Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20120285 Ver 1_Report_20061206� � p�F Your comp/imentary �use period has ended. Site # (indicate on attached map) Co m p l ete Thank you for using :F;� POFComp/ete. �Y ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ° 2. Evaluator's name: Jennifer M Freeman �. La�e oi evaivauon: i�-ii-uo 4. Time of evaluation: 1530 5. Name of stream: UT to Crowder's Creek 6. River basin: Catawba 7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: 1 9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County: Gaston 11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude: Longitude: Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other 13. Locarion of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) locarion): East of Bud Wilson Rd, north corridor on east side of D20 mainstem 14. Proposed channel work (if any): n/a 15. Recent weather conditions: cool, sunny 16. Site condirions at rime of visit: sunny & 64 degrees 17. Identify any special waterway classificarions known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essenrial Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters water Supply (I-I� Watershed 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation yes If yes, estimate the water surface area: point? 19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? no 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? no 21. Esrimated watershed land use: 10% residenrial 10% industrial 80% forested 22. Baiikfiill width: 2 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 8 in — 2 ft 24. Channel slope down center of stream: Fi�t (o to a�io� X Gentie �a to 4�io� ivtoaerate �4 to io�io� steep �io�io� ZS. CllaIlI101 S1T1UOS1Ly: Straight x Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on locarion, terrain, vegetation, stream classificarion, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristics within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief descriprion of how to review the characteristics idenrified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluarion. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather condirions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanarion in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream amy be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 49 Comments: Evaluator's Signature (Jennifer M Freeman) Date 12-11-06 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the complerion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. ��� ppF Your comp/imentary �use period has ended. Site # (indicate on attached map) Co m p l ete Thank you for using :F;���� POFComp/ete. �Y ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET .,. CS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of flow / persistent pools in streams 1 (no flow or saturarion = 0; strong flow = maY points) 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 1 Evidence of past human alteration 2 (eatensive alterarion = 0; no alteration = maY points) 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 3 Riparian Zone 3 (no buffer = 0; conriguous, wide buffer = maY points) 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 4 (eatensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maY points) 0-5 0- 4 0- 4 3 Groundwater discharge 5 (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maY points) 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4 1 Presence of adjacent floodplain 6 (no floodplain = 0; eatensive floodplain = max points) 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2 2 Entrenchment / floodplain access 7 (dee 1 entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = maY oints) 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 3 Presence of ad,jacent wetlands 8 (no wetlands = O; large adjacent wetlands = maY points) 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 1 Channel sinuosity 9 (eatensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maY points) 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 2 Sediment input 10 (eatensive deposition = 0; little or no sediment = maY points) 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate ll (fine homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points) NA* 0- 4 0- 5 1 Evidence of channel incision or widening 12 (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maY points) 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 3 Presence of major bank failures 13 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maY points) 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 4 Root depth and density on banks 14 (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maY points) 0- 3 0- 4 0- 5 2 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 15 (substanrial impact = 0; no evidence = maY points) 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 3 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes 16 (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well developed = max points) 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 2 Habitat complexity 17 (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maY points) 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 2 Canopy coverage over streambed 18 (no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = maY oints) 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 4 Substrate embeddedness 19 (deeply embedded = O; loose structure = maY points) NA* 0- 4 0- 4 3 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 20 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maY points) 0- 4 0- 5 0- 5 0 Presence of amphibians 21 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maY points) 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 0 Presence of fish 22 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maY points) 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 3 Evidence of wildlife use 23 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maY points) 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 Total Points Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 49 * These charactersitics are not assessed in coastal streams.