The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20070913 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20110413oq-�Iu 601 North Stream Restoration Project Annual Monitoring Report Monitoring Year: 2010 Monitoring Year: 3 As -built Date: 2008 NCEEP Project Number: D 06054 -A Submitted to: NCDENR- Ecosystem Enhancement Program 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1619 os stem E1 afMeilt PROGRAM Prepared by: North Carolina State University Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering 3100 Faucette Drive / Campus Box 7625 Raleigh, NC 27695 -7625 Prepared for: RECive® Environmental Banc and Exchange Q PR 13 909 Capability Drive Suite 3100 ZQ �� Raleigh, NC 27606 ENHgNCE COSYSTEM MENTPROGRAM t� �:' . ` is - NCDENR • l��C E N G I N E E R I N G t 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 'fable of Contents Tableof Contents ........................................... ............................... 1.0 Executive Summary ................................. ............................... 2.0 Introduction .............................................. ............................... 2.1 Project Description ................................... ............................... 2.2 Project Objectives .................................... ............................... 2.3 Project History ......................................... ............................... 3.0 Project Condition and Monitoring Results ............................. 3.1 Vegetation Assessment ............................ ............................... 3.1.1 Vegetation Success Criteria .................. ............................... 3.1.2 Description of Vegetation Monitoring .. ............................... 3.1.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring ......... ............................... 3.2 Stream Assessment .................................. ............................... 3.2.1 Stream Success Criteria ........................ ............................... 3.2.2 Stream Morphology Monitoring Plan ... ............................... 3.2.3 Stream Morphology Monitoring Results ............................. 3.2.4 Problem Areas ....................................... ............................... 3.3 Rainfall Data ............................................ ............................... 4.0 Conclusions .................................... ............................... Appendix A — As Built Survey ............ ............................... Appendix B — MY2 Survey ................. ............................... Appendix C — Profile, Cross Sections, and Pebble Counts. Appendix D — Site Photos .................... ..............................: Appendix E — Vegetation Data ............ ............................... Appendix F — Rainfall Data ................. ............................... Appendix G — Morphology Table ........ ............................... EEP Project #D 06054 -A 1 ........ ............................... 1 ........ ............................... 2 ........ ............................... 3 ........ ............................... 3 ........ ............................... 4 ........ ............................... 5 ........ ............................... 6 ........ ............................... 6 ........ ............................... 6 ........ ............................... 6 ........ ............................... 7 ........ ............................... 9 ........ ............................... 9 ........ ............................... 9 ...... ............................... 10 ...... ............................... 10 ...... ............................... 12 ...... ............................... 13 ...... ............................... 14 ...... ............................... 15 ...... ............................... 16 ...... ............................... 42 ...... ............................... 61 ...... ............................... 64 ...... ............................... 66 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 1.0 Executive Summary This Annual Monitoring Report documents the results of monitoring activities during the 2010 (MY3) growing season on the 601 North Stream Restoration Project. Construction of the site, including planting of trees, was completed in March 2008. The 2010 data documents results from the third year of geomorphic and vegetation monitoring at the site. The design of the 601 North Stream Restoration Project involved a major stream restoration. After construction, it was determined that the project generated 3,036 feet of stream restoration. The As -Built Survey is included as Appendix B. This Annual Monitoring Report presents data from three vegetation monitoring plots, one crest gauge, one rain gauge, six cross sections, approximately 3,000 linear feet of profile survey and photographic reference locations, as specified in the approved Restoration Plan for the site. A manual rain gauge was used in conjunction with the onsite automatic rain gauge to validate precipitation data. Although dryer conditions developed during the second and third quarters, the entire monitoring year had normal rainfall at this site. The 2010 vegetation monitoring documented the surviving planted stem density for the plots between 323 and 566 stems per acre. The average density was 459 stems per acre. This represents a survival rate of approximately 76% based on a baseline density of 608 stems per l acre. The initial vegetative success criteria of 360 stems per acre at the end of three years was achieved. The site is on track to achieve the final vegetative success criteria of 260 five- year -old planted stems surviving per acre at the end of five years of monitoring. Two bankfull events were recorded in March and May. The restored stream channel has remained stable in the priority I section and is providing the intended habitat and hydrologic functions. Some minor problem areas mainly due to erosion and lack of vegetation were identified in MY2 around the beginning of the priority II section near station 119 +50 and extending to the end of the project. Some of these problems are reduced with the growth of vegetation as evidenced in the Appendix D Photos. All monitored cross sections and the longitudinal profile for 2010 display very little adjustment in stream dimension. EEP Project #D 06054 -A 2 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Project Description The 601 North site is located approximately 10 miles south of Monroe in Union County (see Figure 1). The property is located off of McManus Circle, SR 2110, from Pageland Highway /US Hwy 601 South. The property is accessed by a gravel farm road off McManus Circle. Figure 1— 601 North Location Map MAPQYEST.�: �} 4011 m t7 1200 ft 1••ti t{ 4yi � R` oe Griffin Rd iLi�i�_nfl _ i �l f •t•� :M �ry 02008 WpQuest Inc. Map Data a 2006tIVAVTE4 or TeleAtias The project is a restoration of approximately 3,000 linear feet of unnamed tributary to Wicker Branch in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin. The project is made up of an upper and lower section of UT, referred to as Reach 1 for monitoring. Reach 1 stationing is summarized in Table EEP Project #D 06054 -A 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 1. The 601 North site has a drainage area of 0.23 mil in the upper section and 0.3 mil in the lower section. The dominant historic land use was originally timber production followed by intensive agricultural production of crops including corn, soybeans, and winter wheat. The channel was straightened and channelized for agricultural purposes. This led to an incised condition with little to no floodplain access. q Table 1 — 601 North Monitoring Reaches Reach Name As -Built Length (ft) Monitoring Stations Restoration Approach UT /Reach 1 3,036 100 +21 — 130 +31 Restoration (Priority I/II) Total 3,036 3,010 2.2 Project Objectives The 601 North site was identified by EBX to support the NC EEP full delivery mitigation process. The objective of the project was to produce a minimum of 3,000 stream mitigation units (SMU) to NC EEP through the full delivery process in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River 03040105 hydrologic unit. Due to the incised condition of the channel and lack of access to the floodplain, the existing channel was abandoned and a Priority I Natural Channel Design approach was selected for the majority of the project. The last 1,000 feet of the project utilizes some Priority II approaches to create a lower elevation flood plain in order to meet the required elevations at the confluence with Wicker Branch. Given the valley type VIII drainage, a C4 channel was chosen as the design channel. Due to the coarseness of the native bed material, few structures were utilized in the design. Monitoring of the 601 North site is required to demonstrate successful mitigation based on the success criteria specified in the Restoration Plan. Stream and vegetation monitoring are conducted on an annual basis. This Annual Monitoring Report documents the results of the monitoring for 2010 (MY3). The as -built data documented 3,036 linear feet of stream restoration. The stream restoration will provide multiple ecological and water quality benefits within the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin. Those benefits are as follows: EEP Project #D 06054 -A 4 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Hydrology: • Re- establishing floodplain connection by raising bed elevations • Increase flood storage by re- establishing floodplain Water Quality: • Reducing turbidity by reducing sediment inputs • Reducing water temperatures by providing shading • Increasing/ stabilizing oxygen levels by reducing BOD /COD and increasing re- oxygenating turbulence Habitat: • Improve bed habitat by increasing riffle -pool diversity, reducing sediment deposition, and improving low flow water depths • Improve bank habitat by increasing stability and woody biomass • Improve floodplain habitat by establishing micro - topography and hydrology, removing invasive vegetation, and increasing habitat diversity • Improve food web dynamics by adding biomass (such as detritus, wood debris, and leaf matter) and re- establishing floodplain connection 2.3 Project History This project was identified by EBX in the winter of 2006. Table 2 — 601 North Site History Project Activity and Reporting History Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or Delivery Restoration Plan February 2007 April 2007 Final Design - 90% N/A July 2007 Construction N/A February 2008 Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area N/A February 2008 Permanent seed mix applied to reach N/A February 2008 Bare roots and live stakes N/A March 2008 Mitigation Plan / As -built (Monitoring Baseline) March 2008 June 2008 Year 1 Monitoring March 2009 March 2009 Year 2 Monitoring October 2009 December 2009 Year 3 Monitoring October 2010 December 2010 Year 4 Monitoring September 2011 Year 5 Monitoring September 2012 - EEP Project #D 06054 -A 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 3.0 Project Condition and Monitoring Results 3.1 Vegetation Assessment 3.1.1 Vegetation Success Criteria Successful establishment of vegetation in riparian areas will be the survival of 260 planted stems following Year 5 monitoring. The interim vegetative success criteria will be the survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre at the end of Year 3 monitoring. Up to 20% of the site species composition may be comprised of volunteers. Remedial action may be required should volunteers present a problem or exceed 20% composition. A digital image photo log will be used to subjectively evaluate the restoration site over time. A series of images over the five year monitoring period should demonstrate maturation of planted vegetation and volunteer species. 3.1.2 Description of Vegetation Monitoring Three semi - permanent vegetation plots were established within the planted restoration areas to monitor the success of planted vegetation. The vegetation plots are 0.01 hectares in size. The vegetation plots are distributed across the site, but the precise location and orientation of the plots was random (see location on as -built drawings.) The plots cover approximately two percent of the site. Seven species were planted on site (see Table 3). 'fable 3 — 601 North Planted Snecies Common Name Scientific Name Abbreviations Paw Paw Asimina triloba AT River Birch Betula nigra BN Shag Bark Hickory Carya ovate CO Green Ash Fraxinus penes lvanica FP Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii QM Water Oak Quercus nigra QN Willow Oak Quercus phellos QP Each of the planted stems inside the plots was flagged to help in locating them in the future. The taxonomic standard for vegetation used in this report was based on "Manual of the Vascular of the Carolinas ", by Albert E Radford et al. The vegetation monitoring protocol used for collecting vegetation data was established for this project in 2000 by the Wetland Restoration Program (WRP) and Karen Hall of NCSU. EEP Project #D 06054 -A 6 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 3.1.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring 601 North is now almost dominated by forbs. Again, Goldenrod is the dominate forb species found with much of the vegetation head high or above. Stream banks here are also better vegetated now with less exposed areas of soil and less erosion.. No water was flowing at the time of the visit. The farm field adjacent to N1 has encroached to within about 3 feet of one plot corner. Minor impacts by animals and no vandalism was observed during this visit. Original planting density, based on the three 0.01 hectare plots, (100 square meters) was 608 stems per acre. The current density is 459 stems per acre which represents a survival rate of approximately 76 %. The planted stems in the monitoring plots ranged from 323 to 566 stems per acre. This site has met the interim success criteria of 360 stems per acre after three years and is on track to meet the final criteria of 260 stems per acre after five years. Table 4 - Baseline Stem Counts Baseline Data May 2008 Plot PLANTED SPECIES AT AT I BN CO FP QM QN QP Q PLANTED STEMS N1 2 2 9 9 1 2 12 14 N2 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 14 N3 4 4 3 3 5 2 3 2 17 TOTALS 2 9 2 14 7 4 4 3 45 Percents 0.044 0.200 0.044 0.311 0.156 0.089 0.089 0.067 1.000 Tahle 5 — MY3 (2010) Stem Counts October 2010 (MY3) Plot PLANTED SPECIES LIVE AT BN CO FP QM QN OP Q PLANTED STEMS N1 2 9 1 12 N2 3 2 1 1 1 8 N3 4 3 5 2 14 TOTALS 0 9 0 14 6 2 3 0 34 Percents 0.000 0.265 0.000 0.412 0.176 0.059 0.088 0.000 1.000 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 7 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Table 6 - Baseline Stems per Acre Monitoring Plots Baseline Data May 2008 Plot Trees Plot size Plot size Plot size Stems n, m ft acre per acre N1 14 100 1076 0.0247 566 N2 14 100 1076 0.0247 566 N3 17 100 1076 0.0247 688 Totals: 45 300 3228 0.074 0.000 Stems per plot 15 1 11.33333 1 Average 608 Table 7 — MY3 (2010) Stems per Acre Fall Monitoring Data October 2010 Plot Trees Plot size Trees Percent Stems n, m Loss Loss per acre N1 12 100 0 0.000 485 N2 8 100 0 0.000 323 N3 14 100 0 0.000 566 Totals: 1 34 1 300 0 0.000 Stems per plot 1 11.33333 1 Average 459 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 3.2 Stream Assessment 3.2.1 Stream Success Criteria As stated in the approved Mitigation Plan, the stream restoration criteria for the site includes the following: Bankfull Events: A minimum of two bankfull flow events must be documented within the five- year monitoring period. Cross - Sections: There should be little change in as -built cross sections. Cross sections shall be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method and all monitored cross - sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for C type channel. Longitudinal Profiles: The longitudinal profiles should show that the bedform features are remaining stable, e.g. they are not aggrading or degrading. Bedforms observed should be consistent with those observed in C type channels. Photo Reference Stations: Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation and effectiveness of erosion control measures. 3.2.2 Stream Morphology Monitoring Plan Stream monitoring will document the stability of the restored channel. Monitoring will occur for 5 years or until the final success criteria have been achieved, whichever is longer. Monitoring methods used are based on US Army Corps of Engineering guidance documents and NC Division of Water Quality guidance documents. Cross Sections Two permanent cross sections, one at a riffle and one at a pool were installed for every 1,000 linear feet of restored stream. Each cross section was marked with permanent pins on both banks. Each cross section is tied to a benchmark to allow for comparison for data each year. The cross section survey takes into account water surface and all breaks in slope including thalweg, top of bank, and bankfull if present. Longitudinal Profile Longitudinal profile is surveyed once every year for five years or until the final success criteria are met. The longitudinal survey will include thalweg, water surface, bankfull and top of bank. Each survey point will occur at the head, midpoint, and end of each feature and the invert of each structure. The survey will be tied to a permanent benchmark. EEP Project #D 06054 -A 9 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Hydrology Bankfull' events will be monitored for the length of the monitoring period. One crest gauge is installed on site to capture bankfull events. Photographs of high water marks, wrack lines and sediment deposition will also be used to document these events. Photo Reference Stations Photographs will be taken at the same locations each year for the length of the monitoring period. These photos will document the progression of the site from year to year. 3.2.3 Stream Morphology Monitoring Results Stream conditions are stable. Banks were stabilized with woven coir matting that provides stabilization until the vegetation is thoroughly established. Base flow was not present during the survey. Stream features including pools and riffles are remaining stable. There are 2 structures within the monitoring reaches. All structures appear to be stable. Constructed riffles are holding grade with no down cutting or headcuts observed. Cross Sections The survey data was collected in September 2010, and the results are presented in Appendix C. Cross sections appear to be stable. Longitudinal Profile The longitudinal profile survey was conducted in September 2010, and the results are presented in Appendix C. The profile survey showed little change in channel dimensions or profile. Hydrology Five bankfull events were documented during this year of monitoring by a crest gauge. The bankf ill events were recorded in November 2009, December 2009, February 2010, May 2010 and June 2010 at stages of 0.50 ft., 0.74 ft., 0.78 ft., 0.14 ft. and 0.35 ft above bankfull, respectively 3.2.4 Problem Areas There were nine problem areas identified from MY (2009) in the priority II section. These problem areas were all minor bank erosion issues. Four of these identified areas are resolving themselves with the resumption of normal rainfall which has improved the vegetative cover. The remaining five areas are stable but vegetative recovery is slower due to soil conditions. Vegetative assessment with possible supplemental seeding will be undertaken in 2011. This should allow the areas to repair themselves during the next growing season. A new tenth problem area (PA10) was located at station 119 +24 where the top of bank is eroding outside the EEP Project #D 06054 -A 10 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) coir matting. Additional matting and vegetative replanting is recommended here as well. No bank re- grading is required at present. Table 8 - 601 North MY3 Problem Areas ID Year Identified Station Description/ recommendation Photo Number PA1 MY2 130 +42 — 130 +62 Corrected Problem Area Photo 1 PA2 MY2 130 +00 — 130 +75 Replant Problem Area Photo 2 PA3 MY2 129 +49 — 129 +76 Replant Problem Area Photo 3 PA4 MY2 128 +72 —129+39 Corrected Problem Area Photo 4 PA5 MY2 128 +12 —128+65 Corrected Problem Area Photo 5 PA6 MY2 127 +50 —127+94 Replant Problem Area Photo 6 PA7 MY2 126 +70 —127+24 Corrected Problem Area Photo 7 PA8 MY2 125 +20 —125+58 Replant Problem Area Photo 8 PA9 MY2 121 +50 — 122 +11 Replant Problem Area Photo 9 PA10 MY3 119 +24 —119+61 Bank Erosion Problem Area Photo 10 1 See Appendix D. EEP Project #D 06054 -A 11 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 3.3 Rainfall Data Rainfall data is collected by an automated rain gauge and confirmed with a manual rain gauge. Rainfall data shows that normal rainfall occurred throughout the monitoring period. The average monthly peak for the 2010 monitoring period was 1.29 inches with a maximum of 2.94 inches occurring in November. The average monthly sum was 3.29 inches with a maximum of 6.79 inches occurring in December. Complete rainfall data is shown in Appendix F. Figure 2 - MY3 Rainfall Data Summary EEP Project #D 06054 -A 12 601N MY3 Rainfall Summary a 7 *Rainfall data collected from 10/12/2009 - 9/15/2010 6 s S ■ Monthly Sum u 5 ■ Monthly Peak 4 M S 3 2 1 0 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP Month EEP Project #D 06054 -A 12 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 4.0 Conclusions Overall stream dimension, pattern, and profile are stable with only minor erosional problem areas. Drought conditions that threatened vegetation in 2008 have eased, and riparian vegetation is flourishing. The entire channel was dry during data collection. All stream structures appear stable and properly functional. Overall, the site is on track to achieve the stream stability and vegetative success criteria specified in the Restoration Plan. Monitoring will continue through 2012. EEP Project #D 06054 -A 13 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Appendix A - As Built Survey EEP Project #D 06054 -A 14 s -i LL. O • � cc § _ . W o a o W a N .� O co 1V, L 0 w d_ W Z o z L $ 8 a ,,%tam) LLJ O E P� W --< O Zt 01 r x M ,� O � `gip � r� l TI a:o+�....d�:" In N Q O Z O ? rbti bd W co 04 1 Z w 0� LLJ W m � m F- o r LL P' .... ) O V `. �0 W ; Q O a wF 4 ..� 0 C.) Z & r Q J,,..,- �o o � LLI W O Z b Qw X Z ? O W O CZ �jW •�,, # , �QQ O'er COOP) O '4r.oi V � Q Q a Q�i Q S 0 0 c. il,. w Z Z I— — .p. Z 3 a "" OQI� � Co W W o a ,. a l Z CE z� ww° D CJ _j Z Z Y W Ux W O t1 CL Y Lj i ~ a ,•.\ c W Q N W l_ a a g As U W N z CL / \\ U)co e Z \ ! < C7 � ^ j} g ZE- \ } °a � > o q (t aZ 2(D N Z a � z i .w-*r-i +e —wai - aooz tL Am ai3ULL -w \rs P— W�WNSDOVO -Po '" � wu aooa W\ a � s? 8� ZLL 111E W f G�\QK ACT Q E 1 '/' : n a o [k d�S, 2I3041` IN � N d 1 J W i J d 0 z V r N w a LLLQQQTTT I I I I o U j V co I I Z I Q z W / i Lj W Z �' En ffi Q J Cl z 1 \11 z LL w z ��Fm ma <�} i3 F W U z 1 1 U LLI a c� ><>�yy 4 m b ' Li Q<2x f CL a CL_ ig as _ C i � -K a ) CD 1 ( zn.za E -C3 i cz 1 W N IE W _ I11 r Ci EM 7M 1 \ \ , / °� i• IZ z w I1, x s J �- r3 z z i N a c� haw All l .pLpnwi As —im - soon SI 4m LwA3m -m \rs w-a\dw\e000- am\-*--"-v %-N = aOD=Ww\-\ a N O O O m m 10 10 w m m u �o K N = W j �g ,9 ,£ ,9'l 0 ,£ L UW j $ J O Z 6W 0 Z _ I O 7£'£09 O 6'909 b LO H11,09 00 R O 0 00 O O LO + O I O i 0 + O O + cD O O O 0 0 O i i 0 O O O + O 0 0 O O LO 0 LA 0 0 o O LO + N O O O , + N O O + O 0 0 0 O + 0 O 0 0 0 O Y Z z W ya L O W LLI O Z ` Ii a cis �i O � I i � I I I 1 I IQ I I }{ I I I I I � F r� mF §z <= U< 4WZ�022ii�55SSo �9�z <a68 W-gp-a Q0 �F O U zCL allia� 00*e IS 33S 3N HOlVW ( CL 0- zzzzzz V �1 j W R� � W W C) a- x Z X LLI F m w�� l j J II I I i i i i 1 JL ,f C � i Y I � f 0� l09 i� 1` p r I f! f I I 1 Ito IHE �, \ON ACT 0 ls1` a3wl\ Z^ �� V � F �+ U � W O 1' acp N � � O N J N N_ 10 00 w K N = W j �g iw Q Q z �z $ UW j J a a J } I I I cy- I I V) I Z 6W 0 Z _ I W 6 cz CD U p 2 C/) cn a) Q E U Y Y 50 m m Ed r b a a s; ww-i A —waL - aox 'nL "n aVS plgl101U \i1. —Y—\OYNI w,— w -n — £ 133HS 33S 3NnHO1VY4 + � 8 0 0 + 0 LO O O r O �n (O O Lj LL- w CL A m O ki 0 0 Ln O LO + O 0 O LO O 0 � 0 LLJ N J LLJ O 0 N O + O O + p Z U' O J LO + O O O + 0 O LO rn 0 m >_;,_� ��Z-E�o �-=�' ffo 00 z0. rc17ia� Y P m _� oz =Er $� 0F5 � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �ir� z�� g z IL i a N F) Ix z H 0. ;f \ \ 00 1 1 r i I j ! I � I ! � t \ 1 I I t 1 IE p \ \ N \ 1 \ 8 I 1 �- -- !, I J 1 I 1 I . 1 Sp THE �t•Gt \pN ACT y 1 a30Nf IN s� S t � I d \ I ! , � I ` � r I r III '1 ! / / 0 / J I � � r I / / r � J i I I J I ! I 11 1 I I I i I ' / I J / J I / r 1 / f £ 133HS 33S 3NnHaym 12 it Q T. a t w N N O �p \ N •.•'��PP .......... �W a in z Q Z r• r U U C v� CD i U O O _CO � Q Y c 6 .RMW4 go —wak - owa b& An gwvb -w Owaciro \ws P-- As- v\aow- OONwa -v 4" wo aowQmw \lNa WNW" -to —10:m - awa '9l 4m SWVW d ONKW -MPS vM.tnDMTeooO-0a1\UDRDA-a 4WH wa aODUMtUNw\a m 1 1 9 133HS 33S 3NnHOIVW v LO $ 99'985 -'A'U £i +L,L V.LS $ N r F 0'069 TWIN X I o b __..�..... _........ L-'Al3 B'SBS ... N ` e (Q� • IL I 9 685 LZ L'£t +L V1S n O _ 1 2131N30 100d y� O Z'069 Z6'985 -'Al3 f'£6 +9Z1 V1S r ° Z IN d0 301 £Z'LBS= Ala I fl 9 cc ` y ., 9'lL +9ZL V15 £'O6S TWIN j0 CIV3H I ` s THE W Of'995 -'Al3 YfS +9Z l V1S I LO ACT + I ��' 1 o £'069 l£'LSS -13 S£ +9ZL 30L 1 I ca I �yJ�bQ�� N �i i- Q J SLI E / I L'68S oil ' LOS -A13 ( r � O '�y LLJ o o � 0'f0 +9ZL V1H I + m Of � ` "��Y30NL1 c0 TN I 9'069 BB'9BS ='Al3 cli ill JF� 4'8B+4Z L VIS I o o 1 0fL'L8S -'n13 'ZL+SZ t V1S IN j0 301 / 1 , / ! I / : \ „'' �• °.pp ..•�' r' -, Z' L6S O LO boN•• °.,.....,•pP 61'985 -'Al3 I G* L69 Zf +SZt V1S I . Q'LZ +4Z1 V1S \ � L' L 65 I 6Z'99 -Ala I O'SOI+SZ l V1S + \ 26 , 1 I II ' -C z j j < LO N c1z� °�_ L' l6S 1 1 SL +*Z -'Al3 9'BL+iZ l V15 I H i 1 .• / i 1 I apo ggq I + O nS I ' OF -'Al3 6'BS+iZ l V1S QN30 100d j£9'[95 I O j ! �j 9 i LO \ p ! y < J �i m84 W V Y1,65 6Z++Zt v1S {_ O'Z6S 9 I �� n Q i o A + / LA-zd le p m £Z'BBS -'Al3 OT O+iZI V1S I H ££'995 -A13 L'06+£Z t 'IS I I f'Z6S N n 6 1 Q 1 i rc 1 I U OZ'68S =A13 9.ti +£ZL V1S £Z61 1 1( I O I I I ! z G I 1 j O A13 0'Og +CZ, S +£Zl V1S to O Ei + O I & L� + ! i F O'Z88 I I N U C I I SL'8BS -'M3 9Z£+£Zl V1S N30 I 19 '8O-A.-IS3 w I I I I I � IJi ' I W � j OZ6S 0'9 L+ IN 301 !!: O I mix I I r) i I CTS 9769 I N O £Z'085 -'Al3 0'S[ +ZZL VIS 1 ! Z O cl) 0'£65 1 BZ'685 -'Al3 6S +ZZL V15 LO c £'£ss N I/ ,�� I � Y Cz 1 I I S E'069-'Al3 £Z +ZZI V1S ' j I j I Z'£6S 6 I 99'069 -'Al3 ! 1 I 1 \ ! N Z ac O j ; m 0'ZO +ZZ1 V1S I + I �k I i 8L'895 -'A13 8.69 +LZL Vls 0'£69 I N I �� I ; I z LLJ �\ 1 I (.0 �, i OL'08S -A13 I J ° x (n L'£6S 0'99+2L V15 O LO Ckf ( i ci8C18S I *T69 -'V' N 1 I ` N I I I 0'S£ +LZL V1S 1 I la .i0 8 '9liLZl Y15 I I 1 •• 9'£69 1 a N d 6Z'L8S -Al3 O O \ + \ 00 ! 9'£69 I 9'£B +OZ1 V1S N \ \ \ 2/ I ?tr$g £1169 -'Al3 I S'£9+OZl Yl� O �� # ! 06'064- A13 1 ' O 6 I N £6' 164 -A13 o I o z O I �`L +g ! 40+OZ1 V1S 114404 4n 6 t'ZBS -'Al3 + O W 1, Z'f69 S'L9 +8L1 V1S 1 L£169-A13 £'ZL +6 L l V15 RIM 'A'13 0 t m ° s 1'95 +6 L7 V1S 1 b m m + ! O F U 01 j 1 O b N 1 f'11,65 I - �5 I , � p a a I ZB'Z8S -'Al3 0'OZ +6 L l V1S rn a ( ii 8 is \ o Z'11169 1 1 I +6'OO6LI is lDOd O 1 Z'i8S f9zs5 -•nV1S is 30.. �NnyJ`' I 9'+65 L'£9 +B l t VlS O �� LO 133HS 339 3NIIH-OIVA 00 i f cli m in m 7S WNW" -to —10:m - awa '9l 4m SWVW d ONKW -MPS vM.tnDMTeooO-0a1\UDRDA-a 4WH wa aODUMtUNw\a t: ¢ k � o € m F� U_ ab a� ~�� SON ]W� ~Z$0� W W Z Li _ s w Ld Ld - z i eFil ��VJJ��, Ld Ld I rn a , LL m Y > I I I o 0_ i5 Z Z I I I vi "- I I I 9SsB'OL8LLr'+9iBti6B••'+f+ •9'+►S£e0BS 9BI BBs Z£-5 S Z 9 - I l --I L 'L - A 1 • n'•YVn�'0A VAom l3 1 - - �7 i i 1 I 1 I 1 1 I h I I ; I 1 I l - I 1 1 I I y � I I I t II I ' G ea6llLL'' '''''B60r69B9B99eBS 9 S 9 s s S N + \ . \ 1 �I � \ 88ii i _i _ g�g E D QQ r Y = : wi- 0 e �S N O CcA n Z /V Q E � ! vOi 1 o z£9- Z L'96+0£ l YlS ONLLS03 Ol 3 M ViS 0 6'C9ro 0 $ Z L s W a: m L b L Lo + C) ° z9•i9s -•nom + rnr 6'f0+0£ t V1S ✓ MAN J0 OY 85 O V 09+8ZV1S y z + 0:3 0) s£999-n13 F cz d1 O'9£V1S 231N30 food ef'sBS -A-13 0 _Q E 7C3 S'£0 +8ZL V1S I cz 96 O'LL+BZ o L'£S Zl V1S L3N30 100d L 889 00 x L9'989 -Ala N 0'9£+9ZL V1S / 9'889 A9-�13 N 9'995 -A13 6o O'00+9ZL V1S +V1S + 00 9 1HS 33S 3NlH31VW N a cli co i i g� e i .iawrvi Ae -waL - aooi bl Fin swsrre owvuo -+v \rs w�- M�e000- aaf�wxdw�w a" M eaoocvcw\-\ a a H Z a w �to z I.- N Ih O _ Q a M co a_ 0 (V � � N O � r o co o o _ M bt 0 iV O CV Z_ ? O tD � t0 O N �- N _ N w M W C 0 �a N d Q W d' M Z W O w V) M tD Q to Z_ N s� w E �8 � g a O � � N . d U pM V Q V �c Uco c U Cd O U Z O cn Q O c t 6i C d I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 0 � I I I I Y U3tn � 0o'"j< 1° CL I �? 0 L,O cs Cj V O � O opwI I — — CL U a N I — Owl I < O N U u j O Z �S I I �O� v p�� _ MW 1 h Q0�0 I I Q I I I�I �I �I al D WI I z a t`'I w wJ 01 3 -I a .. o a �1 I y �W� <I I N ml v z Z v YI 0 QI ml a. W OI a E y'j`y b oal f I I I Iil I I I QJ V _ H Z a w �to z I.- N Ih O _ Q a M co a_ 0 (V � � N O � r o co o o _ M bt 0 iV O CV Z_ ? O tD � t0 O N �- N _ N w M W C 0 �a N d Q W d' M Z W O w V) M tD Q to Z_ N s� w E �8 � g a O � � N . d U pM V Q V �c Uco c U Cd O U Z O cn Q O c t 6i C d rui 3(e mwat - ma tit awl apTwjw t-►o\m p � v\=P\ww-uanwwm m wart w �wx- M N 0 C5 1° M� N U- O cs Cj V O � O - — — — — — < O N I1� li �S 0 _ MW cV D r M _ v z < F E y'j`y b i D _ d z p tG p N • g�S a h 8 m N A FUN al e n a° t ( w \ a M : rui 3(e mwat - ma tit awl apTwjw t-►o\m p � v\=P\ww-uanwwm m wart w �wx- nwcrvi A9 ,M:GL - 900E bl 4m MPVWW VNMW- d-9d\7-S P— l/\0W \000D- Wl\1°9°1OlM %'M wY SWOL9610 \Y°\il . W .4 xB —M:ol — 900C YI A.M ""NVld auNVwio \rs v+oo.N\bw \aoo ram\uoaoAwa uwx M e000=Lo\kW\a g ¢ g O s� A ° O a W � g � � �p THE apt \pN ACT 3 $ a3aw � N a • bON' .. ..O p@ . 1 o 1�, L Z DOpOU� '` oDO� V . Z W� O U W ° = FJ U U LL = ° Z c 0 1 C13 CD CS ° k D Y cis U 40° 0091 qtl QRp optlO l' 90 0400 WE b W 6 N N N N as i V gg 126 +00 i ° J hP s. �e a { I UU DU , O G 00, D� o° g 6 133HS 335 3Nn1 MVA "P,W.4 �(e —M:01 – em 'S� "n "Pmww otaLwl&- o \m am =w\—\ a 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Appendix B - MYZ Survey Figure B 1 - 601 North Reach 1 Sheet 1 Figure B 2 - 601 North Reach 1 Sheet 2 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 15 F c L s e L L e L X � + e -I M O Z . .-1 Q O H �o (Al I I F0 Z Ln � � h Jj / / C O u O 4J LL- 0 O HA HA w w H w w 2 N H.1 �o z o m N t HDVR - Nt09 JN 'Jl1NnO0 NOINn o a 569LZJN H9131VH Ln O AIISH3AINn 31V1S VNIIOHVJ H1HON o O SZ9L X09 sndLNVJ SSVI H3AV3M ,..� 9NIH33NIDN3 i"niIf1JIH9V'8IVJI90lOis o r rI ON 1HD131da 9N12011NO0 G ° z d33- 21N3aJ N N) 010 / Fl OZ 231 N w w 31VQ NHJ NK :S310N 'ON of a S � N ` a / w C� / J J Q a _' H Y w Z Z Z m Z / Y U' lJ C7 m m r- LL Q L7 0 �,� 0 0 LoN $ co F OC7 H OF F— — a 0 2 r 0 r} 1 Z� 0Z 00000) rnoo Ln 00 00 00 0 / w 000 0 N N N N N N 0 �I w w J ' X 00 Z Q .—I N tD F c L s e L L e L X � + e -I M O Z . .-1 Q O H �o (Al I I F0 Z Ln � � h Jj / / C O u O 4J LL- 0 O HA HA w w H w w 2 N H.1 �o z Q W } J J Q Z Y Ne Y w Z Z Z Zwmwmwm c7 ��wp�0 Q Q D- Q D- Q a p H p O Z r-I O N N m M Z Op 00 O1 Q1 O O p 0 0 0 0 I c 0 0 0 0 0 0 L N fV N N N N 0 Z W W J 1 H Z w W Q W FA 1 i d e j^T . .� LD w N a-I 0 W In / - / I Alll V I M X u1 X Ln o m .-I N N Z 71 4 Q O H o lD (n Z HDV3a - N�09 JN 'A1NnOD NOW 8 O� I I I I 569LZ�N H913ltlH Ln O LL ALISH AINn 31ViS VNIIOHVD H1HON (D SZ9L X06 sndWV:) S6VI b3AV3M ,� 3 9NIH33NI9N3 IVHfllln:)iH9V'8 IV'DI901016 o z N ON 'HJ131V' l OANOW z d33-UN34JN Z 2IV3A N109 ED w w z w 31V(l AHD I NHO S310N ON pl a LL Q W } J J Q Z Y Ne Y w Z Z Z Zwmwmwm c7 ��wp�0 Q Q D- Q D- Q a p H p O Z r-I O N N m M Z Op 00 O1 Q1 O O p 0 0 0 0 I c 0 0 0 0 0 0 L N fV N N N N 0 Z W W J 1 H Z w W Q W FA 1 i d e j^T . .� LD w N a-I 0 W In W W N w H w w 2 N Hy z / / I Alll V I M X u1 X Ln .-I N Z 71 4 Q O H lD (n r 8 O� I I I I W W N w H w w 2 N Hy z 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Appendix C - Profile, Cross Sections, and Pebble Counts Table of Contents 601 North R1 RXS -1 ...................... 601 North RI PXS- 1 ....................... 601 North R1 RXS -2 ...................... 601 North R1 PXS- 2 ....................... 601 North R1 RXS -3 ...................... 601 North R1 PXS- 3 ....................... List of Photos Photo C 1 - R1 RXS -1 Left Pin ......... Photo C 2 - R1 RXS -1 Right Pin ....... Photo C 3 - R1 RXS -1 Downstream.. Photo C 4 - R PXS -1 Left Pin.......... Photo C 5 - R1 PXS -1 Right Pin........ Photo C 6 - R1 PXS -1 Downstream.. Photo C 7 — R1 RXS -2 Left Pin......... Photo C 8 — R1 RXS -2 Right Pin....... Photo C 9 — R1 RXS -2 Downstream. Photo C 10 — R1 PXS -2 Left Pin ....... Photo C 11 — R1 PXS -2 Right Pin..... Photo C 12 — R1 PXS -2 Downstream Photo C 13 — R1 RXS -3 Left Pin....... Photo C 14 — R1 RXS -3 Right Pin .... Photo C 15 — R1 RXS -3 Downstream Photo C 16 — R1 PXS -3 Left Pin ....... Photo C 17 — RI PXS -3 Right Pin..... Photo C 18 — R1 PXS -3 Downstream ............................ 18 ............................ 21 ............................ 24 ............................ 27 ............................ 30 ............................ 33 ..................................................... ............................... 18 ..................................................... ............................... 18 ..................................................... ............................... 19 ..................................................... ............................... 21 ..................................................... ............................... 21 ..................................................... ............................... 22 ..................................................... ............................... 24 ..................................................... ............................... 24 ..................................................... ............................... 25 ..... ............................................ ............................... 27 ..................................................... ............................... 27 ..................................................... ............................... 28 ..................................................... ............................... 30 ..................................................... ............................... 30 ..................................................... ............................... 31 ..................................................... ............................... 33 ..................................................... ............................... 33 ..................................................... ............................... 34 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 16 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) List of Figures Table C 2 - R1 PXS -1 Dimension Data ......................................................... ............................... t Table C 3 - Figure C 1 - R1 RXS -1 Cross Section Plot .................................................... ............................... 19 Figure C 2 - R1 PXS -1 Cross Section Plot .................................................... ............................... 22 Figure C 3 — R1 RXS -2 Cross Section Plot ................................................... ............................... 25 Figure C 4 - R1 PXS -2 Cross Section Plot .................................................... ............................... 28 Figure C 5 — R1 RXS -3 Cross Section Plot ................................................... ............................... 31 Figure C 6 — R1 PXS -3 Cross Section Plot .................................................... ............................... 34 Figure C 7 - R1 Longitudinal Profile Single Sheet ........................................ ............................... 36 Figure C 8 - R1 Longitudinal Profile Sheet 1 ................................................ ............................... 37 Figure C 9 - R1 Longitudinal Profile Sheet 2 ................................................ ............................... 38 Figure C 10 - R1 RXS -1 Pebble Count .......................................................... ............................... 39 Figure C 11 - R1 PXS -1 Pebble Count .......................................................... ............................... 39 Figure C 12 - R1 RXS -2 Pebble Count .......................................................... ............................... 40 Figure C 13 - R1 PXS -2 Pebble Count .......................................................... ............................... 40 Figure C 14 - R1 RXS -3 Pebble Count .......................................................... ............................... 41 Figure C 15 - R1 PXS -3 Pebble Count .......................................................... .. .............................. 41 List of Tables Table C 1 - R1 RXS -1 Dimension Data ......................................................... ............................... 20 Table C 2 - R1 PXS -1 Dimension Data ......................................................... ............................... 23 Table C 3 - R1 RXS -2 Dimension Data ......................................................... ............................... 26 Table C 4 — R1 PXS -2 Dimension Data ........................................................ ............................... 29 Table C 5 - R1 RXS -3 Dimension Data ......................................................... ............................... 32 Table C 6 - R1 PXS -3 Dimension Data ......................................................... ............................... 35 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 17 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 601 North R1 RXS -1 Photo C 1 - RI RXS -1 Left Pin V 1 - .. - 14L. * _ �" L4 sw $ '— Photo C 2 - R1 RXS -1 Right Pin EEP Project #D 06054 -A 18 601 North Mitigation Site (Year 3) 608.00 607.50 607.00 F LL Z 606.50 O H j 606.00 w J w 605.50 605.00 Photo C 3 - R1 RXS -1 Downstream U I - xi KXS -1 Uross section riot 601 N R1 RXS -1 t As -Built —�— MY1 msµ^ BANKFULL MY2 — MY3 223 228 233 238 243 248 253 258 263 STATION (FT) EEP Project #D 06054 -A 19 O O O O fi fi O 1224 O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 1224 O O O 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 601 North R1 PXS -1 Photo C 4 - RI PXS -1 Left Pin Photo C 5 - R1 PXS -1 Right Pin EEP Project #D 06054 -A 21 601 North Mitigation Site (Year 3) 609.00 608.50 608.00 607.50 LL H 607.00 z 0 606.50 Q w 606.00 J W 605.50 605.00 Photo C 6 - RI PXS -1 Downstream c z - xi rxs -t cross section riot 601N R1 PXS -1 50 60 70 80 90 100 STATION (FT) EEP Project #D 06054 -A 22 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 601 North R1 RXS -2 Photo C 7 — RI RXS -2 Left Pin Photo C 8 — R1 RXS -2 Right Pin EEP Project #D 06054 -A 24 O ti O rn CI4 138 O O O . ..... . . . . ill Jill rn CI4 138 O O O 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Photo C 9 — R1 RXS -2 Downstream Figure C 3 — RI RXS -2 Cross Section Plot 601 N R1 RXS -2 602.50 602.00 601.50 BAs -Built � 601.00 -f-My1 J/ O 600.50 0- BANKFULL 600.00 w MY2 W 599.50 — MY3 599.00 147 152 157 162 167 172 177 182 187 STATION (FT) EEP Project #D 06054 -A 25 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 601 North R1 PXS -2 Photo C 10 — R1 PXS -2 Left Pin Photo C 11 — R1 PXS -2 Right Pin EEP Project #D 06054 -A 27 601 North Mitigation Site X10 (Year 3) Photo C 12 — R1 PXS -2 Downstream Figure C 4 - Rl PXS -2 Cross Section Plot 601N R1 PXS -2 600.50 600.00 599.50 599.00 98.50 O 98.00 4 As -Built 97.50 > —F MY1 97.00 BANKFULL 596.50 MY2 MY3 596.00 595.50 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 STATION (FT) EEP Project #D 06054 -A 28 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 601 North R1 RXS -3 Photo C 13 — R1 RXS -3 Left Pin Photo C 14 — R1 RXS -3 Right Pin EEP Project #D 06054 -A 30 601 North Mitigation Site 10 (Year 3) Photo C 15 — Rl RXS -3 Downstream Figure C 5 — RI RXS -3 Cross Section Plot 594.50 601N R1 RXS -3 594.00 593.50 593.00 92.50 992.00 F-- 91.50 J 91.00 tAs-Built MY1 BANKFULL . MY2 —W —MY3 I WW 590.50 590.00 176 186 196 206 216 226 STATION (FT) EEP Project #D 06054 -A 31 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 601 North R1 PXS -3 Photo C 16 — R1 PXS -3 Left Pin Photo C 17 — R1 PXS -3 Right Pin EEP Project #D 06054 -A 33 601 North Mitigation Site ► (Year 3) Photo C 18 — R1 PXS -3 Downstream Figure C 6 — RI PXS -3 Cross Section Plot 601N R1 PXS -3 593 592 591 P 590 -- - 4 As -Built p 589 f MY1 > 588 �- BANKFULL - MY2 w 587 -0-MY3 586 14 24 34 44 54 64 74 84 STATION (FT) EEP Project #D 06054 -A 34 O I O O O � y O O ti N O � b � O ti r d C n C n v 0 C 9 w C O C7 d t N tko C v � f0 N N � � O Z L r, a 0 ba C �L 0 O r x X� G x XX x x x x ¢' 0.a;x 0. x X ox x x x 4 m < x x x o0 x x x O x x x x x XX x x x x AK x x A x x x x x x x 0 x x x x o 0 � o �O O� O o e 0 o 0 d! o� b O O o pv 7 (o N a i N f�'1 i 3 F Y Ln Ln � Y O m a m 0 14 m 14 co N co, N O O m O m co, f i I I X • ,. O O o b (:}) u01jena13 g °o O O O N N °O Ln O O O O O O O O O W 4 C O iJ m N Ic M 4 0 0 Q U U O f1. N Ln Ln (:}) u01jena13 g °o O O O N N °O Ln O O O O O O O O O W 4 C O iJ m N Ic M 4 0 0 Q U U O f1. w M O O ti N O O � bq O M r C 4 V1 O Q U O CLO A.1 W W 0 ■ , xo X, °x 8 . xo x t 90, v o x o O O O o O o .a a 4bA � XO � B S a •�d °QO x N N N O O v L 9a l x a xa gy�° m'a p° O ° O n x OF x x O ' 0 o x ~ d XO a � s g a+ o N a" dk o OL. s X w ei 'C) x �p a O C o °� a °x :° .a Z + . 9 a 7p9k N K L a O U = OA x °' o L 0 01. O Q LT. qX G a x°a' o Iv, It xjp f9c p o � xo a ° •a D 0 x o X +r 3 rl "� N N rn fn 'SE x O ca 1-1 P4 > N m } a X %O • m N m 0 O J m m m 0 0 0 1' J K m m 0 0 J g yX�°• a R O I I . X O O o 0 8 oao y�. x �pO 3' %o x$ x ao o ~ Ln m rn m o o CA °' $ $ Ln Ln Ln (:y) uoi;en813 M r C 4 V1 O Q U O CLO A.1 W W O O ti N Y Z O V Q" 'o r 4 kn O O Q U N O a W W + °+ ++ + + 00 N * ° N + o° a • + O° * + ° O X ° p +,x * 4 °cP op ° + o p°°° + S + ,° n + ❑ ° + ° + os- S +o X S Ln + O, x + 4Px N- K + ° °10 ° + o C° . X + AA O+' X+ X° + O + 8 .x °p N + 140 do N 4) + ° x � + x H V] y N W a• + + K D p + L '� x - L V C O + .°a °' * ° °rte o v1 a c 0 'L + �° . ° N O llr U 'C 6 o x x' ❑ o ° p ° ° ° *,IS p o rn %�,6p ~ x ° x. ° m N M m } } >- >- >- n m 00 m M %P ° m � O � 0 F- O F- � o� + ° X O , ❑ o o ° ° O X A � + x ° odd � 03 o l 04. $ rn m m rn 0010 In In V1 In In ono In 00 Ln Lm 0~ v1 (4}) u01;ena13 'o r 4 kn O O Q U N O a W W 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% Y C 70.0% d 60.0% a 50.0% > 40.0% Y 30.0% E 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 1 003 Figure C 11 -_Rl PXS -1 Pebble Count Pebble Count 601 N R1 PXS -1 O �•Lg O500 'J e sop 3ti000 11.11 y1tiOp0 1000 0 Particle Size (mm) EEP Project #D 06054 -A 39 Figure C 10 _Rl RXS -1 Pebble Count Pebble Count 601 N R1 RXS -1 100.0% -- 90.0% — 80.0 % — �; Ae w 70.0% 60.0% - MY a 50.0% (2008) w >_ 40.0% ;. 30.0% MY 3 20 0 E 20.0% U 10.0% 0.0% 00'� 10,1000 Particle Size (mm) 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% Y C 70.0% d 60.0% a 50.0% > 40.0% Y 30.0% E 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 1 003 Figure C 11 -_Rl PXS -1 Pebble Count Pebble Count 601 N R1 PXS -1 O �•Lg O500 'J e sop 3ti000 11.11 y1tiOp0 1000 0 Particle Size (mm) EEP Project #D 06054 -A 39 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) ............ Figure C_13 - R1 PXS-2 Pebble Count Pebble Count 601 N R1 PXS-2 100.0% Figure C-1-2 --R-I-RXS--2-- Pebble ---------- -Count - ----- ----------------- Pebble Count 601 N R1 RXS-2 ------ 100.0% 90.0% 90.0% - 80.0% - 80.0% 70.0% 70.0% - ASBUIIT-,ZUUZ5) 60.0% - 60.0% 50.0% )uilt (2008 Z 40.0% 50.0% 30.0% T T E 20.0% U 10.0% 2 40.0% 0.0% ZZZ 6000 e 1,15, p ZZ $'I - -1 30.0% Particle Size (mm) E 20.0% U 10.0% 0.0% s- "TOO Particle Size (mm) ............ Figure C_13 - R1 PXS-2 Pebble Count Pebble Count 601 N R1 PXS-2 EEP Project #D 06054-A 40 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% )uilt (2008 Z 40.0% F1 v)nnsn 30.0% T T E 20.0% U 10.0% 0.0% ZZZ 6000 e 1,15, p ZZ $'I - -1 Particle Size (mm) EEP Project #D 06054-A 40 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Figure C 15 - R1 PXS_3 Pebble Count Pebble Count 601 N R1 RXS -3 100.0% Figure C 14 - RI RXS -3 Pebble Count — Pebble Count 601 N R1 RXS -3 100.0% 90.0% :. 90.0% — pr 80.0% Y 80.0% — 70.0% d 70.0 a`r °L y a 60.0 40.0% 30.0% =IF= V1YI (2008 50.0 40.0% 20.0% 30.0% � 7 20.0% Y 3$201() 10.0% *_ --X- Y 3 2010 0.0% 0034 01'Lh 000 ,LOCH 3000 00 0 O 00 01 Oh 11, Ib 0 �� 3.LQ" g'L0 y�1 �0o. Particle Size (mm) Figure C 15 - R1 PXS_3 Pebble Count Pebble Count 601 N R1 RXS -3 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 41 100.0% — 90.0% — pr Y 80.0% — 70.0% a`r °L 60.0 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% =IF= V1YI (2008 E 20.0% -�- Y2 2009 � 10.0% — Y 3$201() 0.0% 0034 01'Lh 000 ,LOCH 3000 3.LQ" 1,L�CJ"- �,y.La" O�p(`� 'L Particle Size (mm) EEP Project #D 06054 -A 41 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Appendix D - Site Photos Table of Contents PhotoPoints ................................................................................................... ............................... 44 ProblemArea Photos ..................................................................................... ............................... 54 VegetationPhotos .......................................................................................... ............................... 59 List of Photos PhotoPoint 1 .................................................................................................. ............................... 44 PhotoPoint 2 .................................................................................................. ............................... 44 PhotoPoint 3 .................................................................................................. ............................... 45 PhotoPoint 4 .................................................................................................. ............................... 45 PhotoPoint 5 .................................................................................................. ............................... 46 PhotoPoint 6 ..................................................... :........................................................................... 46 PhotoPoint 7 .................................................................................................. ............................... 47 PhotoPoint 8 .................................................................................................. ............................... 47 PhotoPoint 9 .................................................................................................. ............................... 48 PhotoPoint 10 ................................................................................................ ............................... 48 PhotoPoint 11 ................................................................................................ ............................... 49 PhotoPoint 12 ................................................................................................ ............................... 49 PhotoPoint 13 ................................................................................................ ............................... 50 PhotoPoint 14 ................................................................................................ ............................... 50 PhotoPoint 15 ................................................................................................ ............................... 51 PhotoPoint 16 ................................................................................................ ............................... 51 PhotoPoint 17 ................................................................................................ ............................... 52 PhotoPoint 18 ................................................................................................ ............................... 52 PhotoPoint 19 ................................................................................................ ............................... 53 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 42 l 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) List of Photos (contd.) ProblemArea Photo 1 .................................................................................... ............................... 54 ProblemArea Photo 2 .................................................................................... ............................... 54 ProblemArea Photo 3 .................................................................................... ............................... 55 ProblemArea Photo 4 .................................................................................... ............................... 55 ProblemArea Photo 5 .................................................................................... ............................... 56 ProblemArea Photo 6 .................................................................................... ............................... 56 ProblemArea Photo 7 .................................................................................... ............................... 57 ProblemArea Photo 8 .................................................................................... ............................... 57 ProblemArea Photo 9 .................................................................................... ............................... 58 ProblemArea Photo 10 .................................................................................. ............................... 58 PhotoD 1 -Vegetation Plot N ..................................................................... ............................... 59 PhotoD 2 - Vegetation Plot N2 ..................................................................... ............................... 59 PhotoD 3 - Vegetation Plot N3 ..................................................................... ............................... 60 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 43 Photo Points 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) ME �. -0. Photo Point 1 Photo Point 2 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 44 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Photo Point 3 Photo Point 4 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 45 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Photo Point 5 Photo Point 6 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 46 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Photo Point 7 Photo Point 8 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 47 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Photo Point 9 Photo Point 10 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 48 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Photo Point 11 Photo Point 12 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 49 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Photo Point 13 Photo Point 14 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 50 t .; \ , 1 -, 0.,N� lit ' 'lip 4 \ \ 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Photo Point 17 Photo Point 18 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 52 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Problem Area Photos Problem Area Photo l Problem Area Photo 2 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 54 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Problem Area Photo 3 Problem Area Photo 4 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 55 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Problem Area Photo 5 Problem Area Photo 6 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 56 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Problem Area Photo 7 Problem Area Photo 8 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 57 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Problem Area Photo 9 Problem Area Photo 10 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 58 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Vegetation Photos Photo D 1 - Vegetation Plot N1 ,d. "" Nt Photo D 2 - Vegetation Plot N2 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 59 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) y Photo D 3 - Vegetation Plot N3 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 60 Appendix E - Vegetation Data Table of Contents Table E 1 — MY2 (2009) Plot N1 Data Table E 2 — MY2 (2009) Plot N2 Data Table E 3 — MY2 (2009) Plot N3 Data EEP Project #D 06054 -A 61 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) ............... 62 ............... 62 ............... 63 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Table E 1- MY3 (2010) Plot N1 Data Table E 2 - MY3 (2010) Plot N2 Data Spring Data Fall Data Notes No Species Coordinates ddh Height DBH Vigor ddh Height DBH Vigor Vigor X (m) Y (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) 1 FP 0.16 3.57 12 111 4 20 181 8 4 0 2 FP 0.36 5.86 11 101 4 14 127 4 0 3 QM 0.65 8.00 6.50 0 0 0 0 4 FP 2.80 2.04 14 138 2 4 17 141 3 4 0 5 FP 3.08 4.61 44 87 123 4 16 115 173 4 4 6 FP 3.39 7.01 5 69 101 4 6 69 153 4 4 7 FP 3.71 9.61 16 174 5 4 19 179 5 4 4 8 QN 6.11 2.65 15 135 191 4 18 193 5 4 4 9 BN 6.41 5.14 16 114 230 4 23 171 3 4 4 10 BN 6.92 7.98 25 176 4 4 36 226 11 4 0 11 QN 8.80 2.22 4.69 23 182 0 4 31 213 0 4 12 FP 9.35 4.59 11 115 167 4 15 142 3 4 4 13 FP 9.58 7.03 7 63 67 4 7 63 68 3 4 14 FP 9.72 9.32 8 78 4 10 79 3 0 Table E 2 - MY3 (2010) Plot N2 Data EEP Project #D 06054 -A 62 Spring Data Fall Data Notes No Species Coordinates ddh Height DBH Vigor ddh Height DBH Vigor X (m) I Y (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) 1 AT 0.17 0.42 0 0 2 AT 0.25 3.30 0 0 3 CO 0.36 6.50 0 0 4 CO 0.43 9.42 0 0 5 BN 3.01 2.20 15 123 4 22 173 5 4 6 QM 3.50 8.67 12 101 4 16 153 6 4 Trunk gnawed 7 QN 3.65 6.16 7 47 4 9 106 4 8 BN 6.75 9.46 26 191 6 4 275 16 4 9 BN 6.88 6.85 34 230 10 4 304 19 4 10 QN 7.05 2.23 0 0 11 FP 7.15 4.69 23 182 7 4 31 213 10 4 12 FP 9.21 7.94 32 167 6 4 38 187 9 4 13 QP 9.64 5.33 6 67 4 7 68 4 14 Q 9.85 2.74 0 0 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 62 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Table E 3 - MY3 (2010) Plot N3 Data EEP Project #D 06054 -A 63 Spring Data Fall Data Notes No Species Coordinates ddh Height DBH Vigor ddh Height DBH Vigor X (m) Y (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) 1 QP 0.75 8.62 9 81 4 16 215 7 4 2 QM 0.78 6.15 12 129 4 17 212 11 4 Trunk gnawed 3 Q 1.00 3.82 0 0 4 QP 1.25 1.35 19 225 8 4 362 19 4 5 FP 3.39 9.33 11 99 4 16 128 4 6 FP 3.69 6.56 19 136 4 30 226 10 4 7 FP 3.89 4.00 17 167 5 4 26 238 11 4 8 BN 3.90 1.38 270 19 4 328 25 4 9 QP 6.37 8.21 0 0 10 BN 6.47 3.47 20 231 9 4 329 19 4 11 BN 6.65 1.20 16 165 3 4 263 10 4 12 Q 6.88 5.78 0 0 13 QM 9.23 7.75 4 43 4 5 43 4 14 QM 9.35 0.41 2 29 4 4 60 4 15 QM 9.55 2.90 4 36 4 4 37 4 Trunk gnawed 16 BN 9.60 9.94 24 188 8 4 306 23 4 17 QM 9.67 5.21 13 92 4 1 16 154 4 4 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 63 r 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Appendix F - Rainfall Data Date Amount (in.) 12/31/2009 0.14 10/12/2009 0.32 1/16/2010 0.46 10/14/2009 0.21 1/17/2010 1.26 10/15/2009 0.36 1/19/2010 0.01 10/16/2009 0.01 1/21/2010 0.82 10/17/2009 0.02 1/22/2010 0.10 10/24/2009 0.21 1/24/2010 0.89 10/27/2009 1.02 1/25/2010 0.94 10/28/2009 0.21 1/30/2010 0.04 10/29/2009 0.01 1/31/2010 0.40 10/31/2009 0.02 2/1/2010 0.08 11/1/2009 0.51 2/2/2010 0.29 11/2/2009 0.01 2/4/2010 0.05 11/10/2009 1.18 2/5/2010 2.69 11/11/2009 2.94 2/9/2010 0.03 11/12/2009 0.51 2/10/2010 0.01 11/13/2009 0.01 2/13/2010 0.06 11/18/2009 0.07 2/15/2010 0.19 11/19/2009 0.03 2/22/2010 0.54 11/20/2009 0.01 2/24/2010 0.09 11/22/2009 0.80 2/25/2010 0.04 11/23/2009 0.57 3/2/2010 0.24 11/25/2009 0.02 3/3/2010 0.25 11/26/2009 0.01 3/10/2010 0.03 11/30/2009 0.10 3/11/2010 0.14 12/2/2009 1.44 3/12/2010 1.03 12/5/2009 0.06 3/14/2010 0.03 12/6/2009 0.01 3/21/2010 0.25 12/8/2009 0.84 3/22/2010 0.02 12/9/2009 0.42 3/26/2010 0.02 12/12/2009 0.05 3/28/2010 0.13 12/13/2009 0.12 3/29/2010 0.64 12/14/2009 0.02 4/8/2010 0.35 12/15/2009 0.01 4/9/2010 0.03 12/18/2009 1.40 4/19/2010 0.01 12/19/2009 0.07 4/20/2010 0.05 12/20/2009 0.01 4/21/2010 0.01 12/21/2009 0.01 4/24/2010 0.14 12/25/2009 2.00 4/25/2010 0.13 12/30/2009 0.19 4/27/2010 0.55 EEP Project #D 06054 -A 64 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) 5/3/2010 0.36 7/13/2010 0.05 5/4/2010 0.03 7/16/2010 0.07 5/6/2010 0.01 7/17/2010 0.44 5/11/2010 0.08 7/18/2010 0.04 5/16/2010 1.15 7/19/2010 0.25 5/17/2010 0.62 7/20/2010 0.02 5/18/2010 0.08 7/21/2010 0.19 5/21/2010 0.46 7/22/2010 0.02 5/22/2010 0.27 7/23/2010 0.04 5/23/2010 0.04 7/25/2010 0.03 5/24/2010 0.02 7/27/2010 0.08 5/25/2010 0.08 7/29/2010 0.02 5/28/2010 0.11 7/31/2010 0.02 5/31/2010 1.42 8/1/2010 0.02 6/1/2010 0.05 8/2/2010 0.01 6/2/2010 1.66 8/4/2010 0.02 6/6/2010 0.25 8/5/2010 0.07 6/10/2010 0.15 8/6/2010 0.04 6/11/2010 0.01 8/11/2010 0.04 6/12/2010 0.01 8/12/2010 0.02 6/13/2010 0.13 8/19/2010 0.03 6/14/2010 0.05 8/20/2010 0.01 6/17/2010 0.05 8/22/2010 0.20 6/18/2010 0.05 8/23/2010 0.02 6/19/2010 0.03 8/24/2010 0.01 6/20/2010 0.01 9/3/2010 0.29 6/21/2010 0.02 9/4/2010 0.01 6/22/2010 0.01 9/8/2010 0.04 6/23/2010 0.02 9/9/2010 0.05 6/24/2010 0.04 9/10/2010 0.01 6/25/2010 0.02 9/11/2010 0.01 6/26/2010 0.08 9/12/2010 0.16 6/27/2010 0.04 9/13/2010 0.04 6/28/2010 0.24 6/29/2010 0.15 6/30/2010 0.04 7/1/2010 0.03 7/2/2010 0.06 7/6/2010 0.07 7/7/2010 0.01 7/9/2010 0.09 7/12/2010 0.04 EEP Project #D 06054 -A , 601 North Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report for 2010 (Year 3) Appendix G - Morphology Table EEP Project #D 06054 -A 66 N M Cn Y s a N O O 0.! b � r- Q ^0 U O C�. a w LU �n G. N N 7 O — � z O 0. o o p N N N O V } h N M V W V N N O N ,n V, O o0 C o 0o N n .G N N — ,n 1 ice+' t� '� M In Ln 10 .. O oo O o0 rq u O— M r p Cl c0 N N z O � 10 rl- ON O p r 10 10 In O ,n p O ^ ^ - o o - — M G G N X M } N Cl Q o0 00 , M oo M O N In In M oo O oo O z C O P — M — Cl — O j o r- Cl 11 °o G L O 00 R E N o en O N �O+ G } � 73 tXd ^ z z R y N CD M 7 4E.. eq — C R z O, �n O ' t d — Q Q _ } 7:> r r � N °O 7 00 R O— O O\ N N 7 z z 000 � Q°+ � In [� h 0() In Vl I'D N l CD In In 7 N O eY O O oo O N Q p M Q Q }' , cX6 00 Ic 1p ,n W N z O U z z �"' M N � °N O� O N N O O O O C 7 l� ,n � ^ O ° O M X CL. O N d, N O 0. z 7 M O0 10 In G9i O O O n °� 7 O ��IO 10 N N C7) N , O O o0 7 Vl 00 M , N 10 4 O N O V Ic R m N N N r 1G M r- 01 IC M r- n r- n � O O a. t Q N N N , N .N.. ro r M M W r ON r Ol ^' Z v1 U z Q z 10 O d N O O V CA , cCC �� N M C, r M y 7 9 O O In V O V V' O Q In N 11 N d. M O M r ' — Cl 00 O C'4 N O O 7 Q Q O W 7 N 7 z z i-' O x n O O °O In in O ,n N [� N p �!yy .7 a� O — ,� M T O ._ N .-- M .-- .-, 1� .-- 7 "Z" M — D, N ._. O 7 — 7 WW O �i z 00 rn `n O O In 00 a� M M D, M 2.1 O In O' O — O 7 i M o M M o0 10 O O O N Q N p 7 Q Q _ M �^ O ,^ N M r � r T } O b O` o0 p n — N S-2 O — o0 N 7 10 O cd W M v1 rNn Cl In Z Z O O } M In '7 W v) '4D *1 C N O+' O O g c '- T� o 3 v cG a i y; E s 3 w v o ar E �bD N b C 'a_ C � C d L ate+ d m 7 C W C C, �'p U C a N o y N x L o O In V oo tR. R G, c 'O d N .-7 L C v N p, .� C C O O o °-' `�' a v w o o t 3 u. m m w wm m 3 m r- Q ^0 U O C�. a w LU