg plots show low species diversity.Only a total of 5 tree
species(including Red Maple and Green Ash)and 1 shrub species were identified in all of the veg plots.With an approved planting list
of 20 species,please confirm that the species and percent stems noted on As-Built Sheet 3.2 accurately reflect what has been planted.
DWR requests that a supplemental planting effort include a variety of the approved species.Due to concerns associated with Emerald
Ash Borer,DWR recommends that Green Ash not be included in a supplemental planting effort.
2. During the IRT site walk on 11/5/2019,several bare areas and areas of sparse herb cover were noted along Reach 2A,which may
not have been visible during the veg survey with 3-4 inches of snow cover.Please monitor closely during the MY1 to determine if soil
amendments and reseeding is warranted.
3. Also during the IRT site walk,there was discussion of relocating the Wetland 2A groundwater gauge and potentially modifying the
Wetland 2A target community type.Neither points were mentioned in the MY0 Report,please provide a brief explanation why not.
Please let me know if you have question.
Thanks,
Kim
Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager,Regulatory Division I U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Dr,Ste. 105 I Wake Forest,NC 27587 I 919.554.4884 x60
BUILDING STRONG(r)er
*NOTE:I am currently teleworking and away from my office.Please contact me via email or at 919.413.6392.
Original Message
From:Browning,Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
Sent:Monday,March 16,2020 11:29 AM
To:Haupt,Mac<[e-mail]>;Davis,Erin B<[e-mail]>;Tugwell,Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)
<[e-mail]>;[e-mail];[e-mail];byron [e-mail];Boggs,Brandee
C CIV USARMY CESAD(USA)<[e-mail]>;McLendon,C S CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)
<[e-mail]>;Jones,M Scott(Scott)CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>;
Crumbley,Tyler A CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
Cc:Allen,Melonie<[e-mail]>;Stanfill,Jim<[e-mail]>;Baumgartner,Tim
<[e-mail]>;Tsomides,Harry<har [e-mail]>;Harmon,Beth<[e-mail]>;Paul
Wiesner([e-mail])<[e-mail]>;Browning,Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)
<[e-mail]>
Subject:Notice of NCDMS Record Drawing Review/Little Pine II Stream and Wetland Site/SAW-2009-00591/Alleghany Co.
Good morning
The below referenced FINAL Record Drawing Report review has been requested by NCDMS. Per Section 332.8(o)(9)of the 2008
Mitigation Rule,this review follows the streamlined review process,which requires an IRT review period of 15 calendar days from this
email notification. Please provide any comments by 5 PM on the 15-day comment deadline shown below. When providing comments
please indicate if your concerns are great enough that you intend to request a site visit prior to the initial credit release. Comments

provided after the 15-day comment deadline(shown below)may not be considered.
At the conclusion of this comment period,a copy of all comments will be provided to NCDMS and the NCIRT along with District
Engineer's intent to approve or disapprove this Final Record Drawing and initial credit release.
15-Day Comment Start Date:March 16,2020
15-Day Comment Deadline:March 31,2020
45-Day Credit Release Approval Deadline:April 30,2020
*NOTE:If a site visit is requested by the IRT,comments are due 15 days after the site visit is complete.
Mitigation Plan lengths may vary from the record drawing.
**As part of this review request,we are also asking for IRT approval of a Mitigation Plan Addendum for a downward adjustment of the
projects stream assets(-107.6 SMUs)
2020 is Monitoring Year 1 for this project. The MY0 report and record drawings are also posted on the DMS portal and IRT SharePoint
page for your review.
Project information and location of the FINAL As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report(MY0):
Little Pine II Stream and Wetland Site
DMS Project#856
Design Bid Build(DBB)
New River Basin
Cataloging Unit 05050001
Alleghany County,North Carolina
Mitigation Plan Project Credits:
3,302.600 SMUs(Cold)
1.484 WMUs(Riparian)
As-Built-MYO Project Credits:
3,195.000 SMUs(Cold)
1.484 WMUs(Riparian)
Mitigation Plan Lengths/Acreages:
3,989 ft.
5.62 acres
As-Built-MYO Lengths/Acreages:
3,719 ft.
5.62 acres
NCDEQ-DMS PM:Harry Tsomides,[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>,[phone]
FINAL As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report and Record Drawings can be accessed directly on the DMS portal here:
LittlePineCreekll 856 MY0 2019
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%20Library/Projects/LittlePineCreekll856 MY02019.pdf
LittlePineCreeklI 856 AB 2019
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20 S ervices/Document%20Management%20Library/Projects/LITTLE-PINE-II-85 6-
ABFinalS ealed-2019.pdf
Thanks,
Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager,Regulatory Division I U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Dr,Ste. 105 I Wake Forest,NC 27587 I 919.554.4884 x60
BUILDING STRONG(r)

f�QUAnvto�
ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Governor Environmental Quality
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director MEMORANDUM
TO: Todd Tugwell, Chair,North Carolina Interagency Review Team(NCIRT)
FROM: Harry Tsomides,NCDEQ- DMS Project Manager
CC: Paul Wiesner,NCDEQ- DMS Western Regional Supervisor
Melonie Allen,NCDEQ -DMS Credit Release Coordinator
Jim Stanfill,NCDEQ - DMS Asset Manager
Tim Baumgartner,NCDEQ- DMS Division Director
SUBJECT: Little Pine Creek II—Project As-Built Update and Mitigation Plan Addendum
(downward adjustment)
DMS# 856
USACE Action ID: SAW-2009-00591
DWR# 09-0048
Alleghany County,North Carolina
DATE: March 13, 2020
DMS requests an amendment to the Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project Mitigation Plan assets to
become consistent with the as-built alignment adjustments, recent stream preservation credit
deductions, and overhead utility presence not previously accounted for. The following tables
summarize the changes requested. This will result in a net change of-107.6 SMUs. Wetland credits
remain unchanged. In summary:
• 40.6 SMU reduction due to preservation Tributaries E and F (203 LF total)becoming
ineligible for credit as agreed on at 11/5/2019 Site meeting with IRT (see Project Meeting
Minutes dated 11/14/2019);this was due to recent downcutting and partial deterioration of
channel conditions since original design;
• 50 SMU deduction (all restoration reaches)due to 2 overhead wire (OHW)rights-of-way not
accounted for in the IRT-approved Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project Restoration Plan
Addendum, January 15, 2016;
• 17 SMU(all restoration reaches) deduction due to as-built alignment adjustments (see
following table comments for detail).
DEQ)
NORTH CAROLINA Department of Environmental Quality
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W.Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

Table 1.Project Mitigation Assets and Components
Little Pine Creek II Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
As-Built
Existing Mitigation , Centerline
Footage or Plan Footage Mitigation Restoration Mitigation Footage or
Project Segment Acreage or Acreage Category Level Priority Level Ratio(X:1) Acreage" Comments
20'LF Not-credited due to OHW ROW;minor
Reach 1 530 Cold R P2 1:1 517 change in as built length
2.894 1512 Cold R PI 1:1 1476 Began farther downstream due to cattle crossing;
, ,
Reach 2A 30LF not credited due to OHW
Reach 2B 321 Cold R PI 1:1 334 Additional 13'LF at end of project
Tributary A 119 86 Cold R P2 1:1 82 Sinuosity less than design;confluence with Reach
2A farther upstream than proposed
50 104 Cold R PI 1:1 78 Confluence with Reach 2A farther upstream than
Tributary B proposed
Tributary C 299 578 Cold R P1 1:1 577
Tributary D 899 655 Cold P N/A 5:1 655
Tributary E 50 50 Cold P N/A 5:1 50 Not credited due to poor as built condition
Tibutary F 153 153 Cold P N/A 5:1 153 Not credited due to poor as built condition
Wetland 1 0.32 0.32 RNR Ents 2:1 0.32
Wetland 2A 0.88 0.88 RNR Erdr 2:1 0.88
Wetland2B 4.42 4.42 RNR P 5:1 ' 4.42
*Mitigation plan credits account for breaks in conservation easements and are based on design stream stationing and taken from the approved mitigation plan.Mitigation plan credits are the same as
the approved mitigation plan.
^Based on centerline calculations from the as-built survey,accounts for breaks in conservation easement and utility right-of-ways.
Project Credits-As Built
Stream Riparian Wetland Non-Rip Coastal
Restoration Level Warm Cool Cold Riverine Non-Riv Wetland Marsh
Restoration - - P. 3,064.000 - - - -
Re-establishment - - - -
Rehabilitation - - - -
Enhancement - 0.600 - -
Enhancement I - - -
Enhancement II - - -
Creation - - - -
Preservation - - 131.000 - 0.884 -
Total Credits' - - 3,195.000 - 1.484 - -
'Project credits reflect the credits consistent with as-built condition,accounting for OHW,IRT preservation credit deductions,and as
built alignment adjustments.
Project Credits-Mitigation Plan
Stream Riparian Wetland Non-Rip Coastal
Restoration Level Warm Cool Cold Riverine Non-Riv Wetland Marsh
Restoration - - 3,131.000 - - - -
Re-establishment - - - -
Rehabilitation - - - -
Enhancement - P. 0.600 - -
Enhancement I - - -
Enhancement II - - -
Creation - - - -
Preservation - - P. 171.600 - 0.884 -
Total Credits' - - 3,302.600 - 1.484 - -
'Project credits reflect the IRT-approved Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project Restoration Plan Addendum,January 15,2016
The As-Built Baseline Report(MYO)is complete and available for IRT review. The project is entering
Monitoring Year 1 (2020).The project credit release and monitoring will follow the monitoring update
memo from DMS to IRT, dated 9/19/2019. Please let me know if you have any comments,questions,
or concerns.
Sincerely,
Harry Tsomides
Project Manager,NCDMS-DEQ
Tel. [phone]
[e-mail]
D_EQ
NORTH CAROLINA Department el Environmental Quality
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W.Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976