20120400 Ver 1_401 Application_20120412

\ GELEBRATTNG 10TEN PEARS S EPI
CENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION
Apn1 17 2012
1025 WADE AVENUE
RALEIGH NC 27605
TEL [phone] FAX [phone]
NC DWQ, 401 /Wetlands Unit 12040
Attention Mr Brian Wrenn
1650 Mail Service Center _
Raleigh NC 27699 1650
Subject Application for Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the proposed replacement of Bridge
No 90 over Brush Fork on East Wade Street in Anson County Federal Aid Project No BRZ 1127 TIP
No B 5009
Dear Mr Wrenn
The Town of Wadesboro NC is requesting authorization for a 401 Water Quality Certification for impacts associated
with the scheduled replacement of Bridge No 90 over Brush Fork on East Wade Street Wadesboro NC (Anson
County) The bridge will be replaced with (2) 10 X 10 box culverts An off site detour is proposed There will be
permanent stream and wetland impacts associated this project Please note in the NCDOT Bridge Inspection Report
the stream is referred to as Moss Creek and not Brush Fork Review of USGS Maps and NCDWQ GIS Data confirmed
that the stream name is Brush Fork (Class C Waters) For the purpose of this PCN the waterbody will be referred to
as Moss Branch (Brush Fork) for consistency The culvert placement will occur in phased construction utilizing
impervious dikes and stilling basins to accommodate the dewatering process
A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) Type IIB was completed in March 2012 and is being reviewed by NCDOT
at this time A no effect was rendered in the PCE document for the Section 7 listed species for Anson County This
project calls for a letting date of May 2012
Sincerely
r
Mr Philip Beach
SEPI Engineering and Construction Inc for Town
of Wadesboro NC
�C/;ZkR ObC D
APR 2 © 2012
DENR GNA R QUiU TTY

/'1 c�eaenxc ��s` rsxieeas
�`•• —' S E P I
CENGINEERING & C0NbTRUCriON
April 17 2012
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
U S Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Ave Room 208
Asheville NC 28805
ATTN Liz Hair Project Manager
1025 WADE AVENUE
RALEIGH NC 27605
TEL [phone] FAX [phone]
Subject Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14 and 401 Water Quality Certification for the
proposed replacement of Bridge No 90 over Brush Fork on East Wade Street in Anson County
Federal Aid Project No BRZ 1127 TIP No B 5009
Dear Ms Hair
The Town of Wadesboro NC is scheduled to replace Bridge No 90 over Brush Fork on East Wade Street Wadesboro
NC in Anson County The bridge will be replaced with (2) 10 X 10 box culverts An off site detour is proposed There
will be permanent stream and wetland impacts associated this project Please note in the NCDOT Bridge Inspection
Report the stream is referred to as Moss Creek and not Brush Fork Review of USGS Maps and NCDWQ GIS Data
confirmed that the stream name is Brush Fork (Class C Waters) For the purpose of this PCN the waterbody will be
referred to as Moss Branch (Brush Fork) for consistency The culvert placement will occur in phased construction
utilizing impervious dikes and stilling basins to accommodate the dewatering process
A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) Type IIB was completed in March 2012 and is being reviewed by NCDOT
at this time A no effect was rendered in the PCE document for the Section 7 listed species for Anson County This
project calls for a letting date of May 2012
By copy of this letter I am forwarding five (5) copies of this application package with $240 fee to Brian Wrenn
NCDER Division of Water Quality 401/Wetlands Unit for his review It is requested that any comments related to
the 401 certification be forwarded directly to me with a copy sent to the US Army Corps of Engineers
U �� o Sincerely
R 2 0 2 0 12 Mr Philip Beach
WAT R Q AtLITy SEPI Engineering and Construction Inc for Town
4 St watez Branch of Wadesboro NC
cc Brian Wrenn Transportation Permitting Unit NCDWQ (5 copies with $240 fee)

cet DAAMG A)rew rows
S EP1
CENGINEERING &CONSTRUCTION
Table 1 Project Impacts
1025 WADE AVENUE
RALEIGH NC27605
TEL [phone] FAX [phone]
PCN
Reference
No
Impact Type
Waterbody Type
Impact
Mitigation
Proposed
W1
Permanent Fill/ Excavation
Linear Wetland
0 004
None
S1
Permanent Fill
Intermittent
Stream
45 ft
4S ft
S2
Permanent Culvert Installation
Perennial Stream
62 ft
62 ft
S3
Temporary Bank Stabilization
Perennial Stream
13
None
S4
Permanent Bank Stabilization
Perennial Stream
20
20 ft
Total Mitigation Proposed
127 Linear ft
Page 2

OapF W A TF9OG
y r
> .1
O <
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN) Form
A Applicant Information
1
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 14 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu
fee program
® Yes
❑ No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1 h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Bridge Replacement #90 over Brush Fork
2b
County
Anson
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Wadesboro
2d
Subdivision name
2e
NCDOT only T I P or state
project no
B 5009
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
3b
Deed Book and Page No
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
3d
Street address
3e
City state zip
3f
Telephone no
3g
Fax no
3h
Email address
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other specify
4b
Name
Hugh James
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Town of Wadesboro
4d
Street address
124 126 East Wade Street P O Box 607
4e
City state zip
Wadesboro NC 28170
4f
Telephone no
[phone]
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
towwaterplant @windstream net
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Philip Beach
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
SEPI Engineering & Construction
5c
Street address
1025 Wade Ave
5d
City state zip
Raleigh NC 27605
5e
Telephone no
919 789 9977
5f
Fax no
919 789 9591
5g
Email address
pbeach @sepiengmeenng com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

B Project Information and Prior Project History
1 Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
Not applicablel
Latitude 34 9661 Longitude 800639
1 b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
(DD DDDDDD) (DD DDDDDD)
1c Property size
0 277 acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to
Brush Fork
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
Class C
2c River basin
Yadkin Pee Dee
3 Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The existing site conditions are an aging bridge in need of repair over a creek in a residential neighborhood
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
0 004 acres
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
155 linear feet
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
Replacement of structurally deficient bridge
3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used
The project involves replacing a small bridge with (2) 10 X10 X59 concrete box culverts buried 1 ft Structure will be of
sufficient length to provide (2) 10 foot lanes with 7 foot shoulders and guard rails on each side Traffic will be maintained
using an offsite detour Road building equipment such as trucks dozers and cranes will be used during construction
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Yes [:1 No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the pasty
Comments
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type
Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company SEPI Engineering &
Construction
Name (if known) Phillip Todd Philip Beach
Other
4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
20 December 2011
5 Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

6 Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes explain
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps 404 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ —non 404 other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
excavation /fill
roadside linear
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0 004
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g Total wetland impacts
0 004
2h Comments Wetland impacts include excavation and fill of linear wetland (0 004 acres)
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number
(PER) or
(Corps 404 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non 404
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)'?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
UT to Brush Fork
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
3 5 ft
45
S2 ® P ❑ T
Box culvert
installation
Brush Fork
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
11 5
62
S3 ®P ❑ T
Bank stabilization
Brush Fork
® PER
INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
11 5
20
rip rap
❑
S4 ❑ P ® T
Bank stabilization
Brush Fork
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
115
13
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S5 ❑ P [:IT
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
140
31 Comments Stabilization impact S3 depicted on Drawing Sheet 3 Impacts S1 S2 and S4 depicted on Drawing Sheet 2
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

r
4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments Not applicable
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
number
of pond
P1
P2
5f Total
5g Comments Not Applicable
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
51 Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse El Tar Pamlico El Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
❑Yes
61 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
El Yes
B2 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
El Yes
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Use of 2 1 slopes angled wing walls and short culvert design will be utilized to minimize impacts
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Sedimentation and erosion control best management practices will be in effect throughout the project construction
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ® Corps
2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
® Payment to in lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached
® Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
127 linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments Permanent stream impacts 127 ft temporary stream impacts 13 ft
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund)
6h Comments Not applicable
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
261 %
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why The
project is an existing roadway and
consists of the replacement of an existing bridge with a culvert No new impervious surface is proposed
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative
description of the plan
Not applicable
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government s jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 246
❑ Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes ❑ No
attached?
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements'?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

F Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1b If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
® Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter )
❑ Yes ® No
Comments PCE document submitted to NCDOT / FHWA on 15 March 2012 and is
awaiting final approval at the time of the PCN sumbittal
2 Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after the fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description
The bridge replacement and associated work will not increase impervious surface beyond what is already existing
4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility
not applicable
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
® Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Field surveys conducted May and Oct 2011 Natural Heritage Program GIS Data (February 2011)
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http / /sharpfin nmfs noaa gov /website /EFH_Mapper /map aspxt
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO see attached letter dated 15 April 2011
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements Not applicable
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Panel 3710648400J
Philip Beach
5 April 2012
Applicant/Agent s Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent s Signature
(Agents signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided )
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

S� a
�< o
e ..
Pvt Dr
'c
hee e1 r St `4 •�
4 � s
z
0
F Met aur� s�
St F
i t`9 <pt�
.e z 7 4 . e
? V $% ,' e e
X74
E I art / \�
t Bridge No 90 ���
E v a d e S t �P� \sf
E Morgan S t O
P .I
iYi 0 �D
f V,
a O a
V � �
�!, o SUM an St
&0�
E Ashe st a 4
OLId L>lesvrlle Rd
STUDIED DETOUR ROUTE
at "O NOR7 H CAROLI \A DEPARniENT OF
1RA.\SPORTATIO\
DI\ ISIO\ OI HICHN AYS
Rd PROJECT DEVELOPME \T&
E V\ IRO\ \IE.\'i AL A \ALN SIS BRA. \CH
os ra
Anson County
I own of Wadesboro \iC
DI\ Islon 10
Municipal Bridge Replacement (Bridge '90)
On Last Wade Street o\er Brush Fork
11 4 B 5009
WBS -9 41538 1 1
Federal Aid E BRL 1127 (2)
Figure I

WL
TO-CHARLOTT
.{
\6
r -IL'
"11I 9IIIllIiII
�r
N
B04R0
. t•
ti ePROJErT R
,AST I O N,
r
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
ANSON COUNTY TIP Project No. B -5009
i Replacement of Bridge No. 90 East Wade Street
over Brush Fork, Anson County. NC
r PROJECT STUDY AREA MAP
�7 FIGURE 2
DATA SOURCE:
SEPI Engineering. Inc. Field Data Jan 2011
NCDOT USGS Mosaic Raster 2010 Anson County. NC
NCDOT ISRN Roads 2010 0 600 1.200
Feet

$OIIS DATA SOURCE:
SEPI Engineering, Inc. Field Data Jan 2011 N
Soils Symbols NC One Map Mosaic Raster 2010 Anson County, NC
USDA Datagateway County Soils Data 2011 W - f3
MgC- Mayodan gravelly sandy loam
0 75 150 S.
MnC -Mayodan- Urban land complex Feet

DATA SOURCE:
SEPI Engineering, Inc. Field Data Jan 2011
Orthoimagery 2010 NC One Map Anson County, NC
0 50 100
Feet
T x

View west of Bridge # 90 and linear wetland originating from RCP (2011 -5 -17)
View west of UT Brush Fork at confluence with Brush Fork (2011 -5 -17)
Photolog— B -5009 PCN Page 1 of 1

Oct 12 2011 10 17AM HP LRSERJET FAX
p 1
cJown o� 4adesboko, cAfoAth CahAlta 28170
GILL THACKER JOHN V WITHWUPOON
MAYOR To" MAN"Wt
TOWN COUNCIL
!D WORM LAW MOB aATINVOD JARARa DAWO Lai
AAIMA TIM aomY wear
FACSIMILE TRAN,%ffnAL SHEET
NUMBER OF PAGES (MCLUDING THIS SHEET]
PLEASE DMJM To
FAMDAME NUMER/SENDING TG• --9 /? - % 9 - S
FACSIl1= MBERISENDING FROM. / -;76) V ---A 9 3,5 /
FACSIlV= SENT
POST OFFICE BOX 697 124928 EAST WADE STREET PNONS (704) 0846171

Oct 12 2011 10 17RM HP LRSERJET FAX
�jSEPI
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
M Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Municipal OMcW
III ! ..
= I JU. i .
Q#% C% X70a0
Phone -704-0(4- 51-2
Project Name0escription Replacement of Bndite No. 90 on East Wade Street over Bivsh
Fork - Ansort County
SEPI Project # EN11 0009
Date
NCDBNR - Division of Water Quality
Attention Ms. Array Chapman
Mall Service Cetner 1650
Raleigh, NC 27699 1650
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
U S Army Corps of Engineers - Wilmington District
Attention Ms. Linz Hair
151 Patton Ave, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28805
Re Wetlands, Streams and/or Buffer Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern
I, The current landowner or municipal official, hereby designate and authorize SEPI F.aguieering
8t Construction, Inc to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to
furnish upon request�uppleme>rtsl uif ion m support of applications, etc from this day
forward, this l27 day of kmQbefL 'gip l l
This notification supersedes any previous coirespondence concerning the agent for this project
Notice Thins anthonzatwn, for liability and prefessonal courtesy reasons, a valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by SEPI staff You should
call SEPI to arrange a prior to vintmng the site. / , _
BY R LiQ �IIgI' S-S B
Print of Landowner s or Municipal Sm Landowner or Municipal
Official s Name
1025 WADE AVEmm RAtruGx,NC 27605 TEL [phone] FAX [phone] SEPIENGMMNG CQM
P 2

U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id 2011 01973 County Anson U S G S Quad Wadesboro
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner /Agent Town of Wadesboro, Attn Mr Hugh James
Address P O Box 697
Wadesboro, NC 28170
Property description
Size (acres) 155 linear feet/ 0 001 acre Nearest Town Wadesboro
Nearest Waterway Brush Fork River Basin Yadlun Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040201 Coordinates 34 96614 N/ -80 06391 W
Location description The proposed project site is located at the existing budge #90 over Brush Fork, on East Wade
Street, in Wadesboro, Anson County, North Carolina 34 96614 N and 80 06391 W
Indicate Which of the Following Apply
A Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information there may be streams and wetlands on the above described property We strongly
suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) junsdiction To be
considered final a junsdictronal determination must be verified by the Corps This preliminary deternmation is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 33 1)
B Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
X There are streams and wetlands on the above descnbed property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
We strongly suggest you have the streams and wetlands on your property delineated Due to the size of your property
and/or our present workload the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner For a
more timely delineation you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final any delineation must be verified by
the Corps
The streams and wetlands on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps
We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by
the Corps Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA junsdichon on your
property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years
X The streams and wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the map labeled
Anson County TIP Project No B-5009 dated January 2011 and submitted on October 17, 2011 Unless there is a
change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from the date of this notification
There are no waters of the U S to include wetlands present on the above described property which are subject to the
pemut requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification

Action Id 2011 01973
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311) If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program please contact Liz Hair at 828 -271 -7980
C Basis For Determination
The site contains wetlands as determined by the USACE 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual and the Eastern Mountain and
Piedmont Regional Supplement, and is adjacent to stream channels located on the property that exhibit indicators of ordinary
high water marks The stream channel on the property is an unnamed tributary to Brush Fork which flows into the Yadkin Pee
Dee River and ultimately flows to the Atlantic Ocean through Winyah Bay
D Remarks
E Attention USDA Program Participants
This del meation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps Clean Water Act junsdiction for the
particular site identified in this request The delmeation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985 If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants or anticipate participation
in USDA programs you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service prior to starting work
F Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved junsd►ctional determinations as indicated in
B above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site If you object to this
determination you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331 Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Ann Jason Steele Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps the Corps must determine that it is complete that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 3315 and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP
Should you decide to submit an RFA form it must be received at the above address by February 20 2012
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence ** °d°'""�"&"
JL0540,� HAIRSARAH E
Corps Regulatory Official A 1054 512
04" 20 1220105 0 osnd
Date December 20.2011 Expiration Date December 20 2016
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public To help us ensure we continue to
do so please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http / /per2 nwp usace army mil /survey html to
complete the survey online
Copy furnished
SEPI Engineering and Construction Att Mr Philip Beach 1025 Wade Ave Raleigh NC 27605

1--
�. 1a�ene enl
PROOF"
Aprd 12, 2012
Town of Wadesboro
c/o Philip Beach
SEPI Engineering and Construction
1025 Wade Ave
Raleigh NC 27605 Expiration of Acceptance October 12 2012
Project B 5009 Bridge Replacement on E Wade St County Anson
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for compensator, mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced protect as indicated in the table below Please
note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for project impacts It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be
approved You must also comply with all other state. federal or local government permits regulations or authorizations associated
with the nronosed activity including SL 2009 337 An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by
S L 2011 343
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Pern*1401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire It is the applicant s
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www nceep net
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table The amount of mitigation required for this impact is determined by permitting agencies
Impact
River
Basin
CU
Location
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
(Sq Ft )
Buffer 11
(Sq Ft )
Cold
Cool
Warm
Ri arian
Non Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Yadkin
03040201
0
0
127 1
0
1 0
1 0
0
0
Upon receipt of payment EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation The mitigation will be performed in
accordance with the N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program In Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28 2010
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Kelly Williams at
(919) 716 -1921
Sincerely
Mich Ellison
Deputy Director
cc Karen Higgins NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Liz Hair USACE Asheville
File
k torul 5 EKA44aKg Prot" Our Stag
A k ROM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1652 / 919 715 0476 / www nceep net

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
( hudti llro%%it \cttn}, Mount tutor
B trly r -nc 1 trim C oN m( r Othc of \rchni, and Ili tor)
1 nd i A ( 11711 It St cret tq Dn i tun of I It toned Re ourett
(ctfrcl I ( ron Dcput) tiecrctiq Dattd Drool, Dtr etor
Aptil 15, 2011
Phillip Todd
SEPI Engin(,cttng R Construction
1025 Wide A\ (,nue
R- sleigh NC 27605
Re Bridge 90 on I-,ist W idc A\ enue o\ et Moss Cieek, Widesboio B 5009 Anson Count),
ER 11 0579
Dent 1\11 7 odd
1 hank) ou foi) out lette.i of Apul 4 2011 conceinmg the ibo\ a plolect
We ha\ e conducted -t te\ ie\v of the plolect ind ate a\v ite of no historic tesoutces «hich \%ould be - Iffected b)
the plolect Thetefoie we ha\ a no comment on the plolect -is pioposed
The abo\ e comments Otte made putsulnt to Section 106 of the Nation�il Histouc Pteser\ pion Act and the
Ad\ isoi) Council on Historic Pieser\ ,ttion s Regulltions fol Comph ince with Section 106 codified -it 36 CPR
1),tit 800
Tli ,ink) ou for ) out coopeiation ind considel itlon I f) ou ha\ a questions conceining the ibo\ a comment
please convict Renee Gledhill Eitle) en\ uonmental te\ le\v cooidinatot it 919 807 6579 In all futute
communication conc, -fining this plolect ple ise cite the ibo\ a tefetenced wickuig number
Sincetel) L
(�,
b5i'Claudi,t Bio vn
Lociuon 109 1 -1 t Jo tes St w 161 tt,h \C)7(01 Mail ng Address 4(11 \htl 1xnic ( e it r It I hl \C 270) 4(17 Telepho e/F OU) 8117 (570/807 ( 5)9

June 2 2011
Regulatory Division
Phillip Todd
SEPI Engineering and Construction
1025 Wade Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27605
Dear Mr Todd
Reference is made to your inquiry dated April 4, 2011 requesting information regarding
the evaluation of potential environmental impacts associated with a NC DOT Division 10 bridge
replacement project known as TIP Project Number B 5009 for bridge #90 on East Wade Street
over Moss Creek, located in the Town of Wadesboro, Anson County, North Carolina It is
anticipated that the project will be processed as Programmatic Categorical Exclusion
The alternatives currently under consideration for the bridge replacement project are specified as
replacing the bridge with a cast in place 2 -10 x10 RCBC
We have reviewed the maps provided and determined that, based upon a review of the
information provided and available maps the construction of these projects are very likely to
impact streams and/or wetlands within the work corridor Please be aware that impacts
associated with the discharge of fill into ,junsdictional waters of the United States are subject to
our regulatory authority pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Any discharge of
excavated or fill material into waters of the United States and/or any adjacent wetlands would
require Department of the Army (DA) permit authorization The type of DA authorization
required (i e, general or individual permit) will be determined by the location type, and extent
of junsdictional area impacted by the project, and by the project design and construction limits
Compensatory mitigation may also be required for unavoidable impacts to waters of the U S
Until additional data is furnished which details the extent of the construction limits of the
proposed projects, and an onsite inspection is completed with regard to determinations of the
presence of_junsdictnonal waters on the project property, we are unable to verify that the project
will not have Jurisdictional impacts or to provide specific comments concerning DA permit
requirements or a recommendation of alternatives To assist you with determining permitting
requirements we recommend that you perform a detailed delineation of the streams and/or
wetlands present on the project site When this information becomes available, it should be
forwarded to our office for review and comment, as well as a determination of DA permit
eligibility

Should you have any further questions related to DA permits for this project please
contact me at 828- 271 -7980 x 225
Sincerely
Liz Hazy
Regulatory Pro ec M2 er
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Copy Furnished
Polly Lespmasse DWQ (E--copy)

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
MEMORANDUM
Date April 13 2011
TO Phillip Todd Environmental Division Manager SEPI Engineering and Construction
FROM Polly Lespinasse NC Division of Water Quality Mooresville Regional Office
SUBJECT Scoping Review of NCDOT s Proposed Bridge Replacement Project TIP Project No
B 5009 Replacement of Bridge No 90 on East Wade Street over Brush Fork in Anson County
In reply to your correspondence dated April 4 2011 and received on April 6 2011 in which you requested comments for
the above referenced project the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) offers the following comments
Project Specific Comments
1 The scoping request indicates the bridge crosses Moss Creek Based on a review of topographic maps and
NCDWQ Stream Classifications the stream is Brush Fork Brush Fork is a Class C Waters of the State
2 Any anticipated bank stabilization associated with culvert installations or extensions should be addressed in the
Categorical Exclusion (CE) document It is understood that final designs are not determined at the time the CE is
developed However the CE should discuss the potential for bank stabilization necessary due to culvert
installation
Any anticipated dewatering or access structures necessary for construction of bridges should be addressed in the
CE It is understood that final designs are not determined at the time the CE is developed However the CE
should discuss the potential for dewatering and access measures necessary due to bridge construction
General Comments Regarding Bridge Replacement Projects
1 DWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project NCDOT shall address
these concerns by describing the potential impacts that may occur to the aquatic environments and any mitigating
factors that would reduce the impacts
2 If foundation test borings are necessary it shall be noted in the document Geotechnical work is approved under
General 401 Certification Number 3687 /Nationwide Permit No 6 for Survey Activities
3 If a bridge is being replaced with a hydraulic conveyance other than another bridge DWQ believes the use of a
Nationwide Permit may be required Please contact the US Army Corp of Engineers to determine the required
permit(s)
4 If the old bridge is removed no discharge of bridge material into surface waters is allowed unless otherwise
authorized by the US ACOE Strict adherence to the Corps of Engineers guidelines for bridge demolition will be a
condition of the 401 Water Quality Certification
Mooresville Regional Office
Location 610 East Center Ave Suite 301 Mooresville NC 28115
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service 1- 877 -623 6748 NorthCarolina
Internet http //portal ncdenr org/webtwg uA fug
An Equal Opportunity \Affrmabve Action Employer 50°/ Recycled /10/ Post Consumer paper Naturall U

Page Two
5 Whenever possible the DWQ prefers spanning structures Spanning structures usually do not require work within
the stream or grubbing of the stream banks and do not require stream channel realignment The horizontal and
vertical clearances provided by bridges allow for human and wildlife passage beneath the structure do not block fish
passage and do not block navigation by canoeists and boaters
6 Bridge deck drains shall not discharge directly into the stream Stormwater shall be directed across the bridge and
pre treated through site appropriate means (grassed swales pre formed scour holes vegetated buffers etc ) before
entering the stream Please refer to the most current version of NC DWQ Stormwater Best Management Practices
7 If concrete is used during construction a dry work area shall be maintained to prevent direct contact between curing
concrete and stream water Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete shall not be discharged to surface
waters due to the potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life and fish kills
8 Bridge supports (bents) shall not be placed in the stream when possible
9 If temporary access roads or detours are constructed the site shall be graded to its preconstruction contours and
elevations Disturbed areas shall be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and appropriate native woody species
shall be planted When using temporary structures the area shall be cleared but not grubbed Clearing the area
with chain saws mowers bush hogs or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat intact
allows the area to re vegetate naturally and minimizes soil disturbance
10 Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to protect water resources must be implemented and maintained
in accordance with the most recent version of North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design
Manual and the most recent version of NCS000250
11 All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area unless otherwise approved by NC
DWQ Approved BMP measures from the most current version of NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities
manual such as sandbags rock berms cofferdams and other diversion structures shall be used to prevent
excavation in flowing water
12 Heavy equipment shall be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in order to minimize sedimentation
and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams This equipment shall be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels lubricants hydraulic fluids or other toxic
materials
13 In most cases the DWQ prefers the replacement of the existing structure at the same location with road closure If
road closure is not feasible a temporary detour shall be designed and located to avoid wetland impacts minimize
the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing stream banks If the structure will be on a new alignment the old
structure shall be removed and the approach fills removed from the 100 year floodplain Approach fills shall be
removed and restored to the natural ground elevation The area shall be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species Tall fescue shall not be used in riparian areas
General Comments if Replacing the Bridge with a Culvert
1 Placement of culverts and other structures in waters streams and wetlands shall be below the elevation of the
streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches and 20 percent of the culvert diameter
for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life Design and
placement of culverts and other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a
manner that may result in dis equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks adjacent to or upstream and down
stream of the above structures The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ If this condition is unable to be met due to bedrock or other limiting
features encountered during construction please contact the NC DWQ for guidance on how to proceed and to
determine whether or not a permit modification will be required
2 If multiple pipes or barrels are required they shall be designed to mimic natural stream cross section as closely as
possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation and /or sills where appropriate Widening the stream
channel shall be avoided Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water
velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage

Page Three
3 Riprap shall not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner that precludes
aquatic life passage Bioengineering boulders or structures shall be properly designed sized and installed
Thank you for requesting our input at this time The NCDOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification requires that appropriate measures be implemented to ensure that water quality standards are met and
designated uses are not degraded or lost If you have any questions or require additional information please contact
Polly Lespinasse at [phone]
cc Liz Hair US Army Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office (electronic copy)
Chris Mditscher Environmental Protection Agency (electronic copy)
Marla Chambers NC Wildlife Resources Commission (electronic copy)
Marella Buncick US Fish and Wildlife Service (electronic copy)
Sonia Carrillo DWQ Central Regional Office (electronic copy)
File Copy

Page 1 of 1
From Phillip Todd
Sent Wednesday April 20 2011 10 45 AM
To Tommy Register Bnttney Layton
Subject FW B 5009 Bridge Replacement
FYI — Please include in the project folder
From Militscher Chris @epamail epa gov [madto Militscher Chris @epamail epa gov]
Sent Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10 23 AM
To Phillip Todd
Cc polly lespinasse @ncdenr gov, sarah a hair @usace army and
Subject B 5009, Bridge Replacement
Phil The USEPA has reviewed the Start of Study notice dated 4/4/11, for B 5009, Bridge #90 over
Moss Creek in the Town of Wadesboro, Anson County
Because you are potentially considering the replacement of an existing bridge with a 2 RCBC
10 x10 , documentation in the CE should clearly outline the existing conditions of the creek
including the identification of any CWA Section 303(d) listed impairment, if relevant and
appropriate Furthermore if the anticipated stream impacts from installation exceed the Merger
screening criteria requiring an I P additional coordination is recommended with the USACE and
NCDWQ
The CE should identify all alternatives considered, any relevant flooding issues, the reasons for the
selection of the preferred alternative, efforts to avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the U S
etc
Thank you for the opportunity to comment
Christopher A Militscher, REM CHMM
USEPA Region 4 Raleigh Office
919 8564206
file //G \Environmental\EN11 009 Wadesboro NC bridge replacment\Agency Scopmg C 4/12/2012

sss$$$SYSTIMEsasss
asssssssssasasssocNSSSasssasasssass
$t$$U ERNAMEssss
CONTRA CT:XXX eYX.X.X TIP PROJECT: B -5009
0 0
CIO) N � MJ
-n o
n
A O N N
^ o 0
I ca
m O O
1 ° C Co
2R ° < d
o co
u n u n u n x
° I a
c ,y
O m
i I � 1
IM =
�O
I
= v
O D
o A
m0
0 z
0 II
X x
x
I
I
y
ci
cn
k IUD
�
tv
I �
I,
y
y
y
�x
~ Q
' I O
e
II �y
[:1
1a�'
QeCyk S�
a
$y
lie
-c'
h , Q
III —Voi
�v
rf
a
w
t
w k
a
I,
8
i
N p
P
k
�� k
t
�
AD 00
0
It
`"
C tv
N a
vJ �
�
r
ti
i
10 © �� „ •
1
. r
op.
/
/ �a
<
``
{t F
t
� t
�
r
If
"
t
� f
�
AD 00
0
It
`"
C tv
N a
vJ �

I•
4
N
0
O
it
Zt
- - - - --- '' I � /' �// / / /�1 /9— ,Zk: — �- -bi
- - - - --
an
JIM I,
V
It -D NO I
- _ -' - - --
IIII___ - - - --
— — — — — — — — — — — — — —
rn Ch
_ Raj rl
L, Nit
Ln
so h
1 Tl / 1 � Ph N
rh
no
rn
1 \\ i t � �
r*1 A z \\ x
� lid
II
l �
III
mG'
i
/
\
\
\
� c
I En
I a
/
c J
I
�
I
-
`�
iz>
y
y
N
Z

Vag I
ca
co
rn
N U, —Z9£-
IL
/\7, A
m m m
1ter- -- U -g
—
- _ S
!
HSW
r,
m
N�
m
X4 rW
�—
II
U
O
/
u
N�
�*
i
y
�
t
I�
I
i
N
I
-TI \J
cv
m
/
\\ O
C
I a
MM-4
0
I
IIA
loll
�I �w // �DE \\
!
T
/
/
1
m
i
II
U
O
/
u
C7 \
e>
r
Z
y z n

iW
g
F—
_z
u
z
3
N ogb O o3
M
LU
V
i
Z
W
I j
ui
v
Z
!�8 abN
_O
1 V
D
ce
F-
cA
ra
Z
z
O
�N
V
ON�y
1� o
ou
s
CL
s311nun HO
Y_
0
N
0
owe
W
0_
I
J I �
1 �
12
M�
Y_
N
r
pM
pjON

I
z z
04 a
IV
N_
Q
1-
N
0
ch
+
Q
H
<N
OL
J
O
O
15
N
O
N
%0
+
O
Ia-
N
°z
1(
D
ULO
F
� � O
ne
0
J
ILGN
X S
_
�Z
�
4
I
H
z
W
II II
J
II O O
O
c o
;
p n n
W
J
5
V
O
*6
N
o�
W 8
N Z
LU
zg
O
o
IL.
W
W
o
w
D
CL
i
E
I
I
I
I
4�z
IV
N_
Q
1-
N
0
ch
+
Q
H
<N
OL
J
O
O
15
N
O
N
%0
+
O
Ia-
N
m
CL
= o
C S
Y
U
1i W)
� � O
0
I
ILGN
X S
_
Z
00
r �
�-ss
H
II 11
II II
z
II O O
0
c o
;
p n n
L
'Q
=o
v
ly
*6
S If 11
h
W 8
a
Q)
v
o
�C�
W
o
c�
D
W
4�z
0
V '�
WV
O
�
m
V)
~O
a _
IV
N_
Q
1-
N
0
ch
+
Q
H
<N
OL
J
O
O
15
N
O
N
%0
+
O
Ia-
N
C S
Y
U
OC
� � O
z
I
ILGN
X S
uj
Z
00
r �
c
o
II 11
II II
z
m
0
c o
O
L
'Q
=o
v
ly
*6
J
h
4
a
Q)
v
p�
�C�
W
��
W
D
p
a
0
V '�
O
OZ
V)
~O
a _
^�
O
LU Q
�r
u U
y0
z
m
o V
�
4 ,
U. II
Q
c
_
>
_C
U. J
3
Zo
0
0
W
sa
4-
IV
N_
Q
1-
N
0
ch
+
Q
H
<N
OL
J
O
O
15
N
O
N
%0
+
O
Ia-
N
Q 3
�+ = go
0 O a
ic 0 to a 6
C
Y
U
OC
z
I
Q
y0
uj
Z
Q
c
o
II 11
z
m
0
° -v
O
L
c_
N
QW'�I
*6
4
WQZ:;t
Q)
v
p�
�C�
W
��
I
d
CL
re
N
C
OZ
V)
~O
a _
v�
Q 3
�+ = go
0 O a
ic 0 to a 6
C
rte+.
In
Go
+
Q
N
LC-Yj
J
I 1
OLo
N t~J�
M-
1=
Y
U
OC
O O
I
Q
y0
C
Z
Q
c
o
II 11
z
Z
0
° -v
O
c_
N
,
V
CL-
+
N
t
co °
l
II m
GC
O
„
N
W
OZ
°°
0
a _
LU Q
m
y0
z
m
o V
�
4 ,
U.
oc
W
_
ii d
3
Q
S
0
W
sa
Z
z0
a
J
A
rte+.
In
Go
+
Q
N
LC-Yj
J
I 1
OLo
N t~J�
M-
1=
Y
U
OC
�
I
Q
Z
Q
�
z
O
N
,
V
CL-
+
N
N
co °
II m
GC
O
„
N
r-
u
LU Q
m
y0
m
�
4 ,
oc
W
J
3
V U.
0
W
OC
W _
Z
Z
J
rte+.
In
Go
+
Q
N
LC-Yj
J
I 1
OLo
N t~J�
M-
1=