Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20120561 Ver 2_Application_20120612Dennison, Laurie From Homewood Sue Sent Tuesday June 12 2012 3 02 PM To Dennison Laurie Subject RE Capstone /Henson Attachments D00061212 pdf Sue Homewood NC DENR Winston Salem Regional Office Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston Salem NC 27107 Voice (336) 7714964 FAX (336) 7714630 E mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties From Dennison, Laurie Sent Tuesday June 12 2012 2 54 PM To Homewood, Sue Subject RE Capstone /Henson Sue application is not signed by anybody From Homewood, Sue Sent Monday, June 11, 2012 4 25 PM To Dennison, Laurie, Strickland, Bev Subject FW Capstone /Henson Please enter as courtesy copy ThxI Bev I hope your hand heals quickly I m so sorry about your accident Sue Homewood NC DENR Winston Salem Regional Office Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston Salem NC 27107 Voice (336) 7714964 FAX (336) 7714630 E mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties From John Vilas [mailtojohn @env ecs com] Sent Monday, June 11, 2012 4 12 PM 1 Dennison, Laurie From Homewood Sue Sent Tuesday June 12 2012 1 18 PM To Dennison Laurie Cc Strickland Bev Subject RE Capstone /Henson Same project but the USACE is issuing two different permits to two different owners Sue Homewood NC DENR Winston Salem Regional Office Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston Salem NC 27107 Voice (336) 7714964 FAX (336) 7714630 E mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties From Dennison, Laurie Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2012 7 55 AM To Homewood, Sue Cc Strickland, Bev Subject RE Capstone /Henson Sue — Is this different from DWQ 12 0561 Cottages of Boone — a paying project — NW12? Received 6/5 & sent to you on 6/7? From Homewood, Sue Sent Monday, June 11 2012 4 25 PM To Dennison, Laurie, Strickland, Bev Subject FW Capstone /Henson Please enter as courtesy copy Thx1 Bev 1 hope your hand heals quickly I m so sorry about your accident Sue Homewood NC DENR Winston Salem Regional Office Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston Salem NC 27107 Voice (336) 7714964 FAX (336) 7714630 E mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties 1 Dennison, Laurie From Homewood Sue Sent Monday June 11 2012 4 25 PM To Dennison Laurie Strickland Bev Subject FW Capstone /Henson Attachments Capstone Entrance area PCN complete pdf Please enter as courtesy copy Thxl Bev I hope your hand heals quickly I m so sorry about your accident Sue Homewood NC DENR Winston Salem Regional Office Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston Salem NC 27107 Voice (336) 7714964 FAX (336) 7714630 E mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties From John Vilas [mailto john@)env ecs com] Sent Monday, June 11, 2012 4 12 PM To Homewood Sue Subject RE Capstone /Henson John Vilas ENV ECS Inc 3764 Rominger Rd Banner Elk NC 28604 ph 828 297 6946 fax 828 297 1982 john 2env ecs com From Homewood, Sue [mailto sue homewoodCa)ncdenr gov] Sent Wednesday May 16 2012 1 59 PM To John Vilas Subject Capstone /Henson Hey John Would you mind sending me an electronic /scanned copy of the package you sent me as a courtesy copy? Thanks Sue Homewood NC DENR Winston Salem Regional Office Division of Water Quality 1 Lo Op WArko, \00 qG Office Use Only Corps action ID no o < DWQ project no Form Version 13 Dec 10 2008 Page 1 of 12 PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version Pre - Construction NotlilLation (PCN) Forin 7 A_ _ Applicant Information Processing �^ R 1a Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps ® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit is [Eb Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 3 or General Permit (GP) number 1c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ❑ No 1 d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWO (check all that apply) ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification ® Yes ❑ No For the record only for Corps Permit ❑ Yes ® No 1f Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu fee program ❑ Yes ® No 1g Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h below ❑ Yes ® No 1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No 2 Project Information 2a Name of project Cottages of Boone 2b County Watauga 2c Nearest municipality / town Boone 2d Subdivision name NA 2e NCDOT only T I P or state project no NA 3 Owner Information 3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed Tract 1) Garry Henson Tract 2) Harold Henson NOTE Harold Henson is the deceased father of Garry Henson Harold Henson died approx 4 years ago and left the property to Garry Henson and wife 3b Deed Book and Page No Tract 1) 687/36 Tract 2) 058/123 3c Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable) NA 3d Street address 1353 Poplar Grove Road 3e City state zip Boone NC 28607 3f Telephone no 3g Fax no 3h Email address Page 1 of 12 PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version 4 Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a Applicant is ❑ Agent ® Other specify Prospective Buyer Developer and Easement Holder 4b Name Amanda Wallis 4c Business name (if applicable) Capstone Collegiate Communities 4d Street address 431 Office Park Dr 4e City state zip Birmingham AL 35223 4f Telephone no 205 612 1107 4g Fax no 4h Email address 5 Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a Name John Vilas 5b Business name (if applicable) ENV ECS Inc 5c Street address 3764 Rominger Rd 5d City state zip Banner Elk NC 28604 5e Telephone no 828 297 6946 5f Fax no 828 297 1982 5g Email address john @env ecs corn Page 2 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version B Project Information and Prior Project History 1 Property Identification 1a Property identificatwn nu <<ax PIN or panel 0/) Tract ) 2900 24 2218 000 T,aGL 2) 2900 24 2858 000 Latitude 36 206573N Longitude 81 704178W lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees) (DD DDDDDD) (DD DDDDDD) The proposed Capstone project Cottages of Boone will be located on an approximate 70 acre parcel The activity proposed in this application is not located on the 1 c Property size Capstone property it is vithin +he DOT R ght of Way and DOT drainage easements on adjacent private property owned by Gary Henson Mr Henson is listed as the owner in Lhis apphation The two Henson tracts dre listed as Tract 1) 29 28 acres and Tract 2) 2 54 acres 2 Surface Waters 2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc) to Laurel Fork proposed project 2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water C Trout 2c River basin Watauga Page 3 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 3 Project Description 3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application The pro,ec+ s *e con,i..t, of portions of Mo trac +s adacert to and o^ both s des of Poplar CroNe P-----,] in the immediate vicinity of the proposed main entrance to the Cottages of Boone development f he tract (Tract 1) on the south side of Poplar Grove Road is primarily used for horticulture (Christmas Trees), the tract (Tract 2) on the north side of Poplar Grove Rd contains a commercial use The site lies close to NC Hwy 105, a major transportation and commercial corridor Poplar Grove Road leading away (south) from Hwy 105 winds throw h mostly rural agricultural, open, or low densrtx single family residential land use Tract 1 contains a seep wetland that originates approximately 70 feet upslope from Poplar Grove Rd , this wetland (Wetland 1) has been previously delineated and is shown on wetland plats submitted and approved by the USACE for jurisdictional confirmation Tract 2 contains a small perennial stream (UT UT Laurel Fork, Stream ID form attached ) that originates from the existing 15 CMP under Poplar Grove Rd and flows open for approximately 75 linear feet before entering an existing 18 CMP that runs to an existing 36 RCP that runs under Hwy_ 105 The stream flows via pipes to UT Laurel Fork (aka Hodges Gap Creek) which flows to Laurel Fork 3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property _2012 012 acres 3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property The oroiect site contains 75 linear feet 3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project The project purpose is to construct improvements to existing drainage infrastructure as required by NCDOT as part of the driveway /encroachment agreement necessary for the Cottages of Boone project NCDOT has determined that the Cottages of Boone project will result in increased storm water runoff to two existing DOT pipes Despite the fact that neither of the two pipes are located within the project boundary, DOT has made it a condition of the driveway permit to upgrade these structures in order to convey the anticipated flows Page 4 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used The protect involves upgrading existing pipes located under Poplar Grove Road (Pipe 1 ) and approximately 75 feet downstream of Poplar Grove Road (Pipe 2) Pipe 1 is an existing 15 metal pie approximately 38 feet lone this ►pe will he replaced with a 36 concrete pipe 38 feet long in the Ndtfle luwtnun , cutiwetu uiidwalis will oe added to botn undh of the new pipe Pipu 2 is all oxistillg 180 metal pipe beginning at an old farm road crossing and tying to an existing NCDOT function box approximately 130 feet away To accommodate the larger pipe a new headwall will be constructed in the same location as the beginning of the existing pipe In order to prevent headcut impacts to the existing stream and wetland grade control structures will be constructed Just upstream or up gradient of both .proposed new 36 pipes In addition to the grade control structures there will be minor temporary impacts in the vicinity of both pies for access and to install temporary diversions so that work can be accomplished in the dry Typical equipment will be used as part of site development trackhoe backhoe bulldozer, and dumptruck 4 Jurisdictional Determinations 4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments All wetlands on the Cottages of Boone project site and acquired easements have been delineated and the ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown boundaries have been confirmed by the USACE This included the small wetland south of Poplar Grove Road VMetland 1) The stream located north of Poplar Grove Rd (UT UT Laurel Fork) was not previously delineated in association with the Cottages project 4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type ❑ Preliminary ® Final y of determination was made? 4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company ENV ECS, Inc Name (if known) John Vilas/Sean Martin Other 4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation All documentation for the Capstone property has already been submitted to USACE a stream ID form for UT UT Laurel Fork is attached 5 Project History 5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions 6 Future Project Plans 6a Is this a phased project? El Yes ® No 6b E If yes explain Page 5 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version C Proposed Impacts Inventory 1 Impacts Summary 1 a Wl ich sect o ^s we a comple +ed below fo you prolec+ (deck all 'hat app' /) lZ Wetlanas Z Streams tributaries ❑ Butters ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2 Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps 404 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) D%NQ —non 404 other) tacreb) Temporary 1N1 ❑ P Z T Exca,6at or Headwater Seep ❑ Yes ® No ® Corps I ® DWQ 0 0023 acres (100 sq ft ) W2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g Total wetland impacts 00023 2h Comments A small headwater seep wetland will be temooranly impacted by construction activities associated with the maintenance upgrade of an existing 38 long by 15 CMP to a 38 long by 36 RCP Temporary impacts will result from excavation and installation of a grade control structure lust up gradient of the existing /proposed pipe 3 Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this question for all stream sites impacted 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number (PER) or (Corps 404 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non 404 width (linear Temporary (T) (INT) other) (feet) feet) S1 ❑ P ® T Excavation UT UT Laurel ® PER ® Corps 5 10 Fork ❑ INT ® DWQ S2 ❑ P ® T Excavation UT UT Laurel ® PER ® Corps 5 10 Fork ❑ INT ® DWQ S3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h Total stream and tnbutary impacts 20 31 Comments UT UT Laurel Fork will be temporarily impacted in two locations S1 is immediately below the proposed pipe replacement at PODIar Grove Road and S2 is immediately upstream of the proposed new headwall and pipe at the lower end of the existing open channel S2 is approximately 65 feet downstream from S1 Page 6 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 4 Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of the U S then individually list all open water impacts below 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e Open water Name of waterbody I I impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Temporary 01 ❑P ❑T 02 ❑P ❑T 03 ❑P ❑T 04 ❑P ❑T 4f Total open water impacts 4g Comments 5 Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed then complete the chart below 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f Total 5g Comments 5h Is a dam high hazard permit required ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no 51 Expected pond surface area (acres) 51 Size of pond watershed (acres) 5k Method of construction 6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form 6a ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar Pamlico ❑ Other Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f 6g Buffer impact number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Temporary (T) impact required? B1 ❑P ❑T El Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P ❑T El Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P ❑T El Yes ❑ No 6h Total buffer impacts 61 Comments Page 7 of 12 PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version D Impact Justification and Mitigation 1 Avoidance and Minimization 1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project The most significant impact LhreaL ivni Lhe proposed activiq is the ur headCULb to oc%,ur in the areas up gradient or upstream of both proposed pipe replacements To prevent this, design modifications have been made to reduce the elevation difference between existing and proposed pipe invert elevations The proposed pipe at W I will be approximately 0 95 feet lower than the existing pipe To prevent headcut related impacts to the wetlands at this location, a grade control structure has been incorporated into the project plans at this location (see Impact Area Map and Typical Detail Sheet ) The proposed invert out elevation at S 1 will be approximately 0 4 feet lower than the existing As the channel drops steeply below the culvert, riprap will be installed in the stream bed and bank, to pre,,ent scour or e -os or below thl "p Pe All rip -ap i 11 be buried or keyed into the stream bed and banks to maintain original elevations and contours The proposed pipe invert at S 2 will be set to match the existing invert, however, a grade control structure will be installed at this location to prevent any headcut impacts lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques Permit conditions reauire that work be performed in the dry, therefore, a pump a round system or a Dive diversion will be used 2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State 2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State ❑ Yes ® No 2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply) ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank ❑ Payment to in lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a Name of Mitigation Bank 3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c Comments 4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program 4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached ❑ Yes 4b Stream mitigation requested 4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only) square feet 4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested 4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested 4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested acres 4h Comments 5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan Page 8 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation9 ❑ Yes ❑ No 6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the amount of mitigation required Zone 6c Reason for impact 6d Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 15 6f Total buffer mitigation required 6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund) 6h Comments Page 9 of 12 PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Vernon E Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1 Diffuse Flow Plan 1a Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? lb If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments 2 Stormwater Management Plan 2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 15% 2b Does this projec require a Stormwa•c Vanagement Plan? ❑ "es Z No 2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why The only 404/401 permit needed to complete this project is this NWP 3 there is no Stormwater requirement associated with NWP 3 There is no local requirement to prepare a WQ SWM plan There are no other protect or site characteristics such as NPDES Phase II or Watershed that would trigger a WQ SWM plan The project will meet all local stormwater quantity standards and will also obtain a NCG 010000 for construction activities 2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative description of the plan ❑ Certified Local Government 2e Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3 Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a In which local government s jurisdiction is this project? ❑ Phase II 3b Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply) ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other 3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4 DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply ORW (check all that apply) ❑ Session Law 2006 246 ❑ Other 4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5 DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 10 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version F Supplementary Information 1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a Does the oroject involve an expenditure of oublic (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes [E No use of public (federal/state) land? lb If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)? 1c If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the State Clea mg House? !If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments 2 Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards ❑ Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)? 2b Is this an after the fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No 2c If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s) 3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑Yes ®No additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality 3b If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy if you answered no provide a short narrative description 4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility The Cottages of Boone project will utilize on site waste water treatment and disposal The proposed facility will include an on site package treatment facility and drip irrigation disposal This facility has been designed and permits have been submitted to DWQ APS under Application #WO0035784 Page 11 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑Yes ®No habitat? 5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑Yes ®No Impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted ❑ Asheville 5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? USFWS database for T &E species in NC/Watauga county 6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No 6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? South Atlantic Habitat and EwM stets IMS digital database ocean flondamarine org 7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No _status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in -North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact histdTic or archeological resources? National Register of Historic Places www hpo ncdcr gov/digitaljNCHPO Digital Start Page 8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 year floodplain? ❑ Yes ® No 8b Jf yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements 8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Town of Boone/Watauga Coun Mood Maps and GIS data �. OW K e r + Gcvey M ReASIA A�,&+ CN V - ce 5 T ^c Applicant/Agents Printed Name Ap icant/Agents Signature Date (Agents signature is lid only if an authorization letter from the applicant Is rovided Page 12 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a Will this protect occur in or near an area with federally protected species or El YC' Z No hahaat? 5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Speries Act ❑ Yes j No impacts? 5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted ❑ Raleigh ❑ Asheville 5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? USFWb database for ME species in NC/Watauga county 6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitats ❑ Yes ® No 6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystem IMS digital database ocean floridamanne org 7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a WIII this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact historic or archeological resources? National Register of Historic Places www hpo ncdcr gov /digitaUNCHPO Digital Start Page 8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplain? JEYes ® No 8b If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements 8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Town of Boone/Watauga County Flood Maps and GIS data Applicant/Agent s Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent s Signature (Agents signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided Page 12 of 12 PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version Print Date: 04/18/12 Map Center: 036-2054626' N 081-7062923' W Scale: 1 inch = 2,000 ft. Horizontal Datum: NAD27 w Dye Z Z e 0 0 v" 0 0 C\j Cl)— C, Gr gi Cern,,,- 41 f, UT Laurel Fork (aka Hodges Gap Creek) Z C) Z C, M A CI) 46 Z— Proposed Maintenance Replacement of Existing —Z 0 C) DOT Pipes j Capstone Development Site Cottages of Boone ri — 0 c) 0 0 to (y) J P0 Piry,G-rove Z Pitts Ce t D Z 0 C> Cottages of Boone C) NWP-3 PCN Location Map ' (Q46. C. gwd��n' . . . . 081.720 0010-lwl 1 1 1 10811.710100' 0. w 081.7001000* w 081.6901000-W' SCALE 1:24000 1000 2000 D YARDS \328850 '.g 329¢.70 1. 18" CMP to 5e Rt aced with posed 36" CP with a Endwall (see see d o ain Rap r N L wzn �qN Z2 ew 38LF-3fC RCP with J-4 ven Disclaimer: Basemap produced by Brooks Engineering Associates Map Scale approximate with graphic representation Map for Planning purposes only; not intended for construction N ru Q O o Q m 4- 'o ;> 0, °- > ro O o U w V ro Q w N Q. N NN > O m co N O N co co 0o @� � O c � 5 ii o 0 = C d E fo U m C CD a) co w (� Q O) Z cq E W c U O a > w�= > c`� c fo W Wpm V -I V L V a I— O n V Z 1- t CL r4- 8. a)_ .O fu 3 O N � U) m Q' � fu 4— °tea c000 u' L a o w fo J o co V N �U O mZ c oC I— O n V Z 1- 2�d can) r4- 8. Q N � U) 00 CM vvt c000 u' (n a o w U J c co E N �U O mZ c co .E W tr >�� Wcim w LU Z '?-i� C O� r i�u n *- 0 Z �M o M Z W 0 M NCH*Y1 3'3x5 Ex. 18" CMP o be placed with Proposed 36" RCP wit e P-r-e� n t r e t e E n d w a I I Pie Temporary Impact S- o New 38LF 36" RCP wi oncre Zn alls e lace E " C _r Impact W -1: 3- ( Osf ad C tro to Prevent adcu -'(see_ deta I) Wetland -1 o mai - - t n c 0 V- ,A: E - I Disclaimer: Basemap produced by Brooks Engineering Associates Map Scale approximate with graphic representation Map for Planning purposes only; not intended for construction 9 46 Ex —Tc Rip (see Ex Streambed or Wetland Elevation I to Mntrh FY Grnrlp -24" Log ------Pond Liner Nailed to Log lock and Gravel Fill ameter Log set at control on and keyed into wingwalls Stream or Wetland Flow 1 Liner (20 mil minimum) nailed to log and nded upstream under flow line and backfilled water does a. The Contractor II flowin g water If land disturbing ried or "keyed—in" streambed Cottages of Boone Typical Grade Control Detail ENV - Environmental Consulting Services, Inc. ENV -ECS Phone: (828) 297 - 6946''' 3764 Rominger Rd. Fax: (828) 297 -1982 Banner Elk, NC 28604 Email: john @env- ecs.com Detail Sheet Created: May 10, 2012 Proposed Concrete Ex. Pipe To Be Rem( Proposed 36" RCP Section View Plan View Notes: 1 See plans for pipe invert elevations and specifications and endwall specifications 2 Contractor shall coordinate wiith Engineer and Environmental Consultant prior to installation. 3 Contractor is responsible for arranging a final 5 inspection of installed grade control structures with Engineer or Environmental Consultant 4 All disturbed areas in wetlands or stream buffers shall be stabilized with annual Rye Grass and overseeded with native g species (use seed mix ERNMX -305 from Ernst Conservation Seeds (800- 873 -3321) or approved equal.) All work must be performed so that flowin not come in contact with the disturbed or, shall submit a plan to capture and divert around work area prior to commencement activities. Riprop placed in stream at S -1 shall be b such that the original stream elevation an( contours are restored. NC nWO gtream Identification Form Version 4.11 UT- UT- Laurel Fork Date: y - /6 - Z al Z Project/Site: Co 1 f e 1 • f ` Latitude: Evaluator: County: �,l/4 Longitude: 0 1 2 Total Points: Stream Determination (circle-Ong) Other Stream is at least intermittent 33 Ephemeral Intermittent nnia e.g. Quad Name: if z 19 or perennial if z 30' 0 1 A. Geomorphology Subtotal = IZ, S Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1' Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 0.5 3 3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 1 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 3 5. Active /relict floodplain 0 Y - 2 3 6- Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 r 2 3 8. Headcuts 1.5 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel N ?=-0j Yes = 3 ' artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = S ) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Y - C. Biology (Subtotal = / Z 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 117 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1.5 25. Algae 0 .5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL 1. Other= 0 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual - Notes: Sketch: I�ureJa,S f y�l<<Sr (lv�,fd ; t Iy w Y3 V Cottages of Boone PCB Photo Sheet 5 -1 -2012 i impact Area 'vV -,i , Proposed culvert and grade control structure shown. Temporary impacts at this location will be approximatelIMO sq.ft. Impact Area S -1: Proposed culvert shown, channel to be lined with rip rap below pipe. Approximately 10 Ift of temporary stream impact is planned at this location. Illlmpact Area S -2: Proposed culvert is shown and portion of grade control. Temporary stream impacts at this location will be approximately 10 I.ft. Cottages of Boone Aerial Photo of Prn;eCt Area 5 -10 -2012 N � E y H WY 105 q �oozPzz _TRW C to Q C 3n z VVaa�� �i m v z z L4 A �a c z Ln m A zz 4 Ln \ w p C �z 7 5 z z C La m Lq rnfnA � .�pmt'n gw 9 3 3 � � ^4--^^?�-1'- - � rMe ^ � COTTAGES OF BOONE NCDOT DRAINAGE STUDY KNNiN<tRINN A2N00IAT99 4,m �"•�'", •""`°'- ;; WATAUGA COUNTY NORTH CAROUNA Fae 1- 6T6 - 21Y -1= Ph— 1 - ® -2II- {700 Draw ing Title: PLAN SHEEP