20061203 Ver 5_401 Application_20120512

VS
Western Wake Partners
Regional Wastewater
Management Facilities
April 20 2012
Mr Henry Wicker � Q9
US Army Corps of Engineers 0
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office MA( 1 7 2012
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington North Carolina 284031343 D 14R ft, ROUALITr
WETLAND6 AND STOR AVATER GF ANCH
Subject. USACE Action ID SAW 2005 -20159
DWQ #2006 -1203
Supplemental Information Request for Permit Modification
Western Wake Regional Wastewater Management Facilities Wake County NC
Dear Mr Wicker
The Western Wake Partners request modification of the permit issued for the subject project
under the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) Action ID SAW 2005 20159 (Issued
Permit) The modification is to accommodate realignment of one portion of the West Cary
Force Main (WCFM) associated with the project (HUC 03030002) and to add infrastructure
extensions related to implementing the Town of Apex Water & Sewer Extension Policy (HUC
03030004) The modifications are addressed individually below
Mitigation for the Issued Permit has been satisfied through payment Into the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) Payment included a total of 484 warm stream
credits and 175 riparian wetland credits in HUC 03030002 and a total of 736 warm stream
credits and 0 25 riparian wetland credits in HUC 03030004
West Cary Force Main Modifications
The proposed realignment was requested by a property owner along the West Cary Force
Main easement The realignment reduces impacts to jurisdictional waters of the United
States as described in Tables 1 and 2 on page 2 and in the attached supporting
documentation (Attachments Al and A3) The tables below and Attachments Al and A3
address only waters of the United States proposed to be impacted by the West Cary Force
Main portion of the project

Mr Henry Wicker
US Army Corps of Engineers
April 20, 2012
Page 2 of 7
Wetland
Impact
Area
Table 1-.
Wetland
Type
Wetland Impacts . • the
Permitted Permitted
Temp f Permanent
Impacts Impacts
(ac) (ac)
Proposed
Proposed
Temp
Impacts
(ac)
Force
Proposed
Permanent
Impacts
(ac)
Change Change
Temp Permanent
Impacts Impacts
(ac) (_ac)
1
Forested
003
001
0
0
-003
_
-001
2
Forested
008
003
0
0
-008
-003
3
Forested
003
001
0
0
-003
001
4
Forested
046
015
044
014
-003
-001
5
Forested
004
001
004
001
0
0
6
Forested
012
004
012
004
0
0
1A
Forested
0
0
002
001
+002
+001
2A
Forested
0
0
001
000
+001
+000
3A
Forested
0
0
0.03
001
+003
+001
TOTAL
076 1
026
086
0.22 1
-010
-004
The total permitted impacts to wetlands for the Western Wake Regional Wastewater
Management Facilities ( WWRWMF) project in are 0 82 acre of permanent impact and 2 95
acres of temporary impact The West Cary Force Main portion of the project (in HUC Code
0303002) has 0 26 acre of permitted permanent impacts and 0 76 acre of temporary impacts
As revised the proposed wetland impacts for the West Cary Force Main portion of the project
are 0 22 acre of permanent impact (decrease of 0 04 acres) and 0 66 acre of temporary
impacts (decrease of 010 acre)
The total permitted impacts to streams for the WWRWMF project are 378 ft of permanent
impact and 1 816 ft of temporary impact The West Cary Force Main portion of the project
has 18 ft of permitted permanent impacts and 110 ft of temporary impacts (to perennial
streams) As revised proposed permanent impacts to perennial streams for the WCFM
portion of the project are unchanged and proposed temporary stream impacts to perennial
streams are decreased by 28 ft
The Partners elected to pay a fee to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCEEP) to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements of the 404 and 401 permits for
the subject project The approach used to determine compensatory mitigation requirements
for impacts originally permitted consisted of determining stream and wetland quality scores
Quality Scores were used in conjunction with Table 3 (for wetlands) and Table 4 (for streams)
on page 3 to determine mitigation ratios Mitigation ratios were applied to permanent
impacts to determined compensatory mitigation requirements
Table
.. the
Proposed Force-Main
Stream
Stream
Permitted
Permitted
Proposed Proposed
Change
Change
Impact
Type
Temp
Permanent
Temp Permanent
Temp
Permanent
Area
Impacts (ft)
Impacts (ft)
Impacts (ft) Impacts (ft)
Impacts (ft)
Impacts (ft)
1
PerenrNal
W
0
0
0
-80
0
2
Perenrdal
50
18
50
18
0
0
1A
Intermittent
0
0
32
0
+32
0
TOTAL
110
18
82
0
-a
0
The total permitted impacts to streams for the WWRWMF project are 378 ft of permanent
impact and 1 816 ft of temporary impact The West Cary Force Main portion of the project
has 18 ft of permitted permanent impacts and 110 ft of temporary impacts (to perennial
streams) As revised proposed permanent impacts to perennial streams for the WCFM
portion of the project are unchanged and proposed temporary stream impacts to perennial
streams are decreased by 28 ft
The Partners elected to pay a fee to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCEEP) to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements of the 404 and 401 permits for
the subject project The approach used to determine compensatory mitigation requirements
for impacts originally permitted consisted of determining stream and wetland quality scores
Quality Scores were used in conjunction with Table 3 (for wetlands) and Table 4 (for streams)
on page 3 to determine mitigation ratios Mitigation ratios were applied to permanent
impacts to determined compensatory mitigation requirements

Mr Henry Wicker
US Army Corps of Engineers
April 20 2012
Page 3of7
Table 3. ' Wetland-Quality Score
Mitigation Ratio Weiland Quality
Score
31 67100
21 34.66
1 1 033
®
Quality Score
Mitigation Ratio i
Stream Quality Score
31
76-100
21
5175
1 1
26.50
1 1
0.25
Attachment A2 provides wetland rating and stream quality assessment worksheets for the
realigned portion of the WCFM and the resulting quality scores Table 5 below summarizes
the changes to required mitigation that result from the proposed realignment of a portion of
the WCFM and includes the impact quantities quality score mitigation ratio, and
compensatory mitigation requirements
Compensatory Table 5.
Impact Impact
Area Type
Permitted
Permanent
Impacts
Resulting from
Proposed
Permanent
Impacts
the Proposed
Quality
Score
Realignment
i Permitted Proposed
Mitigation Compensatory Compensatory
Ratio Mitigation Mitigation
Requirements Requirements
1
Wetland
0 009 ac
0
36
21
0 018
0
2
Wetland
0 026 ac
0
37
21
0 052
0
3
Wetland
0 010ac
0
33
1 1
0 010
0
4
Wetland
0154 ac
0143
56
21
0 308
0 28e
5
Welland
0 014 ac
0 014
23
1 1
0 014
0 014
6
Wetland
1 0 044 ac
0 044
69
31
0132
0132
1A
Wetland
0
0 005
44
21
0
001
2A
=Wetland
0
0 003
49
21
0
0 006
3A
0
0 011
45
21
0
0 022
TOTAL WETLAND
0 26 ec
02100
053
047
1
Stream
0
0
77
NA
0
0
2
Stream
18 ft
18 ft
54
21
38
36
1A
Stream
0
0
39
NA
0
0
TOTAL STREAM
left
left
36
36
For the WCFM portion of the Western Wake project the compensatory mitigation
requirement for wetlands is 0 06 credits less than permitted compensatory mitigation
requirements There is no change in compensatory mitigation requirements for streams

Mr Henry Wicker
US Army Corps of Engineers
April 20 2012
Page 4 of 7
Apex Site 14 Water & Sewer Extension Policy
The Town of Apex's Site 14 Water & Sewer Extension Policy will construct water and
wastewater Infrastructure to serve eligible residents near the Western Wake Regional Water
Reclamation Facility Tables 6 and 7 below and the attached supporting documentation
(Attachments 61 and 133) summarize the proposed wetland and stream Impacts associated
with the Water and Sewer Extension Policy only
Table i.
Wetland Impacts
along the Proposed
Perennial
yes
Sewer Extension
Policy Infrastructure
Ephemeral
Wetland
Wetland
Proposed Temp
Proposed Permanent
Impact Area
Type
Impacts (ac)
Impacts (ac)
C
Forested
003
002
D E
Forested
007
002
TOTAL
Ephemeral
010
004
Table
Stream
Impact Area
Impacts
7. Stream • . the Proposed Apex
Extension Policy
Stream I On W RF Proposed Temp Proposed
Type I Site Impacts (ft) Permanent Impacts
t (n)
S2
Perennial
yes
30 10
S3
Ephemeral
No
NA NA
84
Intermittent
NO
30 i 10
S5
InternMent
No
30
10
so
Ephemeral
No
NA
NA
S7
Ephemeral
No
NA NA
S8
Ephemeral
No
NA
NA
Total Perennial Stream Impacts
30
10
Total Interrnment Stream Impacts
00 20
Attachment B2 provides wetland rating and stream quality assessment worksheets for the
portion of Apex Water and Sewer Extension alignment Table 8 on page 5 summarizes the
required mitigation which results from the proposed Apex Water & Sewer Extension Policy
portion of the project

Mr Henry Wicker
US Army Corps of Engineers
April 20 2012
Page 5 of 7
Impact Impact Proposed ' Mitigation
Area Type Permanent Impacts Ratio
C Wetland 0 02 ac 11
Compensatory
Mitigation Requirements
0 02 ac
D-E
Wetland
0 024 ac
31
0 07 ac
TOTAL
0 044 ac
00960
S2
Stream
10 if
21
20 If
S4
Stream
10 If
1.1
10 If
S5
Stream
10 If
11
10 If
TOTAL
30 If
40 If
For the Apex Water & Sewer Extension Policy portion of the Western Wake project in HUC
Code 0303004 the compensatory mitigation requirements for wetlands and streams are 0 09
credits and 40 credits respectively
Net Change in Impacts and Required Mitigation
The WCFM modifications (HUC 03030002) results in no Increase to stream Impacts The
addition of the Apex Water & Sewer Extension Policy (HUC 03030004) results in an Increase
of 30 linear feet to stream impacts The total increase to stream impacts will be 30 linear
feet
Accounting for the expected mitigation ratios the required mitigation for streams does not
increase for HUC 03030002 but Increases by 40 credits (HUC 03030004) totaling an
increase of 40 credits
Under the Issued Permit required compensatory mitigation for streams are 484 credits (HUC
03030002) and 736 credits (HUC 03030004) totaling 1 220 stream credits Revised required
compensatory mitigation for streams is 484 credits (HUC 03030002) and 776 credits (HUC
03030004) totaling 1 260 credits Stream credits purchased from NCEEP totaling 484 (HUC
03030002) and 736 (HUC 03030004) An additional 40 stream credits will need to be
purchased in HUC 03030004 Table 9 on page 6 outlines the changes and new
requirements for stream impacts and compensatory mitigation in addition to stream credits
already purchased from NCEEP

Mr Henry Wicker
US Army Corps of Engineers
April 20 2012
Page 6 of 7
Total Stream
Compensatory
Additional
Total Stream
Compensatory
Stream Mitigation
Compensatory
Impacts (10
Mitigation
Credits
Stream Credits
378
Requirements 1
Purchased _
4 Needed _
Current Issued Permit
HUC 03030002
253
484
484
0
HUC 03030004
125
738
736
0
TOTAL
378
1220
1220
0
WCFM and Apex Site 14 Water & Sewer Extension Policy
HUC 03030002
0
0
0
0
HUC 03030004
30
40
0
40
TOTAL
30
40
0
40
Total Proposed Modirications
HUC 03030002
253
484
484
0
HUC 03030004
155
776
736
40
TOTAL
408
1260
1220
40
The WCFM modifications (HUC 03030002) result in a 0 04 acre decrease to wetland
Impacts The addition of the Apex Water & Sewer Extension Policy (HUC 03030004) results
In a 0 04 acre increase to wetland impacts There will not be an increase in wetland impacts
Accounting for the expected mitigation ratios the required compensatory mitigation for
wetlands will not increase for HUC 03030002 and will increase by 0 09 credits (HUC
03030004) totaling an increase of 0 09 credits
Under the Issued Permit required compensatory mitigation for wetlands are 152 credits
(HUC 03030002) and 012 credits (HUC 03030004) totaling 164 wetland credits Revised
required compensatory mitigation for wetlands Is still 152 credits (HUC 03030002) and will
be 0 21 credits (HUC 03030004) totaling 173 wetland credits Since credits were purchased
from NCEEP wetland credits are rounded to the nearest 0 25 credit Wetland credits
purchased were 175 (HUC 03030002) and 0 25 (HUC 03030004) Since more wetland
credits were purchased due to rounding than the total required wetland credits in both
RUCs under the proposed modifications it is proposed that additional wetland credits will not
need to be purchased Table 10 on page 7 outlines the changes and new requirements for
wetland impacts and compensatory mitigation in addition to Weiland credits already
purchased from NCEEP

Mr Henry Wicker
US Army Corps of Engineers
April 20 2012
Page 7 of 7
Total Wetland
Impacts (ac)
Current Issued Permit
Total Wetland
Compensatory
Additional
Compensatory
Wetland
Compensatory
Mitigation
Mitigation Credits
I Wetland Credits
Requirements
Purchased
L Needed
HUC 03030DO21
073
152
175
-023
HUC OW300041
009
012
025
-013
TOTAL
1 0 82
164
200
-036
WCFM and Apex Site 14 Water & Sewer Extension Policy
HUC 03030002
-004
0
0
0
HUC 03030004
004
009
0
009
TOTAL
000
009
0
009
Total Proposed Modifications
HUC 03030002
082
152
175
-023
HUC 03030004
013
021
025
-004
TOTAL
095
173
2.00
-0.27
We trust the Information above is sufficient to modify the permit issued USACE Action ID
SAW 2005 20159 Please feel free to contact our consultant Mr Ken Bruce of Brown and
Caldwell telephone [phone] or email kbruce@brwncaid com if you need further
information or would like to discuss this request We look forward to your response
Sincerely
TOWN OF CARY
Stephen J B own PE
Director of Public Works and Utilities
Attachments (2)
1 Attachment A West Cary Force Main Modifications (1) Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Form — West Cary Force Main (2) Wetland Rating and Stream Quality
Assessment Worksheets — West Cary Force Main (3) Stream and Wetland Impact Maps —
West Cary Force Main
2 Attachment B Apex Site 14 Water & Sewer Extension Policy (1) Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Form — Apex Water & Sewer Extension Policy (2) Wetland Rating and Stream
Quality Assessment Worksheets — Apex Water & Sewer Extension Policy Alternate Routes A
and B (3) Stream and Wetland Impact Maps — Apex Water & Sewer Extension Policy (4)
Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners — Apex Water & Sewer Extension Policy

USACE Action ID SAVV 2005 20159
DWQ #2006 1203
Supplemental Information Request for Permit Modification
Western Wake Regional Wastewater Management Facilities
Attachment A West Cary Force Main Modifications

Attachment 1 Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Form - West Cary Force Main

ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD)
B NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD
Town of Cary, Contact Person Jamie Revels
C DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER Wilmington District,
AID# SAW 2005 -20159
D PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION This
portion of the Westem Wake project is known as the West Cary Force Main, and
Is located between Green Level Road West (SR 1605) and Wimbedey Road (SR
1603)
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State NC County /pansh/borough Wake County
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format)
Lat 35 046'06 21" North Long 78 054'56 06" West
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody White Oak Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area
Non wetland waters 92 linear feet 184 width (ft) and/or 0 004 acres
Cowardin Class Rivenne
Stream Flow Interauttent and perennial
Wetlands 0 657 acres
Cowardin Class Forested
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters
Tidal
Non Tidal
E REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY)
❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date
® Field Determination Date(s)

I The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time
2 In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit venfication requiring
"pre - construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters, (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization, (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authonzation and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary, (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable, (6) accepting a permit authorization (e g , signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C F R Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C F R 331 5(a)(2)) If during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be "waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information
2

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked Items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps, plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant Hazen and Sawyer, P C
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheetstdelineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters study
® U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps 03030004
® U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name Green Level
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
❑ StatatLocal wetland inventory map(s)
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
❑ Photographs ❑ Aerial (Name & Date)
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Other information (please specify)
later lurlsdictional determinations
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
3
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

SAMPLE
Estimated
Site
Cowardin
amount of
Class of
number
Latitude
Longitude
Class
aquatic
aquatic
resource in
resource
review area
Stream
357728
789079
Intermittent
32 feet
non - section
1 A
10 — non
wetland
Stream
35 76764
-78 90962
Perennial
60 feet
non section
1
10 — non
wetland
Wetland
35 76749
-78 90941
PFO
0 023 acre
non - section
1A
10 — wetland
Wetland
35 76677
-78 90845
PFO
0 014 acre
non - section
2A
I
10 — wetland
Wetland
3575977
-7890805
PFO
0 038 acre
non - section
3A
10 — wetland
Wetland
3575946
-7890806
1
PFO
0 582 acre
non section
4 1
1
1
110
— wetland

Nr i1W(1 Cfranm idonfifiratinn Fnrm Vertinn d I I
- - -- -- -------- - - - - --
Date C. L Zola
Profect(Site VjkAf -00.k. -%1
Latitude 35 4iR%%
Evaluator L Dl efOo t} KAYYOLng.
County 1AJ dk
Longitude 4$
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent 3$ 5
Stream Determination (circle one )
Ephemeral Intermittent erenoie
Other
e g Quad Name
if t 19 or ff2 rennial 30 �/
2 Sinuosity of channel along the"
0
A Geomorphology ( Subtotal = «5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2 )
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along the"
0
1
05
3
3 In- channel structure ex nffle -pool step -pool
n le- ool sequence
0
05
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Acbvelrelrct floodplam
0
1
2
CD
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
C9
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
0
3
8 Headcuts
1
2
3
9 Grade control
05
1
15
110 Natural valley
0
05
1
j-
1
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Ye
3
arMat ditduss are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hvdraloav (Subtotal = 10 1
12 Presence of Basetlow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxrdmng bacteria
0
1
2 )
3
14 Leaf lifter
15
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debns
0
05
2
15
16 Organic debris Imes or piles
0
05
1
15
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Ye = 3
C Bloloov (Subtotal = 11 1
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
15
24 Amphibians
0
05
C9
15
25 Algae
05
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed prW.
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 15 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods
See p 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch

NC DWt1 Stream idenhficatinn Form Version 4 11 S fea v%q I A - UT +D W Ina to OaJc tree k
Date
ProjectlSite LOWt u-) 9 E
Latitude
Evaluator t
County
Longitude
Total Points
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e g Quad Name
if a 19 or erennral if 2:30
2
3
A Geomorphology (Subtotal= )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In channel structure ex nffle pool step -pool
ripple ool se uence
0
O
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
CID
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
1
3
6 Deposibonal bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
05
2
3
8 Headcuts
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
0 5
1
15
10 Natural valley
0
0 5
1
15
11 Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated see discio in manual
R Hvdroloov (Subtotal = '05:25
)
12 Presence of Baseflow
D
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
CCD
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
15
1
0 5
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
0
1
15
17 Sod based evidence of high water table?
No
Yes
C Blol Subtotal =
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
CD
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
0
0 5
1
15
24 Amphibians
0
5
1
15
25 Algae
05
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 7 OBL = 15 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Prgecl/Skte \" Cl(-,M d City/County, 1 aLL Sampling Date 1�QA� i I
Applicant/Owner WW �W, tF State �r�- Sampling Point W �
Investigator(s) �. D 1 � ! KAy'YO n G2 Section Township Range
Landform (hdlslope terrace etc) VtSQ& V it S111 focal relief (concave convex nonex C Oy1 CLty"e_ Slope (56) 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lot Long Datum
Soil Map Unit Name VJg1kiJIdjUR %t/J k ULA" NWI classification pFQ 1G
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (lf no explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances present? Yes k No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
deQ(- 2sa, or,.- -(—t oDdt:.pWvl 0-� IIEX UIt 06-k �
ojA vjdf&J wwpa & W - I a.Ax W aS W 1 A,
HYDROLOGY
Primary Indlimloss (minimum of one is rammed.
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Surface Water (A1)
" True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High WaterTable (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_, Oxldized Rhmospheres on Uvfng Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Unes (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ DrySeason WaterTable (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
^ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible an Aerial Imagery (Cg)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
T Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Shadow Aquitard (03)
_ WatsrStained Leaves (89)
_ Mxrotopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 57
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth pnches). Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
ncludes canillary fringe)
Describe Recoided Data (stream gauge monitonng wed aerial photos previous Inspections) if evadable:
Remarks
h ixti o bVN,d
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum (Plot size
1 ft L*- r1A.b ftL M
2 t1%A.lA `
3 1AdT± n LA S XAA -NO1
4
) Cover Species? Status
Zo
40 a wy)
5
x 1 =
6
x2= SU
7
x3= to aO
8
x 4 --
Saalino /Shrub Stratum (Plot size
1
2 Sit r l,rts(.f ln,taaa
3
ZO = Total Cover
)
Sp oy-w
��G1 �/a t
4
(A) �I 8 O (B)
5
6
7
8
9
10
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
2 _%.(. V41! i is S j1j gA 544S
zi) - Total Cover
% Ot) � S .�
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
12
Woody Vine stratum (Plot size
1 fu.t&i" 0..
2 i eg ret jQ fp d `[s-
) Totai Cover
pv Ln fpLc
26 N,&
3
4
5
6
O = Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a seoarale sheeLl
+Ms a.,,b Stivubs
Sampling Point w2'J W
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC $ (A)
Total Number of Dominant Q
Species Across All Strata O (B)
Percent of Dominant Species v�
That Are 081. FACW or FAC C010 (A/B)
Total % Cover of
Multiply by
OBL species —'
x 1 =
FACW species 11110
x2= SU
FAC species Z 00
x3= to aO
FACU species
x 4 --
UPL species
X5.
Column Totals _ 39 0
(A) �I 8 O (B)
Prevalence Index - B/A = Z S I
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophybc Vegetation
$ 2 Dominance Test Is X50%
X 3 Prevalence Index is S3 0'
—4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydrrc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Venetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants excluding vines 3 In (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH) regardless of
height
Saplingf6rub - Woody plants excluding vines less
than 3 in OBH and greater than 3 28 It (1 m) tall.
Herb -Al herbaceous (non - woody) plants regardless
of size and woody plants less than 328 it tall
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 it in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes x No
1Ah t,M 01M WkQA -e- W mlij-� I's cieSf
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
the
or
Sampling Point 02-3 w
Depth matrix Redox Features
(inches) Col moist %_ Color 1 00 _%_ Type' Loci Texture Remarks
0 -j 1�yR5 1 85 LO-(g 51W IS RM TL 5ANC( U
-U
Hydric Soil Indicators
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Hisgc (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_, Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
_ Sandy Gieyed Mafia (S4)
_, Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type
Depth (inches)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
— Thin Dark Surface (39) (MLRA 147 148)
__.. Loamy Gleyed Mai* (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (FB)
Iron- (Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
Piedmont Floodplaln Sops (1`19) (MLRA 148)
n o resincfi ve �� .P v►c.ou -,4-tra
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sous (F19)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ Red Pamrd Material (72)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explam to Remarks)
3Indicators of hydmphybc vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Sol Present? Yes f No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Pro)ect/Site W QF Gty/County Wa,K P— Sampling Date
Applicant/Owner Wu/-wp — State Sampling Po int WIr 7 - 3
Investigator(s) L—bi- r-haRi Kirr,a m
f l
Section Township Range
Landform (hplslope terrace etc.) Local relief (concave convex none) CMCdtV•2 Slope (%) 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 1 Let Long UrDwatum
Sod Map Unit Name w L.l�-rC.rL " li I CIO-110L, NN classification r ry IC
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes %- No (If no explam in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances present? Yes 4 No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydmphytic Vegetation Present? Yes 1� No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Welland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No K
4*
HYDROLOGY
F7-x- Iv6W,r Lt,, eke ar +(Aa.h. WaF%"
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two reputed)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is repared
check all that apply) _
Surface Sal Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhtaospheres on Living Roots (C3) _
Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _
Crayfish Burro" (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _
Saturation bible an Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
, Other (Explain in Remarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ bon Deposits (85)
_i
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_
Shallow Agwtard (D3)
_ Water Stained Leaves (B9)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No-j)(___ Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Saturation Presets? Yes No
K Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes caplkw fn
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum (Plot size i
% Cover Species ? Status
1
PiAna,►S tar,u_tA
L4 () _
. cl PAC-
2
PCA.,r ✓LJOAkvr.
ZS
S _ 'G
3
L.gwAa*Kba1rs'hmm,
2S
p-1-
4
fUA j rQ&IM5 V IM .t1
la_
Vta �AG(d
5
6
7
8
10_
= Total Cover
SavOrm/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size
)
1
AP9.r nAbor Ayv—
s
VA 5d:c.
2
?
-
MGf
3
D
ZD
5 _
FC-
5
6
7
8
9
10
_ = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sampling PoinL W 2 -J U
Number of Dominant Species 4
That Are OBL FACW or FAC U (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species silo That Are OBL FACW or FAC io (pig)
Total % Cover of.
Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 -
FACW species —
x2=
FAC species 240
x3-
FACU species .. 0
x4= )
UPL species —
x 5 = "-
Column Totals 3 26
(A) 990 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = .309
_ 1 Rapid Test for HydrophyUC Vegetation
J_2 Dominance Test is >50%
—3 Prevalence Index is 93 0'
—4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophybc vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants excluding vines 3 In (7 6 cm) or
more to diameter at breast height (DOH) regardless of
height.
Sapling*rub - Woody plants excluding vines loss
than 3 in 0BH and greater than 3 28 R (1 m) tall
11 I Herb -All herbacedus (non - woody) plants regardless
12 of size and woody plants less than 328 it tail
= Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot sae )
1 WM_ ' 3C) �14C-
2. 1,t Fit
3
4
5
6
-.7— = Total Cover
or on a
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes %� No
n o dnwma of SpeG e_s W--- sfM"t ( k_A �Y
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point V% Z'
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
finches) moist _ % Co (moist) Type' Loci Texture Remarks
o- i3 toes qs rore 5 A-s c n/I loaIPw-
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problemahc Hydric Solis
_ Histosol (Al)
` Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Hisdc Epipedon (A2)
,._ Polyvalue Babes Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Hisdc (A3)
` Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layer: (A5)
,_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
— Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shadow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
— Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
` Iron- Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplatn Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or Problematic.
Type
Depth (inches)
ii 0 tresI n& V-e.- w l e v- e rl
h o k j'*) G P I t„� cries o 6Se4n 6(
Hydric Sol Present? Yes No X
i
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - interim Version

� WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont 1.+"� tf
Project/Site _WCGrYI City/County. �kw cp- Sampling Date
Applrcant/Owner WV3 LO L State — IC- Sampling Point W3-4
Investigator(s) L ye1z 4 . K AWQ-'�
Section Township Range
Landform (hilislope terrace eta) (QyRt�071 Local relief (concave convex none) Gale Csty`e Slope (/o)
Subregion (LRR or MLR`A) LaL Long Datum
Soil Map Unit Name / 1444 S I- -E KR 5 NWI classification ` _ v1 Ot
Are climatic / hydrologic conWihons on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ( No (If no explain to Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Sod . or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances present? Yes —4__ No
Are Vegetation Soil . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations transacts Important features etc
Hydrophybc Vegetation Present? Yes X _ No Is the Sampled Area
Hyddc Soil Present? Yes �No within a Welland? Yes X No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes �_ No
Remarks
vit,RMAJ conyc#s +t) ff4fp4ed u,e a, Lft#-cf a fta.
vIA"& %VLkfac;k- area 2
HYDROLOGY
Primary Indicators (mkumum of one is repwre
Surface Water (Al)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
— Iron Deposits (85)
_, Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_, Water-Stained leaves (B9)
_, Aquatic Fauna (B13)
heck all that apply)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Oxidized Rhimsphems on Living Roots (C3)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Titled Soils (C6)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
_._. Crayfish Burrows (C8)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Shallow Aquilard (D3)
Microlopographic Relief (D4)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (Inclms
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth Cmchesg Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _Y No
Oncludes capillary
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) If avatlabte
Remarks
as C eTt,' IP mAes d Own zot Wet 9oly d2ee., -
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum (Plot size
Absolute Dominant Indicator
) Cover Species? Status
1
2
71&M.S +qcAm-
3fAAAm
Li0 t/os Awc
30 -'F -
10 (B)
! ,� g.,.ti
F%-CW
3
_Ace -,- n�- bn.�...
Zo _ •�gf
4
Column Totals 3 US-
(A) 9 85- (8)
Prevalence Index a B/A = Z _10
6
7
8
SaoGna/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size
e
ZO = Cover
)
1
r wAs 'iA pRp
VA -
2
_Aciz a riw..%rlLt,
„5 —r-
71) tits
— -�
3
lib wrdavrcbd►- SrtLdra rt:.w
�. �D ,6�C Ff�lGt
a
.n><nus ['a raLn.
10 .o� 7 C<
5
6
7
8
9
10
Herb Stratum (Plot errs
3� a Total Cover
)
1
CA 3 SAS SA.t.S
(�Q - �1 !S WW
2
e sua
qD Y.Q tyut
�
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12.
5 ° Total Cover
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size
)
1 �r
2 AOW
M lays Yb*. . Aj fb4-o.
Germ fffMpy cp_
50 ��
3
4
5
6
J a Total Cover
Remarks. (Indude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet t
Sampling Point W 3--t LL)
Number of Dominant Species
10
That Are 081. FACW or FAC
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata
10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
%
That Are 081. FACW or FAC
(oo (A(B)
Total % Cover of
Multiply by.
OBL species
x 1 = —
FACW species I I D
x2- 220
FAC species 2SS
x3- +(95-
FACU species '-"
x4=
UPI. species ---
x 5 =
Column Totals 3 US-
(A) 9 85- (8)
Prevalence Index a B/A = Z _10
1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytk Vegetation
?� 2 Dominance Test is >5o%
3 Prevalence Index is s3 0'
_ 4 Morphological Adeptahans' (Provide supping
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetlaind hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH) regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants excluding vines less
than 3 in 013H and greater than 3 28 R (1 m) tall
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants regardless
of st m and woody plants less than 328 it tall
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 it in
heighL
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
or confirm the
Sampling Point Wow
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (mops)) % Color imo st % Type oc� Texture Remarks
0-12 90 !0 s 5 RM 'FL &d IfiaAw
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A1o) (MLRA 147)
_ HIsdc Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Hxstic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Roodplain Sods (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 13% 147)
_ 2 cm Muds (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (FO)
_ Red Parent Material (72)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (FT)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (FS)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
_ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbrk: Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytrc vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (SS)
Piedmont Fkrodplain Sags (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present
Stripped Matrix (SS)
unless disturbed or Droblematxz
Type
Depth (inches)
ho v esi-A cA;%v2 1 &t,,e- P.rtc".ere4
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

Pmject/Sde W
Appffcant/Owner
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
City /County W l..ks- Sampling Date jig 9r
State QC- Sampling Point w3.
Investigators) LIhZ.k O K'A NflW Ld EA- Section Township Range
Landform (hiUslope terrace etc.) Local relief (concave convex none) �� Slope (7) O - Z
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Let Lang Datum
Soil Map Unit Name w t/l2 l oa k I NWI classification #I
Are climatic / hydrologic conditgns on the site typical for this time of year? Yes b(,- No (If no explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances present? Yes No
Are Vegetation . Sal or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area �(
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No k within a Wetland? Yes No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Weiland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicalars (minimum of two recuired)
Primary indicators (minimum of one is reouired. check
all that aooly) _ Surface Sal Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (814) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (86)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___, Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0) _ Moss Trim Lines (916)
_ Water Marks (B1) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) —
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_ Drift Deposits (93) _
Thin Muds Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Gust (B4) _
Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ WaterStalned Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC- Neutrel Test (05)
Field Observations
Surface water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth pnches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(Includes capillary (rings)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) If available:
Remarks
US Amry Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point 433 -q U
Remarks. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
ypLtAr t Opiv-, `AV.-OP('
VNo S liue fl fr, ( FAc W or bat e -eS d a .i rla
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size
A Cover SoeciesT Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 94,4 t N taApkr
_ V lS 1;* C_
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Spades Across All Strata a (8)
2 A cj r mkAo a&,,v`' ZS 1� cf -
3 %.tp` y� i a�A.tu.�it,rac G.c�a- ZS"F
�G
4
That Are OBL FACW or IAC 10%
5
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of Mulbply by
OBL species x 1 =
8
Z d = Total Cover
a m /S rub Stratum (Plot size
)
FAC species x2=
1 tr_4tS JM.tJ.0.
3y
1(/-5 /fib
�TUES
FAC spades 2$D x3- $4 0
FACU species 80 x4- 3 2O
UPI. species — x5= —
2 U G &AdZ W_ J40g r AM D- X 13i"C-+
3 T re-tf.- 60t31 QN Zp _ f� r-A-C -
4
Column Totals (eD (A) I I te 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3 22
5
6
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
7
1 Rapid Test for Hydmphytic Vegetation
8
_
% 2 Dominance Test is:-W%
9
_ 3 Prevalence Index Is Si 0'
10
— 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
=Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
� (Plot size
1 J
)
A Cttf
_ Problematic IiydroPhyfie Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Weo-2-
2 S
3
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata•
S
Tree - Woody plants excluding vines 3 In (16 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH) regardless of
6
7
he
8
Sapling/$hrub -Woody plants excluding vanes less
g
than 3 in 158H and greater than 326 it (1 m) tall
10
Herb A c ll kerba sous (non woody) plants regardless
of size and woody plants less than 328 ft tau
11
12
Woody vine - AD woody vines greater than 3.26 it in
D = Total Cover
Woody Vine Striatum (Pict size.
)
height
1 I 1W ckra I E02id
ZD
15AC
2 &4* 1Ct1f /d "cam
_ou
W__
3 EP1Sesrt�'r� scoallP�ryf�
[-tits
IIGT S �c-
4
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
Present? Yes �� No
6
= Total Cover
Remarks. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
ypLtAr t Opiv-, `AV.-OP('
VNo S liue fl fr, ( FAc W or bat e -eS d a .i rla
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling PoinL W 3"`i L{
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matax Redox Features
(inches) %— Color (moist) % Tvoe Log-- Texture Remarks
��1 10 2S ell — — — ,1 IAA_
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
— Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (AID) (MLRA 147)
— Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvakie Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19)
_ Stratilled Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox: Depressions (178)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR N
_ Iron4&ngaanese Messes (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
3Indxaakxs of hydrophylic vegetation and
— Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No K
marks
i
c� v�e l ,r eAcwnterd
v�o I dln`c -;Orn 1 '0A! ca:i obwl-e4
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site NV Ut, -Iy\
Applicant/Owner :J' W P-1W
Invwcfinafndcl L D t e bo t-%
City/County, Sampling Date 1 '� MJL-r l
State N L Sampling Point. WLi 5
✓L GQ— Section Township Range
Landform (hilslope terrace etc) oSS , an. oft --7—n —S cal relief (concave convex none) C Dn r a MC Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) I,,, rr Lat. Long D turn
Soil Map Unit Name ROtjU Ob— 'ilk - loam NWI classification to ��(
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this tine of year? Yes X No (if no explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Sol or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sol Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes �_ No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes _X No
orn t At-pa� rvuf s, u��e L W 3
HYDROLOGY
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired check
all that apply)
_ Surface Sal Cracks (BS)
is Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhwospheres on Living Roots (0) _ Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drill Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iran Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water Stained Leaves (Bg)
_ NNaotopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC•Neutral Test (D5)
Surface Water Present? Yes L No Depth (inches) W
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
gauge
ri CKA-
h� � 1j) 1 a�- wA c� cs obs�rVed
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
(Plot size
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
Cover Species? Status
Sampling Point W4 -5IA1
Dominance Test worksheet-
Number of Dominant Species
That Are 081. FACW or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata
S (A)
S (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are 081. FACW or FAC 1,90 (A/B)
Total % Cover of Mulholy
by.
081. species x 1 -
= Total Cover
Sapling
/Shrub Stratum (Plot size
)
(O DO
1
i er
LAO
-7F-5-7
qes FAC#-
2
- Ut&&As kaS au FfUet
Prevalence Index - B/A =
V&C
3
'itua�- dag
5
no 'r-A C.
4
_Cvg01,4SW oourUUnACLna
' ) Q \LT Fftc
5
6
7
8
9
10
2 O
e Total Cover
Barb Stratum u(Plot size )
2_
yJa%A o.ra h s
Is-
PA-C
Sampling Point W4 -5IA1
Dominance Test worksheet-
Number of Dominant Species
That Are 081. FACW or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata
S (A)
S (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are 081. FACW or FAC 1,90 (A/B)
Total % Cover of Mulholy
by.
081. species x 1 -
-"'
FACW spades 35 x2=
_1-40
FAC species ZD 0 x3-
(O DO
FACU species 15 x4-
(00
UPI. species _- X5=
_
Column Totals 300 _ (A)
�_ (B)
Prevalence Index - B/A =
1 14
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation
2 Dominance Test is >50%
3 Prevalence Index is s3 0'
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporing
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophybc Vegetation' (Explain)
3
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
4
3
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
5
Tree - Woody plants excluding vines 3 In (7 6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH) regardless of
6
Remarks
7
height.
8
SaplingfShrub - Woody plants excluding vines less
9
than 3 In. DBH and greater than 3 28 it (1 m) tall
10
11 Herb -AA herbaceous (nonAvoody) plants regardless
12 of size and woody plants less than 328 it tall
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1 S nti•_Am cnhu d A60.
1- Total Cover
Ito yes FA'G
vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
2
3
4
5
6
T
= Total Cover
Remarks
(Include photo numbers here or an a separate sheet )
Ca,4coP y n Sever 1 rl S wo un r� o,-r
. — gfzovrJ fb
havt bc�n c4tiwdd sNUtt,Q y U/S ado
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point. W -J w
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix
finches) Cotor (moist) %
Redox Features r z—
Color % Tvoe Loc
Texture Remarks
0- tZ (oyR S/t 90
1Q K to KM PL
-m & -
'Type C= Concentration D =De letion RM= Reduced Matrix MS-Masked Sand Grains =Location PL-Pore Uninti, M- Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
Hlstosol (A7)
^_
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Hlstic Epipadon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Bieck Hlshc (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplaln Solis (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (AS)
�X Depleted Matrix (F3)
13Met 47)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Red Parent (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
^ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S7) (LRR N
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gh yed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
indicators of hydroptrytio vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (SS)
_ Piedmont Floodplaln Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
!l
Dept, (ink)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
-
Y% () qskn ol\e- ` we -UA (,"A W
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Projectislie 0 v'FM City/County- yvCUV s Sampling Date n
Appircant(Owner ww K W KF State P L Sampling Point W(4 —S
Investigators) Lbi ebo Lk . K)h- bI/1'1. cR._ Section Township Range
Landform (hilslope terrace etc.) 'n At, Local relief (concave convex none) GM CAS Slope (9ro)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lot Long Dalurp
Soil Map Unit Name O NWI classification V1 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of yea Yes )-(_ No (if no explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances present? Yes - No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes JL No Is the Sampled Area
Hyddc Sol Present? Yes No X within a Weiland? Yes No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
We,� \&'1A
HYDROLOGY
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Welland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators (minimum of two recurred)
Primary Indicators /minimum of one is reauired. check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquabc Plants (814) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhlzospheres on Living Roots (0) _ Moss Trim Lines (Si 6)
_ Water Marks (BI) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reducton in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_ Drift Deposits (83) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (95) _ Geomorphic Poslbon (02)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Reif (04)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813) _ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No x Depth (Inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspectlons) If available
Remarks
,,,,-tt'' yy" - � "�,p�,
V\0 \WAkU.N�U N�M[6%t W1�,1�wLk -fS obse rud
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point W 4-5 Li
Tree Stratum (Plot size
) % Cover ties us
Number of Dominant Species
�
1 A<-,- ,LA b t'l -*_
20 ljlArC
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
2 L4jW ~�
�
3 a QYZA tS
Lo C) —
Total Number or Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
5
Percent of Dominant Species
100
That Are OBL FACW or FAC WEI)
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
8
Total % Cover of, Multiply by.
40 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
SaolmO/Shrub Stratum (Plot size
)
FACW species x2=
1 1,UAL CFA0i
0 � vi, U �
FAC species Z t O x 3=
1,A
2 t 5 <AA
20 \MS FftC
FACU species x4=
3 CALib d
!N G
UPL species x 5=
4
Zo ye—s fAc-
Column Totals �_ (A) \P30 (B)
5
6
,-
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3 D
7
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
s
— 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophykc Vegetation
9
r 2 Dominance Testis >50%
—
3 Prevalence Index is s3 0'
10
�t7 = Total Cover
-it-
— 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb trelum (Plot size
)
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1 �d['o�D
to � � --
— Problemabe Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2
3
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
DefinRions of Four Vegetation Strata
5
6
Tree - Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more In dhameterat breast height (DBH) regardless of
7
tteighL
8
g
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants excluding vines less
than 3 In DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tall
10
11
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants regardless
of sloe, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
= Total Cover
vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 it In
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
_
)
L
s,,,. evfu4tab �-
ia-r
2
3
4
5
Hydrop�c
Vegetation
K
6
Present? Yes No
Total Cover
Remarks Oncluds oholo numbers here or on a seoamis sheeL)
6kx4Orl c 81/vl oppa. -61�d
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point VU q -S LA
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matrix Redox Eeatures
(inchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Texture Remarks
U�1 1G (L5 3 tojjtSte_ L5 P, W1 _ L %tAh,(fW
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muds (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 14T 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 14T 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplom Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
, Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Pared Material (72)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
— Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
` Redox Depressions (FB)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
— Iron Manganese Messes (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbdc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
— Piedmont Floodplain Sofia (F19) (MLRA 148)
Weiland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type
Depth (Inches)
rtifincP01 4� ei4CMA-44a
�Ol S Vl of f 13 lWi C-
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No A
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

Attachment 2 Wetland Rating and Stream Quality
Assessment Worksheets - West Cary Force Main

wr.TT.Awn uA,rrtvn wnuucup.w,r rant, vwDernm
WEIMI M
ProjectName ?,W kF County hl&b-
Nearest Road _ ynGn Uigg—UMI M 11 At ar 201
Wetland Area (acr _ 1). og aa+- wetland Wi th (R) 80
me of Evaluators) ypn's,n fih LD0 4bo —�- WeUand M W ¢
WETLAND LOCATYON
ADJACENT LAND =
on sound or estuary pond orlalm ��p�
dream
(withm 112 mile upstream, upslope or radius)
A forestedmatow vegetation � U
an effamd
�Ava
�_agrrcultivaV aurlmnn�ed if %
�
x UnImmo � %
within divide N,,ptl�
Special
other
SO"
DOMINANTMtG— MMTiON
soil Series '-
1 S
pedommantly organic (humus, mu r: or peat)
2
—.�— Predommandymineral ( d�► )
4
predominantly am*
$YDRAULIC FACTORS
FLOODING AND Y/JM BS&
Rash
nand flooded or mundatat
shy
seasonally tlaadedflY � rarta
Y
steel) topoWBAY
mtemuttently flooded or Wnpoarary+ surface water
ditched or chenaelized
no evidence of tloodmg or surface water
total wetland width >_ 100 beet
WETLAND TYPE (select one)*
Bottomland Hardwood Forest BogfFen
Swamp Forest HendwaW Forest
Carolina Bay }
Poemn Epiliancral Wetland
Pine Savannah Of>or
Freshwater Marsh
• The rating system cannot be eppl red to salt etrd brackish marshes or stream laurels.
DBM RATW(�
WATER STORAGE !i
X 400 =
BANK, SHORELINE STABILTI.A71014 Z
X 400 =
POLLUTANT REMOVAL 2
X 500 = l d
VWLIFE HABITAT l
X 100 - Z
AQUATIC LIFE 1'
X 400 -
RBCREA77ONJEDUCAITON 0
X 100 = o
TOTAL WETLAND SCORE
• Add one point if in sensitive wateralied and >100A Aupomt disturbance within. U2 aSle u tr eaur, or raditra
Wg14

WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET (4th VERSIONI
MorrITYXIIASITh
Project Name vJW KwK f
Cotirtty ILA t
Wetland Areal Rod Wetland Width 35 tiol
me ofEvaluator(s) Kbff —wcL LblzbwR Wetland ID *f 4
REIAND LOCATION
AW —ACM LAND UM
on sound or estuary pond or lake
(wrthpi I12 mr7e % alt erA %*lope or radius)
. ✓/ forested/aaioral vepetahmt -tq %
A onperemadatresm
vibamzed zs %
en mteruutteat stream
mWervrous gadaoe I %
wrthm mterstream dtvute
acent Spemel Natural Areas
other
Sons
00MWANT VBG1tTATIO L
Soil Sexes. 306A DW ;Ak S 161dA
I S"C
PrWominan uw. * or peat}
2 J Pk"
)ply muietal (may)
3 Woa
mclommandy sandy
4 `
EXDEAULIC FAQ TORS
FWODRiG AND WBTWM
7- freshwater
scmWennaconfly to p meneatly flooded or mudded
brackish
It saasmud y flooded or mw red
steep topography
— intermittently flooded or tempmarp surface water
drWred or channelrud
np evidence of floodrug ora dne water
total wetland width_ 100 feet
WETLAND TYPE (select one)*
Bottomland Hardwood Form
Bog/Fen
Swamp Forest
Carotma Bay
HeadwaterPmt3t
W
Bog Forest I"
Pocosin
V
Ephemeral Wedand
Pine Savannah
Other'
Freshwater Marsh
• The rating system, caa,ot be applied to salt and bm dw h mamsla or stream dumuck
PBM�TING
WATER STORAGE 3
X 400 = �2-
BAW, SHORELINE STABILIZATION �_
X 400 =
POLLUTANT REMOVAL 3
* X Sao =
WII DLFE HABITAT 3
X 2.00 = �4
AQUATIC: LIFE T
X 400 =
RECRFA110N/EDUCATION y
X 100 = Q
TOTAL WETLAND SCORE _ q5
* Add one point if rn senartrve waterahmsl and >10%nonpomt disturbance within 1A mile upslope, or radus

WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET (4th VERSION)
.n
ProlectName: wvj g w KF county wo�@ca-
Nearest Road _ _Grr[ca G 4- Date A�
Wetland Area (ac) -2 accts Wetland Width (fly S - U f4
Name of Evaluator(sr KIM4caar A L e C-b, W Wetland ID w 3
(wrtbplA mile upsherma, upslope or radure)
ova souk or stream pond arlake / f �� on _ o %
on went stream �� surface �_ %
within, mterskeam divide Adjacent Speaal Natural Areas
other
AOMRWff W- GRTATE
Sod Sens• 'f1R(i 1 4lus ueA&
predomtn y wpm (humus, muck c4peat) 2 L.
predominantly muretal(aam,4eady) 3 4&:g39 SMILgvdA
PAY sandy 4 e..-s ti �.S
X freshwater seaupumaneMy to parmenently flooded or inundated
brackish rc seasonally flooded or mundated
steeP topography mtecmdenUly flooded or temporary sudace water
ditched or channeltzed _ no evidence of flooding or surface water
total wetland width?: 100 feet
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Bog/Fen
Swamp Forest
--r Headwater Forest IW40
Carolina Bay
Bog Forest
Pocosm
Ephmcral Wdland
Pine Savannah
Other -
Freshwater Marsh
/ S
• The rating system cannot be applied to salt ad brackish marshes or stream chaoaels
WATER STORAGE
-3
X 400 =
BANK, SHORELINE STABUUTM
d
X 400 =
O
POLLUTANT REMOVAL
3
X 500 -
/ S
WILDLIFE HABITAT
3
X 2.00 =
AQUATIC LIFE
X 400 =
�i ( _
RECREATION/EDUCATION
D
X 100 =
a
TOTAL WETLAND SCORE _
k_
' Add one point rf nr sensitive watershed and >I0 %norrpottrt disturbance w&n 1A mile
or radius.
A

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached trap)
a] STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following Information � for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicant s name WQ. M�A�ill ?ar+ut.r'.IrS 2 Evaluator a name dam, LT
3 Date of evaluation. 17 AAL 24 t 4 Tune of evaluation Om
5 Name of stream 11T fo U51U ft 004 CPY, f ly- 6 River basin . CA.e- RA�
7 Approximate dramage 8 Stream order 1 Of
9 Length of reach evaluated. I60�t- 10 County
11 Site coordinates (if known) puefor m decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any) n 1A
Latitude (ex 341723 t 2) �5 -4-TSE ° N Longitude (ex - 77.55661 q - " °I 0 4MO E
Method location detacmined (mole) (�) Topo Sheet Octlw (Aerial) Photo1GIS Otber OIS Oder_
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying shum(s) location)
14 Proposed chaniiel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions h of , no Irda I d + q% k wd n
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries habitat
Trout waters Outstanding Resource waters , Nutrient Sensitive waters water supply watershed (I IV)
I& Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation pomt YES NO Uyes estimate the water surface area 1 Q.0 1L
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map? 0 NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use J—% Residential — % Commercial =% Industrial 4 % Agricultural
t t MY. Forested =% Cleared I Logged =% Other l )
22 Bankfirll width `t 23 Bank height (firm bed to top of bank) �l'T
24 Channel slope down center of stream. Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep (> 10%)
25 Channel smuosity ,Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very smuous _Ararded channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, twam, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristre must be scored using the some ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring boat and provide an explanation in the
continent section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (c& the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach mast range between 0 and 100 with a scare of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse)• M Comments
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is Intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Englaeers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form Is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103 To Comment, please call 919 876.8441 x 26

3XI
Ira
7} t t. 7 c �!'vi: � i <.�.�� �.�.t� .i. fit. 'St�jy�•�Yr'1 a ((� it >'j��T�, i �. a ,
t r rjc
., '• I r - i, _. iy j•``, l l�f �!Si'�.. � {Tl�ci. r _ (�r } � � I -� r t__f -:

Attachment 3 Stream and Wetland Impact Maps - West
Cary Force Main

C
co West Cary
O
Pump Station
n
c WCFM Stream 1A
n
s
a Figure 2a
`Nest
k
�e4e
.10
Proposed Alignment of
West Cary Force Main
Construction Corridor
Figure 21 WCFM Stream 1
R
Permitted Alignment of
West Cary Force Main
Construction Corridor
WCFM Wetland Area 1
WCFM Stream 1
WCFM Wetland Area 2 f
WCFM Wetland Area 3
600 300 0 600 Ft I WCFM Wetland Area 5
1 Inch = 600 feet
WCFM Wetland Area 1A
WCFM Wetland Area 2A
WCFM Wetland Area 3A
WCFM Wetland Area 4
Figure 2c
N Figure 2 Wetland and Stream Impacts
fWEN AND SAWYER Overall Alignment and Index
Environmental Engineers & Scientists Western Wake Partners West Cary Force Main
Wake County North Carolina

WCFM Stream 1A
Temporary Impact
Intermittent Stream
32 feet
Legend
Temporary Impacts (Stream)
100 50 0 100 Ft
1 inch = 100 feet
West Cary
Pump Station
N Figure 2a Wetland and Stream Impacts
HAZEN AND SAWYER Stream 1A
Environmental Engineers & Scientists Western Wake Partners West Cary Force Main
Wake County NaM Carolina

Temporary Impact
Forested Wetland
(0 011 acre)
I WCFM Wetland Area 2A f
Legend
L.� Permanent Impacts
® Temporary Impacts
Permanent Impact
Forested Wetland
(0 003 acre)
Temporary Impact
Forested Wetland
(0 027 acre)
Temporary Impact
Forested Wetland
(0 439 acre)
100 50 0 100 Ft
1 inch = 100 feet
WCFM Wetland Area 3A
Permanent Impact
Forested Wetland
(0 011 acre)
Permanent impact
Forested Wetland
(0 143 acre)
WCFM Wetland Area 4
N Figure 2c Wetland and Stream Impacts
HAZEN AND SAWYER Wetland Areas 2A 3A and 4
Environmental Engineers 8 Scientists Western Wake Partners West Cary Force Main
Wake County North Carolina

USACE Action ID SAW 2005 20159
DWQ #2006 1203
Supplemental Information Request for Permit Modification
Western Wake Regional Wastewater Management Facilities
Attachment 6 Apex Site 14 Water & Sewer
Extension Policy

Attachment 1 Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Form - Apex Water & Sewer Extension Policy

ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD)
B NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD
Town of Cary, Contact Person Jamie Revels
C DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER Wilmington District,
AID#
D PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION This
portion of the Western Wake project is known as the New Hill Water & Sewer
Infrastructure The area is located north of U S Highway 1, south of Old U S
Highway 1, east of proposed Site 14, and west of New Hill Hollemann Road
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State NC County /pansh/borough Wake County
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format)
Lat 35 040'19 87" North, Long 78 °56'04 65" West
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody White Oak Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area
Non - wetland waters 1,380 linear feet 3105 width (ft) and/or 0 07 acres
Cowardin Class Riverme
Stream Flow Ephemeral Intermittent and Perennial
Wetlands 2 0 acres
Cowardin Class Forested
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters
Tidal
Non Tidal
E REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY)
❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date
® Field Determination Date(s)

1 The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time
2 In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters, (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions, (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization, (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terns and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary, (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable, (6) accepting a permit authorization (e g , signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court, and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable Further, an approved JD a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C F R Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C F R 331 5(a)(2)) If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be "waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
9 a plicant/consultant Withers & Ravenel
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters$ study
® U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps 03030004
® U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name New Hill
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps
[:11 00-year Floodplain Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
❑ Photographs ❑ Aerial (Name & Date)
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Other information (please specify)
IMPORTANT NOTE The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later iurlsdictional determinations
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
3
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

SAMPLE
Estimated
Site
Cowardin
amount of
Class of
number
Latitude
Longitude
Class
aquatic
aquatic
resource in
resource
review area
Stream
100 linear feet
non section 10
1
0 003 acre
— non wetland
Stream
400 linear feet
non - section 10
2
0 05 acre
— non wetland
Stream
200 linear feet
non - section 10
3
0 005 acre
— non - wetland
Stream
100 linear feet
non section 10
4
0 002 acre
— non wetland
Stream
150 linear feet
non - section 10
5
0 005 acre
— non wetland
Stream
150 linear feet
non section 10
6
0 002 acre
— non wetland
Stream
180 linear feet
non section 10
7
0 003 acre
— non - wetland
Stream
100 linear feet
non section 10
8
0 004 acre
— non - wetland
Wetland
0 2 acre
non - section 10
C
— wetland
Wetland
18 acre
non section 10
D -E
— wetland

\
I/
�I
I i
I it r {
I�/{_ V, I
38 i
"+9 4 V�\
X36 I \� \
U 5 V \ \\
` 35— \
`\40 5 —\ \
\
23 11
'
21 T 12
20 0 /a
rp1 13
6
J l n 11
i
41 17 Wetland J 1
0 15 DE 14 u 1
1 � 1
\ 15 1\
142 / �\
400 200 0 400
SCALE 1 400
AD 127 2011
J' I
=11�E 12 Wt Lae
2 , II' PROPOSED TEMPORARY SEWER ``ASE12NT
I PROPOSED TEMPORARY OR$ RUCTION BOIODM
PROPOSE WAFT SERER
/ A
-PROPOSED ORm MAIN
PROPOSED TER wa+
I
TREAN ROSSM
.�R.n 3
\
I/
�I
I i
I it r {
I�/{_ V, I
38 i
"+9 4 V�\
X36 I \� \
U 5 V \ \\
` 35— \
`\40 5 —\ \
\
23 11
'
21 T 12
20 0 /a
rp1 13
6
J l n 11
i
41 17 Wetland J 1
0 15 DE 14 u 1
1 � 1
\ 15 1\
142 / �\
400 200 0 400
SCALE 1 400
AD 127 2011

ZaB -
b7-
ARCADIS
CHMAHILL
MATCH UNE 1 C052
M
t
N�l t
;Dj
/Ct=
ARCADIS
CH2W"LL
MATCH LINE I C053
la ARCADIS
CHMORK"
0953

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/site s 1AM1
-4 plicant/Owner
Testigator(s)
Landform (hdislope terrace etc )
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) I 1A
Sod Map Unit Name 1A/d
I 11.V
VA --r- Sampling Date
Ak Sampling Point
' C.jV0- Slope (%)
f,a all tit/ Datum W 11K
n classification E Ina I_
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no explain In Remarks )
Are Vegetation AZ— Soil IV , or Hydrology Al significantly disturbed-) Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes —le—/ No _
Are Vegetation, Sod -AZ� or Hydrology Al naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes mot✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reawred
check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
, True Aquatic Plants (614)
^ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
aturation (A3)
` Oxidized Rhlzospheres on Living Roots (0)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
,V'Dnft Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Positron (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Agwtard (D3)
_ Water Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No_
Depth (inches)_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No
includes capillary fn
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) d available
Remarks
R
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

'� 11
VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point
Tree Stratum (Plot siz y oe _ )
Absolute Uommant Indicator
Cover Soecies? Status
1 � re r rti� w1
_ V 61k
FACW species _�
x2=
3 tA
Q CLA
4 T p
wiz_ l L
E _ Al 14C
6
X5=
7
(A)�Q} (B)
Sapling Stratum (Plot size �)
_g0 =Total Cover
1
2 �°-r- 1!Ltti1
4
5
6
7
'r� �
=
Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size / /p )
1 L t���JM g` M��
r
4
5
6
i
=Total Cover
HerbyStratum (Plot size Ir )
t1,u: %tit ti ion Aem w _ PAC
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Wood Vine Stratum (Plot size ) Total Cover
1
2 S _j0 _ _ Al
3
5
= Total Cover
or on a
Number of Dominant Species $
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC d 6 (AlB)
Total °/ Cover of
Multiply by
OBL species Q
x 1 =
FACW species _�
x2=
FAC species A
x3= A
FACU species L—
.4= J A
UPL species _ f`�
X5=
Column Totals Z7 Q
(A)�Q} (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
JRapid Test for Hydrophytic, Vegetaton
Dominance Test is >60%
,%/_3 Prevalence Index Is 53 0'
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Tree — Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 R (6 m) or more In height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling — Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more In height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub — Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb — All herbaceous (non woody) plants Including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
plants except woody vines less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine — All woody vines regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
K 17
Sampling Point_
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moi t % _ Color (moist) A Tvne Loci Texture Remarks
�4Wr
iWo
'Type C= Concentration _D= Deplebon RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Locahon PL =Pnra Lmina M--Mahiv
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
_ Histosol (Al)
T Dark Surface (87)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147)
— Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (88) (MLRA 147 148)
,_, Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Hisbc (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
— Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ 2 cm Muds (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (FT)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
— Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
— Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR N
_ iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_„_, Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
°Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present
�tSandy
Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic
Type
Depth Cinches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes / No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

ProjectlSite _;
I, pplicant/Owner
sestigator(s) _
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
lampling Date • to 11
Sampling Point: � -11I
Landform (hillslope terrace etc) Local relief (concave convex none) Slope ( /o)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat 3 f ` �Q ? �� +�" N Long T� °� . + It N/ Datum
Soil Map Unit Name WA_n "in NWI classification P F d
Are climatic l hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes -4/— No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation AIL_, Soil / . or Hydrology *_ significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No
Are Vegetation _ /V Sod gV , or Hydrology 4/ naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers In Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophyfic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reaured. check all that apply) _
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_
_ Oxidized Rhmospheres on Living Roots (C3) _
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (81)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Sorts (C6) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ DnK Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (B7)
_
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_
FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
-L/—
Depth (inches) �+
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (Inches) _
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary in e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if evadable
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
1 Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size _ V _) / Cover Species? Status
L •` �� dim %s sue.. t�t`�lv,� � 9AC`
3 L: �,`�ole,► d ra�f Zf �ty►�— - -- N 5ACM -
4
�� tl
Sampling Point
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
5 Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (AB)
6
tD = Total Cover
Sapling Stratum {Plot size !� )
1 Its G
2 t`T
3 04A S J=911D1A 10 _ IU D
5
6
7
t &A = Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
1 TA --10 pit ciT ZA _ _ -
2
3
4
5
6
I = Total Cover
'R
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
Total % Cover of- Muiboly by-
081- species 6 x 1 = O
FACW species Z-f-Zl` x2= .AJFO!',�Q
FAC species j s r x3=
FACU species JX x4=
UPL species x 5 -
Column Totals 11F (A) _f V_ (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophybc Vegetation
�2 Dominance Test is >50%
-V3 Prevalence index Is 53 0'
—4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc sal and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 In
Q 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) In height
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
plants, except woody vines less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height
12 Wood vine All
Woody - woody vines regardless of height.
► �,� =
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size d Total Cover )
1 1a�►� �; u 1ip__i4C
2
3
4 Hydrophytic
Vegetation , /
5 Present? Yes V No
ILI _ = Total Cover
or on a separate
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point Y
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color mol /o Color (moist) % Tvoe Lo Texture Remarks
),a-72>�
'Type C= Concentration D =De letton RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matnx
Hydric Soil Indicators Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
_ Histosol (A1) — Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Hrstic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) 7, joamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) " Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N _ Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148) MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (SS) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic.
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Intenm Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site + 5/; City /County Sampling Date �~ ~ 14 �r 11
wi,plican t/ Owner /� �` State JV�. Sampling Point _ C
estigator(s) Section Township Range
Landform (hilisiope terrace etc } + Local rebef (co�cave convex none) r0,►C#cV �' Slope (%)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) P Lat j3'04J6t 61 ;8 Al Long '7$� 46 t 13 Yell M Datum >7✓a � '�4
Soil Map Unit Name , / NWI classification I rnd
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V No (If no explain In Remarks )
Are Vegetation W Soil ►/ or Hydrology Al significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes %/ No
Are Vegetation _Aj�_ Sod _,AL or Hydrology _AZ— naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes i✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired_ check
all that sapRYL
— Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_�Burfaca Water (A1) _
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _
OF
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Lrvmg Roots (C3)
_ Moss Tran Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (81)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
— Dnft Deposits (B3) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _,–,
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ . Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present) Yes No ✓
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes _V No
Depth (inches)
Saturation Presents Yes 4 No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ,/ No
includes capillary inn e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well, asnal photos previous Inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Absolute Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum Plot size 6 ) Cover Species? St_ atus
D k
3 , s kadm- 61.4dem
4
5
6
7
O = Total Cover
Sa Irn St r to (Plot size )
1 _ �u
2 �' hin-
4
5
6
7
p = Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size i " )
2
3 T
4
5
6
r
p_ = Total Cover
�
Herb ,,//Stratum (Plot size /� )
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 1 _ie ) =Total Cover
1
2 s �"-
3 4 16
5 .,..
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Sampling Point
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC
2 (A)
$ (B)
— (A18)
Total'/ Cover of. Multiply by
081- species n x 1 = 4
FACW species JAW x 2 =
FAC species -1'M x 3 =-
FACU species _�A x4=---44
UPL species o X5= m
Column Totals 2:0 (A) 4 jig (B)
Prevalence Index = B1A = Z fi4i
1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Z2 Dominance Test Is >50%
,Z 3 Prevalence Index is Si 0'
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling — Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub — Woody plants excluding woody tines
approximately 3 to 20 R (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb — All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
plants except woody vines less than approximately
3 it (1 m) in height
Woody vine — Ali woody vines regardless of height
Hydrophybc
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

IN I)
SOIL Sampling Point C
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color ist % Color (moist) A Tvae Loci TextFre Remarks
-io
'T a C =Concentration D =Depletion RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains 21-ocation PL =Pore Lmina M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Y
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods'
— Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Eplpedon (A2)
— Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Hishe (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
��.oamy
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F79)
_„ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
— 2 cm Muck (AID) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
,-,_ Iron Manganese Messes (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytrc vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
__,_ Piedmont Floodpiain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
welland hydrology must be present,
? Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or Droblematic.
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ,,,1,,'—'/- No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
` i 1-7,1-1)
Project/Site Cty /County
Vplicant/Owner
h f State � Sampling Point It e »
Section Township Range
Landform (hllslope terrace etc ) %lull24 flC Local relief (concav e convex none) CA Siope (%)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) �- Last 116 TZ "A / Long 7dt fA �� 1 W Datum &
Soll Map Unit Name NWI classification 8 /
Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no explain in Remarks)"
Are Vegetation A/ Sod _V or Hydrology _M significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes —Z No
Are Vegetation _AL Sod _Al or Hydrology V naturally problematic? (1f needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects Important features etc
Hydrophylc Vegetation Presents Yes No is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes � No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Pnmary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
� urrace Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (136)
�J High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_�Saturatfon (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_ Moss Trim Lines (316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ _ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
, FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches) I -Z
Water Table Present? Yes _� No
Depth Cinches)
Saturation Present? Yes _%/ No
Depth Cinches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca lla fringe)�_
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
)
i
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
nusviuin uvnunarn uwiwwr
Tree Stratum Plot ize
1 ( 6 ) -" /a verver sn" Yes? StW atus
30 At NiC
5
sa = Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size )
1 GU r d'NLrw rA 1 1/
ft
2 Lit m -04 m kA A \ T Mc
3 _�a A)
4 n ib_ �14�G
5
Sampling Point R-
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species QQ
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (4B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of. MOWN by
OBL species G x 1 = G
FACW species l06 -•- x 2 L7
rFAC species — x 3 =
FACU species I e _ x4=
UPL species -' x 5 = d
Column Totals Ulf iU;r (B)
6
7 Prevalence index = BiA =
1 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
Shrub Stratum (Plot size ) _- /1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1 Aht us � ��1 3 �i PAW 2 Dominance Test is >50 k
2 �j g u m �� A�- _ -Ie"3 Prevalence Index is 53 0'
3 % —4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
4 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
X; _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
F
Herb Stratum (Plot size �_ } = Total Cover
1 QNuACJjAAA: W# -�-
2 �AIWCA )A 14 e _ A �
3
5
6
8
10
11
12
qOl = Total Cover
Woody vine Stratum (Plat size //
1
fin 11 a x s�y�Im ) �_ � P*c
21.E --P-M� J r. -&J _ILA -i eA-
3
5
= Total Cover
Remarks (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet 1
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more In height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 it (1 to 6 m) In height
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
plants except woody vines less than approximately
3 It (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point —E
to document the Indicator or
Depth Matnx Redox Features
inches Color (moist) % Color (moist) T9 Type' Co-7— Texture Remarks
'Type C= Concentrabon D= Depletion RM= Reduced Matrix, MS-Masked Sand Grains 21-ocation PL =Pore Lining M =Matnx
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
_„_, Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA W)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
,,,,_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sails (F19)
_, Stratified Layers (AS)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
, Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral ($1) (LRR N
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
jL Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (SS)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present
l Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

Attachment 2 Wetland Rating and Stream Quality
Assessment Worksheets - Apex Water & Sewer
Extension Policy Alternate Routes A and B

WgrLWb L'
Project Name Nearest road
County yJ gYE Wetland area acres Wetland width .41% feet
Name of evaluator CMRtS "cIpp6a (53. *QU0y> Date O(o RRoV ?A[!
Wetland location
on pond or lake
_X_ on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other
Soil series Wauatstgg eNr IRIgs
predominantly organic
(humus muck or peat)
_.� predominantly mineral
(non sandy)
predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
_ steep topography
-, ditched or channel ized
— total riparian wetland width > 100 tt
ADZAcc -NT STREAM %6gMj5Ly
INCISE
Adjacent land use (within 1/z mile upstream,
upslope, or radius)
X forested/natural vegetation 10 %
X agriculture urban/suburban
impervious surface %
Dominant vegetation
l) nlq Cr
2).
3)_
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently flooded
or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
intermittently flooded or temporary
surface water
_ X no evidence of flooding or surface water
weuana type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna
Headwater forest Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
' Wet flat
Ephemeral wetland
Pocosln Carolina Bay
Bog forest Other
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
R
Water storage
A
Bank/Shoreline stabilization 1
T
Pollutant removal
I
Low flow augmentation i
N
Wildlife habitat
G
Aquatic life
weight
x 400 A.
x 400 = ¢
x 5 00 = 5 1
x 200 = �_
x 400 = A
x 100 = 2.
-A Nit- o4 TCTr kSSunep SCA.W pF '� to S
Gd",.:k,0r\ 0---
'Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >I 0% nonpoint disturbance within % mile radius

\N45TLAt,Sb 'D-E-:
Protect Name Nearest road S R iZ-1
County W —" Wetland area acres Wetland width feet
Name of evaluator OjAgis JAOeMIz SyNFp. ') Date CD5 1�oU Z# I
Wetland location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
_�_ other l- IEADWR
Soil series CRt=FbmwR
predominantly organic
(humus muck or peat)
_ X_ predominantly mineral
(non sandy)
predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
_ steep topography
ditched or channelized
_ total riparian wetland width > 100 ft
Adjacent land use (within V2 mile upstream,
upslope, or radius)
X forested/natural vegetation °is %
X agriculture urban/suburban
impervious surface %
Dominant vegetation
1) Aaer rubr cs m
2) So -, n,aM
3) Acyhaina.-r«
Flooding and wetness
semipennanently to permanently flooded
or inundated
_ X seasonally flooded or inundated
intermittently flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
wetiana type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Pine savanna
_ Headwater forest
Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest
Bog/fen
Wet flat
Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin
Carolina Bay
Bog forest
Other
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
weight
R
Water storage x
400 =
la
A
Bank/Shoreline stabilization_ x
400 =
Q-
T
Pollutant removal x
500 =
5
1
* Low flow augmentation ,� x
200 =
tww
N
Wildlife habitat :_ x
400 =
G
Aquatic life 2- x
100 =
2
@Or W TEXT NSSWAVEb Scq%.F, Op 1 To $
'Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >I 0% nonpoint disturbance within %: mile radius
0

USACE AID#
DWQ #,
Site # _ F(indicate on attached map)
in STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET :
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment,
1 Applicants name 2 Evaluator s name CNvuS \AOPPER CSyNER��t>
3 Date of evaluation NO Mb%i U% 4 Time of evaluation 1 VW
5 Name of stream k S % 16 B96h &AA 6 River basin GAPE V7689 ( 1A69Z15 LAXE)
7 Approximate drainage area A, 8 Stream order 1
9 Length of reach evaluated " 1St 10 County wmuK -
11 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any) Q� At r -
Lati tudc (cx 34 872312) , 5 1 ude (ex —77 556611) "-T 8 15 W 2-D �p
Method location determined (circle) GPS Topo Sheet �rtho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GiS Other GGeCf F. (r�t(�t}j 13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby ro attach map identifying stream(s) location)
W CP L�S i 1495c�') ^-�R o� r-sil R 2, 00 -� W oP s R url t2 100'
14 Proposed channel work (if any) SG%%ER i V pS%1 N V
15 Recent weather ionditions lixita- br--N A:1 tiRS 1 k% o R 60 EyewT�%
16 Site conditions at time of visit ± 40 -r1t) Uo P%h&Ef 1AWb REST
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known Section 10 ,_Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I 1V)
IS Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES < If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map) 0 @5 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ED NO
21 Estimated watershed land use `% Residential -___% Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural
&&% Forested —40 % Cleared / Logged -- o Other ( )
22 Bankfull width 1-2! 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank)
24 Channel slope down center of stream _Flat (0 to 2%) _X _Gentle (2 to 4 %) ____Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>100o)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instruchons for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classifiication, etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) 4f9 — Comments —rwc. siR*
Evaluator's Signature _�C11 �W&L
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals In
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET —AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicants name
3 Date of evaluation ft) Mam 20 1
5 Name of stream UT RAN(_iA
2 Evaluators name O -Ayzys IAopm R (:s4a
4 Time of evaluation
6 River basin
7 Approximate drainage area 1 &5X 8 Stream order _ z
9 Length of reach evaluated ZOO' 10 County W Ak 11
11 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any) p� /S C
Latitude (ex 34 872312) -5S ido t S65 Longitude (ex -77 556611) - -7 O qJ Z 15 r tD
Method location determined (circle) GPS Topo Sheet Q io (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other GbQG .1u EAQT N
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
N VS 1
(I. W C�p y� 2158 112"7 1mxrr-QC"N � � � clod
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions
{ I J:f vE
16 Site conditions at time of visit - TAaTr'om%- AtAh atzss r
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fishenes Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _—Water Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES e If yes, estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map9 EY) NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? (a NO
21 Estimated watershed land use 1S % Residential 5 % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
�© % Forested J% Cleared / Logged %Other ( 1
22 Bankfull width S T 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 16- IZi
24 Channel slope down center of stream Flat (0 to 2 %) XGentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 1/a)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight Occasional bends ____Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) (a U Comments CAL cZT9, -* 2
Evaluator's Signature ( /(r- Date 0(0 mow, z1 i
This channel evaluation form Is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
a] STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment \
1 Applicant s name 2 Evaluators name bA ?, S VkbPPE2 (-'S4 K\UkG\1 )
3 Date of evaluation O(n tsloy M1 4 Time of evaluation Q800
5 Name of stream kAT BIG 23gl\KW N 6 River basin -C-N,%, F6k?, (%AN tS LAKE
7 Approximate drainage area � AC 8 Stream order l
9 Length of reach evaluated �� 10 County W A -C
I 1 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any)) N3 1
Latitude (cx 34 872312) INS 1,011 z - U O Longitude (cx -77 556611) --T r �` 93L l %
Method location determined (circle) GPS Topo Sheet h�Ia
Other GIS Other r Q0(-A. CAP -T%A
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads atach map identifying stream(s) location)
X LSS 1 (2 --mg! S -21 R R. M50') w 4 SR 11
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions I
16 Site conditions at time of visit 1_ 2T C .��Tt�s� iZ C�t�1 1� ^- �j� y.o. ME51t✓ �7ng ST ptA S,
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fishenes Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters ____Water Supply Watershed ([ IV)
IS Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (0) If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad mapv YES (@5 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21 Estimated watershed land use 5_0/o Residential % Commercial _% IndusMal _% Agricultural
46% Forested .5Q% Cleaned / Logged _% Other ( )
22 Bankfull width 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 1. r
24 Channel slope down center of stream _Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) ,Steep (>I 0%)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander , _Very sinuous ____Braided channel
Instruchons for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
charactenstic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) 2.4 Comments Tw `- zx?,*
PIAEMEQAL DWtI SM EQV.M st ArAl - 10 C-So"
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

USACE AID # -
Site # (indicate on attached map) -
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -A*
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicant s name 2 Evaluator s name SJK.8RC���
3 Date of evaluation 05 doy 2411 4 Time of evaluation ESi
5 Name of stream Uro R t%At,,hC.M 6 River basin Q hPC C t -IRRRk LAKE�
7 Approximate drainage area AL 8 Stream order 1
9 Length of reach evaluated 140 10 County W AK E
11 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any) til / A
Latitude (ex 34 872312) 55.6 13059 Longitude (cx -77 556611) °` 'T%9-%2--J9 -
Method location determined (circle) GPS Topo Sheet rtho (Aerial) Photo /GI Other GIS Other Comet Lr— I±AM Vk
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
N er- L-34.:; I- ft 00 ) CSY y.1. tz, lop 2.9', 112`( t t .I-go
14 Proposed channel work (if any) SEWER CpSStts(y
15 Recent weather conditions VZP.1N ro ber> 2S5 v4gs - ?RAopZ ct
16 Site conditions at time of visit (1 VRS " c&r - en_uTOV6R
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known Section 10 Tidal Waters — Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _ Water Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation points YES iS If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map9 YES 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21 Estimated watershed land use 1 O 'i�o Residential % Commercial % Industrial %Agricultural
20 % Forested _J&% Cleared / Logged % Other (
22 Bankfull width,. 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 4
24 Channel slope down center of stream Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation, stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
07 A-
Total Score (from reverse) `i Comments -TW C- STR
■ S ■� - .. •
Evaluator's Slgnature % �__ Date os 00( 2.g 1
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not unply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment, please call 919 876 8441 x 26

USACE AID# -� _ -_ - _ -�DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map) -�
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
fi
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicant s name 2 Evaluators name C"kats �kc�PPEy, �5`ttUE41�V�
3 Date of evaluation (b,5 Mom 2-011 4 Time of evaluation I TN?S 3
5 Name of stream L3T Rio, "t�tZAt•.�Cl� 6 River basin CAPE FEAR C i�RRR1S LAIC )
7 Approximate drainage area s QC 8 Stream order S-
9 Length of reach evaluated 10 County V^i AKtr
11 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any)
^ -� tai
Latitude (cx 34 872312) on etude (cx -77 556611) 17i .el Y1f o� D
Method location determined (circle) GPS Topo Sheet rtho (Renal) PhotolG Other GiS Other C- rr,C -�_r•. FA2T N
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby reads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
N a 1st (2,50§0 � S oy CSX Q t 1 le—m b� w J S k �2`f �► 2�Cbi
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions 'V
16 Site conditions at time of visit
I as G
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 Sidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (1 IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES <EO) If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map* YES @> 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21 Estimated watershed land use 1Q% Residential % Commercial _% industrial %o Agricultural
10 % Forested % Cleared / Logged %o Other ( )
22 Bankfull width 2� 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) t�
24 Channel slope down center of stream _Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (> 10%)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification, etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) -5 Comments TV30 STP
: KJT -r=2M tTT!~&M — S6-4k zAL AMP}li Pnbc Pratt iD
Evaluator's Signature Date „Q�s &I Mt 20 11
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 -8441 x 26

[m

USACE AID # - ^� DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -A*
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment \
i Applicants name 2 Evaluators name C A%s "OpPgv_ yock(. i )
3 Date of evaluation 05 Km 2-011 4 Time of evaluation 1 A-oo
5 Name of stream U'i $tt� `[3t lar.aca� 6 River basin C1_AP9 &Ae. CuARPtS
7 Approximate drainage area 4 AG 8 Stream order
9 Length of reach evaluated '%? 10 County W AK
11 Site coordinates lit
(if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any) ISJ_
Latitude (ex 34 872312) -55 to-1504-7- Longitude (ex -77 556611) --1 W . Cl ttnia
Method location determined (circle) GPS Topo Sheet Qtho (Aerial} Photo OtherGIS Other GAq_&L_f CnR 9
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) location)
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions
" 9VfJ�4T
16 Site conditions at time of visit S yRS yas ► - - OTomeR
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters —Water Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES t0> If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map9 YES Q 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey9 YES r b�10
21 Estimated watershed land use 16-0/o Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
*/o Forested (�Q% Cleared / Logged Yo Other ( )
22 Bankfull width < 1 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) ' 4
24 Channel slope down center of stream _Flat (0 to 2 0A) Gentle (2 to 4 %) --Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (> 10 %)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) t A- Comments _�yjc_ sr2 * to
Evaluator s Signature Date 05 Woy "i 1
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to MACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment, please call 919 876 -8441 x 26

USACE AID# - - - - DWQ # y _ Site # (indicate on attached map)
Im STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
2 Evaluators name A9%.5 1CRPE2 CS4niFRC -y0
4 Time of evaluation 14- � 0 EST
6 Riverbasm CAPE FEAR [ '469t %S LAt�E�
8 Stream order
10 County W A1Ct�
1 Applicants name
3 Date of evaluation 05 Mw
5 Name ofstream QX ?%,
7 Approximate drainage area —��
9 Length of reach evaluated
11 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any)
Latitude(ex 34872312) ,S% um( 02-1 Longitude(cx - 77556611) - -1 W
Method location determined (circle) GPS Topo Sheet rtho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other G1S Other 6stlYSLE -"P -'TN
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
14 Proposed channel work (if
15 Recent weather conditions
16 Site conditions at time of v
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (1 IV)
18 is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? &NO If yes estimate the water surface area I AC
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map? �a NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use - 6-% Residential % Commercutl % Industrial % Agricultural
2D% Forested % Cleared / Logged , o Other ( )
22 Bankf til width { r 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 4 7 Curt
24 Channel slope down center of stream Flat (0 to 2 %) X Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep (>10%)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander .,Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) Comments
�PNEMER14L bWO ST2 FoetA \t 4A1 = 'T 5 to 's 645
1
Evaluator's Signature Date —O5 tsi nv 70 ,k l
This channel evaluation form Is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation raho or requirement Form subject to change - version 06103 To Comment, please call 919 876 8441 x 26

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET LAUD
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
2 Evaluators name amms 1komp,_ SvNER�V�
4 Time of evaluation 1 I-M _
6 River basin. CAP, PEAR C VAN .XS LAKiE>
1 Applicants name
3 Date of evaluation IS t A0\t Akk
5 Name of stream UT BKG FiR OAQX1
7 Approximate drainage area 46"r ® X tay 8 Stream order 1
9 Length of reach evaluated '�'2 -�� i 10 County W AUCE
11 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any) t-3 1 tk
Latitude (ex 34 $72312) )S, to-i �QLO Longitude (ex -77 556611) -SIR AS-IN rSup_
Method location determined (circle) GPS Topo Sheet o (Aerial Other GIS Other --,000 L-- gm 1k
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
ts% .Ys'L(t p0c; K- vJ of S Q 111.`i t L.001
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions
± % it
16 Site conditions at time of visit _ B -L" roREST
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 _____Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I IV)
1& Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES® If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad mapli YES ® 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use 20 0A Residential 5 % Commercial % industrial % Agricultural
IS % Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other ( 1
22 Bankf ill width 1`In IJ60*39h CA& L.. 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 0
24 Channel slope down center of stream k Flat (0 to 2 %) Oentle (2 to 4 0%) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep (>10%)
25 Channel sinuosity X Straight .,Occasional bends ,Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instruchons for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation, stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a bnef description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
rnrn �
Total Score (from reverse) 59 Comments —P#30— QTR #
Evaluator's Signature �, /�/ ��l�l V Date W5 NO\( 7-0 11
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental'
nvironments professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

.
. %� MM-
.� NOR �Rl
URTMA EVI-Z'51�'
, I IN

Attachment 3 Stream and Wetland Impact Maps -Apex
Water & Sewer Extension Policy

anau �nr.nweam
I
MNdW0�4B100M3H1
n o a n n ra j n o n 1 M M I I I I i
I
a I
°n I
ILI
I
�
I
I I I
N ro1 I
I I
Z;;W rl9 m a!a rjs o3m ad aiz II
r" Wl90l u" 1l99 dM wjjhwj Q
MM AWaM .0 M3 go t
lL18D BM 9L TM Mi -r-- t t l i
MAIM m" AMM mw
x3N do JIM Ills,
S
.. t `
r
0 10
t
g�a I U
W
Z
3a 8 I b J
I =
11 �
d
aka lir
j §3
Ix
418
a
a
m
$
U x m J
LU Z
n
n
n
n
n
IR
n
52
n
InoIf)
ooN
n
n
I
aw anm
1
tx
I
rro
I
I
I
I
I
E3
I
I
I
I
a
!
w
n
LLI
W
M
8
8

e�a�rewwoae�
I I sc LC role rl Wx roe tspLas r-Wsws a k3W
ANVdAOONU=3H1
/ � swos terms �vlxrn r� � 3� t ti 6 dd y + �
+ana 33S 4L L6 Yl8
� � a
1 �s5 6
$ a
I�
I
I ,gk
I
� I
O - .J,—)
III
fiat
1 t�
II �
4
gad �
a �t�
a a'no
N N
m
N
n
N
11
N
Iii
m
N
w
N
N
0 a
N N
II11
III
111
Pik
I
III
I�
III
� II
hie
1
lit,�
1111
I
g L\ 1 1
I��aa
e , 1
I
, 1
s
I
II
I'
�
'
i
li
I
I
I 1111
I
I
I
II
I�
I
I ,gk
I
� I
O - .J,—)
III
fiat
1 t�
II �
4
gad �
a �t�
a
�n
a a'no
N N
m
N
n
N
11
N
Iii
m
N
w
N
N
0 a
N N
II11
III
111
I I�
I
III
I�
III
� II
1111
I
I��aa
�� (I 141
I
I
II
I'
�
'
i
li
I
I
I 1111
I
I
I
II
I
Iilll
I
III
I �'
1
I III
1
1
I,II
I �
I I
�� I I I
1
I
I
I
I I
III
II
1 I
I I
I
I
1 I
I
1
1
I
I
III
i
t
I
I
I
�
I
1 1
I�
b1 I
I
111
II
I
I
II
�
IIII
cc
KK
�
liJl
l
I
1 1 l r
l I
I
III,
II
1
1
1
II
I II
1
1 II,
I
1
I
I I
I
I
I
IIII
I
1
I
l
IIII
i
II
I�
II 8
1 1
I
11
it
I
i
IIII
III
1
III
I
11
I
1
I
I III
I
II
I
I
f
1
I
'I II
>s
II
I
1
�1
I
I f
I I
oaro�4 �
8� I I
1
1
I
N
N
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
a
�n

S L S v s m S[ is tl_S ta*-a A.W-" S M3N Z R E
mv&, faWW3Hl LO
MUMLSVIbm MMM t JMWMTM btu! J S�
Of
S SL
/i
jai
Y18
1 "
+ I I I ! I
a 11 F
la j k a i
t
1 �
1
a�i
lei
d
8
g / \
r kl M I aS € s
1f It III
I I i
I
i I �
31x
f it I AA` $ a $
let Yaae
I
$
€ §
M M N N
1.9
N N N N N N
I I I
l�III � I I 1 I
I
-I I
$II
a I I I
� I
a I I
I
� � I
1 g
I �
� b
I I I
3
I II
II ( I cYZ ua .w
I
I
I
I I I
I I 1 $
I I III II\�I I� I II I
I I I II
I
I
I lit �a I I
�I
III � I
I I I app
M 0
M1
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N

— cmm iw owmrpwa�
OBBS =YILS OLL On YJS k M36 Awma A M3N
�
0
VV" vis 91 l4 Y18 ww:M AWJIM Ja M3N
Z
— ANVdW001�L00M3H1
E s�
3W�IW8ptlJM IBM391 U31 T191 Max
J g
��
MlOMJ WlA71 AI/IIOD IDIYA1
�
O�1
N
0�0
N
co
N
v�
a a
s Q t
a gas Ra
9 ✓
+e
F
1
$ \ h
I $
1 1
1 1 �
1 1 �
p A
f
/ I \
/ 1
/ � 1
r \
dv
0
'n
N
In
O O
M
M
O1
N
O�1
N
0�0
N
co
N
I
I
II
L I
II '
I
i
I
i
I
i
i
I
i
li
II I
'
ec.oc
I
w
I
I
m v
N
I I
I
I
I$
I
I
N
I
M MI
M
M
N
N
N
N
O
O
W
n
N
i
M
M
0�1
N
OOf
N
N
Opp
N
N
I
I
'
!
n
Hn
I
I
IIV
i
I
\\
I
l
I �
N
I
I
I
I
su
�o
I
I
I
I
I
x
m v
;
n
a
I
i
I
I I
I
I �
I
ROO�ao
a
x� aomt
r�rox
I
�„r-
�
I
ez uq
I
I
I
aiz c1
u 1
I
nw
I
� I
I
r
it
�q
I
r
r
�
I
I
I
I
cli
cc
cs
dv

L4 M YL„ OL M"L YLS _3NOS MUM" 9 !LM
I
MV^dVYCON DQM3Hl g 6
0 MMLXWLWdd M MBMM T WiVMTM MM J S
a a,aw �L v rnm xucx " owM a s
+
t
t
t! g
^I
~
it Xar ao wxoi
B S
O N
e� M N
I I
8
�
°m
m
N
Cl
°
m
N
n
N
n
N
co
N
toO
to
N
w ae
111
tree
x� w
Im
I
a I
1
11 a 111
\ 1
$� x Ll
�I
1
8
1
1
1 I
r Fl I I ox wt
i ox
c
o nm 1
I i l f
1
a� d o 0 0
K—i h N N
0
N
0
N
N
o
N
N
o
N
n
N
K av

Attachment 4 Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners -
Apex Water & Sewer Extension Policy