Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20120578 Ver 1_Application_201206112®120578 The following is an abbreviated application form for those applying for a 401 Water Quality Certification to impact FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) regulated lake shore or bottom under the U S Army Corps of Engineers Permit GP30 This Application cannot be used for wetland or stream Impacts Please provide seven (7) copies of this application and supporting information as well as a non - refundable application fee to the Division of Water Quality of $340 00 for impacts of to lake bottom of less than 1 acre and $475 00 for impacts to lake bottom of greater or equal to 1 acre Applications should be sent to M&_F� Division of Water Quality Wetlands Unit 11P 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650 Applicant Information 1 Owner/ Telephone Nun E mail Address Number 2 Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner /applicant ) Name a / A Company Affiliation Mailing Address _ 11 / Telephone Number Fax Number E mail Address 11 Project Information Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such as towns rivers and roads Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties You may use the diagram below to make a hand sketch of your project Also see the example below for guidance Both the vicinity map and site plan must include a scale and north arrow The footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included Location County __UAYI &SOn Nearest Town Subdivision name or site address (include phase/lot number) Directions to site please include road numbers, landmarks, etc (This is not necessary if an adequate vicinity map is included) �, 2 Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application s 1.0 ;V o P. t P. Su varovAr.. 3 Property size (acres) 4 Nearest body of water (stream/nver /sound/ocean/lake) 0 L 'ist the type of equipment to be used to construct the project ��( M4rr . 9mrl�; no 7 Amount of impact (including all excavation, backfill rip rap retaining wa �s, etc ) below the normal pool lake level in square feet or acres 5,12 a Amount of impact (including all clearing back fill excavation rip rap retaining walls, etc) above the normal pool lake level and 50 feet land ward in square feet or acres O ���� _�_J b Please describe vegetation above the normal pool lakfe level and 50 feet land ward to be impacted (number of trees for instance) N Applicant/Agent s Signature Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided ) HIGH HI ROCK FOR ABUTMENTS YADKIN DEVELOPMENT HIGH ROCK DAM FERC PROJECT No 2197 Prepared for Alcoa Power Generating Inc — Yadkin Division Badin, North Carolina October 2010 Prepared by PB POWER Boston, Massachusetts TABLE OF CONTENT'S 10 Executive Summary 20 Purpose 30 Observations 3 1 Left Abutment 32 Right Abutment 40 Evaluations and Conclusions 41 Left Abutment 42 Right Abutment 50 Recommendations 5 1 Left Abutment 52 Right Abutment 5 3 Finalize Repair Design Appendix A Figures Appendix B Photos ! \26006 APGI YADKINU-IIGHROMAbutment Erosion\Report\HR Erosion Repair Sept docx 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 6 6 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides an evaluation of the erosion at the left and right abutments of High Rock Dam and recommended repair options The erosion at the left abutment appears to be caused by wave action eroding the soil where the soil slope abutment meets the concrete non overflow section of the dam and at a small area about 75 feet upstream of the dam Erosion at the right abutment appears to be caused by rainfall runoff from the hillside and roadway above the abutment The repair recommendation for the left abutment at the concrete non overflow section and at the erosion area about 75 feet upstream of the dam includes placing armor stone protection on the erosion scarps to resist the wave erosion from the reservoir Preparation of the base below the armor stone requires removing all debris and vegetation from the area to be filled and filling irregular low areas with crushed stone to make a smooth surface on which to place the filter fabric Compacted sand should be used to fill the undermined portion of the erosion area 75 feet upstream of the dam Filter fabric and a bedding layer of crushed stone are needed beneath the armor stone to provide a filter between the existing abutment soil and the armor stones to prevent the soil from washing out between the armor stones The stone sizes for the armor stone and bedding and general cross sections of the proposed repairs are shown in Figures 6 and 8 The total estimated volume of crushed stone bedding material is about 25 cubic yards (cy) for sand is about 5 cy and for armor stone is about 55 cy Until the left abutment repairs are completed the two erosion areas should be visually monitored monthly and after large wind storm events to evaluate their condition At the right abutment no repair is needed at this time for the erosion next to the upstream face of the concrete non overflow section However this area should be visually monitored annually for signs of erosion Drainage improvements should be made to the unpaved crest access road consisting of filling in the erosion gullies in the road re grading the road to pitch toward the west drainage ditch and improving the flow in the west drainage ditch 20 PURPOSE Soil erosion has occurred at the left and right abutment slopes next to the concrete non overflow sections of the dam and at the left shoreline about 75 feet upstream of the dam as shown in Figure 1 This report presents evaluations of the cause of the erosion and repair recommendations for these three areas J \26006 APGI YADKINWIGHROMAbutment Erosion\Report\HR Erosion Repair Sept docx 30 OBSERVATIONS 31 Left Abutment The erosion scarp at the left abutment is at the Intersection with the concrete non overflow section as shown in Figures 3 to 5 and Photos 1 to 5 in Appendix B A berm separates the reservoir from the railroad tracks along the left abutment and is perpendicular to the dam axis extending upstream and downstream from the end of the concrete non overflow section as shown in Photo 8 The drainage ditch along the railroad tracks is about 5 feet below the normal maximum reservoir level (El 655 feet Yadkin Datum) and seepage has been observed in it coming through a fracture in the bedrock slope next to the drainage ditch when the reservoir is at approximately El 650 feet or higher The seepage source is from the reservoir based on dye testing performed in 2007 Soil is exposed along the reservoir side of the berm dust upstream of the dam abutment and bedrock is exposed in several places on the reservoir side of the berm dust upstream of the soil next to the dam abutment Bedrock is also exposed near the dam abutment along the railroad side of the berm and extends higher than the reservoir level upstream and downstream of the abutment Top of bedrock at the abutment cannot be determined with certainty whether it is above or below reservoir level because it is buried under a soil covered path that leads from the dam abutment to the railroad tracks The material in the erosion scarp next to the dam appears to be soil fill with cobbles and boulders and appears to have been placed after the concrete dam was constructed based on observing the horizontal concrete form lines continuing into the soil The concrete to bedrock contact was not exposed along the erosion scarp The erosion scarp starts at the concrete dam face and extends about 35 feet upstream of the dam and is the full height of the berm at the concrete face about 10 feet above normal pool The scarp had an average slope of about 1H 1V but in places was near vertical PB measured the scarp profile at the concrete dam as shown in Figure 4 A bench was found based on measurements taken by Yadkin in the reservoir at the base of the scarp It was a few feet underwater within 15 feet of the concrete dam face and extends about 10 feet out from the shoreline, as shown in Figure 4 Another soil erosion scarp was observed at the water level about 75 feet upstream of the dam extending about 15 feet long and 8 feet high ,lust upstream of a large bedrock outcrop along the shoreline (see Figures 3 and 7 and Photos 1 and 6) The back slope of the soil scarp was near vertical Erosion extended about 10 feet beyond the downstream face of the scarp forming an undermined void that extended southeast at about a 25 degree angle from the shoreline The undermined void was about 5 feet wide and high at the entrance and tapered to about 2 feet wide and high at the back see Photo 7 Bedrock lined the sides soil formed the roof and water covered the bottom of the undermined void It appeared that the undermined void followed a soil filled vertical point in the 2 i \26006 APGI YADKINWIGHROMAbutment Erosion\Report\HR Erosion Repair Sept docx bedrock A bedrock cut observed along the railroad tracks extended well above the reservoir level between the tracks and this erosion scarp 32 Right Abutment Soil erosion along the right abutment has formed a gully along the upstream face of the concrete non overflow section and exposed the bedrock contact of the concrete non overflow section as shown in Figure 2 and Photos 9 to 12 The soil erosion gully is about 10 feet wide and extends from the reservoir level to the top of the concrete non overflow section (crest) about 15 feet high The depth of erosion is generally less than 5 feet The exposed bedrock surface next to the dam stair steps down from the crest to the reservoir at an average slope of about 1 H IV following the exposed blocky bedrock points The concrete to bedrock contact was observed at many locations along the erosion gully There was no undermining of the concrete observed and the bedrock appeared stable sound and in good condition The abutment was observed during a heavy rain in August 2010 Rainfall runoff flowed down the unpaved crest access road in a drainage ditch on the west side of the road and in gullies down the middle and east side of the road A Jersey barrier was positioned on the east side of the road Only a small percent of the runoff from the road reached the erosion gully along the upstream face of the concrete non overflow section as shown in Photo 13 Most of the runoff flowed in an erosion gully on the east side of the road and exited the road about 50 feet upstream of the dam where it flowed into the woods along the reservoir rim as shown in Photo 14 Some runoff flowed in the drainage ditch on the west side of the road and discharged downstream of the dam 4 0 EVALUATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 41 Left Abutment An erosion scarp in the berm between the reservoir and the railroad tracks at the left abutment has been progressing over recent years into the berm next to the concrete non overflow section If erosion were to continue the berm width would be reduced and there is concern that the berm could breach allowing reservoir water to flow uncontrolled into the railroad track ditch which is about 5 feet below the maximum normal reservoir level It could not be determined if top of bedrock in the berm is above or below the reservoir level immediately behind the erosion scarp because the ground is covered with soil However bedrock is exposed above reservoir level on the railroad side of the berm both upstream and downstream of the erosion scarp Existing soil along the reservoir rim at the abutment appears to be fill material susceptible to wave erosion Reservoir water waves produced by northerly winds can build up across a long reservoir fetch and strike the left abutment Existing boulders in the soil fill appear to provide some wave erosion protection but it does not appear to be enough to prevent the soil from eroding around the boulders J \26006 APGI YADKINWIGHROMAbutment Erosion\Report\I-iR Erosion Repair Sept docx Wave erosion protection along the shoreline is needed at the abutment scarp to prevent continued soil erosion The erosion scarp is too steep for Yadkin staff to safely access the reservoir from the left abutment The erosion scarp about 75 feet upstream of the dam should be repaired because of the significant depth of soil undermining and size of the void 42 Right Abutment The soil erosion appears to be caused by rainfall runoff from the crest access road and hillside upslope of the right abutment Some of the runoff appears to have been channeled to the upstream face of the concrete non overflow section where it has eroded soil next to the concrete and exposed the concrete to bedrock foundation contact Soil erosion may progress up the abutment along the unpaved crest access road at the west end of the concrete non overflow section If this erosion were to become significant a gully could form preventing safe vehicular access to the dam crest The soil that eroded from the upstream dam face was likely backfill material placed after the concrete dam was constructed and does not affect dam stability or dam safety It does not need to be replaced Reservoir access from the upstream dam abutment along the stair stepped bedrock slope is likely to be better than if a slope stabilizing material such as armor stone is added Also in the past Yadkin has expressed interest in adding a boat dock at this location with a ramp from the reservoir to the dam crest Construction would be easier with the bedrock exposed to allow footings to be founded directly on the bedrock Water erosion from rainfall runoff has formed gullies in the unpaved crest access road The erosion gullies are largest in the steep section of the road more than 100 feet northwest of the dam Erosion gullies are likely to continue to form and become larger unless the drainage along the unpaved access road is changed 5 0 RECOMMENDATI ®NS 51 Left Abutment General The erosion scarp next to the left concrete non overflow section of the dam as shown in Figures 3 to 6 and the erosion scarp with undermined area 75 feet upstream of the dam as shown in Figures 3 7 and 8 and as described below should be repaired with armor stone to provide protection from ongoing wave erosion and protection against loss of berm width The repairs are generally intended to replace material that has been eroded from the abutment restore the abutment to its original slope and improve the wave erosion resistance of the abutment We expect that the repairs will be made by Yadkin with support from the Engineer in order to address actual field conditions as the work 4 J \26006 APGI YADKINU-IIGHROMAbutment Erosion\Rcport\HR Erosion Repair Sept docx proceeds The repairs are similar for each repair area therefore they are discussed together as follows Base Preparation Remove all vegetation organics trash logs and loose soil from the area that will be covered with armor stone This includes removal of organic soils that may be present under the reservoir water level After removal of this material the geometry of the repair shown in Figures 5 to 8 may change and require field modifications of the repair geometry by Yadkin in conjunction with the Engineer If surface irregularities exist after base preparation fill the irregularities with bedding layer material to form a suitable surface for the filter fabric For estimating purposes assume 5 cubic yards (cy) of bedding layer material is needed For the erosion scarp with undermined area 75 feet upstream of the dam fill the entire undermined area with concrete sand that has properties and gradation given in ASTM C 33 For estimating purposes assume 5 cy of concrete sand is needed Thoroughly compact the sand into the back of the undermined area and completely fill the undermine void Compaction should be achieved by hand tamping using a long ram after each foot wide layer of sand is placed The sand should be wet but not runny during compaction Filter Fabric Place a filter fabric on all surfaces that will be filled with crushed stone bedding or armor stone as shown in Figures 6 and 8 It is intended to prevent the existing soil from washing out from behind the armor stone due to wave action Use a heavy weight non woven filter fabric such as having a weight of at least 12 oz/yd2 a grab tensile strength of at least 300 Ibs and a CBR puncture strength of at least 800 lbs Mirafi 1120N will meet these requirements www mirafi com Overlap adjacent fabric sections by at least 1 foot Filter fabric is not needed inside the undermined void 75 feet upstream of the dam because sand acting as a filter will be placed against the soil An estimated 1 100 square feet of filter fabric is anticipated for both repairs Bedding Lay Place a bedding layer of crushed stone in all areas where armor stone is to be placed as shown in Figures 6 and 8 It is intended to fill in the low spots provide a planer surface on which to place the armor stone layer and protect the filter fabric from puncture by the armor stone The stone size is given in Figures 6 and 8 The estimated volume of bedding layer material needed for both repairs is 20 cy Armor Stone Lamer Armor stone should be used to cover the bedding layer to at least the limits shown in Figures 6 and 8 The armor stone size is intended to resist erosion from the expected reservoir waves caused by a 70 mph wind as recommended in the US Soil Conservation Service Engineering Guidelines The stone size is given in Figures 6 and 8 The estimated volume of armor stone layer material needed for both repairs is 55 cy 5 J \26006 APGI YADKINXHIGHROCK\Abutment Erosion\Report\IiR Erosion Repair Sept docx Construction Considerations Construction access for repair materials is likely from a barge in the reservoir A backhoe or crane should be used to make the required base preparations and to place the new stone materials in the repair area A likely location for this equipment is on the barge Land or dam crest access has limited space and it would be difficult to reach the entire repair area The existing crane on the dam crest cannot reach the abutment The reservoir should be lowered to approximately elevation 648 R which is below the level of all repairs to allow all repairs to be made above water level This will allow better visual control of the work and prevent placing new material in the water Material volumes estimated above do not include contingencies such as extra volume to replace material removed during construction for base preparation Stone used for the repair must be angular hard durable and resistant to breakdown when subject to wetting and drying cycles Proof of these qualities should be provided by the quarry or supplier of the stone Monitorins Until the repairs are made the two soil scarp areas should be visually monitored monthly and after large wind storm events (winds >50 mph) This inspection can be made at the same time as the monthly inspection of the switchyard seepage After the repairs are completed the area should be visually monitored annually 52 Right Abutment No repairs are recommended at this time to improve dam safety However to improve vehicular access to the right abutment the erosion gullies in the access road should be filled in with the same crushed stone material used for road resurfacing and the drainage ditch on the west side of the road should be improved to prevent water from spilling over and forming gullies in the road Improvements should consist of deepening and widening the west drainage ditch and making the bottom a smooth pitch Re grading the road surface to pitch toward the west drainage ditch can also reduce the risk of erosion gullies forming in the road including from rainfall landing directly on the road Visual monitoring should be conducted annually to evaluate the condition and identify any signs of deterioration of (1) the abutment (2) the concrete to bedrock foundation contact on the upstream face of the concrete non overflow section (3) the crest access road next to the concrete non overflow section, and (4) trees potentially undermined upstream of the erosion gully next to the upstream face of the dam 53 Finalize Repair Design The following steps are recommended to finalize the abutment repair design 1 Discuss the repairs presented in this report with Yadkin and incorporate any comments 2 Submit the final report to the FERC for review and approval 6 J \26006 APGI YADKINWIGHROMAbutment Erosion\Report\iiR Erosion Repair Sept docx 3 Yadkin to determine if any permits are needed to make the repairs and if so obtain the permits 4 After receiving approval from the FERC and receiving applicable permits begin construction of the repair with the Engineer on site as required 7 J \26006 APGI YADKINUi1GHROMAbutment Erosion\Report\HR Erosion Repair Sept doex Appendix A Figures v' 90�� — � ` L \ e,. #, ® ' , > < ® x �® % }| % § / 6 � < ] * E o = ©_ \b � � �_ e ® z p 3 § 'n ~ � ) < 6 E §/ 3 / >(f) ? / e 3 z 5 § [ 0- < §\ \z z§ § § §e § § )§ z b 7 § j 7(§ / � § §�§ # \ 2 C3 = \ 2 / k ) � _ g _ � S § I z o i R§ §) Z) < \ �� �7 = z 2 }2 \6 �) \{ ± I tjj <0 -T° ~ Fr (n \ I ( §S m± I _ && 2ƒ -_ ) Lj /In \} /\�0ul Lu — z 2 « 7!: r j3� V) < q § E o� (§ /z ƒ © <!, g e I © | \ G cl Of I /§ LLJ / z _ / § ƒ!| / $ c i 9 � z< / Lu / ? / /§ 2 f \na g ui !\ }§ M r #q ^ # )\ k Q n � ■ I § \ j § § ` of z # $ 6 F ƒ§ \6 z D< z< 5 F 9 ± e ~§ k< \ 3 u %U z Z u » § g 5 _ � u Ll §| k , \O } §rdoN a ~ � a § ■ | y if x m r Z ■ , §a Z Z \ ■ § ■§) § ■�, ■zI c_ _mm_ N Z Q W IJ 7 Z m0 ,o , mil 22 Q w � w y Y, O p O g N ° zn �N O� wa >r �a �F = m W o 2 Jp Ni UQ m Ew 0w w Ja w g� v �� S bi w LLI a_ a z? iv�i a< � J °� LLI 671 W 661 —�� J RA��ROAD z �w w7� zQ J 661 �S 9__, __ -- OS9 3 — 651 uj a- w W Lal — — a Y d 00 E F Ir - —8bg�� > — _ m 0 of w ow ao °� m Q(n � o ° Cr af J W JW Q lJ W ` m rno a^ ° J m oa oz 0 �w w O f1fw W Z 3 O �— xO p L� 0 u O�ii? z K Z Y O D U V) O 0 V) � � � ✓we wi �eM�4�woo wwe�� oaua�fweoaa oar aoou� �u wn w (vinIVO NNOVA Li) NOI1VA313 L a :2 ¢ D 00 (D t0 ID n N O n n OD �O (O N (O O Oo t0 M <t N M to N O co N 0 O (D to N •t O co M F Z _0 (O co t0 l0 (O f0 w (a to to to w f0 f0 t0 to (O (O (O l0 t0 (O w f0 t0 O m O V'- J O O N Q V1 CL 0 rn O � � �p N Z mr Uw o yy T' O a Q N J � �O R = Z w ¢ Y O � w O � Z of N LLJ n w O (� O � J LO O W Q � g Q Z (n ro w o LL � U � O �w Z M O � LLI (W/) a O J O w O LLI w � w o_ or I o 0 W � rn } w � � O N I � W �Z Z O 1 Q1 M U w o: Of Of Of W m � N C � (A WO U_ Z L� Z O p w � O q0 o a C��j 0 C7 w c� Z_ W a z 0 U O u O a o: " p p w (n O W F- Z I O -' U Z O Z H H Q O N p Z O O U ¢ W 0] � O I N 1 m F- Z Z w O w Z) U N O N I 0 M I O a I 0 LL Ul J O rn O � � �p N Z yy T' O a Q J � ¢ Y O � O � Z N n w O O � J O W Q � g Q Z (n ro w o � U � �w Z O � (W/) a O J O w O w � w o_ or I o 0 W � rn } w � � I � W �Z Z O 1 Q1 W U o: � W m � N WO U_ Z w � O q0 o a C��j 0 w c� a z a o: p p I O -' M LO F- o ZZ w �, wg [if 0 t� a: F- a z W 0o O D mQ� I Q- �w� o U Z Q O Y Q Li Z Z O O W [if C) N Q (,D o O Ir a— = F- a D 0w �W a of .w t 2 Z LL X O m Q: a aLL I M Q Y It 2 0 a ~of UO O K ir U af Q U F- LLJ :D m0 LJ0 Y 00 Z O w� Xo Xw wm ,It N O 00 r n n m m to m = W �1 m Z Z K H r ~ Z� w W O W = Q UW moan m z m Q Y 0' K Z 0000 O a4 i Z o Lj a N Q 7 O m G 0 MWO wZFo -6ww �U Q�N Tjo�s W�F� =ti Ci U �O wNZOma< <?-- w moon 0 3 vi m Uf/12 U WF � � �OZZO� J o 0 lai N w S Y W o 00 O Z O O y W Q JZ W W LIU ~ O7 wUWF V11nQ w pJ Q O J> a' a. O w- X p Fro, 8uo o.: QQwQO oa� j QLe w; Z W W W W C7 V10=J JQ•�O o �a�z�ooU *�ooaaa�wo www50-� g5 Szof Mown a >rraz irnaai4cL rornorna ri ri a vi �6 (WfllV(l NINOVA '13) NOI1VA313 w N O m to Q N O rb u) m io to to n in N v) v) a - < to co O to m (o w m m so ro �a 0 I I I I LO W Q I I J O � . d w I LLJ Q O' Cl- YOa o 00 o N Z a- Lij F 0 J CL W m L5 m I i = w o W I I z o I W z ° N i lL 0 CL �o �N IJ w N 3 I i Q j w w W 0 I3o -iw ul I � I p O cr J O o I w O r Q 0 J W 0 a F w IL W O =Z 7 00 U m W� W O N ti- U U z O O U U w O W 0 a0 F O J w O 0 Iz 0 F w J -r o W w a0 7W m - O r7 L'iQLLJ vJ � N 0 i.� U �mO 0 7 dv�rm rn r+�s Qw WM�4Aw�n woWVmup�eou - afi uowe�r Cf) LO W Q � L . d w LLJ Q O' Cl- YOa o 00 o N a- Lij F 0 J CL W m L5 m = w o W L'iQLLJ vJ � N 0 i.� U �mO 0 7 dv�rm rn r+�s Qw WM�4Aw�n woWVmup�eou - afi uowe�r /z§ \ <; \ ) [ \ \t � % / ! |$ /\ Cl- || » Of e 0 z o > � i \ F j �\_ // \ LLJ LL) :/ S§ y « 0 \� LJ ... e IL \j \ ^" d\ 0 p m0 �K » / 0 \ .a \. n± \ }}j Of I \zw / | \) \ \ �!| \n % ■ § / 0 CL BUJ \ u |©/ 1 « cr 0!1 m z m— L (-\ < af < L< CD [ ) I u [ ¥ O C) §\ ® § +� O � - u§ - fn w CL �� § O ry Ab e CL» I ` }% §(n \ m - cL ® in ) ( ) 2 @ § k ` ~:x of § of z §§ § ( 6 § ko / w / $ § m \\ o �\ , \ 2 � ) �o & § / m } �) ? § ®§9 2 _ �� § 3 §3 Lao , ozjm\ k(( f$§ /� / / �R ))oo- §ir a O - §§2Ky }k `L ° �` � §, § §[ {R\ ® \ }m� 0 j } u s _ F- < Z - «� we« a m l��� «En \ \o -ir(L X d 'w / � aa� b § y L o » _ \ 7 � Appendix B: Photos b 0 0 0 wr CD = cr o CL w En o =1 0 0 �ql o' O :3 3 P� N cu O w O I �. C C 'L3 <D w O M (D 0 O ^t (D r+ fD O O O N M O b 0 O LE w � M M lD � O W A (D N O 0 r. n O O F3 �:s fi n 't C6 N O O O O N � O O J CD 0 O O w a CD E CD CD a a I Cn � o Uq' cn . �r o � O CD �- � l7 p? O .Y CD N 0 a- CD N O O 01 .O .a a k -o 0 O Ut CD 0 0- a 0 m 0 O 3 0 O' �CD 0 O u' C N _O � O � O CD 0 O O 0 CD 0 C 0 O O "O O O J � o 0 0 o 0 En o 0 N O o a' CD (D 0 CD A� 0 r+ J CD 0 C T1 .y W O -o 0 O w o a, 0 a 0 0 o— n o 0 .-. o �CD O N O � O c 00 D O M O 0 O O 0 'r 0 CD CD O O 'S7 O O r a �- O " a� N o a- m 0 0 N CCD O to C u h C CD CD O '-h O' 0 0 0 �s 0 (�D O O O �a 0 E T = O M Ln, =- O � O � d 0 n C7 O (T O N O O b T3 fD 0. a �v 0 0 W� O y .r C O Q R O O' dQ 9 M M O 0. =r O 0 O C P� C CD r`Y 0 0 O C O N 0' O � O Qq C (D a a w a' w uc CD a r: A CD (D W h LU CT C CD N O M to 0 0 W., A� O a c cn a UQ 0 A d El W A CD ^t N O O Rum IVY r) Levi rIV no-4tDnol E SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PLAN mom$