20120561 Ver 1_401 Application_20120612

E1W
June 1 2012
Ms Tasha McCormick
USACE
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Paton Ave Rm 208
Asheville NC 28801 -5006
RE Cottages of Boone
Town of Boone and Watauga County NC
Access Road PCN
Dear Ms McCormick
201 2056 1
3784 Rominger Rd
Banner Elk NC 28804
Pit 828-29?-8948
Fax 828 - 297 1982
e-mail wccJv@skybest com
1 I J 1!J
Enclosed is an application for NWP 12 and WQC #3884 for the referenced project. The property owner
is CCC -Boone LLC represented by Amanda Wallis and the Applicant is Capstone Collegiate
Communities Amanda VVellis is the contact. John alas with ENV Inc is the agent, (authorization letter
included with PCN) and has prepared this application Copies of this PCN have been mailed to both
DWQ (5 with a check for $240 to cover 401 fee) and NCWRC
If you need to schedule a site visit please contact me Please include ENV Inc on the copy list of all
correspondence for this protect If you have any questions regarding this information please call me at
82&2974M thank you
Sincerely
J hn C Vitas
President, ENV Environmental Consulting Services Inc
Cc Mr Dave McHenry NCWRC
Ms Amanda Wallis Capstone
Mr Mark Brooks Brooks Engineering
NCDWQ
JUN 5 1012

O�0� W ATF9QG
O Y
20120561
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 13 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A Applicant Information
1
Processing
tl
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Ilermit
1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 12 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu
fee program
❑ Yes
® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Cottages of Boone a Capstone Collegiate Community Utility Line
Access Road
2b
County
Watauga
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Boone
2d
Subdivision name
NA
2e
NCDOT only T I P or state
project no
NA
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
CCC Boone LLC
3b
Deed Book and Page No
1632/840
201
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Amanda Wallis �NR
3d
Street address
431 Office Park Dr
3e
City state zip
Birmingham AL 35223
3f
Telephone no
205 612 1107
3g
Fax no
3h
Email address
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other specify Developer and managing entity
4b
Name
Amanda Wallis
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Capstone Collegiate Communities
4d
Street address
431 Office Park Dr
4e
City state zip
Birmingham AL 35223
4f
Telephone no
205 612 1107
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
John Vilas
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
ENV ECS Inc
5c
Street address
3764 Rominger Rd
5d
City state zip
Banner Elk NC 28604
5e
Telephone no
828 297 6946
5f
Fax no
828 297 1982
5g
Email address
john @env ecs com
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

B
Project Information and Prior Project History
1
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
2900 32 5915 000 (old PIN new not yet available)
Latitude 36 20000ON Longitude 81 70000OW
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
(DD DDDDDD) ( DD DDDDDD)
The proposed Capstone project Cottages of Boone will
be located on an approximate 70 acre parcel The activity
1 c
Property size
proposed in this application is located both on the
Capstone property and an easement over an adjacent
property
2
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc) to
Laurel Fork
proposed project
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C Trout
2c
River basin
Watauga
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

3 Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The project site consists of old pasture land and adjacent wooded land The old pasture area is close to
an existing farm house with out buildings and landscaped areas The proposed utility lines and access
road will pass just to the west of the farm house through an easement area cross a driveway
small perennial stream (UT Laurel Fork P) within the acquired easement (Impact Site 1) After the
first stream crossing the project passes out of the easement and onto Tract 2 of the Cottages of Boone
project site The utility line and access road extends into a wooded area following an existing-woods
road, a second crossing of an intermittent stream (UT Laurel Fork Int) will occur along this woods
road (Impact Site 2)
The site is accessed from Poplar Grove Road near NC Hwy 105 a mayor transportation and
commercial corridor Poplar Grove Road leading away (south) from Hwy 105 winds through mostly
rural agricultural, open, or low density le family residential land use
Impact Site 1 This site involves a small first order perennial stream (UT Laurel Fork P)
adjacent to an existing gravel driveway The banks and npanan zone of this stream have been
consistently maintained by the property owners by mowing and weed eating For several hundred feet
above Impact Site 1 the quality and character of the small stream has been influenced by landscaping
and other similar activities The quality of this stream is good despite a history of minor impacts
Approximately 200 feet below Impact Site 1 UT Laurel Fork P flows into the main stem of Laurel
Fork
Impact Site 2 This site involves a small intermittent stream flowing through a wooded area The site
consists of an existing woods road that was constructed at least 25 years ago The graded width of the
existing road vanes from 10 feet wide to 25 feet wide The woods road crosses UT Laurel Fork Int at
Impact Site 2 An 8 inch clay pipe approximately 24 feet long was installed years ago but has become
clogged at times and a gully has formed across the woods road from periodic high flow events The
clay pipe currently conveys base flow Immediately below the woods road there is an eroded area
approximately 6 feet deep with unstable vertical banks Two sections of the 8 inch clay pipe were
undermined and lay in the bottom of the gully, only 16 feet of clay pipe is currently functioning
Approximately 80 feet below the woods road UT Laurel Fork Int flows into a wetland and into Laurel
Fork
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0 012 acres
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
The project site contains approximately 200 linear feet of perennial stream and 40 linear feet of intermittent stream
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The project purpose is to install utility lines from proposed student housing units to the proposed waste
water treatment plant (WWTP) and from the WWTP to various drip irrigation fields where the treated
effluent will be discharged The project also involves construction of an access road necessary for or the
installation and maintenance of the utility lines
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used
The overall project is to develop a multi family residential facility designated for student housing
project will occur on two tracts of land purchased by the Applicant and easements obtained by the
Applicant from adjacent land owners to allow for access between the two tracts The project site is not
served by municipal water or sewer, the Applicant has planned and received most of the approvals for
an on site water and sewer system This application is for a N WP 12 and WQC 3884 to authorize
impacts to jurisdictional waters, at two locations associated with the installation of utility lines and the
construction of an access road (See Avoidance and Minimization Section for extensive description of
the project)
Typical equipment will be used as part of site development trackhoe backhoe bulldozer, and
dumptruck
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments All wetlands on the Cottages of Boone prolect
site and acquired easements have been delineated and the
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
boundaries have been confirmed by the USACE This
included both streams proposed to be impacted in this PCN
UT Laurel Fork P is shown as Stream 1 in the JD report and
UT Laurel Fork Int is shown as Stream 2 in the JD report
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type
El Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company ENV ECS, Inc
Name (if known) John Vdas /Sean Martin
Other
4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
All documentation for the Capstone property has been submitted and approved by USACE stream ID forms for UT
Laurel Fork P (S 11 and UT Laurel Fork Int (S 2) are attached along with a copy of the JD approval letter
5 Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions
A PCN for a NWP 3 (WQC 3883) was submitted to USACE on May 14 2012 Written authorization from NCDWQ
was not required for proposed activity but a courtesy copy of PCN was sent to DWQ The proposed work involved
maintenance upgrade of two existing pipes within DOT jurisdiction Both pipes were outside of the Cottages of Boone
project boundary but stormwater runoff was anticipated to impact both pipes and DOT made the pipe upgrades a
condition of the driveway permit No permanent impacts were proposed temporary impacts were 0 0023 acres of
wetlands and 20 linear feet of streams Total impacts to streams and wetlands associated with both PCN s will be 39
linear feet of permanent stream impact 45 linear feet of temporary stream impact and 0 0023 acres of wetland impact
6 Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes explain
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ® Streams tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps 404 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ —non 404 other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g Total wetland impacts
0
2h Comments
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number
(PER) or
(Corps 404 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ®T
Pipe and temp
p p
UT Laurel Fork P
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
6
30 perm
and 10
temp
S2 ® P ® T
Pipe and temp
UT Laurel Fork Int
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
® DWQ
4
9 perm
and 15
temp
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑Corps
❑ INT
❑DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
64 lin ft
31 Comments UT Laurel Fork P (S 1) will be permanently impacted by a 30 foot long pipe for an access road and
temporarily
impacted by installation of a grade control structure and construction activities UT Laurel Fork Int (S 2) will be permanently
impacted by installation of -a 25 foot long pipe (replacing an existing 16 foot long pipe) for an access road and temporarily
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

impacted by stabilization of an eroded bank at the pipe outlet and construction activities
4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed then complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID
number
5b
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
51' Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If protect will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar Pamlico ❑ Other
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
Buffer impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c
Reason
for
impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required
6f
Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
6g
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
61 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing protect
The proposed protect has been planned from the beginning to avoid and minimize impacts to )unsdictional
waters to the maximum extent practicable The Applicant initiated an environmental consultant near the
binning of the planning stage for the project to perform a wetland delineation and advise regarding potential
permit issues Consequently, the pro has been designed so that the vast majority of the land disturbing
-lect
activities will be located in upland areas well away from any streams or wetlands The only impacts are
associated with utility line installation and maintenance access and two existing pipe upgrades required by
NCDOT as a condition of the driveway pennrt The DOT pipe replacement impacts have been addressed in a
separate application for a NWP 3 submitted to the USACE on May 14 2012
Utility Line Impacts The Cottages of Boone project involves development activities on two tracts of land
separated by a narrow corridor, through which the Applicant has obtained an easement All of the roads and
buildings associated with proposed student housing are located on Tract 1 of the project Tract 2 was acquired
primarily as a location for on site water and sewer systems required to serve the development The easement
will allow for access between the tracts for utility lines and associated maintenance access A small perennial
stream (UT Laurel Fork P) flows through the narrow corridor separating Tracts 1 and 2 There is an existing
driveway also located within this comdor and adjacent to UT Laurel Fork P The easement connecting the
two tracts, crosses both the dnveway and the stream (Impact Site 1) and lines up with an existing woods road
on Tract 2 that leads to the proposed WWTP The existing woods road crosses a small intermittent stream
(UT Laurel Fork Int) at Impact Site 2
Utilizing the existing woods road minimizes impacts by eliminating the need to construct a new access road
across a sloping forested hillside Constructing an access road around UT Laurel Fork Int would not be
practically feasible because the steepness of the road would make it extremely difficult if not impossible to
bring in the package WWTP and a pump station would be required for the sewer line The location of the
easement and crossing of UT Laurel Fork P was selected to maximize distance between a house and the
easement while still allowing for usable access road to be constructed No alternative locations are available
that would not also have to cross this stream and in some locations would have to cross it twice
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

Impact Site 1 This crossing has been designed with dual 30 CMP s 30 feet long with stacked boulder
headwalls This design was selected as the least impacting practicable alternative A bridge was contemplated
but construction of the abutments would have caused the driveway o be blocked for an extended period
(unacceptable to owners), the construction would likely have impacted the stream due to proximity, and the
cost was much greater Temporary impacts to the stream channel will be necessary for construction a
temporary pump a round diversion and to install a log grade control structure I ust upstream of the proposed
pipes
Impact Site 2 The existing crossing consists of an 8 by 16 long clay pipe that was installed many years ago
This pipe has apparently become clogged or was overwhelmed at times and water flowed over the road
creating a small gully in the road and a large gully with steep eroding banks below the road The crossing was
in fact approximately 24 feet long initially but two 4 foot long sections of pipe broke off during the formation
of the gully In order to repair this existing crossing, 24' CMP s 25 feet long proposed The eroded
gully below the existing road will be stabilized with large boulders Large boulders will also be keyed into the
streambed to prevent scour below the proposed pipes Temporary impacts to the stream channel will be
necessary for construction, a temporary pump a round diversion and to install keyed in boulders below the
pipes
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Permit conditions require that work be performed in the dry, therefore a pump a round system will be used at both impact
sites (see detail) Work will be coordinated so that each instream activity will be completed in one day
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
❑ Yes ® No
2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool [-]cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b
If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why
❑ Yes El No
Comments
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
15%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan expla n why The only 404/401 permits needed to
complete this project are NWP 3 (WQC 3883) and NWP 12 (WQC 3884) there is no
Stormwater requirement associated
with either NWP or WQC There is no local requirement to prepare a WQ SWM plan There are no other project or site
characteristics such as NPDES Phase II or Watershed that would trigger a WQ SWM
plan The project will meet all local
stormwater quantity standards and will also obtain a NCG 010000 for construction activities
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government s jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a
Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate regwreme, its?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

F Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter )
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2 Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after the fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an Explanation of the violation(s)
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes No
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality
3b If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description
4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility
The Cottages of Boone project will utilize on site waste water treatment and disposal The proposed facility will include an
on site package treatment facility and drip irrigation disposal This facility has been designed and permits have been
submitted to DWQ APS under Application #WQ0035784
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

& Endangered Spedes and Designated Critlaal Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will On project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
hWxW
❑Yes ® No
5b Have you checlod with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑Yes No
impacts?
5c if yes Indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS daMhM for UE mows in NCANAm oa county
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? 1
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to de2etmure whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
SOM Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystem IMS digital database ocean floridamanne om
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cuibual Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or now an area that the state federal or tribal
status (em g Natiorrai designated Trust hftft or cultural preservation
nation or properties significant in
❑ Yes ® No
North Carolina history and archaeology)
7b What data sources did you use to determine whetter your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places www hoc ncdcx aov/digitallNCHPO Diodal Start Pane
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMAAesrgnated 1001ear floodplarn? -T-Oyes
® No
8b If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements
ft ha scurne(s) did you use to matte the ftodptaln determination? Town of BoonelWatauoa County Flood Maps and GIS
John C Was Agent
6-12012
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Apphcen / Snature
Date
y4lenft s valid oW it an nutliorke*m letter tram the appkw t
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version

Agent Authonzahon Form
Project Cottages of Boone
Date 7 - 31- ► z
Property Tract 1 and Tract 2 of Cottages of Boone Project Site including all Rights of
WU and Easements associated with the �Qr lect
Parcel ID Watauga &MM #
DB/Page 1(o5z1pgV
Street Address dap /Q, G1ti�t Reek
Owner Cdr — i3wu, 1. cc — � � %vi• //`s
Address y3/ 60,V",t R.4 iif i3 v.h .� 4., r, 41 3S z Z 3
Phone ;2c,5-- 6, z - I /o .1
The Undersigned registered property owners of the above noted property do hereby
authorize Mr John C Was of ENV Environmental Consulting Semces, Inc to act on
my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached
certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
of my Knowledge
4 a r
Signature
Printed Name
513 1
Date

Map Name: Unknown Scale: 1 inch = 2,000 ft. Horizontal Datum: NAD27
Print Date: 06/01/12 Map Center: 036.2048067' N 08
!i l ti d.
y ,(
�' » 14
Z
CD
Nit v -,swi • .,f •• .,.
;`�' j t( , .1 pew. ��; .�
�. 1 a l'' 1 e i; .v c '•
Z
CO
j }I '
O
Gi alr fern 1 220
1
a Feachp`s
J / ' v� .: ;• ,/ Capstone Development Site
Cottages of Boone
HO ap'
°
Zo
' C l `,' ✓ ' O Impact Sits 1
CD
0
°`
f, _
Impact Site
GAk
o
\Itts t
Rift
CD
, ��. -. 1 �Wu>ilirr'., i.em , J
7.
o
j
/
C C 19 , Ea (s'i I
081.720
000° W 081.710
000° W 081.700 000° W 081.690
000° W
SCALE 1:24000
0 1000 2000
YARDS

Watauga County, NC Page I of 1
http: / /www.wataugacounty.org/ias/ arcgismaps /PrintMap.aspx ?pageType =A... 5/31/2012

.f �M
It
� Ill• � '�
\
hill
� t
0" tape9
\\X, li `TRe Ilu
Xnp&ct Site
z�
��\ \
Impact Sit. z
VARRCl TRACT
a I I
\
\
\ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \\
tl�l'wiilm r� 'rr .:a:daz'aa� �
11 IN
P!.1:11ect
31 COTTAGES OF BOONE ...
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS BROOKS ",
ROOKS
T -1.0 w
WATAUGA COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ry g i rv[ e w ry g A g a o c AT [ ., N. 5bh[
AA.—., N.C. 28801
o,e.iNg race: Planning• Engineering• Surveying PNPPel- ezaz3z -0TOa
1- 828 - 2321331
OVERALL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN -Environmental Services •w,.w.woowsw.can
Ni
jj NOR3M x
$ CAROIJNA PS

;AAa rmfsuoo acy papualul jou 'Aluo sasodand 6uluueld AoI dew
uoljejuasajdaa algdea6 ql!m alewlxoadde aleaS dew
saler) ossy 6ulaaaulbu3 s�looia �(q pampo.id dewase8
:aawlelasld
col jo lemajul inoluoa s
1333
3 M
08 \ 0v 0 01
IS9Z-T£- 006Z :NId
r /
l I
87_Z 'Jd TLT '90 �%,
-A
r
IZ-PLi2ll@AA/
ads
.d , D . 9TAxi, 8 , `I
'1NI- )I'dOA ii2i wi -lfl ---- - - - - -- `
Z -s we@j4s ;
` saa:)d , S T
moil weaajS \\ ST6S- Z£-006Z :NId
\ \ 1 i;,Zt, 'Jd 'TZtT 'Sa
Z# aI! S ped w I \\ c iDn.-i
\ \ �
UOISO.la JjUeq a.lanaS 10 eaad \ 1.Dd211 JIONNbh NOIBdOd JNINIVW3N
1 r
peon spoom
saa:)y -OT •xo.lddy \ \ l
Z 1 D"i l
9NO09 30 S3Jd110D
pUe14aM i
Sp00 M
Inoa1 weaajS /1;',P
4!S pedwj
- -� uae g 0
d - >I2i0j iD2invl -i - eaa jJ`�
PUPPM �; ,��, p Aiepunog
/�� A 4uau�ase� lO�
saa�y £l • saaay -09 •xo.lddy
/�6Lt,- 7£ -006Z :IJId � � '-/ / I iDV' l
£99 •Jd '8SZT '90 I� ��I .' 3NO09 30 S39d110D
C, AONNVA let/
_ — }.J93d 'S S3wv[ i
�
V7
�_
0
N
0)
O
a N
O
0
O�
O
m
0
� �
U
LU
u
;AAa rmfsuoo acy papualul jou 'Aluo sasodand 6uluueld AoI dew
uoljejuasajdaa algdea6 ql!m alewlxoadde aleaS dew
saler) ossy 6ulaaaulbu3 s�looia �(q pampo.id dewase8
:aawlelasld
col jo lemajul inoluoa s
1333
3 M
08 \ 0v 0 01
IS9Z-T£- 006Z :NId
r /
l I
87_Z 'Jd TLT '90 �%,
-A
r
IZ-PLi2ll@AA/
ads
.d , D . 9TAxi, 8 , `I
'1NI- )I'dOA ii2i wi -lfl ---- - - - - -- `
Z -s we@j4s ;
` saa:)d , S T
moil weaajS \\ ST6S- Z£-006Z :NId
\ \ 1 i;,Zt, 'Jd 'TZtT 'Sa
Z# aI! S ped w I \\ c iDn.-i
\ \ �
UOISO.la JjUeq a.lanaS 10 eaad \ 1.Dd211 JIONNbh NOIBdOd JNINIVW3N
1 r
peon spoom
saa:)y -OT •xo.lddy \ \ l
Z 1 D"i l
9NO09 30 S3Jd110D
pUe14aM i
Sp00 M
Inoa1 weaajS /1;',P
4!S pedwj
- -� uae g 0
d - >I2i0j iD2invl -i - eaa jJ`�
PUPPM �; ,��, p Aiepunog
/�� A 4uau�ase� lO�
saa�y £l • saaay -09 •xo.lddy
/�6Lt,- 7£ -006Z :IJId � � '-/ / I iDV' l
£99 •Jd '8SZT '90 I� ��I .' 3NO09 30 S39d110D
C, AONNVA let/
_ — }.J93d 'S S3wv[ i

T #lUS-ddW iDVdWI :a14!1 bulMDJQ
d'b,L
�!'f/�
WOO'D85MoojG'MMM
OOL4- Z£Z -8Z8 -t :aU04d tf£t- ZSZ -8Z8 -t :XDd
t088Z '0'N 'apinaysy 190-J;S uo ;6uiNy Lt
° `�j
o
p
z
w
0
C3
VNIIO`d J H1bON AINnoD ` E)nvj-vm
SaOitiaSJeluawuoJinu3. 6uiAatinS•6uua9ui6u3.6wuueld
S31dIJOSBV ONIlIi3NION3
SX00..ON
SddW NOLLVDIdIlON NOI10f1dISNODIdd
,ado•
C
O
(D
O
�
B
Q10,
O
N 009 d 0 S3 Jd110D
d
�---�
�
o°rna`oo`�(or
0
'�
o
`
N
3:
`
"
3
u
\
Y�
�O
0-
\
0
Z
Q
LLJ
ch
O
LL.
Lill
z
J
Ch
W
W
(!)
W
OP
nW -mac \� � r
N
o
\ = Q
~w Of
O Q
L LJ
Z W
J U
Z
(Y W
H LL-
Q �
1i
0
Z
Q
J �
W L'
0)
O
0
O
i
4-J
E
O C
Q O
-C fu
Y =
fu OO-
4-J
Q .Q
0) C
fu
� O
N
�W
E f6
fll
fu L
L �
0)
L
fli _0
O
z
w
U
W
in
Q
11
CL
w
0-
0-
0
W
M
O
0-
O
ly-
0-
Q Lr-
O
U
0
C3
0
D
C
O
(D
O
M
Q10,
O
d
0
W
0
■■
V
L-
40-
■■
r- Z
C3
(�
0 O
0
F
0
Ln
�
6
E
N
H
E
0)
O
0
O
i
4-J
E
O C
Q O
-C fu
Y =
fu OO-
4-J
Q .Q
0) C
fu
� O
N
�W
E f6
fll
fu L
L �
0)
L
fli _0
O
z
w
U
W
in
Q
11
CL
w
0-
0-
0
W
M
O
0-
O
ly-
0-
N C� m w � N a m w�
��¢� ¢�in pf)
��¢I�r T�t-d-I:r�r!? o
nnrr)M npnnFnM a w
R
rim
w °
J
+
CIA 0
J M
P
0
N
+
0
r�
O
0
C3
C
O
O
M
M
0
■■
V
L-
40-
■■
Cad
C3
f
a'a
V
F
E
d
6
E
N
H
E
u7 Ln � �f d- m rn
d'd'b 4d-dt'
H
C
a
=
f--1
c
fp
L
=
f0
C
O
E
�
L
CL
!-
�-
L
E
N
E
Q"
n
-,
N C� m w � N a m w�
��¢� ¢�in pf)
��¢I�r T�t-d-I:r�r!? o
nnrr)M npnnFnM a w
R
rim
w °
J
+
CIA 0
J M
P
0
N
+
0
r�
0
C3
0
C3
R1Ca mw T VQamw 0
u7 Ln � �f d- m rn
d'd'b 4d-dt'
n n rn m r7 n n M M MS

Z# 31IS -ddW 1�ddWI
al�!1 bUIMDaQ
WOD'DBS�OOJG'MMM
00L*- Z£7-SZS -I :auO4d l££l- Z£Z -?Z8-I
'8II.Na4sV
:XDd
o
IOSSZ '0'N 3aaJ }S u076wNV Ll
0 0
W
w
bNIl0J H120N
lLNf0�
d�fdldM
.
Ill/
s�itig�eluawuo
nu3
.6uiFatins•6uuaaw6u3.6uiuue�d
0
Z
B31dIJOBBV 8NI2l33NION3
a
�
SX(DO)M
g
Sd`dW NOI LVDI�LLON
NOI10(12LSN0DTdd
3N009 J0 SlJd110D
�'-r
� � -�
o
CE
m
0
V)
d
0
0
-C
0
cr
0)
0
W
"a
Z
O
O
N
L
N
of
W
V)
N
Li
LL-
(n
_
C
0
V)
m
.0
C
. V)
:2
U
~
C'-)
N-
LA
w
W
0
u
..
NO1-0'a74
a
LL-
/
(n
-
J
C
.� .�.+
�O O
_
a.+
J.-
��
a a,L�
a
OL
C:
C:
ro
0- -W
1--1
\ \
\
1
1
YI
fu
Ea'�
_
a l U
fu
i
I
m
0
_O
cV
= O E
0 �
a. cn
CL
E
I
v
I
mI
E
4-J
(n Oai
'
E-o
j
I
i
0�1
�
�;
(nwaa�
foH
/
N
J
W
L-
Ln
Z
/
J
Q
�,
o f
L
0'
Q
/
Q
3:
U-) 1
\
(p
i
'
C)
<
w
/
U
C)
p
W
=
0.
Q
/
1)
J
_0
L
C)
O
O
W
/
/
Z
4-
-
O
Q
/
O
D
/
\/
Q
a
m
`
W
Cl
W
W
U
J
:E
D
\ X
a_
W
1
\
a
LLLJ
LU
f
1
3450 ,-
c�
V)
FM I
e
Hj —1in
nnnnnnno
—
D
+
4
Q
CD
CL
En
CL
0
i
w
`
+
a
I
i
N10
"-
0
m
o
I
°
o
W
I
Z
W
Q
o
W
Of
J
(nw(n
0
INE'o
U
Of z
+
zo
J
°z
Q O
m,-
z
—OQ
0
�q
ED ED � PJ 0
�CTvgr
n o
pROpER ��
U�O
�N
LLJ
m ~v
��
W
D
C)m
0mO
\
o
�Q
\
Y
O
Q�
m (n
w W—
N
of
<
D
cn O
J
WY
O
m
U
U)
,
Q
ry W
:D W
Q
iL3
U i

Pr
he
Typical Grade Control Detail
Section View
Proposed Boulder Headwall Ex Streambed to remain
undisturbed
Proposed
Proposed Invert
Approx B
Plan View
Notes
i Non -woven filter cloth shall be installed between boulders
antl earth fill for road section See plans far pipe invert
elevations and specifications and endwall specifications
2 Contractor shall coordinate wiith Engineer and
Environmental Consultant prior to installation
9 Contractor is responsible for arranging a final
Impaction of installed grade control structures
WIN Engineer or Environmental Consultant
4 All disturbed areas in tlends or stream buffers shall be
stabilized with annual a grass and overseeded with native
species (use seed mix 908 from Ernst Conservation
cede (000- 873 -3921) or approved equal )
8 All work must be performed so that flowing water does
not come in contact with the disturbed area The Contractor
shall submit a plan to capture and divert ell f10 ing water
around Mork area prior to commencement of Land disturbing
activities
Log Install at
Elevation
Diameter Log set at control
and keyed into boulders
ism or wetland Flow
11 minimum) nailed to log and
o under flow line and beckfilled
Cottages of Boone PCN
May 30 2012

STREAM DE- WATERING DETAIL
a
CL
E °' o
0
Ilk
csj
yv �i
�a 4
E
to mmv
I m
l o " o a�
ro
o c� x c
ro
ro c:
v
3� a
m d v 0) L E
m" o
ro U
t
U
N
'O
a
'0
o w-
O
2 v wv
CL 0 b cc
Cu te+ a. m
�
CroaC
0
me
laov o
1
w

COTTAGES OF BOONE
PCN APPLICATION
PHOTOSHEET
MAY 31, 2012
Photo 1: View looking to the
north up Stream S -1, UT-
Laurel Fork -P. Proposed
Impact Site #1 will occur at
the approximate location of
the yellow lines. A dual
30 "x30' long CMP is
proposed to be installed for
the access road utility lines
will be trenched under pipes.
Photo 2: View looking south
at Impact Site #2 (S -2). UT-
Laurel Fork -Int flows left to
right. Overflow gully runs
across woods road and
severely eroded area is on the
right with top edge marked by
pink flags. Limits of access
road will be roughly the
yellow lines. A dual 24 "x 25'
long CMP is proposed.

U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action I D 2012-00428 County Watauga U S G S Quad. NC Boone
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner /Agent Capstone Companies, Amanda Wallis
Address 431 Office Park Drive, Birmingham AL 35223
Telephone No 205 -612 1107
Property description
Size (acres) Approximately 70 acres Nearest Town Boone
Nearest Waterway UT to Laurel Fork River Basin Watauga
Coordinates 36 20032/ 9170009 hydrologic Unit Code 06010103
Location Description The site is located off Poplar Grove Road, Boone Watauga County North Carolina The site is
comprised of two tracts and two easements
Indicate Which of the Followmg Apply
A Prehmmary Determination
Based on prelumnary information, there may be waters and wetlands on the above described property We strongly
suggest you have this property mspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) junsdiction To be
considered final, a junsdictional determination must be verified by the Corps This preliminary detennmation is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Proms (Reference 33 CFR Part 33 1) ) If you
wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed) by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD
B Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
X There are waters and wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
_ We strongly suggest you have the waters and wetlands on your property delineated Due to the size of your property
and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner For a
more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be venfied by
the Corps
_ The waters and wetlands on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps We
strongly suggest you have tlus delineation surveyed Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and venfied by the
Corps Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your
property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years
X The waters and wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on April 27, 2012 Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
There are no waters of the U S to include wetlands present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations this determination may be roped upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification

Action Id 2012 -00428 1
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311) If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program please contact Tasha McCormick at 828-2717980
C Basis For Determination
The site contains wetlands as determined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the Interim
Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Region These
wetlands are adjacent to stream channels located on the property that exhibit indicators of ordinary high water marks The
stream channel on the property is an unnamed tributary to Laurel Fork which flows into the Watauga River The Watauga
River is in the French Broad Holston Watershed and ultimately drams to the Gulf of Mexico Specifically the Watauga River
joins with the North Fork Holston River to form the Holston River The Holston River merges with the French Broad River to
form the Tennessee River The Tennessee River drams to the Ohio River then to the Mississippi River before entering the Gulf
of Mexico
D Remarks This jurisdictional determination verifies Waters of the U S within Tract 1 Tract 2 Inset A and Inset B as
shown on sheets 1 and 2 of the plat titled Recombination Survey for Capstone Companies dated April 17 2012 This
junsdictional determination is not valid for any areas outside of the specific tracts listed above Jurisdictional Waters of the
U S are located adjacent to and outside of the tracts described above and were observed durmg the Corps on site
investigation. Additional delineation and jurisdictional determination efforts should be undertaken prior to any development
activities occurring beyond the tracts identified above
F Attention USDA Program Participants
This delmeation/determmation has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delmeation/determmation may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985 If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation %ervice pnor to Starting work
F Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B above)
Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination If you are not in agreement with that approved
jurisdictional determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331 Enclosed you will find a request for
appeal (RFA) form If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following
address
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn Jason Steele Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW Room 1 OM 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 3315 and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by June 26 2012
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence **
Corps Regulatory Official Tasha McCormick
Issue Date April 27, 2012 Expiration Date April 27,201

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public To help us ensure we continue to
do so please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http /lpefZ.nwp usace army Mg urvey html
to complete the survey online
CF ENV Environmental Consulting Services Inc Attn John Vilas 3764 Romutger Road, Banner Elk, NC 28604
Peggy and James L Vannoy 55 Woodland Dnve Apt 106 Vero Beach, FL 32962 3719
Gary M Henson 1353 Poplar Grove Road Boone NC 28607

2A:-ri-&vpe, NC DW
Stream Idenhficahon Form Vers><on 411
Date to o 2 o i 1
Project/Site C S A- AV-
Latitude
Evaluator Y y�
County
L.ongdude
Total Points
airele one)
Ot1er5f (jqA- 2
Stream is at least mtarmrYtant ' 'j 1 s
Ephemeral Irrtennitberrt erennw
e g Quad Name
d 2 19 or renmal d 2 3d
2
3
A Geomorphology Subtotal = S
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
15
1
2
3
3 In- channel structure ex riffle-pool step -pool
ripple-poolsequence
0
©
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
05
2
3
5 Active/relict floodplam
No = 0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7 Recent allumai deposits
0
CD
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
05
Notes
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
0 5
1
11 Second or greater order channel
6b =
Yes = 3
arfikud drt hes are not rated see doc ussions in manual
B Hydrology (Subtotal=--Z'5 )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
15
1
0
0
15 Sediment on plants or debns
0
1
1
15
16 Organic debris Imes or piles
0
05
1
1 5
17 Sal -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes r 3
C Biology (Subtotal = la "715)
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
CID
05
1
15
24 Amphibians
05
1
15
25 Algae
COD
0.5
1
is
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75
L = 15 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch

UT- La.ure 11 =eric-
Nf" IIWA CtrpAm Idpnfifimtmn Form Veninn 4 11
Date l io x
Prq*aite {,p n
Latitude
Evaluator �ryti
County :1JO�+A,�J.C`G
Longitude
Total Points
Stream Determination (oi
Other �J►�t
Stream is at least intermnent 0 -7 S
•
Ephemeral Intermrtte rennia
e g Quad Name S t
If z t! or ►ennual d a 30
2
3
A Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel alor g thaMieg
0
1
2
3
3 In- channel structure ex nfAe -pool step -pool
npple-pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4 Parbde size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Activetrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
FACW = 0 7jpOBL
2
3
9 Grade control
0
05
C3
15
10 Natural valley
0
05
CT
15
11 Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
a arMoat ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology Subtotal =
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron madong bactena
a
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
15
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
Qp
1
15
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C Biology (subtotal= -I
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21 Aquabc Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
(0
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
0
1
15
24 Amphibians
0
C OV
1
15
25 Algae
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 7jpOBL
=1 5 Other = 0
pereroiiai streams may also be identified using other melhoda See d 35 of maf
Notes
Sketch
�2 L
u�1
,7C
� it'