Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20120334 Ver 1_More Info Received_201205021111111 Hill 111111111111111 lilt 1111 39063 FAST LANE PICKUP DATE Lf z PICKUP TIME '3 ICJ SAME DAY DRIVER M +4 # OF PIECES I WEIGHT N EXPTr DAY.' FROM , e-b ra der^ — J - a WSP SELLS SHIPPER RECEIVER 3RD PARTY ROUND TRIP CHARGES C MPANY NAME f1�A/ - lj ad e. rn(Q 14 a STREET ADDRESS �3L' � EQ r v-e-+ ' 15401 WESTON PARKWAY STE 100 ° CITY l e t o ST Nc°zIP CARY NC 27513 CONTACT NAME T, 9196780035 ENE# �l7 -- A67— 6 366 ? � /,I � SIGNATURE% Al,-6 `+ -. A DATE TIME I �/ /WSP ■SELLS 15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 Cary NC 27513 T 919 678 0035 F 919 678 0206 www wsgsells corn TO Karen Higgins 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh ti LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE 4 30 12 JOB NO 10 -4003 PROPOSAL NO ATTN Karen Higgins RE Butner /Granville County Hike and Bike Trail Resubmittal for #s 5 and 6 r-% - 0 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑x Attached ❑ Via Fed Ex the following items Via Mail Shop Drawings Prints ❑ Plans Copy of Letter Change Order Photographs Control Photographs ❑ Contact Prints Diapositives See Below ❑ Samples ❑ Manuscripts ❑ Specifications ❑ Diskettes COPIES DATE NO DESCRIPTION 5 4 16 12 r-% n Drawings _0 0994�4ctjo I :r (' F� H Y 2 2612 f <��� DE R I i!! i APR 3 0 2012 I LjJ water Branch � 11 _ P THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below x For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit For your use Approved as noted Submit As requested Return for corrections Return For review and comment For your records Control survey required Analytical aerial triangulation required See below remarks For review and comment copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints ❑ FORBIDS DUE 20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Karen attached please find the engineering drawings for the Butner /Granville County Spur of the Bike and Hike trail that were requested on #s 5 and 6 of Additional Information Requested letter In response to your comments dated April 20 2012 5 The plans are included for your review No pipes or concentrated flow is proposed since boardwalks are proposed in these low lying locations 6 The buffers impacted will be replanted with trees and shrubbery and all other areas will be seeded with native grasses COPY TO _Scott Phillips / Justin Jorgensen SIGNED Herald Pottern Goldstein & Associates ,it 15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 Cary NC 27513 T 919 678 0035 F 919 678 0206 www wspsells corn TO Karen Higgins Mail ervice Center Raleigh LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE 4 30 12 JOB NO 104003 PROPOSAL NO ATTN Karen Higgins RE Butner /Granville County Hike and Bike Trail Resubmittal for #s 5 and 6 I - 033 Revised PCN comment letter and Exhibit Maps WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑x Attached ❑ Via FedEx the following items Via Mail Shop Drawings Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications Copy of Letter Change Order Photographs Control Photographs ❑ Contact Prints ❑ Manuscripts ❑ Diskettes Diapositives See Below COPIES DATE NO DESCRIPTION 5 4 16 12 Revised PCN comment letter and Exhibit Maps lulz DENR yyA ate Branch THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below X For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit For your use Approved as noted Submit As requested Return for corrections Return For review and comment For your records Control survey required Analytical aerial triangulation required See below remarks For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints 20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Karen attached please find the remaining information requested from your April 20 2012 Additional Information Request letter COPY TO Scott Phillips / Justin Jorgensen Gerald Pottern Goldstein & Associates SIGNED Debbi Ferm C.�ot warS; Q > r -+ d T la, -0331+ Office Use Only Corps action ID no DWQ project no Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008 Page 1 of 2 PCN Form - Version 1 3 Dec 2008 Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form Section A Applicant Information revised 30 Apr 2012 new text in red 1 Processing 1a Type(s) of approval sought from Corps ® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number NWP 14 or General Permit (GP) number 1 c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes Eric Alsmeyer ❑ No 1 d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply) ® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification ❑ Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit ❑ Yes ® No 1f Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu fee program ❑ Yes ® No 1g Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h below ❑ Yes ® No 1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No 2 Project Information 2a Name of project Butner / Granville County Spur of Hike & Bike Trail CMAQ 5114 2b County Granville County 2c Nearest municipality / town 1 5 miles east of Butner 2 5 miles west of Creedmoor 2d Subdivision name NA 2e NCDOT T I P or state project no NCDOT TIP # CMAQ C 5114 3 Owner Information 3a Name(s) on Recorded Deeds Granville County Goldsboro Properties LLC S Jones & R Aiken and Carefusion Manufacturing See attached list of parcels and ownership below 3b Deed Book and Page No See list below PCN page 11 3c Responsible Party (for LLC ) 3d Street address 3e Mailing Address 144 3f Telephone no Z�1 3g Fax no Band ZW1>1 3h Email address ate 8�t1Y Page 1 of 2 PCN Form - Version 1 3 Dec 2008 4 Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a Applicant is ❑ Agent ® Other specify Granville County 4b Name Scott Phillips Director 4c Business name Granville County Development Services 4d Street address 122 Williamsboro Street (mail P O Box 877) 4e City state zip Oxford NC 27565 4f Telephone no 919 603 1429 4g Fax no 919 693 6794 4h Email address scott phillips @granvillecounty org 5 Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a Name Debra Ferm P E (Project Engineer & Agent for Permitting) 5b Business name WSP Sells Engineering 5c Street address 15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 5d City state zip Cary NC 27513 5e Telephone no 919 678 0035 5f Fax no 919 678 0206 5g Email address Debra ferm @wspsells corn 5h Name Gerald Pottern (Environmental Consultant PCN prep) 51 Business name Robert J Goldstein & Associates Inc 51 Street address 1221 Corporation Pkwy suite 100 5k City state zip Raleigh NC 27610 51 Telephone no 919 872 1174 5m Fax no 919 872 9214 5n Email address Gpottern @RJGAcaroltna com Section B Project Information and Prior Project History 1 Property Identification 1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) See attached parcel list below PCN page 11 1 b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees) East end at NC 56 Lat = 36 1402 Long= 78 7172 West end at Lyon Sta Lat = 36 1418 Long= 78 7251 1 c Property size 4000 ft long x 20 ft average construction width = 1 84 acres 2 Surface Waters 2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc) Ledge Creek unnamed tributary below Lake Rogers 2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water Ledge Creek below Lake Rogers Dam = WS IV NSW 2c River basin Neuse DWQ 03 04 01 USGS 03020201 Page 2 of 2 PCN Form — Version 1 3 Dec 2008 3 Project Description 3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at time of this application The 4 000 foot long trail corridor is located southeast of 185 exit 191 between Butner and Creedmoor in southern Granville County It extends from East Lyon Station Rd southeastward following a powerlme right of way for 2 170 feet then turns northeastward following the east edge of Pond Drive for 1 830 feet to its intersection with NC 56 The adjacent area north of the proposed trail contains commercial industrial and institutional development An apartment complex and a mobile home community are located southeast of Pond Drive and additional residential development is located northeast of NC 56 The adjacent land southwest of the powerline is forested and industrial land A small unnamed stream flows southeastward into Ledge Creek roughly parallel to the powerlme segment of the project 3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property The stream segment near the middle of the project has adjacent marsh and scrub /sapling wetlands mostly in the powerlme right of way RJG &A Environmental Consultants delineated portions of two wetlands (CA and CB) within 50 feet of the project corridor The area of wetland CA delineated is approximately 0 21 acre and the area of wetland CB delineated is approximately 0 20 acre The Granville County Soil Survey shows Chewacla loam mapped along the stream near these wetlands The wetlands may extend beyond the limits of RJG &A s field delineation (beyond the project construction impact area) 3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property An unnamed tributary of Ledge Creek parallels the powerlme and is within 50 feet of the project construction corridor for approximately 900 feet between project stations 15 +00 to 22 +00 and stations 28 +50 to 30 +50 This stream is depicted on both the USGS Quad (Stem NC) and the Granville County Soil Survey The trail will cross this stream (S 1) near station 20 +60 An unmapped intermittent stream (S2) flows southward into this main stream with a trail crossing near station 30 +40 The Soil Survey also depicts a smaller tributary crossing the corridor near station 45 +00 along Pond Drive but this channel was piped and buried when Pond Drive was built and no longer exists as an open channel in the project corridor 3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project The project will provide a safer walking and biking route between the residential areas to the south and east and the commercial and institutional destinations to the north and west This new trail combined with existing trails and sidewalks is expected to decrease the number of short automobile trips 3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used The project includes construction of approximately 4 000 feet of new 10 foot wide greenway trail Beginning at East Lyon Station Rd the proposed trail extends southeastward for 2 170 feet mostly within a Progress Energy transmission line easement then turns northeastward and follows the edge of an existing street (Pond Drive) for 1 830 feet Clearing construction and restoration methods vary based upon the location of greenway trail as described below Boardwalk trail (10 ft wide) will be installed along three trail segments totaling 389 feet at stream wetland and zone 1 buffer crossings The majority of the project will be asphalt paved trail with a 10 ft wide paved surface plus a 2 ft crushed stone shoulder on each side Side slopes will be 3H IV or flatter as recommended by DWQ Nearly all of the project corridor is non forested either within the mowed powerlme easement or along the mowed roadside One segment 210 ft long (station 18 +50 to 20 +60) extends into the upland forest adjacent to the powerlme easement in order to minimize wetland and zone 1 buffer impacts The only forested land where mechanical clearing is necessary is approximately 0 21 acre of upland pine/hardwood forest in this area The trail alignment and construction access have been selected to avoid and minimize impact to trees and wetlands and to provide as much separation as possible from streams and riparian buffers The construction corridor will be generally 25 feet wide to allow 10 feet for the trail plus 15 feet for temporary equipment access Tree protection fencing will be installed prior to clearing to protect trees and other vegetation not scheduled for removal Because of the narrow construction corridor trees will be cut down first and then the stumps removed where necessary to install the asphalt surface greenway Where boardwalk is installed trees will be cut at ground level and stumps left in the ground All cleared material will be removed from site and no on site burning will be permitted Page 3 of 3 PCN Form — Version 1 3 Dec 2008 3e Describe the overall project in detail (continued) Crossing of streams with clearing equipment is not planned However the contractor will be required to cross the streams to pave the greenway so bridgemats are proposed at the two stream crossings Silt fence or combination silt fence /tree protection fence will be placed between the work area and the adjacent stream or wetland area to keep sediment and equipment out of the stream and wetland area To protect wetland soils the contractor will also use timber mats when crossing wetlands Following corridor clearing and staking for greenway construction the contractor will begin rough grading and building boardwalk where specified While the plans do not anticipate such underground utilities will be reinforced to support additional loads where needed Small bull dozers hydraulic excavators front end loaders dump trucks and sheep s foot type equipment will be used In installing the boardwalk it is anticipated the contractor will employ a small farm tractor with an auger connected to its power takeoff The auger will excavate a three foot diameter hole (7 1 sq ft) for each boardwalk footing where sonotube and reinforcing steel will be installed and then concrete poured to support the post All excavated material will be removed from the wetland area for disposal in uplands Crushed stone will be delivered to the site by dump trucks After partially spreading the stone during dumping a motor grader will further spread the stone along the proposed asphalt surface segments Vibratory compactors will compact the stone base to the required compaction then paving equipment will place the asphalt Once the surface is paved the 2 feet wide shoulders and slopes will be dressed and seeded Side slopes will be 3H IV or flatter as recommended by DWQ At stream and wetland crossings silt fence will be installed between the work area and the stream Soil will be excavated for boardwalk foundations and removed from the wetland area and the concrete foundations poured The remaining boardwalk construction will require no further ground disturbance For the timber boardwalk after the foundations are installed the contractor will cut timber posts to the design elevation and install support girders support beams decking and handrail system The contractor will collect all construction debris daily for disposal All erosion and sedimentation control measures will be regularly monitored at least weekly immediately before a forecasted storm event and immediately after a storm event exceeding '/2 inch of rainfall within a 24 hour period Remediation measures will be employed to keep the erosion and sedimentation control measures performing as designed Restoration of the disturbed area will commence near the end of construction Following fine grading all disturbed areas not covered with new asphalt or boardwalk will be stabilized by seeding and mulching Erosion and sedimentation control measures will remain in working order until disturbed areas have been stabilized with new grass No fescue or other non native perennials will be seeded in wetland areas Town of Butner staff will maintain the greenways and take measures to mitigate any local erosion problems that may occur The 2 feet wide greenway shoulder will be mowed to preclude trees and other large vegetation In the forested area Just west of the stream crossing the remainder of the temporary construction corridor beyond the trail shoulders will be left to regenerate in natural forest With the exception of periodic maintenance vehicles this greenway will not carry motor vehicle traffic Thus the greenway should not contribute to road runoff pollutants except for the minor hydrocarbons from the asphalt itself Boardwalk at the single stream and wetland crossing will minimize impacts to flow aquatic life passage soil compaction and vegetation 4 Jurisdictional Determinations 4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? 4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final of determination was made? 4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company Name (if known) Christopher Hopper RJG &A RJG &A Environmental Consultants 4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation Delineated by Chris Hopper of RJG &A in September 2010 Not yet verified by ACE or DWQ 5 Project History 5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Page 4 of 4 PCN Form — Version 1 3 Dec 2008 5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions 6 Future Project Plans 6a Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b If yes explain Section C Proposed Impacts Inventory 1 Impacts Summary la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply) ® Wetlands ® Streams tributaries ® Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2 Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted > NONE 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps 404 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non -404 other) (acres) Temporary W1 ®P ❑ T 10 Boardwalk Alluvial scrub /marsh ❑ Yes ® No ® Corps E] DWQ 0 00482 W1 ❑ P ®T Temp Construction Alluvial ❑ Yes ® Corps 000927 Bndgemat scrub /marsh ® No ❑ DWQ 2g Total wetland impacts 001409 2h Comments Boardwalk impact will permanently affect vegetation growth beneath but is not a loss of wetland 3 Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this question for all stream sites impacted 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g Stream impact Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number Type of impact Stream name (PER) or (Corps 404 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non -404 width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 [:I PUT Temporary bridgemat in creek alongside 10 UT Ledge Cr ® PER ® Corps 6 10 boardwalk ❑ INT El (yes buffer) S2 []PUT Temporary bridgemat in creek alongside 10 UT to UT ❑ PER ® Corps 3 10 boardwalk Ledge Cr ®INT ❑DWQ (no buffer) 3h Total stream and tributary impacts 20 31 Comments Footings for the boardwalk crossings over the streams will be in uplands or wetlands beyond the stream channel OHWM The only stream fill will be temporary crossing mats and the only permanent impact will be stream bank vegetation removal under the boardwalk 4 Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of the U S then individually list all open water impacts below Page 5 of 5 PCN Form - Version 1 3 Dec 2008 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Temporary 01 ❑P ❑T 02 ❑P ❑T 03 ❑P ❑T 4f Total open water impacts None 4g Comments 6 Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed the complete the chart below 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres) number pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f Total None 5g Comments 5h Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no 51 Expected pond surface area (acres) 51 Size of pond watershed (acres) 5k Method of construction 6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form 6a ® Neuse E] Tar Pamlico ❑Other Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f 6g Buffer impact number— Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) or Temp required? B1 ®P ❑ T Boardwalk UT Ledge Cr ® Nos 608 432 B1 ®P ❑ T Paved Trail UT Ledge Cr ® Yes s 0 2088 131 ❑ P ®T Construction Disturbance UT Ledge Cr ❑ Yes ® No 840 3671 B2 ®P ❑ T Boardwalk UT Ledge Cr ® Yes s 878 78 B2 ®P ❑ T Paved Trail UT Ledge Cr ®Nos 0 584 B2 ❑ P ® T Construction Disturbance UT Ledge Cr ❑ Yes ® No 1700 1464 Page 6 of 6 PCN Form — Version 1 3 Dec 2008 B3 ®P ❑ T Boardwalk UT Ledge Cr El Nos 49 1252 B3 ❑ P ® T Construction Disturbance UT Ledge Cr ® Yes s 448 2373 B4 ®P ❑ T Paved Trail UT Ledge Cr ® Yes s 0 600 6h Total buffer impacts sq ft 4 523 12 542 61 Comments No buffer mitigation required for greenway trails Zone 1 impact is minimized by use of boardwalk Stream impact S 2 is not mapped by USGS or USDA and is not subject to Neuse Buffers Section D Impact Justification and Mitigation 1 Avoidance and Minimization 1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project The selected alignment is almost entirely within mowed rights of way (utility lines and roadsides) The one location where forest clearing required is necessary to minimize stream wetland and zone 1 buffer impacts along the segment where the stream and wetland runs parallel under the powerlme The stream wetland and zone 1 buffer crossings will use boardwalk rather than asphalt to minimize fill and to avoid adding new impervious surface in these sensitive areas 1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques Erosion and sediment controls and tree protection fencing will be installed at the beginning of project construction Construction access will be from existing roads at both ends of the project and by use of bridgemats to cross the two streams Concrete will be poured using sonotubes inserted in augered holes thus preventing the uncured concrete from releasing toxic substances into adjacent waters A non fescue seed mix will be used for stabilizing disturbed wetland areas following construction 2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State 2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes ® No impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State? 2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply) ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a Name of Mitigation Bank NA 3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) �ype NA Quantity NA 3c Comments NA 4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached ❑ Yes b Stream mitigation requested NA linear feet c If using stream mitigation stream temperature ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold Page 7 of 7 PCN Form — Version 1 3 Dec 2008 d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only) NA square feet e Riparian wetland mitigation requested NA acres f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested NA acres g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested NA acres h Comments 5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan NA 6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ® No 6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the amount of mitigation required Zone c Reason for impact 6d Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 NA NA 3 (2 for Catawba) NA Zone 2 NA NA 1 5 NA 6f Total buffer mitigation required NA 6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund) 6h Comments Section E Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1 Diffuse Flow Plan la Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? ® Yes ❑ No 1 b If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why Pedestrian and bicycle trails do not generally require a diffuse flow plan However the project design includes appropriate measures for drainage and erosion prevention ❑ Yes ® No 2 Stormwater Management Plan 2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? NA % 2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ® No 2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why Pedestrian and bicycle trails do not generally require a stormwater management plan 2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative description of the plan Page 8 of 8 PCN Form — Version 1 3 Dec 2008 Section F Supplementary Information ❑ Certified Local Government 2e Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program use of public (federal /state) land? ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3 Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a In which local governments jurisdiction is this project? Granville County ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Phase II 3b Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply) ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other 3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? NCDOT and the Federal Highway Admmistration in January 2012 We are awaiting 4 DWQ Stormwater Program Review confirmation of NCDOT and FHWA approval of the document ❑ Coastal counties 2 Violations (DWQ Requirement) E] HQW 4a Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW (check all that apply) ❑ Session Law 2006 246 ❑ Other 4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5 DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Section F Supplementary Information 1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ® Yes ❑ No use of public (federal /state) land? lb If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ® Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter) Comments A NEPA Categorical Exclusion document for this project was submitted to Yes No ® ❑ NCDOT and the Federal Highway Admmistration in January 2012 We are awaiting confirmation of NCDOT and FHWA approval of the document 2 Violations (DWQ Requirement) Page 9 of 9 PCN Form — Version 1 3 Dec 2008 2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards ❑ Yes ® No or Ripanan Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)? 2b Is this an after the fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No 2c If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s) NA 3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description This project is intended to provide a safe alternative to automobile transportation for short trips in the project vicinity It will not induce urban growth or secondary and cumulative impacts 4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility This project will not generate sanitary wastewater 5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No habitat? 5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ❑ No impacts ® Raleigh 5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted ❑ Asheville 5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Cntical Habitat? US FWS and NC NHP websrtes list three federally endangered species in Granville County Dwarf Wedgemussel Harperella and Smooth Coneflower The Ledge Creek tributary in the project area is apparently too small to provide suitable habitat for Dwarf Wedgemussel and there is no record of this mussel in Ledge Creek or other Falls Lake (Meuse basin) tributaries in Granville Durham or Wake counties The stream in the project area is also apparently too small to provide suitable habitat for Harperella which occurs on rocky islands or gravel bars in larger streams and rivers including the Tar River near Oxford Based on lack of suitable habitat and lack of any nearby records neither of these stream dwelling species will be affected by the project Smooth Coneflower occurs in glades or prairie like natural communities with an open or thinly wooded canopy and can also occur along scrubby road embankments and powerlme rights of way There are several known occurrences of Smooth Coneflower in the Butner Creedmoor vicinity mamly on soils mapped as Enon Iredell and Picture soil series RJG &A biologist Christopher Hopper searched the project corridor (especially the powerlme) for Smooth Coneflower during September 2010 when this plant should be readily identifiable and did not find any specimen Soils in the project corridor are mostly mapped as Creedmoor and Chewacla series which are not soils likely to support Smooth Coneflower Based on our field survey and the lack of mapped suitable soils we conclude the project will not affect Smooth Coneflower 6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) Page 10 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1 3 Dec 2008 6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No 6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NC DMF and NC WRC Ledge Creek and its tributaries are not designated essential fish habitat 7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? RJG &A submitted a scopmg letter and project map to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) which conducted a review of the project and determmed that no known historic resources would be affected by the project and did not recommend any further cultural resources survey work SHPO s response letter (11 Dec 2011) is attached 8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplain? ❑ Yes ® No 8b If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements 8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplam Mapping Information System Granville County map panel 0886 The upper limit of the FEMA mapped floodplain on Ledge Creek is approximately 6 000 feet downstream of the project area Debra Ferm, P E D&.,— M �..� —� 30 April 2012 Applicant/Agent s Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent s Signature (Agents signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided List of Parcels Alonathe Proiect Corridor, See Attached Granville Countv Parcel Man 1) Carefusion Manufacturing Parcel Record #14703 DB 1214/114 PB 8/107 7000 Cardinal Place Dublin OH 43017 (614) 766 5726 2) Seby B Jones & Rufus T Aiken Parcel Record #14703, DB 217/325 PO Box 19067 Raleigh NC 27619 (919) 528 0073 3) Goldsboro Properties Parcel Records #24676 and 24677 DB 770/752 PO Box 1766 Greenville NC 27835 1766 4) Granville County Parcel Record #9393 DB 768/50 122 Williamsboro Street Oxford NC 27565 (919) 603 1326 Adjacent Parcels Not Directly Affected Parcels Not Directly Affected 5) Altec Industries Parcel Record #8607 DB 768/50, PB 22/95 6) Altec Industries Parcel Record #15932 DB 616/783 PB 9/105 7) Hockaday David & Susan Parcel Records #20561 and 25952 DB 567/761 PB 667/687 8) Mitchell Eden R Parcel Record #16949 DB 1279/111 Page 11 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 Dec 2008 Responses to DWQ Request for More Information (20 April 2012) 1) Section C 3 Removal of vegetation on stream banks does not constitute an impact to a stream channel However, the plans depict what appears to be a pipe in the stream Please revise /resubmit this page of the PCN and plans to reflect more accurate information Response A section near the middle of the proposed trail connecting the powerline segment to the Pond Drive segment was realigned to avoid the Altec Industries property where the County could not obtain an agreement from the landowner The current revised alignment has two stream crossings S1 (perennial buffered stream) near station 20 +60 and S2 (intermittent unmapped non buffered stream) near station 30 +40 The proposed temporary pipe crossings have been removed from the plans and temporary bridge mats will be used instead impacting 10 feet of channel at each of the two crossings The permanent trail at both stream crossings will be boardwalk with footings anchored beyond top of bank Text in PCN Sections B 3 c B 3 e and C 3 a to C 3 1 and WSP Sells plans have been revised accordingly 2) A stream is depicted on the soil survey close to NC 56 The PCN and plans do not account for buffer impacts at this location Has DWQ conducted a buffer determination for this stream? Response Martin Richmond of DWQ and Eric Alsmeyer of ACE examined this stream in 2011 while looking for a source of sediment in the streams We sent them an email on April 25 inquiring whether they evaluated this sod mapped stream emerging from the pipe under Pond Drive for Neuse Buffer applicability As of April 30 we have not gotten a response but we have revised the PCN assuming that this feature is a buffered stream The culvert outlet is more than 30 feet beyond the proposed trail and the impact (600 sq ft of pavement) will be entirely in buffer zone 2 within the mowed road shoulder of Pond Drive 3) The plans near Buffer impact B3 refer to 2 18 HDPE pipes for stream crossing but the PCN does not indicate an impact Please explain the discrepancy and revise /resubmit more accurate and consistent information Response The plan to use temporary pipes at stream crossings has been revised to use temporary bndgemats instead The bndgemat impact length will be 10 feet at each stream crossing See also response #1 above 4) The buffer impacts shown on Sheet C2 0 do not match the impacts on the PCN application or the inset impact sheets Please revise /resubmit more accurate and consistent information Response The buffer impacts in the table on Sheet C2 0 have been corrected to match those in the PCN text (Section C 6) and inset maps for buffer impact areas B1 B2 and B3 Buffer impact B4 is not in this table on Sheet C2 0 but is in the PCN text and on a new additional inset figure 5) Please provide engineered plans with all ditches outlets to the buffer and pipes proposed along the trail including contour lines Response WSP Sells has revised the plan sheets accordingly No pipes or concentrated flow is proposed Page 12 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 Dec 2008 6) Please provide plans at 1 = 50 with details showing temporary vs permanent buffer and wetland impacts Explain how you plan to restore buffers in temporarily impacted areas Response WSP Sells has revised the plan sheets accordingly The buffers impacted will be replanted with trees and shrubs and all other areas will be seeded with native grasses Feel free to contract Debbi Ferm if you need further information on project design, construction and restoration methods or Gerald Pottern if you need further information on stream wetland and buffer characteristics Sincerely A /f, Debbi Ferm P E WSP SELLS (919) 678 0035 debra fermgwspsells com Gerald Pottern RJG &A Environmental Consultants (919) 872 1174 gpottern&a RJGAcarolma com Page 13 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1 3 Dec 2008 6680-4 :'oN aSUEQI� woo'silosdSM'MAMA S£00'M'616 • £1SLZ ON 'Ajeo • ooL apS /emWd uOISOM W1,91 einlonilseE;ul R uoijopodsuej1 STI3S • dSM . tt rr Lt l+ 1 J L 9+ tL t t 1 F Zoo �LLH x z Lei x 7JZ W W O of It U IL 999LZ ON'Oaojxo 13381S 0809SLNVIIJIM ZZL uNnOO 3_nIANV210 3nRi0 CINOd Ol aVOb NOIlViS NOA. •3 IIV Jl AAIH (INV 3>118 d0 2jndS AVMN33219 A1NnO:D 31�InWJS t,- t,5 - O OVAO F� 7t 'C6 QY �. �_'' mY _,� i�i'4 °d "' � Ica •\ i 1 / �`3 , 1 %Q I v / �0 f i� 0 1 / i / Er d I V IZ E J ill "•..,,__ +��`` 3 v � v A L CL d a O0 N O0 N O C o r, � s � m o a O c� V O V Ln a 'o � o "s rc -4 Qj E F a � a a J a~ cr > X F 0 W U Ln O `n N 7t 'C6 QY �. �_'' mY _,� i�i'4 °d "' � Ica •\ i 1 / �`3 , 1 %Q I v / �0 f i� 0 1 / i / Er d I V IZ E J ill "•..,,__ +��`` 3 v � v A L CL d a O0 N O0 N O C o r, ap c� V O V Ln N 'o ch O -4 Qj E F t9 G. Ln O `n N O a+ y u L9 � Y Gl LVO 0 0 0 N E 00 00 rl 00 Ln Ln C CD ~ o d ° 0000 Ln C L9 rl rP o E � aa) N ND T r1' LM N V rn rI N n O n N V � f0 O. � O E N O O Ol W 00 01 G La 00 m 0 N O E c H N ,--i N c�•1 V Y Y Y O Z o 3 o 3 ro 3 = -o -2 u to Q m O ro O ro O m m m m m 1- N rn H F v � v A L CL d a O0 N O0 N O C o ap c� V O ~ 0 E CL Qj E F t9 G. N £ O m Z u L9 � Y Gl CLI 0 0 M, 415 I-- w ui 4> IQ d- ,p x CO)Oc r5,e ci <,- ell rip co LC) r. C4 C-4 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N E E CL a E E 0 CD a. 0. F- Cf I I /I juatuase JaA4,9 z atq/4,92 + 0 FA Fri. IQ 0 Ci 4) Sty 0 N v N. C. HJ-�� WA Y 5 6 u 146 +61 Uj 5� ,Q � 0- iie �d I �O IpzN a:zNl I 0 m I� OQ(L. ,C BUFFER IMPACT B4 Zone 1 = No Impact Zone 2 = 600 s.f. paved ''I 100 FEET Soil- mapped stream buried in culvert �P �P I � ' �,a• 'oQo��O p ��� �P I I UT to F•'',� <I Ledge Cr I I I I I W I I II u� � I A h I I z � I J 0 ,C BUFFER IMPACT B4 Zone 1 = No Impact Zone 2 = 600 s.f. paved ''I 100 FEET Soil- mapped stream buried in culvert �P �P I � ' �,a• 'oQo��O p ��� �P I I UT to F•'',� <I Ledge Cr I I I I