20120446 Ver 1_Application_20120504

t-gAlr
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Itlqr
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO t' :,uos,�,� Z
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE EU�,qC�oNTI, JR
GOVERNOR s
April 27, 2011
Ms Lon Beckwith, NCDOT Regulatory Project Manager
U S Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue Room 208
Asheville NC 28801 -2714
Subject Nationwide 14 Permit Application
SR 1296 Little Willow Circle
Henderson County
State Project # 14C 045147 (DWQ Minor Permit Fee $240)
Dear Ms Beckwith
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to widen, grade dram
and pave SR 1296, Little Willow Circle, in Henderson County for a distance of 1,682 feet This
proposal entails widening and paving the existing gravel road to a standard 18 -foot roadway
Little Willow Circle is a secondary gravel road, which conveys local traffic
I am enclosing a typical section of the road, drawings for pipe culvert replacements, photographs
a marked county map and a USGS quad map
The U S Fish and Wildlife Service list 32 species with federal status for Henderson County that
are known from current records or were known to occur in the county historically One species
white fringeless orchid (Platanthera integn1abia) is a candidate species and is known from
historical records The bog turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergza) is listed as threatened due to
similarity of appearance with the listed northern bog turtle Sic species Appalachian elktoe
(Alasmidonta raveneliana) swamp punk (Helontas bullata), small whorled pogoma (Isotna
medeoloides), bunched arrowhead (Sagittana fasciculata) white nnsette (Sisyrinchaum
dichotomum), and Carolina northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabnnus coloratus) are listed as
federally threatened or endangered
There are no records for the listed species within one mule of the project The unnamed tributary
of Perry Creek is 3 -4 feet in width The impacts from replacement of the culvert should be
mammal Habitat is lacking for all the listed species except there is a slight probability that a
portion of the woodland edge (approximately 1000 feet) primarily along the cut side of the road
_V, � v' 1 u ^�
Avision 14 Ast; tct 14
Phone [phone] a "4142 Haywood Road Mills River North Carolina 28759 _ fi Fax (828),_891 5026

SR 1296 Little Willow Circle 2
could support small whorled pogoma Small whorled pogonia can occur in a variety of forested
habitats and typically occurs with other orchids Several species of orchids were observed along
the woodland edge
The best management practices will be used to minimize and control sedimentation and erosion on
this project Water will be pumped around the work area to minimize erosion and sedimentation
from the pipe trench The construction foreman will review all sedimentation control measures
during installation to ensure sedimentation is controlled effectively If the planned devices are not
functioning as intended they will be replaced imimediately with better devices The sedimentation
control devices will be in place prior to pipe culvert removal and remain in place until the new
pipe is in place
Impacts to Waters of the United States
Perry Creek (DWQ Class B) is shown on the USGS topographic map as a perennial stream The
unnamed tributary of Perry Creek is not shown as a perennial stream on the USGS topographic
map The unnamed tributary is approximately 3 -4 feet in width with a well - defined channel and
has a cobble, sand and gravel substrate The channel lacks vegetation The unnamed tributary
supports good populations of mayflies caddisflies and snails The unnamed tributary flows
approximately 650 feet to Perry Creek Perry Creek flows approximately 2 5 riles to Osceola
Lake Osceola Lake meets the definition of a Traditional Navigable Water For these reasons, we
believe that the unnamed tributary to Perry Creek is a Relatively Permanent Water and is under
the jurisdiction of the U S Army Corps of Engineers In order to replace the culvert, it will be
necessary to impact waters of the United States in the French Broad River Basin Specifically,
NCDOT is requesting to replace and/or extend one metal culvert in an unnamed tributary to Perry
Creek Listed below is a summary of the proposed impacts
Site No
Existing Condition
Proposed Condition
Net Impacts
Site 1
45'x 48 CMP
60'x 48 CMP
15'
Site IA
Free Flowing Channel
Flow Diversion
75'
Tot 1 Impact _L n in6&?Feet 15
Temporary Impact for Dikes and Flow Diversion in Linear Feet 75
Permits Requested
NCDOT is hereby requesting authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for the
construction project outlined above By copy of this letter I am asking Mr David McHenry,
Mountain Region Coordinator of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC)
to comment directly to you concerning the 404 Nationwide Permit request
I am also requesting authorization under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act from the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Division of Water Quality

SR 1296 Little Willow Circle 3
(DWQ) In addition, I am asking Mr McHenry and Mr Ed Ingle Roadside Environmental Field
Operations Engineer ( NCDOT) to comment directly to me concerning this permit request
If you have any questions or need additional mfonnation please contact Ms Lon Jones or me at
(828) 891 -7911
Sincerely
Steven L Cannon P E
District Engineer
Enclosures
cc Mr Brian Wrenn DWQ DENR Raleigh (4 copies)
Mr David McHenry, Mountain Region Coordinator NCWRC
Mr Mike Parker, DWQ, Asheville
Mr Jason Mays, Biologist, U S Fish and Wildlife Service, Asheville
Mr Mark Gibbs P E Division Maintenance Engineer
Mr Mark Davis, Division Environmental Officer
Mr E L Ingle, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT
Mrs Lon M Jones, P E , Henderson County Maintenance Engineer, NCDOT
File

Corps Subnuttal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info
1 Project Name _SR 1296 Little Willow Circle
2 Name of Property Owner /Applicant, NCDOT
3 Name of Consultant/Agent N/A
*Agent authonzathon needs to be attached
4 Related/Previous Action ID number(s) N/A
5 Site Address Little Willow Circle, Henderson County
6 Subdivision Name N/A
7 City Hendersonville
8 County Henderson
9 Lat 35 285870_ Long -82 507100 _(Coorchnates at Morton Creek) (Decimal Degrees Please)
10 Quadrangle Name Hendersonville 35082 -C4 -TF -024
11 Waterway UT to Perry Creek
12 Watershed French Broad River
13 Requested Action
X Nationwide Permit # 14
General Permit #
_ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre- Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office
AID
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose
Site /Waters Name
Keywords

vJ
0
OF WAT�9
lip
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
For Section 404 and/or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
SR 1296 Little Willow Circle
Henderson County
r-01 ,40R7N Coq
O
I- GY
Tc
0 2
0
'4r�FhrOF TA nN`'Q0o-~c
NCDOT Drvmsion 14

o�oF \NArF,
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page Iof11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A Apphcant Information
1
Processing
1a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
lb Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number NW 14 or General Permit (GP) number
1 c
Has the NW P or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e
is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu
fee program
[]yes
® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
[]Yes
® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
SR 1296 Little Willow Circle
2b
County
Henderson
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Hendersonville
2d
Subdivision name
N/A
2e
NCDOT only T I P or state
project no
14C 045147
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b
Deed Book and Page No
N/A
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
N/A
3d
Street address
N/A
3e
City state zip
N/A
3f
Telephone no
N/A
3g
Fax no
N/A
3h
Email address
N/A
Page Iof11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other specify District Engineer
4b
Name
Steven L Cannon
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
4d
Street address
4142 Haywood Road
4e
City state zip
Mills River NC 28759
4f
Telephone no
828 -891 7911
4g
Fax no
828 -891 5026
4h
Email address
slcanno n@ ncdot gov
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
N/A
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
N/A
5c
Street address
N/A
5d
City state zip
N/A
5e
Telephone no
N/A
5f
Fax no
N/A
5g
Email address
N/A
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

B Project Information and Prior Project History
1 Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
N/A
1 b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 28587 Longitude 8250710
(DD DDDDDD) ( DD DDDDDD)
1 c Property size
N/A acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to
UT to Perry Creek
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
B
2c River basin
j French Broad River
3 Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
Landscape is mostly forested with primarily deciduous forest in immediate vicinity of culvert and mixed pine and
deciduous along the remainder of the cut side of the road Most of the fill side of the road is lawns and landscaped areas
There are 3-4 residences along the road and a new subdivision that uses this road as access
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
N/A
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
N/A
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
To upgrade the existing gravel road to current NCDOT secondary road standards
3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used
The area will be cleared and erosion control measures installed A single culvert will be replaced /extended with the water
diverted around the site during installation The roadbed will be widened graded and fill material added as needed The
road will be paved Track hoes dump trucks bulldozers paving equipment water pumps diversion pipe various hand
tools will be used to accomplish the work
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past
Comments N/A
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company N/A
Name (if known) N/A
Other N/A
4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
N/A
5 Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions
N/A
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

6 Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b if yes explain
N/A
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
1a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ® Streams tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps 404 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404 other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
❑ Yes
El No
❑ Corps
❑DWQ
N/A
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
El DWQ
2g Total wetland impacts
N/A
2h Comments N/A
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number
(PER) or
(Corps 404 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non 404
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Culvert
Unnamed
Tributary to Perry
® PER
❑ INT
0 Corps
®DWQ
4
15
Creek
S2 ❑ P ® T
Flow Diversion
Unnamed
Tributary to Perry
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
®DWQ
4
75
Creek
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
15
31 Comments Total Temporary Impact for Impervious Dikes and Flow Diversion is 75 feet
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number—
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f Total open water impacts
N/A
4g Comments N/A
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
P2
5f Total
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5g Comments N/A
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no N/A
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
N/A
51 Size of pond watershed (acres)
N/A
5k Method of construction
N/A
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse El Tar Pamlico El Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired�
131 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
El Nos
N/A
N/A
B2 ❑ PEI T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
r6i
N/A
N/A
Comments N/A
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The culvert is being extended in length only to provide the minimum width needed to bring this road up to current secondary
road standards
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Impervious dikes will be installed in the channel to minimize the water flowing into the work area Then water will be diverted
around the site during pipe installation to limit downstream habitat and water quality degradation Appropriate BMPs
according to the approved erosion and sedimentation control plan will be installed on the project prior to culvert installation
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2b If yes nuthgation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this
prolect�
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank N/A
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type N/A
Quantity N/A
3c Comments N/A
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
15 linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature
❑ warm ® cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
N/A square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
N/A acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
N/A acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
N/A acres
4h Comments N/A
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
N/A
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c
6d
6e
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
N/A
N/A
3 (2 for Catawba)
N/A
Zone 2
15
6f Total buffer mitigation required
N/A
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund)
N/A
6h Comments N/A
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments N/A
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A %
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why N/A
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative descnption of the plan
Project is covered by individual NPDES Permit NCS000250
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
® DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government s jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs
El
apply (check all that apply)
El ❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes No
❑
attached?
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

F Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
lb If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter )
Comments N/A
2 Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 0200)?
2b Is this an after the fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s) N/A
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantdative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description
This project involves the widening and paving of an existing secondary gravel road to minimum secondary road
standards The road is a short circular road and is not likely to lead to any significant increase in development patterns
over the existing road since the area already has residential development and a subdivision is already in place
4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Database
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
N/A —There are no marine or estuarine habitats in the Blue Ridge Physwgraphic Province
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The project was submittted in 2008 for Cultural Resources Review It was determined that no surveys were required for
archaeology or architecture State Historic Reference No is ER08 -0281
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements N/A
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program
Steven L Cannon, P E
27 April 2012
Applicant/Agent s Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent s Signature
(Agents signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section N of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION I BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
B DISTRICT OFFICE FILE NAME AND NUMBER
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION SR 1296 Little Willow Circle
State NC County /pansh/bomugh Henderson City Hendersonville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 35 28587 N Long 82 50710 W
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody Unnamed Tributary of Perry Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows Osceola Lake
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 06010105030020
® Check if inap /diagrani of review area and/or potential junsdictional areas is/are available upon request
❑ Check if other sites (e g offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
® Office (Desk) Determination Date March 28 2012
® Field Determination. Date(s) March 29 2012
SECTION II SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There X no navigable waters of the US within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
❑ Waters are presently used or have been used in the past or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain.
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There e waters of the US within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required]
1 Waters of the U S
a Indicate presence of waters of U S in review area (check all that apply) i
❑ TNWs including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters including isolated wetlands
b Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non wetland waters 150 linear feet 3-4 width (ft) and/or acres
Wetlands acres
c Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on EsiabLshed —by—
Pik
WK
Elevation of established OHWM (if known)
2 Non regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable) 3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional
Explain
'Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year round or has continuous flow at least seasonally'
t v f— ally 4 month 1

SECTION III CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section III A 1 and Section III D 1 only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sections III A.1 and 2
and Section III D 1 otherwise, see Section MX below
1 TNW
Identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting detemunation
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands if any and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanas have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs) i e tributaries that typically flow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e g, typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW but has year round
(perennial) flow slap to Section III D 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
skip to Section III D d
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary or its adjacent wetlands, or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands complete Section M.B I for
the tributary Section HLB 2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section MX 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III C below
1 Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size Pickf List
Drainage area _Pick List
Average annual rainfall inches
Average annual snowfall inches
(n) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW
Project waters are Pick List river dales from RPW
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNV
Tributary stream order if known
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and in the and
West
5 Flow route can be described by identifying e g tributary a which flows through the review area to flow into tributary b which then flows into TNW

(b) General Tributary Charactenstics (check all that apply)
Tributary is ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man altered) Explain
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (esturr te)
Average width feet
Average depth feet_
Average side slopes Pick List
Pnmary tnbutary substrate composition (check all that apply)
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type // cover
❑ Other Explain
Tnbutary condition/stability [e g highly eroding sloughing banks] Explain
Presence of run/nffle /poolcomplexes Explain
Tnbutary geometry Pick List
Tributary gradient (approxmlate average slope) %
(c) Flow
Tnbutary provides for Pick List
Estnnate average number of flow events in review area/year Pick fi—st
Describe flow regime
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is Pick List Characteristics
Subsurface flow Pick List Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
Tnbutary has (check all that apply)
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWN16 (check all indicators that apply)
❑ clear natural line impressed on the bank ❑ the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ destruction of tenestnal vegetation
❑ shelving ❑ the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down bent or absent ❑ sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ❑ scour
❑ sediment deposition ❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining ❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
❑ High Tide Line indicated by ❑
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debns deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /charactenstics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
me lateral extent of CWA junsdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ survey to available datum,
❑ physical markings
❑ vegetation Imes/changes in vegetation types
(m) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize tnbutary (e g water color is clear discolored oily filnn, water quality general watershed charactenstics etc )
Explain
Identify specific pollutants if known
'A natural or man made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily severjunsdiction (c g where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody s flow
regime (e g flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert) the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'lbid

(tv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that apply)
❑ Riparian condor Characteristics (type average width)
❑ Wetland fringe Characteristics
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildhfe diversity Explain findings
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size acres
Wetland type Explain
Wetland quality Explain
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non TNW
Flow is Pick List Explain
Surface flow is Pick List
Characteristics
Subsurface flow Pi k Li t Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non TNW
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explain
❑ Separated by berm/bamer Explain
(d) Proxviuty(Relationslup) to TNW
Project wetlands are klLast river miles from TNW
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is from Pick List
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(u) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize wetland system (e g water color is clear brown oil film on surface water quality general watershed
characteristics etc ) Explain
Identify specific pollutants if known
(in) Biological Characteristics Wetland supports (check all that apply)
❑ Riparian buffer Characteristics (type average width)
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic/wildhfe diversity Explain findings
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)r
All wetland(s) being considered m the cumulative analysis Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

For each wetland specify the following-
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological chermcal and physical functions being performed
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or msubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include but are not limited to the volume duration and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly the fact an adjacent wetland hes within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include for example
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species such as feedmg nesting spawning or reanng young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have other relationships to the physical chemical or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non R.PW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary itself then go to Section III D
2 Significant nexus findings for non RPW and its adjacent wetlands where the non RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findin gs of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section 1ILD
3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands then go to
Section I LD
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS /WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
❑ TNWs linear feet width (ft) Or acres
El Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
2 RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Tributanes of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicatmg that
tributary is perennial The unnamed tributary of Perry Creek is shown on the NC Floodplain Mapping Program The channel
is well defined and there is good flow The stream supports good populations of mayflies caddisfhes and snails
❑ Tnbutanes of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow seasonally' (e g typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally

Provide estimates for junsdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
® Tributary waters 150 linear feet 3-4 width (ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
Non RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is junsdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for junsdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III B and rationale in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW
Provide acreage estimates for junsdictional wetlands in the review area acres
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IMC
Provide acreage estimates for junsdictional wetlands in the review area acres
Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule the impoundment of a junsdictional tributary remains junsdictional
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from waters of the U S or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-b) or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
ISOLATED [INTERSTATE ORINTRA- STATE] WATERS INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS THE USE
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COAV'IERCE INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) to
® which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
❑ Interstate isolated waters Explain
❑ Other factors Explain
$See Footnote # 3
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
i Prior to asserting or declining C WA j urisdiction based solely on this category Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPAMemorandum Regarding CWA Act Junsdichon Following Rapanos

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination
Provide estimates forjunsdicthonal waters in the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width (tt)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
❑ Wetlands acres
F NON- RWSDICTIONAL WATERS INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in SWANCC the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
Migratory Bird Rule (MBR)
❑ Waters do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explain
❑ Other (explain, if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis ofjunsdicthon is the MBR
factors (i a presence of migratory birds presence of endangered species use of water for irrigated agriculture) using best professional
judgment (check all that apply)
❑ Non wetland waters (m a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
El Lakes /ponds acres
❑ Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
0 Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the Significant Nexus standard, where such
a finding is required for junsdmctmon (check all that apply)
❑ Non wetland waters (1 a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
❑ Lakes/ponds acres
0 Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/dehneation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
0 Corps navigable waters study
El U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑ U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps
❑ 100 year Floodplain Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs ❑ Aerial (Name & Date)
or ® Other (Name & Date) Culvert Site March & April 2012
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Applicable /supporting case law
❑ Apphcable /supporting scientific literature
El Other information (please specify)
B ADDITIONAL CONE IENTS TO SUPPORT JD

14
SR 1296 Little Willow Circle
Henderson County
Existing & Prop Center Line
35 28587 °N 82
--------------- - - - - -- ------------- -- - - - -- 2
Inlet Invert Elev Replace Existing Perched Oulet Invert Elev
9888 45x48 CMP with 60 x48 CMP 9820
gs Approximately 20 from shoulder of existing road
1 9849
2 9760
See plans for erosion control
* Drawing not to scale

SR 1296 Little Willow Circle
Henderson County
Photo 1 Culvert Inlet

Photo 3 Culvert Outlet
0 9M
r <
v
�a
4:iaWAN",. i ®
Photo 4 Channel Downstream of Outlet impacted By Kudzu, Multiflora Rose

Photo 6 Little Willow Circle Near The Beginning Of Project
Photo 7 Typical Section Of Road With Woodland Along Cut Side and Landscaped

Ll
N C DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SECONDARY ROAD SURVEY
SUBJECT SR 1296 Little Willow Circle
LOCATION Begin at the western intersection of SR 1191 and SR 1296 and
continue in a southerly direction for a total distance of 1 682 feet to end of project at the
eastern intersection of SR 1191
WORK TYPE Grade, Drain, Base, Pave & Erosion Control
WORK ORDER 14C 045068 (Temp)
COUNTY Henderson TOWNSHIP Crab Creek
DATE Revised 3/20/2012 SCALE 1 " =50'
Current ADT Bracket 0 -360 Design ADT Bracket 0 -600
Water UT to Perry Creek, Class B
NOTES 50' R/W EC PREPARED BY BA
50' 0"
RIGHT OF WAY
CENTERLINE
' 9' _ 1- 4' _ 1 _ 3'
ASPHALT , PAVEMENT
SHOULDER I I I SHOULDER I DITCH
2W 0
goof
MAX SLOPE
FILL 1 vz 1
CUT 11

7F
4/
Propose 40 x 15 CMP
Slit Check Type
A
Slit Basin Type
B
2 x3 x6
Slit Basin Type
B
2x3x6
Note Basin Size Change
Silt Basin Type
B
2x3x8
Silt Basin Type
B
2x3x8
Slit Basin Type
B
2x3x8
Coir Fiber Baffles must be
Installed In all silt basins
4/
7/
7/
T
12 Wattle
12 Wattle l
Place TSF 2 feet beyond top of
cut as temporary diversion from
s #a I +00 to sta 4 +75
12 Wattle
KASEY- PHILLIPS DEVELOPMENT LLC
1978 HENDERSONVILLE RD
ASHEVILLE NC 28803
95573723 0 12 Wattle
1265 -160
12 Wattle 1
May use Wattles or
with pmatting and PAM 12 Wattle
12 Wattle
i
I
12 Wattle
4
I
021
I
I
I
1
I I
11
tt
11
1�
11
11
11
od
Q o�
SR 1296 Page I
2 Stream
01
WILLOW ROAD LLC
1120 S FEDERAL HWY
DELRAY BEACH FL 33483
9557166313
1250 -799
End and low point measures must
be Installed at all silt fences
Pavement Ends
\ t
Begin Project 0 +02-, " 5 616 4 ' Begin Project 0 +00
SR 1191 Willow Road 0 +00 SR 1191 Willow Road

•7 •
4/
4/
V/
2/
12 Wattle
Propose 20 x 15 CMP
Rock Columns
12 Wattle __.g,
May use Wattles or
Wrapped Check Dams
W ith matting and PAM
12 Wattle
06
SNYDER VERNE SNYDER BEVERLY
CMR 431 BOX 1433
APO AE 09267
9557360998
867 -540
12 Wattle
Colr Fiber Baffles must be
Installed in all silt basins
Propose 40 x IS CMP
Silt Check
Type A
Silt Basin
Type B
2 x3 x6
Silt Basin
Type B
2 x3 x6
L XJ Xb
Silt Basin Type B
2 x3 x6
Place TSF 2 feet beyond top of
cut as temporary diversiom from
sta 6 +40 to sto 8 +40
05
KASEY- PHILLIPS DEVELOPMENT LLC
1978 HENDERSONVILLE RD
ASHEVILLE NC 28803
9557372300
1265 -160
12 Wattle
i
I
I
I
i
10
I�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
Riid:.
�x
III
Ix
III
II
I
I m
Ixo
C
III
1
Ix
ix
ail
I
I
11
Ix
I�O
Ia
I
i
SR 1296 Page 2
End and low point measures must
be Installed at all slit fences
03
FRENCH HANS T FRENCH MICHELE M
125 LITTLE WILLOW CIR
HENDERSONVILLE NC 28739
9557362678
1275 -673
IL
F\ Eg
I
1 02
HILLS JERRY W HILLS MARTHA V
Q- 183 LITTLE WILLOW CIRCLE
Il HENDERSONVILLE NC 28739
\ \ /�e 11 95 487 560359
\ N
1 IL
'b71
v 101
1 1
1 I
1 1
I I
1 I
1 1
1 1
1 1
F91
I 1 N
1 1 ~
I
1 I
i I
17171
5 +00
n
JI
I I
I I
it
11
01
WILLOW ROAD LLC
1120 S FEDERAL HWY
I1� DELRAY BEACH FL 33483
9557166313
I I 1250 -799
II
fl
II
II End and low point measures must
be installed at all silt fences
I�
it
It
11
11 r S+rem

7 Silt Check Type A
Silt Basin Type B
9/ 2 x3 x8
Silt Basin Type B
2 x3 x8
Note Basin Size Change
Silt Basin Type B
2 x3 x8
05
KASEY - PHILLIPS DEVELOPMENT LLC
1978 HENDERSONVILLE RD
ASHEVILLE NC 28803
9557372300
1265 -160
Coir Fiber Baffles must be
installed in all silt basins
Propose 40 x 18 CMP
Silt Check Type A
Silt Basin Type B
2x3 x9
Note Basin Size Change
Silt Basin Type B,
2 x3 x9
Place TSF 2 feet beyond top of
cut as temporary diversion from
sta 10 +45 to sto 15 +32
A
Propose 40 x 18 CMP
SNYDER VERNE SNYDER BEVERLY
CMR 43`7 BOX 1433 Silt Check Type A
APO AE 09267
9557360998 Silt Basin Type B
867 -540 2 x3 x6 w /baffle
Silt Basin Tye B
Note Basin Size Change 2 x3 x6 w /baffle
Silt Basin Type B
2 x3 x9 w /baffle
Silt Basin Type B
9/ 2 x3 x9 w /baffle
Coir Fiber Baffles must be
installed in all silt basins
4/
May use Wattles or
Wrapped Check Dams 12 Wattle
with matting and PAM
+UU
121
1
1
1
1
1
1
01 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
SR 1296 Page 3
05
KASEY- PHILLIPS DEVELOPMENT LLC
1978 HENDERSONVILLE RD
ASHEVILLE NC 28803
9557372300
1265 -160
End and low point measures must
be Installed at all silt fences
Silt Check Type A
Silt Basin Type B
2 x3 x6
Note Basin Size Change
Silt Basin Type B
2 x3 x6
It
04
BARNETTE JAMES H JR BARNETTE LINDA
105 N OVERLOOK TERRACE
HENDERSONVILLE NC 28739
719 8265824 D
c
o�
m� 03
10 * FRENCH HANS T FRENCH MICHELE M
125 LITf LE WILLOW CIR
\�
HENDERSONVILLE 7 NC 28739
o
1
End and low point measures must
be installed at all silt fences

SR 1191 Wallow Road
End Of Project 16 +82
G/ 2 Stream \\
05 \\ 12 Wattle
KASEY- PHILLIPS DEVELOPMENT LLC
1978 HENDERSONVILLE RD
ASHEVILLE NC 28803
1265-160 300
l�
Silt Basin Type B
Note Basin Size Change 11 Silt3 Checkb f��pfl�
11 100 ESA I5 +$ I
11
F7
2 Stream
6/ = _
45 x 48 CMP with Hoc
SAG Replace With 60 x 48
9/
Begin 100 ESA at I4 +87
SR 1296 Page A
SR 1191 Willow Road
=nd Of Project 16 +82
12 Wattle
Pavement Ends
Coir Fiber Baffles must be
I I installed In all silt basins
Silt Basin Type B
II 0 I OI 2 x3 x9 w /baffle Note Basin Size Change
Silt Check Type A
05
KASEY- PHILLIPS DEVELOPMENT LLC
1978 HENDERSONVILLE RD
V) 9557372360 C 28803
1265 -160
End and low point measures must
be installed at all silt fences
ZZ
+ 0
4 Stream

l
U
N
O
L
70
N
O
cu
-0 A
O
N O
cn U
N c
U O
L_ (n
U a�
O N
J
C,fl
N
T—
w
U)
1
s o
s
O�
d
4a
5IL
D
Oye
D pay
uul a�ye� pue�y6r �o
R
e`
G sa G
4
m
� n A
Ne \sin �
G
O �
o .o
1r
U
� 3
0
aA
a �e
�d
30
Rambling 7d /
a
O
N
O
�D o
3 O
a
y
o�
A
Ty
c
aG e
Cpp N cu
�a
a
z c
d
co c
J
P8 nue)q
r�
J`'
A
V v
a
J
d
s
Z
O JQ pis e-
r
o
w
i
$tC
gym
is
anydda)S
`
0�
c ,sr A
o
j
ei�yM LL
a
Ma^ ✓�
f
is
�
ari
s o
s
O�
d
4a
5IL
D
Oye
D pay
uul a�ye� pue�y6r �o
R
e`
G sa G
4
m
� n A
Ne \sin �
G
O �
o .o
1r
U
� 3
0
aA
a �e
�d
30
Rambling 7d /
U)
_m
f �
nN
It
A'`
O
LO
M
O
0
O
N
O
m
w
Cc
E
Cpp N cu
U
z c
d
co c
J
U)
_m
f �
nN
It
A'`
O
LO
M
O
0

3
0
d
J
m
N
T"

• e
�>z
`
11'a
i 'ti 4.31.3��' (" .
i t (a'c' i
ti•- -- jr
."' i4a
i�
\
.>r,s`�, 1 J
4 i /'1- � -``-z�
wa �{' L':+t ✓f
� "i�`x ! 1
'`�-"'� `w "'�
;� S €„�,
i � .: � �)J�
�i�£Y S
1 � /�,�_5 s� \.�
}1. ��
"� i w
r %%' fi •e�1`(°'e�� >�
�� -M+. -e..t
x �,
t'�`� /�`
Fr (► �
1�I�0 sad n..
�� t
r F �
! �
� �. 2'`�,t`
+/fci
c'
IP
�` r
`'
�� l �
4or
� ~' $rats
y8bq
� /
�,�,
\ �
a3
�` ,
s �,
-� q �;� �f
.�
fit► � l^
tom-
;
{
_
/�
YfiF]�` �� \C
� t� EN }']r4^..%
f `�tk i l� �
� ! .:� \q�s f
/�•�w_ \��", �'R
� �,t I 'a"'^
�a
^421
< y
�.�q� f!
fi�lY1
r.t I� l
Thy�LtC��,.,��5
•-
J 11 � u
f
c rall,
�
k ^ l
r
g
�t t
t
� � -x �a t +.
"l,r h N
t I/t -, r �
� J
S
✓` ��"
P
� Yi S�
t }� 6 1 �
i Ek,11
ff •x,,,,o4r� t, �
�l—`��� r�
� -� 1,��
Kt
� r tit �
>
�l�r —,
r ys+rrr
i -`-- -- �
4� \�'• +��
��w ,�,_/1
�� I� t Vv,-,
lFy1 � }`t1ti��1
tr tf�=?
�` ,. /� �>F ��
�"`''� ,�'" �✓/ I
� 1 � �--�,
J ll �, �" (
7���—� t� �
�,�, � 1,:., jt1�1.�-"J
(1 �t f