The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20120285 Ver 1_Stream Call Letter_20070504North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/1/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26114 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S1 Longitude: _81.2781g Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #2 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= 2�.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 3 3 3 0 3 0 �[�� i�.7 3 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: 0 3 i � is � � is = i.s i.s i.s North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/2/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25883 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S2 Longitude: _81.28317 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #2 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 3 3 3 2 0 1 1 0.5 is Yes = 3 3 3 3 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 2 1 0 i o.s 1 0 o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/2/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26204 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S3 Longitude: _81.27�53 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #2 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 22.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 3 3 2 0 � 0 is Yes = 3 3 3 3 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 i o.s 1 0 o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/2/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26086 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S4 Longitude: _81.2718g Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #2 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >> > 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Vk] Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 i i i 0 i i 0 i o.s o.s No=O 3 3 3 o.s o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 z I 0 0 0 o.s 0.5 0 o.s FAC = 0.5 on the presence of aqi Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: StYealll IS peYellllla� �]Y North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/6/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25715 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S5 Longitude: _81.26953 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #4 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >>.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 4.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 i i 0 0 i 0 0 z o.s i No=O i i i 0 o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 � � 0 0 0 0 � n None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/6/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25915 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S6 Longitude: _81.26945 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #4 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 C �[�� 0 0 0 n�.7 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: � 0 2 2 o.s i is 3b7 ��a North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/20/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26516 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S7 Longitude: _81.2623 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #3 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 20 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 2 1 1 i Yes = 3 3 3 3 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 i i 1 0 o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/10/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26689 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S8 Longitude: _81.2g2g2 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #3 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = �.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Vk] Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 0 0 i i 0 0 0 0 i o.s i No=O 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FAC = 0.5 on the presence i o.s o.s Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: Stream is intermittent �]Y 2 i o.s 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/10/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26902 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S9 Longitude: _81.26454 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #3 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = �.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Vk] Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 0 0 i i 0 0 0 0 i o.s i No=O 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FAC = 0.5 on the presence � � Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: Stream is intermittent �]Y 2 2 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/15/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25929 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S10 Longitude: _81.2g2�7 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #4 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= 2�.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 2 2 2 C � 0 is Yes = 3 2 2 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 o.s o.s 0.5 0 i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/15/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2616 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S11 Longitude: _81.26409 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #3 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >> > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 4.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 0 z i 0 0 0 i i o.s is No=O i i i 0 0 i Yes = 1.5 3 0 0 0 0 0 FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence Sketch: �]Y North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/17/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26383 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S12 Longitude: _81.26195 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #3 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �2 > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 � � C � C 0.5 o.s No=O i i i o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: 2 2 Ya i � 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/17/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26213 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S13 Longitude: _81.26163 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #3 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �2 > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 i No=O 2 2 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 I o 0 0 0 o.s 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/20/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25431 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S14 Longitude: _81.26084 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #4 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 2 2 3 0 �0 No=O 0 2 3 3 i 0 is Yes = 1.5 3 2 1.5 0 o.s 0.5 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/27/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25287 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S15 Longitude: _81.26339 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #4 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2s � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 1 3 3 2 2 1 0 Yes = 3 3 i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: � � � � E F � � 3b7 � � i.s North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/16/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25291 Evaluator: S&ME (C. McRae) Site: S1.S15B Longitude: _81.24139 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 2 2 0 0.5 0 0 1 0 is Yes = 3 3 3 3 i i is Yes = 1.5 0 0 '� � � � 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/6/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23394 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S15C Longitude: _81.23315 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #15 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 i 0 z i 0 i i 0 o.s i Yes = 3 3 is i 3 3 0 1 o.s o.s 0.5 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland p Sketch: � � is = i.s North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/12/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.19928 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S15D Longitude: _81.22356 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #18 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = v.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 i 3 3 3 o.s i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: � � � 0 is Yes = 3 2 3 3 0 is is Yes = 1.5 0 0 i 2 i.s North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/19/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.18215 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S15E Longitude: _81.21799 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #10 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 2 1 3 2 0 0 o.s � Yes = 3 3 3 3 is o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 3 3 1.5 0 i i 1.5 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/21/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25431 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S16 Longitude: _81.25846 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #4 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = a > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. Sinuosity 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 5.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong i i 0 i 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 No=O i i i is o.s 0 Yes = 1.5 3 3 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/5/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2506 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S17 Longitude: _81.26363 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #4 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 3 2 3 3 1.5 is No=O 3 3 3 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 o.s o.s 1 0 i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/28/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25131 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S18 Longitude: _81.26616 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #4 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 i i 3 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 No=O I 3 0 0 0 0 0 29 focuses on the presence i i i i Yes = 1.5 0 i i 1 ' aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 11/28/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25109 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S19 Longitude: _81.26553 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #4 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >> > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 i 0 0 0 0 i 0 No=O 29 focuses on the presence Sketch: �]Y z 0 2 2 i i � 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/4/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.24628 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S20 Longitude: _81.2635 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #4 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 i i 2 0 1 1 0 1 0.5 is No=O 2 2 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/4/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.24471 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S21 Longitude: _81.26139 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #4 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 � � � i is No=O 2 2 is o.s i Yes = 1.5 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: � North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/4/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.24488 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S22 Longitude: _81.2615 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #4 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �6.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 0 z i 2 3 1 0 1 1 is No=O 2 2 i 0 i Yes = 1.5 3 0 0 0 0 0 FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence Sketch: �]Y � North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/4/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.24814 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S23 Longitude: _81.25993 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #4 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �3.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 0 i 2 1 2 0 0 2 1 is No=O 2 2 is o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 o.s 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/6/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23885 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S24 Longitude: _81.25924 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #5 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 44' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 1 1 0.5 2 2 2 i Yes = 3 3 3 3 3 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 I 0 o.s o.—s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: va North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/26/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.24143 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S24B Longitude: _81.24514 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #14 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 3 3 2 3 G � r i Yes = 3 1.5 3 3 3 is o.s i Yes = 1.5 2 3 1 0 i i 1. i o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/5/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23971 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S25 Longitude: _g1.26038 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #5 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 6 ) 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 5.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish an 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Vk] Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 G � � � � C i o.s o.s No=O 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 FAC = 0.5 on the presence i i i o.s o.s Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: Stream is intermittent �]Y i 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/7/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.24021 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S26 Longitude: _81.26334 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #5 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= 16 ) 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 3 i i 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 i No=O 2 2 i o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 0 o.s 0 o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/7/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.24038 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S27 Longitude: _81.2635 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #5 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 i i 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0 No=O 3 3 2 i o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/8/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23821 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S28 Longitude: _81.26047 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #5 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >> > 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 � C C � r C � � 0 0 0 0 0 n Q 0 0.5 o.s No=O i i i o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aq Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: Stream is intermittent �]Y 2 i 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/8/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23823 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S29 Longitude: _81.26032 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #5 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = a > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 3.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 � � � � � � 0 0 0 n 0 1 0.5 o.s No=O i i i o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: 2 0 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/19/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23192 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S30 Longitude: _81.25949 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #5 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 20 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 3 3 2 2 3 1 1 0 0.5 is No=O 3 3 3 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 z I None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: i i i i 2 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/29/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23177 Evaluator: S&ME (C. McRae) Site: S1.S30B Longitude: _81.24987 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #14 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 22 > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 3 1 3 3 G � r 1.5 is Yes = 3 3 3 3 is o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 3 0 2 i i 1. i o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/8/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2345 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S31 Longitude: _81.26394 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #5 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 0 0 0 0 o.s o.s No=O � '� � 3 o.s 0 0 o.s 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: � � � 2 2 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/15/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23198 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S32 Longitude: _81.257g� Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #5 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 9 > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 4 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 2 0 2 1 0.5 o.s No=O i i i 0 0 o.s Yes = 1.5 I � 0 0 0 0 0 0 FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence n�.7 Sketch: �]Y North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/15/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23133 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S33 Longitude: _81.25745 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #5 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �6.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 0 0 0 o.s i No=O 3 3 3 i o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 3 3 0.5 0 0 i 0.5 0 i. None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/19/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23195 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S34 Longitude: _81.25459 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #5 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 i i i 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 is No=O 3 3 3 i o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 3 I None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/19/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23181 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S35 Longitude: _81.25816 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #5 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = s.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 0 i 0 i 2 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 No=O � � 3 o.s o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: 2 2 o.s 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/19/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23199 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S36 Longitude: _g1.26008 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #5 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= 16 ) 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 i 3 1 2 C C 3 0.5 No=O 3 1.5 3 3 3 i i Yes = 1.5 i.s 0 0.5 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: � North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/19/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23222 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S37 Longitude: _g1.26138 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #5 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �3.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 0 0 G � � C 3 1 is No=O 2 2 i o.s 0 Yes = 1.5 3 3 0.5 0 0 i.s 0.5 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/20/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2695 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S38 Longitude: _81.25633 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #3 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = ».5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 21b. Rooted plants in channel 22. Crayfish 23. Bivalves 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 2 1 3 0 1 1 1 is No=O � � 3 0 n i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: f 3b7 � � North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/20/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2696 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S39 Longitude: _81.25713 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #3 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �0.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 G � � C �[�� C 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence 0 0 i i o.s n�.7 Sketch: �]Y � 0 0 � is 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/21/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26761 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S40 Longitude: _81.25094 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #3 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 2 3 3 1 2 1 1 1 o.s Yes = 3 2 3 3 is o.s i Yes = 1.5 2 3 0.5 0 o.s 0.5 i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: i.s North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/27/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26758 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S42 Longitude: _81.24677 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #11 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 Q � � 2 2 2 �i Yes = 3 3 3 3 3 is o.s is Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/27/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.27167 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S43 Longitude: _81.24669 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #11 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= 2�.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 3 2 2 3 0 2 1 1.5 i No=O 3 3 3 i o.s is Yes = 1.5 3 3 1.5 0 i o.s 0.5 2 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 12/27/2006 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.27335 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S44 Longitude: _81.2444 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #11 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �3.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 2 i No=O 2 2 i 0 o.s Yes = 1.5 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/3/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.28172 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S45 Longitude: _81.24486 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #11 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �6.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 �[�� f�7 e 3 Q 0 0 � Q 0 � o.s 0 o.s i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: 2 0 is 3 3 3 i Yes = 1.5 � North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/3/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2813 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S46 Longitude: _81.24363 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #11 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �9.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 1 is No=O 3 3 3 is o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 3 I o.s o.s 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: f North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/4/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.28134 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S47 Longitude: _81.2237 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #12 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = ».5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 3 0 1 1 1 1 is No=O 2 2 is o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 3 0.5 0 0 i.s 0.5 i i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/4/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.28094 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S48 Longitude: _81.22414 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #12 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao �' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 i 0 i 2 0 1 2 1 1 is No=O 2 2 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 3 0.5 0 0 i.s 0.5 0 o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/9/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.27825 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S49 Longitude: _81.22�p2 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #12 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = ».5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 2 1 2 0 2 1 0 1.5 i No=O 2 2 is o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 i 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/9/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.27829 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S50 Longitude: _81.223gg Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #12 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �5.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 is No=O 3 3 3 is o.s is Yes = 1.5 3 I o.s o.s 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: f North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/10/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.27222 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S51 Longitude: _81.23191 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #12 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= 2�.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 0 1 is No=O i�.7 3 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: � � � � 3b7 � � North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/10/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2784 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S52 Longitude: _81.22583 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #12 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �o � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 0 i i i i i o.s o.s No=O 2 2 is i o.s Yes = 1.5 3 3 0.5 0 0 o.s 0.5 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/11/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.27445 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S53 Longitude: _81.23336 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #12 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 12 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 �[�� i�.7 3 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: 2 2 3 � 3 3 3 3 3 1.5 1.5 3 3 is is = i.s i.s i.s North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/11/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.27321 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S54 Longitude: _g�.23451 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #11 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = ».5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. Sinuosity 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong i 2 i 3 1 2 0 2 3 0.5 0 No=O i i i i is o.s Yes = 1.5 i i i.s 0 0 i 1 0 o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/12/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.27094 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S55 Longitude: _g1.24078 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #11 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2s > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 3 3 2 3 2 0 2 3 o.s i 0 i 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: 3 1.5 is Yes = 3 3 3 0 is = i.s i.s i.s SAV = 2.0 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/11/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.27219 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S56 Longitude: _81.23526 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #11 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = ».5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 i 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 is �[�� 0 0 FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence 3 3 3 i o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 2 0 i.s i 1.5 i ' aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/12/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.27583 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S57 Longitude: _g1.23868 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #11 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >> > 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Vk] Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 2 G � C C � 0 1 0.5 o.s No=O � '� � None = 0 on the presence of aq Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: Stream is intermittent �]Y 2 2 3b7 3 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/12/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.27583 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S58 Longitude: _81.23799 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #11 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 i 0 i 2 0 0 2 2 1 is No=O i i i o.s 0 i Yes = 1.5 z I 0 0 0 0 0 0 FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence n�.7 Sketch: �]Y North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/15/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26999 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S59 Longitude: _81.24085 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #11 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �o � 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 C 0 0 � � 0 0 0 0 0 n Q 0 i i o.s o.s No=O i i i o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aq Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: Stream is intermittent �]Y i 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/15/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26883 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S60 Longitude: _81.24037 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #11 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �5.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 0.5 i No=O 2 2 i o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 3 3 0.5 0 0 i 1 0 o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/15/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2688 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S61 Longitude: _g�.23961 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #11 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Vk] Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 2 �[�� 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 FAC = 0.5 on the presence Q 0 0 i i o.s o.s Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: Stream is intermittent �]Y i o.s is 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/15/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26545 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S62 Longitude: _81.23709 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #11 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 i 2 0 2 2 1 0 1 0.5 is No=O � � 0 0 0 � 0 n 2 2 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 n�.7 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/16/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2615 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S63 Longitude: _81.2q�g2 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �5.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 i 0 z z i i 2 0 1 is No=O 2 2 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 n�.7 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/15/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26412 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S64 Longitude: _81.24082 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �3 ) 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 i i i i 0 0 i 2 0.5 is No=O 2 2 i 0 o.s Yes = 1.5 3 I 0 � 0 n o.s 0.-5 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/16/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.26257 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S65 Longitude: _81.24�2 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = s.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. Sinuosity 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong i i i 0 3 G � C � �[�� 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: 2 2 2 is 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/17/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25709 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S66 Longitude: _g1.24248 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = s.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. Sinuosity 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong i i i i G � � � � � C 0 is No=O i 2 is o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 � � 0 0 0 0 0 n None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/22/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25504 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S67 Longitude: _81.24462 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 5.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 i i 2 2 0 2 0 1 0.5 i No=O 2 0 0 i o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/22/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2556 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S68 Longitude: _g�.24331 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = �.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. Sinuosity 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 5.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong i 0 i 0 z �[�� 0 0 0 0 0 0 FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence 1 � Sketch: �]Y 0 � is 3b7 0 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/22/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25581 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S69 Longitude: _81.24365 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = �.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. Sinuosity 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 5.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong i 0 i 0 z �[�� 0 0 0 0 0 0 FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence 1 � Sketch: �]Y 0 � is 3b7 0 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/23/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25409 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S70 Longitude: _81.23653 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 G � r 2 2 2 3 1.5 i No=O 2 2 is o.s is Yes = 1.5 3 I o.s 0 o.s 0.5 i 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: f North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/23/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25676 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S71 Longitude: _81.23514 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 0 o.s No=O � � � � 0 2 2 is o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/25/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25245 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S72 Longitude: _81.23586 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 0 i i No=O 2 3 3 is o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 o.s i 1. 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/3/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.24939 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S73 Longitude: _81.24162 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= 2�.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 0 is No=O 2 0 0 i is o.s Yes = 1.5 2 2 0 1 0 i 1.5 0 i.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/25/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.25254 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S74 Longitude: _81.24016 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �o � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 i i 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 No=O i 2 i o.s 0 Yes = 1.5 3 3 0.5 0 0 o.s 1 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: 3 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/25/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2384 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S75 Longitude: _81.24803 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #14 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �6.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 � � � � 0 i is No=O 2 2 is o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 3 3 0.5 0 0 i 1. i o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/25/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23821 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S77 Longitude: _81.24795 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #14 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = a > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 4.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 i i 0 0 0 0 0 i o.s No=O is i i i i 0 0 Yes = 1.5 3 3 0.5 0 0 i 0.5 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/26/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23197 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S78 Longitude: _81.24963 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #14 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = s.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 2 G � � � � C i o.s i No=O 2 2 o.s o.s 0 Yes = 1.5 i 2 0 0 0 i 0.5 0 o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/26/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.24142 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S79 Longitude: _g�.24611 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #14 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 3 1 3 2 0 0 0.5 is No=O 3 3 3 is i is Yes = 1.5 2 3 1 0 i i 1.5 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/26/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.24198 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S80 Longitude: _81.24497 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #14 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 6 ) 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Vk] Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 2 0 G � C i 0 0 o.s o.s No=O 0 0 0 0 0 0 FAC = 0.5 on the presence i 2 i o.s is Yes = 1.5 z I Sketch: �]Y North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/26/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.22913 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S81 Longitude: _81.24779 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #14 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 3 3 3 2 3 0 is Yes = 3 3 3 3 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 i 0 z i.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/27/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2389 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S82 Longitude: _81.24376 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #14 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �6.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 is No=O 2 3 3 is 0 o.s Yes = 1.5 3 3 0.5 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: � North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/29/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.22582 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S83 Longitude: _81.24523 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #6 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >> > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 i i 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 No=O i 2 i 0 o.s Yes = 1.5 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: � North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/29/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.22489 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S84 Longitude: _81.24415 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #6 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 9 > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 G � C 0 0 0 i o.s o.s No=O 2 2 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 2 1.5 0 0 o.s 1 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/30/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23195 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S85 Longitude: _81.24263 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #14 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 3 0 0 3 1 is No=O 3 3 3 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/30/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23195 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S86 Longitude: _81.2425 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #14 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 z i is No=O 2 3 3 i 0 i Yes = 1.5 � � 0 0 0 0 � n None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/7/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.21559 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S87A Longitude: _81.25886 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #6 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2s.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 3 3 3 2 1 3 2 1 is Yes = 3 3 3 3 i i is Yes = 1.5 3 I None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aq Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: StYealll IS peYellllla� �]Y i i i i 2 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/3/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.21479 Evaluator: S&ME (C. McRae) Site: S1.S87B Longitude: _81.242�2 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #6 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 is Yes = 3 3 3 3 i i i Yes = 1.5 I � o.s 0 0 o.s 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/30/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2205 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S87C Longitude: _81.23559 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #16 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 2 3 2 1 1 �i Yes = 3 1.5 3 3 3 o.s o.s is Yes = 1.5 I � o.s 0 0 o.s i o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/30/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.22007 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S88 Longitude: _81.23907 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #16 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �9.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 3 i 2 2 2 0 2 1 1.5 i No=O 2 2 i i 0 Yes = 1.5 i i o.s 0 o.s o.s 0.5 3 � FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/30/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.21893 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S89 Longitude: _81.23185 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #16 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = ».5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 3 0 0 z 3 1 1 1 is No=O 0 0 29 focuses on the presence 3 3 3 i is i Yes = 1.5 0 0 i.s i 1 i SAV = 2.0 ' aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/30/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23254 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S90 Longitude: _81.242gg Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #14 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �0.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 i i 0 0 0 0 0 z i is No=O 2 2 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 � � 0 0 0 i 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: � North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 9/1/2004 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.21478 Evaluator: S&ME (M. McKinney) Site: S1.S91A Longitude: _81.23577 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #16 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �6.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 5.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Absent Weak Moderate Strong i 2 i 3 1 is No=O i i i o.s o.s i Yes = 1.5 i i o.s 0 0 0 0.5 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aq Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: StYealll IS peYellllla� �]Y North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 9/1/2004 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.21731 Evaluator: S&ME (M. McKinney) Site: S1.S91B Longitude: _81.232g7 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #16 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �5.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. Sinuosity 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong i 2 i i i is No=O i 2 o.s o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 I � o.s 0 0 o.s 0.5 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/31/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.20893 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S92 Longitude: _81.22g3 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #17 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 0 i 3 3 3 3 3 1 0.5 is No=O 3 3 3 i is is Yes = 1.5 2 i i i 0 29 focuses on the presence o.� 0.5 i FACW = O75 aauaticorwetland Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/31/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.24927 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S93 Longitude: _81.23559 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= 19 > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 3 2 2 1 0 2 1 i No=O 2 3 3 is o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 2 1 0 0 29 focuses on the presence � FACW = O75 auaticorwetland Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 1/31/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.24587 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S94 Longitude: _81.23539 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #13 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �3.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 C �[�� 0 0 0 o.s 1 � None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: 2 i i 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/5/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.21106 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S95 Longitude: _81.22g57 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #17 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 2 0.5 i �[�� 29 focuses on the presence 3 3 3 o.s o.s i Yes = 1.5 � f f o.s i 1 i i FACW = O75 aauaticorwetland i Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/7/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23205 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S96 Longitude: _g�.22601 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #15 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao �' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �5.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 2 1 1 0 1 1 is No=O 2 2 is o.s is Yes = 1.5 2 3 0 0 0 0 0.5 i o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/3/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23308 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S97 Longitude: _81.2245 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #15 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >>.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 0 �[�� i�.7 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: 0 2 i i i � 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/5/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2168 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S98 Longitude: _g�.24441 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #6 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >> > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. Sinuosity 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong i 2 0 i i 2 0 1 0 2 0.5 o.s No=O 0 0 0 FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence 3 2 o.s o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 0 0 o.s o.s 0.5 ' aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/3/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.21456 Evaluator: S&ME (C. McRae) Site: S1.S99 Longitude: _81.24126 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #6 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 4.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 2 0 0 2 0.5 i No=O i i i o.s o.s 0 Yes = 1.5 2 i o.s 0 0 0 FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence Sketch: �]Y � North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/5/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2425 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S100 Longitude: _81.22g�2 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #15 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �9.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 is No=O 2 3 3 is is is Yes = 1.5 2 i i 0 o.s i.s 1.5 2 i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/6/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.22142 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S101 Longitude: _81.25243 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #6 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= 19 > 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 1 2 1 2 2 0 2 0.5 3 1.5 No=O 3 3 3 o.s i o.s Yes = 1.5 0 FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: StYealll IS peYellllla� �]Y � f f I f � North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/6/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23428 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S102 Longitude: _81.23284 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #15 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �0.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 0 i 0 z z 0 i i 0 o.s 0 No=O 2 3 3 i 0 0 Yes = 1.5 I � 0 � 0 0 0 n None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/12/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23376 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S103 Longitude: _81.2327g Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #15 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 22.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 0 � 0 2 2 2 2 i Yes = 3 3 o.s i 1.5 � � is Yes = 1.5 3 3 0.5 0 0 o.s 0.5 2 i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/6/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.22257 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S104 Longitude: _81.25695 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #6 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2s.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 3 3 3 1 3 � � i�.7 3 0 0 FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence is Yes = 3 3 3 3 is i Yes = 1.5 i.s i i i 1 ' aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/6/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.22199 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S105 Longitude: _g1.25618 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #6 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �2.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 1 i i 2 1 1 1 0 1 0.5 i No=O 3 3 3 o.s o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 FACW = O75 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/6/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.22287 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S106 Longitude: _81.25876 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #6 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 22.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 3 3 2 2 0 �[�� 3 29 focuses on the presence 3 1.5 0 3 3 3 o.s i i Yes = 1.5 0 i.s i i i 1 2 o.s SAV = 2.0 ' aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/7/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.21572 Evaluator: S&ME (M. McKinney) Site: S1.S107 Longitude: _81.257� Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #6 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 i i 3 1 0 2 2 2 1 is No=O I 3 2 i i o.s Yes = 1.5 i 2 1.5 i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/7/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.21656 Evaluator: S&ME (M. McKinney) Site: S1.S108 Longitude: _81.25gg� Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #6 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 25.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 3 3 2 0 3 � 0 �[�� 3 i 2 3 1 0 0 2 i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland p Sketch: is 3 3 is is = i.s ��a North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/7/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23089 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S109 Longitude: _81.2273 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #15 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >> > 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 Q 0 va o.s o.s No=O 2 2 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 � � 0 0 0 0 � n None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aq Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: Stream is intermittent �]Y North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/7/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.22854 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S110 Longitude: _81.224g7 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #15 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 44' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 25.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 3 2 1 1 3 1 3 2 1 1 is Yes = 3 3 3 3 i i i Yes = 1.5 2 3 0 0 0 i 0.5 i i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/7/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.22803 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S111 Longitude: _81.22602 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #16 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = �.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 0 0 i i 0 0 0 0 o.s i No=O 2 i i o.s o.s i Yes = 1.5 i 2 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/8/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2135 Evaluator: S&ME (M. McKinney) Site: S1.S113 Longitude: _81.257gg Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #6 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �3.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 3.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 2 0.5 i No=O i i i 0 0 0 Yes = 1.5 I � 0 0 0 0 0 n None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/8/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.20126 Evaluator: S&ME (M. McKinney) Site: S1.S114 Longitude: _81.2537 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #7 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �9.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 0 1 1 0.5 2 2 2 2 i Yes = 3 2 3 3 is o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 o.s i 1 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/8/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.22529 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S115 Longitude: _81.22549 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #16 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >> > 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 C i�.7 i i 1 1 1 0.5 o.s No=O i i o.s o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aq Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: Stream is intermittent �]Y 2 i 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/8/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.20853 Evaluator: S&ME (M. McKinney) Site: S1.S116 Longitude: _81.25975 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #7 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = �.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 4.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 1 0 i i 0 0 0 0 i o.s i No=O i i i i 0 0 Yes = 1.5 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/9/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.21482 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S117 Longitude: _81.22p�g Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #16 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= 2� > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 0 � 0 2 2 1 i Yes = 3 3 3 3 3 3 is o.s i Yes = 1.5 3 3 0.5 0 o.s o.s 1 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/8/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.20736 Evaluator: S&ME (M. McKinney) Site: S1.S118 Longitude: _81.25659 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #7 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 i 2 1 1 0 1 0 2 0.5 i No=O i 2 i o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 i i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/9/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.2137 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S119 Longitude: _81.21907 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #16 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �2 > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 � 0 0 1 1 0.5 o.s No=O 3 i 3 3 is 0 i Yes = 1.5 2 3 0 0 0 o.s 0.5 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/9/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.20344 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S120 Longitude: _g�.25451 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #7 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 9 > 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 0 C i i i i i i i o.s o.s No=O 2 i i o.s o.s i Yes = 1.5 i i o.s 0 0 0 0.5 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aq Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: StYealll IS peYellllla� �]Y North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/10/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.20128 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S121 Longitude: _81.257g� Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #7 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 25.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 3 3 29 focuses on the presence 3 is Yes = 3 3 3 3 i o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 2 2 o.s 0.5 i OBL=1.5 ' aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/10/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.20163 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S122 Longitude: _81.25864 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #7 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = �.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 5.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 �[�� 0 � � 0 0 0 0 � n 0 0 o.s i o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: 0 2 i o.s 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/19/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.19958 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S123 Longitude: _81.227gg Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #17 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2s > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 i�.7 2 2 3 2 2 3 � 1 i Yes = 3 3 i � � is Yes = 1.5 3 3 0.5 3 o.s i 1 0 o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/10/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.20159 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S124 Longitude: _81.2g�g� Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #7 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �3.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 C 1 1 0.5 2 2 � � � No=O 3 2 i o.s 0 Yes = 1.5 2 2 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/10/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.20158 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S125 Longitude: _81.22gg7 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #17 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >>.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Vk] Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 i i i i i i o.s No=O � � 0 None = 0 on the presence of aq Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: StYealll IS peYellllla� �]Y 0 2 2 � 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/12/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.19962 Evaluator: S&ME (C. McRae) Site: S1.S126 Longitude: _g1.25678 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #7 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao �' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >> > 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 5.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 C i i i i o.s o.s No=O va 2 i i o.s o.s 0 Yes = 1.5 z I 0 0 0 0 0 n None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aq Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: Stream is intermittent �]Y North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/12/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.23769 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S127 Longitude: _81.22584 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #15 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �0.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 2 C � � 0 0 0 0 � n i i i i i o.s No=O 0 i 2 i o.s i Yes = 1.5 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aq Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: Stream is intermittent �]Y North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/13/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.20133 Evaluator: S&ME (C. McRae) Site: S1.S128 Longitude: _81.25314 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #7 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= 2�.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 3 3 2 0 2 0 2 1 is �[�� 3 3 3 o.s i i Yes = 1.5 f 0 0 i 0 1 2 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/13/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.19948 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S129 Longitude: _81.22309 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #18 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �o � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 1 i 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 No=O i 3 3 i i is Yes = 1.5 � � 0 0 0 0 � n None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/13/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.19736 Evaluator: S&ME (C. McRae) Site: S1.S130 Longitude: _81.2604 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #7 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = ».5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 i 2 2 2 0 1 0 2 1 is No=O 3 2 o.s o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 2 3 1.5 0 0 i.s 1 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/15/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.19638 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S131 Longitude: _81.21789 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #18 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= 2�.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 2 2 3 2 1 3 2 1 is No=O 3 2 i i i Yes = 1.5 i i o.s 0 0 i 1.' 3 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/13/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.19277 Evaluator: S&ME (C. McRae) Site: S1.S132 Longitude: _81.25284 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #8 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= 19 > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 3 2 2 3 2 0 1 0 1 0.5 is No=O 3 2 o.s o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 2 2 0.5 0 0 i 0.5 3 o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/15/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.19281 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S133 Longitude: _g1.25428 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #8 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 21b. Rooted plants in channel 22. Crayfish 23. Bivalves 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 3 3 3 2 2 0 3 1 1 is No=O 3 3 3 o.s o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 2 i o.s i.s 0 29 focuses on the presence FACW = O75 rticorwetland Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/15/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.19247 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S134 Longitude: _81.25423 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #8 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 3 2 3 2 2 0.5 3 3 is Yes = 3 3 2 i i o.s Yes = 1.5 z I o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: va i.s i.s North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/15/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.19206 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S135 Longitude: _81.25159 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #8 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 9 > 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 0 0 i i 0 0 i 0 i i No=O 2 i i i i 0 Yes = 1.5 3 3 1 0 0 o.s 1 0 i None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/15/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.19233 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S136 Longitude: _81.25273 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #8 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 3 2 3 0 3 2 1 is No=O 3 3 3 i i i Yes = 1.5 z I i 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: f i.s ts North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/16/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.18474 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S137 Longitude: _81.23942 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #9 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �o � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 4.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 1 i 0 0 i 0 i 0 z i i No=O i i i i 0 is No=O I � 0 0 0 0 0 n None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/16/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.18365 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S138 Longitude: _81.24434 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #8 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �9.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 0.5 i Yes = 3 3 2 3 3 is o.s i Yes = 1.5 2 3 0.5 0 i.s i 1.5 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/19/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.18531 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S139 Longitude: _81.24706 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #8 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= 2�.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 3 0 0 FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence 0 , o.s � � � � �i Yes = 3 3 3 3 o.s i i Yes = 1.5 i a o.s o.s o.s 0.5 ' aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/16/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.18493 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S140 Longitude: _81.24794 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #8 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 8 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 i 2 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 is No=O 2 2 o.s o.s is Yes = 1.5 z I 0 0 0 0 0 n None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/19/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.18515 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S141 Longitude: _81.24385 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #8 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 i i 2 1 0 1 2 1 0.5 i No=O 3 3 3 i i o.s Yes = 1.5 I � o.s 0 o.s o.s 0.5 i o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/20/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.18413 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S142 Longitude: _81.22g2� Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #9 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao 4 e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 20.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 2 1 3 2 0 3 �[�� 0 0 FAC = 0.5 29 focuses on the presence fl 0 is 3 3 3 o.s is i Yes = 1.5 i 2 1.5 i 1.5 i.s ' aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/19/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.20036 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S143 Longitude: _g1.22358 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #18 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >> > 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 2 i i i i i i i o.s o.s No=O 2 2 o.s o.s i Yes = 1.5 I � 0 0 0 o.s 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/22/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.19831 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S144 Longitude: _81.2�727 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #18 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2a � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 10.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 2 � � � � � 0 � �[�� 2 is o.s i Yes = 1.5 2 3 1 0 o.s i 0 o.s None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants Sketch: 3 3 3 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/22/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.19804 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S146 Longitude: _81.2�633 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #18 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= >>.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 is No=O 2 i i i o.s i Yes = 1.5 � � 0 0 0 0 � n None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/22/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.20251 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S147 Longitude: _81.2189g Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #18 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao ' e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 7 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 i 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 1.5 i No=O i 2 is o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 3 I o.s 0 0 o.s 0 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/22/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.20555 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S148 Longitude: _81.2223g Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #17 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = a.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 0.5 0 No=O i 3 3 o.s o.s 0 Yes = 1.5 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: ��a North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/23/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.18212 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S149 Longitude: _81.2�275 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #10 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 2s.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 3 3 2 2 2 � 0 3 is Yes = 3 3 3 3 i i is Yes = 1.5 2 i.s i i 1 2 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/23/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.18306 Evaluator: S&ME (J. Lawler) Site: S1.S150 Longitude: _81.2177 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #10 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 20 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 9 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 2 2 2 2 3 2 0 2 0 �[�� i�.7 3 o.s 0 0 o.s 0 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: 2 2 i i 1.5 1.5 3b7 North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/23/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.17909 Evaluator: S&ME (C. McRae) Site: S1.S151 Longitude: _81.20933 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #10 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = s.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. Sinuosity 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 5.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Stream is intermittent Absent Weak Moderate Strong i i 0 i 2 0 1 0.5 � � � No=O 2 i i o.s o.s 0 Yes = 1.5 z I 0 0 0 0 � n None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/23/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.1825 Evaluator: S&ME (S. Knudsen) Site: S1.S152 Longitude: _81.2�204 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #10 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai= �6.5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank 2. SIIIUOSIty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 11.5 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunc 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plz Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) StYealll IS peYellllla� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 3 1 0 i i i 0 3 3 1 1 is No=O 0 3 None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Sketch: 3 3 3 is is = i.s North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 2/23/2007 Project: Gaston E/W Connector Latitude: 35.17829 Evaluator: S&ME (L. Beckstrom)Site: S1.S153 Longitude: _81.20765 Total Points County: Gaston Other See Fig #10 of Approx. Stream is at least intermittent itzi9orperenmaiitzao � e.g.QuadName: WatersofU.S.maps A. Geomorphology (sue��ai = 5 � 1a. Continuous bed and bank sequence i z. ivacurai vauey or arainageway . econ or greater or er on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. a. man-made dltches are not rated; see dlscusslons In manua B. Hydl-ology (subtota� = 6 ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharqe 15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 16. Leaflitter 17. Sediment on plants or debris . raanic e ris ines or pi es rac ines C. Blology (subtota� _ 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 24. Fish 'LEi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abui 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 28. Iron bacteria/fungus 29b. Wetland plants in streambed b. Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong 2 G � � C C C C C C 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 i No=O 2 i i o.s o.s o.s Yes = 1.5 z I None = 0 29 focuses on the presence of aq Notes (use back side of thls form for addltional notes) Sketch: Stream is intermittent �]Y Wetland ID: W1.W1 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Interstate 85 County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.010 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 11/1/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 90 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Juncus effusus �) Microstegium viminea 3) Bidens sp. � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat X Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 3 2 1 3 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 12 10 2 12 0 Total Score = 44 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W5 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Wolfe Lane County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.29 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U10/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) Alnus serrulata Carpinus caroliniana Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 4 1 2 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 16 5 4 8 0 Total Score = 3'7 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W6 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Interstate 85 County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.051 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U10/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) � Carpinus caroliniana Lonicera japonica Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 5 1 2 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 20 5 4 8 0 Total Score = 41 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W7 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Interstate 85 County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.058 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U15/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 90 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Carpinus caroliniana 2) 3) � Elaeagnus angusrifolia Polysrichum acrosrichoides Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 3 2 2 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 12 10 4 8 0 Total Score = 38 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W8 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Interstate 85 County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.040 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U15/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 80 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Arundinaria gigantea 2) 3) � Carpinus caroliniana Liquidambar styraciflua Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 4 1 2 0 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 16 5 4 0 2 Total Score = 31 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W9 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Barneycastle Lane County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.212 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U15/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 90 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ulmus rubra �) Acer rubrum 3) Carpinus caroliniana � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 3 1 2 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 12 5 4 8 0 Total Score = 33 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W10 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Barneycastle Lane County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.223 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U15/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 80 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) Liquidambar styraciflua Rosa mulriflora Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 4 1 3 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 16 5 6 8 0 Total Score = 39 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W11 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.278 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U17/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 90 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Carex lurida �) Juncus effusus 3) Alnus serrulata Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 0 1 3 1 1 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 4 15 2 4 1 Total Score = 2( i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W12 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Frankin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 4.198 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U20/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 70 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Betula nigra 3) Quercus phellos Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 5 3 4 4 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 20 15 8 16 2 Total Score = '73 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W13 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.184 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U21/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 60 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Liquidambar styraciflua �) Rosa mulriflora 3) Solidago sp. Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 2 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � m � 0 0 A Total Score = Zj i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W14 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.118 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U21/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream X On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense �) Rosa carolina 3) Betula nigra � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 1 1 2 4 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 4 5 4 16 2 Total Score = 35 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W15 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.245 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U21/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream X On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense �) Betula nigra 3) Rosa multiflora � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 3 2 2 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � 0 � � 0 pl Total Score = 41 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W16 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Victory Lane County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.04 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U27/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 80 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Lonicera japonica 2) 3) � Ligustrum sinense Liquidambar styraciflua Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 2 3 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 8 5 4 12 2 Total Score = 35 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W17 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.724 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U28/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, X muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 95 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Betula nigra 2) 3) Lonicera japonica Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar X inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 2 3 2 5 4 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 8 15 4 20 4 Total Score = 63 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W18 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.023 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U28/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 95 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) Liquidambar styraciflua Lonicera japonica Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 1 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � 0 � 0 0 � Total Score = 23 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W19 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.093 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U29/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 80 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense �) Polysrichum acrosrichoides 3) Acer rubrum Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 0 3 2 5 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 0 15 4 20 2 Total Score = 53 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W20 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.364 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U29/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 80 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Betula nigra �) Acer rubrum 3) Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 3 2 5 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 8 15 4 20 0 Total Score = 51 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W21 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.017 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U29/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 80 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) � Lonicera japonica Carpinus caroliniana Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 4 0 1 1 4 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 16 0 5 2 16 1 Total Score = 40 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W22 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.051 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1U29/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 60 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Carex lurida �) Juncus effusus 3) Sambucus canudensis � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 1 1 2 5 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 4 5 4 20 0 Total Score = 3'7 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W23 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Archie Whitesides Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.062 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/4/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 98 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Carpinus caroliniana 2) 3) � Arundinaria gigantea Polysrichum acrosrichoides Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 1 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 0 � 0 0 � Total Score = 2'] i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W24 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Archie Whitesides Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.024 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/4/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 98 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Polysrichum acrosrichoides 2) 3) � Carpinus caroliniana Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 1 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � 0 � 0 0 � Total Score = 23 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W25 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Archie Whitesides Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.025 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/4/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Liriodendron tulipifera 2) 3) � Carpinus caroliniana Arundinaria gigantea Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 1 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � 0 � 0 0 � Total Score = 23 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W27 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Archie Whitesides Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.009 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/5/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Carpinus caroliniana 2) 3) � Polysrichum acrosrichoides Smila�e rotundifolia Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 3 2 1 1 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 12 10 2 4 0 Total Score = 40 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W28 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Archie Whitesides Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.098 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/5/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 60 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Juncus effusus 3) Carpinus caroliniana � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 1 1 1 3 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 4 5 2 12 0 Total Score = 2'] i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W29 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Archie Whitesides Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.037 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/7/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 50 % Impervious cover % 1) 2) 3) � Predominant Vegetation Ligustrum sinense Lonicera japonica Liquidambar styraciflua Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 4 1 1 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 16 5 2 8 1 Total Score = 44 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W30 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Archie Whitesides Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.228 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/7/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 10 % Impervious cover % 1) 2) 3) � Predominant Vegetation Ligustrum sinense Lonicera japonica Liquidambar styraciflua Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 4 2 2 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 16 10 4 8 1 Total Score = 51 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W31 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Linwood Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.058 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/8/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream X On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 70 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense �) Acer rubrum 3) Carpinus caroliniana � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � m � 0 0 � Total Score = ZQ i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W32 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Brentwood Circle County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.077 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/8/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream X On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 80 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Liriodendron tulipifera 3) Liquidambar styraciflua � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat X Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � 0 � 0 0 � Total Score = 2'] i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W33 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Linwood Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.075 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/8/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream X On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 70 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Liriodendron tulipifera 3) Ligustrum sinense � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 2 1 2 2 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 0 � 0 0 A Total Score = 35 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W36 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Camp Rotary Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.068 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/15/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 75 % Impervious cover % 1) 2) 3) Predominant Vegetation Arundinaria gigantea Polysrichum acrosrichoides Lonicera japonica Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 4 2 1 2 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 16 8 5 4 12 1 Total Score = 46 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W37 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Camp Rotary Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.017 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/15/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 60 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense �) Lonicera japonica 3) Acer rubrum � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 4 2 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � 0 A 0 0 � Total Score = 39 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W38 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Camp Rotary Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.223 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/18/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 85 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) Rosa mulriflora Lonicera japonica Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 4 1 2 4 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 16 5 4 16 1 Total Score = 54 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W39 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Camp Rotary Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.308 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/19/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 85 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Carex lurida �) Lonicera japonica 3) Juncus effusus � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 3 2 1 4 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 12 10 2 16 0 Total Score = 52 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W40 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Camp Rotary Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.174 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/19/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 70 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) Carpinus caroliniana Polysrichum acrosrichoides Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 3 1 2 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 12 5 4 8 1 Total Score = 34 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W41 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Camp Rotary Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.04 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/19/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 70 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Carpinus caroliniana 2) 3) � Lonicera japonica Polysrichum acrosrichoides Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat X Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 3 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 0 5 2 12 0 Total Score = 23 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W42 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Camp Rotary Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.279 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2:00:00 AM Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) Carpinus caroliniana Microstegium viminea Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 0 1 2 4 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 0 5 4 16 0 Total Score = 3'7 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W43 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Edgewood Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.003 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1/2/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 70 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) � Polysrichum acrosrichoides Lonicera japonica Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat X Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 1 3 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 8 5 2 12 0 Total Score = 31 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W44 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Oates Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.031 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1/2/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 50 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Juncus effusus �) Salix nigra 3) Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar X inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest X Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 3 1 1 1 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 12 5 2 4 2 Total Score = 3'7 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W45 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Oates Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.010 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1/2/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 90 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Typha larifolia �) Carex lurida 3) Juncus effusus Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar X inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest X Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 3 1 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 0 5 6 4 1 Total Score = ZQ i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W46 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Interstate 85 County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.010 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/27/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 70 % Impervious cover % 1) 2) 3) Predominant Vegetation Ligustrum sinense Arundinaria gigantea Lonicera japonica Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat X Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 1 3 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 8 5 2 12 0 Total Score = 31 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W47 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Interstate 85 County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.011 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 12/27/2006 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 80 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Juncus effusus �) Carex lurida 3) Lonicera japonica � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � 0 � 0 0 � Total Score = 2'] i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W48 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Delta Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.142 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1/3/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 70 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Juncus effusus �) Carex lurida 3) Alnus serrulata Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 3 1 1 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 12 5 2 12 1 Total Score = 40 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W49 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Delta Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.024 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1/3/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 70 % Impervious cover % 1) 2) 3) � Predominant Vegetation Ligustrum sinense Lonicera japonica Polysrichum acrosrichoides Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 3 1 1 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 12 5 2 12 1 Total Score = 44 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W50 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Delta Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.704 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1/3/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake _ On perennial stream On intetmittent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 90 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Typha larifolia �) Juncus effusus 3) Scirpus validus Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar X inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest X Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 0 3 1 3 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 0 15 2 12 2 Total Score = 39 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W51 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Delta Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.015 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1/3/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 95 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) � Carpinus caroliniana Liquidambar styraciflua Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 2 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 0 � 0 0 � Total Score = 31 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W52 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Delta Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.091 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1/3/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 85 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) Carpinus caroliniana Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 5 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 20 5 2 8 0 Total Score = 4'7 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W53 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Shannon Bradley Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.002 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1/4/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) Polysrichum acrosrichoides Lonicera japonica Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat X Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 1 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 8 5 2 12 1 Total Score = 32 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W54 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Shannon Bradley Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.016 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1/4/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 50 % Impervious cover % 1) 2) 3) Predominant Vegetation Quercus phellos Ligustrum sinense Polysrichum acrosrichoides Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat X Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 1 3 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 8 5 2 12 0 Total Score = 31 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W55 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Raeford Court County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.381 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 1/9/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 90 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) Polysrichum acrosrichoides Lonicera japonica Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 4 2 2 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 16 10 4 8 1 Total Score = 4'7 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W56 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Delta Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 1.892 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U12/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense �) Juncus effusus 3) Carex lurida � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 4 5 5 2 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 16 20 25 4 8 0 Total Score = '73 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W57 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Raeford Court County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.048 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: Ull/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 60 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Salix nigra �) Acer rubrum 3) Liquidambar styraciflua � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat X Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 0 2 2 1 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 0 10 4 4 0 Total Score = 2( i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W58 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Raeford Court County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.037 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: Ull/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 80 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Juncus effusus 2) 3) � Ligustrum sinense Scirpus validus Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat X Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 1 1 2 1 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 4 5 4 4 0 Total Score = Zj i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W59 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Raeford Court County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.042 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: Ull/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Liquidambar styraciflua �) Liriodendron tulipifera 3) Acer rubrum � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 1 1 2 1 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 4 5 4 4 0 Total Score = Zj i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W60 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Raeford Court County: Gaston Wetland Area: 1.174 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: U12/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 60 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Liquidambar styraciflua 3) Liriodendron tulipifera Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh X Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 4 5 4 5 3 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 16 20 20 10 12 0 Total Score = ']$ i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W61 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Shannon Bradley Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.071 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U15/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, X muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 80 % Impervious cover % 1) 2) 3) � Predominant Vegetation Liriodendron tulipifera Ligustrum sinense Polysrichum acrosrichoides Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 4 1 1 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 m A 0 0 � Total Score = 40 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W62 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Interstate 85 County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.009 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U15/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) � Lonicera japonica Smila�e rotundifolia Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 1 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � 0 � 0 0 � Total Score = 23 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W63 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Belfast Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.115 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U16/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) � Carpinus caroliniana Polysrichum acrosric Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 3 1 2 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 12 5 4 8 1 Total Score = 42 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W65 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.161 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (M. McKinney) Date: U17/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Liquidambar styraciflua �) Betula nigra 3) Carpinus caroliniana Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh X Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 0 0 3 5 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 0 0 6 20 0 Total Score = 34 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W66 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.136 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (M. McKinney) Date: U17/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Liquidambar styraciflua �) Acer rubrum 3) Carpinus caroliniana Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh X Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 0 2 3 1 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 0 10 6 4 0 Total Score = 28 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W67 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.200 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (M. McKinney) Date: U17/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Betula nigra �) Sambucus canadensis 3) Acer rubrum Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh X Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 0 0 3 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 m m 0 0 � Total Score = 22 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W69 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Shannon Bradley Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.044 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U17/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake _ On perennial stream On intetmittent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 100 % Impervious cover % 1) 2) 3) � Predominant Vegetation Carpinus caroliniana Lonicera japonica Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest X Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � m � 0 0 � Total Score = 19 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W70 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: OA64 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (M. McKinney) Date: U17/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Betula nigra �) Carpinus caroliniana 3) Acer rubrum Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh X Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 0 0 3 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 m m 0 0 � Total Score = 22 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W71 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.565 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U24/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 100 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Betula nigra �) Populus deltoides 3) Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 5 4 2 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 20 20 4 12 1 Total Score = 69 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W72 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Patterson Circle County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.183 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U31/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 5 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ludwigia alternifolia �) Juncus effusus 3) Typha latifolia � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 3 1 1 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 12 5 2 12 1 Total Score = 36 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W73 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Patterson Circle County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.065 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U24/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Liquidambar styraciflua �) Acer negundo 3) Arundinaria gigantea Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 0 0 2 5 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 0 0 4 20 0 Total Score = 32 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W74 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.086 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U24/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 100 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Salix nigra 3) Carpinus caroliniana � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 5 4 1 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 20 20 2 8 1 Total Score = 59 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W75 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Franklin Boulevard County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.11 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U24/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake _ On perennial stream On intetmittent stream X Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 100 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Alnus serrulata 3) Carex lurida Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 1 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 0 5 2 4 1 Total Score = 16 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W76 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Patterson Circle County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.234 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: U25/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) Ligustrum sinense Quercus phellos Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay X Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 0 4 3 4 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 0 20 6 16 1 Total Score = 55 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W77 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Patterson Circle County: Gaston Wetland Area: 2,068 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U27/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream X On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Liquidambar styraciflua 3) Betula nigra � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 3 5 4 5 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 12 25 8 20 1 Total Score = ']Q i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W78 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Carson Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.755 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/3/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Betula nigra 3) Pinus serorina Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 2 1 4 5 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 8 5 8 20 1 Total Score = 54 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W79 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Carson Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.138 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U27/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 80 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense �) Salix nigra 3) Carpinus caroliniana � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 5 1 1 4 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 20 5 2 16 1 Total Score = 48 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W80 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Carson Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.084 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U27/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) Lonicera japonica Carpinus caroliniana Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 1 4 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 8 5 2 16 1 Total Score = 36 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W81 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Carson Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 1.206 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U27/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Betula nigra �) Ligustrum sinense 3) Juncus effusus Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 5 1 1 2 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 20 5 2 8 2 Total Score = 41 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W82 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Carson Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.313 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U27/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 60 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Carpinus caroliniana �) Betula nigra 3) Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 1 4 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 8 5 2 16 1 Total Score = 36 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W83 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Carson Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.418 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U29/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 60 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) Polysrichum acrosrichoides Liquidambar styraciflua Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 1 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � 0 � 0 0 � Total Score = 28 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W84 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Torrence Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 2,704 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U30/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 75 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) � Ligustrum sinense Carpinus caroliniana Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh X Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 4 3 1 4 4 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 16 12 5 8 16 1 Total Score = 58 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W85 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Old Providence Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.299 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U31/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream X On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) � Platanus occidentalis Arundinaria gigantea Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 4 1 4 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 m A 0 0 � Total Score = 45 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W86 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Torrence Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.437 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U30/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) Quercus phellos Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 5 5 5 4 5 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 20 20 25 8 20 1 Total Score = 94 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W87 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Courtney Cove Court County: Gaston Wetland Area: 4.070 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: U31/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 85 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Ligustrum sinense 3) Betula nigra Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 2 2 3 5 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 8 10 6 20 1 Total Score = 5'] i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W88 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: West Rogers Avenue County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.383 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: U31/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 5 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Salix nigra �) Typha angustifolia 3) Acer rubrum Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar X inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 3 1 2 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 12 5 4 12 1 Total Score = 46 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W89 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Hillmont Street County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.350 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/3/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 70 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense �) Rosa palustris 3) Acer rubrum Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 5 4 1 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 20 20 2 12 1 Total Score = 63 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W90 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Carson Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.266 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/3/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) � Carpinus caroliniana Polysrichum acrosrichoides Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 2 3 2 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 8 15 4 8 1 Total Score = 48 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W91 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Courtney Cove Court County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.106 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/5/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 50 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Carpinus caroliniana 3) Betula nigra Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 3 5 3 3 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 12 25 6 12 2 Total Score = 65 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W92 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Courtney Cove Court County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.121 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/5/2007 Wetland location X On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Typha larifolia �) Betula nigra 3) Juncus effusus Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar X inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest X Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 0 2 1 4 4 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 0 10 2 16 4 Total Score = 40 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W95 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Linwood Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.017 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/5/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Carpinus caroliniana �) Ligustrum sinense 3) Juncus effusus � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 3 1 1 3 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 12 5 2 12 0 Total Score = 39 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W96 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Linwood Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.218 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/5/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Juncus effusus �) Salix nigra 3) Typha latifolia Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar X inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest X Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 3 1 1 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 12 5 2 12 1 Total Score = 36 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W97 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Linwood Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.016 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/5/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover 30 % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ludwigia alternifolia �) Juncus effusus 3) Salix nigra Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar X inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest X Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 2 1 1 3 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 8 5 2 12 0 Total Score = 39 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W98 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Linwood Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.008 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/5/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 80 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Juncus effusus 2) 3) � Liriodendron tulipifera Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 3 1 1 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 12 5 2 12 1 Total Score = 36 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W100 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: River Creek Lane County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.177 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/15/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 95 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) � Carpinus caroliniana Arundinaria gigantea Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 2 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 8 5 4 12 1 Total Score = 34 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W102 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Linwood Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: OA64 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/6/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover 50 % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense �) Juncus effusus 3) Lonicera japonica Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest X Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 1 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 8 5 2 12 1 Total Score = 32 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W103 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Linwood Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.066 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/6/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) � Carpinus caroliniana Liquidambar styraciflua Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 3 4 3 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 12 20 6 12 1 Total Score = 63 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W104 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Linwood Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.101 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/6/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 97 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense �) Juncus effusus 3) Salix nigra Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest X Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � m � 0 0 � Total Score = ZQ i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W105 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Linwood Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.377 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/6/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense �) Liquidambar styraciflua 3) Juncus effusus � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � m � 0 0 � Total Score = ZQ i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W106 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Camp Rotary Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.19 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/6/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Betula nigra 3) Carpinus caroliniana � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 0 2 1 3 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 0 10 2 12 2 Total Score = 34 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W107 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Old Church Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 3.552 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (M. McKinney) Date: 2/7/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 70 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Liquidambar styraciflua �) Carpinus caroliniana 3) Ilex opaca Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 2 4 4 1 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 8 20 8 4 0 Total Score = 52 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W108 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Hillmont Street County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.028 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/7/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 90 % Impervious cover % 1) 2) 3) � Predominant Vegetation Lonicera japonica Rhus copallinum Pueraria lobata Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest X Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � 0 � 0 0 � Total Score = 2'] i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W110 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Old Church Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.005 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (C. McRae) Date: 2/8/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream X On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 60 % Impervious cover % 1) 2) 3) � Predominant Vegetation Ranunculus sp. Cardcunine hirsuta Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 0 1 1 1 3 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 4 5 2 12 0 Total Score = 23 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W111 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Penny Park Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.138 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/8/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake _ On perennial stream On intetmittent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 90 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Betula nigra 3) Liquidambar styraciflua Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest X Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � m � 0 0 � Total Score = 19 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W113 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Lewis Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.769 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/9/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 30 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Arundinaria gigantea 3) Carpinus caroliniana Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 4 3 2 4 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 16 12 10 8 12 1 Total Score = 59 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W114 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Stablegate Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.017 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/9/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 95 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) Carpinus caroliniana Quercus phellos Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat X Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 3 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 0 5 2 12 0 Total Score = 23 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W115 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Lewis Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.605 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/9/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 80 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Rosa palustris �) Rubus sp. 3) Liriodendron tulipifera Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 3 3 2 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 12 15 4 8 1 Total Score = 52 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W117 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Lewis Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.374 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/10/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 90 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) Liquidambar styraciflua Sambucus canadensis Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 2 1 3 4 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 0 A 0 m � Total Score = 44 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W118 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Ferguson Estates Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.067 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/10/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) � Polysrichum acrosrichoides Platanus occidentalis Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 4 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 16 5 2 8 0 Total Score = 35 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W119 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Ferguson Estates Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.36 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/10/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Ligustrum sinense 3) Juncus effusus Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 4 1 1 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 16 5 2 8 1 Total Score = 36 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W120 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Linwood Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.032 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/12/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 90 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Carpinus caroliniana �) Betula nigra 3) Ligustrum sinense � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � m � 0 0 � Total Score = ZQ i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W122 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Lewis Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.150 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (C. McRae) Date: 2/12/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 80 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Carpinus caroliniana �) Smila�e rotundifolia 3) Acer rubrum � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 2 2 2 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 8 10 4 12 1 Total Score = 43 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W123 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Lewis Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 6.687 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/13/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 70 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Betula nigra �) Salix nigra 3) Acer rubrum Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 5 5 4 4 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 20 25 8 16 2 Total Score = 83 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W124 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Lewis Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.005 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (C. McRae) Date: 2/13/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 90 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Juncus effusus �) Salix nigra 3) Scirpus validus Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat X Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 1 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 8 5 2 12 1 Total Score = 32 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W125 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Crowders Creek Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.088 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/12/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake _ On perennial stream On intetmittent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 70 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Juncus effusus �) Carex lurida 3) Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 0 0 0 1 3 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 0 0 2 12 0 Total Score = 14 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W126 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Crowders Creek Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.472 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/15/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 95 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Carpinus caroliniana �) Liquidambar styraciflua 3) Acer rubrum � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 3 1 2 2 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 � A � 0 pl Total Score = 39 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W127 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: River Creek Lane County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.707 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/15/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 95 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) � Carpinus caroliniana Liriodendron tulipifera Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 1 1 3 4 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 4 5 6 16 1 Total Score = 36 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W129 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Hanna Ford Place County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.031 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/16/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % 1) 2) 3) � Predominant Vegetation Carpinus caroliniana Polysrichum acrosrichoides Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat X Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 4 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 0 5 2 16 0 Total Score = 2'] i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W130 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Archie Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.055 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/19/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 70 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Carpinus caroliniana 2) 3) � Liquidambar styraciflua Alnus serrulata Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 2 1 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 8 10 2 12 1 Total Score = 3'7 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W131 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Archie Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.11 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/19/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 25 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Alnus serrulata �) Rubus sp. 3) Carpinus caroliniana � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 2 2 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 8 10 4 12 1 Total Score = 39 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W133 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Lingerfelt Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.072 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/19/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 90 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense 2) 3) � Arundinaria gigantea Carpinus caroliniana Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 3 3 4 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 0 15 6 16 1 Total Score = 42 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W134 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Lingerfelt Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.29 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/20/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 95 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Carpinus caroliniana 3) Betula nigra � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 1 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 8 5 2 12 1 Total Score = 32 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W135 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Crowders Creek Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 1.145 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/20/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Ligustrum sinense �) Betula nigra 3) Liquidambar styraciflua Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 0 1 1 5 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 0 5 2 20 2 Total Score = 3'7 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W136 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Lingerfelt Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.081 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/20/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 90 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) � Liriodendron tulipifera Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 0 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 0 5 2 0 0 Total Score = jj i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W137 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Crawford Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.142 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/20/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Populus deltoides 2) 3) Liquidambar styraciflua Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � m � 0 0 � Total Score = 19 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W138 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Crowders Creek Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.035 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/20/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 60 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Salix nigra �) Ligustrum sinense 3) Acer rubrum Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 2 1 1 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = � 0 � 0 0 � Total Score = 28 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W139 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Crowders Creek Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.036 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/21/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 60 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Rubus argutus �) Salix nigra 3) Carex lurida Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 1 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 0 5 2 4 1 Total Score = 16 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W140 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Crowders Creek Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.442 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/20/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 60 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) Alnus serrulata Liquidambar styraciflua Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar X inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 3 3 2 2 2 2 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 12 12 10 4 8 2 Total Score = 48 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W142 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: New Haven Drive County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.261 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/22/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 50 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Betula nigra 3) Liquidambar styraciflua Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat X Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 1 1 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 0 5 2 12 1 Total Score = � i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W143 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: New Haven Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 2,188 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/22/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 95 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Populus deltoides �) Acer rubrum 3) Quercus phellos Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 0 2 2 2 4 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 � � � 0 � Total Score = 34 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W144 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Crawford Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.161 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/23/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 100 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Betula nigra 3) Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 3 1 2 3 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 8 12 5 4 12 1 Total Score = 42 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W145 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Crawford Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.094 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (S. Knudsen) Date: 2/23/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover 80 % 1) 2) 3) � Predominant Vegetation Carpinus caroliniana Ligustrum sinense Polysrichum acrosrichoides Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 2 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 0 � 0 0 � Total Score = 31 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W147 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Crawford Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.048 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (L. Beckstrom) Date: 2/23/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake _ On perennial stream On intetmittent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban 25 % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Sambucus canadensis 3) Ligustrum sinense Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 2 0 1 1 2 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 0 m � 0 0 � Total Score = � i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W148A WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Crawford Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 1.966 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/23/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Carpinus caroliniana 3) Betula nigra � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 5 1 2 3 5 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 20 4 10 6 20 1 Total Score = 61 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W148B WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Crawford Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.417 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (J. Lawler) Date: 2/23/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake X On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 90 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum �) Carpinus caroliniana 3) Betula nigra � Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 4 0 1 1 4 0 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 16 0 5 2 16 0 Total Score = 39 i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. Wetland ID: W1.W150 WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version Project Name: Gaston E/W Connector Nearest Road: Crawford Road County: Gaston Wetland Area: 0.015 acres Wetland Width: --- Feet Name of Evaluator: S&ME, Ina (L. Beckstrom) Date: 2/23/2007 Wetland location On pond or lake On perennial stream On internuttent stream Within interstream divide X Other: Soil Series: Predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) Predominantly mineral g (non-sandy) Predominantly sandy Hydraulic Factors Steep topography Ditched or channelized X Total riparian width > 100 feet Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X Forested/natural vegetation 80 % Agriculture, urban/suburban % Impervious cover % Predominant Vegetation 1) Acer rubrum 2) 3) Carpinus caroliniana Arundinaria gigantea Flooding and Wetness Semipermanently to permanently flooded ar inundated Seasonally flooded or inundated Intermittently flooded ar tempararily inundated No evidence of flooding ar surface water Wetland type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savannah X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh Swamp farest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina B ay Bog forest Other: * The rafing sysfem cannot be applied fo salt or brackish marshes and sfream channels R A T I N G Water storage B ank/shareline stabilization Pollutant removali Wildlife habitat Aquatic life Recreation/Education 1 0 3 1 1 1 x x x x x x Weight 4.00 = 4.00 = 5.00 = 2.00 = 4.00 = 1.00 = 4 0 15 2 4 1 Total Score = 2( i Add 1 point if sensifive waiershed and > 10% non-point disfurbance wifhin'/z mile radius. USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/1/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 01:56:09pm 5. Name of stream: S1.S1 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 1 9. Length of reach evaluated: 2422 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.26114 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.27816 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#2 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: sunny mild 16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny mild 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? YES If yes, estimate the water surface area: UNK 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK � % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial � % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 90 % Forested 10 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 15 - 5' variable 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): average 4-5' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0-2%) X Gentle (2-4%) Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends X Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 65 Comments: Stream is perennial Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11 /1 /2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 4 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 1 (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 3 (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 4 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 2 � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 � (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 j (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 3 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 1 (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 4 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 2 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 2 � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 3 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) � 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 3 (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 17 Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 5 (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 3 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 4 (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 5 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 4 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 4 � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 5 Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 65 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/2/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 09:45:48am 5. Name of stream: S1.S2 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 3 9. Length of reach evaluated: 445 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.25883 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.28317 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#2 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: warm mid 70s dry 16. Site conditions at time of visit: mid 60s 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? YES If yes, estimate the water surface area: UNK 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK � % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial � % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 90 % Forested 10 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 30-40' 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 4-5' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0-2%) Gentle (2-4%) Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 67 Comments: Stream is perennial Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11/2/2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 3 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 4 (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 4 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 3 (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 3 � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 3 (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 � (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 2 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 3 (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 2 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 3 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 4 � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 2 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 4 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 4 (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 1� Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 4 (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 4 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 3 (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 3 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 j (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 2 � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 3 Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 67 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/2/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 12:25:47pm 5. Name of stream: S1.S3 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 2 9. Length of reach evaluated: 2428 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.26204 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.27153 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#2 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: warm mid 70s dry 16. Site conditions at time of visit: mid 60s 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? YES If yes, estimate the water surface area: UNK 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK 10 % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial � % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 80 % Forested 10 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 15' 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 4-6' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0-2%) Gentle (2-4%) X Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 66 Comments: Stream is perennial Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11/2/2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 4 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 3 (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 2 (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 4 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 3 � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 2 (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 � (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 2 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 3 (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 4 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 2 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 2 � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 2 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 4 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 4 (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 1� Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 4 (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 3 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 4 (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 4 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 2 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 3 � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 3 Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 66 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/2/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 01:11:04pm 5. Name of stream: S1.S4 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 1 9. Length of reach evaluated: 123 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.26086 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.27186 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#2 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: warm mid 70s dry 16. Site conditions at time of visit: mid 60s 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK � % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial � % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 100 % Forested 0 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 3' 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 1' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0-2%) X Gentle (2-4%) Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 54 Comments: Stream is perennial Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11/2/2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 2 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 3 (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 4 (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 1 � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 3 (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 � (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 2 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 3 (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 j (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 4 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 5 � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 2 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 4 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 j (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 17 Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 2 (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 3 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 4 (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 2 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 j (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 Q � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 j Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 54 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/6/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 09:10:34am 5. Name of stream: S1.S5 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 1 9. Length of reach evaluated: 179 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.25715 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.26953 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#4 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: cold sunny mid 50s 16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold sunny low 50s 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK 20 % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial � % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 80 % Forested 0 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 2-4' 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 1-3' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0-2%) Gentle (2-4%) X Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 45 Comments: Stream is intermittent Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11/6/2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 � 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 3 (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 4 (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 1 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 � � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 � (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 � (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 2 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 4 (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 2 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 3 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 5 � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 3 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 4 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 j (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 1� Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 j (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 4 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 4 (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 Q (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 Q (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 Q � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 j Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 45 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/6/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 10:23:38am 5. Name of stream: S1.S6 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 1 9. Length of reach evaluated: 362 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.25915 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.26945 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#4 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: cold sunny mid 50s 16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold sunny low 60s 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK 20 % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial � % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 80 % Forested 0 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 2-4' 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 1-3' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0-2%) Gentle (2-4%) X Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends X Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 3J Comments: Stream is perennial Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11/6/2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 1 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 2 (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 � (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 2 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 1 � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 1 (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 � (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 3 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 � (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 j (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 1 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 3 � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 1 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 1 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 2 (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 17 Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 2 (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 4 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 3 (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 4 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 3 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 Q � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 j Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 39 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/20/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 10:51:45am 5. Name of stream: S1.S7 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 2 9. Length of reach evaluated: 4868 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.26516 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.2623 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#3 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: cold sunny 16. Site conditions at time of visit: windy cold 50 cloudy 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK � % Residential 40 % Commercial 0 % Industrial � % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 50 % Forested 10 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 4-5' 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 2-8' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0-2%) X Gentle (2-4%) Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends X Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 51 Comments: Stream is perennial Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11/20/2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 2 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 3 (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 1 (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 2 � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 1 (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 2 (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 2 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 1 (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 2 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 2 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 2 � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 2 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 1 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 3 (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 1� Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 3 (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 3 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 2 (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 3 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 3 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 2 � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 4 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 51 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/10/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 03:15:22pm 5. Name of stream: S1.S8 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 1 9. Length of reach evaluated: 36 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.26689 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.26292 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#3 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: rain >48 hours 16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny warm 80 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK 5 % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 20 % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 70 % Forested 5 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 2 ft 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 3.5 ft 24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0-2%) Gentle (2-4%) Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 28 Comments: Stream is intermittent Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11/10/2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 1 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 1 (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 1 (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 2 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 2 � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 1 (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 � (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 � (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 � (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 j (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 3 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 � � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 1 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 3 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 Q (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 1� Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 j (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 5 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 2 (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 Q (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 Q (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 Q � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 j Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 28 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/10/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 3:30:10 PM 5. Name of stream: S1.S9 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 1 9. Length of reach evaluated: 17 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.26902 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.26454 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#3 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: rain >48 hours 16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny warm 80 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK 5 % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 20 % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 70 % Forested 5 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 2.5 ft 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 3.5 ft 24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0-2%) Gentle (2-4%) Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 36 Comments: Stream is intermittent Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11/10/2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 2 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 1 (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 3 (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 2 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 2 � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 1 (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 3 (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 1 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 1 (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 j (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 2 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 j � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 2 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 3 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 Q (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 1� Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 j (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 5 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 j (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 Q (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 Q (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 Q � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 j Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 36 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/15/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 09:18:09am 5. Name of stream: S1.S10 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 2 9. Length of reach evaluated: 1714 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.25929 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.26217 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#4 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: sunny 60s 16. Site conditions at time of visit: cloudy drizzle 60s 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK � % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial � % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 80 % Forested 10 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 3' 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 1-4' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0-2%) Gentle (2-4%) X Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 70 Comments: Stream is perennial Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11/15/2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 2 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 4 (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 4 (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 2 � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 3 (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 4 (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 2 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 3 (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 3 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 3 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 4 � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 3 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 4 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 3 (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 1� Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 4 (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 4 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 4 (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 3 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 j (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 j � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 3 Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 70 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/15/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 11:04:47am 5. Name of stream: S1.S11 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 1 9. Length of reach evaluated: 80 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.2616 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.26409 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#3 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: sunny 60s 16. Site conditions at time of visit: cloudy drizzle 60s 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK � % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial � % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 90 % Forested 10 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 1-2' 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 1' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0-2%) Gentle (2-4%) X Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 51 Comments: Stream is intermittent Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11/15/2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 � 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 Jr (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 4 (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 1 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 � � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 2 (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 � (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 1 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 4 (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 2 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 3 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 5 � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 3 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 4 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 Q (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 17 Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 2 (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 5 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 4 (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 j (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 Q (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 Q � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 2 Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 51 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/17/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 10:47:41 am 5. Name of stream: S1.S12 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 1 9. Length of reach evaluated: 154 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.26383 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.26195 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#3 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: rain w/in 24hrs 16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 50s 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK � % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial � % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Forested 100 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 3' 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 3' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0-2%) X Gentle (2-4%) Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 47 Comments: Stream is perennial Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11/17/2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 2 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 2 (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 1 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 4 (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 2 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 � � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 � (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 � (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 2 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 4 (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 2 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 3 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 4 � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 1 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 4 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 2 (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 17 Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 2 (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 3 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 3 (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 j (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 2 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 Q � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 3 Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 47 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/17/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 11:43:42am 5. Name of stream: S1.S13 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 1 9. Length of reach evaluated: 71 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.26213 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.26163 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#3 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: rain w/in 24hrs 16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 50s 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK � % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial � % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 100 % Forested 0 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 2' 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 5' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0-2%) X Gentle (2-4%) Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 3J Comments: Stream is perennial Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11/17/2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 2 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 � (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 � (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 2 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 2 � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 � (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 � (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 1 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 1 (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 2 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 3 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 2 � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 2 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 1 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 3 (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 1� Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 3 (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 3 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 2 (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 5 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 j (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 Q � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 j Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 39 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/20/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 10:17:32am 5. Name of stream: S1.S14 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 1 9. Length of reach evaluated: 534 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.25431 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.26084 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#4 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: cold sunny 16. Site conditions at time of visit: windy cold 50 cloudy 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK � % Residential 70 % Commercial 0 % Industrial � % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 5 % Forested 25 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 4' 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 2-8' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0-2%) Gentle (2-4%) Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 47 Comments: Stream is perennial Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11/20/2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 2 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 1 (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 3 (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 4 � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 2 (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 4 (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 1 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 1 (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 2 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 2 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 j � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 2 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 2 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 2 (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 1� Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 3 (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 2 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 j (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 3 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 j (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 Q � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 3 Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 47 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (S. Knudsen) 3. Date of Evaluation: 11/27/2006 4. Time of Evaluation: 09:11:13am 5. Name of stream: S1.S15 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 3 9. Length of reach evaluated: 3432 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.25287 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.26339 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#4 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: sunny mild 16. Site conditions at time of visit: same 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK � % Residential 20 % Commercial 0 % Industrial � % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 50 % Forested 30 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 40' 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 15' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0-2%) Gentle (2-4%) Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 70 Comments: Stream is perennial Evaluators Signature: S&ME / S. Knudsen Date: 11/27/2006 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 4 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 3 (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 3 (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 4 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 4 � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 2 (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 2 (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 3 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 2 (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 2 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 2 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 2 � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 2 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 2 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 3 (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 17 Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 5 (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 3 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 4 (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 4 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 3 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 4 � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 5 Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 70 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams USA OE Aid # DWQ # Site # ; , �, ;�� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the followin� information for the stream reach under assessment: (indicate on attached map) 1. Applicant's name: PBS&J 2. Evaluator's name: S&ME (C. McRae) 3. Date of Evaluation: 1/16/2007 4. Time of Evaluation: 02:01:56pm 5. Name of stream: S1.S15B 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: ---- 8. Stream order: 3 9. Length of reach evaluated: 3654 feet 10. County: Gaston 11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.25291 Longitude (ex. - 77.55661 -81.24139 Method location determined GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS) Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location): See Fig#13 of Approximate Waters of the U.S. Including Wetlands maps 14. Proposed channel work (if any): Unknown 15. Recent weather conditions: light rain overnight 16. Site conditions at time of visit: overcast 17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: UNK 20 % Residential 15 % Commercial 0 % Industrial � % Agricultural 21. Estimated watershed land use: 65 % Forested 0 % Cleared/Logged % Other 22. Bankfull width: 45 feet 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 15' 24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0-2%) Gentle (2-4%) Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 68 Comments: Stream is perennial Evaluators Signature: S&ME / C. McRae Date: 1/16/2007 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of tlow / persisieni pools in sfream 1 (no flow or saturafion = 0; slron flow = max oinfs) 0-5 0-4 0-5 4 2 Evidence of pasi human alieraiion 0-6 0-5 0-5 3 (exiensive alierafion = 0; no alferafion = max poinfs) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3 (no buffer = 0; confi uous, wide buffer = max oinfs) 4 Evidence of nufrieni or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 2 (exfensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max oinfs) � 5 Groundwaier discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 4 � (no dischar e= 0; s rin s, see s, weflands, eic. = max oinfs) r.i 6 Presence of ad,jaceni tloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 4 � (no flood lain = 0; exiensive flood lain = max oinfs) � � � �frenchmeni / tloodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 2 (dee 1 enfrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max oinfs) 8 Presence of ad,jaceni weflands 0-6 0-4 0-2 j (no weflands = 0; large adjacent weflands = max poinfs) 9 Channel sinuosiiy 0-5 0-4 0-3 2 (exfensive channelizafion = 0; natural meander = max oinfs) 10 Sedimeni inpui 0-5 0-4 0-4 2 (eaiensive de osifion= 0; liftle or no secliment = max oinfs) 11 Size & diversiiy of channel bed subsfraie NA* 0-4 0-5 3 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max poinfs) IZ Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 2 � (dee 1 incised = 0; siable bed & banks = max oinfs) � Presence of major bank failures � 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, sfable banks = max poinfs) 0-5 0-5 0-5 2 � Rooi depih and densiiy on banks 14 (no visible roofs = 0; dense roofs fhrou hout = max oinfs) 0-3 0-4 0-5 3 F � 15 �Paci by agriculture, livesiock, or iimber producfion 0-5 0-4 0-5 (subsianfial im act =0; no evidence = max oinfs) 4 16 Presence of rifII�pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 4 (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max poinfs) � 17 Habiiai complexiiy 0-6 0-6 0-6 5 (liftle or no habiiat = 0; fre uenf, varied habifafs = max oinfs) � 18 Canopy coverage over sfreambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (no shading vegeiafion = 0; confinuous canopy = max poinfs) 5 '.t'i 19 Subsiraie embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 2 (dee 1 embedded = 0;loose slructure = max) 20 Presence of sfream inveriebraies (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 2 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) � 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 2 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poinfs) O 22 Presence of C sh 0-4 0-4 0-4 2 � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oinfs) � Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max poinfs) 0-6 0-5 0-5 5 Toial Poinis Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 68 *These characferisfics are not assessed in coasial slreams