HomeMy WebLinkAbout20120285 Ver 1_Mitigation Information_20100101Gaston East -West Connector
STIP NO U -3321
GASTON AND MECKLENBURG COUNTIES, NC
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
On -Site Mitigation Field Review
Prepared by
j I o
1616 East Millbrook Road, Suite 310
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Prepared for
5 NORTH CAROLINA
moo
Turnpike Authority
January 2010
V
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
On -Site Mitigation Field Review
The purpose of this memorandum is to document potential on site mitigation opportunities
within the project study area to possibly aid in meeting the compensatory mitigation
requirements of the proposed Gaston East West Connector (Garden Parkway) For the
purposes of this memorandum on site is defined as an area in the vicinity of the Least
Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) (DSA 9) extending from 1 85 west of
Gastonia in Gaston County to 1485/NC 160 near the Charlotte Douglas International Airport in
Mecklenburg County
Site Selection Methodology
Potential wetland and stream restoration sites were first identified through GIS analysis Aerial
photography was examined in areas where wetlands streams and buffer areas were found to
be coincident with disturbed land uses Based on aerial photography interpretation areas
fudged to have restoration potential were recorded and those areas without potential were
discounted Specific methodology and data used in identifying wetland and stream restoration
sites are described separately in this section Aerial photography used in the identification of all
restoration sites consisted of 2008 aerial photography acquired from the National Agricultural
Imaging Program for Mecklenburg and Gaston Counties Aerial photography was used in
concert with other data sets including soils (SSURGO database) hydrology (NHD) contour data
(NCDOT) and county parcel data
Criteria for the selection of potential wetland and stream restoration sites were established
prior to the GIS analysis Site selection criteria were developed with consideration for guidance
from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (EEP) The following guidelines were observed throughout the GIS
analysis
Stream Restoration
• Stream projects must have a minimum of 50 feet conservation easement on both sides
of the stream for the entire project length Easements are measured from the top of
the stream bank on both sides of the stream The easement may be wider if there is
room for additional planting (up to 200 feet from the top on either side of the stream)
or if there is a wetland component to the project (no easement width limit)
• One side of stream must be free of utilities
• Streams with a utility on one side must have a 50 foot easement in addition to
any existing utility easement The width of the utility cannot count towards the
50 foot requirement
[1j
• The stream segment proposed for restoration must be greater than or equal to 2 000
linear feet in length however exceptions may be made under certain circumstances
There is no maximum length for a stream project Stream restoration opportunities that
are less than 2 000 linear feet but involve relocation of the existing stream as a result of
the proposed roadway were also considered
• Less than 10 square mile drainage area (typically 1st and 2nd order streams 3rd order
streams in some cases) and no greater than a 3'd order stream
• Proposed stream segments must be perennial as indicated on USGS 24K Quadrangle
Maps and /or in the NRCS Soil Surveys No more than 20 percent of the proposed
restoration or enhancement project can be intermittent
Wetland Restoration
• Hydric soils must be present (might be relic)
• Original wetland hydrology is altered by ditching the drains filling or other means
caused by human influences
• Proposed wetland restoration area lacks appropriate wetland vegetation
• Minimum of 2 acres (unless associated with a stream project) in size but no maximum
• Site is not comprised entirely of invasive vegetation species (i a manageable within
reason)
After identification of potential mitigation opportunities sites were further evaluated in the
field Field evaluations at prospective mitigation sites were performed over the course of two
days by staff with extensive experience in mitigation implementation Evaluations included an
assessment of soils hydrology vegetative cover and landscape /watershed characteristics
Sites were evaluated with consideration for an existing buffer and proximity to existing
jurisdictional systems Notes were collected regarding species composition soil matrix and
chroma and any site constraints (e g active farming culverts utilities) Site photos were also
collected
Based on the GIS analysis 20 tax parcels totalling approximately 1050 acres were identified as
potentially containing mitigation opportunities (Table 1)
[2l
Table 1 Parcel Data and Field Evaluated Mitigation Opportunities
PIN
PID*
OWNER
PARCEL ADDRESS
ACREAGE
MITIGATION POTENTIAL
3535210554
00469558
DOCKERY DAVID N
LINWOOD RD
428
Stream Enhancement (Site 1)
DOCKERY
3535229884
1403024
PROPERTIES LLLP
HUBERT ST
291
Stream Enhancement (Site 1)
3534287991
00469558
DOCKERY DAVID N
2900 LINWOOD RD
1016
Stream Enhancement (Site 1)
HARRISON
Stream Enhancement and
3562837404
1460409
CHARLES
6338 UNION RD
155
Restoration (Site 2)
HARRISON
Stream Enhancement and
3562839141
1460409
CHARLES
6338 UNION RD
193
Restoration (Site 2)
HARRISON
Stream Enhancement and
3562920627
1460409
CHARLES
6338 UNION RD
223
Restoration (Site 2)
HARRISON
Stream Enhancement and
3562922221
1460409
CHARLES
WILSON RD
206
Restoration (Site 2)
362 CROWDERS
3533650153
1562686
FALLS ROBERT P
CREEK RD
216
Wetland Enhancement (Site 3)
1113 SHANNON
No Mitigation Potential impaired
3535098933
1550392
STILES PARKS
BRADLEY RD
158
stream reach too short
ROBINSON
No Mitigation Potential stable
3535091505
03970476
ROBERT F & ANNIE
DUNDEEN DR
262
stream
SHANNON BRADLEY
No Mitigation Potential impaired
3536009443
1550392
STILES PARKS
RD
4 1
stream reach too short
No Mitigation Potential stable
3552053030
1491098
ENTLER EARNEST L
GRANNY TRL
47
stream
THOMPSON
No Mitigation Potential stable
3552039171
03994535
JAMES C JR
SPARROW DAIRY RD
1793
stream
FERGUSON
MARGARETANN
162 WILSON FARM
No Mitigation Potential
3562438039
1377773
QUINN
RD
1372
functioning wetland system
Omega Realty and
1208 UNION NEW
No Mitigation Potential
3573819339
1505700
Development LLC
HOPE RD
285
functioning wetland system
UNION NEW HOPE
No Mitigation Potential currently
3573830015
03974703
STOWE JEFFREY W
RD
835
under construction
MECKLENBURG
Completed stream restoration
4502847583
14117111
COUNTY
DIXIE RIVER RD
750
project
MECKLENBURG
Completed stream restoration
4512051925
14117112
COUNTY
DIXIE RIVER RD
1050
project
DIXIE RIVER LAND
Completed stream restoration
4502649026
14117101
COMPANY LLC
DIXIE RIVER RD
159
project
DIXIE RIVER LAND
No Mitigation Potential stable
4502820480
19925103
CO LLC
DIXIE RIVER RD
1028
stream
"Value is recognized as PID by Mecklenburg County (Mecklenburg County POLARIS database) and Owner Id by Gaston County
(Gaston County GIs Web Site)
In most cases the natural resource feature with mitigation opportunity extended across
multiple parcels In which case the parcels were combined to facilitate field evaluation
Following field evaluations seven parcels were found that contain opportunities for stream
and /or wetland mitigation These parcels are grouped Into 3 sites (Sites 1 3) and are described
[3]
below. Figures and photographs for each site are also provided. All of the recommended sites
will require additional analysis and feasibility studies to determine the full mitigation potential.
Site 1: 2900 Linwood Road, Gastonia, NC (Linwood Golf Course)
Owner: David Dockery
Mitigation Opportunity: Stream Enhancement
Site 1 (Figure 1) is located at 2900 Linwood Road in southwest Gastonia. The site consists of
three tax parcels that total 173.5 acres. Land use consists of a golf course with routine
maintenance associated with fairway upkeep. The site contains approximately 5,600 linear feet
of Crowders Creek. Crowders Creek is a 303d listed stream for impaired biological integrity
primarily resulting from urban runoff and storm sewers (North Carolina Division of Water
Quality, 2006 Final 303d). The reach of Crowders Creek contained within the Site is deeply
entrenched and characterized by steep banks, limited sinuosity, and a poor riparian buffer.
Mowing occurs along both stream banks with only a limited stream buffer consisting of shrubs
and grasses. Eroding stream banks were observed throughout this reach of Crowders Creek.
Mitigation potential within Site 1
consists of stream enhancement
opportunities along approximately
5,600 linear feet of Crowders
Creek. Stream enhancement
involves activities that result in
improvements to the impaired
stream and riparian corridor that
restore dimension and profile
(USACE 2003). However, Level 1
stream enhancement activities
may include other techniques that
ultimately result in improvement
to channel stability, water quality,
and in- stream habitat.
Eroding banks and poor riparian buffer along Crowders Creek
Stream enhancement approaches
that are appropriate for this reach of Crowders Creek include stream bank stabilization (relaxing
the grade of overly steep, unstable banks) and excavating a floodplain (or bankfull bench)
adjacent to the channel. Additionally, planting a riparian buffer will enhance bank stability,
increase channel shading, and provide additional wildlife habitat. Discussions with the
landowner (David Dockery) indicated an interest in making improvements to Crowders Creek,
so long as mitigation activities do not interfere with the continued operation of the golf course.
Cooperation with adjacent landowners may also be necessary along a portion of the creek that
flows adjacent to the parcel boundary. Additional analysis and feasibility studies are necessary
to determine if mitigation activities are practical and cost effective.
[4]
created in support of logging activities.
Mitigation potential within Site 3 consists of wetland enhancement opportunities for
approximately 6.0 acres. Wetland enhancement primarily involves the re- introduction of
functions that the existing wetland area previously performed. Wetland enhancement
approaches that are appropriate for this Site include removal of timber slash, filling /grading
ditches, ripping /discing areas compacted by logging equipment, and planting characteristic
wetland species to restore the pre- disturbance community.
The mitigation activity multiplier for wetland enhancement is 4.0. Wetland enhancement of
approximately 6.0 acres may result in 1.5 wetland mitigation units (WMU). The USACE (in
conjunction with NCDWQ and any other relevant regulatory agencies) ultimately determines
the mitigation credit ratio for each project on a case -by -case basis.
[7]
I
L�(
ti
_ L t
t _
x-
{
C �
Aw
i
Legend
Sitel
DSA 9 ROW Boundary
DSA 9 Corridor Boundary
700 0 700
FEET
SCALE: t IN = 700 FT
Data Sources:
2008 Aerial Photo (NAIP)
Parcel (Gaston County)
Roads (NC OneMap)
Streams (NHD)
ROW and Corridor (DEIS, April 2009)
prepared By:
Y
_ I s
SU
OqZ y"
vil
e:
� 4 ��NLr Q �dJ.• 4. 1
MITIGATION POTENTIAL
SITE I: 2900 LINWOOD ROAD
GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
°vnBy:
FIGURE
MCG
Ckd By:
JWG
JAN 2010
100010933
v,eva.ea er:
MITIGATION POTENTIAL
ow�ey:
MCc
FIGURE
�O
SITE 2: 6338 UNION ROAD
cee By:
JWG
JAN 2010
POjeG
GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
100010933
F ;r,..• ,r £ •c v,
I 4t
ti e + I �f t',�r �"� ''+ 1�•, r '� rh% -F a' •� � r Ft�;�tY �'�i ?+ '�� 4s �s a ° ly
�� 1�`"rJ � .-�r� ,yam r��. ' j� :«' 4" ' � Awr S �: t', �: ' t � '� •' 7
Kam.,, 1• � � .,�����F F`•i� �� �\ �'\� , 9 �� � . Y
{ t 4
w
y 1• r
� • � D i �� � . ,* •.. � t c Vic. t' L r �
Tel y AV
,C,sP i ir,� ► _,• ' i -F .# • .' W 1 0'
rr ,..1yTF N r .ry `.... F A• ga,• r
err ' S
i'tr+P'' �' +!,Fl .1 t� r �^11
.mow+ Y• _ ay tl-T a
�r
Ir �y�-7 ' tea- �'�r,�, i Sa 7 { k ► Ml Lrs r lr /�
/\ `• p �i 1 or e..
k�-� a� 1 � ' - : �- ivr - f �• i �r•"" :4�,y + f� - �y 1 i� 1ai_Y -
Legend
Site3
DSA 9 ROW Boundary
DSA 9 Corridor Boundary
300 0 300
FEET
SCALE: 1 IN = 300 FT
Data Sources:
2008 Aerial Photo (NAIP)
Parcel (Gaston County)
Roads INC OneMap)
Wetlands (U3321 delineation)
ROW and Corridor (DEIS, April 2009)
a� '�.` �_ � ` `� •r:` .- cam. :r'.. � _ - .
' 'p
VL
1
d F R•a �
Prepared By:
MITIGATION POTENTIAL
�. By'
MCG
FIGURE
�®
y
SITE 3: 362 CROWDERS CREEK ROAD
3
cxd By:
JwG
Dare.
JAN 2010
P' ° ""
100010933
GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA