HomeMy WebLinkAbout20120285 Ver 1_Meeting Minutes_20110715Oji�o NORTH CAROLINA
Turnpike Authority
MEETING SUMMARY
Date July 15 2011
10 00 AM
Location Various (see below)
Project STIP U 3321 Gaston E W Connector — STP 1213(6)
Attendees
Liz Hair — USACE
Marella Buncick — USFWS
Polly Lespinasse — NCDWQ
Michael Gloden — Atkins
Phillip Rogers — HNTB
Purpose
Visit Linwood Springs Golf Course mitigation site and review existing conditions and proposed hydraulic
design at three proposed culvert locations as requested by agencies at the June 9 2011 Concurrence Point
(CP) 4B meeting [Note at the CP 4B meeting agencies also requested to visit Stream S297 however during
the field visit it was agreed not to visit this site ]
Summary
Linwood Springs Golf Course Site Visit NCDOT recently purchased the Linwood Springs Golf
Course in Gastonia to use as a mitigation site for this project and /or others in the area The site visit
at Linwood Springs Golf Course began with a review of mapping depicting the jurisdictional
delineation and a discussion of the various resources on the site The delineation previously
performed for the Garden Parkway did not include resources located within the limits of the golf
course and Atkins staff has subsequently mapped all site features Atkins staff is also preparing a
conceptual mitigation plan which includes an assessment of existing conditions and the proposed
restoration concept Under existing conditions surface water on the site is contained within numerous
ponds (water hazards) that drain to Crowders Creek through vegetated ditches and an underground
drainage network
Crowder s Creek was observed by the group from the southern most golf cart crossings where it was
noted that streambank vegetation is disturbed and maintained Crowder s Creek shows evidence of
dredging and straightening as well as manipulation to stream banks including artificial levees
constructed to keep flood waters within the channel and away from the fairways Priority 2 restoration
is proposed for Crowders Creek From the bridge crossing over Crowders Creek it was also observed
that an unnamed tributary to Crowders Creek that enters the site from the west (S59) is routed
through a series of ponds and then a linear vegetated ditch A combination of Priority 1 and 2
restoration is proposed for the unnamed tributary
The remaining tributaries that enter the site from the northeast were not reviewed during the site visit
in the interest of reviewing the culvert crossings requested by agencies at the June 2011 Concurrence
Field Visit - 07/15/11
Page 2of3
Point 4B meeting. A second site visit with the USACE and NCDWQ is planned to review the
delineation and discuss the restoration concept in more detail.
Site #1 Stream S296 (Sheet 10): A 2 -cell 7x6 foot reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) is
proposed to convey cross drainage associated with Stream S296. The culvert length is 395 feet with
an approximate slope of 0.76 percent. The alternate box will include a concrete sill and a floodplain
bench. Class I riprap will be placed on stream banks as specified on the outlet channel improvement
details. Stream S296 has an average width of 6 feet and an average depth of 2 -4 inches.
At the CP 4B meeting, agencies noted that the alignment of the culvert inlet at the end of a meander
may be of concern. The group discussed potential realignment. If the inlet was realigned, it would
likely impact approximately 60 linear feet more of S296. If the fill slope was steepened so the culvert
inlet was farther downstream, the steeper slope may be difficult to stabilize. The currently proposed
fill slope is at 2:1. A steeper slope may require rock plating. Another challenge will be getting the
water from the lateral ditches to the culvert, particularly if the culvert is realigned.
During the field visit, severe stream bank erosion was observed approximately 50' upstream of the
proposed RCBC inlet. USFWS expressed concern about drainage that is being ditched to the inlet of
the proposed RCBC. USFWS and NCDWQ stated that they preferred reducing the skew of the
proposed RCBC, considering the existing upstream erosion and stream meander. They also inquired
about the possibility of shortening the proposed RCBC. Mr. Rogers stated that the current design is
utilizing 2:1 fill slopes; therefore, in order to steepen these proposed slopes, rock plating would have
to be utilized. NCTA/HNTB will investigate changing the skew of the proposed RCBC.
Stream S296 Looking East
Stream S296 Looking North near Proposed Inlet
Field Visit - 07/15/11
Stream S296 Looking West
Page 3 of 3
• Site #2 Stream S300 (Sheet 30): A 2 -cell 6x6 foot box culvert is proposed for the crossing of Stream
S300 associated with the proposed Tucker Road service road located to the southwest of the NC 273
(Southpoint Road interchange). The culvert would be approximately 166 feet long with an approximate
1.2 percent slope. Stream S300 has an average width of 3 -5 feet.
NCDWQ expressed some concern over the width of the existing stream channel relative to the
proposed RCBC cell width of 6 feet. However, after viewing the existing stream no further revisions
were requested and no further action is required.
Site #3 Stream S312M317 (Sheet 41): At this location, there is a proposed service road (connecting
Garrison Road to Dixie River Road) crossing of Stream S312A (Beaverdam Creek) downstream of the
mainline crossing of Beaverdam Creek. There is the main channel of the creek and an adjacent
wetland (W317) with an enclosed intermittent stream (Stream S318A) on the west side of the creek's
floodplain. A 2 -cell 10x5 foot box culvert is proposed for Stream S312A and a 2 -cell 10x4 foot box
culvert is proposed for Wetland W317 and Stream S318A. These are sized to meet FEMA
requirements. The fill slopes are 2:1 and it would not be practicable to steepen them in this location to
reduce the culvert lengths.
At the CP 4B meeting on June 9, 2011, USFWS asked if the roadway could be shifted slightly south to
an area where Wetland W317 is narrower. It was also noted that this site was discussed at the
Concurrence Point 2A meetings held March 4, 2008 and April 8, 2008. The site is referred to as
crossing KD29 in the meeting minutes. At the CP2A meeting, the USACE noted that the wetland
W317 near crossing KD29 was highly silted. Sediment was observed throughout the streams and
wetlands in this area. At that time, the attendees agreed a culvert was the appropriate hydraulic
structure.
During the field visit, both the wetland and stream sites were reviewed. The group observed that the
proposed RCBC cell width is consistent with the existing stream width for S312. NCDWQ and USACE
that the current proposed roadway alignment is satisfactory, since it appears that a shift in the
alignment to minimize wetland impact would likely increase stream impacts.
Stream S312A Looking South
Field Visit - 07/15/11
Stream S312A Looking North