20150634 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_2020_20210219

ID#* 20150634 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 02/19/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 2/19/2021
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jeremiah Dow
Project Information
...................................................................................
ID#:* 20150634
Existing IDr
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*1
Existing Version
r DMS r Mitigation Bank
UT to Falls Lake Riparian Buffer and Nutrient
Offset Mitigation Project
Durham
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: UTFL_95389_MY4_2020.pdf 6.22MB
Rease upload only one RDFof the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jeremiah Dow
Signature:*

YEAR 4 ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
FINAL
Year 5 Post Planting
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm)
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Project
Durham County, North Carolina
NC Division of Mitigation Services Project #: 95389
Neuse River Basin
03020201
DWR #: 2015.0634
Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Prepared for and by:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699.1652
December 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Project Summary ............................................................................................................................1
2.0 Performance Standards....................................................................................................................1
3.0 Monitoring Plan..............................................................................................................................1
3.1 Reporting.................................................................................................................................1
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring.................................................................................................................2
4.0 Maintenance & Contingency Plan........................................................................................................2
5.0 Year 3 Annual Monitoring..................................................................................................................2
Appendices
Appendix A. Background Tables
Table 1 Project Components
Table 2 Project Activity & Reporting
Table 3 Project Contacts
Table 4 Project Attributes
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Asset Map
Figure 3 Current Condition Plan View
Site Photos
Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6 Planted Tree Species
Table 7 Planted and Total Stems

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) implemented the UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Project (Project) to fulfill
riparian buffer mitigation needs in the Neuse 03020201 Catalog Unit and nutrient offset mitigation needs in the Upper Falls
Lake Watershed in accordance with the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) Temporary Buffer Mitigation Rule (15A NCAC
02B .0295) effective October 24, 2014.
This project site is located off Benny Ross Road in Durham County approximately 7.5 miles east of the City of Durham and is
within the Upper Falls Lake Watershed (Appendix B, Figure 1). The site is within the Lick Creek watershed (HU
3020201050030) which is comprised of sub -watersheds draining to Lick Creek, its tributary Rocky Branch, Laurel Creek, and
unnamed tributaries to Falls Lake. Falls Lake is a drinking water supply watershed with additional nutrient restrictions regulated
by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources. The site is in NC DWR's 03-04-01 sub -basin.
Riparian buffer mitigation activities occur along the Project from top of bank and extending out to 200 feet, resulting in a
maximum of 9.67 acres (421,385 ft2) of riparian buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation through planting and preservation of
10.86 acres of forested buffer easement along the main unnamed tributary to Falls Lake and several water conveyances that
flow to UT to Falls Lake. Refer to Appendix A, Table 1 for project mitigation components and Appendix B, Figure 2 for the
project component/asset map. Due to the site's location within the Upper Falls Lake Watershed, nutrient offset mitigation from
this site can only be provided to offset impacts from development within the Falls Lake Watershed. In addition, riparian buffer
mitigation from this site can be used to offset permitted impacts according to the Temporary Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0295)
effective October 24, 2014.
The following goals of this riparian buffer/nutrient offset mitigation project are to address stressors identified in the Project
watershed through the restoration of riparian buffers along the UT and its conveyances.
• Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural activities
• Reducing sedimentation onsite and downstream
The success of these goals are based on the following objectives;
• Removal of horses and goats from riparian areas;
• Reducing the application of agricultural materials into and adjacent to streams;
• Establishing a vegetative buffer adjacent to streams to treat surface runoff, which may contain pollutants such as
sediment and/or agricultural pollutants from the adjacent landscape;
• Reducing bank erosion associated with a lack of vegetative cover; and
• Planting a diverse hardwood vegetative buffer adjacent to Site tributaries.
Project restoration activities were completed in March 2016. Refer to Appendix A, Tables 2, 3 and 4 for detailed project activity,
reporting history, project contact information and project baseline information and attributes.
Directions to the Project from Raleigh: Take US 70 West/Glenwood Avenue toward Durham. Turn Right on NC 50
North/Creedmoor Road. Exit onto NC 98 West. Turn Right onto Southview Road and follow to T intersection. Turn Right onto
Baptist Road. Turn right onto Benny Ross Road Site. Travel approximately 0.3 mile to gate on the left. Access is by foot
through the gate and 50 ft. access easement See Appendix D, As -Built Sheets). Coordinates: 35.998142,-78.742794
2.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Performance standards were established for native forest development and diffuse flow through the riparian buffer in
accordance with DWR's Administrative Code 15A NCAC 02B.0295 (Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and
Maintenance of Riparian Buffers) (NCDWR 2014 Temporary Rule). Performance standards are dependent upon the density
and survival of characteristic forest species. After five years of monitoring, an average density of 260 woody stems per acre
must be surviving and diffuse flow maintained.
3.0 MONITORING PLAN
3.1 Reporting
Annual monitoring data will be reported following DMS's Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Buffer Annual Monitoring Report
Template (ver. 1.0) dated Feb. 2, 2014. The monitoring report shall provide a project data chronology and assist in decision
making regarding project close-out. The following table outlines monitoring requirements and parameters for this project.
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020
1

Required
Parameter
Quantity
Frequency
Notes
Quantity and location of vegetation plots
Vegetation will be monitored for a period of five years or until
Yes
Vegetation
will be determined by Division of
Annual
success criteria are met. During years 2, 3 and 5 random plots will
Mitigation Services
be used. Visual monitoring of the site will be done all five years
Yes
Project
Annual
Locations of fence damage, vegetation damage, boundary
boundary
encroachments, etc. will be mapped
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring
To monitor the vegetation at this site, the NC Division of Mitigation Services will use a combination of visual monitoring and
random vegetation plots. Visual monitoring will be conducted during all five years of monitoring to assess vegetative cover,
diffuse flow and easement integrity. DMS will monitor ten (10) rotating, random 1,500 square foot vegetation plots in years 2,
3, and 5 to assess vegetative success representative of the entire mitigation area from top of bank to 200 feet from each
tributary/conveyance. These ten (10) plots will provide coverage of 3% of the site each year used. In each sample plot,
monitoring parameters will include species composition and density. As it was done for the baseline data collection, the
vegetation plots will be randomly selected using a grid and random number generator or similar method for each of the
monitoring years 2, 3 and 5. Visual observations of the percent cover of shrub and herbaceous species, diffuse flow and
easement integrity will be documented by photograph and site visits.
Monitoring of site restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until performance standards are met. The first annual
monitoring assessment (MY1) was completed in the fall of 2016. The vegetation will be monitored for a total of five years,
with the final monitoring activities concluding in 2021. The close-out for the Project will be conducted in 2022 given that the
performance criteria has been met.
4.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLAN
DMS shall monitor the site and conduct a physical inspection of the site a minimum of once per year throughout the post -
construction monitoring period until performance standards are met. These site inspections may identify site components
and features that require routine maintenance. Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years
following site construction and may include the following:
Component/Feature
Maintenance through project close-out
Remedial Measures
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure survival. Routine vegetation
Any remedial activities performed will be
Vegetation
maintenance and repair activities may include supplemental planting. The site
documented in the annual monitoring reports.
will also be evaluated to ensure diffuse flow is still occurring.
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between
the mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by
Any remedial activities performed will be
Site Boundary
fence, marker, bollard, post, tree -blazing, or other means as allowed by site
documented in the annual monitoring reports.
conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary markers disturbed,
damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis.
5.0 YEAR 4 MONITORING
Based on the results of Year 2 annual monitoring, and DMS's efforts to contract with a new planting contractor to replant the
Project and treat invasive vegetation, DMS did not conduct annual monitoring in 2018. The replanting of the site was
completed in late February 2019. A list of species planted during the replant of the site is provided in Appendix C. Invasive
treatments were last completed in June 2019. Species treated included Tree of Heaven, Lespedeza and dog fennel.
Additional treatment of will be done as needed.
Year 4 annual monitoring (MY4) was conducted in August 2020. While quantitative vegetation monitoring was not proposed
for MY4, due to the history of planted stems struggling at this site, and observations of low stem density and vigor, MY4
monitoring activities included stem counts using ten (10) rotating, random 1,500 square foot vegetation plots. Other
monitoring activities included visual monitoring of the project verifying the presence or absence of invasive species;
checking the integrity of the easement and fencing; and taking photographs at the established photo points.
Five (5) of the ten (10) transects did not meet success criteria of 260 stems per acre for planted stems. Visual monitoring
and random vegetation transects conducted by DMS staff revealed most planted stems are concealed by herbaceous
vegetation and areas with low stem density are likely due to low soil fertility, and to a lesser extent, competition from a dense
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020
2

herbaceous layer. Furthermore, in plots that met success criteria, the vigor of many stems was poor (See Appendix B for
representative photos). The fence installed along the easement boundary is functioning as intended and all installed
signage is still in place.
DMS secured a new planting contractor, Terravista Landscape Management (Terravista), to treat invasive vegetation and
replant approximately 3.27 acres of low stem density area within the easement. Terravista began the supplemental planting
on December 16, 2020 and completed the work on January 4, 2021. To maximize survivability of stems in the poor site
soils, Terravista dug 10" deep holes by hand with shovels and backfilled with 50/50 mix. Planted stems were at least 24" in
height and 0.5" in caliper size. Planted species included Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana) and Sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis). Terravista has been contracted to conduct independent, random vegetation transect monitoring to ensure
survival of at least 300 stems per acre in the supplemental planting zones. The results of Terravista's monitoring will be
included in future monitoring reports in addition to the normal yearly vegetation monitoring.
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020
3

APPENDIX A
BACKGROUND TABLES
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020

Table 1: Project Mitigation Components
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) DMS Project #95389
Mitigation
Components*
Riparian
Nutrient
Nutrient
Buffer
Offset
Offset
Existing
Restored
Creditable
Mitigation
Mitigation
Credits
Credits
Buffer
Buffer
Buffer
Restortion
Ratio
Credits
Nitrogen
Phosphous
Project Component
SF
SF
SF
Level
(X:1)
(SF)
(Ibs)
(Ibs)
Notes/Comments
Buffer
Riparian Buffer TOB-50'
Restored riparian buffer for buffer or Nutrient
(Reaches Al, A2 & B)
0
49,393
49,393
R
1
49,393
OR
2,577.48
166.00
Offset credit
Subject Rural
Riparian Buffer 51-100'
Restored riparian buffer for buffer or Nutrient
(Reaches Al, A2 & B)
0
82,083
82,083
R
1
82,083
OR
4,283.35
275.87
Offset credit
Subject Rural
Riparian Buffer 101-200'
Restored riparian buffer for Nutrient Offset
(Reaches Al, A2 & B)
0
149,557
149,557
R
1
7,804.36
502.64
credit only
Subject Rural
Riparian Buffer TOB-200'
Restored riparian buffer for Nutrient Offset
0
72, 392
72, 392
R
1
3, 777.65
243.30
Non -Subject Rural
credit only
Riparian Buffer TOB-100'
Preserved Riparain Buffer for Buffer Credit
(Reaches Al, A2 & B)
64,826
0
64,826
P
10
6,483
only
Subject Rural
Preserved Riparian Buffer for Buffer Credit
only. Area in this zone is less than 10% of
Riparian Buffer 101-200'
3,134
0
3,134
P
20
157
total Buffer Mitigation area. 20:1 ratio = 10:1
(Reach A2) Subject Rural
factoring in 50% reduction for preservation
on a Subject Non -Urban stream.
Totals
421,385
138,115
18,442.85
1,187.82
*All assets and credits generated in accordance withDWR Temporary Buffer Mitigation Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0295) effective October 24, 2014.
Length and Area Summations by Mitigation Category
Restoration Level
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -riparian
Wetland
Creditable
Buffer
(linear
feet)
(acres)
(acres)
(square
feet)
Riverine
Non-
Riverine
Restoration
353,425
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
Creation
Presery ation
67,960
High Quality Pres
Overall Assets Summary
Overall
Asset Category
Credits
Buffer'
138,115
Nutrient Offset Nitrogen
18,442.85
(Ibs/ac/30 yr)
Nutrient Offset
1,187.82
Phosphorus (Ibs/ac/30 yr)
' Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295(n)(1)
(2014 Temporary Rule), buffer mitigation
credit used for buffer credit will not be
used for nutrient offset credit
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) DMS Project #95389
Activity or Deliverable
Data
Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Institution Date
NA
Jun-13
404 permit date
NA
NA
Restoration Plan
Jul-15
Sep-15
Final Design — Construction Plans
Jul-15
Sep-15
Construction
NA
Mar-16
Planting
Mar-16
Mar-16
Mitigation Plan / As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
May-16
Jun-16
Year 1 Monitoring
Oct-16
Oct-16
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct-17
Oct-17
Invasive Treatment
NA
Oct-19
Site Replant
NA
Feb-19
Invasive Treatment
NA
Jun-19
Year 3 Monitoring
Sep-19
Sep-19
Year 4 Monitoring
Aug-20
Aug-20
Year 5 Monitoring
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) DMS Proiect #95389
Designer
NC Division of Mitigation Services
217 W Jones Street, Raleigh, NC 27603
Jeff Schaffer, DMS
[phone]
Construction Contractor
Wright Contracting, LLC
PO Box 545, Siler City, NC 27344
Andrew Dimmette
[phone]
Initial Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc.
PO Box 1197, Fremont, NC 27830
Charlie Bruton
[phone]
Supplemental Planting &
Terravista Landscape Management
Invasive Contractor
7213 Becky Cir., Raleigh, NC 27615
Jennifer Barnhill
[phone]
Monitoring Performers
NC Division of Mitigation Services
217 W Jones Street, Raleigh, NC 27603
Jeremiah Dow, DMS
[phone]
LIT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020

Table 4: Project Attributes Table
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) DMS Project #95389
Project Information
Project Name
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm)
County
Durham
Project Area (acres)
10.86
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.998142,-78.742794
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)
10.86
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
3020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
03020201050030
DWR Sub -basin
03-04-01
Project Drainage Area (acres)
21.5
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
< 5%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Majority Forested, some pasture
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Docs?
Water of the United States - Section 404
No
Water of the United States - Section 401
No
Endangered Species Act
No
Historic Preservation Act
No
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA)
No
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020

APPENDIX B
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
LIT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020

paws
Lake 5#a
Falls Rec leatvn
L aka
I3
0
n
Zr
Project ��° �
D
in
+� a
Fag Is V it lage
(.
',Off COCOF56 a _— _ ----- LIc
_----`re4 = -_
Ug
or W'1
e�
ON
G�
Sources: ESFi. HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermep, increment PCorp., NRCAN, ESrI
Japan, METI, ESrI China {Hong Kong), Esri {Thailand), MapmyIndia,
DpenStreetMapcontributors, and the GIS User Community
FIGURE I
Project Location Map JE
UT TO FALLS LAKE (McDANIEL FARM)
Durham County, NC 0 025 0.5 0.75 1
Miles
LIT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020

UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020
10

Reach A I +
r
S
• a ra
{ - A 4.r
IF
� 4
Reach A t•. '.
w
If
IF P
�L
.'
Owe
92
IF
7.
hAt
_ Reach B
Ir. _ � y ti- y�� � *5.�1',{• �.r YL r. tr'
1 41,
i- e
Figure 3: current Condition Plan View , .
L,
UT to Fills Lake (McDaniel Farm)
Photo Points+'-
MY4 Transects
MY3 Transects
Supplemental Plant Area 2020f2021 dormant
season (approx. 3.27 acres)
Mowin g Allcrwa nce
Bridle Rath
_ Subject Channel
Existing Mature Trees
Non -Subject Channel
Easement (1a.86 ac}
Tr, i
i * tiFt w C
AI
LIT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020
11

Site Photos
Photo Point 1
Photo Point 2B-NE
Photo Point 3B-NW
Photo Point 5
Photo Point 2A-NW
js
Photo Point 4
Photo Point 6
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020
12

Photo Point 7A-SE
Photo Point 8A-NW
Photo Point 9
View of Veg Transect 2
Photo Point 7B-E
Photo Point 8B-SE
Photo Point 10
View of Veg Transect 2
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020
13

Table 5: Vegetation Condition Assessment
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) DMS Project #95389
Planted Acreage 10.86
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Planted
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
0.1 acres
Pattern and Color
0
0.00
0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
0.1 acres
Transparent
Pink Polygons
5
3.27
30.1%
Total
5
0.00
0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.
0.25 acres
Pattern and Color
0
0.00
0.0%
Cumulative Total
5
1 3.27
1 30.1%
Easement Acreage 10.86
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Easement
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1000 SF
Pattern and Color
0
0.00
0.0%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
Pattern and Color
0
0.00
0.0%
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020
14

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Plot Data
LIT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020
15

Table 6a: Planted Tree Species
UT to Falls Lake McDaniel Farm DMS Project #95389
Scientific Name
Common Name
Number
Planted
% of
Total
Acer rubrum
Red Maple
1,000
17.5%
Fraxinus
enns Ivanica
Green Ash
1,000
17.5%
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
1,000
17.5%
Betula ni ra
River birch
1,000
17.5%
Ulmusamericana
American Elm
1,000
17.5%
Hamamelis vir iniana
Witch hazel
700
12.3%
Table 6b: Supplemental Planted Tree Species (2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Number
Planted
% of
Total
Liriodendron tuli efera
Tulip poplar
700
15.6%
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
700
15.6%
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
600
13.3%
Betula ni ra
River birch
600
13.3%
Diosypros vir iniana
Persimmon
600
13.3%
N ssa s Ivatica
Black gum
600
13.3%
Cercis Canadensis
Red bud
700
15.6%
Total 5,700 100% Total 4,500 100.0%
Table 7: Planted and Total Stems - MY4
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) DMS Project #95389
Current Year MY4
Annual Means
VT1
VT2
VT3
VT4
VT5
VT6
VT7
VT8
VT9
VT10
MY4
2020
MY3
2019
MY2
2017
MY1
2016
MYO
2016
Scientific Name
Common Name
Type
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
Acer rubrum
Red Maple
Tree
2
2
3
3
26
26
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
1
1
2
2
3
3
13
13
7
7
3
3
24
24
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
Tree
2
2
7
7
4
4
1
1
3
3
3
3
20
20
18
18
12
12
25
25
26
26
Betula ni ra
River birch
Tree
1
1
13
13
5
5
24
24
32
32
Ulmus americana
American Elm
Tree
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
9
9
9
9
6
6
17
17
35
35
Hamamelis vir iniana
Witch hazel
Tree
43
43
9
9
19
19
28
28
Liriodendron tuli efera
Tulip poplar
Tree
Diosypros vir iniana
Persimmon
Tree
2
2
4
4
3
3
4
4
2
2
1
1
1
1
8
8
3
3
28
28
14
18
N ssa s Ivatica
Black gum
Tree
1
1
2
2
4
4
6
6
5
5
23
23
6
6
47
47
Cercis Canadensis
Red bud
Tree
Pinus taeda
Loblolly pine
Tree
10
1
57
1
26
1
4
1
2
1
6
15
67
21
9
1 217
1 165
1 81
1 46
29
Li uidambarst raciflua
Sweet g um
Tree
5
2
3
8
9
9
36
62
85
64
38
Salix ni ra
Black Willow
Tree
2
Chamaecyparis th oides
Atlantic White Cedar
Tree
1
2
1
4
2
2
1
Quercus s.
Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
Unknown
Tree
1
1
4
8
1
Stem count
1
11
8
66
12
45
7
14
7
12
10
24
7
32
11
87
34
55
10
19
107
365
110
343
41
214
91
213
171
239
Plot size acres
0.034
0.034
0.034
0.034
0.034
0.034
0.034
0.034
0.034
0.034
0.344
0.344
0.344
0.344
0.344
Species Count
1
1 2
4
6
3
6
2
5
3
5
5
7
2
5
4
6
3
4
3
4
5
9
6
9
6
11
6
12
6
9
Stems per ACRE
29
319
232
1,916
348
1,307
203
407
203
348
290
697
203
929
319
2,526
987
1,597
290
552
311
1,060
319
996
1 119
621
264
I 618
581
1016
Type = Tree, Shrub, Livestake
P = Planted
T = Total
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
UT to Falls Lake (McDaniel Farm) Year 4 Annual Monitoring Report December 2020
16