20120540 Ver 1_401 Application_20120512

» f
2 ®120540
DI
Senator Royall Mixed Use ---s°°
Development
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Nationwide Permit PCN Submittal
Prepared For
Mr R Elam Hall
Multifamily Development Group
Crescent Resources LLC
227 West Trade Street, Suite 1000
Charlotte NC 28202
Prepared By
Leonard S Rmdner PLLC
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews NC 28105
[phone]
May 27 2012
MAY 3 1 2012
Fj

0 North Carolina Secretary of State
Page 1 of 1
`
"��� North Carolina
�� Elaine F Marshall DEPARTMENT OF THE
Secretary SECRETARY aF STATE
h t 7
PO Box 29622 Raleigh NC 27626 -�22 (� 9180 200K0
Date 5/27/2012
Click here to
View Document Filings I File an Annual Report
JPrint a Pre populated Annual Report Fellable PDF Form I Amended A Previous Annual Report
Corporation Names
Name
Name Type
NC CRESCENT RESOURCES
LEGAL
LLC
Limited Liability Company Information
SOSID
0577377
Status
Current Active
Effective Date
1/12/2001
Annual Report Due Date
Citizenship
FOREIGN
State of Inc
GA
Duration
PERPETUAL
Annual Report Status
CURRENT
Registered Agent
Agent Name CT CORPORATION SYSTEM
Office Address 150 FAYETTEVILLE ST BOX 1011
RALEIGH NC 27601
Mailing Address 150 FAYETTEVILLE ST BOX 1011
RALEIGH NC 27601
Principal Office
Office Address 227 W TRADE STREET SUITE 1000
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Mailing Address 227 W TRADE STREET SUITE 1000
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Officers
Title MANAGER
Name KEVIN LAMBERT
Business Address 227 W TRADE STREET SUITE 1000
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
This website is provided to the public as a part of the Secretary of State Knowledge Base (SOSKB) system Ver
2848
http / /www secretary state nc us /corporations /Corp aspx9Pitemld= 5300395 5/27/2012

O�oF V a
rFgoG
Uj 9
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A Apphcant Information
1
Processing
1a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
FZ
1b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 29 39 and 18 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corpse
® Yes
❑ No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu
fee program
® Yes
❑ No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Senator Royall Mixed Use Development
2b
County
Mecklenburg
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Charlotte
2d
Subdivision name
Senator Royall Mixed Use Development
2e
NCDOT only T I P or state
project no
3 2012
3
Owner Information NR
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Crescent Resources LLC+
3b
Deed Book and Page No
13510 461 11167 674 11888 364 11167 -674
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Kevin Lambert Manager
3d
Street address
227 W Trade Street Suite 1000
3e
City state zip
Charlotte NC 28202
3f
Telephone no
3g
Fax no
3h
Email address
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

I-
4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other specify Owners Representative
4b
Name
Mr Elam Hall
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Crescent Resources LLC
4d
Street address
227 W Trade Street Suite 1000
4e
City state zip
Charlotte NC 28202
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5
Agent /Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Leonard S Rmdner
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Leonard S Rindner PLLC
5c
Street address
3714 Spokeshave Lane
5d
City state zip
Matthews NC 28105
5e
Telephone no
704 904 2277
5f
Fax no
5g
Email address
lnndner @carolina rr com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

B Project Information and Prior Project History
1 Property Identification
la Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
04738108 04742106 04742102 04742101
lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 3329 Longitude 807537
(DD DDDDDD) ( DD DDDDDD)
1c Property size
+/ 59 40 acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to
UT of Mallard Creek 03040105
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
Water Classification C
2c River basin
Rocky/Yadkin
3 Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The site consist mature woodland area in mid succession with some mature pockets The site is adjacent to residential
subdivisions thoroughfares multi family large office and commercial sites
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
Approximately 0 18 acres of wetlands and streams
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
approximately 631 linear feet
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
General project development including parking buildings and stormwater management facilities
3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used
The project where the impacts occur are on the multi family section of the mixed use development however the
stormwater features are for the entire project in general The impacts are limited to less than 0 155 acres of Waters of the
U S Heavy construction machinery will be used
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property !
®Yes ❑ No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past '
Comments
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type
❑ Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company Leonard S Rmdner PLLC
Name (if known) Leonard S Rmdner /Pat Kealy
Other
4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
Wetlands and streams were field verified by Steve Kichefski of the USACE on February 2 2012 and Alan Johnson of
NCDENR on March 23 2012 The delineation has been submitted for certification and awaiting written approval as of
5/27/12
5 Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
El Yes ®No El Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past
5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

r r
i 6 Future Project Plans I
6a Is this a phased project? ® Yes ❑ No
6b If yes explain
The multi family portion of the site is expected to be built before the commercial development The stormwater plan is
expected to be phased to allow occupancy for completed ponons of the project The mitigation and the stormwater
management plan approval will be obtained prior to impacts and the mitigation will be paid to the NCEEP prior to impacts
as required
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

FC
C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
1a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

C
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps 404 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P)
(if known)
DWQ —non 404 other)
(acres)
or Temporary T
W1 ® P ❑ T
fill NWP 29
PFO1A
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
04
W2 ❑ PET
NWP # 18
PFO1A/PSS1A
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
05
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g Total wetland impacts
09
2h Comments These wetland areas are a collection of 4 small wetland pockets
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact length
number
(PER) or
(Corps 404 10
stream
(linear feet)
Permanent (P)
intermittent
DWQ — non 404
width
or Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
fill /grading for
UT of Mallard
Creek Stream C
❑ PER
® Corps
2 3
240 LF
site development
Section 2
® INT
® DWQ
UT of Mallard
212 If
S2 ® P [:IT
fill /grading for
Creek Stream C
❑ PER
® Corps
2 3
unimportant
stream / USACE
site development
Section 1 and
® INT
® DWQ
Section 3
field
verification
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
452 If
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P FIT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tnbutary impacts
452 If
31 Comments The stream and wetland determinations were confirmed by the USACE on 2/2/12 and NCDENR on 3/23/12
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number
— Permanent
(P) or
Temporary (T)
4b
Name of
waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 [:]PEI T
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed then complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID
number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland (acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

r
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g -
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
impact
required?
T)
61 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Alternative site plans were submitted and review by the USACE and NCDENR prior to the submittal of this application Based
on site conditions it was agreed that complete avoidance was not practical The plans were modified to completely avoid the
perennial stream which originates at Flag Point E 1 Stream C Segment 4 Unavoidable impacts are limited to less than 0 15
acres The NCDENR agreed that the intermittent streams approved as unimportant by the USACE would be limited to 5 to 1
mitigation
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Project is subject to strict enforcement of erosion control plans
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
® DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this
® Payment to in lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 8of12
PCN Form - Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

3c Comments NA
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached
® Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
346 (240 If important intermittent streams at 1 1 basis per
USACE and NCDENR 212 If unimportant intermittent stream at
a 5 to 1 basis per NCDENR) linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
N/A acres
4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that
requires buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
15
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b
If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why
❑ Yes F1 No
Comments
2
Stormwater Management Plan
ranges from 40% to 80% for
developed areas preliminary
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
calculations provided by the
planner /engineer are attached
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative
description of the plan
The stormwater plan will be also designed in accordance with the Charlotte Mecklenburg PCCO NPDES Phase 2
Requirements The final stormwater plans and /or approvals will be submitted to NCDENR for approval prior to any
impacts to streams and wetlands
® Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government s jurisdiction is this project?
Charlotte /Mecklenburg
® Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other Lower Lake Wylie
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4 DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a
Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5 DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements
❑ Yes El No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been mete
TO Yes ❑ No
F
Supplementary Information
1
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c
If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes El No
letter)
Comments
2
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after the fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description
The project utilizes existing road network and infrastructure
4
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility
Will connect with existing municipal sewer system
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

PROGRAM
May 22, 2012
Elam Hall
Crescent Resources
227 West Trade St Suite 1000
Charlotte NC 28202 Expiration of Acceptance November 22 2012
Protect Senator Royall Mixed Use Development County Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below Please
note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for project impacts It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be
approved You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated
with the proposed activity including SL 2009 337 An Act to Promote the Use of ComgensaM Mitigation Banks as amended by
S L 2011 343
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Pernut/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame this acceptance will expire It is the applicant s
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www nceep net
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table The amount of mitigation required for this impact is determined by permitting agencies
Upon receipt of payment EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation The mitigation will be performed in
accordance with the N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program In Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28 2010
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Kelly Williams at
[phone]
Sincerely
Mich 1 1lison
Deputy Director
cc Karen Higgins NCDWQ Wetlands /401 Unit
Steve Kichefski USACE Asheville
Alan Johnson NCDWQ Mooresville
Len Rindner agent
File
nftorwg 'EnkAxaii�l Prot" 0" st-a&
SNW ��
i � �
OEM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program 1652 Mad Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1652 / 919 715 0476 / www nceep net
River
CU
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
Buffer 11
Basin
Location
(Sq Ft )
(Sq Ft )
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Impact
Yadkin
03040105
0
0
Up to
0
0
0
0
0
452
Upon receipt of payment EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation The mitigation will be performed in
accordance with the N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program In Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28 2010
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Kelly Williams at
[phone]
Sincerely
Mich 1 1lison
Deputy Director
cc Karen Higgins NCDWQ Wetlands /401 Unit
Steve Kichefski USACE Asheville
Alan Johnson NCDWQ Mooresville
Len Rindner agent
File
nftorwg 'EnkAxaii�l Prot" 0" st-a&
SNW ��
i � �
OEM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program 1652 Mad Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1652 / 919 715 0476 / www nceep net

Page 1 of 1
Len Rindner
From Williams Kelly [kelly wlliams @ncdenr gov]
Sent Tuesday May 22 2012 3 34 PM
To Len Rindner
Cc Dennison Laurie Johnson Alan Kichefski Steven L SAW
Subject Senator Royall Mixed Use Development EEP In Lieu Fee Mitigation Request
Attachments STIR Senator Royall Mixed Use Development pdf
Len
Attached please find a response letter from EEP for the In Lieu Fee Mitigation Request for the above
referenced project I included the total for the impacts I have noted that you are discussing mitigation
ratios with the permitting agencies so the actual amount of mitigation may differ from the number in
our letter A hard copy of the attached letter will be mailed to the applicant This acceptance letter
expires in six months If an extension to this acceptance letter is needed please let me know prior to its
expiration
Once EEP receives the permits associated with the project from the applicant /agent we will generate an
invoice based on the mitigation amounts specified in the permits
Note that our fees will be adjusted July 1 2012 if the permits are issued prior to that date please send
me copies so that I can issue an invoice The last day to obtain an invoice at the current fee schedule is
June 30 2012 All invoices are valid for 60 days all invoices and invoice extensions issued after June 30
will reflect the fee schedule in place on the date the invoice is issued
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this service to our customers
Feel free to contact me if you have any questions
Sincerely
Kelly Williams
NCEEP In Lieu Fee Program Coordinator
919 716 1921
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 276991652
E mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may
be disclosed to third parties
5/27/2012

Mecklenburg County, NC Polans
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
POLARIS
Parcel Ownership and GIS Summary
Date and Time 512712012 9 57 02 AM
Parcel ID # 04738108 GIS ID # 04738108 FEMA Flood Information
Owner Name CRESCENT RESOURCES LLC FEMA Panel # 710457700J
AND C/O PROPERTY TAX FEMA Flood Zone OUT
DEPT FEMA Panel Date 3/02/2009
Mailing Address 227 W TRADE ST STE 1000 Community Flood Information
CHARLOTTE NC 28202 Community UT
Flood Zone
Property
Characteristics
Legal Desc
NA
Land Area
11 2172AC
Fire District
00 CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
UNIVERSITY AREA
Account Type
NON NC CORP
Municipality
1 CHARLOTTE
Property Use IVACANT
Deed Reference(s) and Sales Price
13510 -461 (4/22/2002) $0 00
09812 501 (7/24/1998) $0 00
Situs Addresses Tied to This Parcel
W MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD
Site Location Information
Zoning Boundaries
Contact Appropriate Planning
Department or See Map
ETJ Area CHARLOTTE
Charlotte Historic Districts NO
Within Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area NO
Census Tract # 55 07
Parcel Falls Inside a Water Quality Buffer? NO
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction
Charlotte
District
Yadkin
Regulated Watershed Information
Watershed Name IMALLARD
Watershed Class
Powered by
4g% N�c�,�
G
M
Page 1 of 1
The information provided by this program is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded
deeds plats tax maps surveys and other public records and data Users of this map data are hereby notified that the aforementioned public
primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no
legal responsibility for the information contained herein
http / /polans mecklenburgcountync gov/ website /redesign/ParcelDetailsReport asp 5/27/2012

Mecklenburg County, NC Polans
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
POLARIS
Parcel Ownership and GIS Summary
Date and Trme 512712012 9 59 30 AM
Parcel ID # 04742106 GIS ID # 04742106 FEMA Flood Information
Owner Name CRESCENT RESOURCES INC FEMA Panel # 3710457700J
AND C/O PROPERTY TAX FEMA Flood Zone OUT
DEPT FEMA Panel Date 03/02/2009
Mailing Address 227 W TRADE ST SUITE 1000 Community Flood Information
CHARLOTTE NC 28202 Community UT
Flood Zone 10
Properly Characteristics Re ulated Watershed Information
Legal Desc INA I Watershed Name MAI I ARn
Land Area 116 47AC I Watershed Class
Fire District
00 CITY OF CHARLOTTE I Powered by
Special District UNIVERSITY AREA
Account Type NON NC CORP
Municipality 1 CHARLOTTE
Property Use VACANT
Deed Reference(s) and Sales Price
11167 674 (3/24/2000) $4 486 000 00
Situs Addresses Tied to This Parcel
W MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD
Site Location Information
Zoning Boundaries
Contact Appropriate Planning
Department or See Map
ETJ Area CHARLOTTE
Charlotte Historic Districts NO
Within Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area NO
Census Tract # 55 07
Parcel Falls Inside a Water Quality Buffer? NO
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction
Charlotte
District
Yadkin
G
►y�
M
Page 1 of 1
he information provided by this program is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded
eeds plats tax maps surveys and other public records and data Users of this map data are hereby notified that the aforementioned public
rimary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no
le al responsibility for the information contained herein
http / /polans mecklenburgcountync gov/ website /redesign/ParcelDetailsReport asp 5/27/2012

Mecklenburg County NC Polaris
Page 1 of 1
Mecklenburg County, North Carohna
POLARIS
Parcel Ownership and GIS Summary
Date and Time 512712012 9 56 03 AM
Parcel ID # 04742102 GIS ID # 04742102
FEMA Flood Information
FEMA Panel # 3710457800J
FEMA Flood Zone UT
FEMA Panel Date 3/02/2009
Community Flood Information
Community UT
Flood Zone
Regulated Watershed Information
Watershed Name IMALLARD
Watershed Class
Powered by
�pEcKN6�R�c
�.p
G'S G�
property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded
of this map data are hereby notified that the aforementioned public
Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no
Owner Name
CRESCENT RESOURCES LLC
AND C/O PROPERTY TAX
DEPT
Mailing Address
227 W TRADE ST STE 1000
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Property
Characteristics
Legal Desc
NA
Land Area
2 125AC
Fire District
00 CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
UNIVERSITY AREA
Account Type
NON NC CORP
Municipality
1 CHARLOTTE
Property Use
VACANT
Deed Reference(s) and Sales Price
11888 364 (1/29/2001) $334 000 00
Situs Addresses Tied to This Parcel
1919 W MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD
Site Location Information
Zoning Boundaries
Contact Appropriate Planning
Department or See Map
ETJ Area CHARLOTTE
Charlotte Historic Districts NO
Within Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area NO
Census Tract # 55 07
Parcel Falls Inside a Water Quality Buffer? NO
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction
Charlotte
District
Yadkin
he information provided by this program is prepared for the inventory of real
eeds plats tax maps surveys and other public records and data Users
nmary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information
e al responsibility for the information contained herein
http / /polans mecklenburgcountync gov/ website /redesi.gn/ParcelDetailsReport asp 5/27/2012

Mecklenburg County NC Polans
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
POLARIS
Parcel Ownership and GIS Summary
Date and Time 512712012 9 55 39 AM
Parcel ID # 04742101 GIS ID # 04742101 FEMA Flood Information
Owner Name CRESCENT RESOURCES INC FEMA Panel # 710457700J
AND C/O PROPERTY TAX FEMA Flood Zone VUT
DEPT FEMA Panel Date 3/02
Mailing Address 227 W TRADE ST STE 1000 Community Flood Ini
CHARLOTTE NC 28202 Community UT
Flood Zone
Property Characteristics Regulated Watershed I
Legal Desc NA Watershed Name IMA LL
Land Area 29 59AC Watershed Class
Fire District 00 CITY OF CHARLOTTE I Powered by
Special District UNIVERSITY AREA
Account Type NON NC CORP
Municipality 1 CHARLOTTE
Property Use VACANT
Deed Reference(s) and Sales Price
11167 674 (3/24/2000) $4 486 000 00
10731 623 (8/31/1999) $4 148 000 00
Situs Addresses Tied to This Parcel
W MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD
Site Location Information
Zoning Boundaries
Contact Appropriate Planning
Department or See Map
ETJ Area CHARLOTTE
Charlotte Historic Districts NO
Within Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area NO
Census Tract # 55 07
Parcel Falls Inside a Water Quality Buffers NO
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction
Charlotte
District
Yadkin
��CMCLEN13
�o
Page 1 of 1
The information provided by this program is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded
deeds plats tax maps surveys and other public records and data Users of this map data are hereby notified that the aforementioned public
primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no
legal responsibility for the information contained herein
http / /polans mecklenburgcountync gov/ website /redesign/ParcelDetailsReport asp 5/27/2012

'it.
?0ad
WEST MALLARD CREEK CHURCH ROAD
for CTOO Rd
--w
A':*�' C
-%, -1
ct,
4�
Nmth America
Universit�t
Q
C
City North
tv
(r,.
rh ao
hnyrs UriiversirV of NwIlh P
Carolina at Charlotte
Botanical Garcipps
4
University
City South University of
CHARLOTTE
eye
FIGURE NO. LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC W. MALLARD CREEK CH SHEET
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group DRAWN REVIEWED
BY PJK BY LSR
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105 VICINITY MAP DATE: PAGE:
(704) 904 — 2277 APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION
[e-mail] 01124112

-a
x;
zw
EA
vi-
-
t ♦i,�' � T ° �`�j�^t'ri i,� • xy. 1 + (1� .' `,�'4+l - Yi.
t '�i,�F • r a e6 �, wR� GYM w _ +' :a � '..
�. ' �,`:C fb',. i K•�'w;�r r R - -:y srr+ RYra+�A+..
9 Y �
4
'�''�j' Y•4`.'9%•'Sa °�, a,< 2 i`R' 4 F -. tit `J"' _ i '`� '�C� ", � ,�y`, +1
�,nX±. �t ♦ .� ., }(ate`
:" .f '^ -e '�1f �`y wie��..4 1 is ♦"a.' � .�+Y.J �i1f. .1� ..'.. .. Y^'�. ..
& ! E }
F
x•
r i.
w`
zw
EA
vi-
-
t ♦i,�' � T ° �`�j�^t'ri i,� • xy. 1 + (1� .' `,�'4+l - Yi.
t '�i,�F • r a e6 �, wR� GYM w _ +' :a � '..
�. ' �,`:C fb',. i K•�'w;�r r R - -:y srr+ RYra+�A+..
9 Y �
4
'�''�j' Y•4`.'9%•'Sa °�, a,< 2 i`R' 4 F -. tit `J"' _ i '`� '�C� ", � ,�y`, +1
�,nX±. �t ♦ .� ., }(ate`
:" .f '^ -e '�1f �`y wie��..4 1 is ♦"a.' � .�+Y.J �i1f. .1� ..'.. .. Y^'�. ..

�. . 1PW F
WEST MALLARD CREEK CHURCH ROAD
SITE
PITS _ W MALLARD CRK CH RD
�,�' Am
t
S• ck
-6T
4sv� s
. 8 T
D' ; i' !�'''�,(j��A ",� e f �� �,,,� / ` � ,�'. '- ���x-.*�`� ' ♦ �� �, Y�r p`� . � �. t ���.�`�"".��� �S'�' r, k,` A "ti.
j��r� 1 ij �,-, �•' (" f f �, J f`A �i� — .;°�," � ` i;",,. _ '�" } F f erx.`$ '" I,� .ear.„ .� ,��
Ird
VAI
if
Olt
ZJ
FIGURE NO. LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC W. MALLARD CREEK CH. SHEET.
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group DRAWN REVIEWED
CHARLOTTE, NC. BY PJK BY LSR
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105 USGS LOCATION MAP DATE: PAGE:
(704) 904 - 2277 APPROXIMATE LOCATION
LEN.RINDNER.PWS @gmail.com DERITA, HARRISBURG (NC) QUADRANGLES 01124112
1993

WEST MALLARD CREEK CHURCH ROAD SITE
Sod Map— Medlenburg County, North Carolina
l
f
1d�p3r�F ►'tArodps�roeRAu►�.',�' +'�pwst
V
L" 0 W 105 HOC "o r
�i Ffc
0 �w Y1a 12W s 89:
FIGURE NO. I LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
(704) 904 — 2277
[e-mail]
W. MALLARD CREEK CHURCH SHEET: 1
Charlotte, NC. DRAWN PJK REVIEWED LSR
BY: BY'.
DATE: PAGE:
NRCS SOIL MAP
APPROXIMATE LOCATION 01 119112

WETLAND
E1 -6
Blue/Pink Flags
WETLAND
F1 -10
Blue/Pink Flags
_ I _
NON - JURISDICTIONAL
UPSLOPE OF PROPERTY LINE
SUBJECT TO USACE / NCDENR
VERIFICATION
_.odd_ _�
-��
h'
SEASONAL RPW C1, PERENNIAL RPW E1
-
(BASED ON USACE FIELD DETERMINATION ON
/
0210212012)
U
BY.
h -
Flag C1 to Flag D4 = UNIMPORTANT INTERMITTENT
ABC
Flag D4 to Flag F1 = IMPORTANTANT INTERMITTENT
Flag F1 to Flag E1 = UNMPORTANT INTERMITTENT
Flag E1 = BEGIN PERENNIAL RPW
Revised
FOR STUDY PURPOSES ONLY
02102112
LOCATE C/L & APPROXIMATE WIDTH /
NON -JURISDICTIONAL -
UPSLOPE OF PROPERTY LINE
- SUBJECT TO USACE /
NCDENR VERIFICATION
LINEAR WETLAND
B1 -5(w)/
• • • •' 133a -133b (w)
WETLAND 1`
D1 -6
Blue/Pink Flags
?, WETLAND
d Al -8
Closes with
property boundary
�.� EC+�1MiliEwM�1$wlDi�rM COUNTY_
wti
GULLY OR SWALE:
NON - JURISDICTIONAL
FIGURE N0. LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
(704) 904 -2277
LEN. RINDNER.PWS @gmail.com
BEGIN SEASONAL RPW
APPEARS TO BE OFFSITE
-LOCATE C/L & WIDTH IF ONSITE
SHEET:
W. MALLARD CREEK CH.
-
DRAWN
PJK
REVIEWED
LSR
BY.
BY:
APPROXIMATE MAP FOR SURVEY
DATE
PAGE:
01124112
WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
Revised
FOR STUDY PURPOSES ONLY
02102112
SUBJECT TO USAGE /NCDENR VERIFICATION

NON - JURISDICTIONAL
UPSLOPE OF PROPERTY LINE
- SUBJECT TO USACE / NCDENR
VERIFICATION
WETLAND
E1 -6
Blue/Pink Flags
WETLAND
D1 -6
Blue(Pink Flags
WETLAND
F1 -10
Blue/Pink Flags
NON - JURISDICTIONAL
UPSLOPE OF PROPERTY LINE
- SUBJECT TO USACE /
NCDENR VERIFICATION
GULLY OR SWALE: ........
NON — JURISDICTIONAL
FIGURE NO. LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
(704) 904 —2277
LEN. RINDNER.PWS @gmail.com
SEASONAL RPW C1, PERENNIAL RPW E1
(BASED ON USACE FIELD DETERMINATION ON
0210212012)
Flag C1 to Flag D4 = UNIMPORTANT INTERMITTENT
Flag D4 to Flag F1 = IMPORTANTANT INTERMITTENT
Flag F1 to Flag E1 =UNIMPORTANT INTERMITTENT
Flag E1 = BEGIN PERENNIAL RPW
- LOCATE C/L & APPROXIMATE WIDTH
LINEAR WETLAND
B1 -5(w)/
63a — 63b (w)
WETLAND
Al -8
- Closes with
property boundary
BEGIN SEASONAL RPW
APPEARS TO BE OFFSITE
- LOCATE CIL & WIDTH IF ONSITE
W. MALLARD CREEK CH.
SHEET:
DRAWN PJK
REVIEWED LSR
BY:
BY:
APPROXIMATE MAP FOR SURVEY
DATE:
PAGE:
01124112
WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
Revised
FOR STUDY PURPOSES ONLY
02102112
SUBJECT TO USACE /NCDENR VERIFICATION

w
0
N
M
N
LO
J
J
Q
0
DC
DC
0
Q
z
w
1�
W
J
Q
U
Ln
z
O
0
0
X
III

c;
0WLL
CD
M W
Ln <
U
V)
.j
0
C Loo 0
0C
0
z
LU
(A
Oil
z
CL
z
0
z
0
u
(D
z
X
LU

it N
N\\
/' !// �__.. / / j // / / 1/ 11 /1% ♦`��... —"•- � t { t �/ /1 \ t 1 1 ! 1 \\ ` � ; ; j `I +f,r� ,
Ik 1\ \\
I If
kk
i� / ,1 \� `,i'� /iii ' -, =: x,11 \t11 \ \ \r \r\ r` \ - --
Mo '^y• / / -8�� fI1 \ }( 1l +�iLLw /'a/ /\ t.\ tlk
w d(
f JJt \ 1 Pw \ �I I11 \ \\ \ \ \ \r\ \ \ \ \`NN
° "`'�'' �� l I11t , �z °ar � li ♦. t rcLL ;11\\ \ \ \ \ \\ �.
gv sty8+ 1 J111 Ir /f!E N8? 1!A
•- "'• -isr'' j�� J / l 1 rcaiVCil!) \ r o°d�la \l\;:7�.� \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ �` �•._
,� �� / 1 1 / t 11J /!1/i //! �fl,sl \, \ \Wr�\ \ \..\ ♦ \\
wrcw
/ / 1 1 1 1 l t { I s r 1 1 f i � t l t P •��' \\ \\ ��3� \! \`� \. \` \` �� \ _. _.
n \\ \ \ Wr\
ooi w\ \`\
Giw \ \\
\o�LLwa \�� `
\\ W05�d� \ \\ ` ��N ♦�-
/' 11 i S 111, t ` \ w ��`3O2�'g' \ \`\ � \`�
% dr � °\ `; \ \\ \\
\ '\
\\ \ \` \ lt� ,, <u�'i \\r\ \\ \ —o NN
S t \ 1 I�
— / / ! { 1 1\ I i 1 \\ N C} 1 W f\ m2w
_— / /' / 1 I i 1 + \ \ I 1 °ww. r 1� 1 w \ \ tOZ4'c�i �•� \•N\ \ \�\\
—_ _ _ —�• 1 / t i l { V ` I t I `r'3do 1
1 + °ZNaJ
\ \ t 1 0�! ! S \ \ \ t \ 1 \\
% '` '- -.-- _ r f t j i I ++ 1
IN
\� —`� '�J/ !' / i 1J1j1I�ri (;\..� \\14�ii�l /f�ilrii f
`,,
�\ \ `__ _. 00% /� / /! l 11111! 1 K ! roW.m
\N' - -~ ' _ 6 '� �1 �� J / J If J J 1 / / �( /1 jJ /JO2ZW<
ti \ 1 1 /!/
itiIII
lit /III\
\ \\ `� __ /. / i �/ il(r! J 1 y14 \ \It II 11 (1 f + E'fl;ritJt
Vvv�v` t {��I}tl� t ,VI�I�ti4�`�fl�l�ilil�tt� 1
N
O
N
M
N
i
J
J
DC
0
Q
Z
w
•1�
•
n
LLJ
Q
U
N
n
Q
V)
O
O
V
F—
l/7
W

k '�
/ i t 1
'� t I
pF � "'_- r''_r.��' /' y..' '' yi•' y' wJ / r�s.`r" -"'� r•."r / ' y �•' ° ,.r -r
�. - ° /•-
._ -__ —O —.' r.- r^r'..- / r,y / r � /,' /' r' iN� r' JI /'may ��✓ -,�
fp
tr –_-r -- –_ - -- ---
_
-
/ 1111 \4
I
t\ /' r
//i
/r - - - - -_– r mF /' / ♦// / // I r I ��
r\ \\ \\ 1 \ \\ \y ( // _. /3]og' � / ✓y�a���^.- - -''i ryy rrr.
\� \.r �_ti i it i \ // / / ` _� � 9 '.Z -��..: — 'wr___ ✓rf,r / /.�,
�r\ \\� \\ \\ \\ __ `_` _,� --`- -- - -. - l -.:�� - -- .` �.. � rrr .�-•' i�
777
,rip f f/
r 4/4**
d
r —
-
��.� /�r� /rte
OPd
i� %..� /J�, /li rir/ \; i....•--_.__ - -_...
Ma
0
N
M
N
J:
J
J
Q
DC
0
Q
Z
w
-1�
db
•
•
on
w
J
U
N
O
O
S/2
W

0
N
d-
(D
LON
M J
N
Ti
J
J
Q
0
ce z
a
w
OL F-
r
Z
w

O
M
1 r
o -
LU
Ln
fit
Cj
of
I mo 1,
0
"� ;gym
w
CL
LU
rz
i.`tit =gym Ir LU
uj i
cr
w.�
- 92
LIM
� ,�` nor .. J {, j I � f I f�� I •-. � �\ ��,� � fl `� { i

b
(D
(-4
Lr)
Ln
w
�T a.
I w
CL
�A
all
A
'00
:7
X
f
a_
LLJ
to
x to;
w
fL
Lu iL z
tu
10 >
f rL C)
ol
w
Of LU
w
V)
w
fL V
ej
f
Is it
I I U2
J
I—A
17
— — — —1 r ;or
— - - ol

IF
.� ,
Now' I
/
T(7
41 LU
LL
1 V 1
/
j
jr___; tea.• =_ - --__
it
1i
/ ;!/ /<! i / rye' '� ,• ,, ��,/ �•- i �
�o
0
N 2 io�
N
M W
N
irl 0
J
J
Q
0
DC
Q
Z
w
•1�
•
IN
W,
-
-
/
_
p
wm
�
•ate
,+
LL
/
T(7
41 LU
LL
1 V 1
/
j
jr___; tea.• =_ - --__
it
1i
/ ;!/ /<! i / rye' '� ,• ,, ��,/ �•- i �
�o
0
N 2 io�
N
M W
N
irl 0
J
J
Q
0
DC
Q
Z
w
•1�
•
IN

M J
�_ '
Z ;• J
g
W
w
OA
LCLJ
/ \
LU
i� !� ; � � � lam♦ Z O
1 1 _
l \
=o
• /
1c 50; I 6a°J• \
I`-- a.

lz
1 \ \ 1 u
J % /
d
r
r J
1 • , 1 '� � do J � � f \ � \ \ 1
3 \ \
ow
YEo�,` may! g3oc \\
o
ryu
guu
m � ♦ 1 1 1
LITE goo °o�b
ca
\ 'SHO \

•6 y\
1
L
M�
7 u`i i
LID r
<z
/ cc
fro
i
s
,i
i

f � i
40 00 �♦
00
/ rI
-4 ../
!K
`t 1
I I Jill 111111
„d ♦
f
r s

City of Charlotte
Land Development Division
Post Construction Controls / Detention Worksheet
The following sections help to provide information on volume and peak controls for the site Attach BMP Inset
tables and Design Procedure Forms for each BMP to show that each is sized appropriately per the design
requirements
Project Description Attach brief explanation of detention plans and any assumptions if necessary
The East wet pond collects stormwater runoff from the southern portion of the multi family site and the drainage divide
has been designed to match the existing drainage pattern The east wet pond has been designed to meet PCCO
requirements and full build out will be achieved during the current phase of multi family construction
PRE- DEVELOPED SUMMARY
Basin area Pre Dev ac (Delineated on attached drainage area map)
Time of Concentration Tcpre 6 72 nun (Based on the SCS Method) (Tc path shown on
attached map) Reference 3 9 6 of the Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Design Manual — SCS Travel Time
Curve Number, Cnpre 60
POST - DEVELOPED SUMMARY
Basin area Post Dev ac (Delineated on attached drainage area map)
Time of Concentration Tcpost 500 min (Based on the SCS Method) (Tc path shown on
attached map) Reference 3 9 6 of the Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Design Manual — SCS Travel Time
Runoff Coefficient Rv 041 Water Quality Volume, WQv (ac ft) 057
Curve Number Cnpost 81 CurveNumber CNpost(modified) 92
Channel Protection Volume CPv (ac ft) 1 38_ CPv Release Rate (cfs) 0 279
DETENTION SUMMARY
Computer Method Used* Pond Pack
*Land Development Plan Review Staff %ill venfy all detention submittals using HEC I for compliance with the City of Charlotte Zoning Ordinance
Section I2 6 This summary is to accompany all detention analysis and is not intended to replace that requirement
Note 2 year storm is required only for sites required detention pei Chapter 12 of the zoning ordinance If a downstream
analysis has been performed submit complete justification for the results
Revised October 2010
Pagel of 3
Pre (cfs)
Post (cfs)
Routed (cfs)
Elevation (Comments)
1
236
005
74323
1 yr
286
2604
0 18
74501
2 yr
1 71
3204
017
74468
10 yr
1704
6843
9 17
74562
25 yr
2740
8636
1860
74595
50 yr
3729
101 46
3230
74624
100 yr
4476
11506
3741
74645
Note 2 year storm is required only for sites required detention pei Chapter 12 of the zoning ordinance If a downstream
analysis has been performed submit complete justification for the results
Revised October 2010
Pagel of 3

PRE - DEVELOPED SUB BASIN CALCULATIONS
Sub basm Name/Level Pre Dev (Coordinate with attached drainage area map)
Type of Flow
Travel Length (ft.)
Slope ( %)
Mammngs (n)
Time (nun)
Sheet Unpaved
100
12
010
3 372
Sheet Paved
661
Impervious Area
CeD2 PaE
Shallow Conc (Unpaved)
918
8
33 A
Shallow Conc Paved
Channel
P ipe
CNP,= 60
TOTAL
N/A
N/A
N/A
TC pre =6 72
Acreage
Land Use
Soil Type
Hydrologic Group
CN
Weighted CN
(AcreagerrotW Are ) (CN)
1660
Woods fair
CeD2 PaE
B
60
661
Impervious Area
CeD2 PaE
Shallow Conc (Unpaved)
98
Shallow Conc (Paved)
Channel
Pipe
CNP,= 60
POST DEVELOPED SUB BASIN CALCULATIONS
Sub basm Name/Level Post Dev (Coordinate with attached drainage area map)
Type of Flow
Travel Length (ft.)
Slope ( %)
Mammngs (n)
Time (nun)
Sheet Unpaved
996
Open Space
CeD2 PaE
B
Sheet Paved
661
Impervious Area
CeD2 PaE
Shallow Conc (Unpaved)
98
Shallow Conc (Paved)
Channel
Pipe
CNp.t= 81
TOTAL
N/A
N/A
N/A
Tc P., =5 00
Acreage
Land Use
Soil Type
Hydrologic Group
CN
Weighted CN
(A eagerr ta)Ar ) (CN)
996
Open Space
CeD2 PaE
B
69
661
Impervious Area
CeD2 PaE
B
98
CNp.t= 81
Revised October 2010
Page 2 of 3

STORAGE / DISCHARGE CALCULATIONS
*(If applicable) Complete Underground Storage Volume Table
Elevation
Underground *
Above Ground
Total Acc Volume (co
Weir 2 /Em
Acc Volume for all
Structures (co
Area (sq ft)
Inc Volume (cf)
Acc Volume (co
(Above and
Underground)
In
8 Ft
Spillway
Control Pipe
Spillway
(cfs)
(ft)
743 OOInv
Inv
745 10 Inv
(Controlled by
30 Dia
(Free flow out of
0 0276 Area
Area
Cw= 3 00
outlet e/struct)
p p
108 Length
pond)
Co= 0 60
Stage Discharge
Co= orifice coefficient Cw = weir coefficient Orifice Area unit shall be square feet (sf)
Elevation /
Onfice 1
Onfice 2
Weir 1
Weir 2 /Em
Outlet
Emergency
Total Q
Stage
2 25In
In
8 Ft
Spillway
Control Pipe
Spillway
(cfs)
(ft)
743 OOInv
Inv
745 10 Inv
(Controlled by
30 Dia
(Free flow out of
0 0276 Area
Area
Cw= 3 00
outlet e/struct)
p p
108 Length
pond)
Co= 0 60
Co=
725 54 Inv
746 00 Inv
Co=O 13
In
Cw= 3 00
CA--
744
013
0
0
013
013
745
018
0
0
018
018
746
023
2003
0
2027
2027
747 1
026 1
1
5987 1
3600 1
9613 1
9613
Underground Storage Volume Table (If applicable)
Provide additional storage volume tables if more structures are used
Elevation
Acc Volume (cf)
Underground Structure #
Length (ft)
Size /dia (ft )
Upper my
Lower inv
Slope ( %)
Acc Volume (cf)
Underground Structure #
Length (ft)
Size /dia (ft)
Upper inv
Lower my
Slope ( %)
Acc Volume (cf)
Underground Structure #
Length (ft)
Size /dia (ft)
Upper inv
Lower inv
Slope ( %)
Acc Volume (cf)
Underground Structure #
Length (ft )
Size /dia (ft )
Upper my
Lower my
Slope ( %)
cmi
CHARLOM
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
Land Development Division
600 East Fourth Street Charlotte North Carolma 28202 2844
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] landpermits charmeck org
Revised October 2010
Page 3 of 3

City of Charlotte
Land Development Division
Post Construction Controls / Detention Worksheet
The following sections help to provide information on volume and peak controls for the site Attach BMP Inset
tables and Design Procedure Forms for each BMP to show that each is sized appropriately per the design
requirements
Protect Description Attach brief explanation of detention plans and any assumptions if necessary
The West wet pond collects stormwater runoff from the northern portion of the multi family site and the drainage divide
has been designed to match the existing drainage pattern This pond is also designed to handle future commercial
development drainage for 80% impervious area The west wet pond has been designed to meet PCCO requirements and
only partial build out will be achieved during the current phase of multi family construction
PRE- DEVELOPED SUMMARY
Basin area Pre Dev ac (Delineated on attached drainage area map)
Tune of Concentration, Tcpre 8 28 mm (Based on the SCS Method) (Tc path shown on
attached map) Reference 3 9 6 of the Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Design Manual — SCS Travel Time
Curve Number Cnp,.e 60
POST - DEVELOPED SUMMARY
Basin area Post Dev ac (Delineated on attached drainage area map)
Time of Concentration, TCpost 500 min (Based on the SCS Method) (Tc path shown on
attached map) Reference 3 9 6 of the Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Design Manual — SCS Travel Time
Runoff Coefficient Rv 077 Water Quality Volume WQv (ac ft) 1 59
Curve Number, Cnpost 92 CurveNumber, CNposgmodified> 98
Channel Protection Volume, CPv (ac ft) 366 CPv Release Rate (cfs) 0 738
DETENTION SUMMARY
Computer Method Used* Pond Pack
*Land Development Plan Review Staff will venfy all detention submittals using HEC 1 for compliance with the City of Charlotte Zoning Ordinance
Section l2 6 This summary is to accompany all detention analysis and is not intended to replace that requirement
Note 2 year storm is required only for sites required detention per Chapter 12 of the zoning ordinance If a downstream
analysis has been performed submit complete justification for the results
Revised October 2010
Pagel of 3
Pre (cfs)
Post (cfs)
Routed (cfs)
Elevation (Comments)
1
25 10
0 17
72567
1 yr
349
6767
063
72764
2 yr
2 36
9009
035
72739
10 yr
2245
14577
1638
72829
25 yr
3601
17272
3341
72858
50 yr
4919
19383
4007
72895
100 yr
5951
21564
4102
72925
Note 2 year storm is required only for sites required detention per Chapter 12 of the zoning ordinance If a downstream
analysis has been performed submit complete justification for the results
Revised October 2010
Pagel of 3

PRE DEVELOPED SUB BASIN CALCULATIONS
Sub basin Name /Level Pre Dev (Coordinate with attached drainage area map)
Type of Flow
Travel Length (ft.)
Slope ( %)
Mammngs (n)
Time (nun)
Sheet Unpaved
100
4
010
5 232
Sheet Paved
1984
Im ervious Area
CeD2 PaE CeB2
Shallow Conc (Unpaved)
670
97
222
Shallow Conc Paved
Channel
Pie
150
67
0 13 1
268
TOTAL
N/A
N/A
N/A
Tc pre =10 13
Acreage
Land Use
Soil Type
Hydrologic Group
CN
Weighted CN
(A eagerr W Ar ) (CN)
2480
Woods fair
CeD2 PaE CeB2
B
60
1984
Im ervious Area
CeD2 PaE CeB2
Shallow Conc (Unpaved)
98
Shallow Conc (Paved)
Channel
Pipe
CNPre= 60
POST DEVELOPED SUB BASIN CALCULATIONS
Sub basin Name/Level Post Dev (Coordinate with attached drainage area map)
Type of Flow
Travel Length (ft.)
Slope ( %)
Mammigs (n)
Time (nun)
Sheet Unpaved
496
Open Space
CeD2 PaE CeB2
B
Sheet Paved
1984
Im ervious Area
CeD2 PaE CeB2
Shallow Conc (Unpaved)
98
Shallow Conc (Paved)
Channel
Pipe
CNP °S(= 92
TOTAL
N/A
N/A
N/A
Tc P °,( =5 00
Acreage
Land Use
Soil Type
Hydrologic Group
CN
Weighted CN
(A eag&T W Ar ) (CN)
496
Open Space
CeD2 PaE CeB2
B
69
1984
Im ervious Area
CeD2 PaE CeB2
B
98
CNP °S(= 92
Revised October 2010
Page 2 of 3

STORAGE / DISCHARGE CALCULATIONS
*(If applicable) Complete Underground Storage Volume Table
Elevation
Underground *
Above Ground
Total Ace Volume (cf
Weir 2/Em
Ace Volume for all
Structures (co
Area (sq ft)
Inc Volume (cf)
Ace Volume (co
(Above and
Underground)
In
6 Ft
Spillway
Control Pipe
Spillway
(cfs)
(ft)
725 001nv
Inv
727 60 Inv
(Controlled by
36 Dia
(Free flow out of
0 0491 Area
Area
Cw= 3 00
outlet pipe/struct)
67 Length
pond)
Co= 0 60
Stage Discharge
Co= orifice coefficient Cw = weir coefficient Orifice Area unit shall be square feet (so
Elevation /
Onfice 1
Onfice 2
Weir 1
Weir 2/Em
Outlet
Emergency
Total Q
Stage
3 001n
In
6 Ft
Spillway
Control Pipe
Spillway
(cfs)
(ft)
725 001nv
Inv
727 60 Inv
(Controlled by
36 Dia
(Free flow out of
0 0491 Area
Area
Cw= 3 00
outlet pipe/struct)
67 Length
pond)
Co= 0 60
Co=
12
714 67 Inv
28 00 Inv
Co=O 013
Inv
Cw= 3 00
Cw-
726
022
0
0
022
022
727
032
0
0
032
032
728
040
455
0
496
496
729
047 1
1
2982
1 3600 1
66 28 1
6628
Underground Storage Volume Table (If applicable)
Provide additional storage volume tables if more structures are used
Elevation
Ace Volume (cf)
Underground Structure #
Length (ft )
Size /dia (ft)
Upper my
Lower my
Slope ( %)
Ace Volume (cf)
Underground Structure #
Length (ft )
Size /dia (ft)
Upper my
Lower my
Slope ( %)
Ace Volume (co
Underground Structure #
Length (ft)
Size /dia (ft)
Upper my
Lower my
Slope ( %)
Ace Volume (cf)
Underground Structure #
Length (ft)
Size /dia (ft )
Upper my
Lower inv
Slope ( %)
•
CHARIBM
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
Land Development Division
600 East Fourth Street Charlotte North Carolina 28202 2844
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] landpermits charmeck org
Revised October 2010
Page 3 of 3

FUTURE WET POND CALCULATIONS
Drainage Area
= 10 Acres
Impervious Area
= 8 Acres
Percent Impervious
= 80%
Average Depth
= 4 ft Okay Okay
TSS Removal
= 85%
Minimum WQv /PPv Ratio
= 030
Rv
= 077
Required Volume
= 27 951 cu ft
Permanent Pool Elevation
= 730 ft
Area at Permanent Pool
= 23 290 sq ft
Temporary Pool Elevation
= 732 ft
Area at Temporary Pool
= 28 323 sq ft
Temporary Pool Volume Provided
= 29 500 cu ft Okay
Permanent Pool Volume Provided
= 92 000 cu ft Okay
Required Forebay Volume (20 %)
= 18 400 cu ft
Forebay Volume Provided
= 16 500 cu ft
Forebay Percentage of Pond Volume = 18%
Pond Drawdown Time
Pond Height above Orifice =
732 00
feet
Orifice Invert Elevation =
73000
feet
i Surface Area at Height Above Orifice =
28 323
square feet
surface Area at Orifice Invert Elevation =
23 290
square feet
Orifice Diameter (D) =
275
inches = 023 feet
Orifice Area (a) =
00412
square feet
Average Surface Area (A) =
25 807
square feet
Gravitational Constatnt (g) =
322
ft/sec2
Head (H) =
1 89
feet
Discharge Coefficient (C) =
06
Time (t) =
356 849
seconds = 413 days

NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 4 1
ETC DVti Q Sh eam Identification Foi; m X e>< s> on 4 1
Date October 09 2011
Pro ect/Site W Mallard Creek Church
1 Stream C (Sectionl 3)
Latitude 35 33242 N
Evaluator ASR PJK
County Mecklenburg County NC
Longitude 80 75548 W
Total Points
lea.,t 21
Stream Determ n (circle one)
Other Denta (NC) Quad
Stream i., at intermittent
Ephemera Mermrtten Perennial
e g 011ad Name HUC 03040105
if >_ 19 or perennial if _ 30
2
3
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2 )
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In channel structure ex raffle pool step pool
ripple-pool se uence
0
1O
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
co
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
C13
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
ap
1
15
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
ED
11 Second or greater order channel
No U0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology (Subtotal= 5 )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
15
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
0 5
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
Q 5
1
15
17 Soil based evidence of high water table'?
No = 0
Yes
3
C Biology (Subtotal = 4
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 )
2
1
26 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
03
05
05
05
1
1
1
15
1 5
15
23 Crayfish
0
24 Amphibians
SQ
25 Algae
0
05
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBI = 1 5
Other 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes +/ 1 3 wide chap (+/.).3 6 wide and 1 — 3 deep top
of bank Silt sand
Areas of stream channel in wetlands and /or flow went subterranean No H2O fibrous roots
Sketch

NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 4 1
NC DAN Q Sti eam Identification Foi m N ei sion 4 1
Date October 09 2011
Pro ect/Site W Mallard Creek Church
1 Stream C 2
Latitude 35 33259 N
Evaluator LSR PJK
County Mecklenburg County NC
Longitude 80 75458 W
Total Points
295
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Denta (NC) Quad
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemera ntermitten Perennial
e g Otiad Narne HUC 03040105
if > 19 or perennial of _ 30
2
3
A Geornorpholo y (Subtotal = 15 5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 in channel structure ex nffle pool step pool
ripple pool uence
0
1
2O
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
CO
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
C-13
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
05
1
15
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
U5
11 Second or greater order channel
No ED
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
05
1
3
0
15
14 Leaf litter
15
1
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
5
1
15
17 Soil based evidence of high water table'7
No = 0
Yes
UJI
C Biology (Subtotal =
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
1
0
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
0
Q 5
1
15
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
15
25 Algae
0
(01,91
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other ED
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes +/ 1 3 wide chan +/ 3 6 wide and 1 — 3 deep top
of bank Silt sand few cobble
Iso ods juvenile crayfish Contains marginal areas without h2o and biology
Sketch

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 4 1
ETC DAN O Sti eam Identification For m Ver stun 4 1
Date October 09 2011
Pro ect/Site W Mallard Creek Church
1 Stream E (strm c section 4)
Latitude 35 33245 N
Evaluator LSR PJK
County Mecklenburg County NC
Longitude 80 75572 W
Total Points
Stream Determination (circle a )
Other Denta (NC) Quad
Stream is at least intermittent 305
Ephemeral Intermitte erennia
e g Quad Name HUC 03040105
if ? 19 or perennial if z: 30
2
3
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = 16 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 in channel structure ex nffie pool step pool
n I I sequence
0
1
2O
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
co
3
5 Activelrelict floodplain
0
C13
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
05
C3
15
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
U5
11 Second or greater order channel
Not 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
05
3
0
14 Leaf litter
15
1
15 Sediment on plants or debns
0
5
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
5
1
15
17 Soil based evidence of high water tables
No
= 0
Yes
3
C Bioloov (Subtotal =
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance )
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
03
1
2
3
22 Fish
CD
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
0
Q 5
1
15
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
15
25 Algae
0
(0_0
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other co
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes +/ 2 4 wide chan +/ 6 8 wide and 2 — 3 deep top
of bank
Silt sand cobble
Iso ods juvenile crayfish
Sketch

C SALE AID *,
D-vtiQ#
Site # (nldic ite on -itached neap)
FIZ-3 STREAM QLALITi 4,SSESSMENT Al ORILSHEET 9AQP
Pi o� ide the following mfoi mation for the sti eam i eich under assessment
1 Applicant . name
3 Date of et aluition October 9, 2011
4 Name of stream Stream C (section 3 Unimportant)
7 Appioximate drama2e area 5 acres +/
2 Ei iluitot s ninie LSR, PJK
4 Time of et aluvition 1 0013M
6 Rix ei basin Rocky (HUC 03040105)
8 Stielin order 1st
9 Length of reach eA iluited +/ 100 to County Mecklenburg
11 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decurial degrees 12 Subdit ision mule (if an-v)
Latitude (ex 34 87 31,) 35 33243 N Longitude hex -77 556611) 80 75535 W
Method location deteniuned (circle) GPS Topo Sheet Ortho ens ioto /GIS Other GIS Other
11 Location of reich tuider et aluatlon (note tieuby to ids ind lvldmaiks and attach mip identif} m2 stieam(s) loc ition)
West Mallard Creek Church Rd and Senator Royal Blvd See attached map
14 Proposed ehvinel a ork (it iny)
iS Recent a eithei conditions No rain < 48 hrs
16 Site toudttioits it time of t i,,it Undisturbed
17 Identify vlr speuil is itens iv clu,ificitioit, knoxsn _Section 10 _Tid it W itets _Es enn it Fisheiies Hibirit
Trout Witers Outshindin2 Resource W iten _ Nutrient Sensitli e Witeis _NN itei Supply Witershecl (I IN)
18 I, thete a pond or lake located upstielnt of the et ilit ition ponit N ES G) If ves estinive the tt itei uutiee itea
19 Does channel ippeir on TTSGS quid clap YES NO 20 Does cliviliel ippev oil USDA Soil Sun ey) 1 ES NO
21 Estinived tiatershed lend use Oo Residenuil 00 C ollimetcill °o Indti,mil 0o Aencultui it
1000o Forested _ o C leaied Lo22ed _00 Otlier ( )
22 Banktull «idth 3 —6 21 Balk heislit (from bed to top of b ink) 1 —3
24 Channel slope dorm center of stielnl Flit (0 to °o) X Gentle (2 to 40o) Moderite (4 to 100o) Steep ( 100o)
24 Channel sintlosim Sti31211t Occ isional bendy X Frequent tilelndei _'% ei� sinuous _Briided ch- iiiilel
lustinctions fet completion of noiksheet (located on page 2) Beein b%, deteinu11in0 the most - ipplopnve ecoie2lon b'1Sed oil
location terrain tenetation sttelnl classification etc Etery chaiacteri,tic nu .,t be scoted using the same ec.oievoii Assign points
to each thara(.terrstic uitllrn the ranee shown tot the ecoie2ton Pane ; protides i bnef de,tliptrtm of Mott to retlett the
Warac,teristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect in oietall i sessment of the stieim ielch undei exilintiorl If i
ctlartcterlsttc cannot be etatuated due to site or utithet conditions enter 0 ul the st011112 box ind piotrde 'in explinition m rile
W111111cot section Where there ate obi ions changes in the ehirietei of a stream under ref lee (e 2 the stielm flott s fionl 1 pi,ttue
Into a forest) the stream may be dit ided alto smaller reiches that displ) mote colltinitiq and a ,epit ite foinl tr,ed to et ilti ite eich
rcacli T'h total st )ts isitaw -d to a stmliu Itath must t-itlze bentteil 0 ind 100 with a score of 100 iepte,entin2 i streim of the
hi;zhPCt Itsaliq
Total Si.ore (from teierse) 49 C omments
Silt Sand
Areas of stream channel in wetlands and /or flow goes underground No H2O fibrous roots
Fialuatoi 4 Siguatut! Date
Tbi4 ebannei eiaivation foim is intended to be used oult as a guide to assist lindmiuets and entnonmental piofessiouals in
gdtheiiug the data iequited bt the United Stites Atm,; Coils of Engineeis to mike a pielimmiu% issessment of stream
yualita The total scote te4ulting from the completion of this form is subject to ISaCE apps of ail and does not impli a
p>it 04ulat mitigation ratio of requitement Forni subject to thinie - c er ion 06 0; To C oniruent plei,e till 919 8-( 8441 ♦ _6

STRE XIM QUALITY ASSESSMENT AN ORKSHEET
" These cbaricteristic5 are not assessed in coistal streams
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Pi esence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
0
(no flow or saturition = 0 strong floe = max points)
`
Evidence of past human altet anon
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
4
extensive alteration = 0 no alteration = max outs
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
no buffer = 0 contiguous u ide buffer = max pout ts
4
Es idence of nutrient of chemical discharges
0-5
0 - 4
0-4
4
extensiv a discharges = 0 no discharges = max outs
ra
5
Gi oundw atei discharge
0- 3
0- 4
0- 4
0
V(no
discharge = 0 springs seeps w etlands etc = max points)
6
Pi esence of adjacent floodplain
0- 4
0- 4
0- 2
2
(no floodplain = 0 extensive floodplain = max pouts)
Enti enchment / floodplain access
0- 5
0- 4
0- 2
4
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
no w etlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max ints
9
Channel sinuositv
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
extensive channehzation = 0 nitural meander = max outs
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensn a deposition= 0 little of no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diver sits of channel bed substi ate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
1
(fine hoino enotis = 0 large diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision of widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
4
�.
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max po uts
13
Pi esence of major bank failuies
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
4
se%ere erosion = 0 no erosion stable batiks = max outs
4
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
2
no c isible roots = 0 dense roots duou bout = niax points)
15
Impact by agricultui a livestock of timber production
4
(substantial impact =0 no evidence = max outs)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
16
Presence of nine pool /ripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
0
(no nffles /npples or pools = 0 u ell des eloped = max pouts)
Q
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
0
little or no habitat = 0 frequent i arced habitats = max onits
m
18
Canopy coverage over stieambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
4
no shadma %e etation = 0 continuous canopy = ma% outs
19
Substi ate embeddeduess
NA'
0-4
0 - 4
2
(deeply embedded = 0 loose stiuctiire = wax)
20
Pi esence of sti eam in%ertebi ates (see page 4)
0-4
0 1
0
>„
(no et idence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
-
0-5
(�
21
Piesence of amphibians
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
0
no et idence = 0 coitiinon numerous types = max outs)
22
Pi esence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
AO
no e% idence = 0 common numerous types = utax mts
23
Evidence of w ildiife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
uo evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
49
" These cbaricteristic5 are not assessed in coistal streams

L SACS AID#
DW Q #
Site # (nldieate oil attached neap)
- -
FM STREAM QLTALITI ASSESSMENT AVORKSHEET AACM
P1 oA ide the folloning infoi matron foi the sti eam i each undei assessment
1 Applicant name
Date of e-, aluatlon October 9, 2011
2 EN altuator s naive LSR PJK
4 Time of eN aluation 1 00 PM
S Name of stream Stream C (section 1 Unimportant) 6 Rn er basin Rocky (HUC 03040105)
7 Appiohunate dlanna2e area 5 acres +/ 8 Stream order 1st
9 Length of leach e-, aluated +/ 100
11 Site coordinates (if know n) prefer m decimal degrees
10 County. Mecklenburg
12 Subdn ision name (if all))
Latitude (ex 34 871311) 35 33242 N Longitude (ex -77 556611) 80 75548 W
Method location detemmned (circle) GPS Topo Sheet Ortho ens hot. /GIS Other GAS Other
13 Location of leach tinder ex aluation (note nearbv roads and lvndmaiks and attach neap identlt)-ul_ stream(s) location)
West Mallard Creek Church Rd and Senator Royal Blvd See attached map
14 Proposed chimer a ori. (it any)
1; Recent a e3thei conditions No rain < 48 hrs
16 Site (.ondrtious at time of i isit Undisturbed
17 Identtfr anv spec nl a atens ay classrtrcations knnoun _Section 10 _Tidal Water s _Essential Frsllenes Habitat
Trout Whets Outstindnig Resotuce Waters _ Ntuttient Sensitise Waters _Water Supply Watershed {I R)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the ex altuation point YES NO If yes estimate the a ater stuface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map YES (NO 20 Does channel appeal on USDA Soil Sun e) I ES NO
21 Estimated uatetshed land use Oo Re identtal _0o Conimelclal _Oo Industnil _ °o A2nculttual
1000o Forested _ o C leased Longed _00 Othel (
22 Bankfull a kith 3 -6 23 Bann. height (hone bed to top of bans.) 1 -3
24 C hantiel slope down center of sheanl Flat (0 to 70o) X Gentle (3 to 40o) A4odelate (4 to 1000) _Steep ( 1000)
2; Channel sinuosity Sttatcllt Occasional bench X Frequent ineuider _del) sinuous _Biatded chilinel
Instructions for completion of noiksheet ( located on page 2) Be2m by deternlnlulg the most appiopnate ecore2lon based on
location terrain %e2etation strewn 0assificatlon etc Etery chalacteusttc must be scored ttaul2 the sane eLoiealon Asaao_n points
to each charactetistu uitiuu the tinge shown tol the ecote2lon Page 3 ptotides a bilef descilptlon of llou to rettet; the
clraractenstics identified m the uoiksheet Scores should reflect in oxeiall assessment of the stleuu learn under exalttatlon If a
charactenstu. cannot be eealuited due to site of «eathei conditions enter 0 in the SLOlt112 box ind pioNide all explanation m the
wminent section Where there ale obtious changes in the character of a stream under ieAieu (e 2 the stream floes hone a pasttue
into a forest) the stream nim be dnlded into smaller leaches that display more Lontnntity and a separate forinl tined to eialuate each
reach The total score asslizued to a stleaul icach must tinge bemeen 0 and 100 tiltli a s,.oie of 100 lepiesentul2 a stream of tile
highest citiaitty
Total Score (f1 om i es et se) 49 C omments
Silt Sand
Areas of stream channel in wetlands and /or flow goes underground No H2O fibrous roots
Eialuatot s Signature Date
Thl4 channel etaluation form is intended to be used onh as a guide to assist hindon net s and eninonmental professionals in
gatheting the d-ita iequlted In the Qnited States Atins Corps of Engineers to male i pieliminvi assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting atom the completion of this form is subject to I SAC E appiovil and does not impIN a
Pat tic ulat mitigation t ANA Al 1 equil ement Foi m subject to change - x e1 ion 06 03 To C onrnrent please Al 919 8 -6 8411 x _6

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT NA ORKSHEET
n These chailctaristics are not asses -,ed in wistal stieams
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
0
(no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
`
Evidence of past human alter ation
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
4
extensn a alteration = 0 no alteration = max po ints
3
Mpai ian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
no buffer = 0 conk iota wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient of chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
extensile discharges = 0 no discharges = max points)
5
Gi ounduater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
0
(no discharge= 0 springs seeps wetlands etc = max points)
6
Pi esence of adjacent fioodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
(no floodplam = 0 extensive floodplam = max points)
IL
7
Enn enchment / floodplain access
0— S
0— 4
0— 2
4
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0 — 4
0-2
3
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel smuosit)
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
extensnne channehzation = 0 natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensti a deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & dii ersity of channel bed substl ate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
1
(fine homogenous = 0 large dit erse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision of widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
4
y+
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Pi esence of major bank failui es
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
4
��,r
severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max points)
d14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 — 4
0-5
2
F,
no isible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impactbi aglicultuie livestock of timbei production
4
substantial ini act --0 no evidence = max points)
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
16
Pi esence of riffle poothipple pool complexes
0-3
0
F
(no nffleslnpples or pools = 0 well- developed = max points)
0 - 5
0-6
Q
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
0
little or no habitat = 0 frequent %aned habitats = max points)
m
Q
18
Canopy coverage o,* er stieambed
0-5
0 —
0-5
4
Z
no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = mat points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded = 0 loose stiuUtue = max
20
Presence of stream in%ei tebiates (see pane 4)
0-4
0 5
0
no et idence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
—
0-5
(,7
1
Presence of amphibians
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
0
(no es idence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no et idence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of a ildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
no et idence = 0 abundant es idence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
49
n These chailctaristics are not asses -,ed in wistal stieams

N
ML sM iaMm' 3s—
JNI S3J21f10S3M 1N3:)S3d:) 2103 0321Vd3dd
E �y� "
AWE ®°'°
id
ON A1Nf10o imnI N31>03W 3J- LO-MVHJ 30 AiM
19b 39Vd OIS£T H009 0330 V
e
oeez Y..Y
VZ9 39Vd L9TIT X1009 (1330 213d S3d:)V 8Z LS
`11
ma y
tc zn3a �°
NO S3d:)V 61T 0 S31VIS 031INn 3H130 S1131VM
AD61�litl
tuns
y�
W tu�� W
< <
u< u
u
(ONno 3ONYAahw*
Q M Q N ^
N Q d O
; 0 r3a ON)
M/a onend oe
0 0 0 0 0
O li O Y. IL
N LL VI VI
0 0 0 0 0
IL O IL O
� �y Vl LL u!
OVON a3ONYa�3� p
IC 4m W Y _
m sM Ymim+9 Odd A46[ �� � �W
SS t5 w
in
N n p of
o N 0 N�
��® St101�pa
4 W
W
m�
F
4�Up tiDI 1
O !h 5 5
o n m
optL
>rwa
Z
cc All I
Uoa-, `'j
Q
W��ommo
j q
0 0 0 0
p w Z
U ? U Al 0:
IL
z(ZMUI
N
I 0 7
iQ
E�i®
C CC
Q
a C
Qyd'n
W p n $e o: —Mi
--
dU
►L 00 005 — — — J m r ^ 1z0
p
n o w
p
°z °z zz z i3u
<a6ma r
° r
lSl9S ZMbm j QaWo
�
u
d o
g O
_ _
���'���� r j�i�
.a r� �ZOZma
ae r
3 3 3 3 >
/ ...j - tam
W +a r � z: 0sm$
�� w
/
wNd�
p
a �i+ O ap
ZpZ
Q
K7A
U -°
NU WNO ^ Inoo
N W {� m
I�
W/ N
W
zL �m°a
.� Er y
r WV)
-v b L)i
ON
J
j r
zoo
Q
0¢eW j
f- W
/ LL na I
p
zV11
bb /'
J O W
/
N 0
w w z
/
�Oa
~a
oN
i
%�1
3 V 0 2 U
-
N
Z
1
�b
/
m o
u� �W
w i n
s Z
i
at 0
z a ®O
oy`�n"
N U
/
�►�
VI m a N 2
°
J
w
/
/
Zd Stt 261
r -N - -
w xN v=i w o
- --
�
/
I
' W��
y
�I L' PSUPVFYO �S
W a
$
W N`J�
51237��� zrn_ Q (0,0 -
aa
co It
����
��.�...�..T- 91067
yN Qro.-
��pan
?3 iT) m'�mp
M 0 Sr- ,aa .tc
N4 29 40 I I 0 N � ¢ � tY 3 iO
W
z � ry
I i °saw 1 �o o
/ I
/
Ca
IY
U
U UN / K� mN
ZQan J pY >�
I I i z�0 ( iFMD 0
1 1 n lima N?z y
,
\ /
\\
J
\y qN,> ZmIY §Wp
% mz'a76FOd
1 1 is ri0 ;0Q
boa
:3 CND
° / W-
i %Maaa v
-0id�Q
ma wsoUTW
3V
I 4 0 (n.�
i I NwmQ'-I<u
w
7W0 =ti -Q
�apN$y00
I
w
I o300�jOa� 1
p
°V?.?W
cn
' I N�37�WWF
p
�JF
JW Q W Z Q
FKZ0i0
I > Q O K z W LLJ OD
f ¢z Wz >LLmwp m in
<U
��il =Vvcn
I I R ��Oes -Z�OOU ICI
w
4ZNWpU�
O
dZdW
dyo�
d
I W
�mW
N OFd
F r
avwa�iw
Z O
N Ud f
I „- �i dZF+n �FQWo
N pZ� Ip
WIN,
WO
W-
r0!
Z X�
py W
�l�(A�
Ig
a M I
I4l w0
Iw ( I�Q1�p UQ I
z~�
s
OF W wom z
VI�
j? 1 rn fi °��
U W0w-
i
y
a�w>R
Ina - I >g0°o�
w°d > 0 NZF
u
Iw I ' _ �mppo o-
Sazwo f
�u
00
a
C pl V)F d�OW
�aW¢ �NV1U 'w<
IW
1� I ! �R F a >V°wWN
=N W Zp Ud 7O W
f
E~
�WI�
00m0
0 O i
�SZzw>-
'
N
10 F "Lo-
o +�
i
z
F=
VaO.
a a FFava
WO K� W
l OFG�i�� v �OZg K ;Z
>>�NamF�
W V) 1
g Fm ZKw Op
1z
z
Fc'iZ°I
i��jviz� W wFO.00,
°am W).- w Eo_B.OFZ
is i �izad�wW�� fz
� I oW- t"opF-=cn
�\
iiaSSw'IIN-
10
a� °p ° �Fnt> °wnZQ
io i ( �waa�wm<cr 1'
w �R
�>
p�°0LL°
wowpz z 6nffime1� Z
W Nw
W W 1 I` - ^aa��zipZ W
V1Ir
6
i
JpwU
SO �VV){U/IGm z�WWW
�Opa moo
Q I I 1: OOOH V
z I F l0 + �a ra <Mzx�V+ rn

+ g
w a �
`: V i S l
(/)
W~
s/
OM 13M'^' ON 3S
Awr 6
ci ow .�
o> r
>tozot' �.�
ONI smid 105321 1N3OS321O 2104 03dVd3dd
ON ALNf10O 9a119N31)1O3W 3110178VHO d0 kLM
T9b 99W OTS£T H009 4330 V
VL9 39bd L9T T T A009 0330 213d S3d:)V 8Z LS
NO S3d:)V LTO 0 S31VIS 031INn 3H1 dO S831VM
e
�
Q < w
Q
U
Z N Q
1 1
JQJ
FOO
1
3K) 0
m
y Z Z f/1
3 a
,W-22
° m U , < < U
m0= y a
aaU TwOU
oyo ya
o30
jU6 w 1
I
N�3Z�WWF. �
zoi�oz�ww Irn
aZV1WZ}L� �U IM
�ilmyl"'V1 pZ U <K IJ
O- a20 W 4
oa %O0887Qo
4] y
O p� y W y° J am%
sza LL8090wwp
O° waa<
wh tg��' y
�ZSaZMb- a y
y
Q0619 9°iaZa77w �
yam-y<
�Kz¢WOOW
W=F a��Fwap a
pU o Q W ZO �� wa
1- (MWO =,R" w
In ia�lP °aa =
�xao0ol- o
�1_aizxRu) vl
ro
11111 /
?P' SpRVEy �.J
ro co °v ss
a S M
S 4 -1 e
rdpA °O a
SS3i��
=
a
DOB =�p I
mZ O O {!
w�oF yL
pp V W 1
o1-zgcnz i I
U - ¢ W
aoo�"o 1
U; �y Lv1� I I
Qz
<.,, U
a w0 >
E:n I 1
~($Wp w
cL F w- 1
= W �� I 1
oogfe IG 1
ag :z,L
F i 1
Q <OZ�FaQj I> 1
F N�O[p9WO� IQ i
w `
r L>sw Zp Fz y
Fo 's paao 1 1
p _y -w]ZF
Z�y 3W 1
a UUUy,�•i =z w I f 1
w5 �o >Q woc z 10 1
II 11H 1
0
n
W
OwlWi
U L, WW
LJ In QQU
vW O Q
U jlnto
O O Lo
O
,5 NO Qw
W 1"
aMw
In a Ir
za<
a V) rr>> N b
�1 r7y w3 t 0
S,
�I
N W
Z WLLJ
Li
F W N
W � a �
�W O U
zcna
a�r0MM0
U!N.-O
L� I.-
W
W LWi
aCyw
zU
Oa
Q� U) C14 1F2 NQ
It
3 11'1 0
mm 1 0
(IRO iOCI �G19}IRMI
M �
0w12
UW W02
vzva
U J a n
a-
ir �n0
539 96
512 37
9
N4 29 40 W 1062 23 (7)
1y!J� r
z $
� B
N L
i
Q 1-
W
Z Ljjt
OW
F' LL !n
W
vw O U
z to a
U J O
3 O1 O N
O
w 0
W~
s/
Iuj
Q W
K W
Q < w
Q
U
Z N Q
1 1
JQJ
FOO
1
3K) 0
m
1' 1
t�t9
539 96
512 37
9
N4 29 40 W 1062 23 (7)
1y!J� r
z $
� B
N L
i
Q 1-
W
Z Ljjt
OW
F' LL !n
W
vw O U
z to a
U J O
3 O1 O N
O
w 0

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form instructional Guidebook
SECTION i BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
B DISTRICT OFFICE FiLE NAME AND NUMBER
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue Room 208
Asheville North Carolina 28801 5006
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION W Mallard Creek Church Site
State NC County /pansh /borough Mecklenburg City Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 35 33298 R Long 80 75372 EW
Universal Transverse Mercator 17
Name of nearest waterbody Mallard Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows Rocky River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040105 Rocky River
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential Jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request
10 Check if other sites (e g offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
Q Office (Desk) Determination Date
® Field Determination Date(s) 02/02/2012
SECTION iI SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Ere navigable waters of the US within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) junsdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area [Required)
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
El Waters are presently used or have been used in the past or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are waters of the US within Clean Water Act (CWA) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required]
Waters of the U S
a indicate presence of waters of U S in review area (check all that apply) i
❑ TNWs including territorial seas
(] Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent watersz (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
[] Non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
El Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Q Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters including isolated wetlands
Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non wetland waters — 631 linear feet width (ft) and/or 0 079 acres
Wetlands 0 10 acres
c Limits boundaries of jurisdiction based on 987 Deli eation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known)
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section iII below
Z For purposes of this form an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TN W and that typically flows year round or has continuous flow at least seasonally
(e g typically 3 months)

2 Non regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) '
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional
Explain
Supporting documentation is presented in Section Ill F

SECTION iII CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs if the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section iiI A 1 and Section III D 1 only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sections III A 1 and 2
and Section III D 1 otherwise see Section IIi B below
1 TNW
identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting determination
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT iS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands if any and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are relatively permanent
waters (RPWs) i e tributaries that typically flow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e g., typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional if the aquatic resource is not a TNW but has year round
(perennial) flow skip to Section 111 D 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
skip to Section IIi D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include In the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and Its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
If the waterbody° Is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD will require additional data to determine If the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines for
analytical purposes the tributary and all of Its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area Identified in the JD request is
the tributary or Its adjacent wetlands or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands complete Section Iii B 1 for
the tributary Section III B 2 for any onsite wetlands and Section Iii B3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section iII C below
1 Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly Into TNW
(I) General Area Conditions
Watershed size (HUC 03040105 entire drainage) 1413 square miles
Drainage area ( Wetland study drainage area) — 55 `al cres
Average annual rainfall 43 inches
Average annual snowfall inches
(n) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tnbutary flows directly into TNW
®
Tributary flows through � tnbutanes before entering TNW
Project waters are i'0 15 river miles from TNW
Project waters are kw(or,less) river miles from RPW
Project waters are 5,10 aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Project waters are �t�(or I se aerial (straight) miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain No
Identify flow route to TNW5 SeaRPW C and empties into PerRPW E which flows offsite into Mallard Creek which
empties directly into Rocky River (TNW)
Note that the instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and in the and
West
5 Flow route can be described by identifying e g tributary a which flows through the review area to flow into tributary b which then flows into TNW

Tributary stream order if known I st
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply)
Tributary is ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man altered) Explain
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate)
Average width 3 6 feet
Average depth 1 3 feet
Average side slopes 01
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply)
• Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
• Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type /% cover
❑ Other Explain
Tributary condition /stability [e g highly eroding sloughing banks) Explain relatively stable
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes Explain moderate run/nffle/pool features
Tributary geometry a 1- 0—Cin -g
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope) 1 2 %
(c) Flow
Tnbutary provides for easo�ioa_t fl w
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year t109(Qr,g tee
Describe flow regime Seasonal flows with input from storm events
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is fierefe ;anal cti ft6d Characteristics
Subsurface flow H knowia Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
Tributary has (check all that apply)
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply)
® clear natural line impressed on the bank
®
the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
®
the presence of wrack line
® vegetation matted down bent or absent
®
sediment sorting
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
® sediment deposition
®
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain
if factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
® High Tide Line indicated by []
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
me lateral extent of CWA junsdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ survey to available datum
❑ physical markings
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types
(m) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize tributary (e g water color is clear discolored
Explain Water was generally clear
Identify specific pollutants if known
oily film water quality general watershed characteristics etc )
6A natural or man made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e g where the stream temporarily flows underground or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody s flow
regime (e g flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert) the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'Ibid

(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that apply)
® Riparian corridor Characteristics (type average width) Forested > 100 +/
® Wetland fringe Characteristics SeaRPW C has abutting wetlands along its reach
® Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings Channel supports habitat for isopods crayfish and amphibians
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size 0 10acres
Wetland type Explain Forested
Wetland quality Explain
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain No
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non TNW
Flow is ate _tie'$ w Explain Wetlands will discharge into the RPW s periodically during the growing season
Surface flow is Dia erc e e
Characteristics
Subsurface flow � vm Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non TNW
® Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explain
❑ Separated by berm/bamer Explain
(d) Proximity (Relationship ) to TNW
Project wetlands arenwfs river miles from TNW
Project waters are 540 aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is from LVV et al rid ton vIgaa btekw tea
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 2 5-yeai floodplam
(n) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize wetland system (e g water color is clear brown oil film on surface water quality general watershed
characteristics etc ) Explain Water was clear
identify specific pollutants if known
(iii) Biological Characteristics Wetland supports (check all that apply)
® Riparian buffer Characteristics (type average width) Forested > 100
® Vegetation type /percent cover Explain Alluvial /Riparian +/ 85/
® Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings Provides habitat for amphibians
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis 4
Approximately ( 0 10 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

For each wetland specify the following
Directly abuts9 (YIN) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
D (Y) 0 011
E (Y) 0 030
F (Y) 0 012
A (Y) 0 047
Summarize overall biological chemical and physical functions being performed Onsite wetlands provide habitat for
herpetofauna and macroinvertebrates The wetlands provide flood storage and ground water recharge The wetlands also trap and
filter pollutants before reaching RPWs and the TNW (Rocky River)
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical physical and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations a significant nexus exists if the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include but are not limited to the volume duration and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplam is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include for example
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW'?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species such as feeding nesting spawning or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have other relationships to the physical chemical or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary itself then go to Section 111 D
2 Significant nexus findings for non RPW and its adjacent wetlands where the non RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands then go to Section IIi D
3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands then go to
Section III D
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
TNWs linear feet width (ft) Or acres
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial PerRPW ( E )(Stream C section 4) was observed to have geomorphology biology and hydrologic flow
characteristics consistent with perennial streams The channel had observed flows clear bed and banks macroinvertebrates
and substrate sorting See NC Stream Data Form PerRPW E
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow seasonally (cg typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IIi B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows

seasonally Seasonal RPW C has the geomorphology hydrology and biology consistent with intermittent streams The
channel had clear bed and banks scour and substrate sorting See NC Stream Data Form SeaRPW C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
MTributary waters 631 linear feet3 6width (ft)
Other non wetland waters acres
identify type(s) of waters
3 Non RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
[] Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is junsdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
C] Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
4 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW Wetland (E) empties directly into and is not seperated from PerRPW (E)(Stream C
section) PerRPW (E) empties directly into Mallard Creek which empties into Rocky River (TNW)
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section iII B and rationale in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW Wetland (A) empties directly into and is not seperated from offsite SeaRPW Wetlands (D & F) empty
directly into and are not seperated from SeaRPW (C) SeaRPWs (C and offsite) empty into PerRPWs (E and offsite)
which empty into Mallard Creek which empties into Rocky River (TNW)
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area 0 10acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
[] Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
6 Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for junsdictional wetlands in the review area acres
7 Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from waters of the U S or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 6) or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
E ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA STATE) WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS THE USE
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 'o
sSee Footnote # 3
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section iII D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
which are or could be used for mdustnal purposes by industries in interstate commerce
* Interstate isolated waters Explain
Other factors Explain
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination
Provide estimates for Junsdicttonal waters in the review area (check all that apply)
Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
�] Wetlands acres
F NON JURISDICTIONAL WATERS INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
® If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropnate Regional Supplements
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision to SWANCC the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
Migratory Bird Rule (MBR)
Waters do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such a finding is required for Jurisdiction Explain
Other (explain if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non Jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of Junsdiction is the MBR
factors (i a presence of migratory birds presence of endangered species use of water for irrigated agriculture) using best professional
Judgment (check all that apply)
Q Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
P s� Lakes /ponds acres
Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
rs Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non Jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such
a finding is required for Junsdiction (check all that apply)
Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
Lakes /ponds acres
Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
[� Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply checked items shall be included in case file and where checked
and requested appropriately reference sources below)
Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant /consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters study
Q U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
® U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name 1 24K Denta and Harrisburg (NC) quads
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL http Hwebsoilsurvey nres usda gov
RNational wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
State /Local wetland inventory map(s)
E9 FEMAIFIRM maps
100 year Floodplam Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs ® Aerial (Name & Date)
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)

❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Applicable /supporting case law
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature
Other information (please specify)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProloctIsite Y41G ll� '' �� CIty1counly �'� er'I ���� °1 �h �� Sampling Date
ApplicarrbOmer state Sampling Point wl wf A8
Investigator(s) L• 5 t,, I PT K — Section Tovnrship Range
Landform (hiilstopo terrace etc) V ex l le-4 Local relief (concave convex none) Slope (%) d 'IL
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) n� G t� LLet t 33 C'-) c" Long " __ 50' �' Datum tJAA 9�
Sod Map Unit Name PQ — G (�T "'i 1,t u ��� '� NYUiclassification
Are climatic ( hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _,,X No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation _ Sol N or Hydrology 0 signirricantiy disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes _,�-- No
Are Vegetation N Sou f, or Hydrology !U naturally problematic? (if needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes , No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes _ No within a Wetland? Yes r` No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes --\L_ No -
Remarks tt L 1}
Remarks A e.s IS r F'r Sg ! �rw St J(irr4CS L� a,1�� r,lL�'I4r1J' AT3
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indlcotors fminLmum of tvro reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of ono_Is rgout(gd.
check all that aoaly)
_ Surface Sort Crack* (136)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (814)
, Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
-6_ Oxidized Rh¢ospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (81)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tillod Sous (C6)
)r Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ DnR Deposits (83)
_ Thin (duck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aenel Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (BS)
Geomorphic Pnsition (02)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water Stained Loaves (SO)
_ Microtopographic Rellet (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes
No ' Depth ( inches)
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (Inches)
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth %inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present", Yes_ No
includes ca ila fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well oonal photos provious inspection.) rf ava IeWe
Remarks t
f r ,�, x
{
.s� 11j !L of i v�tit �tSrr�e-
h�,i
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountain and Piedmont — Interim Version
)
l

a
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point a 4. 1 VJ� W A3
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Spocias
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant --7
Species Acres All Strata
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC �<'6 7.6 (A,B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size
) % Cover Species Status
t L .vim_;.- .tot,f `riy
rkct�Ic.t,L 3d
_ YAC1,
X3=
FACV species
x 4 -
3 u bets,.
tb
Column Totals
4
5
6
7
8
!Q $
a Total Cover
SapilrMIShrub Stratum (Plot size
)
1 _F!'•a}Crnv�
'3-5
V FALVI
2 L yu ti.�\a9t c
rt c t �7 1t4 Q
�
3
4
5
6
7
8
8
10
C
= Total Cover
Sampling Point a 4. 1 VJ� W A3
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Spocias
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant --7
Species Acres All Strata
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC �<'6 7.6 (A,B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of
MUMMY by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
X2=
FAC species
X3=
FACV species
x 4 -
UPL pecie
X5=
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index - BIA =
Hydrophyhc Vegetation Indicators
_ 1 Rapid To t for Hydrophytic Vegetation
J, ' D'ommance Test is >50%
—3 Prevalence index Is 53 4'
—4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size ) data rn Remarks or on a separate sheet)
I Mt r `�i $�� t t ��, V wt rMt(Q 11 f=Ac. — Probinmatrc Hydrophytrc Vegetation' (Explain)
2 ., sr v- ,
3 02 o i:At { Indicators of hydrae soil and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or probiernabc
4 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
5
g Tree - Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in d,ametar at breast he ght (DBH) regardle of
7 height
8
8 Sapling /Shrub- Woody plants excluding vm+s less
than 3 m DSH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tell
10
It Herb -All herbaceous (non woody) plant rogardlo
-- of Ito and woody plants Is than '128 It tali
12
11 b = Total Cover Woody vine -All vmdy vine greater than 3 28 ft,n
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size ) height
t
2
3
4
5
6
Total Cover
photo numbers here or on a soparatc
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Ycs \< No
t_ rc91 +i �,,, , Je5,r n7 L.� G*6 -.-., , 1 �' I3 /- ,1
US Army Corps of Engineers
■
,r-2 P-,- c--f -e - � C f 4 - IF lit L , / L sj C.i 41C t-
Eastom Mountams and Pwdmont - Irtenm Vomlon

SOIL
Samnilnn Anint 001 t W kl A8
Pro- rife Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix Rodox Features
Pinches Colo (moist] �f_ Color (moist) ° Tvoe _Loc Textute ReMirics
it - i a y 5/9 '10 4 6 to L 54 r• � 6 ic
'Type C =Concentration D-Depletion, RM Reduced Matrix MSnMasked Sand Grains Location PL-Pore Lining, McMatnx
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods
_ Hisboeol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147)
_ HI ®dc Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 146)
_ Coast Prairie Rodox (A16)
— Black Histic (A3)
–, Thin Dark Surface (S®) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_, Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyod Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F 9)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
aA Depleted Matrx (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Rodox Dark Surface (FS)
_ Red Parent Mater al (TF2)
— Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
— Rodox Depressions (F8)
T Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
— Iron Manganese Messes (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84)
_ Umbric SaAace (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
3Indrea1ors of hydrophytic vepotalron and
Sandy Rodox (SS)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
%votiand hydrology must be present
— Stripped Matrix (BS)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
( 4,
vtca i s t; 5 t C o 6 5 e!
US Army Corps of Engineers Ea tarn Mountains and Piedmont – Interim' Version
a

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProlocbSite \r `\ 4 11 :,Z r <t fir ► G1^ City County 1-1'� 44 -14 % L-,E Sampling Data ltd �a t
AaplicanttOwner State NC Sampling Point f? T�IA
Investigator(s) 1" R (�4" Section Township Range
Lindform (hdisiope terrace etc) Local relier(concave comox none) convfX Slope (°6)
Subregion (I.RR or MLRA) M tF fk A tLot -35A-21 I y P) Long - Y-1 4; 11:) ' Datum AJAa 3
Sod Map Unit Name i- t,o L t 1 a �t Il o c, V^. NWT elassrficahon
Are climatic hydrologic condrlrons on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _" No (if no explain in Remuk )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology N Ignificantly disturbed? Arc Normal Circumstance prosont? Yes _ No
Are Vegetation Sod N _ or Hydrology l`) naturally problematic? (If needed explain any ansvwrs in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophyt c Vogetation Present? Yes No :_ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No V within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 7r
Remark j
v , N � � A
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (min mum of two roctu redi
Primary indicators frninlmum of one is reoulred check all that apply}
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (At)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
— Spit ,ely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
high Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
— Drainage Pattern 1610)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizo phores on Liv ng Roots {C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (Bi6)
Water Mark (131)
_ Pro once of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Dry Sea on Water Table (C2)
_ Sedimont Deposits. (B21
_ Regent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
— Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (631
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Vi ible on Aenal Imagery tC9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plant, (D1)
Iron Depostt (05l
_ Geomorphic Posdion (02)
i- tundat on Asible on Aerial imagery (87)
_ Shallow Aqudard (031
Wat r Sta nod Leaves (1391
M crolopographic Rehr.f (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
FAC Neutral To t (D5)
Field Observations
Surface +Mater Present? Ye
No Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes
No �_ Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No _ 't
J ncludes ca ri aty fr n e
Doarxrko Rf corded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aortaf photos previou inspections) If ovAllible
fienL'I►kb
p
1'y ( [
� v .tl
1 -j r- 1,
4,
/
J1 Jl-1 e (r-/7 LJ<- - r rVLi
US Army Corps of Engimooto Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Vor ion

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
7
8
s
10
ti
12
15 = Total Cover
Woody V no Stratum (Plot are )
1
3
4
5
Total Cover
Remarks (Includo photo numbers here or on a eeparato beet y
San pling Pont riaq P I J
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC ' (A)
Total Number of Dominant 1
Species Across All Strata l (B)
Percent of Cominani Spectes + o,
That Are OBL FACW or FAC % o (AFB)
Total % Cover of Multi ply by
OBL specie A t =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species to x3= _._2t Q,___�
FACU specie /r, )(4-
% d
UPL pecie X5
Column Totals ! f (A) IY /> (B)
Prevalence Index = 8 A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytto Vegetation
_ 2 Dominance Test i >50%
_ 3 Prevalence Indey is 53 0'
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydile soil and wetland hydrology must
loo prosent unlos disturbed orpioblematic
Definitions of Four Vegetoition Strata
Tree -Mody plants exduding vines 3m (7 B cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH) regardle s of
height
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants exctud ng vines less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 H (1 m) tall
Herb- All horbaceou (non Aoody) plums rognrdle s
of size and broody plants loss than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine -All woody vane greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X_
147 j,0 pt, /y . .. "' - -)C.+ -E ItId - rLrl �.� - "_n ,, 01 ��5t'rv�UP
Uo Army Cnrps of Frigneers Eastern Mountain and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
%Cover Specio~ Status
r W
FACA
4
5
6
7
8
_
Total Cover
Sapling Shrub Stratum (Plot sae
)
I.1._Y
��S Flbrlr`i�
3 u y r 5, a
1 V FAr,ty
—6� Cu
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Lin - Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Piet sae )
t 0 h t E -r- Q V% I LqA
FA<
^ —CAcLA
3
4
5
6
7
8
s
10
ti
12
15 = Total Cover
Woody V no Stratum (Plot are )
1
3
4
5
Total Cover
Remarks (Includo photo numbers here or on a eeparato beet y
San pling Pont riaq P I J
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC ' (A)
Total Number of Dominant 1
Species Across All Strata l (B)
Percent of Cominani Spectes + o,
That Are OBL FACW or FAC % o (AFB)
Total % Cover of Multi ply by
OBL specie A t =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species to x3= _._2t Q,___�
FACU specie /r, )(4-
% d
UPL pecie X5
Column Totals ! f (A) IY /> (B)
Prevalence Index = 8 A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytto Vegetation
_ 2 Dominance Test i >50%
_ 3 Prevalence Indey is 53 0'
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydile soil and wetland hydrology must
loo prosent unlos disturbed orpioblematic
Definitions of Four Vegetoition Strata
Tree -Mody plants exduding vines 3m (7 B cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH) regardle s of
height
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants exctud ng vines less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 H (1 m) tall
Herb- All horbaceou (non Aoody) plums rognrdle s
of size and broody plants loss than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine -All woody vane greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X_
147 j,0 pt, /y . .. "' - -)C.+ -E ItId - rLrl �.� - "_n ,, 01 ��5t'rv�UP
Uo Army Cnrps of Frigneers Eastern Mountain and Piedmont - Interim Version

a
SOIL
Sampling Point J4
Profile Descnpbon (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matra.
�C
Roday Features
4 nchas) I r (mo rt)
Color rmorstl % Typo, Loc
Textu a Romorks
t, L!P, a s
S Y
� 1ae ,
Type C Concentration DaDe Ietlon RMQReduced Matrx MS =Masked Sand Grams
Location PL =Porn Lining, M- Matrix
Hydnc Sod Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydrtc Sods
_ Histosol (At)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histrc Eplpedon (A�)
_ Potyvalue Below Surface (SS) (MLRA 147 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Buck Histrr tA3)
_ Thin Dark Surfaco (Sg) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
— Piedmont Floodplarn Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layer (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ 2 cm )Ruck (A 10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (FS)
_ Rod Parent Matonal (TF2)
r Deplotad Botow Dark Surfaco fAt t)
_ Deplotod Dark Surfaoo (F7)
_ Vary Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
_ Iron Manganeso Ma.,soo (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 135)
Sandy Gloved Matrix (S4)
_ Umbrrc Surface (F13) (MLRA 138 122)
Indicators of hydrophytrc vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
^ Piedmont Fioodplam Sods (F19) (MLRA 148) vmlland hydrology must be pre ent
_ Stripped Matrl (Sb)
Lnies disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Sall Present? Ye No
Remark
C
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mounta ns and Predm nt- Interim Jorsron
r �

Aq S �$
¢� mN
r a�
zm,< H°
MZ�ao
WmOF Vl
p4p8-m MW
O a iK , Fz
11F-ZO VIz
J a— p a W
Woz
�a
R "Sa
V;O D
Qzaw �U
aI_^o4n
<�WZOm
a?W?WaL)w
F ~ O g W
�Z
r�O Zp F-N
CL Z7
F
tnFQ�Ow
z ommw<,
F OOW
L-
W Zm
0� iLz u ,, =Zz 520 P
F'I N_�Oro 2W=1
�FOO1coo z
n°
o
fU/1
S
U
a
chi
°n
tJ
F
AD N35 viu vw,
Awl ao
ddn �..a
409z S�
OE T +^�
I TOM30 —
L17
Q
0
ONI S3Obf10532! 1N3OS3IiO IdOd 032iVd3dd
ON AlNf10O 9,dnGN31>1O3W 31101bVHO 30 AlIO n
T9b 39Vd OTS£T X1009 0330 IR N
17L9 39Vd L911T A009 0330 213d S3d:)V 8Z LS
NO S3210V UT 0 S31V1S 031INn 3H1 :10 Sd31VM
A
Q
W V)
W
LL
z V) Q
Q Ifs 't
W Cr O O
3 Q N O
O
X10
10 goel 60 Ll 90S
reo aw )
U
0
zz
u
V
W`
2�
W
o d
Z
N
T I�
aP yuavero d°'y
co
�o n S
U{ 0 Y
M dpH�
I
aZa 'n
�BJN ZOZ
Z
�WaQa�ac�i
Tr- a�v�ioJNOQ
o3$oc�o��
f
N 3� L-FW
Q zNWZ 2U ,K)
OAF
�ymV/W�OVa� �J
6Qi0— W or r,) aW a
Za TW 0 m
4 -�OUa0
z
oo�Tm Ixa
n"10
0
Z iF
Z r J
W
�5 °a ZOO o
- rn
O W j a 1 O � l
CL
w Z U m m
r
}} s am w
WO i
m ¢Woo
�c�c
Wzp<MM Wuo \"
U O a W¢ W :3! U f
0 ix �0ZW0Z o I
in4ZU a: JF
am L �"�o w
,nwaizOa< z
�a�a�0z = °r,ii v0-i