20081317 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20120502

a
Ot
ZR
4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
€
SUITE 2
I N C O R P O R A T E D
WILMINGTON NORTH CAROLINA 28403 1725
Containing
e
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
TEL [phone]
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO David Lekson USACE (via FedEx priority overnight)
LKar nn Higgins DWQ (via FedEx priority ovemight)_ _�
AI Hodge —DWQ- (via -FedEx priority overnight)
Jeff Furness PCS (via FedEx 2 day)
Jonathan Ricketts Jonathan Ricketts Inc (via FedEx 2 day)
Kevin Tweedy Michael Baker Engineering (via FedEx 2 day)
Jim Hudgens CZR Incorporated (via FedEx 2 day)
Ross Smith (w /o enclosures & included In J Furness envelope)
Michael Brom (w /o enclosures & included in J Furness envelope)
FROM Arnie Strohmeier
DATE 1 May 2012
SUBJECT Second Annual (2011) Report for the Hell Swamp /Scott
Mitigation Site
WE ARE SENDING YOU
FAX [phone]
czrwdm @czr me com
11EIVE
MAY 2 2012
Copies
Description
Second Annual (2011) Report for the Hell Swamp /Scott Creek
1
Watershed Mitigation Site text tables figures and appendices)
Containing
Second Annual (2011) Report for the Hell Swamp /Scott Creek
1 CD
Watershed Mitigation Site (text tables figures and appendices)
2011 Hell Swamp Monthly Hydrology Tables
Flow videos
NOTE A second CD containing the Hell Swamp hydrology graphs will be sent separately
Signed
Arnie Strohmeier
CP #1745 59 66
2151 Alternate A I A South SUITE 2000 JUPITER FLORIDA 33477 3902
TEL [phone] FAX [phone] cznnc @czr inc com www CZRINC com

Ik PotashCorp
Helping Nature Provide
Federal Express
May 1 2012
Mr David Lekson
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 West 5th Street
Washington North Carolina 27889
Dear Mr Lekson
® ? - IaII
Enclosed is the Second Annual (2011) Report for the Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Watershed
Mitigation Site Pantego Township Beaufort County North Carolina Earthwork was initiated
on the mitigation site in July 2009 and planting was complete in May 2010 Minor additional
earthwork was done in September 2010 We are providing your copy unbound as you
requested A CD containing all of the hydrology graphs from the monitoring wells will be sent
separately in the near future If you have any questions please call me at [phone] or
Julia Berger of CZR Incorporated at [phone]
Sincerely
< < IA/,- IIA"
Jeffrey Furness
Senior Scientist
PC Karen Higgins DWQ Raleigh w /encl
Al Hodge DWQ —
Wash w/ encl
R M Smith
w /Summary
M Brom
w /Summary
J Hudgens CZR
w /encl
J Ricketts JTR
w /encl
K Tweedy Baker
w /encl
S Cooper CZR
w /encl
J Berger CZR
w/o encl
23 11 019
w /encl
1530 NC HWY 306 S Aurora NC US 27806 9245 T 252 322 4111
www potashcorp corn

SECOND ANNUAL (2011) REPORT FOR THE
HELL SWAMP /SCOTT CREEK WATERSHED MITIGATION SITE
PANTEGO TOWNSHIP
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
;Aft& : .
Prepared for:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Prepared by:
CZR Incorporated
April 2012
s
r -_�.
'a
'p
71
fop

SECOND ANNUAL (2011) REPORT FOR THE
HELL SWAMP /SCOTT CREEK WATERSHED MITIGATION SITE
PANTEGO TOWNSHIP
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Prepared by:
CZR Incorporated
April 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT OVERVIEW .......................................... ...............................
1.1
History .................................................................... ...............................
1.2
Location .................................................................. ...............................
1.3
Goals and Performance Criteria ............................. ...............................
2.0
REQUIREMENTS .................................................. ...............................
2.1
Normal Rainfall and Growing Season .................... ...............................
2.2
Hydrology ............................................................... ...............................
2.3
Vegetation .............................................................. ...............................
2.4
Hydrogeomorphic Monitoring of Streams and Valleys ..........................
2.5
Photographic Documentation ................................. ...............................
3.0
SUMMARY DATA .................................................. ...............................
3.1
Rainfall ................................................................... ...............................
3.2
Hydrology ............................................................... ...............................
3.2.1
QA /QC of Well Performance ............................... ...............................
3.2.2
Geomorphic Monitoring, Flow Events and Annual Stream Surveys. .
3.2.3
Hydroperiods ....................................................... ...............................
3.2.3.1
Riparian Headwater Systems / Bottomlands . ...............................
3.2.3.2
Non - riparian Hardwood Flat ......................... ...............................
3.2.4
Hydroperiod Comparison to Control Forests ....... ...............................
3.2.4.1
Plum's Pit .................................................... ...............................
3.2.4.2
Windley ........................................................ ...............................
3.2.4.3
Winfield ........................................................ ...............................
3.3
Vegetation .............................................................. ...............................
3.3.1
Riparian Buffer ..................................................... ...............................
3.3.2
Riparian Areas / Bottomlands ................................ ...............................
3.3.3
Non - riparian Hardwood Flat ................................ ...............................
3.5
Photographic Documentation ................................. ...............................
4.0
SUMMARY ............................................................ ...............................
LITERATURE CITED
........................................................................ ...............................
Cover Photo: Aerial photo 13 February 2011. View to NNW, Seed Tick Neck Road to right
edge of photo.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site ii PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1
Performance criteria, methods summary, and current status.. ..................................
T -1
Table 2A
Longest hydroperiods in 2011 of 92 riparian monitoring wells at Hell Swamp
Hell Swamp Mitigation Site Monitoring Locations on Soil Survey.........
Figure 4A
restorationsite ............................................................................. ...............................
T -4
Table 2B
Longest hydroperiods in 2011 of 111 non - riparian hardwood flat monitoring
2011 Hell Swamp and WETS- Belhaven Rainfall .... ...............................
Figure 6
wells at Hell Swamp restoration site .......................................... ...............................
T -10
Table 3A
Longest hydroperiods in 2011 of 92 riparian monitoring wells at Hell Swamp
Hell Swamp Mitigation Site Monitoring Wells -2011 Hydroperiods and
restoration site during normal or below normal rainfall .............. ...............................
T -18
Table 3B
Longest hydroperiods in 2011 of 111 non - riparian hardwood flat monitoring
wells at Hell Swamp restoration site during normal or below normal rainfall...........
T -24
Table 4
Summary of 2011 flow gauge data from upper Scott Creek and its headwater
systems (UT1 — UT7) and a tributary to Smith Creek (UT8) at Hell Swamp............
T -33
Table 5
Survival of trees and shrubs planted in 19 0.017 -acre plots in potential riparian
buffer areas at Hell Swamp from baseline (summer 2010) to fall 2011 ...................
T -34
Table 6
Survival of trees and shrubs planted in 12 riparian 0.22 -acre plots at Hell
Swamp from baseline (summer 2010) to fall 2011 .................... ...............................
T -35
Table 7
Survival of trees and shrubs planted in 111 non - riparian 0.22 -acre plots at Hell
Swamp from baseline (summer 2010) to fall 2011 .................... ...............................
T -36
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1
Hell Swamp Vicinity Map ........................................ ...............................
Figure 2
Hell Swamp Monitoring Locations .......................... ...............................
Figure 3
Hell Swamp Mitigation Site Monitoring Locations on Soil Survey.........
Figure 4A
Hell Swamp Restoration Area Well Locations on As Built LiDAR.........
Figure 4B
Hell Swamp Control Forest Well Locations on Pre - restoration LiDAR..
Figure 5
2011 Hell Swamp and WETS- Belhaven Rainfall .... ...............................
Figure 6
Hell Swamp Mitigation Site Monitoring Wells -2011 Hydroperiods and
HydrologicZones .................................................... ...............................
Figure 7
Hell Swamp Mitigation Site Monitoring Wells -2011 Hydroperiods and
Hydrologic Zones During Normal or Below Normal Rainfall ..................
APPENDICES
................. Fig -1
................. Fig -2
................. Fig -3
............... Fig -4A
............... Fig -413
................. Fig -5
Estimated
................. Fig -6
Estimated
................. Fig -7
A 2011 Cross Section Measurements in Restored Single Thread Channel of Upper Scott
Creek
B 2011 Flow Events Recorded by Low Flow Gauges, Observer Data, and Stream
Survey Results in Each Tributary or Headwater System
C Stem Counts at Individual Plots at Hell Swamp
D Selected Second Annual Restoration Vegetation Photographs
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site iii PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012

1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
1.1 History. The 1,297 -acre Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Watershed mitigation site is a
significant component of the compensatory mitigation for future unavoidable impacts to wetlands
and waters as authorized by Section 404 Permit Action ID 200110096 and the Section 401 Water
Quality Certification DWQ #2008 -0868, version 2.0. Hydrogeomorphic monitoring of the stream
valleys was conducted by Baker Engineering. CZR Incorporated (CZR) of Wilmington, NC
monitors hydrology and vegetation of the Hell Swamp site, as well as three other sites (Windley,
Plum's Pit, and Winfield) used as hydrological controls. Restoration activities at Hell Swamp
were authorized by the NC Division of Coastal Management and Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA) major development permit 83 -09 as well as the NC Division of Land Resources Erosion
and Sediment Control Permits, which were issued for 11 separate phases and further described
in the As Built Report (CZR 2010) and the Baseline and First Annual Report (CZR 2011). Work
occurred from 1 July 2009 until 22 June 2010 and began in areas not subject to CAMA or Section
404 jurisdiction. Planting occurred from February to May 2010, after each phase of restoration
earthwork was completed; planted species and densities are described in CZR 2010.
1.2 Location. The Hell Swamp site is located within the Pamlico Hydrologic Unit
03020104 of the Tar - Pamlico river basin within the Pungo Creek subbasin and is drained by Scott
Creek, Smith Creek, and Broad Creek. The site encompasses almost the entire Scott Creek
watershed and a portion of the watersheds of Smith Creek and Broad Creek. Located on the
southwest side of Seed Tick Neck Road (SR 1714) in Beaufort County, the site is approximately 2
miles east - southeast (straight -line distance) of the town of Yeatesville, Pantego Township, North
Carolina (Figure 1).
1.3 Goals and Performance Criteria. The primary goal of the project is to restore a
self- sustaining functional watershed and wetland /stream complex to allow surface flow to move
through vegetated wetlands before reaching any stream. Mitigation yields are estimated and
performance criteria are described for the project in detail in the Compensatory Mitigation Plan for
Restoration of Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Watershed (CZR 2009). Performance criteria are
summarized in Table 1. Overtime the Hell Swamp site is expected to successfully:
re- establish approximately:
• 19,783 linear feet (LF) of zero and first -order stream, including the
restoration of six riparian headwater systems and three low energy
streams;
• 21 acres of Tar - Pamlico riparian buffer, with additional potential buffer
opportunity if suitable stream segments form in the riparian headwater
systems;
• 58 acres of riparian forested hardwood wetland (headwater forest,
bottomland hardwood forest and riverine swamp forest), with some
additional enhancement potential; and
• 808 acres of non - riverine hardwood flat; and
preserve or rehabilitate:
• 40 acres of non - riverine hardwood flat including a 34 -acre "state or
regionally significant" mature hardwood flat;
• 28 acres of riverine swamp forest /bottomland hardwood forest;
• 18 acres of non - riverine hardwood flat; and
• 200 acres of areas mapped as uplands on the county soil survey.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site 1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012

An additional 103 acres underlain by hydric soils are included as "potential non - wetland"
areas due to drainage effects from perimeter ditches that must remain open. Approximately 34
acres at the head of the watershed is mature non - riverine wet hardwood forest underlain by Cape
Fear soil (the Windley tract), and will be preserved to help mitigate for impacts to the Bonnerton
non - riverine wet hardwood area. The Windley tract, the Plum's Pit tract (Arapahoe soil), and the
Winfield tract (Augusta, Tomotley, and Roanoke soils) are nearby hardwood forested wetlands at
similar elevations to portions of Hell Swamp and underlain by soil series mapped on Hell Swamp
as shown on the Beaufort County Soil Survey (Kirby 1995). These tracts will be monitored as
hydrologic controls for the restored hydrology of applicable areas at the Hell Swamp site (Figure
1).
2.0 REQUIREMENTS
2.1 Normal Rainfall and Growing Season. A continuous electronic rain gauge is
downloaded once a month and its data are used in conjunction with data from nearby automated
weather stations (e.g., NRCS WETS data from NOAA's site at Belhaven and NOAA's Aurora site
to fill Belhaven data gaps) to determine normal rainfall during the monitoring period. Hell Swamp
data were compared to the WETS range of normal precipitation to determine if Hell Swamp
rainfall was within the normal range. The range of normal precipitation for this report refers to the
30th and 70th percentile thresholds of the probability of having onsite rainfall amounts less than or
higher than those thresholds. The range of normal and the 30 -day rolling total data lines begin on
the last day of each month and the 2011 WETS - Belhaven monthly precipitation total is plotted on
the last day of each month.
Under the 2010 regional guidance from the Corps of Engineers for wetland hydroperiods,
the normal growing season for Beaufort County is 28 February to 6 December or 282 days
(WETS table for Beaufort County first/last freeze date 28 degrees F 50 percent probability) (US
Army Corps of Engineers 2010). At the suggestion of the Corps' Washington regulatory field
office, data collected between 1 February and 28 February provide important information related
to analyses of site hydrology during the early growing season, but are not part of the hydroperiod
calculation for success.
2.2 Hydrology. Figure 2 depicts the locations of hydrology monitoring equipment. To
document surface storage, flow in the restored riparian headwater system, and hydroperiods of
all wetland types on the site, 111 semi - continuous electronic Ecotone water level monitoring wells
(manufactured by RDS) are deployed at a density of approximately 1 well /10 acres in the non -
riparian wetland flat areas. An additional 12 wells within the expected riparian zone and 80 wells
in 40 arrays across the stream valleys measure the hydrology of the riparian stream system and
bottomlands (92 riparian wells). Forty (40) gauges (beta models) to record low flow events were
also installed either within or near each of these stream arrays in early 2011. Each stream valley
array consists of a well on either side of the perceived valley and a flow gauge in the valley where
flow has been evident or seems likely based on the topography of the valley and surrounding
area. The arrays are approximately 500 feet apart (along the long axis) for each valley (at least 3
arrays per 1,000 -foot reach; upstream, center, downstream). The low flow gauges are
programmed to take 72 readings per day and the units are downloaded once a month. For most
gauges, a minimum flow threshold of 0.5 gal /min is used when the data are analyzed and flow
events are tallied. Observations during downloads and stream surveys, rainfall, and geomorphic
position are also part of the analysis and interpretation of the flow gauge data.
Additionally, three electronic wells, each paired with a manual well, are monitored in the
Windley tract (wetland preservation area and control site). Four electronic wells were installed in
October 2010 at Plum's Pit, a nearby hardwood forested wetland at a similar elevation to portions
of Hell Swamp and underlain by one of the soil series found at Hell Swamp. Installation of seven
additional monitoring wells at the Winfield tract (third control area) occurred in July 2011. All well
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site 2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012

locations are also depicted on the Beaufort County Soil Survey sheet 9 (Figure 3) and on LiDAR
(Figures 4A and 4B).
Electronic wells are downloaded once a month and the data (readings every 1.5 hours for
wells) evaluated on an annual basis to document wetland hydroperiods. Wetland hydroperiods
are calculated by counting consecutive days with water level no deeper than 12 inches below the
soil surface during the growing season under normal or below normal rainfall conditions. Data
from the Windley, Plum's Pit, and Winfield sites are used to compare to hydrology at applicable
areas at Hell Swamp. Because of differences in maturity and disturbance characteristics of the
mitigation site, these data will not be used for strict success or performance parameters, only to
confirm local /regional hydrological response to precipitation. Flow gauges are also downloaded
once a month and the data used to calculate duration and frequency of flow events. No control
site for the flow parameter has been identified.
2.3 Vegetation. The second annual survey of the 123 0.22 -acre planted tree and
shrub monitoring plots occurred in October and November 2011 and represents a 2 percent
sample of the restoration area (Figure 2). Smaller (0.017 -acre) planted tree and shrub monitoring
plots were also surveyed at 19 stream arrays to provide an estimate of stem density in the
potential riparian buffer areas. Monitoring for three nuisance species [red maple (Acer rubrum),
sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)] occurred in 2011 for the first
time as required (Year 2). Nuisance monitoring plots (1 meter square) were established at the
corner opposite the well in all tree plots; all woody stems taller than 1 foot were counted and
identified.
2.4 Hydrogeomorphic Monitoring of Streams and Valleys. The main channel that
flows through the site is named Scott Creek from its headwaters to the downstream extent of the
property at NC Route 99, where the creek flows through a road culvert and eventually discharges
to Pungo Creek, a tributary to the Pungo River. For this report, it is divided into Upper Scott
Creek, which contains the constructed single thread channel and the zero order valley upstream,
and Lower Scott Creek. Several headwater tributaries (UT1 — UT8) were identified that would
have historically drained to Scott Creek or Smith Creek and each is described and shown on
Figures 2 - 4. Two cross sections in the Scott Creek single thread channel stream segment are
measured annually during the monitoring period; the others are measured in the third and fifth
monitoring years.
2.5 Photographic Documentation. Twenty (20) permanent photo point locations
were established at random well locations and five were established near the perimeter of the
restoration area (Figure 2). Photographs were taken in the four cardinal directions as well as an
additional direction to capture as much of the plot as possible unless it was already captured in
the other four photos. Photographs at the fixed -point stations were taken in July 2010 (baseline)
and each subsequent fall during the monitoring period; second annual photographs were taken in
October 2011.
3.0 SUMMARY DATA
3.1 Rainfall. Total rainfall recorded at the Hell Swamp rain gauge for 2011 was
50.54 inches and total rainfall recorded at the PCS Aurora NOAA Station 6 was 46.62 inches.
Total 2011 rainfall recorded at the Belhaven NOAA station is incomplete at the time of this report
so the monthly rainfall totals from PCS Aurora Station 6 were substituted for the Belhaven
monthly gaps. The WETS 30 -year range of normal data shown on Figure 5 is derived from the
latest available data set and comprises the years 1971 -2000. The 30 -day rolling total of Hell
Swamp 2011 rainfall was considered within WETS normal range except for dry periods in mid -
March, mid -May through mid - August, and all of December which were considered below normal.
Mid - February was above normal and Hurricane Irene at the end of August resulted in above
normal rainfall. Rainfall in September and most of October remained above normal (Figure 5).
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site 3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012

Hydroperiods were calculated for the entire growing season without regards to normality of
rainfall and were also calculated for the longest consecutive hydroperiod within the growing
season during normal (and below normal) rainfall only.
The US Drought Monitor (http: / /droughtmonitor.unl.edu) provides a synthesis of multiple
indices and impacts and reflects the consensus of federal and academic scientists on regional
conditions on a weekly basis (updated each Thursday). For North Carolina's Beaufort County,
this monitor reported 28 weeks in 2011 with drought status (11 weeks were classified abnormally
dry, 4.5 weeks were classified as under a moderate drought, and 12.5 weeks were classified as
under a severe drought). During the 41 -week long growing season 16 weeks were classified as
without any drought status. All but four of the weeks with some type of drought status occurred
15 March and 23 August with the arrival of Hurricane Irene.
3.2 Hydrology. The first full year of post- restoration hydrology data for the entire site
was 2011 because construction activities prevented all wells from being installed at the start of
the 2010 growing season. However, wells were installed as soon as construction in an area was
complete, so data were collected during a large portion of the 2010 growing season over most of
the site. Tables depicting 2011 daily well readings and rainfall are included on a companion CD
with this report (hydrology graphs will be provided on a separate CD at a later time).
3.2.1 QA/QC of Well Performance. In 2011, approximately one third of the
Hell Swamp wells were tested for performance. A proportional suite of wells were chosen across
soil types mapped on the site as shown in the Beaufort County Soil Survey (Kirby 1995) and
holes adjacent to each electronic well in the suite were augered to the same depth for
comparison to the electronic well. If water was present in either hole, it was pumped out and
water was added to both holes. Conversely, if no water was present, the same amount of water
was added to both holes. The lapsed time between initial and final measurement ranged from
one hour to 22 hours and depended on soil type and logistics. Of the 36 wells in the suite, 12
were in Arapahoe soils, six were in Portsmouth, five each were in Dragston and Tomotley, four
were in Cape Fear, three were in Roanoke, and one was in Augusta. Of the 36 wells, five test
holes originally showed a difference of 3 or more inches (three were drier and two were wetter
than the screened hole). A second visit to these five sites indicated water level in two of the five
test wells were still greater than 3 inches (one wetter [ Tomotley] and one drier [Arapahoe] than
screened hole). In summary, results of both visits indicate that two test holes were greater than 3
inches different, two were within three inches, five were within 2 inches, 21 were within 1 inch,
and six pair were both dry. Nine of the 36 screened wells contained 0.75 to 1.5 inches of
sediment in the bottom of the screen; however, only one of the nine was wetter than the test hole,
so clogged or plugged screens do not appear to be affecting well performance.
3.2.2 Geomorphic Monitoring, Flow Events and Annual Stream Surveys. Two
cross sections (7 and 8) in the single thread channel of upper Scott Creek were established at
baseline and are measured annually. The second annual measurement occurred in December
2011 and no areas of concern were identified. Appendix A contains the Baker geomorphic report.
Data from the low flow gauges indicate flow occurred at almost all locations at
some point during the year. In some cases, a particular gauge may not have recorded a flow
event, but the gauge just upstream or downstream of the gauge had multiple events. While the
gauges were deployed at logical locations where stream characteristics were perceived to occur
over the course of the restoration and equilibration of the site to the new hydrology, some units
may not be in the best location to capture flow events; as 2011 was a particularly dry year, the
gauges will not be moved but may be redeployed in the future. Excessive rainfall and large flow
volumes from Hurricane Irene may have overcome some of the units as the data appear suspect
after Irene in some units where flow events recorded by the gauge were erratic or values were
repetitive and no longer correlated with rainfall. A summary of the number of flow events and the
number of calendar days with flow for each gauge is shown in Table 4. Tables for each gauge
showing number of flow events and duration and a summary table of observations made during
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site 4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012

downloads or troubleshooting visits are included in Appendix B. Photographs and video of flow at
various locations or evidence of past flow events were taken and noted during both surveys and
selected photos are included in Appendix B. An accompanying CD with video of flow at various
locations is also included with this report.
The first stream survey occurred 27 January 2011 when each headwater valley
was walked to determine the locations for installation of the low flow gauges. In some instances,
the location of the flow gauge was selected slightly upstream or downstream from a given well
array depending on conditions. During the January survey, flow of varying amounts and depths
was noted in almost all the valleys and at almost every gauge location. A second stream survey
was conducted at the end of the year 30 November — 1 December 2011. Active flow was
occurring during the second stream survey at UT8 and Lower Scott Creek; while water was
encountered in other valleys, active flow was not discernible in the other valleys at the time of the
second survey. However, evidence of past flow events was noted during the second stream
survey in UT3, UT6, UT7, UT8, and Upper Scott Creek (sorting, deposition, shallow channel
features, debris /wrack, and braids or meanders). Refer to Appendix B for a summary of the two
surveys, selected photos, and map of documented stream features.
3.2.3 Hydroperiods. The majority of all wells exhibited wetland hydroperiods
regardless of rainfall conditions (Tables 2A and 2B, Figure 6). Many wells had a wetland
hydroperiod in the spring and in the fall. When only the longest consecutive hydroperiod during
normal or below normal rainfall is calculated (i.e. excluding September and October), most wells
still exhibited wetland hydroperiods, although many wetland hydroperiods were reduced (Tables
3A and 3B, Figure 7). The hydroperiods at some locations were shortened by well malfunctions.
The monthly tables depicting 2011 daily noon readings and rainfall which are included with this
report show those gaps. The site was wetter this year than last, even though except for the
above normal rainfall months, the year was relatively dry, as was last year. As evidenced by the
cumulative days shown in the tables, many wells had hydroperiods in addition to the longest
hydroperiod (Tables 2 and 3). Rehydration of the site will continue as the site equilibrates to its
new hydrology, although it may be delayed due to continued regional dryness.
3.2.3.1 Riparian Headwater Systems/Bottomlands. Most of the riparian
wells (49 out of 92) exhibited a wetland hydroperiod greater than 12.5 percent of the growing
season regardless of rainfall conditions (Table 2A, Figure 6). When counting cumulative days
during the growing season, most wells (87) had water levels less than or equal to -12 inches for
more than 6 percent of the growing season and 48 recorded hydroperiods 12.5 percent or
greater. Eight riparian wells did not exhibit a hydroperiod greater than 6 percent which may be
due to the somewhat dry conditions re: precipitation or to a location upslope of the riparian valley
edge.
Since many wells recorded wetland hydroperiods in both the spring and
fall, when well data from above normal rainfall periods (September and October) are excluded,
most wells still exhibited a wetland hydroperiod (Table 3A, Figure 7). Furthermore, even though
many of the hydroperiods were reduced, only two of the wells (UT2 -1 C and UT8-1C) changed
wetness category because of the long duration of the spring wetland hydroperiods. Most wells
also measured water tables shallower than -12 inches between 1 February and 27 February.
3.2.3.2 Non - riparian Hardwood Flat Most (59) of the 111 non - riparian
wells exhibited a wetland hydroperiod for greater than 12.5 to 25 percent of the growing season
regardless of rainfall conditions (Table 2B, Figure 6). Sixteen percent (18) of wells exhibited a
wetland hydroperiod of greater than 12.5 to 75 percent of the growing season and are scattered
across the site (Table 2B, Figure 6). Sixty -nine percent (77) wells exhibited hydroperiods greater
the 12.5 percent of the growing season. Many wells also measured water tables shallower than -
12 inches from 1 February through 27 February.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site 5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012

Since many wells recorded wetland hydroperiods in both the spring and
fall, when well data from above normal rainfall periods (September and October) are excluded,
most wells still exhibited a wetland hydroperiod (Table 3B, Figure 7). Furthermore, even though
many of the hydroperiods were reduced, none of the wells changed wetness category because of
the long duration of the spring wetland hydroperiod.
In the wetland enhancement area, two wells recorded longer
hydroperiods post- construction (24.8 to 32.3 percent in 2011 for HS17 and HS18) and the longest
2011 hydroperiod at HS2, which did not have pre- restoration data for comparison, was 25.5
percent.
3.2.4 Hydroperiod Comparison to Control Forests.
3.2.4.1 Plum's Pit. Three of the four wells at Plum's Pit recorded
wetland hydroperiods of 32 or 33 percent and the fourth recorded a hydroperiod of 21 percent.
When excluding above normal rainfall months, only one well had a wetland hydroperiod. All
wells, except one also measured water tables shallower than -12 inches from 1 February through
27 February (Figures 6 and 7).
3.2.4.2 Windley. The three wells in the Windley tract (Refl - Ref3)
exhibited hydroperiods of 26 or 32 percent of the growing season) regardless of rainfall
conditions. However, during normal or below normal rainfall, the wetland hydroperiods were
reduced. All wells also measured water tables shallower than -12 inches from 1 February
through 27 February. Two of the wells did not measure many other days during the year outside
the continuous hydroperiod with a shallow water table, but the well with the longest hydroperiod
measured another 29 days with water shallower than -12 inches during the growing season
(Figures 6 and 7).
3.2.4.3 Winfield. The seven wells in the Winfield tract were installed on
27 July 2011 after an agreement with the owner was reached to use the site as a hydrological
control during the monitoring period; therefore, early spring hydroperiods were not recorded if
they occurred. Three of the wells did not exhibit a wetland hydroperiod, two others were >6
percent but less than 12.5 percent. One well exhibited a 32 percent hydroperiod. None of the
seven wells exhibited a wetland hydroperiod during normal rainfall (Figures 6 and 7).
3.3 Vegetation. Additional treatment to control the invasive common reed
(Phragmites australis) occurred in September /October 2011 in the forested section of lower Scott
Creek with application of Habitat @. Control of common reed in lower UT6 appears effective from
previous treatment, but this and other areas will be assessed in June /July 2012 to determine
whether subsequent treatment is necessary.
Results of the Year 2 nuisance monitoring indicate that when all three species are
combined, they represent 47.8 percent of the 180 stems counted in the 123 plots. When counted
individually, loblolly pine was 31.7 percent, red maple was 11 percent, and sweet gum was 5
percent. Loblolly pine is a problem in three plots (HS2, HS122, and HS124) where 48 of the 57
total loblolly pines were counted. Plot HS2 is located in a wetland area that was a young pine
forest prior to restoration with abundant seed source available to sprout. The other two problem
plots are located near the southeastern boundary of the site, east of UT8, adjacent to mature
loblolly pines along the property edge which also provide abundant seed source. This issue will
be discussed with the Corps of Engineers and a course of action determined.
By use of only the number of planted stems that were unquestionably alive in the
monitoring plots, the most conservative estimate of survival is presented. Many stems appeared
dead or questionable, but based on prior monitoring experience, a stem needs to appear dead (or
not be found) for two sampling events before it can be confidently counted as dead. Appendix C
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site 6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012

contains the number of stems that were alive in each plot for the baseline sampling event and for
the fall 2011 survey.
3.3.1 Riparian Buffer. Overall survival of trees that were unquestionable alive
in the 19 riparian buffer plots from baseline (mid- summer 2010) to fall 2011 was 84 percent, with
a corresponding density of 725 trees per acre (Table 5). If trees with uncertain survival status
(stem appeared dead but could not be confirmed) are included with trees that were definitely
alive, survival increases to 92 percent and a density of 794 trees per acre. Red bay (Persea
palustris) and water tupelo (Nyssa aquatica) had the lowest survival (38 and 40 percent,
respectively and same as last year) when excluding the uncertain stems (Table 5). Twelve (12)
of the 20 tree species had 80 percent or greater survival, with seven of the 12 at 100 percent
survival. If uncertain stems are added, 12 species reach 100 percent.
Only four shrub species represented by only a few stems were found in the
riparian buffer plots; likely due to the overall low density of shrubs across the site and the small
size of the buffer plot. Overall survival of shrubs from baseline (mid- summer 2010) measurement
to fall 2011 was 60 percent for stems that were unquestionably alive with a corresponding density
of 19 shrubs per acre (Table 5). If shrubs with uncertain survival status (stem appeared dead for
the current sampling event but will not be confirmed until next fall) are included with shrubs that
were definitely alive (less conservative estimate of survival), survival increases to 90 percent and
a density of 28 shrubs per acre. All shrub survival percentages and densities are lower than last
year. Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis, 1 stem) and winterberry (Ilex verticillata, 2 stems)
had the lowest survival (0 percent) and swamp doghobble (Leucothoe racemosa, 1 stem) had the
highest survival (100 percent) when excluding the uncertain stems. If uncertain stems are
combined with those unquestionably alive, survival of the three species is 100 percent. The
fourth species, Virginia willow (Itea virginica) is represented by five stems that were
unquestionably alive but its survival is at 83 percent. Buttonbush and winterberry survival is
much higher in the hardwood flat monitoring plots.
Density in the potential riparian buffer areas for all trees and shrubs combined
after fall 2011 survey was 747 stems per acre for all species unquestionably alive and 822 stems
per acre if species with alive and uncertain survival status are combined. The current density is
much higher than the 320 stems required for success, so even though densities and survivals are
lower than last year, it is anticipated that the densities will remain above the minimum required
amount.
3.3.2 Riparian Areas /Bottomlands. Within the 12 plots located in
riparian /bottomland areas, overall survival of trees from baseline (mid- summer 2010) to fall 2011
survey was 78 percent for stems unquestionable alive, with a corresponding density of 290 stems
per acre (Table 6). If trees with uncertain survival status (stem appeared dead but could not be
confirmed) are included with trees that were definitely alive, survival increases to 88 percent and
a density of 327 trees per acre. Survival of red bay, sweet bay (Magnolia virginiana), unidentified
oaks, and water tupelo is less than 50 percent and less than 15 percent for the two bays.
Survival of eight of the 18 tree species is >_90 percent and two of these eight are 100 percent.
When the uncertain stems are included, survival of nine species is >_90 percent, six of which are
100 percent.
Overall survival of shrubs from baseline (mid- summer 2010) to fall 2011 survey
was 53 percent for stems that were unquestionably alive, with a corresponding density of 6
shrubs per acre (Table 6). If shrubs with uncertain survival status (stem appeared dead for the
current sampling event but could not be confirmed and will be confirmed at the next event) are
included with shrubs that were definitely alive (less conservative estimate of survival), survival
increases to 63 percent and a density of 9 shrubs per acre.
When all 92 riparian plots are combined (Table 5 and Table 6), density of all
unquestionably alive stems in the riparian areas after the 2011 fall survey is 346 stems per acre
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site 7 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012

and survival is 73 percent. When the uncertain stems are included, density increases to 390
stems per acre and 83 percent survival. Both density estimates are higher than the 260 stems
required for successful restoration.
3.3.3 Non - riparian Hardwood Flat. Overall survival of trees unquestionably
alive in the 111 plots representing the non - riparian hardwood flat area from baseline (mid-
summer 2010) to fall 2011 was 91 percent, with a corresponding density of 380 trees per acre
(Table 7). If trees with uncertain survival status (stem appeared dead but could not be confirmed)
are included with trees that were definitely alive, survival increases to 96 percent and a density of
401 trees per acre. Sourwood (Oxydendron arboreum), red bay, and unidentified oak species
had the lowest survival (0, 14, and 19 percent, respectively) when excluding the uncertain stems,
and 15 species had 90 percent or greater survival (Table 7). When adding the uncertain stems,
nine of the 25 tree species had 100 percent survival and 20 had 90 percent or greater survival.
Overall survival of shrubs from baseline (mid- summer 2010) to fall 2011 survey
was 86 percent for stems that were unquestionably alive, with a corresponding density of 13
shrubs per acre (Table 7). If shrubs with uncertain survival status (stem appeared dead for the
current sampling event but could not be confirmed and will be confirmed at the next event) are
included with shrubs that were definitely alive (less conservative estimate of survival), survival
increases to 94 percent and a density of 14 shrubs per acre. Swamp rose (Rosa palustris) had
the lowest survival when excluding the uncertain stems (0 percent) but was represented by only 1
stem in all plots (Table 7). Swamp doghobble and possumhaw viburnum (Viburnum nudum) had
the highest survival (100 percent) when excluding uncertain stems and five other shrub species
had >90 percent survival. If uncertain stems are combined with those unquestionably alive,
survival of five of the ten species is 100 percent and all species survival is greater than 89
percent.
Density in the non - riparian hardwood flat areas for all trees and shrubs combined
after the 2011 survey was 394 stems per acre for all species unquestionably alive (88 percent
survival), and 417 stems per acre if species with alive and uncertain survival status are combined
(93 percent survival) (Table 7). Both density estimates are higher than the required 260 stems.
3.5 Photographic Documentation. Although the planted stems rarely show above
the vegetation yet, a few photos representative of 2011 conditions are paired with baseline
photos at the same location in this report for comparison (Appendix D). More are available upon
request.
4.0 SUMMARY
According to WETS rainfall estimates, dry periods in mid - March, mid -May through mid - August,
and all of December were considered below normal. Hurricane Irene at the end of August
resulted in above normal rainfall and September and most of October remained above normal
due to large rain events.
Post - restoration wetland hydrology and flow monitoring for success officially began January 2011.
Most wells on the entire Hell Swamp site, including on the nine headwater valley systems,
recorded wetland hydroperiods during periods of normal or below normal rainfall. Wells at Plum's
Pit and Windley reference forests also recorded similar wetland hydroperiods. Wells at Winfield
reference forest recorded no wetland hydroperiod or shorter hydroperiods than the Hell Swamp
and the other control forests, possibly as a result of not being installed until mid - summer, after the
wet winter /spring. Some evidence of flow (braided patterns, channel formation, flowing water)
has been seen in some areas of most of the stream valley systems, including the single- thread
channel.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site 8 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012

Overall survival of trees unquestionably alive in the 19 riparian buffer plots from baseline (mid-
summer 2010) to fall 2011 survey was 84 percent, with a corresponding density of 725 trees per
acre. Overall survival of shrubs in the potential riparian buffer areas from baseline (mid- summer
2010) to fall 2011 survey was 60 percent for stems that were unquestionably alive, with a
corresponding density of 19 shrubs per acre. Survival density in the potential riparian buffer
areas for all trees and shrubs combined after the 2011 survey was 747 stems per acre for all
species unquestionably alive and 822 stems per acre if species with alive and uncertain survival
status are combined. Overall survival of trees unquestionably alive in the other 12 riparian plots
from baseline (mid- summer 2010) to fall 2011 survey was 78 percent, with a corresponding
density of 290 trees per acre. Overall survival of shrubs in the riparian plots from baseline (mid-
summer 2010) to fall 2011 survey was 53 percent for stems that were unquestionably alive, with a
corresponding density of 6 shrubs per acre. Survival density in the 12 riparian plots for all trees
and shrubs combined after the 2011 survey was 297 stems per acre for all species
unquestionably alive and 338 stems per acre if species with alive and uncertain survival status
are combined. When all riparian data are combined, density is 346 stems per acre and survival is
73 percent for stems unquestionably alive.
Overall survival of trees in the 111 non - riparian hardwood flat plots from baseline (mid- summer
2010) survey to fall 2011 was 91 percent, with a corresponding density of 380 trees per acre;
when uncertain stems are included survival increases to 96 percent and density is 401 stems
trees per acre. Overall survival of shrubs in the hardwood flat areas from baseline (mid- summer
2010) measurement to fall 2011 survey was 86 percent for stems that were unquestionably alive,
with a corresponding density of 13 shrubs per acre; when uncertain stems are included, survival
increases to 94 percetn and density is 14 stems per acre. Survival density in the non - riparian
hardwood flat areas for all trees and shrubs combined after the 2011 survey was 394 stems per
acre for all species unquestionably alive and 417 stems per acre if species with alive and
uncertain survival status are combined.
Overall survival of all stems unquestionably alive at Hell Swamp is 86 percent with 388 stems per
acre; with the uncertain stems added survival increases to 92 percent and 414 stems per acre.
All planted areas are currently well above density success requirements for each type of
mitigation.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site 9 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012

LITERATURE CITED
CZR Incorporated. 2009. Compensatory Mitigation Plan for Restoration of Hell Swamp /Scott
Creek Watershed.
CZR Incorporated. 2010. As -Built Report for the Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Restoration Site.
CZR Incorporated 2011. Baseline and First Annual Report for the Hell Swamp /Scott Creek
Restoration Site.
Kirby, Robert M. 1995. The soil survey of Beaufort County, North Carolina. Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2002. Regulatory guidance letter (RGL) 02 -02. Guidance on
Compensatory mitigation projects for aquatic resource impacts under the Corps regulatory
program pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, EPA, NC Wildlife Resources Commission, and NC Division of
Water Quality. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. Wilmington, NC.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2005. Technical Standard for Water -Table Monitoring of Potential
Wetland Sites. WRAP Technical Notes Collection (ERDC TN- WRAP- 05 -2.) U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and NC Division of Water Quality. 2007. Draft information on
stream restoration with emphasis on the coastal plain. 4 April supplement to USACOE, et
al. 2003.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 08 -03. Minimum
monitoring requirements for compensatory mitigation projects involving the restoration,
establishment, and /or enhancement of aquatic resources.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional supplement to the Corps of Engineers wetland
delineation manual: Atlantic and Gulf coastal plain region. Version 2.0. J.S. Wakeley,
R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble, eds. ERCD /EL TR- 08 -30, Vicksburg, MS.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site 10 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012

Table 1. Performance criteria, methods summary, and current status.
Type of Mitigation
Performance Criteria
Documentation Methods
Dimension & Controls
Current Status
85 percent of wells had a
28 February — 6 December;
hydroperiod greater than
Semi - continuous monitoring
Belhaven NOAA WETS data
12.5 percent of the growing
?12.5 to 25 and >12.5 to 75
wells (arrays); onsite rain
for normal rainfall; valley
season, 5 percent had a
percent hydroperiod within
gauge; as -built cross
dimensions as indicated by
marginal hydroperiod ( >6-
the topographic valley
sections
LiDAR, cross sections,
12.5 percent of the growing
comparison to 3 control sites,
season), and 8.7 percent did
and agency concurrence
not exhibit a wetland
hydroperiod.
Survival for all trees after the
Riparian wetland restoration
2011 sampling event was
(headwater forest and
290 stems per acre (78%
bottomland hardwood)
survival) for all species
Vegetation plots on 2
unquestionably alive and 327
Survival of 260 planted trees
percent of the site; 12
stems per acre (88%
per acre (using acreage
riparian plots (HS42, HS53,
Annual monitoring
survival) if species with alive
planted in trees) of 5- year
HS67, HS70, HS75, HS79,
and unsure survival status
old planted woody stems
HS82, HS91, HS92, HS93,
are combined. [If data from
HS94, HS123)
the 19 buffer plots are also
added; the stems per acre
increases to 346 (73%
survival) and 390 (83%
survival)].
Flow from upper Scott Creek
is now delivered directly into
the wooded riparian wetland
instead of into the excavated
diversion channel along the
north edge of the woods.
Riparian wetland
Increase in wetland
Semi - continuous monitoring
28 February — 6 December;
The channel was filled as
enhancement
hydroperiod from pre-
wells; onsite rain gauge
Belhaven NOAA WETS data
part of the restoration of
restoration conditions
for normal rainfall
Scott Creek watershed.
Additionally, overland flow
from the watershed north of
the wooded riparian wetland
can now enter this wetland
without being diverted offsite
by the old channel.

N
Table 1. (continued)
Type of Mitigation
Performance Criteria
Documentation Methods
Dimension & Controls
Current Status
68 percent of wells had a
hydroperiod greater than
28 February — 6 December;
12.5 percent of the growing
?6 percent 1 hydroperiod for
Semi - continuous monitoring
Belhaven NOAH WETS data
season, 16 percent had a
hydric mineral soils
wells (1 well /10 acres);
for normal rainfall,
marginal hydroperiod ( >6-
onsite rain gauge
comparison to 3 control sites
12.5 percent of the growing
season), and 16 percent did
not exhibit a wetland
Non - riparian wetland
hydroperiod.
restoration (hardwood flats)
Survival density for all trees
after the 2011 sampling
Survival of 260 planted trees
event was 380 stems per
per acre (using acreage
Vegetation plots on 2
acre (91 /o survival) for all
planted in trees) of 5 -year
percent of the site; 111
Annual monitoring
species unquestionably alive
old planted woody stems
plots
and 401 stems per acre
o
(96 /o survival) if species with
alive and unsure survival
status are combined.
The hydroperiods at the two
Non - riparian wetland
Increase in wetland
Semi - continuous monitoring
28 February — 6 December;
wells with pre- restoration
enhancement (hardwood
hydroperiod from pre-
wells HS2, HS17, HS18;
Belhaven NOAA WETS data
data increased and HS2 (no
flats)
restoration conditions
onsite rain gauge
for normal rainfall,
pre -data) exhibited a
comparison to 3 control sites
hydroperiod of 26 percent in
2011.
Photographs of flow
Some braided patterns and
conditions 2 (e.g., sediment
Corps and DWQ April 2007
channel formation was seen
Linear feet of credit based
deposits, debris flows,
Information; Calendar year;
in some areas of most
Zero to first order stream
on most upstream location
wrack lines, sinuosity,
Belhaven NOAH WETS data
stream valleys. Flowing
restoration within riparian
of flow documented at least
braided features, channel
for normal rainfall; flow
water
water was seen in the single -
headwater system
twice per year in 3 years out
features); semi - continuous
confined to times of
thread channel. Video of
of 5
monitoring well arrays;
rainfall
some flow events is included
GPS; open channel flow
with CD which accompanies
monitoring equipment.
this report.

w
Table 1. (concluded)
Type of Mitigation
Performance Criteria
Documentation Methods
Dimension & Controls
Current Status
Flowing water was seen in
the single- thread channel on
Two bankfull events in
numerous visits and
separate years during 5
Photos winter and summer;
Stream Mitigation Guidelines
recorded by gauges.
years of monitoring
channel stability analysis
April 2003
Evidence of out of bank
events was also noted.
Video of some flow events on
CD included with this report.
Survival density in all the
potential riparian buffer areas
First or second order stream
for all stems after the 2011
restoration
sampling was 725 stems per
80 percent survival of
acre for all species
planted tree species within
unquestionably alive and 794
50 feet of stream on each
Established vegetation
Stream Mitigation Guidelines
stems per acre if species
side after 5 years (or 320
plots; plant survival analysis
April 2003
with alive and uncertain
trees per acre- per buffer
survival status are combined.
criteria)
Density in the one buffer plot
within the single thread
segment is 294 stems per
acre for all alive and 412
when combined with unsure
stems.
15A NCAC 02B.0260 Tar -
Survival density in the
Pamlico River Basin
potential riparian buffer areas
50 feet one or both sides of
Mitigation Program for
for all trees and shrubs
stream feature shown on
Riparian Buffers; DWQ 25
combined after the 2011
USGS or county soil survey
Monitoring for planted tree
January 2008 Clarification
sampling event was 725
Riparian buffer restoration
or zero order stream
survival within established
#2008 -017; for zero order
stems per acre for all species
segment with 320 trees per
plots at years 1, 3, and 5.
streams, flexible buffer
unquestionably alive and 794
acre at maturity (5 years)
mitigation if approved by
stems per acre if species
EMC as stated in 401
with alive and uncertain
certification dated 15 January
survival status are combined.
2009 (DWQ#2008 -0868)
1 With elevations ranging from 9 feet above MSL to less than 1 foot, the non - riparian mineral flats at Hell Swamp will have a range of hydroperiods increasing downslope into the riparian
wetlands.
2 Documentation may be for active or past flow conditions; may include other agency- approved structural elements or use of technical equipment not on list.

Table 2A. Longest hydroperiods in 2011 of 92 riparian wells (includes 80 stream array wells) at Hell Swamp restoration site.
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Cumulative
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
percent of
days 28 Feb -6
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
Dec where
Dec where
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6-12.5%
0
>12.5 -25 /o
0
>25 -75 /o
table is -12"
water table is -
water table is -
season
or above
(282 days)
12" or above
12" or above*
42
27
175
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
53
27
167
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
67
27
169
73
28Feb -11 May
25.9
X
70
23
63
22
28Feb -21 Mar
7.8
X
75
27
146
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
79
27
75
20
28Feb -19Mar
7.1
X
82
27
119
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
91
20
43
<17
NA
<6
X
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
92
27
171
102
27Aug -6Dec
27.3
X
93
27
106
63
28Feb -1 May
22.3
X
94
15
46
<17
NA
<6
X
123
26
123
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
UT1 -1A
20
65
<17
NA
<6
X
UT1 -1C
27
146
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT1 -2A
27
154
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X

Table 2A. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Cumulative
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
percent of
days 28 Feb -6
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
Dec where
Dec where
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6-12.5%
0
>12.5 -25 /o
0
>25 -75 /o
table is -12"
water table is -
water table is -
season
or above
(282 days)
12" or above
12" or above*
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
UT1 -2C
27
173
19
27Aug- 14Sept
6.7
X
82
16Sept -6Dec
29.1
UT1 -3A
27
163
71
28Feb -9May
25.2
X
UT1 -3C
27
164
71
28Feb -9May
25.2
X
UT2 -1A
27
160
64
28Feb -2May
22.7
X
UT2 -1 C
27
165
82
16Sept -6Dec
29.1
X
UT2 -2A
27
129
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
UT2 -2C
27
141
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
UT3 -1A
27
157
64
28Feb -2May
22.7
X
UT3 -1 C
27
166
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT3 -2A
27
137
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
UT3 -3A
27
124
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT3 -3C
27
130
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
UT3 -4A
25
81
47
28Feb -15Apr
16.7
X
UT3 -4C
27
117
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
UT3 -5A
27
164
67
28Feb -5May
23.8
X
UT3 -5C
27
107
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X

Table 2A. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Cumulative
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
percent of
days 28 Feb -6
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
Dec where
Dec where
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6-12.5%
0
>12.5 -25 /o
0
>25 -75 /o
table is -12"
water table is -
water table is -
season
or above
(282 days)
12" or above
12" or above*
UT3 -6A
27
147
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT3 -7A
25
101
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
UT3 -7C
27
146
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT3 -8A
27
144
65
28Feb -3May
23.0
X
UT3 -8C
27
160
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT3 -9A
27
130
70
28Feb -8May
24.8
X
UT3 -9C
27
174
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
X
UT4 -1A
27
135
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
UT4 -1 C
27
147
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT4 -2A
27
85
54
28Feb -22Apr
19.1
X
UT5 -1A
27
175
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
X
UT5 -1 C
27
136
65
28Feb -3May
23.0
X
UT5 -2A
25
67
47
28Feb -15Apr
16.7
X
UT6 -4A
25
100
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
UT6 -4C
24
80
20
28Feb -19Mar
7.1
X
UT6 -5A
20
51
<17
NA
<6
X
UT6 -5C
20
56
<17
NA
<6
X

Table 2A. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Cumulative
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
percent of
days 28 Feb -6
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
Dec where
Dec where
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6-12.5%
0
>12.5 -25 /o
0
>25 -75 /o
table is -12"
water table is -
water table is -
season
or above
(282 days)
12" or above
12" or above*
UT6 -6A
27
97
54
28Feb -22Apr
19.1
X
UT6 -6C
27
91
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
UT7 -1A
20
64
<17
NA
<6
X
UT7 -1 C
25
76
23
28Feb -22Mar
8.2
X
UT7 -2A
27
108
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
UT7 -2C
27
93
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
UT7 -3A
27
106
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
UT7 -3C
27
92
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
UT8 -1A
27
149
63
28Feb -1 May
22.3
X
UT8 -1 C
27
177
67
28Feb -5May
23.8
X
102
27Aug -6 Dec
27
UT8 -2A
27
141
67
28Feb -5May
23.8
X
UT8 -2C
27
160
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT8 -3A
27
137
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
UT8 -3C
27
153
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT8 -4A
27
171
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
102
27Aug -6 Dec
27
UT8 -4C
27
148
78
28Feb -16May
27.7
X

Table 2A. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Cumulative
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
percent of
days 28 Feb -6
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
Dec where
Dec where
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6-12.5%
0
>12.5 -25 /o
0
>25 -75 /o
table is -12"
water table is -
water table is -
season
or above
(282 days)
12" or above
12" or above*
UT8 -5A
15
46
<17
NA
<6
X
UT8 -5C
22
86
<17
NA
<6
X
UT8 -6A
27
164
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT8 -6C
27
166
71
28Feb -9May
25.2
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
USCAA
27
178
76
28Feb -14May
27 27
X
102
27Aug - -6Dec
USC -1 C
27
174
78
28Feb -16May
27.7
X
USC -2A
19
81
20
28Feb -19Mar
7.1
X
USC -2C
27
137
63
28Feb -1 May
22.3
X
USC -3C
27
146
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
USC -4A
27
122
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
USC -4C
27
141
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
USC -5A
27
176
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
USC -5C
27
102
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
USC -6A
27
102
80
28Feb -18May
28.4
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
USC -6C
27
102
79
28Feb -17May
28
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2

Table 2A. (concluded).
*Only 17 days or more (6 %) are included in this column and only the longest hydroperiods (or two longest if they
are similar or if they are only separated by a few days) are listed
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Cumulative
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
percent of
days 28 Feb -6
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
Dec where
Dec where
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6-12.5%
0
>12.5 -25 /o
0
>25 -75 /o
table is -12"
water table is -
water table is -
season
or above
(282 days)
12" or above
12" or above*
USC -7A
27
102
78
28Feb -16May
27.7
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
USC -7C
27
102
83
28Feb -21 May
29.4
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
USC -8A
27
181
79
28Feb -17May
28
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
USC -8C
27
178
76
28Feb -14May
27
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
USC -9A
27
151
63
28Feb -1 May
22.3
X
USC -9C
27
145
62
28Feb -30Apr
22.0
X
USC-10A
27
174
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
USCA1A
27
180
78
28Feb -16May
27.7
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
USC -11 C
27
192
90
28Feb -28May
31.9
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
USCA2A
27
178
78
28Feb -16May
27.7
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
US -12C
27
192
90
28Feb -28May
31.9
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
USCA 3A
27
186
83
28Feb -21 May
29.4
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
USC -13C
27
167
73
28Feb -11 May
25.9
X
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
*Only 17 days or more (6 %) are included in this column and only the longest hydroperiods (or two longest if they
are similar or if they are only separated by a few days) are listed

0
Table 2B. Longest hydroperiods in 2011 of 111 non - riparian hardwood flat monitoring wells at Hell Swamp restoration site.
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
Percent of
Cumulative days 28
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
Feb -6 Dec where water
Dec where
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
table is -12" or
season (282
table is -12" or above
water table is -
above
days)
12" or above*
1
27
231
119
28Feb -26Jun
42.2
X
2 **
27
163
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
3
27
120
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
4
27
92
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
5
26
112
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
6
27
121
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
27
27Mar -22Apr
9.6
7
27
104
23
23Sept -150ct
8.2
X
8
27
89
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
9
27
148
65
28Feb -3May
23.0
X
23
28Feb -22Mar
8.2
27
27Mar -22Apr
9.6
10
25
104
22
23Sept -140ct
7.8
X
11
12
23
<17
NA
<6
X
12
27
179
91
27Aug -6Dec
32.3
X
94
28Feb -1 Jun
33.3
13
27
196
91
7Aug -6Dec
32.3
X
14
19
73
19
1 Mar-1 Mar
6.7
X
21
28Feb -20Mar
7.4
23
24Mar -15Apr
8.2
15
27
122
24
23Sept -160ct
8.5
X

Table 2B. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
Percent of
Cumulative days 28
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
Feb -6 Dec where water
Dec where
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
table is -12" or
season (282
table is -12" or above
water table is -
above
days)
12" or above"
16
27
160
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
17
27
158
70
28Feb -8May
24.8
X
83
28Feb -21 May
29.4
18
27
186
91
27Aug -6Dec
32.3
X
20
1 Mar -20Mar
7.1
19
21
83
25
27Mar -20Apr
8.9
X
26
27Mar -21Apr
9.2
20
27
94
24
23Sept -160ct
8.5
X
21
27
173
91
27Aug -6Dec
32.3
X
22
27
99
54
28Feb -22Apr
19.1
X
22
28Feb -21 Mar
7.8
23
21
80
20
27Mar -15Apr
7.1
X
67
28Feb -5May
23.8
19
27Aug- 14Sept
6.7
45
16Sept -30Oct
16
24
27
168
36
1 Nov -6Dec
12.8
X
22
28Feb -21 Mar
7.8
25
27
90
24
27Mar -19Apr
8.5
X
26
27
152
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
27
27
177
91
27Aug -6Dec
32.3
X
28
27
186
91
27Aug -6Dec
32.3
X
29
27
122
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
30
27
81
47
28Feb -15Apr
16.7
X

N
Table 2B. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
Percent of
Cumulative days 28
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
Feb -6 Dec where water
Dec where
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
table is -12" or
season (282
table is -12" or above
water table is -
above
days)
12" or above"
31
25
89
19
27Mar -14Apr
6.7
X
32
27
87
54
28Feb -22Apr
19.1
X
33
19
64
<17
NA
<6
X
34
27
104
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
35
27
98
51
28Feb -19Apr
18.1
X
36
27
93
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
37
27
180
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
X
38
27
159
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
X
39
20
55
<17
NA
<6
X
40
27
158
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
41
20
67
<17
NA
<6
X
43
18
31
<17
NA
<6
X
44
21
56
<17
NA
<6
X
45
27
83
51
28Feb -19Apr
18.1
X
46
27
73
39
28Feb -7Apr
13.8
X
47
27
107
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
48
27
175
102
Aug27 -6Dec
36.2
X

w
Table 2B. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
Percent of
Cumulative days 28
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
Feb -6 Dec where water
Dec where
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
table is -12" or
season (282
table is -12" or above
water table is -
above
days)
12" or above"
49
27
165
67
28Feb -5May
23.8
X
50
19
56
<17
NA
<6
X
51
12
18
<17
NA
<6
X
52
22
49
<17
NA
<6
X
54
27
95
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
55
27
149
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
56
24
74
19
27Mar -14Apr
6.7
X
57
22
50
<17
NA
<6
X
58
22
68
<17
NA
<6
X
59
23
81
23
28Feb -22Mar
8.2
X
60
27
161
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
61
27
118
23
28Feb -22Mar
8.2
X
62
25
85
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
63
27
132
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
64
27
152
65
28Feb -3May
23.0
X
65
24
72
22
28Feb -21 Mar
7.8
X
66
18
49
<17
NA
<6
X

Table 2B. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
Percent of
Cumulative days 28
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
Feb -6 Dec where water
Dec where
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
table is -12" or
season (282
table is -12" or above
water table is -
above
days)
y )
12" or above"
82
28Feb -20May
29.1
68
27
182
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
X
69
22
76
21
1 Mar -21 Mar
7.4
X
71
25
57
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
72
27
132
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
73
27
148
70
28Feb -8May
24.8
X
Hydrologic
Zone
(NC WETS)
Percent of
Consecutive
Well
Days 1 -27 Feb
Cumulative days 28
days 28 Feb -6
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6 -12.5 /o
0
>12.5 -25 /o
0
>25 -75 /o
> -12"
Feb -6 Dec > -12"
season (282
Dec > -12"
days)
74
27
158
68
28Feb -6May
24.1
X
76
24
57
22
28Feb -21 Mar
7.8
X
77
27
167
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
78
24
101
47
28Feb -15Apr
16.7
X
80
25
98
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
81
27
132
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
83
19
51
<17
NA
<6
X
84
25
105
23
28Feb -22Mar
8.2
X

cr
Table 2B. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Percent of
Consecutive
Well
Days 1 -27 Feb
Cumulative days 28
days 28 Feb -6
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6 -12.5 /o
0
>12.5 -25 /o
0
>25 -75 /o
> -12"
Feb -6 Dec > -12"
season (282
—
—
Dec > -12"
days)
85
27
136
69
28Feb -7May
24.5
X
86
25
77
47
28Feb -15Apr
16.7
X
87
27
124
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
88
27
173
62
26Aug -26Oct
22.0
X
89
27
97
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
90
25
75
39
28Feb -7Apr
13.8
X
95
27
73
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
96
27
147
64
28Feb -2May
22.7
X
97
27
158
70
28Feb -8May
24.8
X
98
27
104
54
28Feb -22Apr
19.1
X
99
27
144
67
28Feb -5May
23.8
X
100
27
179
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
X
101
27
179
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
X
102
22
63
20
28Feb -19Mar
7.1
X
103
27
79
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
104
27
90
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
105
27
65
<17
NA
<6
X

rn
Table 2B. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Percent of
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
Cumulative days 28
growing
Well
days 28 Feb -6
Dates
<6
o
>6 -12.5 /o
0
>12.5 -25 /o
0
>25 -75 /o
> -12"
Feb -6 Dec > -12"
season (282
—
—
Dec > -12"
days)
106
25
59
26
28Feb -25Mar
9.2
X
107
27
105
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
108
27
143
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
109
27
113
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
81
28Feb -19May
28.7
110
27
186
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
X
111
27
147
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
112
27
126
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
113
27
96
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
114
27
201
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
X
115
27
165
71
28Feb -9May
25.2
X
116
27
165
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
117
27
282
282
28Feb -6Dec
100.0
X
118
27
86
54
28Feb -22Apr
19.1
X
119
27
132
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
120
15
45
<17
NA
<6
X
121
27
102
49
28Feb -17May
17.4
X
122
23
65
<17
NA
<6
X
124
20
65
<17
NA
<6
X

Table 2B. (concluded).
*Only 17 days or more (6 %) are included in this column and only the longest hydroperiods (or two longest if they
are similar or only separated by a few days) are listed
* *This well located in existing jurisdictional wetland
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Percent of
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
Cumulative days 28
growing
Well
days 28 Feb -6
Dates
<6
o
>6 -12.5 /o
0
>12.5 -25 /o
0
>25 -75 /o
> -12"
Feb -6 Dec > -12"
season (282
—
—
Dec > -12*
days)
Control wells
18
27Aug- 13Sept
6.3
Ref1 27
167
73
16Sept -6Dec
25.9
X
70
28Feb -8May
24.8
18
27Aug- 13Sept
6.4
Ref2 27
170
73
16Sept -6Dec
25.9
X
Ref3 27
181
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
X
PP1 17
123
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
X
PP2 27
170
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
X
82
28Feb -20May
29.1
PP3 27
187
102
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
X
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
PP4 27
151
60
27Aug -27Oct
21.3
X
WF -1 Installed 28 Jul
102
91
27Aug -6Dec
36.2
X
WF -2 Installed 28 Jul
27
17
23Sept -9Oct
6
X
WF -3 Installed 28 Jul
29
21
23Sept -130ct
7.4
X
WF -4 Installed 28 Jul
17
<17
NA
<6
X
WF -5 Installed 28 Jul
14
<17
NA
<6
X
WF -6 Installed 28 Jul
59
35
28Sept -27Oct
12.4
X
WF -7 Installed 28 Jul
18
<17
NA
<6
X
*Only 17 days or more (6 %) are included in this column and only the longest hydroperiods (or two longest if they
are similar or only separated by a few days) are listed
* *This well located in existing jurisdictional wetland

w
Table 3A. Longest hydroperiods in 2011 of 92 riparian wells (includes 80 stream array wells) at Hell Swamp restoration site during
normal or below normal rainfall in September and October was considered above WETS normal rainfall.
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Cumulative
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
percent of
days 28 Feb-6
days 28 Feb-6
Well
where water
Dec where
Dec where water
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6-12.5%
0
>12.5 -25 /o
0
>25 -75 /o
table is -12"
water table is -
table is -12" or
season
—
orabove
(282 days)
12" or above
above"
42
27
118
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
53
27
113
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
67
27
113
73
28Feb -11 May
25.9
X
70
23
52
22
28Feb -21 Mar
7.8
X
75
27
105
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
79
27
65
20
28Feb -19Mar
7.1
X
82
27
104
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
91
20
40
<17
NA
<6
X
92
27
113
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
93
27
104
63
28Feb -1 May
22.3
X
94
15
37
<17
NA
<6
X
123
26
95
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
UT1 -1A
20
46
<17
NA
<6
X
UT1 -1C
27
107
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT1 -2A
27
104
56
28Feb -24A r
19.9
X

Table 3A (continued).
H drolo is Zone NC WETS
Cumulative
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
percent of
days 28 Feb-6
days 28 Feb-6
Well
where water
Dec where
Dec where water
Dates
growing
<6
>6 -12.5%
>12.5 -25%
>25 -75%
table is -12"
water table is -
table is -12" or
season
or above
(282 days)
12" or above
above"
UT1 -2C
27
113
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
UT1 -3A
27
110
71
28Feb -9May
25.2
X
UT1 -3C
27
111
71
28Feb -9May
25.2
X
UT2 -1A
27
105
64
28Feb -2May
22.7
X
UT2 -1C
27
107
64
28Feb -2May
22.7
X
UT2 -2A
27
91
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
UT2 -2C
27
98
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
UT3 -1A
27
106
64
28Feb -2May
22.7
X
UT3 -1C
27
108
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT3 -2A
27
101
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
UT3 -3A
27
105
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT3 -3C
27
101
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
UT3 -4A
25
70
47
28Feb -15Apr
16.7
X
UT3 -4C
27
95
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
UT3 -5A
27
108
67
28Feb -5Ma
23.8
X

N
O
Table 3A (continued).
H drolo is Zone NC WETS
Cumulative
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
percent of
days 28 Feb-6
days 28 Feb-6
Well
where water
Dec where
Dec where water
Dates
growing
<6
>6 -12.5%
>12.5 -25%
>25 -75%
table is -12"
water table is -
table is -12" or
season
or above
(282 days)
12" or above
above"
UT3 -5C
27
93
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
UT3 -6A
27
107
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT3 -7A
25
81
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
UT3 -7C
27
106
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT3 -8A
27
102
65
28Feb -3May
23.0
X
UT3 -8C
27
107
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT3 -9A
27
109
70
28Feb -8May
24.8
X
UT3 -9C
27
113
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
UT4 -1A
27
84
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
UT4 -1 C
27
114
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT4 -2A
27
70
54
28Feb -22Apr
19.1
X
UT5 -1A
27
114
73
28Feb -11 May
25.9
X
UT5 -1 C
27
85
65
28Feb -3May
23.0
X
UT5 -2A
25
65
47
28Feb -15Apr
16.7
X
UT64A
25
82
52
28Feb -20A r
18.4
X

N
Table 3A (continued).
H drolo is Zone NC WETS
Cumulative
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
percent of
days 28 Feb-6
days 28 Feb-6
Well
where water
Dec where
Dec where water
Dates
growing
<6
>6 -12.5%
>12.5 -25%
>25 -75%
table is -12"
water table is -
table is -12" or
season
or above
(282 days)
12" or above
above"
UT64C
24
60
20
28Feb -19Mar
7.1
X
UT6 -5A
20
39
<17
NA
<6
X
UT6 -5C
20
44
<17
NA
<6
X
UT6 -6A
27
75
54
28Feb -22Apr
19.1
X
UT6 -6C
27
71
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
UT7 -1 A
20
50
<17
NA
<6
X
UT7 -1 C
25
63
23
28Feb -22Mar
8.2
X
UT7 -2A
27
84
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
UT7 -2C
27
78
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
UT7 -3A
27
86
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
UT7 -3C
27
75
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
UT8 -1A
27
107
63
28Feb -1May
22.3
X
UT8 -1 C
27
116
67
28Feb -5May
23.8
X
UT8 -2A
27
109
67
28Feb -5May
23.8
X
UT8 -2C
27
108
66
28Feb -4Ma
23.4
X

N
N
Table 3A (continued).
H drolo is Zone NC WETS
Cumulative
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
percent of
days 28 Feb-6
days 28 Feb-6
Well
where water
Dec where
Dec where water
Dates
growing
<6
>6 -12.5%
>12.5 -25%
>25 -75%
table is -12"
water table is -
table is -12" or
season
or above
(282 days)
12" or above
above"
UT8 -3A
27
97
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
UT8 -3C
27
107
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT84A
27
110
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
UT84C
27
119
78
28Feb -16May
27.7
X
UT8 -5A
15
43
<17
NA
<6
X
UT8 -5C
22
66
<17
NA
<6
X
UT8 -6A
27
107
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
UT8 -6C
27
112
71
28Feb -9May
25.2
X
USC -1A
27
117
76
28Feb -14May
27.0
X
USC -1C
27
117
78
28Feb -16May
27.7
X
USC -2A
19
64
20
28Feb -19Mar
7.1
X
USC -2C
27
96
63
28Feb -1 May
22.3
X
USC -3C
27
101
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
USC -4A
27
86
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
USC -4C
27
94
53
28Feb -21A r
18.8
X

T,
N
W
Table 3A (concluded).
*Only 17 days or more (6 %) are included in this column and only the longest hydroperiods (or two longest if they
are similar or if they are only separated by a few days) are listed
H drolo is Zone NC WETS
Cumulative
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
percent of
days 28 Feb-6
days 28 Feb-6
Well
where water
Dec where
Dec where water
Dates
growing
<6
>6 -12.5%
>12.5 -25%
>25 -75%
table is -12"
water table is -
table is -12" or
season
or above
(282 days)
12" or above
above*
USC -5A
27
115
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
USC -5C
27
41
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
USC -6A
27
41
80
28Feb -18May
28.4
X
USC -6C
27
41
79
28Feb -17May
28.0
X
USC -7A
27
41
78
28Feb -16May
27.7
X
USC -7C
27
41
83
28Feb -21 May
29.4
X
USC -8A
27
120
79
28Feb -17May
28.0
X
USC -8C
27
117
76
28Feb -14May
27.0
X
USC -9A
27
97
63
28Feb -1 May
22.3
X
USC -9C
27
90
62
28Feb -30Apr
22.0
X
USC -10A
27
113
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
USC -11A
27
119
78
28Feb -16May
27.7
X
USC -11C
27
131
90
28Feb -28May
31.9
X
USC -12A
27
117
78
28Feb -16May
27.7
X
US -12C
27
131
90
28Feb -28May
31.9
X
USC -13A
27
125
83
28Feb -21 May
29.4
X
USC -13C
27
115
73
28Feb -11 May
25.9
X
*Only 17 days or more (6 %) are included in this column and only the longest hydroperiods (or two longest if they
are similar or if they are only separated by a few days) are listed

N
Table 3B. Longest hydroperiods in 2011 of 111 non - riparian monitoring wells at Hell Swamp restoration site during normal or below
normal rainfall. (Rainfall in September and October was considered above WETS normal rainfall.)
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Cumulative days
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
Percent of
28 Feb -6 Dec
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
where water
Dec where water
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
table is -12" or
table is -12" or
table is -12" or
season
above
(282 days)
above
above*
1
27
170
119
28Feb -26Jun
42.2
X
2
27
113
72
28Feb -10May
25.5
X
3
27
93
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
4
27
72
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
5
26
88
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
6
27
95
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
7
27
64
27
27Mar -22Apr
9.6
X
8
27
70
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
9
27
105
65
28Feb -3May
23.0
X
23
28Feb -22Mar
8.2
10
25
72
27
27Mar -22Apr
9.6
X
11
12
13
<17
NA
<6
X
12
27
119
78
28Feb -16May
27.7
X
13
27
135
94
28Feb -1Jun
33.3
X
14
19
58
19
1 Mar-1 Mar
6.7
X
21
28Feb -20Mar
7.4
15
27
87
23
24Mar -15Apr
8.2
X
16
27
106
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X

N
Ln
Table 3B. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Cumulative days
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
Percent of
28 Feb -6 Dec
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
where water
Dec where water
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
table is -12" or
table is -12" or
table is -12" or
season
above
(282 days)
above
above*
17
27
104
70
28Feb -8May
24.8
X
18
27
125
83
28Feb -21 May
29.4
X
20
1 Mar -20Mar
7.1
19
21
66
25
27Mar -20Apr
8.9
X
20
27
64
26
27Mar -21Apr
9.2
X
21
27
112
71
28Feb -9May
25.2
X
22
27
78
54
28Feb -22Apr
19.1
X
22
28Feb -21 Mar
7.8
23
21
65
20
27Mar -15Apr
7.1
X
24
27
109
67
28Feb -5May
23.8
X
22
28Feb -21 Mar
7.8
25
27
70
24
27Mar -19Apr
8.5
X
26
27
100
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
27
27
116
75
28Feb -13May
26.6
X
28
27
125
75
28Feb -13May
26.6
X
29
27
87
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
30
27
70
47
28Feb -15Apr
16.7
X
31
25
71
19
27Mar -14Apr
6.7
X

N
Table 3B. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Cumulative days
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
Percent of
28 Feb -6 Dec
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
where water
Dec where water
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
table is -12" or
table is -12" or
table is -12" or
season
above
(282 days)
above
above*
32
27
70
54
28Feb -22Apr
19.1
X
33
19
51
<17
NA
<6
X
34
27
77
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
35
27
71
51
28Feb -19Apr
18.1
X
36
27
41
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
37
27
119
78
28Feb -16May
27.7
X
38
27
106
65
28Feb -3May
23.0
X
39
20
43
<17
NA
<6
X
40
27
110
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
41
20
57
<17
NA
<6
X
43
18
31
<17
NA
<6
X
44
21
43
<17
NA
<6
X
45
27
64
51
28Feb -19Apr
18.1
X
46
27
61
39
28Feb -7Apr
13.8
X
47
27
82
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X

N
v
Table 3B. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Cumulative days
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
Percent of
28 Feb -6 Dec
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
where water
Dec where water
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
table is -12" or
table is -12" or
table is -12" or
season
above
(282 days)
above
above*
48
27
114
73
28Feb -11 May
25.9
X
49
27
111
67
28Feb -5May
23.8
X
50
19
40
<17
NA
<6
X
51
12
8
<17
NA
<6
X
52
22
49
<17
NA
<6
X
54
27
92
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
55
27
99
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
56
24
58
19
27Mar -14Apr
6.7
X
57
22
39
<17
NA
<6
X
58
22
56
<17
NA
<6
X
59
23
65
23
28Feb -22Mar
8.2
X
60
27
107
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
61
27
118
23
28Feb -22Mar
8.2
X
62
25
71
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
63
27
93
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
64
27
105
65
28Feb -3May
23.0
X

N
W
Table 3B. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Cumulative days
Consecutive
Days 1 -27 Feb
Percent of
28 Feb -6 Dec
days 28 Feb -6
Well
where water
where water
Dec where water
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
table is -12" or
table is -12" or
table is -12" or
season
above
(282 days)
above
above*
65
24
59
22
28Feb -21 Mar
7.8
X
66
18
39
<17
NA
<6
X
68
27
121
82
28Feb -20May
29.1
X
69
22
62
21
1 Mar -21 Mar
7.4
X
71
25
57
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
72
27
104
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
73
27
91
70
28Feb -8May
24.8
X
Percent of
Cumulative days
Consecutive
Well
Days 1 -27 Feb
28 Feb -6 Dec >-
days 28 Feb -6
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
> -12„
12"
Dec > -12*
season
(282 days)
74
27
110
68
28Feb -6May
24.1
X
76
24
51
22
28Feb -21 Mar
7.8
X
77
27
111
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
78
24
85
47
28Feb -15Apr
16.7
X
80
25
83
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
81
27
105
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
83
19
41
<17
NA
<6
X

N
Table 3B. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Percent of
Cumulative days
Consecutive
Well
Days 1 -27 Feb
28 Feb -6 Dec >-
days 28 Feb -6
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
> -12„
—
12"
Dec > -12*
season
(282 days)
84
25
85
23
28Feb -22Mar
8.2
X
85
27
107
69
28Feb -7May
24.5
X
86
25
65
47
28Feb -15Apr
16.7
X
87
27
105
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
88
27
117
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
89
27
79
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
90
25
63
39
28Feb -7Apr
13.8
X
95
27
73
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
96
27
106
64
28Feb -2May
22.7
X
97
27
111
70
28Feb -8May
24.8
X
98
27
87
54
28Feb -22Apr
19.1
X
99
27
106
67
28Feb -5May
23.8
X
100
27
118
77
28Feb -15May
27.3
X
101
27
118
78
28Feb -16May
27.7
X
102
22
51
20
28Feb -19Mar
7.1
X

w
0
Table 3B. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Percent of
Cumulative days
Consecutive
Well
Days 1 -27 Feb
28 Feb -6 Dec >-
days 28 Feb -6
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
> -12„
—
12"
Dec > -12*
season
(282 days)
103
27
64
53
28Feb -21Apr
18.8
X
104
27
73
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
105
27
47
<17
NA
<6
X
106
25
53
26
28Feb -25Mar
9.2
X
107
27
94
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
108
27
107
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
109
27
86
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
110
27
125
81
28Feb -19May
28.7
X
111
27
107
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
112
27
101
56
28Feb -24Apr
19.9
X
113
27
80
55
28Feb -23Apr
19.5
X
114
27
140
74
28Feb -12May
26.2
X
115
27
112
71
28Feb -9May
25.2
X
116
27
107
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
117
27
221
185
28Feb -31Aug
65.6
X
118
27
72
54
28Feb -22Apr
19.1
X

w
Table 3B. (continued).
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Percent of
Cumulative days
Consecutive
Well
Days 1 -27 Feb
28 Feb -6 Dec >-
days 28 Feb -6
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
> -12„
—
12"
Dec > -12*
season
(282 days)
119
27
107
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
120
15
35
<17
NA
<6
X
121
27
102
49
28Feb -17May
17.4
X
122
23
51
<17
NA
<6
X
124
20
51
<17
NA
<6
X
Control wells
Ref1
27
108
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
Ref2
27
111
70
28Feb -8May
24.8
X
Ref3
27
120
79
28Feb -17May
28
X
PP1
17
62
36
1 Nov -6Dec
12.8
X
PP2
27
109
66
28Feb -4May
23.4
X
PP3
27
126
82
28Feb -20May
29.1
X
PP4
27
92
52
28Feb -20Apr
18.4
X
WF -1
Installed 28 Jul
41
36
1Nov -6Dec
12.8
X
WF -2
Installed 28 Jul
8
<17
NA
<6
X

Table 3B. (concluded).
*Only 17 days or more (6 %) are included in this column and only the longest hydroperiods (or two longest if they
are similar or only separated by a few days) are listed
N * *Riparian Wells
Hydrologic Zone (NC WETS)
Percent of
Cumulative days
Consecutive
Well
Days 1 -27 Feb
28 Feb -6 Dec >-
days 28 Feb -6
Dates
growing
<6
o
>6- 12.5/0
0
>12.5 -25/0
0
>25 -75/0
> -12„
—
12"
Dec > -12*
season
(282 days)
WF -3
Installed 28 Jul
6
<18
NA
<6
X
WF -4
Installed 28 Jul
4
<17
NA
<6
X
WF -5
Installed 28 Jul
2
<17
NA
<6
X
WF -6
Installed 28 Jul
16
<18
NA
<6
X
WF -7
Installed 28 Jul
4
<17
NA
<6
X
*Only 17 days or more (6 %) are included in this column and only the longest hydroperiods (or two longest if they
are similar or only separated by a few days) are listed
N * *Riparian Wells

Table 4. Summary of flow gauge data from upper Scott Creek and its headwater systems (UT1 -UT7) and a
tributary to Smith Creek (UT8).
UT1 -1 B
Number of flow
Number of calendar
Dates of longest flow
Consecutive days of longest
Flow station
events'
days with flown
event
flow event
USC -1 B*
7
19
4/28-5/1
4
USC -2B*
3
5
5/21 -5/23
3
USC -3B*
6
15
8/22-8/28
7
USC -4B*
10
126
2/1 -3/3
31
USC -513
8
27
2/4-2/13
10
UT3 -1 B
14
23
8/27 - 9/17 and 11/16
4
USC -613
11
94
9/22-10/4
22 each event
UT3 -3B
3
13
-12/15
8
USC -7B
7
12
9/2-9/6
5
USC -813
1
23
8/31 -9/22
23
USC -913
19
91
2/2-2/22
21
USC -10B
12
90
3/27-4/21
26
USC -11 B
8+
74+
8/27-10/1
36
UT1 -1 B
10
37
9/22-9/29
9
UT1 -213
unit malfunction
UT1 -313
3
13
7/26-8/1
7
UT1 -413
24
63
5/23-6/3
10
2/4 - 2/6; 8/28 - 8/30;
UT2 -1 B
9
19
3 each event
9/25-9/27
UT3 -1 B
14
23
8/27-8/30
4
UT3 -2B
12
53
9/22-10/4
13
UT3 -3B
3
13
2/4-2/12
8
UT3 -4B
2
2
2/25; 4/28
1 each event
UT3 -5B
2
62
10/4-12/31
89
UT3 -6B
12
99
2/28-4/19
43
UT3 -7B
16
63
9/22-10/5
15
UT3 -8B
12
46
9/22-10/3
12
UT3 -9B
1
2
8/27-8/28
2
UT4 -1 B
10
19
9/26-9/29
4
UT4 -2B
0
0
UT6 -1 B
no gauges; valley construction incomplete due to wetness
UT6 -2B
UT6 -3B
4
19
2/4-2/14
12
UT6 -4B
15
79
8/28-9/16
20
UT6 -5B
9
52
9/22-10/10
19
UT6 -6B
0
0
UT7 -1 B
9
27
2/4-2/13
10
UT7 -2B
2
3
9/28-9/29
2
UT7 -3B
5
26
8/27-9/15
20
2/1 - 2/20; 10/26 -
UT8 -1 B
11
71
20 each event
11/15
UT8 -2B
10
32
2/1 -2/10
10
UT8 -3B
2
54
7/14-9/5
54
5/21; 7/10; 8/27;
UT8 -4B
4
4
1 each event
12/28
UT8 -5B
16
93
8/22-9/22
32
UT8 -6B
2
3
8/29-8/30
2
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months
Z Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
* Gauges in the single thread segment of upper Scott Creek (USC)
T -33

Table 5. Survival of trees and shrubs planted in 19 0.017 -acre plots in potential
riparian buffer areas at Hell Swamp
from baseline (summer 2010) to fall
2011.
Tagged at
Baseline stems
Fall 2011 stems
Percent Surviva14
Scientific name
Common name
baseline'
Alive
Unsure
Tota13
Alive
Unsure
Tota13
Alive
Tota13
Large trees
Carya aquatica
water hickory
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
100
100
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
--
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
36
33
0
33
35
0
35
97
97
Nyssa aquatica
water tupelo
5
5
0
5
2
0
2
40
40
Nyssa biflora
swamp black gum
39
32
1
33
31
2
33
79
85
Prunus serotina
black cherry
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
--
Quercus albs
white oak
4
4
0
4
3
1
4
75
100
Q. falcata
southern red oak
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
100
100
Q. laurifolia
laurel oak
15
17
0
17
15
0
15
100
100
Q. lyrata
overcup oak
38
30
0
30
35
3
38
92
100
Q. michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
29
30
0
30
26
3
29
90
100
Q. nigra
water oak
10
8
0
8
10
0
10
100
100
Q. pagoda
cherrybark oak
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
100
100
Q. phellos
willow oak
3
3
0
3
3
0
3
100
100
Q. spp.
oak
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
--
--
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
36
33
2
35
32
2
34
89
94
Ulmus americana
American elm
14
13
0
13
13
1
14
93
100
Small trees
Clethra alnifolia
sweet pepperbush
9
9
0
9
5
3
8
56
89
Cyrilla racemiflora
titi
5
5
0
5
3
1
4
60
80
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
6
5
0
5
6
0
6
100
100
Ilex decidua
possumhaw
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
--
1. opaca
American holly
4
4
0
4
2
2
4
50
100
Magnolia virginiana
sweet bay
11
9
2
11
5
4
9
45
82
Oxydendron arboreum
sourwood
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
--
Persea palustris
red bay
8
8
0
8
3
0
3
38
38
Total tree stems
275
251
5
256
232
22
254
84
92
Density
859
784
16
800
725
69
794
Shrubs
Cephalanthus occidentalis
buttonbush
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
100
Corpus amomum
silky dogwood
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
--
Ilex glabra
ink berry
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
--
Ilex verticillata
winterberry
2
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
100
Itea virginica
Virginia willow
6
7
0
7
5
0
5
83
83
Leucothoe racemosa
Swamp doghobble
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
100
100
Lindera benzoin
spicebush
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
--
Rosa palustris
swamp rose
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
--
Vaccinium corymbosum
high bush blueberry
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
--
Viburnum nudum
possumhaw viburnum
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
--
Total shrub stems
10
9
0
9
6
3
9
60
90
Density
31
28
0
28
19
9
28
Unknown sp.
21
10
14
24
1
2
3
5
14
Total
Total stems
306
270
19
289
239
27
263
78
86
Total density
956
844
59
903
747
84
822
'The number tagged at baseline has been adjusted to reflect the proper identification of species in the fall sampling event. The baseline survival columns were not adjusted for this.
2Survival was considered unsure if the stem appeared dead (brittle, no green, broken, etc.) at the current sampling event and dead if at both the current and last sampling events the stem was not unquestionably alive.
3Total includes alive + unsure.
4Percent survival was calculated as: (Fall /Baseline tagged) X 100.
T -34

Table 6. Survival of trees and shrubs planted in 12 riparian 0.22 -acre plots at Hell Swamp from baseline (summer 2010) to fall 2011
Scientific name
Common name
Tagged at
baseline'
Baseline stems
Alive Unsure Tota13
Fall 2011 stems
Alive Unsure Tota13
Percent surviva14
Alive Tota13
Large trees
Cephalanthus occidentalis
buttonbush
4
4
0
4
4 0
Carya aquatica
water hickory
3
2
0
2
3
0
3
100
100
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
160
173
0
173
153
7
160
96
100
Nyssa aquatica
water tupelo
150
149
7
156
64
36
100
43
67
Nyssa biflora
swamp black gum
21
24
0
24
20
1
21
95
100
Q. laurifolia
laurel oak
4
21
0
21
2
1
3
50
75
Q. lyrata
overcup oak
179
196
1
197
172
5
177
96
99
Q. michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
47
50
0
50
44
2
46
94
98
Q. nigra
water oak
4
4
0
4
3
1
4
75
100
Q. pagoda
cherrybark oak
7
2
0
2
7
0
7
100
100
Q. phellos
willow oak
141
124
1
125
130
9
139
92
99
Q. spp.
oak
7
7
5
12
2
2
4
29
57
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
188
182
15
197
137
25
162
73
86
Ulmus americana
American elm
10
16
0
16
9
1
10
90
100
Small trees
Clethra alnifolia
sweet pepperbush
16
17
0
17
9
1
10
56
63
Cyrilla racemiflora
titi
8
7
0
7
5
1
6
63
75
1. opaca
American holly
4
10
0
10
2
1
3
50
75
Magnolia virginiana
sweet bay
15
16
0
16
2
2
4
13
27
Persea palustris
red bay
17
14
3
17
2
2
4
12
24
Total tree stems
981
1,014
32
1,046
766
97
863
78
88
Densitv
372
384
12
396
290
37
327
Shrubs
Cephalanthus occidentalis
buttonbush
4
4
0
4
4 0
4
100
100
Itea virginica
Virginia willow
15
20
0
20
10 2
12
67
80
Leucothoe racemosa
Swamp doghobble
1
2
0
2
0 1
1
0
100
Lindera benzoin
spicebush
6
6
0
6
2 0
2
33
33
Viburnum nudum
possumhaw viburnum
4
4
0
4
0 0
0
0
0
Total shrub stems
30
36
0
36
16
3
19
53
63
Density
11
14
0
14
6
1
7
Unknown SD.
82
26
77
103
3
6
9
4
11
Total
Total stems
Total densitv
1,093 I 1,076 I 109 I 1,185 I 785 I 106 I 891
414 408 41 449 297 40 338
72 1 82
'The number tagged at baseline has been adjusted to reflect the proper identification of species in the fall sampling event. The baseline survival columns were not adjusted for this.
2Survival was considered unsure if the stem appeared dead (brittle, no green, broken, etc.) at the current sampling event and dead if at both the current and last sampling events the stem was not unquestionably alive.
3Total includes alive + unsure.
4Percent survival was calculated as: (Fall /Baseline tagged) X 100.
T -35

Table 7. Survival of trees and shrubs planted in 111 non - riparian 0.22 -acre plots at Hell Swamp from baseline (summer 2010) to fall 2011.
'The number tagged at baseline has been adjusted to reflect the proper identification of species in the fall sampling event. The baseline survival columns were not adjusted for this.
2Survival was considered unsure if the stem appeared dead (brittle, no green, broken, etc.) at the current sampling event and dead if at both the current and last sampling events the stem was not unquestionably alive.
3Total includes alive + unsure.
4Percent survival was calculated as: (Fall /Baseline tagged) X 100.
T -36
Tagged at
Baseline stems
Fall 2011 stems
Percent surviva14
Scientific name
Common name
baseline'
Alive Unsure Tota13
Alive Unsure Tota13
Alive Tota13
Large trees
Carya aquatica
water hickory
167
161
1
162
152
12
164
91
98
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
89
98
0
98
87
2
89
98
100
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
1,189
1,180
2
1,182
1154
24
1178
97
99
Nyssa aquatics
water tupelo
541
502
5
507
419
84
503
77
93
Nyssa biflora
swamp black gum
667
694
3
697
564
67
631
85
95
Prunus serotina
black cherry
32
32
0
32
31
1
32
97
100
Quercus alba
white oak
236
232
2
234
235
0
235
100
100
Q. falcata
southern red oak
170
157
0
157
168
2
170
99
100
Q. laurifolia
laurel oak
741
636
34
670
682
30
712
92
96
Q. lyrata
overcup oak
801
786
2
788
787
11
798
98
100
Q. michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
1,619
1,533
18
1,551
1522
63
1585
94
98
Q. nigra
water oak
862
786
14
800
829
18
847
96
98
Q. pagoda
cherrybark oak
656
603
12
615
605
31
636
92
97
Q. phellos
willow oak
630
584
4
588
601
25
626
95
99
Q. spp.
oak
66
121
57
178
9
13
22
14
33
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
700
679
14
693
626
41
667
89
95
Ulmus americana
American elm
505
503
0
503
486
17
503
96
100
Small trees
Clethra alnifolia
sweet pepperbush
126
121
3
124
95
12
107
75
85
Cyrilla racemiflora
titi
14
14
0
14
12
2
14
86
100
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
35
35
0
35
35
0
35
100
100
Ilex decidua
possumhaw
6
6
0
6
6
0
6
100
100
1. opaca
American holly
32
31
1
32
28
1
29
88
91
Magnolia virginiana
sweet bay
193
188
2
190
124
36
160
64
83
Oxydendron arboreum
sourwood
2
2
0
2
0
1
1
0
50
Persea palustris
red bay
83
69
12
81
16
16
32
19
39
Total tree stems
10,162
9,753
186
9,939
9,273
509
9,782
91
96
Density
416
400
8
407
380
21
401
Shrubs
Cephalanthus occidentalis
buttonbush
32
32
0
32
29
2
31
91
97
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
23
23
0
23
21
2
23
91
100
Ilex glabra
ink berry
19
19
0
19
18
0
18
95
95
Ilex verticillata
winterberry
21
21
0
21
19
2
21
90
100
Itea virginica
Virginia willow
189
179
5
184
164
10
174
87
92
Leucothoe racemosa
Swamp doghobble
2
1
0
1
2
0
2
100
100
Lindera benzoin
spicebush
36
31
2
33
21
11
32
58
89
Rosa palustris
swamp rose
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
100
Vaccinium corymbosum
high bush blueberry
48
47
0
47
43
3
46
90
96
Viburnum nudum
possumhaw viburnum
2
2
0
2
2
0
2
100
100
Total shrub stems
373
356
7
363
319
31
350
86
94
Density
15
15
0
15
13
1
14
Unknown sp.
437
170
460
630
18
32
50
4
11
Total
Total stems
10,972
10,279
653
10,932
9,610
572
10,182
88
93
Total density
450
421
27
448
394
23
417
'The number tagged at baseline has been adjusted to reflect the proper identification of species in the fall sampling event. The baseline survival columns were not adjusted for this.
2Survival was considered unsure if the stem appeared dead (brittle, no green, broken, etc.) at the current sampling event and dead if at both the current and last sampling events the stem was not unquestionably alive.
3Total includes alive + unsure.
4Percent survival was calculated as: (Fall /Baseline tagged) X 100.
T -36

- r = _
1 l � w0.F �_' -- • h� � SLatanbCrry'
J_' \
ICI l •�a. �
_ JJ
1 - •*•-+ �� J BROAD _ c FivGP-nes
slam
' •�+ �, r� �[ ! '� °•��, ,f �; � rail y .
.'-A 1� ? ,-•.11 ��, - % �° �f�� RT. 264 - SEED TICK NE6K RO }:' •• '�
_ ��_ ��'•
•vf h' ;pLum'S'F'IT
_ CONTROL
WETLAND FOREST
J
�•: '�o • :-�. .{L� "� WINDLEY \\
l y LONGOUDE 78 41' 07. 38" RT. 99 t
CONTROL / LATRUDE: 35' 31' 31..4188• �.
WETLAND FOREST .p {( •. -
HELL SWAMP -
5 SCOTT CREEK,
♦' �'
� PUNGO ..
CREEK ROAD I '��� boulhlwo: ••�
WINFIELD
CONTROL �• _,�.,.� "
WETLAND FOREST I _
Is
ptE �.
• �'�'. i,8egr 4Y.r. C���k
0 5,000 10,000
NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE IN FEET
SITE LOCATION HELL SWAMP VICINITY MAP
HELL SWAMP -SCOTT CREEK
LEGEND PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
HELL SWAMP PROJECT BOUNDARY SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: BFG /TLJ
CONTROL PARCELS DATE: 04/25/12 FILE: HELLSMP_VIC_201 1 RPT
CP# 174559.66
SOURCE: 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP $UITE 2
IMAGES, N AND USGSTOPOTILE1L13.SIDNUSGS 0 DRANGLES RANSOMVILLE AND PANTEGOID lotu WILMINGTON, NORTH FIGURE 1
WEB SITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

HS -1
ROAD
ACCESS ROAD
HS-33 HSj3
-.
HS-
IT UT6 HS -51
HS -55
.Ire uT2 HS -56
5 -67
H HS -6 /
I HS -68 I
uT
HS-
HS -91
HS -102 UT4
x100 HS -103
HS -11
5 -112
' 5 -117
5 -120
I
-121 /
I
PP4`
A A
PP1
A -
PP2 PP3
PLUM'S PIT CONTROL
WETLAND FOREST
HS -83
�ACCE55 ROAD
0 1200 2400
SCALE IN FEET
LEGEND
HS -5
- - -
HS -3 •
•� S -4 0
HS -2 O•
HS -10
-/�
•o •
•
FJS -8 HS -9 HS -11
HS -1
HS-1 •OHS-20
A
HS -16
o
TREE /SHRUB PLOT MONITORING LOCATION
HSR7
HS-
HSR2
VALLEY WELL /FLOW METER ARRAY
H311113
HS -27 HS -29
\
/..
O
HS -26 O• HS -28 O• O•
/
HS-39
/
HS -36 HS -37
HS -38
/
•0 :F"� o• O i
VALLEY 2 (34.55 ACRES)
/ WINDLEY TRACT
ZONE 1 (308.61 ACRES)
` CONTROL
HS -48 O HS -51
0
WETLAND FOREST
• •0 •
HS -49 HS -50
HS -60 HS -61 O 0
•O O• HS -6 •
NOTE:
HS -7 O
1. ACTUAL PLANTING ZONE BOUNDARIES DIFFER
O• HS -73
SOME AREAS FROM THIS FIGURE.
HS -84 HS -85 HS -86 Q
OF TWO SHALLOW MONITORING WELLS ON THE
O• •� O HS -8
NEAR THE MIDDLE OF THE VALLEY, BETWEEN THE
O •O
HS 96 HS -97 HS -98
H -10
OH
WF7 06 0 •�
A
A WF5 WF6
•
O
WF4
WINFIELD A
CONTROL
WETLAND FOREST WF3 O•
WF7 A
ACCESS ROAD /
,& A WF2
HS -1
ROAD
ACCESS ROAD
HS-33 HSj3
-.
HS-
IT UT6 HS -51
HS -55
.Ire uT2 HS -56
5 -67
H HS -6 /
I HS -68 I
uT
HS-
HS -91
HS -102 UT4
x100 HS -103
HS -11
5 -112
' 5 -117
5 -120
I
-121 /
I
PP4`
A A
PP1
A -
PP2 PP3
PLUM'S PIT CONTROL
WETLAND FOREST
HS -83
�ACCE55 ROAD
0 1200 2400
SCALE IN FEET
LEGEND
- - -
PROJECT BOUNDARY (1,296.87 ACRES)
CONTROL PARCEL
ACCESS ROAD
EXISTING ROAD
GATE
•
WELL LOCATIONS
HS -1
WELL NUMBER
A
REFERENCE WELL LOCATIONS
o
TREE /SHRUB PLOT MONITORING LOCATION
-
VALLEY WELL /FLOW METER ARRAY
VALLEY WELL /FLOW METER ARRAY
WITH TREE /SHRUB MONITORING PLOT
PHOTO STATION
PLANTING ZONES
(1,263.02 ACRES)
UPLAND (117.29 ACRES)
VALLEY 1 (35.08 ACRES)
VALLEY 2 (34.55 ACRES)
ZONE 1 (308.61 ACRES)
ZONE 2 (190.32 ACRES)
ZONE 3 -1 (116.67 ACRES)
ZONE 3 -2 (154.49 ACRES)
ZONE 4 -1 (140.33 ACRES)
ZONE 4 -2 (165.68 ACRES)
NOTE:
1. ACTUAL PLANTING ZONE BOUNDARIES DIFFER
SLIGHTLY IN
SOME AREAS FROM THIS FIGURE.
2. VALLEY WELL /FLOW METER ARRAYS CONSIST
OF TWO SHALLOW MONITORING WELLS ON THE
OUTER EDGES OF THE VALLEY WITH FLOW METER
NEAR THE MIDDLE OF THE VALLEY, BETWEEN THE
WELLS.

f To A PP=
Sb t PP1 PP2
A
Ds PP3
H 1 `� PLUM'S PIT CONTROL
To / Ap WETLAND FOREST
�� /T* HS -5• • HS -7• Ap
/ •
S-2 HS -30 HS4 HS -6 �` Sb LEGEND
Cf _ • -1 Hs --
— HELL SWAMP BOUNDARY
g HS -10• • • 0 CONTROL PARCEL S HS -14�\/ To
S -8 H 11 ,Q
At `� �� • WELL LOCATIONS
HS -19
_16 HS -20 HS -21 HS -22 H 3 HS -1 WELL NUMBER
•
TO • • • • •
HSR1 � HS -24 HS -25 Pt A REFERENCE WELL LOCATIONS
HSR2 \, U`SC Ap — VALLEY WELL /FLOW METER ARRAY
HSR3\ HS- R 0 HS 9 HS -3 HS -33 • HS -35 VALLEY WELL /FLOW METER ARRAY
/yy_ • • • • •
HS -26 S -28 S -30 HS -32• • HS -34 • 1 WITH TREE /SHRUB MONITORING PLOT
{}}
HS -37 S -38 HS -40 HS 45 HS -46
TT
PHOTO STATION
• •
• • • Bb SOILS
HS -36 HS -3 HS-41 HS -4 HS-43 HS-4,4 HS -47
/ WINDLEY SYMBOL SOIL NAME
Ap ARAPAHOE
CONTROL UT6 UT% To At AUGUSTA
WETLAND FOREST HS -48 UT1 HS -54 HS -58 HS -5 At �T Cf CAPE FEAR FINE SANDY LOAM
` • • • • • • OHS-57 • • Ds DRAGSTON
-W—A ,i j� HS -49 HS -50 HS -5 S_52 HS -55 ijWS -56 Pt PORTSMOUTH
�} L I Me MUCKALEE
I HS -53 HS -67 Ro ROANOKE
UT2 HS -69 / Sb SEABROOK LOAMY SAND
S -61 62 HS -65 HS -66 H$ Ap To TOMOTLEY
• •10 • • • • • 0 HS-70 • mithtown Ds
HS -60 H -63 HS -68 / .
` 1 � WATER FEATURES
HS 80 UT5 / 4 A a A �_ — . — ' PERENNIAL
Ds Sb Me
-72 -74 HS -7 HS -79 I / P — "' INTERMITTENT
H S -77 ��, S -81 HS -82 HS -83 J
I I
1 e To Ds
HS -84 HS -8 H -86 S -88 A p UT3 } HS -94 AaA
• • HS -87 • HS -89 HS -9 HS -91 �H C',1 , HS -95 _ —� AV)
AaA
HS -97 P t UT4 - A p D s A p A
� • • \\ • HS-102 • �.
HS -96 • HS- 8 HS -99 1 HS- HS -101 HS -103 \I \ \ S-1 C Cl B
1 \
HS -104 \
\ \\ AaA At
HS -106 HS 9 • • { • HS -1131
A 7\ • HS -107 : S -108 1 ; -''
\ HS -110 S -111 l 1 s' T a B
AaA HS -112 p t` 0 1 ,200 2,400
A t T6 \\ � � ' 1 SOURCE:
yyy..��I e' SOIL SURVEY OF BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
A WF5 HS -114 HS -115 0- US DEPARTMENT R AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES
Y • ��` ^A CONSERVATION SERVICE SCALE IN FEET
• • HS -116 HSI181 V M Q ISSUED: SEPTEMBER 1995
l
WINFIELD A4 u HS -1221 \ �� 1 GJ Ap �� HELL SWAMP MITIGATION SITE
CONTROL HS -1 �\ AaA MONITORING LOCATIONS ON SOIL SURVEY
W ND FOREST WF3 \ • - • /
HS -119
WF, WF2 \ u HS -124 HS -12 Ds DS AaA PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
.�
Aa / SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: BFG /TLJ
HS -123 •�/ 1 / DATE: Q4�27�j 2 FILE: HELLSRPTSOILS-MON-
RO t U
At \�� 92 TaB CP #1745.59.66
S 7 n 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
SUITE 2
re e Ds O \ INCORPORATED WILMINGTON, NORTH TEL 91,0 /392 -9253 FIGURE 3
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

SOURCE: Hg -123
AS BUILT LIDAR PROVIDED BY:
JONATHAN RICKETTS ENGINEERING,
3450 NORTHLAKE BLVD., PALM BEACH
GARDENS, FLORIDA, PHONE 561_630_6700
LEGEND
2
0,000
PROJECT BOUNDARY (1,296.87 ACRES)
■
CONTROL PARCEL
1,000
—� PP 4\
■
GATE
•
/ A
HS -1
WELL NUMBER
A
PP7
6
4,00-
C 7
`
7
6.030
2 -
Ns" PP3
• ACCESS ROAD
8,000
7.00D
HS-1
7.001)
PLUM'S PIT CONTROL
10
S.00D
WETLAND FOREST
■
�` HS -5 HS -6 HS -7
$,40P
14,G44
-- • • •
HS S-3
Access ROAD
11,000
j3
• • HS -4
11 DOD
12.000
HS -2
12,600
13 DOG
HS -10
• HS -15
•
"
HS -14
HS -8 HS -9 HS -11 HS -12 HS -13
S -16 HS -190 Hg -20 HS -21
HS -23 HS -25
HSR1
HS -17 HS -18 HS -22
HS -24
HSR2
HSR3
HS -27 HS -29 HS -31
HS -32 HS -33 • HS -35
• • *HS-30 •
HS
• •
•
-26 HS-28
HS -34
HS -36 HS -37 HS -38 HS -40 HS -41 HS -42
HS -45
HS -46
• • • • • •
•
%S
• HSJ7
HO-39
HS -43 -44
WINDLEY TRACT
CONTROL Hg -48 HS -51
HS -54 HS -55
HS -58
WETLAND FOREST • • • • •
• • •
• • •
HS -49 HS -50 HS -52 HS -53
HS -56
HS-57 HS -59
•
HS -60 HS -61 HS -64 HS -65 HS -66 • HS -67
HS -6 0
• • HS -62 • • •
•
•
HS -63
HS-68
HS 71
HS -72 HS -74 HS -75 HS -76 HS -77 HS -78 HS -79 HS -81
HS -83
• HS -73 • • • •
• HS 80 •
HS -82 •
HS -84 HS -85 HS -86 HS -90 HS -92
ACCESS ROAD
HS -94
• • • HS -87 HS -88 HS -89 •
HS -91 • HS 93
• HS -95
•
HS -102 HS -104
HS -96 HS -97 HS -98 HS -99 HS -100 HS-101
HS -103
HS -105
HS -107 HS -108 HS -110
HS -112
ACCESS ROAD
• •
•
/WF7 H •
S -106 HS -109
HS -111 HS -113
\
WF6 HS -114 HS -115
/A
.S -117
HS -118
WF5
/WF4
HS -116
WINFIELD A
/
CONTROL HS -120
WETLAND FOREST WF3 •
HS -119 HS -121
WF7 ACC65 ROAD
HS -122
L
F2
— HS -124
SOURCE: Hg -123
AS BUILT LIDAR PROVIDED BY:
JONATHAN RICKETTS ENGINEERING,
3450 NORTHLAKE BLVD., PALM BEACH
GARDENS, FLORIDA, PHONE 561_630_6700
LEGEND
2
0,000
PROJECT BOUNDARY (1,296.87 ACRES)
■
CONTROL PARCEL
1,000
ACCESS ROAD
■
GATE
•
WELL LOCATIONS
HS -1
WELL NUMBER
A
REFERENCE WELL LOCATIONS
FJava6ons 7ahie
� o.aDD s,aea �
2
0,000
1.000
■
3
1,000
2.000
■
4
21000
3004
5
3.000
4.004
6
4,00-
61000
7
6.030
8.fl00
8
8,000
7.00D
9
7.001)
B.00D
10
S.00D
0.00D
■
11
$,40P
14,G44
iz
1o,000
11,000
13
11 DOD
12.000
14
12,600
13 DOG
0 1200 2400
SCALE IN FEET

_T
cn
24.00
22.00
20.00
18.00
16.00
c
14.00
s
0 12.00
c 10.00
T
0 8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
NOTES:
Data for WETS Monthly Rainfall for January -March and November - December
2011 comes from WETS /Aurora rainfall totals due to lack of
data for entire year for Belhaven.
"Range of Normal" and "WETS Monthly Rainfall Total" plotted on last day of each
month.
"Range of Normal" refers to the 30th and 70th percentile thresholds of the
probability of onsite rainfall amounts outside of the normal
range (based on historical averages from 1971 - 2000).
WETS Data subject to periodic revision. Data shown are latest available from
Portland, OR office of Water & Climate Services National
•
_A
•
titi
titi
titi
titi
titi
titi
titi
titi
titi
titi
titi
titi
�,�Q
O
,e\
O
Q
�O
O�G
Oti
oy
0,
oti
Oy
Oti
Q
Oti
Oti
IS;
Oti
1111111111111111111111111112011 Hell Swamp Rain Gauge Daily Rainfall 2011 Hell Swamp 30 -day Rolling Total • 2011 Monthly WETS /Belhaven Rainfall Totals
X2011 WETS 30 -yr 30% less chance 1971 -2000 -2011 WETS 30 -yr 30% more chance 1971 -2000 2011 Hell Swamp Monthly Rainfall
Figure 5. 2011 HELL SWAMP and WETS - BELHAVEN RAINFALL

WINDLEY
CONTROL WETLAND
FOREST
WINFIELD
CONTROL
WETLAND FOREST
PUNGO C
REEK ROAD
(SR 1715)
D
LEGEND
ZONES
PP1
- - -
HELL SWAMP BOUNDARY
0 O
= >6 - 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
0 O
P
JA
D O
CONTROL PARCEL
NOTE:
ROAD
ACCESS ROAD
PLUM'S PIT CONTROL
CONTOURS ARE NOT SHOWN.
WETLAND FOREST
LSC
LOWER SCOTT CREEK
USC
UPPER SCOTT CREEK
O
WELL LOCATIONS
HS -1
WELL NUMBER
0
REFERENCE WELL LOCATIONS
VALLEY WELL /FLOW METER ARRAY
VALLEY WELL /FLOW METER ARRAY
WITH TREE /SHRUB MONITORING PLOT
NOTE:
VALLEY ARRAY SYMBOLS MAY NOT BE VISIBLE ON
SOME PRINTED VERSIONS - SEE ELECTRONIC VERSION.
HYDROLOGIC
ZONES
WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
0 O
= <6% OF THE GROWING SEASON
0 O
= >6 - 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
0 O
= >12.5 - 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
D O
= 2!25 - 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
NOTE:
ROAD
LIDAR CONTOURS WERE USED TO DRAW HYDROPERIOD
ZONE POLYGONS.
CONTOURS ARE NOT SHOWN.
97"� 0 1200 2400
SCALE IN FEET

ACCESS ROAD
0 HS -50 0 HS
0 HS -3,9 HS -4 HS -6 ACCESS RDAo
HS -2
HS -8 HS -9 0 0 HS -15
• O S -10 • 0 0 HS -14
13C S -11 HS -12 HS -13
13
HS -19 HS -20 = U -10C
HS -16 12C 10C HS -21 HS -22 HS -23 HS -25
0 HS -170 1 0 • 0 • 0
REF1 HS -18 9 HS -24
REF2 .SC 9A 8C
REF3 HS -27 S -29 S -318A 7C HS -33 0
HS -26 HS -28
O O O O OHS -3 0 7 HS -32 0 0 HS -34
WINDLEY 6A 6C
7
CONTROL WETLAND HS -36 HS -3 HS -38 HS -45
FOREST 0 0 0 0 HS-39 0 0 S -41 0 HS- 2 5A 5C H S-43 H 544 O
U
HS -48 UT1 3C 4A HS -54 HS -55 6(
0 0 • • • 4C 0 O 0 6
HS -49 HS -50 HS -51 HS -52 3A 2A 2C 1 3C 2C UT2 HS -56 c
HS -60 HS -53 HS -67 2C S -69�
HS -61 HS -64 U 1 -1A =USC- 2
62 1 C
O O HS -6? H 650
HS-66 1A OHS -
1 1C
9C -75 = 6A HS 8- \HS 80 UT5
\b
HS-72 9A 8C HS -74 7C 5C OHS -7 HS077 HS -79
HS -73 8A 4 3C 2A HS -81
7A 6A SA 2A
4A 3A L 1A 1A
HS -84 HS -85 HS -86 1C
O O O HS -87 HS-88 HS-89 HS -90 S -91 1C HS -92
A
HS -97 HS -1 2A UT4
S -96 O HS-98 HS -99 S-0100 OHS -10 O OHS -103
HS -104
WF HS -106 6A HS -113
0 HS -107 HS -108 HS- 10
O O 0 HS -109 O O O
WINFIELD WF6 6 HS -111
CONTROL H
WETLAND FOREST \ 5A IL
� WF5 \ HS -114 HS -115 C OHS -117 •
O O 4A 0 11 HS -11
WF4 4C
A ACCESS ROAD UT8
HS- 0
WF3 \ 0 3A
C
I \ HS -119 3 HS -1210
WF1 HS -122
Q - WF2 C HS-
2A
PUNGO CREEK HS -123 C /
(SR 1775)ROAD
HS-46
0 0
HS -47
/0
C
OHS-105
\ACCESS ROAD
A PP4.
PP1
`
A P
PP2P3
PLUM'S PIT CONTROL
WETLAND FOREST '
HS -71
0
ROAD
OTHER THAN THE CONTROL
FORESTS, ONLY TWO WELLS WITHIN
THE MITIGATION SITE CHANGED
(BLUE TO GREEN) FROM FIGURE 6.
LEGEND
— — —
HELL SWAMP BOUNDARY
0 O
CONTROL PARCEL
0 O
ACCESS ROAD
LSC
LOWER SCOTT CREEK
USC
UPPER SCOTT CREEK
O
WELL LOCATIONS
HS -1
WELL NUMBER
0
REFERENCE WELL LOCATIONS
VALLEY WELL /FLOW METER ARRAY
VALLEY WELL /FLOW METER ARRAY
WITH TREE /SHRUB MONITORING PLOT
NOTE:
VALLEY ARRAY
SYMBOLS MAY NOT BE VISIBLE ON
SOME PRINTED
VERSIONS - SEE ELECTRONIC VERSION.
HYDROLOGIC
ZONES
WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
0 O
= <6% OF THE GROWING SEASON
0 O
= >6 - 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
0 O
= >12.5 - 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
D O
= >25 - 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
NOTE:
LIDAR CONTOURS WERE USED TO DRAW HYDROPERIOD
ZONE POLYGONS.
CONTOURS ARE NOT SHOWN.
97"� 0 1200 2400
SCALE IN FEET

APPENDIX A
2011 CROSS SECTION MEASUREMENTS IN
SINGLE THREAD RESTORED CHANNEL OF UPPER SCOTT CREEK

BAKER ENGINEERING 2011 HELL SWAMP CROSS SECTION MEASUREMENT
1.1 Geomorphic Monitoring
For monitoring stream success criteria, 34 permanent cross - sections were installed following construction
m2010. In accordance with the Hell Swamp Mitigation Plan (July 2009), three cross - sections were
established per 1,000 foot reach of stream /valley restoration. The permanent cross - sections are used to
monitor channel formation and scour overtime. For the riparian headwater systems (no defined channel
construction), these cross - sections were measured for the as -built report and will also be measured at
Years 3 and 5 if channel features form. For the Scott Creek single thread channel stream restoration
segment, the cross sections were measured for the as -built report and then annually during the monitoring
period.
1.1.1 Geomorphic Success Criteria
Valleys should remain stable with minimum changes through the monitoring period; however,
these cross - sections may show minor changes in flow patterns as valleys develop.
1. 1.2 Results and Discussion
Two permanent cross - sections (7 and 8) are established in the Scott Creek single thread channel.
Year 2 monitoring data from these two cross - sections were collected in December 2011. Cross -
sectional data collected during this monitoring event, were compared to the as -built baseline data
collected in 2010. Approximate locations of the two cross sections and 2011 cross - sectional
graphs from each of the monitored cross - sections are included on the following page.
Permanent cross - section 7 is located across a riffle at station 47 +66 on Scott Creek. According to
the Year 2 survey data, the channel features in riffle cross - section 7 have remained very stable
since as -built conditions. No significant areas of concern regarding the channel along this cross -
section were noted following Year 2 monitoring. The survey data did record some changes in the
floodplain along cross - section 7. The floodplain changes observed are attributed to flood
deposition, soil settling, vegetation maturity, and slight differences in survey point location. The
floodplain observations noted are expected with newly constructed restoration sites, where some
minor adjustments are common.
Permanent cross - section 8 is located across a pool at station 52 +81 on Scott Creek. According to
the Year 2 survey data, the channel features in pool cross - section 8 have remained stable since as-
built conditions. The Year 2 data show that cross - section 8 has experienced some minor
deposition within the pool area of the channel, but this is common for pools in restored
meandering channels, and will likely vary from year to year depending upon the flow frequency
and magnitude. The survey data also recorded some changes in the floodplain along cross -
section 8. The channel and floodplain changes observed along cross - section 8 are attributed to
flood deposition, soil settling, vegetation maturity, and slight difference in survey point location.
The pool and floodplain observations noted are expected with newly constructed restoration sites,
where some minor adjustments are common.
According to the Year 2 survey data, cross sections 7 and 8 have experienced some slight
adjustments and settling since as -built conditions. The adjustments observed in the monitored
cross - sections are minor and are not considered to demonstrate signs of instability. No areas of
appreciable scour have been observed within the restored channel.
1.1.3 Areas of Concern
No areas of concern have been identified for the restored headwater prongs.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site A -1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix A

Generated by CZR
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site A -2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix A

Riffle cross - section 7
5
4.5 As-Built
4 — Year
3.5
0 3
c�
2.5
w
2
1.5
1
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Station (ft)
Pool cross - section 8
5
BAs -Built
4
—Year 1
3
g 2
ca
� 1
w
0
-1
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Station (ft)
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site A -3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix A

2011 FLOW EVENTS RECORDED BY EACH GAUGE,
2011 MONTHLY SUMMARIES OF FLOW EVENTS, OBSERVER DATA,
AND SELECTED 2011 PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION OF FLOW

Table B -1. Monthly summary of flow at USC1 B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
0
0
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
1
3
May
1.01
3
5
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
2
3
September
10.71
2
8
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
Error after 11/20
TOTAL 50.54 7
19
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -2. Flow events recorded at USC1 B. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were recorded,
they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event Date(s) of flow event Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1 4/28-5/1 1709-0829
4
2 5/24-5/25 2329-1109
2
3 5/26-5/27 1849-0709
2
4 8/27-8/28 1050-0449
2
5 8/29 0209-0449
1
6 9/14-9/20 1509-729
7
7 9/21 0429-1209
1
Error after 11/20
B -1

Table B -3. Monthly summary of flow at USC2B. Voltage calibration 1.245 volts; flow is defined as>_
0.5gal /min (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A N/A
February
3.00
0 0
March
3.55
0 0
April
2.63
0 0
May
1.01
1 3
June
2.17
0 0
July
2.06
0 0
August
17.58
2 2
September
10.71
0 0
October
1.75
*Meter malfunctioned 8/31/11 - 11/6/11
November
2.05
0 0
December
0.52
0 0
TOTAL
50.54
3 5
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -4. Flow events recorded at USC2B.
*Meter malfuntioned 8/31/11 - 11/6/11
M
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of flow event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
5/21 -5/23
2300-1140
3
2
8/28
0340-1800
1
3
8/29
1340-1540
1
*Meter malfuntioned 8/31/11 - 11/6/11
M

Table B -5. Monthly summary of flow at USC3B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as>_
0.5gal /min (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A N/A
February
3.00
0 0
March
3.55
0 0
April
2.63
0 0
May
1.01
4 6
June
2.17
0 0
July
2.06
0 0
August
17.58
2 9
September
10.71
*Meter malfunctioned 8/31/11 - 10/18/11
October
1.75
0 0
November
2.05
0 0
December
0.52
0 0
TOTAL
50.54
6 15
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -6. Flow events recorded at USC3B.
*Meter malfunctioned 8/31/11 - 10/18/11
B -3
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of flow event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
5/11 -5/12
1921 -2201
2
2
5/13
1821 -2021
1
3
5/14-5/15
2201 -441
2
4
5/26
1321 -1521
1
5
8/22-8/28
2021 -1901
7
6
8/30-8/31
2221 -1321
2
*Meter malfunctioned 8/31/11 - 10/18/11
B -3

Table B -7. Monthly summary of flow at USC4B. Voltage calibration 1.26 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min (meter installed on 4/2/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
1
28
March
3.55
3
22
April
2.63
2
27
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
2
6
September
10.71
3
23
October
1.75
3
20
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
10
126
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -8. Flow events recorded at USC4B.
B -4
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of flow event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/1 -3/3
1740-1920
31
2
3/6-3/19
0940-1420
14
3
3/27-4/22
0020-2200
27
4
4/26-4/30
1540-1520
5
5
8/26-8/27
2140-0940
2
6
8/28-9/10
0640-1800
14
7
9/15-9/18
2300-2000
4
8
9/22-10/7
1220-0740
16
9
10/9-10/16
2040-0040
8
10
10/18 - 10/22
2300-0440
5
B -4

Table B -9. Monthly summary of flow at USCSB. Voltage calibration set at 1.26 volts, flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min (meter installed on 4/2/2011).
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
1
10
March
3.55
3
4
April
2.63
4
7
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
1
1
September
10.71
1
5
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL 50.54 8 27
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -10. Flow events recorded at USCSB. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
B -5
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of flow event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/4-2/13
2023-1843
10
2
3/11
0723-1123
1
3
3/27
0743-1603
1
4
3/30 -4/3
1523-1943
5
5
4/5
1123-1703
1
6
4/10-4/11
0243-1043
2
7
4/17
0743-1003
1
8
8/31 -9/5
1303-2303
6
B -5

Table B -11. Monthly summary of flow at USC6B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
0
0
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
3
4
May
1.01
1
5
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
1
5
September
10.71
3
23
October
1.75
2
23
November
2.05
3
22
December
0.52
2
12
TOTAL 50.54 11 94
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -12. Flow events recorded at USC6B. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
W.
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
4/26
0850-1930
1
2
4/27
0850-2250
1
3
4/28-4/29
0830-1650
2
4
5/8-5/12
2150-1150
5
5
8/27-9/17
1310-2210
22
6
9/22
0510-1530
1
7
9/26-10/9
2150-0930
14
8
10/18-11/1
1230-1410
15
9
11/9-11/14
1430-1110
6
10
11/16-12/7
2310-1910
22
11
12/11 - 12/15
1130-1410
5
W.

Table B -13. Monthly summary of flow at USC7B. Voltage calibration 1.26 volts; flow is defined as 2: 0.1
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/2/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
0
0
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
0
0
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
1
2
August
17.58
5
5
September
10.71
1
5
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
7
12
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -14. Flow events recorded at USC7B. (If only a single or few readings of <0.1 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
B -7
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
7/7-7/8
2220-0700
2
2
8/15
0540-0800
1
3
8/28
1220-2220
1
4
8/29-8/30
1120-0020
2
5
8/30
1320-1800
1
6
8/31
0320-2340
1
7
9/2-9/6
2200-1040
5
B -7

Table B -15. Monthly summary of flow at USCBB. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as 2: 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/2/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
0
0
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
0
0
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
1
1
September
10.71
1
22
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
1
23
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -16. Flow events recorded at USCBB. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
Flow event Date(s) of event Start/stop time of event Number of consecutive calendar
days with flow
1 8/31 -9/22 1428 -0028 23
- ;]

Table B -17. Monthly summary of flow at USC9B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/2/2011).
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
3
23
March
3.55
7
16
April
2.63
5
17
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
2
7
September
10.71
3
16
October
1.75
2
9
November
2.05
2
3
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL 50.54 19 91
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -18. Flow events recorded at USC9B. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
Me
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/2-2/22
1234-2214
21
2
2/25
0354-1854
1
3
2/28-3/1
2214-0734
2
4
3/6-3/7
1114-0334
2
5
3/10-3/14
1614-0214
5
6
3/16-3/17
0534-1534
2
7
3/24
0534-0334
1
8
3/26-3/29
2334-1554
4
9
3/30-4/6
1314-1434
8
10
4/8-4/9
2234-0134
2
11
4/9-4/13
2114-1614
5
12
4/16-4/17
1934-2214
2
13
4/28-4/29
2134-0014
2
14
8/20
0114-0214
1
15
8/26-9/5
2114-1114
11
16
9/7-9/8
0934-1554
2
17
9/22-10/7
1234-1954
16
18
10/30-11/2
1034-1614
4
19
11/4
0814-1134
1
Me

Table B -19. Monthly summary of flow at USC10B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/2/2011).
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
1
21
March
3.55
4
12
April
2.63
3
25
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
2
6
September
10.71
3
16
October
1.75
1
6
November
2.05
1
4
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL 50.54 12 90
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -20. Flow events recorded at USC10B. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
B -10
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/2-2/23
1235-1325
21
2
3/11 -3/14
1545-0905
4
3
3/16-3/17
0605-1005
2
4
3/24
0105-0205
1
5
3/27-4/21
0005-1625
26
6
4/26-4/27
1545-1505
2
7
4/28-4/29
2205-0305
2
8
8/20
0145-2005
1
9
8/27-9/5
0205-1705
10
10
9/7-9/8
0945-1605
2
11
9/22-10/6
1225 -2345
15
12
11/1 -11/4
2325 - 1805
4
B -10

Table B -21. Monthly summary of flow at USC11 B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as 2: 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/9/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
0
0
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
2
9
May
1.01
1
17
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
1
5
September
10.71
1
30
October
1.75
5
10
November
2.05
2+
3+
December
0.52
N/A
N/A
TOTAL
50.54
8+
74+
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -22. Flow events recorded at USC11 B. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
Flow events difficult to discern in November and December due to flooded conditions and flow not
coincident with rain events.
B -11
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
4/20-4/22
1507-0507
2
2
4/24-5/17
0127-1307
24
3
8/27-10/1
1327-0207
36
4
10/13 - 10/14
1127-1827
2
5
10/20
1147-2007
1
6
10/23 - 10/27
1107-2247
5
7
10/31 -11/1
1227 - 007
2
8
11/4-11/5
0827-0147
2
Flow events difficult to discern in November and December due to flooded conditions and flow not
coincident with rain events.
B -11

Table B -23. Monthly summary of flow at UT1 -1 B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
1
6
March
3.55
3
8
April
2.63
3
7
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
2
5
September
10.71
1
9
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL 50.54 10 37
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -24. Flow events recorded at UT1 -1 B.
B -12
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/4-2/9
1009-0349
6
2
3/6-3/7
1949-1529
2
3
3/10-3/12
2009-2329
3
4
3/27-3/29
0229-1849
3
5
3/30-4/2
1509-1329
4
6
4/10-4/12
0609-0509
3
7
4/17-4/18
1249-1249
2
8
8/27-8/27
0609-2309
1
9
8/28-8/31
1909-0149
4
10
9/22-9/29
1309-2109
9
B -12

Table B -25. Monthly summary of flow at UT1 -213. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as 2: 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51 N/A N/A
February
3.00
March
3.55
April
2.63
May
1.01
June
2.17
July
2.06 *Unit malfunction entire year
August
17.58
September
10.71
October
1.75
November
2.05
December
0.52
TOTAL
50.54 0 0
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -26. Flow events recorded at UT1 -213.
Flow event Date(s) of event Start/stop time of event Number of consecutive calendar
days with flow
*Unit malfunction entire year
B -13

Table B -27. Monthly summary of flow at UT1 -313. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as 2: 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A N/A
February
3.00
0 0
March
3.55
0 0
April
2.63
0 0
May
1.01
0 0
June
2.17
0 0
July
2.06
1 6
August
17.58
2 7
September
10.71
*Unit malfunction 8/31/11
October
1.75
0 0
November
2.05
0 0
December
0.52
0 0
TOTAL
50.54
3 13
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -28. Flow events recorded at UT1 -3B.
*Unit malfunction 8/31/11. New unit installed 10/18/11.
B -14
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
7/26-8/1
0758-1338
7
2
8/5-8/5
0758-1658
1
3
8/27--8/31
1538-0918
5
*Unit malfunction 8/31/11
*Unit malfunction 8/31/11. New unit installed 10/18/11.
B -14

Table B -29. Monthly summary of flow at UT1 -413. Voltage calibration 1.2385 volts; flow is defined as 2: 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
August and early September flow events difficult to correlate with rainfall and were not counted.
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
1
2
March
3.55
9
10
April
2.63
12
29
May
1.01
2
9
June
2.17
1
3
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
0
0
September
10.71
1
8
October
1.75
1
1
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
24
63
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -30. Flow events recorded at UT1 -4B.
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
Number of consecutive calendar
days with flow
1
2/27-3/1
1528-1448
3
2
3/13-3/13
0908-1808
1
3
3/17-3/17
1008-1608
1
4
3/18-3/19
0908-1208
2
5
3/21 -3/21
0908-2308
1
6
3/22-3/22
0728-1728
1
7
3/23-3/23
0748-2348
1
8
3/24-3/24
0928-1548
1
9
3/29-3/29
1028-1648
1
10
4/2-4/2
0928-1708
1
11
4/3-4/3
0948-1828
1
12
4/4-4/5
0648-1728
2
13
4/6-4/6
0848-1748
1
14
4/7-4/7
0728-2328
1
15
4/8-4/9
0708-1428
2
16
4/10-4/16
0708-2228
7
17
4/17-4/17
0908-1848
1
18
4/18-4/18
0808-2128
1
19
4/19-4/21
0608-1328
3
20
4/22-4/29
1108-2228
8
21
4/30-4/30
0708-2108
1
22
5/2-5/4
0628-1748
3
23
5/25-6/3
0548-2248
10
24
9/23-10/1
0848-1928
9
B -15

Table B -31. Monthly summary of flow at UT2 -1 B. Voltage calibration 1.2385 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Poor correlation with rainfall in some months; those events not counted.
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
4
9
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
0
0
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
1
3
September
10.71
4
7
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
9
19
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -32. Flow events recorded at UT2 -1 B.
B -16
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/4-2/6
1926-2026
3
2
2/7-2/8
1746-2306
2
3
2/9-2/10
2346-2246
2
4
2/11 -2/12
0946-0526
2
5
8/28-8/30
2206-0106
3
6
9/23-9/23
1246-1546
1
7
9/25-9/27
1846-1846
3
8
9/28-9/28
1626-2146
1
9
9/29-9/30
1746-1246
2
B -16

Table B -33. Monthly summary of flow at UT3 -1 B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
4
6
March
3.55
4
7
April
2.63
3
3
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
2
5
September
10.71
1
1
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
1
1
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL 50.54 14 23
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -34. Flow events recorded at UT3 -1 B. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
B -17
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/4-2/5
1920-2100
2
2
2/7-2/8
2120-0820
2
3
2/10-2/10
0500-2140
1
4
2/11 -2/11
1920-2320
1
5
3/6-3/6
1820-2000
2
6
3/10-3/11
2100-0020
2
7
3/27
0100-1700
1
8
3/30-4/1
1520-1200
3
9
4/10
0200-1240
1
10
4/16
2020-2120
1
11
8/26- 8/27
2120-0520
2
12
8/27-8/30
1120-0220
4
13
9/2-9/2
0800-1340
1
14
11/10
0600-0840
1
B -17

Table B -35. Monthly summary of flow at UT3 -213. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5 gal /min, but
inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
1
10
March
3.55
3
5
April
2.63
2
4
May
1.01
1
2
June
2.17
2
6
July
2.06
1
3
August
17.58
3
7
September
10.71
2
10
October
1.75
1
4
November
2.05
1
2
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
12
53
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar
days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -36. Flow events recorded at UT3 -213.
(If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were recorded, they
were considered
unreliable and left out of calculations).
Number of consecutive calendar days
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
with flow
1
2/4-2/14
1813-0413
10
2
3/10-3/11
2013-2113
2
3
3/27
0053-2033
1
4
3/30-4/2
1453-1833
4
5
4/10-4/11
0053-1253
2
6
5/30-6/5
2153-1853
7
7
6/30-7/3
2033-0113
4
8
8/20
0113-0233
1
9
8/26-8/27
2113-0953
2
10
8/28-9/1
0433-0533
5
11
9/22-10/4
1213-1053
13
12
11/4 -11/5
1013 -0513
2
B -18

Table B -37. Monthly summary of flow at UT3 -3B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
1
8
March
3.55
1
12
April
2.63
1
1
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
1
2
September
10.71
0
0
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
3
13
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -38. Flow events recorded at UT3 -3B. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
B -19
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/4-2/12
2056-2116
8
2
3/20-4/1
1616-2056
3
3
8/28-8/29
0016-0616
2
B -19

Table B -39. Monthly summary of flow at UT3 -4B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
1
1
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
1
1
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
0
0
September
10.71
0
0
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
2
2
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -40. Flow events recorded at UT3 -4B. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
Flow event Date(s) of event Start/stop time of event Number of consecutive calendar
days with flow
1 2/25 1527 1
2 4/28 0707 1
Many potential flow events less than 0.5 gal /min that appear to be the result of rain, but data are suspect
due to manv similar readinas
B -20

Table B -41. Monthly summary of flow at UT3 -5B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
0
0
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
0
0
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
1
1
July
2.06
1
1
August
17.58
03
03
September
10.71
13
93
October
1.75
2
30
November
2.05
1
30
December
0.52
1
31
TOTAL
50.54
2
62
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
3 Inaccuarate number because data lost with Hurricane Irene.
Table B -42. Flow events recorded at UT3 -5B. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
Flow event Date(s) of event Start/stop time of event Number of consecutive calendar
days with flow
1 6/20 1256 1
2 7/4 0916 1
3 9/22-10/2 0925-2005 11
4 10/4-12/31 0605-2345 89
Meter and data accumulated by the meter (4 August through 22 September) were lost due to Hurricane
Irene. There are many potential flow events less than 0.5 gal /min in the spring that may be related to rain
events.
B -21

Table B -43. Monthly summary of flow at UT3 -6B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
6
26
March
3.55
1
31
April
2.63
4
27
May
1.01
1
3
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
1
2
August
17.58
1
6
September
10.71
0
0
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
1
10
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL 50.54 12 99
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -44. Flow events recorded at UT3 -6B. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
Many intervals of inaccurate data (some within and some outside of flow events) made intrepretion of data
very difficult.
B -22
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/1 -2/2
1725-1345
2
2
2/2-2/16
1145-0905
14
3
2/16-2/17
1825-0825
2
4
2/19-2/21
0625-0825
3
5
2/21 -2/27
1925-0825
7
6
2/28-4/19
0325-0625
42
7
4/21 -4/22
0425-0825
2
8
4/22-4/27
1645-0645
6
9
4/28-5/3
2205-0605
6
10
7/25-7/27
1925-0925
3
11
8/26-8/31
1645-1725
6
12
11/2-11/10
2215-0935
10
Many intervals of inaccurate data (some within and some outside of flow events) made intrepretion of data
very difficult.
B -22

Table B -45. Monthly summary of flow at UT3 -7B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
4
18
March
3.55
5
11
April
2.63
4
10
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
1
1
July
2.06
2
7
August
17.58
2
8
September
10.71
2
10
October
1.75
1
5
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL 50.54 16 63
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -46. Flow events recorded at UT3 -7B. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
B -23
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/2-2/3
0430-1558
2
2
2/4-2/18
0530-2258
14
3
2/25
0758-1618
1
4
2/28
1058-1718
1
5
3/6-3/8
1418-0038
2
6
3/10-3/13
1618-0238
4
7
3/16
0838-1618
1
8
3/27-3/28
0738-1738
2
9
3/30-4/3
1438-1658
5
10
4/10-4/12
0018-1658
3
11
4/16-4/18
0938-1218
3
12
4/28
0258-1818
1
13
6/28
1638-1738
1
14
8/4-8/6
1258-0238
3
15
8/27-9/1
0558-1343
5
16
9/22-10/5
1238-1658
15
B -23

Table B -47. Monthly summary of flow at UT3 -8B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
1
11
March
3.55
3
6
April
2.63
3
7
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
1
5
September
10.71
5
14
October
1.75
1
3
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL 50.54 12 46
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -48. Flow events recorded at UT3 -8B. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
B -24
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/4-2/14
1927-1527
11
2
3/6-3/7
2027-0347
2
3
3/10-3/11
2007-1927
2
4
3/30-4/3
1507-0047
5
5
4/10-4/11
0147-1527
2
6
4/16-4/17
2027-1627
2
7
8/27-8/31
0727-1747
5
8
9/2
0207-1747
1
9
9/4
0627-0907
1
10
9/8
0647-0927
1
11
9/17-9/18
0447-1007
2
12
9/22-10/3
1307-1627
12
B -24

Table B -49. Monthly summary of flow at UT3 -9B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
0
0
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
0
0
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
1
2
September
10.71
0
0
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
1
2
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -50. Flow events recorded at UT3 -9B. (If only a single or few readings of <0.5 gal /min were
recorded, they were considered unreliable and left out of calculations).
Flow event Date(s) of event Start/stop time of event Number of consecutive calendar
days with flow
1 8/27-8/28 1959-0319 2
B -25

Table B -51. Monthly summary of flow at UT4 -1 B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Poor correlation with rainfall in some months; those events not counted.
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
2
3
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
0
0
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
1
3
September
10.71
3
9
October
1.75
1
1
November
2.05
3
3
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
10
19
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -52. Flow events recorded at UT4 -1 B.
B -26
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/7-2/8
0825-1025
2
2
2/10
1225-2325
1
3
8/27-8/29
1205-1705
3
4
9/1 -9/2
0945-2205
2
5
9/23-9/25
1225-0525
3
6
9/26-9/29
1225-1425
4
7
10/19
1205-1705
1
8
11/10
0505-1105
1
9
11/16
0905-1645
1
10
11/23
0225-1305
1
B -26

Table B -53. Monthly summary of flow at UT4 -2B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
No flow event recorded during rainfall pre- and post- Hurricane Irene.
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
0
0
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
0
0
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
0
0
September
10.71
0
0
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
0
0
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -54. Flow events recorded at UT4 -2B.
Flow event Date(s) of event Start/stop time of event Number of consecutive calendar
days with flow
11 events recorded > 0.5 gal, only two of which corresponded to rainfall;no event was greater than 1 hour
duration none were counted; possible voltage issue with unit
B -27

Table B -55. Monthly summary of flow at UT6 -3B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/5/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A N/A
February
3.00
1 12
March
3.55
3 5
April
2.63
1 2
May
1.01
0 0
June
2.17
0 0
July
2.06
*Unit malfunction 7/7/11
August
17.58
1503-1543
September
10.71
0 0
October
1.75
0 0
November
2.05
0 0
December
0.52
0 0
TOTAL
50.54
4 19
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -56. Flow events recorded at UT6 -3B.
*Unit malfunction 7/7/11. Reinstalled 9/22/11.
B -28
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/4-2/14
1003-0503
12
2
3/10-3/11
2003-1103
2
3
3/27
0143-1823
1
4
3/30-4/2
1503-1543
4
*Unit malfunction 7/7/11. Reinstalled 9/22/11.
B -28

Table B -57. Monthly summary of flow at UT6 -4B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/2/2011).
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
1
15
March
3.55
6
13
April
2.63
3
10
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
2
6
September
10.71
4
14
October
1.75
1
5
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL 50.54 15 79
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -58. Flow events recorded at UT6 -4B.
B -29
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/2-2/16
0859-1319
15
2
3/1
0239-1359
1
3
3/6-3/7
1419-0919
2
4
3/10-3/12
1619-1339
3
5
3/16-3/17
0559-0339
2
6
3/26-3/29
2359-0539
4
7
3/30-4/4
1359-1039
5
8
4/9-4/12
2119-1959
4
9
4/16-4/17
1959-0939
2
10
8/26-8/27
2119-0519
2
11
8/28-9/16
0859-1939
20
12
9/17-9/18
1059-2219
2
13
9/19-9/22
0739-1159
4
14
9/23-9/24
0919-0819
2
15
9/25-10/5
1739-1819
11
B -29

Table B -59. Monthly summary of flow at UT6 -5B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/2/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
2
14
March
3.55
3
5
April
2.63
1
2
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
1
4
September
10.71
2
15
October
1.75
1
10
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
9
52
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -60. Flow events recorded at UT6 -5B.
B -30
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/2-2/3
0926-1306
2
2
2/4-2/15
0826-1346
12
3
3/10-3/11
2006-1526
2
4
3/27
0246-1626
1
5
3/30-4/3
1406-1106
4
6
4/10-4/11
0006-1626
2
7
8/27-8/30
2246-1026
4
8
9/2-9/7
2006-0926
6
9
9/22-10/10
1306-1726
19
B -30

Table B -61. Monthly summary of flow at UT6 -6B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/2/2011).
No events greater than 0.5 gal; highest event recorded 9/22/11 at 0.45584, but rest of day 0.25595.
Lots of noise on graph; voltage adjustment did not improve the output.
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
0
0
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
0
0
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
0
0
September
10.71
0
0
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
0
0
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -62. Flow events recorded at UT6 -6B.
Flow event Date(s) of event Start/stop time of event Number of consecutive calendar
days with flow
No flow events recorded
B -31

Table B -63. Monthly summary of flow at UT7 -1 B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/2/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
1
10
March
3.55
3
5
April
2.63
1
1
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
0
0
September
10.71
4
9
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
9
27
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -64. Flow events recorded at UT7 -1 B.
B -32
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/4-2/13
1029-2129
10
2
3/10-3/11
2009-0429
2
3
3/27
0109-1509
1
4
3/30-4/2
1449-0409
4
5
4/10
0049-1749
1
6
9/12-9/16
2129-1849
5
7
9/26
0509-1749
1
8
9/27
0649-1309
1
9
9/28-9/29
1629-0209
2
B -32

Table B -65. Monthly summary of flow at UT7 -2B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/2/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
0
0
March
3.55
1
1
April
2.63
0
0
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
0
0
September
10.71
1
2
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
3
3
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -66. Flow events recorded at UT7 -2B.
Flow event Date(s) of event Start/stop time of event Number of consecutive calendar
days with flow
1 3/30-3/30 1639-2359 1
2 9/28-9/29 1639-0339 2
B -33

Table B -67. Monthly summary of flow at UT7 -3B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates. (meter installed on 2/2/2011).
Unit stopped recording 12/13/2011.
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
0
0
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
2
4
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
1
5
September
10.71
3
17
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
3
26
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -68. Flow events recorded at UT7 -3B.
B -34
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
4/10-4/11
2345-0845
2
2
4/11 -4/12
1825-0005
2
3
8/27-9/15
1525-1505
20
4
9/16
0725-1245
1
5
9/23
0725-1345
1
B -34

Table B -69. Monthly summary of flow at UT8 -1 B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
1
20
March
3.55
1
2
April
2.63
3
14
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
0
0
September
10.71
3
13
October
1.75
3
8
November
2.05
1
15
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL 50.54 11 71
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -70. Flow events recorded at UT8 -1 B.
B -35
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/1 -2/20
1122-1622
20
2
3/6-3/7
1502-2142
2
3
4/2-4/6
0042-0002
5
4
4/9-4/13
2322-1302
5
5
4/16-4/19
2222-1442
4
6
9/7-9/18
1922-1942
11
7
9/19
0742-1642
1
8
9/26
1002-1642
1
9
10/18
0002-1902
1
10
10/25
0002-1902
1
11
10/26 - 11/15
0542-1302
20
B -35

Table B -71. Monthly summary of flow at UT8 -2B. Voltage calibration 1.235 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
1
10
March
3.55
2
5
April
2.63
0
0
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
3
14
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
1
1
September
10.71
0
0
October
1.75
1
1
November
2.05
2
2
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL 50.54 10 32
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -72. Flow events recorded at UT8 -2B.
B -36
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/1 -2/10
1130-0053
10
2
3/6-3/8
1833-0803
3
3
3/27-3/28
1613-1233
2
4
6/3-6/4
1913-0733
2
5
6/4-6/6
1813-0753
3
6
6/13-6/21
2253-0453
9
7
8/27
1253-1453
1
8
10/18
1353-1533
1
9
11/17
1513
1
10
11/23
0933-1133
1
B -36

Table B -73. Monthly summary of flow at UT8 -3B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
1
29
March
3.55
1
11
April
2.63
0
0
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
1
18
August
17.58
1
31
September
10.71
1
5
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
2
54
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -74. Flow events recorded at UT8 -3B.
Flow event Date(s) of event Start/stop time of event Number of consecutive calendar
days with flow
1 2/1 -3/11 1147-1507 40
2 7/14-9/5 1227-0807 54
B -37

Table B -75. Monthly summary of flow at UT8 -4B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
0
0
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
0
0
May
1.01
1
1
June
2.17
0
0
July
2.06
1
1
August
17.58
1
1
September
10.71
0
0
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
1
1
TOTAL
50.54
4
4
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -76. Flow events recorded at UT8 -4B.
B -38
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
5/31
1505-1625
1
2
7/10
1145-1505
1
3
8/27
1205
1
4
12/28
1305
1
B -38

Table B -77. Monthly summary of flow at UT8 -5B. Voltage calibration 1.24 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month Monthly rainfall Number of flow events' Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A N/A
February
3.00
7 20
March
3.55
6 9
April
2.63
2 24
May
1.01
0 0
June
2.17
0 0
July
2.06
0 0
August
17.58
1 10
September
10.71
1 22
October
1.75
Equipment malfunction 9/22/11 - 11/8/11
November
2.05
2 8
December
0.52
Equipment malfunction 12/14/11 - 12/31/11
TOTAL
50.54
16 93
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -78. Flow events recorded at UT8 -5B.
B -39
Number of consecutive calendar
Flow event
Date(s) of event
Start/stop time of event
days with flow
1
2/1 -2/3
1315- 1515
3
2
2/5-2/9
0235-1615
5
3
2/14
1055-1755
1
4
2/16
1315-1535
1
5
2/17-2/22
0955-1415
6
6
2/25
1355-1715
1
7
2/27-3/1
0955-1655
4
8
3/7-3/9
0935-1435
3
9
3/13
0955-1735
1
10
3/18
0935-1755
1
11
3/26-3/28
2315-1335
1
12
3/30-4/1
1815-1555
3
13
4/8-4/20
1235-0735
23
14
8/22-9/22
0955-1055
32
15
11/3-11/4
1149-1049
2
16
11/9-11/15
1149-1709
6
B -39

Table B -79. Monthly summary of flow at UT8 -6B. Voltage calibration 1.25 volts; flow is defined as >_ 0.5
gal /min, but inaccurate for volume estimates (meter installed on 2/1/2011).
Month
Monthly rainfall
Number of flow events'
Number of calendar days with flow2
January
3.51
N/A
N/A
February
3.00
0
0
March
3.55
0
0
April
2.63
0
0
May
1.01
0
0
June
2.17
1
1
July
2.06
0
0
August
17.58
1
2
September
10.71
0
0
October
1.75
0
0
November
2.05
0
0
December
0.52
0
0
TOTAL
50.54
2
3
' Total may not be the sum of all events by month if an event overlapped two months.
2 Number of calendar days with at least one reading from a flow event.
Table B -80. Flow events recorded at UT8 -6B.
Flow event Date(s) of event Start/stop time of event Number of consecutive calendar
days with flow
1 6/18 2145 1
2 8/29-8/30 1625-0025 2
B -40

Table 81. Hell Swamp -Flow Observation Data for 2011 (depth in inches). Gauges installed 1 -2 February 2011. Arrays at UT6 -1 B and -213 were not installed because deep wet ruts prevented valley construction. Inflow column: H =high, M =moderate, L =low, N = none
and P = ponded with no discernible flow. An - in any cell indicates no data were collected at that location on a certain date due to malfunction or error, or the reason for visit was to troubleshoot elsewhere.
Date
2/1 -2/2
Flow Depth
2/8 -2/9
Flow Depth
3/9
Flow Depth
3/30
Flow Depth
5/4
Flow Depth
6/2
Flow Depth
7/6 -7/7
Flow Depth
8/3 -8/4
Flow Depth
8/31
Flow Depth
9/21
Flow Depth
9/29 -9/30
Flow Depth
10/6
Flow Depth
10/18
Flow Depth
1 10/26 -10/27
Flow Depth
11/15 -11/16
Flow Depth
12/14
Flow Depth
USC -113
L
4.75
M
7.75
P
5.5
L
4.5
P
2
N
0
N
0
N
0
L
6
L
12
Y /very low
4.25
-
P
2
P
2
N
0
USC -213
H
16
H
20.5
L
13.5
L
13.3
L
10
N
0
N
0
N
0
L
20.5
-
-
-
-
L
9
-
Y /very low
8
P
9.5
P
8
USC -313
M
12.5
H
18
L
9.5
L
8.5
L
5
N
0
N
0
N
0
L
18
-
-
-
-
L
12
-
P
6
P
6.5
P
3.75
USC -413
M
5.75
H
11
L
4.5
M
3.25
L
1
N
0
N
0
N
0
L
13.5
-
-
-
-
M
6.25
-
P
3
P
1
N
0
USC -513
L
1.5
M
2.5
P
0.5
L
1
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
3
-
-
-
-
P
1.5
-
P
0.25
N
0
N
0
USC -613
L
6.25
L
10.5
P
6
P
9.25
P
5
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
9
-
-
-
-
P
7
-
P
6
P
6
P
3.75
USC -713
L
6.25
L
7.75
P
4.75
P
5.5
P
3.75
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
6.5
-
-
-
-
P
5
-
P
3.5
P
3
P
2
USC -813
P
3.75
L
5.25
P
2.75
P
3.25
P
1
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
5
-
-
-
-
Y /very low
3
-
P
1.5
P
0.5
N
0
USC -913
H
2
H
2.75
M
1
L
1.5
M
0.25
N
0
N
0
N
0
L
3.5
-
-
L
5
L
3.25
-
P
1
N
0
N
0
USC -10B
H
2.75
H
3.75
L
2
L
1.75
L
0.5
N
0
N
0
N
0
L
3.5
L
1.5
P
2
P
2
N
0
USC -11B
L
12
P
9.5 11
L
10
1 P
7
1 N
0
N
0
N
0
P
10.5
-
P
13.5
P
9.75
P
6.5
P
6
P
4.5
UT1 -113
L
4
M
10
L
0.25
P
3.5
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
L
10
-
-
-
-
P
2.5
-
-
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT1 -213
P
3.75
L
5.5
L
3.25
P
3
P
1.75
N
0
N
0
N
0
L
4.5
-
-
-
-
P
3
-
-
N
0
P
3
N
0
UT1 -313
L
3
L
4.5
P
2.5
P
3
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
4
-
-
-
-
P
3
-
-
N
0
P
0.5
N
0
UT1 -413
P
3
P
4.25
P
2.75
L
0.5
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
3.5
-
-
-
-
P
2.5
-
-
N
0
P
1
N
0
UT2 -113 P
0.75 L 1 0.25 L 0.5 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 P 0.5 N 0 P 0.5 N 0 N 0 N 0
UT3 -113
L
1.5
L
3
L
1.75
P
2
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
2
-
L
3
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT3 -213
M
2
M
3.25
P
1.5
P
1
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
1.75
L
5
-
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT3 -313
P
1.5
L
3
P
1.5
P
1
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
2
-
L
1.5
N
0
P
2
N
0
UT3 -413
P
2
L
3
P
1.75
P
1.5
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
1
L
3
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT3 -513
P
4
P
6
P
3.25
P
4
P
2
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
5
L
4
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT3 -613
P
3.5
L
4.5
P
1.25
P
1
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
3
-
N
0
-
N
0
N
0
UT3 -713
M
1.75
M
3
L
1.75
P
1.5
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
2
L
2
-
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT3 -8B
M
2.25
M
3.25
P
1.75
P
1.5
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
2
L
2
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT3 -9B
P
4.25
P
5.25
P
4.5
P
4
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
5
L
3
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT4 -1B
P
1.75
L
2.25
P
2
P
1
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
0
P
3
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT4 -213
P
1.5
P
2
P
1.25
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
0
L
3
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT6 -1B
UT6 -2B
UT6 -313
L
0.25
M
1.5
P
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
L
14
P
1
P
1
N
0
UT6 -413
H
1.25
M
1.5
P
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
0.25
L
3
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT6 -513
M
0.75
M
1.5
P
0.25
P
0.5
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
0.5
L
3.5
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT6 -6B
L
2.25
L
4.75
P
1.25
P
1.5
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
2
L
4.5
P
0.25
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT7 -1B
L
2.25
M
3
P
1.25
P
1
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
0.75
L
6
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT7 -213
L
1.5
L
1.75
P
0.5
P
1
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
0.5
P
2.75
N
trace
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT7 -313
P
0.75
L
1.75
P
0.25
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
2
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
UT8 -113
H
3.75
H
8.5
H
3.75
M
5.5
P
1
N
0
N
0
P
1
P
13.25
M
25
P
2
P
2
P
2
UT8 -213
L
4.25
L
8.25
L
3.75
P
3.5
P
0.25
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
8.75
L
12.5
N
0
P
1
N
0
UT8 -313
L
7
M
11
L
6
L
6.5
P
3
N
0
N
0
N
0
L
10.75
M
15
L
3
P
2
P
5
N
0
UT8 -413
P
4.75
L
9
P
4.25
P
4
P
2
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
8
L
12.5
L
2.5
P
1
P
3
N
0
UT8 -513
M
2.5
M
4.25
M
2
L
2
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
4
L
8
L
2
N
0
N
0
P
1
N
0
UT8 -6B
L
5.25
M
7.75
L
5
P
5
P
2
N
0
N
0
N
0
P
6
L
9.5
L
2
P
1
P
1
N
0
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Appendix B B -41 April 2012

2011 STREAM SURVEYS OF HELL SWAMP HEADWATER VALLEY SYSTEMS
On 27 January 2011, all the headwater valleys at Hell Swamp were walked to determine
the best locations for the low flow gauge to be installed. At the same time, active flow or
evidence of past flow was also documented with photographs and video. Active flow of various
strengths and in various water depths was observed in all valleys with the exception of UT4 and
UT5. On 30 November and 1 December 2011, the headwater valleys and tributaries were
surveyed for evidence of flow events and formation of any channel features. Each system was
walked from the downstream end to its upstream end. Physical features noted included bed and
bank, sediment transport and /or scour, debris wrack, matted vegetation in orientation of
downstream flow, or lack of vegetation. When evidence of channel formation was longer than 10
feet the perceived channel was walked with GPS and points collected along the axis and at the
beginning and end of the feature. Until the planted trees and shrubs reach enough height to
shade the valleys, development of dense herbaceous vegetation will continue to occur in many
areas. This herbaceous layer can attenuate flow events and reduce velocity below the point of
scour and can also obscure other incipient channel formation features. Photos of certain stream
features are included after the text descriptions below.
Lower Scott Creek. This segment includes the most downstream reach of the stream
portion of project (fill of the channelized section of old Scott Creek) and ends at the first stream
crossing constructed at the location of the old Scott Creek culvert under the farm road. Actively
flowing during the January survey, the lower end of the filled ditch continued to exhibit stream
features by the second survey including bed and bank formation, a meandering profile, sediment
transport, lack of vegetation, and flowing water. A 121 -foot long channel has formed in this
segment and continues upstream beside the old ditch spoil and then enters into the vegetated
Scott Creek swamp forest and becomes indistinct. No other stream features were found in the
old filled Scott Creek channel nor in the vegetated swamp forest of Scott Creek. No low flow
gauges or stream arrays are located in the lower Scott Creek filled ditch or vegetated swamp
forest.
Constructed Single Thread Channel of Upper Scott Creek. Most of channel is
choked with vegetation and no flow was evident at the time of the second survey although there
was water in the channel. The riffle areas of the channel appear less vegetated in the upper
reach than in the lower.
Upper Scott Creek. This segment begins above the constructed single thread portion of
Scott Creek. Matted vegetation oriented in the direction of flow was evident for 45 feet of the
valley just above the confluence with the single thread channel. At array 5 there was evidence of
sheet flow and just upstream of constructed stream crossing vegetation is oriented in the direction
of flow but no flow was discerned in 3 to 4 inches of water. ATV wakes have oriented the
vegetation on either side of the constructed crossing. A barely distinct channel has formed on the
south side of the valley about half the distance to array 6 and another feature in the valley invert
has vegetation oriented in direction of flow but no strong evidence of flow. There are many ruts
and ATV tracks up the valley and across the valley. Between array 8 and array 9, a 131 -foot
channel has formed with little to no vegetation and some sorting; the channel almost disappears
in some spots. A second channel of 108 feet has formed above array 9, although its features are
faint. A 36 -foot channel has formed as an offshoot of the 108 -foot feature. Although small, bed
and bank were evident as was scour in the shorter channel. Between array 9 and array 10 two
additional channels have formed, one of 181 feet and one of 69.5 feet.
UT8. Most of this valley displayed no evidence of flow or channel formation. Water is
being held in the valley but the amount of algae in the water indicates long periods of standing
water and lack of flow. A discernible channel 55 feet in length has formed just upstream of the
constructed stream crossing on UT8 and lack of vegetation and little scour were features noted in
this short channel during the survey. Upstream of array 6, the valley is very rutted.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Restoration Site B -42 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix B

UT7. This valley had more water in its upper portion than its lower at the time of the
survey, but all the stream features were confined to the lower half. Between array 1 and array 2,
a 97 -foot channel has formed with meander, shallow bed and bank, no vegetation in channel, and
signs of sediment transport.
UT6. At the confluence of UT6 with lower Scott Creek, a 46 -foot long channel has
formed with evidence of sorting and flowing water at the time of the survey. Beyond this channel
there is an extensive section of standing water until just downstream of the confluence of UT7
(nuisance vegetation removal in this area left large deep ruts which were not able to be smoothed
into a headwater valley shape during stream construction because the ground remained too wet
to work). Near array 5, the perceived valley bottom was wetter than the surrounding valley, the
vegetation became sparse, and the valley appeared to split into two although no strong evidence
of bed and bank were noted. In one area downstream of array 6, very shallow bed and bank
appeared to have been formed along the southern edge of the valley. The upper end of UT6
valley is vegetated but while no water was evident at the time of the survey in the upper valley,
there were numerous areas where dead plant stems were imbricated in the direction of flow, and
scattered small wrack lines were evident.
UT5. Natural channel development appears to be inhibited, or at least interrupted, by a
large tracked vehicle rut up the long axis of the valley and the entire lower valley is dissected by
ruts across the long axis.
UT4. Although the feature was holding water in some places, no flow features were
noted in this valley. There were some very short meanders noted in a few places but they were
filled with vegetation and there were many ruts perpendicular to the long axis.
UT3. The lower end of this valley south of the old farm road appears too rutted across
the long axis for natural stream development. An ATV trail runs up the apparent lowest part of
the valley to the second flow gauge and there are numerous cross axis ruts. Two channels have
formed in the UT3 valley, an 84 -foot segment in the vicinity of array 3 and a 69 -foot segment near
the end of array 4. Both segments have a narrow flow way devoid of vegetation, some scour,
some very shallow bed and bank, stem orientation to flow direction, and some small wrack piles.
UT2. Although there was little vegetation at array 1, there was no evidence of flow at the
time of the survey. The valley is densely rutted and heavily vegetated with herbaceous species in
the top portion of the valley.
UT1. Not as rutted in the upper portion as other valleys but some interruption of potential
development by ruts. Dense juncus and grass clumps made it difficult to find flowways; some
small flow paths 5 to 10 feet long but not GPSd. Valley is holding water but no evidence of flow
at the time of survey.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Restoration Site B -43 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix B

LOWER SCOTT CREEK 30 November 2011 Photos 1 - 4
Photo 1. Channel formation in filled ditch; view upstream to
west. Two trees in middle distance on right mark the mouth of
UT6. 30 November 2011.
Photo 2. Channel formation meander approximately 30 feet long.
Note same two trees visible in Photo 1 to right beyond biologist.
30 November 2011.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Restoration Site B -44 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix B

Photo 3. Biologist standing at fork in channel; one goes into
swamp to left and other goes beyond the biologist and connects
to UT6 Tree to right of photo is the inmost tree of pair visible in
Photos 1 and 2. Total channel length 121 feet.
''`!Xw)v
Photo 4. Sediment sorting at the fork shown in Photo 3. Flow is
towards right lower corner.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Restoration Site B -45 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix B
Photo 4. Sediment sorting at the fork shown in Photo 3. Flow is
towards right lower corner.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Restoration Site B -45 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix B

UT6 3 Video January survey and November 2011 Photos 5 - 6
Photo 5. View upstream from confluence of UT6 with lower Scott
Creek, total channel length 46 feet. Tree to right of biologist is
same tree in Photo 3.
Photo 6. View downstream in vicinity of UT6 -513, stems oriented to flow path.
Much of this mid -to -upper UT6 valley has areas of stem orientation but little
visible channel features.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Restoration Site B -46 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix B

Constructed Single Thread Channel Scott Creek January 2011 Photos 7 - 8
y
Photo 7. View upstream of active flow from just below beginning of single
thread channel. Narrow constriction marks the beginning of single thread.
Photo 8. View upstream of active flow in single thread channel from just
before the confluence with UT1.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Restoration Site B -47 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix B

UT7 Video January 2011 and 30 November 2011 Photo 9
Photo 9. View downstream between UT7 -1 B and 2B. Camera at
end of 97 -foot channel feature, biologist walking channel. More
water in upper valley but also more vegetation.
UT8 Video January 2001 and 1 December 2011 Photo 10
�rx
� i w •fix "��. y�ji!S i . :
Photo 10. Upstream from constructed stream crossing, well 123 in
left distance. Channel 55 feet long before vegetation obscures or
prevents continuation.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Restoration Site B -48 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix B

UPPER SCOTT CREEK Video January 2011 and 1 December 2011 Photos 11 -15
_ bk A::•i�� � ..; ".r::.1.r a .. ". '
a
Kt
i i •y... .. .
Photo 11. Upstream to USC -10B. Total channel length 69 feet. Well
HS20 in middle distance.
Photo 12. Downstream between USC -913 and 10B total channel length
181 feet. Array 9B in distance beyond biologist.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Restoration Site B -49 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix B

Photo 13. Downstream at USC -913, channel visible left of gauge;
total channel length 108 feet. Another small 36 -foot channel forks off
this channel upstream of 9B.
■
Photo 14. Biologist walking up 131 -foot channel between USC -8B
and 9B. Sediment sorting evident with little to no vegetation, but
feature weakly formed in some locations.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Restoration Site B -50 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix B

yy �
_.' _
„�`����sr�`•��;3.:sb � �"': -�� .:> • .x• . _� - ' =rte`: •h;:� .�,.�
�'' f ,: i� ����,• �'} a✓ rt as
�.. ..... ...;. r'k'ti'...'r...t :r�,Rr �.�- •:.��'� a :Vi•µ
'�C -.�: 1.wR".✓ -• '' s.:.;.:'?':'' w: Y.: 5+ 1fri ...d.r%:.'•: =•$7'it:+s!-� -:F. �r7d�
Photo 15. Downstream at beginning of single thread channel with
HS53 in right distance. No channel formation above constructed
channel at this location but large areas of matted vegetation in
direction of flow (evident in near bottom foreground).
UT3 Video January 2011 and 30 November 2011 Photos 16 — 17
IV
� H
Photo 16. Downstream channel towards UT3 -4B gauge (biologist at
gauge). Total channel length 69 feet. Minor evidence of scour,
slight meander, no vegetation in channel.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Restoration Site B -51 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix B

Photo 17. Downstream in 84 -foot channel near UT3 -2B. Very
shallow unvegetated narrow channel, some scour, some stems
oriented to flow, few shallow 1.5 to 2 inch banks.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Restoration Site B -52 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012
Appendix B

APPENDIX C
STEM COUNTS AT INDIVIDUAL PLOTS AT HELL SWAMP

Appendix C1. Hell Swamp baseline (BL) and second (2nd) 2011 annual riparian buffer plot totals. Number in each column indicates trees and shrubs unquestionably alive at sampling. Shrubs are indicated with an asterisk. Plot size is 0.017 acre.
TOTALS 11 5 16 16 18 15 20 20 14 16 19 13 23 20 15 12 10 11 13 13 16 11 0 10 0 0 0 0 18 14 17 18 17 7 21 18 22 20
Plot was not monitored at baseline.
2 Plots have not been established.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report C1 -1 April 2012
USC -1 B
USC -513
USC -813
USC -11 B
UT1 -1 B
UT1 -313
UT2 -213
UT3 -1 B
UT3 -413
UT3 -713
UT4 -1 B
UT5 -2131
UT6 -1 B2
UT6 -313 2
UT6 -513
UT7 -213
UT8 -1 B
UT8 -4B
UT8 -613
Scientific name Common name
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
Unknown Unknown
1
1
1
1
1
6
Carya aquatica water hickory
1
"Cephalanthus occidentalis buttonbush
1
1
Clethra alnifolia sweet pepperbush
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
Cynlla racemiflora titi
1
1
1
3
2
"Cornus amomum silky dogwood
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon
5
6
Fagus grandifolia American beech
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
13
13
Ilex decidua possumhaw
1. glabra ink berry
1
1. opaca American holly
1
1
1
1
1
1. verticillata winterberry
0
"Itea virginica Virginia willow
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
"Leucothoe racemosa Swamp doghobble
1
1
"Lindera benzoin spicebush
Magnolia virginiana sweet bay
1
1
1
1
4
2
2
1
1
Nyssa aquatica water tupelo
3
3
1
1
1
1
Nyssa biflora swamp black gum
2
4
4
2
2
4
4
1
1
1
3
6
3
3
3
2
1
3
3
3
2
2
1
Oxydendron arboreum sourwood
2
Persea palustris red bay
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
Prunus serotina black cherry
Quercus albs white oak
4
3
Q. falcata southern red oak
3
1
1
Q. laurifolia laurel oak
2
2
3
3
4
4
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
Q. lyrata overcup oak
3
3
3
3
6
7
1
1
1
4
2
2
5
5
3
1
1
3
1
3
6
2
2
Q. michauxii swamp chestnut oak
2
2
4
4
1
4
4
1
1
1
1
4
3
2
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
2
0
Q. nigra water oak
2
8
8
Q. pagoda cherrybark oak
1
1
Q. phellos willow oak
1
1
2
2
Q. spp. oak
1
"Rosa palustris swamp rose
1
Taxodium distichum bald cypress
1
1
6
6
4
4
4
4
3
2
1
1
2
2
3
2
4
5
5
5
Ulmus americana American elm
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
4
4
2
2
1
1
"Vaccinium corymbosum high bush blueberry
"Viburnum nudum possumhaw viburnum
TOTALS 11 5 16 16 18 15 20 20 14 16 19 13 23 20 15 12 10 11 13 13 16 11 0 10 0 0 0 0 18 14 17 18 17 7 21 18 22 20
Plot was not monitored at baseline.
2 Plots have not been established.
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report C1 -1 April 2012

Appendix C2. Hell Swamp baseline (BL) and second annual (2nd) 2011 plot totals. Number in each column indicates trees and shrubs unquestionably alive at sampling. Shrubs are indicated with an asteri
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report
C2 -1
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Scientific name Common name
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
Unknown Unknown
0
0
1
0
4
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
2
0
4
1
1
1
1
2
2
Carya aquatica water hickory
6
5
Cephalanthus occidentalis buttonbush
Clethra alnifolia sweet pepperbush
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
7
5
3
3
6
4
2
2
Cyrilla racemiflora titi
Corpus amomum silky dogwood
6
5
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon
4
5
Fagus grandifolia American beech
9
9
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash
4
4
11
9
9
8
1
1
2
2
5
4
13
13
9
9
11
11
2
2
3
3
Ilex decidua possumhaw
1. glabra ink berry
4
4
1
1
4
4
1. opaca American holly
*1. verticillata winterberry
*Itea virginica Virginia willow
1
1
1
2
4
4
5
5
5
4
12
11
2
2
2
2
*Leucothoe racemosa Swamp doghobble
*Lindera benzoin spicebush
1
0
4
3
Magnolia virginiana sweet bay
13
13
3
2
7
6
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
5
2
2
1
Nyssa aquatica water tupelo
10
7
Nyssa biflora swamp black gum
23
14
5
4
2
3
11
10
14
12
19
19
30
30
5
5
3
3
11
9
31
27
9
8
32
32
12
12
10
6
8
5
38
31
Oxydendron arboreum sourwood
Persea palustris red bay
2
1
Prunus serotina black cherry
4
4
1
Quercus albs white oak
11
10
Q. falcata southern red oak
Q. laurifolia laurel oak
5
3
18
21
6
4
1
1
31
25
6
6
21
10
12
13
13
24
21
Q. lyrata overcup oak
1
1
Q. michauxii swamp chestnut oak
14
9
15
15
31
26
37
36
24
25
16
16
22
21
18
18
18
19
13
14
12
12
28
28
14
14
26
27
48
48
36
38
23
4
18
17
Q. nigra water oak
7
9
17
18
24
30
7
9
19
19
22
27
3
6
27
30
28
27
18
18
18
1
12
12
2
2
5
3
Q. pagoda cherrybark oak
29
26
22
25
14
13
55
56
27
24
10
16
9
9
12
11
6
3
3
Q. phellos willow oak
1
Q. spp. oak
1
0
0
0
5
0
7
2
1
2
1
2
*Rosa palustris swamp rose
Taxodium distichum bald cypress
11
11
4
3
Ulmus americana American elm
7
4
4
4
8
8
1
17
17
14
13
7
7
12
13
26
23
16
16
29
29
1
1
*Vaccinium corymbosum high bush blueberry
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
2
*Viburnum nudum possumhaw viburnum
TOTAL
77
53
62
61
93
93
90
82
85
76
90
90
80
78
90
87
84
88
84
82
80
77
86
84
93
88
85
84
110
113
93
92
81
71
67
35
86
76
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report
C2 -1
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2012

Appendix C2. (continued)
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report
C2 -2
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2012
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Scientific name Common name
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
Unknown Unknown
1
1
1
2
3
2
2
1
2
2
3
Carya aquatica water hickory
Cephalanthus occidentalis buttonbush
Clethra alnifolia sweet pepperbush
2
1
1
1
4
4
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
5
5
1
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
Cyrilla racemiflora titi
Corpus amomum silky dogwood
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon
Fagus grandifolia American beech
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash
18
18
3
3
9
9
17
17
23
21
9
9
6
6
8
8
20
19
11
11
33
31
Ilex decidua possumhaw
1. glabra ink berry
1
1
1
4
4
1
2
1
1. opaca American holly
2
2
*1. verticillata winterberry
1
Tea virginica Virginia willow
3
3
2
1
8
8
2
2
2
1
1
*Leucothoe racemosa Swamp doghobble
*Lindera benzoin spicebush
1
Magnolia virginiana sweet bay
2
2
2
3
1
3
1
1
1
10
7
4
1
2
7
3
Nyssa aquatica water tupelo
3
1
29
5
6
Nyssa biflora swamp black gum
13
12
2
2
5
5
20
19
31
3
3
5
3
1
1
3
3
6
6
13
12
29
24
40
36
28
26
2
2
8
7
5
4
Oxydendron arboreum sourwood
Persea palustris red bay
1
1
2
1
1
1
3
Prunus serotina black cherry
2
2
Quercus albs white oak
1
Q. falcata southern red oak
Q. laurifolia laurel oak
12
12
1
35
36
6
6
11
18
20
21
35
35
21
21
4
23
23
34
36
18
17
31
27
30
28
13
12
Q. lyrata overcup oak
5
5
8
8
1
1
Q. michauxii swamp chestnut oak
15
14
14
14
27
27
28
29
24
23
52
52
19
18
20
16
20
20
27
25
32
32
4
4
22
22
31
31
5
5
16
15
18
19
31
30
17
18
Q. nigra water oak
3
4
20
19
52
52
21
23
1
26
22
32
31
Q. pagoda cherrybark oak
3
3
1
1
1
24
21
36
38
17
16
23
23
6
7
18
19
17
12
20
18
Q. phellos willow oak
4
6
1
1
7
7
Q. spp. oak
0
2
1
3
7
2
2
3
1
*Rosa palustris swamp rose
Taxodium distichum bald cypress
14
14
2
2
19
17
Ulmus americana American elm
2
2
22
22
7
7
10
10
9
10
24
22
8
8
42
42
13
13
3
2
28
25
*Vaccinium corymbosum high bush blueberry
9
9
4
4
1
1
4
4
3
2
1
2
5
5
*Viburnum nudum possumhaw viburnum
2
2
TOTAL
97
95
1 94
90
96
95
86
88
102
100
1 95
93
72
69
95
94
103
96
104
99
98
93
90
86
70
68
103
97
83
79
100
90
103
89
105
90
106
88
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report
C2 -2
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2012

Appendix C2. (continued)
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report
C2 -3
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2012
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
Scientific name Common name
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
Unknown Unknown
5
1
1
2
2
1
2
8
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
Carya aquatica water hickory
Cephalanthus occidentalis buttonbush
4
4
7
6
Clethra alnifolia sweet pepperbush
1
1
1
4
4
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
1
1
Cyrilla racemiflora titi
1
1
4
5
1
1
1
1
Corpus amomum silky dogwood
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon
Fagus grandifolia American beech
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash
14
14
10
10
12
11
21
20
10
10
9
9
3
2
17
15
29
27
23
21
31
30
14
14
4
4
17
17
26
26
36
35
15
15
15
Ilex decidua possumhaw
1. glabra ink berry
1
1
1. opaca American holly
6
6
*1. verticillata winterberry
Tea virginica Virginia willow
1
1
3
2
3
3
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
5
5
1
2
*Leucothoe racemosa Swamp doghobble
1
1
1
*Lindera benzoin spicebush
1
1
2
1
1
1
Magnolia virginiana sweet bay
1
1
1
3
3
8
1
4
3
10
6
16
12
4
2
2
2
3
Nyssa aquatica water tupelo
3
3
7
5
13
12
4
4
1
1
7
4
7
6
7
6
5
Nyssa biflora swamp black gum
8
7
8
6
13
10
10
6
2
5
4
10
9
17
15
5
4
Oxydendron arboreum sourwood
1
1
Persea palustris red bay
1
1
6
5
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
Prunus serotina black cherry
Quercus albs white oak
Q. falcata southern red oak
Q. laurifolia laurel oak
37
36
27
27
15
16
27
29
22
18
9
14
19
19
30
30
17
17
Q. lyrata overcup oak
20
20
12
11
10
7
26
26
10
10
1
2
2
20
22
18
19
12
11
27
27
11
Q. michauxii swamp chestnut oak
26
27
15
13
24
25
1
0
2
2
43
44
13
13
37
40
11
17
28
30
8
8
22
22
17
18
19
19
10
10
1
1
5
Q. nigra water oak
1
1
22
22
Q. pagoda cherrybark oak
24
25
2
2
4
3
3
16
18
1
1
Q. phellos willow oak
9
9
14
14
25
21
2
2
6
6
2
2
4
6
22
20
8
7
22
Q. spp. oak
1
1
1
2
9
*Rosa palustris swamp rose
Taxodium distichum bald cypress
9
9
16
16
4
4
5
4
10
10
2
2
16
14
5
4
1
7
6
15
Ulmus americana American elm
6
6
29
27
28
26
19
15
19
19
6
6
*Vaccinium corymbosum high bush blueberry
4
3
1
1
*Viburnum nudum possumhaw viburnum
TOTAL
117
111
73
67
89
86
1 85
62
76
67
99
98
1 77
74
110
101
114
99
85
77
42
48
94
84
100
92
94
93
114
108
71
69
71
66
71
0
64
79
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report
C2 -3
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2012

Appendix C2. (continued)
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report
C2 -4
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2012
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
Scientific name Common name
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
Unknown Unknown
1
2
1
1
5
2
4
2
2
4
2
7
2
1
2
2
1
Carya aquatica water hickory
Cephalanthus occidentalis buttonbush
1
1
2
2
1
1
Clethra alnifolia sweet pepperbush
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
6
4
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
3
Cyrilla racemiflora titi
1
1
2
Corpus amomum silky dogwood
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon
Fagus grandifolia American beech
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash
25
25
26
27
14
13
9
9
20
20
19
19
23
23
3
3
10
9
19
10
8
14
14
10
10
7
8
1
1
18
18
Ilex decidua possumhaw
1. glabra ink berry
1. opaca American holly
1
*1. verticillata winterberry
Tea virginica Virginia willow
2
2
5
5
12
10
1
1
6
6
6
6
3
3
5
5
3
3
2
1
5
4
3
3
1
1
*Leucothoe racemosa Swamp doghobble
*Lindera benzoin spicebush
2
2
4
5
3
2
2
1
Magnolia virginiana sweet bay
1
1
2
2
4
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
Nyssa aquatica water tupelo
20
15
19
16
19
18
22
22
21
18
36
21
13
13
16
6
19
9
1
1
25
21
Nyssa biflora swamp black gum
21
18
9
9
3
3
10
9
11
4
15
15
Oxydendron arboreum sourwood
Persea palustris red bay
2
2
1
1
6
4
2
1
2
1
4
2
2
1
Prunus serotina black cherry
Quercus albs white oak
Q. falcata southern red oak
Q. laurifolia laurel oak
1
1
Q. lyrata overcup oak
14
13
24
24
1
10
10
30
30
12
14
13
13
30
30
29
29
23
23
40
41
1
1
26
25
Q. michauxii swamp chestnut oak
9
9
15
16
23
22
22
24
10
10
22
28
14
14
2
17
18
7
7
27
27
22
26
11
10
1
2
Q. nigra water oak
1
1
7
13
10
25
30
40
13
11
1
22
30
2
3
3
4
3
3
Q. pagoda cherrybark oak
37
36
12
12
1
2
5
17
18
10
13
1
2
7
Q. phellos willow oak
9
10
15
18
20
20
9
9
14
20
13
13
14
10
13
13
Q. spp. oak
8
18
16
1
1
3
11
1
17
1
1
*Rosa palustris swamp rose
Taxodium distichum bald cypress
11
11
9
8
4
3
26
25
7
7
12
12
21
19
8
7
13
11
8
8
10
10
12
11
33
32
36
34
Ulmus americana American elm
4
4
19
19
6
6
14
14
8
7
*Vaccinium corymbosum high bush blueberry
1
1
1
1
*Viburnum nudum possumhaw viburnum
TOTAL
97
91
111
110
97
91 92
84
91
76
77
79
115
113
96
96
97
98
82
61
92
84
62
74
101
76
95
82
102
100
95
78
54
47
67
71
110
102
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report
C2 -4
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2012

Appendix C2. (continued)
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report
C2 -5
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2012
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
Scientific name Common name
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
Unknown Unknown
2
7
1
3
1
1
5
14
5
2
1
1
1
4
1
1
2
1
2
1
4
Carya aquatica water hickory
17
15
4
4
12
12
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis buttonbush
2
2
6
6
2
2
3
3
6
4
Clethra alnifolia sweet pepperbush
5
6
1
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
2
2
2
2
1
3
2
3
1
Cyrilla racemiflora titi
1
1
2
2
Corpus amomum silky dogwood
1
1
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon
6
6
5
4
Fagus grandifolia American beech
10
10
15
16
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash
16
16
31
28
36
31
10
10
20
19
3
3
19
19
16
15
16
13
10
10
47
45
38
37
15
15
1
1
5
5
14
11
Ilex decidua possumhaw
1
1
1
1
1. glabra ink berry
1
1
1. opaca American holly
4
4
2
1
3
3
*1. verticillata winterberry
3
2
4
2
*Itea virginica Virginia willow
1
1
1
5
3
2
2
6
6
1
1
3
2
*Leucothoe racemosa Swamp doghobble
*Lindera benzoin spicebush
2
1
1
2
1
Magnolia virginiana sweet bay
4
4
2
2
1
0
6
1
4
3
4
2
2
2
Nyssa aquatica water tupelo
7
4
11
4
20
13
8
7
5
1
14
12
11
7
11
4
28
16
6
14
2
14
11
Nyssa biflora swamp black gum
4
5
2
2
8
5
27
27
4
2
1
1
Oxydendron arboreum sourwood
Persea palustris red bay
1
2
1
2
2
1
Prunus serotina black cherry
7
7
Quercus albs white oak
27
28
7
7
14
14
Q. falcata southern red oak
10
10
9
9
20
21
Q. laurifolia laurel oak
17
18
5
5
1
Q. lyrata overcup oak
10
14
18
17
33
32
16
15
11
11
7
7
8
8
11
11
20
20
25
22
26
26
25
25
3
4
10
10
Q. michauxii swamp chestnut oak
10
11
3
3
1
17
18
13
14
27
28
4
3
8
8
1
Q. nigra water oak
15
15
17
21
14
14
10
10
9
8
1
1
Q. pagoda cherrybark oak
30
29
40
40
Q. phellos willow oak
28
27
7
9
3
4
15
15
18
18
20
20
1
18
18
28
31
21
25
14
14
3
3
15
17
4
4
Q. spp. oak
1
1
1
1
*Rosa palustris swamp rose
1
Taxodium distichum bald cypress
29
31
17
17
21
15
12
11
22
11
33
31
2
2
25
23
6
6
27
24
14
1
25
13
13
9
Ulmus americana American elm
18
18
*Vaccinium corymbosum high bush blueberry
3
1
1
1
*Viburnum nudum possumhaw viburnum
4
TOTAL
1 106
102
98
101
109
95
82
71
90
74
76
70
79
47
103
91
107
95
96
95
82
70
102
99
91
85
132
129
110
99
114
97
54
33
68
41
70
50
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report
C2 -5
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2012

Appendix C2. (continued)
1 The area in the vicinity of plot 105 has not been planted
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report
C2 -6
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2012
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
1051
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
Scientific name Common name
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
Unknown Unknown
8
6
1
1
1
2
1
4
3
1
Carya aquatica water hickory
11
11
12
13
18
17
14
15
15
16
12
8
Cephalanthus occidentalis buttonbush
2
2
Clethra alnifolia sweet pepperbush
1
0
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
Cyrilla racemiflora titi
1
1
1
1
1
1
Corpus amomum silky dogwood
1
1
4
3
1
1
2
2
2
2
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon
2
2
8
8
1
1
2
2
4
4
Fagus grandifolia American beech
5
4
9
9
4
4
6
5
10
10
15
6
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash
26
26
9
9
17
17
7
7
18
27
5
5
9
9
30
30
22
22
17
17
30
30
Ilex decidua possumhaw
1
1
3
3
1. glabra ink berry
0
1. opaca American holly
3
3
1
1
2
1
4
4
1
1
5
4
*1. verticillata winterberry
2
2
4
4
1
3
2
1
2
1
2
*Itea virginica Virginia willow
3
1
5
5
3
3
2
3
7
5
2
2
3
2
2
3
5
5
1
1
*Leucothoe racemosa Swamp doghobble
*Lindera benzoin spicebush
1
1
2
1
3
3
Magnolia virginiana sweet bay
1
4
2
7
6
1
1
5
3
1
4
2
2
1
1
1
3
2
2
2
Nyssa aquatica water tupelo
17
10
20
17
9
3
16
11
20
14
7
7
12
12
20
14
Nyssa biflora swamp black gum
2
10
8
22
14
5
2
Oxydendron arboreum sourwood
Persea palustris red bay
2
3
1
2
1
1
2
Prunus serotina black cherry
3
3
2
2
1
1
4
3
3
3
Quercus albs white oak
12
12
22
23
23
23
26
26
19
18
24
26
Q. falcata southern red oak
20
19
14
14
8
9
23
23
21
21
16
24
Q. laurifolia laurel oak
21
24
1
1
1
18
Q. lyrata overcup oak
0
8
8
24
24
25
35
17
17
17
17
14
14
46
46
17
Q. michauxii swamp chestnut oak
15
14
14
15
27
28
21
19
11
10
24
22
12
11
3
3
6
6
16
15
Q. nigra water oak
23
26
22
23
24
24
30
30
17
17
18
18
24
24
16
16
17
16
Q. pagoda cherrybark oak
22
18
15
14
1
21
21
Q. phellos willow oak
9
9
19
19
15
19
18
20
20
20
21
21
17
14
8
10
Q. spp. oak
1
*Rosa palustris swamp rose
Taxodium distichum bald cypress
13
12
24
23
15
14
14
12
8
8
16
15
8
7
19
18
Ulmus americana American elm
1
1
5
5
18
18
4
4
2
2
*Vaccinium corymbosum high bush blueberry
1
0
1
1
1
*Viburnum nudum possumhaw viburnum
TOTAL
104
86
92
82
89
84
96
81
111
104
89
86
98
99
95
88
95
107
0
0
81
75
l0ii
88
106
98
102
95
117
112
103
103
94
93
104
97
97
92
1 The area in the vicinity of plot 105 has not been planted
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report
C2 -6
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2012

Appendix C2. (concluded)
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report
C2 -7
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2012
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
Scientific name Common name
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
BL
2nd
Unknown Unknown
4
1
1
4
4
Carya aquatica water hickory
19
18
19
18
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis buttonbush
Clethra alnifolia sweet pepperbush
1
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
Cyrilla racemiflora titi
2
2
1
1
1
Corpus amomum silky dogwood
6
6
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon
1
1
2
2
Fagus grandifolia American beech
6
5
9
9
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash
15
15
11
10
15
15
7
7
17
17
10
10
12
17
18
17
Ilex decidua possumhaw
1. glabra ink berry
1. opaca American holly
3
3
2
2
2
1
*1. verticillata winterberry
2
2
*Itea virginica Virginia willow
3
4
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
*Leucothoe racemosa Swamp doghobble
1
1
1
*Lindera benzoin spicebush
2
1
1
1
Magnolia virginiana sweet bay
4
4
1
1
5
Nyssa aquatica water tupelo
18
17
4
2
1
16
14
10
7
15
15
7
5
12
4
14
5
Nyssa biflora swamp black gum
9
8
Oxydendron arboreum sourwood
Persea palustris red bay
2
1
1
1
1
4
Prunus serotina black cherry
4
3
2
2
Quercus albs white oak
27
27
20
20
Q. falcata southern red oak
9
11
7
7
Q. laurifolia laurel oak
1
1
4
2
Q. lyrata overcup oak
31
30
12
16
6
6
22
22
26
26
25
25
22
23
13
13
Q. michauxii swamp chestnut oak
9
11
2
2
15
15
7
10
Q. nigra water oak
26
26
28
28
Q. pagoda cherrybark oak
Q. phellos willow oak
14
14
20
20
1
1
18
17
27
28
17
16
24
24
8
10
25
26
Q. spp. oak
*Rosa palustris swamp rose
Taxodium distichum bald cypress
33
32
13
12
24
24
25
25
19
18
12
11
7
10
15
13
Ulmus americana American elm
1
1
1
2
2
2
*Vaccinium corymbosum high bush blueberry
*Viburnum nudum possumhaw viburnum
TOTAL
114
109
95
92
98
96
97
95
94
89
97
95
100
98
94
90
96
80
93
78
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site
Second Annual Report
C2 -7
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2012

APPENDIX D
SELECTED SECOND ANNUAL RESTORATION PHOTOGRAPHS

UT6 -1 B photo station view downstream. 14 July 2010.
UT6 -1 B photo station view downstream. 27 October 2011.
D -1
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012

iW
I
Well 14 photo station view to the north. 13 July 2010.
Well 14 photo station view to the north. 27 October 2011.
D -2
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012

Well 98 photo station view to the west. 13 July 2010.
Well 98 photo station view to the west. 25 October 2011.
D -3
Hell Swamp /Scott Creek Mitigation Site PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Second Annual Report April 2012