20120460 Ver 1_Public Notice_20120529

a_ol�Loo
PUBLIC NOTICE
Issue Date May 25 2012
Comment Deadline June 25 2012
Corps Action ID # SAW 2012 00848
The Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application from
Mr Joe Tate Jr of the Lincolnton Lincoln County Regional Airport Authority seeking
Department of the Army authorization to impact 1 510 linear feet of stream channel associated
with the construction of runway safety improvements in Iron Station North Carolina
Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans
This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site
at www saw usace army mil /wetlands
Applicant
Agent
Authority
Mr Joe Tate Jr
Lincolnton Lincoln County Regional Airport Authority
714 Jack Dellinger Drive
Iron Station North Carolina 28080
Mr Eric Mularski
HDR Engineering Inc of the Carolinas
440 South Church Street
Charlotte North Carolina 28202
2
MAY :2299 2012
DENR WATEk QUALITY
btlanrlc t cv_—
The Corps will evaluate this application and decide whether to issue conditionally issue or deny
the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
US C 1344)
Location
The Lincolnton Lincoln County Regional Airport (Airport) is located at 714 Jack Dellinger
Drive (Airport Road) Iron Station North Carolina 28080 The proposed project is located
adjacent to the southwestern portion of the existing runway This site is located in the Santee
River Basin (8 Digit Cataloging Unit 0305010 1) and the coordinates (in decimal degrees) for the
site are 35 478 north 81 17 west (North American Datum 1983) (See Figure 1)

Existing Site Conditions
The airport facility is a general aviation airport utilized by business and recreational aircraft The
nearest surface waters are unnamed tributaries to Lick Run The proposed project area is located
on existing airport property The area immediately adjacent to the southwest end of the existing
runway includes maintained fields and a mixed hardwood forest buffer alongside each stream
Beyond the airport property is Jack Dellinger Road The land use in the surrounding area is rural
in nature and consists mainly of a mix of undeveloped forested tracts single family residential
and agricultural use
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct runway safety improvements to
accommodate increased levels of operations and to comply with changes in FAA requirements
Protect Description
The Airport proposes to address safety issues by extending Runway 05 end 200 feet and
installing a new localizer The runway extension will utilize the existing blast pad at the end of
Runway 05 as new runway A partial parallel taxiway will be extended to the new end of
Runway 05 to address safety concerns that involve back taxiing for takeoffs on Runway 05
Finally installation of a new localizer/DME and shelter will be required to maintain compliance
with FAA Order 6750 16D — Site Criteria for Instrument Landing Systems replacing an existing
16 year old system Approximately 1 510 linear feet of unnamed tributaries to Lick Run would
be permanently impacted as a result of the construction of the parallel taxiway and new localizer
antenna The applicant has proposed to mitigate for the anticipated impacts through payment to
the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program s (EEP) in lieu fee program at a 1 1 ratio based on the
quality of the features proposed to be impacted (see Figure 3)
Other Required Authorizations
This notice and all applicable application materials are being forwarded to the appropriate State
agencies for review The Corps will generally not make a final permit decision until the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality ( NCDWQ) issues denies or waives State certification
required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92 500) The receipt of the application and
this public notice combined with appropriate application fee at the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality central office in Raleigh will constitute initial receipt of an application for a 401
Water Quality Certification A waiver will be deemed to occur if the NCDWQ falls to act on
this request for certification within sixty days of the date of the receipt of this notice in the
NCDWQ Central Office Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification
may be reviewed at the NCDWQ Central Office 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit 512
North Salisbury Street in Raleigh North Carolina All persons desiring to make comments
regarding the application for certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act should do so
in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality ( NCDWQ) 1650 Mail
Service Center Raleigh North Carolina 27699 1650 Attention Ms Cyndi Karoly by
June 25 2012

Essential Fish Habitat
This notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements of the
Magnuson Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act The Corps initial determination
is that the proposed project will not adversely impact EFH or associated fisheries managed by
the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine
Fisheries Service
Cultural Resources
The Corps has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places
and is not aware that any registered properties or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion
therein are located within the project area or will be affected by the proposed work Presently
unknown archeological scientific prehistoric or historical data may be located within the
project area and/or could be affected by the proposed work
Endangered Species
The Corps has reviewed the project area examined all information provided by the applicant and
consulted the latest North Carolina Natural Heritage Database Based on available information
the Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as threatened or endangered or their
critical habitat formally designated pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA)
within the project area A final determination on the effects of the proposed project will be made
upon additional review of the project and completion of any necessary biological assessment
and/or consultation with the U S Fish and Wildlife Service and/or National Marine Fisheries
Service
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts
including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest That decision will
reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources The
benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against
its reasonably foreseeable detriments All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be
considered including the cumulative effects thereof among those are conservation economics
aesthetics general environmental concerns wetlands historic properties fish and wildlife
values flood hazards flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988) land use
navigation shoreline erosion and accretion recreation water supply and conservation water
quality energy needs safety food and fiber production mineral needs considerations of
property ownership and in general the needs and welfare of the people For activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States the evaluation of the
impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental
Protection Agency s 404(b)(1) guidelines

Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public Federal State and local agencies
and officials including any consolidate State Viewpoint or written position of the Governor
Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this
proposed activity Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to
determine whether to issue modify condition or deny a permit for this proposal To make this
decision comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species historic properties water
quality general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above
Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine
the overall public interest of the proposed activity
Any person may request in writing within the comment period specified in this notice that a
public hearing be held to consider the application Requests for public hearings shall state with
particularity the reasons for holding a public hearing Requests for a public hearing shall be
granted unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is
otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work as outlined above will be received by the
Corps of Engineers Wilmington District until 5pm June 25 2012 Comments should be
submitted to Steve Kichefski Asheville Regulatory Field Office 151 Patton Avenue Room 208
Asheville North Carolina 28801 5006

,-�4
N
}
Pumpkin
Center
y � x
f �
I %
d f
r3at
I
1s0 I Protect Area Mau I
G cou ny
�. An Nc it
�>kf27t
27
J
r
a
c
C I $
k
- � 7
y t
321
t � �
tJ t
� r
321
one $n03l5
(27
ti
I
t
z
4
1 Inch =1 mile
�0 05 1 2
Miles
P
M I
PI
Project Vicinity
Fa ` Figure 1
ONE COMPANY I Many Solutions
Lmcolnton- Lincoln County Regional Airport I Runway Safety Improvements I Individual Permit
�
E
4
I
e
v
E
N
}
Pumpkin
Center
y � x
f �
I %
d f
r3at
I
1s0 I Protect Area Mau I
G cou ny
�. An Nc it
�>kf27t
27
J
r
a
c
C I $
k
- � 7
y t
321
t � �
tJ t
� r
321
one $n03l5
(27
ti
I
t
z
4
1 Inch =1 mile
�0 05 1 2
Miles
P
M I
PI
Project Vicinity
Fa ` Figure 1
ONE COMPANY I Many Solutions
Lmcolnton- Lincoln County Regional Airport I Runway Safety Improvements I Individual Permit

t
Project Area
- .� 4s J s' ` it -•,w ,� �� ,; ^, '`'� �-�,,,_,,,,��`
k
k
gj {� ,y
ch
r
1 Inch = 2 000 feet j
0 1 000 2000 4 000
3
Feet
EDR
ONE COMPANY I A;fany Solutions
USGS Lincolnton East Quadrangle
Figure 2
Lkncolnton- Lincoln County Regional Airport I Runway Safety Improvements I Individual Permit

rl(
I
E
;/(
39 %n
t \\�
� r
�r
j� Dehneated Waters of the US
1l 1U/ 1 Figure 3
ONE COMPANY IMany Solutions
Lmcolnton- Lincoln Courty Regional Airport I Runway Safety Improvements I Individual Permit

L LL
zz
4
00c
Ita
4O
�
t
W
1
/
c
1
-
mCL
aaaaaan
PI �
iii d�
=
a
aammc�U
EEER
i (
IL
NN
L
cn
�
m w
b b
m
b
m
b
rn
/
pp
/
U2 (l j
v
to
r co
U m n
! �`
'��'� �..
Cl
m d E
0 CL
h
o
CL CL
1
n_ n. = U ac
L
s
0
L LL
zz
4
00c
Ita
4O

1
® a0upakw &boom. O
J
May 7 2012 V _
Mr Steve Kichefski
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue Room 208
Asheville North Carolina 28801 5006
NC Division of Water Quality
401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mad Service Road
Raleigh North Carolina 276991650
v ov g
Re Lincolnton Lincoln County Regional Airport Runway Safety Area Improvements
Individual Permit Application
Lincoln County North Carolina
To Whom It May Concern
HDR Engineering Inc of the Carolinas (HDR) on behalf Talbert & Bright Inc (TBI) is requesting authorization
under an Individual Section 404 Permit and Section 401 Water Quality Certification to construct the proposed
Runway Safety Area Improvements at the Lincolnton Lincoln County Regional Airport (Airport) in Lincoln
County North Carolina (Figure 1 and Figure 2)
Block 18 — Nature of the Activity
The Proposed Action will address safety issues by extending Runway 05 by 200 feet and installing a new
localizer antenna system The runway extension will utilize the existing blast pad at the end of Runway 05 as
new runway A partial parallel taxiway will be extended to the new end of Runway 05 to address safety
concerns that involve back taxiing for takeoffs on Runway 05 Finally installation of a new localizeddistance
measuring equipment (DME) and shelter will be required to maintain compliance with the Federal Aviation
Administration s (FAA) Order 675016D — Site Criteria for Instrument Landing Systems replacing an existing
16 year old system
Installation of the new runway extension and localizer will require installing sod embankments and a new
drainage system over existing jurisdictional stream channels The new drainage system will result in the
placement of a 640 linear foot (If) 72 inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) a 104 If 72 inch dual RCP a 108 If
60 inch RCP and a 312 If 36 inch RCP in unnamed tributaries to Lick Run Creek Additional impacts will result
from the installation of approximately 297 If of np rap aprons for the proposed pipe system (Figure 5, Grading
and Drainage Plans, and Storm Drainage Profiles)
_ \ /� ),CtO HDR Engineering Inc of the Carolinas
6
440 S Church Street Phone [phone]
Suite 1000 Fax [phone]
Charlotte NC 282021919 www hdrinc corn

Block 19 — Proposed Proiect Purpose
The positive aviation growth at the Airport has rendered many of the existing facilities Inadequate with respect
to runway safety FAA standards and guidelines and facility development Runway safety improvements are
required to accommodate increased levels of operations and to comply with the changes in FAA requirements
The Airport is only minutes from downtown Llncolnton The lighted runway length is 5 500 feet (6 000 feet with
over runs) Services include aircraft rental aircraft maintenance aircraft storage tie down space and aircraft
charter service Many local businesses and industries house their corporate aircraft at the Airport for fast and
convenient access
Lincoln County is a growing community In the Charlotte region the nation s thirty fourth largest metropolitan
area Lincoln County has a diverse workforce with a strong emphasis on manufacturing Wages for Lincoln
County s dependable and trained workforce are below the state and national average Manufacturing
employment in the County increased from 1980 to 1990 and 1990 to 2000 despite losses in the region state
and country
The Airport was constructed In 1985 and has provided an extended runway safety area (ERSA) length of 300
feet on the Runway 23 end Currently the Airport has a usable takeoff runway length of 5 500 feet due to a
series of intermediate runway extensions in the 1990s and early 2000s and most recently with the recapture of
a 300 foot landing threshold displacement However a 200 foot displaced landing threshold still exists on the
Runway 23 end due to an ERSA length deficiency of 200 feet from the end of the existing runway pavement to
the end of the ERSA The Airport must extend Runway 05 to meet the existing needs and projected growth to
accommodate corporate air traffic and comply with FAA requirements
The existing ERSA for Runway 23 extends 100 feet beyond the end of the runway pavement The Runway 23
threshold has been displaced 200 feet in order to comply with FAA Advisory Circular 15015300 13 — Airport
Design (as amended)
Runway safety Improvements are scheduled to begin construction once all necessary permits and approvals
are acquired It is anticipated that construction activities will take a minimum of 8 months
Block 20 — Reason for Discharge & Block 22 Surface Areas or Wetlands to Other Waters Filled
Jurisdictional waters of the U S were venfied in the field by the U S Army Corp of Engineers (USACE)
personnel on November 3 2011 (Figure 3) Construction of the parallel taxiway and new localizer antenna as
part of the proposed action will result in 1510 If of permanent stream impacts (Figure 5) Impact lengths were
calculated using the centerline of the surveyed stream to account for the natural sinuosity of the stream
channel Table 1 is a summary of jurisdictional waters and associated impacts No jurisdictional wetlands or
other waters of the U S will be impacted There will be no additional temporary impacts to jurisdictional waters
due to placement of temporary erosion control devices or temporary stream crossings (all temporary impacts
will occur within the permanent impact footprint)
HDR Engineering Inc of the Carolinas Page 2 of 9

Table 1 Stream Impacts Summary
Impact
Sheet
Stream Name
Intermittent
Impact Type
Permanent Stream
Number
Number
or Perennial
Impacts I
S1
8
UT to Lick Run
Perennial
72 Inch RCP /Fill
678
Creek
S 3 to S 2
S2
8
UT to Lick Run
Perennial
Rip Rap Apron /Fill
137
Creek
S3
7
UT to Lick Run
Perennial
36 Inch RCP /Fill
313
Creek
S 5 to S-4
S4
8
UT to Lick Run
Perennial
Rip Rap Apron /Fill
105
Creek
S5
8
UT to Lick Run
Perennial
60 inch RCP /Fill
222
Creek
S 6 to S 2
S6
8
UT to Lick Run
Perennial
Rip Rap Apron /Fill
55
Creek
Total
1,510
Block 21— Types of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Approximately 800 cubic yards of stone will be discharged into jurisdictional waters In order to construct the
proposed np rap aprons Approximately 700 cubic yards of clean fill material will be placed into jurisdictional
waters to install the drainage system Standard earth moving equipment including dump trucks pans and
bulldozers will be used for grading activities
Block 23 — Description of Avoidance. Minimization, and Compensation
Avoidance
An alternatives analysis was completed as part of the Airports Runway Safety Area Improvements
Environmental Assessment (EA) submitted to the N C Department of Transportation Division of Aviation
(NCDOA) in January 2012 Alternatives were selected in order to determine If Impacts to environmental
resources could be avoided Impacts were minimized where avoidance was not practical Based on this
analysis Alternative 2 was Identified as the Proposed Action The following summarizes the five alternatives
as detailed In the EA
• Alternative 1— Extend Runway 23 ERSA 200 feet toward Lick Run Creek
• Wetlands and Streams Alternative 1 is anticipated to result In significant impacts to Lick
Run Creek (totaling approximately 1590 If) and two adjacent wetlands (totaling
approximately 1 acre) An onsite consultation with USACE and the N C Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) representatives revealed that installing a permanent culvert along Lick Run
Creek under the proposed ERSA embankment would cause considerable impacts to aquatic
habitat and would not be accepted as a practical alternative Relocation of Lick Run Creek
would require mitigation and Increased design costs
• Federally listed species Alternative 1 could cause direct Impacts to a population of dwarf
flowered heartleaf (federally threatened) located along the western slopes of Lick Run
Creek
• Cost Estimated total cost is $7 469 399
HDR Engineering Inc of the Carolinas Page 3 of 9

Alternative 2 (Proposed Action) — Extend Runway 05 end 200 feet and install new localizer
without relocating Jack Dellinger Drive
• Wetlands and Streams — Alternative 2 (Proposed Action) is anticipated to result in
approximately 1 150 If of impacts to tributaries to Lick Run Creek
• Federally listed Species — Alternative 2 (Proposed Action) contains suitable habitat for
dwarf flowered heartleaf On September 12 and October 11 2011 S &ME Inc conducted
pedestrian surveys for dwarf flowered heartleaf within the proposed action area No dwarf
flowered heartleaf was observed during these surveys The North Carolina Natural Heritage
Element Occurrence (NHEO) data indicates that the nearest dwarf flowered heartleaf
population is located approximately 50 feet west of Jack Dellinger Drive approximately 200
feet upstream of the Proposed Action In Appendix B (Biotic Communities) of the 2011 EA it
states that based on previous experience in the area the individuals of dwarf flowered
heartleaf lust west of the Airport Road [aka Jack Dellinger Drive] were transplanted to an off
site location in 2006
• Cost — Estimated total cost is $4 370 766 25
• Alternative 3 — Extend Runway 05 end 200 feet, install new localizer with relocation of Jack
Dellinger Drive
• Wetlands and Streams — Alternative 3 is anticipated to result in over 1 500 If of impacts to
tnbutanes to Lick Run Creek Additional stream impacts would be realized from the
proposed relocation of Jack Dellinger Drive
• Federally listed Species — See Alternative 2 (Proposed Action) for a description of dwarf
flowered heartleaf populations located to the west of Jack Dellinger Drive Re locating Jack
Dellinger Drive to the west could potentially cause direct impacts to known populations of
dwarf flowered heartleaf
• Cost — Estimated total cost is $4 887 423 75
Alternative 4 — Extend Runway 05 end 700 feet and install new localizer with relocation of Jack
Dellinger Drive
• Wetlands and Streams — Alternative 4 is anticipated to result in over 1 500 If of impacts to
tributaries to Lick Run Creek Additional stream impacts would be realized from the
proposed relocation of Jack Dellinger Drive It is estimated that this alternative would have
the greatest amount of impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U S
• Federally listed Species — See Alternative 2 (Proposed Action) for a description of dwarf
flowered heartleaf populations located to the west of Jack Dellinger Drive Re locating Jack
Dellinger Drive to the west would likely cause direct impacts to known populations of dwarf
flowered heartleaf
• Cost — Estimated total cost is $8 882 793 75
• Alternative 5 — Extend Runway 05 end 500 feet, construction 300 foot wide by 600 foot long
ERSAs on both runway ends, and install new localizer with relocation of Jack Dellinger Drive
o The estimated project cost for Alternative 5 was in excess of $10 000 000 With the
excessive cost a detailed analysis of Alternative 5 was deemed unnecessary as part of the
EA
HDR Engineering Inc otthe Carolinas Page 4 of 9

• No Action Alternative — The No Action Alternative assumes that the existing Airport would have a
useable takeoff runway length of 5 500 feet with a 200 foot displaced landing threshold on the
Runway 23 end The No Action Alternative would not improve the ERSA to meet FAA standards and
therefore would not accomplish the purpose of the proposed project
Minimization
Minimization strategies were Incorporated as part of the design Jurisdictional waters were delineated and
surveyed within the proposed project area and the preliminary design was adjusted to minimize Impacts Best
Management Practices (BMPs) will be Implemented throughout project construction Individual minimization
Items are listed below
• Culverts were designed to be placed below one foot below the elevation of the stream bed for all
culverts greater than 48 Inches in diameter and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having
a diameter less than or equal to 48 Inches to allow for low flow passage of water and aquatic life
• The Airport will employ sediment and erosion control structures during construction that may Include
diversion ditches and dikes temporary sediment traps sediment basins straw bale dikes and rock
dams to retain sediment on the construction site and prevent sedimentation to jurisdictional waters
• The Airport will avoid placing erosion control structures in jurisdictional waters
• Grass swales will be utilized where feasible to provide stormwater treatment
• Culverts have been sized and will be Installed at elevations not to Impede low flow passage of water
and migration of aquatic life
• Rip rap aprons will be buned at the original stream bed elevation and Installed to dissipate flows and
prevent downcutting during high flow events
• All work in or adjacent to stream(s) will be conducted in a dry work area
• The Airport will minimize long term water quality Impacts using the most recent BMPs as required by
the NC DOA
• The Airport has implemented a long term water quality Spill Prevention Control and
Countermeasures Plan (SPCC) as described in the National Pollution Discharge System (NPDES)
permit to protect water quality from possible oil and grease spills during construction Undetected
leakage would be absorbed and /or filtered by slopes and ditches before reaching jurisdictional
waters
Compensation
The Proposed Action design has avoided and minimized Impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest
extent possible Jurisdictional wetlands will not be Impacted and will not require mitigation Jurisdictional
stream impacts requiring mitigation total 1 510 If Stream impacts will be offset by payment to the N C
Ecosystem Enhancement Programs (EEP) in lieu fee program Current fees for HUC 03050101 are
$349 00/If A copy of the EEP Acceptance Letter is attached
Block 25 — Names and Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners Lessees etc
Adjoining property owners are listed in Table 2
HDR Engineering Inc ofthe Carolinas Page 5 of 9

Table 2 Adioinina PrODerty Owners
Property
PIN
Deed
Deed
Physical Address
Mailing Address
Owner
Book
Page
Michael Clete
3653 36 9381
1749
770
Airport Road (Jack Dellinger)
5472 Ruby Lane
Smith
Iron Station NC 28080
Iron Station NC 28080
Glen Franklin
Asbury Church Road
333 McAlister Road
Smith
3653 36 5998
876
813
Iron Station NC 28208
Lincolnton NC 28092
Edna
3653 47 0663
90E
133
3500 Bridge Port Lane
3500 Bridge Port Lane
Carpenter
Lincolnton NC 28092
Lincolnton NC 28092
Edna
3653 47 6324
90E
133
3500 Bridge Port Lane
3500 Bridge Port Lane
Carpenter
Lincolnton NC 28092
Lincolnton NC 28092
Airport Road (Jack Dellinger)
115 W Main Street
Lincoln County
3653 57 0522
1503
780
Iron Station NC 28080
Lincolnton NC 28092
Airport Road (Jack Dellinger)
115 W Main Street
Lincoln County
3653 57 0903
1486
257
Iron Station NC 28080
Lincolnton NC 28092
Airport Road (Jack Dellinger)
115W Main Street
Lincoln County
3653 58 6457
1486
257
Iron Station NC 28080
Lincolnton NC 28092
Rickard B
3653 59 5812
2129
854
3965 Asbury Church Road
3965 Asbury Church Road
Cronland III
Lincolnton NC 28092
Lincolnton NC 28092
Airport Road (Jack Dellinger)
115 W Main Street
Lincoln County
3653 58 6457
655
569
Iron Station NC 28080
Lincolnton NC 28092
Airport Road (Jack Dellinger)
115 W Main Street
Lincoln County
3653 69 4002
1486
257
Iron Station NC 28080
Lincolnton NC 28092
1090 Smith Family Lane
1090 Smith Family Lane
Lewis E Smith
3663 08 3487
414
351
Iron Station NC 28080
Iron Station NC 28080
Phillips D L
3653 87 3424
631
611
Airport Road (Jack Dellinger)
1116 Momingside Drive
Invest
Iron Station NC 28080
Charlotte NC 28205
Abernethy and
365376 1351
571
281
NC Hwy 73
144 W Bland Street
Falls Realty
Iron Station NC 28080
Charlotte NC 28203
NC Hwy 73
115 W Main Street
Lincoln County
3653 771656
755
76
Iron Station NC 28080
Lincolnton NC 28092
Oakwood Circle
3830 Oakwood Circle
Sara Vinson
3653 55 8807
901
581
Iron Station NC 28080
Iron Station NC 28080
Thomas
3653 55 6315
537
238
Oakwood Circle
3823 Oakwood Circle
Tinsley Jr
Iron Station NC 28080
Iron Station NC 28080
Oakwood Circle
115 W Main Street
Lincoln County
3653 551180
857
319
Iron Station NC 28080
Lincolnton NC 28092
Leonard R
3743 Oakwood Circle
3743 Oakwood Circle
Cornwell
3653 44 6921
1121
236
Iron Station NC 28080
Iron Station NC 28080
HDR Engineering Inc ofthe Carolinas Page 6 of 9

Stormwater Management Plan Requirements
The construction of the proposed runway safety area Improvements is estimated to contribute 12 percent of
additional Impervious surface area (Impervious Exhibit) to the project area The site plan and drainage
strategy was discussed with Alan Johnson with the NCDWQ on January 4 2012 It was determined that a
Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) Is not required for the project
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A Phase 1 cultural resources Investigation was conducted and completed by S &ME Inc No archeological
sites or Isolated finds were Identified during the archeological survey As part of the architectural survey three
historic structures (LC 1 LC 2 LC 3) were Identified and described In Table 3
Table 3 Historic Structures within 0 5 mile of the proposed oroiect
Resource No
Site Description
NRHP Eligibility
Recommendation
Management
Recommendation
LC 1
McDowell House ca 1905
Not eligible
No further work
LC 2
CarpenterHouse ca 1900
Not ell able
No further work
LC 3
CarpenterHouse ca 1958
Not eligible
No further work
Structure LC 1 dates to around 1905 and is a two story frame residence Significant alterations including vinyl
siding and additions have compromised the resources integrity Structure LC 2 is a simple single story
vernacular frame residence that dates to around 1900 Structure LC is a single story frame cottage that dates
to the mid 1950s Both Structures LC 2 and LC 3 are relatively common examples of rural vernacular
architecture and do not represent a particular time period or architectural style All three structures are
recommended as ineligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)
Based on the Phase 1 investigation no archeological or historic properties will be affected by the proposed
project Correspondence was sent to the N C State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) requesting
concurrence of the cultural resources investigation SHPO reviewed (CH 11 1729) and concurred that the
proposed project will have no adverse effect on historic properties (dated November 8 2011)
Federally Protected Species
The U S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) protected species list and the N C Natural Heritage Program
(NHP) Element Occurrence database was reviewed for Lincoln County Table 4 identifies federally protected
species listed in Lincoln County
Table 4 Federallv Protected Species in Lincoln Countv. NC
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Habitat
Biological
Status
Present
Conclusion
Hexastyl►s nan►flora
Dwarf flowered
Threatened
Yes
No effect
heartleaf
S m h otnchum georgianum
Georgia aster
Candidate
Yes
No effect
Rhus m►chauxn
Michaux s sumac I
Endangered
Yes
No effect
HOR Engineering Inc of the Carolinas Page 7of9

Suitable habitat for the dwarf flowered heartleaf Georgia aster and Michaux s sumac is present within the
Proposed Action study area A pedestrian survey for the respective protected species revealed that no
individuals were present The proposed project is anticipated to have no effect on these species A Protected
Species Assessment produced by S &ME Inc biologists was forwarded to the USFWS for review on comment
(dated October 14 2011) The USFWS reviewed (Log No 4 2 12 024) and concurred with the determination
that the proposed project will have no effect on federally listed species (dated November 16 2011)
Indirect and Cumulative Impacts
The Airports Runway Safety Area Improvements EA considers the indirect and cumulative impacts created by
the Proposed Action and the consequences of subsequent related actions Indirect impacts may include
growth of the community and changes in land use demographics and socioeconomics that are created as a
by product of the Proposed Action Cumulative impacts could result from several individual actions that are
each minor in nature but together create a combined effect that may be considered significant Indirect and
cumulative impacts were discussed in greater detail in the EA submitted in January 2012
Summa
We are hereby requesting a verification of delineated waters and authorization to construct under a Section
4041401 Individual Permit Enclosed herein are
➢ ENG Form 4345
➢ Project Vicinity (Figure 1)
➢ USGS Lincolnton East Quadrangle (Figure 2)
➢ Delineated Waters of the US (Figure 3)
➢ NRCS Soils (Figure 4)
➢ Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters of the US (Figure 5)
➢ Grading and Drainage Plans (Sheet 7 and Sheet 8)
➢ Storm Drainage Profiles (Sheets 1 3)
➢ Erosion Control Plan (Phases 1 5)
➢ Miscellaneous Details
➢ Impervious Exhibit
➢ Representative Photographs
➢ EEP Acceptance Letter
➢ USFWS Concurrence Letter
➢ SHPO Concurrence Letter
Thank you in advance for your assistance If you have any questions or require additional information after
your review of the enclosed information please contact Eric Mularski at [phone] or at
eric mularski(cD-hdnnc com
HDR Engineering Inc of the Carolinas Page 8 of 9

Respectfully
e
Eric Mularski PWS
Environmental Scientist
Cc Patrick Tumey Project Manager TBI
Judith Elder Llncke Project Manager TBI
HDR Engineering Inc ofthe Carohnas Page 9 of 9

U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
OMB APPROVAL NO 0710-0003
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
EXPIRES 31 AUGUST 2012
J3 CFR 32
Public reporting for this collection of lnformabon is estimated to average 11 hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of Information including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense
Washington Headquarters Executive Services and Communications Directorate Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget Paperwork Reduction Project (0710 -0003) Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 33 USC 403 Clean Water Act Section 404 33 USC 1344 Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries
Act Section 103 33 USC 1413 Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers Final Rule 33 CFR 320 -332 Principal Purpose Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses This information may be shared with the Department of Jushoe and other
federal state and local government agencies and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law Submission
of requested information is voluntary however if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued One set
of anginal drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and/or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having tunsdiction over the location of the proposed activity An application
that is not completed in full will be returned
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1 APPLICATION NO
2 FIELD OFFICE CODE
3 DATE RECEIVED
4 DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BYAPPLJCAN7)
5 APPLICANTS NAME
8 AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First Joe Jr Middle Last Tate
First Eric Middle Last Mularski
Company Lmcolnton Lincoln Count�yy�Regional Airport Authority
Company HDR Engineering Inc of the Carolinas
eJErAT� � WJ( -0L- -J Go-te,JvTY t9R�
E-mail Address com
E mail Address
enc mularskl@hdnnc
6 APPLICANTS ADDRESS
9 AGENTS ADDRESS
Address 714 Jack Dellinger Dnve
Address 440 South Church Street
City Iron Station State NC Zip 28080 Country
City Charlotte State NC Zip 28202 Country
7 APPLICANTS PHONE NOs WAREA CODE
10 AGENTS PHONE NOs w /AREA CODE
a Residence b Business c Fax
a Residence b Business c Fax
704 735 0602 704 736 8788
704 973 6878 704 338 6760
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11 1 hereby authorize Eric Mularski to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to fumish upon request
supplemental information in support of this permit a pcation
SIGNATURE Og APPLICANT DATE
NAME LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTOR ACTIVITY
12 PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Lmcolnton Lincoln County Regional Airport Runway Safety Improvements
13 NAME OF WATERBODY IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14 PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
unnamed tributaries to Lick Run
Address 714 Jack Dellinger Drive
City Iron Station State NC Zip 28080
15 LOCATION OF PROJECT
Labtude N 35 479 Longitude W 81 169
16 OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID 3653 02 5688 68 Municipality Iron Station
Section Township Range
ENG FORM 4345 OCT 2010 EDITION OF OCT 2004 1S OBSOLETE Proponent CECW -0R

17 DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
714 Jack Dellinger Drive Iron Station NC 28080 Please see attached vicinity map and cover letter
18 Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
Please see cover letter
19 Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project see instructions)
Please see cover letter
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND /OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20 Reason(s) for Discharge
Construction of the parallel taxiway and new localizes antenna.
21 Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
950 Cubic Yards of rip rap stone
22 Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres
or
Linear Feet 1 510 linear feet of perennial stream channel will be impacted
23 Description of Avoidance Minimization and Compensation (see instructions)
Please see cover letter
ENG FORM4345 OCT2010

24 Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? QYes Mto IF YES DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
25 Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners Lessees Etc Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here pease aHach a suppem ntW list)
a Address- Please see Table 2 m cover letter
City State Zip
b Address -
City State Zip
c Address -
City State Zip
d Address
City State Zip
e Address
City State Zip
26 List of Other Certificates or Approvals/Denials received from other Federal State or Local Agencies for Work Descnbed in This Application
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
Would include but is not restncfed to zoning budding and flood plain permits
27 Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work descnbed in this application ! certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant
3��`"iz ill a4t
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGN URE OF AGENT DAT
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or It may be signed by a duly
authorized agent If the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed
18 U S C Section 1001 provides that Whoever In any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies conceals or covers up any tack scheme or disguises a material fad or makes any false fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry shall be fined not more than $10 000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both
ENG FORM 4345 OCT 2010

Project Area
NRCS Soil Survey
m
N
ChA Chewacla loam 0 2% slopes (frequently flooded)
GrC Georgeville loam 8 15% slopes
= PaC Pacolet sandy loam 8 15% slopes
PaD Pacolet sandy loam 15 25% slopes
PeC2 Pacolet sandy clay loam 8 15% slopes (eroded) ,
Z WoA Worsham fine sandy loam 0 2% slopes
E +
r
Q D E
U
6�
.F
p
'7
f i D
� r
�a
AIA
1 y
d � S
i
i c D
D �
1 Inch = 200 feet
0 100 200 400
t
Feet
IUR ONE COMPANY I Many Solutions,
Figure 4
Lincolnton Lincoln County Regional Airport I Runway Safety Improvements I Individual Permit

MATCH LINE A — THIS SHEET
\ I a
MATCH LINE A — THIS SHEET
1
N�€�
I I I !
4
°
0 0 0
a o 0 0 \I I IIII \ ol\
0 1 �II I I
A = =m< = Im m— _ — JO=
°L bilk �ry ( < c;n
` \ \I
W ammo °y cc
o a
°w
rj m \
O 2
3 f CTf A m m a —Q
m m
RSA AND ILS IMPROVEMENTS AND
PARALLEL TAXIWAY EXTENSION
IMPERVIOUS AREA EXHIBIT
is w s[ scut s snarm
:LWCOLNTON-UNCOLN COUNTY
REGIONAL AIRPORT
WON STAMM NORTH CAROIWA
a
mw ctt so
wH w
PE
w ,w

lal
n AiC nn nA MV I
... »..-T , ... -1.1 bite Pnot ra ns -
Individual Permit
s
f
f
r
b`b. �di2 C
9� w sd
� � d
C
m 66
� 8
a � s
southwest toward Stream A
t�
F o
r
Photograph #2- Stream A looking upstream
� a

v +,, , F t� �...4 > ;r 'r S,r - ,+�' r} y ? r #i� +'�' r y�r.�..`t` ef•� -4 --�.'
r �.���� s'^4y� Jw.< �, -,. 3 r FJL . r��s�"`1FeY �. `,r•y; 1•. 1�rH�,�'+� sa,+. ��y /�.d�2
+i 3 •..�; •�..: �/, •� t` ��t ,F„o-'Y�.j.,,,,*'^+,.,...wy;,y z�`",yas.�+...z t:
ko
4�^- ,5_;r��,
� K_ •C7 f-vsr f+'+k„J w. F 4y +,J+. � r ) � r') 7.aY�. �r 3c :+�� {,p, .�i ��� —•�"�, �'
3
yiaS ;` ti S-
'
.`i
Al
�3, . � t r �L t / Cf •[� , �svr r�M + � 1r � a/�"F I, � � ?
✓ -• j .�- � y!lv- •'�-7e.r fl,j � T' ,r . r {r "--�i :t�'�t e- a�l.� "`• ��y r !
3� +�1 •I �4�:J• /'n7 �: st.Yt� ?,�fr _i %r a j) / f�• f % f �. f � ../
f K, t .r..r ,s''�a. ( ; .!R t s J !o �'�• r• j. J .+ r
t v
�'�."'t 1 � f �r �+,�/' ys_• i�f ; }li r�'�� � �?#; � �� 4 j K. � f ._.
Y l �
v-
j a �., " s � � .-, ..�,'' ��'�� icy l•.
Oil
,� ►� n s > � r. � �Fa� `. ,

y�
-,�j`2 .ti � ;c � •r tir t " tt'} to Rf {^"
ii- + .
Y
a
rri
- 1
IL
IL
'� •• - '• _ ' � '.�! �� •mac' <It< _ �,i'..
� � - .: "•jt� - � ` �•' ply' :!
i
tit
���..
iIis`Ott
or
T

I.
�•�� ��• °••••� •.•ww ��•� ^� bite rnotograpns - uncomton uncoin
w�Y-�
l
a, moo•- -r_.�p "ai w
Photograph #7 - Existing Taxiway
maiviouai
PL
Nil' -Q, '
% of "'fir 3 'h
s "
os'O Y61 # tom. h h
J4 *16 IK
Mb
It it
a
a �h
doq p m a
Photograph #8 - Existing Localizer

r441�
%
E 11 MeIem
PROGRAM
January 10, 2012
Joe Tate Jr
Lincolnton Lincoln County Regional Airport
714 Jack Dellinger Drive
Iron Station NC 28080 Expiration of Acceptance July 10 2012
Protect Lincoln County Regional Airport Runway Safety Improvements County Lincoln
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced protect as indicated in the table below Please
note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for protect impacts It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be
approved You must also comply with all other state federal or Iocal government.permits regulations or authonzations associated
with the proposed activity including SL 2009 337 An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by
S L 2011 343
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit1401 Certification/CAMA permit within this fame frame, this acceptance will expire It is the applicant s
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permits) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www nceep net
Based on the information Supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table The amount of mitigation required for this impact is determined by permitting agencies
Impact
River
Basin
CU
Location
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
(Sq Ft )
Buffer II
(Sq Ft )
Cold
Cool
WRi
ar ian
Non Ri arian
Coastal Marsh
Catawba
03050101
0
Q
0
0
0
0
0
Upon receipt of payment EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation The mitigation will be performed in
accordance with the N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program In Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28 2010
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Kelly Williams at
[phone]
Sincerely
Mi relEffison
Deputy Director
cc Karen Higgins NCDWQ Wedands/401 Unit
Steve Kichefski USACE Asheville
Alan Johnson NCDWQ Mooresville
Eric Mularski agent
File
RUtoratg F Prot" Our Stag
e ,A
MUM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program 1652 Mad Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1652 / 919 715 0476 / www nceep net

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville North Carolina 28801
November 16 2011
Mr Chris Daves
S &ME Inc
134 Suber Road
Columbia South Carolina 29210
Subject Endangered and Threatened Species Assessment Lmcolnton Lincoln County Airport —
Runway 5 Improvements Lincoln County North Carolina
Dear Mr Daves
In your letter dated October 14, 2011 (received on October 20 2011), you requested our
comments on the subject project We have reviewed the information you presented and are
providing the following comments in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act, as amended (16 U S C 661 667e) and section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U S C 1531 1543) (Act)
Endangered Species — According to the information in your letter, you conducted field surveys
on September 12 2011 and October 11 2011 for species federally listed as endangered or
threatened on the project site You state that no endangered or threatened species that occur
within Lincoln County were found during the field surveys Based on the information provided,
we agree that no listed species occur on the site and we concur with your determination that the
proposed project will have no effect on federally listed species Therefore we believe the
requirements under section 7 of the Act are fulfilled However obligations under section 7 of
the Act must be reconsidered if (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action
that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this
action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review or (3) a new
species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments If we can be of assistance or if you
have any questions please do not hesitate to contact Mr Bryan Tompkins of our staff at
828/258 3939, Ext 240 In any future correspondence concerning this project please reference
our Log Number 4 2 12 024

Nr-'TH CAROLINA STATE CLEARING —)U
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRAT_ _,N
INTERGO '* "AL P�
COUNTY LINCOLN F03 AIRPOR � �
MS RENEE GLEDHILL - EARLEY
'SE
STATE NUMBER 12 -E- 0000 -00
DATE RECEIVED 08/29/2011
AGENCY RESPONSE 09/26/2011
REVIEW CLOSED 09/29/2011
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
MSC 4617 - ARCHIVES BUILDING
RALEIGH NC
J /y e.tll
�I f
/
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
tic a�
(5
(V
CC &PS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
CENTRALINA COG
DENR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
5c`"LA44`r
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
?Ali
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT NCDOT Division of Aviation
TYPE National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
DESC Runway safety area improvements for the Lincolnton- Lincoln County Regional
Airport entails capturing existing 200 foot paved blast pad at the end of Runway
05 as new runway back - taxiing for takeoffs on Runway 05 - extension of partial
taxiway to new end of Runway 05
The attached project has been submitted to the N C State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 -1301
If additional review time is needed please contact this office at (919)807 -2425
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED ❑ NO COMMENT COMMENTS ATTACHED
I 0
SIGNED BY l-�C
t DATE
2
-�. Nov 2411 .'A
jl
SEP 0 1 2011

i
North Carohna Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona tit Barto
Bet erl L\ e% I erdue C o erno
Adrtunt trator
Lord i Ca hA Secretan
I t n I C. o Deputy S etan
I�
t
NOV 2011
=r,
November 8 2011
F lUv�
'�
DWOW4 s oft
Jeff Lvnn
Lmcolnton /Lincoln County Regional - �irport -luthonty
714 Jack Dellinger Dr
-< l�
4^ •-�
Iron Station NC 28080
Ofhe of %reh es and H ton
D ti on of H stoncal Re ourcc
Da td Brook arectur
Re Lincolnton/ Lincoln Count] Regional kirport Improvements Lincoln County CH 11 1729
Dear Mr Lynn
We have received notification from the State Clearinghouse concerning the above project and the Phase I
Cultural Resource Investigation Report.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area Based on our knowledge of the
area it is unlikely- that any archaeological resources that may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of
Historic Places will be affected bl the project We therefore recommend that no archaeological investigation
be conducted in connection with this project
For the purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, we concur with
the report s findings that the following properties are not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic
Places
♦ McDowell House (Structure LC 1)
♦ Carpenter House (Structure LC 2) and,
♦ Carpenter Cottage (Structure LC 3)
),ccordmgly we also concur with the report s finding that the proposed project will ha '. e no adverse effect on
historic properties
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the rational Histone Preservation Net and the
A.dvisorl Council on Historic Preservation s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800
Locanoa 109 l a r 1 n -. Street RA1ei h vC_ 7(01 Madmg Addte 4! 1 \nail Scn c Cc Rai tah N(, - 699 -40 Telephone /Pax (919) 80 6 70/80 1590

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill Earle) environmental review coordinator at 919 807 6579 In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number
Sincerely
(�� '""" v
6=/Ramona M Bartos
cc State Clearinghouse