20120498 Ver 1_Application_20120517

r -
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
414
o *4 ��l �✓
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ; 1
sr "
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE EUGENE A �JR
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 7, 2012
Ms Lon Beckwith NCDOT Regulatory Project Manager
U S Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801 -2714
Subject Nationwide 14 Permit Application
SR 1212 Came Lane
Transylvania County
State Project # 14 208811 (DWQ Mmor Permmt Fee $240)
Dear Ms Beckwith
The North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) is proposing to widen, grade, dram
and pave SR 1212, Came Lane, in Transylvania County for a distance of 470 feet This proposal
entails widening and paving the existing gravel road to a standard 18 -foot roadway Came Lane
is a secondary gravel road that is being added to the State system
I am enclosing a typical section of the road drawings for pipe culvert replacements photographs
a marked county map and a USGS quad map
The U S Fish and Wildlife Service list 46 species with federal status for Transylvania County that
are known from current records or were known to occur in the county historically One species
the bog turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergti), is listed as threatened due to similarity of appearance
with the listed northern bog turtle Seven species, Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta
ravenehana) swamp punk (Helonias bullata), small whorled pogoma (Isotria medeoloides),
spreading avens (Geum radiatum), Virginia spu•aea (Spiraea virgintana) rock gnome lichen
(Gymnoderma ltneare) and Carolina northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabnnus coloratus) are
listed as federally threatened or endangered
There are no records for the listed species within one mile of the project The unnamed tributary
of Glady Branch is 1 -2 feet in width This overall project is limited in scope Habitat along the
proposed project has been affected by private residences Vegetation along the light gap created
by the road and adjacent yards is relatively dense Some sections of the road cuts have been
Phone
x(828)891 �791�1� � G,4142 Haywood Road MillslRiverf Nortth Carohna 28759s� 'Faxb [phone]

SR 1212 Came Lane 2
affected by invasive species such as English ivy and periwinkle Habitat is not characteristic of the
listed species
The best management practices will be used to minimize and control sedimentation and erosion on
this project Water will be pumped around the work area to minimize erosion and sedimentation
from the pipe trench The construction foreman will review all sedimentation control measures
during installation to ensure sedimentation is controlled effectively If the planned devices are not
functioning as intended, they will be replaced immediately with better devices The sedimentation
control devices will be in place prior to pipe culvert removal and remain m place until the new
pipe is in place The existing eroding ditches will be removed and the new ditches will be lined
with fabric and stabilized with rock
Impacts to Waters of the United States
The unnamed tributary to Glady Branch (DWQ Class C HQW) is not shown on the USGS
topographic map The unnamed tributary is approximately 2 feet in width with a well - defined
channel composed primarily of gravel, sand and silt The channel lacks vegetation The unnamed
tributary flows approximately 0 4 miles to Glady Branch Glady Branch flows 0 9 miles to
Spanish Oak Branch Spanish Oak Branch flows 0 5 miles to Cathey's Creek Cathey s Creek
flows approximately 0 6 miles to the French Broad River The French Broad River meets the
definition of a Traditional Navigable Water For these reasons we believe that the unnamed
tributary to Glady Branch is a Relatively Permanent Water and is under the jurisdiction of the
U S Army Corps of Engineers In order to construct this project, it will be necessary to impact
waters of the United States in the French Broad River Basin Specifically NCDOT is requesting
to replace and extend one metal culvert in an unnamed tributary to Glady Branch Listed below is
a summary of the proposed impacts
Site No
Existing Condition
Proposed Condition
Net Impacts
Stat No
Site 1
30 x 15 CMP
40 x 24 CMP
10
2 +16
Site IA
Free Flowing Channel
Flow Diversion
85
Total,Impact�_nn Lmear�Feet 10
Temporary Impact for Dikes and Flow Diversion m Linear Feet 85
Permits Requested
NCDOT is hereby requesting authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for the
construction project outlined above By copy of this letter, I am asking Mr David McHenry,
Mountain Region Coordinator, of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC)
to comment directly to you concerning the 404 Nationwide Permit request

SR 1212 Carrie Lane 3
I am also requesting authorization under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act from the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) In addition I am asking Mr McHenry and Mr Ed Ingle Roadside Environmental Field
Operations Engineer ( NCDOT) to comment directly to me concerning this permit request
If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Mr Ben Williams or me
at (828) 891 -7911
Sincerely,
Steven L Cannon P E
District Engineer
Enclosures
cc Mr Brian Wrenn DWQ DENR Raleigh (4 copies)
Mr David McHenry, Mountain Region Coordinator, NCWRC
Mr Mike Parker, DWQ, Asheville
Mr Jason Mays, Biologist, U S Fish and Wildlife Service, Asheville
Mr Mark Gibbs P E , Division Maintenance Engineer
Mr Mark Davis, Division Environmental Officer
Mr E L Ingle, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT
Mr Ben Williams, P E , Transylvania County Maintenance Engineer, NCDOT
File

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info
1 Project Name SR 1212 Came Lane Secondary Road Addition
2 Name of Property Owner /Applicant NC Department of Transportation
3 Name of Consultant /Agent N/A
*Agent authonzathon needs to be attached
4 Related/Previous Action ID number(s)
5 Site Address N/A
6 Subdivision Name N/A
7 City Brevard
8 County Transylvania
9 Lat 35 20900 N Long 82 75560 W (Approx Project Center)
10 Quadrangle Name Brevard
11 Waterway Unnamed TnbutaU of Glady Branch (Class C HQWI
12 Watershed French Broad River
13 Requested Action
X Nationwide Permit # 14
General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre - Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office
I
AID
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose
Site /Waters Name
Keywords

�w
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page Iof11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A Apphcant Information
1
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number NW 14 or General Permit (GP) number
1 c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
❑ Yes
® No
1 g
Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
SR 1212 Carrie Lane
2b
County
Transylvania
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Brevard
2d
Subdivision name
N/A
2e
NCDOT only T I P or state
project no
14 208811;
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
NC Dept of Transportation
3b
Deed Book and Page No
N/A
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
N/A
3d
Street address
N/A
3e
City state zip
N/A
3f
Telephone no
N/A
3g
Fax no
N/A
3h
Email address
N/A
Page Iof11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other specify District Engineer
4b
Name
Steven L Cannon
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
4d
Street address
4142 Haywood Road
4e
City state zip
Mills River NC 28759
4f
Telephone no
[phone]
4g
Fax no
[phone]
4h
Email address
slcannon @ncdot gov
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
NIA
5b
Business name
(d applicable)
N/A
5c
Street address
N/A
5d
City state zip
N/A
5e
Telephone no
N/A
5f
Fax no
N/A
5g
Email address
N/A
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

B Project Information and Prior Project History
1 Property Identification
la Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
N/A
Latitude 35 2090 N Longitude 82 7556 W
1b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
(DD DDDDDD) ( DD DDDDDD)
1 c Property size
N/A acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to
UT to Glady Branch
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C HQW
2c River basin
French Broad
3 Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
Rural1175— capes a mixture of�forest and single family resideng:- ,-The existing road is narrow and steep Ditches are
eroding severely
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
N/A
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
N/A
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
Replace and add length to pipe to bring this road up to current secondary road standards
3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used
The road footprint will be cleared Erosion and sedimentation devices will be installed Flow diversion will be installed
and the old culvert removed and the new culvert installed The road will be widened graded and drainage pipes
installed Ditch lines will be stabilized with fabric and rock Road bed will be prepared and paved Track hoes dump
trucks water pumps diversion pipe paving equipment and various hand tools will be used to accomplish the work
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past
Comments N/A
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company N/A
Name (if known) N/A
Other N/A
4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
N/A
5 Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past
If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions
K b
N/A
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

6 Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes explain
N/A
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ® Streams tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps 404 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ —non 404 other)
(acres)
Temporary T
El Yes
El Corps
N/A
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
E] No
E] DWQ
El Yes Yes
❑
W2 P ❑ T
❑
❑ No
❑ DWQ
El Yes
El Corps
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
[I Corps
W4 P ❑ T
❑
❑ No
❑ DW Q
El Yes
F1 Corps
W5 E] P E] T
❑No
E] DWQ
El Yes
El Corps
W6 P ❑ T
❑
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g Total wetland impacts
2h Comments N/A
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
length
number (PER) or (Corps 404 10 stream
width (linear
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non 404
(INT)? (feet) feet)
Temporary (T) other)
UTto"Glady
®PER
Corps
2
10
Si ®P ❑ T
Culvert
Branch
❑ INT
® DWQ
S2 ❑ P ®T
Flow Diversion
UTtoG a y
Branch
PER
❑ INT
®Corps
® DWQ
2
85
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S3 ❑ P E] T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
E] PER PER
❑
S4 E] P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S5 E] P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
10
31 Comments Total temporary impact for impervious dikes and flow diversion is 85 feet
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
impact number —
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
02 ❑P
03 ❑P
04 ❑P ❑T
4f Total open water impacts
N/A
4g Comments N/A
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed the complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
number
of pond
P1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
P2
5f Total
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5g Comments N/A
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
N/A
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
N/A
5k Method of construction
N/A
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
a No
N/A
N/A
❑Yes
B2 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
❑Yes
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments N/A
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1 a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The culvert is being extended only to the length needed to bring this road up to current secondary road standards
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
An impervious dike will be installed in the channel to minimize the water flowing into the work area at culvert installation site
Water will be diverted around the site during pipe installation to limit downstream habitat and water quality degradation
Appropriate BMPs according to the approved erosion and sedimentation control plan will be installed prior to culvert
installation and road construction Eroding ditch lines will be removed and new ditches will be lined with fabric and stabilized
with rock
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State's
❑ Yes ❑ No
2b If yes nntigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in lieu fee program
❑ Permdtee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank N/A
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type N/A
Quantity N/A
3c Comments N/A
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
10 linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ coot ®cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
N/A square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
N/A acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
N/A acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
N/A acres
4h Comments N/A
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
N/A
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c
6d
6e
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
N/A
N/A
3 (2 for Catawba)
N/A
Zone 2
i
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required
N/A
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank
permdtee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund)
N/A
6h Comments N/A
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is 4 adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b
if yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why
❑ Yes ED No
Comments N/A
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A %
2b Does this project requires a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative description of the plan
Project is Covered by Individual NPDES Permit NCS000250
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
® DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local governments jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other N/A
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 246
❑ Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes E] No
attached'?
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? N/A
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? N/A
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

F Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
lb If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an
❑ Yes ® No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter )
Comments N/A
2 Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated
❑ Yes ® No
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 0200)?
2b Is this an after the fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s) N/A
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description
Thisis a�rural unpaved�secondary road�that is lessrthan 500 feet in`tilength Houses already exist along road section to
be +pavedThewo is tobnngthisgroadupatocurrent secondary roadstandardsDevelopmental )patternsarenot
+rk
expected�to�,change as�a,resu�t of�this� prolecti
4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
U S Fish and Wildlife Service County List
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
N/A —There are no marine or estuarine communities within the Blue Ridge Province
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
T�his?protect is�47Q,,feetlin length and the footprint�appears to haVe�beenddistur�bed!,7previously by residential construction
Therefore we believe the potential to impact cultural resources is minimal
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements N/A
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC F000dplain Mapping Program
Steven L Cannon
5/7/2012
Applicant/Agents Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent s Signature
(Agents signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received Fee Paid Permit Number
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECT
This form may be photocopied for use as an anginal
DWO Stormwater Management Plan Review
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes this application form, a supplement form for each BMP proposed
(see Section V) design calculations and plans and specifications showing all road and BMP details
PROJECT INFORMATION
NCDOT Project Number 14 208811 County Transylvania
Protect Name 5R 1212 (Came LaneZWiden, grade dram and pave to NCDOT secondary road standards
Project Location SR 1212 (Came Lane) located approximately 23 mi from the intersection of SR 1114 and SR 1124
Contact Person Steve Cannon, PE Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
Receiving Stream Name Glady Branch River Basin French Broad Class C, HQW
Proposed linear feet of project 470
Proposed Structural BMP and Road Station (attach a list of station and BMP type if more room is needed)
See attached Stormwater Management Plan
Type of proposed project (check all that apply)
❑ New ®Widening N2 lane* ❑4 lane* ❑Curb and Gutter ❑Bridge Replacement
NOther (Describe) Widen grade drain and pave to current NCDOT Secondary Road Standards
*2 lane and 4 lane imply that roadside ditches are used unless Curb and Gutter is also checked
II REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided below to indicate the following design requirements have been-met and supporting documentation
is attached Supporting documentation shall, at a muumum, consist of a brief narrative description including (1) the scope of
the project (2) how the items below are met (3) how the proposed best management practices minimize water quality
impacts and (4) any significant constraints and/or justification for not meeting a b c and d to the maxi num extent
practicable
De t er s Initials
a The amount of impervious surface has been minimized as much as possible
b The runoff from the impervious areas has been diverted away from surface waters as much as possible
c Best Management Practices are employed which minimize water quality unpacts
d Vegetated roadside ditches are 3 1 slope or flatter

III OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
I acknowledge and agree by my initials below that the North Carolina Department of Transportation is responsible for the
implementation of the four maintenance items listed I agree to notify DWQ of any operational problems with the BMP s that
would mipact water quality or prior to making any changes to the system or responsible party
Maintenance Engineer s Initials
a BMP s shall be inspected and maintained in good working order
/; Z✓ b Eroded areas shall be repaired and reseeded as needed
IP—' c Stormwater collection systems including piping inlets and outlets shall be maintained to insure proper
functioning
Maintenance Engineer s Name Ben Williams PE
Title Transylvania County Maintenance Engineer - --
IV APPLICATION CERTIFICATION
I (print or type name) Steve Cannon. PE of Division 14 District 1 Division of Highways Branch,
certify that the -information -included on this permit application form is to the best of my knowledge correct and that the
project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans and that the proposed project complies with the
requirements of 15A NCAC 2H 1000
Title District Engmeer
Address 4142 Haywood Rd Mills River NC 28759
Signature �,— �!- �r� --�� Date
V SUPPLEMENT FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each BMP
specified for this project Contact the Stormwater and General Percmts Unit at [phone] for the status and availability
of these forms
Form SW401 Low Density
Form SW401 Curb Outlet System
Form SW401 Off Site System
Form SW401 Wet Detention Basin
Form SW401 Infiltration Basin
Form SW401 Infiltration Trench
Form SW401 Bioretention Cell
Form SW401 Level Spreader
Form SW401 Wetland
Form SW401 Grassed Swale
Form SW401 Sand Filter
Low Density Supplement
Curb Outlet System Supplement
Off Site System Supplement
Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Infiltration Basin Supplement
Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Bioretention Cell Supplement
Level Spreader /Filter Strip /Restored Riparian Buffer Supplement
Constructed Wetland Supplement
Grassed Swale Supplement
Sand Filter Supplement

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section N of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION I BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
B DISTRICT OFFICE FILE NAME AND NUMBER
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION SR 1212 Came Lane
State NC County /pansh/borough fransylvatua City Brevard
Center coordinates of site Oat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 35 2090 N Long 82 7556 W
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody Unnamed Tributary to Glady Branch (DWQ Class C HQW)
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows French Broad River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 06010105010060
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request
❑ Check if other sites (e g offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
® Office (Desk) Determination Date April 20 2012
® Field Determination Date(s) April 23 2012
SECTION H SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There A no navigable waters of the US within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area [Required]
E] Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
❑ Waters are presently used or have been used in the past or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are waters of the US within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required]
1 Waters of the U S
a Indicate presence of waters of U S in review area (check all that apply) i
❑ TNWs including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ hnpoundments of junsdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters including isolated wetlands
b Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non wetland waters 150 linear feet 2 width (ft) and/or acres
Wetlands acres
c Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on kstabhshed by OHWM
Elevation of established OHWM (if known)
2 Non regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable) 3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional
Explain
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year round or has continuous flow at least seasonally'
t o tv ally A month 1

SECTION III CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies-will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section III A 1 and Section III D 1 only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sections III A.1 and 2
and Section III D 1 otherwise, see Section III B below
1 TNW
Identify TNW
Sunmianze rationale supporting deter tnation
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands if any and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established underWapancir have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are `relatively permanent
waters (RPWs) i e tributaries that typically flow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e g., typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW but has year round
(perennial) flow slap to Section III D 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
slop to Section III D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary or its adjacent wetlands, or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands complete Section III.B 1 for
the tributary Section HLB 2 for any onsite wetlands and Section HIM 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III C below
1 Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size Pick List
Drainage area Pick List
Average annual rainfall inches
Average annual snowfall inches
(u) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationslup with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
❑ Tnbutary flows through Pick si tL tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are Pic river rimes from TNW
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW
Project waters are Pic�List aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW5
Tnbutary stream order if known
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and in the and
West
'Flow route can be described by identifying e g tributary a which flows through the review area to flow into tnbutary b which then flows into TNW

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply)
Tributary is ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man altered) Explain
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate)
Average width feet
Average depth feet
Average side slopes Pick List
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply)
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type //o cover
❑ Other Lxplain
Tributary condition/stability [e g highly eroding sloughing banks] Explain
Presence of nm/nffle /pool complexes Explain
Tributary geometry PieUDIst
-1 nbutary gradient (approximate average slope) A
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year Pick L_ ist
Describe flow regime
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is Pick L si t. Characteristics
Subsurface flow P ck,List Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
Tributary has (check all that apply)
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply)
❑ clear natural line impressed on the bank
❑ the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑ the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down bent or absent
❑ sediment sorting
❑ leaf titter disturbed or washed away
❑ scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine
lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
❑ High Tide Line indicated by ❑
Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ survey to available datum,
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings
❑ physical markings/charactenstics
❑ vegetation Imes/changes in vegetation types
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
(m) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize tributary (e g water color is clear discolored oily film, water quality general watershed characteristics etc )
Explain
Identify specific pollutants if known
6A natural or roan made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily severjunsdiction (e g where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody s flow
regime (e g flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert) the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
7N&

(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that apply)
❑ Riparian comdor Characteristics (type average width)
❑ Wetland fringe Characteristics
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatio/wrkdhfe diversity Explain findings
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size acres
Wetland type Explain
Wetland quality Explain
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General flow Relationship with Non 1NW
Flow is Pick List Explain
Surface flow is Pick List
Characteristics
Subsurface flow Fick, Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non TNW
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explain
❑ Separated by berm/bamer Explain
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is from Pick List _
Estimate approxunate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplam.
(u) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize wetland system (e g water color is clear brown oil film on surface water quality general watershed
characteristics etc ) Explain
Identify specific pollutants if known
(in) Biological Characteristics Wetland supports (check all that apply)
❑ Riparian buffer Characteristics (type average width)
❑ Vegetationtype /percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic/wddhfe diversity Explain findings
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

For each wetland specify the following
Directly abuts? (Y/M Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological chemical and physical functions being performed
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations, a significant nevus exists if the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume duration and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specd3c threshold of distance (e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include for example
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) provide habitat and hfecycle support functions for fish and
other species such as feeding nesting spawning or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have other relationships to the physical chemical or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary itself then go to Section III D
2 Significant nexus findings for non RPW and its adjacent wetlands where the non RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands then go to Section III D
3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands then go to
Section III D
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
❑ TNWs linear feet width (ft) Or acres
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
2 RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
®
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial The stream has a well defined channel The stream is shown on the NC Floodplain Mapping program.
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow seasonally' (e g typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally The

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
® Tributary waters 150 linear feet 2 width (ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
3 Non RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for junsdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters tmear feet width (ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
4 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section HID 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section IMB and rationale in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
R Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
6 Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section MC
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
7 Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from waters of the U S or
0 Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6) or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
E ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS THE USE
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) "
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
v❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
❑ Interstate isolated waters Explain
❑ Other factors Explain
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination
8See Footnote # 3
9 To complete the analysts refer to the key in Section III D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
io Prior to asserting or declining CWAiurisdiction based solely on this category Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos

Provide estuates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
❑ Wetlands acres
F NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in SWANCC the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
Migratory Bird Rule (MBR)
❑ Waters do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explain
❑ Other (explain, if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis ofjunsdiction is the MBR
factors (i a presence of migratory birds presence of endangered species use of water for irrigated agriculture) using best professional
judgment (check all that apply)
❑ Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
Lakes /ponds acres
❑ Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply)
❑ Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
❑ Lakes/ponds acres
❑ Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/dohneation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/dehneahon report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters study
❑ US Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑ U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps
Q 100 year Floodplain Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs ❑ Aerial (Name & Date)
or ® Other (Name & Date) Culvert Site April 2012
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Applicable /supporting case law
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature
❑ Other information (please specify)
B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD

Stormwater Management Plan
Project
Transylvania County 4/30/2012
Roadway Description
The project consists of improvement and paving of an existing gravel road SR 1212 Carrie Lane The
total project length is 470 feet The project is located in the French Broad River Basin The project
drainage system consists of matted shoulders and ditches corrugated metal pipes with rip rap dissipater
pads at the pipe outfall
Jurisdictional Stream Unnamed tributary to Glady Branch
Environmental Description
The project is located within the French Broad River Basin in Transylvania County Glady Branch is
classified C HQW Stormwater impacts to the stream will be minimized to the maximum extent
practicable by utilizing sheet flow in matting lined ditches along the roadway and using rip rap pads to
diffuse flow before entering the stream The existing drainage patterns will be maintained with the
hydraulic design of the project
Best Management Practices
The primary goal of Best Management Practices (BMPs) is to prevent degradation of the state s surface
waters by the location construction and operation of the highway system The BMPs are activities
practices and procedures taken to prevent or reduce Stormwater pollution The BMP measures used on
this project to reduce Stormwater impacts are
Matted Roadway Ditches
This will promote infiltration and filtration of construction runoff by directing water from L into a
matted roadway ditch The cut slope will be 11 to mimic the existing cut slope as well as to reduce cost
by minimizing excavation and R/W
Outlet Protection with Rip Rap
Rip rap outlet protection is provided at all pipe outlets to dissipate energy from stormwater runoff to
provide non erosive velocities for infiltration and filtration before entering the stream

NWP 3 Site Coordinates
Carne Lane
SR 1212
Transylvania County
Existing & Prop Center Line
--------------- - - - - -- --------------- - - - -- 2
Inlet Invert Elev Replace Existing Perched Oulet Invert Elev
9999 30x18 CMP with 40x24 CMP 9987
!gs Approximately 20 from shoulder of existing road
1 10004
2 9985
plans for erosion control
* Drawing not to scale

r
SR 1212 Carrie Lane, Secondary Road Addition —NW14
Transylvania County
i X }

Photo 3 Culvert Inlet 35 20909N 82 75559W
Photo 4 Culvert Outlet

Photo S From Unnamed Tributary Looking Toward SR 1124 Intersection
A .ar �1 .,+ � �✓� .. .s.�a�. h, �i�s�. 7 a i X S �. ^'� � .�� ,.rw. .a
Photo 6 Looking From Near Unnamed Tributary Toward End Of Project And Turnaround
Aran

Photo 7 Turnaround Area at End of Project
Photo 8 Eroding Ditch To Ile Removed and
New Fabric Lined and Rock Stabilized Ditch Installed

i
i
i
U
N
O
^^L
70
N
O
2:
t0 �
D
oU
U �
N
U
cu
C
(Q
J cu
N
(D
L
Ri
All
N
T-
N
r
w
U)
U
a
C
z �
a
d
aP el��
Fisher oa
�c
4
me
w
y
a
Sig
is it
`tea G`eet1
o sec
�JG
�G
�o
�o
m
r ;
4 S 040
OlAt
6raOke�s Creek
eel
e
da��Ct
4F
ca
pb `� d9
L--]]
a —�
Rr�er
goad
Fre
r loaf
SUga
A�
A�
o�
NI
9
� m
Sr�e�y
Ga
peerwoode
C N7
o
s
''"'9// m
]QE'
cll 7
Gr �
o,
0
m
�
W
GoJ
a
E
E
C N7
o
s
''"'9// m
]QE'
cll 7
cn
N
� N
1Lo
I r
LO
0
LO
N
C)
O
U
0
m
�
W
E
E
LO)
LL
,J v/
W
I
J
cn
N
� N
1Lo
I r
LO
0
LO
N
C)
O

N
CA
ills
NL
j�
.11 �l�
�� r J �' CitiO 6S,b
i I�
''_"'✓ (�' "^ �`""'1� /f Vv �
1
..,;..-�'/ �.
1
1i'
7W' \ �'
r
f +
/auk
j k
CD
�'
� � '� t" \. /�
jib 1. i
f /"� a'�.f',ti ^'%M
�!t�
i J.� � ..,,�,...
� ��.�
S
`
J jp ti\i ..=,i
l •-�.� � -^^., S' - +, i+ ��
< N�tp � , 'ti. d��2 � pll� j{", f
i� 1
\
{ �
r� � 9d r �
I �+ i
A } �� � � � � I �
�-
�
.1
1 � �� f\
10 r� =/ i
1
r ((3 ti DOd�
N

N C DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SECONDARY ROAD SURVEY
SUBJECT SR 1212 Carrie Lane
LOCATION Begin at the Intersection of SRI 124 (Illahee Point) and SR 1212 and
continue in a Southerly direction for a total distance of 470 feet to end of project
WORK TYPE Grade, Drain, Base, Pave & Erosion Control
WORK ORDER 14 088023(Temp) PRIORITY
COUNTY Transylvania TOWNSHIP Cathey's Creek
DATE 7/16/2010 (Revised 412312012) SCALE 1 " =50'
Design ADT Bracket 0 -600 Current ADT Bracket 0 -360
Water UT to Glady Branch (C, HQW)
Notes 45' R/W EC PREPARED BY BA
45' 0"
RIGHT OF WAY
CENTERLINE
i
6' 9' 9' 4' 3'
ASPHALT PAVEMENT
SHOULDER ' SHOULDER
' DITCH
MAX SLOPE
FILL 11,2 1
CUT 11
• o'/

J
NCG -01 Permit Compliance Language for EC Plans
THESE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS COMPLY WITH THE
REGULATIONS SET FORTH BY THE NCG- 010000 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT EFFECTIVE AUGUST 3 2011 ISSUED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF
WATER QUALITY

f
rL
>i
2 x3 x7
U
0
`
ARNAHAN
AC MICC °HAEEELL &
S A�
Deed 351 Page' 90
8 stn Type
M x01
120 WILSON DR
BREVARD NO 28712 \ ^/
Pin
LP Gas Tank
Moved Off R/W e
857"ll -M1-000
Deed 394 Page 495
Install temporary slit fence 2 beyond
top of Cut as
temporary diversion
propose 35 xl8 HOPE
+5
Pvt qrive
cant es, 45
Y Line
_ _
NEIMAN GRAHAM C & CARRIE A
22 CARRIE LANE
BREVARD NO 28712
I
I
Pin 8575-824312-000
Type
5z3
B
Clip Berm
U.
x%pIn
roposed
12/
Wrapped Stilt Check
un
4o
Type A with PAM M iii
TSF
Install temporary silt fence 2 beyond
top of cut as temporary diversion
to
1
q
I7
61,
STI 3 84sin Type
2 6
B
�
Note Basin Size Change
I
Slit Basin Type
2 x3 x6
9
I
/
Temporary Roc
slit check Typ rak
1
O Propose 40 x 24 HOP
12/
I
t
WORLEY WANDA MARIE
I
PO BOX 636
PISGAH FOREST NO 28768
Pin W1182a08it400 5fit Basin Tyg.
2
I
1
Dead 445 Pegs. 179 x3 x7 LA
031
3/
3/
3/
T
21n3 XQsiny Type
8f It Ch77eCft T o ff
1 W e
Concrete r e
.'tailed i baffles l ibasl must
O silt ch CK Ripe
silt Check Type
REED JAMES W
Silt 89�51n Type
PO BOX 425
2 x3 x7
TU XEfM NC 28784
Pin 857�-82fi307-000
Deed 351 Page' 90
8 stn Type
M x01
Ill t che ck Type A
LP Gas Tank
Moved Off R/W e
12 Wattle
Install temporary slit fence 2 beyond
top of Cut as
temporary diversion
Illahee Point SRII24
Fence
(� 1 l,arrle Lane (A(altion)
U Page I
BRYSON DORENE HLTE
88 CARRIE LN
BREVARD NO 28712
Pin Deed x212381 -000
Ln
;lit Basin Type B
? x3 x6
Of Baqsin Type 8
X3 x6
gmporary Rock
Note Basin Size Change
Ill t che ck Type A
Moved Off R/W e
love
propose 35 xl8 HOPE
O
'T
NEIMAN GRAHAM C & CARRIE A
22 CARRIE LANE
BREVARD NO 28712
Pin 8575-824312-000
Deed 521 Page 606
Clip Berm
U.
xfstlna 25 x 24 CMP
100 ESA
sIf k% 2 Stream
x24 HOPE +
I �
Low and end point measures must
be Installed at allsilt fences
e
�.0/
I T I�
615 'IN
0 +00
O
GILLESPiE CLAUDE E
256 ILLAHEE POINT
BREVARD NO 28712
Pin 857582. 5848 -000
Deed 0 Paga 0
Illahee Point SRII24