HomeMy WebLinkAbout20120561 Ver 2_Application_20120612Dennison, Laurie
From Homewood Sue
Sent Tuesday June 12 2012 3 02 PM
To Dennison Laurie
Subject RE Capstone /Henson
Attachments D00061212 pdf
Sue Homewood
NC DENR Winston Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem NC 27107
Voice (336) 7714964
FAX (336) 7714630
E mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties
From Dennison, Laurie
Sent Tuesday June 12 2012 2 54 PM
To Homewood, Sue
Subject RE Capstone /Henson
Sue application is not signed by anybody
From Homewood, Sue
Sent Monday, June 11, 2012 4 25 PM
To Dennison, Laurie, Strickland, Bev
Subject FW Capstone /Henson
Please enter as courtesy copy ThxI
Bev I hope your hand heals quickly I m so sorry about your accident
Sue Homewood
NC DENR Winston Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem NC 27107
Voice (336) 7714964
FAX (336) 7714630
E mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties
From John Vilas [mailtojohn @env ecs com]
Sent Monday, June 11, 2012 4 12 PM
1
Dennison, Laurie
From
Homewood Sue
Sent
Tuesday June 12 2012 1 18 PM
To
Dennison Laurie
Cc
Strickland Bev
Subject
RE Capstone /Henson
Same project but the USACE is issuing two different permits to two different owners
Sue Homewood
NC DENR Winston Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem NC 27107
Voice (336) 7714964
FAX (336) 7714630
E mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties
From Dennison, Laurie
Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2012 7 55 AM
To Homewood, Sue
Cc Strickland, Bev
Subject RE Capstone /Henson
Sue —
Is this different from DWQ 12 0561 Cottages of Boone — a paying project — NW12? Received 6/5 & sent to you on 6/7?
From Homewood, Sue
Sent Monday, June 11 2012 4 25 PM
To Dennison, Laurie, Strickland, Bev
Subject FW Capstone /Henson
Please enter as courtesy copy Thx1
Bev 1 hope your hand heals quickly I m so sorry about your accident
Sue Homewood
NC DENR Winston Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem NC 27107
Voice (336) 7714964
FAX (336) 7714630
E mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties
1
Dennison, Laurie
From Homewood Sue
Sent Monday June 11 2012 4 25 PM
To Dennison Laurie Strickland Bev
Subject FW Capstone /Henson
Attachments Capstone Entrance area PCN complete pdf
Please enter as courtesy copy Thxl
Bev I hope your hand heals quickly I m so sorry about your accident
Sue Homewood
NC DENR Winston Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem NC 27107
Voice (336) 7714964
FAX (336) 7714630
E mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties
From John Vilas [mailto john@)env ecs com]
Sent Monday, June 11, 2012 4 12 PM
To Homewood Sue
Subject RE Capstone /Henson
John Vilas
ENV ECS Inc
3764 Rominger Rd
Banner Elk NC 28604
ph 828 297 6946
fax 828 297 1982
john 2env ecs com
From Homewood, Sue [mailto sue homewoodCa)ncdenr gov]
Sent Wednesday May 16 2012 1 59 PM
To John Vilas
Subject Capstone /Henson
Hey John
Would you mind sending me an electronic /scanned copy of the package you sent me as a courtesy copy? Thanks
Sue Homewood
NC DENR Winston Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
1
Lo
Op WArko,
\00 qG Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
o < DWQ project no
Form Version 13 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version
Pre - Construction NotlilLation (PCN) Forin
7
A_ _ Applicant Information
Processing �^ R
1a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit is
[Eb Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 3 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ❑ No
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWO (check all that apply)
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu
fee program
❑ Yes ® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes ® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Cottages of Boone
2b
County
Watauga
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Boone
2d
Subdivision name
NA
2e
NCDOT only T I P or state
project no
NA
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Tract 1) Garry Henson Tract 2) Harold Henson NOTE Harold Henson is the
deceased father of Garry Henson Harold Henson died approx 4 years ago and left the
property to Garry Henson and wife
3b
Deed Book and Page No
Tract 1) 687/36 Tract 2) 058/123
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
NA
3d
Street address
1353 Poplar Grove Road
3e
City state zip
Boone NC 28607
3f
Telephone no
3g
Fax no
3h
Email address
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version
4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other specify Prospective Buyer Developer and Easement Holder
4b
Name
Amanda Wallis
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Capstone Collegiate Communities
4d
Street address
431 Office Park Dr
4e
City state zip
Birmingham AL 35223
4f
Telephone no
205 612 1107
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
John Vilas
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
ENV ECS Inc
5c
Street address
3764 Rominger Rd
5d
City state zip
Banner Elk NC 28604
5e
Telephone no
828 297 6946
5f
Fax no
828 297 1982
5g
Email address
john @env ecs corn
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
B
Project Information and Prior Project History
1
Property Identification
1a
Property identificatwn nu <<ax PIN or panel 0/)
Tract ) 2900 24 2218 000 T,aGL 2) 2900 24 2858 000
Latitude 36 206573N Longitude 81 704178W
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
(DD DDDDDD) (DD DDDDDD)
The proposed Capstone project Cottages of Boone will
be located on an approximate 70 acre parcel The activity
proposed in this application is not located on the
1 c
Property size
Capstone property it is vithin +he DOT R ght of Way and
DOT drainage easements on adjacent private property
owned by Gary Henson Mr Henson is listed as the
owner in Lhis apphation The two Henson tracts dre
listed as Tract 1) 29 28 acres and Tract 2) 2 54 acres
2
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc) to
Laurel Fork
proposed project
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C Trout
2c
River basin
Watauga
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
3
Project Description
3a
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The pro,ec+ s *e con,i..t, of portions of Mo trac +s adacert to and o^ both s des of Poplar CroNe P-----,]
in the immediate vicinity of the proposed main entrance to the Cottages of Boone development f he
tract (Tract 1) on the south side of Poplar Grove Road is primarily used for horticulture (Christmas
Trees), the tract (Tract 2) on the north side of Poplar Grove Rd contains a commercial use The site
lies close to NC Hwy 105, a major transportation and commercial corridor Poplar Grove Road
leading away (south) from Hwy 105 winds throw h mostly rural agricultural, open, or low densrtx
single family residential land use
Tract 1 contains a seep wetland that originates approximately 70 feet upslope from Poplar Grove Rd ,
this wetland (Wetland 1) has been previously delineated and is shown on wetland plats submitted and
approved by the USACE for jurisdictional confirmation
Tract 2 contains a small perennial stream (UT UT Laurel Fork, Stream ID form attached ) that
originates from the existing 15 CMP under Poplar Grove Rd and flows open for approximately 75
linear feet before entering an existing 18 CMP that runs to an existing 36 RCP that runs under Hwy_
105 The stream flows via pipes to UT Laurel Fork (aka Hodges Gap Creek) which flows to Laurel
Fork
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property _2012 012 acres
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
The oroiect site contains 75 linear feet
3d
Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The project purpose is to construct improvements to existing drainage infrastructure as required by
NCDOT as part of the driveway /encroachment agreement necessary for the Cottages of Boone project
NCDOT has determined that the Cottages of Boone project will result in increased storm water runoff to
two existing DOT pipes Despite the fact that neither of the two pipes are located within the project
boundary, DOT has made it a condition of the driveway permit to upgrade these structures in order to
convey the anticipated flows
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
3e
Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used
The protect involves upgrading existing pipes located under Poplar Grove Road (Pipe 1 ) and
approximately 75 feet downstream of Poplar Grove Road (Pipe 2) Pipe 1 is an existing 15 metal pie
approximately 38 feet lone this ►pe will he replaced with a 36 concrete pipe 38 feet long in the
Ndtfle luwtnun , cutiwetu uiidwalis will oe added to botn undh of the new pipe Pipu 2 is all oxistillg 180
metal pipe beginning at an old farm road crossing and tying to an existing NCDOT function box
approximately 130 feet away To accommodate the larger pipe a new headwall will be constructed in
the same location as the beginning of the existing pipe
In order to prevent headcut impacts to the existing stream and wetland grade control structures will be
constructed Just upstream or up gradient of both .proposed new 36 pipes In addition to the grade
control structures there will be minor temporary impacts in the vicinity of both pies for access and to
install temporary diversions so that work can be accomplished in the dry
Typical equipment will be used as part of site development trackhoe backhoe bulldozer, and
dumptruck
4
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments All wetlands on the Cottages of Boone project
site and acquired easements have been delineated and the
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
boundaries have been confirmed by the USACE This
included the small wetland south of Poplar Grove Road
VMetland 1) The stream located north of Poplar Grove Rd
(UT UT Laurel Fork) was not previously delineated in
association with the Cottages project
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type
❑ Preliminary ® Final
y
of determination was made?
4c
If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company ENV ECS, Inc
Name (if known) John Vilas/Sean Martin
Other
4d
If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
All documentation for the Capstone property has already been submitted to USACE a stream ID form for UT UT Laurel
Fork is attached
5
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b
If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions
6
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
El Yes ® No
6b
E
If yes explain
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
1 a Wl ich sect o ^s we a comple +ed below fo you prolec+ (deck all 'hat app' /)
lZ Wetlanas Z Streams tributaries ❑ Butters
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps 404 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
D%NQ —non 404 other)
tacreb)
Temporary
1N1 ❑ P Z T
Exca,6at or
Headwater Seep
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
I ® DWQ
0 0023 acres
(100 sq ft )
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g Total wetland impacts
00023
2h Comments A small headwater seep wetland will be temooranly impacted by construction activities associated with the
maintenance upgrade of an existing 38 long by 15 CMP to a 38 long by 36 RCP Temporary impacts will result from
excavation and installation of a grade control structure lust up gradient of the existing /proposed pipe
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number
(PER) or
(Corps 404 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non 404
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ® T
Excavation
UT UT Laurel
® PER
® Corps
5
10
Fork
❑ INT
® DWQ
S2 ❑ P ® T
Excavation
UT UT Laurel
® PER
® Corps
5
10
Fork
❑ INT
® DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tnbutary impacts
20
31 Comments UT UT Laurel Fork will be temporarily impacted in two locations S1 is immediately below the proposed pipe
replacement at PODIar Grove Road and S2 is immediately upstream of the proposed new headwall and pipe at the lower end
of the existing open channel S2 is approximately 65 feet downstream from S1
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
I
I
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
51 Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary (T)
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version
D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The most significant impact LhreaL ivni Lhe proposed activiq is the ur headCULb to oc%,ur in the areas
up gradient or upstream of both proposed pipe replacements To prevent this, design modifications have been
made to reduce the elevation difference between existing and proposed pipe invert elevations The proposed
pipe at W I will be approximately 0 95 feet lower than the existing pipe To prevent headcut related impacts
to the wetlands at this location, a grade control structure has been incorporated into the project plans at this
location (see Impact Area Map and Typical Detail Sheet ) The proposed invert out elevation at S 1 will be
approximately 0 4 feet lower than the existing As the channel drops steeply below the culvert, riprap will be
installed in the stream bed and bank, to pre,,ent scour or e -os or below thl "p Pe All rip -ap i 11 be buried or
keyed into the stream bed and banks to maintain original elevations and contours The proposed pipe invert at
S 2 will be set to match the existing invert, however, a grade control structure will be installed at this location
to prevent any headcut impacts
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Permit conditions reauire that work be performed in the dry, therefore, a pump a round system or a Dive diversion will be used
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
❑ Yes ® No
2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation9
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
15
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Vernon
E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
15%
2b
Does this projec require a Stormwa•c Vanagement Plan?
❑ "es Z No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why The only 404/401 permit needed to
complete this project is this NWP 3 there is no Stormwater requirement associated with NWP 3 There is no local
requirement to prepare a WQ SWM plan There are no other protect or site characteristics such as NPDES Phase II or
Watershed that would trigger a WQ SWM plan The project will meet all local stormwater quantity standards and will also
obtain a NCG 010000 for construction activities
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government s jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
F Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a Does the oroject involve an expenditure of oublic (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes [E No
use of public (federal/state) land?
lb If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1c If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clea mg House? !If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2 Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after the fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ®No
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality
3b If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy if you answered no provide a short narrative description
4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility
The Cottages of Boone project will utilize on site waste water treatment and disposal The proposed facility will include an
on site package treatment facility and drip irrigation disposal This facility has been designed and permits have been
submitted to DWQ APS under Application #WO0035784
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑Yes ®No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑Yes ®No
Impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS database for T &E species in NC/Watauga county
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat and EwM stets IMS digital database ocean flondamarine org
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
_status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
-North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact histdTic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places www hpo ncdcr gov/digitaljNCHPO Digital Start Page
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b Jf yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Town of Boone/Watauga Coun Mood Maps and GIS
data �.
OW K e r + Gcvey M ReASIA
A�,&+ CN V - ce 5 T ^c
Applicant/Agents Printed Name
Ap icant/Agents Signature
Date
(Agents signature is lid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Is rovided
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this protect occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
El YC' Z No
hahaat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Speries Act
❑ Yes j No
impacts?
5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWb database for ME species in NC/Watauga county
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitats
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystem IMS digital database ocean floridamanne org
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a WIII this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places www hpo ncdcr gov /digitaUNCHPO Digital Start Page
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplain? JEYes
® No
8b If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Town of Boone/Watauga County Flood Maps and GIS
data
Applicant/Agent s Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent s Signature
(Agents signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version
Print Date: 04/18/12
Map Center: 036-2054626' N
081-7062923' W
Scale:
1 inch = 2,000 ft.
Horizontal Datum: NAD27
w
Dye
Z
Z
e
0
0
v"
0
0
C\j
Cl)—
C,
Gr
gi Cern,,,-
41
f,
UT Laurel Fork (aka
Hodges Gap Creek)
Z
C)
Z
C,
M
A
CI)
46
Z—
Proposed Maintenance
Replacement of Existing
—Z
0
C)
DOT Pipes
j
Capstone Development Site
Cottages of Boone
ri
—
0 c)
0
0
to
(y)
J
P0
Piry,G-rove
Z
Pitts Ce
t D
Z
0
C>
Cottages of
Boone
C)
NWP-3 PCN
Location Map
' (Q46.
C.
gwd��n'
. . . . 081.720
0010-lwl 1 1
1 10811.710100'
0. w 081.7001000*
w
081.6901000-W'
SCALE 1:24000
1000 2000
D
YARDS
\328850
'.g 329¢.70
1. 18" CMP to 5e Rt aced with
posed 36" CP with
a Endwall
(see see d
o ain
Rap r
N
L
wzn
�qN
Z2
ew 38LF-3fC RCP with
J-4
ven
Disclaimer:
Basemap produced by Brooks Engineering Associates
Map Scale approximate with graphic representation
Map for Planning purposes only; not intended for construction
N ru Q
O
o Q
m
4-
'o ;>
0, °- >
ro O
o
U w
V
ro
Q
w
N
Q.
N
NN
>
O
m
co N O
N
co
co 0o @�
�
O
c
�
5
ii o
0 =
C
d E
fo
U
m
C
CD
a)
co
w
(�
Q
O) Z
cq E W
c
U O
a
>
w�=
> c`� c
fo
W
Wpm
V
-I
V
L
V
a
I—
O
n
V
Z
1-
t
CL
r4- 8.
a)_
.O
fu
3
O
N �
U)
m
Q'
� fu
4—
°tea
c000
u'
L
a
o
w
fo
J
o
co
V
N
�U
O
mZ
c
oC
I—
O
n
V
Z
1-
2�d
can)
r4- 8.
Q
N �
U)
00
CM
vvt
c000
u'
(n
a
o
w
U
J
c
co
E
N
�U
O
mZ
c
co .E W
tr
>��
Wcim
w
LU Z
'?-i� C
O� r
i�u n
*-
0
Z �M o
M Z
W
0
M
NCH*Y1
3'3x5
Ex. 18" CMP o be placed with
Proposed 36" RCP wit e
P-r-e� n t r e t e E n d w a I I
Pie
Temporary Impact S- o
New 38LF 36" RCP wi oncre
Zn alls e lace E " C
_r Impact W -1: 3- ( Osf
ad C tro to
Prevent adcu
-'(see_ deta I)
Wetland -1 o mai -
- t n c
0
V- ,A: E - I
Disclaimer:
Basemap produced by Brooks Engineering Associates
Map Scale approximate with graphic representation
Map for Planning purposes only; not intended for construction
9
46
Ex
—Tc
Rip
(see
Ex Streambed or
Wetland Elevation
I to Mntrh FY Grnrlp
-24" Log
------Pond Liner Nailed
to Log
lock and Gravel Fill
ameter Log set at control
on and keyed into wingwalls
Stream or Wetland Flow
1 Liner (20 mil minimum) nailed to log and
nded upstream under flow line and backfilled
water
does
a. The
Contractor
II flowin
g water
If land
disturbing
ried or
"keyed—in"
streambed
Cottages of Boone
Typical Grade Control Detail
ENV - Environmental Consulting Services, Inc.
ENV -ECS Phone: (828) 297 - 6946'''
3764 Rominger Rd. Fax: (828) 297 -1982
Banner Elk, NC 28604 Email: john @env- ecs.com
Detail Sheet Created:
May 10, 2012
Proposed Concrete
Ex. Pipe To Be Rem(
Proposed 36" RCP
Section View
Plan View
Notes:
1 See plans for pipe invert elevations and specifications
and endwall specifications
2 Contractor shall coordinate wiith Engineer and
Environmental Consultant prior to installation.
3 Contractor is responsible for arranging a final 5
inspection of installed grade control structures
with Engineer or Environmental Consultant
4 All disturbed areas in wetlands or stream buffers shall be
stabilized with annual Rye Grass and overseeded with native g
species (use seed mix ERNMX -305 from Ernst Conservation
Seeds (800- 873 -3321) or approved equal.)
All work must be performed so that flowin
not come in contact with the disturbed or,
shall submit a plan to capture and divert
around work area prior to commencement
activities.
Riprop placed in stream at S -1 shall be b
such that the original stream elevation an(
contours are restored.
NC nWO gtream Identification Form Version 4.11 UT- UT- Laurel Fork
Date: y - /6 - Z al Z
Project/Site: Co 1 f e 1 • f `
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County: �,l/4
Longitude:
0
1
2
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle-Ong)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 33
Ephemeral Intermittent nnia
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if z 30'
0
1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = IZ, S
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0.5
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
Y -
2
3
6- Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
r
2
3
8. Headcuts
1.5
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N ?=-0j
Yes = 3
' artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Y -
C. Biology (Subtotal = / Z
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
117
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL 1. Other= 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of
manual -
Notes:
Sketch: I�ureJa,S f y�l<<Sr (lv�,fd ; t Iy
w
Y3
V
Cottages of Boone
PCB Photo Sheet
5 -1 -2012
i impact Area 'vV -,i , Proposed culvert
and grade control structure shown.
Temporary impacts at this location will
be approximatelIMO sq.ft.
Impact Area S -1: Proposed culvert
shown, channel to be lined with rip rap
below pipe. Approximately 10 Ift of
temporary stream impact is planned at
this location.
Illlmpact Area S -2: Proposed culvert is
shown and portion of grade control.
Temporary stream impacts at this
location will be approximately 10 I.ft.
Cottages of Boone
Aerial Photo of Prn;eCt Area
5 -10 -2012
N
� E
y
H WY 105
q �oozPzz _TRW
C to Q C 3n
z VVaa�� �i m
v z
z L4
A
�a
c z
Ln
m
A zz
4
Ln
\
w
p
C �z
7
5 z z
C
La m
Lq
rnfnA �
.�pmt'n gw
9 3 3 � � ^4--^^?�-1'- - � rMe ^ � COTTAGES OF BOONE
NCDOT DRAINAGE STUDY
KNNiN<tRINN A2N00IAT99
4,m �"•�'", •""`°'- ;; WATAUGA COUNTY NORTH CAROUNA
Fae 1- 6T6 - 21Y -1= Ph— 1 - ® -2II- {700
Draw ing Title: PLAN SHEEP