20120377 Ver 1_Application_20120413

A rK[ N 5 TRANSMITTAL
Stephen Smith [phone] x 353 DATE April 16 2012
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
TO Division of Water Quality Surface Water Protection Section
1628 Mail Service Center JOB NO 100021689
Raleigh NC 27699 1628
Elizabeth Schemer Phone [phone] fax [phone]
From Atkins North America Inc
?i RE U 4716 A/C Clegg Passing Siding & Hopson
1616 East Mdlbrook Road Suite 310 Road Grade Separation Nationwide 14
Permit
Address /Office Raleigh NC 27609 -4968 SAW 2012 00430
WE ARE SENDING YOU ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
the following Items
❑Shop Drawings El Prints
�-� \�. ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order
O_ svP
i
N
D
�2
�
❑ Plans
❑ Specifications
❑ Samples
COPIES
DATE
NO
DESCRIPTION
1
4 16 12
❑
Permit package for NWP 14
1
4 16 12
For review and comment
CD with permit materials
❑
For bids due
20
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED As Checked Below
®
For approval
❑ Reviewed as submitted
®
For your use
❑ Reviewed as noted
❑
As requested
❑ Returned for corrections
❑
For review and comment
❑
❑
For bids due
20
❑ Prints returned after loan to us
REMARKS
Please let me know if any
W(3 5-4� Sgom I
SIGNED Elizabeth Scherrer
DISTRIBUTION
information is
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
El
i SUwhY
If enclosures are not as noted kindly notify us at once

April 13, 2012
Stephen Smith
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 0617 Division of Water Quality Surface Water Protection Section
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 1628
RE U 4716 A/C Clegg Passing Siding & Hopson Road Grade Separation Nationwide 14 Permit
SAW -2012 00430
Dear Mr Smith,
Enclosed please find a permit package in support of a Nationwide 14 Permit for the above
mentioned project The project is located on the Wake /Durham County line along NC Highway
54 Included are a PCN form mapping, and supporting materials We have pursued a
Nationwide Permit for this project due to its small scale and minimal impacts
Impacts for this project total 0 08 acre of permanent wetland impacts from fill, excavation, and
clearing Permanent impacts to open waters total 0 03 acre and 178 linear feet due to culvert
extensions The project occurs within the Neuse River Basin, and buffer impacts total 0 55 acre
at three stream crossings We propose that project impacts are below mitigation thresholds,
and therefore do not require mitigation
Please let me know if you have any comments or need any other documentation from us We
will be happy to furnish any additional information required
Yours truly
Atkins North America, Inc
6V'LVA SchGrneK__
Elizabeth Scherrer
Senior Scientist
P
1616 East Mdlbrook Road Suite 310 Raleigh NC 27609 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] www atkmsglobal com

U 4716 A/C Hopson Road Rail
Table of Contents
Cover Letter
Table of Contents
PCN Form
Figures
Figure 1 Project Location
Figure 2 Topography
Figure 3a 3b Soils
Attachments
Block B 1 b Project Location
Block B 3 Permit Drawings
Block B 4 a Jurisdictional Determination 2006
Block B 4 a Jurisdictional Determination 2012
Block C 2 3 Wetland Impact Summary
Block C 6b Buffer Impact Summary
Block E 1 2 Stormwater
Block F lc FONSI
Block F 7b SHPO memo
Appendix A Wetland and Stream data forms

\oa0F W A Lk90
v a >
unQnu o <
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
NR
Page Iof12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notificatson (PCN ) Form
A Applicant Information
1
Processing
1 a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NW P) number 14 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corpse
❑ Yes
❑ No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu
fee program
❑ Yes
® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Clegg Passing and Hopson Road Grade Seperation
2b
County
Wake and Durham
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Morrisville /Durham
2d
Subdivision name
NA
2e
NCDOT only T I P or state
project no
U 4716A/C
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
NA Multiple Properties
3b
Deed Book and Page No
NA
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
NA
3d
Street address
NA
3e
City state zip
NA
-�
3f
Telephone no
NA
3g
Fax no
NA
3h
Email address
NA
NR
Page Iof12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent El Other specify NCDOT Rail Division
4b
Name
Marc Hamel
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Rail Division NC Department of Transportation
4d
Street address
1553 Mad Service Center
4e
City state zip
Raleigh NC 27699 1553
4f
Telephone no
919 707 4705
4g
Fax no
919 715 6580
4h
Email address
mhamel @ncdot gov
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Elizabeth Scherrer
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Atkins North America Inc
5c
Street address
1616 East Mdlbrook Road Suite 310
5d
City state zip
Raleigh NC 27609 4968
5e
Telephone no
919 431 5296
5f
Fax no
919 876 6848
5g
Email address
elizabeth scherrer@atkinsglobal com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

B Project Information and Prior Project History
1 Property Identification
1 a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
N/A
Latitude See Attached Table Longitude
lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
(DD DDDDDD) ( DD DDDDDD)
1c Property size
project study area is approximately 70 acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to
Stirrup Iron Creek DWO Index # 27 33 4 2
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C NSW
2c River basin
Neuse 03020201
3 Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The project is split equally between the municipal boundaries of Durham and Morrisville with Durham to the north and
Morrisville to the south Land use in the vicinity consists of Mixed Urban /Developed Land Industrial /Commercial
Complexes and relatively small patches of Forest Land and Grass /Shrublands Many of the ditches and tributary
channels are degraded and filled with silt
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
0 062 acres 404 Wetlands 0 063 acres Non 404 State Isolated Wetlands
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
371 95
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose of the project is to increase railroad capacity improve passenger and train schedule reliability and improve
railroad and vehicular safety
3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used
NCDOT Rail Division proposes to construct a grade seperation at the North Carolina Railroad /Norfolk Southern Railroad
(NCRR /NS) crossing at Hopson Road (SR 1978) in Durham County North Carolina The project also includes track
realignment and new siding track for the adjoining 3 4 mile segment of track extending from 140 south to McCnmmon
Parkway (SR 1635) Fill will be used to construct the realigned track and new siding tracks and several ditches will be
relocated The clearing and grubbing work will require the use of trackhoes tandem dump trucks and bulldozers
Compaction of earth material will require the use of sheep s foot compactors and smooth drum rollers in cooperation with
the bulldozers that spread and place the earth and subballast material Additional activities that would result in impacts
include riparian canopy removal in stream construction use of fertilizers and pesticides for revegetation and
pavement/culvert installation
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments Please see attached approvals
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type
® Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company Atkins North America
Name (if known) Adam Efird David O Loughlin (Current)
Inc (Current)
Names of delineators from other firms are not known
Other S &EC (2004 ?) EcoScience (2006)
4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
2006 Action ID 200620636 06/26/2006 2012 SAW 2012 00430
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5 Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions
NA
6 Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased protect?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b If yes explain
NA
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
1 a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ❑ Streams tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of Jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps 404 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ —non 404 other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill Excavation
Wetland AO
❑ Yes
® Corps
005
Clearing
AQ /AR
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
Excavation Fill
Wetland AD /AE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
003
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
2g Total wetland impacts
008
2h Comments Wetland impact numbers correspond to site numbers on drawings
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of Jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number
(PER) or
(Corps 404 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWO — non 404
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Culvert
AN UT to Stirrup
Iron Cr
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
5
46
S2 ® P ❑ T
Culvert Riprap
AF UT to Kit Cr
® PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWO
4
83
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ®���
dt Culvert Riprap
AA UT to Stirru p
Iron Cr
❑ PER
❑INT
❑ Corps
❑DWQ
6
49 Q�
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tnbutary impacts
178
31 Comments Stream impact numbers correspond to site numbers on drawings
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
IN'_

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
NA
02 ❑P ❑T
NA
03 ❑P ❑T
NA
04 ❑P ❑T
NA
4f Total open water impacts
NA
4g Comments NA
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
NA
P2
NA
517 Total
5g Comments NA
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes No If yes permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
NA
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
NA
5k Method of construction
NA
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
® Neuse ❑ Tar Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ®P ❑ T
RRng
AN UT to Stirrup Iron Cr
El Nos
4893
3099
cr
B2 ®P ❑ T
cRR
UT to Kit Cr
D Nos 5333
3716
B3 EJ P ❑ T
RR
crossing
AA UT to Stirrup Iron Cr
El Yes
® No
4139
2609
6h Total buffer impacts
F&Comments
14365
9424
B1 is at Site 1 on drawigs B2 is at Site 2 B3 is at Site 4
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1 a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The NCDOT Rail Division has been at all times committed to incorporating all reasonable and practical design features to
avoid and minimize jurisdictional area impacts Fill slopes have been minimized to the extent practicable Impacts at Site 2
(Station 3391) have been restricted to the west side of the existing railroad bed Impacts at Site 3 (Station 3410) occur in a
narrow fragmented wooded area between the rail bed and Chapel Hill Road The proposed access road turnaround near Site
4 (Station 3435) is placed to avoid impacts to Stream AA Fill slopes were adjusted to minimize impacts to this stream
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Construction will be limited to an area between the existing railroad and the extents of the realigned track and the new siding
track This minimization will be reinforced by the installation of silt fence along both eastern and western margins of the track
bed Rip rap will not be placed in stream beds
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWO ❑ Corps
2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this
projects
❑ Mitigation bank
Payment to m lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank N/A
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
N/A linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature
El warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWO only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
N/A
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWO
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
N/A
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund)
6h Comments Impacts for each of 3 crossings do not exceed the mitigation threshold
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments Please see attached Plan and permit drawings
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
21 %
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative
description of the plan
Please see attached Plan and permit drawings
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local governments jurisdiction is this project?
City and County of Durham City of
Morrisville Wake County
® Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5
DWO 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

F
Supplementary Information
1
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
® Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c
If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter )
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments FONSI signed February 2 2012
2
Violations (DWO Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards
❑ Yes
❑ No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after the fact permit application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2c
If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s)
NA
3
Cumulative Impacts (DWO Requirement)
3a
Will this protect (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
Yes
No
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality
3b
If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description
NA
4
Sewage Disposal (DWO Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility
N/A
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes El No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes No
❑
impacts?
5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
® Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Protected species listed for Wake and Durham County are the endangered Michaux s sumac (Rhus Michauxii) smooth
coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) red cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) and dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta
heterodon) Directed surveys were conducted on May 22 2006 and again in May 2011 for these species There was no
suitable habitat identified for smooth coneflower due to soil type Suitable habitat was identified for Michaux s sumac but
no plants were found There was no suitable habitat identified for red cockaded woodpecker or dwarf wedgemussel
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
N/A
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The N C State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was contacted regarding the proposed project and a subsequent
investigation of historical resources was initiated by SHPO The results of that investigation indicated that there are no
historic resources that would be affected by this project Written verification was received from the SHPO by letter dated
March 9 2006 A copy of the letter is attached to this application
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements N/A
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Data pulled from the NC Floodplain Mapping Program
Mtirc- v-,-t e,
z
Applicant/Agent s Printed Name
Date
Applican Agent s Signature
(Agents signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

COPY
U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Acton ID 200620636 County Durham U S G S Quad Southeast Durham & Cary
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION
Property Owner NCDOT - Rail Division
Attn Marc Hamel, Environment & Planning Branch
Mailing Address 1553 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 1553
Telephone No (919) 733 -7245, ext 270 �� \
Authorized Agent EcoScience Corporation
Attn Layna Thrush
Mailing Address 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
Telephone No (919) 828 -3433
Property description
Size (acres) —133 Nearest Town Durham
Nearest Waterway unnamed tributaries to Stirrup Iron and Burdens Creeks River Basin Neuse and Cane Fear
USGS HUC 03020201 & 03030002 Coordinates N 35 873° W 78 852 °
Location description Study area for the Hopson Road Grade Separation and Norfolk Southern Track Realignment
(TIP Y4117B), as shown on the drawings submitted on 2/21/2006
Indicate Which of the Following Apply
A Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information there may be waters of the U S including wetlands on the above described property
We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA)
jurisdiction To be considered final a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps This prehmmary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33
CFR Part 33 1)
B Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change m the law or
our published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
X There are waters of the U S including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Secton 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
_ We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U S including wetlands on your property delineated Due to the size of
your property and/or our present workload the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely
manner For a more timely delineation you may wish to obtain a consultant To be considered final any delineation must
be verified by the Corps
X The waters of the U S including wetlands on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified
by the Corps We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed Upon completion this survey should be reviewed
and verified by the Corps Once verified this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA
jurisdiction on your property which provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years

AID 200620636
The waters of the U S including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations this deterrrnnation may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
_ There are no waters of the U S to include wetlands present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311) If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program please contact Eric Alsmeyer at (919) 876 -8441, ext 23
C Basis For Determination
The study area contains stream channels of unnamed tributaries to Stirrup Iron and Burdens Creeks tributaries of the
Neuse and Cape Fear Rivers, respectively, with indicators of ordinary high water marks and wetlands adjacent to the
tributaries
D Remarks
Per site inpection on 1/10/2006 wetlands and streams are accurately depicted on maps submitted on 2/21/2006 There
are isolated wetlands and ponds within the study area that are not subject to Section 404 because of no connection to
jurisdictional waters and no nexus to interstate commerce
E Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved ,jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site If you object to this
determination you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331 Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the South Atlantic Division Division Office at the Following
address
Mr Michael F Bell Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD ET CO R
U S Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street Room 9M15
Atlanta Georgia 30303 8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps the Corps must determine that it is complete that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 3315 and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP
Should you decide to subrrut an RFA form it must be received at the above address by 8/28/2006
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence **
Corps Regulatory Official
Date 6/26/2006 Expiration Date 6/26/2011
Copy furnished EcoScrence

x - NOTIFICATION,OF ADMIlVISMATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND fROCE89 AND
: .
RE UE3_T FOR APPEAL=
Applicant NCDOT - Rail Division/
File Number 200620636
Date 6/26/2006
TIP Y 4117B
Attached is
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of ennission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
decision Additional information may be found at http / /www usace army mil/inet/functions /cw /cecwo /reg or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331
A INITIAL PROFFERED PERNUT You may accept or object to the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP) you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the peanut in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the
permit including its terms and conditions and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit
• OBJECT If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may request that the permit be modified accordingly You must complete Section II of this form and return
the form to the district engineer Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of
the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future Upon receipt of your
letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may (a) modify the permit to address all of your
concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having
determined that the permit should be issued as previously written After evaluating your objections, the
district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below
B PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for finial
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP) you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit
• APPEAL If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and
conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal
Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must
be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
C PERMIT DENIAL You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
D APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information
• ACCEPT You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD
• APPEAL If you disagree with the approved JD you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
E PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD The Preliminary JD is not appealable If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD

DIVISION ENGINEER
Commander
U S Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -3490
SECTION H - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record )
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION
If you have questions regarding this decision
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact
may also contact
Eric Alsmeyer
Mr Michael Bell Adinmistratrve Appeal Review Officer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
CESAD- ET -CO -R
US Army Corps of Engineers
U S Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M 15
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
1 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations
Date
Telephone number
Signature of appellant or agent
DIVISION ENGINEER
Commander
U S Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -3490

U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id SAW 2012 00430 County Wake U S G S Quad NC CARY
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner North Carohna DOT, Rail Division Aaent Atkins North America Inc
Ryan White Adam Efird
Address 1553 Mad Service Center Address 1616 East Md1brook Road, Smte 310
Raleigh, NC, 27699 Raleigh, NC, 276074968
919 7334245 919 876 - 6888x5257
Nearest Town Mornsville Nearest Waterways UTs to Crabtree, Kit and Shrrup Iron Creeks
River Basin Upper Neuse North Carohna USGS RUC 3020201
Coordinates Latitude 35 861 Longitude -78 846
Location description Study area for improvements to Hopson/Clegg rad sections On existing RR corridor west of
NC 54 from McCrimmon Parkwav to I40 m Durham and Wake Counties, North Carolina
Indicate Which of the Following Apply
A Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information there may be waters of the U S including wetlands on the above described project area
We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA)
jurisdiction To be considered final a jurisdictional determination must be venfied by the Corps This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33
CFR Part 33 1) If you wish you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed) by contacting the Corps district
for further instruction Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the
JD
B Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change m the law
or our published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of
this notification
X There are waters of the U S including wetlands on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
_ We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U S including wetlands on your project area delineated Due to the
size of your property and/or our present workload the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner For a more timely delineation you may wish to obtain a consultant To be considered final any
delineation must be venfied by the Corps
X The waters of the U S including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
venfied by the Corps We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed Upon completion this survey should be
reviewed and venfied by the Corps Once venfied this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
The waters of the U S including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on _ Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
_ There are no waters of the U S to include wetlands present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
Page 1 of 2

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311) If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program please contact Eric Alsmever at 919 5544884 x23/
Enc C Alsmeveraa.usace annv and
C The study area contains relatively permanent waters, with indicators of ordinary hwh water marks stream channels
of unnamed tributaries of Crabtree, Kit and Stirrup Iron Creeks, and abutfine wetlands Crabtree and Kit Creeks are
tributaries of Lake Crabtree. and Kit Creek is a tnbutary of Jordan Lake Those lakes have been determined to be
Traditional Navigable Waters
D Remarks
Tins JD was confirmed by field inspection on 7/26/2011 The drawmes Funtre 3A 3D (copy att ) submitted by
e-mail on 8/10/2011, eenerallv depict the iurisdretronal waters of the US within the subject study area Wetlands AB
AC, AK, AJ and Al. as shown on previous Figures 3A -3D, submitted on 6/8/2011, are isolated wetlands not subject to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
E Attention USDA Program Participants
This delmeation/determmation has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request The delmeation/determmation may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985 If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants or anticipate participation
in USDA programs you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service prior to starting work
F Appeals Information (Tins information applies only to approved junsdretronal determinations as m(hcated m
B above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site If you object to this
determination you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331 Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn Jason Steele Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW Room 1OM15
Atlanta Georgia 30303 8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps the Corps must determine that it is complete that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR. part 3315 and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP
Should you decide to submit an RFA form it must be received at the above address by 5/712012
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence **
Corps Regulatory Official
Date 3/9/2012 Expiration Date 3/9/2017
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public To help us ensure we continue to
do so please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http / /per2 nwp usace army mil/survey html to
complete the survey online
Copy furnished Atkins Global (A Efird)

� p
Applicant North Carolina Department of
File Number SAW 2012 -00430
Date 3/9/2012
Transportation, Rail Division
Attached
is
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
❑
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision
Additional information may be found at http / /www usace army mil/met/functions /cw /cecwo /reg or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331
A INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or object to the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP) you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety and waive all
rights to appeal the permit including its terms and conditions and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit
• OBJECT If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future Upon receipt of your letter the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written After
evaluating your objections the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration as indicated in
Section B below
B PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP) you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety and waive all
rights to appeal the permit including its terms and conditions and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit
• APPEAL If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice
C PERMIT DENIAL You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
D APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information
• ACCEPT You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD
• APPEAL If you disagree with the approved JD you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
E PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD The Preliminary JD is not appealable If you wish you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed)
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD

SECTION II REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record )
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record
However you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact
also contact
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr Jason Steele Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn Eric Alsmeyer
CESAD PDO
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
U S Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
60 Forsyth Street Room 1OM15
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Atlanta Georgia 30303 8801
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Phone [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel and any government
consultants to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunit to participate in all site mvesti ations
Date Telephone number
Signature of appellant or agent
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Attn Eric Alsmeyer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to
Division Engineer, Commander, U S Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn Mr Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone [phone]

Finding of No SfgniFcant Impact
Background Information
The Piedmont Improvement Program is an initiative by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation ( NCDOT) the Norfolk Southern Railway (NS) and the North Carolina
Railroad (NCRR) to improve passenger and freight railroad operations along the NCRR
Piedmont Corridor from Raleigh to Charlotte The NCRR Piedmont Corridor consists of the
Greensboro to Charlotte portion of the NS Mainline from Washington DC and Atlanta and
the Greensboro to Raleigh portion of the NCRR H line
The proposed project NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Project No
U 4716 is located in southeastern Durham County with portions of the project located
within Durham city limits The project study area is about 12 miles long and encompasses
approximately 165 acres Portions of the project study area are located within Durham city
limits with the remainder located in the unincorporated area of Durham County Other
incorporated towns near the project study area include Morrisville and Cary to the south
and Raleigh to the southeast all of which are located in Wake County
Land uses within and adjacent to the project study area consist of rapidly developing
residential commercial and industrial uses as well as pine dominated woodlots
pastureland and existing residential lots
Procedural History
The project is included in the NCDOT 2009 2015 State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP) as project U 4716 Funding for the project is anticipated to come from a
variety of sources including FRA and FWHA grants
The protect began at the NCDOT Rail Division with the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) as the lead agency The Hopson Road Grade Separation and NC Railroad /North
South Track Realignment and Church Street Grade Separation and Street Realignment
Durham County NC Environmental Assessment (EA) was approved and signed by FHWA
on September 2 2009 There was a public comment period and a public hearing was held
on January 14, 2010 Agencies and members of the public provided comments
Subsequently the project became eligible for American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
(ARRA) funding requiring a change in the lead agency The FRA became the lead agency
and a revised and updated Hopson Road /Church Street Rail and Roadway Improvements
Durham County NC Environmental Assessment was completed on December 1 2011
Updates to existing conditions were included in the updated EA as well as some minor
corrections There were no changes to the project the Preferred Alternative or project
impacts
Because there were no changes to the project or to the Preferred Alternative nor were there
notable changes in project impacts NCDOT determined that another public hearing and
public comment period were not required Comments received on the previous version of
the EA are still valid Responses to all comments received are included in a later section of
this FONSI
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements
STIP U 4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
Statement of Purpose and Need
The purpose of the project is to improve the safety efficiency and mobility of train and
vehicular traffic in the area around Hopson Road and Church Street in Durham County
North Carolina
This project will facilitate and support future increased passenger rail service for the NCRR
Piedmont Corridor NCDOT proposes to add six daily (three round trip) NCDOT Piedmont
Service trains to the NCRR Piedmont Corridor between Raleigh and Charlotte The
additional Piedmont Service trains will serve the following nine stations Raleigh Cary
Durham Burlington Greensboro, High Point Salisbury Kannapolis and Charlotte
Because this corridor development plan consists of the expansion of an existing service
there are no changes planned in the classes of service fare policies or service quality
standards
The proposed project is located along the Preferred Alternative for the Southeast High
Speed Rail Corridor (SEHSR) determined by the FRA and FHWA in the Record of Decision
(ROD) for the Tier I SEHSR Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) For the southern
portion of the SEHSR, NCDOT is preparing individual project level NEPA documents
including this EA FRA and NCDOT have determined that the individual projects each
have independent utility that is each protect will provide tangible benefits to existing
freight and passenger rail service even if no additional investments are made for high
speed service Regardless of future high speed rail development the proposed protects
would provide benefits to schedule reliability train speeds and overall rail capacity and
safety The respective NEPA documents provide more details on the independent utility of
each project
The SEHSR corridor is planned to include eight daily (four round trip) high speed trains to
the route between Charlotte and Raleigh with service extending beyond the NCRR
Piedmont Corridor northward to Richmond VA and Washington DC and southd to
Atlanta GA and points further south This includes a Piedmont service train that will be
extended north beyond Raleigh upon completion of the proposed Raleigh to Richmond
segment of the SEHSR Ultimately the NCRR Piedmont Corridor is expected to host up to
20 daily (10 round trip) passenger trains between Charlotte and Raleigh by 2030 including
the current and proposed frequencies
The need for the project is summarized below
Improve Mobility and Efficiency for Train Trafric The existing curve of the railroad
tracks at the Hopson Road railroad crossing has a radius that requires passenger trains to
slow down to maneuver through the curve safely Realigning the track and straightening
the curve to maintain a 79 mph speed limit through the study area would improve mobility
and reduce travel time for passenger train traffic
Straightening the curve also would allow trains to maintain momentum When trains slow
down they lose momentum and must accelerate to get back to the speed limit which takes
a considerable amount of time due to the size and weight of the trains Accelerating less
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 2
STIP U-4716

Finding of No Sigmiicant Impact ,
would reduce emissions and fuel consumption allowing the trains to operate more
efficiently
The freight train speed limit is separate from the passenger train speed limit and is
restricted by NS the freight operator of the railroad in this area to 50 mph throughout the
area for safety reasons This restriction is part of NS standard practice for the types of
freight trains that pass through this area (freight trains that are long and carry a mix of
materials) Therefore the freight train speed limit would not change as a result of this
project However the reduced degree of curve would result in less wear and lower
maintenance costs and fuel costs for the NS Railroad
Improve Rail and Road Safety Currently the intersection of Hopson Road and the
NCRR/NS tracks is an at grade intersection with the potential for collisions between
vehicular traffic and freight and passenger trains Providing a grade separation for this
intersection would eliminate the potential for vehicle /train collisions which would improve
safety for both road and rail traffic
The current vertical alignment for Hopson Road at the railroad crossing makes it difficult
for drivers to see past the railroad tracks This poor sight distance for vehicular traffic has
the potential to contribute to collisions During construction of the grade separation the
vertical alignment of Hopson Road would be improved which would improve safety for road
traffic
The Church Street at grade crossing also has a very high potential for collisions Church
Street (SR 1980) has poor geometrics at the crossing for both roadway and railroad traffic
There are inadequate stacking distances between the railroad and the adjacent intersection
with NC 54 (Miami Boulevard) unsafe movements short queuing distances and poor sight
lines
Improve Traffic Flow for Roadway Traffic At present traffic along Hopson Road and
Church Street passing through the at grade intersections with the railroad tracks must
stop for passing trains Typically ten to twelve trains per day cross both Hopson Road and
Church Street This contributes to delay and has a negative effect on traffic flow for cars
and trucks Grade separating Hopson Road and closing the Church Street railroad crossing
would eliminate the need for vehicular traffic to stop for passing trains which would reduce
delays for vehicular traffic
A reasonable range of alternatives was considered for the proposed action These included
the No Build Alternative Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternatives Travel
Demand Management (TDM) Alternatives Mass Transit Alternatives and two Build
Alternatives (Hopson Road Under Railroad Alternative and Hopson Road Over Railroad
Alternative)
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 3
STIP U 4716

Finding of No Significant impact
Preferred Alternative The Preferred Alternative is the Hopson Road Under Railroad
Alternative Figure 1 shows the Preferred Alternative This was the Recommended
Alternative in the EA The NCDOT Rail Division proposes to improve rail and vehicular
safety efficiency and mobility within the project study area through the following actions
• Realignment of the NCRR/NS rail line within the project limits to straighten the
curve allowing trains to operate at higher speeds and thereby improve efficiency of
rail operations The new railroad track alignment would be constructed to
accommodate a future parallel passing siding track (Clegg to Nelson passing siding)
• Replacement of the at grade rail crossing at Hopson Road (SR 1978) with a grade
separated crossing increasing safety by eliminating train vehicle conflicts and
improving mobility for vehicles by removing the need to stop for passing trains
Hopson Road would be expanded to a curb and gutter section with one 12 foot and
one 16 foot travel lane in each direction and 5 foot sidewalks on both sides Phe
outside 16 foot travel lanes would be striped to accommodate bicyclists Z he
centerline of Hopson Road would shift approximately 30 feet to the south and will
include a minimum 17 foot vertical clearance under the rail line
• Closure of the at grade rail crossing of the NCRR/NS at Church Street (SR 1980)
and closure of the adjacent Church Street/NC 54 (Miami Boulevard) intersection for
safety reasons
• Extension of Church Street northward to intersect with Hopson Road to maintain
mobility as a result of closing the Church Street /NC 54 (Miami Boulevard)
intersection and at grade railroad crossing Church Street would be constructed to
include 36 feet of pavement with curbs and sidewalks on both sides which would
match the cross section constructed by the private developer of Keystone Crossing
Through the Keystone Crossing residential subdivision the proposed pavement
striping would have two lanes of travel and on street parking on both sides of the
street and the speed limit would be 30 mph The Church Street extension to the
north is proposed to be striped to provide two lanes of travel with a center turn lane
and no on street parking However the final lane striping plan for Church Street
through the project study area will be determined during final design
Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Stud v Other alternatives
considered but eliminated from further study included the Hopson Road Over Railroad
Alternative the No Build Alternative TSM Alternatives TDM Alternatives and Mass
Transit Alternatives
The Hopson Road Over Railroad Alternative would carry Hopson Road over the NCRR/NS
rail line Hopson Road would be shifted approximately 150 feet south Other features of
this alternative would be similar to the Preferred Alternative (Hopson Road Under Railroad
Alternative)
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 4
STIP U 4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
The Hopson Road Over Railroad Alternative was eliminated from consideration during the
project development process This alternative was eliminated due to the additional area
required from surrounding properties for right of way and the greater expense involved
with construction of a roadway bridge over the rail alignment The inconvenience of a
detour during construction and the larger impact footprint were other contributing factors
The Hopson Road Over Railroad Alternative received additional concerns from Hopson
Road residents due to its proximity to their properties
The No Build Alternative TSM Alternatives TDM Alternatives and Mass Transit
Alternatives were eliminated from consideration because these measures would not meet
the projects purpose and need They would not address the safety concerns at the two at
grade 1 ail crossings nor would they improve efficiency of rail operations
Discussions of the environmental impacts associated with the Hopson Road/Church Street
Rail and Roadway Improvements are located in Chapter 4 of the EA The potential for
environmental effects is summarized for each resource category in Table 1 below
Table 1 Summary of Impacts Preferred Alternative
Impact Area
EA Sections
Containing
More Detail
Summary of impact
Proposed Mitigation
Air Quality
332 4 3 2
No long term impact The project area is a
In accordance with NCDOT
maintenance area for carbon monoxide (CO) and
standard practice during
ozone and in attainment for all other criteria air
construction measures will be
pollutants The Preferred Alternative meets general
taken to reduce dust generated
conformity and transportation conformity
by construction when the
requirements The Preferred Alternative would not
control of dust is necessary for
cause or contribute to any new localized CO violations
the protection and comfort of
or increase the frequency or severity of any existing
motorists and area residents
CO violations The Preferred Alternative does not
These dust suppression
include a significant air pollutant emissions source
measures may include watering
New USEPA rules (March 2008) will dramatically
unpaved work areas and
reduce emissions from diesel locomotives of all types
covering stockpiled materials
Construction Activities Air quality impacts from
For construction activities in
construction of the Preferred Alternative are expected
Durham County open burning if
to be minor and short term
allowed will require a permit in
accordance with the Durham
County Code of Ordinances
Section 16-13
Water Quality
343 4 5 2
Project activities such as clearing and grubbing
Utilize NCDOT s Best
riparian canopy removal in water construction
Management Practices for the
fertilizer and pesticide use for revegetation
Protection of Surface Waters
redirection of surficnal groundwater flows could
and Design Standards for
impact surface water resources in the absence of
Sensitive Watersheds
appropriate Best Managements Practices (BMPs)
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements
STIP U 4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
Table 1 Summary of Impacts Preferred Alternative
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements
STIP U-4716
EA Sections
Impact Area
Containing
Summary of Impact
Proposed Mitigation
More Detail
Noise and
3 3 1 4 3 1
No Impact from Train Noise The FTA Noise Impact
The construction of roadway
Vibration
Criteria were used to determine whether the
noise barriers would not be
Preferred Alternative would result in noise impacts to
feasible for the Preferred
nearby noise sensitive receivers from trains All
Alternative because roadway
receivers fall into the No Impact' range from trains
noise impacts in the project area
The railroad tracks would be realigned farther from
would occur in residential areas
existing neighborhoods Also because the at grade
where roadway access is
crossings in the project study area would be removed
required for each individual
trains will not need to use horns and existing horn
home and the construction of
noise would not occur in the future a noise benefit to
long uninterrupted sound walls
the environment Vibration impacts were determined
would not be possible
to not be of concern for this project due to low speeds
and infrequent operations
The predicted unmitigated
Impacts from Vehicular Traffic Noise Vehicular
traffic noise impacts do not rose
traffic noise levels are predicted to be between 56 and
to the level of significance
72 dBA Leq Predicted traffic noise would result in
projected exceedances of FHWA Noise Abatement
Criteria at approximately 75 residences and a daycare
in the project study area The impacted receptors are
along Hopson Road and along Church Street in the
Keystone Crossing neighborhood
Solid Waste
4 1 3
No impact The Preferred Alternative would not
Not applicable
Disposal
46
generate substantial solid waste or hazardous waste
Waste generated during construction would be
properly disposed of in accordance with State and
local regulations
Ecological
3 5 2
Permanent impacts would occur to 3 5 acres of Pine
None needed
Systems (Biotic
451
Forest and 16 1 acres of maintained /disturbed areas
Communities
Short term displacement of wildlife would occur
and Wildlife)
during construction
Wetlands and
3541
The Recommended Alternative (with a 40 ft buffer
A permit under Section 404 of
Neuse River
3542
around construction limits) would impact
the Clean Water Act will be
Buffer Rules
4 5 3
approximately 760 linear feet (If) of stream at four
required from the US Army
crossings Of these impacts 245 If are along a
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and
perennial stream and 515 If are along three
a Section 401 Water Quality
intermittent streams There are no wetland or pond
Certification will be required
impacts
from the NC Division of Water
The Recommended Alternative would impact up to
Quality ( NCDWQ)
approximately 123 acres of Neuse River buffer
Depending on the impacts
The Recommended Alternative avoids and minimizes
calculated during final design
impacts to streams and buffers to the extent
the project may require
practicable It is expected that actual impacts to
mitigation for buffer impacts in
streams and Neuse River Buffers will be less when
accordance with the Neuse River
calculated using final design information because the
Buffer Rules
buffer used around the construction limits will be less
Final determinations on
compensatory mitigation are
made by the USACE and NCDWQ
as part of the permitting
processes
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements
STIP U-4716

Finding of No Signiricant Impact
Table 1 Summary of Irnnacts Preferred Alternative
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 8
STIP U-4716
EA Sections
Impact Area
Containing
Summary of impact
Proposed Mitigation
More Detail
Endangered
3543
No impact No suitable habitat exists in the Preferred
Not applicable
Species
454
Alternative study area for smooth coneflower
Directed surveys for Mahaux s sumac in suitable
habitat conducted on May 22 2006 and July 21 2010
within the project study area found no plants The
Biological Conclusion for smooth coneflower and
Michaux s sumac is no effect
Flood Hazards
338 4 3 7
No impact There are no floodplains in the Preferred
Not applicable
and Floodplam
Alternative study area
Management
Coastal Zone
14
No impact Durham County is not in a coastal zone
Not applicable
Management
Energy
15 1
Positive Effect By straightening the curve of the
None needed
Resources
4 1 5
railroad track the Preferred Alternative would allow
more consistent speeds through the project study
area for passenger trains Accelerating less would
reduce emission and fuel consumption allowing the
trains to operate more efficiently
Implementation of the Preferred Alternative would
decrease the average delay time per vehicle at the
intersections within the project study area compared
to the No Build Alternative However the closure of
the Church Street intersection with NC 54 (Miami
Boulevard) would lengthen travel distances between
the subdivisions along Church Street and destinations
on or requiring access to NC 54 (Miami Boulevard)
thus offsetting travel time and energy savings for
these vehicular trips
Other Natural
3 3 3
No impact There are no active farmlands or mines in
Not applicable
Resources
3 3 7 433
the project study area
(water
minerals
timber
farmland etc)
Aesthetics and
3 3 5
No impact Minor changes in the visual landscape
None needed
Design Quality
4 3 5
would occur as a result of the project These changes
are consistent with the adopted land use plans for the
area The proposed railroad bridge over Hopson Road
would include aesthetic design features
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 8
STIP U-4716

Finding of No Staniricant Impact
Table 1 Summary of Impacts Preferred Alternative
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements g
STIP U 4716
EA Sections
Impact Area
Containing
Summary of Impact
Proposed Mitigation
More Detail
Impacts on
22
Positive Effect Overall the project would have a
Not applicable
Transportation'
2 4 2
positive effect on passenger train and freight train
4 1 1
traffic and vehicular traffic Flattening the railroad
track curve through the area would provide more
efficient train operations Closing the at grade
crossings at Hopson Road and Church Street and
grade separating Hopson Road would improve safety
for vehicles and trains and improve vehicular traffic
flow Extending Church Street to Hopson Road would
provide connectivity
Positive Effect Bicycles and pedestrians would be
provided facilities on Hopson Road Sidewalks would
be provided on Church Street in the project area
Currently Hopson Road in the project area does not
have sidewalks or a wide outside lane to
accommodate bicyclists as would be provided under
the Preferred Alternative
Minor Impact As a result of closing the Church Street
at grade railroad crossing and extending Church Street
to Hopson Road traffic patterns would change as
increased traffic is routed through the Keystone
Crossing neighborhood Measures to minimize
impacts coordinated with the neighborhood residents
and incorporated into the preliminary design included
reducing the speed limit on Church Street to 30 mph
through Keystone Crossing and allowing on street
parking
Possible Barriers
4 1 1
No impact The Preferred Alternative would not
Not applicable
to Elderly and
divide or isolate the Keystone Crossing or Hopson
Handicapped
Road neighborhoods nor create barriers to the
mobility of the elderly or handicapped Sidewalks
would be provided along Church Street and Hopson
Road and provisions for bicyclists would be provided
on Hopson Road
Land Use
3 2 1
No Impact The Preferred Alternative is consistent
Not applicable
4 2 1
with existing land use and local land use plans and
zoning
Socioeconomics2
3 1
Minor positive impact The Preferred Alternative
Not applicable
41
would not create or eliminate permanent jobs but
construction of the project would generate temporary
construction jobs No relocations of businesses or
residences are required Neighborhoods and
communities would not be disrupted and business
districts would not be negatively impacted
Environmental
414
No impact No direct or indirect impacts to any
Not applicable
Justice
neighborhoods residences or churches including
potential minority communities would occur
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements g
STIP U 4716

Finding of No SigntFcant Impact
Table 1 Summary of Imuacts Preferred Alternative
1 Impacts on transportation include impacts to passengers and freight by all modes Including bicycles and pedestrians in local regional
national and international perspectives and impacts on traffic congestion
2 Socioeconomic impacts includes effects on number and kinds of available lobs potential for community disruption and demographic shifts
the need for and availability of relocation housing impacts on commerce including existing business districts metropolitan areas and the
immediate area of the alternative and impacts on local government services and revenues
Potential indirect and cumulative effects in the project specific Indirect and Cumulative
Effects (ICE) Study Area also were investigated for this study Indirect and cumulative
effects of the overall program of corridor improvements were addressed in the Tier I EIS for
the SEHSR corridor
Adverse indirect water quality impacts may occur under the Recommended Alternative due
to stormwater runoff However these impacts would be minimized through
implementation of NCDors Best Management Practices for the Protectton of Surface
Waters
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 10
STIP U-4716
EA Sections
Impact Area
Containing
Summary of Impact
Proposed Mitigation
More Detail
Public Health
4 1 3
No impact The Preferred Alternative would not
Not applicable
generate substantial hazardous waste nor would
operations pose a public health concern
Public Safety
162 4 1 3
Positive Effect The Preferred Alternative would
Not applicable
(including
provide improved access for emergency vehicles by
Hazardous
eliminating delays occurring at the Hopson Road and
Materials)
Church Street at grade crossings Elimination of the
at grade crossings would also improve safety for local
motorists and train crews The construction of
sidewalks along Hopson Road would provide safe
pedestrian walkways The Preferred Alternative
would not generate hazardous waste nor would
operations pose a public health concern
Recreational
3 1 5 4 1 3
No impact There are no public parks or other
Not applicable
Opportunities
recreational facilities within the Preferred Alternative
Historic
34 44
No impact There are no significant historic
Not applicable
Architectural
architectural or archaeological resources within the
and
Preferred Alternative study area as confirmed by the
Archaeological
State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) The letter
Resources
from the SHPO(dated November 2 2009) is included
in Appendix D
Section 4(f) and
3 1 5
No impact There are no Section 4(f) or Section 6(f)
Not applicable
Section 6(f)
resources in the Preferred Alternative study area
Resources
Construction
47
Temporary impacts associated with construction of
Utilize Best Management
Impacts
the Preferred Alternative could occur to air quality
Practices and standard NCDOT
water quality and wildlife
procedures during construction
1 Impacts on transportation include impacts to passengers and freight by all modes Including bicycles and pedestrians in local regional
national and international perspectives and impacts on traffic congestion
2 Socioeconomic impacts includes effects on number and kinds of available lobs potential for community disruption and demographic shifts
the need for and availability of relocation housing impacts on commerce including existing business districts metropolitan areas and the
immediate area of the alternative and impacts on local government services and revenues
Potential indirect and cumulative effects in the project specific Indirect and Cumulative
Effects (ICE) Study Area also were investigated for this study Indirect and cumulative
effects of the overall program of corridor improvements were addressed in the Tier I EIS for
the SEHSR corridor
Adverse indirect water quality impacts may occur under the Recommended Alternative due
to stormwater runoff However these impacts would be minimized through
implementation of NCDors Best Management Practices for the Protectton of Surface
Waters
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 10
STIP U-4716

Finding of No SigniFcant Impact
There is also the potential for cumulative visual and aesthetic effects and effects to
unnamed streams in the vicinity of the study area Minor changes to the visual landscape
would occur under the Preferred Alternative Although there are no prominent scenic
vistas or visual resources in the project area the widening of Hopson Road and Church
Street as well as the extension of Church Street to connect with Hopson Road would
introduce new elements into the built environment These new elements combined with
those of projects on Davis Drive NC 54 and the Triangle Parkway would introduce new
man made elements to the visual environment and continue changing the visual character
of the area from rural to suburban However this is consistent with the land use plans for
the area and recent developments such as Keystone Crossing
The Preferred Alternative together with other growth and development in the ICE Study
Area would increase the amount of soil disturbing activities thus increasing the risk of
stieam sedimentation and turbidity from construction related erosion However local
sediment and erosion control regulations Neuse River buffer rules post construction and
stormwater ordinances and other water quality protection measures would minimize these
effects
Construction of the Preferred Alternative would contribute to continued forest
fragmentation and wildlife habitat disturbance that has occurred throughout the ICE Study
Area Cumulatively there are several protects planned in the ICE Study Area that could
add to this effect However the area is developing consistent with the land use plans of
Durham County which call for a mix of commercial industrial and medium density
residential development in the project area
Public and Agency Coordination
Circulation of the Environmental Assessment As previously noted the original EA
for the project was approved and signed by FHWA on September 2 2009 when FHWA was
the lead agency The EA was made available for public review at various government
offices Copies were distributed to state and federal environmental resource and regulatory
agencies and local governments A map displaying the location and design of the project
and a copy of the environmental document were available for public review at the NCDOT
Highway Division 5 Office located at 2612 N Duke Street in Durham the Town of
Morrisville Town Hall located at 100 Town Hall Drive in Morrisville and at the City of
Durham — Transportation Division located at 101 City Hall Plaza (41h floor) in Durham
Copies of the Public Hearing Map also were available upon request at
www ncdot ore/ doh/ nreconstruct /hlghwav /roadway/heanngmans by county/ Comments on
the EA were accepted by NCDOT through February 19 2010
Subsequently the project was selected for ARRA funding through the FRA requiring a
change in the lead agency The FRA became the lead agency and a revised and updated
EA was completed on December 1 2011 Because there were no changes to the project or to
the Preferred Alternative nor were there notable changes in project impacts NCDOT
determined with FRA s concurrence that another Public Hearing and public comment
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 11
STIP U4716

Finding of No Stanificant Impact
period were not required Comments received on the FHWA version of the EA are still
valid and are addressed below and in Appendices B and C
Public Hearin e Following circulation of the FHWA version of the EA for comments a
Public Hearing was held for the project The public hearing was held on January 14 2010
from 4 30 pm to 7 30 pm at the Archie K Davis Conference Center at the Research Triangle
Park Headquarters The public notice and handout for the hearing are included in
Appendix A The Public Hearing was held in an informal setting to answer questions and
receive comments regarding the proposed project Public Hearing Maps presenting the
project design as well as environmental constraints were available for viewing Copies of
the EA also were available
Approximately 39 people attended the Public Hearing A total of 29 public comments were
submitted at the Public Hearing and an additional ten comments were submitted
afterwards All public comments received are included in Appendix C with responses for
each comment Common concerns also are addressed below under Public Comments
Received on the Environmental Assessment
Neighborhood Meeting with Keystone Crossin A neighborhood meeting with
residents and property owners of the Keystone Crossing subdivision was held at the
Research Triangle Park Headquarters at 12 Davis Drive Research Triangle Park NC on
August 26 2010 from 5 00 pm to 7 00 pm Residents and property owners in Keystone
Crossing were informed of the meeting through a direct mailing
The purpose of this neighborhood meeting was to provide information to the residents and
property owners in Keystone Crossing regarding traffic calming measures proposed along
Church Street (Keystone Park Drive) through their neighborhood These measures
included striping Keystone Park Drive (future Church Street) for two travel lanes and on
street parking through the subdivision and a proposed speed limit of 35 mph
Approximately 32 residents and/or owners from the Keystone Crossing subdivision
attended the meeting Most attendees appeared satisfied with the proposed measures
although some expressed a desire for a 25 mph speed limit through the neighborhood
Upon consideration of public comments the NCDOT changed the proposed speed limit to
30 mph on Church Street through Keystone Crossing A newsletter was mailed to meeting
attendees and the neighborhood residents in February 2011 to announce the decision
Agency Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment Several local and
state agencies provided comments on the FHWA version of the EA during the public
comment period In addition two agency letters were received after the project scoping
process but before the comment period for the FHWA version of the EA These letters are
from the City of Durham Transportation Manager (January 8 2009) and the Durham
Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (March 31 2008)
All comment letters from state and local agencies, and the responses to these comments
are included in Appendix B It should be noted that the comments received were based on
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 12
STIP U-4716

Finding of No Signiricant Impact
the agencies review of the FHWA version of the EA The FRA version of the EA
incorporated many of these comments
Public Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment Thirty nine
comment forms /emailsAetters were received from the public during the comment period
Many of the public comments were similar and involved concerns with common issues
Responses to each of these frequently cited concerns are provided below Appendix C
includes all the comments received from the public and individual responses
Issue 1 The extension of Church Street through the Keystone Crossing subdivision will
cause unsafe conditions for pedestrians particularly children within the community due to
elevated traffic levels and travel speeds
Response Sufficient pedestrian crossings are available to minimize potential
safety issues 1 he existing section of roadway through Keystone Crossing includes
sidewalks The proposed extension also would include sidewalks and there are
striped pedestrian crossing locations in the neighborhood Also the extension and
connection of Church Street would maintain the existing lower speed limit (30 miles
per hour) through the neighborhood and would be consistent with area
transportation and land use plans Traffic calming measures through the
neighborhood being proposed by NCDOT include striping the section of Church
Street through the neighborhood for two travel lanes with parking on both sides
The roadway striping will be finalized during final design
Issue 2 The extension of Church Street through the Keystone Crossing subdivision will
reduce home values by negatively affecting the quality of life within the neighborhood
Response The extension of Church Street is consistent with land use and
transportation plans for the area and was part of the approved site plan for the
Keystone development Traffic calming measures through the Keystone Crossing
subdivision have been included in the preliminary designs As discussed in the
previous response sidewalks and pedestrian crossings will be included in the
project The speed limit on Church Street is proposed to be 30 mph through
Keystone Crossing The proposed pavement striping on Church Street includes two
lanes of travel with on street parking on both sides of the street and crosswalks
Issue 3 Residents of the Keystone Crossing subdivision were not provided advanced
knowledge of the planned extension of Church Street and therefore were not able to make
an informed decision regarding the purchase of their homes
Response The developers of Keystone Crossing Keystone Corporation have been
consulted on the planning process for the Church Street extension project since
2003 approximately four years prior the first home sales within the subdivision
Keystone Corporation was responsible for providing homebuyers with information
on the planned Church Street extension project The extension was included on the
plans for the Keystone development
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 13
STIP U 4716

Finding of No Slaniricant Impact
NCDOT held two Citizen Information Workshops on January 29 2008 and
October 30 2008 and a Public Hearing on January 14 2010 These meetings were
advertised through direct mailings and public notices in local newspapers In
addition for the Citizen Informational Workshops approximately 75 notices were
hand delivered to local businesses within and adjacent to the project study area
Issue 4 The elimination of the Church Street/NC54 intersection will result in severe
traffic delays for drivers that are attempting to access NC 54
Response The rail bridge over Hopson Road should improve traffic flow because
train crossings will no longer cause delays on Hopson Road and NC 54 While
construction activities may impact travel in the short term the project will provide a
safer trip overall
Also the Church Street at grade crossing has a very high potential for crashes with
poor geometrics at the crossing for both roadway and railroad traffic including
inadequate stacking distances between the railroad and the adjacent intersection
with NC 54 unsafe movements short queuing distances and poor sight lines The
grade separation at Hopson Road will eliminate the potential for vehicle /train
collisions which would improve safety for both road and rail traffic
Environmental Commitments
During the NEPA process, commitments are made to avoid minimize or mitigate project
impacts Commitments result from public comment or through the requirements of or
agreements with, environmental resource and regulatory agencies The determination that
project implementation will not have a significant impact on the environment is predicated
on these commitments made to protect the environment
In addition to compliance with applicable federal and state requirements and regulations
such as Section 404 Individual Permit Conditions Nationwide Permit Conditions Regional
Conditions and State Consistency Conditions NCDOT Guidelines for Best Management
Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters General Certification Conditions and Section
401 Conditions of Certification and the Endangered Species Act the following special
project commitment has been agreed to by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation
• The privately owned Creekstone Creative School daycare located at 4823 Hopson
Road has an outdoor play space in front of the building facing Hopson Road
Current plans show land from this parcel is required for right of way but that there
would be no encroachment on the outdoor play space If this facility is still a
daycare at the time Hopson Road is widened adjacent to the building and the
outdoor play area is still in use the final design for the protect will avoid
encroaching on the play area (based on current boundaries)
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 14
STIP U 4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
Conclusion
FRA and FHWA find that the impacts of the Preferred Alternative as assessed in the
Hopson Road /Church Street Rail and Roadway Improvements Durham County NC
Environmental Assessment (December 1 2011) and this Finding of No Significant Impact
satisfy the requirements of FRA s Procedures of Considering Environmental Impacts and
FHWA s requirements and that the project will not have a significant impact on the quality
of the human or natural environment following the implementation of identified mitigation
measures
l
Joseph C Szabo Administrator
Federal Railroad Administration
`)4vohn Sullivan III PE Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
7
Date
/ /Z, 6 // e-
Date
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 15
STIP U 4716

Finding of No Significant impact
FRA Contact Person
John Winkle
Environmental Protection Specialist
Federal Railroad Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE RM W38 311
Washington DC 20590
202 493 6067
List of Persons and Organizations Preparing the FONSI
Ryan White PL
NC Department of Transportation — Rail Division
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 1548
919 733 7245 x266
Jill Gurak PE AICP
Project Manager
Atkins
1616 East Millbrook Road Suite 31
Raleigh NC 27609
919 431 5298
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 16
STIP U 4716

North Carohna Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
I to 13 sandix G Adm n trat
Nftchncl 1 I a Im ( owns x Offi(x of \rcht� cs and I It tor}
t lath ( 1 vir cretan Lkvt ton of Ili tonal Rc OUMc
(ettr ('ro%c lk-pun S cn,tan 1)1 td Brook Ikreu( r
March 9 2006
Lauren Wolfe
PI3SJ
1616 b ast Millbrook Road
Suite 310
Raleigh NC 27609 4968
Re Hopson Road Grade Separation and Railroad I rack Realignment, U 4716 Durham County
ER 06 -0312
Dear Nis Wolfe
I hank j ou for your letter of January 23 2006 concerning the aboi e project
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources that would be affected by
the project Therefore wt, liaN a no comment on the project as proposed
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Adiison Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800
I hank you for vour cooperation and consideration If you have questions concerning the abo-, e comment
please contact Renee Gledhill Farley environmental renew coordinator at 919/733 4763 In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number
Sincerely
eter Sandbeck
Location Matting Address Telephone /Fax
ADMINISTRATION 5 i N Bh tnt SUL t Ital gh N( 4117 Ma Ltn (,cnt R 11,1 N( (9)4617 (91))13347131 338(5.)
RESTORATION Sl N BI u t ltm t R I gh \( 407M I tier. cc Cent Ralc gh'J( 09L41 (91))731f 54 /t 15.48ol
SURVEY & PLANNING 115 N 131 uitstn t Ralcgh N( 4117 Mad Se c (_ent,- R.ItighN( >>6))4(1r ()1))/33(545/71x4811

U 4716 A/C Hopson Road Rail
Appendix A
Stream and Wetland Data Forms

7401AN -w, Ak--i-A
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site DQswn - 0% 0% City/County Wilik S OJA C!� OS11,01 Sampling Date
Applicant/Owner wcodT State �J(-- Sampling Point 112 E ,44W—
i
Investigator(s) A E d !�UG>7 Section Township Range
Landform (hilislope terrace etc) Local relief (concave convex none) Slope ( /o)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat 35, RQ S 9 q Long -76 %423a3 Datum WOIC3
Sod Map Unit Name Cs610% 4W1 '3�° (o ei AUK G��woc NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes VI No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
7
_ High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_✓ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Agwtard (D3)
_
V Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches) Z.-
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
j US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
I

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
/ Cover Species? Status
1 Nye syl, Jb�h�
-��— n
2
x 1 =
3
x 2 =
4
x 3 =
5
x 4 =
6
x 5 =
7
= Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size
)
1 _ Ar lJ�eldmn
�Ll— F1i-�
2 `,itf J ��l"lbOr i+1 �fec:�aki
�e
3
4
5
6
7
_ = Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
1 M��feSity Uvh Y M�`IIG./w�
_� `ZS F/4C
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Sampling Point
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species c
That Are OBL FACW or FAC 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species �M
That Are 0131- FACW or FAC (0v_ (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total / Cover of
Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 Dominance Test is >50 /
_ 3 Prevalence Index is s3 0'
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
Tree – Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling – Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub – Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb – All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
plants except woody vines less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine – All woody vines regardless of height
L0 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5 Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

SOIL
A 91,4
Sampling Point
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) / Color (moist) / Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0 -5 101 'tIZ loo tcon Cloy
(L g(z gs WIC S16 c An CH
'Type C= Concentration D= Depletion RM= Reduced Matrix
Hydnc Soil Indicators
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
2Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matnx
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sc
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Coast Prame Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matnx (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 136)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Sod Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

A01AE_VIArc -v
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site }6esao - ck!m
City/County \�btet
6,4 OJA%VA Lo ✓01�_ Sampling Date OS I !I
ApphcanUOwner NCDD-T
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
I State Nc_ Sampling Point (. f �Rk -J
Investigator(s) A ��r1Y�i d�
�OuY�utitln
Section Township Range
_ Saturation (A3)
Landform (hdlslope terrace etc)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Local relief (concave convex none) Slope ( %)
Subregion (LRR or MLR_A__)__
Lat
3S $62�Si
Long —70 941 040
II
Map Unit Name wbo(
Sod 6w
Ssn4j 104so,
_(� \° t�optf. urAOdE�Qi��
-Datum
BYa NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions
on the site typical for this time of year' Yes
No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod
or Hydrology
significantly disturbed?
Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Sod
or Hydrology
naturally problematic?
(If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Agwtard (D3)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
AVIAE -vr Ak,-U
Sampling Point
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
A Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
P,, li % -1424 V
-51)_
4 CA) C
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
2
QLA&A-i /ttg rQ
4r0,<.AJ*
to
'�Cj
- 00 -W
10 VA
Total Number of Dominant
Across All Strata (B)
3
U-A 14i 4i
_
-
Species _
4
hr is 00ir"^
75'
Via PIK_
5
QW4 !�
2©
� _
Percent of Dominant Species
Y�`4 (A/B)
That Are OBL FACW or FAC
6
Prevalence Index worksheet
7
= Total Cover
Total °/ Cover of Multiply by
Sapling
Stratum (Plot size )
(,) 'V
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
1
Sjnuoejf & tBA' aNc1
2
Q .\h d S
-Lo_
lag f
FAC species x 3=
3
a r&j<. CA6
�_
,�1� (%
FACU species x 4 =
4
UPL species x 5 =
5
Column Totals (A) (B)
6
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7
50
Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
=Total
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1
_ 2 Dominance Test is >50 °/
2
_ 3 Prevalence Index is _ <3 0'
4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5
6
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
7
be present unless disturbed or problematic
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
1
so
� , _
Tree — Woody plants excluding woody vines
—'
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
2
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
3
4
Sapling — Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
5
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
6
Shrub —Woody plants excluding woody vines
7
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
8
Herb — All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
9
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
10
plants except woody vines less than approximately
11
3 ft (1 m) in height
12
Woody vine — All woody vines regardless of height
_
= Total Cover
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size
�1Mt141D ri)�+/,lltii�o(ta
`A�•
1
_LL_
2
3
Hydrophytic
4
Vegetation
5
Presents Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moss �_ Color (moist) A Type' Loc Texture Remarks
D_to lei (L L139^ Gp
'Type C= Concentration D= Depletion RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Limno M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sods3
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (1719)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
_ Iron Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

f�0e2( -""
�
� WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
,(
Project/Site ' r6NA— 0!1J City /County W �� � 0VA4� �,0� r Sampling Date
Applicant/Owner 14COOT State 1" Sampling Point AQ eg �11
Investigator(s) elf 9 Section Township Range
Landform (hdislope terrace etc) 4 Local relief (concave convex o ) Slope (°/ )
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat 35 Ul' 44� Long ZZ� Datum 0097,
Sod Map Unit Name ��� S� (� (d°� - / NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Pnmary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
__Saturation Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
T
Water Table Present? Yes V No
Depth (inches) 1 kJ"P'S
Saturation Presents Yes �L No
Depth (inches) 1 M�
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes `� No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point 4,000
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
�
/ Cover S ecies? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
" �`
(�a,yi dOalOgr S+V (4cAu4
PY
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
2
3
Q.� ✓s 'toed a
t.✓ firoi�
` �_�
�C s r
Total Number of Dominant
(((
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
5
Percent of Dominant Species
tOO
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet
7
flu = Total Cover
Total A Cover of Multiply by
Sapling Stratum (Plot size )
OBL species x 1 =
1
LaYJwS C Vn0V lyuv\
tc-, e 5 FA-(�
FACW species x 2 =
2 _AjAVS
(4'J kq{-4
10 J l VJ
'mac
FAC species x 3 =
3
Q--ie,,c Alle klo�
S _^T
FACU species x 4 =
4
UPL species x 5 =
5
Column Totals (A) (B)
6
7
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
30 =Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1
Motel.l lq Ceyn%rGdd
_ (�
_ 2 Dominance Test is >50 /
2
S, r iodW f0 .mac
_� 6
3 Prevalence Index is 53 0'
3
W0 08L
— 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5
6
7
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
Total
= Total Cover
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
_
of Five Vegetation Strata
1
�
.NC_Q T Ti/
Zo Yc5 -Tl�
Tree — Woody plants excluding woody vines
2
hlic i' etno casuc
k j% FA,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
4
iZi6S?tctt I I VA, L.l V-%
10 tjo -/fr
Sapling — Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
5
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
6
7
Shrub — Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
8
g
Herb — All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
10
plants except woody vines less than approximately
11
3 ft (1 m) in height
12
Woody vine — All woody vines regardless of height
= Total Cover
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
Sffi jaq "+,4A4 'C0 (14
to _
2
5_ —
3
4
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5
Present? Yes No
6 7 = Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point ho ea
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) °/ Color (moist) Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0_1 c�lR- S 3 kWM44��c
'Type C= Concentration D =De lebon RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains 20cation PL =Pore Linimg M =Matrx
Hydnc Sod Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sods'
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A111) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvaiue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Coast Prarne Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
_ Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
V/
Depth (inches)
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

©es- v
11 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern (Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site }'tlf�SOrM1— C'�� City/County W0" /� �'rf�a'^^ Co Sampling Date sdl.,a6Q /�,r
Applicant/Owner NCO Ti State NC Sampling Point
Investigator(s) f ( ffia , 0 B I (,p�j�n�N Section Township Range
Landform (hdlslope terrace etc) Local relief (concave convex none) Slope (A)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat Long 7 S VS 3 ZZiZ Datum _NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name WLVIA44e S L00tH NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes t/ No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophyhc Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Presents Yes No ./ /
within a Wetland? Yes No J
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
_ Geomorphic Position (02)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Agwtard (D3)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
°/ Cover
Species? Status
1 9mu S faeda
90
Ife5_ TAC _
2 (.nJ6440Ar)8r tCbtJ4___
x 3 =
FACU species
3 &,r rj6r A^
UPL species
At5 FAC
4
(A) (B)
5
6
7
8
Total Cover
SaDIm /Shrub Stratum (Plot size
N,-A yis � a d ck
)
30
FA Y-
�_
2 AW r ( jo IiJ,,A
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
TftUoLU"M
IS
5_ FfhC
1 rcd��tn
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
�S
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
)
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
4
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
sheet)
Sampling Point A00g'Lj
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC tO 0 (A/B)
Total / Cover of
Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 Dominance Test is >50°/
_ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 0'
4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH) regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants excluding vines less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non woody) plants regardless
of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 It in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation /
Present') Yes >! No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of and
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) A
I IL JENC UL ,00
Redox Features
Color (moist) / Tvi)e Loc
Sampling Point Ao ar V
Texture Remarks
ew lad
C c °�
'Type C= Concentration D= Depletion RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matnx
Hydric Sod Indicators Indicators for Problematic Hydric
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type
Depth (inches)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 136)
Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (1719) (MLRA 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Praine Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

FUSACE AID# DWQ # Site # AA04
e
m
0 o p o u STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET r—
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicants name NCDOT 2 Evaluator s name A Ef rd
3 Date of evaluation 05/19/11 4 Time of evaluation 9 OOAM
5 Name of stream
6 River basin Neuse
7 Approximate drainage area 140 ac 8 Stream order
9 Length of reach evaluated 50 feet 10 County Wake and Durham Co
11 Site coordinates (if known) 35 847716 78 838127 12 Subdivision name (if any)
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
Immediately west of Chanel Hill Road (54) between Watkins Road and McCnmmon Parkway
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions Rain within 48 hours, sunny and warm otherwise
16 Site conditions at time of visit Water in channel
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use 10_% Residential
20_% Forested
35_% Commercial 15_% Industrial 0_% Agricultural
20_% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22 Bankfull width 6 feet 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 2 feet
24 Channel slope down center of stream _Flat (0 to 2 %) X_Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight X_Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture into a forest) the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each reach The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) 46 Comments
Evaluator's Signature Date 05/25/11
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a prelmunary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change — version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
M. U1
ount8
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
extensive alteration = 0 no alteration = max mts
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
no buffer = 0 contiguous wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
extensive discharges = 0 no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0— 4
0— 4
1
no discharge = 0 springs sees wetlands etc = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
1
no flood lain = 0 extensive flood lain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplam access
0-5
0-4
0-2
2
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
0
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
extensive channehzation = 0 natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
2
fine homo enous = 0 large diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
�+
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
4
severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
14
visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max poi nts
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
3
y
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
15
substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
16
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
2
F
no nffles/npples or pools = 0 well-developed = max nits
17
Habitat complexity
little or no habitat = 0 frequent, vaned habitats = max points)
0-6
0-6
0-6
4
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = max points)
0-5
0 — 5
0-5
5
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
0
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
Presence of amplubians
21
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
Q
no evidence = 0 common numerous s = max points)
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0 — 4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0 common numerous s = max points)
H
Evidence of wildlife use
23
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
46
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

L USA ACE AID# DWQ # Site # AF02 N
8
0 0 o o STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET t—
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicants name NCDOT 2 Evaluator s name A Efird
3 Date of evaluation 05/19/11 4 Time of evaluation 10 OOAM
5 Name of stream 6 River basin Neuse
7 Approximate drainage area 65 ac 8 Stream order
9 Length of reach evaluated 50 feet 10 County Wake and Durham Co
11 Site coordinates (if known) 35 858489 78 844102 12 Subdivision name (if any)
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
Immediately west of Chapel Hill Road (54) directly across from Litchm Boulevard
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions Rain within 48 hours, sunny and warm otherwise
16 Site conditions at time of visit Water in channel
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use 10_% Residential 35_% Commercial 15_% Industrial 0_% Agricultural
20_% Forested 20_% Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22 Bankfull width 4 feet 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 1 foot
24 Channel slope down center of stream _Flat (0 to 2 %) X_Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight X_Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture into a forest) the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each reach The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) 58 Comments
Evaluator's Signature Date 05/25/11
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or reqmrement Form subject to change — version 06/03 To Continent please call 919 876 8441 x 26

STREAM QUALNT Y ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mommtain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
2
2
Evidence of past human alteration
extensive alteration = 0 no alteration = max points)
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
no buffer = 0 contiguous wide buffer = max pom ts
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
extensive discharges = 0 no discharges = max points)
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
4
no discharge = 0 springs sees wetlands etc = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
no flood lam = 0 extensive flood lam = max points)
0— 4
0— 4
0— 2
2
Entrenchment / floodplain access
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
0- 5
0- 4
0- 2
3
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max points)
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
9
Channel sinuosity
extensive channelization = 0 natural meander = max its
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max points)
1 1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 — 4
0 — 5
2
2
fine homogenous = 0 large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0 — 5
3
,9+
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
�-+
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
4
d
severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
3
E'+
no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max points)
W
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or tunber production
15
substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
16
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
3
no nffles/hpples or pools = 0 well developed = max rants
17
Habitat complexity
tittle or no habitat = 0 frequent vaned habitats = max rants
0-6
0-6
0-6
4
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = max omts
0-5
0-5
0-5
5
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
0
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max ruts
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max p omts
Presence of fish
22
no evidence = 0 common numerous es = max points)
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
0
Evidence of wildlife use
23
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
58
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # AN02
e
v n Q u u STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicants name NCDOT 2 Evaluator s name A Efird
3 Date of evaluation 05/26/11 4 Time of evaluation 9 35 AM
5 Name of stream
7 Approximate drainage area
6 River basin Neuse
8 Stream order
9 Length of reach evaluated 15 feet 10 County Wake and Durham Co
11 Site coordinates (if known) 35 871382 78 853174 12 Subdivision name (if any)
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
West of Chapel Hill Road (NC 54) between Surles Ct and Emperor Blvd in Durham County
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions No rain within 48 hours sunny and warm
16 Site conditions at time of visit Water in channel
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map9 YES NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey) YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use 10_% Residential
20_% Forested
35_% Commercial 15_% Industrial 0_% Agricultural
20_% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22 Bankfull width 5 feet 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 1 feet
24 Channel slope down center of stream _Flat (0 to 2 %) X_Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight X_Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture into a forest) the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each reach The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) 51 Comments
Evaluator's Signature Date 05/27/11
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change — version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

STREAM QUALNTY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CIIARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
I
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
2
Evidence of past human alteration
extensive alteration = 0 no alteration = max points)
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
2
no buffer = 0 contiguous wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
extensive discharges = 0 no discharges = max points)
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
4
no discharge = 0 springs sees wetlands etc = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 — 4
0-2
3
no flood lam = 0 extensive flood lam = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplam access
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
0— 5
0— 4
0— 2
2
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max po mts
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
extensive channehzation = 0 natural meander = max points)
10
Sedunent input
0-5
0-4
0-4
0
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
fine homogenous = 0 large diverse sizes = max points)
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
1
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
3
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed &banks =max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 — 5
0-5
2
d
severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
E+
14
no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max points)
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
2
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial impact --0 no evidence = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
16
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
3
E
no nffles/ripples or pools = 0 well-developed = max points)
�*
1
Habitat complexity
little or no habitat = 0 uent vaned habitats = max nits
0— 6
0— 6
0— 6
4
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = max points)
0-5
0 — 5
0-5
4
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
1
dee 1 embedded = 0 loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
2
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
Presence of amplubians
21
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
®
no evidence = 0 common numerous t3Ws = max ints
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0 — 4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0— 6
0— 5
0— 5
2
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max nits
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
51
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

tj�a Y
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Date 05111111 /
Project/Site Rem
Latitude IS 241-114
Evaluator A Eq4
County tAw g 0AU14 C6
Longitude -79 231Na
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent a
Stream Determ o circle one)
Other
if 2 19 or perennial if z 30
Ephemerald� Perennial
e g Quad Name
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = (3.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In channel structure ex We pool step pool
ripple pool sequence
0
1
©
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
0
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
M
3
8 Headcuts
M
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
015,
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
5
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No VD,
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are notrated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology (Subtotal=
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf htter
1-5
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants ordebris
0
1 05
2
15
16 Organic debris Imes or piles
0
1 05
1
15
17 Sod based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
C Biology Subtotal = —
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
05
1
15
24 Amphibians
W
05
1
15
25 Algae
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other 0
t perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch

A F02
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Date BSI �� (�
Project/Site H°PSW . C(ey y
Latitude 3S SS S 481
Evaluator A
County (, O„ 4v^ Co
Longitude
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent 3 2 5
Stream Determination (crrc
Ephemeral Intermittent
Other
if _ 19 or perennial if ? 30
eren
1
e g Quad Name
A Geomorphology (Subtotal =-21--)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
05
3
3 In channel structure ex We pool step pool
ripple ool sequence
0
1
2
1 5
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
0
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
1 5
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
1 5
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
9 Grade control
0
5
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
0
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No UO
Yes = 3
° artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hvdroloav (Subtotal = I � )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
3
1
2
3
14 Leaf fitter
15
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants ordebns
0
05
2
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
1 0
1 05
1
5
17 Sol based evidence of high water tables
I No = 0
Yes
1
C Bloloav (Subtotal = `i
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants In streambed
3
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
Q
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
05
1
15
24 Amphibians
AE
0 5
1
1 5
25 Algae
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch

11KOZ
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 411
Date USM61 l (
Project/Site { Ofv n l d
Latitude 35 v 135 2
Evaluator A, gikA
County VL4 OVAwyl
Longitude � g 95 3 r2i�
Total Points �A
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determi ircle one)
Ephemer ntermitte Perennial
Other
e g Quad Name
if Z 19 or perennial if 2 30
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In channel structure ex nffle pool step pool
ripple sequence
0
1
e-3)
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
05
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
Yes =f 3
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
05
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
05
1
15
10 Natural valley
0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
1
15
11 Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hvdrologv (Subtotal = I$ )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
11P
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
5
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1
1 1 5
17 Soil based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =f 3
C Blologv (Subtotal=
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 15
23 Crayfish
W,
05
1
15
24 Amphibians
0
0 y
1
15
25 Algae
0
05
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL
1 5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch

U 4716 A/C Hopson Road Rail
Block B 1 b — Project Location
Site 1
Latitude 35 871444 Longitude
78 853057
Site 2
Latitude 35 858514 Longitude
78 844168
Site 3
Latitude 35 853619 Longitude
78 842342
Site 4
Latitude 35 847698 Longitude
78 838234

�k
D
re
C
K C:11ldl�i 3t
N00SPr+ Rd
i
1L C�n�
a�a
d,
�a ash t Jc,�R
prR
c
554 ��Qb
z
C
Z +
I
o� v„
�'I �`�,► � �r1e 3 '��
'P
I
;
Legend
Hopson -Clegg Study Boundary
4I
r
Emperor e,5vd
v
3
V
Op
*Mich G1��oOr
Rd� � `P.
m �
-
LL c a
to
4
a
3
Everette Fields Rd
=x
n
m
a
aQ
OfAce P Oki' t J4d
oc
U
n
i
Q
P30
II
aI
S
�a
Wake Durham County, NC
i
A
_, 4..,1
1A
Pararn4
-04
J-
Watkins Rd
A
C J1
Waf'k' $ Rd �I
Mccrlmmdn rn
Q�
925 462.5 0 925 1,850 ' 1
Feet Background: ESRI World Streets Basemap
_ Project: Title: Dwn By: Ckd By: FIGURE
� NoR`TH C,
Clegg Passing and ARE DKo
Hopson Road Date: Scale:
Grade Seperation VICINITY MAP MAY 2011 1:14000 1
Wake and Durham Counties, ATKINS Project No.:
OFTRA North Carolina 100021689

699LZOOOI euiloaeO 4PON �ydeuzooy�
ON }aa(oad SNINiV 'saijunoO weyjnQ pue a�qeM
00017 L:L I�0z,kdw AN uoijeaadeS epejE)
a�eag ale4 Aanis 133roHd peob uosdoH �, aY
ONG 3I jjv pue fiuissed 66813 0660
3�ineizi :A8 oo :Ag um(] :al;il :10afaad
r
+ s --- tiepuno8 ApnjS 66910- uosdoH
" - pua6a-j
of Z
IVV
r `
\` 4 '• Y £
AW
I MI
sow
fu
JML
xoll,
LC
It • /,
-
•
v 1"
� _t. Y " fir• \ 'v a/ 4 M -# ��� :�'\�� +�
\\ f .11,
} _ •
IN
%WL
f 1 \\
_ / • I � � �` � � �� � P �+ %rte .!x••1.1 -

c
I,
Il3ackground 2010 NAIP Aerial Imagery Ur WsB L�SC) Cr6
•.Gu
Symbol
Series
% Hydric
Cc
Cartecay and Chewacla soils
100%
CrB
Creedmoor sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
CrC
Creedmoor sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
GrB
Granville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
GrC
Granville sandy loam, 6to 10 percent slopes
Gu
Gullied land, clayey materials
HeB
Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
MfB
Mayodan sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
IV
Mayodan sandy loam, 6 t 10 percent sl opes
MfD
Mayodan sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
PfC
Pinkston fre sandy Icon) 2 to D per cent I (pes®
PfE
Pinkstonfte sandy I ® n) D b b percent AgDes®
W
Water
Wn
Wehadkee silt loam
100%
WsB
White Store sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
WsC
White Store sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
WsE
White Store sandy loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes
WvC2
White Store clay loam, 2to 10 percent slopes, eroded
WvE2
Wk to Store clay loam, 10to 25 percent slopes, eroded
wsC
i�
WsE
MfE
MfC
HE
a
•4
D P
WsE
MfB
wsc
wsc
Be
i♦
i� �i ♦ioi
i♦i � ioioi
► ♦� � 'e ♦ioi
�� ♦� ioi ♦�
�i♦i ioi ♦i
'A ♦,� :e, >�4 �e� ♦fit ♦I ♦��
•♦• t ►♦ ♦� Vie. ♦ems �
♦e� e♦i ♦� ♦♦ ♦♦ tee• i
♦ o♦ eo ♦i♦ ��♦y..•�ri`. ...- - - ♦oiei ♦. .�oioi ♦. ioi ♦i ♦i ,'♦oio eoi
ee♦o�•.� � ♦•��������•. �• ei ♦i�i•♦�i ♦i ♦ioi ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i`♦ °i ♦ioi ♦i ♦i`. _ _ ♦ ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i•'e ♦i ♦�" �i�
.s♦ ♦ .o. •♦♦o♦♦♦♦eoe• ♦♦• eo ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦eeo♦e♦♦ e�
♦'O ♦ ♦o!� �,. .� ♦isooioi ♦i ♦i ♦ioi ♦ice ♦ooioi eoo ♦e ♦eeiei'♦oie♦oioioioi�P• ►♦�
� ♦.0�� ♦� ♦♦ •,°., �1 ♦♦ � ♦ ♦ ♦e� ► ♦♦ ♦1 � ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦e ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦e ♦♦eel
♦ ♦ ♦• ♦ �� ♦♦ 50"
�� ♦� Qav Q+ ♦ ♦e♦ 11
Vie` ►4'4 �
c
_ � a
17i�1 Y/!: "n ^+r,91S'79
Project: •
Clegg Passing and
Hopson • •
Grade Seperation 111
Wake • Durham Counties, Project •
North Carolina 111 •:•

6991,Z0006 eu!IOJe0 LWON "aodiuzoo
:'ON loa(oad SNINIV 'saljunoo wegjna pue @� W
9 000 :1 �L oz Avvy S110S oomnSS - uoilejadaS epejE)
:aleos :alea peon uosdoH
ova 3�d pue fiuissed 6fi810
��n��d A8 P�I� :A8 um(] :911u :loa(ad �ON1doN_i°
' Z���•'r"l ... is ;d , Z0sM
'
ZBSM ZOSnn 0 L L 1L OL£ 0
M' ZBjo .;
zosM m
sadols lua»ad E olo'weol Apues we4sjoM `dAM
�` ' v� ZBSM sado s ua »ad o
ZoSM 13 OZ lOT'weol Apues aJolS al!4M 3SM
ZEsM''
ZBAO papoia Alalejapow'sadols lua»ad oT olg'weoI Apues ajolS a1!4M Z:)sM
- papoia Alalejapow 'sadols ;uxuad g of Z'weol Apues ajo ;S al!4M ZEsM
M
t� • ZBJo i papoia Alajanas'sadols lua3jad ST of Z'xaldwo:) aJolS al!4M- uolllod £Old
e I
sadols lua»ad SZ olq'xaldwoo puel pa!Iing- ;alMed 3Sd
Z91S - sadols ;ua»adOTolo'weol Apues uolSMu!d 31d
.� mpapaUAlaiej'sadols;uaajad Z olo'weol Apues a!4:)elueW `data
sadols lua »ad OZ of oT 'weal Apues joowpaaj0 2310
a a
papoia l ;enpow' sadols ;ua»adoTo ;g'weolApuesjoowpaaj:) Z:)JJ
papoja Alalejapow 'sadols lua:)jad g of Z'weol Apues joowpaaj0 ZEJ:)
ZOSM Z %S sadols;ua »ad £ olo'weol Apues xe;Io0 dui
pn. %S ®papo4} Alluanbai ;'sadols lua »ad Z olo 'weol Apues el:)ema40 yw:)
.A sadols;ua:)Jad ST o;oT'xaldwo:) uane4Mhug- uo ;uogJe:) QeD
sadols luxuadololg 'xaldwo:)uane4ihug- uoluogje0 Oeg
sadols lua:)jad 9 of Z 'xaldwo:) u0ne4M:)uS- uoluogje0 gel
' oppAH % sapas loquiAS
/ z -lo
3sM 1
Z�sM 0
Seo ba W
Z35M
ZBSM
3 SNI,
ZBSM d6d
ti t ZOSM oSM / ZOSM
OLIO
ZosM 3SN1
3sM £dld 3SM
\ ZOSM Z13SM
3s
ZB,O I j
%i
Zos
d6d ZOSM (�
a --
/ ?
3SM, ,
bep, ZB�� £ad ZOSM
wo
�e� iaeeo
d6d
did s
Z�S 1 u,Z M ZBSM
oeo ZBSM
Vuo M ZBSM.
)eD e
Deo d6d uI e 1 Z�sAA: EO�d b�M
� V'aIN
8�� x 3sM
MId
zajo ZOSM
3, O
tJU
d6d --�
Z 0 ZBSM
zojo d
ZOSM
ZBjo
ZOSM /
Geo M 3SM
ZBSM 3SM
3'O 3SM Zoao - ----
s ,_ 36d d6d tia6ewl leuaydIVN 0602 :Puna6�oe8

Background: 2010 NAIP Aerial Imagery l, �` ^•; ""
Nr 040 7 Legend
Map Area (FIG 3A)
D
77 -
„
N ,
ll
k on
111 r•.
S V
44 f.
„
�► - ■m -,'
__ ,,-aJ •' ! ` _ • pin ,�0 • e
'� � 4 "7 t + c !� i. � _ ry , a y!i •ifs" • - ` �' ■
n
•
EF 4:
41111% a
Ila
low
Art
IN
i
It
r .
a R•'� wlt
■ fig I� .. �" - � " � F -.
�16u_
Legend
0 Wetland Points
Stream Points
Stream Lines
Wetland Lines
^:. • c.
Culverted - •�y • p•ji ! rk
■ • e °:! T.
Stream • • • �..`
try •R
wetiand Polygons
Neuse Buffer Zone 2 (20 feet)
Neuse Buffer Zone 1 (30 feet) 4
Hopson-Clegg Study Boundary
lop
•
w
t
r
Project: ® • Clegg Passing and I Grade
Hopson Road JURISDICTIONAL ElDate: -
• • AREAS AUG 2011 III
Wake • Durham Counties, Project •
North • 100021689

699LZOON eullOJeO LWON tLL:io
:'ON PafoJd SNIAiV Isaijunoo wet4in(] pue a�eAA
000L L m SV3NV E) zonv uoijejodaS apej
SE
-.9jeos :ale(], -Moiniasiunr peon uosdOH
ONG 3?]V pue BulssBd Majo '06 ay
3�jnsi::i :Aq PNOI :As UM(] x1111 :109fOjd b�uwo
z 09
1
09L OOL 09 0 G
Aiepunog ApnjS 66910-uosdOH
(Iaaj OE) � auoZ jagnq asn@N
it ,
• jr 116.
'It
0
0
(9C E)jj) eajV den
PU86G-j
*1
771 (1991 OZ) Z auoZ jagnq asn9N
SUOU10d PUBRGAA
SU0bA10d WeWIS
P91J9AIno
s9ul-1 Puell@AA
squi-1 wegils
slu'Od weWIS 0
slu'Od Pue119AA o
pueBa-1
I, 711'4
47
L
A
•
Ji(J@Bewl le!J@V d1VN 0 LOZ :pLnoj5�woe8

0
-
,
�n
a
r
Legend
o Wetland Points'
° Stream Points
`
Stream Lines
y
_
Wetland Lines
Culverted
'
8
Stream Polygons
w
Wetland Polygons
'F
Neuse Buffer Zone 2 (20 feet)
Neuse Buffer Zone 1 (30 feet)
Hopson -Clegg Study Boundary
50 25 0 50 100 150
Feet
rp
HoR c490
Project:
Title:
Dwn By: Ckd By:
FIGURE
a�o�
4�
Clegg Passing and
ARE DKO
q
Hopson Road
JURISDICTIONAL
Date: Scale:
�)
Grade Seperation
AREAS
AUG 2011 1:1000
3C
Wake and Durham Counties,
ATKINS Project No.:
OFTRA'
North Carolina
100021689

6896Z0006 eullae:D LWON aOvkujo
:'ON 3o9fo�d SNIAIV sai3unoo u�eyjnp pue a�{eM
a 000L L mz and Sd3HV uoijejadaS apeaE)
JS Q peon uosdoH
ova :9I2 ga 93e
d �dNOI1�IaSl?�fl� pue 6uissed "813 ob, 41
38nou :Ae P40 :R8 UMQ :913!1 d °-yidor±
:3oafa � _
�u
091 05 0 Sz 09
gin: � • �
A I -`
tiepuno8 ApnjS 66910- uosdoH
. .. � - .� (1991 OE) auoZ aagn8 asnaN
(1991 OZ) Z auoZ aagn8 asnaN
ice
suobAlOd PERM - --
suofiAlod uaeaalS
- o O
p _
-__
=. -- palJanlno
saul� pueI19M
saul� weeils
u sluiod we9JIS
.�:
sluiod pueI}aM o
r pua6a�
'A T �.
ar°e r -
,a.
r*
'�IuO pa�!�Iosl a�e�S '�O�,�uoN
4
197
(a£ ou) e9jy dew
pue6a�
ra ■
Ml tia6L'wl 1e1JaydIVN OIOZ :punojbAoe8

c
i
1�
1 �
Q
rl �
Z Z
O
O
�¢ Za
03 oa r
LL
�(nU
Cl) C3 NO
z= Zpip O
v W
LL Z C L A D
00 a o z
(7 a` cf)
a 0
JO
UO
U
Z 0
m
mmiiiiiiiiimmo
����muniiiimmie
1111111111111111111111
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
■II�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
W
■IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
o_
a
O
z
U
J
W
W
H
II
a
U
U
c
i
1�
1 �
Q
rl �
mmiiiiiiiiimmo
����muniiiimmie
1111111111111111111111
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
■II�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
■IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
c
i
1�
1 �
Q
rl �

z
cc
Z
LL
a
a
E �
o��
odd
to
o
rA Q
zrno
QWa
C-)
a.
�
- c c°o o.
°
o
o
y l0 d
�
W U �
�oyo�
W
a
O N y d
z w
5
N af°�
v
v
�
�;
LL%
cco E �-
a�''o
a
U
X L
wv Ea
Q
A x w
U.
ir
U
�. =
CO
U
O
z
a �
lVtl
a O. ld
O
g
� E
O
Cl
c y
N
cc
o.m
o
0
0
Cl)
CD
Q
€ E --
0
0
0
0
d
a
m�
OQ
Q
C.
o
¢a
Q
o
d
=�
U
ru
CD N
ca cc
0
0
d
�
3
c
�
C y
°
4
. � U
O
O
O
J
� td
O
O
O
X
3
W
11 'O
C
O
o
E
Cl
c m
ld _ � V
O
O
O
E��`d
o
0
0
a
m
U o
aaaa
U
U
U
U
0 T
CO
co
co
co
o
I1
M
_2
f'N7
(`�
W
a
°
o �
a°+o
0
0
�°n+
a
mE
Z
z
A
rtOirno�
J0
Q
w
Q
(4
U
0
J
W
W
H
co
11
CL
U
U
o
I1
M
M
f'N7
(`�
Z
J0
Q
w
(4
0

North Carolina Department of Transportatio
Rail Division
�r�Ot pORTB qROCCt
q � 7
T'-/
Hopson Road/Church Street
Rail and Roadway Improvements
Durham County, NC
STIP Project U -4716
State WBS Project No 39080 1 STROM
Administrative Action
Finding of No Significant Impact
Submitted Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
42 USC 4332(2)(c)
US Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration
Federal Highway Administration
and
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Prepared in accordance with FRA's Environmental Procedures
(64 Fed Reg 28545 (May 26,1999))
January 2012
z

I
I
9 50 38 AM
\Sheets \Ho son hyd 08weta dgn
$$$$USERNAME$$$$
° ° �� 00 Op U S££ ON DMa 33S
b'1S 3NIIHD1HW
° 1 Ir w O r
0 1 I r Ch I O
°
Ir I
$ \ w1 63
I STA 3336 +00
��r I VAL STA 3336 +01 00
m zlze ,C .
o 1 1 r 1 6& \-
u
d °° ° co ml, w 1� 48 SCP
0 a
b 2 O O1�
I n
° m I r p
° II
I 1 ze I a I rn o w
m
° I w a a K CA
I m
0 I � or I I I m z n L�
z II A q
I ° II
8>1 Z r m
O I I i3
a
°
0 aD z y� I Ili
m
Oot 0 0 0" 0-4 I I I
D y I I I I O i+
rm I I I I 3 as
i (v�V02 O O I y
w n O
o�P o o I I I
o� ° °
8'9 S z I ° o a�
CD
s 0 0 yea I i l l °ol
Is t. i i ° I I I I
° I 1
P�" °
Z- 0 n °
1
° 0 0 I II
I 11
° 0 0 I I II
II 0 0 0
°2 ° I I I
I i ��� ° °
Z 1 I II
tl �' �y� e ° °
C,
I I t o
J�o j l i l
o9ez C ' O
0
°
O °
1-rmm fA 0
°o Z O ° 11 jj I I I I
Zµ 1 O 0-4 I I I I
y O o O`er I I
Z 0>
'xo < 2 ° ° ° I II 1 I /
0
woo>
o
O 0 O
' 1 11
A W o
o A 0 O I 1 II I
V r z 1
0 I I II I
mN x ° I ;o I 11 I
P " �
° o
° o zs m
O x� D C
W
s° o
+
0
O y
�a ^4c �
� d
Wc
cq�° /r
44
4t:�i A
`°
I Iw ► �4'✓/
' I Iv w D
° I I °, +
0
i
m�°�°n 0 I I I Z c
7O A O I 9
z �:f �-
G
n S °
°�z° Z F cl 0
A c
\ f1 Z 0 m 0 0 0
�4 to pO 0
0 0 0
O
�oQ j II i A
D = ° a II
p
o °°
I
I I I , •
c �° I II I I I •� / I
m I
m m I 1 I I ! �� :•
rnGo
°
m
-
� r.
o
r
Z Z Z = sum 0
O O O ti z m
RCP 5 RCP a I l I
5 1 I
�o
N
Z
nm D°ti -nII Z
VI
I
I 1 I
I
N
_ _A
=S Zg
M.
`Z py M^ wo
0
I P T I
14
°
=
m c m no
SEE DWG NO RR - -09
c Z Z mi
/
/
p
/
� eFRR //Vc

/ \ au m z w
'�� 60 —d ON JM4 33S
B QQ N
00 00 +61�££ d1S 3NIlHDl`dW =a
� zz
W sa
W' .w UJ.., UJILI
Be c?`s w� z F
I / \I / Q I" ° z ° °z o�
i o
0 IL
loo
° o z
If
a °° / O
400 w
Q
.a
/ o 0 z
o n
° 00 z eIC
0 / O °
i Z
39� Z
o/
z
\ III I I IIiI I I I i—�� n
— 398 - -0
0
o
I 1 I I I 1 bq9 I �6�
1 °
O
h N
0 30
N � F
"q ° i
W
F
Y LU
u �
r
z
u
Z
o
O / j� / \ �\ {I ` I j I �II 11 I I 1 I 0/�
0
�9
CD
1 / � JteUV
J
co o
/ w \ 3 Ce /, m \\ 4l / 1 \ I I I \ I r°� no J ��` — / -1 ° o°'L
l '1 I 1 I I I l I °
/Y a A, co I
3° I \° J z =:M "U
0 xcz
I°
Ipi� \ i \\ I\ bbl I\ I i i 1 li I I I ► I — - - - - - -P
I
0 \� 8 I z
W _ - -o 0 \ \ II I V i I I 0
I
1 �
( \ m I o I \I
/ 0
o °
of m
m/ I I I� P i z
Go\ II
- / \ Im Ii 'I I I I` /�Z6E o =2 ° �I- -390— I Rl
\\ o I \�� IIII I I I e�c1 II II 0. Z
\ s rS I ICI III ml I I / 1 181
I 1 =m- sm i I A 1 I m 11 I II e / ° I I z$ al
aeQ�x o / I II Ii I ! ��� F °
o \ II II IIII —
I \Ij i �I I\ 390 jO °
- -- o ° I an
o u I�Cm� nl pzc
O / o I
u_j
Z o 4 II
LLJ
/2
— I 1 III �I Il s
a a �\ '\ `� III ill ICI I o
low
W ill °
I*V r I I III
II II ml I ,I� III °
II I I I I
lo/ e \ \\ u gz T 111111 II I �� (III �� �h o II
�/ _ W I _I I� I I I / z of �w Q
/J / � -( n o °� �,— V ♦ �s�, �� I III i I �� ° �1
O
I
O �I
0
Id6S gi'\ I I \II h II� /1 0 0
III I ^ N /�� ° \
III BI III 1 u J I m�
00 L0 +9E££ `diS
E900 +9EE6 `diS
I \/ \ °
0
37— —� I) / I II II I© //
IIII 1 IIIII j1 / �� 1 1 \I
0 We
M (IIIII II II I / \I Illl1i \I
MATCHLINE SA O 3335 + pp 00 ° 1,
SEE DWG w
RR-07 m �� 10
u6P 9+eM80 PA4
6

9 SI 04 AM
\Sheets \Hop son hyd llweto dgn
$$$$USERNAMt$$$$
T
X
G)
0
—G)T
m
za°o
°,
_-
����o 3�
o
0
�Ij'y� ti
'°
z i ° j Fs
II
�I
�I
ICI
7
Ildl
°
�I
0
as H
}
� � r
m
T1 O
N �
T �
� pp
Z
k X
zaa,x
I /
A w
wQ
z
m� o
m rte + X�_X x / C7 C )
z In
© �r
g
�m�° o z °°
az 8 = W
NO D
NY
a -n / D C
X — i mr
H� r D
VM i
mµ
D
Z
o m �1 0
Z M
N -� m
0 X = D
�} O M
0
Z
c<Zp ZI G1 \ Q
° ° "°
N \ p D
V Gl N OZ fit\
� � I
J D =
0 � 4 x
o ai
° Iz
OX
� e I �°
m
o 0 0 L.2 >v= m
`� N z rn, Zm r �~~., a° m6Oy Z
ru
` m ty D nm Nom'
�+ Z z"' D^ zm
a cm
m
V z = an wp
O m
0 z z mK
OL—ld l ON JMa 33S
00 OO +LL££ V1S 3NIIH:)1VW
�n
II II
II i I I i II
II i I I II � II
II —
_ I o i -z;
o I + -
I —
__
I II
II
�� II
dil i�
II II
II I�
z mass
Iox Noc
= o�
co
W
ow
I O
II
I I I
I �
I
;
I
�I I
I I
i< I I
3cn I I d
ZI I
I I
I I
I W I
I
+, i co
En
I ° 1 0
I °
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I 1
I I
I I
I I
°1
I 1
I
" OF;
II 11
° -1 , m m I -n W m
�
my cn -� I I F
a "' 0
i =
= No I I W
W
so I I +
m
II
(f
• ObAcl 3S
I
� II
II
it
II
II
II
III
I�
I
II
D d
II
n
O 'Il
N
D ° III
C-
>
'I
al
` 1
m
;
N E
i
`1 i II
j
j II
0
II II o
0
ji II ° °
jl II
II II
- -!L_ ili
II II I /
II
II
II II
II
II III
II
II II
II
it II
II
II it
II
II II
II
II II
FIJI q
�l II II
J
2
c
r
A�NI
6 +6 41
6+ 0
11 j y06'
JI I II o c
y /o��k�S
III I II 114c�<��
li i i l
II I I III

/ N z N O
•�L1 K� H
d� QW "" � d+ '\ V1
SEE N� STq 3391 pp W TW J Wx�J
I n 00 0 �93� WQ �4i is
R 10
wu
w i <w is o o O N
\ V II 0 o�s` wm z z z F cq 0 ru
J
oN W W W
o o W
\ \\ Ij i Ili i it II N /� et` I \, 9<1 W)
LU
I c W
W
ow/
b 1 I \ \ \� I II II �_ ail( / X _mac----- -
I II II III xl ) 1 t I( f' `\ O o
/yJ i 8 rn o aa`I If II eV/ - - -_ = d
I I� \ 11 I II cl III fl / I i I\ I I \ w Co- f I
I III I � III / I I I w a'
I 1
z
r 9 I I I• �\ III I I \\ I "` \ 1
II I I I I 11 III I II fl I I u, l \ H
QIII
+e£ I vn
o
I I I 6cc� � I ZEE f
zz u\ N
u v5
I + III \ t- I I `\ - I \ ,� �—J ° c� p O
L✓ m { aL / Z
ors I I O I I I \Z I I 1 `F- \_ i^ _ 37 z o > O
m X
II I o No I - = - - -- °�� u Z
II I E �\ III I �\ I Iry I1 e s - Xese \\ t\ 0 Y
\ II I I I I I c \ \\ o w
06 I \ \� • I IIII ' I �1 F ° I I I III fl QN / -\ \\ u u W
1 I Q u C
f 1 W ✓8 ✓$
�
r � C� X \
\ \ m J III ► 1 I I I I I I I> O
\ \ Y I I I U 1 1 1 I `L �zae m I Q=
/ I I b °IVm I 111 I I IIII 1 Q
I I�� f I I I If I —i
I t I I I 1 z `vwa
o\ 1 iI U I ICI I I I( \�I it \ I I� m U
II i I l� I I �I I I \I1 II/ qd Z �// a • I\ g J
CY
Z •
UU
Ta
A\
\\ 376 \ \� I II II I 1 1\ I + / I I I s� / / / I \� z z ,v
/ xmwz
Il 1 I II I1 J I 1 j IP /sje
mg I II a \ III I I 1 1 1 1 ; '1 II 1 1 z l I /
�I i I l l i �1 I I k I 4
_ Im I I /
;3s4�
I e
eoc- / II I \ , I I I / / I I I I� _ + I \ a a
o
3g of \ 8
// ° \ o \ zg
� • �, �, �'
�\�\��� �e�d\ \ \�
/�l�llll I�Illjllili `-- -1>__i I \ I I I I I ' � I �/'oY���\- 8� =� J -✓ � � /
I�f� //1111 IIII IIIiI I� III I I ' 110 \_ /
III IIIIIIIIIIiI IIIIIIIIIII n �� -�' 1I 4-
� I
II IIIIIIIII ��� it \ I �j'f'
IIII�II�IiI��_a_ � IIII IIII \
1111 p1111� �_� IC�I I, I I \�� \l Iggo I I I r.
1111�y�,IIIIIIII�� 1
1111111111111
11 \1j111111111111- _- �i°L-`
11111111111q �� I II'T' -�- I I I � T -� I _ t IIII 1111111 _
o
r) I ifa-
�Illlm \ fin°
il I i� ���_
�
I I IIII I x0
j I s II 1 I� T _ I _ I 1111111111 mz
\\ \\ 400— _- 416 C), - -_ -_- i I 6 I txA I I I T'- L1 111111
__--- ._ - - -\ I i II � I III I � I 1 � n1�IIIII
\ \1 \ \\ ° \�` I II II I �Q /I j j I 11 �rlimA
% \ \\ o j,�I I it II / / I I � I II II x 1
I I II ! I{ I I I I II III
� 468_=
o i 11 1 II II i I I I i I �I
= 0 = =
16� I '__ 39e - 39z — =' = =_ 'e= =
III \, -
/' �,��, i Ir�ll \\I► � �I i 1\ i m `� III I° ; II lil i � �� // - -- =384 = == �
, - --
r
MATCHLINE STA 3377+0000 aF�\
SEE DWG NO RR -10
ssss�wINa3snssss
u6P q�em11 PA4 uos off \S+8e4S\
WV 91 IS 6

9 51 27 AM
hyd 12weto dgn
O
LL-111 ON OMd 33S \\
00 00 + l6££ ` .LS 3NI1H71
p P 36
N
Il
0 0� HgRRIS J4R�;� ; ii I rn 1 11 I Ib m
�\HOr,,o a a ANo
OHE�RS � I N II III
\`U CORq O co ; II
I m I i I I� i i�
0•
I N I
co r r x
—cn 11 11 m 41
a A � I
r °�PQ x T
RgNSP
I O J
��
to
r�
� / /// /// � ° °�� jl °� � I i •III j ; I 1 I I �I �
ta
X'`"� � ° 0800 �°
0 0 6a a0 00 I I II I Ij O� / �RIE S °�
Vz. 0& Iv I 1 Y
y /r / /�� \� °° ° a III o / 1 /1 �aE�
°° ° o 11 I I I, I II 1 c
000 0
I I I \ b
ZI ° ° °a} ° °°
o
©
o oo = —j o ao o o\ I I
A a � ° aa� o O
° o a o oo - - --
m112 Oa °a°ao a oaa o1
r.m °°° I I I // a Oa000 a0
a I I I
11 I I
o
Nmo >�° l 1% iA l ll I o�ll / /0
ArG9 �� as / /� to A I 1 Ir
ao io ° P TR�C r'o
mM x a� / / I l� R T NS HP N
°8 l i i 1 II 111l� 0
°� 0
T NERSH /P PENNING I 1 ll Jl // l o 0
& HAROt� Ot/t4R Q ll / I i 1 ll Ill �0
0 n m 1 MO l i i I I� II l v LEROY ES TATE
o a I
o
O
A °
do �' 1 11 ll
I I a 0
14 p�°Z 1 il \ ll'lilla ,8°
I 0
LL o $a°a 0 c W o ioN 000a00000 \/
l %M P q
}m
37-
X // / N 1 I I o
° ° I Ll z
N i --
�
C
m i 1 III II II� 1 (
m
° o 0 o si ate=
Z O Z mm tiac L N p W LA ° 2 RC / C NC I 1 I III II I I I I I n / (£
MCI
o0 MATCHLINE STA 3405 +00 00 I it
H o m s" ��0 DWG NO RR -13
0 z i m,
11
S

- - - -- 9 CL ON JMa
0000+
Q ,1 �/ B
\ Y r
\ N I
d I
A �
J
I �I�
o it It/
J� I
—� - - -- ���
qTT
::D
D
� 1111E
0a� °II / 1 w1111j
11 1
31 b'1 S3 .10131 n I I 1 11 \ 1
z�c �
a o %;� l� 11 I
a
dH$Nl P /
N0/, �n��s1 /flh 1111 I ` \
It I
It
1 \
\ \b L>r - - -, �/a V -1 l P� 1 !I � l I 2l f
' ' l 11 11 � ; ,� `I
.��, / � l � 11 1 /I 11 \ I \' i
I I
�OOOOOpp� O° ( �� I� I � /��I
�_ �y ; � 11 � �, �' III � II
�� isle \ lI
10-00
10_00 CQ
1 �
a °I I
It it �, Irl IIII I �
� I
,7 I I
/ I Ifs /
j/
/
It
II
It
10 I
11 i�V�b�1
�0ONlI I m I ! m
II I I J I I 1
X
No
Ros a W = '.7-- z n H
K W¢ ZLL
W,A WU w J N= uLj D
uxj
w ia- ir zm 0- o o O 4
o C w
@sc ✓ \��� y v
W d
II IIII m
po
�=i I N p = Q p
It le PoopCOOg o00o PQ4Q?
Q, QQpT$P \ ~
/ I ees ti 4 /r i o i H
u a «S
Z 0 z >°
I I l ��` 11 / I l ►++ z W
\ \ .O W
Y \ n Z
M.
0 u U
0 � u
I / , w
0 10
/
I I
e
It 1 / / ,R I —� \I 1 c \ \ \� \� o
It
p il
o
cot
� m oLL"z
\lll I/_ \
if l I �� 1 r s \\ m p m ¢�
lle II IO ° (]' %0 O 00 PO x �ntiJ
• '^ II Im 0 �p0 ° 0 ° 00 0P 000 c xM¢z
Op 0 I
x a P p o \ 0
00 4 00000 2
a 0
1 © \
y \`\ 0j P 00 �\ \
P P��- ,�,,p�
I I, p a lQ a
00 6,r l I I I
nl I I I II IIII ,s la�\a 00
1 °
'a { w —
C3 \aa8'
s
o
10 /l 1 m�li a z�
C3 'go
'?, ) Y/// //
I II II e
CD lVV
—360
I I II IIII
�Jli �I II 1 I \ I �� II m �II I� \\ a ! $� /�% Zg� a
P-oA�l'I ry� �I �-� �1\ 0, b�00 ,a
SOH" n�
C\I
ut CL
I I\ \ o
O J d I \\ \ �% �'iT / b a i / �I a \
I l`� I y 1111a l C3a
1�,1 \II I � ���Y xi - -"-- \�_ap �\�`\
I N I X ° -�
1\ 1\ I ;I I�M ^� IIII I II g� I Ia�e�\T //% I\n ��
1
MATCHLINE STA 3391+00 00
RR-11 - - - -«
SEE DWG NO
U6P q+
WV 6£ IS 6

9 51 50 AM I
\Sheets \Hop son hyd 13weto dgn
$$$$USERNAMt$$$$
/
MATCHL ►NE STA
DbyG 3405 + Op 00
NO RR -12 I o
� l J i' i II 1 111 1111 �o
r� I °
° d�
°
m A I j II (I II
CD
I \ VIII
°I
LLD)
ITT
00 s
°
I
r ,h
17
m 0
r y I c� I
N m I A2 SCP I 'o a
= m � �
•
D = I w £
' m I I II
>
r
ax sz I $zap
W
1 >�
I
I
I I
� I I
® I
Z ' ° 1
x °
I ; Sy/
Z.wx
�0/e r
�' �� I °a
m� o
°yx
M1
.2 S �
2 T(1 W °
s O
�o
nclmM � .n ° °O / I
N OD z
NN z
m
mo
N
Yo
N
\\ \ )
00 ° °
��o C °
A ei �D,' r D D 9 T S
Z
A �A
++ o
gm' To (n 0 0 9 m
IN, Z _ � o n 00 0 O Z � D o m � >1 = nJ n Z
po
�° 11 Z CD a �
Im fll
�II
Is II
I m II
'III
,, II
�I
1
2
1 I+
v Z
ci CA
-' 11 ° 1
y D
II 0 �
°o rn O ti o v 1
Z y _ o D
H m w s
-1 v ? = o mi svz 'n / I 1 I III 1 11
N O ti _� TO pnp Z
71 D� y
Q Z Mn = r mN NN v
Z D= OM 1
DT
� z mg aA -X �° �` a�+ �N 3N��H7 dW
O m o N �p . ((( �` bb +BlyE �,�
0 rn K --
I�\ 11 N o
}� A � N
II wo �
II
II
E:X
x J
x ll�� 0.
C41VO4 C
0
r

\y +9915 •/ alW.1 O W
jC� -1LINE Np` RR i4 ! °£� Z _ �Z 0
+/� C WN WU J N_J O 0
&!£ �NbJ D C/ - I 1 11 X1111 I 1 r'ryryv `\ I/ // �Iu1^�+ Wai °zs X O o O N
/ r 1 1 /\/ 1 a `1 I // / V c?s ON W W , .lp7 Q
\ �— I / / 1 I,1 \ 1 I I 1 \t I I 2 J O O O F W
N �\ d M
�
U W �
I \ ��� 11 11 1111 1111 1 i 1\ 1 0
L
� I Fez
In
p o
{� (1 11 J 1 I egc ro t / O G o
IC3 NI 111 r/ ��
b
bi
lk\ I i- c9 H t9
co Z c9
\ICI Im 1 ,0/ 1 m Z
\ / / — Q �11II 1 1 O nM _ Q V u <
W 1-_
O e\ r�� 1111 II J Z Q Z
\1 0 00 = u u
Lu
J
1 I I on
ZI Z
`o\ \la£ u
N `\ tom} —� I �1 \ � _ �
0��368- _ \ O X67- ' - �\ ,�� 1 '� \ 5 00 u ✓5
- - - -- 368 - - -- -- o
35s - -- ass- - - -___
,\
\`/36 - --
362 -�,� --- \\___ 36q\ I II 111E e < �o
=w =m
(� \J.2\ \I Z' 11 k1 \ IIII IIII 1 °
36� ey£ \ \� 11 I 1\ 1114 I I III 11 m I1 L__I d 8 mW.j
N L' 2d 00
�7o O zof¢2
f�• \� /
z
S^;��v6� II I \\IIE I \1 11111 1 II� / ce ,
- v \
ffi
� \ �
�� - - - - - -\ - -3 - - \ _ l IIIIw, j I�i r� -\360 - - \_
Q �� I� \\ V I I I I III 1-
- \\ C3 135811 (IIII III r \ 1
\�s Ili 1i
h/ \\ M N, Se \�i I e\ EE la 'I
/ 352 \// 3S \
l \
\
C3
O
j a
ro
\C3�I °� Q
it \I i o9 _L1
S
�, `ese - - -- - - -- - -�r
—
O� II �nn'j
� III ✓ —\ \ /) � r �
r -z9F
I,
\ III gi j I Iml I � a�
3� � 1 111, � I,I � ..
LU xg 0.8
- I ICI li 111111 /'/ \
V) \ \\
¢ /
Cl w
, f
ICI / I I
-J\
III 1 141 I ✓' Il\ \� W// /� � /
`I
O
LO
C3
C}
/ ma`s I � c / / \
dl , i lI 11111 t^ 'co-
I II i i i i /II
\I // 11 I i�yl1 s /'I 111111 (I1 /I \l < -1 I 7"
JY!h
-362 �/ ,,z
Jp I I
0000 50�� ObN
1S 3NI7H:).Lv'W
u6P 4+
WV 10 ZS 6

aC
US

j
L
/&0 � I IIII
II I IIII
c y° ti ° 0 �I III
I �° IIII
� o
\ II C? °
° IIII
1 li 1II II° ° I Ill
o II \
I
\ i II Ili
9
�tib �Ob 1
01
b/JOSSb
r!:
a �
1
I I
1
o �
i
}
C
4/0
n5 6'i T —
r'�
I °III I �
`Y /I■I -1�1
w
w o III
w II
N II I
• II II =
II II
II II I
II II '
o
In
g° W
s
°
� ��NOO' II III
�
I
I�
Z
% II
II II
LUo Il II
¢w IIInLu
ccn
LO
J �
IIII I
I II I
I I
WI I F
Ld
�i,ll I I
OI
CI
0
z
EA I
a�
O
u
N
W
a
Ln
a
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
� � I
z � I
< � I
I
1
5
0
z
ct
0
z
CL
m
CL
r
I
1
1
I
I 0
I ,
I
I
I, I
awl is
C
°�
o
III �
I I
I '
II
W
p
Q N�
I m
�w �� 4
H
p
LL
1 W
z
° o,
� ffi
C
4/0
n5 6'i T —
r'�
I °III I �
`Y /I■I -1�1
w
w o III
w II
N II I
• II II =
II II
II II I
II II '
o
In
g° W
s
°
� ��NOO' II III
�
I
I�
Z
% II
II II
LUo Il II
¢w IIInLu
ccn
LO
J �
IIII I
I II I
I I
WI I F
Ld
�i,ll I I
OI
CI
0
z
EA I
a�
O
u
N
W
a
Ln
a
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
� � I
z � I
< � I
I
1
5
0
z
ct
0
z
CL
m
CL
r
I
1
1
I
I 0
I ,
I
I
I, I
awl is
C
II
I I
I '
¢W
J°
C/)�
Q N�
I mi
LL
II III
i
� ffi
a �
w h
m
�
zUF
go y
O
I
I I
) W
wo
ti
CC
°o
g
I
[}
Q
N
MATCHLINE
N
STA
3433+000(
o
t -g
DWG NO
RR -14
au o °W
a a --
N H
oa Uz b �o z
a
WN =Q J
R2
=!2 �z s =!2 �it is
a
Z WF FU fI1�J {i1J
. VIX Q 4{�I WZ WU Z
W °zap- i11 os o O
''1^� a
V O =; 00 W W W Q
J C O2
d
W
ILI
DID
0 G
d 0 a
o
N �
/ z
N Q
� � a
' G
� z
I 1 U W
1199. J
— 8
O
N
Z li
O 10
C4
C.
cFc
`N
Q � OO�LL
_o
A
ZU �
a v
C"
z j
0
0
N
Z
do
� UM
S°
� a
z o.ia
.a �n
� N
F .z.
� J mtl tl
OY
Q
X ua z
a� Z
am
0
z m
W H+i
< m J
z FCIN
� zOtO t]
a
U
O
z
®�a
z z
e
F: a
a� x�
z8 a8
u 5 P 0 � 9 m S I PA4 uos$d3oH \.4e.4SX $
WV 11 ZS 6
= o
U
0
+ o
Q N�
W �z G
a �
w h
m
�
&
6,
��b�9
ti
°o
a
�m
m
LL. O-
J yaap y� � m
IL m P
�
Q
N
aa
e? O
s
N
Q�
2 2
o
t -g
= O
U
0
+
+
N m
Va~f
Q �E
O
0 5-
+
+
I y
Fa-
N
_ y
ie
O
LL
•
I I
O
N
Z li
O 10
C4
C.
cFc
`N
Q � OO�LL
_o
A
ZU �
a v
C"
z j
0
0
N
Z
do
� UM
S°
� a
z o.ia
.a �n
� N
F .z.
� J mtl tl
OY
Q
X ua z
a� Z
am
0
z m
W H+i
< m J
z FCIN
� zOtO t]
a
U
O
z
®�a
z z
e
F: a
a� x�
z8 a8
u 5 P 0 � 9 m S I PA4 uos$d3oH \.4e.4SX $
WV 11 ZS 6

9 52 22 AM
\Sheets \Ho son hyd 15wetb dgn
$$$$USERNAM�$$$$
V L O G V IN Z;/"U
00
0 +j£� £( i Jr£ II II1� I � i I Ji L S I1III I 3NI IlH71W
7i I � I I
1 I w I II I �o i w / i
�74, \J/� / 1 L /�4 / !I364—" I m r T I I 1
mm
";
/�✓
M
�cn \� _ a\ \
+ as�
i
� D
04c °o mao /g6n
rN °� T ° n I I ( I IIW II II III j1 1 mD
o r = I I Im II I l / 1i _ I 1 11 i s mm > e
�\
III III c I �o / 1 / I
Imp' ��
\ r370--_
z3
w � S \ � x/366// \
/ —N
a , � a N
_� —�
; 7a `- o \ 11 ,
nT
P`
Ln
�ro 8 z qZ III r, f D I m
8 F o
Oz III I N 4l D om
o D 111 I w I I Ij I� I \ ` ase- j I
Z xy m "� r 1 III I I I ` Ill yes
d \ w \
_n D I D III IIII
1 / \
= 1 / \ ml I I I I '--' III II • � \� \�� \ \\ \ \` \\ \\
_j BT 1� s\� I a IIw I I I p / \ \II �_0[£_
Zr i IIIII U) _ — zce 16
�m III IIB� m
�I
I p;\ I I Y I I I II II
oFPM ,\
1/ ,
`rl L�
001 ez
a 11
no mz
•� o �� / I ill I I I II I II m�
°__
zo MO \ I 1/ I I Iq
v-oia C� I \ I n 2 A 3 O
cpTF p V L A 341 I I �q
N�9'� I r3' i 11 II 3
-7
z
�o x
( I I t ❑
/ i1 ° ��— O I
/ 3 1 �jo I Il
9 /
,L Ij I � a
n n Z I / II I
° r I II 11 \ I I i i I \ho° I j \\ ,II \ \_nse --
�^ L Z
<Z O \BSI \I \\ /� �\\ III i Imo(
l
Z
v
_ Nc�, �aQc" i \`\ I°o
Z '\ I IIII III I 1 L J �2 I'
a ,/ i I II Ijl I I� °ill �/
l !
CAR
I 1 \
b °m m °m ao ; -m C1 4 \aea \ 1 ✓� 11 ( m s j �� - -�` I 1
Z �"
rw tn nm
09 O as IV! mo' �^ _— I 11 �\ I / I1 �� IL - - -- C
0 � � _< r mm. cv
N V oD i My Co
cn

60 bb ON JMa 33S &-Al
00 00 +6�££ V1S 3NIlHD1VW D PE 0
z
rir I I I II o dy5 d� Zo �u
LU
W
r /• I I I I I m �
° / O
o �
0
a
n
�9
of
W
U.
I I YC ° ° 00 ? U. ',
In °° u
O O eke
b
I I I I O Q oC N
O° Cv ` VuZvcS
at
W T 0
Q I i t i I o
U N r0
• z I I 1 I r
0
CL
I
I i I o u U a
U o� o� d
k + I of I I °
/ > I o I o W 8 is
Ln
°
� I
I
°
= N
/ ��° s ; ►I I z
w
I ► 1 I ' I o
f ° a
°
JNUJ
PQ I O OY
j 6 C
�i � tim � II m"I i
c�
0 a xm c
DJ u W.I.i
m J
° ° ° ° a
O v
°°
I �
f� � � I I I O O z
°
O 0 I�
ym� 0y i I i I ° 0 0
I
oy I I I I ° °
z — °
° m ° z
J= I I ( I I
my 1 I I I ° N° a ��
I I II i I I 0
o S +
°e to
o+ I I I ' X25 ° ° 8
I Cn�n O O
V ACT
P °
co
J o 5 Z °� o I I I I � ��, o ono
a + I I 0 0
J
V I I a¢ °
o F y�c
LL I I I I mW » OO
N O O
LL I III I gw
I w rNN ^NO°^n<
I I nv7 oHO c C O _
o Ir
71 e� ° I
Q
o
W °
I �z
I /� I
I I \ w d° �h I Q°
o V♦ 3 I m
0 I ° IL'
J ❑J I
LL
O
O�
` W I Ic
_ ir\ p
�� R = ° R
I 94 m
oil
o,o0 9
ti d� e�
Q \ ° es oo ssss vls�h I f � I o
C
O
� O
4
I I I
I II
I o 11 I �ryg�r��W
I co i `q�g�.�oa
M I c�i��`C�ioCS
MATCHLINE STq 3335 +0000
SEE DWG NO RR -07 \�
Ubp o804-nq p!y $
S
6

9 52 IT AM
hyd buf08b dgn
o Il o� %m �\ '°�m�\ \1 \\ ( 00 00 + S£e ON 1S 3N H
\_r �oo°sss I III Ilil / W Jl
0 00
OWN N m J \
6
I )h
Hill
\ \ ) 1
III
j \5° o I, )_IIII III I // \ I �_ _ - -OLE \ \�
N I
III V STA 3336 +00 63
\o ��388 la I IIII VAL STA 3336 +01 00
O° o
o
p o
I
CI °
1� I I III I ,�
o b \\1 I I ml L, m N \ \
II ° z
3-7 II I �I,w�
III ° III I 08 ,,>
I11 ° II
�.,o
�I / - - - -ffi �pNV °'P��' L�c� \ \� /Z III III IIII I \ \\ \ \\ \\
Go " 0
o� 9\ \\ \
°2I o n _J $ V °II N o
1 o o °
I IIII j I \ ' \ °
et +
Obc -- - l m
° or p
I =m = \ 1 I
8 � !o o�
m I \ P N H \
\\+ r° i \ \ \
� I I
— a6E — O �6e 392-/11 III I I \� r h _r r 1 \\ \I • / \\
(� I / s /
o
z .zn 1 d I
0 3g,i
o
—Z6E —I I 6v I I \1' I \� \\ � �--� -- >ee � a� 2ge /� , II 1 /
cr
o /O I I I \I I M J Q \ !mil 1 "fo/
o /o j
Z ° ° _
IzI e\ I °
°a
6
°c �I - - - -- I
d / � � li I \�I �I I I � 44
z m C,9A2 C� / \\ ° e
��,� r o1 w I I► 1 1 I \ //
®mz O I O I O
/ -4 o 1 —/
ra �z o wo
\
..oa O
ommM �I� d ( °
o> i a
o
NCB �8 o J� 0
1
°
z , —\ I I -- -
I Iw11II i� IIII Ir �I 1� ° I �-
09
n � � o
o o
Z �
o / Z
'^ Z / — �'1 0� I I I I I I I I I I I
eb£
C << 'o o I I I I I I I I w / / PNr 1 ��
> ° / I I �I I I I I / / c I I / / / y/ /
CP
p n \° 0 0
o
N T= 00 °
0 t
n °
m H �
C.
o°
!/
I r i
z — ° °
1, _ m I/ I/ � 11 I I I °✓ tl 1 J/ / 1 / l I � I � \\
F_;
m m
H c >
aez
m ° � \g �e \\ mti/ mm ICI ( II I
m 9 , I IIII —' / A >
I 1 I I I
Osro^ o
z D
Z I r
N
000
\N MATCHUNE STA 3349 + 0
0 FIX SEE DWG NO RR -09 �� 4

C?--, -�-, `
IC3q \
�I
II I
II
I
\ I I
sr *� I III
i
II �9
ID ID
II
+/ II
05
II
J
U
Y
Q
a�
U
II
II
II
I�
ii
it
ii
ii
ii
II
II
II
1�
MATCHLINE STA y o
r SEE pWG 3391 + 00 00
II NO RR-12 z
10
z �, oG
N cW
II 1 I I I I W Lu
LLJ II W i of I IW
/ I I o ; _
?
oU
_ , u
II LL , I I W mw x
II I I N °° b
o
0 8 +8 IV V I \ w °C
LP 99 +8 ££ h/l ° ° I Z LL 0 ,,
{ II I Q I I I ri ��' ) m uV�N
ad
I I � J x \ (J O Y W
{ { I a 0
l- II ° Q I I I I o \ �vu W
II° u33d
0 C3
Y ^ C DID
I
x N
�
sQ x w
Q N
IQ I I Jw r x caw
II I Q w a
w
II I i I I V <o w
0 1 �
II II I I °° z • o 0 oYUu
II I I Q o C) < �o
II II I x x —x
I I I 1 Q �
ytZ.m o O + In
� + 9 m +
I zY mco
, Sw¢2
° I Ir
� z
o �I,� �
II II i i I� II J m m \ \ \\
� z
0
zSaB
Y r-
jj II
° ° II II
II II
° II II
II jl
r --
II I I II
o I
m i °o I �_-
-�_ 'o , II-
I
- -jr I�-
II � ; II
II ° i I I II II
III ° i i II
I it
II ' i i II
II MATCHUNE STA 3377+0000
SEE DWG NO RR -10
u6p o11}nq p L4 uos$Rwd._3..1 S$$$
H \S +says\
M 65 ZS 6
-e'
II I�
o
W+
_k
II I
u6p o11}nq p L4 uos$Rwd._3..1 S$$$
H \S +says\
M 65 ZS 6

i
1
I
I
9 53 12 AM
$ hyd bufllb dgn
OL- -2111 ON JMa 33S
00 OO +LL££ ` IS 3N11HX"
I
\ i II II 14 1 I I I iITiJ III III cr /
8� I i II II 111 I i it
_x
�X--k
sae �+ i N,
, II I
–= – / 1 I ° II I m \
II\ I II to
0\ I //
(
0 �bf— \\ I� I \ I I I I / I
_ �\ \\ I 1 I O \\\ I \\
o
_ GE
m ��91V 11 1111111j1 m
om� 1 111111 I j– 1-li
511
–
�\ I
111
111111111 i 1
a 1 I —__ rymn1111111�
111111j11 1 1111 I la - -- °'=~�L_ . \\I� -, I 1 ��-� 111111114111101
a 11 I d i, I 1 1 1' –�_ �11.�111 11 1 11111111111
=
II = 39
a ^JI i� ICJ u 11III�I ���_1111111111111
_ �3 – 92 ` I f I I W I IIII I I I I III III
s—
i
oh � I 1 II II IIII III / /�J1�
/� Illl�f/
I�
as I(Q \ \ \ \` \�
mw W II
I
X
8$ z 1 o I I 1 1 1 1\ I y\ \ 9
Zsm \�e1c, � �
1 I \ \ \` \\ea\ a9 ✓ / / / //% / //i /
\ o D I I I I I II 9\
\ s
I�
386–
°o g011 I I/ II 1 I V/,
V 1I / I s_ �' I ` � I III
iblo
•141
It
\ i o 1 1
A r/ it Ii i t /'� Ij
® I /
�■ x � / /��m�' I l i \ii I 1�1 ``! 1 � li
> \� x x
zmwm \e \ \
\\
>
ZMmo �1 s I \I \ 1 1 D
���° °, , • / / - z °
I/--- n 1 1`j� W
O
fit- �//
mo tI� �p
r= } y f 11 I I y 1
mN
z z
m o��I
o�N4^�rJI I's n
g I\ x g ��^���s�� 1 1 1 I i �o I< ti 11 O I l I \I II
rl
D I/ _
p m P \\ 3 –I , \ I R°
Q r^ , \ \ —� �3•t I I I S '^ III I \\
(� \ \I� \ �8
^+ �" Z N n `380X — _ - -_—.\ 0 wN
G < Z O °!
o 23D �� // i\ \� I '\ Ifl / – I \ w 1 D
Q C'� ,I !J 3�z I �3�e
T z �'\ _� / I \r "' I I I I I w I h j 1fAl 33 8 +6 41
I I I JI /I I I 8 +B 6 ,c YO
I ny�1 Q m
III C)
p I I I I 1 II I 60,111
m II I\ I I r 11 III m \`_ • I I
cl
m
a i/ si0 l l �D "' m j
ea
u `^ o -- — ,e /I /J I �m
Z
lr
° —3j0— / JI 1 I�DO \ I lo' I I 111 \ I ('\ I 1 I qC1
'� 4,
e °m M 1I C
,o T J j 372 r-o I I B\ I I i l IW j II Ij I II 1 j
m
CA m c, 31 °= 1 / l i 11 I; I ll1 I i i II
m� m
�v N o 3° 3 0
Z o �\ �,,%
0? I N� C' – t l –�a w'
H Z 00 DO +16£�b1g 3v 33S v
0 IN-
NI1HJlbyy

1 I I 100 00 50V£ S 3N1 HD1dW / /� Y
Q
�j� � Q I I I I I! II � I / o � o
oa oa Z
C)
f I ��I II III I c o o
LU~
0 s q _
a t
r If o I I I II II I I I I // ° J W H
°
Q
_ IN
p P O �°° - I I I C
z
• / / y O
CD
° tJ O
N o O d
- -__ I I I / o
J I kI.- o pppp�p 9Q � 7/44
IoI t, I Pa°pp ° 000%0 LL
�Il u
u N
21 OZ j
I u w
/ ° Y
P I Ill l� �I
31 b1 S3 .10�J -i ) i z
U
n I 11 � IZ I �w
�b71 N� 70�jbH
C3c l l/ I� III i i 11 1 SN�NN3d d�HSy3N1
a,ll/ II ll1 I /I
C3
�1 S
No,�SN1& ° ��wfll � /°'� I I III li ill I I � F o z
o o � o N y
,
# r/ a C3
l/11�1 llI i Mi I I /lrn
II I 11 I °� x
cC3 00
�I I � � 3C3 ° a ^'� Qyzm
IIIo °Q
m o tm
z o
3 Oa 00080 p p mW~J
I II
° °
°
10 co
Q O ° 00 Op O °O z iemo
— I I Q Q P ' xM¢z
-- I • I I© Q C3° °O ood aOpp p O Oppp e
I I x p O
ce o
2
Q °
:y C3 R O
/� O ® °
C3 ja
° II B °
P O R ° O ° ° pQ O °
� m { 3
C
°a
o
I I I I I 4 88C3 \ o , ,
I II I Ia a °` � ° � F
° P Q o
p C7 a C�� w
CPO I I S I II I I a O C3)
l
C3 0 CD C3 0 C3 C3 cD aC, � _ C3 C3
�
C3 C3 \ \\ �p \ � a
cC3 o � \ 0 % /
/ z S
FW
I
of I III I � C3
�
M �
I
10 d I III I aa° C3 \�
V11� dN p 1 ��I I i I I III C3 C3
JN
i II
� N—
m
I ( —
x i o
� I � 1 II � � �I , � I •� , ° co � k
C3 C3
s 11 I i o N LI C3
'D 1 C3
email III N I `" CL b��� 1 •
ci I I i � < S /y�
W C3
1 1 = 4
Idd
1 11 o
1 '
I
MA ST A 3391 + 00 00
TCHLINE
SEE DWG NO RR -11
&o Q \0 CIO
$..$$d..' $IVNa3snsss$
ubp oZI}nq p C4 ff \s_ea4s\
WV bZ £S 6

9
hyd bufl2b dgn
N - - - --- 11 b-! ON ma 33S \
00 OO +Ib£E `d1S 3NIlH:)I W d 1 w 11
I CA
J A
\ • Hp� p �- ,��' ° /,�-� � \\ 1 � \°� �R
;fin Tl
/ \I
CO Q �i
m
911 III 1 I 1 I l i I p-
'
`09c—
1 l ✓ 1 \ /r I I I/ 1 I
X 11/ oBSCU ( I I I
INC 'Ix
TRAi� T
III9® °e L p I �I�o /
i I
°��
�\ ' 0
s�i I II I I I fl I' i I I 11 I 1 r�l /
�
" / /� /mowo ;v s z I
/
�
I-
� �
i> I' / q
I � a / # cp 6), o 4p io a Qa I ,
°� C�
v 1 I 1 /R*I S 1°
\ \ ��� ° i I I II m 1 1 IflI, Y
s I I Ia I 1
\\� s \ \�� � cD
�� \\ _o� oaf° 11
if ,,. Sal
Oc
o io 1 ���� a�ec��i � I 1I I17' i I 1/ ED
000 0
z 00 0 it
\ I I ° �
Igo o ° o e� I I I 1I 1 \
\ f✓ 000
m oa a 376 a a ° ° ©° a° ° °.. /• 6 a— I r Ii II I I 1 11 / /I I _ /I I 1 I
>I a° p 1137 /3� 7 x it \
rr�m
/ /1 ° 1 y3 Il i l I ll/ I I /J a m?a000CS
o
. _ "_ 6.--d �w 4'� /
�
0.1mo W1 \ I �`�_, // ' \° li i I 11 r3, ; - - -_ 74�
— 36e/ /o °9j / /f
3$ ( o/ I l .o, I I , Q /II /A\���/
am 6 // Il _ J /ryl gg� °al / 1 31 I 1 11 // 1 \,/ `It31 •'ll T S rR
ow" \\ I ; / 1 / i ' Iu° I 1 11 IIl l PR rNC r /ON
o" c \ /�\ / r I I II / ` / / /I I / l� l I 1 o NSHP
z z / \o I I `� / \ f /I I I�' llI 11 /a)
0 i/ i 111 11 %f o/
I \ 1 ,��
g rNERSHIP \�\ ENN�NC r� �f 3 0 //l i %// 1/ `� � II i �
l
BAR p' CN r \ �// I\ �/ /� r 111 I/ I 1 1 11 37 —/
\\ /i �D MC R IIA \1\ 3g✓0 /I //� 7i iii I i I i6�\ _// l 1 I� �' / IV 3�2
Z , \ / I ( I r// ,41 I rl /m 1 I / 1, 1 /� LEROY ESTATE
`\ 6 I IIII / , ATE
3160 - I 1
" LO �+ '� i /I% / ��/1 �r lrJl1 /��1 37
(� \ I a
<ZO / // ✓ 1 1 x 2�/
A ( / I z , I 11 I , r 1 I �' / 0?�— �_ - - -3j
0
A Z Jl ' m / \ ti 354 I �/ 1 I I �1 1 11 II o
p v \\ 0$1000 2s�; aool� /i� �I `'° I z 6aaa L�OOOO \ IIII / ( /I I c l ^ l \
a C
P° A \m 6 68
N o -
10 _/ w
z /i \ \ I// / /cD / / 1 I tii I i w CD
ll f I �
e iC,
5 m I, w I II/� I u
m� "' m ��_\ /l,I I IIII Ir I (� i '`362 —`` �\ I
210
0 3m v it l / r' I I
z D
o / / / W
TH MATCHLINE STA 3405 +00 00 I� I I� I \`� L
pu A `��� / DWG NO RR -13 __-

II o j jl
I yo
O
1°
�I \
Mr
:titer
:#
► rY.
1r rRA
# #
I
Q � f3� III
III
� II
n. I I I
"9 W
C
ONb�Obd' o
01- ¢ j
s�� b�JO
Ssb
IX
�
U J
��J Ia-
`� n O
0
�o oo�r^0o N
n
o���8sooss
F-
°
LLI
1 m° °
LD
g �
I
�c I o '
�J CD
V
o f
Co LUW
W II
Lo I II
AunL
II II
� o
❑
7 '1VA q —I
° z
Q
°W
vi r 9
WIA
II I�
�� II
0
W
HI
crl
LL.I
n
01
CI
I
0Iz
EciI
Q I,
O
U
N
w
a_
_ U
a
a
QQO�
75°
fl�°
0
�a
cn C
_ 4—Z
o +
tom "
O
Z (w
°F
l�M�
W W
°
^0n�
0°
o�ll
di
� U, l
Z IL
30
0
W
HI
crl
LL.I
n
01
CI
I
0Iz
EciI
Q I,
O
U
N
w
a_
_ U
a
a
QQO�
75°
fl�°
0
of
o
y
,r d `o
= 1/J
0 LU
U.
Z LL
21 oZ,�
I 1 I u y
1 z
CL
u u ,
u��a
O /
o8,9 l �
TN
F o
+� m
F
I qt
kt:�SLL I W
mnZ 8;-.) I
moNCO � U
I
llocon I I
N
MATCHLINE STA 3433 +
DWG NO RR -14
Vl
o +
O
o h
o
� m
�
t
0
Z IL
30
p
� m
r
W
~ M
p
z
Lu
F
e7
p �
W
J
W
<<
`y
of
o
y
,r d `o
= 1/J
0 LU
U.
Z LL
21 oZ,�
I 1 I u y
1 z
CL
u u ,
u��a
O /
o8,9 l �
TN
F o
+� m
F
I qt
kt:�SLL I W
mnZ 8;-.) I
moNCO � U
I
llocon I I
N
MATCHLINE STA 3433 +
DWG NO RR -14
Vl
.g
S
n
�- I ye poo
LLO-
m
Z
S
h
E
P
U
0
+
m
M
v
M
0
N
a
H
0
cc
8 ROm
d
Nm
N
CJ UU
Ox
¢ C
� YO
OC ULL Z
s� ¢m
m O tm
p z m
W rl+l
� m J
p SW¢Z
U
z
® m�
z z
-1
F
Otii m a ztl
� a �
0
N_
;5
a
v
M
zP O •
I
c •
!� o
u6p °Sl}nq pAL4 MMYTdN_3..1 S\
H \s�ee4S\
WV 60 £S 6
o +
O
o h
� m
�
t
a
� m
W
~ M
.g
S
n
�- I ye poo
LLO-
m
Z
S
h
E
P
U
0
+
m
M
v
M
0
N
a
H
0
cc
8 ROm
d
Nm
N
CJ UU
Ox
¢ C
� YO
OC ULL Z
s� ¢m
m O tm
p z m
W rl+l
� m J
p SW¢Z
U
z
® m�
z z
-1
F
Otii m a ztl
� a �
0
N_
;5
a
v
M
zP O •
I
c •
!� o
u6p °Sl}nq pAL4 MMYTdN_3..1 S\
H \s�ee4S\
WV 60 £S 6

9 54 02
hyd bufl5b dgn
L
�v o X374 -1
I
i
y
f s
/37Z W
/ W
I W
JI °
a
oec
0
q l —bb ON JMa
30 00 +££Jr£ d1S 3NIIH :)IVW
it / /I I
II �i 1 I
III 11 w aT
o° ,� e r �✓
I I I n• ti
1 1 I Tl8 owm oo mm
�° .:qa D -0z
v�
c 10
T x
WI
\ IJ I' L I III I III ° III IIII 1 m� mco
II i II �� y I III II11 s mm
(;\-� III �a \\
\ / I III II II I 1 D III MII \ 97x / /�
,31D — I I I I c I� \
I
o I 4 ��
\ I I I w / I l �I
Ln
'/m r 1W ��I /L_BS I
� 6��
D co p\ r
sz Fly III I\ I
N I D
$ P W "s III I I I N o ° m I,
qST J > as I 1 III \i n9c I II \\I ° �`O'
z
i
to // o m j1 I I N / \ �'2s e _ \
ZS° �°, \ �\ c� ✓�, 3�` \�
i v \
r
Z -N, D Oa1
D 9g£ \ S e
\\
\ °
/ + N ! §c-7 III I III II / N'"j"JnaP ^`"i��� \ \\ \ j\ \°
D
z
'°f I' I II a \ \\ \\ \ \\ 9
® _ \ \ 9 \
I o
fA
Z � �ZSe,
I� c 1 / ' ) ' I I I I III I sl rmfi m
a
i I I I I I� III I I�"
Z� 0 111
\ I
A W=
n II II II II ( 1 4\
I I 1
r M" 1 a\C /mil
m0ya
NI
fAT b V L A 34 � 0 J's
II ` 'Q
m \ tii Ill Jl l 110 l / I tl CS l f j / I
/— X362__ - - --
m° Z /�� °
° / �• —a _� \J
� ZQO Il i I I JP�' • �' I I I �i ��� i o i l ,l /I i �
� @ � � � 1 I � 1 \\ C \✓ J ��/ � 3 � \I IQO I I 1111 9� � \o \ I ) � / 1 \
m a 1 l I I� j\ I \ °© I I I \\ I I _ \I I ���� \\ \ —v9E
xZ
p N z o\3
S A
I1\ \\ 1 I I \ �,
N m T / i'I, \i I I; I ' \\ 4 iii i I\ ° ° II °
m H / `ri —X —
z `_0 1 i l\ i ill \ Tp , a r I
ticpFr 9F\ -- it 0,4-
n '^ 0 4,10 l /Il
$
o/
Z 7 I �cT IS
II _
�
,
C' CO
rn
m�
z m \ / / ) 11 I / °� - - -- III
_ � l
�Z � �
vii b z ° \ I I� �� \� /
0 rom n b I III 116 1 11 \) 11 i it t \ \�i lil4�
v�
i
D
W
A
W
+
O
/ 1 /
J y
A
W
I
�
+
°
°
I
o I 4 ��
\ I I I w / I l �I
Ln
'/m r 1W ��I /L_BS I
� 6��
D co p\ r
sz Fly III I\ I
N I D
$ P W "s III I I I N o ° m I,
qST J > as I 1 III \i n9c I II \\I ° �`O'
z
i
to // o m j1 I I N / \ �'2s e _ \
ZS° �°, \ �\ c� ✓�, 3�` \�
i v \
r
Z -N, D Oa1
D 9g£ \ S e
\\
\ °
/ + N ! §c-7 III I III II / N'"j"JnaP ^`"i��� \ \\ \ j\ \°
D
z
'°f I' I II a \ \\ \\ \ \\ 9
® _ \ \ 9 \
I o
fA
Z � �ZSe,
I� c 1 / ' ) ' I I I I III I sl rmfi m
a
i I I I I I� III I I�"
Z� 0 111
\ I
A W=
n II II II II ( 1 4\
I I 1
r M" 1 a\C /mil
m0ya
NI
fAT b V L A 34 � 0 J's
II ` 'Q
m \ tii Ill Jl l 110 l / I tl CS l f j / I
/— X362__ - - --
m° Z /�� °
° / �• —a _� \J
� ZQO Il i I I JP�' • �' I I I �i ��� i o i l ,l /I i �
� @ � � � 1 I � 1 \\ C \✓ J ��/ � 3 � \I IQO I I 1111 9� � \o \ I ) � / 1 \
m a 1 l I I� j\ I \ °© I I I \\ I I _ \I I ���� \\ \ —v9E
xZ
p N z o\3
S A
I1\ \\ 1 I I \ �,
N m T / i'I, \i I I; I ' \\ 4 iii i I\ ° ° II °
m H / `ri —X —
z `_0 1 i l\ i ill \ Tp , a r I
ticpFr 9F\ -- it 0,4-
n '^ 0 4,10 l /Il
$
o/
Z 7 I �cT IS
II _
�
,
C' CO
rn
m�
z m \ / / ) 11 I / °� - - -- III
_ � l
�Z � �
vii b z ° \ I I� �� \� /
0 rom n b I III 116 1 11 \) 11 i it t \ \�i lil4�

CONTRACT 54000 1.STR01 T1 B TIP PROJECT- U- 4716A/C
iii
III
t#
^�!
N
m
m
U
1
9
o
0
�
o �¢
0 O>
2
2
Z n
O
O
;u n
n
T
v
D
Q
z�Z
0
9
>
o
m
M
M
C
r
O
0
m
0
i
T
X
w1+m
o z �
NA
N
m
;
-U
M
M
o
m
o
m
o
r
i
0
m
'0
_
M
_
O
r
0
m
Z
0
cn
G)
I
w
=
_I
cn
o
V
o
n
3
D
Z
m
r
D
cn
r
°o
°o
°
I
iii
III
DI
z�
z
z
m�
,Z1
m
m
t#
^�!
N
m
m
U
1
9
69
I �
�
o �¢
0 O>
2
2
Z n
O
O
;u n
n
T
v
D
Q
z�Z
M
c
9
>
I �
m
M
M
C
r
W
0
T
0
i
T
X
w1+m
o z �
NA
N
m
;
-U
M
O
m
i'
m
m°
o
r
i
0
m
M
O
r
Z
0
G)
I
w
=
V
I
3
DI
z�
z
z
m�
,Z1
m
m
t#
^�!
N
� m
U
1
ms �
w702
Q
D6rb.T1
ca
0
m
o �¢
0 O>
m Z
Z n
v
a O
;u n
D
v
v
D
Q
z�Z
M
c
9
>
v
m
M
M
D
pin
W
N
T
0
0m
.-mz
I�
w1+m
o z �
DI
z�
z
z
m�
,Z1
m
m
m
z
2
z
m
m
I �
I
I
I�
Za
m�
r
'0 0
i
I
I
I
Iz
-gA
W
OW
� Z
°z
O
I�
I
I
z
M
O
z �
8
A
c 'Z7_,
z cn
v
S ��--
z
�Z
o
z
A
z
"7
O
z Z
Jm
1
r
D
z
0
90
V
N
m
D
0
1
cn
F
1,
z
cn
D
T�
V
m O
0 00 (�
0
X 0 r
z m
D 00 ;00
J� m
�
v�
1
00 =m vG)
�mr 0
m z�
mD n0 �
cn m r �? 0U)
mz z9 �z
>K U-o Mv0i
m :c m >
r-zi Z
Z
zmMN) oy
U 0 zzv
cv
1 ri -Oo
c0 m O
m� � z
A
T�
A =
6
0
r
m
G7 O
A=
b>
1 V
s
TC
z
DT
m
0
0
C
z
C/)
V ^ ,
r
019
Z
t�
�0
a � �
a
b
C a
v
0 P
ms �
w702
Q
D6rb.T1
0 1
0
m
o �¢
0 O>
$
a O
mb�
C�
nom
m$w
0
z�Z
M
c
9
>
v
m
M
m�4m
pin
VI
A
I�
NA
N
m
-
-U
yr
m
i'
m
m°
o
r
i
m
z
2
z
m
m
I �
I
I
I�
Za
m�
r
'0 0
i
I
I
I
Iz
-gA
W
OW
� Z
°z
O
I�
I
I
z
M
O
z �
8
A
c 'Z7_,
z cn
v
S ��--
z
�Z
o
z
A
z
"7
O
z Z
Jm
1
r
D
z
0
90
V
N
m
D
0
1
cn
F
1,
z
cn
D
T�
V
m O
0 00 (�
0
X 0 r
z m
D 00 ;00
J� m
�
v�
1
00 =m vG)
�mr 0
m z�
mD n0 �
cn m r �? 0U)
mz z9 �z
>K U-o Mv0i
m :c m >
r-zi Z
Z
zmMN) oy
U 0 zzv
cv
1 ri -Oo
c0 m O
m� � z
A
T�
A =
6
0
r
m
G7 O
A=
b>
1 V
s
TC
z
DT
m
0
0
C
z
C/)
V ^ ,
r
019
Z
t�
�0
a � �
a
b
C a
v
0 P

t
%
§
t
2
_
<_
o
CD
k
k
t
b
£
0
z
w
I_
3
_p
k
/
3
«
/\§fn
kf2
\
CO §
7
U- o
Z
9
7
e
a
�
U
"
�
§
. &
z
f
n _
�
§
2
E
/
ƒ
� 2
Q
p
2
§
)
;
c
7
-3:
\
/
m
m
..
z
An
3
z
�
.2
to
o
a
■
E
2
$
t
gE
°
k E E K
k
k§
-
§
k w IL
0°`
J
k
k§
z
z
■
_$ 2§
Ul
u
zi
I
■
2
e
�i20
■
Lu
J
2
f Ir
to
>
v orb
..
2
f
2
LL
2
J
2
.
\
k
)2
no
CL
@
§
]
C
0
f
2
c
e)
c
)
k
q
`
§
/ §
\
/
§
%
n
§
)
°
c o
�
E
a
6
0
U-
%
§
§
2
\
�f£
$
a 7
(
2.
_
,
t
E
_
a
A
}
§
}
\
�
j
/
I
§
k)
$
z
§
E
/
g
j
k
)
0
�
§
°
_ ■
-_
a
■
■
.o
�2
CL
§
}k
J
a
q 2;
..
r,§
L
=
0
2
e
z
/4
E �IL
z
..
®�
_9
;
u
E
[
to
_�
■
:?
�®
.
=o
» 2
t
.f
a
§
2
2
§
3
.
o
2
t
I
/
&
a
e
a
b
2
2§
22
e
S
§
I
S
k§
k
e
e
§(
a
z
§
M£
z
o
o
m
a
a
w
«
o

7■/
\.
2
&
\...
rL U
/
k
k
�
%
a
Im
■
04
<
<
«
7 0
2
z
z
w
�
© la
2
I
$
E
)
G
J
$
\§
2i
I
�
2
�
c
§§
)
k
§
%
o
§
&
§
o ;
z
z
A
-
s
EE
-
�3
0
-
k
E
�w-
R
§�
f;
.
E
k •
cli
\
e
f
,
-2&
c
-oaA
2
a
§
§
�
k
{ E
§
�
2
&
[ o
e
u
t
a
6 �
)
§
§
m
c3J §/35a
&2
`o
�kc����
§ I.-
§
/
0
-
8
6
6
)
k
k
-
k
) §
-
{
Im
- }
2
/
2 §
§
\ !
�
Q
C,_
#
c
-
:
_
k 3:
0
o
C { /
�ƒ
f
E
E
�
|
CL
a -
|
|
E
§
E
(D
a
a -
\2
2
-_}
¢0
§ §ma(\si
{ 2/
�§i(a&§§
k�/
*\ !&
G�§@RRnn
§/\
_d\
cc
Lul
\
_
_
Jk

Y Y
c
C7
O d 0
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
c
Z
D
N �
—
� L
N
C W
N
N
O
DI
1�
CI.
� fD
O
N
O
O
d
0 Q
w
N �
O
�
C
h
cq
CR
m
O
c
m
(b E
Q V
N
r..
.-
N
N
p
� � u
°�
d
c
d
G c
n7 d
AL
L
N d%
N
O
O
m
t0
D
> f
N
O
O
O
N
N y
CC)
d
L °
O
CD
U
E a c
N (d
N
N
N
P7
In
1D
N
`O t_ -
O
W.
° G G
m
cd
'
52 cc
f
d m
- on
C
o
a
o
o
c
°
° O pN
O 0
v
rn
C.
m
w
CK?
w
N
6i
2 C m
N
N
a
O
O
O
>
p Y 3
O
J
G CD
E o c
x
t
W
O
H N L
co
G
V C Z
O
O
O
O
0
3
a J
L
cn
a m N
i Z
V
O C
N >
r
a E�
U
'°
«0
N O G
° cu 'c0
a a m
c
-p
0 oo
a
E
�Fj
_N
i- Q
CL 3
m J
c
r-
co y cU
o .. UJ¢
E x
c°�
o
m
o
O
o
0
0
o
O
p
o
o
O
o
0
Cl E
E
3°
CW7>
�+
of
N
�
EoLrnm
E 3
li
¢
8�
�a
o
3
L
a O ¢
m
N
f"
C
O
m m
co 3 c
Lu
lC A H W
m
c
p L
c 3 a2
O)
0 0
0
o
N
N
oo
v
E
E$
fC
+_°
C m I J
_ 2 ¢
C m
Lo a
cD
O
N
N
O
1�
O
R7
O
O C
p 5 D
m m 0
V= Q U.
C
U N
°' r
t O
E
Z 3
E� v
Z
j
m m c
N
Y =
f7
N
fh
N
t7
(7
-0 U
N G N
O , co
N
3
�
m
C 01
(D
N N L
a)
2
40
a
W
2
d
° N M
a Uy C
°
E .o
p
'OG j
7
O
U.
C
m p
` lII d
o E
U C
G O+ U
i
C
U m
'CD
cn O
O
O
in
O
cn
O
u]
O
cn
O
cn
O
cn
O C
p >
4
d
C CD d
00 m
m CO e0
�a
Ewa
(0
CD
o
o
CO
�
_=
mE<
r
fD
m a —
W W
+
I
+
co
+
rn
+
m
+
co
+
v
E m
3 0
•-
Q
�S
Vl U Ui
cn
cn
cn
c`7
M
V)
m
O
N
_ c
G .Q
EZ)
2 a
m 3
2
H N y
L _ a
�
O N
O N
O O
O O
O O
O N
o Y =o
U
y=
c
O 1D
+ +
O tD
+ +
O O
+ +`
O
t
O In
+ +
O N
++
C
°'' E
a
io E�n�O70f
mm mm
c7 tD
O O
O
TTNC�
v v
N t0
V c7
>
'y� E p
Ommmmmmmco
NLL
c�c��c7c�c�c�cocot�t�cn
mamcn
LL
c �°
iJ
O=r-
O
° � m
z Z
Z
N
Oo � a