20070623 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20100217

�51�� \�yj4�5[ - a5'r, "�-:. •. '_'"- '_':R'�ii 1. GyRK. .,fit �.,:4SC;;• O -c,'�w .: 1 ^. ,. - ,'JR +i..
k
Y
r-
C
>. YY .` J � x tt -'4a +. .,,rr, _ F ra. ' {._ ; ?'x yf� ..;- �J....L�..f Z. •. � _ '
Year 1 Point
it
"},ty+�:F•��r�:'.;v�.i,..; -w. -. ..-�.t
e Ip r's't .-^ ^-h. - '* .'�j' s -. {;7 ry t '14
Its
y' �r +x -
� J� �'
F� ,''fit a r �Ti'�''i' =t �✓ �k �, t - .�l��tiy .obi t fix'
E r s � . •r ro z r� � � i� t.{r' un f�l i iX C` -+k r t [ ti�
Mi
K - t

E Ownern NCDENR
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
°? l'kli >,�`w Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1652 Mail Service Center
p •i
.sIt
s ,. , 47. `��Cem Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
�, 1 Vent
rAo.w
EEP Project Manager: Guy Pearce
Phone: [phone]
Design and Monitoring Firm
Mulkey Engineers and Consultants
---MULKEY 6750 Tryon Road
eno�neena r, coweu �r�wre
Cary, North Carolina 27518
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Manager: Wendee B. Smith
Phone: [phone]
Project Engineer: Scott Hunt
Phone: [phone]

Lade White Oak Cry A maul Mm airg Report Felmrary 2010
StmamRatoration (Year 2 of 5)
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary ........................................ ............................... 1
2.0
Project Background ............................................ ...............................
4
- 2.1
Project Location and Setting
4
2.2
Project Goals and Objectives
4
2.3
Project Restoration Approach and Mitigation Type
5
2.4
Project History
6
2.5
Project Monitoring Plan View
6
3.0
Project Condition and Monitoring Results .............. ...............................
7
3.1
Project Vegetation Monitoring
7
- 3.1.1
Vegetation Monitoring Methodology
7
3.1.2
Vegetation Monitoring Success Criteria
8
3.1.3
Vegetation Monitoring Results for Year 1 of 5
9
_ 3.1.4
Vegetation Monitoring Results for Year 2 of 5
3.2
Project Stream Monitoring
10
3.2.1
Stream Monitoring Methodology
10
3.2.2
Stream Monitoring Success Criteria
13
3.2.3
Stream Monitoring Results for Year 1 of 5
14
3.2.4
Stream Monitoring Results for Year 2 of 5
17
4.0 Project Monitoring Methodology ............................ ............................... 20
5.0 References ......................................................... .............................21
Figures
Tables
Figure 1. Location Map
Table I. Project Restoration Approach and Mitigation Type
Table II. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table III. Project Contacts
Table IV. Project Background
Table V. Stem Counts Monitoring Year 2 for Each Species Arranged by Plot
Table VI. Vegetative Problem Areas
Table VII. Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary
Table VIII. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Table IX. BEHI and Sediment Transport Estimates
Table X. Verification of Bankfull Events
Table XI. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Table XII. Stream Problem Areas
Appendices
Appendix A.
Monitoring Plan View
Appendix B.
Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix C.
Reference Point Photos
Appendix D.
Cross Section Photos
Appendix E.
Raw Data

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of 5)
1.0 Executive Summary
This annual monitoring report details the second year monitoring activities and their results
for the Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration Site (LWOC). All of the monitoring
activities were conducted and the subsequent results are reported in accordance with the
approved mitigation plan (Mulkey Engineers and Consultants, 2008) for LWOC. The
content and format of this report were developed in accordance with the contract
requirements for the Full Delivery RFP 16- DO6027 (NCEEP, 2005). Accordingly, this
report includes project background information, project monitoring results, and description
of the project monitoring methodology.
Mulkey Engineers and Consultants (Mulkey) submitted LWOC for the Full Delivery RFP
16- DO6027 to provide 18,200 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs). Mulkey was awarded the
stream restoration contract and began work on the project on May 16, 2007 The primary
goals of LWOC were to improve water quality, to reduce bank erosion, to reestablish a
floodplain along each of the stream reaches, and to improve the aquatic and terrestrial
wildlife habitat. These goals were met through the following objectives:
• By using natural channel design to restore stable pattern, dimension, and profile for
18,290 linear feet of stream channel
• By establishing a conservation easement, which will protect the streams from cattle
intrusion and future development activities
• By establishing a floodplain or reconnecting the stream back to its historic
floodplain, or a combination of both, for each project stream reach
• By creating or restoring floodplain features such as vernal pools, off channel ponds,
or riparian wetlands
• By increasing the amount of aquatic habitat through the addition of rock and wood
structures
• By reestablishing native plant communities throughout the conservation easement,
whereby reintroducing shading, cover areas, and travel corridors.
LWOC is located in Polk County, North Carolina near the community of Mill Springs and is
situated in the Broad River Basin. Past land use practices, including extensive cattle
farming, stream channelization and dredging, and clearing of the riparian buffers resulted in
substantial degradation of the stream systems at LWOC. LWOC is comprised of seven
stream reaches totaling 18,290 feet of restored stream channel. All of the analyses, design,
and restoration at LWOC were accomplished using natural stream channel design methods.
In addition to stream channel restoration, the restored stream banks and the riparian and
upland buffer areas along LWOC were also replanted with native species vegetation.
The survivability of the planted vegetation at LWOC was monitored at representative
vegetation plots as well as project -wide. Stem counts, photo documentation and
comparison, and visual assessment were utilized. Bare root stock were planted at a density
of 680 stems per acre (8 foot by 8 foot spacing) and live stakes were planted on the stream
banks at a density of 1,742 stems per acre (5 foot by 5 foot spacing). A total of 24
representative vegetation plots were installed at LWOC based on the recommendations set
1

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of 5)
forth by EEP regarding the acreage contained in the conservation easement. The
survivability of the planted woody vegetation at LWOC was monitored using annual stem
counts at each of the plots. In addition to the stem counts, annual photos were taken at each
of the plots and also from 14 other permanent photo reference points. The vegetation plot
photos were used for photo documentation and comparison of the vegetation growth at each
plot. The photo documentation at the reference points were employed to assist in a project -
wide visual assessment of the vegetation at LWOC. Survivability will be based on
achieving a minimum of 320 stems per acre after Year 3 and 260 stems per acre after Year
5, across the project site. The stem counts were conducted during the latter part of the
growing season months (August, September, and October) to insure survival throughout a
complete growing season while still allowing for relative ease in identification.
In late August 2008, the vegetation monitoring for Monitoring Year 1 was conducted using
the methodologies described above, including stem counts, photo documentation, and visual
assessment. The stem counts resulted in the 24 vegetation plots having a survivability of
planted woody stems ranging from 438 to 1000 stems per acre, with an average survivability
of 713 stems per acre. The results indicated the survivability of the planted woody
vegetation at LWOC will meet the success criteria outlined above for Year 3 and Year 5.
The comparisons of the baseline and Monitoring Year 1 photos at both the 24 vegetation
plot photo reference points and the 14 permanent photo reference points strongly
complemented this suggestion, as no concerns, problems, or negative trends were
documented. Similarly, the project -wide visual assessment provided further validation, as
no vegetation problem areas were observed.
In mid October 2009, the vegetation monitoring for Monitoring Year 2 was conducted using
the methodologies described above, including stem counts, photo documentation, and visual
assessment. The stem counts resulted in the 24 vegetation plots having a survivability of
planted woody stems ranging from 367 to 1000 stems per acre, with an average survivability
of 670 stems per acre. As with the previous year, the results indicated the survivability of
the planted woody vegetation at LWOC will meet the success criteria outlined above for
Year 3 and Year 5. The comparisons of the baseline and Monitoring Year 2 photos at both
the 24 vegetation plot photo reference points and the 14 permanent photo reference indicated
the vegetation is moving in a positive direction. The project -wide visual assessment
provided validated this positive trend, as no vegetation problem areas were observed.
Stream dimension, pattern, profile, stream bed material, bank stability, and bankfull
hydrology were monitored to evaluate the success of stream restoration at LWOC. The
limits of the project stream reaches to be monitored at LWOC were determined using the
sampling rates outlined by the USACE et al. (2003). The monitoring were conducted using
annual field surveys, pebble counts, crest gage recordation, visual assessment and photo
documentation. Baseline conditions for comparison of the stream parameters to be
monitored were established from data gathered immediately after construction through the
as -built survey process. Longitudinal profiles and Modified Wolman pebble counts were
conducted for all reaches and a total of 13 permanent cross sections were surveyed and
photo documented across LWOC. A total of eight crest gages across LWOC were installed
for hydrologic monitoring to verify the occurrence of bankfull storm events. Annual photo
2

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of 5)
documentation was used for stream monitoring to complement and validate the other stream
monitoring practices from 14 permanent reference photo points. Annual project wide visual
assessment was conducted using field observation and pedestrian surveys to identify any
specific problem areas. Since it is only required during Monitoring Year 3 and Monitoring
Year 5, the BEHI information will only be collected during those years. Stream restoration
success at LWOC was evaluated by comparison of the annual monitoring results against
those same parameters as predicted, specified, and required in the proposed design and as
implemented during the construction process represented by the as -built or baseline
conditions. Success is achieved when all such comparisons reveal positive trends toward
overall stream stability.
In late August 2008, the stream monitoring for Monitoring Year 1 was conducted using the
methodologies described above. The results of the stream dimension, pattern, and profile
monitoring demonstrated that all of the reaches were experiencing the expected minor
adjustments indicative of movement toward increased stream stability and were attributed to
vegetation establishment and natural channel adjustments. Fluctuations in bed materials
were expected to occur during the early years following construction. Fining of the bed
materials was documented by the stream bed material monitoring. The stream systems at
LWOC appear to be sand - dominated and therefore coarsening of the bed may not occur.
However, the monitoring results suggested on -site sediment supply from LWOC has been
reduced as a result of the restoration. Fluctuations in bed materials are likely to continue
and several years may be needed to observe a consistent bed material. Data collected at six
of the eight on -site crest gauges provided evidence indicating a storm event producing a
stage in excess of the bankfull storm occurred at LWOC during Monitoring Year 1. This
documented the first of two required bankfull events over the five year monitoring period in
order to achieve success with regards to hydrologic monitoring at LWOC. No stream
problems were documented through the photo documentation comparison process.
However, the project -wide visual assessment conducted along each of the project stream
reaches revealed 12 specific stream problem areas which included in- stream structure
failures and associated stream bank erosion, areas of floodplain and adjacent stream bank
erosion, and an area of stream bank erosion. Mulkey elected to promptly address all of the
observed stream problem areas and conducted construction repairs of each in October 2008:
All of the in- stream structures and the areas of floodplain and stream bank erosion were
repaired. The repairs to the all of the areas of eroded stream banks included re- grading, re-
seeding with appropriate temporary and permanent seed, re- installing coir fiber matting, and
re- planting with live stakes. Upon completion of the repair work, LWOC experienced no
other stream problem areas and was deemed a success for Year 1 Monitoring.
In mid October and early November 2009, the stream monitoring for Monitoring Year 2 was
conducted using the methodologies described above. The results of the stream dimension,
pattern, and profile monitoring demonstrated that all of the reaches were experiencing the
expected minor adjustments indicative of movement toward increased stream stability and
were attributed to vegetation establishment and natural channel adjustments. Fluctuations in
bed materials were expected to occur during the early years following construction. Fining
of the bed materials was documented by the stream bed material monitoring. The stream
systems at LWOC appear to be sand - dominated and therefore coarsening of the bed may not
3

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of S)
occur. However, the monitoring results suggested on -site sediment supply from LWOC has
been reduced as a result of the restoration, particularly from increased native vegetation and
soil stabilization. Fluctuations in bed materials are likely to continue and several years may
be needed to observe a consistent bed material. Data collected at seven of the eight on -site
crest gauges provided evidence indicating a storm event producing a stage in excess of the
bankfull storm occurred at LWOC during Monitoring Year 2. This documented the second
of two required bankfull events over the five year monitoring period in order to achieve
success with regards to hydrologic monitoring at LWOC. No stream problems were
documented through the photo documentation comparison process. However, the project -
wide visual assessment conducted along each of the project stream reaches revealed 3
specific stream problem areas, all of which are associated with beaver dams constructed
along reaches R1 and R2. Mulkey is actively coordinating with the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) Wildlife Services under their Beaver Management
Assistance Program (BMAP) to have the beavers and beaver dams removed, as well as to
have site monitored for future beaver activity.
Therefore, based on the results of the stream monitoring for Monitoring Year 2 at LWOC, as
well as the ongoing corrective actions being taken, Mulkey did not propose any additional
recommendations or actions other than to proceed with the annual stream monitoring.
2.0 Project Background
2.1 Project Location and Setting
The Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration Site is located in Polk County, North
Carolina approximately 2.5 miles east /southeast from the community of Mill Springs along
NC Highway 9 South, and approximately 0.5 mile northwest from the intersection of NC
Highway 9 South and US Highway 74 (Figure 1). LWOC is situated in the Broad River
Basin 8 -digit cataloging unit of 03050105 and the 14 -digit cataloging unit 03050105030010.
Mulkey proposed to provide 18,200 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) with LWOC under the
Full Delivery RFP 16- DO6027 issued by the Ecosystem Enhancement Program Department
of Environment and Natural Resources (NCEEP). Mulkey acquired and installed permanent
fencing along an easement covering 55.3 acres, which encompasses the restored streams and
associated buffers at LWOC.
2.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The primary goals of LWOC were to improve water quality, to reduce bank erosion, to
reestablish a floodplain along each of the stream reaches, and to improve the aquatic and
terrestrial wildlife habitat.
These goals were met through the following objectives:
• By using natural channel design to restore stable pattern, dimension, and profile for
18,290 linear feet of stream channel
E

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of 5)
February 2010
• By establishing a conservation easement, which will protect the streams from cattle
intrusion and future development activities
• By establishing a floodplain or reconnecting the stream back to its historic
floodplain, or a combination of both, for each project stream reach
• By creating or restoring floodplain features such as vernal pools, off channel ponds,
or riparian wetlands
• By increasing the amount of aquatic habitat through the addition of rock and wood
structures
• By reestablishing native plant communities throughout the conservation easement,
whereby reintroducing shading, cover areas, and travel corridors.
2.3 Project Restoration Approach and Mitigation Type
LWOC is comprised of three main reaches (R1, R2 Upper and R2 Lower) and four
tributaries (R1A, R2A, R2B and R21)). Prior to construction, these seven reaches were
identified and proposed for restoration due to their distinct stream characteristics and
drainage areas. These seven existing reaches totaled approximately 15,487 linear feet. A
total of 18,290 linear feet of stream channel was restored at LWOC within the 55.3 acre
conservation easement.
Analyses, design, and restoration of the stream channels at LWOC was accomplished using
Natural Stream Channel design methods developed by Rosgen (Rosgen, D. L., 1994, 1996,
- 1998). The proposed Rosgen channel type for two of the tributaries (R2A and R213) was a
C4 channel. The restoration of these tributaries was implemented using Priority Level I and
II methodologies. The proposed stream classification for the majority of the reaches (R1,
RI A, R2 Upper, and R2 Lower) was a C5 channel. A combination of Priority Level I and 1I
JI methods were used to construct these reaches. The remaining reach (R213) was proposed to
be a C6 channel using the same methods previously mentioned.
The most significant stream restoration component at LWOC involved the reconstruction of
each of the stream reaches such that stream flows greater than bankfull are allowed to access
the restored stream's floodplain. Two different approaches were used to insure such
floodplain access. The first approach involved relocating and raising the stream bed such
that the historic floodplain is accessed by stream flows greater than bankfull (the sections of
the project stream reaches that were restored using Priority Level I methodologies). A
second approach was used where site constraints prevented such relocation and raising of
the stream bed. Therefore the second approach involved building a floodplain at a level
lower than the historic floodplain through the construction of bankfull benches (the sections
of the project stream reaches that were restored using Priority Level II methodologies). In-
stream structures were installed along each of the stream reaches to provide grade control
and stream bank protection, and to increase in- stream habitat diversity. The in- stream
structures installed included rock cross vanes, j -hook rock vanes, rock vanes, constructed
riffles, and root wads. Stream banks were further stabilized through the installation of coir
fiber erosion control matting, temporary and permanent seeding, and the installation of
native species vegetation in the form of transplants, live stakes, and bare root stock. All
areas of the site that were disturbed during construction activities were stabilized using
5

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of S)
temporary and permanent seeding. The riparian and upland buffer communities along
LWOC were also restored with native species vegetation using a target community which
will emulate the Piedmont /Low Mountain Alluvial Forest described by Shafale and Weakley
(1990). The conservation easement was fenced to permanently protect the restored stream
and buffer areas. Information regarding the restoration approach and mitigation type for
each of the seven project stream reaches is detailed in Table 1.
2.4 Project History
The existing conditions at LWOC prior to restoration were a result of cattle use for the past
50 years. When Mulkey initially became involved with this project, there were
approximately 200 livestock (cattle and horses) utilizing the pastures. The livestock had
never been fenced from any of the stream channels within LWOC. This continual livestock
access to the streams resulted in substantial erosion along the stream banks, incision of the
channels, channel widening in some areas, and heavy siltation throughout LWOC, as well as
reduced water quality due to large quantities of fecal matter into the stream system. Based
on information gained from the property owner, it was determined that many of the streams
at the LWOC, particularly the smaller tributaries, were historically maintained through
channelization, dredging, and clearing of the riparian buffer. As a result of these land and
water quality issues, Mulkey submitted LWOC for the Full Delivery RFP 16- DO6027 to
provide 18,200 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs). Mulkey was awarded the stream
restoration contract by the NCEEP and began work on the project on May 16, 2007. The
project activity and reporting history are detailed in Table II. Table III lists the contacts for
the designer, contractor, relevant suppliers, and monitoring firm for LWOC. Table IV
provides a complete listing of project background information.
2.5 Project Monitoring Plan View
Mulkey conducted monitoring baseline surveys along the entire length of each of the
restored project stream reaches using total station survey equipment. These surveys were
conducted to establish and document baseline conditions for the newly restored stream
channels for future monitoring activities. As -built drawings were developed using the
results of the monitoring baseline surveys. These drawing depicted the post construction
condition of LWOC and are included in Appendix A. The as -built drawings consisted of
plan sheets that include the following:
• Title sheet
• Legend sheet
• As -built planimetric drawing developed from aerial photography of LWOC after the
completion of construction
• As -built planimetric drawings and profiles developed from the baseline monitoring
field surveys
The as -built drawings illustrate the location of all major project elements, including, but not
limited to the:

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of S)
February 2010
• Restored stream channel thalweg, normal edges of water, constructed bankfull
channel limits, and the constructed cut slope limits
• Conservation easement boundaries
• Permanent fencing limits
• Topography
• In- stream structures
• Photo points
• Crest gages
• Vegetation plots locations
• Permanent cross sections
• Project survey control
• Monitoring profile survey limits
• Relevant structures and utilities
3.0 Project Condition and Monitoring Results
3.1 Project Vegetation Monitoring
3.1.1 Vegetation Monitoring Methodology
The survivability of the planted vegetation at LWOC, including both woody and herbaceous
species, was monitored at representative vegetation plots as well as project -wide.
Monitoring at representative vegetation plots focused primarily on planted woody vegetation
and was conducted using stem counts and photo documentation. Project -wide monitoring of
planted vegetation included both woody and herbaceous species and was accomplished
using visual assessment as well as photo documentation.
Major grading and channel construction was completed during the last week of November
2007. Throughout construction, appropriate temporary and permanent seeding was
conducted to stabilize areas disturbed during construction. Appropriate existing native
species vegetation was also salvaged, where feasible, in the form of transplants and live
stakes, throughout the construction process. Immediately following the completion of the
major grading and channel construction activities, all remaining plant material was installed
during the months of November and December 2007. These remaining plant materials
consisted of native species bare root seedlings and live stakes and were installed, as
appropriate, to restore the riparian and upland buffer communities along LWOC within the
conservation easement area. A complete listing of the planting zones, their corresponding
acreages, and the corresponding vegetation species was included in the approved mitigation
report (Mulkey Engineers and Consultants, 2008). The bare root stock were planted at a
density of 680 stems per acre (8 foot by 8 foot spacing) and the lives stakes were planted on
the stream banks at a density of 1,742 stems per acre (5 foot by 5 foot spacing).
An As -Built Survey was initiated immediately following the installation of plant materials.
In December 2007, during the as -built survey and after the completion of planting, a total of
24 representative vegetation plots (vegetation plots 1 through 24) were installed randomly
across LWOC. An iron pipe was installed at each plot corner for monumentation and a
7

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of 5)
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe, along with a label specifying the plot number, was also
installed at one of the corners of each plot. The plot corners were strategically located such
that each plot has a total area of approximately 100 square meters. Between January and
February 2008, after the establishment of the plots, all stems contained in the plots were
identified and tallied by species and plot, then marked with loosely tied survey flagging (on
lateral branches) to facilitate future identification. This data was recorded to provide the
baseline survivability. The survivability of the planted woody vegetation at LWOC for the
various monitoring periods was then calculated using annual stem counts at each of the plots
and compared to the baseline data. During each of the annual stem counts, the planted stems
were re- flagged as required to ensure that all planted stems were accounted for and
considered in the survivability calculations. In addition to the stem counts, photos were
taken at each of the plots. Where necessary, the corner of each plot was remarked with PVC
pipe and the plot number relabeled. This PVC plot corner was used as the reference point
from which the annual vegetation plot photos were taken such that the photos at each plot
will have the same orientation. The photos were compared to the photos from the previous
years to validate and document vegetation success. In addition to the photo reference points
established at each of the vegetation plots, a total of 11 additional permanent photo reference
points were installed across LWOC. Subsequently, three additional permanent photo
reference points (photo points 2.5Y1, 3.5Y1, and 8.5Y1) were added during the Year 1
monitoring period to ensure adequate photo documentation would be conducted within the
monitoring limits of the project stream reaches. These additional permanent photo reference
points were monumented using steel rebar and PVC pipe. Photos were taken from each of
the 14 permanent photo reference points with the same orientation each applicable year and
used for photo documentation and annual comparison of the vegetation growth across
LWOC. This exercise helped to further validate and document vegetation success at
LWOC. Between January and February 2008, after installation of the described 11
permanent photo reference points, photos were taken from each of the permanent photo
reference points to document the baseline conditions at LWOC with regards to planted
vegetation. Monitoring Year 1 and Monitoring Year 2 photos were taken from all 14 photo
points during the visit in August 2008 and October 2009, respectively. Project -wide visual
assessment was also used for vegetation monitoring at LWOC. A visual assessment was
conducted using annual field observation and pedestrian surveys to identify any specific
vegetation problem areas at LWOC during the monitoring period. Any problem areas where
vegetation was lacking or exotic vegetation was present, was identified and categorized as
bare bank, bare bench, bare floodplain, or invasive population. Such areas were documented
using representative photos and their locations were identified on the Monitoring Plan View.
3.1.2 Vegetation Monitoring Success Criteria
Vegetation success at LWOC was determined by stem survivability. Successful
survivability is dependent upon achieving at least 320 stems per acre after three years and
260 stems per acre after five years across the project site. Therefore, survivability rates
exceeding these requirements in previous years were deemed successful. The stem counts
were conducted during the latter part of the growing season months (August, September, and
October) to ensure survival throughout a complete growing season while still allowing for
relative ease in identification. As described above, photo documentation and visual
E

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of 5)
assessment was used to complement the stem counts as part of the vegetation monitoring
protocol at LWOC. If during any given year, the planted species survivability was not
anticipated to meet the final criteria established for vegetation; supplemental plantings were
considered. In the event this occurred, a remedial planting plan was developed to achieve
the survivability goals established for Years 3 and 5.
3.1.3 Vegetation Monitoring Results for Year 1 of 5
In late August 2008, the vegetation monitoring for Monitoring Year 1 was conducted. The
methodologies described in the Vegetation Monitoring Methodology Section above were
used for the vegetation monitoring at LWOC for Monitoring Year 1. Stem counts were
conducted at each of the 24 vegetation plots and the results are summarized in Table V.
Photos were taken from the photo reference points at each of the 24 vegetation plots.
Appendix B compares these photos with the initial baseline photos taken from the photo
reference points at each of the 24 vegetation plots. Photos were also taken from each of the
14 permanent photo reference points. Appendix C compares these photos with the initial
baseline photos taken from the original 11 permanent photo reference points and provided
the baseline photos for the 3 points installed during the Monitoring Year 1. A project -wide
visual assessment was also conducted to identify any specific vegetation problem areas.
Table VI summarizes the results, of the project -wide vegetation visual assessment. The
results of the Monitoring Year 1 stem counts showed that the 24 vegetation plots had
successfully achieved the survivability of planted woody vegetation with stem counts
ranging from 438 to 1000 stems per acre, with an average survivability of 713 stems per
acre. The results indicated the survivability of the planted woody vegetation at LWOC
should meet the success criteria defined in Section 3.1.2. During the stem counts, it was
noted no significant volunteer woody species were observed at any of the 24 vegetation
plots. The comparison of the baseline and Monitoring Year 1 photos at both the 24
vegetation plot photo reference points and the 11 permanent photo. reference points strongly
complemented this suggestion, as no concerns, problems, or negative trends were
documented. The project -wide visual assessment provided further validation, as no
vegetation problem areas were observed. Based on the results of the vegetation monitoring
for Monitoring Year 1 at LWOC, Mulkey did not propose any additional recommendations
or actions other than to proceed with the annual vegetation monitoring.
3.1.4 Vegetation Monitoring Results for Year 2 of 5
In mid October 2009, the vegetation monitoring for Monitoring Year 2 was conducted. The
methodologies described in the Vegetation Monitoring Methodology Section were used for
the vegetation monitoring at LWOC for Monitoring Year 2. Stem counts were conducted at
each of the 24 vegetation plots. Table V-presents the results of these stem counts for each of
the plots. This table includes and compares the results of the initial stem counts from the
original planting, the previous years, and Monitoring Year 2. Photos were taken from the
photo reference points at each of the 24 vegetation plots and are compared to the previously
collected photos in Appendix B. Photos were also taken from each of the 14 permanent
photo reference points. Appendix C compares these photos with the initial baseline photos
taken from the original 11 permanent photo reference points from Year 0 and the photos
W

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of S)
from the 14 total permanent photo reference points in Monitoring Year 1. A project -wide
visual assessment was also conducted to identify any specific vegetation problem areas and
is summarized in Table VI. The results of the Monitoring Year 2 stem counts continued to
display successful survivability in all 24 vegetation plots with the counts ranging from 367
to 1000 stems per acre and an average survivability of 670 stems per acre. Therefore
survivability of the planted woody vegetation at LWOC should meet the success criteria
established in Section 3.1.2. Similar to Monitroing Year 1, no significant volunteer woody
species were observed at any of the 24 vegetation plots. The comparison of the Monitoring
Year 2 photos to those previously collected at both the 24 vegetation plot photo reference
points and the 14 permanent photo reference points suggested the vegetation was growing
exceptionally well. Live stake vegetation has exceeded growth expectations and the bare
root material is starting to overcome the weedy vegetation. A further review of the
vegetation through the project -wide visual assessment validated this positive trend, as no
concerns, problems, or negative trends were documented. Based on the results of the
vegetation monitoring for Monitoring Year 2 at LWOC, Mulkey did not propose any
additional recommendations or actions other than to proceed with the annual vegetation
monitoring.
3.2 Project Stream Monitoring
3.2.1 Stream Monitoring Methodology
Stream dimension, pattern, profile, stream bed material, bank stability, and bankfull
hydrology were monitored to evaluate the success of the stream restoration activities at
LWOC. The monitoring of stream dimension, pattern, and profile, or morphometric
monitoring, along with the monitoring of stream bed material, were conducted using annual
field surveys along with visual assessment. The morphometric, stream bed material, and
stream bank stability monitoring were conducted along representative sections of the project
stream reaches. Hydrologic monitoring consisted of field measurements of bankfull events
using crest gages. Project -wide stream monitoring was accomplished using visual
assessment as well as photo documentation.
Major grading and channel construction were completed during the last week of November
2007. Immediately following the completion of the major grading and channel construction
activities, all remaining plant material was installed during the months of November and
December 2007. The as -built survey of all of the stream reaches at LWOC were initiated
immediately following the installation of plant materials and were conducted utilizing aerial
photography and total station surveys while following the protocols set forth by the 2003
USACE Stream Mitigation guidelines ( USACE et al., 2003). In addition to documenting
the construction of LWOC for comparison to the proposed design, the results of the as -built
survey were also used to establish baseline morphology for the proposed monitoring. This
information is presented in Table VII. A summary of the restored stream channel lengths
are outlined in Table I. A complete set of As -Built Drawings including a monitoring plan
view and longitudinal profile for the as -built conditions of the restored channels can be
found in Appendix A. After the completion of the as -built survey, the limits and
corresponding lengths of the project stream reaches to be monitored at LWOC were
10

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of S)
determined using the sampling rates outlined by the USACE et al. (2003). A total of 5,893
linear feet (32 %) of all restored stream channels will be surveyed annually during the
monitoring period. Based on these the sampling rates, the limits of the project stream
reaches to be surveyed annually for monitoring are as follows:
Reach R1 — 1,974 Linear Feet Total (Stations 14 +00 -R1- through 33 +74 -R1 -)
Reach R1A — 500 Linear Feet Total (Stations 0 +00 -R1A- through 5 +00 -RIA -)
Reach R2 — 2,047 Linear Feet Total (Stations 25 +13 -R2- through 45 +60 -R2 -)
Reach R2A — 326 Linear Feet Total (Stations 0 +00 -R2A- through 3 +26 -R2A -)
Reach R213 — 551 Linear Feet Total (Stations 9 +35 -R2B- through 14 +86 -R2B -)
Reach R21) — 495 Linear Feet Total (Stations 2 +84 -R2D- through 7 +79 -R2D -)
The upstream and downstream limits of these reaches were monumented in the field using
steel rebar /PVC pins. Each pin was also labeled with an aluminum tag identifying the
respective reach and the correct descriptor ( "begin" or "end ").
A total of 13 permanent cross sections, consisting of both riffles and pools, were established
across LWOC and surveyed during the as -built survey process. The number of cross
sections was determined using the sampling rates outlined by the USACE et al. (2003). The
left and right ends of each cross section were monumented with a steel rebar pin and PVC
pipe. An aluminum tag identifying the cross section number was also installed at the pin on
the left side of the channel. In addition to the cross section surveys, photos were taken at
each of the 13 cross sections, looking across the stream from left to right, to document the
baseline conditions at each respective cross section. Specific stations along each permanent
cross section were established during the as -built survey to promote replication and
consistency during the subsequent annual cross section surveys. The stationing for each
cross section was established to always begin on the left side of the channel, facing
downstream, at the left rebar /PVC pin, and to continue across the stream channel to the
rebar /PVC pin on the right side. The as -built survey of the 13 cross sections established the
baseline conditions with regards to stream dimension. All of the 13 cross sections will be
surveyed each year during the five -year monitoring period and the resulting parameters will
be compared annually. The parameters to be monitored include bankfull width, floodprone
width, bankfull cross sectional area, bankfull mean depth, bankfull max depth, width to
depth ratio, entrenchment ratio, wetted perimeter, and hydraulic radius. Annually, photos
will be taken at each of the 13 cross sections looking across the stream from left to right and
compared to the photos from the previous years to document stream conditions at each
respective cross section.
The pattern for all of the stream reaches was surveyed and baseline conditions were
established as part of the as -built survey. Monitoring surveys for stream pattern are limited
to the project stream reaches specified above for annual monitoring surveys. The stream
pattern parameters resulting from the annual monitoring surveys include sinuosity, belt
width, radii of curvature, meander wavelength, and meander width ratio. These parameters
will be compared annually.
11

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of 5)
The as -built survey included a longitudinal profile survey along the entire length of all
restored stream reaches. Longitudinal profiles were surveyed by identifying each stream
feature (riffle, run, pool, or glide) and surveying specific points at each feature. These
specific locations included top of bank, bankfull, water's edge or surface, and thalweg. The
as -built survey were used to establish the baseline conditions with regards to monitoring the
longitudinal profile within the project reaches described above. The longitudinal profiles
surveys conducted each year are then limited to the project stream reaches specified above.
The parameters resulting from these longitudinal profile surveys are compared on an annual
basis to those of the baseline and previous years. The parameters to be monitored include
bankfull slope, riffle length, riffle slope, pool length, and pool to pool spacing.
During the as -built survey, Modified Wolman pebble counts were conducted at each of the
project stream reaches to classify the stream bed materials. The pebble counts for the larger
project stream reaches (RI and R2) were conducted at each of the permanent cross sections
by performing an equal number of counts at each cross section and then combining the
results into a reach -wide count. A minimum of 100 counts were made for each of these
larger reaches. Reach -wide pebble counts were conducted along the smaller project stream
reaches (R1A, R2A, R2B, and R2D). A minimum of 50 counts were made for each of these
smaller reaches. The stream bed materials are monitored at LWOC by repeating the same
pebble count procedures on an annual basis. The results of the pebble counts for each
specified project stream reach are compared on an annual basis.
BEHI information was collected during the existing condition surveys and sediment
transport rates were subsequently developed. The resulting information served as baseline
data for stream bank stability at LWOC. Stream bank stability monitoring using these
parameters is required in Monitoring Year 3 and 5. Data collected during these years will be
compared with pre - construction conditions to determine the change in bank erosion hazard
indices and sediment export rates for each reach assessed. Positive change, namely
reduction, in both the stream bank erosion rates and sediment transport rates at LWOC are
expected as a result of restoration and will be documented as described to demonstrate
success.
A total of eight crest gages, one at each reach and one at the confluence of Reaches R1 and
R2, were installed across LWOC during the as -built survey. At the base of each crest gage a
permanent vertical datum was installed. The locations of each crest gage along with the
elevation of the permanent vertical datum were surveyed during the as -built survey. The
crest gages were used for the hydrologic monitoring at LWOC to verify the occurrence of
bankfull storm events. Each crest gage was set during its initial installation and baseline
photos were taken. The crest gages were checked annually and the flood stage(s) recorded
by each gage and measured relative to the permanent vertical datum of the respective gage.
The results of these measurements were used to document the occurrence of significant
storm events, with the goal of specifically documenting the occurrence of bankfull and
larger stream flow events.
Photo documentation and project -wide visual assessment was used for stream monitoring at
LWOC to complement the other stream monitoring practices. A total of 14 permanent
12

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of 5)
reference photo points were installed across LWOC (11 during the as -built survey and 3
during the Year 1 monitoring period as described above). These photo points were
monumented using steel rebar /PVC pins. Photos were taken at that time to provide photo
documentation of baseline stream conditions. Photos were taken from each of the 14
permanent photo reference points with the same orientation each year and were used for
photo documentation and annual comparison of the stream conditions across LWOC. This
exercise helped to further validate and document stream restoration success at LWOC. The
visual assessment was conducted using annual field observations and pedestrian surveys to
identify any specific problem areas along the streams at LWOC during the monitoring
period. Any such problem areas were identified and organized under appropriate categories.
Such areas were documented using representative photos, where applicable, and their
locations were mapped on the Monitoring Plan View. The suspected cause and appropriate
remedial action for each problem was determined. If during any given year, the streams
were not anticipated to meet the final established monitoring criteria, corrective actions were
considered. Such modifications were documented and discussed with EEP.
3.2.2 Stream Monitoring Success Criteria
Stream dimension, pattern, profile, stream bed material, bank stability, and bankfull
hydrology were monitored annually for the project stream reaches as described in detail
above. Stream restoration success at LWOC was evaluated by comparison of the annual
results against the same parameters as predicted, specified, and required in the proposed
design. Success was achieved when all such comparisons reveal positive trends toward
overall stream stability. Expectation was the stream monitoring results should confirm the
stream channels at LWOC are of the proposed stream channel type (Rosgen 1994).
Stream dimension parameters including bankfull width, floodprone width, bankfull cross
sectional area, bankfull mean depth, bankfull max depth, width to depth ratio, entrenchment
ratio, wetted perimeter, and hydraulic radius were measured and /or calculated for each of the
permanent cross sections. The described dimension parameters were expected to remain
consistent from year to year and should fall within the ranges established by the original
proposed design parameters. It was expected and acceptable that minor adjustments in
dimension will occur such as the development of point bars and the subsequent deepening of
pools. As vegetation becomes established and the stream banks are stabilized, the
anticipation was that the width depth ratios will decrease and the entrenchment ratios will
increase slightly, both within the normal ranges for C and E stream channel types (Rosgen,
1994).
Stream pattern parameters including sinuosity, belt width, radii of curvature, meander
wavelength, and meander width ratio were measured and /or calculated. Stream pattern
measurements were expected to remain consistent from year to year and to fall within the
originally proposed design parameters. As vegetation becomes established and the stream
banks are stabilized, it was anticipated that the sinuosity of the streams will also adjust,
likely becoming more sinuous with time.
13

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of S)
Stream longitudinal profile parameters including bankfull slope, riffle length, riffle slope,
pool length, and pool to pool spacing were measured. Longitudinal profiles parameters were
expected to remain relatively consistent from year to year. The stream profiles should not
show aggrading or degrading conditions during the five -year monitoring period, however,
minor profile adjustments such as deepening of pools was expected.
Stream bed material was monitored using the described Modified Wolman pebble counts.
The success criteria for the bed material will be determined at the end of the five -year
monitoring period when data can be reviewed and compared to the proposed channel
material types. Fluctuations in bed materials will likely occur during the early years
following construction and several years may be needed to observe a consistent bed
material. Bed materials should ultimately reflect the proposed design conditions for each
reach at LWOC.
Stream bank stability will be monitored using BEHI and sediment transport estimates during
Monitoring Years 3 and 5. Data collected during these years will be compared with pre -
construction conditions to determine the change in bank erosion hazard indices and sediment
export rates for each reach assessed. Positive change, namely reduction, in both stream bank
erosion rates and sediment transport rates at LWOC are expected as a result of restoration
and will be documented as described to demonstrate success.
Hydrologic monitoring success was based on the ability to document the occurrence of
bankfull storm events at LWOC. A minimum of two bankfull events, each occurring in two
separate monitoring years, are required to be documented within the five -year monitoring
period. The described crest gauges were used to determine and document the occurrence of
these bankfull events.
As described above, photo documentation and visual assessment was used to complement
the other stream monitoring practices as part of the stream monitoring protocol at LWOC. If
during any given year, the streams were not anticipated to meet the final established
monitoring criteria, corrective actions was considered. Such modifications were
documented and discussed with EEP.
3.2.3 Stream Monitoring Results for Year 1 of 5
In late August 2008, the stream monitoring for Monitoring Year 1 was conducted. The
methodologies described in the Section 3.2.1 were used for the stream monitoring at LWOC
for Monitoring Year 1. Detailed surveys were conducted along the project stream reaches
specified to be surveyed for annual monitoring. The results of these surveys were compared
to the baseline data for the morphometric monitoring obtained during the as -built survey.
All of the 13 cross sections were surveyed to measure the bankfull width, floodprone width,
bankfull cross sectional area, bankfull mean depth, bankfull max depth, width to depth ratio,
entrenchment ratio, wetted perimeter, and hydraulic radius. The results of the cross section
surveys are presented in Table VIII. Appendix D compares photos taken during Monitoring
Year 1 with the initial baseline photos at each of the 13 cross sections. Appendix E provides
14

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of S)
an overlay of the Monitoring Year 1 and baseline conditions along with the raw data for
each cross section. The comparison of the baseline and Monitoring Year 1 stream
dimension morphometric data for each of the project stream reaches showed very positive
results, all of which were comparable to the originally proposed design parameters. The
results showed that all of the reaches were experiencing the expected minor adjustments
including decreasing width to depth ratios, increasing entrenchment ratios, and minor
increases in depth. Each of these trends was indicative of movement toward increased
stream stability and was attributed to vegetation establishment and natural channel
adjustments. The comparison of the Year 1 Monitoring cross section photos to the as -built
cross section photos strongly complemented these suggestions, as no concerns, problems, or
negative trends were documented.
The pattern for all of the stream reaches was surveyed to measure the parameters of
sinuosity, belt width, radii of curvature, meander wavelength, and meander width ratio. The
results of the pattern surveys are presented in Table VIII. The comparison of the baseline
and Monitoring Year 1 stream pattern morphometric data for each of the project stream
reaches showed very positive results, all of which were comparable to the originally
proposed design parameters. The results showed that all of the reaches were experiencing
the expected minor adjustment attributed to vegetation establishment and natural channel
adjustments. This adjustment included slightly increasing radii of curvature, indicative of
movement toward increased stream stability. These minor adjustments can be viewed
through the overlays included in Appendix A.
Longitudinal profile surveys were conducted along each of the project stream reaches
specified for annual monitoring surveys. The surveys were performed to measure the
parameters of bankfull slope, riffle length, riffle slope, pool length, and pool to pool spacing.
The results of the longitudinal profile surveys are presented in Table VIII. The comparison
of the baseline and Monitoring Year 1 longitudinal profiles for each of the monitored project
stream reaches showed very positive results, all of which were comparable to the originally
proposed design parameters. The results showed that all of the reaches were experiencing
the expected minor adjustment attributed to vegetation establishment and natural channel
adjustments. This adjustment included deepening of pools. The comparison of the baseline
and Monitoring Year 1 longitudinal profiles did not show excessive aggrading or degrading.
Overlays can be found in Appendix E along with the raw data from both the baseline and
Monitoring Year 1 conditions.
Modified Wolman pebble counts were repeated at each of the project stream reaches to
classify the stream bed materials for comparison to the baseline conditions. The results of
the pebble counts are presented in Table VIII while the raw data and overlays of the percent
accumulation graphs can be viewed in Appendix E. Fluctuations in bed materials were
expected to occur during the early years following construction. This expectation was
observed in comparing the results of the baseline and Monitoring Year 1 pebble counts.
Specifically, the bed material d50 and d84 for each of the stream reaches decreased. This
trend may be observed during the five -year monitoring period. At this time it is believed
that the original assumption that the stream bed materials would coarsen after restoration
may have been incorrect. The stream systems at LWOC appear to be sand - dominated and
15

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of 5)
therefore coarsening of the bed may not occur. The monitoring results do suggest, however
that on -site sediment supply from LWOC has been reduced as a result of the restoration. As
noted earlier, the success criteria for the bed material will be determined at the end of the
five -year monitoring period when data can be reviewed and compared to the proposed
channel material types. Fluctuations in bed materials will likely continue to occur and
several years may be needed to observe a consistent bed material.
Stream bank stability monitoring was not conducted, as this monitoring practice is scheduled
to be performed using BEHI and sediment transport estimates during Monitoring Years 3
and 5. BEHI information was collected during the existing condition surveys and sediment
transport rates were subsequently developed. The resulting information will serve as
baseline data for stream bank stability at LWOC and is presented in Table IX. The raw data
for this table can be viewed in Appendix E.
Each of the eight crest gages were checked during the Monitoring Year 1 surveys to monitor
hydrology at LWOC. Six of the eight crest gages recorded flood stages in excess of the -
bankfull stage. The two crest gages that did not record flood stages in excess of the bankfull
stage were the crest gages at Reaches R2A and R2D. The crest gage at Reach R2A
apparently did not record any evidence of a flood stage event, possibly due to problems with
the cork or the gage itself. The crest gage at Reach R2D recorded a flood stage that was
0.26 feet below the bankfull stage. Each of the crest gages was reset after checking stage
measurements, in order to record future events. Table X lists the information related to the
verification of bankfull events at LWOC for Monitoring Year 1 while the raw data can be
found in Appendix E. The evidence recorded by the crest gages indicated a storm event
producing a stage in excess of the bankfull storm occurred at LWOC during Monitoring
Year 1. This documentation of the first bankfull event at LWOC during the monitoring
period suggests success with regards to hydrologic monitoring at LWOC.
Photo documentation and project -wide visual assessment were used to complement the other
Monitoring Year 1 stream monitoring practices. Photos were taken from each of the original
11 permanent photo reference points. Three additional photo points (photo points 2.5Y1,
3.5Y1, and 8.5Y1) were also added to ensure that adequate photo documentation would be
conducted within the monitoring limits of the project stream reaches. Photo point 2.5Y1
was added for Reach R2, photo point 3.5Y1 for Reach R2B, and photo point 8.5Y1 for
Reach R1A. After installation, photos were taken at each of the three added photo points.
Appendix C includes all of the described photos and provides comparison of the photos with
the initial baseline photos taken from the 11 permanent photo reference points. The new
photos taken at three additional photo points will serve as supplemental baseline condition
photos and subsequent photos at these same locations will be compared in Monitoring Years
2 through 5. No stream problems were documented through the photo comparison process.
A project -wide visual assessment was conducted along each of the project stream reaches to
identify any specific stream problem areas. Table XI presents the results of the project -wide
visual assessment. The project -wide visual assessment revealed 12 specific stream problem
areas. Each of these stream problem areas, including their description, location, and
suspected cause, are listed in Table XII. The stream problem areas included eight in- stream
structure failures and associated stream bank erosion, three areas of floodplain and adjacent
IEII

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of S)
stream bank erosion, and one area of stream bank erosion. Mulkey elected to promptly
address all of the stream problem areas and conducted construction repairs of each in
October 2008. The eight stream problem areas categorized as failures of in- stream
structures and were determined to be caused by incorrect construction of the given in- stream
structure. The failed in- stream structures included j -hook rock vanes and rock cross vanes.
All eight of the structures and the associated areas of stream bank erosion were repaired.
Several of the j -hook rock vanes were converted to rock vanes during the repairs to prevent
future point bar erosion. The three stream problem areas categorized as floodplain and
adjacent stream bank erosion were determined to be attributed to the incorrect installation of
floodplain interceptors. All ' three of the eroded areas were repaired and floodplain
interceptors were installed using both rock and log materials. The remaining stream
problem area categorized as stream bank erosion was determined to be caused by a minor
field adjustment made to the stream alignment in order to save an existing mature tree at the
request of the landowner. This area of stream bank erosion was also repaired. The repairs
to the all of the areas, of eroded stream banks included re- grading, re- seeding with
appropriate temporary and permanent seed, and re- installing coir fiber matting. Black
willow (Salix nigra) and /or silky dogwood (Cornus amomum) live stakes were harvested on-
site and were installed at the repaired stream banks. Please note that the results shown in
Table XI were updated such that the repairs to the stream problem areas described above are
included. Based on the results of the stream monitoring for Monitoring Year 1 at LWOC, as
well as the subsequent corrective actions taken, Mulkey did not propose any additional
recommendations or actions other than to proceed with the annual stream monitoring.
3.2.4 Stream Monitoring Results for Year 2 of 5
In mid October and the beginning of November 2009, the stream monitoring for Monitoring
Year 2 was conducted. The methodologies described in the Section 3.2.1 were used for the
stream monitoring at LWOC for Monitoring Year 2. Detailed surveys were conducted along
the project stream reaches specified to be surveyed for annual monitoring. The results of
these surveys were compared to the previous data collected during prior monitoring periods,
baseline conditions established through the as -built survey, and to the proposed design
parameters calculated prior to construction.
All of the 13 cross sections were surveyed to measure the bankfull width, floodprone width,
bankfull cross sectional area, bankfull mean depth, bankfull max depth, width to depth ratio,
entrenchment ratio, wetted perimeter, and hydraulic radius. The results of the cross section
surveys are presented in Table VIII. Appendix D compares photos taken during Monitoring
Year 2 with the initial baseline photos and the previous monitoring photos taken at each of
the 13 cross sections. Appendix E provides an overlay of the Monitoring Year 2, the
previous monitoring periods, and baseline conditions along with the raw data for each cross
section. The comparison of Monitoring Year 2 to the previous surveys for stream dimension
data for each of the project stream reaches showed very positive results, all of which were
comparable to the originally proposed design parameters. Throughout all the cross sections,
the bankfull cross sectional area and entrenchment ratios remained consistent indicating the
channels were able to contain and convey all the flows experienced during Monitoring Year
2. However, the main channels RI and R2 displayed typical signs of adjustment in their
17

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of S)
channel geometries. Both of these reaches have recently been impacted by beavers and
some of these adjustments can be attributed to this recent development. In particular on R1,
cross section 11 had a significant increase in the width to depth ratio due to the backwater of
a downstream beaver dam causing the pool to experience siltation. On the other end, cross
section 12 experienced the reverse because a beaver dam was located directly upstream and
the cascading water created scour ultimately decreasing the width to depth ratio. Similarly;
cross sections along R2 exhibited localized changes in channel geometries, some attributable
to beaver activity and others to natural fluctuations, but all within the acceptable ranges of
the design parameters. The one exception was cross section 1, with a width to depth ratio
climbing up to 22 and the bankfull cross sectional area remaining consistent, a cursory
analysis raised concern. However, the overlay of cross section 1 clearly demonstrated the
channel developing opposing inner berms to better accommodate the low flow capacity.
This effectively allowed the channel to deepen without creating a change in the cross
sectional area causing the width to depth ratio to increase instead of decrease due to the
derivation being based on the calculated value of mean depth. The results of the smaller
tributaries RIA, R2A, R213, and R21) consistently exhibited minor natural adjustments
typical of stable C type streams. The comparisons of the Monitoring Year 2 overlays and
cross sectional photos to the previous years strongly substantiated these findings, as no
concerns, problems, or negative trends were documented.
The pattern for, all of the stream reaches was surveyed to measure the parameters of
sinuosity, belt width, radii of curvature, meander wavelength, and meander width ratio. The --
results of the pattern surveys are presented in Table VIII. The comparison of the Year 2
monitoring data to previous years stream pattern data for each of the project stream reaches
showed very positive results, all of which were comparable to the originally proposed design -
parameters. The results showed that all of the reaches remained consistent to the design
parameters with minor variations attributed to vegetation establishment, natural channel
I _,
adjustments, and variance in measuring techniques. These minor variations can be viewed
through the overlays included in Appendix A. -
Longitudinal profile surveys were conducted along each of the project stream reaches
specified for annual monitoring surveys. The surveys were performed to measure the
parameters of bankfull slope, riffle length, riffle slope, pool length, and pool to pool spacing.
The results of the longitudinal profile surveys are presented in Table VIII. In comparing the
data collected from Monitoring Year 2 to the previously collected data, the results followed
the previous analysis. All reaches showed acceptable minor variations in all parameters
monitored. These variations are within the design tolerances and are attributable to
vegetation establishment, natural channel adjustments, and variance in measuring
techniques. Overall, none of the longitudinal profiles showed excessive aggrading or
degrading. Overlays of the longitudinal profiles can be found in Appendix E.
Modified Wolman pebble counts were repeated at each of the project stream reaches to
classify the stream bed materials and for comparison to the previous years' conditions. The
results of the pebble counts are presented in Table VIII while the raw data and overlays of
the percent accumulation graphs can be viewed in Appendix E. Fluctuations in bed
materials were expected to occur during the early years following construction. Over time
WN

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of 5)
the expectation was for the stream to eventually coarsen, however, Monitoring Year 1 and
Year 2 have shown the opposite to be true. Specifically, the bed material d50 and d84 for
each of the stream reaches decreased. Therefore it is believed that the original assumption
that the stream bed materials would coarsen after restoration may have been incorrect. The
stream systems at LWOC appear to be sand - dominated and therefore coarsening of the bed
may not occur. Nonetheless, the monitoring results do suggest on -site sediment supply from
LWOC was reduced as a result of the restoration. As noted earlier, the success criteria for
the bed material will be determined at the end of the five -year monitoring period when data
can be reviewed and compared to the proposed channel material types. Fluctuations in bed
materials will likely continue to occur and several years may be needed to observe a
consistent bed material.
Stream bank stability monitoring was not conducted, as this monitoring practice is scheduled
to be performed using BEHI and sediment transport estimates during Monitoring Years 3
and 5. BEHI information was collected during the existing condition surveys and sediment
transport rates were subsequently developed. The resulting information will serve as
baseline data for stream bank stability at LWOC and is presented in Table IX. The raw data
for this table can be viewed in Appendix E.
Each of the eight crest gages were checked during the Monitoring Year 2 surveys to monitor
hydrology at LWOC. Seven of the eight crest gages recorded flood stages in excess of the
bankfull stage. The one crest gage that did not record a flood stage in excess of the bankfull
stage was at Reach R2D. Although, the region has seen a significant drought, the site has
received large quantities of rain this monitoring year. Additionally, the R213 reach has a
constant flow of water throughout its course. The crest gage at Reach R213 recorded a flood
stage that was 0.10 feet below the bankfull stage this monitoring year. This information
coupled with the other seven gauges having recorded a bankfull event during this monitoring
year suggested that Mulkey needs to recheck the R213 crest gage in 2010 for elevation
discrepancies with regard to its zero elevation. All of the crest gages were reset after
checking stage measurements, in order to record future events. Table X lists the information
related to the verification of bankfull events at LWOC for Monitoring Year 2 while the raw
data can be found in Appendix E. The evidence recorded by the crest gages indicated a
storm event producing a stage in excess of the bankfull storm occurred at LWOC during
Monitoring Year 2. This documented the second and final required bankfull event at LWOC
and therefore demonstrated success with regards to hydrologic monitoring per Section 3.2.2.
Photo documentation and project -wide visual assessment were used to complement the other
Monitoring Year 2 stream monitoring practices. Photos were taken from each of the 14
permanent photo reference points. Appendix C includes all of the described photos and
provides comparison of the photos between the baseline conditions, Monitoring Year 1 and
Monitoring Year 2 photos taken from the 14 permanent photo reference points. No stream
problems were documented through the photo comparison process. A project -wide visual
assessment was conducted along each of the project stream reaches to identify any specific
stream problem areas (Table XI). During the project -wide visual assessment, along with the
other Monitoring Year 2 field work activities, Mulkey noticed a significant increase in
beaver activity at the site. Specifically, beaver dams have been constructed along Reaches
19

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of 5)
R1, R2 Upper, and R2 Lower in several locations. Please note that Table XI and Table XII
have been updated to reflect these observations. Mulkey is currently coordinating with the
USDA Wildlife Services under BMAP to have the beavers and beaver dams removed, as
well as to have the site monitored for future beaver activity. Mulkey has also observed
cattle intrusion into the fenced buffers at LWOC. Mulkey is working with the landowner to
prevent future cattle trespass from occurring. Other field observations made during the
Monitoring Year 2 include the observation of the apparent restoration of wetland hydrology
adjacent to Reach R1A. , The restoration of Reach R1A appears to have reconnected the
stream to its historic floodplain, as well as raise the groundwater table in the buffer areas
adjacent to the reach. These observations are evidenced by the increase of wetland
vegetation species and the saturation of the soils in the buffer areas adjacent to Reach R1A.
The waste treatment outfall located on R1 reach and emanating from the nearby school
appears to be functioning extremely well. Vegetation around the outfall is growing rapidly
and helping to create a highly stable secondary treatment area.
Based on the results of the stream monitoring for Monitoring Year 2 at LWOC, as well as
the subsequent corrective actions being taken, Mulkey does * not propose any additional
recommendations or actions other than to proceed with the annual stream monitoring.
NCEEP expressed concerns regarding the fencing of the conservation easement at LWOC to
Mulkey in a letter dated May 26, 2009. Mulkey responded to NCEEP in a June 1, 2009
letter, urging NCEEP to consider several key exceptions for this particular case. These
exceptions are explained in the referenced June 1, 2009 letter. Mulkey awaits response from
NCEEP regarding the July 2009 letter before further addressing the concerns raised by
NCEEP.
4.0 Project Monitoring Methodology
Success criteria for stream mitigation sites are based on guidelines established by the
USACE, US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), NC Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) and the NCDWQ (USACE et. al, 2003). These guidelines establish
criteria for monitoring both hydrologic conditions and vegetation survival. These same
guidelines were used to develop the monitoring methods, frequencies, and success criteria
discussed herein for LWOC and further described in detail in the approved mitigation report
(Mulkey Engineers and Consultants, 2008). LWOC site conditions will be monitored
annually during the latter part of the growing season months (August, September, and
October) over the five -year monitoring period. This monitoring period complies with the
requirements set fourth in the Full Delivery RFP 16- D06027. Monitoring results will be
documented on an annual basis, with the associated reports submitted to the NCEEP as
evidence that the established project goals and objectives are being achieved. The results of
annual monitoring will be used to evaluate the degree of success LWOC has achieved in
meeting the said goals and objectives. In the event that goals are not being met, Mulkey will
coordinate with the NCEEP to develop a plan for ameliorating the areas of concern.
20

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report February 2010
Stream Restoration (Year 2 of S)
5.0 References
Mulkey Engineers and Consultants. 2008. Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration
Mitigation Report. August 2008.
NCEEP. 2005. Content, Format, and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports.
Version 1. 1, September 16, 2005. NCDENR, NCEEP. 17 pp.
Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A Classification of Natural Rivers. Catena, 22:169 -199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs,
Colorado.
Rosgen, D.L. 1998. The Reference Reach — A Blueprint for Natural Channel Design. From
Proceedings of the Wetlands and Restoration Conference, March 1998, Denver CO.
Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina, Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division
of Parks and Recreation, N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources.
USACE, USEPA, NCWRC, and NCDWQ. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. April 2003.
21

WATAUG NEW ROANOKE CHOW N
FRENCH R•pq PASOUOT NK
LITTLE BRDA CATAWBA YADKIN 'Lid
TENN SSEE C NEUSE /CO
_Gt![ /c �� `l - ° •"`, HIWA SEE F,o
SAVANNAH Fq
\, `.l �� cr.yz.. .: ln.. • lG�i R WHITE -QAK
•,; �. � - � ; 1 / I n -, ✓I � � `i Fes.
�° 1 108
'dill j j i 2,._:_. �-�) ''• ' C' � '� ,. �� —� �\ ( I 1 ' `��. �
LITTLE WHITE OAK
_ -_
�� ' °•�
MITIGATION T
350 17'21. 800 07'00.4" W
fill
cxurPbB <i.
!F.ld Its
•G J
TO CHARLOTTE`,
Oak
1r
white
two
74 E t
�V J,
TO AS EVILLE`r� C,I i
I
I
1:36,000 N�+'
Feet • I , .
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
USGS 7.5- Minute Topographic Quadrangles: •' x + - ti ?!
Mill Spring & Pea Ridge ` • ,u, ! -,\ \
Contour Interval 40 Feet f,lQ J �P
_,
�.
A6
'
r� LOCATION MAP Figure
;alt LITTLE WHITE OAK STREAM RESTORATION
*-mULKEY POLK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 7
PROJECT NO. D06027 -B March 20, 2008

Table 1. Project Restoration Approach and Mitigation Type
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027 -B
Stream Reach
Restoration
Mitigation
Linear
S = Stabilization
SS = Stream Banks Stabilization
ID
Approach
Type
Footage
Stationing
Comments
Channel relocation with floodplain
RI
P2
R
7,543
0+00-75+43
excavation
Includes 850 feet of P1 and 190 feet of
R1A
PUP2
R
1,040
0+00-10+40
P2 channel relocation
R2 (Upper
Channel relocation with floodplain
and Lower)
P2
R
7,107
0+00-71+07
excavation
Channel relocation with floodplain
R2A
P2
R
336
0+00-3+36
excavation
Includes 250 feet of P1 and 1224 feet of
R213
P1 /P2
R
1,474
0 +00- 14 +74
P2 channel relocation
Includes 100 feet of P 1 and 690 feet of
IR21)
PI /P2
I R
790
0+00-7+90
P2 channel relocation
R = Restoration
P1 =Priority I
El = Enhancement I
P2 = Priority II
Ell = Enhancement 11
P3 = Priority III
S = Stabilization
SS = Stream Banks Stabilization

Table II. Project Activity and Reporting History
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027 -B
Activity or Report
Scheduled
Completion
Data
Collection
Completion
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan Prepared
Oct -06
Aug -06
12- Feb -07
Restoration Plan Approved
Nov -06
N/A
30- Mar -07
Final Design - 90%
Dec -06
N/A
16- May -07
Construction
Jun -07
N/A
13- Nov -07
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
Jun -07
N/A
13- Nov -07
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area
Jun -07
N/A
13- Nov -07
Planting live stakes
Dec -07
N/A
11- Jan -08
Planting bare roots
Dec -07
N/A
11- Jan -08
End of Construction
Dec -07
N/A
11- Jan -08
Survey of As -built conditions (Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline)
Jan -08
Jan -08
9- Jan -08
Monitoring
Year 1 - 2008
Dec -08
Sep -08
Dec -08
Year 2 - 2009
Dec -09
Oct -09
Dec -09
Year 3 - 2010
Dec -10
N/A
N/A
Year 4 - 2011
Dec -11
N/A
N/A
Year 5 - 2012
Dec -12
N/A
N/A
Bolded items represent those events or deliverables that are variable. Non - bolded items
represent events that are standard components over the course of a typical project

Table III. Project Contacts
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027 -B
Designer
6750 Tryon Road
Mulkey Engineers
Cary, NC 27518
and Consultants
Contact:
William Scott Hunt, III Tel. [phone]
Construction Contractor
P.O. Box 796
Vaughan Contracting, LLC
Wadesboro, NC 28170
Contact:
Tommy Vaughan Tel. [phone]
Planting Coordinator
150 Black Creek Road
Bruton Nurseries and Landscapes
Fremont, NC 27830
Contact:
Charles Bruton, Jr. Tel. [phone]
Seeding Contractor
P.O. Box 796
Vaughan Contracting, LLC
Wadesboro, NC 28170
Contact:
Tommy Vaughan Tel. [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
P.O. Box 669
Evergreen Seed
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Contact:
Wister Heald Tel. [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
5594 Highway 38 South
International Paper
Blenheim, SC 29516
South Carolina SuperTree Nursery
Contact:
Geoffrey Hill Tel. [phone]
762 Claridge Nursery Road
North Carolina Forestry Service
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Claridge Nursery
Contact:
James West Tel. [phone]
Monitoring Performers
6750 Tryon Road
Mulkey Engineers
Cary, NC 27518
and Consultants
Contact:
William Scott Hunt, III Tel. [phone]

Table IV. Project Background
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027 -B
Project County Polk County, North Carolina
Drainage Area [sq. mi(acres)]
R1
4.46 (2854)
R1A
0.11 (70)
R2
10.85 (6944)
R2A
0.54 (355)
R2B
0.12 (77)
R213
0.05 (32)
Drainage Impervious cover estimate ( %)
RI
2
R1A
2
R2
2
R2A
2
R2B
2
R2D
2
Stream Order
R1
3
R1A
1
R2
3,4
R2A
2
R2B
1
R2D
1
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Southern Inner Piedmont
Rosgen Classification (As- built)
Rl; RIA, R2
C5
R2A, R2B
C4
R2D
C6
Cowardin Classification
R3UB2
Dominat Soil Types
Riverview - Chewacla- Buncombe
Reference Site ID
UT to Ostin Creek
USGS HUC for Project and Reference
Project
03050105
Reference
03050105
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project and Reference
Project
03 -08 -02 (Broad)
Reference
03 -08 -03 (B orad)
NCDWQ Classification for Project and Reference
Project
C
Reference
C,Tr
Any portion of any project segement 303d?
No
Any portion of any project segement upstream of a 303d listed segment?
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
N/A
Percent of project easement fenced
100
(R) Riverine (3) Upper Perennial (UB) Unconsolidated Bottom (2) Sand

a�
N fn
} F
y o
Lc
N C
t� N
b h
b
W^
O
.--•
D\
^,
N
A
O O O
4
y
O
V Q
}
w
O
y
h
01 h
00
O
N
vt
.-• r
7
7
�p
M
C
00 00 h
}
'Ir
O
WO
O
¢
�
7
N
N
•--•
r
^
�
V
'IT
�
O
G
O
O
N
O
¢c
y
N
V1
.-•
�
.�
W
0o
n
°
Op
L O
Q b
R
V
N
M
•--
vl
K
O
O
7
7
b
N
O
p
iTa
3
oo
n
O
N £
r
k
1
O
tm
C V
.L d
�
M
h
•--'
�
O
O
In
a
Q
�
h
v�1
O
V
C L
b
v1
V1
ry
_
CM�
F
^
J5
J5
Cif
N
N
N
R
M
M
b
N
N
°
^
�
O
O
�
O
M
M
N
O
O
p
U
N
Q
U
ib
O
z L
O
O
C y
v4
r
C
[
i
p
G
G
C
Z11
pCi
FwUUO�S0.aCCCOlAAl&I
&I
v
j
I

Table VI. Vegetative Problem Areas
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027 -B
Feature /Issue
Station / Range
Probable Cause
Photo No.
(If Available)
No vegetative problem areas observed (Year 1, 2008)
All project reaches
N/A
N/A
No vegetative problem areas observed (Year 2, 2009)
All project reaches
N/A
N/A

l�
00
•O
l-
•--�
O
�
'cC
N
n
N
N
M
N
.G
N
M
.G
N
O
O
7
O
V
O
>!
c�-0+
-.
�n
.•+
O�
'.
N
O
m
[�
M
M
N
C
x
e0
c
Vi
M
00
O
00
�n
wn
:C
M
'7
O
M
M
N
N
N
/-.
N
�G
6
v)
m
N
M
[�
�O
�n
M
0
�t
M
.G
N
r
cn
N
O
M
N
�C+
,G
7
M
�cC_
O
O
N
A
N
06
cG
Cl
r
7
O
N
ON
h
N
N
N
M
a
oo
Q\
p
mV
. -�
M
v-�
U
~
00
O�
ON
^
XX
cd
N
N
b
N
N
p
W
O
C
r
�c=-+
oo
O
C
r
o0
C,
CC_
<N:>
V
00
Ic
N
'O
�n
o6
N
r�
M
d'
O
crl
m
00
O
'O
O
r-
O
O
Obi
m
•O
N
O
--�
-n
C)
o0
.�+
Ln
7
RA
Qj
a
v
o
o
v
oo
v
�
a
c
0
0
�
N
i
E N
W
N
r
M
can
N
N
kn
N
o0'
O
O
M
O
C
hOV
V
7
4E5
V] O
y
C
O
N
V
n
7
m
C
0
0
0
C
p
M
M
M
°
cmn
oc
00
0
kn
_O
M
m
O
00
7:3
W
[-
vi
N
d
O
M
O
L
0�1
\D
m
M
N
N
M
m
M
--
N
m
�
o0
W
CC W M
U
cd
M
o0
r
M
d'
O
O
00
!�'
00
M
D\
M
"�
T
N
W
N
O
O
m
•C
is In
C
'�c-+
G
N
M
vi
W
M
�•.
G
C
W
V"
vri
1C..
C
it
N
Ll
y
C
C.
C4
�
kn
M
N
N
N
O
O
O
V
La
N\C,
Ir
C �
c
O
z
a
o
00
a
a
M
a
04 3
0
>
C>
a
a
d�
Q
c7
cn
0
c
❑
g
LI�
Cv'. Cvr dvr •o •o Cv Cv
4v Cv. 4v+ '^
Ca 2 Cv.
r O' L C; Pi y N
CC
t DD
E E
bO L O i0
a�
� �
o
00
3u3 QCa
�
3 C6
a
3C o L or- a
0.1 U
r o
E— c v U
w
°� a�b
03b
o
�a °
�L
H
a3
Rb
rz
a:�>
W a x
w cn
N
U
�
J
�
x o
a
od.
00

a
�
ro
ro
d
v
A
to A
y
N
w ro
a
tz o
o fD GG °
(1
cao y
R x
M
° 3
C7 D
0 0
°— CD
°n =
c a °_ w° b7
rm
;o
co A
C4_ r o
a s
cro o
°�
o
N_
aao
S
y -CD w w S° S
4l
V
w
y
o'
�
w
7
A
_
N
77
O
O
yy
't1
A
�Sy O
w
n
~
N
O
D\
O
QD
O°�
A
C,
N
iC
N
00
.-.
W
ON
N
0
i-y Vi C
°
?
a
0
0
w
W
x
60
sa
C
W
W
W
N
.-.
.-'
N
.-'
^O
v.
C
W
W
w
A
--]
A
tJ
n
ii
A
A
A
O
cn
D
o
'00
O
W
0
N
O0
v
O
a
_
tJ
W
_
�1
W
N
O
1
y
J C
�
N
A
�
Al
oho
cwn
O
O
c
w
A
P
v
0
W
O
0
c
W
<<
�p
p.
0
0
0
G.
4,
Oo
00
W
O
A
W
N
U
d
J
O
O
yy
y7
C�
\0
�O
N
O
00
7
�o
O
ran
tAn
J
O
O
77
a
rn�
A
7
=�
twig
7
a
cn
W
A
�°p
a\
O
it
0
X
J
tr
H
paWd
X
A
O
tJ.
C,
W
W
...
c.n
O
O
O
00
N
--I
O
.1-
00
Q.
to
Lo
00
W
W
O
U
°
0.
t�
J
O
O
IJ
O
77
a
O
v'
A
O
�
_
O
O
�
�
9
'd'
N
O
O
ONi
yy
�
�
.N-.
�D
y
y
•yy1
tJ
p.1-�
yya
O
O
d

N
p
00
p
Z
M
N
M
.�O
x
tctl
t'i
O
N
Nj
M
h
V'
M
O
00
�
,G
M
N
V'
M
N
O
N
p
°l
N
C
CO
7
00
M
17,
N
p �
0
N M
v
zO
N
N
p
'O
p
O
-n
M
C�
'd
N
n
b
"R
o
5
°`
06
M
M
l-
N
N
M
M
N
F.
"i
M
v
N
V
'AR
�
d
_
y
y
'�"
M
•ct
"'
v1
O�
eO
o0
'�"'
O
O
l�
O
Vi
O
r
Q
N
N
O
O
C
O
CC
'7
O�
V
C
00
�t
O
cn
N
M
M
O
M en
00
M
V'
O
M
B
It
•0
O
O
O
I
'0
N
--!
y
M
cq
V'
01
M
M
[-
C CQ
M
O
O
O
0,
O?
.-.
7
�O
ao
N
en
r
V'
c�-0+
O
O��
O
O
.-.�
cC
�
�
�
N
00
vi
O
N
M
N-•i
V'1
vl
00
"'
O
O
O
'n
O
•� A
•�
G
�
p
�G
N
�
V•
N
n
h
v?
M
�
�
C
�
O
�
O
°�
O
M
C
�
O
M
o0
M
O
U
00
00
00
N
Vl
00
M
c
'.
W
kn
O
C
t
N
oo
�n
H
X
M
V
M
M
y R
d
17
o
°
a
W G
U
�3
0
0o
a
a
Q
cn
c7
n
5
c
e
U
b 'O a a Y °
3 a e°
b i 011
Rio
a
O V'
° %.
m G
o
3 ca ca
Y
w3�
° o
a❑
c> o°�u
'w 3 x
cn
v pro/
d
o
C4
a
� U
y
a
y
L
a
a
a`
JI,
d

y
vz
ro
ro
a
_q
�1
O
A
'ate p
y
u
$CD
y
A
o b
o c w
�
rn b7 x °o
UQ
'w
o 0
CD
fo
c y
v ID °o y
U
w
y_
w 'vv d d
v°
_a
y
_•
O'
Q' O' :E�
y
may'
yl
"
H
�
CD
-
a
rCD
$;
r
CD
C2
' ow
6
N
c
o
tn
"
O �
t
.a
CD fD
CD
� a
�� -ms"f
'
00
00
N
�7
> CD
CD
UQ
y
w
O
Q
7�
C
00
00
J
O
W
N
1
yap��
C
J
0
a
�
'
N
0.
eo W
a`�
� s
vG
O
�
O C� 1
/s
o p
Oo
O
7 apX
�
1r
41
O
<31
17,
. y
W
eA
00
0.
O
O
O
Q.
00
O
0U 0
0.
D
5
V
00
A
p
y
ON
�O
O
Oo
C
00
O
yay
Q*
O
7
77
77�
a
�l
O�
00
n
_
W
A
W
O
�
V
O
N
N
O
W
OA1
p�A��
W
O1
O
J
�
W
7
rype�.
i
y
yqy
Fn
C
O
to
�O
Oo
X
N
X
iC
vii
O
O
w
N
N
O
A
N
N
k
k
C
N
O
0o
'A
0.

N
M
7
d
00
[�
x
'�
O
00
"1
00
�'
W
Q.
O
�-r
G
M
M
c
M
00
4
M
C,
O
"
00
l-�
N
O
v'i
O
vi
N
O
O
~_
�-+
,G
M
O
O
N
M
a,
O"
N
N
y
N
O�
00
N
O
vii
O�
O
yNj
7
U
N
V
ccS
!n
'It
vi
l�
„•�
06
��•++
oMO
O
-•
'�
Q
M
O
V
O
O
C
N
Ln
C
'n
N
N
C
C
O
cc
00
M
N
p
N
ON
O
M
L
V]
i�
�O
o0
7
M
I
N
O
'.7 N
W
N
r
M
N
N
"
N
N
a0
"'
00
O
M
O
O
W)
7
U
•�
C
O
N
7
l�
V
M
C
0
0
0
C
C
M
M
M
M
G
06
6
vl
iG
M
M
vl
00
0
N
C
%�
t�+l
W
00
M
x
i
R �Nr�i/1 •ice..
O
ON
00
vi
.fir
00
'c«cc7
rl
'y
O
i!
d c�NV
C_
y' U
w
It
c
w
w
c
�
�
O
�3
0
H
Q
cn
cn
1+y
tC!Il
10-1!1
y
O11
n 72 °'
a
�"o
° °
° °v°
° ° w
aci
3 3
a°i
aCi
L n
v>
o 3
era
0
w x
U
u
Q
o
Chi
p
e U
aj
•o
a
a`
�
�

6
w
CJ p
N
CD
o
CD
0
° �CD
cn °o y
o°o U
n
° w
=Say
a 9 d w
.'h 7 CD
v°
a
'O
^0' �'
4,
ww
x
?:
w
y
a
a
a
y
r a
rr
-
o'
�
w
O
O
CC
�
0 �
� e"o
Ccf
ti7
o
N
w
ny
n `.
A
w
n �
77
7y
of) 0
oo
w
N
o
�]
A
oo
irl
cam+ fD 'S
cD
uQ
�
O
0
N
0
�•
'���yy O
O
�w�„
ay
N
fJ
Oo
OO
U
C
U
00
N
N
7
CfD
W
cc
iC
X
X
fb
m
o
O,
d
0 �.
O
O
--3
w
U
U
G
7
B-'-'l
C
'c7
O
W
la
la
0
0
0
7
U
A
J
A
N
O
7
fig
W
N
~
?
A
O
53,
O
O
U 0o
T
y
U
C
U
C
O
O
pl
N
al
)e
n
Co
p�
J
W
W
A
CT
"
,.,,
N
W
�.-�
.-+
W
•-'
^
�O
M.
A
0
�O
0
J
0
�
G.
A
O
Oo
o�
W
O
A
W
N
U
.1
C
O
7
U
Oo
O
O
p
O
N�
O
H
cAii
J
O
7
a
yy
A
7
yp�
7y
A�
rte-.
W
W
U
O
O
W
N
O
W
N
O
O
U
C
�D
G.
A
OO
py,
U
W
00
�l
W
W
O
U
O
Gyy.
00
O
p
O
O
W
W
("D
N
y
U
W
O
O
U
U
N
yay
pp��
ti
O
y
yy
W
C)
O
W
Oo
p,
J
w
O
N
O
O
d

d
V
f }Q
N
f }L�
t }N�
G
G
f }F�.
F }G
G
f }Q
}FL
G
Q
C
O
W
m
O
yN b Q
N N
O 0
0
r m
Vj C
b
L
x
N n
O N
n
M
N
•�;.
�
O O
•C O
W
lO�
G
9
9
•bT•O
L �y
3 U
m
0
N%
x
G
�L
/v w
L
>
o
�a
o
F
ti a
n
�
Q
o
O
Q�
�'•�
yy
p�
P
O
•
4
N
Q
e°n
O m�
O
O
O°
n
r ci ci �
z
m e
a v
�a3w T
e
d
�
U
�
V to
O Q
N
C
W
n
E
D
d
V
N
G
G
F }G
G
N
x
X
O
G
9
9
0
N%
x
G
O
O
Q�
�'•�
yy
p�
.N.
W N��
e°n
O m�
O
O
O°
n
V to
O Q
N
9 M
O O
n
I,
Egg!
C g o a
s u
e
E e
C C 9� o
�3
c
au,arn
° Q
'O .O
RMIMIE
dv,S�ma �
mu
>m
fs7
� •o
U
� � V o
A !
E
y
d
t
a
9
a
a
r°n
a

�
P
O
6
n
1
o n
�'aA7
o
0 = S
w "
a
i s
8
w y
am
a.
aq c og
og
MINN
111111111
111111111
0
111111111
111111111
111111111
J
O
•.•W.
P�
V`
P d
y
J�
111111111
111111111
O
p
P
111111111
3
111111111
3
-
111111111
111111111�
111111111
�N
0
3
�
_ -
111111111
111111111�
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
0
d
6
111111111
111111111
111111111
�
111111111
3
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
N
a
MINN
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
-
111111111
111111111�
111111111
_ -
111111111
111111111�
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111

N
}FG
G
yFG
C_
G
C_
O
t
�
N Q
O
N%
N
Q Q
CO Q
b
m r
�
Q
h
f }�
�}Q
C
J
U
N
vii
N"
Q
N
N
o
� `y
O N
a N
0 •G
r
P
C�
O O
•C O
R
O
O
y
G
�O
O r
G
C
C_
0
-
�a
T
F N
O O
Q
-
_U
O1
ap
�
3
O
F
, a
tf
•O �
h-
N
9 1�
O r
M
O
C
�
No
N
N
O
m c � a �, i a° J a° a
3� g.cS
v
Qa
a S
a c v °'
>
aa0.0.
�o
E
��_•��
G Qa
W��'
E
0
N
G
C_
C_
t
�
N%
%
C_
'O
O
O
G
G
C
C_
o
T
F N
O O
Q
O
•O �
h-
N
9 1�
O r
M
O
N
O
> 3
>
aa0.0.
�o
F
��_•��
W��'
y
W
E
�
r
L
a
y
a
?
m
9
a
Q

b
5
q
3
8
_
m H
d 8
8
J og vg N
N
a a :v
c m J J
sail
Mmono
OM
mmom
..
N
0
O
...
O
w
1a O
roro
N
O V
A roro
yJ
O
-
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
J
0
w �
ao �
N
b 0
twig
111111111
111111111
w
111111111
O
-
T 0
p
111111111
0
1111111119
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
�N
0
0
111111111
a
a
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
0
c
c
0
a
a
sail
Mmono
OM
mmom
111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
-
111111111
1111111119
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111

7
7
}/
k
k
!
!
7
7
§
!
!
})
)
§
!
!
7257&
/r
\E§
§
-
7
7
}/
k
k
!
!
7
7
§
!
!
})
)
§
!
!
7257&
/r
\E§
§
§
!2
67-:5
>!
§�)\ )\
277 %a
�
�
k

G
S
�
3
v
� '
o
uq vq
5.
3
ag ag
og
c
Iloilo
0
111111111
111111111
0
111111111
111111111
111111111
0
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
x
%
N
0
111111111
6
6
111111111
�
3
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
A
111111111
111111111
�o
111111111
a
a
111111111
111111111
1111111119
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
N
6
6
Iloilo
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111
1111111119
111111111
111111111
111111111
111111111

Exhibit Table IX. BEHI and Sediment Export Estimates
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027 -B
Time Point
Segment /
Reach
Linear
Footage or
Acreage
Extreme
Very High
High
Moderate
Low
Very Low
Sediment
Export
ft
%
ft
%
ft
%
ft
%
ft
%
ft
%
tons /yr
Preconstruction
2006
Rl
6530
5877
90
455
RIA
906
906
100
229
R2
5979
5381
90
767
R2A
625
100
32
R2B
1713
1625
1713
100
120
R2D
526
526
250
TOTAL
16279
6813
42
6502
40
1713
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
1853
Monitoring Y3
2010 (NOT
APPLICABLE)
R1
7543
RIA
1040
R2
7107
R2A
336
R2B
1474
R2D
790
TOTAL
18290
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Monitoring Y5
2012 (NOT
APPLICABLE)
R1
7543
RIA
1040
R2
7107
R2A
336
R2B
1474
R2D
790
TOTAL
18290
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Exhibit Table X. Verification of Bankfull Events
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027 -B
Date of Data
Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo No.
(If Available)
8/25/08 - 8/27/08
Unknown
Crest Guage
N/A
10/13/09 - 10/14/09
Unknown
Crest Guage
N/A

Table XI. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027 -B
Reach RI (7543ft)
Feature
Initial
MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
MY -05
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
Pools
100%
100%
100%
Thalwegs
100%
100%
100%
Meanders
100%
100%
95%
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
Structures
100%
100%
95%
Rootwads
100%
100%
95%
Reach R1A (1040ft)
Feature
Initial
MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
AZY -05
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
Pools
100%
100%
100%
Thalwegs
100%
100%
100%
Meanders
100%
100%
100%
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
Structures
100%
100%
100%
Rootwads
100%
100%
100%
Reach R2 (7107ft)
Feature
Initial
MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
MY -05
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
Pools
100%
100%
100%
Thalwegs
100%
100%
100%
Meanders
100%
100%
95%
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
Structures
100%
100%
95%
Rootwads
100%
100%
95%
Reach R2A (336ft)
Feature
Initial
MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
MY -05
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
Pools
100%
100%
100%
Thalwegs
100%
100%
100%
Meanders
100%
100%
100%
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
Structures
100%
100%
100%
Rootwads
100%
100%
100%
Reach 11213 (1474ft)
Feature
Initial
MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
MY -05
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
Pools
100%
100%
100%
Thalwegs
100%
100%
100%
Meanders
100%
100%
100%
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
Structures
100%
100%
100%
Rootwads
100%
100%
100%
Reach R2D (790ft)
Feature
Initial
MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
MY -05
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
Pools
100%
100%
100%
Thalwegs
100%
100%
100%
Meanders
100%
100%
100%
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
Structures
100%
100%
100%
Rootwads
100%
100%
100%
Notes The results shown above as less than 100% percent, reflect the construction of beaver dams on the
respective reaches during MY -02 (2009)

v
d
o
z
z
z
aw
U
L
4
� C7
W �
O C
N A
L �
CC C
CJ O
Y.
� y
� y
L,
y
U
O
�
a
3
�3
cd
�
a
U
U
�
�
d
U
7
U
7
U
3
.y
O
O
O
O
E
E
+'
ca
m
cG
�
M�
W
M� W
LM

00
O
O
N
0
0
C
'O
U
7
T3
C
O
U
i
U
3
°
°
Y
c
a�
E
0
a
E
L
O
C.
rx
d
Z
s Q
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
aw
O y,
N
C
� 3
� o
'b
c
y
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
,t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
E a
U
y
O
L
L
L
y
L
O
O
O
R
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
L
O
L
O
L
O
N tU.
y 7
4
O•
U
U
U
L
U
L
U
U
U
U
L
y
Y
V
V1
VJ
�
; t;
VI
v
V]
Y
V1
Vl
L
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
ct
b N 7
� O
CQ �
R
L y
Qa
k0
L
CL
o
N
O �
0.
bD
E
E
E
E
E
E
L
R
N
C N
C N
C4
z C4
x
r
�C4
o
U N
00
U O
N
[�
-�
O
+
-F
U
N
y
U
y
+
vl
00
cn
C/) M
N
X=
U
°' o
> `�
>
Y
3
O/
O
�
O N
�O/ a
w E
a
� w
E
o
L E
/
^ E
^ / E
L E
/ E
^
E
E
E
E
0
a
x
a¢
T as
o a
x a-4
14-
o a
a
n
a
a
ca
LL c�
-� c�
-� c
L� c ci
=, ca C
Q
Q
Q
Q
0
0
0
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cd
m
M
Cd
ct
ro
Cd
I
m
ro
cz
m
u
m
*
1.5
4C-11
`2
C
C
❑
c
c
C
o
c
ca
co
cd
0
U �
0
U �
U 0
U O L
R
C
R
O
L
N
L
y
Y
x
c
6a
c
❑
o
.D
c
m .9C
c
A
c
m
c
� .0
a
a .0
c
R
c
R
C
.R
cz
E
°? E
L F
y E
E
L E
L E
-o
-o
"O Q.
C'j
ct
ri
°
°
°
°
5
w
00
O
O
N
0
0
C
'O
U
7
T3
C
O
U
i
U
3
°
°
Y
c
a�
E
0
a
E
L
O
C.
rx

;�4
kom
O
U
x
O
O
O
A
O
A
0
V
W
O
O
O
k
W
Z OO
O
U
LLJ
W
W ui
O
LLJN
2
O
Q
O�
W
t
U
W
0
N
z
_ a
N � C
r O O
H
� Z G
K
f
z P
Z � n
S
6�
W �
W �
2
N
/
N
Z
1
ro
i
z
NNmZ
O
Qo
rW
—J
r-
w
�
O
z
o'
�W
W
W
1
I
~
w�
car-
w 2
O_ r
-
Z 0
N
Ln
w�
U W
N
O_ Q
Z A
N N
Q
I 3
W W
J
r
W
Y Q
J
O
Y S
H
Z
-
i
a
a.
/
1
- - - - -- -----------
-
�i m
O
1
V_
Z W 1
m d
0
N
z
_ a
N � C
r O O
H
� Z G
K
f
z P
Z � n
S
6�
W �
W �
2
N
w
i
N
Z
w
ro
7 QU
z
NNmZ
z
z
m
rW
—J
r-
w
a
o'
�W
W
01 N
a
._
WH
~
w�
car-
w 2
O_ r
-
Z 0
N
Ln
w�
U W
N
O_ Q
Z A
N N
Q
I 3
W W
J
r
W
Y Q
J
O
Y S
H
Z
w
i
N
Z
w
ro
7 QU
z
NNmZ
z
z
m
r
N PPy}j
r-
w
a
o'
�W
W
01 N
a
Z
L
ar
W CD
o W
IL Z
w�
car-
w 2
O_ r
-
Z 0
N
Ln
w�
U W
N
O_ Q
Z A
N N
Q
I 3
W W
J
r
W
Y Q
J
O
Y S
H
U)
f
Z
Q
J
7
i
N
Z
ro
7 QU
uj
NNmZ
d
m
r
N PPy}j
a
mZLnLn3
�W
W
01 N
Z
Z
olmmi
m�PP3
CL z
w
oa - -3
UZTT3
o x
Z _ .....
W 0
J O n
UN
NN -
a _
000�a
NIO

A
z
w
w
a
\� i, I
HTS
� ® o
I i i� � I, L_d
CL
_0 0) m c °
L m o
O m a m m
C = _
Q 0. c r
o = ° O v ~ ° s
v O
m W °m > �
3 m c 4) O
q U m j
O O N Oy p 2 2 s s o O o
C 3 YZ ii N m o ca co if- o N
� O m > C m c m o o m LL c o c a -0 ; v O m p ° 3 m a C N
CVp d c O o N
U > F 2 ` 3
O O x x
m a m m �
_ ` W $ = 0) o o m o H U d u U a F N iL U U H 7 I
ce
w
O
m ce
e m m
= O O V c
m
d =p •V s O _
N •C
p x c 0 c 0
O ` m S S m p O O
CL `
; o m d w o m 0 m 'c p
m
J F• X m V ? $ J o °
s � V
m
o Q N m
LL _° c a° o ° ` m 3
ds c m� s m ° o m V)
C > N N c c c c m Z y-0 m °° m 0 o o o C Y c O v
p, O O O O m m m m > m ? m m m d d J o o o ° p ; 3 ~ H O N C S t S S H 0 0 M m O m O
..r a a a a , o o > N d p 0 W c > o 0 o 0 N O L m d d m m
WW w � m Q W
N N V) Q OC
I
I I I � lad I l j m
V 3 I
I
W
R C
LU m
° °
(� m
V v o m e
a 0 m o J
i 0 J
0) a g o o C9 Q m 3 3 V a° m 3 E c d -°
0
_
O CO 7 = o p U -0 o C , S "N m c W t O .0 m m ` O C m m Co 3 3 s o m a
W o U N o V ° Q � o
C Ol 0 N O t c 7
3 < L d O m m J H O E m
OC d C C O
O LL E E
m > O O? -° ° m "' p .y A2 L Z m a x O o m s
w w w O X i cx V)i W w w ul O m m lL 0 a i i
W W d a d J 2 d C9 d Q
CL
�1
Li
a
o
q
V N S 0
L a L p
V m O o m rn �° J
O 'C °
o� O °o y p m a 0 m
0 0) L l E = m a O d
O p
C 'O CL > O N N m N m N V
I
I
ow
❑W
X
I
a
I
I� o -1 Z
X
I
I
°
w
V
V
m
vJ
C
LL
m
c
LL
C
/may'
L
4c)
LL
O
3
c
c
3
E
V
}y
w
y
C
°
u
=
C
d
LL 'O °
o i
O
s
w
E
m
c
o
=
0
o
c
O
U
m
ti
O
o
o p
o
7
q
e'
m
C
c
o
O
�
°
o
—
7 0
° a
L O
O
J
0
0
COL
p
p
0
0
o
X
o
o
X
o
m
U
V
a m U
O O
V)
V
H
V
ce
d
W
d
d
W
F-
d
n.
d
F-
a`
zz
�1
Li
a
o
q
V N S 0
L a L p
V m O o m rn �° J
O 'C °
o� O °o y p m a 0 m
0 0) L l E = m a O d
O p
C 'O CL > O N N m N m N V

c �

I_
O
2
w
U
Z
w
Er
I
Ll-
w
w
0
f-
�m
Z
a
J
m
Z
f
ay
IC,
N
0
U
��
W
�Z
�
m Q[�]
4
r U
NNmZ
r
QommF
mWwm3
1
1
i
S
of *3 * ill
I W)
..
O .
o
„
` I
w IL it
-1
` I
t+i'l i,',',1 \,\.\ • •`�`�: �'66` i` ` \fib I lr''i' ( �,/,%%''' ' ; ;' 1' I ,i
If
vI
TT
.�11 " %' `�6\ 6\ •�� 1 I'�iij1 p'i ;I'll ,�� ° \ ' `' I '� .� I
, ,' . \1,` `, I ; /i /i, 0QB
I Uri
I; 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 ; I 1 I , I'y■I;r ' r /,
`6,�' /444/Iy{{,L
/
r _
X11
' i 1 ' ' I 1 � 11; r/, I✓'i f; Qm`, , 1 , I ; ' i� � IA i i 41 11',��`, \\(� \,1 1�`�6, ii; (i,
1 1 I , I ", , , ,�9a. ; I' , / I I , 1 , 11 , ; 1 ! I ►; °' \, \�,; \ "' ',/I
111'1'1 �� ` 1 \, ' /('
11
1,' \\
- Qr,' r /''' %', .'��',',:' ^ -' -�- 900 r '/ ' 'F_A �� / ='�'� 0 i� ♦ /''�',' /,':i / ' /' 9
fl
\I IVA
-
-- -- - - -- -- --"� 'I A��'�Q /y / ✓i/ �i /� ;;' %/ "/ / / 1
Vii., , /,, ''' /,' fii�,., ;_.- -------' -- _-_•,> � /'/ _ '.!',T -S. //_ j/j �.,, ;, /, //, ' mR,,'i � ' � ' / ,\
---------- -
--- ":�% �1-
'.% �- ��'% ,ja jam. , - - %/� !✓ ��� /�,:! /\ 1 /�.: %, r , ,� % / /��', /,,�,,�oi .' ,,'.y4 ,'� -
/N�y��y�� ...- '''_, � ,Y ,//
::%�, '1/
`_ --
`, � • mt l /sue _- -__� -' ''', /,� �, ,•�',•� � ' � �
p
w; ;;I ;;;
,'1', ; ,
1 , 1 1 ♦ ,X ,1 Il ', , , 1 ! r ' , , , , , I r ; , , I , 1 1 , 1 , , �O' 1 , , , \
/\
' , ,1'
q .J., ., I , Ol I
,,
I, ` 1\19,11
�','�\
\yy I{ ,'` I11'1 / Il >If�;`,`, I ; , ` +; \ ', \'\ \ vt7-' \`•` \i \ \,l,\ �; yY`a;;�,`"\ + ; - '' \9.
1' I ` 11 IA �/ F„r 4•i X , \`V'`;` \ R, \`,, \,61 . I ,, -
f I , - -'' '- �1i0 ." �/��` /, \ -
'�\ \ 1 'r 1 {/ ,nlj/ 1 1 , 1 \ 915, -• _
\\ \ .; ` �' \
Ni
11''` \ '`�ap�`t \�s /` _ - �Y•�\\ \�� • �'I 1 `\ 1111 /�1` \ \`�� \�,:..\ \.\`"n -'.�n --------``� 9gS �``'`i` \`
, \ -iA ' \ "'II ` \ " ✓��� \``, 1;'1'1 ,;,P ` 1 '`, `' �...,�`: .5•.�'' ` `I \ \'
011,
''11 , 1 \ 1 1 '`U,' S... ,� .'_"'- ���'` __`. ``V+•�J` ". \ \ _
\d'/ Oil ` \
\'-�� •__ -_, ,`\ \,' ,_ , � ' I' 1111; 1`, ` ; ' I \`� -., \,` �� \ \ ,`', BS 'P, _ �� �_
._W- ----------
�\ 1 , 1 I fi 1 � ; °,^• , I �' \k `- '� I l ail %�• ` -. `: ` , \ ` `'` \ - -- I' \'' \ `' ``' ``
,' ; ; I';'; ; ; I'`, `,''11'1 1 ;'`, '', '' /' � \Y� ;l ;l'1'I `� \' -' "''• � ` 69
e \ \
\ \ —'b� /—
0
nn
C�
■C%NI ■
■■
�n ■
I�CIC�' � •
MEN
=niiiiiii
■C■CC■CC7aC%
'nn■■■■■
'i■'�i'■'■iuiiC _
0
O
0
10
Irrrrrrrrrrrp r■
■ ■rrrprrr■rrr ■r■ H
�iiiiiiiiiir' m. CH
w
Aror
-N
v
W
m
m
v
2
2m 2W
w
J CmD
A
ro A
Am
a
�
O
m
o
O
W
D
1.2
a airo
m
W
w
m mv
m
W
mm
mI
■nl
mN
mC
m m
m
J
I ■
■RC°mi■'wi :
O
c9lr�im��i��mfO�ll
�o�W(yy
,nolnoN
1■'■'CCI t
V mr�rml
SCI
«771
-
rmN
W ry
F-mN
OmI(
v v
a~D
N W
o NNe�i7�Nm
"Wee
Z
y
■�n■■■'1
WW
°S2
t °W
amommmr�mmm
■... s
son
°,r'�i
oW�oo�soossso�00000000
om
mo=o n
nommmom' w
w0i'ii■mul
mn■■■on■uu ■
■ ■ ■ ■
■■r� i
■■inom
p ■ ■
■ ■ ■r■p Y
Y■nN
L)
CDm
MN�-�
t7 N
m t9
mml7mmaD
No W
,n W
mm W
w
Z c+W.-
O
r m
ov.-
W W
�Inrm�nm
W m
m 0
W m
Nm�m
N 0
a7 m
W
V m
W vm
N W
C
OMMKNC� '
'■RC
N 6 .-
O�
■■ -
m N
Inmmvm
N m
W Y
lh lh
v v.70Y
W N
m
t9
lh l'7
a9 to
1n W
to e7
m W
a+l t�v
CL
CL
Z mmmm
. r
n
.
m
r
. ,n n
r r
m m
n
min .
r
. lnmmm,n
rrrrl�rr
FO
0
� N[7
0 0
v
0 0
m m
0 0
r m
0 0
W O�Na9amm�m
0
W
nn
C�
■C%NI ■
■■
�n ■
I�CIC�' � •
MEN
=niiiiiii
■C■CC■CC7aC%
'nn■■■■■
'i■'�i'■'■iuiiC _
0
O
0
10
Irrrrrrrrrrrp r■
■ ■rrrprrr■rrr ■r■ H
�iiiiiiiiiir' m. CH
1 ■�C':�.CCCC' ■
■:Ci.■CCCCm R
■CCR ■
RICO o
■�CCCCCCC:1
oliCH
■■nnpn■ ■
■n ■
■n■ C
lag
C ■nl. ■
■ ■
■nl
1 ■
I ■
■RC°mi■'wi :
:CCCN 1
1■'■'CCI t
t S
SCI
■ p
"Wee
"o \5 ■
■�n■■■'1
■nn ■
■... s
0
O
0
10
Irrrrrrrrrrrp r■
■ ■rrrprrr■rrr ■r■ H
�iiiiiiiiiir' m. CH
nr■ ■/ pri
■
s ■
C 'T)
A
nn
....a
■nnnc�'
.pn �■
i°
.n
�np ® •
nnre
.rn
•
1 ■�C':�.CCCC' ■
■:Ci.■CCCCm R
■CCR ■
RICO o
■�CCCCCCC:1
oliCH
■■nnpn■ ■
■n ■
■n■ C
lag
C ■nl. ■
■ ■
■nl
1 ■
I ■
■RC°mi■'wi :
:CCCN 1
1■'■'CCI t
t S
SCI
■ p
"Wee
"o \5 ■
■�n■■■'1
■nn ■
■... s
son
i:C
om
mo=o n
nommmom' w
w0i'ii■mul
mn■■■on■uu ■
■ ■ ■ ■
■■r� i
■■inom
p ■ ■
■ ■ ■r■p Y
Y■nN
ii'rliai'iuAN
f l
Roo" N
No W
l
1
CC�CC� f
G
H R
C
OMMKNC� '
'■RC
Cg '
■■ -
■
Gi H
- =
= ■
■p ■ ■
■rnnppN i
C 'T)
A
nn
....a
■nnnc�'
.pn �■
i°
.n
�np ® •
nnre
.rn
•

o
z
F-
W
W
=
to
0
m
t
2
F
J
n
z
Q 0
f
O m
C5 x
�1
.i
i v r _a
Z �
iG
r
an
m m aD
O
NUmew
W Q
L o
r r
W nZ��J
Lj
W�
m
W
w
0 0
Z oommF
w F_
iYy
�z ni "3
W arcQ°_3
J
fe�L'
m m
a.
V
m m
W
W
4
I /Iiil
I 1
4I; # r'4 2
rl ll '
r J
== -' '=tea,
�A, \`','`,'
(/ , yy , • - --
�
off`
UW )O�i
LLJ
ses
Qom)
X
-
,( 1' ♦,� m � ,� ,�� " '/ y /�� //i , X � '' ' / /�' 1 I � J % I I I' J I % I J ' % ' �O l l I
m CP
'
C13 J �,..
co ;;'I;;
01
lot
� ; I
'��` ir`` ; I ;�li ll�l',i JI�y1 1i 11111ii�011pI
. B;II 0
', 11''111 j1
'm I
h
Oi
' Q1.
1 S
11 _
::::n ■YY:::F.�g■La! m. me ■e ■t
■u.mNH■u■gN1..uN ■ ■118um
nugN■uvuuur0.uur: H8m■HH8
mono■ ■uuuH:_u■n m 1m0gp
/ ■88 ■1■ ■81:1 ■e ■e11q��1H818N ■mpeH1
HN ■ ■1H ■1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■eH1'._ u1 ■�N1 ■ H8N8N■
�ppgHlgmH■8H�q81 ■7I ■N ■�H■
iiiH ■ ■ ■q / ■N ■pH ■l;N ■ own N ■ ■■ N■■
Yu8..1.11R1u11.'�1own11m q■■m■111R
:M
IE:
�mAaom
O
h co
f
O m
YPlmO
�
N O
Awwmm
N w
O N
w m
Nmv>of
O
an
m m aD
■
LLJ
_J m
m r
r r
w N
1� m
m
W
m m
0 0
0� m
:IrI�....
W m
m m
m m
w w
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m w m
J
Rem
WOOMMENW,
■H
■
■oo881R
ME
MEM
■H■818808p
O
■■
h
Y N
m � N a�
A w aw n
m m m
nN
R
cl w!
O c!
R N
O m
r
r
A
A m
N w
F m
iy O
m I
O Y
m W
\808
HRHH1
881N18HpH1■
Z
N m
m W
W O
m
W
m m
m
A m
m t0 h
O
W0000000000�oSwOSoB000
8
8 ■8geg888u8H
■1
mgnNoHquu■
■Hmn
■■11me
MM11
■ ■1A
8H
H8HNH88
■N
�
888818■
F
1111
188HH
m
■111
ME
V
�m
ON
�,-an
Nmaf
mmtll
m
mnm
W
mm w
W
O
A m
w w
w m
m O
w m
N 0
Hf m
Y .n
N w
�
=ni
ai ah
adraoraao
i�cioauor
vaai
vi nip
N0
d'mlwn
u'�ivuwi�vv�vawn��ami
MaaMv
LL
a
z r
lnhwmmin
r r
r r
A A
lnwwln
A A
A A
In
A A
lnmin
A A
In
r r
lnwwln
r r r
In
rO
0
Nan
0 0
V
0 0
N m
0 0
Amw
0 0
O
0
W N
anvmmrmw
I /Iiil
I 1
4I; # r'4 2
rl ll '
r J
== -' '=tea,
�A, \`','`,'
(/ , yy , • - --
�
off`
UW )O�i
LLJ
ses
Qom)
X
-
,( 1' ♦,� m � ,� ,�� " '/ y /�� //i , X � '' ' / /�' 1 I � J % I I I' J I % I J ' % ' �O l l I
m CP
'
C13 J �,..
co ;;'I;;
01
lot
� ; I
'��` ir`` ; I ;�li ll�l',i JI�y1 1i 11111ii�011pI
. B;II 0
', 11''111 j1
'm I
h
Oi
' Q1.
1 S
11 _
::::n ■YY:::F.�g■La! m. me ■e ■t
■u.mNH■u■gN1..uN ■ ■118um
nugN■uvuuur0.uur: H8m■HH8
mono■ ■uuuH:_u■n m 1m0gp
/ ■88 ■1■ ■81:1 ■e ■e11q��1H818N ■mpeH1
HN ■ ■1H ■1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■eH1'._ u1 ■�N1 ■ H8N8N■
�ppgHlgmH■8H�q81 ■7I ■N ■�H■
iiiH ■ ■ ■q / ■N ■pH ■l;N ■ own N ■ ■■ N■■
Yu8..1.11R1u11.'�1own11m q■■m■111R
:M
IE:
■
memo 0101
:EE:::
■�::H::�
■::ENS
:IrI�....
am
H■
8HN81N
■p■HH18N■`C.f88N
Rem
WOOMMENW,
■H
■
■oo881R
ME
MEM
■H■818808p
■0
qm
■■
888
8N
81H8H8g88HHN
.1111111■
■H
■181111
■8 ■ ■8H8
■8H8
■88q
NHN■
H1q
8■HN11188g888H11HN8888N
H8HH811RRRp8mHgg4.
\808
HRHH1
881N18HpH1■
N888g11188N8fl1
gp
1H111
HeNN
8
8 ■8geg888u8H
■1
mgnNoHquu■
■Hmn
■■11me
MM11
■ ■1A
8H
H8HNH88
■N
�
888818■
■118111888111
1111
188HH
m
■111
ME
C 7
O
O
+
N I O
+

m
F
iO z
J
J
U3 i
0 ■ 0
o m 4n
x U r U
w �
� nnmz
r -
Y O m N mOW
o �w mZtn1nj
N z xoommf
� � mjrnm3
iYj w arc?' �' 3
J
W
W
W
\ ` ;/ //
N
� l 11 /l�'llI l ` ' /,1 ' 1 1 � 1 ; ; � ' � � I I 1 ' ; i • / `/�
♦/ ; ` /,'
'I 1 .y 1,
If
IZ
I
In Q 111
I ,1
cow ♦ ',
1 �
I �
I ,
I
1
1 - /
1 I I
I ,
I
I
/
1
i
� l
c I
O I'
I,
I
-L
O I
I.
cC
X11
I'
t
I
t,
li
I
I I,
$113. *31'111* 031ral
>m
O
II
b i
N r W
W Y W N
f
m O
4G
J m
N
m 0
W
0oW Nmm
Y'OD
6
m
W
m000Y
m
WmmmmmmmmmmmWm
W
0p OD
J
O
(DV
m
W_
I�R
I
Y
V M
P 9
n im
h
mNhNrh
U) m
N O
m A
W
Y Y
Yr
m W
Nt7�m
N W
Y N
O m
N Y
m m
P n
W YM
N m
^
m m
m o
m m°
m
m m
m PP
m
2 °m yr
o
0
<
W0000000000�°d��o�0000
H
W
?onm
°Waaiomvm�NOamn
invvO1i
tW,lmO
�=
N
Hl l•l
m A
fG
�
"
M
m
A
r
r
r
r Y r
r
O.
z n
n m
n n
n n
, „
n „
n In
�o
0
d Y
Na7Y
0 0
Y Y
Ylnmrm
0 0
Y
0 0
Y Y
0 0
Y Y
W o�NaoYnmrm
0
Y Y
0 0
Y 0
0 a
W
O R Y
\ ` ;/ //
N
� l 11 /l�'llI l ` ' /,1 ' 1 1 � 1 ; ; � ' � � I I 1 ' ; i • / `/�
♦/ ; ` /,'
'I 1 .y 1,
If
IZ
I
In Q 111
I ,1
cow ♦ ',
1 �
I �
I ,
I
1
1 - /
1 I I
I ,
I
I
/
1
i
� l
c I
O I'
I,
I
-L
O I
I.
cC
X11
I'
t
I
t,
li
I
I I,
$113. *31'111* 031ral
O
II
b i
I to
BE
C {, O
+
co
- 0- !�I__ %0
LLJ
1
- -
(' tQ
1 QW
I
- -lo
0
o>
�o
Off:
M
■
Eli ■��
■ ■. ■. ■
■■■■■■l■ ■
■■ ■ ■.. .
■NN ■ ■■
CL E
LLJLJ
1 1....
1 11
1
11 -
1
1
T
II
b i
I
I
/
C {, O
+
co
- 0- !�I__ %0
LLJ
1
- -
(' tQ
1 QW
I
- -lo
0
o>
�o
Off:
M
■
Eli ■��
■ ■. ■. ■
■■■■■■l■ ■
■■ ■ ■.. .
■NN ■ ■■
CL E
LLJLJ
1 1....
1 11
1
11 -
1
1
T

.3113. *3 . $31
'` '11111111 1;11 11;1 1111 1;�1 - - -I 1 T
O N �V A
Z ,, 1, Jl l l' 11 I( I I 1111 11 11 I l lml 1 I I I 1 I I O ^ 0 O
F- 1,A ,+/ I ; ,111 111��111111111Pi 111Q'll♦111 ; / co Go co o
fl1'; iFl ;iiiliiiiliiiil;iiiliiiil'�i'1 1i 1i
W___— __ _.. 'I _..._ 10
7 , 11 18117 1111 /
r YZ �[0] it l;i ll��i111111;111'I 11111 Illllli'10 `I ' �1
Y r W 1 1, 1 1�;11�1111'1 I'I 1111 1¢p11 1 t ,``,1 // r I
V ~
Z W N m� 11; 111
wQ O r : 11,II;Q`1 i 1 11111 %'1111111,1 }))} Illl ' _.I.
wa �V��Y 111'1 "II;;,I "'11 ' C
¢ o w NZ - -J ,�' 1' 11, 1 1
w �W N �il� Q''I'i'II1 d' I( '11 '11'x; I I
tL XImm� 1 i 1 ; 1 ;1�i ;rmr , S'1,�' 1; im-11 1 ' '1% '' _ -+
w ? o0 11,111 ,,11g`'11;Il�j,l1;1,�;1 1 x11j1 ','sei 1 /.' .I p
Ct
m WQ10,3 ' I I I i 1 r I1'''ll ", 11 II 1 , 111 ; I , I - -9� ; 1 1 'I .: Ln
LO J ^^ i, , t; , i I 1 1 I 1 1; I I; I 1 1' ', t0 , ...
~ NA Z , / ; `� i _ i.
ci m Q 1 1, 1 1 I I 1' 1 1 1 1 ' N I 1 1 I' 1 1 1'' ' '
w arc,...3 1 , 1;1'11,;;11 "11°'1' 111; l,' '( %l ' tf-P' I
o-- - --
d
--
'1 -
;, ; , �I�I r 1'111; 11'11'1 "'' //' %' % %;I /' %,/ /''', i �- /� %•L —_ �t _ _ +
/OD/ /ll r \ ,11 ^1 j`{ I W
in
I
i
; i i i� 1 i/ 1 +I //� '� / i-- _`\ \`� —
, , � , 11- •1111117,11,11;11111,1 I1� , , �/ �� �`_
, / ''7111 1,11,1,1111 11' I / �' /.'" - -_ \ ..T� -
1
I I " I ' / ,f ' 11 ,/' /�l� '© I I _ -1- O
%•, ,/, ,1111 ®; 1'I il, I'1j ,, ,II,, ,, 1� S %,'' �`.`ZZ, _ _�_ _ - - -+
�-
Y I
I4%' 11'
' , PryrV % !' % , /, % %11 ♦♦ ♦'1;11,111 1111, I , , , 1 1 1 I , /I ; I�1 i i 1 'V,; -___- � -_ - --. • / _!-i j
9
/, m' as s -1
7 %- /�,' //I
�' 55.1'00
NO
Ln
Ir
I
`61 ,' l� / 1 , . a
,t\i�,P\",�,�,it`1`'nM`,,` ��,`i ilil' %! �C %% '9,rf ,, / -`: %%l , to `, vV �t" , 'I -
/ ; \'),; : ;\'�` U \ `' „\ '; ,� _
-
`
\l,`�, ,n ;;,1v;i %'' d /' , , ' , , , ,,`` \`•` __ L r0
,'fl ;a�1 , , a1` rP
-
a-- - - - - --
-- _--- - -9�5. :'. -, /, , , /,,, .oy r;' /' rr' ' I / � ,, ' r /,r /Al r r f r 1m 1 , 1 , `I ,`:� 1) , - -
,/ ,r /, �,/ ,,, eee / � ,11 r ) II ,1 I �
\'
r' ` -- T '.1
,` „, � ; I' ' 1`11 „� 1 -
�
' --____ `�- ''A /�'�, ' J '%''i �'''/ I I 1 � 11 I1 ' � 111,1 %� -.r/' -�__ \`••\ \`•�``- , t \ ' 1, , � •Y' W� L � _l _ _
-- P,
-_ 'I
\
°?'' - ---
- - - -''' ,', ik/ 1•`t I,' ' , '� \`t'' • 1 I ` I '- - i�'0 —, 1 , ,- 1'�`�”, ® .._I O
% : '•'% ' �: ; '" , ji , ,,
4 ' \
o;� (p�] 1 ;gyp \\L
+
LO
1 a
� ; 111'1 •� \� -'---• ` .,y., I
J ,' �'' / , I' i ' ,', -% /i '-`✓ ��'',;% � 6111 `•,` .-9g _ _ -
-
/'fI
50 r
/ A o / �1 1i �I I �
r /
� /w
+
LO,
,
I
I l
x � 1 4A �F
11
w
-' 1 W i o
/� (' C
N.
C(/ _
co
t I r
ZW_
I ,
Zj

O N
Z f
r a0 V Z
w d
w F
= J
N :3
$31it 03ML$ 03
LO
>mn
O
o.m
N l7
v
O m
LO
my
NON
0
V N
in
m
O
m m
m m C
n
A A
N
A m
m
I
O ti
m m
co
O_
m
co
W m
ao
m m
ao
m m
coo
m m
m m
m m
m m m
J
0
U'1rv.°'!Vu
nmrunmc'na�r�mOn�nm
LO
I
1.L
F
tG
HmNOmm
fV mNr�
m
Y YmO
a1�Na0
NODY
0 Z m
O Y 0 n
w w 1 d rnNmI / / II.
w < n�mmw
Y O
It W �W z�y - -� i, +
w r Z ximmf -LL
N C mWWN3
L
w , w arc00_3 OO o 1
�_ I -
f� -
CL V4 - - -- z
CC
CNIIJ
C-R I -
• 1
" i 1 NI h N
\, , I 1 ll,1l l "'II % % 1 ?'' %'! ; ' %l '' "' ' L J
\�"'�ql ,�',';� %,1,1;; % %1! "I ' :', �\y _ I
L` /--1 ♦ _ I. .r.
11 , " -I
'/ s+ >_�/ .- -_` ♦_ \„�`= \\ \`i„ 111 Ir liltnl I , I ' `` ," ♦ \\.`)! —"�, � ``•, - �
`` \` lf� - I
i `,` ,`,1 ' lull %�{�r1i�mi �'��� 1'I1' li�l ®'1.♦ `� \� ♦ \, ♦\` `. \\.I j��, ♦`, ♦_9 ?�S�\� ♦,: I' � � .. -F....
« / '` ♦` \`` \ � `♦ \ 1 `� \'II I Ilt,p IT ' , ' I . I I I 1 1 1 �
1 I'll;l 1, 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 , 1 1 J 1
� \ `\ ,yIIII, ' I 11 ,()il � 1 I 1 11, i' 1 ` �� \ ` ♦` ` ♦♦ -
k ♦ ♦. -' \.`� �1 ���I:i' lld I %; 11,1 ili +; i l i 1�, '11 \ i ' ` \ `````` 9f5 .y.a ♦` ♦- .` ♦`,` __ I - r...:O tv
b �.q�d �' 4''�I "' II i #I, I1 ; 1;; \I;\ \` ♦\ ��::;,�.�,17i - \:_``:,, j 1- +
+'/ .: , ' ` � ; �I�YIII� •.I 1 a ' I1111' , I 1 1 � , I , , ` \ ♦ - ' � - ,
l \♦ 4
p/ 1
`lI . _` •� ` -_Y_` ,' • `_- ,I - - IN I'r `` \� - eS \�```. ``• -i. -,, ) \ \ \\.1 11
I N,
IN
-rr-' O
kgl
�ok ;-_
IN
I� li ",I ' ��` ��� i .1'��1,,,11 11 `,1`� ,1\.`.`i \\\` ,�♦ -' lr \�� �� J_, �� -_- � t i\
1 . t
- _`-
IN" \� ` �\
IN z
4C%: mow,;;\ , 1�i ,P1/� ` �� ♦` ♦♦ ``, ,- ' \ ♦R. �``, `• ``` - - +
ANN
IN IN
IN 0
r
r -
, / r
\
� - ``` \j\ �' \
co
VIA
`I
lb
� /j1 %:'% �' lilt \ � ♦ \` `, \�j;,, `,` ,` � - �O
pl
No 19
IN I
YY" r
i "
A �O
\ ` \ \ \\ ♦ �`. I
Zw
a
I
' 1
_ ♦ � \aril\ \�1 �� � I z> o
1 - o
SHE u— �
VA O c+ N
a CL- ,o
C ID
>mn
O
o.m
N l7
v
O m
Y co
my
NON
OO
V N
IAmv
m m
m
O
m m
m m C
W m
A
A A
N
A m
m
Ol W
O ti
m m
Y o'
m W
O_
m
W m
m m
m m
m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m m
J
0
U'1rv.°'!Vu
nmrunmc'na�r�mOn�nm
1.L
F
tG
HmNOmm
fV mNr�
m
Y YmO
a1�Na0
NODY
hOmmmGO
NN�
Of
any
OI
avi
Nm
m O A
Z
yaom
ANA
of
N
O. W
m.---Mw
O to
Y Y
a0
mm
N
AAmmmm
t0
Q m
W o
m m
0 0
m n
0 0
...
0 0
n
0
m
0 0
m m
0 0
m m
0 0
m m
0 0
m m m
0 0 0
U
H
(.�
�% m
P. N
.-
a•. N
m Vf
m m
l7 m
m f0
IA m
m m W
w
O
A m
W W
m m
m Y
m m
N 0
a9 m
v m
N W
(aV
Cl t+l
m r
m r
Y m
n N
O
0�
z..I.
......
.......
CL
r O
CL Y
g"
v<
m v
O O
m m
V O
Y O
O
m m
Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y Y
C ID

031134 43"U 031VW
in 66 1 a
OD Go
Z
W - --
w -
W
- -- ,
m
z m <u t
z z0
w ° r !
cl W`
W W -1fIN� r _
.. \
N U' m � WQl3 \ � iii �� ^� _. �\ &•°'� `�� 1 /I i/� l,$'`
W
(\ \/V/ `troy ` . \.4. ` ,11■ ,1 1 Ill�i
O
� J \ \ I , ♦ , \ 4 1' I I1' ' 1' 1
-
\
•`�\ 1 + \`__\ \ , \ 1� '1'111 I 11'1!111111.41 T�
WxO \♦; pm7 1ul111111'I
\♦`\ 1' I\ `` ` I `I r 1 11, 1, 11 I I I 1 I
\\A
, ,
j , ; ,' \',
yJ /
y
, '/ „
"/ '
\\ ®Fie ->✓ ,`'\ I� i, r '1 11!1'I�; "I;'t�!'11 1 ' 'f; I, /I ;I; I %: ; /; i; ; a
` `` `, ♦ ,� \ J � �'' \ , ' I I1 #- < rl\ 1 1 ' I 1 ; 1 U11 Ill! /,' ,/' '// ,� / , Q I , II _
/Ij
MMMmmm
!iii
.....
m 1 Mm
!iii
111a
�16H
s
O
T
.� /
N ,
'' `11 {` \ " \`�,,
r b b p.`, ,, ♦, . \e
Iwo I `,`�I
SSSS \
3 � , \`, `,, ` \ \` \,� `� \�`• \`', �l\ , , . ` \ ` �1��1 Ili �'`� dA\ - `{ 1', , ,f,'4 `,'\`{ `„ "�u ` i, ,
1 I I
I 1
'- _ar______•� 5 \`a \\i`.'6 `, ♦ \�:6 ,,,`, \ii``S\� {! ♦ \`, \`` 11,1`. ``,\ \ \`,, �_� '{ , ,�','{'{{` \{`, `�\�', \„�', \,1 \4 \ \�`4{ (
\
Zb,
, „ , \, ` , , \` 8 \', ,y yl n \\ a cp ,`, \{ , , © F
\`1` { \1` ``, `6 ,♦, \``___ <y _� �` \\e l\ 1 1 ,,,n {` +�',
v t
`,`` „ \`, �`' \ \,
j
\,,` ; \ ",,�` I
\,',1
1c,` „c, \,`�
1, 1,,,1 ,,, ��., �, I wa`.\` "11,,,1„ \, ;, \,,,,� _ Q
`\S„ `' \; „ ,, ,', \ \` ', '� \ \k\ \\ ,1 11 +, { „ \�`I1
` `\\ ` �
p `\ ',,,\ ` \` \i` ` o'e" ``\
�\,`1�, \'` \��ii� �i,/���'` ✓.�',' JYIC
0, ,,,
,\� ,` \
\
\ \` `,; �q,`
6 `` ` ,,
%/ .�' // 6e
TF
I _ r £,
� . /j A' v m
0
0
+
,` ♦` \,,,`, \\4\ , \, \, \ \, ,, \\ `,• , `\ \ 11\ /,/ ,'�� �-
,�� "V. l I I 1
'•S'c^a.� \`\``\�``� \ \`'� 6\',, ,` \\ ,, `'�\��pp,1` \`, ` +'1\ \ ; ' i 1/ `. �, /� ' /'J II.q ; I I i i I I iO
\`, 'r ``` "I' // ``'' ' I "I'Y'1
,;`\`,, ,,, \`,, ,,\, ,, "A0•,,,, ,�,IIII II I ; 1 i;� __{ 4_� ". \�,\ `, Ilr, i 1 I,;,,I '�I__!I �I
\\ ` `. \\�; A\"\�\` `,`\\`�,\ \\,`
,N ; \ , \ \ ,` \ \` ; \ , \ , ` 1 ° ' ' \ \'1'11\ ' ;11
,r6\ , \�': ,, \ \ „A` ,\`,; `;:1; `'lii�l; ;l;l I,�; ; `x \,\`,,\ /�'. I;I \,1 ; I M i ` ``�' \`'�`, ;I,If`; I 91 ' IQI \ \�``, " \\ `�`` \\ ` \al 11 I; 1,�\\ „ I Q , 1 _. - �r W OD
Oli
l �+ `, 1 ...0
�s; 0V, \,`,,O'C \` ,\ `��, \ \ \1 '`, �`, 1- 11`1',11 -
` `, \'`'. `,`\ \ ' '`'\ `\ \,`,yy\ \rte \ \ 1,1\ `,` 1\ \• \ i`
. \�`` 6 \�; \, \`\``,,\ \♦`; \``♦` `"\" , W", \1 ; ,I;,1`I,; ; , - _ _03ay\: �atc `~,,
\', , \ \`,, ,` ,�,`�\�;�``, \ \�`��`�``11,S \ \,�`, `\ \`,, `,'YI';'_I''il I' I 1i` 'mod' \�T © \` \ �116�\
\`` , ♦ \` \\� \'` `' \6, \ , \`'��\''S C'
, C,`' \`
`\' `,` , ',`, `�', `` `,\`'``',\'`,. I, --
• }� 1
;,` \` e` \'\ \ \' ``1\ ,`� i' I i " _ ',` �,, ///
/
\ \ `! ,' \`:` ;� ` �s` `1 % \... \' , \` ,, I •+ / 111J1 _ III 1 '
`\ ` `'` 6
, \`,1` ,`, �`'
, , „''p
' \,1 \1'` ", ' / /, /(� ,.C7 �� j✓ _ �'��
.y , \, „ `
'``,1,`, v, , , , ! 11 , 1` „ ,,`,'\ , `, \', 11'1 1 �` \` \ \�,,, \,, ,`,\ ,,,1i`,, , t1`1'', \``` `,`'' I,II 11 11111'1;11111 II II,,, \, \a „'\``c\\\ \;, \,1111n11 / %'
\`\ `; ,1\ \ \A, \i, \1,11111 111 1,'"1;111 '�/
G \I `,'\\ ` \, '` \ \`` \� , ,,1`,1,'1` 1 ',,�'>• , II ,�' \�`�'ll \��U.1p ' `� �, ._
\` ' \, \, \,\ ,`I, ,`,�,\ 111'
1'1 1. -+
{, "1'1
;111
our
•
tA J-+
\` \ \`141 1 „IP `,`1 '111,!,11,1111 II ,, \,\ ``II I1 /, /, ,, '/, I ,II : ___ _-
`'`' \`�\ ` \♦`6 `' \`'\ 6'` ' \`''1,`I `1' {I''''1''I'l l; l' ,{i �1,; tits, ,� \\ \.\ `?� ` ` ,,, ' , �i, / / Q, L. �;�
\` "'
\, I I
\'
r ^ \�,
7F V
v - �%n��/ r -�" ' ' , -J ' . �• p/ °, % ` / I , 1 ; ' 1 , ' % 1 1I 1II # ' 1l'� l IIf1" 1' I i I ; AIM, ' �I/ 1 /i'p, • I;/I I' /i((' /r / / �„ / , /"/,' % �„'�/ „r;.�r � ,;;�" ; ii '/' , 'I Y% � ' , / "' ,' I \ ♦ , �. �`,; •i. \ \ 1 ,I
i
' Q
<
�
/I1a;111,'I'
, , / /, % / III 1 T l�, r' I Ir'r Ilir 'LOI"
�;"�/ ', hl'�1, 1�11I, I .;'
//r
/�: %�
_" �
':_.- _'' ' /''��q icl,
'P- � %l- -�+P'.
/ y
,,/ I,, I , l ' ' 1 'O
/ /'' , li � ' � i r' �,�/' /,' i \I
�m
_
___�`' _ _. __ __- /S'.e' /',.,, i''%, /,' : %:'.'(�'l,. /' d1' / �,. '% I/ lI `,•K,\ . $ -" 'f x'11111 �; 1 1 I lI /I/ , 11.
�J.+� -,r :.- ;- 'i.,'. /,',' ' ��%', �' ,/ % : ��'' .oY' , , rr/ I a V ✓ " - Ii�MI , I I „r ` i ' I I ' l
�, `:
,': %�/''�','�,i / / //l
t�Y- F,''•j' .' % %r',+'•� 'Sj ''� / /'rn`'i , "� Im�/r %' /x'111'1 i;ll I r ii %' it I' l� �I
II
/
','' %l %%
I/,
i
Ln
Tr, r/r r I��,'�,b ,' /, , / , [1, r /% , t/I y�j �y cc
ll'/ 11', / I',
c O
+
+
W
A {n
In cnofo
I
t�
I 1 1 1 I
A
ao
O O
v,ryoco�ommcn
IA CD
N m
h E7 N
J CD
A A
A A
,�
m N
A m
O O��
m CND
m m
CAD � O
'1
W CD
� 1 , 1 1 1 ; " �
!I I'I I•G
�88J��� !!I I i I l I I,{;
1 1 ll]
, ;
1 -', 11 I
I
1/q'�y'�
�+Y
m m
1 1
111'1 111 1111 11
I/,
i
Ln
Tr, r/r r I��,'�,b ,' /, , / , [1, r /% , t/I y�j �y cc
ll'/ 11', / I',
c O
+
+
W
A {n
In cnofo
CD Y
t�
O f
aiot�n
A
ao
O O
v,ryoco�ommcn
IA CD
N m
h E7 N
J CD
A A
A A
,�
m N
A m
O O��
m CND
m m
CAD � O
W CD
CD CD
O m
m
O CD
O m
m m
CD CD
CD CD
CD O CD
J
O
<
IA
m'
2 N
1A A
7 A
of m
CD A
� rn
N n
CD to
� N
V �
h
� a+f
O, a^l
Ol vl CD
Z
�0p
x$$$$
CApD �p
TpO
W
�m
CC�CpDp���
0m
Dh
O
0
{OO{pp
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
U
�m
l N�
r
a7 N
0 n
CDOw
m
CDN
nmmnO
W
M
oAmw
W
O
�am
h A
cOVacONOC�v,vinNO�
m h
m N
O O
W Y aD
O
�rov°Dinvrcoi�va$�vcon�c�"c'�r,
aon
a�i cony
A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A A
a-
a
z
1ICI�1�1��1�1��,�1�
F-O
Nnf
0
Nm
A OO,O�NCn
Y1nm
ACDO
0
aree��
0
0 0
0 0
+�vvaevaeve�:re+
0 0
0
I/,
i
Ln
Tr, r/r r I��,'�,b ,' /, , / , [1, r /% , t/I y�j �y cc
ll'/ 11', / I',
c O
+
+

9311 9 03MUO 931
N 111 ' I
Cr
W O s 1 �\ \\1 ,III,'/
H -- -- I CID
I Ii, 'ill /���i' a N
LLj
MAT ;, �� Ln
' 1 1 ,I +Ill/' ``SC♦ `� - \ \ \♦ I '' ',; "ll y''''`Jn'��i'' /i� / / _ ,I 4 {
1 , ,
f
I+\ {' I ' K \ J ' \'\ i11``♦ ' /'','�I11 ��''1t�11''1I1 //; �.mO ";; I {i;l /l , i y ��. - -N
,
' ' 1�ll l `♦ 1 +IF /� ' ' ' ' 1111 "; 1 "''� "IIII
■p I (Il1 , 1 /� ice-.. % � I I ' I I.
\I `` I x ; I / �i ... rvy •r ' '1111 I♦* ' / ; , 11 1; I f; III . -.._. __..
fill, ♦ ♦� I l' / ✓' �, ' /'' /�;' 1 ' 1y1 X11 I'; il;' 1Il IIII;;; (�YY
7q5 SS 1j , ♦` ♦♦ ', �'♦ ' 1 1 I 1 (v l' 1 \'111111' {1'I +III I "_YyYy O
x r + , . ' S��J , 1 1 , 11 \'I "�' IT' II � cT
- , ♦ ' .''� , ,\ 111 ;II' II `l� O
__� ;1 +
X I1, Will I i'' liTlIll ...._ ��
-I- CV
- Ill`
l u, w y/ - /- ^'f'_, I I �.♦ Irxjiify 1 Iltyi "aii# 1',It +i'I'ii +..
�I t 1151111111 y��y�111'1 J li
' ; 11' 1 I ,l ,'•/ 1 • A11 I1 f 1 ` \I\ I 1'' 'I C.J' \\ ♦ ♦, `'' 1' "' r'�J�,J 111,�i1',1'11111, 111�'I Ij111', I- I _ ,
I ,p ��tt I, 1 ♦ 1 \ 1 1 Ifl 11 1 1 1
11 / I I ' f// .7,' I'lll/' 11111 ♦� \'�`` \V 1' 111111 ' ~i `�/ g ' 1111 „11'11'1' l 1111 T.. .. , -0
r,/ \\ /�'/ \ \ \ \ \` ' \��'���� �`�1''• (�!1�/ /' 1\ � 1'l l'!1�''lll itt''I'IIIV11'I _
i i , m '` ♦Y I -' - \ '�?�\��` x``41 , I �' I” l,' �Il +1111l.'l ill ;111 j'1 .. __ _ I' 1 LO
NA
1 m LJ ftom�' // A; ,
op$<��/,
r�it� /�
O
,
CN
`tZ r
r 5,1 bi ____
, , 1
O
' / /' _'�,i' � �`���\ \♦ III - ._;`` \� \1y. ; 1, ,,l ; � /♦` \ - I ' Q
,(bT;;
I;
+' I -
1 `.�\+/ ,?�i� ;j `''� 1 ` \` ;;;I�� {.'_-_ �~;";'' #1;1,x' I'
/ � _' I;;i / = - -�a� .�% ' I 1 1 ; % ``I�'`♦:` -'I � '.D ' ; � 1 ; I + � j ; f ,; J I � I , I � -� -- r
N
�-
'
I ` '
, ♦ I ILLI,, / ; // , 11/
{ O
0 111 11, 1I / Ill, '- -1 O co
F \ 46
''/
/S@ // /,,�/ w
LLJ
ZD
ocD
oO
CID
co
LIJ
11 1 1
` w
ZW
f-0
♦
P� N
m
m N
O m
0
1 0
1
N m
O N
z
m
O
m In
m m t7
co
CD Cb CD co
O
n
'�Ni
wt
lzv
oic
m
Ni
0
d
vz R�
In
m
W m
r r
m m
r
m m
y
0
a
omd BUNNY
CD
-r
-- m 1
m m
m m
—
m m
m a m
�
W "q, j
( ^
V z
I
O I'
O
O
Z oommF
N
�w aIm (ft 0
OO
'
m�
N m.
-NmNA
a
om
m
nee
m �m
nm
O
N 111 ' I
Cr
W O s 1 �\ \\1 ,III,'/
H -- -- I CID
I Ii, 'ill /���i' a N
LLj
MAT ;, �� Ln
' 1 1 ,I +Ill/' ``SC♦ `� - \ \ \♦ I '' ',; "ll y''''`Jn'��i'' /i� / / _ ,I 4 {
1 , ,
f
I+\ {' I ' K \ J ' \'\ i11``♦ ' /'','�I11 ��''1t�11''1I1 //; �.mO ";; I {i;l /l , i y ��. - -N
,
' ' 1�ll l `♦ 1 +IF /� ' ' ' ' 1111 "; 1 "''� "IIII
■p I (Il1 , 1 /� ice-.. % � I I ' I I.
\I `` I x ; I / �i ... rvy •r ' '1111 I♦* ' / ; , 11 1; I f; III . -.._. __..
fill, ♦ ♦� I l' / ✓' �, ' /'' /�;' 1 ' 1y1 X11 I'; il;' 1Il IIII;;; (�YY
7q5 SS 1j , ♦` ♦♦ ', �'♦ ' 1 1 I 1 (v l' 1 \'111111' {1'I +III I "_YyYy O
x r + , . ' S��J , 1 1 , 11 \'I "�' IT' II � cT
- , ♦ ' .''� , ,\ 111 ;II' II `l� O
__� ;1 +
X I1, Will I i'' liTlIll ...._ ��
-I- CV
- Ill`
l u, w y/ - /- ^'f'_, I I �.♦ Irxjiify 1 Iltyi "aii# 1',It +i'I'ii +..
�I t 1151111111 y��y�111'1 J li
' ; 11' 1 I ,l ,'•/ 1 • A11 I1 f 1 ` \I\ I 1'' 'I C.J' \\ ♦ ♦, `'' 1' "' r'�J�,J 111,�i1',1'11111, 111�'I Ij111', I- I _ ,
I ,p ��tt I, 1 ♦ 1 \ 1 1 Ifl 11 1 1 1
11 / I I ' f// .7,' I'lll/' 11111 ♦� \'�`` \V 1' 111111 ' ~i `�/ g ' 1111 „11'11'1' l 1111 T.. .. , -0
r,/ \\ /�'/ \ \ \ \ \` ' \��'���� �`�1''• (�!1�/ /' 1\ � 1'l l'!1�''lll itt''I'IIIV11'I _
i i , m '` ♦Y I -' - \ '�?�\��` x``41 , I �' I” l,' �Il +1111l.'l ill ;111 j'1 .. __ _ I' 1 LO
NA
1 m LJ ftom�' // A; ,
op$<��/,
r�it� /�
O
,
CN
`tZ r
r 5,1 bi ____
, , 1
O
' / /' _'�,i' � �`���\ \♦ III - ._;`` \� \1y. ; 1, ,,l ; � /♦` \ - I ' Q
,(bT;;
I;
+' I -
1 `.�\+/ ,?�i� ;j `''� 1 ` \` ;;;I�� {.'_-_ �~;";'' #1;1,x' I'
/ � _' I;;i / = - -�a� .�% ' I 1 1 ; % ``I�'`♦:` -'I � '.D ' ; � 1 ; I + � j ; f ,; J I � I , I � -� -- r
N
�-
'
I ` '
, ♦ I ILLI,, / ; // , 11/
{ O
0 111 11, 1I / Ill, '- -1 O co
F \ 46
''/
/S@ // /,,�/ w
LLJ
ZD
ocD
oO
CID
co
LIJ
11 1 1
` w
ZW
f-0
♦
P� N
C
<Uj-
(OM -
0 1 �
3z o
1 0Q O
=F-- +
I. Q
JW:.r
Li-w
O .
\, ... :. CCx:..
• - L1JIJ2.
I oa O
— -- 1 -- _ __.z¢C
0 U) O fA
0 00 r11 N 10
In QO 00 00 00
O
m N
O m
�.�m
v
a
"R
N m
O N
m r0
m
O
m In
m m t7
Lu—mQw
Woreel6
J
n
'�Ni
of
lzv
oic
m
Ni
<of
row
m
W m
r r
m m
r
m m
m N
m
w m
m m
m m
m m
m
m m
m m
m m
m
m m
m m
m a m
J
Om
(i���mrmm�mr-
NmN
of �
m�
N m.
-NmNA
a
om
m
nee
m �m
nm
O
m m
0 t^l
O N
Y m
A
M�
N W N
a
mlV
0
\hNr`
r N
r N
IJ) Oi
mfmr`
fV
< Y
+- mOmlff
N m
rD
W
IA t7
O r
Z
m
m mm0
m m
0 [mrl
`n
mmmmrl�
a0 eN1
ah
m
m
m min
O
Qmmmml�mm
W o
0 0
0 0
0 0
l�nmmmmmmmmmm
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
U
90 11
H
rnN
m nmm/n
m
m 7
mmm
mm
W
l"f
Or
m
mm
O Y
Xm
m
m A
aDv
m h
S mN
m N
0
m
n m
m m
O mN
W Q m
W 7
N
m m
N N
m�
N n
O m
N O
r I.V
m N
O aD
O N
O r
•- m
o m
m O
m t7
N m m
m
O
m
O♦
M f
O Hl
trl t7
l7 lh
l/! M<
0'
d
Zmm
z-
-----
mmmmmmmmmminm\r/mminm
l�n
r rl�n1�......
F.'-N
0
CL
0 ....
v
mml�
0
m
0 0
mo�N
0
c�
Inmrmm
C
<Uj-
(OM -
0 1 �
3z o
1 0Q O
=F-- +
I. Q
JW:.r
Li-w
O .
\, ... :. CCx:..
• - L1JIJ2.
I oa O
— -- 1 -- _ __.z¢C
0 U) O fA
0 00 r11 N 10
In QO 00 00 00

O N
Z F
H � r •1 Z
w � Q
w F
_ J
N 7
fn
z m �a
.31111 .3.11. .3110.
It LO
lot
i
1
O Y 11 r 4 -
Zw x U V 1
CD
w w w
w � Z x=mmi Cr
= mWUm3
3 lid 7
Z ILt ^'C
L' � arc?' °' w I'
7 O
II
(0, x, j v
W Il`
/ J
1 ,mW/
>
Ci
-- — --
,
r
/ t o / -- �� V) LLJ { o
1�
23 / �. ' O { -
-40+00
LLJ
Li
CL Cf)
PITL
T-77 TFIT
k
,
I
I ,
I
,
,
I '
' � 1
rl _
\
cn
Ly `
i
1 `
\ , , , 1 I Il� ��� \•ems ``: _ '� \ ',\ C�LB��� ^ \.�_ - _. I:- _ +
/ ov
co>
It
co uj
'Ilk �J> + >.;� \`;,' 1, ; ,,;; -_ ,I y
A LO
it
CIO
,
\ ,, I n 111; I /� � � /,' :,•1',,'' ;�;, „ ` t l / � " a / , _ t -_ � P � I
1 /
I th
SOE ET,
sw-
C
TEE 1
1 0� 00
1 : "�- +
i;
-:.. N
i' C-
In V
a=-
1 �F
\ 3Z O
I.:. Nom' +
Z _
JO M
Lew
I °x
Z
+
LM
Q Cl-
I O0- O
ZQ O
"'
In °° o ° 40 1
]m
O
v,mva/nm
N p!
O m
N O
�A
N OI
O N
m'm
m
O
M/n
00 m M
W
o6
am�AM
•-
W
O
O
m N
m N
t•I
m A
N
N
h N
A m
m m
m
O!
Z
M
IA
O m
m m
W<
m
N In
N A
Q A
N
r
Z
w m
Q m
A N
m
m . m
A N
W O
m A
m 0
m
m w m
0 t7
r A
Y Y
m
n
m t7
m m
m m
N m
m A
m m
Hf O,
m
o m
m O A
m m
m m m
W o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 o
0 0
0 0
0
0 0 0
U
N
W
W
Z t7
O
C9
A m
0<
W W
Q m
m A
m Q
m
O m
m
N 0
m •-
l A
m n
a
V m
N O
Or
{
N
M t•I
m A
m A
O m
A N
O m
O A<
m
m (7 �
�' m
Imn In
INn v
,n m
.>• v
r7 a
v n
In In
N
o, r7
N
M o, a
hN
d
Z .............
IrAi
I(
F O
•- N
M O
m m
A m
W O
R N
Cf Y
m m
A m O,
TEE 1
1 0� 00
1 : "�- +
i;
-:.. N
i' C-
In V
a=-
1 �F
\ 3Z O
I.:. Nom' +
Z _
JO M
Lew
I °x
Z
+
LM
Q Cl-
I O0- O
ZQ O
"'
In °° o ° 40 1

C5
z
L> m
O
m
N
(A
�r
W
Z
r
y
m '7 1
ttO
m
N �
VZ
w
J
O
z w
`O
[�
k-
n Qa
i L
a w
U
6 Y
NNm
L`
IJ
< tOmr) I
N 00 y�
W <
O
w m
W mZ��J
m
w
w
m N
.
A m
m m
w
Z xommF
03113. 031110 $1
Z
F- La 0
'~ HEFT
o
ZI
II 1 1 II I I
\',, '1 aT4 11�11,� {I\
4'
✓'',. -' ;�I;'; ; ;�'„ ;i W', ; ma �%�
O
.' /// ' ' : '/,' I , i •6/�/ i ' / /ri,`'�',' _. _._.
/! /(l • \1W 1 I I
I I ; ' ��� �,'.' � �\ '�', ;,, ,�`�` \,� \��f'I�'ll ` \\'','�II'1\� r It ;l l' I''1 / `; r, I- '-F-._ -+
; I I " '' f ;' ,i : �
"o,
Ilk I.
_ r
/,y
I
'Pi- - ��. -' - '- _'- -'�''% � � ; %� % ; ' '�� \, '111 \``',11'1'' ' „I' ,`� ' 15'1 II� %•�'�,, ,, 1.1 ,', Il i I/ � Ly..'.
"II; I,'I
,i' ' '
T � I NI ---
L,
\'I
_ - I 4 `,' `•"� -- ,\ \ \,, ;. II /II�;11 "I�I;J�� ii;; Illl hilt ;;; �'' I rl; i ; 11 ' ''
i I I N 11
\\ ` `, \\ , , I ,, }I$ II II�I�'Ii,. , �' I _
\\ \\ >\ ' , % `IjI1 ;I#nl hilt ��i" l 1 { /
O
\ /I'i I'I'Ui'r / ((i i11 `\�`�� \I ; ' 1 ' ', ' ' I �I
Lo
1 I I ( I, III, ,l '' % /;h' /' ,1 �' 11 1' '` ' ' 1\ ' , \ 11 ` , 1 1 --r-' Y'y I
,
I I 1 , Lo
/V ; I /, 11 II'' ` ,
/ /� 111 ` 9• ,` , '•�,` \, .-
xm �.' ,,'' ' emu, j,J,\ `,1 \\ ``` ,\,�,I ;I' \,\ \ O
mw
I \1•'k 11' ` 't �A \;\9
tn
<9 CID
I
I,
I p l '
1\'1,,11',', \, \`,�'.
1, 11' 1 , ` \ \ \`,` `\ ,\``
`';'A'.``\`
` \, 00 in
WQV
\ \ rY y \ 'N, dr \ \`'```\ \� O
I Q \, O
\
,` \`\ ,`
, CN
jo
Ln
\\
,�,1,_- -. - - -' -'' � ,- � �� ,•r. ,� ��� IIII � ..I
;i lad / `� . C o , I _ - -- t'
I ;I' `,` / ,'' /I III Qp
------ ` I I` III ,�,' Y z�
\ \ \ O� 1
,
0
I '
- - I
WA
'y 1', .f iI co
\ a 1 ; m �/ 45+� II v,
r `V
I wV W
°o
tit I o� o
LA
LJ
+ � I z Q +
01 HO1 b v) .I N�
U� W
O
Od
CD
L> m
O
A 2
-I
m Y
O m
p O
m«
N Wm
W N
W m
m O
m '7 1
ttO
m
�rt U
W V
w
J
ED
- "i
6 Y
lm
7
< tOmr) I
m
w m
m m
m
m N
.
A m
m m
m
m m
mm
m
m � m
I
M 1
co W co 00
O
,Vn
m N
m N
O A
m A
N h
N
IA N
A O
m m
w
Z O
z
W IA
O M
O
r-
r-m
m
N N
NOm,nOO
N A
W
Y A
m W
N W
N
h
o NNV
o m
YI m
� t�I
O O t7
m
Z
N m
m
O O
O O
W
m m
m
A m
fp-N
mmp
O
W 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 '
0 0
m�m
0 0
0
mm0 {App
0 0 0
r'
U
Zm.N..-t7Nm-m
m
m
mOn
W
m h O
W
Z M
OAmmOI
m
0 0
Olmmv
h A
m N
Om
o
m N
N0a7
m
,nOnN
m -1
I Y m
W r
7=
N
t7 l7
m A
m A
O m
A ....
I-
v m
m t7 z
O��mmm
m
Nmm
vH�a.f
M <v
rl
l+, a7M
o o Y
N
lL
O A
A AAA
A
A A
A A
A
in
A A
A A
A A A
EL
z
..........
.......
I- O
N
0
t7 Y
0 0
Ty'y'
0 0
0
N
a7 ♦
IA m
A
Y
V V
O Y
Y 0
0 V'
O V
v Y
Y O
Od
CD
a uj
- -;- �� V_'IZ-
- oQ
o
z w
W O
�rt U
W V
v
10
ED
- LLW
W
_ (&
TQ
—
In 0
+
In
I
M 1
co W co 00

$311,10 BILLS 031
dj \\ , / ,',,,/ 1,;,12,1\ `� ♦ ,`♦`,.`" ♦8 \ -` 9 �'`' \`, , \ \ \ \♦ ,♦
Z 16121'tpl�`, I v\\;oa�:� _ - -_�y S \` \ \`,` : ♦� LO O Ln O
�w w/� wI� wMw
M �E' \ . `\ ♦ , \ \` `.'� // / /,' ' ;,,Ylilrl`y '� ♦`� \\`�♦' \��`♦ ' ,1`\ ``\ W W W W
♦
cb
N.
I
1
w '
LLJ
\ \\\
w
L, x W N NNE ''j'r i I `, ` \`�``'`": \W- \`'` \`♦ ,� — ._.. _. +
I
m�
-
or
La
-
�� „/ \ \`,
THEF
/ X ••• @iiii
�A, II
U 1
/ I
W II
1 \
i.
- •mss 1' ; ;/ /; ,/• ; / \\ // \\ �\2� t
IE I i r
l _ �\ I
III u, +
-10
\ ♦ a - -� -- I ,
ao
> Ld
_ - -- \ m
/
I
- h J ,�✓ \
v; .�♦ 4
cow
i \ I
o' _ -
`,
�� 1'I 1` mod, .1 \�\ - .. �I_�I �—
0.
ZO
1l
1.
\\ . 65•+00 -
�( / ):
Ilk %
19 : \ / 'J CD
CD\
i 1
,
,
I \\
CD
13, NN
,
,
♦
,
\\` gyp'` \ ``; \ \♦ `\t`. \ �� Vx\ + I O
+
TP
` \`, `�\ ` ````:��g•= , "��� = -_ ♦\ �3,p.' \:��� \`, ` \`�`�, {d ; Ill k \1 '� I , Ire I y_�� ��� I� �� -
,' \ ` \ , \� ` \ \ \ � ♦ �`'O� � C+T'.." ,,�♦,`l \`, ``\\uhf , ,-1 ' /' �•�� _'- I
`\`` ``1, \` _�. =`�___ \ i /,��, �� � `1 \` ♦1 \:�` ,� ♦ ♦\` `t� \, "�,`;;���..:qi'.\, \1�— _�1 ,,,�1 `I '' ' � Ire /'' � %:i i'0�!+�.' t3 - { _
_ �♦ \♦♦ - -
♦
\ 1 _
♦
\` -
,
PL
\ 1 1
5♦
1 I -S-R64 _
I
O
-- -='i = ----__-- -��� == =`� W �3� ',IJ >/(_�3;1 '�'N'''''' ,i�'♦ +,I '1'`- Inm ;y
✓�'_ __� lmri , �F ', 1111.0i.
�
j
� • �_--- �- ----------- ---== �E'$' =- i', ,;' % ', %I,I II , ' III I` o
—s
, y ,• _ -'-- .
OOZw> .
O
CJF-
_ �F
N
r of 0 _
C
1 ,
I ` l
, I
/''ii/ -- 'art
' � C
>mr.�
O
m t'I
v
O m
a`mv
N O
�rwmmm
N m
Y N
01 m
Nmin
� O
tD to
m m Cl
J °m
mrnnn°D
mm
°m
ai
°mmm�m
°m
W m
m m
m m
Cm♦ii
m m
m m
m m
amo
m m
m m
m m
m m m
NZ
+
I....
O
C7 ,n
,n I�
n m
In
m ao
a
ao
a i�
eo in m
=x..
-.CLQ..
.:.I...
Z
m
N O
m m♦
V
m m
N m
O N
N 0
l'i
N m
Z
onm
m ma
oal
ao���mmmm
r mm
mm
0
Qmmmmrmmrrnmmmmmmmmmm
W o
0 0
+
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0 0 0
U
7!F
1990
H
W
Z ,nm
�o
v.
-.-lei
lam
mmNm�m
mm
am
7
0
FN�,�N
n
Nr
NOm
NON�Yrf
mON�m
�° mumimi�lNnvumimeeomivaamne
"na"n��nmia
d
Zu,mmmm
mmin
l„ln
minmmmmmmmm
r O
O
17100101
�
O
0 0
0
C
1 ,
I ` l
, I
/''ii/ -- 'art
' � C
I' N2
I
1 , 1
T3:z
NZ
+
I....
:. I, JOO
LL w:0
=x..
-.CLQ..
.:.I...
...
�...
:I Z..
ww..
O
I Z<
I
+
0
E I mI
`°

Z
F
W
W
_
v
7RV1
N
>%
F
J
IN F
Z
N O
N W
z
w
Er
~
v t7 `p
ID
° r, —L)
w
w
V
/�
N N!Z
dI p nnY
m
fop �
W W
0
dUO�NY
m� Oi
w
a
o
W �Zn
� iO
w
W NYI�
aommmm
uj
ct
=
N
Z oommE
mgmm3
c-)
a
�
Qty
0
2 z o <nn;
w aa°'?'3
. �
- -
0 cL
O
C9 N
W
a
� � Q
a `O`
�\ LQ
(,o >
U
O W
�J
O �
i
MATCH TO SHEET 5
\� a
I \
}
.m
,V
I
X
X
X
X
O r�
wP�
tea. X
X c(i P
Qz
;X
cl
CIS C� Z - - - - - --
z —
f" *k� -- --
Qf co
< / Li_I/
P, z9
,
,
W -
Y' p
w
LLJ
0
U N �
• 1� � ®����gg�
1 RUNUP
g samg I
._ • ��gggggg
� o O�ial
1�
0-
ro�.:rrarri
ggg' 'e°
as
•
o uooi
W
W ..
ZN
n
W-
V J
a7
O�
N O
N W
O N
tD
O
OD aD C7
W
J-
r m
--'
N'
m
fop �
W W
aOD m
m OOi
m� Oi
W..
mmaO........
ao
aommmm
J
O
C9 N
ap N
N
N m
N
m vi
v
Nl
M
M m
F"
Fm
NOtp
lAV
VSO
OiNOIONNa�M�NfD
W o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
U
z m
M N
7 N
p M
OD OD
N m
m 7
0
OD l O
W
Z
O
1- m
O O
W 1p
m
N r
m Y
W N
O/ R/
m N
N O
m I
l'7 Y1
O O
O h
IN Y m
N m �
F N
O N
N l7
N I�
°mvvnov��n.�+�Mnna
N O
O N
O N
N
CD Y
N W OD
(L
�mvmi
Q
v'/'i
vNivv°fi
(L
z
In
d °v°v
°v°e
O
°evvvv
�
<:vvve
0
U N �
• 1� � ®����gg�
1 RUNUP
g samg I
._ • ��gggggg
� o O�ial
1�
0-
ro�.:rrarri
ggg' 'e°
as
•
o uooi
W
W ..
ZN
n
W-
V J

C5
z
> O
N
m
Y
O
W
Z
w
2
O
aD
D N
Wt,
J
N i
W
Z
■. I
�Z N QU
U U
w
W
w
I.>
V
~
NNm2
r
O
m N 0 0 W
z
z
W
c
o
m
_���Y
L
.....................
M W m NNU
w
=
N
Z oommi
L7 mwmm3
.. .
3
z ❑a��3
WW
LLJ
F
ON
d�2T3:
0
� J
O' S 01 Hj1
I i V In'
YpI
Y J 1
sib i i; ; i \' '� �8
0P' p 1 / I 1
Iv
, _
4 -------------
1 � •, / W z
'ter \ —O b s LL -
1
\ I \` ``,� \ \
I
_Ij�
f-0
0
W
LLJ
_j -0CD.
I
/4
s,1
-----------------
Li
- --
0
I' !
I
-----------------
Ltd / I ---- - - - - --
�� r I Ij %%
\ Z z
LLJ
LIJ
w O
QILI— - -" I NN_
O 6a / w ~O F
LLI
ON2
woo - -
\ =O=
- t..
rep, ww m _
b w
z m
O O
L
MT4
W
> O
N
m
Y
O
W
f N�
mtD
O
aD
D N
W
....
■..
...
■. I
maowmm`wmmmmm
oil
as
"B
mN
m mN
m
.....................
J
.. .
............g......
ON
Y
CJ In��lnrinmm
m N
m N
C7 r
m r
Inmaoe�.
O
N m
N
Yf N
-ao
r W
W awnlnm
m m
0:
Z O
W m
N
0 l7
N
O N
m
m
f
r
r
N
m r
O
r m
H
N W N
•C
N
I�
Ici
t�
tV th
fG
O_i ail
UD
Q m
m Q
m m
W O
m r
W ...
m m
r r
.
ro m
m m
{cd
fv
0�
W o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
F-
U,
O
r N
ODD h
N lr�!
N W
m W
Y
mmin
O r
m N
r r
N m
,A Y,n�
r r
W
r r
t7 t0
YYOYV
r r
W N
r r
m
m
r
t7 th
a7 a7
r r
a7m
r r
n+n v
r r r
a
zmI„In
In ln.min
lnhh\n
mmmin
\n lnm
FO
0
d <<
�Nl7
0 0
Y
Y,Am
0 0
Y Y
0 0
Y Y
r m
0 0
Y Y
W O�
0
Y Y<
N
0
a7 <hmr
0 0<
Y
m W
Y Y O
0
� J
O' S 01 Hj1
I i V In'
YpI
Y J 1
sib i i; ; i \' '� �8
0P' p 1 / I 1
Iv
, _
4 -------------
1 � •, / W z
'ter \ —O b s LL -
1
\ I \` ``,� \ \
I
_Ij�
f-0
0
W
LLJ
_j -0CD.
I
/4
s,1
-----------------
Li
- --
0
I' !
I
-----------------
Ltd / I ---- - - - - --
�� r I Ij %%
\ Z z
LLJ
LIJ
w O
QILI— - -" I NN_
O 6a / w ~O F
LLI
ON2
woo - -
\ =O=
- t..
rep, ww m _
b w
z m
O O
L
MT4
W
::::
....
■..
...
■. I
oil
as
"B
"q
.
.....................
......
.. .
............g......
.iioo.o.uo.
::::::::::::::
...00..N.O.a

C;
z
N
YW '
F-
!
W
Z
m
^ O
w
w
=
N
\ C )
O
Q
J
�=
Z
oU
A m
m A
N
A tp
m
z
W
m O, m
m m CI
i
J
w
w
~y
NNmZ
_
ca
NUTNY
w<
M
o
O
w NZ.•�J
m
]
I n
w
w
m A
m
N UI
m til
W rtl■1]
Z oommf
,
A W
W CI
3
N
Z O
m h
U
w
Y m
Z U�Oi Q.;
A
S
y �!
l�
O� Ho
I, I' Y
W -
a_
O
J ti3
, r
' ^
/ / W
If
� O . x
CD,
x
as w
CD
CD z
i .�\ - x It z
\ \ x
\\ q %' f , ----- it O i
Cr
--- -- - - - - -- Q w \
$ - j V)
It i' t/ / W
It
- - -- - - - - - -- -
/ I I ----------- - X
I 0.77
---- - - - - --
\\__ ��•,\I \', � 1. '. 1 \\ \\
-- - - - - - - - - - -
LLJ
69-- py \`. \�\ LLJ
/ LL.
LLJ
O O
r�
mI molliallimm"
..............
.......... .
inumm oil
W
a
J
NLU
ZW
20
pW
Z>
UQ
-JQ
JW
coo
L�
QW
V�
ZV)
3Z
oa
NZ
m
Y
YW '
m
N o
N W
W
m
^ O
D Ci
\ C )
LLJ
O
W m
m m Y m
A m
m A
N
A tp
m
OJ
m m GYO
W
m O, m
m m CI
Y
f7
J
_
_
C
L
Y
m N
I n
t7 A
m m
m A
m
N UI
m til
N
Y
m N
t'7
A W
W CI
m m
t�l N m
Z O
m h
0 t+f
O N
Y m
A
A
m A .
A m
A
N OD N
F
^L
m
F m
N N
N O
N A
m N
A N
N m
Y Y
O, m
Y IA
m
0 ^^
N l7
N m
Y
N
Y N
m
C
N Y
N m
N m
(7
O Y M
N m
m O A
m
N
m m
0, 0.
m
.
m m
m A
A m
m m
OQ
m
o
m m
0 0
m A
0 0
m m
0 0
n A
0 0
A m
0 0
m m
0 0
m m
0 0
m m
0 0
m m m
0 0 0
U
W ������
9FF!2
T
U
U m
M N
l N
m M
m m
N m
m 7
m m
m m O
W
Z CI
O
m
A m
0 Y
OI OD
O! m
m A
m Y
m m
m m
m N
N 0
m
a7 m
m m
Y m
Oi Y m
N OI r
7
= N
t7
m A
m A
Y m
A N
O m
O A
Y m
m
4-
O
v>�v>v>v>v>v>mmmmmmmu,
A
AA
A A
AA
A A
AA
n-
M Y
v, u, �n
O_
Z,n
,n
a Y
0
Y Y
0 0
Y Y
0 0
Y Y
0 0
Y Y
0
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y Y
O O
r�
mI molliallimm"
..............
.......... .
inumm oil
W
a
J
NLU
ZW
20
pW
Z>
UQ
-JQ
JW
coo
L�
QW
V�
ZV)
3Z
oa
NZ
_________
C-) V)
___ _ \
\ C )
QWO
m
------ -
0 LLJ
_
r-11 LLJ
_
_
C
L
LLL- I=
m
w
O O
r�
mI molliallimm"
..............
.......... .
inumm oil
W
a
J
NLU
ZW
20
pW
Z>
UQ
-JQ
JW
coo
L�
QW
V�
ZV)
3Z
oa
NZ

O n
Z F
F- r•I Z
w � Q
w
_
h
�
F
J
LLI
N E
Z
i
z
0
W E;4
m QU fa
UU r 4 U
+
k 14
r
O
NUOI QI yL
w
<
Y
w
m m
xi
z im m
cr
N
3
o o_
6 mWNsI
~
W
2 13 ( - -;
dJ
W
W
�cH �0
M A
\i
r r
1 ll
I
1'
E-� 13
MH E
/
\\ 00
(.J
CD z
z�
Q�w
O
�z
zo
N
� � Q
Q W
E-4 W
O �
a V)
V) W
U W
oz
zw
' wI
� m
>mA.+,meanmv
O
O
i
Ammm
+
Nom.nn
W
A r
(.J
CD z
z�
Q�w
O
�z
zo
N
� � Q
Q W
E-4 W
O �
a V)
V) W
U W
oz
zw
' wI
� m
>mA.+,meanmv
O
N CI
Ammm
Nom.nn
W
W
A r
A
{I
A fOD
m m
0 Omi
aD
O�
W
J
-
O
0
�o��nm.-
mmo,e��o,mo,o,�nm
O
h m
,
,
— — - - ---------------- �$ // co
---------------
LLI
LLJ
LL.
��� - -- 1 - - - --/ ' W�
Jp
—,w0 m
_______ - - - -- 1 QwZ v
X I
l 1 cj/ &
8 Z
C7
`I
LLJ
\ \ LJ 0
=O� m
w
ILI
I
■ml
�2-
Pi-� i
hi-
W
_i ' W
w
>mA.+,meanmv
O
N CI
Ammm
Nom.nn
W
W
A r
A
W N
A fOD
m m
0 Omi
aD
O�
W
J
O
0
�o��nm.-
mmo,e��o,mo,o,�nm
O
h m
F- m
tV N
N O
h
. .
h O
< Y
O A
m
Z
A N
A NO
W OI
O lh
V V
m C,
N m
M Ol
m O A
oo
W
0 o
m A
0 0
fn (n
0 0
n n
0 0
A m
0 0
m m
0 0
m m
0 0
m m
0 0
m m m
0 0 0
.-
H
W
L m
O
m z
m
m
A d
0
m Om N m
m N N
tm N
7
m
m
m
=
7
.
W'
.
m Am
.
A N
.
O m
O A
Y
�
0N
N
W m
N l0 7
N A
N O
t�l
N
W N���Clm
O N
� N
m
Olm
m
W
,y
�ammNmOlvl7
mmmm
A
A A
emm
A A
A A
O a
A A
a7 v
A A
v
A A
�n
A A
v, o+o+o+<
A A
A A
D_
8-
�n
z
mmmm
u, mmmv>v>v,mmmmmmmu,
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0 0<
Y
Y O Y
—,w0 m
_______ - - - -- 1 QwZ v
X I
l 1 cj/ &
8 Z
C7
`I
LLJ
\ \ LJ 0
=O� m
w
ILI
I
■ml
�2-
Pi-� i
hi-
W
_i ' W
w

o
Z
m
r A
m
F
z
Q,
°
i
Ln O
Vl
00 00
Ln
j 00
00
O
00
00
—
w
O
W ;
z
,
I.
o
0
Y�
t
. . . . .........
I,
o
�I
o
w
I I
I
W
W
{_ I
j
I
O
LL
� z
j ;
; p
p
\
tn
w
w�
O
a
�~1I
W
� r
{{
r
I
I
CD
Q
J
!
II
I
r
In
U
I
I I
I
I O
J
cl�
i O
O
o
O
I �
ch
i
W
V)
f
Q
ZJ
U W
I O
O
........
r o
O
1
O
r
N
CLI
Q
Uj CL
I
ZU
I I
I O
i I
!V)
O
N�
--
I
do
IJ0
+
r
ON
I
I
o_ -
I
i
i
..z
ww
�
Iza
I
O
O
- -LO
+
O
Ln
o
00
0
�i
co
cOoo
O
O
I O
i
r
n
_
r
�
- ----- _
I
--
I
i
+
r
+
Ln
O L
- -
- - -
- -
I
! N
it p
°o
p °
I
I
I I
I i
:
i o
o
1
ch
o
�C)
+
O
O
ino
C
,I _1 Z
+
ZJ
_! .
I,
.r -
-o 0
0
~
Ll
O /
/ w
wCL
\
zU
Q
r
I
1T
I I
I
—
I.
o
i
t
. . . . .........
I,
o
�I
I
I I
I
{_ I
j
I
O
j ;
; p
p
\
tn
I I
� r
{{
r
I
I
CD
+
I
r
I
I I
I
I O
I
cl�
i O
O
o
O
I �
ch
i
+
V)
f
Q
ZJ
U W
I O
O
........
r o
O
1
O
r
N
CLI
Q
Uj CL
I
ZU
I I
I O
i I
!V)
O
N�
--
I
do
IJ0
+
r
ON
I
I
o_ -
I
..z
ww
�
Iza
I
O
O
- -LO
+
O
Ln
o
00
0
�i
co
cOoo
I
1T
I I
I
i
I
I I
I
{_ I
j ;
; p
p
I I
� r
{{
r
I
I
+
I
r
I
I I
I
I O
O
i O
O
I �
I r
i
+
f
I O
O
O
r
1
I I
I O
i I
O
+
ON
I
I
i
+
00
O
I O
I �
�
- ----- _
__1--------
� -
--
I
+
Ln
O L
- -
- - -
- -
I
! N
it p
°o
p °
I
I
I I
i o
o
1
ch
,ON
,I _1 Z
ZJ
_! .
.IUD
.r -
-o 0
0
O /
/ w
wCL
zU
j I
OZ_
I v
v=ia O
O
VIZ ~
+
L -
- -- o
o w
�c5 �
�x
1T

o
~
w
I
- m
z
Q
Q,
O
`"'I
Ln
co O
O
co O
"1
0001
O
0^0
O
+
O
co O
Ll)
o^0
—f-
O
00
_�
LO
0000
-- —
C
OCC
N
W J
I�
-
i
Ln
�'
Zx
o
;
Q
Q
o
�
wLd
a
'C
W
._. ........
m
1
0
o
o
v
LLJ
Er
a
�y
W
LLJ
_j
Q
LLJ
_
O
I
O
I
O
,
I
Wj
U
�,
Q
I
+
-
--
J
Q
z
J
—
�
I,
1
I
t1
'I
Q
w
°
o
N
Fr
O
�
W
>
I
O
0
1
+
10
.o
o
N�
QD—
C/1
al
w
a
I�
a
j
I
I
�
T-T+
I
-
I
-�–
-
-- —
.._.......
I�
I
i
o
;
Q
Q
o
�
._. ........
m
o
_
O
I
O
I
O
,
I
�
I
t1
'I
Q
1
I
O
0
1
+
10
.o
o
0
N
LO
Ln
o
I
It
-
y
p
�
I
O
V)
cl
t2v)
f
.. -----
ZJ
pw
._. >_
°o
=w
O
L
!NQ
+
N
z
ch
40v)
/
Z"
3V)
oz
ocr
_ ..
_.. {.
...__ .._
}
......_
. _...__
I____ >_
F-- o
O
r
.O LJ
-:
- --
I
-
i
N
`Ww
I
LL) (L
O
I,
Z
3V)
O
p
LO
O
COO
CO
I CO
CO
v=ia
O
t
i
LLJ
J
0tL,
�
CLx
IWw
/
T
Fa
O
Lam....__
O
j
I
I
�
I
-
I
-�–
-
-- —
.._.......
;
Q
Q
_
._. ........
o
O
I
O
O
,
I
�
I
'I
1
.o
o
0
N
Ln
-
y
�
I
O
V)
cl
t2v)
f
.. -----
ZJ
pw
._. >_
=w
O
L
!NQ
+
N
Z"
3V)
oz
{
xa
O
J �
r
.O LJ
-:
Mx
�d-
-
i
`Ww
I
O
+
O
p
LO
O
COO
CO
I CO
CO

�'— M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
... I..... s .....1-1. Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 1
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
BNO1NEC4B ° ° ° ~ °� T ° ~TS Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 2
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

-� M U L.K EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
...,..... 4 CON.ull. r. Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 3
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

4-- M U L K E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
` " °' " "" ° ` ° " ""T ".— Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 4
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
4
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-�'- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
EN...« =s s ..... —1. Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 5
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

4 MUL.KEY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
` " °' " " "' ° ` "'.`T ° "TS Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 6
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

�'- M U LK E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 7
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

Is MU L KEY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 8
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year I Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

-�' - M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
CNYIN[... 4 .....,.r Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 9
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year I Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

-�-- M U L K E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
— .1—` °' ° ` °^""`T.NI. Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 10
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
10
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-�'- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
�NO�.1... s .....I -- Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 11
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
11
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

4-- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
~ °I ~ ° °•° ° ° ° ~ Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 12
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
12
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-�2- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
... 6 ..... Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 13
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
13
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

- M U L.K EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
` .1....' " ` ° "g"`T ° "T' Stream Restoration
Vegeation Plot 14
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
14
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-�-- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
BN b,N[C,! 3 CON9 ❑LTA NT9 Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 15
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
15
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

!� M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
` ° °" "' T- ' _. Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 16
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
Ice
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-�2- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
..n, „«.. R .....11 -- Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 17
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
17
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

*- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 18
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
18
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

�'- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
��� = =RS s =pMpULTANT9 Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 19
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
19
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

--- M U L K EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
` " °' " " "' ° `..... °" Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 20
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
20
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

- �'-MULKEY
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
«a9 uLT4NT9 Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 21
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
21
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
e """ . ` ` ° "" T ° "" Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 22
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
22
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

- '-MU U LK E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
... . ....u"..1. Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 23
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
23
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

° M U L K E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
e ..." —I ` ` ° " "11° "1s Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 24
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
24
Year I Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year S Monitoring:

-�-- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
[NDiN [[4! 6 C[IN9114T4 NT9 Stream Restoration
Photo Point 1; Looking Downstream on Reach R2
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

-t=- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
.HO r MCC +n n .....I —
Photo Point 2; Looking Downstream on Reach R2
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

--= M U LK E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
��,.�« »� 6 ������ =•HT, Stream Restoration
Photo Point 2; Looking Upstream on Reach R2
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

4-- M U L. K E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
...,..... n en... 1-1.
Photo Point 2; Looking upstream on Reach R2A
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
4
Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3. Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

�'— M U L K E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
eNO1NC *s 4 =��s� rats Stream Restoration
Photo Point 2.5Y1; Looking Downstream Along R2
Not Applicable
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

-�'- M U L K E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
° °.. ° ° ~sull. —. Stream Restoration
Photo Point 2.5Y1; Looking Upstream Along Reach R2
Not Applicable
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
6
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

�'- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
... 6 .....11 -- Stream Restoration
Photo Point 3; Looking Downstream
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year I Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

-�-- M U L K E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
[NRIN[C4A . �oNS��r <Nrs Stream Restoration
Photo Point 3; Looking Upstream
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

-— M U L K E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
CNBIN[E49 6 CONGJLTANT9 Stream Restoration
Photo Point 3.5Y1; Looking Downstream Along R2 &R2B
Not Applicable
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

. ' ,a M U L.K EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Photo Point 3.5Y1; Looking Upstream Along R2
Not Applicable
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
N
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

- --- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
...I ..... s ..... T , Stream Restoration
Photo Point 3.5Y1; Looking Upstream Along R2B
Not Applicable
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
11
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

4-- M U L K E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Photo Point 4; Looking Downstream
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
12
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-�'- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
..o,.«„ b ..... ..— Stream Restoration
Photo Point 4; Looking Upstream at Confluence of Rl &R2
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
13
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Photo Point 5; Looking Downstream
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
14
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

p - M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
e�e,�«as Stream Restoration
Photo Point 5; Looking Upstream
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
15
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

*— M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
CNpIN[EA� h CGNSIJ LT4Nif Stream Restoration
Photo Point 6; Looking Downstream Along Reach R1
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
16
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

4= M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
... I.,... .1 ....ul -1. Stream Restoration
Photo Point 6; Looking Upstream Along Reach RI
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
17
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-�-- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
LN OINCL41 6 CONlLI lT4 NT!
Photo Point 7; Looking Downstream Along R1
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
18
Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-�- M U L K E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
CNmIN [[4! b Ca NlI.I I.T4 N'r!
Photo Point 7; Looking Upstream Along Rl
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
19
Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

4-- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
" ° ° " " °`T ^ "'s Stream Restoration
Photo Point 8; Looking Downstream Along R1
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
20
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

- �-MULKEY
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Photo Point 8; Looking Upstream Along R1
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
21
Little White Oak Greek
Stream Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

�-- M U L K E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Photo Point 8; Looking Upstream Along R1A
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: November 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
22
Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

42- MULKEY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
E�,E � —.111 —T. Stream Restoration
Photo Point 8.5Y1; Looking Downstream Along R1A
Not Applicable
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
23
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

4= M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
[N. -... 6 .....I-- Stream Restoration
Photo Point 8.5Y1; Looking Upstream Along R1
Not Applicable
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
24
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-�- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
..m,.«,. R ..... r• rs Stream Restoration
Photo Point 9; Looking Across Reach R1
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
25
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-� M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
"'° °�•° ° ° °^' °"`-1. Stream Restoration
Photo Point 9; Looking Downstream Along Reach R1
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
26
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

�-- M U LK E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
..m... =a. a =.. Stream Restoration
Photo Point 9; Looking Upstream Along Reach RI
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
27
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

�'- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
° ~ °I ~ °... s ° ° ~s. Stream Restoration
Photo Point 10; Looking Across Reach RI
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
28
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

--- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
CNOiN[... 6 ..... ..- Stream Restoration
Photo Point 10; Looking Downstream Along Reach R1
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
29
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

- -- M U LK E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
CN OIN [Ci9 4 C�N9U LTANT9 Stream Restoration
Photo Point 10; Looking Upstream Along Reach R1
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
30
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-�-- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
..m,.«4s s ..... ..— Stream Restoration
Photo Point 11; Looking Across Reach RI
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
31
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

--- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
E.. °,..... ° ....u—..,. Stream Restoration
Photo Point 11; Looking Downstream Along Reach R1
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
32
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

MULKEY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
tN OIN LLff 6 CON •N lT4Nr9
Photo Point 11; Looking Upstream Along Reach R1
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
33
Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

---- MULKEY
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 1
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

*— M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
...I NEC.. . ........1. Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 2
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
4
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
eRS Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 3
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

---M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
--E— 6 Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 4
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
4
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-' - MULKEY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little Wliite Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 5
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
5
Year I Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-#_- M U L K E Y PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
Permanent Cross Section 6
Year I Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

- °— M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 7
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
7
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-- M U L.K EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
E.....— 6 —S -1—,. Stream Restoration
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
Permanent Cross Section 8
D
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-�'-MULKEY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 9
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: November 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:

4 -° M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
EI —E—S 6 °°I=UIT°I•= Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 10
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: November 2009
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:
10

-�'- M U L K EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
..o,.. =RS .a Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 11
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: November 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
11
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

--- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
[NGINE... 6 .....11 -TS Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 12
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: November 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
12
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

-I- M U LK EY PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
EN6iNEERS � ...... NT= Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 13
As -built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring: October 2009
Year 4 Monitoring:
13
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

m
c
0
r
U
N }
N
O N
U�
N N
N
.o _
) fV
N }
1 p N
T U OC
o
U �
Nco
C
CO
Cl) m
C
U
N °
U
L
(Z c
Y
co
00
C
O
U
N
U
N
p N
U�
N
N CC
El
}
i
w
x
A
r
0
x
A
0
N
r
M
w
x
A
S
(11) UOIJUAa13
r
O
co
O
i1
U
C
cd
o C/)
LO 0
c
0
o N
O
2
0
co
0
N
O
O

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Little white oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2
Cross Section Name: (Year 2) Cross Section 1 - Riffle (R2)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE F
0
10
15
25
35
40
44
48.5
51.5
52.5
53
54
56
58.5
59.8
60.5
61
62
63.5
65
67
69.5
72
76 l
78 1
82.5
92 l
97.5 I
104.5 I
110 I
'S ELEV
i 877.06
i 876.74
i .876.24
874.25
873.74
873.91
1 873.68
1 872.67
871.75
871.16
870.85
871.12
871.41
871.12
871.07
870.22
869.99
869.73
870.05
871.07
871.79
871.95
871.93
873.11
873.54
873.72
874.17
875.56
876.57
876.99
NOTE
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
BKF
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
LEW
GS
GS
TW
GS
REW
GS
GS
GS
RB
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
877.63
877.63
877.63
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
873.68
873.68
873.68
Floodprone width (ft)
110
Bankfull width (ft)
37.5
18.75
18.75
Entrenchment Ratio
2.93
- - - --
- - - --
Mean Depth (ft)
1.71
2.02
1.41
Maximum De th (ft)
3.95
3.95
3.79
width /Depth Ratio
21.93
9.28
13.3
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
64.23
37.8
26.43
wetted Perimeter (ft)
39.26
23.62
23.22
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
1.64
1.6
1.14
Begin BKF Station
44
44
62.75

End BKF Station 81.5 62.75 81.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified shields curve
channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb /sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

0
O
a
N
C
O
U T-
d �
� N
N }
N
O N
U OC
N a
a
_ N
O O _
O
C
LL N �
co
`O N
N U�
o
c
ao
U a
VJ �
7
N
i
O�
L �
U
N
N °
L _U
c
c
7
Y
m
c
0
N
o^
Us
N O
i O
f� d
} '
.� N
N
II
x
A
t`
II
w
x
A
0
Ln
N
W
X
A
3
(11) UOIIEn813
D
7
0
m
O
co
O
m
o U
cfl cz
Cl (z
LID a-+
O
N
O
O
Cl)
O
N
0
O

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Little white oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2
Cross Section Name: (Year 2) Cross Section 2 - Pool (R2)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
0
876.14
GS
10
0
876.16
GS
17
0
875.96
GS
19
0
875.79
GS
28
0
873.48
GS
38
0
873.11
GS
49.5
0
873.1
LB
52.5
0
872.44
GS
56
0
871.56
GS
59
0
871.38
GS
61
0
871.38
GS
62
0
871.27
GS
63
0
870.91
GS
64.5
0
870.88
GS
65
0
870.72
LEW
66
0
869.94
GS
67
0
870.15
GS
69.8
0
869.86
GS
71
0
869.49
GS
72
0
869.33
TW
73.5
0
870.71
REW
76
0
872.81
BKF
79
0
872.8
GS
87.5
0
872.62
GS
93.5
0
872.59
GS
108.5
0
876.03
GS
112
0
876.45
GS
115
0
876.23
GS
120
0
876.09
GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
876.29
876.29
876.29
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
872.81
872.81
872.81
Floodprone width (ft)
116.48
Bankfull width (ft)
25.18
12.59
12.59
Entrenchment Ratio
4.63
- - - --
- - - --
Mean Depth (ft)
1.75
1.11
2.4
Maximum Depth (ft)
3.48
1:91
3.48
width /Depth Ratio
14.39
11.34
5.25
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
44.18
14.01
30.17
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
27.11
14.72
16.2
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
1.63
0.95
1.86
Begin BKF station
50.82
50.82
63.41
End BKF station
76
63.41
76

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
shear stress (lb /sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

6
O
a
CV) �o
c °'
° u
C1 r
U) x
y} a
O N
U OC
N o
o
a
_ M
0
O
0 V O
C L U) O c0
L N
to
1 O N m
U�
C: <7
N II
O C W
co
U)
(A
C/5 m
0
U
/1 N
N
CIS
L O
cz C N
(D _ o
7 N
Y II
ca
CO w
x
� A
S
C
O
U
(D
U)
N
O
N
U�
N O
L O
(0 a-
tC
M
(11) uOijUnaj:j
a
n
D
D
0
N
0
O
O
O
rn N
U
C
co
O
co V)
Co (�
n �
O
N
cc O
2
O
Ln
V
O
Cl)
O
N
0
O

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Little white oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2
Cross Section Name: (Year 2) Cross Section 3 - Pool (R2)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
0
10
20
24
32
38
48
53
54.5
56
57.5
57.5
59.5
60
61
61.5
62
64
65
67
68
75 t
81 t
86
96
114
120
126
138
148 1
157 1
164 1
S ELEV
874.04
I 873.73
I 873.73
! 873.76
872.55
872.36
872.38
872.16
872.12
871.65
871.33
870.05
870.19
869.11
868.63
868.24
868.47
868.66
868.72
869.15
869.76
870.95
872.03
871.56
871.67
875.6
875.92
875.98
873.63
873.35
873.46
874.65
NOTE
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
LB
GS
GS
LEW
GS
GS
TW
GS
GS
GS
GS
REW
GS
BKF
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
875.82
875.82
875.82
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
872.03
872.03
872.03
Floodprone Width (ft)
155.31
-
Bankfull width (ft)
26.2
13.1
13.1
Entrenchment Ratio
5.93
- - - --
- - - --
Mean Depth (ft)
1.79
2.42
1.16
Maximum De th (ft)
3.79
3.79
2.33
width /Depth Ratio
14.64
5.41
11.29
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
46.85
31.65
15.2
wetted Perimeter (ft)
28.99
18.01
15.64

Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.62 1.76 0.97
Begin BKF Station 54.8 54.8 67.9
End BKF Station 81 67.9 81
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified shields curve
channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0 0 0
shear stress (lb /sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

a>
v
c
O
V r
D) �
� N
N r
N
O N
Um
N
U
O
a) f�
U) a)
N }
C N
Us
� a
O
c
o
Ua
rr � ^ U
VJ � co
of
O
L
U
�L
N 0
� U
`cz
Y
co
m
C
O
U
a)
N _
O N
U�
N �
co
t4
El
a
�C
A
r)
ti
N
0
x
A
0
N
X
A
3
(11) UOIIEA913
0
T
0
aD
r-
n
N
o U
co cz
_N
cl
O (z
LO
C
0
N
.L
0 0
a
O
M
O
N
O
O

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Little white oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2
Cross Section Name: (Year 2) Cross Section 4 - Riffle (R2)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE F
0
8.5
17.5
23
33
41
43
45.5
48
48.5
49
50
51.5
54
56
58.5
59.5
64
68.5 l
78
86 I
96 I
106 I
116 I
120 I
:S ELEV
I 874.32
I 874.28
872.07
I 871.78
I 871.8
1 871.65
1 870.92
870.21
869.61
869.08
868.24
868.14
868.15
867.91
868.3
869.01
869.4
870.29
872.34
872.19
872.11
873.6
873.04
873.14
872.83
NOTE
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
BKF
GS
GS
GS
LEW
GS
GS
GS
TW
GS
REW
GS
GS
RB
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
875.39
875.39
875.39
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
871.65
871.65
871.65
Floodprone width (ft)
120
- --
Bankfull width (ft)
25.99
12.99
13
Entrenchment Ratio
4.62
- - - --
- - - --
Mean Depth (ft)
2.13
2.17
2.09
Maximum Depth (ft)
3.74
3.74
3.74
width /Depth Ratio
12.2
5.99
6.22
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
55.38
28.17
27.21
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
27.6
17.75
17.33
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
2.01
1.59
1.57
Begin BKF Station
41
41
53.99
End BKF station
66.99
53.99
66.99
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --

Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
slope 0 0 0
shear stress (lb /sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

0
0
IL
LO
c
0
U r
N �
O
N
U [r
N o
a
_ LO
0
O U O
A O f6
LL. U) N
fn }
1 N
U, U,
a
O"
c
o
U 0
�
a/)
co
00
7
U)
N N
OD m
O�
U
N °
L _U
S
S
Y
co
m
c
0
U
N
U)
y
O
N
U�
N 0 i O
00-
}
c
0
W
x
A
w
x
A
0
r
r
N
W
x
A
3
(4) U04UAq3
D
r
0
O
0
O
cn
N
U
c
cz
O Cl)
c
O
C) N
It
O
O
Cl)
O
N
O
O

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Little White Oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2
Cross Section Name: (Year 2) Cross Section 5 - Pool (R2)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
0
14
29
45
48
54
56
57
59
61
65
67 1
69 l
70.5 I
73 I
77 I
81.5 I
88.5 I
99 I
105 I
=S ELEV
871.35
871.47
871.37
871.36
871.3
869.67
869.69
869
868.09
867.85
867.87
867.87
868.92
869.87
870.58
870.94
871.13
871.26
873.14
873.43
NOTE
GS
GS
GS
GS
LB
GS
GS
LEW
GS
GS
GS
TW
GS
GS
GS
BKF
GS
GS
GS
GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
874.03
874.03
874.03
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
870.94
870.94
870.94
Floodprone width (ft)
105
- - - --
- - - --
Bankfull width (ft)
27.67
13.83
13.84
Entrenchment Ratio
3.79
- - - --
- - - --
Mean Depth (ft)
1.67
1.77
1.57
Maximum Depth (ft)
3.09
3.09
3.08
width /Depth Ratio
16.57
7.81.
8.82
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
46.19
24.48
21.71
wetted Perimeter (ft)
28.92
17.51
17.57
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
1.6
1.4
1.24
Begin BKF Station
49.33
49.33
63.16
End BKF Station
77
63.16
77
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0

shear stress (lb /sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

a�
o�
U �
N N
U}
OQ
N
U CC
Q
N
. o
0 Q
� O N
Us
C
c
O
cis
ci) m
0
U
N
a
W w
Y
C
m
c
0
U
N
Cl) _
N Q
O
U�-
N �
N
El
i
W
x
A
w
x
A
A
i
W
V
A
3
(11) UOIIEA913
b
0
0
LO
a�
U
C
c
0
N
M
0
N
O
O

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Little white oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2A
Cross Section Name: (Year 2) Cross Section 6 - Riffle (R2A)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0
880.24
GS
20
880.44
GS
28.5
880.16
GS
38.5
876.88
GS
42
876.24
GS
47
876.24
GS
50
875.78
LB
52
875.51
GS
52.5
875.15
LEw
53
874.87
GS
54
874.61
GS
55.5
874.52
GS
56.5
874.05
GS
57
874.05
Tw
58
874.06
GS
59.5
874.77
GS
61
874.73
GS
62
875.15
REw
62.5
875.5
GS
64
875.87
GS
65
875.95
BKF
73
876.46
GS
79
879.11
GS
84
879.78
GS
90
879.88
GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
877.85
877.85
877.85
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
875.95
875.95
875.95
Floodprone width (ft)
40.6
-
Bankfull width (ft)
16.11
8.06
8.05
Entrenchment Ratio
2.52
- - - --
- - - --
Mean Depth (ft)
0.94
0.9
0.98
Maximum Depth (ft)
1.9
1.9
1.9
width /Depth Ratio
17.14
8.96
8.21
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
15.14
7.29
7.85
wetted Perimeter (ft)
16.87
10.32
10.35
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.9
0.71
0.76
Begin BKF Station
48.89
48.89
56.95
End BKF Station
65
56.95
65
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --

Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields curve
channel Left side Right side
slope
shear Stress (lb /sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

N
p-
O r
U Ca
N N
co
N
O m
L N
U OC
m �
CV °'
cc
�cc
r}
N
0 m
� O N
Us
N
O O
CL
U)
N w
N CO
0 3.
�o
N co
CZ C
W w
Y
C
in
C
O
C _
N m
O �
U s
N
N
cz CC
}
O
v�
N
C'
I
W
X
A
N
W
x
A
N
co
W
x
A
3
(11) UOIILn913
D
10
7
0
L n
Qi
U
C
cz
U)
0 D
c
0
N
M
O
N
O
O

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Little white Oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2B
Cross Section Name: (Year 2) Cross Section 7 - Riffle (R2B)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0
874.81
GS
10
874.9
GS
19
874.74
GS
25
874.77
GS
33
874.64
GS
36
874.53
GS
40
874.58
GS
42
873.93
GS
44
873.36
GS
47
873.12
GS
49
872.74
GS
50
872.73
BKF
51
872.53
GS
52
872.3
GS
52.5
872.14
LEw
53
872.01
GS
54
871.89
GS
55
871.88
Tw
56
871.95
GS
56.5
872.14
REw
57
872.33
GS
58
872.71
RB
59
872.78
GS
61
872.86
GS
64
872.7
GS
67
873.09
GS
69
873.97
GS
73
874.13
GS
80
874.21
GS
90
874.01
GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
873.58
873.58
873.58
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
872.73
872.73
872.73
Floodprone width (ft)
24.89
- - - --
- - - --
Bankfull width (ft)
8.26
4.13
4.13
Entrenchment Ratio
3.01
- - - --
- - - --
Mean Depth (ft)
0.51
0.46
0.57
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.85
0.84
0.85
width /Depth Ratio
16.2
8.98
7.25
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
4.24
1.89
2.35
wetted Perimeter (ft)
8.5
5.07
5.12
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.5
0.37
0.46
Begin BKF Station
50
50
54.13

End BKF Station 58.26 54.13 58.26
Entrainment Calculations
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left Side Right side
Slope
shear Stress (lb /sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

m
O
16-
}
N
O Fj
N
U OC
0
N °'
.o 0
�r
N
(/1 Q
2 N
Ucr-
C
O o
�--� d
^U^''
VJ
ch CO
0�
U
N _
/ CO
C
m
C
O
U
N
N 0
O s
U --
N �
N
as CC
} M'
r,
r,
r
I
w
x
A
LO
x
A
rn
O
X
A
3
(11) UOIIEA913
O
W,
O
LO
O
a
N
U
C
cz
N
0
M
O
N
O
O
N
O
O
no

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Little white Oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2D
Cross Section Name: (Year 2) Cross Section 8 - Riffle (R2D)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
0
5
10
16
22
26.5
28.5
29.5
30.5
31
31.5
32.5
33.5
35
36 l
37
39 I
42 I
49 I
59 I
65 I
70 I
S
ELEV
NOTE
------------------------------------------------------
I
871.55
GS
I
871.42
GS
1
871.27
GS
1
870.95
GS
- - - --
870.64
GS
5.47
870.63
GS
6.4
870.6
GS
Mean Depth (ft)
870.65
BKF
0.5
870.13
GS
1.05
869.96
LEw
16.82
869.7
GS
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
869.61
Tw
2.72
869.73
GS
6.75
869.6
GS
0.63
869.77
GS
Begin BKF Station
869.92
REW
34.97
870.54
RB
34.97
870.77
GS
871.02
GS
870.91
GS
870.86
GS
870.74
GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
871.7
871.7
871.7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
870.65
870.65
870.65
Floodprone width (ft)
70
- - - --
- - - --
Bankfull width (ft)
10.93
5.47
5.46
Entrenchment Ratio
6.4
- - - --
- - - --
Mean Depth (ft)
0.65
0.8
0.5
Maximum Depth (ft)
1.05
1.05
1.05
width /Depth Ratio
16.82
6.84
10.92
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
7.11
4.39
2.72
wetted Perimeter (ft)
11.29
6.75
6.63
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.63
0.65
0.41
Begin BKF Station
29.5
29.5
34.97
End BKF Station
40.43
34.97
40.43
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve

Channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0 0 0
shear stress (lb /sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

0
O
n.
m
c
0
U r
N
U
2-
U�
T p
O
IL
_ rn
O00
O U O
A O f
LL Ga
V) }
N
O
U�
o c
�--+ o
U a
Nco
co
(n
N
O3:
L P.
U
, N
N °
L U_
c
cO
`} C
Y
m
C
O
U)
0
o
Us
N O
O
N d
a
0
x
A
rn
0
w
x
A
0
ri
N
W
x
A
3
(11) Uol}Una13
u
'J
O
0
o>
0
O
P-
U
U
C
(z
o U)
cn
c
� o
O
0
O
Cl)
O
N
O
O

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Little White Oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R1
Cross Section Name: (Year 2) Cross Section 9 - Pool (R1)
Survey Date: 11/17/2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
33
37
42
48
52
56 1
58
60
60.5
61 I
62 I
64 I
65 I
65.5 I
66 I
67 I
67.5 I
68 I
69.5 I
70.5 I
74 I
76.5 I
79 I
85 I
91 I
96 I
100 I
105
112
116 I
120
130
=S ELEV
888.59
888.7
888.61
888.36
887.88
886.61
884.66
883.87
883.41
883.14
882.97
882.87
882.44
882.1
880.25
879.99
879.03
878.38
878.48
878.55
878.69
878.86
879.09
879.45
880.02
880.96
881.28
882.14
882.76
882.64
882.48
882.58
884.07
885.2
886.58
888.06
888.51
888.73
888.9
NOTE
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
LB
GS
GS
LEW
GS
TW
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
REW
GS
GS
GS
BKF
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Channel Left Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft) 887.14 887.14 887.14
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 882.76 882.76 882.76
Floodprone Width (ft) 84.74 - - - -- - - - --

Bankfull width (ft)
23.6
11.8
11.8
Entrenchment Ratio
3.59
- - - --
- - - --
Mean Depth (ft)
1.91
2.02
1.81
Maximum Depth (ft)
4.38
4.38
4.22
width /Depth Ratio
12.36
5.84
6.52
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
45.13
23.77
21.36
wetted Perimeter (ft)
26.16
17.63
16.98
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
1.72
1.35
1.26
Begin BKF Station
53.02
53.02
64.82
End BKF station
76.62
64.82
76.62
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right Side
slope 0 0 0
shear stress (lb /sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

c o co U y
}
N
c
O p
U°
a
T
O
C �
O N
O CD
O U)
co
275
6,0
L
O
T v�
c
'o
Oa-
U
}� O
U
N n
(n
ca
C/) ►
O
C) s
co
—.0
N
c y
td
m
C
O
U
N
O
U=
— O
N O
ltl �
a
I
W
Y
A
u
x
A
iq
w
x
A
3
(11) UOIILIA013
u
D
D
r
0
a�
O
co
o �
O
U
C
(z
c00 N
c
LO O
N
O
2
O
M
O
N
0
O

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Little white Oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R1
Cross Section Name: (Year 2) Cross Section 10 - Pool (R1)
Survey Date: 11/17/2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE F
0
4
9
14
19
24
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
65
67
69
71
73
74
75
76
76.5
77.5
81
82
83.5
84
86
87.5
93.5 I
99 I
104 1
106 I
110 I
116 I
119 I
130 I
:S ELEV
i 886.58
885.97
I 884.85
I 883.53
1 882.42
I 881.61
1 881.75
1 881.63
881.68
881.6
881.61
881.65
881.61
881.41
881.4
880.92
880.41
880.25
879.74
879.13
878.61
878.12
878.11
878.13
878.13
878.03
879.91
880.23
881.17
881.51
881.67
881.75
881.95
882.31
883.66
885.64
886.27
886.46
NOTE
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
LB
GS
GS
GS
LEW
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
TW
REW
GS
GS
BKF
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
884.99
884.99
884.99
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
881.51
881.51
881.51
Floodprone width (ft)
105.66
- --
Bankfull width (ft)
26
13
13

Entrenchment Ratio
4.06
- - - --
- - - --
Mean Depth (ft)
1.64
0.87
2.41
Maximum Depth (ft)
3.48
2.64
3.48
width /Depth Ratio
15.85
14.94
5.39
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
42.62
11.34
31.28
wetted Perimeter (ft)
27.86
16.07
17.07
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
1.53
0.71
1.83
Begin BKF Station
61.5
61.5
74.5
End BKF Station
87.5
74.5
87.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields curve
channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb /sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

C
O 41
U }
CD
U�
N _
06
Uo
a
T
r O
C �
O N
O V }
c
1..�
0-5
60
T <;
T w
c
'o
O(L
U
}� O
� n
U)
Cl) 3:
V) ►
0
L N
Uo
co
�1 U
N
^` Y
`W c
m
c
O
U
N
U)
N
O
U=
o
N O
c0 �,
N
}
rh
a
m
x
A
N
it
x
A
N
Cl
N
W
x
A
3
(11) UOIIEn913
0
U
J
0
0
0
m
00
o
n
U
U
C
cz
c
CD O
LO N
O
2
0
C7
O
N
0
O

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Little White oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R1
Cross Section Name: (Year 2) Cross Section 11-- Pool (R1)
Survey Date: 11/17/2009
------------------ - - - - --
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation:
0 ft
Backsight Rod
Reading:
0 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
0
886.11
GS
5
0
886.1
GS
9
0
885.76
GS
14
0
885.75
GS
19
0
885.55
GS
24
0
885.08
GS
26
0
884.79
GS
29
0
883.73
GS
34
0
882.31
GS
38
0
881.13
GS
42
0
880.78
GS
48
0
880.73
GS
52
0
880.69
GS
56.5
0
880.67
GS
57
0
880.61
GS
59
0
880.59
GS
60
0
880.58
BKF
62.5
0
879.06
GS
63
0
879.01
GS
64
0
878.85
GS
66
0
878.85
GS
66.5
0
878.42
LEW
66.5
0
876.99
GS
67
0
877.16
GS
68
0
877.28
GS
69
0
877.15
GS
71
0
877.13
GS
72
0
877.09
TW
73
0
877.32
GS
74
0
877.11
GS
76
0
878.09
REW
78
0
879.88
GS
81
0
880.72
RB
85
0
880.73
GS
91.5
0
880.5
GS
96.5
0
880.82
GS
101.5
0
881.85
GS
106.5
0
883.17
GS
111.5
0
884.26
GS
116.5
0
884.96
GS
121.5
0
885.2
GS
130
0
885.18
GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
channel Left Right

Floodprone Elevation (ft)
884.17
884.17
884.17
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
880.58
880.58
880.58
Floodprone width (ft)
83.33
- - - --
- - - --
Bankfull width (ft)
20.5
5.31
15.19
Entrenchment Ratio
4.06
- - - --
- - - --
Mean Depth (ft)
2.16
1.24
2.49
Maximum Depth (ft)
3.59
1.73
3.59
width /Depth Ratio
9.49
4.28
6.1
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
44.35
6.59
37.76
wetted Perimeter (ft)
23.63
7.48
19.61
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
1.88
0.88
1.93
Begin BKF Station
60
60
65.31
End BKF Station
80.5
65.31
80.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields curve
channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0 0 0
shear stress (lb /sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

NN
O N N
U } II
� w
A
O
U
T
N O
^+ C CC
W � }
H N r
Cn d
O =
N a
� N
T
C II
C d W
O X
A
U
(D �
U)
m
U
U) ►
O
Us`
al
N
cz
L — r
Y M
^' C N
c X
o A
- 3
U
N
2S
U �
N �
(11) UOIILIA813
r
D
30
0
r`
O
CO
a�
o U
� O
N
O
2
0
O
N
O
O

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Little white oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R1
Cross Section Name: (Year 2) Cross Section 12 - Riffle (R1)
Survey Date: 11/17/2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
0
8
11
15
20
25
31
35
38
40
41
42.5
43 1
45 1
46.5 1
47 I
49 I
51.5 I
52.5 I
54 I
56 I
57 I
59 I
61.5 I
62.5 I
64.5
69.5 i
73.5 i
78.5 i
84 i
90 i
95 i
100 i
S
ELEV
NOTE
-------------------------------------------------------
885.24
GS
884.93
884.54
GS
879.92
883.34
GS
Floodprone width (ft)
882.11
GS
880.24
GS
12.17
879.82
GS
4.08
879.81
GS
Mean Depth (ft)
879.8
GS
1.94
879.92
BKF
5.01
879.15
GS
9.46
878.56
GS
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
877.79
GS
22.33
877.57
LEW
875.55
GS
875.25
GS
874.91
TW
875.1
GS
875.32
GS
877.71
REW
878.13
GS
878.32
GS
878.27
GS
878.58
GS
879.88
GS
880.13
RB
880.26
GS
880.27
GS
880.43
GS
880.43
GS
882.21
GS
883.79
GS
884.51
GS
884.63
GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
884.93
884.93
884.93
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
879.92
879.92
879.92
Floodprone width (ft)
96.46
Bankfull width (ft)
23.66
12.17
11.49
Entrenchment Ratio
4.08
- - - --
- - - --
Mean Depth (ft)
2.5
3.03
1.94
Maximum Depth (ft)
5.01
5.01
4.72
width /Depth Ratio
9.46
4.02
5.92
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
59.24
36.9
22.33

wetted Perimeter (ft)
27.2
18.41
18.22
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
2.18
2
1.23
Begin BKF station
38
38
50.17
End BKF Station
61.66
50.17
61.66
Entrainment calculations
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields curve
channel Left side Right side
slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb /sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

M
r �
Oi
U
N
O
Q
LL r
fd
W � Q
O �
U p�
M
T C
�O
� a
O�
N
U
U
U
U)
0 i
U
N
L. w
cl{ Y
\/�V' C co
`TW m
C
O
U
N
(� Q
tq _
O
U m
N
cC �
M
II
x
A
a
x
A
M
N
m
I
W
x
A
3
0
N
V
D
r
0
00
Cl
r`
U
as
c
LO O
N
O
2
0
O
M
O
N
0
O
(11) UOIIEn913

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Little white oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R1A
Cross Section Name: (Year 2) Cross Section 13 - Riffle (R1A)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0
887.64
GS
10
887.7
GS
25
887.72
GS
30
887.64
GS
34
887.73
GS
39
887.56
GS
47
887.55
GS
53
887.77
BKF
55
887.64
GS
55
887.25
LEw
57
887
GS
58
887.06
GS
59
887.05
Tw
60
887.17
GS
61
887.27
REw
62.5
887.88
RB
69
887.64
GS
74
887.68
GS
79
887.76
GS
89
887.59
GS
99
887.59
GS
109
887.49
GS
125
887.66
GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
888.54
888.54
888.54
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
887.77
887.77
887.77
Floodprone width (ft)
125
- - - --
- - - --
Bankfull width (ft)
9.23
4.61
4.62
Entrenchment Ratio
13.54
- - - --
- - - --
Mean Depth (ft)
0.48
0.41
0.54
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.77
0.77
0.73
width /Depth Ratio
19.23
11.24
8.56
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
4.39
1.88
2.51
wetted Perimeter (ft)
9.75
5.75
5.46
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.45
0.33
0.46
Begin BKF Station
53
53
57.61
End BKF Station
62.23
57.61
62.23
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve

Channel Left side Right Side
Slope
Shear stress (lb /sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

N '
'o +
� (L
m aQ
cH +
} J � M
/\ Q '2 +
o) Q n
J M
M
M
I
C)
O a
X
T
' A M
U) a
t
0
^" m
I L cc
O
O
J m
T J
C
N
L— LL
(id Y
m
G
e
U
C♦
� O♦
O ♦
O ♦
O•
♦
(Gki) 81MU Z4 uogoeg ssaO (ZJea,v 0 —'— —
p♦
•
oa
O I
O
(LH) Iood - l4 UOIIOGS ssaO (Z —
O
j
0
0
O -
O:
O ♦ i
( la) Iood 0l uol ;oag sSO, (Z Jew —
O♦
♦ Oi
•a
♦ O
0
o !.
S I
—T G Tod --6 uoi3oes ssaO (Z �ee)k,) —
S
0
0
.o
V-
0
O
o♦
b
a
Oo
co
(4) u01j *ena13
0
0
v
Cl)
O
co
Cl)
0
0
N
M
O
O
co
0
0
Cl)
— °
O
p
°o
co
N
°o
N
O
N
,°n
N ~i
0 co
N
cn
O CD
co
_0
(z
N U
cz
O �
N 0
O
O
N
CD
O
N
CDp
0
O
0
O
N
n
O

RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
River Name: Little white oak creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R1
Profile Name: (Year 2) R1 Long. Profile (STA 14 +00 -- 33 +74)
Survey Date: 11/17/2009
Survey Data
DIST CH WS BKF LB RB P3 P4
1394.07 879.32
1394.59
881.06
1398.482
883.37
1400.829
883.47
1416.009
881.02
1416.103
883.12
1416.874
878.63
1427.139
883
1433.115
880.98
1433.115
879.61
1449.442
879.96
1449.442
880.97
1450.065
882.74
1451.697
882.86
1484.464
882.57
1487.122
880.84
1487.442
882.68
1487.457
880.5
1514.31
880.19
1514.31
882.89
1514.919
882.71
1515.049
880.48
1535.774
882.97
1537.593
879.84
1539.585
880.7
1549.845
880.61
1550.312
878.44
1558.395
883.36
1565.211
882.99
1575.872
878.87
1579.182
880.5
1591.52
882.66
1593.136
883.31
1602.541
879.27
1603.612
880.46
1628.726
880.39
1632.887
878.78
1632.887
882.15
1643.739
882.28
1667.126
882.72
1667.126
878.67
1668.126
879.98
1683.098
882.51
1699.21
882.7
1713.544
878.91
1714.154
880.25
1720.047
882.5
1725.54
882.52
1734.829
877.06
1734.829
880.09

1753.569
882.66
1757.147
880.08
1757.311
878.79
1762.948
882.76
1785.563
878.38
880.005
882.76
882.44
1798.287
877.31
1798.528
879.99
1801.657
882.58
1818.37
880.19
1818.383
878.58
1825.981
881.91
1828.08
882.49
1844.31
877.96
1844.997
880.03
1862.549
882.31
1866.15
882.29
1871.585
878.48
1875.67
880.07
1888.755
882.39
1906.223
877.56
1908.76
881.77
1911.627
880.01
1916.461
882.24
1934.802
877.64
1934.802
881.66
1938.015
879.94
1950.407
878.6
1952.865
880.06
1956.373
882.01
1957.1
881.47
1979.235
879.95
1981.897
877.97
1987.163
881.7
1992.637
882.1
1994.159
879.86
1994.159
877.78
2017.625
882.08
2023.114
882.34
2027.575
879.86
2028.573
878.27
2043.825
882.18
2059.345
882.51
2062.995
880.03
2062.995
877.8
2095.108
881.93
2099.33
881.98
2109.172
878.19
2109.99
879.89
2135.633
881.71
2141.111
881.51
2141.431
877.84
2141.431
879.95
2173.445
877.2
2173.973
880.03
2181.981
881.56
2183.673
881.19
2208.203
877.73
2213.987
879.93
2222.847
881.31
2224.19
881.45
2238.435
878.03
879.825
881.51
881.4
2255.906
881.37
2259.177
879.94
2261.224
881.63
2264.807
877.12
2286.239
880.02

2288.135 877.49
2288.135
881.11
2315.546
880.89
2325.692
881.11
2334.105
879.92
2334.105
877.49
2348.565
881.24
2353.966
881.13
2353.966
879.99
2353.966
877.26
2383.897
881.06
2384.81
876.8
2384.81
880.05
2390.626
879.91
2392.469
879.22
2401.04
877.91
2402.781
880.81
2408.245
880.44
2427.898
881.14
2432.738
878.36
2433.015
877.32
2450.334
880.66
2462.42
880.96
2469.514
876.7
2471.675
878.41
2495.839
880.81
2502.392
876.15
2505.434
878.32
2506.328
880.31
2532.417
880.84
2543.775
878.22
2546.87
876.38
2555.868
880.45
2572.977
880.56
2584.2
877.48
2587.718
878.26
2588.525
880.71
2608.644
880.59
2629.778
881.05
2646.534
877.06
2646.534
878.09
2649.113
880.9
2662.891
880.6
2673.124
880.87
2673.124
876.02
2673.124
878.07
2691.273
876.99
878.255
880.72
880.58
2715.666
880.81
2720.918
878.28
2721.736
877.28
2728.867
880.43
2738.234
880.26
2751.008
878.2
2751.008
876.49
2765.217
880
2767.621
880.41
2780.063
876.63
2782.959
878.16
2792.627
880.14
2806.448
879.98
2810.652
876.49
2812.712
878.02
2830.818
880.09
2838.408
875.77
2842.059
877.94
2857.961
880.24

2866.51 877.08
2870.454 878.05
2872.467
2890.631
2897.36 878.06
2898.404 876.75
2923.69
2933.445
2939.328 877.99
2939.328 876.35
2953.911
2979.092 876.88
2979.092 877.99
2982.387
2994.257
3008.216 878.05
3009.043 876
3017.239
3027.485 875.48
3028.393 878.06
3036.515
3037.147
3052.069 878.05
3052.069 877.64
3059.309 874.91 877.64
3070.016
3090.46 875.78
3092.943
3093.134 877.53
3095.832
3121.019 876.01
3124.819 877.58
3127.782
3128.403
3148.683 875.89
3154.116 877.5
3155.262
3166.561
3174.939 877.41
3176.641 876.37
3176.641
3196.684
3199.098
3199.098 877.34
3199.098 876.84
3225.277 876.04
3225.277
3226.653 876.76
3233.822
3244.947 876.16
3244.947 874
3256.503
3260.049
3271.669 874.26
3271.936 876.06
3276.122
3299.042 876.09
3299.433 875.37
3308.548
3317.51
3333.174 876.06
3333.174 874.81
3344.473
3346.146
3355.854 875.22
3355.854 876.01
E- IVIIIW
880.41
880.12
880.12
880.08
879.94
880.34
879.72
879.95
880.23
880.13 879.92
879.5
880.29
879.54
879.87
879.74
880.16
879.47
879.98
879.76
879.76
880
879.45
879.44
879.63
879.18
879.19
879.45
879.19
879.32

3376.843 878.64
3389.938 875.81
3390.947 874.66
3393.851 879.09
3404.071 878.62
3414.328 874.17
3416.612 875.88
3424.168 878.92
3438.545 878.93
3443.835 875.8
3444.314 879.2
3444.314 874.72
Cross section / Bank Profile Locations
Name
Min
Avg
Type
Profile Station
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Year
2)
Cross section 9 -
Pool (R1)Riffle XS
1785
(Year
2)
Cross section 10
- Pool (R1)Riffle XS
2238
(Year
2)
Cross Section 11
- Pool (R1)Riffle XS
2691
(Year
2)
Cross Section 12
- Riffle (R1)Riffle XS
3059
Measurements from Graph
Bankfull slope: 0.00205
variable
Min
Avg
Max
----------------------------------------------------------------------
S riffle
0.00236
0.01813
0.02762
S pool
0
0
0
S run
0
0
0
S glide
0
0
0
P - P
33.74
89.61
168.72
Pool length
37.49
54.74
88.11
Riffle length
13.12
22.5
30
Dmax riffle
0
0
0
Dmax pool
0
0
0
Dmax run
0
0
0
Dmax glide
0
0
0
Low bank ht
0
0
0
Length and depth measurements
in feet,
slopes in ft /ft.
0
RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
Notes
River Name: Little white Oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R1
Profile Name: (Year 2) R1 Long. Profile (STA 14 +00 -- 33 +74)
Survey Date: 11/17/2009
DIST Note
1394.59
REW
1416.009
REW
1433.115
REW
1449.442
REW
1487.122
REW
1515.049
REW
1539.585
REW
1549.845
REW
1579.182
REW
1603.612
REW

1628.726 REW
1668.126 REW
1714.154 REW
1734.829 REW
1757.147 REW
1785.563 XS9
1798.528 REW
1818.37 REW
1844.997 REW
1875.67 REW
1911.627 REW
1938.015 REW
1952.865 REW
1979.235 REW
1994.159 REW
2027.575 REW
2062.995 REW
2109.99 REW
2141.431 REW
2173.973 REW
2213.987 REW
2238.435 XS10
2259.177 REW
2286.239 REW
2334.105 REW
2353.966 REW
2384.81 REW
2390.626 REW
2432.738 REW
2471.675 REW
2505.434 REW
2543.775 REW
2587.718 REW
2646.534 REW
2673.124 REW
2691.273 XSll
2720.918 REW
2751.008 REW
2782.959 REW
2812.712 REW
2842.059 REW
2870.454 REW
2897.36 REW
2939.328 REW
2979.092 REW
3008.216 REW
3028.393 REW
3052.069 REW
3059.309 XS12
3093.134 REW
3124.819 REW
3154.116 REW
3174.939 REW
3199.098 REW
3226.653 REW
3244.947 REW
3271.936 REW
3299.042 REW
3333.174 REW
3355.854 REW
3389.938 REW
3416.612 REW
3443.835 REW
- TW Intersect @ station 1785
- TW Intersect @ station 2238
- TW Intersect @ station 2691
- Tw Intersect @ station 1665.239

Q �
20
�CL a
r o ~0+
Lo
+
Q N �
O O
O d O
T }'Fo
/�- 3 In
LO
C)
0 v
CL
O X
a
U)
CO
�+
0
n
co
cc
o
0
J
a co
T J
N
L LL
(Z Y
m
Cl)
O
2
U
(4) UOIJEA913
5
0
0
co
E
cz
cn
0
cz
0 m
N �
cz
O
0
W.l

RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
River Name: Little White Oak creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R1A
Profile Name: (Year 2) R1A Long. Profile (STA 0 +00 -- 5 +00)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
Survey Data
DIST
CH
WS BKF
LB
RB P3 P4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
891.16
0
891.75
0
891.74
0
892.02
3.478
891.07
3.478
892.04
5.646
891.59
6.22
891.83
22.455
891.81
23.801
891.18
23.994
891.42
24.729
891.93
31.471
891.81
31.863
891.38
32.291
890.88
35.042
891.53
37.849
891.91
40.741
891.3
40.883
891.02
45.303
891.36
58.854
891.52
60.927
890.45
60.927
891.02
60.927
890.66
73.439
890.85
73.481
890.67
75.742
891.22
75.742
890.17
77.703
891.49
83.181
890.93
84.023
890.55
85.742
889.88
85.742
891.27
93.631
890.54
95.089
890.67
96.074
890.04
102.823
890.38
118.159
890.57
118.865
890.44
118.865
889.62
123.459
890.37
125.565
890.85
130.502
889.53
131.314
890.57
131.565
890.29
132.186
890.64
145.666
889.7
145.707
889.39
145.707
890.16
147.2
890.11

156.73
157.004
889.47
158.687
889.2
158.687
163.372
165.544
888.83
167.539
167.579
889.29
170.337
179.161
888.74
179.75
889.13
181.38
184.2
192.846
193.465
888.65
193.465
194.455
888.85
207.217
208.082
208.773
888.79
209.445
888.43
216.729
217.338
219.252
888.7
220.002
888.21
227.607
888.61
227.607
888.45
227.891
230.088
237.375
240.882
243.347
888.15
244.996
244.996
887.61
251.69
253.421
887.64
254.114
887.97
254.602
264.92
265.185
887.44
266.159
887.66
266.609
277.036
887.43
277.036
887.77
277.036
278.289
285.006
285.705
887.81
286.062
887.29
287.301
297.623
887.26
298.077
887.76
298.509
298.841
313.409
887.32
313.983
887.61
314.166
314.411
324.151
324.357
325.36
887.4
326.579
887.11
329.213
335.47
337.246
887.31
338.07
s
M. . . I
.,
889.73
889.1
889.59
888.76
889.12
889.16
888.66
889. H
888.68
888.84
888.5
888.95
P... ,.
888.42
888.1
888.15
887.91
887.93
� ;' 8 ,
887.99

338.07 886.98
350.717
887.29
350.999
886.7
352.978
888.02
356.383
887.66
360.505
886.76
361.686
887.31
363.622
888.15
366.298
887.52
368.321
886.72
368.321
888.17
368.97
887.14
372.927
887
887.26
887.88
887.77
388.614
887.64
390.214
887.02
391.638
886.5
393.048
887.62
399.317
887.94
400.748
887.01
401.394
886.49
404.604
887.55
406.933
887.94
414.89
887.81
416.798
886.43
418.036
886.92
419.099
887.83
433.996
888.01
434.79
887.45
435.837
886.43
436.317
886.97
444.602
886.58
444.674
887.02
445.164
886.84
449.861
887.53
458.336
887.21
467.374
887.4
467.475
886.81
469.215
886.5
475.126
887.12
479.417
886.62
479.567
886.31
479.567
887.25
484.123
886.25
484.516
887.35
484.981
886.56
486.555
887.06
491.516
886.44
492.201
885.97
495.94
886.97
496.484
887.04
497.42
886.48
498.252
886.06
Cross section /
Bank Profile
Locations
Name
Type
Profile Station
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Year 2)
Cross Section
13 -
Riffle (R1A)Riffle XS 373
Measurements from Graph
Bankfull slope: 0.01056
Variable Min Avg Max
---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --

S riffle
0.01311
S pool
0
S run
0
S glide
0
P - P
25.67
Pool length
11.14
Riffle length
11.63
Dmax riffle
0
Dmax pool
0
Dmax run
0
Dmax glide
0
Low bank ht
0
Length and depth
measurements
0
REW
0.02236 0.03303
0 0
0 0
0 0
50.58 73.63
16.63 24.70
14.90 19.38
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
in feet, slopes in ft /ft.
RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
Notes
River Name: Little White Oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R1A
Profile Name: (Year 2) R1A Long. Profile (STA 0 +00 -- 5 +00)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
DIST Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
REW
5.646
REW
23.994
REW
31.863
REW
40.741
REW
60.927
REW
73.481
REW
84.023
REW
93.631
REW
118.865
REW
131.565
REW
145.666
REW
157.004
REW
167.579
REW
179.75
REW
194.455
REW
208.773
REW
219.252
REW
227.607
REW
243.347
REW
254.114
REW
266.159
REW
277.036
REW
285.705
REW
298.077
REW
313.983
REW
325.36
REW
337.246
REW
350.717
REW
361.686
REW
368.97
REW
372.927
XS13 - TW Intersect @ station 372.927
390.214
REW
400.748
REW
418.036
REW
436.317
REW
445.164
REW
467.475
REW
479.417
REW

484.981 REW
491.516 REW
497.42 REW

(11) uOljPnal3
C)
0
�
p
�
•
S uogos ssao (Z -eat
O
-
°o
•Y
Lo
O
♦,
O /
o
0
O ♦•
•
♦
•
o
�
O
O ♦
Cl)
v
N N C2
CC =
•,
Y
O
a N
°
CM CM
O
a� <+
O
♦
} 0 VJ �
°
•
•
°
+
(ZH) 014!8 4 uo!3oas ssaO (Z leak) O
2
0
O
+
oaN
♦p
°a
CO
cz o�¢ °m
rn
4
Co
o\
°♦
m
M
♦ °
M
o
_
Lo
x
♦O
°•_
c`
co
N
_
(ZH) !ood E uo!;oas sswO (Z JsaA)
o
Q
a
O
N
+
• °
o Ln
♦ •°
M
♦ °
C
_O
0
• O
M
co
G=
• O
N
CJ
p
O •
°o
C
O •
• O
C� y
c
CZ
O
fA
O
o
c
O
c_
o
N
°
�
°
(Z
-
o
ZH�od Z uo!olas ss O
- A)—
Cl)
N
♦ ov
CLS
LL
• °
O
O �
o
° • `
N
i ♦ O
Y
tq
O
°0
♦ °
N
�
♦ O
p
t
o
O
04
N
—(ZH) aIMU - l uogoa= ssaO (Z teak)-
: e
N
o •
o
°
0
N
c0 LL, V Cl) N
h n n n n
m m m m CO
O m m co
n n cD cD co
OD co 00 co 00
CD lD
CD CD
00 OD
(11) uOljPnal3

RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
River Name: Little white oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2
Profile Name: (Year 2) R2 Long. Profile (STA 25 +13 -- 45 +60)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
Survey Data
DIST CH 'Vis BKF LB RB P3 P4
2510.76 869.21
2510.76
873.56
2510.76
871.33
2516.46
874.39
2539.066
871.29
2539.94
873.19
2540.034
869.7
2544.977
874.01
2552.347
871.17
2552.447
869.14
2552.447
873.05
2568.001
873.2
2572.916
871.27
2572.977
870
2572.977
873.24
2597.252
869.8
2597.252
873.74
2597.252
871.24
2603.537
872.56
2612.705
873.57
2613.849
871.23
2614.064
870.13
2631.852
869.73
871.07
873.68 873.11
2646.801
873.34
2652.444
870.34
2653.404
871.06
2664.367
873.13
2670.369
871.01
2670.85
869.67
2682.113
873.77
2689.913
873.56
2697.073
873.58
2697.073
869.92
2699.411
870.96
2719.592
873.12
2720.654
870.9
2722.592
869.97
2737.227
869.49
2740.286
870.91
2740.691
873.69
2743.113
873.44
2761.49
870.86
2763.281
873.8
2763.281
869.33
2781.207
873.81
2786.443
870.2
2786.9
873.07
2789.319
870.98
2812.169
873.11
2812.432
869.55

2816.811
870.83
2822.337
873.42
2835.329
873.4
2836.879
869.91
2839.434
870.84
2857.999
873.52
2859.995
873.2
2866.554
870.9
2867.221
869.75
2877.669
873.46
2887.48
873.72
2895.117
869.05
2895.816
870.75
2900.732
873.19
2918.128
869.29
2918.51
870.71
2928.17
873.75
2928.774
872.93
2945.972
869.83
2945.972
870.78
2953.845
872.82
2958.922
872.49
2968.285
869.65
2968.52
870.86
2985.88
873.17
2988.865
873.36
2991.366
869.72
2991.366
870.79
3010.951
873.35
3017.779
870.07
3017.881
872.96
3018.547
870.66
3041.613
873.43
3053.069
873.03
3058.219
869.9
3077.755
869.72
3080.04
872.83
3083.613
870.63
3085.104
873.05
3109.508
869.33
870.715 872.81
873.1
3116.421
869.35
3120.208
870.72
3130.217
872.89
3134.155
869.74
3136.098
873.19
3138.906
870.77
3153.222
869.88
3155.041
872.69
3156.304
870.36
3180.195
872.78
3182.764
873.03
3185.244
869.51
3187.378
870.34
3206.789
873.18
3214.974
872.52
3225.056
869.25
3226.745
870.39
3239.903
872.64
3242.561
870.42
3243.104
869.07
3250.399
873.14
3254.638
867.89
3254.769
870.32
3263.678
872.27
3267.942
872.6
3283.275
869.17

3285.459
870.3
3287.429
872.91
3295.166
872.47
3298.828
870.39
3298.863
867.84
3317.74
872.45
3318.785
870.42
3318.785
869.49
3321.913
873.08
3340.645
870.22
3340.977
872.53
3343.359
869.44
3343.359
872.17
3387.129
872.94
3391.667
872.24
3392.522
869.13
3392.667
869.94
3414.845
868.88
3415.024
869.96
3419.134
872.54
3422.94
872.62
3433.936
868.32
3436.569
869.95
3443.976
872.7
3451.892
872.44
3462.255
868.66
3468.012
872.87
3468.012
869.83
3471.987
872.48
3476.71
869.87
3480.758
872.36
3480.758
868.15
3507.752
872.2
3507.752
868.76
3512.092
872.68
3512.255
869.6
3533.189
872.4
3534.097
869.02
3534.402
869.91
3535.389
872.01
3547.894
868.78
3549.31
869.85
3553.073
872.41
3566.19
869.76
3566.764
867.81
3571.273
872
3575.861
872.3
3591.034
868.83
3591.805
871.84
3591.912
869.78
3606.652
871.76
3610.214
869.74
3611.203
868.22
3611.203
871.75
3630.288
868.24
869.975 872.03
871.65
3654.763
868.23
3654.763
871.72
3654.763
869.71
3664.474
871.99
3677.014
869.66
3677.416
871.91
3677.416
868.23
3691.051
871.82
3698.57
868.59
3698.57
869.67
3701.746
871.59

3716.896
869.62
3717.761
869.23
3718.997
872.11
3729.458
871.92
3748.513
869.68
3749.053
868.73
3754.312
871.53
3775.924
868.45
3775.924
871.76
3781.228
869.66
3781.228
872.12
3801.023
871.84
3812.457
872.02
3812.457
868.32
3815.665
869.57
3842.559
867.9
3843.459
871.88
3845.273
869.45
3856.326
868.59
3861.595
871.96
3861.595
869.54
3884.481
869.54
3886.172
868.56
3886.292
871.88
3889.302
872.15
3917.707
868.66
3917.707
869.5
3917.813
871.81
3929.798
871.84
3944.218
868.31
3944.218
869.53
3948.555
871.76
3967.158
866.12
3967.158
869.46
3972.522
871.55
3981.325
871.77
3983.167
867.89
3984.895
869.12
4003.753
871.67
4007.046
871.66
4014.971
867.61
4014.971
869.13
4034.402
871.62
4049.991
869.24
4050.113
868.3
4053.147
871.12
4068.631
871.71
4072.517
868.62
4076.683
871.95
4079.424
869.18
4081.106
866.49
4093.009
867.3
4094.449
869.21
4102.196
867.91
869.045 871.65
872.34
4122.194
871.47
4124.578
869.14
4124.873
868.3
4136.424
872.27
4143.415
870.99
4149.724
867.92
4151.359
869.12
4161.349
871.24
4162.914
871.75
4174.421
867.59
4180.044
869.11
4197.426
867.36

4197.426
871.35
4198.893
869.08
4209.809
871.01
4223.629
867.72
4225.416
871.01
4227.071
868.99
4241.356
867.54
4244.821
869.11
4248.042
871.11
4264.966
867.9
4264.966
871.28
4265.786
869.03
4282.284
870.99
4283.603
867.86
4284.022
869.07
4298.471
871.05
4308.897
870.84
4315.513
867.94
4317.472
869.03
4323.703
871.14
4331.025
870.4
4331.025
866.95
4331.077
869.1
4354.858
870.67
4359.408
869.09
4359.408
867.71
4377.271
871.18
4379.96
870.97
4390.723
867.97
4390.723
868.97
4400.089
870.78
4407.746
869.04
4409.294
867.97
4412.946
870.93
4428.119
871.09
4447.282
870.87
4447.282
867.94
4449.627
869
4466.472
870.64
4474.187
867.71
4477.418
869.13
4481.836
870.65
4498.026
870.78
4506.596
868.94
4506.596
867.05
4512.28
870.94
4530.647
866.89
4532.097
868.94
4532.571
871
4535.077
870.93
4545.845
867.85
869
870.94 870.58
4549.682
869.31
4549.682
867.71
4549.682
870.69
4561.356
871.48
4570.204
870.88
4574.441
867.54
4575.085
869.28
4589.747
869.09
4590.139
868.09
4590.935
870.41
4595.612
871.59
4610.65
870.82
4614.198
868.85
4619.062
868.06
871.04

Cross Section / Bank Profile Locations
Name
Min
Avg
Max
----------------------------------------------------------------------
S riffle
Type
Profile Station
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Year
2)
Cross
section
1 -
Riffle (R2)Riffle XS
2631
(Year
2)
Cross
Section
2 -
Pool (R2)Riffle XS
3109
(Year
2)
Cross
Section
3 -
Pool (R2)Riffle XS
3630
(Year
2)
Cross
section
4 -
Riffle (R2)Riffle XS
4102
(Year
2)
Cross
Section
5 -
Pool (R2)Riffle XS
4545
Measurements from Graph
Bankfull Slope: 0.00138
variable
Min
Avg
Max
----------------------------------------------------------------------
S riffle
0.00201
0.00375
0.00616
S pool
0
0
0
S run
0
0
0
S glide
0
0
0
P - P
79.62
147.00
228.66
Pool length
30.62
50.27
91.87
Riffle length
20.42
28.07
34.71
Dmax riffle
0
0
0
Dmax pool
0
0
0
Dmax run
0
0
0
Dmax glide
0
0
0
Low bank ht
0
0
0
Length and depth measurements
in feet,
slopes in ft /ft.
0
RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
Notes
River Name: Little White Oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2
Profile Name: (Year 2) R2 Long. Profile (STA 25 +13 -- 45 +60)
survey Date: 11/18/2009
7� niF-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2510.76
---
REW
2539.066
REW
2552.347
REW
2572.916
REW
2597.252
REW
2613.849
REW
2631.852
XS1 - TW Intersect @ station 2631
2653.404
REW
2670.369
REW
2699.411
REW
2720.654
REW
2740.286
REW
2761.49
REW
2789.319
REW
2816.811
REW
2839.434
REW
2866.554
REW
2895.816
REW
2918.51
REW
2945.972
REW
2968.52
REW
2991.366
REW

3018.547
REW
3083.613
REW
3109.508
xs2 -
Tw Intersect @ station 3109
3120.208
REW
3138.906
REW
3156.304
REW
3187.378
REW
3226.745
REW
3242.561
REW
3254.769
REW
3285.459
REW
3298.828
REW
3318.785
REW
3340.645
REW
3392.667
REW
3415.024
REW
3436.569
REW
3476.71
REW
3512.255
REW
3534.402
REW
3549.31
REW
3566.19
REW
3591.912
REW
3610.214
REW
3630.288
xs3 -
TW Intersect @ station 3630
3654.763
REW
3677.014
REW
3698.57
REW
3716.896
REW
3748.513
REW
3815.665
REW
3845.273
REW
3884.481
REW
3917.707
REW
3944.218
REW
3967.158
REW
3984.895
REW
4014.971
REW
4049.991
REW
4079.424
REW
4094.449
REW
4102.196
X54
- TW Intersect @ station 4102
4124.578
REW
4151.359
REW
4180.044
REW
4198.893
REW
4227.071
REW
4244.821
REW
4265.786
REW
4284.022
REW
4317.472
REW
4331.077
REW
4359.408
REW
4390.723
REW
4407.746
REW
4449.627
REW
4477.418
REW
4506.596
REW
4532.097
REW
4545.845
x55
- TW Intersect @ station 4545
4549.682
REW
4575.085
REW
4589.747
REW
4614.198
REW

9.T 1
o °O
ALL+
} O � N
�J (nom
+
Q
C_
N
CV
�o
+ }tea
CV)
O
O
+ a
O X
Q
CL
CU +
4—
O
m
d) O
a
O
J
Q m
N -'
N
LL
(� Y
[O
O
2
U
•
O
(4) UOIIBn913
E
cz
U
cn
c
0
cz
m
U
C
cn
W

RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
River Name: Little White Oak creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2A
Profile Name: (Year 2) R2A Long. Profile (STA 0 +00 -- 3 +26)
survey Date: 11/18/2009
Survey Data
DIST
CH
WS
BKF LB
RB P3 P4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
874.51
0
877.31
0.458
877.26
1.112
876.44
9.285
877.03
10.552
876.4
10.979
877.14
12.316
875.09
20.339
876.65
23.198
876.51
23.198
875.34
23.198
876.24
37.191
876.94
37.191
876.06
37.191
875.22
43.266
875.94
43.582
875.15
43.582
876.46
44.017
876.6
45.977
876.36
51.516
875.28
52.726
876.3
53.38
875.86
53.535
876.25
62.002
876.76
63.119
875.46
64.091
876.41
64.091
874.57
75.179
877.04
75.179
874.39
76.254
875.48
76.944
876.67
87.145
874.46
87.145
876.69
90.222
875.23
91.048
876.77
96.28
874.33
96.28
876.59
97.96
875.26
98.089
876.4
106.804
875.22
108.313
874.34
109.729
875.98
109.893
876.63
124.106
874.05
875.15
875.95 875.78
140.635
874.05
140.635
874.82
140.831
876.02
141.705
875.61
152.325
876.14

152.325 873.59
152.325
874.53
154.346
875.36
163.954
875.46
166.162
873.92
166.326
874.15
167.472
875.74
176.468
875.41
176.793
875.34
176.916
874.21
177.155
873.49
192.043
874.93
192.819
872.83
193.862
875.22
194.096
873.9
200.454
872.01
200.454
873.79
207.256
875.13
207.434
873.92
209.895
874.71
209.895
872.62
224.751
872.76
224.751
874.33
228.155
873.73
229.425
874.69
245.345
873.52
245.548
874.15
246.945
872.67
246.97
873.99
266.946
873.6
267.362
873.4
268.888
872.87
268.937
873.71
283.563
873.04
284.386
873.7
284.386
872.47
286.521
873.78
291.151
873.92
291.194
872.92
292.402
872.08
294.257
874.06
298.713
872.16
298.713
872.92
299.572
873.74
306.857
872.03
306.906
872.8
307.979
873.66
308.165
873.95
314.452
871.64
314.667
872.87
315.135
873.97
316.516
874.04
321.334
871.71
872.71
cross Section / Bank Profile Locations
Name
Type
Profile Station
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Year 2)
cross Section
6 - Riffle
(R2A)Riffle XS 124
Measurements from
Graph
Bankfull
Slope:
0.01149
Variable
Min
Avg
Max

----------------------------------------------------------------------
S riffle
0.00463
0.01158
0.02008
S pool
0
0
0
S run
0
0
0
S glide
0
0
0
P - P
47.66
72.72
93
Pool length
13.18
18.34
22.09
Riffle length
18.21
21.44
26.35
Dmax riffle
0
0
0
Dmax pool
0
0
0
Dmax run
0
0
0
Dmax glide
0
0
0
Low bank ht
0
0
0
Length and depth measurements
in feet,
slopes in ft /ft.
0
314.667
REW
RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
Notes
River Name: Little White Oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2A
Profile Name: (Year 2) R2A Long. Profile (STA 0 +00 -- 3 +26)
survey Date: 11/18/2009
DIST Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1.112
REW
10.552
REW
23.198
REW
37.191
REW
43.266
REW
53.38
REW
63.119
REW
76.254
REW
90.222
REW
97.96
REW
106.804
REW
124.106
xS6 - Tw Intersect @ station 124.106
140.635
REW
152.325
REW
166.326
REW
176.916
REW
194.096
REW
200.454
REW
207.434
REW
228.155
REW
245.345
REW
267.362
REW
283.563
REW
291.194
REW
298.713
REW
306.906
REW
314.667
REW

(11) UOIJUAGO
iz
w
0
0
u�
°o
d'
O
O
r
O
N
0
0
°o
0
J o
rn
tD
OR
E
cz
cn
C
0
co
a)
U
C
�r
co
,,,
m
'2 M
ra+
m�
W
r 0
J r
m
N i
N
cc`2 M
CD
o a rn ^ (91 1) Owl
00
d>¢ CO
0 1
T
t
1
11
UJ
M
a
0)
x
Q
U)
/
C7
(L
_N
+
O
CL
m
cc
O)o
c
O
J
m
m
N
cc
N
>`
cz
LL
m
U
O
O,
i
2 C
U
•
(11) UOIJUAGO
iz
w
0
0
u�
°o
d'
O
O
r
O
N
0
0
°o
0
J o
rn
tD
OR
E
cz
cn
C
0
co
a)
U
C
�r
co
,,,

RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
River Name: Little white oak creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2B
Profile Name: (Year 2) R2B Long. Profile (STA 9 +35 -- 14 +86)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
Survey Data
DIST CH wS BKF LB RB P3 P4
924.61 877.23
924.61
878.28
924.61
877.98
925.679
878.11
933.761
877.87
935.004
877.49
935.004
878.13
936.758
878.45
941.173
878.31
943.268
877.58
943.795
877.79
945.385
877.7
945.857
877.43
953.135
878.64
955.511
878.3
958.117
877.31
958.58
876.96
965.379
878.43
967.252
876.81
968.21
877.26
972.1
878.17
973.197
878.17
976.199
877.17
977.147
876.99
981.288
878.19
987.126
877.99
988.087
877.06
988.183
876.57
990.685
877.66
998.28
877
998.579
876.49
998.862
877.44
1002.065
877.58
1007.894
877.52
1008.257
876.98
1008.503
876.63
1015.368
876.87
1016.127
876.55
1016.51
877.37
1017.003
877.59
1028.669
876.51
1028.721
876.23
1028.721
876.96
1034.535
877.52
1035.896
876.34
1036.589
876.22
1042.318
876.98
1044.857
876.84
1044.857
875.75
1045.16
875.98

1051.886
876.43
1052.112
875.8
1053.059
875.62
1054.044
876.51
1064.07
876.46
1064.07
875.41
1064.171
875.77
1065.01
876.91
1076.668
876
1080.245
875.41
1080.245
876.07
1080.245
875.59
1092.231
876.05
1095.112
874.78
1095.112
875.79
1095.191
875.25
1104.18
876.21
1104.557
875.11
1106.005
874.66
1106.005
875.65
1118.173
875.13
1118.173
876.46
1118.173
874.53
1121.504
876.08
1125.567
876.12
1129.724
876.07
1129.724
874.5
1129.724
875
1137.277
876.03
1138.117
874.82
1138.117
874.44
1139.334
875.92
1149.049
875.7
1150.107
874.37
1151.385
874.71
1151.478
875.74
1163.11
875.23
1164.93
874.67
1169.904
874.07
1169.904
875.28
1177.929
874.63
1179.61
875.21
1179.841
874.18
1183.142
875.2
1192.223
874.81
1192.323
874.52
1193.25
874.1
1193.729
875.01
1206.618
874.93
1207.98
873.86
1208.38
875.04
1209.471
874.23
1217.616
873.71
1217.616
875.11
1217.616
874.18
1219.635
874.8
1229.62
874.12
1229.62
874.4
1229.62
873.93
1230.876
874.46
1242.49
874.17
1243.605
873.43
1243.605
873.17
1243.605
874.12
1254.865
873.36
1255.71
873.95

1255.71 872.9
1256.951
873.96
1263.43
873.97
1263.43
872.89
1265.268
873.26
1268.413
873.9
1269.283
873.99
1278.311
873.7
1279.697
873.1
1279.798
873.67
1279.798
872.84
1295.728
872.79
1297.505
873.28
1297.505
872.21
1301.036
873.64
1311.743
873.3
1315.122
873.37
1315.122
872.44
1315.142
872.73
1328.975
871.88
872.14
872.73
872.71
1340.098
872.87
1340.623
871.84
1341.215
872.04
1342.305
872.59
1349.141
872.9
1349.141
871.48
1349.81
871.64
1352.01
872.45
1360.588
871.05
1360.958
870.88
1361.215
871.76
1361.74
871.94
1375.751
870.08
1375.751
871.29
1376.583
870.45
1377.717
871.61
1386.652
871.49
1389.809
870.9
1390.288
870.56
1390.288
869.99
1401.083
870.1
1401.288
870.95
1401.304
870.26
1404.106
871.14
1413.858
870.78
1415.061
870.09
1415.603
869.51
1415.603
870.87
1425.579
870.98
1428.077
869.21
1433.106
870.54
1433.565
869.92
1442.854
870
1443.387
869.34
1446.568
870.34
1448.881
870.02
1468.562
870.52
1470.06
870.02
1470.809
868.95
870.15
1476.969
866.12
Cross Section /
Bank Profile Locations
Name
Type
Profile Station
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Year 2)
Cross Section 7
- Riffle (R2B)Riffle XS 1328

Measurements from Graph
Bankfull Slope: 0.01641
Variable
Min
Avg
Max
----------------------------------------------------------------------
S riffle
0.01252
0.03485
0.04758
S pool
0
0
0
S run
0
0
0
S glide
0
0
0
P - P
30.37
42.24
55.12
Pool length
13.50
17.51
23.62
Riffle length
5.06
7.76
10.69
Dmax riffle
0
0
0
Dmax pool
0
0
0
Dmax run
0
0
0
Dmax glide
0
0
0
Low bank ht
0
0
0
Length and depth measurements
in feet,
slopes in ft /ft.
0
1229.62
REW
1243.605
RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
Notes
River Name: Little white oak creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2B
Profile Name: (Year 2) R2B Long. Profile (STA 9 +35 -- 14 +86)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
DIST Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------
924.61
REW
933.761
REW
943.795
REW
945.385
REW
958.117
REW
968.21
REW
976.199
REW
988.087
REW
998.28
REW
1008.257
REW
1015.368
REW
1028.669
REW
1035.896
REW
1045.16
REW
1052.112
REW
1064.171
REW
1080.245
REW
1095.191
REW
1104.557
REW
1118.173
REW
1129.724
REW
1138.117
REW
1151.385
REW
1164.93
REW
1177.929
REW
1192.323
REW
1209.471
REW
1217.616
REW
1229.62
REW
1243.605
REW
1254.865
REW

1265.268
REW
1279.697
REW
1295.728
REW
1315.142
REW
1328.975
XS7 - TW Intersect @ station 1328
1341.215
REW
1349.81
REW
1360.588
REW
1376.583
REW
1390.288
REW
1401.304
REW
1415.061
REW
1433.565
REW
1448.881
REW
1470.06
REW

3
0
U
•
r7
O
(4) UOIJUAG13
0
0
0
0
0
O
co
E
o co
L
i
C
O
cz
N
U
C
c�
A2
o
0
0
M
J °o
N
co
co
co
D m
aN^C o
raN�
`m c,
mc�+
+
0
(D i
N
'p
co
+ cli
"" J 1+
A+
1 `
1
�M
W
+
a
N
x
Q
C/)
M
a
+
Ei-
O
i
(L
m
cc
o
�
O
J
�
m
J
N
i
CO
LL
m
N
3
0
U
•
r7
O
(4) UOIJUAG13
0
0
0
0
0
O
co
E
o co
L
i
C
O
cz
N
U
C
c�
A2
o
0
0
M
J °o
N
co
co
co

RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
River Name: Little white Oak creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2D
Profile Name: (Year 2) R2D Long. Profile (STA 2 +84 -- 7 +79)
survey Date: 11/18/2009
Survey Data
DIST
CH
WS BKF
LB
RB P3 P4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
280.8
869.79
280.8
870.85
280.8
870.07
282.343
870.75
287.856
869.6
869.94 870.65
870.54
297.621
870.62
299.636
870.38
300.449
869.02
301.49
869.86
306.666
870.76
307.846
870.46
307.925
869.81
309.346
868.98
313.635
870.32
317.225
869.56
317.818
869.8
319.158
870.81
325.808
870.95
326.575
869.75
327.452
869.64
329.195
870.89
337.598
870.68
337.598
869.25
338.785
869.56
339.34
870.4
344.082
870.43
344.523
870.27
345.201
869.6
345.476
869.06
355.151
870.07
356.446
870.02
356.446
869.6
356.446
868.78
368.639
870.19
371.052
869.12
371.052
869.58
371.052
869.84
380.559
869.92
381.75
869.5
382.123
869.32
382.123
870.12
386.289
869.96
389.642
869.97
391.017
869.3
391.915
869.08
393.544
869.7
396.788
868.85
396.788
869.86
404.218
869.07
404.977
868.8

405.731
869.68
409.146
869.88
412.307
868.7
412.519
869.19
413.024
868.94
413.207
869.88
423.335
868.8
423.335
868.67
423.335
869.67
425.754
869.53
434.791
869.37
437.068
868.05
439.08
868.57
440.345
869.42
448.064
868.09
448.544
868.6
448.9
869.03
449.649
869.45
457.876
868.42
458.018
868.22
458.018
868.89
460.276
869.2
468.196
868.89
469.338
868.83
470.088
868.12
470.191
867.8
474.634
868.13
475.048
867.84
475.048
868.9
476.854
868.86
483.522
868.75
485.551
867.28
485.775
868.71
486.667
868
487.915
869.03
491.611
867.92
492.313
867.72
492.625
868.63
495.704
868.97
506.709
867.64
507.043
867.48
507.255
868.71
507.79
868.31
516.711
868.02
518.557
867.08
519.67
867.07
519.855
867.99
535.129
867.43
535.168
867.06
535.168
866.5
538.034
868.1
546.951
868.02
550.76
867.49
552.109
866.93
552.22
866.81
553.209
865.82
553.791
866.2
553.814
867.23
555.223
867.81
558.774
867.6
558.841
866.22
559.196
865.89
564.723
867.53
564.723
865.24
565.81
866.26
567.212
867.34

567.84
867.45
569.495
866.18
570.385
867.33
570.385
865.99
577.462
867.04
580.58
867.03
580.788
866.15
581.02
865.75
587.057
866.86
592.648
865.88
592.808
866.57
592.849
866.03
593.126
866.37
602.972
866.05
603.81
865.62
603.81
865.83
605.193
866.26
610.042
866.22
611.692
865.5
611.848
865.67
613.444
866.17
615.235
865.67
615.54
866.17
615.54
865.17
621.533
865.37
621.533
866.13
621.533
865.66
623.561
866.16
632.769
866.05
635.484
866.29
636.588
865.53
638.823
865.26
641.53
865.94
649.693
865.72
649.693
865.13
650.701
865.45
652.948
866.16
657.191
865.87
661.327
866.17
663.25
865.32
664.337
865.06
668.993
865.83
673.625
865.23
673.968
865.98
674.19
865.07
674.513
865.96
679.739
865.77
682.292
864.91
682.292
864.29
682.292
866.27
690.025
865.69
690.025
864.64
690.025
864.99
693.797
865.73
702.955
865.68
702.955
864.66
703.094
864.77
705.455
865.8
712.668
865.34
713.713
864.79
714.102
864.37
714.102
865.37
720.674
865.29
721.193
864.78
721.829
865.17
721.829
864.19

731.937 864.73
731.987 864.8
732.676 864.28
734.273 865.3
744.845 863.16 864.74 865.38 865.49
Cross Section / Bank Profile Locations
Name Type Profile station
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Year 2) Cross section 8 - Riffle (R2D)Riffle XS 287
Measurements from Graph
Bankfull Slope: 0.01252
Variable
Min
Avg
Max
----------------------------------------------------------------------
S riffle
0.01092
0.02507
0.04369
S pool
0
0
0
S run
0
0
0
S glide
0
0
0
P - P
27.9
49.41
66.27
Pool length
8.14
16.77
24.41
Riffle length
5.81
8.06
12.21
Dmax riffle
0
0
0
Dmax pool
0
0
0
Dmax run
0
0
0
Dmax glide
0
0
0
Low bank ht
0
0
0
Length and depth measurements
in feet,
slopes in ft /ft.
0
RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
Notes
River Name: Little white oak creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2D
Profile Name: (Year 2) R2D Long. Profile (STA 2 +84 -- 7 +79)
Survey Date: 11/18/2009
DIST Note
280.8
REW
287.856
XS8 - TW Intersect @ station 287
301.49
REW
307.925
REW
317.818
REW
326.575
REW
338.785
REW
345.201
REW
356.446
REW
371.052
REW
381.75
REW
391.017
REW
404.218
REW
413.024
REW
423.335
REW
439.08
REW
448.544
REW
457.876
REW
470.088
REW
474.634
REW

486.667
REW
491.611
REW
506.709
REW
519.67
REW
535.168
REW
552.109
REW
553.791
REW
558.841
REW
565.81
REW
569.495
REW
580.788
REW
592.849
REW
603.81
REW
611.848
REW
615.235
REW
621.533
REW
636.588
REW
650.701
REW
663.25
REW
673.625
REW
682.292
REW
690.025
REW
703.094
REW
713.713
REW
721.193
REW
731.937
REW

i
U
C
LL.
C
N
U
U
d
(Year 2) R1 Reachwide Pebble Count
Particle Size (mm)
100
(Year 2) R1 Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)
(Year 0) R1 Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)
V (Year 1) R1 Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)

RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
River Name: Little white Oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R1
sample Name: (Year 2) R1 Reachwide Pebble Count
Survey Date: 11/23/2009
Size (mm)
TOT # ITEM % CUM %
0 - 0.062
46
46.00
46.00
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.00
46.00
0.125 - 0.25
18
18.00
64.00
0.25 - 0.50
14
14.00
78.00
0.50 - 1.0
20
20.00
98.00
1.0 - 2.0
0
0.00
98.00
2.0 - 4.0
0
0.00
98.00
4.0 - 5.7
0
0.00
98.00
5.7 - 8.0
0
0.00
98.00
8.0 - 11.3
0
0.00
98.00
11.3 - 16.0
0
0.00
98.00
16.0 - 22.6
2
2.00
100.00
22.6 - 32.0
0
0.00
100.00
32 - 45
0
0.00
100.00
45 - 64
0
0.00
100.00
64 - 90
0
0.00
100.00
90 - 128
0
0.00
100.00
128 - 180
0
0.00
100.00
180 - 256
0
0.00
100.00
256 - 362
0
0.00
100.00
362 - 512
0
0.00
100.00
512 - 1024
0
0.00
100.00
1024 - 2048
0
0.00
100.00
Bedrock
0
0.00
100.00
D16 (mm)
0.02
D35 (mm)
0.05
D50 (mm)
0.15
D84 (mm)
0.65
D95 (mm)
0.93
D100 (mm)
22.6
silt /Clay ( %)
46
sand (%)
52
Gravel (%)
2
Cobble (%)
0
Boulder (%)
0
Bedrock (%)
0
Total Particles = 100.

i
N
C
ll
C
CD
U
(Year 2) R1 A Reachwide Pebble Count
Particle Size (mm)
X61
A (Year 2) R1 A Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)
(Year 0) R1 A Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)
V (Year 1) R1 A Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)

RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
River Name: Little white Oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: RlA
Sample Name: (Year 2) R1A Reachwide Pebble Count
Survey Date: 11/23/2009
Size (mm)
TOT # ITEM % CUM
0 - 0.062
29
58.00
58.00
0.062 - 0.125
2
4.00
62.00
0.125 - 0.25
1
2.00
64.00
0.25 - 0.50
6
12.00
76.00
0.50 - 1.0
7
14.00
90.00
1.0 - 2.0
1
2.00
92.00
2.0 - 4.0
0
0.00
92.00
4.0 - 5.7
0
0.00
92.00
5.7 - 8.0
0
0.00
92.00
8.0 - 11.3
0
0.00
92.00
11.3 - 16.0
1
2.00
94.00
16.0 - 22.6
2
4.00
98.00
22.6 - 32.0
1
2.00
100.00
32 - 45
0
0.00
100.00
45 - 64
0
0.00
100.00
64 - 90
0
0.00
100.00
90 - 128
0
0.00
100.00
128 - 180
0
0.00
100.00
180 - 256
0
0.00
100.00
256 - 362
0
0.00
100.00
362 - 512
0
0.00
100.00
512 - 1024
0
0.00
100.00
1024 - 2048
0
0.00
100.00
Bedrock
0
0.00
100.00
D16 (mm)
0.02
D35 (mm)
0.04
D50 (mm)
0.05
D84 (mm)
0.79
D95 (mm)
17.65
D100 (mm)
32
Silt /Clay ( %)
58
Sand ( %)
34
Gravel M
8
cobble ( %)
0
Boulder ( %)
0
Bedrock M
0
Total Particles = 50 (need at least 60).

L I -
W
U
d
(Year 2) R2 Reachwide Pebble Count
Particle Size (mm)
100
A (Year 2) R2 Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)
(Year 0) R2 Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)
V (Year 1) R2 Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)

RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
River Name: Little white oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2
Sample Name: (Year 2) R2 Reachwide Pebble Count
Survey Date: 11/23/2009
Size (mm)
TOT # ITEM % CUM
0 - 0.062
39
39.00
39.00
0.062 - 0.125
14
14.00
53.00
0.125 - 0.25
19
19.00
72.00
0.25 - 0.50
23
23.00
95.00
0.50 - 1.0
0
0.00
95.00
1.0 - 2.0
0
0.00
95.00
2.0 - 4.0
0
0.00
95.00
4.0 - 5.7
0
0.00
95.00
5.7 - 8.0
0
0.00
95.00
8.0 - 11.3
1
1.00
96.00
11.3 - 16.0
3
3.00
99.00
16.0 - 22.6
0
0.00
99.00
22.6 - 32.0
1
1.00
100.00
32 - 45
0
0.00
100.00
45 - 64
0
0.00
100.00
64 - 90
0
0.00
100.00
90 - 128
0
0.00
100.00
128 - 180
0
0.00
100.00
180 - 256
0
0.00
100.00
256 - 362
0
0.00
100.00
362 - 512
0
0.00
100.00
512 - 1024
0
0.00
100.00
1024 - 2048
0
0.00
100.00
Bedrock
0
0.00
100.00
D16 (mm)
0.03
D35 (mm)
0.06
D50 (mm)
0.11
D84 (mm)
0.38
D95 (mm)
0.5
D100 (mm)
32
silt /clay (%)
39
sand ( %)
56
Gravel (%)
5
Cobble ( %)
0
Boulder (%)
0
Bedrock (%)
0
Total Particles = 100.

i
N
C
LL
C
N
U
a.
(Year 2) R2A Reachwide Pebble Count
Particle Size (mm)
A (Year 2) R2A Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)
(Year 0) R2A Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)
V (Year 1) R2A Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)

RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
River Name: Little white oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2A
Sample Name: (Year 2) R2A Reachwide Pebble Count
Survey Date: 11/23/2009
Size (mm)
TOT # ITEM % CUM
0 - 0.062
5
10.00
10.00
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.00
10.00
0.125 - 0.25
6
12.00
22.00
0.25 - 0.50
10
20.00
42.00
0.50 - 1.0
11
22.00
64.00
1.0 - 2.0
6
12.00
76.00
2.0 - 4.0
0
0.00
76.00
4.0 - 5.7
0
0.00
76.00
5.7 - 8.0
0
0.00
76.00
8.0 - 11.3
4
8.00
84.00
11.3 - 16.0
3
6.00
90.00
16.0 - 22.6
2
4.00
94.00
22.6 - 32.0
2
4.00
98.00
32 - 45
0
0.00
98.00
45 - 64
1
2.00
100.00
64 - 90
0
0.00
100.00
90 - 128
0
0.00
100.00
128 - 180
0
0.00
100.00
180 - 256
0
0.00
100.00
256 - 362
0
0.00
100.00
362 - 512
0
0.00
100.00
512 - 1024
0
0.00
100.00
1024 - 2048
0
0.00
100.00
Bedrock
0
0.00
100.00
D16 (mm)
0.19
D35 (mm)
0.41
D50 (mm)
0.68
D84 (mm)
11.3
D95 (mm)
24.95
D100 (mm)
64
Silt /Clay ( %)
10
Sand M
66
Gravel M
24
Cobble ( %)
0
Boulder M
0
Bedrock M
0
Total Particles = 50 (need at least 60).

i
N
C
U-
C
N
U
U
d
(Year 2) R213 Reachwide Pebble Count
Particle Size (mm)
A (Year 2) R2B Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)
(Year 0) 13213 ReachWde Pebble Count
(PC)
V (Year 1) R26 Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)

RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
River Name: Little white Oak Creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2B
Sample Name: (Year 2) R2B Reachwide Pebble Count
Survey Date: 11/23/2009
Size (mm)
TOT # ITEM % CUM
0 - 0.062
47
92.16
92.16
0.062 - 0.125
1
1.96
94.12
0.125 - 0.25
0
0.00
94.12
0.25 - 0.50
2
3.92
98.04
0.50 - 1.0
0
0.00
98.04
1.0 - 2.0
0
0.00
98.04
2.0 - 4.0
0
0.00
98.04
4.0 - 5.7
0
0.00
98.04
5.7 - 8.0
0
0.00
98.04
8.0 - 11.3
0
0.00
98.04
11.3 - 16.0
0
0.00
98.04
16.0 - 22.6
0
0.00
98.04
22.6 - 32.0
1
1.96
100.00
32 - 45
0
0.00
100.00
45 - 64
0
0.00
100.00
64 - 90
0
0.00
100.00
90 - 128
0
0.00
100.00
128 - 180
0
0.00
100.00
180 - 256
0
0.00
100.00
256 - 362
0
0.00
100.00
362 - 512
0
0.00
100.00
512 - 1024
0
0.00
100.00
1024 - 2048
0
0.00
100.00
Bedrock
0
0.00
100.00
D16 (mm)
0.01
D35 (mm)
0.02
D50 (mm)
0.03
D84 (mm)
0.06
D95 (mm)
0.31
D100 (mm)
32
silt /Clay (%)
92.16
sand (%)
5.88
Gravel ( %)
1.96
Cobble (%)
0
Boulder (%)
0
Bedrock (%)
0
Total Particles = 51 (need at least 60).

L
4)
C
LL
C
N
V
d
(Year 2) R21D Reachwide Pebble Count
Particle Size (mm)
100
(Year 2) R21) Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)
(Year 0) R2D Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)
V (Year 1) R2D Reachwide Pebble Count
(PC)

RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
River Name: Little white oak creek (Year 2)
Reach Name: R2D
sample Name: (Year 2) R2D Reachwide Pebble count
Survey Date: 11/23/2009
Size (mm)
TOT # ITEM % CUM
0 - 0.062
21
42.00
42.00
0.062 - 0.125
2
4.00
46.00
0.125 - 0.25
8
16.00
62.00
0.25 - 0.50
16
32.00
94.00
0.50 - 1.0
3
6.00
100.00
1.0 - 2.0
0
0.00
100.00
2.0 - 4.0
0
0.00
100.00
4.0 - 5.7
0
0.00
100.00
5.7 - 8.0
0
0.00
100.00
8.0 - 11.3
0
0.00
100.00
11.3 - 16.0
0
0.00
100.00
16.0 - 22.6
0
0.00
100.00
22.6 - 32.0
0
0.00
100.00
32 - 45
0
0.00
100.00
45 - 64
0
0.00
100.00
64 - 90
0
0.00
100.00
90 - 128
0
0.00
100.00
128 - 180
0
0.00
100.00
180 - 256
0
0.00
100.00
256 - 362
0
0.00
100.00
362 - 512
0
0.00
100.00
512 - 1024
0
0.00
100.00
1024 - 2048
0
0.00
100.00
Bedrock
0
0.00
100.00
D16 (mm)
0.02
D35 (mm)
0.05
D50 (mm)
0.16
D84 (mm)
0.42
D95 (mm)
0.58
D100 (mm)
1
silt /Clay ( %)
42
sand M
58
Gravel ( %)
0
Cobble ( %)
0
Boulder M
0
Bedrock ( %)
0
Total Particles = 50 (need at least 60).

r-
O
O
N
V
N
r
d
a�
N
C
0) 0
N (13
U U
� s
O 0
N z
O O
J Y
0
d
6 d
E rca
Z
v r
a� c
o
a U
-0
U
s
W
WU
Z
w
a
w
W
(7
U)
(7
c
W-
D
O
`
Q
v
N
Q
N
m
U
of
�
fr_
7+
.O
CD
V d
fC =
fC 7
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
H d
0
V
x
W
LO
a-
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
d
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
d
Cl)
I-
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
L
r
r
r
r
r
r
O
N
0
0
O
0
t4
r
r
r
r
O
r
r
O
N
0
O
o
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
C)
a�
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
N
}
CO
O
M
O o
M
N
0
0
=
LO
N
LO
r-
(D
r
0)
(O
O
N o
00
m
rl-
r-
r
ti
(D
0
>
00
m
w
m
w
m
00
00
++
m
�
E
W
I-
0
y.
C
3 0
N
d'
O
O
O
O
O
M
_.
14 0
r
O
O
0 y
(fl
N
Lo
00
(D
r
d7
0
7
f4 �
w
m
m
Co
00
00
0~0
0~0
0~0
000
�
d
W
N
U
�
r
N
C7
d
0
0
ti
0
3
m
i.�

m
C_
CL
E
m
U)
a
rn
a
a
s
a
w
W
U
a
w
a
LJ
yW
W
u
0
�)
Z
C/)
U)
a
C
-
C/)
�-
D
v
U
Q
N
CV
m
n-
O
T
elf
Cn
nvo(0(fl
tn
co
m
O
M
m
N
M
a:+
d
w
LO
N
cO
n
M
O
co
'y
n
mmnnnt�COco
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
c�
nv000cO
n
N
S
m
O
M
oA
N
T
M
U
cn
(O
N
tO
n
M
�-
O
o
O
mmnnnncoco
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
C
W
�
n
't
O(OCOc
-
ten
00
O
M
o
N
(o
CO
m
❑
co
LO
N
(O
n
(D
M
CO
f4
'r+
�
m
m
n
n
n
n
CO
0
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
T
m
0
f)
nvocOCO��n
N
CO
O
CO
0
N
tO
T
(fl
n
m
(o
LO
LO
M
O
O
I
n
M
N
�--
ami
�
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
w
d"'T
w
m
O
O
m—
O
O
co
O
n
O
0
M
(A
d
LL
co
m
N
m
to
n
m
n
(0
n
T
n
O
0
CO
CO
`1
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
00
m
O
M
o
N
U)
T
M
Lo
N
u-)
n
CO
T
CA
(D"
N
a
T
N
M
IT
LO
(0
n
00
y
m
i�
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
C_
CL
E
m
U)
�
w
U�-
vw
yW
t
w
Q
Z
w
a
-
C/)
�-
D
v
U
Q
N
CV
m
n-
elf
nvo(0(fl
tn
m
O
M
m
N
M
LO
N
cO
n
M
O
co
mmnnnt�COco
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
nv000cO
n
m
O
M
oA
N
T
M
cn
(O
N
tO
n
M
�-
O
o
mmnnnncoco
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
n
't
O(OCOc
-
ten
00
O
M
o
N
(o
CO
co
LO
N
(O
n
(D
M
CO
m
m
n
n
n
n
CO
0
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
nvocOCO��n
CO
O
CO
0
N
tO
T
(fl
n
00
N
(O
n
M
O
O
ami
mmnnnncOCO
w
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
d
n
V
OOCO
—
rt
n
m
O
M
o
N
U)
T
M
Lo
N
u-)
n
CO
T
CA
(D"
N
co
co
I--
r-
I--
r-
CD
co
y
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
U
nv0cocO
�n
m
O
co
O
N
O
.+
Ln
In
N
n
o
M
CO
C
co
0
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
=
n
't
O
M
(C)
�-
n
3
m
O
M
O
N
CO
7
(D
O
to
N
LO
n
O
T
o
O
r—y
m
m
n
n
n
n
M
O
Y
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
cc
N
d
n
It
O
CO
(0
n
m
0
cl
CA
N
CO
O"1
(n
N
LO
n
co
O
(D
m
m
n
n
n
n
M
CO
m
m
m
I
m
m
m
m
m
n
V
O
(D
(0
d
o
m
O
CO
07
N
(o
(fl
N
Lo
N
LO
n
(fl
T
O
O
m
m
nnnn(0co
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
4")
O
(O
—
10
Lo
00
m
O
N
N
co
N
N
O
n
n
N
CO
m
(O
N
O
O
mmnnnnO(0
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
N
N't
0
o
o
o
o
M
w
T
O
m—
cO
n
o
m
CO
N
to
m
(D
T
0)
CO
LL
mmnnnn(O(0
Y
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
❑
N
co
It
(O
CO
n
m
m
c�
m
C_
CL
E
m
U)

a�
U N
C
r r r r r r 0
m 0
N
U
X
W
C W U 'O W a) W
w zw-o co co
co C/)
T ? O
Q v N N m U 0
� �
Of
O I �I �I �I �I 5I 5I �I � 1(::)
� I 1 I I I I O
00I �I 5I �I 5I 3I FI 1111 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
31313:I�:I3131313:
�Irl�ll�l�l�l�l.0
CD I TI zI 5I �I 5I 6I 3I 5 IO
(D
m LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w
�LU
o
m
3
3
a
a
t
W
W
Z
c
LU
o
a
W
C a
)
LLI
0
mCl)
_X
Y
U)
U)
°—(n
�
(~
-
d
C
0
'
N
N
m
U
0
r
CIJ �
C-4
�
O
r
O
CO
00
m
O
M
O
N
CO
(fl
G1
(n
N
Cn
r
(D
SD
O
d
r
O
m
0
O
m
m
O
m
O
m
m
r
CD
O
O
r—
r
N
�
(D
m
O
M
m O
N
(o
O
U
W
(O
N
LO
r
(fl
O
(fl
O
w
m
00
r--
r-
r
(D
(D
m
CIO
m
Cl)
m
m
m
c
w
Lo
r
't
O
(D
(.0
r
r
m
c0
O
M
m
N
(n
7
(D
m
co
(n
N
(O
r
CD
O
0
R
d.
co
00
r
r
r
r
(D
(D
C
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
N
r
O
CO
(0
r
V'
r
L.
R
0)
Cl)
m
O
CO
(3)
N
(n
r
CO
ar
C)
N
Lf)
N
LO
r
(fl
r
(A
(O
�-
(D
N
m
O
m
O
LO
co
"t
Cl)
LO
00
O
co
r
00000--c
m
m
m
m
m
c0
N
O
O
O
O
O
co
r
0
00
r
M
r
O
O
LLw
CD
mmrrrrcDCD
N
(O
N
CD
r
O
CD
Y
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
y
[0
m
m
r
r
r
r
CO
CO
0
m
m
m
00
m
m
m
m
U
r
N
M
V
(o
CD
r
m
m
r
qIT
O
(D
CO
'It
r
a�
U N
C
r r r r r r 0
m 0
N
U
X
W
C W U 'O W a) W
w zw-o co co
co C/)
T ? O
Q v N N m U 0
� �
Of
O I �I �I �I �I 5I 5I �I � 1(::)
� I 1 I I I I O
00I �I 5I �I 5I 3I FI 1111 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
31313:I�:I3131313:
�Irl�ll�l�l�l�l.0
CD I TI zI 5I �I 5I 6I 3I 5 IO
(D
m LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w
3
o
m
3
3
a
a
7
W
U
c
o
W
0
W
0
csiwc0z
_X
Y
LU
°—(n
stn
C
o
N
U
m
Q
CO
miomni
m
O
M
O
N
CO
(fl
(n
N
Cn
r
(D
SD
O
O
m
m
O
m
O
m
m
r
CD
O
O
r—
r
m
O
M
m O
N
(o
O
W
(O
N
LO
r
(fl
O
(fl
m
00
r--
r-
r
(D
(D
m
CIO
m
Cl)
m
m
m
r
't
O
(D
(.0
r
r
c0
O
M
m
N
(n
7
(D
co
(n
N
(O
r
CD
O
0
co
00
r
r
r
r
(D
(D
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
r
O
CO
(0
r
V'
r
m
O
CO
(3)
N
(n
r
CO
ar
C)
r
Lf)
N
LO
r
(fl
r
(A
(O
m
m
r
r
r
r
(D
(D
m
m
m
m
m
m
c0
m
N
@
N
O
M
M
N
(O
r
Cfl
O
(O
N
Co
r
(fl
O
co
y
m
m
r
r
r
r
CO
CO
d
m
m
m
00
m
m
m
m
U
r
qIT
O
(D
CO
'It
r
m
00
O
co
m
N
(o
r
(D
++
(o
N
Lo,
r
M,
CT
(6
t
m
m
r
r
r
t�
CD
co
o)
co
co
co
co
m
co
0o
m
r
'IT
CD
(C)
CD
r
It
r
=
3
m
O
M
M
N
(o
r
O
O
d'
(O
N
Cn
r
co
r
(A
(fl
LL
m
m
r
r
r
r
(D
(D
Y
00
c0
00
00
00
m
00
m
�v
n'
r
O
O
O
r
r
m
O
M
G)
N
(o
r
(D
Lo
N
(o
r
(fl
r
O
CO
m
c0
r
r
r
r
CO
O
m
m
00
co
c0
m
m
m
I--
d'
O
(D
O
r
m
O
M
GA
N
(O
r
N
Lo
N
(! i
t
(O
m
m
m
r
r
r
I�
CD
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
["10)
co
N
r
Cp
N
N
co
r
r
O
N
r
(fl
N
M
m
O
M
O
m
m
r
r
r
r
r
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
d
N
0
0
0
0
0
co
w
r
0
c0
r
co
r
m
(A
O
N
(O
m
CO
m
co
U-
00
0o
r
r
r
f�
CD
(D
Y
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
0
rNco
(OOrm
f0
a�
U N
C
r r r r r r 0
m 0
N
U
X
W
C W U 'O W a) W
w zw-o co co
co C/)
T ? O
Q v N N m U 0
� �
Of
O I �I �I �I �I 5I 5I �I � 1(::)
� I 1 I I I I O
00I �I 5I �I 5I 3I FI 1111 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
31313:I�:I3131313:
�Irl�ll�l�l�l�l.0
CD I TI zI 5I �I 5I 6I 3I 5 IO
(D
m LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w
3
3
3
3
3
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
_X
Y
a
C
CO
miomni
0
0
0
0
() U) N N N 0
a a a a a a a
r aoi ai aoi ai aoi aoi aoi 0 r
X X X X X X X-0
0 0 0 O O O N
N N V O O O O O M
W r 0 c0 r M r O m 0
(D N (O 00 CD r 0) (D
LL V
mmrrrrO(fl
Y mmmmmmmm ca C
v E
o w N
m
0
0© ©0©000
rJ