20120517 Ver 1_401 Application_20120512

1
E NGINEERING & H YDROGEOLOC'Y
231 HAYWOOD STREET ASHEVILLE NC 28801
TEL [phone] FAC 828 281 3351
WWW ALTAMONT6NVIROHNENTAIL CON
May 22 2012
Ms Karen Higgins
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality 401 /Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699 1650
Subject Additional Documentation Requested by DENR
Electrolux Expansion
1310 Fanning Bridge Road
Fletcher North Carolina
Dear Ms Higgins
20 205 1 7
2 0 r
f
Pleasc find attached to this letter the documents requested In your correspondence letter dated May 17
2012 from the Division of Water Quality to me
b
The additional information requested indicated that Minkles LLC was shown as dissolved Based on a
phone conversation wish you yesterday we understand that this was a mistake The Secretary of State
document attached to this letter shows that Minkles LLC is in fact a North Carolina licensed company The
attached report printed from the Department of the Secretary of State website indicates that Minkles LLC
has a current active status
Five copies of a completed Application for Department of the Army Permit form are also attached Lastly
please find attached five copies of an Agent Authorization Form signed by Minkles LLC for the Electrolux
property
If you have any additional questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me
at (828)2813350 Thank you for your time and consideration on this project
Sincerely
A ONT ENVIRONM NTAL
Joel
Enclosures
.�'-Z
PG
MAY
E')
DENR WlyiFt Qi;rsLITY
Department of the Secretary of State status report for Minkles LLC kone copy only)
Five copies of the Application for Department of the Army Permit
Five copies of the Agent Authorization Form
Check for $570 to the Division of Water Quality
Five copies of the Individual Permit Application dated April 19 2012
Five I opies of the Request for Jurisdictional Determination dated April 9 2011
P \Acadia t apitdl Group \Hr rtrolux Site \DLNR \Cover Letter To DENR With Additional Documentation Docx

w
Y
4-.
O
a�
U
O
O
t8
U
U-
Oj
C
O
N
Yl
Lw� d CD
W
0 C � y
IL�j /�J o dr' °-' U)
V
CY v/ f CY d LL
40
C
C N
CM
0 O N O
w >. !. N
m
N
Z N O1
1n N
S�yyrr
cli
m O
X w c m CD Y
IN
CY € N
u LL N LL N (o
% w
z
0 0
Z a c_
F
m o t
fi ° Q w
U) _
U c N °
U y 5
ma U mn
m
"' (n
V 3 V
5 J l0 7
..I O) D.
W 0 L
a o
w m a
cL
a
y
7 N
1 9? T L W a a
d
Na -V N 3: 'o
fAU Z � HN
►7
a
M
M
N
O
N
w
0

201 205 1 T
U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
OMB APPROVALNO 0710.0003
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
EXPIRES 31 AUGUST 2019
133 CFR 3951
Public reporting for this collection of inforrnatrun lb estimated to average 11 hours par response including the lime for revlowing Instructions searching
existing data sources gathering and maintaining the date needed and completing and ravlawing the collection or information Send comments tug arding
lids buden eatiindlu or any other aspect of the collection of Information Including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department or Defense
Washinolnn Headquarters Executive Services and Communications Directorate Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget Paperwork Reduction Project (0710 0003) Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law no person shall be
subject to any penally for tailing to comply with a collection of information If it dusb itul display a currently valid ONO control number Plesso UO NOT
RETURN your form to either of chose addresses Completed applications must bp subm tied to the District Crigmeer having Jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authentic Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 33 USC 403 Clean Water Act Serllon 404 13 USC 1344 Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries
Act Section 103 33 USC 1413 Regulatory Programs of lho Corps of Engineers rinal Rule 33 CFR 320 332 Principal Purpose Information provided on
this form will be trued in evalualinq the application to a permit Routine Uses This information may be shared with ilia Department of Justice and otter
federal btate anid lut al government agencies and the public and maybe made available as part or a public notice as required by Federal law Submission
of twptmtnrl Infafmalion ib voluntary however if Information is not provided pie permit application Carmel be evalueled not wo a peril be Issued One sel
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show lhL location and character of the proposed activity must be ailachPrl In this application (son
sample drawings andlor instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having Jurisdiction over the location of Pie proposed act vlty, An application
that is not completed in full will be returned
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED i3Y THE CORPS)
1 APPLICATION NO
2 FIELO OFFICE CODE
3 DATE RECEIVED
4 DATE APPLICATION COMPLETt
(ITEMS BFLOW TO BE FILLED BYAPFLiCANT)
5 All LK AN i b NAMh
8 AUTHORIZErl AGFNT S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First I)dv►d Middle Last Gibbons
l-abl JIMI Middle David Last Lail,
Company Minhle% 1 I (
Company Allamtnit I nvrnnmLatal Inc
E mall Address dn%gibb,0%,i%hcll nU
E mail Address ) lL►al. (('I"altaniontenvironm►.nlyd cam
G APPIJCANTS ADDRESS
g AGENT S ADDRESS
Addn bs 400 South W coal 51 1250
Address 211 1loy%%i od St
City 0811 is Stain I X Zip 75202 Country LISA
City A +hcvdle Staa N( tip 2b801 Country USA
7 APPI ICANr%PHONL NOs yr /AREA L UUt
10 AGENTS PHONE NOs wlAREA CODr
a Rmidance It BUbrtesb c Fax
a Residence b Buellocs c Fax
211 747 0150 214 717 1710
1 828 281 3350 828 281 3131
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
i 1 f hereby aulhonze r Joel l) Lank to ucl in my bel calf ab my agLnl In the processing of this application and to furnish upon request
rupplemental information In support of this permit appl canon
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
�^ NAME LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12 PROJL(.T NAME OR TITLE ( co in trucilons)
W,trulu\ I \p i nmon
13 NAME OF WATERBODY IF KNOWN (it applicable)
14 PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
t Iniunned l rihul ir) fo I ruwh 13ttn id Rn ci
Address 1310 railning 13i idgc
D t1
15 LOCATION OF PROJECT
Cit/ I letehel S 2
Lulluie N 35433665 longitude W 81521181
16 OTI ICR LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS IF KNOWN (see instructions) �. h Y R J
A VI a
State Tax Parcel ID 911371758100(X)0 MunichpalllyAshclIlk
Sadaut l ovmshhp f ILILhci Range N )� QUf�LITY
DER
Bra
CNG r ORM 4345 OCT 2010 EUITiONOt• OCT 2004IS OBSOLETE rr rorern clmvor

17 DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From Interstate 26 exit at Exit 40 Head west on Highway 280 for approximately 0 5 miles Turn IeA on Fanning Bridge Road and site is
first drive on left at 1310 Fanning Bridge Road Please refer to Figure 1 Site Location Map
18 Nature of AcOvity (Description of prolecl include all features)
The project comprises of constroction of a 300 000 square foot additton onto the existing 400 000- square -foot Electrolux Facility on a
zoned industrial site. The existing building will be expanded in two areas One area will occur to the northwest of the existing building
and will be approximately 200 000 square feet built in an L shape configuration The other area will occur to the southwest of the
existing building and will be approximately 100 000 square feet built in a rectangular configuration The building expansion will be
consti ucted of material similar to the existing building which is mostly concrete flooring with steel framing and metal siding The
expansion will require grading work with both cut and fill of existing soil on site Additionally the shipping entrance will be reconfigured
to have the entrance off of Highway 280 instead of Fanning Bridge Road The expansion will Impact 614 linear feet of stream and 0 006
acres of wetland The stream will be placed Ina culvei t from where it exits the existing culvert on the west side of the current parking area
to where grading for the expansion terminates Please refe► to Appendix A Site Plan and Figure 2 Stream and Wetland Map
19 Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project see Instructions)
The client who leases the Minkleb LLC property is Eleetrolux Electrolux has expanded their operations and in order to accommodate
their growth the building will need to increase in size or else Electrolux will move their operations to a different facility outside of the
state of North Carolina taking with them approximately 267 local jobs The construction of the expansion needs to begin by September
2012 for the project to remain viable The project is scheduled to be completed in December 2012
USE BLOCKS 20 23 IF DREDGED ANDIOR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20 Reason(s) for Discharge
The specific purpose of putfing fill material into the existing stream and wetland is to allow for the existing stream to be placed into a
culvert to create the area for the expansion to be constructed The proposed configuration of the expansion was selected to impacted the
least amount of streams and wetlands possible within the site s parcel boundary
21 Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type In Cubic Yards
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount In Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
Cut sod native to the site 200 cubic yards
22 Surface Area In Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filed (see Instructions)
Acres 0 006 of wctland
or
Unear Feet 614 of stream
23 Description of Avoidance Minimization and Compensation (see Instructions)
The expansion is avoiding approximately 1200 Imeat feet of streams and 0 3 acies of wetlands on remaining portions of the property
Additionally the configuration of the proposed construction plan has been modified to minimize impacts to existing streams and will leave
an additional 200 linear feet of stream un impacted totaling 1 40D linear feet. Compensatory mitigation will he performed by purchasing
credits from the North Carolina Rcosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP)
ENG FORA? 4346 OCT 2040

24 Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? XQYes []No IF YES DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
I Inmmng Rork utcl udml, but not Irmltcd to a prt, conslrur.tion topubuaphie %uric) of thi,eapanion area architectural design and
unruronnienhil a orl, for the expansion has either taken place or is undcr%%ay Construction nor t.arlh moving work has begun at the site
25 Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners lessees Etc Whose Property Adjoins the Walerbody (I more fhm cmbe entered here please egad a stppememal hsq
a Address 13011 annum Widgt, Ito id
City Iletchcr State Al( Zip 28732
b Address 61 ft.nnmil l)nvL
City Iletchcr State N( Zip 28732
c Address
city State Zip
d Address
City State lip
e Address
City State Zip
20 LIM of Other CeilifiLdleb w AppiuvdWDeidals received front other Federal Slate or Local Agencies for Work Described In This Application
AGENCY 1 YPE APPROVAL IDENTIfICAT10N DATF APPI IFn DATE APPROVFD DATE DENIED
NUMBER
Would include but is not restricted to zoning budding and flood plain pemuls
27 Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described In [his application I ceib Ihat this tDformabon in this application is
complete and accurate I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or in a�iifig as the duty authorized agent of the
appicanL
ti.a-r'q� � 1�-1 20l L. /,. / _ 20120423
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE ,SIGNATUR19OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed
18 U S C Section 1001 provides that Whoever to any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies conceals or covers up any tnck scheme or disguises a material fact or makes any false fichhous or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry shall be fined not more than $10 000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both
ENG FORM 434,) OCT2010

[ E`NGINEERIiVG & H Y b ROGEOL04GY
231 HAYWOOD STREET ASHEVILLE NC 28801
TEL [phone] FAG 828 281 3351
WWW ALTANONTRNVIRONNUNTAL CON
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCELID 9643717581
STREET ADDRESS 1310 Fanning Bridge Road
Fletcher, North Carolina 28732
Please print
Property Owner David Gibbons. as Managing Member for Minkles LLC
The undersigned registered property owner(s) of the above noted property do hereby authorize
Joel Lenk , of Altamont Environmental. Inc.
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing issuance and acceptance of this
permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above)
400 South Record Street. Suite 1250
Dallas, Texas 75202
Telephone [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted In this application Is true and accurate to the best of our
knowledge
�1• ;vim\,- _
Authorized Signature
Date _April 16.2012

=E. NGINELRiNG & H YDROGEOLOGY
131 HAYWOOD STREET ASHEVILLE NC 28801
TEL [phone] FAc 828 281 3351
WWTN ALTAMONTENVIRONMENTAL CON
2Q120517
May 10 2012
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality 401 /Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699 1650
Subject Individual Permit Application and Jurisdictional Determination Data provided to the USACE
Electrolux Expansion
1310 Fanning Bridge Road �
Fletcher North Carolina $
Dear 401 /Wetlands Unit 4
Please find along with this letter the documents that were provided to the United States Army Corps of
Engineeers ( USACE) titled Individual Permit (IP) Application dated April 19 2012 and Request for
Jurisdictional Determination (JD) dated April 9 2012 for the Electrolux Expansion project in Fletcher North
Carolina Due to the amount of impacts to streams an Individual Permit was required for proposed
expansion activities in lieu of a Pre construction Notification Additionally please be aware that the figures
in the JD package predate the figures in the IP package and that the IP figures are the most recent and most
accurate figures for the site (notably Figures 2 3 and Aiton drawing C101)
Thank you for your time and consideration on this project Please feel free to call or respond with any
questions or comments
Sincerely
A7Le RONMENTAL INC MAY >' 4 2012
DENR WATE=R QUALITY
Wetlands & St watw l3ranch
J
Enclosures Check for $570 to the Division of Water Quality
Five copies of the individual Permit Application dated April 19 2012
Five copies of the Request for Jurisdictional Determination dated April 9 2012
P \Acadia Capital Group \Electrolux Site \IP Appiication \Cover Letter To DENR Dory

ALTAtiiONT E MRONNIENTAL,
. .
231 HAYWOOD STREET ASHEVILLE NC 28801
TEL [phone] FAC 828 281 3351
WWW ALTANONTENVIRONNENTAL CON
Transmitted by email
Tasha L McCorm►ck@usace army mil
April 19 2012
Ms Tasha McCormick
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
U S Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District
151 Patton Avenue Room 208
Asheville North Carolina 28801
Subject Individual Permit Application
Electrolux Expansion
Fletcher North Carolina
Dear Ms McCormick
Enclosed with this letter you will find an Individual Permit application prepared by Altamont Environmental
Inc on behalf of Minkles LLC Minkles LLC owns parcel number 9643717581 which contains an existing
400 000 square foot building Electrolux is the current tenant of that building and has requested that
Minkles LLC construct a 300 000 square foot expansion in order to maintain operations at their current
location The proposed expansion will impact 614 linear feet of stream and 0 006 acres of wetland
Altamont Environmental Inc and Minkles LLC appreciate your time and consideration on this project
Please feel free to call or respond with any questions or comments that you may have
Since
AMONT ENVI
Joel enk P G
Enclosures Individual Permit Application
Figure 1 —Site Location Map
Figure 2— Stream and Wetland Map
Appendix A -Site Plan Prepared by David Alton of Alton Anderson Architecture
Appendix B -NC SHPO Map
Appendix C -NC EEP Letter
P \Acadia Capital Group \Electrolux Site \IP Application \Cover Letter Docx

INDIVIDUAL PERMIT APPLICATION

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Finding for Above Numbered
Permit Application
This document constitutes the Environmental Assessment 404(b)(1) Guidelines Evaluation Public Interest
Review and Statement of Findings
1 Application as described in the public notice
APPLICANT Acadia Capital Group LLC /Mmkles LLC --%> '�00 6 lord J* a�Q
w.QA .�Z "T X -75 Zo 2-
WATERWAY & LOCATION Unnamed Tributary to the French Broad River Fletcher North Carolina
(Figure 1)
LATITUDE & LONGITUDE Latitude North 35 433665
Longitude East 82 533181
PROJECT PURPOSE
Basic Construct a 300 000- square foot addition onto the existing 400 000 square foot Electrolux
Facility (Appendix A) on a zoned industrial site
Overall The client who leases the Acadia Capital Group LLC /Minkles LLC property is Electrolux
Electrolux has expanded their operations and in order to accommodate their growth the budding will
need to increase in size or else they will have to move their operations to a different facility outside of
the state of North Carolina taking with them approximately 267 local Jobs The expansion of the facility
will impact 614 linear feet of stream and 0 006 acres of wetland The applicant will purchase
compensatory mitigation credits for the stream impacts from the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NCEEP) Furthermore the applicant strongly considered proposing on site
mitigation for stream impacts however this option was not selected due to concerns associated with
the timing of receiving an Individual Permit for this type of mitigation initiating construction of the
expansion project and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and North Carolina Division
of Water Quality (DWQ) priorities regarding preferred methods for obtaining compensatory mitigation
Water Dependency Determination The building expansion has been designed to impact the least
amount of stream and wetland possible while taking into consideration the restrictions associated with
the parcel size topography and access for the expansion that will include a new entrance that will allow
tractor trailer trucks to safely navigate in and out of the facility
PROPOSED WORK
Avoidance and Minimization Information The expansion is avoiding approximately 1200 linear feet of
streams and 0 3 acres of wetlands on remaining portions of the property Additionally the
configuration of the proposed construction plan has been modified to minimize impacts to existing
streams and will leave an additional 200 linear feet un impacted totaling 1400 linear feet
Compensatory Mitigation Compensatory mitigation will be performed by purchasing credits from the
NCEEP
Page 1

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
EXISTING CONDITIONS According to the USACE and DWQ, and Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets
completed for the site the existing condition of the streams on the site are Poor —Fair The site has
historically been impacted from the construction of Interstate 26 adjacent to the Permit Area parcel
development of the existing Electrolux facility in the 1980s and development upstream of the Electrolux
facility in the 1990s All of this development has resulted in large amounts of deforestation creation of
impervious surface and the resulting hydrologic changes in the watershed Additionally this
development has culverted large sections of the existing stream which has further impacted habitat and
stream condition (Figure 2)
2 Authority
® Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U S C §403)
® Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U S C §1344)
❑ Section 103 of the Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U S C 1413)
3 Scope of Analysis
a NEPA (Write an explanation of rationale in each section as appropriate)
(1) Factors
(i) Whether or not the regulated activity comprises merely a link in a corridor type project The
project is not merely a Imk in a corridor type project
(u) Whether there are aspects of the upland facility in the immediate vicinity of the regulated
activity which affect the location and configuration of the regulated activity A portion of the
building expansion will impact an existing stream However a majority of the building
expansion will occur in an upland area The budding expansion has been designed to impact
the least amount of stream and wetland possible while taking into consideration the
restrictions of the parcel size topography and access for the expansion that will include a new
entrance that will allow tractor trailer trucks to safely navigate in and out of the facility
(Appendix A)
(iii) The extent to which the entire project will be within the Corps jurisdiction 614 feet of stream
and 0 006 acres of wetland are the only aspects of the expansion project within the USACE
jurisdiction
(iv) The extent of cumulative Federal control and responsibility The extent of cumulative Federal
control is limited to the stream and wetland impacts and associated regulatory requirements
Other Federal control associated with the proposed expansion include compliance with the
Americans with Disabilities Act
(2) Determined scope
® Only within the footprint of the regulated activity within the delineated water
❑ Over entire property Explain
Page 2

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
b NHPA Permit Area
(1) Tests Activities outside the waters of the United States ® are/[] are not included because all of
the following tests ❑ are /® are not satisfied Such activity ® would/0 would not occur but for
the authorization of the work or structures within the waters of the United States Such activity
is /❑ is not integrally related to the work or structures to be authorized within waters of the United
States (or conversely the work or structures to be authorized must be essential to the
completeness of the overall project or program) and Such activity ® is /❑ is not directly
associated (first order impact) with the work or structures to be authorized Explain The building
expansion encroaches on an adjacent stream and a wetland No impacts would occur if the building
expansion was not constructed Therefore the Permit Area will include the Limits of Disturbance
from the building expansion
(2) Determined scope Describe The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Online
GIS Web Mapping Service has been referenced to determine if an NHPA site could potentially be
located within the subject property Nothing of historical significance was identified within the
Permit Area in the SHPO database (Appendix B) Therefore an archeological study is not proposed
for this project However if during construction an area or object that appears to be of historical
significance is identified construction will stop immediately until the area or object has been
properly classified
c ESA Action Area
(1) Action area means all areas to be affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action and not merely
the immediate area involved in the action
(2) Determined scope Describe The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program database was
referenced and there does not appear to be threatened or endangered species within the Permit
Area or immediately downstream Additionally no threatened or endangered species have been
identified during site visits by Altamont Environmental Inc ( Altamont) However if a potential
threatened or endangered species is identified during construction then work will stop immediately
until the species has been properly classified Additionally the tributary flows through multiple
culvert and manmade channels associated with the airport facility downstream of the site before
emptying into the French Broad Rarer
(3) Public notice comments ❑ NA Public notice has not been issued at this time
(1) The public also provided comments at ❑ public hearing ❑ public meeting and /or ❑ Explain
(2) Commenters and issues raised
Name Issue
Page 3

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
(3) Site ® was/F-1 was not visited by the Corps to obtain information in addition to delineating
jurisdiction Include dates and synopsis of information gathered if site was visited The site was
visited by Ms Tasha McCormick with the USACE and Mr Kevin Barnett with the DWQ on March 27
2012 The intent of the site visit was to verify stream and wetland site conditions characterized by
Altamont
(4) Issues identified by the Corps Describe One wetland area was identified that Altamont had not
previously delineated Since that meeting the wetland has been delineated and was determined to
be approximately 0 006 acres in size Based on correspondence with USACE mitigation will not be
required for this area due to it being less that 010 of an acre in size
(5) Issues /comments forwarded to the applicant ❑ NA/0 Yes
(6) Applicant replied /provided views ❑ NA /® Yes
(7) The following comments are not discussed further in this document as they are outside the Corps
purview ® NA/ ❑ Yes Explain
4 Alternatives Analysis
a Basic and Overall Project Purpose (as stated by applicant and independent definition by Corps)
® Same as Project Purpose in Paragraph 1
❑ Revised Insert revised project purpose here and explain why it was revised
b Water Dependency Determination
® Same as in Paragraph 1
❑ Revised Insert revised water dependency determination here if it has changed due to changing
project purpose or new information
c Applicant preferred alternative site and site configuration
® Same as Project Description in Paragraph 1
❑ Revised Explain any difference from Paragraph 1
Criteria
Issue
Measurement and /or constraint
e g Wetlands
Acres of direct impact
Page 4

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
d Off site locations and configuration(s) for each (e g alternatives located on property not currently
owned by the applicant are not practicable under the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines as this project is the
construction or expansion of a single family home and attendant features such as a driveway garage
storage shed or septic field or the construction or expansion of a barn or other farm building or the
expansion of a small business facility and involves discharges of dredged or fill material less than two
acres into Jurisdictional wetlands ) Alternatives located on property not currently owned by the
applicant are not practical under the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines as this project is an expansion of an
existing large distribution facility The property is owned by Minkles LLC and leased by Electrolux In
order for the property manager to retain Electrolux as a tenant the facility must expand to
accommodate their growing needs
Off site locations and configurations
Description
Comparison to criteria
Site A
Purchase an additional parcel and build a new facility
Site B
Purchase an additional parcel with an existing facility
of the needed size
Site C
Move Electrolux to a different site owned by a
different property owner
e (® NA) Site selected for further analysis and why
f On site configurations
Description
Comparison to criteria
Plan Al
Budd a second story onto the budding instead of
budding out
Plan A2
Budd addition to the north and east instead of north
and west
Plan A3
Build addition to the north instead of north and west
g Other alternatives not requiring a permit including No Action
Page 5

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
Description
Comparison to criteria
No Action
Do not build onto the existing facility and leave the site
as is
Plan Al
Build a second story onto the building instead of
budding out
Plan A3
Build addition to the north instead of north and west
h Alternatives not practicable or reasonable Describ %xpla►n
© Site A is not reasonable because the cost of this option would greatly exceed the funds necessary to
construct the proposed expansion Additionally the carbon footprint to budding a facility of the
appropriate size would greatly exceed the carbon footprint of the preferred alternative Due to the
topography and hydrology characteristic of this region it would be likely that streams and /or
wetlands would be impacted by this alternative as well Therefore moving the Electrolux
operations to a parcel and constructing a new building is not practicable or reasonable
o Site B is not reasonable because finding a nearby parcel with an existing building that is large
enough to serve the needs of the Electrolux operations may be difficult or impossible If a large
enough budding were to be found the new facility would need to be prepared and /or modified to
accommodate the specific needs of the Electrolux operations therefore the cost associated with the
purchase of the of the new land and the building and the costs of necessary upgrades as opposed to
the preferred alternative (constructing an addition to the existing facility) makes Site B not
practicable or reasonable
O Site C is not reasonable because the applicant would lose Electrolux as a client and tenant The
applicant would need to find another industry that would be able to move into the building to
replace the Electrolux operations or potentially sell the property if it were to go unoccupied for a
long period of time This alternative has already been pursued and will likely result in Electrolux
operations moving to South Carolina resulting in the loss of approximately 300 local Jobs
® Plan Al is not practicable for the expansion needed for Electrolux's operations as a distribution
center because of the nature of shipping and receiving operations needing to occur on ground level
Additionally the existing budding was not constructed to be able to bear the load of an additional
level
O Plan A2 is not practicable due to the layout of the parcel This option would potentially impact more
linear feet of stream and acres of wetlands if expanded in this direction Additionally this
alternative would require more grading work due to topography and provides less room for the
expansion
Page 6

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
c Plan A3 is not feasible although this alternative would impact the least amount of streams and
wetlands Due to the layout of the parcel there is not enough space on the north side of the parcel
for the budding to be expanded to a size to accommodate the need for Electrolux operations
C The No Action plan is not feasible because the applicant and property owner would lose Electrolux
as a client and tenant The applicant would need to find another industry that would be able to
move into the building to replace Electrolux or sell the property if it were to go unoccupied with
either outcome resulting in a loss to the local economy and potential impacts to streams and
wetlands at another site
Least environmentally damaging practicable alternative Describ %xplam The least environmentally
damaging practicable alternative is the preferred alternative The preferred alternative described in this
permit would add an expansion onto the existing building to the north and west This alternative
impacts the least amount of stream and wetlands while still providing a large enough expansion to
accommodate the needs of the Electrolux operations The proposed alternative will occur in an already
developed watershed area on a parcel that is already zoned industrial rather than potentially
developing less impacted property elsewhere Additionally the preferred alternative provides a safe
and efficient entrance to the expansion for trucks It requires the least amount of grading work of all
the alternative configurations and therefore has the smallest carbon footprint Lastly the preferred
alternative is the most cost - efficient option for the budding expansion and provides the largest benefit
to the local economy
5 Evaluation of the 404(b)(1) Guidelines Q NA)
a Factual determinations
Physical Substrate
❑ See Existing Conditions paragraph 1
® The physical substrate will remain intact where the stream impacts will occur because filling
rather than cutting is proposed in the area of stream impact
Water circulation fluctuation and salinity
❑ Addressed in the Water Quality Certification
® A culvert will be installed where the stream impacts will occur This option allows surface water
to flow into the existing stream downstream of the project area
Suspended particulate /turbidity
❑ Turbidity controls in Water Quality Certification
® The installed culvert will reroute the existing stream and will prevent any discharged material
from entering the stream once the culvert's installation is complete Sediment and erosion control
techniques will be employed during all phases of construction of the expansion and will limit the
turbidity in the tributary to below 50 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) A sediment and erosion
Page 7

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
control plan for the development is currently being developed and will be provided to Mr Shane
Briggs of Buncombe County Planning Department
Contaminant availability
® General Condition requires clean fill
Aquatic ecosystem and organism
❑ Wetland /wildlife evaluations paragraphs 5 6 7 & 8
® According to the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet the existing conditions of the site
are Poor —Fair This rating is a result of historic impacts from the construction of Interstate 26 adjacent
to the Permit Area parcel development of the existing Electrolux facility in the 1980s and development
upstream of the Electrolux facility in the 1990s All of this development resulted in deforestation
creation of impervious surface and changes to more natural hydrology including increased stormwater
runoff Additionally this development culverted multiple sections of the existing stream further
impacting habitat and hydrology (Figure 2)
Proposed disposal site
® Public interest paragraph 7
Cumulative effects on the aquatic ecosystem
® See Paragraph 7 e
El
Secondary effects on the aquatic ecosystem
® See Paragraph 7 e
b Restrictions on discharges (230 10)
(1) It ® has/F] has not been demonstrated in paragraph 5 that there are no practicable nor less
damaging alternatives which could satisfy the projects basic purpose The activity l,71 is not
located in a special aquatic site (wetlands sanctuaries and refuges mudflats vegetated shallows
coral reefs riffle & pool complexes) The activity ❑ does/" does not need to be located in a
special aquatic site to fulfill its basic purpose
(2) The proposed activity ❑does /® does not violate applicable State water quality standards or
Section 307 prohibitions or effluent standards (❑ based on information from the certifying agency
Page 8

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
that the Corps could proceed with a provisional determination) The proposed activity ❑ does /®
does not Jeopardize the continued existence of federally listed threatened or endangered species or
affects their critical habitat The proposed activity ❑ does /® does not violate the requirements
of a federally designate marine sanctuary
(3) The activity0will/171 ® will not cause or contribute to significant degradation of waters of the
United States including adverse effects on human health life stages of aquatic organisms
ecosystem diversity productivity and stability and recreation esthetic and economic values
(4) Appropriate and practicable steps ® have/F-1 have not been taken to minimize potential adverse
impacts of the discharge on the aquatic ecosystem (see Paragraph 8 for description of mitigative
actions)
6 Public Interest Review All public interest factors have been reviewed as summarized here Both cumulative
and secondary impacts on the public interest were considered Public interest factors that have had
additional information relevant to the decision are discussed in number 7
+ Benificial effect
0 Negligible effect
Adverse effect
M Neutral as result of mitigative action
+ 0 M
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Conservation
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Economics
®❑ ❑ ❑ Aesthetics
❑ ❑ ❑ ® General environmental concerns
❑ ❑ ®❑ Wetlands
❑ ® ❑ ❑ Historic properties
❑ ❑ ❑ ® Fish and wildlife values
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Flood hazards
1:10 ❑ ❑ Floodplain values
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Land use
❑ ®❑ ❑ Navigation
❑ ®❑ ❑ Shore erosion and accretion
❑ ®❑ ❑ Recreation
❑ ® ❑ ❑ Water supply and conservation
❑ ❑ ❑ ® Water quality
❑ ®❑ ❑ Energy needs
❑ ® ❑ ❑ Safety
Page 9

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
❑ ® ❑ ❑ Food and fiber production
❑ ® ❑ ❑ Mineral needs
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Considerations of property ownership
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Needs and welfare of the people
7 Effects policies and other laws
a ❑ NA
Public Interest Factors (add factors that are relevant to specific project that you checked in number 6 above
and add a discussion of that factor)
Factor
Discussion
Wetlands
There will be a negative impact on approximately
0 006 acres of wetlands that will not be offset by
compensatory mitigation due to the small size of the
wetland Wetlands smaller than 010 acres in size do
not necessarily require compensatory mitigation
b Endangered Species Act ® NA
The proposed project
(1) Will not affect these threatened or endangered species
❑ Any /❑ Explain
(2) May affect but is not likely to adversely affect
Species Explain
(3) ❑ Will /❑ Will not adversely modify designated critical habitat for the
Explain
(4) ❑ Is /❑ is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the
Explain
(5) The Services ❑ concurred/[:] provided a Biological Opinion(s)
Explain
c Essential Fish Habitat Adverse impacts to Essential Fish Habitat ❑ will /® will not result from the
proposed project Explain According to the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet the existing
conditions of the site are Poor —Fair The site has historically been impacted from the construction of
Interstate 26 adjacent to the Permit Area parcel development of the existing Electrolux facility in the
1980s and development upstream of the Electrolux facility in the 1990s All of this development
Page 10

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
resulted in large amounts of deforestation impervious surfaces and the resulting stormwater runoff
Additionally this development culverted large sections of the existing stream further impacting habitat
condition (Figure 3) Therefore the streams proposed to be impacted are not considered Essential Fish
Habitat
d Historic Properties The proposed project ❑ will/1'71 will not have any effect on any sites listed or
eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or otherwise of national state or local
significance based on ❑ letter from SHPO /® the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
Database (Appendix B) Explain
e Cumulative & Secondary Impacts The geographic area for this assessment is the Avery Creek — French
Broad River watershed (HUC060101050704)
(1) Baseline Approximately <1yo of the watershed area is wetland There are also approximately 225
stream miles contained within the watershed comprised of 60% perennial 30% intermittent and
101/0 ephemeral tributaries Corps permits for the period unknown has authorized the fill of
unknown acres and linear feet of stream The projection is that authorizations will continue ❑ at
the current rate/0 increase /® unknown because unknown Natural resource issues of particular
concern [from Corps & non Corps activities] are unknown
(2) Context The proposed project is ® typical of /❑ a precedent /❑ very large compared to /❑ _
other activities in the watershed Development similar to the proposal have occurred
since the development of the Asheville Regional Airport Future conditions are expected to be the
same Besides Corps authorized projects other activities include unknown Resulting natural
resource changes and stresses include unknown These resources are also being affected by
unknown A key issue(s) of concern in this watershed is /are the unknown resulting from wetland
loss
(3) Mitigation and Monitoring The project affects the following key issue(s) 416 linear feet of stream
and 0 006 acres of wetland The magnitude of the proposed effect is neutral because of the
proposed purchase of compensatory mitigation credits through NCEEP within the watershed
Avoidance and minimization methods include siting of the development area which resulted in the
avoidance of 1.400 linear feet of stream that exists on the site that will result in fewer impacts than
if the expansion were sited elsewhere on the property Compensatory mitigation namely purchase
of credits from NCEEP and monitoring described herein will result in a neutral overall impact to the
watershed
Expand this section commensurate with the level of impact and appropriate level of existing and reasonably
foreseeable watershed stress to aquatic resources
f Corps Wetland Policy Based on the public interest review herein the beneficial effects of the project
outweigh the detrimental impacts of the project
g (❑ NA) Water Quality Certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act ❑ has/[7' has not yet
been issued by❑ _/® State /❑ Commonwealth
Page 11

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
h (® NA) Coastal Zone Management (CZM) consistency /permit Issuance of a State permit certifies that
the project is consistent with the CZM plan ❑ There is no evidence or indication from the
that the project is inconsistent with their CZM plan
i Other authorizations
J (® NA) Significant Issues of Overriding National Importance Explain
8 Compensation and other mitigation actions
a Compensatory Mitigation
(1) Is compensatory mitigation required? ® yes ❑ no [If no do not complete the rest of this
section]
(2) Is the impact in the service area of an approved mitigation bank? ❑ yes ® no
(i) Does the mitigation bank have appropriate number and resource type of credits available? ❑
yes ❑ no
(3) Is the impact in the service area of an approved in lieu fee program? ® yes ❑ no
(i) Does the in lieu fee program have appropriate number and resource type of credits available?
® yes ❑ no Please see attached letter from NCEEP (Appendix C)
(4) Check the selected compensatory mitigation option(s)
❑ mitigation bank credits
® in lieu fee program credits
❑ permittee responsible mitigation under a watershed approach
❑ permittee responsible mitigation on site and in kind
❑ permittee responsible mitigation off site and out of kind
(5) If a selected compensatory mitigation option deviates from the order of the options presented in
§332 3(b)(2) (6) explain why the selected compensatory mitigation option is environmentally
preferable Address the criteria provided in §332 3(a)(1) (i a the likelihood for ecological success
and sustainability the location of the compensation site relative to the impact site and their
significance within the watershed and the costs of the compensatory mitigation project) Based on
a review of the USACE database for available mitigation banks in the watershed no compensatory
mitigation credits were available through prorate mitigation banks for this watershed at this time
(6) Other Mitigative Actions
9 General evaluation criteria under the public interest review We considered the following within this
document
Page 12

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
a The relative extent of the public and private need for the proposed structure or work (e g Public
benefits include employment opportunities and a potential increase in the local tax base Private
benefits include land use and economic return on the property for transportation projects benefits
include safety capacity and congestion issues ) Explain The extent of public need for the Electrolux
expansion includes assurance that approximately 300 Jobs will remain in Western North Carolina and
not be relocated to another region or state The Electrolux expansion will provide new employment
opportunities Additionally the Electrolux expansion will occur in an already developed watershed
drainage area rather than developing a less impacted property elsewhere Private benefits include land
use and economic return on the property and assurance that Electrolux will remain a tenant of the
existing building
b ® There are no unresolved conflicts as to resource use Check the appropriate box delete the
statements that do not apply and explain
c The extent and permanence of the beneficial and /or detrimental effects which the proposed work is
likely to have on the public and private uses to which the area is suited ® Detrimental impacts are
expected to be minimal although they would be permanent in the construction area The beneficial
effects associated with utilization of the property would be permanent Explain Due to the existing
condition of the on site stream proposed to be impacted being ranked as Fair Poor' the detrimental
impacts of rerouting the existing stream into a culvert are minimal in comparison to a site with Good"
or Excellent' existing conditions The beneficial effects associated with utilization of this site are in the
public s best interest from an economic standpoint
10 Determinations
a Public Hearing Request ❑ NA
❑ I have reviewed and evaluated the requests for a public hearing There is sufficient information
available to evaluate the proposed project therefore the requests for a public hearing are denied
b Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act General Conformity Rule Review The proposed permit action has
been analyzed for conformity applicability pursuant to regulations implementing Section 176(c) of the
Clean Air Act It has been determined that the activities proposed under this permit will not exceed de
minimis levels of direct or indirect emissions of a criteria pollutant or its precursors and are exempted by
40 CFR Part 93 153 Any later indirect emissions are generally not within the Corps continuing program
responsibility and generally cannot be practicably controlled by the Corps For these reasons a
conformity determination is not required for this permit action
c Relevant Presidential Executive Orders
(1) EO 13175 Consultation with Indian Tribes Alaska Natives and Native Hawaiians ® This action has
no substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes Explain if appropriate
(2) EO 11988 Floodplain Management ® Not in a floodplain (❑ Alternatives to location within the
floodplain minimization and compensation of the effects were considered above )
Page 13

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
(3) EO 12898 Environmental Justice In accordance with Title III of the Civil Right Act of 1964 and
Executive Order 12898 it has been determined that the project would not directly or through
contractual or other arrangements use criteria methods or practices that discriminate on the basis
of race color or national origin nor would it have a disproportionate effect on minority or low
income communities
(4) EO13112 Invasive Species
® There were no invasive species issues involved
❑ The evaluation above included invasive species concerns in the analysis of impacts at the project
site and associated compensatory mitigation projects
❑ Through special conditions the permittee will be required to control the introduction and
spread of exotic species
(5) EO13212 and 13302 Energy Supply and Availability ® The project was not one that will increase
the production transmission or conservation of energy or strengthen pipeline safety (❑ The
review was expedited and /or other actions were taken to the extent permitted by law and
regulation to accelerate completion of this energy related (including pipeline safety) project while
maintaining safety public health and environmental protections )
d Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Having reviewed the information provided by the applicant
and all interested parties and an assessment of the environmental impacts I find that this permit action
will not have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment Therefore an
Environmental Impact Statement will not be required
e Compliance with 404(b)(1) guidelines ❑ NA
Having completed the evaluation in paragraph 5 1 have determined that the proposed discharge
complies /❑ does not comply with the 404(b)(1) guidelines
f Public Interest Determination I find that issuance of a Department of the Army permit ® is not/0 is
contrary to the public interest
Page 14

CEXXX XX (District abbreviation) Application XXX XXXX XXXXX (ORM number)
SUBJECT Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above
Numbered Permit Application
PREPARED BY
Project Manager
REVIEWED BY
Date
Date
Chief Regulatory XX District (insert appropriate level reviewer)
APPROVED BY
Date
Colonel Corps of Engineers Commanding (insert appropriate level approver)
Page 15

FIGURES

7- 1 ^ 5 7777 •1�� 5 t T
IN
'L r^F xM ! � j 1'. '' +9r."°"'�..f 1 ` •. \_ • y • • li i ! �.. r+"��i ? � '�.
r -
5 r/, _ yp� �`F i` �.�^rT- �r,7 d,v r I �("� ..- -+ � �t�,. f� � ' �'�.,._ '� � r fF. ^ •
l � 'Y �'r 7.rr � s� F 't� i If M �4 ` 1',b f ,� \`_:1� f•�` �'.7'�_ � i� t f ,--�' ; �1'i •.'� � "}
,.�'�' Y '� l Y' , �{ ,Tj, p: v � ,r _._t {�"".��•:� '�� 'R ' f �• �' !r ,; a �`� �! e t t �`•4 - ti
i)tPrx;;l
r�9� 5ptrjrffJ %i Yti : •1
ifJY••�.r�: °\ "'x..45 -'. r:. -;•S i�� �' h't 1' Y{ t ri.� -. �r .mss- .r•[ Ir e
�.. "�_ �FF t ctur4t ti a { , i •! �i • 1 i ` .41r 1 \l \t51+J1
( ttL 1
'��`(i � 1 �� � \� Gf,� 5 � I _� � 3 +" ,:� +l, *�L li � • } is � Rte{ F 1 j♦�'•�: t t 4" t f.'I{.�a
ur Mtif r'�� i .b � �f-^, rt �.1 " d ��� r- -'b •!t tr
. [� I. Yr •S•-�•\ i''t11 f`�� s- Pr • r 11 + s 1� .b, ����5i l \ j— r•••.a.
�• •v '4 #4^I t t isA. pu ,/ •`r. L VF;'y�j� J
r� •r 1 i 7 s i t
i 1f 1 f t �,\+� t i� _i f ; dr. St; ^C '•`t"',,1`.i -' titi"' i41il
111 ` ` 5 r tr. '"icni• 'tit , .— ytti, i. Pty 1 t �,' j x •�
pow,
',r y I , 1 • +-
a x F \fit `� 14" \ Site Location
f lei -�. 4� f,T lfeG t 1 C vk `•> u `$ T c ' _'f
r •'fib` .y� 1 si ;y ti.AS 67LLE hl° r. 6 .^ r4 -r��, i f 'i _. a r t ;rrt
REG� AlR
1, P0R7'',
yam`'• Y:, i 5 4 5 t, • 1 t.,,, e i i\ •' . •• ., }� { ' )� 1 t ��. — • i :'i t j . t`, t�. t _
I si - `x i t �f ii'x 1 • `� '2 �4
'fit •" `1. �i ! o � ", •4 5 {,!r{ t�i� f � 1 _ � � . ' 4 1 � i `7,`'9 `a. -�•` � ry l tt � : �J,� ,j
^`'r' ? {rrr;•'. F.., �\ }y\9.` ti4 •ti5 xtil PCF�" 11-1 I R.
�` % "�`'\ .i �`; e 4 1 i 14' �jlt� ¢ �' •l; w f� f"tRi t _i t/ i'`Yt y'il.'
i� F YL a : �, "' r e} 4 ;`'s` x.�,ftla� i tl •} !' i� •; t e ' (' �: x:'!� F *s _.
fF r-�yi 'til � s � �r , ,1 ',,� ! 4 �'� t + � �'1. =` t •�,1 lti 4 +f • �� •° . �'�" �'�''. � �r�f.`�.,d.,
jf
}t .• •. S',a�'"' l'9{ jai
%
- - ,.1'pj 'wq4 yi i a, ltiaw�+� J K .'e. �'a ." i. \ ^� •` ' 1 p
' — � - vim'.. -. 1 -• a- t !", i �t !+" fi ".•�'-'k i ___,_. ` �S-t'� '4 ,�. ''.i g l� •R. f
{' _ # ".'� l �. ; , d ` ti.61',E d ✓ l' t•.�.... . •rh Y"es. YF Sit 1. p�
V , •r
'�.{�.�fF_�^•4'\: X - r �.__ `�,, ti+ r F r'.. 1• t•r. sg"- ,�A 11 �,.
i+ r , it t f',' '�sx• _ •• ` +'i.� ..t J 5 t • t •. i a 4 "az•
.r .,�^"` _ �.. x , r k S "��5 ♦ �4�, � � r r� is R� 1 ? . %� t. (T �x_ 1.M.
__y ,5 � •�` y —_ �'�t�If` � *�. �1y �+ xt Se�i �, 94 �
n(b a S "+t tom: �i 15.c ` f r.{ \� f�T• s °�. �..Y ..r.iiZ.1z3A'q''.•✓J_ Y �f
1!4 _.- -rjr ;� ► � �s "� i ttY � rj�,� � 'r`,."' { 1�' d �! �ay.•� . •.'�9•` +•. .�. �' Y rF. a'"+ -.S
• +,.�` A ;, ��• i f t ! i + -F : tp ^c ice+ ! - e
(� �' ��^•i j i.� -`-Y= �°`� ib."'�' + f � l 1 \,f �i � r' "r�° {-�C = � � �s L�'+� i
to
} r�il Sl $ j4 `4`• Fe 17
,� + JAT' 1 t�fif
�`• �� ]1 $�
7,` _ _ _ _- .. 1- ~— i✓` � , `�'s' ,a `x��- �f���.��"� r �t"i��, ' , F.
ti` 1't.'" s .t, ...-.. �,2'. 11. •- r
t
UFS
i'�11 �. ��t,� FB2i l i ��'.<` ✓•'I[�
`t J r I f Fi ( 2 7511
LEGEND
/
PROPERTY BOUNDARY 1 I !
ti 7 i Fi \ 1 . •'
SOURCE: fe1� _y ,,. ��,_ ` %� ; t :•.•, ,.
•pct` .. ra .t
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC. MAP, HENDERSONVILLE QUADRANGLE
AiTA-MONT • SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE
ENGINEERING & HYDROGEOLOGY
231 HAYWOOD STREET. ASHEVILLE. NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC -929- 291.3351 ELECTROLUX
1R—ALTANCRTER•,.ONRSRTAI.CYR 1310 FANNING BRIDGE ROAD I
DRAWN Br: ANNA SAYLOR FLETCHER, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT MANAGER: JOEL LENK SCALE
CLIENT: ACADIA CAPITAL GROUP FEET
0 500 1,000 2,000
DATE: 4/9/2012 PAACADIA CAPITAL GROUP \ELECTROLUX SITE \FIGURES \GIS \FIGURE 2 - SITE LOCATION MAP.MXD

ea
proP�s
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Delineatled Wetland (WA 1)
Approxitnately 0.006 Acres
PROPOSED IMPACTS
STREAM /WETLAND ID
LIMITS OF IMPACT
UT I
NONE
UT 2
NONE
UT 3 -1
284 LINEAR FEET
UT 3 -2
330 LINEAR FEET
WA 1
0.006 ACRES
LEGEND
— CULVERTED STREAM
-- STREAM
ll� APPROXIMATE WETLAND AREA
STREAMS AND WETLANDS PRPOSED FOR IMPACT
Modified Stormwater Detention Basin
EXISTING STORMWATER RETENTION BASIN
I _ gPROPOSED BUILDING EXPANSION
® PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
O EXISTING BUILDING
PARCEL BOUNDARY
I
I
I
I
�lq �
I
1
I
231 HATW000 STREET. AEHETILLE. HC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
A .ALTA110RTRNV18*ftNK TAL.eeR1
DRAWN BY: ANNA SAYLOR SCALE
PROJECT MANAGER: JOEL LENK FEET
CLIENT: ACADIA CAPITAL GROUP 0 50 100 200
DATE: 5/3/2012
Existing Building
Proposed Mod' i
orrnWa etention
Basin
i
i
STREAM AND WETLAND
IMPACT MAP
ELECTROLUX
1310 FANNING BRIDGE ROAD
FLETCHER, NORTH CAROLINA
TAL GROUP \ELECTROLUX SITE \FIGURES \GIS \FIGURE 3 - STREAM
FIGURE
3
IMPACTS SMALL.MXD 1
(
R
�E
I
I
I
I
I
I
k
�s
I
I
I
I
I
�lq �
I
1
I
231 HATW000 STREET. AEHETILLE. HC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
A .ALTA110RTRNV18*ftNK TAL.eeR1
DRAWN BY: ANNA SAYLOR SCALE
PROJECT MANAGER: JOEL LENK FEET
CLIENT: ACADIA CAPITAL GROUP 0 50 100 200
DATE: 5/3/2012
Existing Building
Proposed Mod' i
orrnWa etention
Basin
i
i
STREAM AND WETLAND
IMPACT MAP
ELECTROLUX
1310 FANNING BRIDGE ROAD
FLETCHER, NORTH CAROLINA
TAL GROUP \ELECTROLUX SITE \FIGURES \GIS \FIGURE 3 - STREAM
FIGURE
3
IMPACTS SMALL.MXD 1

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A
Site Plan Prepared by David Aiton
Of Aiton Anderson Architecture

N
N N
`TU
bZ
Q E'er
IL }
VNI-IObVO HIHOIN b2H013'ld
O V O X n
O 1NJV7 1
,
\,N
1
U
-o its '`'
N �
W 2
co
CD
Z• J
I
s
i
Q E'er
IL }
VNI-IObVO HIHOIN b2H013'ld
O V O X n
O 1NJV7 1
,
\,N
1
U
-o its '`'
N �
W 2
co
CD
1 a
I
CD
Ol NOIlI00V NV
p
o3�""
a CN
co
a
N Q
~
y rM
s � 7
Z
IL
rn
U f
0
I
w w LL LL
(�
(n tll f0
N N m
Ul
zz
---- - --'''' / I �/ --
o _ - --- - -- / yLU
_ ..�i �i i j tllltr�_ �'.aa � `� r� < °' I I�j' /^ � '^� � wwz 0
--- -- //�,�� %I
-___ - - - - - - - - — _- -- -A-- - �\*_-- / /III
1 1 , w '' ,� 1 =rr♦., _ `--'^- ,'—.�" -- Jam°` d 1 Of
r r r
y 1 \ I�'I' 1 \ /'/ \`. `_:= __= - :� ` ♦\ III'' II 1 ' III"
I ,
I Ij If rll l i -I I/
I I
I it'll) I -I ITI -I II I IT ` I \\ II I I I I I \ ♦11 8 Q
i I I /1111 L C-
111111 - --
% I 1 I / //' \ ( :4 a rw I \ l- ✓ {� a.
% 1 X 11111 / \ l "° � i y� -'�"\\ \\ \ 1 I I i I 111 I \i�l / ♦ \, I
III J •3 \ \ W 1
"A-
/ / rill III! I \l A.,♦ � \ t
J i l l It �, qF 1 1.01 _ ' I I '� ' 1 I'' �I ✓� / - '' N
1 , / / / 11y 1\ \ \I I t 1 I II /d ✓ 1 p IIII it ��/ / I - - - -'' / / N
/ II
lN� I
% fill 1 ' 111 /i/1
III
- \ \ \I IJit 1 °�,§ I ISM /11111 '/ , ' ''
I
�rR
u / Il 11 ♦1 �� /, i II 11 I i 9 � � /'I�/ {�i� Ifr /al I I / '
r�
I
I
1 I I III
I III it I 1
\\ 1 1 ! IIII 4 it
tol
♦ \I "" � \ D I �(1 // 1 \ I !' / / ' � / III � I F 6wN t _ten
Ilr�' III! /, I 1 I yy a \ / r 1 U1, 1f °r o�vcz o pz
1V 1 111 ' i 1 - -i l 1 II 141 cJ r rn <5 c�ia
rw a
III I I♦ T °T Wv w n r -P,.
1 Jill I fl >II I I m= N
�/ / J � I I j °o..r ° o.a0,+
\
ill(j J ' 1 I
4-
0 a
i
1% r 1
W3
/ /111111j111.1 \I f ✓ �I /IIj111/ I , / r , ,� 11 j ^a N Zx
I / ll 111 ails I III i I ' �' 6 m oZ iN °° - c�ir
/ ly 111 II / I
4
t — Oln rSr N�
A,,II 1 � -
' I flllll111111111 /III
/ I I l 1(111111
°+ /1 / \ \l I l l I I � � � c _,�, -I I /g� I 1'illl�/ '� 1♦ ♦ ` , .\
/ 1 11111111111 I ♦II ) Illy1 \ \ /\` \ ���
1 j I111j111111111 / 1 / �i 11 I yCr'� \ \tiJ�� \\
�It11111- -
/
i [IMIllillllI 9 m r Pfl II _% - �` ♦\ llI
i i' illiill1till l
luli ♦ ib iJliiilily'( /,T-
11Il Y j� ",SIT
N / 11 \I\ 1 ♦� — — _ — — _ - -_ //_ — / — /-/ _/ — —=v ''� /i��'(r�l', — . — \ ♦ \ \ \y \III }�
,cam^ � r. — .yam✓ �./ �mwe _ — '/ // / / \ / 1
$4
1 1, it //'
_ !
y _
1 \'

APPENDIX B
NC SHPO Map

j
- ' y
i
l �
Zn
7 V -
0 E.
■

APPENDIX C
NC EEP Letter

r-;j
g
��etm
PROGRAM
April 17, 2012
David Gibbons
Acadia Capital Group LLC
400 S Record St Suite 1250
Dallas TX 75202 Expiration of Acceptance October 17 2012
Protect Electrolux Expansion County Buncombe
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced protect as indicated in the table below Please
note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for protect impacts It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be
approved You must also comply with all other state federal or local government permits regulations or authorizations associated
with the proposed activity including SL 2009 337 An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by
S L 2011 343
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Ccrtification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire It is the applicant s
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www nceep net
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table The amount of mitigation required for this impact is determined by permitting agencies
Upon receipt of payment EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation The mitigation will be performed in
accordance with the N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecdsystem Enhancement Program In Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28 2010
Thank you for your intere t in the NCEEP If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Kelly Williams at
[phone]
Sincerely
eeHEllison
Deputy Director
cc Karen Higgins NCDWQ Wetlands /401 Unit
Tasha McCormick USACE Asheville
Kevin Barnett NCDWQ Asheville
Anna Saylor /Joel Lenk agent
File
RUM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program 1652 Mad Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1652 / 919 715 0476 / www nceep net
River
Basin
CU
Location
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
(Sq Ft)
Buffer II
(Sq Ft)
Cold F Cool Warm
Riparian Non Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Impact
French
06010105
0 833 0
0 0
0
0
0
Broad
Upon receipt of payment EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation The mitigation will be performed in
accordance with the N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecdsystem Enhancement Program In Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28 2010
Thank you for your intere t in the NCEEP If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Kelly Williams at
[phone]
Sincerely
eeHEllison
Deputy Director
cc Karen Higgins NCDWQ Wetlands /401 Unit
Tasha McCormick USACE Asheville
Kevin Barnett NCDWQ Asheville
Anna Saylor /Joel Lenk agent
File
RUM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program 1652 Mad Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1652 / 919 715 0476 / www nceep net

aE IN�G 1 WE E R I NAG & H Y'D R O,G E�gIL�O G Y 20 1 20 5 f i
231 HAYWOOD STREET ASHEVILLE NC 28801
TEL [phone] FAC 828 281 3351
WWW ALTAMONTENVIRONMENTAL COM
Transmitted by email
Tasha L McCormick @usace army mil
April 2012
Ms Tasha McCormick
United States Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue
Asheville North Carolina 28801
Subject Request for Jurisdictional Determination
Electrolux Site 1310 Fanning Bridge Road
Fletcher North Carolina
Dear Ms McCormick
This letter provides the request for a Jurisdictional Determination at the Electrolux site located in Fletcher
North Carolina The requested determination is for streams and a small wetland that were viewed during a
preliminary site visit on Tuesday March 27 2012 that will be impacted by a proposed expansion of the
building on the site The proposed development plans to impact 832 6 linear feet of perennial and
intermittent stream and 0 006 acres of wetland at the Electrolux site A list of supporting documents for this
determination is below
Altamont appreciates the opportunity to provide this information to you Please feel free to call or respond
with any questions or comments you have related to this project
Sincerely
-X TL AMONT ENVIRONME NC
Joel enk P G
Enclosures Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form
Figure 1 USGS HUC Map
Figure 2 Site Location Map
Figure 3 Soil Map
Figure 4 Stream and Wetland Map
Appendix A Stream Determination Forms and Wetland Delineation Forms
Appendix B Site Plan Prepared by David Alton of Alton Anderson Architecture
Appendix C National Wetland Inventory Map
Appendix D FEMA /FIRM Map
Appendix F Soil Map Unit Descriptions
Cc Mr David Gibbons Acadia Capital Group
Mr David Aiton Alton Anderson Architecture
P \Acadia Capital Group \Electrolux Slte\JD \20120409 JD Cover Letter Docx

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION FORM

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION I BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
B DISTRICT OFFICE FILE NAME AND NUMBER
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
State NC County/parish/borough Buncombe City Fletcher
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 35 433665 N Long 82 533181 (E
Universal Transverse Mercator 17N
Name of nearest waterbody Higgins Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows French Broad River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 601010
® Check if map /diagram of review area and /or potential Jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request
❑ Check if other sites (e g offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
�] Office (Desk) Determination Date
❑ Field Determination Date(s)
SECTION II SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There ire no navigable waters of the US within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
❑ Waters are presently used or have been used in the past or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are waters of the US within Clean Water Act (CWA) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required]
Waters of the U S i
a Indicate presence of waters of U S in i eview area (check all that apply)
TNWs including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TN W s
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
�Cf Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of Jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters including isolated wetlands
b Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non wetland waters 832 6 linear feet 3 width (ft) and /or acres
Wetlands 0 006 acres
c Limits (boundaries) of Jurisdiction based on ''1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known)
2 Non regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) 3
10 Potentially Jurisdictional waters and /or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not Jurisdictional
Explain An ephemeral stream is located within the review area but was determined not to be a relatively permanent
water and therefore not Jurisdictional See Appendix A Stream Determination Forms
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below
2 For purposes of this form an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year round or has continuous flow at least seasonally
(e g typically 3 months)
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F

SECTION III CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert Jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section III A 1 and Section III D 1 only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sections III A 1 and 2
and Section III D 1 otherwise see Section HI B below
1 TNW
Identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting determination
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands if any and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are relatively permanent
a
waters (RPWs) i e tributaries that typically flow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e g typ y
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW but has year round
(perennial) flow skip to Section IH D 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
skip to Section III D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines for
analytical purposes the tribut -iry and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary or its adjacent wetlands or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands complete Section III B 1 for
the tributary Section III B 2 for any ons►te wetlands and Section III B 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both ons►te
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III C below
1 Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(►) General Area Conditions
Watershed size 28 4square miles
Drainage area 5 8 j aci es
Average annual rainfall 47 07 inches
Average annual snowfall 14 9 inches
(n) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
® Tributary flows through � tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are 1 2 river miles from TNW
Project waters are (or less) river miles from RPW
Project waters are 2 aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Project waters are (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW' Unnamed Tributary (UT) 3 4 flows into UT 3 2 which then flows into UT 3 1 which then
flows into UT I which then flows into an off site unnamed tributary which then flows into TNW (French Broad River)
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and in the and
West
s Flow route can be described by identifymb e g tributary a wluch flows through the review area to flow into tributary b which then flows into TNW

Tributary stream order if known First
(b) General Tributga Characteristics check all that —apply)-
Tributary is ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man made) Explain
® Manipulated (man altered) Explain Grading work from the devlopment of the Electrolux
Facility in the 1980s altered the existing stream channel Additionally the drainage area for this UT has been altered by development of
126 7 &S Cafetria, Hotel and other commercial buildings
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate)
Average width 5 feet
Average depth 2 feet
Average side slopes 2 1
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply)
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type /% cover
❑ Other Explain
Tributary condition /stability [e g highly eroding sloughing banks] Explain Tributary appears predominantly dry
stable and to convey stormwater from upstream development in response to storm events
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes Explain There does not appear to be any run/riffle /pool complexes Stream bed
was not observed to convey intermittant or continuous flowing water
Tributary geometry Meandering
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope) 0 07 %
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for �phemeral flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year 20 (or greater)
Describe flow regime The stormwater that is discharges from the commercial development up slope of the tributary
flows directly into the tributary and appears to be the only source of water to the channel
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is Discrete and confined Characteristics Water that enters Tributary UT 3 4 appears to be the direct
result of precipitation on predominantly impervious serfaces associated with the development upslope an d is conveyed to the channel
through stormwater infrastructure
Subsurface flow Iio Explain findings There was no evidence of a high water table in Tributary UT 3 4
❑ Dye (or other) test performed Hand augei was used to inspect channel to a depth of approximately one foot
below groud surface
Tributary has (check all that apply)
® Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply)
❑ cleai natuial line impressed on the bank
®
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
desti uction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
®
the presence of wi ack line
® vegetation matted down bent of absent
❑
sediment sorting
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
®
scour
® sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
❑ High Tide Line indicated by 0
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings/characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ survey to available datum
® physical markings
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types
'A natural or man made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever j urisdi ction (e g where the stream temporarily flows underground or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody s flow
regime (e g flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert) the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'Ibid

❑ other (list)
(►u) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize tributary (e g water color is clear discolored oily film water quality general watershed characteristics etc )
Explain Tributary had no flowing water 48 hours after a rain event Water source is a result of precipitation on
impervious commercial development uphill of tributary and possibly from the adjacent Interstate 26
Identify specific pollutants if known

(►v) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that apply)
❑ Riparian corridor Characteristics (type average width)
❑ Wetland fringe Characteristics
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size acres
Wetland type Explain
Wetland quality Explain
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non TNW
Flow is [Pick List Explain
Surface flow is Fick List
Characteristics
Subsurface flow t jck List Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non TNW
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
• Ecological connection Explain
• Separated by berm/barrier Explain
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are �ick List river miles from TNW
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is from Pick List
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplam
(n) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize wetland system (e g water color is clear brown oil film on surface water quality general watershed
characteristics etc ) Explain
Identify specific pollutants if known
(iii) Biological Characteristics Wetland supports (check all that apply)
❑ Riparian buffer Characteristics (type average width)
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish /spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis O'►ck List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

For each wetland specify the following
Directly abuts9 (Y/N) Size in acres Directly abuts9 (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological chemical and physical functions being performed
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical physical and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations a significant nexus exists if the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include but are not limited to the volume duration and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include for example
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species such as feeding nesting spawning or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs9
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have other relationships to the physical chemical or
biological integrity of the TNW9
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary itself then go to Section III D The tributary has
the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to TNWs fi om the receiving stormwater but does not appear to be able to reduce
the amount of pollutants or flood waters The tributary does not appear to provide habitat of lifecycle support functions for fish or
other species The tributary flows directly into an approximately 300 foot long culvert Additionally the tributary only has water
flow during and soon after a rain events The tributary does appeal to have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon
during or soon after a rain event but is not a constant source for these nutrients The tributary does not appear to have any other
relationship to the physical chemical or bilogical integrity of the TNW
2 Significant nexus findings for non RPW and its adjacent wetlands where the non RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands then go to Section III D There are no wetlands adjacten to the non RPW
3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands then go to
Section III D
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
i] TNWs linear feet width (ft) Or acres
[] Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
2 RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year sound are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial See Appendix A for Stream Determination Forms

Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow seasonally (e g typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally See Appendix A for Stream Determination Forms
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
Tributary waters 832 6 linear feet 3 width (ft)
Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
3 Non RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
4 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
J� Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III B and rationale in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW The wetland is directly abutting the seasonal RPW because of its connectedness and close proximity
(within 5 feet) to the seasonal RPW which indicates the two water bodies are sharing the same immediate water table
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area 0 006 acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates foi jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
6 Wed-inds adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review aiea acres
7 Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
❑❑Demonstrate that impoundment was created from waters of the U S or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 6) or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
E ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA STATE] WATERS INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS THE USE
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) "
'See Footnote # 3
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regaldalg CYVA Act Jurisdiction FolloivingRapanos

which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
Interstate isolated waters Explain
Other factors Explain
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
b Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
❑ Wetlands acres
NON JURISDICTIONAL WATERS INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
�] If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and /or appropriate Regional Supplements
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in SWANCC the review area would have been regulated based 521ely on the
Migratory Bird Rule (MBR)
Waters do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explain An ephemeral
stream was identified in the review area that did not meet the significant nexus standard
❑ Other (explain if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non Jurisdictional waters in the review area where the sole potential basis of Jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (1 a presence of migratory birds presence of endangered species use of water for irrigated agriculture) using best professional
�udgment (check all that apply)
❑ Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
❑ Lakes /ponds acres
❑ Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non Jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such
a finding is required for Jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) 206 linear feet 5 width (ft)
❑ Lakes /ponds acres
❑ Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ 'Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply checked items shall be included in case file and where checked
and requested appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant Appendix B Site Plan prepared by David Alton
® Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters study
U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas Figure 1 USGS HUC Map
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name Figure 2 Site Location Map (1 24 000 Henderson Quadrangle)
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation Figure 3 Soil Map
® National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name Appendix C NWI Map
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s) Not Available
® FEMA/FIRM maps Appendix D FEMA/FIRM Map
❑ 100 year Floodplain Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs ® Aerial (Name & Date) Figures 3 and 4
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Applicable /supporting case law

Applicable /supporting scientific literature
❑ Other information (please specify)
B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD

FIGURES

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A
Stream Determination Forms and Wetland
Delineation Forms

NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 411
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 411
L
ProjectlSite14 -,,v� atitude
Date -2 `! L
Evaluator A� 8 County 9juv- cov, Longitude
Total Points S am ermmation (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent hemeral Intermittent Perennial e g Quad Name
if-- 19 or perennial if 2:30
A Geomor holo (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3 In channel structure ex nfFle pool step pool
(5
1
2
ripple pool sequence
0
0
1
2
4 Particle size of stream substrate
1
2
5 Active /relict floodplain
1
2
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
7 Recept alluvial deposits
0
1
2
eadcuts
0
0
05
1
rade control
1
Natural valley
g
No = 0 a
Second or greater order channel
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology Subtotal = 6
1
2
12 Presence of Baseflow
Op
2
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
1
0
14 Leaf litter
15
5
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
17 Soil based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =3
UT(
Strong
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
15
15
3
3
0
15
15
pct i ua
41
11 (1Ir-

NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 411
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 411
ProjectfSlte Latitude
Date
2 1 21 I Z
Evaluators lT- County Longitude
Total Points Stream Determination (circle ones Other
stream is at least intermittent �. Ephemeral Intermittent a ennial e g Quad Name
if z 19 or perennial if z 30
A Geomorphology (Subtotal ='%0 ) Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
0
0
2
3
ripple pool sequence
0
1
2
4 Particle size of stream substrate
1
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplarn
0
1
21
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Re cent alluvial deposits
0
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
0 5
1 5
9 Grade control
0
05
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
No = 0
Yep= 3
11 Second or greater order channel
artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology Subtotal = K+ )
2
of Baseflow
n oxidizing bacteria
0
1
1
0 5
0
E12Presence
af litter
1 5
0
05)
1
15
ediment on plants or debris
0
0 5j
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
No = 0
Yes —,.3
17 Soil based evidence of high water table?
C Biology Subtotal = _.
3
all,
1
0
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
(-03
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
0
1
05
1
1 5
22 Fish
0
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
0
0 5 �
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0�
0 5
1
1 5
25 Algae
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75
OBL = 1 5 Other= 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch 0AAX�1 10£P
\Ihq
(J
x
41

Sketch
41
� l i
U/ Sd
NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for
Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 411
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Date
2 24
l�-
ProjectlSite
Latitude
Evaluator A5 13
County
Longitude
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle A
Ephemeral Intermttte erenmal
Other
e g Quad Name
if z 19 or perennial if Z 30
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = is 6 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
1
2
3
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
0
p
9
2
3
n le ool sequence
0
1
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
1
n2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
3
2
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
05
1
15
9 Grade control
0
W5
1 5
10 Natural valley
No �0
=
Yes 3
11 Second or greater order channel
artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology Subtotal = s_
01
2
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
l
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
0
1
0 5,
14 Leaf litter
1 5
0
0 5
,
(1
1 5
15 Sediment on plants or debris
5
v
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
Yes = 3
17 Soil based evidence of high water table?
C Blolo Subtotal = '9� )
1
0
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
3
2
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants to streambed
3
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
1
1 5
2 2 Fish
0
(0
0 5
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
01
05
1
15
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1 5),
25 Algae
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 O$t�er = 0 I' iel
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch
41

NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 411
NC IDWQ Stream Identification Form Version 411
Project/Site t ,k dA Vg Latitude
Date -L �lt � I2
Evaluator P's
County Longitude
� � L...
Total Points Stream Deter!g circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent �+rJ� Ephemeral ntermittent erennial e g Quad Name
if z 19 or perennial if z 30 i
A Geomorphology (Subtotal IS 5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
.=
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
0
1
ZM
ripple pool sequence
0
1
2�
4 Particle size of stream substrate
05
1
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
2
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
�
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
2
8 Headcuts
0
1
1
9 Grade control
0
0 5
0 5
10 Natural valley
0
11 Second or greater order channel
No 0
artificial ditches are not rated see discussions ip manual
B Hydrology (Subtotal= )
e of Baseflow
0
1
2
izing bacteria
0)
5
1
1
2
0 5
r
1
Mbased
0
0 5
1
nt on plants or debris
1
debris lines or piles
0
05
Nor 0
sed evidence of high water table?
C Blolo ISubtotai = I=� ) )
I
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
21 Aquatic Mollusks
10)
1
2
22 Fish
0}
05
1
23 Crayfish
05
1
24 Amphibians
( 0�
05
1
1
25 Algae
26 Wetland plants in streambed
U091
05
FACW = 0 75
OBL =1 5 Other
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods Seep 35 of manual
Notes
=3
3
0
1
0
0
3
3
15
5
15
15
C11".1.r r
tla % 54 0i
tke
ry nE,o clIe
Sketch
M U��)
o
41 f tit, 1
�o l
'kw C)0 1�;
k6 fct

NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 411
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 411 �
Date 2�2� �(�
ProjectlSite Latitude
Evaluator �^ County (�,un�6vv_- 4L Longitude
Total Points SttrpArn.D_eiermmation (circle one Other
Stream is at least intermittent (Q 'EPhemeerraP Intermittent Perennial e g Quad Name
if 2:19 or perennial if;? 30
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = S )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
2
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
1
2
—ripple pool sequence
0
1
2
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
5 Active/relict floodplain
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
2
7 Recent alluvial deposits
� �0)
0
1
1
2
8 Headcuts
0
0 5
C
9 Grade control
0
0 5
1
10 Natural valley
Not= 0
11 Second or greater order channel
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology Subtotal = �dJ
sence of Baseflow
1
2
oxidizing bacteria
R0
1
1
2f
0 5
P131ron
litter
1 5
'
0 5
1
diment on plants or debris
ganic debris lines or piles
0 �
0 5
d based evidence of high water table?
`
No = 0
` 19
� DCD
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
15
15
Yes = 3
E153
3
0
15
Yes _ 3
41

U �r�
NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 411
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 411
Date 2`v �(�- Project/Site 11AWAVIVA Latitude
Longitude
Evaluator As U ,JL County �V�c�a�
Total Points Strea;termination (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent ' 62 �phemer Intermittent Perennial I e g Quad Name
if 2:19 or perennial if z 30
A Geomorphology (Subtotal =)
Absent
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
0
—ripple ool sequence
0
4 Particle size of stream substrate
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
( 0
6 Depositional bars or benches
1
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
8 Headcuts
0
9 Grade control
0
10 Natural valley
0
11 Second or greater order channel
N0 �_
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
05
B H drolo Subtotal
15
Yes = 3
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
14 Leaf litter
15
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0 4
17 Sod based evidence of high water table?
No =
C 131010 Subtotal = ko. )
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
73
0
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
0
22 Fish
(0)
23 Crayfish
0
24 Amphibians
1.
0
25 Algae
26 Wetland plants in streambed
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Sketch . Ci.,V v I
4`1
Weak
Moderate
strong
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
1
2
2
3
3
1
2
3
�1
2
3
1
2
3
0 57
1
15
05
1
15
Yes = 3
2 3
1 2 3
1 05
05 1 15
r5 1 15
`�` Yes = 3
2 1 0
2 1 0
1 2 3
1 2 3
05 1 15
05 1 15
05 1 15
05 1 15
W = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other= 0j,
j, f" f r( I

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site �(_Q c4.,-o( vy )1' L� I1I I.4 City /County TI& Wk Sampling Date �1 10i I7.
Applicant/Owner
"Gr-- C A��� � a� State KX- Sampling Point \o� Q
Investigator(s) !I�c� Section Township Range
A
Landform (hillslope terrace etc) oci �(g, t Local relief (concave convex none) ! ou1(2,0 _!� /
- Slope (/) 610
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 130 S �u A hktLat �5 14, 2,2c 1 U 2° Long - OZ �i2,q tl6q ° Datum N
Soil Map Unit Name C.5C- - G J, J'dye e,0j -tcJ. (t)9:1a NWI classification Nn 1A714141 Ll f Shy
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no explain In Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes V No within a Wetland? Yes L `� No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
HYDROLOGY
drology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauiredl
ators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
— Surface Sod Cracks (136)
,/Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
ater Table (A2)
r_ZVSaturabon(A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
— Drainage P atterns (610)
ion (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
— Moss Trim Lines (1316)
arks (B1)
✓ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Dry Season Water Table (C2)
nt Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
— Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
— Thin Muck Surface (C7)
- Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
— Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
-
Iron Deposits (65)
— Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
— Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water Stained Leaves (B9)
— Microtopographic Relief (D4)
— Aquatic Fauna (1313)
— FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations /
1
Surface Water Present? Yes J No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes a/ No
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches)
re sent? Yes V No
includes ca illa fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names
of plants
Sampling Point
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
Cover Species? Status
9 Do YL
Number of Dommant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
1 (�1� �1�4 C�Vr�i
2
Total Number of Ddmmant
(B)
3
Species Across All Strata
4
Percent of Dominant Species �e /
5
That Are OBL FACW or FAC __� (A(B)
6
evalence Index worksheet
7
(D� Cover
Total / Cover of Multiply by
= Total
BL species i— x 1 = \
[FACW
Sapling Stratum (Plot size )
i
, Ali-
species � � � x2=
2 (>r t r�'If -W—v«
f Lk i Off' 1.�
FAC species 2 x3=
FACU species x4= 0
3
4
UPL species X5= a
1,1 t) L) (A) (b,0 (B)
Column Totals
5
6
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2^
7
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
\ 0 0 =Total Cover
1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
2 Dominance Testis >50 /
1
1,3 Prevalence Index is <_3 0'
2
4 Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
3
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5
6
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
7
be present unless disturbed or problematic
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
CtaJnLl� �r "i�6�tt�i 1
Tree —Woody plants excluding woody vines
1
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
2
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
3
Sapling —Woody plants excluding woody vines
4
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
5
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
6
Shrub — Woody plants excluding woody vines
7
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
8
Herb —All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
g
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
plants except woody vines less than approximately
10
3 ft (1 m) in height
11
Woody vine — All w oody vines regardless of height
12
00 =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1ftic�y,
_-
2
3
4
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
No
5
Present? Yes
00 = Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
f
(qw[ UA;,t/t4�
CO,V(aIvsU1 C6E,0�tvbtmac-
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point W Ar t
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) /
Color (moist) �_ Type' Co-7—
Texture Remarks
3 loY2 � (oo
/I
�- I2 245Y T
5 YP `) $ �(d e hA M L Saki t f tick!
t7--2q D
7 6IR—&J2 to J�rJ enT
'Type C= Concentration D Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains
2Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matnx
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Eplpedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
_ Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
3Indicators
ZSandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_. Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type Qojj
s
Depth (inches) 1 �—
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V/ No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site EI��Eirat�u City /County �tf' "toa• Sampling Date 3�30�12
Applicant/Owner Ac J 000 LQ 6�i��.� ��� D State N C Sampling Point U h
Investigator(s) A Section Township Range Aj r &mInE to wow
g� t
Landform(hilislope terrace etc) Y1 t����Ai]P Local relief (concave convex none) tQVtVtK Slope( /)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Let �S , 1-1 S7,3 ID � Long — 97 cInyd Ll �2�D Datum
Sod Map Unit Name rd— swdl,, +4fx4 NWI classification 'SJAv- -k(,
.(
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes . ✓ No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers In Remarks )
ci iannn®tav nF FiKinihic;s — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No t
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_, Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_
Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
— Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_. Shallow Agwtard (D3)
_
Water Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ PAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
xX Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
/
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches) Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Total / Cover of Multioly by
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
Cover
Species?
Status
1 p� 2G' ins f r� cti� lea P�
2
_ 50
_ v
I
A xLe
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3
5
6
7
Total CoVer
Saoling Stratum (Plot size )
1 ' sliul; �� I►r+nrAsir.
--- (`'�tL
2 Link►err.re, t( Cu, t C yL
5a
3
t0l
'
4tl t (i �Di e:!�t �i i 1 Et4"etsra�U
5
6
7
=Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size pp )
1 �7�ltottb r�CVtG t �t1 C 0- k -ek-It yil,t
1 0 (7 \q
UPL^
3
4
5
Sampling Point UPI
Dominance Test worksheet.
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC~ (A)
Total Number of Dominant 0 (B)
Species Across All Strata 0
Percent of Dominant Species e7
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (r b (A1B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total / Cover of Multioly by
OBL species 0 x 1 =
FACW species a x 2 =
FAC species 00 x3=
S�rCa
FACU species _I_ x4=
2�U
UPL species 220 X5=
l (U G
Column Totals Lf �o (A)
(q ,$0 (B)
A xLe
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
— 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
— 2 Dominance Test is >50 /
_ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 01
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
6 'Indicators of hydnc soil andwetland hydrology must
7 be present unless disturbed or problematic
111:90 = Total Cover I Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Qe?r = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size ) too
2 J
3
5
= Total Cover
(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet
Tree - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
plants except woody vines less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

up I
SOIL
Sampling Point
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matrix
(inches) 9010r mois A
Redox Features
Color (moist) �_ Tvoe Loci
Texture Remarks
d ° �6 lny►E- (00
s��Li�'oa�Jill
'Type C= Concentration D-De letion RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains
ZLocation PL--PoreLInlnq M =Matrx
for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Hydric Soil Indicators
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
Indicators
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
_
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
_ Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present
_
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 2Z-
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont ({
City/County 0 J "�� Sampling Date S u i 2,
Project/Site ��,Q it nI J`r kid U
Applicant/Owner Y�L[�(�IlP (d/ �"t�g L3lo�up 1State �� !�L Sampling Point w�
Investigator(s) � 604 1 °` Section Township Range YIIQ( rU �IFRUle�
dlslope terrace etc) D� <.0� Datum
Local relief (concave convex none) ShbbGlii�.41- Slope
Landform (h
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) �, �i4 Q-k4t ,e_ Let �i� y ��� 2 Long
�a�ai� 1 s.31kYJ �S
Soil Map Unit Name
Ull (1, n+ 4", JS — 60neg)1 (7-, NWl classification t, rV e
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 'f No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Lis the Sampled Area Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No �° ith►n a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reowredl
ydrology Indicators
Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
icators (minimum of one is required check al l that aaoly)
—
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
rPrimary
e Water (A1)
— True Aquatic Plants (614)
Sulfide Odor (C1)
—
Draina a Patterns 1310
— g
ater Table (A2)
_Hydrogen
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
— Moss Trim Lines (1316)
tion (A3)
—
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
D Season Water Table (C2)
— ry
Marks (B1)
ent Deposits (62)
—
— Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
,_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
—.
Other (Explain In Remarks)
( p
- Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
— Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
—
Geomorphic Position (D2)
- Iron Deposits (135)
—
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
—
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
—
FAC Neutral Test (D5)
— Aquatic Fauna (613)
—
Field Observations
�
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes _,Z No
1
Depth (inches) Cw /
Depth (inches) ! Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No —
Saturation Present? Yes No
Saturation
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
US Army Corps of Engineers

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 Id pine That Are OBL FACW or FAC � (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across All Strata (B)
4 Percent of Dominant Species Q 2 0
5 rhn4 Ara ORI FAM nr PAC U J 'f _ (A/B)
6
7
v = Total Cover
Saolmg Stratum (Plot size )
3
4
5
6
7
(vn =Total Cover
Shrub nnStratum (Plot size )
1 t1i v�&thc, GG ikLVlra
2 o
3
4
5
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total / Cover of
Multiply by
OBL species !)
x 1 =
@
FACW species — /_ -L0
x 2 =
L1 —q0
PAC species C-1
x3=
FACU species 0
x4=
UPL species zo
X5=
Column Totals 6 'j C �
(A)
c5 q* (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 7-7-15
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_✓ 2 Dominance Test is >50 /
3 Prevalence Index is < -3 0'
—4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
6 'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
7 be present unless disturbed or problematic
(D U = Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
Tree - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1 J\3 o�1e
9
3
4
5
de photo numbers here or on a separate sheet
0 = Total Cover
Sapling - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants Including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
plants except woody vines less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine -All woody vines regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes r:/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point VV Ji �L
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators )
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) �_
Color (moist) /q Tvne Lo
Texture Remarks
'Type C= Concentration D =De letion RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M —Matrx
Hydric Sod Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_. Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (fF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
— Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
_ Iron Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No t/
Remarks
s
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

APPENDIX B
Site Plan Prepared by David Aiton
Of Aiton Anderson Architecture

I rill/ '
t I
Jill I- 1
I \\ I 'IIII i lk
11 \ \I ii u I rri
\ r 1 111 I It
\
I I rhn I
r 1 I I r't n 1
I I 11'nl I u
/ I Ilan I n \
, I 111111 I / 6
Ittl
% l�rll
fill II \l 11
l i
,fll
iru t IrI t
3, ii'ii I i '
it 1 III l B
i l j � � ,r'� I$jji♦ \l 1
l/ / // 1 I ;\1I
I I\ I t // \t 11 It l 1 9
'1 i/, I I I I' l
\ \I II I
\ III ! IIII -'I I
11 I IIII ® I I
1 II
\.- -Iiil1 in
111 s - 'FF a
\ I AllJ r �3er'�i�•,r 1 j
'� 111111 ll
1 \1 Il It I it i ; 1
�111'll' I
/ 1111/111 I 1
/ 'llt'111 1 1
I \\ \11111
tt / I ; I
� I III Ill .
,/ \ tl'111 tl I II III /
tl l tt
11111't Ij F
, 1111'III111 r
/ Ii \I \llt�ll /
/ / I
it 111j11ltl I
11111111111 I I
I , I„ lttu l'in
% 1 ' X1511 l jlj 111 I
j ,' ,\I111111II� 1 1
% 1ljlit'tlftlll 1
/ ' lllltltl'I11I
/ tllll 111 1111
j;llljlll X111
/ I IIII II
\ II II
__ 11111dV1�p
t
l
1
t
t
l
1
1
1
t
t
t
--------- - - - -- - /
'-
.W---- --- - -_ - -
_- - -- - -- - - - - --
- -- - - - - -- —
-.P
-- mss. - -.
N
N i n.1
o
WN
-
r
j
L\ VNI1O`JVO HIUON a3HO131J
w� �� OVON 3JOILifl `JNINNV� OLQL
�. 111111 i
n
111 Z,
z r
g¢
�-
!
t.
v'
°
C��, 5 1
w W
(
1� Yl Ol NOIl104V NV
�./
d
_
I rill/ '
t I
Jill I- 1
I \\ I 'IIII i lk
11 \ \I ii u I rri
\ r 1 111 I It
\
I I rhn I
r 1 I I r't n 1
I I 11'nl I u
/ I Ilan I n \
, I 111111 I / 6
Ittl
% l�rll
fill II \l 11
l i
,fll
iru t IrI t
3, ii'ii I i '
it 1 III l B
i l j � � ,r'� I$jji♦ \l 1
l/ / // 1 I ;\1I
I I\ I t // \t 11 It l 1 9
'1 i/, I I I I' l
\ \I II I
\ III ! IIII -'I I
11 I IIII ® I I
1 II
\.- -Iiil1 in
111 s - 'FF a
\ I AllJ r �3er'�i�•,r 1 j
'� 111111 ll
1 \1 Il It I it i ; 1
�111'll' I
/ 1111/111 I 1
/ 'llt'111 1 1
I \\ \11111
tt / I ; I
� I III Ill .
,/ \ tl'111 tl I II III /
tl l tt
11111't Ij F
, 1111'III111 r
/ Ii \I \llt�ll /
/ / I
it 111j11ltl I
11111111111 I I
I , I„ lttu l'in
% 1 ' X1511 l jlj 111 I
j ,' ,\I111111II� 1 1
% 1ljlit'tlftlll 1
/ ' lllltltl'I11I
/ tllll 111 1111
j;llljlll X111
/ I IIII II
\ II II
__ 11111dV1�p
t
l
1
t
t
l
1
1
1
t
t
t
--------- - - - -- - /
'-
.W---- --- - -_ - -
_- - -- - -- - - - - --
- -- - - - - -- —
-.P
-- mss. - -.
I I ru '
I I'Illjljl I' S \\ \flit
�a �'°g \ \ 5 1111111 ; N
I I L %
/. � I III
'j- I - Irkf /-
it
I
jl;l �I I \j lj /-
9
M ILI I I ,
1
--
I
/ 1 nn -1�
INS 1 ' / i
v
�c
I' I
It
/ 6
/ III
1 I d 5 I I I I I I I I III'1
t I I I I I I I I I I I III I
Jill i
f
f i 1 H li lid , I
a ' I it'll
1 \
I 11 I V/z t\ \
/I l I P41 1 I 1
/I )]I'll
1 11 L � `
I Irr /i!
IG
� {�"" h 11 Ill III � "•_ � � \
/1- %---------- _------- _- - - - - -_ ------ _ _=; rill
------- - - -",/
, r
/ /� �i - --
��ra I 1 tll
' ' d
-- A I I 11l'I
I
I l
I I 9�
I /
�LLU) V
C O j
9 U
ORn' M
v
fy
X�W O
SQ
Q
J
0- E
HBp
0B
F- \
U
=00
=o0
� a
U LLV
G � v
m _
Nv �3� �yLro
.-
F NV9 -
� f"
z
_ ,11111 �
� Ily
�. 111111 i
i t`I
�a �'°g \ \ 5 1111111 ; N
I I L %
/. � I III
'j- I - Irkf /-
it
I
jl;l �I I \j lj /-
9
M ILI I I ,
1
--
I
/ 1 nn -1�
INS 1 ' / i
v
�c
I' I
It
/ 6
/ III
1 I d 5 I I I I I I I I III'1
t I I I I I I I I I I I III I
Jill i
f
f i 1 H li lid , I
a ' I it'll
1 \
I 11 I V/z t\ \
/I l I P41 1 I 1
/I )]I'll
1 11 L � `
I Irr /i!
IG
� {�"" h 11 Ill III � "•_ � � \
/1- %---------- _------- _- - - - - -_ ------ _ _=; rill
------- - - -",/
, r
/ /� �i - --
��ra I 1 tll
' ' d
-- A I I 11l'I
I
I l
I I 9�
I /
�LLU) V
C O j
9 U
ORn' M
v
fy
X�W O
SQ
Q
J
0- E
HBp
0B
F- \
U
=00
=o0
� a
U LLV
G � v
m _
Nv �3� �yLro
.-
F NV9 -
� f"
z

APPENDIX C
National Wetland Inventory Map

i
a
N N @ G
a
ftS Q a a o
lu
X111'1 � I C�
�Qo
o�
°E'o
�Yn
a3E
qq-
41�D Uri
wm�
oa�A
to
#b.... 6
r, �1
�� t L
ell
x
r�:

APPENDIX D
FEMA /FIRM Map

C coo`,---
Z
V AVM -�� 0 <-
p F > v3 fit •�
0 o
w z
w _79 w M
z .
�w Y4 r Q> so
R w Q p ZN o Cd
, ip s
LLI D ° Z r' m C)
L b ;3
cn a o a
r
z
r TT
Y o
m
laf LL
-F
Lo
OC
aL
O
QtS ItIO& tl WEN
CV
cl
L'.i -i N
' U3 M
Uv, o cn
♦Y
LLI
to •
~ E
3W
I-
N O
P
I-
w
r
R W a
Lu c
>.
6
ELao E
w
LU
a
�
¢_
4
LL rYYr
�FSO m0
�M
J
v
Ol]LLL
�L'
NY
�c~l6
co
LL
oEo
i
LLF
QI8S� 8
LE$
Fz+
v {'
o
o
s E v_ o
<
z� N
Z v
�NAOo
m — EEu_
F
®
Ld>
°'
w
=
Z
j..J
IrI
o
tm � F
polo
ozz >>
mom LlA
g Ln U_ }. . �,•�_
B
W_.,
o p
t'bo �i
E s f i°'"°^
rr
o uIL
o
��
Q
Np
F
�i
J 4r
o'
ZUUrz
m�,o LLIQ4 °�:" =3
Yr=
'r ��Q
Z
ii O"
Lil OJ _
z5'�`C8
�5�,.°U
�u�_
Uns
�cm>E Q
®
0
�w
Q (]
Q.. Na
xz'-z�
E Q
Zf LnH G�
¢a
Sti
m o
N
6L
LL
U
UQmSi
�.ILL�U
V
LL!
° O
a g. ° `3t
o..
v
--
IE
OY L
p
rc
m
Y Q2tMVfk2t(TN QOD11AnliMC m
o[. Q
C coo`,---
Z
V AVM -�� 0 <-
p F > v3 fit •�
0 o
w z
w _79 w M
z .
�w Y4 r Q> so
R w Q p ZN o Cd
, ip s
LLI D ° Z r' m C)
L b ;3
cn a o a
r
z
r TT
Y o
m
laf LL
-F
Lo
OC
aL
O
QtS ItIO& tl WEN
CV
cl
L'.i -i N
' U3 M
Uv, o cn

APPENDIX E
Soil Map Unit Descriptions

Map Unit Description Urban land— Buncombe County North Carolina and
Henderson County North Carolina
Buncombe County, North Carolina
Ux —Urban land
Map Unit Composition
Urban land 90 percent
Description of Urban Land
Setting
Parent material Streets parking lots buildings and other structures
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirngated) 8s
Data Source Information
Sod Survey Area Buncombe County North Carolina
Survey Area Data Version 7 Jul 7 2010
Sod Survey Area Henderson County North Carolina
Survey Area Data Version 10 Oct 1 2010
Web Sod Survey 312612012
Natural Resources page 1 of 1
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey

Map Unit Description Clifton sandy loam 8 to 15 percent slopes- Buncombe
County North Carolina and Henderson County North Carolina
Buncombe County, North Carolina
CsC— Clifton sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation 2 100 to 2 300 feet
Mean annual precipitation 45 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost free period 130 to 180 days
Map Unit Composition
Clifton stony and similar soils 85 percent
Description of Clifton, Stony
Setting
Landform Mountain slopes ridges
Landform position (two dimensional) Summit shoulder
Landform position (three dimensional) Mountaintop crest
Down slope shape Convex
Across slope shape Convex
Parent material Residuum weathered from amphibolite or
hornblende gneiss
Properties and qualities
Slope 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature More than 80 inches
Drainage class Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water
(Ksat) Moderately high to high (0 57 to 1 98 in/hr)
Depth to water table More than $0 inches
Frequency of flooding None
Frequency of ponding None
Available water capacity High (about 10 2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated) 3e
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches Sandy loam
8 to 55 inches Clay
55 to 80 inches Loam
Data Source Wormatuon
Sod Survey Area Buncombe County North Carolina
Survey Area Data Version 7 Jul 7 2010
Sod Surrey Area Henderson County North Carolina
Survey Area Data Version 10 Oct 1 2010
Web Soil Survey 312612012
Natural Resources page 1 of 1
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soll Survey

Map Unit Description Udorthents loamy — Buncombe County North Carolina
and Henderson County North Carolina
Buncombe County, North Carolina
Ud— Udorthents, loamy
Map Unit Setting
Elevation 1950 to 3 800 feet
Mean annual precipitation 0 inches
Mean annual air temperature 32 degrees F
Frost free period 0 days
Map Unit Composition
Udorthents loamy and similar soils 85 percent
Description of Udorthents Loamy
Setting
Down slope shape Linear convex
Across slope shape Convex
Parent material Loamy and clayey mine spoil or earthy fill derived
from igneous metamorphic and sedimentary rock
Properties and qualities
Slope 0 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature More than 80 inches
Drainage class Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat) Very low
to very high (0 00 to 19 98 in/hr)
Depth to water table More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding None
Frequency ofpond►ng None
Available water capacity Moderate (about 7 2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (non►rngated) 7e
Typical profile
0 to 80 inches Sandy clay loam
Data Source Worrmatlon
Soil Survey Area Buncombe County North Carolina
Survey Area Data Version 7 Jul 7 2010
Soil Survey Area Henderson County North Carolina
Survey Area Data Version 10 Oct 1 2010
USDA Natural Resources Web Sod Survey """"" i
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 1

Map Unit Description Udorthents Urban land complex 2 to 50 percentslopes-
Buncombe County North Carolina and Henderson County North Carolina
Buncombe County, North Carolina
UhE-- Udorthents -Urban land complex, 2 to 50 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation 1 950 to 3 400 feet
Mean annual precipitation 0 to 54 Inches
Mean annual air temperature 32 degrees F
Frost free period 0 days
Map Unit Composition
Udorthents rocky andslmdarsoils 55 percent
Urban land 40 percent
Minor components 1 percent
Description of Udorthents Rocky
Setting
Down slope shape Linear convex
Across slope shape Convex
Parent material Loamy and clayey mine spoil or earthy fill derived
from Igneous metamorphic and sedimentary rock
Properties and qualities
Slope 2 to 50 percent
Depth to restrictive feature More than 80 Inches
Drainage class Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat) Very low
to very high (0 00 to 19 98 In /hr)
Depth to water table More than 80 Inches
Frequency of flooding None
Frequency ofpondmg None
Available water capacity Moderate (about 8 4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nomrrigated) 7s
Typical profile
0 to 80 inches Sandy loam
Description of Urban Land
Setting
Parent material Streets parking lots buildings and other structures
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated) 8s
Minor Components
Rock outcrop
Percent of map unit 1 percent
Web Soil Survey 312612012
Natural Resources Page 1 of 2
Conservation Service National Cooperative Sod Survey

Map Unit Description Udorthents Urban land complex 2 to 50 percent slopes —
Buncombe County North Carolina and Henderson County North Carolina
Landform Mountain slopes ridges
Data Source Information
Sod Survey Area Buncombe County North Carolina
Survey Area Data Version 7 Jul 7 2010
Soil Survey Area Henderson County North Carolina
Survey Area Data Version 10 Oct 1 2010
n InC In non
Natural Resources Web Sod Survey page 2 of 2
Conservation Service National Cooperative Sod Survey